Welcome back, everyone. Today on the Joseph Carlson
Show, there is a stock that I keep buying.
I'm buying another $3000 of it today.
We'll be going over which company it is.
Why I keep building up this position, why I believe it's a
buy. We'll be discussing all of it.
Now, we also have a lot of other news to get into.
Of course, we have the big news. the United States officially
bombed Iran directly, dropping 13 MO PS massive ordinance
penetrators. These bombs weigh 30,000 lbs
apiece. They were targeted specifically
at Iran's nuclear clear facilities.
Now, this is a huge escalation entering the US directly into
this conflict. But so far, investors, the
market don't seem too concerned about this escalation.
We'll be going over why the market is reacting the way it
is, as well as getting commentary from other people
like Tom Lee on why he thinks the market is so resilient.
Another thing that happened over the weekend was the Tesla robo
taxi event. We have people excitedly
anticipating this day. We've been awaiting it for a
long time where Tesla finally gets to the point of launching
their Bobo taxi vehicles. Now, I watched a number of
footage from all different vehicles and rides and different
drivers and the different content creators that went to
this event, and I have a lot to say about it.
We'll be doing a full review. My overall thoughts of how I
think this launch event went, whether I think Tesla investors
should be bullish or bearish based on this event.
Now, last week, we had this crazy news that Sam Altman,
members of his team at Open AI were receiving $100 million
signing bonuses, that Mark Zuckerberg was trying to poach
his best people and he was willing to pay any amount
necessary. Now, that was just from Sam
Altman, and we've since received more on this news.
We now know that it's real. Sam Altman wasn't making this
up. And it gets even crazier with
Zuckerberg directly reaching out to these people.
We'll be going over this report on how intently focused Mark
Zuckerberg is on building up his team.
And then we have a bunch more stuff to get into hims and her
stock is crashing 32%. We'll be looking at that as
well. As Amazon launches their second
batch of Kuiper Internet satellites, we'll be looking at
that as well. So obviously, we have a ton to
get into in this episode. Let's go ahead and start off
with the company that I keep buying.
The stock is in the financial category and it's Equifax.
I'm buying another $3000 worth of Equifax today.
I'm continually building up this position because I'm very
bullish on this company. Equifax is a company that I
would describe as much better than it appears on the surface.
I think that looks can be misleading and even though
Equifax looks like an old stodgy company with nothing
particularly interesting about it, this is truly a great
company. Now if we just look at the
revenue of this company, you can see that it's growing over time.
It has ebbs and flows, grows a little bit faster at some points
than others. But ever since around 2002, it's
an old company. Ever since around then it's
grown very steadily. And that's because it's a credit
Bureau. When you're a credit Bureau,
you're basically in an oligopoly.
You're in a shared monopoly. Those in and of themselves are
very high Moat businesses. It's almost impossible to
replicate what a credit Bureau is today.
Now, that's not the exciting part of the company.
We know that Equifax has grown year after year.
They've grown organically due to the housing market, and the need
for additional credit ratings has grown.
Knowing who you're lending money to is a really big deal.
They play a crucial role in that.
But if we look at this more specifically, in fact if we
breakdown this revenue growth by segment, it paints a much
clearer picture. We have the KP is here in
Qualtrim. Equifax is broken up into three
key segments. The first one is the workforce
solution. This is the biggest and fastest
growing segment of the company. The work number is not the only
part of workforce solution, but it's by far the most important
part. We also have USIS.
This is the credit reports segment of the company.
Of course, a good part of the business, it's better 90% of the
businesses in the world, but again, it's not the most
important part of this company. Then we have international where
they bucket all of their products in total revenue.
Internationally, this is probably been the slowest
growing portion of the company. We look at what the company's
doing care and the reason that I remain so bullish on it, it's
for two reasons. First of all, we have the credit
report part of this company. If we look at just the growth of
that, it grows during time periods where people take out
more loans, where interest rates are lower, where people are
transacting more with home mortgages.
Now organically this grows overtime anyway, but interest
rates going down has an outsized impact on this.
If interest rates go down in the future, which I believe they
will, lower interest rates is a strong catalyst for this
company. Now again, this part of the
business I believe is better than most businesses in the
United States. So even the the lesser good
portion of Equifax, I still believe is better than most
businesses. The most exciting part to me is
the work number. It's in the Workforce Solutions.
Now the work number, just a refresher, is a work history
verification service where you can look up someone and see
their entire work history, what companies they worked at, how
long did they work there, what did they do at the company, what
was their role and how much money were they making.
