1
00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:02,900
I think there's an interesting 
opportunity in the very large 

2
00:00:02,900 --> 00:00:06,400
Banks, and the way I think about
it is. 

3
00:00:07,900 --> 00:00:12,700
In the great financial crisis, 
the banks failed, the bond 

4
00:00:12,700 --> 00:00:15,200
markets, basically failed, and 
the fed, and the federal 

5
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,100
government had to come in and 
bail out both. 

6
00:00:17,900 --> 00:00:21,500
And this time around the banks 
and fine and the federal 

7
00:00:21,500 --> 00:00:23,600
government had to come in to 
bail out the bond markets. 

8
00:00:23,700 --> 00:00:26,200
Again. 
This is Steve Eisman on April 

9
00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:28,400
23rd repeating. 
Something that he said 

10
00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:32,600
frequently that he thinks that 
US banks are a good opportunity 

11
00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:34,300
right now. 
This is something that he's 

12
00:00:34,300 --> 00:00:36,800
claimed for a while. 
This is notable because Steve 

13
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:40,500
Eisman is one of the You people 
that made major bets against the

14
00:00:40,500 --> 00:00:44,100
US Financial Market against 
these same Banks during the 2008

15
00:00:44,100 --> 00:00:46,700
financial crisis. 
So I made a fortune doing that. 

16
00:00:46,700 --> 00:00:49,200
It became very popular. 
He had movies made after them. 

17
00:00:49,500 --> 00:00:52,300
And now, this same guy is saying
that he sees a big opportunity 

18
00:00:52,300 --> 00:00:54,600
with US Banks. 
He thinks that the sentiment 

19
00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:57,900
against these Banks is more 
negative than it needs to be, 

20
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,000
and because of, that they're 
being priced lower than they 

21
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,400
need to be. 
So, I actually agree with him. 

22
00:01:02,400 --> 00:01:04,900
I agree with them enough that 
I've been buying some of these 

23
00:01:04,900 --> 00:01:06,800
Banks. 
I did a recent purchase of 22, 

24
00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:09,000
shares of JP. 
Morgan that's about twenty one 

25
00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:12,300
hundred dollars and I'm going to
continue buying both JPMorgan 

26
00:01:12,300 --> 00:01:14,800
and Bank of America over the 
next while. 

27
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:17,700
So especially if the price 
continues to decline, I'm going 

28
00:01:17,700 --> 00:01:19,500
to be picking up more shares in 
these companies. 

29
00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:22,500
I want to go over in this video,
my bowl case. 

30
00:01:22,500 --> 00:01:25,000
The reason that I'm going to be 
dollar cost averaging and 

31
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:27,600
putting a little bit more 
emphasis on these US Banks. 

32
00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:29,500
In other news. 
I want to talk about, I feel 

33
00:01:29,500 --> 00:01:32,700
like this is the same story over
and over again, week in and week

34
00:01:32,700 --> 00:01:35,800
out, the market has traded lower
because there's new fares of the

35
00:01:35,808 --> 00:01:38,800
coronavirus and there's fears of
Economy, closing back down 

36
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:42,000
stores, closing back down. 
That's the headline that we have

37
00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:44,400
new cases. 
The cases are literally off the 

38
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,800
charts, in the US, the y-axis 
had to be adjusted upwards 

39
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:50,800
because we couldn't fit the new 
numbers on the scale right now. 

40
00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:55,200
We had on June 26, 44,000 plus 
cases in the US. 

41
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:58,100
That's a really high number that
is bigger than any day during 

42
00:01:58,100 --> 00:02:01,900
the initial wave of cases. 
So I want to give some context 

43
00:02:01,900 --> 00:02:03,600
to this. 
I think there's important 

44
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:05,500
details that are being left out 
of the reporting. 

45
00:02:05,900 --> 00:02:08,400
I'll be going over that but I 
also On to talk a little bit 

46
00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:11,500
more about investor sentiment. 
How if you're new to investing, 

47
00:02:11,500 --> 00:02:13,300
if you've been investing for 
less than five years. 

48
00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:17,100
You should be hoping that people
react negatively to this. 

49
00:02:17,500 --> 00:02:20,600
You should be hoping that people
react fearfully to this. 

50
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,200
That's something that we can 
take advantage of as investors. 

51
00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:25,100
So I want to dive a little bit 
into that. 

52
00:02:25,100 --> 00:02:27,200
I think it will be an 
interesting topic to cover and 

53
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:29,300
then other fun things that were 
going to be talking about today 

54
00:02:29,300 --> 00:02:31,500
are some emails that I think are
interesting like one of them 

55
00:02:31,500 --> 00:02:34,700
from Ashland that points out 
these articles saying how much 

56
00:02:34,700 --> 00:02:37,500
money Jeff Bezos makes every day
or how much money. 

57
00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:41,300
Makes every second and how that 
money is even stored what he 

58
00:02:41,308 --> 00:02:42,900
does with it. 
How people say that? 

59
00:02:42,900 --> 00:02:45,600
Jeff Bezos wastes his money. 
I'll be talking about that in 

60
00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:47,300
responding to this email. 
Okay. 

61
00:02:47,300 --> 00:02:49,100
Let's first. 
Jump in a JPMorgan Chase. 

62
00:02:49,100 --> 00:02:51,000
This is a bank. 
I'm going to be focusing on. 

63
00:02:51,300 --> 00:02:53,100
Let's go ahead and read a quick 
summary of it. 

64
00:02:53,100 --> 00:02:54,500
This is a write-up for 
Morningstar. 

65
00:02:54,700 --> 00:02:57,700
They say, JPMorgan Chase is 
arguably the most dominant Bank 

66
00:02:57,700 --> 00:03:00,300
in the United States, with the 
leading Investment Bank 

67
00:03:00,300 --> 00:03:03,700
Commercial, Bank credit card, 
retail bank and asset wealth 

68
00:03:03,700 --> 00:03:04,800
management. 
Franchises. 

