1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,680
Welcome back everyone. 
We've had some big news over the

2
00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:05,120
past couple of days. 
We've had two companies really 

3
00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:07,480
talk about different 
developments they're doing with 

4
00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:09,480
AI. 
The first one is Open AI. 

5
00:00:09,480 --> 00:00:13,080
Open AI scheduled for their 
developer conference to be one 

6
00:00:13,080 --> 00:00:15,880
day in advance of Google's and 
they showed off their 

7
00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:18,320
capabilities. 
And of course, the very next day

8
00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:20,000
we had Google's developer 
conference. 

9
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:23,120
That was yesterday where they 
showed off their capabilities 

10
00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:25,600
and of course these two 
companies are going back and 

11
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:28,720
forth. 
It's the battle over AI over 

12
00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:32,960
ChatGPT and Gemini over 
artificial assistance. 

13
00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:36,080
Now what I want to do in this 
episode is go over a little 

14
00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,000
highlight of both of them and 
kind of compare and contrast. 

15
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,320
We have two different companies 
here taking two different 

16
00:00:41,320 --> 00:00:44,160
approaches, but they're really 
competing over the same thing. 

17
00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:46,920
We'll go over who's actually 
winning in the Say I race. 

18
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:49,600
Now, of course, we also have a 
lot of other news to get to. 

19
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:54,600
The former SEC chair Jay Clayton
Win on a CNBC, and he expressed 

20
00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:57,920
his disappointment and 
frustration over the meme stock 

21
00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:00,400
craze. 
We have news that Walmart is on 

22
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,960
track of being taken over as the
largest retailer by Amazon. 

23
00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,000
We also have a report that 
Amazon is pushing further and 

24
00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:10,720
further into traditional media, 
taking advertiser dollars from 

25
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,360
cable TV. 
Another headline is that Netflix

26
00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:15,520
is officially streaming live 
sports. 

27
00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:17,960
They've entered into this 
category from their own blog 

28
00:01:17,960 --> 00:01:19,360
posts. 
They say Netflix will be the 

29
00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:22,440
home of live NFL games this 
Christmas Day. 

30
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:25,760
And then finally, does Polet 
give you 2 small serving sizes? 

31
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:29,000
Well, there is currently an 
online trend of very frustrated 

32
00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:32,200
people that aren't getting big 
enough burrito bowls and they're

33
00:01:32,200 --> 00:01:33,880
taking their frustration to 
TikTok. 

34
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:36,720
They're actually calling for 
boycotts on the company. 

35
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:39,200
We'll be discussing this and of 
course much more. 

36
00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:41,720
Now, as I'm sure most of you 
have observed, there's major 

37
00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:44,400
themes that drive the market 
over time, things that people 

38
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,480
want to invest in because it's 
the new driving, innovative 

39
00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:49,960
force in the market this time 
period. 

40
00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:52,120
That theme is artificial 
intelligence. 

41
00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:55,320
We know that it's a buzz term. 
Some companies try to put 

42
00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:57,800
themselves in the artificial 
intelligence bucket when they're

43
00:01:57,800 --> 00:01:59,920
really not. 
But it is a major thing. 

44
00:01:59,920 --> 00:02:01,840
And artificial intelligence is 
real. 

45
00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:03,560
It's present. 
It's actually generating 

46
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:05,560
revenue. 
That's how you tell something's 

47
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:08,759
actually a real product when 
it's generating sales and 

48
00:02:08,759 --> 00:02:10,960
profits. 
And artificial intelligence is 

49
00:02:10,960 --> 00:02:13,720
far past that point. 
We know from companies like 

50
00:02:13,720 --> 00:02:16,920
NVIDIA that there is massive 
demand for AI. 

51
00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:21,440
Now, I'm invested in a couple 
companies that have a lot to do 

52
00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:24,240
with artificial intelligence. 
In my main portfolio, the 

53
00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:27,760
passive income portfolio. 
I'm invested in tech companies 

54
00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:31,160
like Salesforce, which is a big 
AI company. 

55
00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:34,320
They have AI interwoven into 
everything they do, but I'm also

56
00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:37,720
invested into Microsoft. 
Microsoft has a partnership with

57
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,440
Open AI. 
They're a major investor in Open

58
00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:42,960
AI. 
They allow Open AI to train on 

59
00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:45,320
their Azure cloud. 
So they're also giving 

60
00:02:45,320 --> 00:02:47,640
infrastructure and support to 
Open AI. 

61
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,320
So I'm invested in Microsoft, 
still very bullish on the 

62
00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,320
company and all these other 
companies that are big players 

63
00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:55,960
in AI. 
Again, Salesforce is 1, but you 

64
00:02:55,960 --> 00:02:59,080
also have Apple that may be 
partnering with Open AI to 

65
00:02:59,080 --> 00:03:02,760
integrate it into their devices.
In my financial category, if you

66
00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:06,160
listen to the earnings call of 
every one of these companies, 

67
00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:09,600
S&P Global is a big data company
and they talk at length of 

68
00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:12,560
artificial intelligence into 
it's a tech company that builds 

69
00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:15,680
upon artificial intelligence. 
So all of these companies are 

70
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:19,400
trying to move into AI as fast 
as they can, but one of the 

71
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,480
companies that's had the biggest
head start, the biggest lead and

72
00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:24,800
some of the biggest talent is 
Google. 

73
00:03:25,080 --> 00:03:27,480
They're a company that I'm 
invested in, in my secondary 

74
00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,640
portfolio called the Story Fund.
I track both of these publicly 

75
00:03:30,640 --> 00:03:33,120
every single week. 
Now in the Story Fund, I have 

76
00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:35,240
Google as the third largest 
position. 

77
00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:38,000
I invest in this company 
primarily because of Google 

78
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,880
Cloud, but I also like their 
core business, Google Search. 

79
00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:43,560
I don't think their market 
shares being eroded, but I also 

80
00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:45,880
believe that Google's one of the
biggest competitors in the 

81
00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:48,040
forefront of AI. 
They've been working on this 

82
00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:50,760
stuff for years now. 
Out of this battle, you have all

83
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:53,560
the players, you have all the 
kind of secondary companies, you

84
00:03:53,560 --> 00:03:56,280
have the ones like this, sales 
forces and intuits that are 

85
00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:59,400
using AI, but they're not really
at the forefront of developing 

86
00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:00,840
it. 
And then you have the companies 

87
00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:05,320
really developing artificial 
intelligence that is Open AI and

88
00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:06,960
Google. 
These are two of the companies 

89
00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:08,680
that are at the very forefront 
of that. 

90
00:04:08,920 --> 00:04:11,360
And both of them just had their 
developer conference. 

91
00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:15,400
Let's start off by looking at an
example of Open AI demoing their

92
00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:17,440
artificial intelligence 
assistant. 

93
00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:19,240
And this is what they focused 
on. 

94
00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:22,120
An assistant that can really 
just help you do all these 

95
00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:26,320
tasks. 
Hello there, I'm here with my 

96
00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:30,920
son and I love you to tutor him 
on this math problem, but don't 

97
00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:33,120
give him the answer. 
You can ask questions and nudge 

98
00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:35,720
him in the right direction, but 
I really want to make sure he 

99
00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:38,440
understands it himself. 
And he's here in the room so you

100
00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:42,320
can talk to him directly. 
See the amount of context he 

101
00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:45,080
gave the artificial 
intelligence, explaining that 

102
00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:48,360
it's his son he wants not not 
just for you to give him the 

103
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:51,600
answer, but to help him learn. 
And he's in the room right now, 

104
00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:53,160
so you can speak directly to 
him. 

105
00:04:53,560 --> 00:04:56,640
A lot of context. 
And it's it's insane that this 

106
00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:59,840
artificial intelligence can take
in all of that context and use 

107
00:04:59,840 --> 00:05:02,000
all of it appropriately. 
And then you listen to the 

108
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:04,400
answer the opening eyes 
Assistant gives. 

109
00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,840
And it feels very human like, 
very, very human like. 

110
00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:13,400
Of course, I'd be happy to help.
Let's look at the problem 

111
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:18,160
together. 
Can you first identify which 

112
00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:22,400
sides of the triangle are the 
opposite, adjacent and 

113
00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:25,440
hypotenuse? 
Relative to angle alpha. 

114
00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:29,440
All right, so I'm pretty sure 
this is the angle alpha right 

115
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,720
here, right? 
Perfect, correct. 

116
00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:36,240
Now, looking at the triangle, 
which side do you think is the 

117
00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:40,360
hypotenuse? 
That's the basic example, and it

118
00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:43,400
it seems magical, just like Sam 
Altman described. 

119
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:45,600
It's kind of magical because it 
feels like there's a tutor 

120
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:49,680
sitting in the room with you, 
and this has huge implications. 

121
00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:51,760
It has, it has huge 
possibilities. 