The work number contains almost all or all of that information
for everybody that opts in. Now, of course, they have all
the legal rights to do it. Everybody signs off and
participates in it. The work number has proper
permission to get this information and there's lots of
companies that benefit from it. The array of companies that
benefit from work verification is massive.
You have government entities wanting to know if you really
have the income that you have. They've all partnered with the
work number, both local municipalities and federal
agencies. We also have lenders, banks,
everybody loaning money wants to verify that you make money so
that you can pay back the loan. You have insurance brokers
wanting to assess your risk. You have landlords wanting to
know that their tenants that they're renting to can really
pay the rent and so on and so forth.
The amount of use cases for the work number is massive.
The product has enormous potential, and it's incredibly
difficult to replicate. There's no company in the world
that has accumulated the partnerships, the network and
the database that the work number has, so they are full
steam ahead. It's important to remember when
you're buying companies in your portfolio to be focused on the
basics of investing. What creates value for
investors? Where does shareholder returns
come from? They don't come strictly from
innovation or how exciting the company is.
In fact, sometimes the opposite can happen.
Some of the most exciting companies in the world,
so-called highly innovative companies, have been some of the
worst investments. Arc Innovation has marketing
materials and documents going over their highly innovative
investment strategy. You can look at this marketing
material and it can sound very compelling, investing in stuff
that's disruptively innovative. Intelligent devices, autonomous
mobility, precision therapies, neural networks, next Gen.
cloud, digital wallets, digital asset, smart contracts, so on
and so forth. You see this type of stuff and
it's marketed all the time. But this isn't what generates
shareholder returns. And that's why it's easy to
contrast the difference in outcomes between these types of
strategies. Arc innovation over the past
five years has returned .42%. It's been completely flat, while
Texas Roadhouse, a company that doesn't do much on the
innovative front, is up 266%, not counting dividends.
Investment returns come from free cash flow per share growth.
They come from profitability, they come from companies, they
come from highly profitable companies growing quickly and
purchased at reasonable valuation.
In My Portfolio, I hyper focus on these type of companies and
my favorite type of company overall is the subscription
revenue type of company. It's why in the story fund I
have Netflix as a top position. I own Costco as another long
term significant bet in My Portfolio.
The way that Costco makes money is by its membership.
It is overall a subscription based company.
Apple transition from a hardware company to a seller of software.
Microsoft is a subscription based company, same with
Salesforce. S&P Global and Intuit are
examples of two other fantastic subscription based companies.
And then we have Equifax, which can be put into that same
category. Equifax has a strong majority
subscription like revenue that I believe will continue to grow in
the future. And on top of that they're
launching a lot of new products. Now typically I like to buy
companies like this on a significant dip, but it doesn't
look like we're going to get that anytime soon.
We just had a major geopolitical event and so far the market
isn't reacting. Now, this is something that we
discussed that could happen in the previous episode.
We said that the US is getting closer to directly bombing Iran.
And we knew this because both figuratively and literally, the
US was getting closer. There were ships and planes and
and military and naval assets moving closer to Iran in
preparation for this, as well as the United States president has
been commentating on this, saying that it's a real
possibility. Well, this weekend, of course,
we had the news that the US directly bombed Iran.
The US flew B2 stealth bombers with Tomahawk missiles as well
as these MO PS massive ordnance penetrators.
There are 30,000 LB bombs that can dive deep into the mountain
and they're called bunker Busters.
And the goal here was to get critical hits on these nuclear
development sites to slow down their nuclear program.
On the success of it, JD Vance said, I'm not going to get into
sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground
with Iran, but we've seen a lot and I feel very confident that
we substantially delayed the development of nuclear weapons
and that was the goal of this attack.
The vice president has also who insisted that this is not going
to drag the US into a long drawn out war in the Middle East.
He's aware that everybody is against that, that nobody wants
that. He says that we're not at war
with Iran, we're at war with their nuclear program and that
these are targeted, limited strikes.
Now, investors are currently in the process of pricing and
judging this event, trying to weigh whether or not Iran being
further away from nuclear development is worth the risk of
escalated war. And as of right now, the
market's relatively flat. I think the market is correct in
being mostly flat today. I don't see this is a big
bullish catalyst. There's no reason that stocks
should surge up today, but I also don't so far see this is a
reason to sell out of companies. Like I said, I think there's a
chance anytime there's escalated chance of conflict that the
market could sell off, and I would buy that dip if it
happened. But right now it doesn't look
like we're going to get a big sell off because of this.