69
00:03:05,100 --> 00:03:08,000
JP Morgan is truly a force to be
reckoned with the Binks 

70
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,200
combination of scale 
diversification and sound risk 

71
00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,100
management. 
Seems like a simple path to 

72
00:03:13,100 --> 00:03:15,800
competitive Advantage, but very 
few other firms have been able 

73
00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:19,700
to execute a similar strategy. 
Even the best manage banks are 

74
00:03:19,700 --> 00:03:21,400
not immune to the occasional 
stumble. 

75
00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,300
But JP Morgan has managed a 
seemingly put all the pieces 

76
00:03:24,300 --> 00:03:27,700
together in a more cohesive and 
less error-prone way than pairs.

77
00:03:28,100 --> 00:03:30,600
This is the type of right up 
that you see a lot about JP 

78
00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:33,700
Morgan that it's a dominant bank
that it has sound risk 

79
00:03:33,700 --> 00:03:36,300
management and that it is the 
best among its pairs. 

80
00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:39,300
It continues on say JP Morgan. 
Now benefits from an early 

81
00:03:39,300 --> 00:03:42,300
unrivalled combination of scale 
scope within the United States. 

82
00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:44,900
It has become the largest bank 
in the country by assets and 

83
00:03:44,900 --> 00:03:47,600
deposits with payments depending
on Metric. 

84
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:50,500
JP Morgan is generally the 
largest credit card issuer in 

85
00:03:50,500 --> 00:03:53,700
the US the second largest u.s. 
Acquired by purchase volume. 

86
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:56,600
The company's Investment Bank is
a leading Global generator of 

87
00:03:56,600 --> 00:04:00,600
fees and JP Morgan's fic see 
trading desk remains, one of the

88
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:03,500
top Global players. 
It goes on talking about the 

89
00:04:03,500 --> 00:04:06,200
scale of this company says the 
scale and multiple Revenue 

90
00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:09,200
sources allow the bank to It's 
customers switching costs, 

91
00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:11,600
generate more Revenue per 
risk-weighted assets than 

92
00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,600
smaller Pairs, and also have a 
larger percentage of Revenue 

93
00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:17,399
come from fees. 
We also see the scale leading to

94
00:04:17,399 --> 00:04:20,500
larger more, scalable Tech 
budgets, which should only 

95
00:04:20,500 --> 00:04:22,100
increase in importance in the 
future. 

96
00:04:22,300 --> 00:04:25,400
This is morningstar's basic 
thoughts on JP Morgan is that 

97
00:04:25,500 --> 00:04:28,000
it's the largest most dominant 
competitive Bank in the United 

98
00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:29,900
States. 
That has sound risk management. 

99
00:04:30,100 --> 00:04:33,400
It generates huge profits, and 
they believe it has a wide 

100
00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:36,300
economic mode and they're not 
the only ones, the cfra 

101
00:04:36,300 --> 00:04:39,500
currently gives it a buy rating.
With 4 stars out of 5, they say 

102
00:04:39,500 --> 00:04:42,300
JPMorgan remains Best in Class 
among large US Banks. 

103
00:04:42,300 --> 00:04:46,100
In our view, even though we 
expect quarter to of 2020 to 

104
00:04:46,100 --> 00:04:49,600
show the full brunt of covid-19 
s impact on banking activity. 

105
00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:53,500
We forecast, JP Morgan is well 
positioned to Rebound in the 

106
00:04:53,500 --> 00:04:56,300
second half of 2020. 
So this is what most analyst 

107
00:04:56,300 --> 00:04:58,400
firms are saying. 
That JP Morgan is 

108
00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:00,500
well-positioned. 
Even in the face of the 

109
00:05:00,500 --> 00:05:03,600
coronavirus, even in the face of
a severe recession that their 

110
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,300
position to be able to take on 
these bad loans without lowering

111
00:05:06,300 --> 00:05:09,200
their Book value. 
We mentioned Steve Eisman before

112
00:05:09,300 --> 00:05:11,100
and this is something that he's 
talked about a lot. 

113
00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,000
He's asked about the systemic 
risk of u.s. 

114
00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:16,100
Banks. 
Pretty much can the same thing 

115
00:05:16,100 --> 00:05:17,900
happen again. 
Can we go through recession and 

116
00:05:17,900 --> 00:05:20,500
these Banks just fail like they 
did in 2008. 

117
00:05:21,100 --> 00:05:24,500
I don't see a systemic problem. 
And you know, the banking system

118
00:05:24,500 --> 00:05:28,100
isn't is in the best shape of 
the 30 years. 

119
00:05:28,100 --> 00:05:31,000
I've been analyzing Banks, you 
know, is it going to be a 

120
00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,100
recession next year? 
The year after? 

121
00:05:33,100 --> 00:05:34,800
I don't know. 
I mean, I think we are, we are 

122
00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:39,000
he said, then in 2019 that he 
Systemic risks with the banks 

123
00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:41,800
and that they're in the best 
shape that he's seen in the 30 

124
00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:44,200
years that he's been looking at 
Banks, but that was back in 

125
00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:46,800
2019. 
Nobody could have foreseen the 

126
00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:49,500
full extent of the coronavirus. 
Let's go ahead and get his 

127
00:05:49,500 --> 00:05:51,600
updated opinion on this. 
Maybe it changed. 

128
00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:53,500
Maybe he really didn't know that
there's going to be something 

129
00:05:53,500 --> 00:05:56,600
quite this bad and this unique, 
come along with the economy and 

130
00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:58,000
that could reasonably change his
opinion. 

131
00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:01,700
So here we are April 13th of 
2020, well, into the 

132
00:06:01,700 --> 00:06:03,700
coronavirus, so he's, well aware
of the coronavirus. 

133
00:06:03,700 --> 00:06:06,800
We've been in it for months, and
this is his opinion on banks. 

