1
00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:01,800
Welcome back. 
Everyone today on the jobs of 

2
00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:05,100
Carlson show, he's back. 
He's finally back to save the 

3
00:00:05,100 --> 00:00:08,100
day. 
We have Bob Iger returning as 

4
00:00:08,100 --> 00:00:12,700
the CEO of Disney. 
This is a little surprised that 

5
00:00:12,700 --> 00:00:15,600
I was not expecting but we have 
this happening. 

6
00:00:15,700 --> 00:00:20,800
It's real Bob Iger is the CEO of
Disney effective immediately and

7
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:24,000
even more importantly than that 
Bob Che pack is gone. 

8
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,900
Bob capex tenure as Disney CEO 
has been disastrous. 

9
00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:30,700
And in this episode, we're going
to Go over it. 

10
00:00:30,700 --> 00:00:33,000
We're going to go over, both 
everything, that's happened over

11
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,800
the past two years with Bob, 
capek as CEO. 

12
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:39,500
And what I think the future 
holds with Bob Iger as the new 

13
00:00:39,500 --> 00:00:42,000
CEO. 
So we have a lot to unravel and 

14
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:44,100
unpack in this video a lot to go
over. 

15
00:00:44,300 --> 00:00:47,900
And even to add two twists, we 
have another surprising twist. 

16
00:00:47,900 --> 00:00:51,800
Something that I don't see too 
often and I hesitate to even 

17
00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:54,400
highlight this because I think 
it's a dangerous game, I'm 

18
00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:57,800
playing here, I have an instance
where I think Jim Cramer may 

19
00:00:57,800 --> 00:00:59,700
have been, right? 
You may have made an accurate 

20
00:00:59,700 --> 00:01:00,400
prediction. 
Action. 

21
00:01:00,700 --> 00:01:03,300
This may be one of the few 
cases, and I'm going to go ahead

22
00:01:03,300 --> 00:01:06,100
and highlight it with caution on
my channel. 

23
00:01:06,100 --> 00:01:08,000
And then outside of the Disney 
news, we also have some 

24
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:11,500
important news with Elizabeth 
Holmes, the case has concluded 

25
00:01:11,700 --> 00:01:15,100
and she received her sentence of
a little over 11 years. 

26
00:01:15,100 --> 00:01:17,200
In federal prison. 
I'm going to show how this 

27
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:21,200
Stacks up against other cases 
and compare her sentencing to 

28
00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:24,000
that of Sunny bhawani. 
So I'll be going over this as 

29
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:25,500
well. 
So as always, we have a lot to 

30
00:01:25,508 --> 00:01:27,400
get to in this episode. 
Let's go ahead and Jump Right 

31
00:01:27,400 --> 00:01:29,600
In. 
Now like I mentioned many times 

32
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:32,000
this, Channel is a little bit 
different than most channels on 

33
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,200
YouTube rather than just talking
about investing and talking 

34
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,400
about finances. 
I actually show which 

35
00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:40,600
transparency everything I'm 
doing with my portfolio, whether

36
00:01:40,600 --> 00:01:42,800
it's good or bad. 
I track the passive income 

37
00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:45,700
portfolio, week by week. 
This is a variation of a 

38
00:01:45,700 --> 00:01:49,800
dividend growth portfolio with a
strong emphasis on Compounders 

39
00:01:49,900 --> 00:01:52,000
companies that have certain 
characteristics that I think 

40
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,800
lead to outperformance. 
Now this portfolio has done 

41
00:01:54,900 --> 00:01:57,700
really well in fact, 
year-to-date, it's only down 

42
00:01:57,700 --> 00:02:00,800
twelve point three, seven 
percent that's Bad being down, 

43
00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:05,000
12 percent, the S&P 500 for 
examples, down 17.5, and the 

44
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:07,300
qqq's down a bit more at, minus 
thirty percent. 

45
00:02:07,300 --> 00:02:10,199
So, even though the portfolio 
performance overall is doing 

46
00:02:10,199 --> 00:02:13,100
well, there's one company in my 
portfolio that's doing 

47
00:02:13,100 --> 00:02:16,000
particularly bad. 
That company is Disney. 

48
00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:19,500
I'm down seven thousand five 
hundred dollars on Disney. 

49
00:02:19,500 --> 00:02:23,400
Now, when I originally picked 
Disney, this is supposed to be 

50
00:02:23,408 --> 00:02:25,500
one of the safest picks in the 
market. 

51
00:02:25,500 --> 00:02:28,400
This is a company with 
Incredible brand value. 

52
00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:31,800
A huge mode, it has, As 
International presence, it had 

53
00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,800
high profitability, Disney was a
shoo-in. 