What would cause a sell off in the US stock market based on
this conflict is continued escalation, specifically if
other big countries join Iran in the fight.
But right now it doesn't look like that's happening.
Bloomberg reports that Iran's leaders are discovering that
they're on their own against the US and Israel without a network
of proxies and allies that have allowed them to project power in
the Middle East and beyond. Without other larger allies
stepping in directly to back Iran and their nuclear ambition,
it doesn't look like this is going to escalate much beyond
this point. Tom Lee shares a similar
sentiment, highlighting the resilience of the stock market.
In some ways it actually strengthens the case for stocks
to do better into year end because at the start of this
year we would said US bombing a nuclear facility is a Black
Swan. Oil would be 120, stocks should
be down 10% and then we have the event and oil is not really
surging and stocks are up. So I'd almost say that you've
put another stress test into the market.
We've seen it pass it and I think it means stocks should do
pretty well here. It all depends on this moment of
if there's continued escalation, Iran is going to retaliate to
some degree. The leadership knows they have
to do at least some type of symbolic retaliation against the
United States. But it really depends on whether
the true stakes get meaningfully higher and higher, whether the
market becomes concerned about this.
One of the things that Iran could do in retaliation is
closing something called the Strait of Hormuz.
It is a shipping which would cause oil prices to go higher.
I do, but you know, Brian Sullivan was off camera was
mentioning a lot of strategic reasons why that that may not be
the case. I'm sure he's going to have his
views, but I I would say I'm watching oil and if oil isn't
surging then I think it just means that the risks of straight
the straights being closed is lower.
There's some debate on whether or not they'll really do this or
for how long because although it would impact U.S. oil prices, it
also impacts Iran's economy dramatically.
So this would be a double edged sword action from Iran.
Now, a question for investors right now is if even an
escalated conflict can't bring down the US stock market,
doesn't mean that prices are so high today that there's nothing
worth buying. Tom Lee and I agree on this
subject that even though there's some companies, some meme stocks
and popular social media stocks that are trading at incredible
valuations, that isn't an indication that the entire
market is overpriced. Similar to 20/21/2021 was unique
and that almost nothing was undervalued.
And that's not the market that we're currently in.
It is. I mean, those are echoes of
2021, which is some stocks get fantastically bizarre valuations
and I'm not naming any. And and then there is signs of
speculation. And, but the one thing that was
true in 2021 that's not true now is when I meet with fund
managers in 2021, they said there was no stock they could
buy because everything was expensive.
That's actually not true anymore now.
Now the people I talked to are saying, look, the numbers have
been better and numbers are going up, but the macro is
making them uncertain. So there's actually a lot less
risk taking by institutional investors.
There's a small number of stocks that are trading at astronomical
valuations, but there's a lot of companies that are trading at
reasonable valuations. We'll see whether or not Tom Lee
is right that the overall market will go up this year, but I do
agree with him that there are many stocks to buy today.
Now moving on, we get to the news that Tesla finally launched
their robo taxi network. It officially happened
yesterday. On Sunday, they had a launch
event. They invited mostly Tesla
influencers, people that are prominent figures in the Tesla
community, to congregate in Austin.
And with around 10 different robo taxis, they launched the
event. This is just a fun event for a
lot of people. You can tell that they're having
fun here gathering. It's something that Tesla
investors have been anticipating for literally years.
Some of them have been in the stock for like 10 years talking
about the launch of this. And so they're obviously happy
to finally get to this point. And I think that's reasonable.
One of the funniest things about this video, though, that the
dancing here I think is good. I'm not criticizing that.
But one of the funniest parts of this video that I noticed is as
he's dancing, filming the Robotaxi launch, a Waymo drives
by in the background. Did you catch it?
There's the Waymo cruising by in the background.
No driver in that driver's seat or passenger in that passenger
seat. That thing is just driving
itself. And that was one of the things
that a lot of people invited to this event commented on, that
they saw Waymo's everywhere. One of them said that they saw
like 300 Waymo's. Everywhere they went, there was
a Waymo. Waymo has been in this area for
years, so they are operating at a pretty good scale here.
Now, there's a few things to note about this event.
The area that it launched is about four miles across.
It's a small geofenced area. If you map it out and compare it
against the initial area that Waymo launched, it's around half
the size. So Tesla took a very
conservative approach on this initial launch.
They didn't want to take any chances.
They launched it in a very confined area.