134
00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:09,900
The Did opinion on it. 
There's an interesting 

135
00:06:09,900 --> 00:06:14,300
opportunity in the very large 
Banks and the way I think about 

136
00:06:14,300 --> 00:06:18,300
it is. 
In the great financial crisis, 

137
00:06:19,600 --> 00:06:23,100
the banks failed, the bond 
markets, basically failed, and 

138
00:06:23,100 --> 00:06:24,900
the fed, and the federal 
government had to come in and 

139
00:06:24,900 --> 00:06:28,700
bail out both. 
And this time around the banks 

140
00:06:28,700 --> 00:06:31,200
and fine and the federal 
government had to come and bail 

141
00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:35,100
out the bond markets again. 
And so, the way I like to think 

142
00:06:35,100 --> 00:06:39,200
about, if you wanted to put it 
in kind of a catchy phrase way 

143
00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:43,400
the banks of 142 and the bond 
markets are 0 for 2, even in 

144
00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:46,700
2020 after knowing about the 
coronavirus, he Not worried 

145
00:06:46,700 --> 00:06:49,100
about Banks and explains why 
he's not worried about them. 

146
00:06:49,500 --> 00:06:53,200
The regulatory apparatus spent 
years working on the banks. 

147
00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:55,100
Making sure this would never 
happen again. 

148
00:06:55,200 --> 00:06:58,400
And led by fed former fed 
Governor Daniel. 

149
00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:01,700
Tarullo. 
The banks were forced to deliver

150
00:07:02,100 --> 00:07:09,200
2D risk and to wield multiples 
more liquidity than they ever 

151
00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:11,100
imagined. 
Now, they complained about it 

152
00:07:11,100 --> 00:07:13,900
all the way, but they had to do 
it anyway, and so now that we 

153
00:07:13,900 --> 00:07:18,400
have a second great. 
Crisis, the banks are fine. 

154
00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:20,300
He says, he thinks our banks are
fine. 

155
00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,900
They even in the face of the 
coronavirus and the recession 

156
00:07:22,900 --> 00:07:25,600
coming up that the u.s. 
Banks are not going to have to 

157
00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:28,200
be bailed out by the government 
again, and he goes on to say 

158
00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:30,200
that because of that, he thinks 
they're one of the best 

159
00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:33,200
cyclical, plays out there. 
The best cyclical play out. 

160
00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:36,100
There are the very large Banks 
because in the great financial 

161
00:07:36,100 --> 00:07:39,200
crisis, they destroyed Book 
value and had to raise Capital 

162
00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:41,600
at the bottom and this time 
around they would have to raise 

163
00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:43,900
Capital at all and they won't 
destroy any book value. 

164
00:07:43,900 --> 00:07:46,600
So he's pretty much saying that 
during the financial This. 

165
00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:50,300
These Banks had a raise Capital 
to pay for loan losses at 

166
00:07:50,300 --> 00:07:52,500
completely bottom of the barrel 
prices. 

167
00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:55,100
They had to sell off their 
assets and destroy their Book 

168
00:07:55,100 --> 00:07:57,500
value at the lowest prices 
possible. 

169
00:07:57,700 --> 00:08:00,600
This is like being margin called
on your portfolio and having to 

170
00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:03,800
sell a good portion of it during
the bottom of a recession, not a

171
00:08:03,808 --> 00:08:06,600
good situation to be in. 
So that's what the bank's went 

172
00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:08,000
through during the financial 
crisis. 

173
00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:10,400
He does not think that they're 
going to have to do that again. 

174
00:08:10,500 --> 00:08:13,000
You think that they have enough 
Capital that they won't have to 

175
00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:15,700
raise any Capital during this 
recession, that they'll be able 

176
00:08:15,700 --> 00:08:18,400
to cover the Losses and they 
won't destroy Book value. 

177
00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:22,600
So, that's the biggest part of 
the BET hair is if banks have 

178
00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:25,600
enough Capital, if they have 
enough reserves to be able to 

179
00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:28,000
cover the losses of the loans 
that are going to fail. 

180
00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:30,600
If you think the failure is 
going to be so severe, that 

181
00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:32,400
banks have to destroy Book 
value. 

182
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:34,200
Then you shouldn't be investing 
in them. 

183
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:36,500
If you think the banks will be 
able to make it through this, 

184
00:08:36,500 --> 00:08:39,400
without destroying Book value. 
They should come out relatively 

185
00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:40,600
strong through it. 
Now. 

186
00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,400
The FED is also looked into this
because banks are vital to the 

187
00:08:43,408 --> 00:08:45,500
US economy. 
If banks run out of money. 

188
00:08:45,500 --> 00:08:48,200
If they Don't loan out anymore 
because they're reserving all 

189
00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:50,200
their money to be able to pay 
for loan losses. 

190
00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:53,700
What that does is it kind of 
chokes the US economy makes it 

191
00:08:53,700 --> 00:08:56,400
so nobody can get a line of 
credit, which is not good for 

192
00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:57,800
growth. 
And we need a lot of growth to 

193
00:08:57,800 --> 00:09:00,600
get out of a recession. 
So the FED doesn't want that 

194
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:02,900
situation to happen. 
So they do what's called a 

195
00:09:02,908 --> 00:09:05,300
stress test where they put the 
bank's through different 

196
00:09:05,300 --> 00:09:07,200
scenarios and they try to find 
out. 

197
00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:10,300
If the bank can survive, what 
they found is that US banks are 

198
00:09:10,300 --> 00:09:12,800
healthy enough to withstand the 
coronavirus crisis. 

199
00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:15,800
They said that they might suffer
tremendous losses. 

200
00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:18,200
There might be hundreds of 
billions of dollars of loan 

201
00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:21,000
losses, but the banks will still
be able to come through it. 

202
00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:22,700
So, that's what their conclusion
is. 

203
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:25,000
There's always a chance that's 
outside of the parameters that 

204
00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:27,700
they put the recession is in the
future. 

205
00:09:27,700 --> 00:09:28,800
We don't know what's going to 
happen. 

206
00:09:29,100 --> 00:09:31,400
But from what the FED did with 
its test, they found that the 

207
00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:33,900
banks were positioned really 
well to handle these type of 

208
00:09:33,900 --> 00:09:35,600
losses. 
Now, in addition to this, the 

209
00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:38,800
FED really wants these Banks to 
be as conservative as possible. 

210
00:09:38,900 --> 00:09:41,500
They don't want them to run into
trouble and they want them to be

211
00:09:41,508 --> 00:09:44,500
able to support the economy with
as much cash as possible. 