122
00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:53,760
We already have a situation 
where there's not enough 

123
00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:56,800
teachers and there's more people
needing one-on-one tutoring, so 

124
00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:59,720
this could come in very handy. 
It wouldn't replace teachers, it

125
00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:03,120
would just help them do their 
job, help kids catch up, and it 

126
00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:05,520
would help kids accelerate that 
are exceptionally smart. 

127
00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:08,200
So obviously there's a mass 
amount of opportunities, and 

128
00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:10,280
this is basically what Open AI 
demoed. 

129
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:13,120
They demoed the strength of 
their artificial intelligence 

130
00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:14,800
assistant. 
It did a lot of other things, 

131
00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:17,960
like live language translation. 
You could talk in one language, 

132
00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:20,200
it would spit it out in a 
different language in a live 

133
00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:23,040
conversation. 
It did things like photo 

134
00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:25,160
recognition. 
It would show you that it 

135
00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:27,480
recognizes your surroundings and
it would talk to you. 

136
00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:32,680
And overall, the entire demo 
from Open AI felt a lot like one

137
00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:36,200
particular movie. 
It felt like her the movie with 

138
00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:38,880
Joaquin Phoenix where he falls 
in love with an operating 

139
00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,560
system. 
It really felt a lot like that 

140
00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:43,640
movie. 
But overall, Opening Eyes demo 

141
00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:45,600
was live. 
It was incredibly impressive and

142
00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:48,160
it was focused specifically on 
artificial intelligence 

143
00:06:48,280 --> 00:06:51,760
assistance, like having a very 
smart secretary, someone that 

144
00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:54,440
really knows a lot about 
everything, follow you along 

145
00:06:54,440 --> 00:06:56,640
throughout the day and converse 
with you and answer your 

146
00:06:56,640 --> 00:06:59,400
questions. 
It's almost like having a super 

147
00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:03,120
advanced Siri that just is with 
you in your pocket and will 

148
00:07:03,120 --> 00:07:06,480
answer any question you want. 
That was opening Eyes, major 

149
00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:09,320
selling point in this demo, and 
they're pushing a lot of these 

150
00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:12,560
updates out right now. 
Now, if we contrast that with 

151
00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:16,200
what Google did, they took a 
different approach in Google's 

152
00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:18,880
developer conference. 
They showed off a lot wider 

153
00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:21,160
breadth of capability. 
Let's go ahead and just take a 

154
00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:23,680
look at some of the highlights. 
The first thing they showed off 

155
00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:26,960
is an advanced photo search. 
It knows the cars that appear 

156
00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:31,080
often, it triangulates which one
is yours and just tells you the 

157
00:07:31,080 --> 00:07:34,320
license plate number. 
You can even follow up with 

158
00:07:34,320 --> 00:07:38,320
something more complex. 
Show me how Lusia's swimming has

159
00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:40,320
progressed. 
Here. 

160
00:07:40,760 --> 00:07:44,680
Gemini goes beyond a simple 
search, recognizing different 

161
00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:48,560
contexts from doing laps in the 
pool, the snorkeling in the 

162
00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:51,200
ocean. 
Google's leveraging their Google

163
00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:54,680
Photos integration with Gemini 
so that it can give you further 

164
00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:57,880
context into your photo history,
something that Open AI can't do 

165
00:07:57,880 --> 00:07:59,600
because they don't have a 
million photos of you. 

166
00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:03,200
Google was also very quick to 
demonstrate their infrastructure

167
00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:06,800
advantage, how they're not just 
an AI company, but they have 

168
00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:08,640
everything vertically 
integrated. 

169
00:08:08,880 --> 00:08:12,200
They have the AI software on top
of the huge infrastructure to 

170
00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:15,280
power it. 
So today we are expanding the 

171
00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:18,200
context window with two million 
tokens. 

172
00:08:19,880 --> 00:08:23,200
This represents the next step on
our journey towards the ultimate

173
00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:26,440
goal of infinite context. 
They show how it's not just a 

174
00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:29,080
thing on your phone that you aim
at different things to try to 

175
00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:32,400
ask questions, but since they 
have such a huge breadth of 

176
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,240
different software and services,
they have the advantage of 

177
00:08:35,240 --> 00:08:38,880
putting Gemini into all of this,
like Gmail for example. 

178
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:42,600
Is an hour long. 
If it's from Google meet, you 

179
00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:44,840
can ask Gemini to give you the 
highlights. 

180
00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,120
There's a parents group looking 
for volunteers. 

181
00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:51,320
You're free that day. 
Of course, Gemini can draft a 

182
00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:53,400
reply. 
They also went on and showed off

183
00:08:53,400 --> 00:08:57,280
something called Notebook LM. 
So this is a new thing from 

184
00:08:57,280 --> 00:09:00,320
Google where it it looks like a 
notebook where you can have 

185
00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:03,960
conversations, but it actually 
takes notes from meetings and 

186
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,760
different notes on different 
subjects and it has an AI 

187
00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:10,440
conversation with it and you can
actually interject with this AI 

188
00:09:10,440 --> 00:09:13,520
conversation. 
He also gives the example of 

189
00:09:13,520 --> 00:09:17,400
teaching something to his son. 
And what's amazing is that my 

190
00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:21,640
son and I can join into the 
conversation and steer it 

191
00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:25,720
whichever direction we want when
I tap join. 

192
00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:28,400
Hold on, we have a question. 
What's up, Josh? 

193
00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:31,920
Yeah. 
Can you give my son Jimmy a 

194
00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:33,440
basketball example? 
Hey. 

195
00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:41,840
Jimmy, that's a fantastic idea. 
Basketball is actually a great 

196
00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:43,760
way to visualize force and 
motion. 

197
00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:46,360
Let's break it down. 
OK, so first imagine a 

198
00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:48,080
basketball just sitting there 
on. 

199
00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:53,000
Both of those voices, both the 
male and female voice, are AI. 

200
00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:55,320
They sound so realistic, just 
like Open AI. 

201
00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:58,520
They sound really good, but 
they're both AI voices now. 

202
00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:01,520
They also showed off the lens 
where you can look through on 

203
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:04,360
your video camera. 
Similar to Open AI, it'll give 

204
00:10:04,360 --> 00:10:06,040
you context about what you're 
looking at. 

205
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:08,960
It obviously understands on the 
fly everything that you're 

206
00:10:08,960 --> 00:10:11,440
pointing the camera AT and it 
will talk with you and explain 

207
00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:14,320
what it is. 
When I I was watching this, I 

208
00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:16,320
thought that Open AI is a little
bit better. 

209
00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:18,520
Honestly, it sounded a little 
bit more fluid, but it's 

210
00:10:18,520 --> 00:10:21,040
basically the same idea. 
Both Google and Open AI are 

211
00:10:21,040 --> 00:10:22,520
trying to do the same thing 
here. 

212
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:25,040
Google also showed off that they
have this in glasses form. 

213
00:10:25,040 --> 00:10:27,880
So she's wearing glasses now 
with a camera and it's giving 

214
00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:29,720
her context. 
Google went over the 

215
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:32,880
advancements in their photo 
generative tools like Imagine 3.

216
00:10:33,680 --> 00:10:37,120
Today I'm so excited to 
introduce Imagine 3. 

217
00:10:37,560 --> 00:10:39,200
Imagine Three is more photo 
realistic. 

218
00:10:39,440 --> 00:10:41,760
You can literally count the 
whiskers on its snout with 

219
00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:45,080
richer details like this 
incredible sunlight in the shot 

220
00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:48,000
and fewer visual artifacts or 
distorted images. 

221
00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:51,040
They also shifted over. 
From images to music with a 

222
00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:54,600
music AI sandbox. 
A suite of professional music AI

223
00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:57,320
tools that can create new 
instrumental sections from 

224
00:10:57,320 --> 00:11:00,080
scratch. 
Transfer styles between tracks. 

225
00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:03,960
They talked about VO, the new 
generative video tool where it 

226
00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:07,520
can take text prompts like a 
fast racing car, and it makes 

227
00:11:07,520 --> 00:11:10,000
videos from it. 
Now they say that you can extend

228
00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,720
the amount of time you can 
change the context, and it's in 

229
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:16,840
1080, so the actual resolution 
is pretty high for generative 

230
00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:18,560
video. 
The thing that impressed me the 

231
00:11:18,560 --> 00:11:22,000
most about Google's capabilities
was not how good it was at one 

232
00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:25,120
particular thing, but how many 
things they're working on at 

233
00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:27,080
once. 
That was the overall feeling I 

234
00:11:27,080 --> 00:11:29,680
got from it. 
With Open AI, you had a super 

235
00:11:29,680 --> 00:11:33,760
well polished tool that was 
really good at like one thing, 

236
00:11:33,920 --> 00:11:36,480
which is being an artificial 
intelligence assistance. 

237
00:11:36,880 --> 00:11:39,160
Now I think that's a good 
strategy from Open AI because 

238
00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:41,080
that's a very good thing to be 
good at. 