You could only ride back and forth in the highlight of
portions. Here we got to take a look at
the Tesla Robotaxi app and for what I could see, it looks very
similar to Uber. Obviously, the Tesla engineers
took a few learnings from it, but it also looks really good.
I actually really like the app. I I think it's really well done.
It looks kind of polished here. You can zoom in.
It just looks like Google Maps or Apple Maps or anything else.
You can see the robotaxi's moving if you zoom in.
You also have integrated controls so that it will
automatically sync your Spotify, Apple Music, your Netflix, that
type of thing with the Tesla vehicle upon entry.
You also have some specific controls like calling support or
pulling over at the bottom. Now there's tons of footage
shared online. Lots of people live streaming
drives. There's still live streaming
drives, and I sat back and watched a couple drives and it
was rather boring, which is a good thing if you're running a
robotaxi network. You want boring, you want
uneventful, you want a car simply going from one place to
the other without anything exciting happening, and that's
typically what happened. We have examples like this of
someone highlighting that Tesla properly slows down for a speed
bump. It's cool that it was able to
recognize the speed bump and adjust the speed of the car.
There's also people that drove that posted full length drives
on YouTube. You can go in and just watch the
entire thing. And again, from the most part
everything I saw I was watching a number of drives and I thought
it looked pretty good. I didn't see any problems with
it. It seemed to drive smoothly.
People in the the passenger seat, in the back seat had a
good experience. And every one of the Tesla
vehicles, they do have a safety passenger, someone monitoring
the vehicle sitting there. So that's the person in the
passenger seat there. But the ones in the back seat
are the passengers. Now, as you can see, they're
just cruising around. There's nothing unusual.
You can look at the Tesla in different situations.
It's stopping at red lights or yellow lights, yielding to
traffic, going through all these different types of situations
and it seems to handle them just fine.
This is what all the footage was showing.
So I'm sitting back pretty impressed with what's going on
here Now. At the same time, there are some
complaints with people saying that the pickup location is
pretty bad. You have to, in some case, walk
blocks and blocks to get to a pickup location.
That's an easy fix for Tesla, something that they can likely
change overtime with some simple updates.
The important thing here is the driving, that Teslas are
behaving correctly, that they're driving normally.
And again, I watch multiple rides, full length rides, multi
miles, and I didn't see any issues now that was the case
until this one part of this OneDrive.
It looks like Tesla ran into some problem with the logic or
the mapping. Either way, something went wrong
and it caused the Tesla to behave a little erratically
here. Here's the exact footage, and
this is posted on the Tesla Daily Channel.
Now, if you didn't see it or you're just listening to the
podcast with audio only, basically what the Tesla does
here is it looks like it's going to turn left.
In fact, the the mapping looks like it's going to turn left and
then it stutters and the wheel jerks left and right while it's
on it. It's already moved out of its
lane in the intersection, like it's going to turn left, but
instead of committing to the left turn lane, it looks like it
decides to go back right. Now it's going back right while
a car presumably behind it thought it was going to go left
because it was initially going left.
That car decided to pass the Tesla and now it's it's kind of
pushing its way back in right and you can hear that driver
behind them honk at them because they're trying to illegally
merge back into the lane. Then when the Tesla seems like
it doesn't have enough room to get back in the lane, it just
crosses over these double yellow lines bypassing the other cars
to get into the left turning lane here.
Now this didn't result in anything.
There is no accident, error or any big event.
But it doesn't look great. This looks like a problem
specifically with the navigation or full self driving.
Now I want to highlight again. This is the only real problem I
saw out of watching 5 or 6 full drives.
So I am highlighting the one thing that went wrong.
But with cars and safety, the one thing that goes wrong is the
important thing. That's what gets highlighted.
You don't surface all the times it got it right, you surface the
time it got it wrong. Tesla's robo taxi network is
going to be judged by these type of events, whether they result
in collisions or accidents. Now it's true that Waymos do
things like this from time to time as well.
We have examples of a Waymo like this blocking an intersection
blocking emergency vehicles from being able to pass for about 30
seconds. So there's examples of
autonomous vehicles doing this and they're never going to be
perfect. Now, while Waymo does that from
time to time, Waymo also has thousands of vehicles on the
road doing 200 + 1000 rides per week.
So they're at a much larger scale already, which makes sense
to have more opportunities for edge cases or weird events.
In this case, there's only 10 Tesla vehicles only for a single
day, and it's already had a pretty big error, which I think
is a bit concerning when you take into account the limited
scale they're already operating at.