212
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,200
So they're telling the banks. 
I want you to stop giving away 

213
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:49,000
money. 
We want you to stop, giving away

214
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:51,900
money to shareholders. 
The basic ways, that companies 

215
00:09:51,900 --> 00:09:54,500
give away, money to shareholders
is through share BuyBacks. 

216
00:09:54,500 --> 00:09:57,000
That's one of the indirect ways 
that give money to shareholders.

217
00:09:57,300 --> 00:09:58,600
The other more direct ways 
through. 

218
00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:00,500
Dividends. 
Those are the two basic ways 

219
00:10:00,500 --> 00:10:02,200
that companies pay out their 
shareholders. 

220
00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:05,100
Now the banks have already 
stopped their share buyback 

221
00:10:05,100 --> 00:10:08,700
programs, but the FED made it 
official that they cannot do. 

222
00:10:08,700 --> 00:10:12,000
Share BuyBacks right now. 
Share BuyBacks, make up a much 

223
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:14,300
bigger amount of spend. 
Then the dividends do. 

224
00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:17,700
So, the Dividends are currently 
Lie on the table, but with the 

225
00:10:17,700 --> 00:10:21,700
share buyback program cut from 
every major bank, that's one of 

226
00:10:21,700 --> 00:10:24,600
the biggest things that supports
the price of these shares that 

227
00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:26,500
supports the price going up all 
the time. 

228
00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:29,300
If we look at a chart of 
JPMorgan, they went through the 

229
00:10:29,300 --> 00:10:30,900
coronavirus. 
Obviously, there's a big 

230
00:10:30,900 --> 00:10:33,800
sell-off, but now they don't 
even have the support of share 

231
00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:35,600
BuyBacks. 
I think this will cause 

232
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:38,000
continual downward pressure on 
these Banks. 

233
00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:40,400
They're not buying their own 
stock and a lot of people are 

234
00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:41,900
very scared about the fate of 
the economy. 

235
00:10:41,900 --> 00:10:45,400
And so there's a lot of downward
pressure on these Banks if we 

236
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:49,500
compared to the S&P. 500, the 
S&P 500 has almost recovered, 

237
00:10:49,500 --> 00:10:51,500
its down seven percent, 
year-to-date. 

238
00:10:51,700 --> 00:10:53,100
That's pretty good. 
JP. 

239
00:10:53,100 --> 00:10:57,800
Morgan is still down 
year-to-date 34% And I think 

240
00:10:57,800 --> 00:10:59,400
that this could continue to 
happen. 

241
00:10:59,400 --> 00:11:02,000
I think the shares could 
continue to go down because they

242
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:03,600
don't have the support of share 
BuyBacks. 

243
00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:05,400
And investors are pretty timid 
right now. 

244
00:11:05,500 --> 00:11:07,800
So, share BuyBacks are 
completely done for banks. 

245
00:11:07,900 --> 00:11:09,600
In the meantime. 
There's going to be no share 

246
00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:12,000
BuyBacks from banks that 
something that was supporting 

247
00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:13,700
the stock price. 
Now that's gone. 

248
00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:16,500
It also says that dividends have
some restrictions Options, it 

249
00:11:16,500 --> 00:11:19,100
says Banks which will announce 
their dividend plans for next 

250
00:11:19,100 --> 00:11:20,200
quarter. 
As soon as Monday. 

251
00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:22,800
They won't be able to make 
payouts that are greater than 

252
00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:26,000
their average quarterly profit 
from the four most recent 

253
00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:28,100
quarters based on that 
restriction. 

254
00:11:28,200 --> 00:11:30,400
Most of the banks are going to 
continue to be able to pay the 

255
00:11:30,400 --> 00:11:31,600
dividend. 
They were before. 

256
00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:33,900
They might choose to lower it 
but they're not going to be 

257
00:11:33,900 --> 00:11:35,800
required to based off that 
restriction. 

258
00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:38,100
I don't see any banks being able
to raise their dividends. 

259
00:11:38,100 --> 00:11:39,500
I don't think they're gonna be 
able to raise them. 

260
00:11:39,700 --> 00:11:41,800
But most of them could continue 
to pay the dividend. 

261
00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:45,400
They were before it highlights 
Wells, Fargo as being the only 

262
00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:47,900
Bank. 
Over that restriction, it says 

263
00:11:47,900 --> 00:11:50,600
that only Wells Fargo has a 
dividend payout that would 

264
00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:52,900
breach the new threshold set by 
the Fed. 

265
00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:54,600
So that's somewhat to be 
expected. 

266
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:57,800
Now as far as these Banks, I own
JPMorgan Chase and Bank of 

267
00:11:57,800 --> 00:11:59,900
America. 
You have to know if you're 

268
00:11:59,900 --> 00:12:01,200
buying these Banks. 
Right now. 

269
00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:04,700
There is a high probability that
they will cut their dividends 

270
00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:06,500
that they will reduce their 
dividend payments. 

271
00:12:06,900 --> 00:12:09,300
The reason why is they might 
choose to do that, to be very 

272
00:12:09,300 --> 00:12:11,100
conservative? 
They might want to keep as much 

273
00:12:11,100 --> 00:12:14,600
cash as possible going through 
this recession if that's the 

274
00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:16,000
case. 
I'm not going to be selling 

275
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:17,600
these. 
As companies I'm investing in 

276
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:20,500
them because I anticipate that 
they'll be paying out a lot of 

277
00:12:20,500 --> 00:12:23,500
money over the next 10 to 20 
years in dividends, if they 

278
00:12:23,500 --> 00:12:26,300
temporarily halt their payments 
for a year. 

279
00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:29,900
Just as we make it through this 
recession, just to be sure just 

280
00:12:29,900 --> 00:12:32,600
to be absolutely certain that 
they don't have to destroy their

281
00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:34,200
company and destroy their Book 
value. 