239
00:11:41,320 --> 00:11:43,880
So they're going in a good 
direction trying to specialize 

240
00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:45,880
in this artificial intelligence 
assistance. 

241
00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:48,840
But I compare it to what 
Google's doing and they're just 

242
00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:51,800
taking different approaches. 
Google's breadth of things 

243
00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:53,920
they're working on is so much 
wider. 

244
00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:57,600
They're auto answering emails, 
auto returning products, they're

245
00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:00,600
generating different videos. 
They also have the artificial 

246
00:12:00,600 --> 00:12:03,360
intelligence assistance and then
it continues on. 

247
00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:06,000
They're wrapping AI into their 
search engine. 

248
00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:08,800
The advancements in their search
engine are what I believe are 

249
00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:10,440
the most important part of this 
meeting. 

250
00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:14,240
Find the best yoga or Pilates 
studios in Boston and show you 

251
00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:17,400
details on their intro offers 
and The Walking time from Beacon

252
00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:19,960
Hill. 
You get some studios with great 

253
00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:23,200
ratings and their introductory 
offers and you can see the 

254
00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:26,920
distance for each like this one.
It's just a 10 minute walk away.

255
00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:30,000
This is like Google. 
Search on Hyperdrive Google 

256
00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:32,600
search where you can add in a 
ton of different contexts and 

257
00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:35,840
you can make really elaborate 
questions and it will understand

258
00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:38,800
the advanced context. 
Think of more examples of this 

259
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:42,440
advanced Google search where you
can ask it to create meal plans 

260
00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:44,440
or trip plans and it does it for
you. 

261
00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:48,240
And you can export your meal 
plan or get the ingredients as a

262
00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:49,880
list. 
There's been a lot of chatter 

263
00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:54,600
about LLM's like proximity or 
ChatGPT taking market share from

264
00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:56,960
Google search, and I just don't 
see that happening. 

265
00:12:57,280 --> 00:13:00,160
Especially with this advanced 
Google search that interwees 

266
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:03,040
Google search with artificial 
intelligence giving it these 

267
00:13:03,040 --> 00:13:05,440
advanced capabilities. 
I think it's now becoming even 

268
00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:07,880
less likely that Google search 
loses market share. 

269
00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:10,840
Google continues to add on all 
these little AI advancements to 

270
00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:13,560
Gmail, which are things that 
they couldn't do without these 

271
00:13:13,560 --> 00:13:15,680
investments in AI and their 
infrastructure. 

272
00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:18,480
And again, no one else can 
replicate this because no one 

273
00:13:18,480 --> 00:13:20,720
else has Gmail. 
It's just Google that owns these

274
00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:23,840
properties. 
Gemini now has an advanced trip 

275
00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:25,760
planning tool. 
Or if you're focusing on a 

276
00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:29,360
vacation or traveling somewhere,
you can lay out exactly where 

277
00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,920
you're going, how long, the type
of money you want to spend on 

278
00:13:32,920 --> 00:13:36,520
this trip, and it will give you 
an entire itinerary tailored to 

279
00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:38,000
the exact thing you're typing 
in. 

280
00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:40,360
In some ways, it looks like 
Google's actually expanding 

281
00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:42,680
their lead in search and 
information. 

282
00:13:42,800 --> 00:13:45,400
They're not losing it. 
And this conference continued on

283
00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,800
with more examples of AI being 
used with different applications

284
00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:51,560
in different contexts. 
And I believe that's the biggest

285
00:13:51,560 --> 00:13:53,840
differentiator between Open AI 
and Google. 

286
00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:57,280
Open AI is a very highly 
polished artificial intelligence

287
00:13:57,560 --> 00:14:01,160
used for very specific reasons. 
Google is a massive 

288
00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:03,720
infrastructure company with 
massive amounts of different 

289
00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:06,560
properties and context to wrap 
their AI into. 

290
00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:08,880
So when we look at these two 
companies next to each other, 

291
00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:12,480
Google's narrowing the gap with 
its AI capabilities, but it also

292
00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:14,640
has this massive infrastructure 
advantage. 

293
00:14:14,880 --> 00:14:18,160
Open AI is going to have to 
partner with bigger companies to

294
00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:19,800
continue to develop like they 
are. 

295
00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:22,520
So I look at them in different 
categories and as far as I'm 

296
00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:25,760
concerned, when I look at Google
and my investment in the 

297
00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:28,840
company, I currently have a 
$41,000 position. 

298
00:14:29,480 --> 00:14:32,440
This has been a company that 
I've owned for some time, and as

299
00:14:32,440 --> 00:14:35,680
of right now I really just have 
no concerns owning them. 

300
00:14:35,880 --> 00:14:38,280
As far as we can see right now, 
Google's still on track. 

301
00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:41,440
Now moving on, we get to the 
continued news developing of 

302
00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:43,760
GameStop. 
We know that Roaring Kitty made 

303
00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:48,320
his epic return by tweeting an 
ominous meme of a gamer leaning 

304
00:14:48,320 --> 00:14:51,200
forward in his chair, even 
though it didn't even reference 

305
00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:52,760
GameStop it. 
Caused the stock. 

306
00:14:52,760 --> 00:14:56,440
To immediately go up 100% as 
many people got excited that it 

307
00:14:56,440 --> 00:14:59,280
was the first time that Keith 
Gill or Roaring Kitty had 

308
00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:02,360
tweeted in over three years. 
Now, if we look at GameStop 

309
00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:05,400
today, of course like you would 
expect, it's a bit of a roller 

310
00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:08,440
coaster. 
The stock is down 32% on the day

311
00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:12,720
after going up like 120%. 
And then it's having its ups and

312
00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:15,920
downs during the day. 
You have day traders, meme 

313
00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:18,440
stirs. 
People like Dave Portnoy betting

314
00:15:18,440 --> 00:15:21,800
on the stock using leverage and 
options, and they're trying to 

315
00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:24,080
get ahead of it, trying to get 
out of it. 

316
00:15:24,280 --> 00:15:27,560
The stock has been halted 
repeatedly over and over again 

317
00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:31,720
by the SEC, and as always, this 
draws a lot of media attention, 

318
00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:33,320
a lot of highlights, a lot of 
headlines. 

319
00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:37,600
And we have here the SEC chair, 
or at least the former SEC 

320
00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:41,600
chair, making an appearance on 
CNBC to show his disdain of 

321
00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:43,760
what's going on. 
Let's go ahead and listen to 

322
00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:45,720
some of this. 
It bothers me. 

323
00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:50,320
It bothers me on on many levels.
I I think your last guess got it

324
00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:52,720
right. 
It's it's a lot closer to 

325
00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:55,440
gambling than it is to trading, 
and it's certainly not 

326
00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:59,480
investing. 
And you know, is a is a tweet 

327
00:15:59,880 --> 00:16:04,480
really investment advice? 
The first thing he says out of 

328
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,080
out of the gate, the first thing
he says in this interview, it 

329
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:09,680
bothers me. 
It it bothers. 

330
00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:12,160
It bothers him. 
People are are doing these 

331
00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:14,240
things trading. 
They're they're gambling. 

332
00:16:14,520 --> 00:16:17,440
How dare that happen in his 
stock market? 

333
00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:21,800
How, how dare people gamble and 
do dumb things in my stock 

334
00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,280
market bothersome. 
Let's go ahead and listen in on 

335
00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:29,200
why it bothers him so much. 
I think we've learned over the 

336
00:16:29,200 --> 00:16:33,320
last five, 6-7 years that a 
tweet is really never investment

337
00:16:33,320 --> 00:16:35,000
advice it. 
Never even mentions that the 

338
00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:36,720
companies involved. 
I mean, that's what's so 

339
00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:40,960
phenomenal to see massive moves 
like this, when really it was 

340
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,240
just the implication that he may
be setting up and taking notice.

341
00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:46,640
That's the tweet we're talking. 
About yeah and and we can, we 

342
00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:48,840
can debate. 
That is exactly what Roaring 

343
00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:52,680
Kitty tweeted. 
A picture a a pen drawing 

344
00:16:52,680 --> 00:16:55,640
picture of a gamer leaning 
forward in a chair. 

345
00:16:56,200 --> 00:17:00,400
And that's what bothers the SEC 
the the former SEC chair is 

346
00:17:00,400 --> 00:17:03,280
roaring Kitty having this type 
of power that he can tweet one 

347
00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:06,480
meme and it will cause a a 
random stock, at least not 

348
00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:09,839
random, but one associated with 
him to go up 100%. 

349
00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:14,960
They whether that's, you know, 
let's put it this way, whether 

350
00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:17,960
it's legal or illegal or it's 
manipulation or not. 