They're seeing this problem on day one.
And this isn't even an edge case.
An edge case for an autonomous vehicle is something happening
far out of the ordinary that only happens once in a million.
Things like police officers being in the middle of an
intersection, things like dogs running out from a car, things
like fog, rain, extreme sun glare.
But in this case, there's nothing that happens.
It's an edge case from what I can see.
It's a totally normal intersection with nothing
abnormal happening. So why did the Tesla screw up on
a normal intersection? That's a question for the Tesla
engineers, and this is going to be a question of how quickly
Tesla can fix these issues, how much their future updates can
address them to make them so they don't happen at greater
scale. The Tesla engineers are going to
need to address these specific situations, make sure these type
of errors don't happen in the future because they'll run into
more and more of these type of edge cases or wacky behavior as
they scale up their vehicle fleet.
Bigger fleets, more cars mean more chances of crazy things
happening. Now, overall, all things
considered, the good and the bad, the way that this was
conducted, I consider this a successful launch of the
robotaxi network. I think Tesla, even in this very
controlled environment with safety monitors, with a very
small Geo fenced area, all of this doesn't really matter.
The big thing that Tesla had to prove to investors is that it's
making real steps, real definitive steps towards getting
the robo taxi launched. And they did that this weekend.
So you can grapple with the specifics of it.
It's on a very small scale. They're charging $4.20 a ride.
They have mostly influencers there with people in the
passenger seat. There's a lot of caveats, but
Even so, Tesla is moving in the right direction and I believe
investors should look at this event as a bullish iterate of
development in the company. Tesla still has a lot to prove.
Scaling from 10 vehicles to hundreds of vehicles introduces
lots of opportunities for edge cases and weirder things to
happen, things that Waymo has been dealing with for years.
So there's still a lot to be said for the future, but as of
right now, I believe that this is an incrementally bullish move
for Tesla. So it makes sense that the stock
is up today, that investors are more bullish on it, and I think
that this move is deserved. If I was a Tesla investor
waiting for four years for this company to release the robotaxi
network, even with the small caveats, I would still be happy
about this change. One company that this leaves in
the more question, I believe, is Uber.
The only real reason that I haven't bought Uber stock is my
concern over autonomous vehicle technology.
Not just Tesla, but with Waymo, these companies are proving that
this technology works, that it can work, that it can scale, and
that it can take market share. Now, Waymo is far ahead of Tesla
at this point, but Tesla could iteratively expand to more
cities and saturate more territory.
Some of the uncertainty with Uber's future is already priced
into the company with a lower multiple and a lower valuation,
and I share those concerns. I think the market that Uber
controls basically all by itself right now is going to be
challenged by this new technology over the upcoming
decade, but we'll have to wait further to see how all this pans
out. Now moving on, we get to this
news story, which is a follow up of a new story, which Sam Altman
said that Meta is offering some of Sam Altmann best employees
$100 million signing bonuses on top of $100 million salaries.
So just massive amounts of money.
Altman said that so far their top talent hasn't decided to go
with it. That's all we knew back then.
And maybe Sam Altman was exaggerating.
Maybe he was a little bit overstating it.
Well, that's not the case. We have further details on this
that it goes even deeper than you would expect.
The smartest AI researchers and engineers have spent the past
few months getting hit up by one of the richest men in the world.
Mark Zuckerberg is spending his days firing off emails and
WhatsApp messages to the sharpest minds in artificial
intelligence. In a frenzied effort to play
catch up, he has personally reached out.
So not members of his team, not his recruiting staff or HR.
He has personally reached out to hundreds of researchers,
scientists, infrastructure engineers, product stars and
entrepreneurs to try to get them to join a new super intelligent
lab. He's putting together.
Some of the people who received the messages were so surprised
that they didn't believe it was actually really Zuckerberg.
One person assumed it was a hoax and didn't respond for several
days. Now that does have to be very
odd to be one of these AI researchers and have randomly a
celebrity status CEO like Mark Zuckerberg message you on
WhatsApp or send you a quick message saying, hey, what's up?
I want you to join this secret lab of super intelligent people
building all this crazy stuff in the future, and I'll give you
generational wealth in the process.
So I think it's understandable that people didn't necessarily
believe it was really him to begin with.
So that's really what Mark Zuckerberg has been doing.