282
00:12:34,500 --> 00:12:38,100
I'm completely fine with that. 
I anticipate that JPMorgan Chase

283
00:12:38,200 --> 00:12:41,000
or Bank of America if they do 
temporarily suspend their 

284
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,200
dividend payments, they'll 
reinstate it as soon as they can

285
00:12:44,300 --> 00:12:45,800
as soon as they have a clear out
look. 

286
00:12:45,900 --> 00:12:47,800
So. 
I think that I'm Investing For 

287
00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:50,300
future dividend payments. 
These are two companies that 

288
00:12:50,300 --> 00:12:53,200
over the next 10 to 20 years. 
They will be paying a lot of 

289
00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:55,200
money in dividends. 
That's my thought on it. 

290
00:12:55,400 --> 00:12:58,200
If I have to sacrifice one year 
of dividends to be able to buy 

291
00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,300
in a company at a very good 
price that I know is going to 

292
00:13:00,308 --> 00:13:02,700
pay dividends in the future. 
That's something I'm willing to 

293
00:13:02,708 --> 00:13:04,300
do. 
So we'll see where this goes. 

294
00:13:04,300 --> 00:13:05,600
I'm going to keep up with these 
Banks. 

295
00:13:05,900 --> 00:13:08,500
Right now, Jay P. 
Morgan is a four thousand dollar

296
00:13:08,500 --> 00:13:11,500
position of my portfolio. 
It's probably going to become my

297
00:13:11,500 --> 00:13:15,000
largest position over the next 
few months, especially if the 

298
00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:16,600
share price keeps. 
Falling. 

299
00:13:16,700 --> 00:13:19,500
I'm going to be buying more of 
this company if people become 

300
00:13:19,500 --> 00:13:21,600
very fearful, there's a lot of 
fair. 

301
00:13:21,700 --> 00:13:24,100
If people are reacting in there 
selling out of the market, if 

302
00:13:24,100 --> 00:13:26,900
the coronavirus continues to go 
crazy and wreak havoc on the 

303
00:13:26,908 --> 00:13:28,700
economy. 
I'm going to be buying more of 

304
00:13:28,700 --> 00:13:30,600
this company, as the price comes
down. 

305
00:13:30,608 --> 00:13:34,000
I think there's a lot of 
downward pressure on banks right

306
00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:36,300
now. 
Not only did their share buyback

307
00:13:36,300 --> 00:13:40,300
program stop, which is something
that really does buoy the stock.

308
00:13:40,300 --> 00:13:42,000
But we also have the fears of 
the coronavirus. 

309
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:43,600
We have the fears of banks in 
general. 

310
00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:46,900
We have a lot going on right 
now, so, Want to take advantage 

311
00:13:46,900 --> 00:13:49,900
of that as much as possible. 
If this price continues to go 

312
00:13:49,900 --> 00:13:52,200
down right now, it's trading at 
92 dollars. 

313
00:13:52,700 --> 00:13:54,600
If it continues to go down. 
I'm going to be buying more of 

314
00:13:54,600 --> 00:13:56,200
it. 
So this will probably become my 

315
00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:57,700
biggest position here really 
soon. 

316
00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:00,900
Even with that said, I have to 
let people know if you're 

317
00:14:00,900 --> 00:14:03,300
looking at buying a company like
this and you see research like 

318
00:14:03,300 --> 00:14:05,700
this, you got to do your own 
research to be able to stick 

319
00:14:05,700 --> 00:14:08,500
with stocks for a long time and 
realize that I'm heavily 

320
00:14:08,500 --> 00:14:11,200
Diversified. 
So I want a lot of companies, JP

321
00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:14,200
Morgan is one of my Holdings. 
It's one of the bigger bets but 

322
00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:16,000
it's not my only holding. 
I'm really well. 

323
00:14:16,100 --> 00:14:18,900
Diversified so keep that in mind
as you make purchases of 

324
00:14:18,900 --> 00:14:21,600
companies like this. 
Now having said that I do see a 

325
00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:23,200
lot of potential with this 
company. 

326
00:14:23,500 --> 00:14:26,600
It has a current market cap. 
The size of it is two hundred, 

327
00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:29,600
eighty two billion dollars, 
which is a big company, but two 

328
00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:32,600
hundred eighty two billion 
dollars during normal times in 

329
00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:38,800
2019, JP Morgan made 36 billion 
dollars in net income. 36 

330
00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,200
billion in net income. 
That's a company that is under 

331
00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:44,200
300 billion dollars in market 
cap. 

332
00:14:44,500 --> 00:14:47,400
Try to find another company. 
It has that type of net income 

333
00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:51,200
for its current market cap size.
It's very difficult to find. 

334
00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:54,000
So, during normal times. 
This is a highly profitable 

335
00:14:54,000 --> 00:14:56,100
company. 
They're invested in a lot of 

336
00:14:56,108 --> 00:14:57,600
tech. 
They're moving forward with 

337
00:14:57,600 --> 00:14:59,500
that. 
The price of it has gone down 

338
00:14:59,500 --> 00:15:01,800
quite a bit. 
And I think as this company 

339
00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:04,400
makes its way through this 
recession, if they can do it 

340
00:15:04,408 --> 00:15:07,100
without destroying Book value 
and they get to a situation 

341
00:15:07,100 --> 00:15:09,000
where they start 
re-implementing, their share 

342
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:11,400
buyback programs. 
If they start raising their 

343
00:15:11,400 --> 00:15:14,100
dividends again, I could see 
this company both having a lot 

344
00:15:14,100 --> 00:15:17,500
of share price appreciation and 
Pay dividends at the same time. 

345
00:15:17,500 --> 00:15:19,500
So that's what I'm hoping for 
now. 

346
00:15:19,500 --> 00:15:21,200
Having said that I can't see the
future. 

347
00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:23,900
We don't know what's going to 
happen, but we'll find out soon.

348
00:15:24,100 --> 00:15:26,300
Okay, so shifting gears a little
bit to something. 

349
00:15:26,300 --> 00:15:28,400
I still think is heavily 
related, especially if you're 

350
00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:31,200
investing in Banks, is the 
coronavirus we've heard about 

351
00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:33,000
this for so long, but I think 
there's some important 

352
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:34,600
information that's being left 
out. 