351
00:17:18,119 --> 00:17:21,960
But I have a question for Keith 
Gill, which is why not tell 

352
00:17:21,960 --> 00:17:25,839
people why you did, why not come
on the show and say, are you 

353
00:17:25,839 --> 00:17:28,600
saying that that that GameStop 
is now a good investment 

354
00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:32,760
opportunity? 
I think here we we just have 

355
00:17:32,760 --> 00:17:36,800
another illustration of how 
incredibly detached and out of 

356
00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:39,880
touch the SEC is with regular 
investors. 

357
00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:44,960
He acts like Keith Gill 
committed some crime by tweeting

358
00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:48,480
out a picture of a meme that 
literally has nothing to do with

359
00:17:48,480 --> 00:17:50,520
the stock. 
Didn't mention it, didn't have 

360
00:17:50,520 --> 00:17:53,160
any hidden meaning. 
There's no call to action of any

361
00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:54,880
kind. 
He just tweeted. 

362
00:17:55,400 --> 00:17:59,280
And the former SEC chair is 
bothered by his tweet, by one 

363
00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:03,080
person tweeting a meme and he's 
calling on him like like he has 

364
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:06,000
some type of power come to me, 
appear to me in front of my 

365
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:10,920
congressional committee here on 
CNBC as if CNBC is the authority

366
00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:14,320
leader in the stock market and 
anybody that has any type of 

367
00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:18,080
influence has to come on a CNBC.
You just see the level of 

368
00:18:18,080 --> 00:18:21,520
detachment, how how out of touch
these SEC members are. 

369
00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:26,280
What did he actually do here? 
You notice that Jay Clayton here

370
00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:30,160
says we can have this debate 
over what's legal and illegal, 

371
00:18:30,560 --> 00:18:32,120
but why don't we just have him 
on? 

372
00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:34,520
No, why don't you just say it, 
Jay? 

373
00:18:34,800 --> 00:18:37,800
Nothing he did was illegal. 
It wasn't illegal. 

374
00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:39,680
That's why you don't want to 
have the debate, because the 

375
00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:42,520
debate would be this quick. 
Was it illegal? 

376
00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:44,840
No, it wasn't. 
What he did was completely 

377
00:18:44,840 --> 00:18:47,040
legal, and that's why you don't 
want to talk about it. 

378
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:50,480
Did he do something illegal, 
Tweeting out a picture of 

379
00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:52,000
someone leaning for it in a 
chair? 

380
00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:55,640
That's not even a debate, Jay. 
There's nothing even remotely 

381
00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:58,200
close to illegal there, he 
continues on with this 

382
00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:00,920
interview. 
We don't know. 

383
00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:05,520
What we know is that triggered 
what I would say is euphoric and

384
00:19:05,520 --> 00:19:08,760
speculative buying among the 
retail community, which is never

385
00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:11,480
a great thing. 
So this was a really interesting

386
00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:14,200
proposition put up by Matt 
Levine from Bloomberg yesterday.

387
00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:18,600
Just what about the idea if 
Keith Gill, Warren Kitty, who 

388
00:19:18,600 --> 00:19:21,320
tweeted this, were to have gone 
on and bought options ahead of 

389
00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:24,560
time, tweeted this and then made
a lot of money based on 

390
00:19:24,560 --> 00:19:27,520
everybody going into this and 
the price going up, is that 

391
00:19:27,520 --> 00:19:29,560
illegal? 
Now the question being posed 

392
00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:32,080
here. 
Is if Keith Gill, Roaring Kitty 

393
00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:34,720
went on to his brokerage and 
bought call options before 

394
00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:38,000
tweeting, knowing that the tweet
would cause the stock to go up, 

395
00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:42,480
would that be illegal? 
So we have Keith Gill buying a 

396
00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:44,840
stock ahead of time before 
releasing it publicly. 

397
00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:46,640
And this is hypothetical. 
We don't even know if he 

398
00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:48,960
actually did this. 
But just assuming he did, 

399
00:19:49,120 --> 00:19:52,760
assuming he did buy the stock 
hypothetically, and then it 

400
00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:55,160
caused the stock to go up when 
he tweeted, would that be 

401
00:19:55,160 --> 00:19:57,360
illegal? 
That is exactly what Warren 

402
00:19:57,360 --> 00:19:59,000
Buffett has done his entire 
career. 

403
00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:03,160
He secretly buys stocks without 
anyone knowing, and then once 

404
00:20:03,160 --> 00:20:06,080
it's released that he bought 
into the stock, it causes the 

405
00:20:06,080 --> 00:20:07,920
stock to go up by billions of 
dollars. 

406
00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:11,760
They're posing questions to a 
retail investor that they don't 

407
00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:13,800
post a billion dollar hedge 
funds and people like Warren 

408
00:20:13,800 --> 00:20:15,480
Buffett. 
In fact, Warren Buffett got 

409
00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:19,040
special approval to hide one of 
his purchases for eight months 

410
00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:21,720
now because he's still 
accumulating shares and he 

411
00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:24,080
doesn't want the knowledge of 
him buying it to cause a stock 

412
00:20:24,080 --> 00:20:26,000
to go up. 
He wants to have his entire 

413
00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:29,640
position already purchased. 
Before anyone else finds out 

414
00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:32,320
about it, because he knows when 
other people find out about it, 

415
00:20:32,320 --> 00:20:35,280
the stock will go up. 
So again, you have this type of 

416
00:20:35,280 --> 00:20:38,520
dichotomy. 
You have this unfair biased look

417
00:20:38,520 --> 00:20:41,520
where the SEC looks with far 
greater scrutiny on retail 

418
00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:43,160
investors. 
Then they do some of the biggest

419
00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:45,200
hedge funds in the. 
World, when it should be the 

420
00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:47,240
complete opposite. 
They should look with far 

421
00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:50,320
greater scrutiny on bigger hedge
funds than they do with people 

422
00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:52,600
like Keith Gill. 
And we have his answer here. 

423
00:20:52,600 --> 00:20:55,720
It's not insider trading that's 
that's that's clear unless he 

424
00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:57,680
and he's trading on his own 
information. 

425
00:20:57,680 --> 00:20:59,520
That's why it's not an insider 
trading. 

426
00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:02,480
But is this, is this something 
that we should be tolerating in 

427
00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:05,200
our markets? 
He goes on to acknowledge right 

428
00:21:05,200 --> 00:21:07,600
away that there's nothing 
illegal about it. 

429
00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:11,160
So technically, if we're 
enforcing the law like we're 

430
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:14,720
supposed to do as the SEC, we're
supposed to enforce the laws on 

431
00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:16,440
the book. 
Well, there's nothing actually 

432
00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:19,040
illegal about it. 
But should we tolerate it? 

433
00:21:19,320 --> 00:21:21,840
Should we have this type of 
action in our market? 

434
00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:26,160
This should be frowned upon. 
I find this type of Country Club

435
00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:29,560
attitude that the SEC has on 
these topics very amusing. 

436
00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:33,320
They act like they have disdain 
for poor investors that are 

437
00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:36,360
going into a meme stock. 
Should we tolerate this type of 

438
00:21:36,360 --> 00:21:38,840
behavior? 
Well, forget all the rich people

439
00:21:38,960 --> 00:21:41,520
that move stocks around like 
crazy and advertise their 

440
00:21:41,520 --> 00:21:44,800
positions like crazy, but this 
is what we should focus on. 

441
00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,960
This whole thing is just silly. 
Why is a former SEC member 

442
00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:51,160
coming on to CNBC and acting 
incredulous over a couple 

443
00:21:51,160 --> 00:21:55,440
investors doing legal things, 
doing things that he, by his own

444
00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:57,880
acknowledgement, say are 
completely legal? 

445
00:21:57,920 --> 00:22:00,200
He continues on with this, 
saying that this should be 

446
00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:03,280
looked at with greater scrutiny.
You know, whether it's legal or 

447
00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:06,160
legal, I don't think so. 
And that's why I say, why 

448
00:22:06,160 --> 00:22:07,960
doesn't it, you know? 
What does that mean not to 

449
00:22:07,960 --> 00:22:10,720
tolerate? 
So the idea I would think is you

450
00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:13,800
look at this more in the context
of market manipulation, right. 

451
00:22:13,840 --> 00:22:17,400
And the question is, are you 
allowed to manipulate the 

452
00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:19,520
market? 
People, by the way, publish 

453
00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:22,720
things all the time and they 
say, hey, I like this stock and 

454
00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:25,760
they, you know, hope that other 
folks follow them. 

455
00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:28,120
Is that market manipulation? 
Generally not. 

456
00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:29,800
Maybe, maybe, maybe not. 
So what? 

457
00:22:30,640 --> 00:22:35,640
So you have Andrew Sorkin here 
explaining the pure hypocrisy of

458
00:22:35,640 --> 00:22:39,520
this SEC former SEC member 
saying that many people come on 

459
00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:42,120
and they give their case for a 
stock and it causes in many 

460
00:22:42,120 --> 00:22:43,640
cases the stock to go up in 
price. 