He's also, if he can't just buy the employees, he's wanting to
indirectly buy the employees by buying the companies they work
at. At least in one case, he
discussed buying a startup outright just to get the talent
within it. While the financial incentives
have been mouth watering, some potential candidates have been
hesitant to join Meta Platform's efforts because the challenges
that it faces in AI, Meta is behind.
So even though these people are getting these crazy offers, they
do want to align themselves with the company that will ultimately
win an AI. Meta struggled to develop
cutting edge artificial intelligence technology reached
ahead in April when critics accuse the company of gaming the
leaderboard to make a recently released AI model look better
than it was. They also delayed the unveiling
of a new flagship AI model, raising questions about the
company's ability to continue advancing quickly in an industry
wide AI arms race. Zuckerberg is reportedly furious
that Meta is falling behind an AI.
And now he's on this rampage of trying to buy his way brute
force to getting the town necessary.
Zuckerberg also held discussions with Perplexity and offered to
buy the AI search startup, according to people familiar
with the matter. We have the $100 million pay
packages that he's offering to multiple people.
And of course, he paid the 14 billion for the AI startup
scale. Now, you can say that this leads
to bad culture, but I don't believe that's the correct take
care. What I see is a person that will
stop at nothing to win the AI race.
He will literally pay any price. He will personally recruit any
talent. And in terms of the tactics of
whether or not this will work or not, he may not be able to get
every employee he wants. There are some that will be
comfortable where they're currently at, but I believe
overall it'll work. Zuckerberg is going to
accumulate a lot of talent with the approach he's taking.
Now we also have news that the stock HIMS and Hers is down 32%
today. Even for hims and hers, this is
a relatively big drop and the reason why is a rather big
reason. Novo Nordisk reportedly
terminated its collaboration with the company.
This is a partner of Hymns and Hers, a company that they're
working with, and not only have they terminated their agreement,
but they've made a lot of accusations for Hymns and Hers.
For example, they say in their release that Hymns and Hers has
failed to adhere to the law which prohibits mass sales of
compounded drugs under the false guise of personalization and are
disseminating deceptive marketing that puts patient
safety at risk. They say that we will work with
telehealth companies to provide direct access to a Govi that
share our commitment to patient safety and when companies engage
in a legal sham compounding that jeopardizes the health of
Americans, we will continue to take action.
The quote semi glutide active pharmaceutical ingredients that
are in the knock off drugs sold by telehealth entities and
compounding pharmacies are manufactured by foreign
suppliers in China. So they say that they're putting
customers safety at risk, that they're an illegal sham and that
their compounded drugs are made in pharmacies in China.
Now for investors in this company, this shouldn't be a
huge shock. His and hers is in an industry
that's highly litigious. These type of legal problems and
disagreements happen all the time in the Pharmaceutical
industry. They also happen more frequently
in industries that HIMS and HERS compete in newer verticals of
pharmaceuticals like telehealth. In terms of risk factors for a
company, there's few that have more lawsuit risk than HIMS and
HERS, so investors in it are going to see this type of
volatility overtime. Now finally, we get to news that
Amazon has launched a second batch of Kuiper Internet
satellites. This is a portion of Amazon's
business that if you're not paying attention to, you may
forget that they actually have. Amazon has so many good
businesses that Project Kuiper, this satellite business is kind
of on the back burners. It's one of these things that
investors don't really mention all that often, but could end up
being incredibly valuable. And the Project Kuyper business
is growing. It's taking bigger and bigger
steps to get to real profitability.
Now they're using different partners to launch these
satellites into the air. They say that this one was
launched using Alliance rockets and it carried 27 Kuyper
satellites. They say that they're continuing
this new chapter in low Earth orbit satellite connectivity.
Now to compare this to Starlink. Starlink currently has around
8000 satellites orbiting the earth.
Starlink of course has those nice little dishes you hook up
to. You have Internet access
basically anywhere in the world. I have two Starlinks at home.
I have the Starlink 3 and the Starlink mini and they are
amazing product. Anytime I plug them in and point
them at the sky, I have high speed Internet within 5 minutes.
So this is an incredible product that has enormous applications.
Amazon is basically copying the playbook, trying to get up
enough Kuiper satellites to be able to offer Internet
capabilities. I think this is actually a
really big deal and I'm glad that this is included in the
Amazon bucket and not as a separate private company.
I'm sure that Tesla investors would like to have Starlink as
part of the company. I think if you put a poll, most
of them would want that. In the case of Amazon, you're
getting the early starting of a Starlink like company, but it is
part of Amazon now. It's gonna be for this episode.
Hope you enjoyed seeing the next one.