353
00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:38,400
First of all, we have the fear. 
We have Florida, shutting back 

354
00:15:38,400 --> 00:15:39,600
down. 
Says it Florida. 

355
00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:41,200
Thought it had dodged, the 
coronavirus. 

356
00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:44,300
Now, it faces a surge. 
We have similar news for other 

357
00:15:44,300 --> 00:15:45,900
states. 
The surgeon covid-19. 

358
00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:49,200
Cases tests, Austin's reopening.
So Texas is seeing the same 

359
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:52,100
thing. 
Basically, the numbers were all 

360
00:15:52,100 --> 00:15:54,100
going down. 
We started to reopen back up the

361
00:15:54,100 --> 00:15:56,600
economy. 
People went out and they did 

362
00:15:56,600 --> 00:15:59,600
their normal business, just like
normal and the coronavirus 

363
00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,500
spread like crazy. 
So we can see the numbers over 

364
00:16:02,500 --> 00:16:04,700
the u.s. 
They're really high right now, 

365
00:16:04,700 --> 00:16:07,200
but there's some other 
information that I think is 

366
00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:09,300
interesting. 
One of them is these antibody 

367
00:16:09,300 --> 00:16:12,000
tests that we're doing show that
there might be a lot more people

368
00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:15,000
with the coronavirus or that 
have had the coronavirus that 

369
00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:16,400
weren't officially tested. 
It. 

370
00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:20,100
So the government estimates, 20 
million Americans were infected 

371
00:16:20,100 --> 00:16:22,500
significantly higher than the 
official count. 

372
00:16:22,900 --> 00:16:25,500
That's ten times higher. 
So if there really was 20 

373
00:16:25,500 --> 00:16:28,700
million people in the u.s. 
Infected that means that the 

374
00:16:28,900 --> 00:16:31,800
fatality rate is 10 times lower 
than what it's reported right 

375
00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:34,600
now. 
So that would be good and bad 

376
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:36,200
news. 
It mean the fatality rate is 

377
00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:39,000
lower that a lot more people 
have the coronavirus but that it

378
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:41,900
spreads more than we think. 
So we have information like that

379
00:16:41,900 --> 00:16:45,300
and we also have better data on 
who is vulnerable to the 

380
00:16:45,300 --> 00:16:48,100
Coronavirus. 
This report shows that the 

381
00:16:48,100 --> 00:16:50,100
vulnerability, the amount of 
lethality. 

382
00:16:50,100 --> 00:16:53,900
This virus has is heavily 
correlated to your age, 80 

383
00:16:53,900 --> 00:16:57,100
percent of the deaths Linked In 
the coronavirus in Europe, where

384
00:16:57,100 --> 00:17:02,100
people over 75 years old, 80 
percent of the deaths in Europe,

385
00:17:02,100 --> 00:17:06,000
where people over the age of 75 
that is heavily weighted towards

386
00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:07,900
elderly people. 
If you look at this, I can 

387
00:17:07,908 --> 00:17:12,099
actually break it down into 
these different crafts. 15 to 44

388
00:17:12,099 --> 00:17:13,800
year olds. 
That's a pretty large age 

389
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:17,900
demographic that red line. 
Is the amount of deaths from it?

390
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:20,400
That's the fatality rate. 
It's very low. 

391
00:17:20,800 --> 00:17:24,400
It's almost zero. 
If you go to 45 to 64, it 

392
00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:26,200
immediately bumps up quite a 
bit. 

393
00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:29,200
You can see the starting of it 
is quite a bit higher and then 

394
00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:32,500
it has another bump. 
That's 45 to 64 years old. 

395
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:35,900
That's about right there. 
The whole working demographic 

396
00:17:35,900 --> 00:17:39,400
from 15 to 64 years old is, 
basically people in the 

397
00:17:39,408 --> 00:17:43,100
workforce, but look at it from 
their people that are elderly or

398
00:17:43,100 --> 00:17:45,100
retired. 
You have people over the age of 

399
00:17:45,100 --> 00:17:48,000
65. 
If it already starts very high 

400
00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:50,500
and then you see a significant 
bump in fatality rate. 

401
00:17:50,600 --> 00:17:55,000
So it's much higher, 65 to 74 
and then 75 to 80 for if you're 

402
00:17:55,000 --> 00:17:57,700
in this age group, you're very 
vulnerable to the coronavirus, 

403
00:17:57,700 --> 00:18:01,800
not something you want to get if
you're 85, Plus, it is extremely

404
00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:04,900
lethal. 
So you look at this breakdown 

405
00:18:04,900 --> 00:18:06,600
and it does give us some 
information. 

406
00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:10,800
It shows us that people that are
mostly young and otherwise, good

407
00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:14,300
health, 15 to 44. 
They have a very low fatality 

408
00:18:14,300 --> 00:18:17,200
rate from the coronavirus as you
get Order it's far more deadly 

409
00:18:17,200 --> 00:18:20,600
in this age demographic data is 
important because a lot of the 

410
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:23,800
new cases seem to be people that
are younger than previous. 

411
00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:25,700
It used to be affecting a lot of
elderly people. 

412
00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:29,000
Now, it seems like most the new 
infections are younger people 

413
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:32,600
from The New York Times? 
It says, in Arizona where drive 

414
00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:35,300
up sites are overwhelmed by 
people seeking coronavirus test,

415
00:18:35,300 --> 00:18:39,800
people ages 22:44 account for 
nearly half of all cases in 

416
00:18:39,800 --> 00:18:42,200
Florida, which breaks records 
for new cases. 

417
00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:45,300
Nearly every day. 
The median age of cases, testing

418
00:18:45,300 --> 00:18:48,300
positive for the virus. 
The virus have dropped to 35 

419
00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:52,500
down from 65 in March. 
So, the median age of people 

420
00:18:52,500 --> 00:18:56,600
getting the coronavirus in 
Florida has dropped from 65 to 

421
00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:58,500
35. 
If we go back and look at the 

422
00:18:58,500 --> 00:19:02,400
graphs again, and compare 35 
year, olds with 65 year, olds. 