461
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:46,720
Is that market manipulation? 
And he says right away, no, it's

462
00:22:46,720 --> 00:22:48,400
not. 
It's not most of the time, but 

463
00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:51,080
just with Keith Gill, just with 
these meme investors, that's 

464
00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:54,840
when we should look at it. 
Is the distinction in your mind 

465
00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:57,360
as somebody who ran this 
department and who's looking at 

466
00:22:57,480 --> 00:22:59,520
and cares about the integrity of
these markets? 

467
00:22:59,600 --> 00:23:01,480
Well, that's why. 
That's why I'm saying, OK, we 

468
00:23:01,480 --> 00:23:04,520
can we can discuss what are 
exactly the facts and 

469
00:23:04,520 --> 00:23:07,920
circumstances around the 
publication of this tweet and 

470
00:23:07,920 --> 00:23:10,880
the like. 
But in but in the meantime, if 

471
00:23:10,880 --> 00:23:13,520
you care about the markets and 
you care about investing, come 

472
00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:15,200
on this program. 
Tell people. 

473
00:23:15,240 --> 00:23:17,880
Tell people why you did this. 
From your lips, God bless you. 

474
00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:20,440
We hope he does. 
So this is a big problem, 

475
00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:23,600
according to the SEC chair, a 
problem that should be looked at

476
00:23:23,600 --> 00:23:26,240
because we want to protect the 
integrity of our markets. 

477
00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:29,680
Of course, with this problem, he
doesn't actually illustrate that

478
00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:31,800
there's any victims. 
No one's being victimized by 

479
00:23:31,800 --> 00:23:33,360
this. 
No one's being hurt by it. 

480
00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:36,840
You can invest in it and either 
gamble your money or not, just 

481
00:23:36,840 --> 00:23:39,800
like anyone else investing money
into highly speculative assets 

482
00:23:40,360 --> 00:23:43,720
so it doesn't affect anyone else
and there's no victims. 

483
00:23:43,920 --> 00:23:47,240
But for some reason this is a 
big problem, and it's only a 

484
00:23:47,240 --> 00:23:50,160
problem when small retail 
investors do this. 

485
00:23:50,360 --> 00:23:51,880
That's an important part of this
equation. 

486
00:23:52,160 --> 00:23:55,200
If we look at other examples of 
wealthy people that have gone on

487
00:23:55,200 --> 00:23:59,840
to CNBC like he says, you see a 
much greater problem that the 

488
00:23:59,920 --> 00:24:03,080
SEC refuses to look at. 
Let me take you back to October 

489
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:06,200
of 2020. 
We're here on CNBC and we have 

490
00:24:06,200 --> 00:24:09,240
Andrew Ross Sorkin and Chamath 
Polyhopatia. 

491
00:24:09,640 --> 00:24:12,800
He's going to talk about one of 
his specs called Clover. 

492
00:24:12,960 --> 00:24:15,440
Let's go ahead and hear what he 
has to say about Clover. 

493
00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,920
Call a spade a spade right now. 
This is a money losing company. 

494
00:24:18,920 --> 00:24:20,480
It does not make money today, 
correct? 

495
00:24:20,480 --> 00:24:25,200
It's still losing money. 
On a per unit basis, on a 

496
00:24:25,200 --> 00:24:28,520
operating margin basis, it is 
almost at break even in 

497
00:24:28,520 --> 00:24:31,440
profitability. 
By 2023, we will have overall 

498
00:24:31,440 --> 00:24:34,120
profitability. 
You have Chamath Polyhopatia 

499
00:24:34,200 --> 00:24:37,800
pitching one of his specs that 
he's being paid for to promote. 

500
00:24:38,240 --> 00:24:40,720
So we have certain agreements 
with different parties, but he's

501
00:24:40,720 --> 00:24:43,200
basically a sales person for 
these SPAC's. 

502
00:24:43,560 --> 00:24:45,880
Now, SPAC has a way of taking a 
company public where you don't 

503
00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:47,040
have to go through the normal 
route. 

504
00:24:47,200 --> 00:24:50,080
You can avoid all those, you 
know, annoying things like 

505
00:24:50,080 --> 00:24:52,680
making sure the company actually
has its accounting together. 

506
00:24:52,960 --> 00:24:56,040
But either way, he's promoting 
this company called Clover, 

507
00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:59,280
which is a health company and he
says right off the bat that it's

508
00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:01,800
close to profitability. 
It's really close. 

509
00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:04,160
It's right on the brink of 
profitability and it will be 

510
00:25:04,200 --> 00:25:08,760
overall profitable by 2023. 
Well, it's 2024, so let's go 

511
00:25:08,760 --> 00:25:11,640
ahead and take a look at that 
forward-looking statement from 

512
00:25:11,640 --> 00:25:13,760
Chamont. 
We have the EBITDA of the 

513
00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:17,960
company In 2023 it lost $180 
million. 

514
00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:22,160
If we look at the free cash 
flow, it lost $116 million in 

515
00:25:22,160 --> 00:25:25,760
free cash flow while paying the 
executives employees a nice 

516
00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:29,240
stock based compensation bonus 
of $140 million. 

517
00:25:29,600 --> 00:25:31,840
So it actually paid the 
employees more money than they 

518
00:25:31,840 --> 00:25:35,200
actually lost in cash. 
If we look at the net income of 

519
00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:37,640
the company, it lost 213 
million. 

520
00:25:37,920 --> 00:25:41,680
If we look at the earnings per 
share, it lost $0.44 per share. 

521
00:25:41,760 --> 00:25:45,480
On an overall profitability 
basis, Clover lost money every 

522
00:25:45,480 --> 00:25:47,400
way you can. 
No matter what accounting way 

523
00:25:47,400 --> 00:25:49,560
you look at the company, it lost
money. 

524
00:25:49,880 --> 00:25:53,160
Now of course, predictions are 
hard, and I don't think Chamath 

525
00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:54,760
believes he can predict the 
future. 

526
00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:57,240
So there's always a chance 
things go worse than expected. 

527
00:25:57,720 --> 00:26:00,480
But you have a 6 minute 
interview here where Chamath 

528
00:26:00,480 --> 00:26:04,000
answers every question in the 
most glowing terms possible, 

529
00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:07,240
promoting a stock that he's 
being paid to promote on live 

530
00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:09,800
television. 
He goes through in great detail,

531
00:26:09,800 --> 00:26:13,040
talking up this company like 
it's the future, you have to 

532
00:26:13,040 --> 00:26:15,520
invest in it. 
He's directly selling this 

533
00:26:15,520 --> 00:26:19,520
company to the public in order 
to get the stock price to go up.

534
00:26:19,720 --> 00:26:22,240
That appearance was in October 
of 2020. 

535
00:26:22,520 --> 00:26:27,440
The stock price from that point 
has dropped over 95%. 

536
00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:29,800
You can see the great decline 
over time. 

537
00:26:30,040 --> 00:26:32,560
Investors in this company lost 
almost all of their money. 

538
00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:35,000
Now maybe my memory is a little 
bit unclear. 

539
00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:37,480
Maybe I just forget. 
But I don't remember the time 

540
00:26:37,480 --> 00:26:41,040
where the SEC chair went on to 
CNBC soon after the interview 

541
00:26:41,040 --> 00:26:44,520
with Chamath and expressed his 
disdain for someone going on and

542
00:26:44,520 --> 00:26:47,400
trying to sell a SPAC. 
Someone trying to go on and sell

543
00:26:47,400 --> 00:26:49,720
something that's highly 
speculative with very poor 

544
00:26:49,720 --> 00:26:51,920
fundamentals. 
Do you remember that interview? 

545
00:26:51,920 --> 00:26:54,280
I don't. 
And this wasn't the only time 

546
00:26:54,280 --> 00:26:57,440
this occurred. 
In September of 2020, Chamath 

547
00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:02,000
once again went on to CNBC and 
this time he got an entire 15 

548
00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:06,160
minute segment with slideshows. 
He had slides accompanying his 

549
00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:09,920
appearance to sell another SPAC.
If we look at this, this one was

550
00:27:09,920 --> 00:27:11,920
called Open Door. 
Let's go ahead and listen to 

551
00:27:11,920 --> 00:27:14,520
some of it. 
Being what we love to call a 

552
00:27:14,520 --> 00:27:16,320
virtuous cycle. 
So how does this work? 

553
00:27:16,600 --> 00:27:20,800
You as a consumer, you can now 
go to opendoor.com and within 24

554
00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:23,600
hours they will give you an all 
cash offer for your home. 

555
00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:27,160
And if you choose to sell within
three days, you can sell your 

556
00:27:27,160 --> 00:27:29,120
home. 
It's a really incredible 

557
00:27:29,120 --> 00:27:30,560
experience. 
And so you can start to 

558
00:27:30,560 --> 00:27:35,280
understand how they can build a 
really powerful competitive Moat

559
00:27:35,560 --> 00:27:39,160
because the more offers that 
they're able to make, the more 

560
00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:42,080
homes that they will buy and 
sell, which means the more 

561
00:27:42,080 --> 00:27:45,480
markets still dominate, which 
means the more value added 

562
00:27:45,480 --> 00:27:47,480
services that they can automate 
online. 