54
00:02:34,900 --> 00:02:37,500
This was a company that's been 
around for 100 years and isn't 

55
00:02:37,500 --> 00:02:40,700
going anywhere. 
But this company has been my 

56
00:02:40,700 --> 00:02:43,900
worst performer by far in the 
passive income portfolio, 

57
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:46,300
Disney's done. 
So poorly over the past couple 

58
00:02:46,300 --> 00:02:51,000
of years, it's down 41 percent 
year-to-date and it wasn't doing

59
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:55,300
great before then, in fact, over
the past five years, half a 

60
00:02:55,300 --> 00:02:59,300
decade. 
Disney's down - 11%, and this is

61
00:02:59,300 --> 00:03:01,900
a company that No longer pays a 
dividend so it doesn't pay a 

62
00:03:01,908 --> 00:03:03,800
dividend and the capital gains 
are down. 

63
00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:06,400
This has been a very difficult 
stock to hold onto. 

64
00:03:06,500 --> 00:03:09,300
It's been very discouraging to 
keep invested in Disney and 

65
00:03:09,300 --> 00:03:12,600
before Bob iger's surprisingly 
took back the CEO role. 

66
00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:15,000
The sentiment for this company 
has never been lower. 

67
00:03:15,100 --> 00:03:18,600
And I personally believe that a 
large part of Disney's under 

68
00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:21,700
performance is related to one 
individual who was the CEO of 

69
00:03:21,700 --> 00:03:25,400
the company, Bob, capek. 
His tenure over Disney has not 

70
00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:27,200
been good. 
Let me lay out the trail of 

71
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:31,200
problems and unforced errors, 
that Bob, Okay, Peck caused 

72
00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:35,400
problem, number one, Scarlett 
Johansson sued Disney 450 

73
00:03:35,400 --> 00:03:38,300
million dollars. 
A public lawsuit, from one of 

74
00:03:38,300 --> 00:03:40,600
their biggest and most respected
Stars. 

75
00:03:41,100 --> 00:03:43,700
She sued them because they 
didn't want to pay her as much 

76
00:03:43,700 --> 00:03:45,100
because of their streaming 
service. 

77
00:03:45,300 --> 00:03:48,000
There is problems with the deal,
and they tried to undercut. 

78
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:51,200
Her pay Scarlett, Johansson 
probably talk to them privately 

79
00:03:51,300 --> 00:03:53,800
when they refused, she made it 
public with a lawsuit. 

80
00:03:54,100 --> 00:03:56,800
This was an absolute disgrace 
for Disney. 

81
00:03:57,000 --> 00:03:59,300
It was an embarrassment. 
It was a black eye on the 

82
00:03:59,300 --> 00:04:01,800
company. 
One thing that Bob Iger prided 

83
00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:04,300
himself was his relationship 
with Talent. 

84
00:04:04,300 --> 00:04:07,500
He had a very positive strong 
relationship with all of their 

85
00:04:07,500 --> 00:04:10,900
cast members all of their Stars.
He never experienced something 

86
00:04:10,900 --> 00:04:14,200
like this one of their biggest 
stars ever someone that they've 

87
00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:17,500
worked with for literally 
decades is suing them openly 

88
00:04:17,500 --> 00:04:21,200
because of a dispute over a 
payment contract that was a 

89
00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:24,700
black guy and this happened 
under Che Peck and most likely 

90
00:04:24,700 --> 00:04:27,000
could have been resolved under 
Che Peck. 

91
00:04:27,100 --> 00:04:29,700
But instead of resolving this 
problem quietly outside of the 

92
00:04:29,900 --> 00:04:32,900
public eye, it became a huge 
public Fiasco and Scarlett 

93
00:04:32,900 --> 00:04:36,100
Johansson ended up settling the 
case with Disney, for likely the

94
00:04:36,108 --> 00:04:38,800
exact same amount that she was 
originally supposed to be paid. 

95
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:41,000
So Disney really had nothing to 
gain from this. 

96
00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,300
All they could really do is hurt
their own image. 

97
00:04:43,300 --> 00:04:45,700
They made this look like a big 
bad company. 

98
00:04:45,700 --> 00:04:49,900
This huge corporation was going 
against one individual trying to

99
00:04:49,900 --> 00:04:52,800
get the paycheck. 
She agreed to the imagery and 

100
00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,500
Optics from this case couldn't 
get possibly worse. 

101
00:04:55,500 --> 00:04:59,100
This is a foolish unforced error
by Bob capek problem. 

102
00:04:59,100 --> 00:05:02,300
Number two, There's another 
massive unforced error by Bob 

103
00:05:02,300 --> 00:05:04,600
jpg. 
Not only did he decide to go 

104
00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:08,000
into the Mucky world of politics
where everyone gets some mud on 

105
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:10,000
them? 
Everyone gets a little dirty but

106
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:11,600
he did it in the most 
strategically. 

107
00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:15,300
Poor way possible picking a 
fight against possibly the most 

108
00:05:15,300 --> 00:05:19,200
popular governor in the country.
Rhonda, Santa's, who just won 

109
00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:23,500
re-election in Florida by a 20 
percentage Point margin. 