423
00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:06,000
Obviously, the 65 year old age 
group is far more lethal. 

424
00:19:06,300 --> 00:19:09,100
So this is both good news and 
bad news. 

425
00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:12,400
Having the median age go down. 
Means that likely there's going 

426
00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:15,100
to be a lower fatality rate, but
obviously having it spread out 

427
00:19:15,100 --> 00:19:16,800
of control like this. 
Not ideal. 

428
00:19:17,200 --> 00:19:18,700
Okay. 
Let's get to some emails. 

429
00:19:18,700 --> 00:19:21,300
Joseph at Joseph Carlson 
show.com is the email address. 

430
00:19:21,600 --> 00:19:24,500
The first one, says hi Joseph. 
My name is Ashlyn and I've 

431
00:19:24,500 --> 00:19:26,700
started listening to your show 
during the pandemic. 

432
00:19:26,800 --> 00:19:28,800
Congratulations on your 100th 
video. 

433
00:19:29,100 --> 00:19:31,300
I've watched at least half of 
them at this point. 

434
00:19:31,700 --> 00:19:34,200
I am a college student studying 
computer science who has been 

435
00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:36,800
using this down, time to learn 
more about investing in finance.

436
00:19:37,100 --> 00:19:39,600
I've been reading a lot of 
books, listening to podcasts and

437
00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:42,400
following the news, but there's 
one thing I just do not 

438
00:19:42,400 --> 00:19:45,700
understand most of my friends at
College in many Twitter users 

439
00:19:45,700 --> 00:19:47,900
trash. 
It's Jeff Bezos has being super 

440
00:19:47,900 --> 00:19:51,600
duper wealthy and not using his 
wealth to fix problems, like, 

441
00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,500
Flint, Michigan, or improve his 
employees working conditions, 

442
00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:57,700
but wouldn't most Basil's wealth
be tied up in Amazon? 

443
00:19:57,700 --> 00:20:00,300
Stock. 
And if so, how can he actually 

444
00:20:00,300 --> 00:20:02,100
make thousands of dollars per 
second. 

445
00:20:02,100 --> 00:20:04,000
For some reason. 
I see this metric everywhere 

446
00:20:04,500 --> 00:20:07,800
with a quick Google search. 
I see that Bezos has a worth of 

447
00:20:07,808 --> 00:20:09,300
about a hundred sixty five 
billion. 

448
00:20:09,600 --> 00:20:12,700
Yahoo! 
Finance says Bezos owns fifty 

449
00:20:12,700 --> 00:20:15,900
five and a half million shares 
of Amazon at 2700 dollars. 

450
00:20:16,100 --> 00:20:18,300
Here. 
That means he has around 150 

451
00:20:18,300 --> 00:20:19,800
billion in Amazon. 
Chairs. 

452
00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:22,700
Amazon does not pay a dividend. 
He apparently makes his salary 

453
00:20:22,700 --> 00:20:25,100
about 80,000 a year with the 
rest of his income. 

454
00:20:25,100 --> 00:20:27,500
Be from bonuses as a CEO of 
Amazon. 

455
00:20:27,800 --> 00:20:31,000
The article, says Bezos annual 
income is 78 million. 

456
00:20:31,100 --> 00:20:34,500
Where is that money coming from?
If not Amazon dividends or his 

457
00:20:34,500 --> 00:20:36,800
average salary? 
Well Ashland, this is an 

458
00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:39,500
interesting question. 
You point out, that most your 

459
00:20:39,508 --> 00:20:42,800
friends at college and many 
Twitter users trash, Jeff Bezos 

460
00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:45,900
for being super wealthy and not 
using his wealth. 

461
00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:49,200
To fix problems, like, Flint, 
Michigan or improve employees. 

462
00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:52,800
Working conditions. 
I've seen this a lot and I would

463
00:20:52,800 --> 00:20:56,100
say, it doesn't even stop there.
I've seen people that when Jeff 

464
00:20:56,100 --> 00:20:59,400
Bezos donates to something, they
complain that he doesn't donate 

465
00:20:59,400 --> 00:21:01,800
enough. 
And if he doesn't donate, they 

466
00:21:01,800 --> 00:21:05,500
complain that he didn't donate. 
And every single cause going on 

467
00:21:05,500 --> 00:21:07,400
every single thing that's 
important to them. 

468
00:21:07,500 --> 00:21:10,200
Jeff Bezos should be doing 
something to fix the thing. 

469
00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:12,500
That's important to them. 
He should be fixing all of 

470
00:21:12,500 --> 00:21:15,200
life's issues. 
Jeff Bezos, should fix every 

471
00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:16,700
single problem. 
We In the u.s. 

472
00:21:17,100 --> 00:21:20,200
I think that's the expectation 
people have, is that he's super 

473
00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:22,600
wealthy. 
He has 150 billion dollars. 

474
00:21:22,900 --> 00:21:25,900
So he should be the guy that 
every single problem is funneled

475
00:21:25,900 --> 00:21:28,500
to him and we should look to him
to solve all of them. 

476
00:21:29,300 --> 00:21:30,600
That's kind of the impression. 
I'm getting. 

477
00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:33,500
I mean, it's silly and it's 
really lazy just to have any 

478
00:21:33,500 --> 00:21:37,500
problem and blame on Jeff Bezos.
I think it's a really lazy way 

479
00:21:37,500 --> 00:21:39,200
of looking at things but that's 
kind of a trend. 

480
00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:42,200
I'm seeing right now, but I look
at this. 

481
00:21:42,200 --> 00:21:45,400
It's obvious if you learn about 
Finance you learn about how his 

482
00:21:45,400 --> 00:21:48,800
money's actually Restored. 
He simply has a big stake in 

483
00:21:48,800 --> 00:21:50,700
Amazon. 
That is where most of his net 

484
00:21:50,700 --> 00:21:52,000
worth. 
Is it son? 

485
00:21:52,000 --> 00:21:54,600
Realized when he sells Amazon 
stock? 

486
00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:57,300
He's realizing those gains. 
He's cashing out. 