563
00:27:47,480 --> 00:27:51,360
For example, mortgages, title 
escrow, all these things where 

564
00:27:51,360 --> 00:27:54,000
you used to have hundreds of 
pages of documents they can 

565
00:27:54,000 --> 00:27:57,480
streamline through a mobile app.
It also allows them to work with

566
00:27:57,480 --> 00:28:01,280
banking partners to secure large
pools of capital at cheaper and 

567
00:28:01,280 --> 00:28:03,840
cheaper rates. 
They can pass all these savings 

568
00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:07,000
on to you and all of that drives
more demand to the business. 

569
00:28:07,720 --> 00:28:10,440
Now that's what got us really 
excited about the company. 

570
00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:13,040
But then we took a step back and
sort of Buffett and Monger 

571
00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:14,840
language asked what's our margin
of? 

572
00:28:15,240 --> 00:28:18,680
Buffett and Monger language this
continues on. 

573
00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:22,360
It's just, it goes on and on for
15 minutes. 

574
00:28:22,680 --> 00:28:24,680
You have Chamoth and one box 
hair. 

575
00:28:24,880 --> 00:28:27,000
You have the virtuous cycle 
right here. 

576
00:28:27,280 --> 00:28:30,920
And you have Chamoth, glowingly,
with his excellent communication

577
00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:35,280
skills, selling this stock to 
investors, and CNBC knows it. 

578
00:28:35,280 --> 00:28:38,160
They're airing this whole thing.
They get very little pushback to

579
00:28:38,160 --> 00:28:40,560
him the entire time. 
And they know that he's being 

580
00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:44,000
paid to promote these specs, 
these companies that have very 

581
00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:47,320
unproven fundamentals. 
They have no robust history of 

582
00:28:47,320 --> 00:28:49,360
finances. 
Everything is built on these 

583
00:28:49,360 --> 00:28:51,600
narratives that people like 
Chamath are saying. 

584
00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:56,280
Now again, this was September of
2020, and we can take a look at 

585
00:28:56,280 --> 00:28:58,400
the outcome. 
If we look back five years, we 

586
00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:02,840
have September of 2020 right 
there at 10/20/20 is around 

587
00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:07,040
$24.00, right? 
So around $2425 and we can look 

588
00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:10,240
at the stock price right now, 
$2.42. 

589
00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:14,520
So investors once again got 
completely crushed and another 

590
00:29:14,560 --> 00:29:19,200
garbage company that Chamath 
promoted directly on CNBC for a 

591
00:29:19,200 --> 00:29:21,560
15 minute segment. 
Now you may have to jog my 

592
00:29:21,560 --> 00:29:23,600
memory because I must be getting
very forgetful. 

593
00:29:23,760 --> 00:29:26,720
I don't remember the time. 
The SEC chair went on to CNBC 

594
00:29:26,720 --> 00:29:30,240
after these appearances by 
Chamath and offered his disdain,

595
00:29:30,640 --> 00:29:34,960
calling Chamath out by name like
he is now with Keith Gill. 

596
00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:39,560
Keith Gill, Roaring Kitty 
committed the crime of tweeting,

597
00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:43,760
tweeting out a picture of a meme
completely unrelated to a stock,

598
00:29:44,000 --> 00:29:47,280
and according to the SEC, that 
is enough for him to appear on 

599
00:29:47,280 --> 00:29:49,920
CNBC. 
Call him out by name, say that 

600
00:29:49,920 --> 00:29:52,560
it's not appropriate and that it
needs to be investigated. 

601
00:29:52,560 --> 00:29:55,920
But when people like Chamath go 
directly onto CNBC to promote a 

602
00:29:55,920 --> 00:29:59,440
stock they're paid to promote 
and dump it on retail investors 

603
00:29:59,680 --> 00:30:02,320
where it subsequently loses 95% 
of value. 

604
00:30:02,800 --> 00:30:05,200
What do you get from the SEC? 
Crickets. 

605
00:30:05,600 --> 00:30:07,920
You don't get anything. 
And therein lies the problem. 

606
00:30:07,920 --> 00:30:10,280
Now let's go ahead and move on 
to some headlines. 

607
00:30:10,440 --> 00:30:12,400
There's one big headline here, 
and I don't want to spend too 

608
00:30:12,400 --> 00:30:14,840
much time on this one. 
It's basically a story from the 

609
00:30:14,840 --> 00:30:19,800
Wall Street Journal that Walmart
is on track to be overtaken by 

610
00:30:19,800 --> 00:30:23,040
Amazon. 
And this is like a similar story

611
00:30:23,040 --> 00:30:26,160
that we hear for all different 
types of industries. 

612
00:30:26,680 --> 00:30:29,720
I remember hearing this about 
FedEx and USPS. 

613
00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:32,400
Amazon overtook them in 
logistics. 

614
00:30:32,760 --> 00:30:35,280
Now Walmart, the biggest 
retailers on track to be 

615
00:30:35,280 --> 00:30:37,800
overtaken by Amazon in retail 
sales. 

616
00:30:38,240 --> 00:30:41,160
Now I don't think this is 
actually that meaningful. 

617
00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:44,320
It's true that Amazon will 
eventually overtake Walmart. 

618
00:30:44,440 --> 00:30:46,160
It's just the dynamics of the 
industry. 

619
00:30:46,280 --> 00:30:50,200
Amazon has the dominant share of
online marketplace and they're 

620
00:30:50,200 --> 00:30:51,880
growing much faster than 
Walmart. 

621
00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:54,760
But I don't think this actually 
serves Amazon that well. 

622
00:30:55,040 --> 00:30:58,240
The only thing I think this news
will accomplish will make it 

623
00:30:58,240 --> 00:31:00,920
easier to have those 
catchphrases by regulators. 

624
00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:03,680
Amazon is the biggest retail 
company in the world. 

625
00:31:03,960 --> 00:31:06,680
That's what they'll say. 
No longer is it Walmart being 

626
00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:10,240
technically bigger than Amazon, 
but Amazon will be #1, which 

627
00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:13,160
they'll now be able to say. 
Amazon is the biggest retail 

628
00:31:13,160 --> 00:31:16,200
company in the world, which will
almost always be exclusively 

629
00:31:16,200 --> 00:31:18,920
used against Amazon. 
Now there's other news for 

630
00:31:18,920 --> 00:31:20,480
Amazon. 
It's a little bit more positive.

631
00:31:20,920 --> 00:31:24,560
They are growing in digital 
media and they're also growing 

632
00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:26,760
in traditional media. 
We have a headline here that 

633
00:31:26,760 --> 00:31:29,920
Amazon's appearance at Upfronts 
highlights its push beyond 

634
00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:32,640
digital ads into the traditional
media. 

635
00:31:32,880 --> 00:31:35,440
They also mentioned that the 
company said its ad supported 

636
00:31:35,440 --> 00:31:40,520
streaming content now reaches 
175 million US viewers every 

637
00:31:40,520 --> 00:31:43,600
month. 
So 175,000,000 is a lot. 

638
00:31:43,840 --> 00:31:46,360
The only company that really 
comes close to this is Netflix. 

639
00:31:46,640 --> 00:31:50,000
They say up from more than 120 
million in 2021. 

640
00:31:50,400 --> 00:31:52,560
So this is growing quick and I 
think it's going to continue to 

641
00:31:52,560 --> 00:31:56,240
grow quick because Amazon is 
pushing out a lot of big content

642
00:31:56,240 --> 00:31:58,840
on Prime. 
It also disclosed that Prime 

643
00:31:58,840 --> 00:32:03,200
Video counts 200 million global 
customers, 115 million of whom 

644
00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:06,600
are in the US So we know that 
Prime is growing closer to 300 

645
00:32:06,600 --> 00:32:09,440
million and Prime Video is now 
above 200 million. 

646
00:32:09,520 --> 00:32:12,280
I've said it many times before, 
I think Amazon is one of the 

647
00:32:12,280 --> 00:32:14,160
biggest advertising winners in 
the world. 

648
00:32:14,440 --> 00:32:17,200
They'll continue to consolidate 
ads and I think they're just 

649
00:32:17,200 --> 00:32:20,840
going to steal from cable TV. 
Cable TV advertising dollar 

650
00:32:20,840 --> 00:32:23,760
continues to go down as Amazon 
and companies like Netflix 

651
00:32:24,000 --> 00:32:27,880
continue to gain. 
Now we also had some surprising 

652
00:32:27,880 --> 00:32:31,280
news, but not that surprising if
you've been following along news

653
00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:34,120
from Netflix. 
There is news now that they are 

654
00:32:34,120 --> 00:32:37,560
going to live stream NFL on 
Christmas Day. 