487
00:21:57,400 --> 00:21:59,800
Then he can actually do 
something with the money, but he

488
00:21:59,800 --> 00:22:02,500
has the huge majority of it in 
Amazon stock. 

489
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:06,400
And if he sold all of that, he 
would no longer own Amazon, he 

490
00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:09,100
would not be able to run it. 
It would be run by other people.

491
00:22:09,200 --> 00:22:12,400
So that's the situation. 
He said he wants to run the 

492
00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:15,800
company that he started. 
He created Amazon, and I think 

493
00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:17,900
that To be able to do that. 
I don't think we should look at 

494
00:22:17,900 --> 00:22:19,300
him to solve every single life 
issue. 

495
00:22:19,300 --> 00:22:21,100
Either. 
He started a company. 

496
00:22:21,300 --> 00:22:23,700
He's good at being the CEO of 
the company. 

497
00:22:23,700 --> 00:22:25,600
He's obviously really good at 
growing it. 

498
00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:28,300
There's not many people on this 
planet that can grow a company 

499
00:22:28,300 --> 00:22:30,900
like Jeff Bezos. 
He's a great Capital allocator. 

500
00:22:31,100 --> 00:22:33,400
He used money and he created 
more wealth with it. 

501
00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:35,600
More Capital. 
He created more opportunities, 

502
00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:37,500
more jobs. 
He grew a company that's 

503
00:22:37,500 --> 00:22:40,100
difficult to do, not a lot of 
people can do it. 

504
00:22:40,100 --> 00:22:43,200
The extent that Jeff Bezos has. 
So I think that we should leave 

505
00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:45,600
them to do what he's good at 
which is growing a company. 

506
00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:48,300
Offering jobs being able to 
create wealth. 

507
00:22:48,500 --> 00:22:50,200
That's something that very few 
people. 

508
00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:53,500
Do try to think of a lot of 
people that can do exactly what 

509
00:22:53,500 --> 00:22:56,000
Jeff Bezos has, and the amount 
of people doing. 

510
00:22:56,000 --> 00:23:00,100
That is very slim. 
So, I think it's the thing that 

511
00:23:00,100 --> 00:23:02,700
you're pointing out, Twitter 
users complaining about them 

512
00:23:02,900 --> 00:23:05,300
College, friends. 
There's always somebody to 

513
00:23:05,300 --> 00:23:07,400
complain about and aim your 
problems at. 

514
00:23:07,400 --> 00:23:10,500
I think that Jeff Bezos has fit 
right in that slot because he's 

515
00:23:10,500 --> 00:23:12,600
super wealthy. 
I don't think that there's much 

516
00:23:12,600 --> 00:23:15,200
more to it than that. 
I think if Amazon had some 

517
00:23:15,200 --> 00:23:17,800
issues in the Price, went down a
whole bunch and his net worth 

518
00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:19,700
went down. 
People wouldn't see these big 

519
00:23:19,700 --> 00:23:21,700
numbers and it would probably 
fizzle out from there. 

520
00:23:21,700 --> 00:23:23,800
So that's kind of my thoughts on
it. 

521
00:23:24,100 --> 00:23:27,300
Stanley says hi Joseph. 
Me and my two brothers, 18 to 20

522
00:23:27,300 --> 00:23:30,600
years old in the UK have 
recently gotten to investing in 

523
00:23:30,600 --> 00:23:33,200
the past few months and I've 
been keeping up to date with 

524
00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:35,300
your videos. 
We find very helpful. 

525
00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:39,400
We have inherited about 30,000 
euros each which we plan to cost

526
00:23:39,400 --> 00:23:41,700
average into a long-term 
dividend growth portfolio. 

527
00:23:42,100 --> 00:23:44,300
Starting off mainly with ETFs 
and bonds. 

528
00:23:44,500 --> 00:23:47,300
We've noticed that there seems 
has to be more promising. 

529
00:23:47,300 --> 00:23:49,100
American companies in terms of 
dividends. 

530
00:23:49,300 --> 00:23:52,000
However, we're wondering whether
or not it would be a good idea 

531
00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:56,300
to invest in American companies 
with the current rate exchange 

532
00:23:56,300 --> 00:23:59,700
between the dollar and Euro, 
which could mean we lose a bit 

533
00:23:59,700 --> 00:24:02,700
of money over the long term. 
Well Stanley, my basic thoughts 

534
00:24:02,700 --> 00:24:06,100
on this are to not worry about 
the exchange rate that much. 

535
00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:09,400
I think that you could first 
look at companies where you're 

536
00:24:09,400 --> 00:24:12,700
not going to have those issues. 
I would first focus on your own 

537
00:24:12,700 --> 00:24:14,800
home court. 
I would look in Europe, look for

538
00:24:14,800 --> 00:24:17,100
companies in the UK. 
And try to find ones, you think 

539
00:24:17,100 --> 00:24:20,600
are good, but I would not forego
investing in companies in 

540
00:24:20,600 --> 00:24:22,700
America because of the exchange 
rate. 

541
00:24:22,700 --> 00:24:25,500
If there's companies you really 
want to own in the US that you 

542
00:24:25,508 --> 00:24:26,500
think are going to double in 
size. 

543
00:24:26,508 --> 00:24:28,000
You think they're going to do 
really well. 

544
00:24:28,400 --> 00:24:30,500
I would not worry about the 
exchange rate. 

545
00:24:30,500 --> 00:24:34,200
I would start buying shares in 
these companies so I would not 

546
00:24:34,200 --> 00:24:35,400
let it this way. 
Do that much. 

547
00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:38,000
I think it's good to have a 
little bit of home court bias to

548
00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:40,400
focus on companies around you 
that you're familiar with. 

549
00:24:40,400 --> 00:24:43,300
But I would also not worried at 
all about investing in companies

550
00:24:43,300 --> 00:24:45,700
and other countries. 
If you think they're going to do

551
00:24:45,700 --> 00:24:47,600
really well. 
Well in the future, okay. 

552
00:24:47,600 --> 00:24:49,300
Well, I'm going to go ahead and 
end this episode there. 

553
00:24:49,300 --> 00:24:52,000
Thanks everybody for listening. 
I will see you guys next time.