655
00:32:37,960 --> 00:32:40,240
They say specifically that 
Netflix will be the home of the 

656
00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:45,320
live NFL games this Christmas 
Day and in 2025 and in 2026. 

657
00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:48,080
Netflix is one of the companies 
that does more strategy shifts 

658
00:32:48,080 --> 00:32:50,960
than any company that I ever 
have been invested in. 

659
00:32:51,320 --> 00:32:54,960
They change their direction and 
they evolve and they change what

660
00:32:54,960 --> 00:32:58,200
they're doing seemingly 
overnight, and that's part of 

661
00:32:58,200 --> 00:33:00,600
their culture. 
If you're invested in Netflix, 

662
00:33:00,600 --> 00:33:03,400
you need to know that this is 
part of your investment, a 

663
00:33:03,400 --> 00:33:05,840
company that will change what 
they're doing on a dime. 

664
00:33:06,240 --> 00:33:09,120
This is both a good thing and a 
bad thing, but I think 

665
00:33:09,200 --> 00:33:12,280
overwhelmingly a good thing. 
We can look at certain examples 

666
00:33:12,280 --> 00:33:14,640
here. 
Netflix said that they were 

667
00:33:14,640 --> 00:33:17,360
first ADVD company and they 
transitioned to a streaming 

668
00:33:17,360 --> 00:33:19,160
company. 
They said that they're a company

669
00:33:19,160 --> 00:33:22,120
that's going to license content 
and then they transition to a 

670
00:33:22,120 --> 00:33:24,480
production company where they 
produce their own content. 

671
00:33:24,640 --> 00:33:26,320
They said that they were a 
company that would never have 

672
00:33:26,320 --> 00:33:28,680
advertising and now they have 
advertising tears. 

673
00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:31,120
They said that they're a company
that allowed for password 

674
00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:33,440
sharing and now they're doing a 
password crackdown. 

675
00:33:33,760 --> 00:33:36,400
They said that they're a company
that wouldn't have live events. 

676
00:33:36,680 --> 00:33:39,760
Everything would be on demand. 
Now they have live events and 

677
00:33:39,760 --> 00:33:41,840
their company that said that 
they would never have sports 

678
00:33:41,840 --> 00:33:45,200
because it was too expensive. 
Now they have live sports, their

679
00:33:45,200 --> 00:33:47,520
company that's constantly 
evolving and shifting. 

680
00:33:47,880 --> 00:33:50,840
Now you can take this the way of
them not doing what they say and

681
00:33:50,840 --> 00:33:53,480
sticking with the every previous
statement they've ever made. 

682
00:33:53,960 --> 00:33:56,280
That's not really how I view 
healthy companies. 

683
00:33:56,480 --> 00:34:00,280
Healthy companies evolve and 
mold and what's best for the 

684
00:34:00,280 --> 00:34:02,800
company. 
In the current situation with 

685
00:34:02,800 --> 00:34:07,160
Netflix, their company notable 
for not having a lot of red 

686
00:34:07,160 --> 00:34:10,600
tape, when they make decisions, 
they can make decisions very 

687
00:34:10,600 --> 00:34:12,880
quickly. 
They can pivot into things very 

688
00:34:12,880 --> 00:34:15,320
quickly. 
You don't have layers and layers

689
00:34:15,320 --> 00:34:16,880
of upper management to go 
through. 

690
00:34:17,320 --> 00:34:21,000
Netflix employees are given a 
lot of autonomy over their job. 

691
00:34:21,560 --> 00:34:24,600
So when I look at this news, it 
is surprising because Netflix 

692
00:34:24,600 --> 00:34:26,560
has stayed out of live sports 
for a long time. 

693
00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:30,600
They've reiterated that it's not
lucrative, it's not economical, 

694
00:34:30,920 --> 00:34:33,320
and I still believe that that's 
a true statement. 

695
00:34:33,560 --> 00:34:37,480
The only reason that I believe 
Netflix made this decision to 

696
00:34:37,480 --> 00:34:41,400
broadcast these two NFL games is
because it made financial sense,

697
00:34:41,760 --> 00:34:44,639
because they believe they'll get
a return on their investment. 

698
00:34:45,080 --> 00:34:47,679
There's no other way possible 
that I think they'd make this 

699
00:34:47,679 --> 00:34:52,040
decision, so they must have 
carved some attractive deal with

700
00:34:52,040 --> 00:34:55,480
the NFL where the viewership and
the additional subscribers and 

701
00:34:55,480 --> 00:34:57,560
the engagement will be worth the
cost. 

702
00:34:58,080 --> 00:35:00,800
Now finally, we move on to the 
story of Chipotle being 

703
00:35:00,800 --> 00:35:03,600
boycotted by social media. 
We know that there's a lot of 

704
00:35:03,600 --> 00:35:06,720
danger with social media, 
especially these name brand food

705
00:35:06,720 --> 00:35:08,560
companies. 
We've seen it happen before 

706
00:35:08,560 --> 00:35:11,200
where companies like Starbucks 
are being boycotted by a lot of 

707
00:35:11,200 --> 00:35:13,720
people because of their 
so-called participation in 

708
00:35:13,720 --> 00:35:16,080
supporting Israel over 
Palestine. 

709
00:35:16,480 --> 00:35:18,320
Now if you look at the data, 
that's not true. 

710
00:35:18,320 --> 00:35:20,760
Starbucks corporate has not 
supported either side 

711
00:35:20,880 --> 00:35:23,280
individually, but either way 
there's always going to be 

712
00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:26,160
boycotts and the risk of people 
gathering together on social 

713
00:35:26,160 --> 00:35:29,080
media to try to prove a point. 
And in this case, we see it with

714
00:35:29,080 --> 00:35:31,200
Chipotle. 
People are upset that they're 

715
00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:34,640
not getting the portion sizes 
they deserve at Chipotle. 

716
00:35:34,960 --> 00:35:38,200
And here's an example. 
This is a viral TikTok of a 

717
00:35:38,200 --> 00:35:41,840
Chipotle employee under serving 
them, not giving them big enough

718
00:35:41,840 --> 00:35:46,640
portions. 
Chicken. 

719
00:35:55,680 --> 00:35:57,880
Oh. 
Man, I'm. 

720
00:35:57,880 --> 00:35:58,680
I'm OK. 
I'm OK. 

721
00:35:58,960 --> 00:36:00,760
He gives them. 
He just walks out. 

722
00:36:00,840 --> 00:36:03,000
The problem here, of course, 
being that she's not giving him 

723
00:36:03,000 --> 00:36:05,200
a whole lot of food. 
These serving sizes, these 

724
00:36:05,200 --> 00:36:06,960
scoops he's getting are a little
too small. 

725
00:36:07,360 --> 00:36:10,520
And this type of trend of 
showing Chipotle not giving 

726
00:36:10,520 --> 00:36:12,680
enough food is blowing up on 
TikTok. 

727
00:36:12,840 --> 00:36:16,840
We now have TikTok Vigilantes 
going after Chipotle in the most

728
00:36:16,840 --> 00:36:20,120
devastating ways they can, first
of which is taking down the 

729
00:36:20,120 --> 00:36:23,240
review star rating on their app 
breaking news. 

730
00:36:23,240 --> 00:36:26,280
As of last night, we have 
officially gotten Chipotle down 

731
00:36:26,280 --> 00:36:29,360
to a 4.6 star rating on the App 
Store. 

732
00:36:29,360 --> 00:36:32,360
Welcome to day four of trying to
get Chipotle to change their 

733
00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:34,480
outrageously small portion 
sizes. 

734
00:36:34,760 --> 00:36:37,680
We're sick of it. 
First and foremost, keep the one

735
00:36:37,680 --> 00:36:39,760
star reviews coming. 
We're starting to call it. 

736
00:36:39,760 --> 00:36:43,200
If you are willing to go to your
nearest Chipotle, order your 

737
00:36:43,200 --> 00:36:47,360
normal stuff, and if the portion
sizes aren't top tier, walk out.

738
00:36:47,360 --> 00:36:49,840
So there you have him, 
instructing masses of people to 

739
00:36:49,840 --> 00:36:53,200
give Chipotle's app A1 star 
review and for them to visit 

740
00:36:53,200 --> 00:36:56,480
Chipotle's, Go through a meal, 
crate the whole thing, and then 

741
00:36:56,480 --> 00:36:58,920
walk out halfway so that 
Chipotle has to waste that food 

742
00:36:58,920 --> 00:37:00,920
and throw it away. 
And there's more of these. 

743
00:37:00,920 --> 00:37:03,680
There's just more and more of 
them never ending videos about 

744
00:37:03,680 --> 00:37:05,840
Chipotle and them not giving you
enough food. 

745
00:37:05,960 --> 00:37:08,040
Hi, can I get a chicken burrito 
please? 

746
00:37:08,040 --> 00:37:10,400
OK. 
And white rice or brown rice? 

747
00:37:10,720 --> 00:37:16,840
White rice, white rice. 
OK, you want black beans, Pinto 

748
00:37:16,880 --> 00:37:18,680
beans. 
There you have it. 

749
00:37:18,680 --> 00:37:20,360
It gives them a tiny portion of 
rice. 

750
00:37:20,360 --> 00:37:22,720
You get the point. 
I've been sent these clips by 

751
00:37:22,720 --> 00:37:26,080
various people, members of the 
community, and viewers here with

752
00:37:26,080 --> 00:37:30,720
great concern that this is this 
is emblematic of the downfall of

753
00:37:30,720 --> 00:37:33,760
Chipotle. 
After all, what other evidence 

754
00:37:33,760 --> 00:37:37,240
do we need that the company's in
serious trouble than people on 

755
00:37:37,240 --> 00:37:40,480
TikTok complaining? 
That's basically that's like the

756
00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:42,800
the silver bullet. 
That's the one thing that really

757
00:37:42,800 --> 00:37:46,400
crushes a company is when people
online complain about the 

758
00:37:46,400 --> 00:37:49,000
company. 
Let me give you another example 

759
00:37:49,240 --> 00:37:53,600
of a company that people 
complain about in mass millions 

760
00:37:53,600 --> 00:37:55,760
of people. 
Just a couple years ago, here's 

761
00:37:55,760 --> 00:37:59,200
a highly critical video, another
critical video of a large 

762
00:37:59,200 --> 00:38:01,840
established company. 
But this time it's not Chipotle,

763
00:38:02,080 --> 00:38:04,840
it's Netflix, and this was 
released one year ago. 

764
00:38:05,400 --> 00:38:08,240
What does this mean for Netflix?
Well, it means that they're 

765
00:38:08,240 --> 00:38:11,960
going to see a drastic decline 
in subscribers, I imagine, 

766
00:38:11,960 --> 00:38:14,840
because they fail to realize 
that this isn't some kind of 

767
00:38:14,840 --> 00:38:17,920
must have item. 
It's not some inelastic good 

768
00:38:17,920 --> 00:38:21,360
that everyone needs to own. 
It's a luxury, and it's an 

769
00:38:21,360 --> 00:38:25,920
expensive one and it's a 
catalogue of mostly dog, more 

770
00:38:25,920 --> 00:38:29,880
like net, am I right? 
So if they can't share an 

771
00:38:29,880 --> 00:38:32,120
account with someone that's 
already paying, it's not like 

772
00:38:32,120 --> 00:38:34,480
that person's going to go out 
and subscribe to Netflix. 

773
00:38:34,600 --> 00:38:36,240
The catalogue's not strong 
enough for that. 

774
00:38:36,240 --> 00:38:38,040
They'll just go to a different 
service or they'll start 

775
00:38:38,040 --> 00:38:40,280
pirating. 
So I imagine once this fully 

776
00:38:40,280 --> 00:38:44,400
goes into effect, Netflix stock 
price will be flushed straight 

777
00:38:44,400 --> 00:38:47,200
down this year and just sync to 
the depths of hell. 

778
00:38:47,520 --> 00:38:51,840
It's going to collapse. 
That video got 3 million views 

779
00:38:51,840 --> 00:38:53,280
and it was released one year 
ago. 

780
00:38:53,280 --> 00:38:55,840
And if you look through the 
comments, every single comment 

781
00:38:56,120 --> 00:38:58,560
agreed with them. 
Netflix was going to tank. 

782
00:38:58,960 --> 00:39:00,960
All the investors are going to 
lose all of their money. 

783
00:39:01,200 --> 00:39:03,760
Everyone was going to cancel 
Netflix because they're doing 

784
00:39:03,760 --> 00:39:06,560
something so dumb. 
In 2022, there's another video 

785
00:39:06,560 --> 00:39:09,320
released called The Rise and 
Fall of Netflix. 

786
00:39:09,560 --> 00:39:11,680
This is a documentary made by 
Cold Fusion. 

787
00:39:12,120 --> 00:39:15,440
For over a decade, the Netflix 
brand has been synonymous with 

788
00:39:15,440 --> 00:39:18,760
innovation and disruption. 
This competition, along with 

789
00:39:18,760 --> 00:39:21,840
creative choices and growth 
struggles, has LED Netflix into 

790
00:39:21,840 --> 00:39:24,600
dangerous territory. 
Netflix's stock price has 

791
00:39:24,600 --> 00:39:27,760
plummeted by 70% as of the 
timing of the production of this

792
00:39:27,760 --> 00:39:30,440
episode. 
Staff are being let go and 

793
00:39:30,440 --> 00:39:32,960
hundreds of thousands of 
households are unsubscribing, 

794
00:39:33,080 --> 00:39:35,600
with even more expected to leave
in the coming year. 

795
00:39:36,040 --> 00:39:38,960
That documentary, as you may 
suspect, goes over the rise and 

796
00:39:38,960 --> 00:39:42,480
fall of Netflix, how it rose to 
the top, and now it's basically 

797
00:39:42,480 --> 00:39:44,720
game over. 
And that again was released in 

798
00:39:44,720 --> 00:39:48,880
2022 when Netflix was at the 
absolute bottom stock price. 

799
00:39:49,360 --> 00:39:52,000
If we look today, fast 
forwarding only one year, we can

800
00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:54,560
see the amount of subscribers 
that Netflix gained over the 

801
00:39:54,560 --> 00:39:56,560
trailing year. 
We can zoom in here. 

802
00:39:56,840 --> 00:40:00,120
Netflix gained last quarter 9.3 
million subscribers. 

803
00:40:00,440 --> 00:40:04,440
The quarter before that, 13.18 
point 76 and 5.8. 

804
00:40:04,680 --> 00:40:07,760
The exact year that people were 
complaining online about Netflix

805
00:40:07,960 --> 00:40:10,840
was the year that they gained 
accumulatively the most 

806
00:40:10,840 --> 00:40:12,920
subscribers throughout their 
entire history. 

807
00:40:13,160 --> 00:40:17,040
Aside from COVID, this was one 
of their best years ever. 

808
00:40:17,360 --> 00:40:19,760
And in many cases, that's the 
best time to buy a stock when 

809
00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:22,000
sentiment is at the lowest. 
That's when I bought the 

810
00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:26,640
majority of my Netflix position 
in 2022 and early 2023. 

811
00:40:26,920 --> 00:40:29,560
That's when most people are 
saying that the company is over.

812
00:40:29,840 --> 00:40:33,400
Now if we look at Chipotle, we 
see a lot of people here 

813
00:40:33,400 --> 00:40:36,480
complaining about the food and 
the portion sizes, but there's 

814
00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:39,360
nothing in the business that's 
actually causing concern. 

815
00:40:39,360 --> 00:40:41,760
We can look at the amount of 
locations they go up every 

816
00:40:41,760 --> 00:40:44,160
single quarter. 
We can look at the average unit 

817
00:40:44,160 --> 00:40:46,520
volume. 
This is how much each location 

818
00:40:46,520 --> 00:40:50,240
is selling every single quarter.
It has gone up consecutively 

819
00:40:50,240 --> 00:40:53,640
every single quarter since 2020.
There's always going to be some 

820
00:40:53,640 --> 00:40:56,240
cases where people complain 
online where they're unhappy 

821
00:40:56,240 --> 00:40:59,080
about a service, especially one 
like Chipotle, where it's not 

822
00:40:59,080 --> 00:41:01,560
perfectly consistent customer by
customer. 

823
00:41:01,800 --> 00:41:03,960
There are some employees that do
a bad job. 

824
00:41:04,120 --> 00:41:06,360
They don't give enough food. 
So there's going to be some 

825
00:41:06,360 --> 00:41:08,920
unhappy customers that go to 
those locations. 

826
00:41:09,280 --> 00:41:12,880
But overall, when we look at the
broad breadth of data here, when

827
00:41:12,880 --> 00:41:16,080
we look at the actual numbers, I
don't see anything concerning 

828
00:41:16,080 --> 00:41:18,520
with Chipotle or their value 
proposition. 

829
00:41:18,760 --> 00:41:20,960
So despite what TikTok would 
have you believe, the 

830
00:41:21,000 --> 00:41:24,240
overwhelming majority of 
customers at Chipotle are happy.

831
00:41:24,480 --> 00:41:26,160
Now that's going to be all for 
this episode. 

832
00:41:26,160 --> 00:41:28,840
If you want more content, 
exclusive episodes and access to

833
00:41:28,840 --> 00:41:31,080
qualtrum.com, you can check out 
the Patreon. 

834
00:41:31,120 --> 00:41:33,240
It comes with a free trial. 
That's all for now. 

835
00:41:33,360 --> 00:41:34,200
See you in the next one.