110
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:26,500
This is the governor that Bob 
capek decided he wanted to pick 

111
00:05:26,500 --> 00:05:29,700
a fight with and try to bully 
and this did not work out. 

112
00:05:29,900 --> 00:05:32,500
Well for Disney, this fight was 
centered around a bill being 

113
00:05:32,500 --> 00:05:35,200
passed in Florida called 
parental rights in education. 

114
00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:37,600
This bill prohibited classroom 
instruction on sexual 

115
00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:40,400
orientation and gender identity 
in kindergarten through third 

116
00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:43,200
grade. 
Bob capek, Not only was opposed 

117
00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,700
to this bill and a Critic of it,
but he was incredibly outspoken,

118
00:05:46,900 --> 00:05:49,300
going. 
As far as to say publicly that 

119
00:05:49,300 --> 00:05:53,700
the entire goal as a company. 
As Disney was getting this bill 

120
00:05:53,700 --> 00:05:57,400
quote, repelled by A legislature
or struck down in the courts. 

121
00:05:57,500 --> 00:06:00,500
Now even if you oppose, the bill
politically you Admit that this 

122
00:06:00,500 --> 00:06:02,300
was a strategic mistake from 
Disney. 

123
00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:05,800
Ron descent is use this as part 
of his re-election campaign 

124
00:06:05,900 --> 00:06:08,000
saying that the residents in 
Florida are not going to be 

125
00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:11,700
governed by Rich Executives in 
California like Bob capek and 

126
00:06:11,700 --> 00:06:15,100
they're not going to be bullied 
by big companies like Disney it 

127
00:06:15,100 --> 00:06:18,900
position, Rhonda Santa's as a 
defender of the people against 

128
00:06:18,900 --> 00:06:20,900
corporate, power and Rich 
Executives. 

129
00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:24,000
This was a huge talking point 
from Republicans across the 

130
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:26,300
board. 
Rhonda Santa's benefited from 

131
00:06:26,300 --> 00:06:28,300
these attacks he wasn't hurt by 
them. 

132
00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:30,900
He benefited from them. 
And on the other side, it's very

133
00:06:30,900 --> 00:06:33,700
difficult to argue that Disney 
benefited from this at all. 

134
00:06:33,700 --> 00:06:36,400
Not only did they lose the 
political fight, but they also 

135
00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:38,700
alienated a large portion of 
Their audience. 

136
00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:42,900
A lot of Disney customers are 
conservative and do support that

137
00:06:42,900 --> 00:06:45,100
bill. 
So, they put themselves at odds 

138
00:06:45,100 --> 00:06:48,100
with a large portion of their 
customer base and their 

139
00:06:48,100 --> 00:06:49,900
shareholder base. 
They also had another 

140
00:06:49,900 --> 00:06:52,900
consequence, which is a 
retaliation from Florida by 

141
00:06:52,900 --> 00:06:55,700
stripping, Disney of its 
independent special district. 

142
00:06:55,700 --> 00:06:58,500
This is a very unique benefit 
that Disney had for decades and 

143
00:06:58,500 --> 00:07:00,900
now it's been removed and Ron 
Auntie has warned that if any 

144
00:07:00,900 --> 00:07:04,800
company like Disney uses quote, 
its economic might to attack the

145
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,700
parents of my state that he 
would view it as a provocation 

146
00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:10,100
and fight back. 
So just to revisit so far, this 

147
00:07:10,100 --> 00:07:13,000
is the beginning of Bob capex, 
tenure one, he offended. 

148
00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:15,300
One of his talent members 
putting a black eye on Disney 

149
00:07:15,300 --> 00:07:18,100
with an embarrassing lawsuit 
from Scarlett Johansson and the 

150
00:07:18,108 --> 00:07:20,300
to we goes to war with one of 
the most popular governors in 

151
00:07:20,300 --> 00:07:23,500
the country, in an attempt to 
alter and dictate the local laws

152
00:07:23,500 --> 00:07:25,500
of a state that he's not even a 
member of. 

153
00:07:25,500 --> 00:07:28,400
But that's not where this stops.
We have problem 3 now the third 

154
00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:31,500
problem with Bob jpeg is Dated 
to the content that Disney has 

155
00:07:31,500 --> 00:07:33,900
been creating. 
I know that Bob capek is not the

156
00:07:33,900 --> 00:07:36,300
creator of the content. 
He's not the one that has the 

157
00:07:36,300 --> 00:07:39,800
direct control, but he does have
Direction over what the content 

158
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:41,500
should be. 
And the type of risks being 

159
00:07:41,500 --> 00:07:45,300
taken and over the past couple 
of years under Bob capex Helm 

160
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:48,000
Disney has not been taking a lot
of risks. 

161
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,000
Their content has become so 
incredibly safe, that sometimes 

162
00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:54,600
it's now just becoming bad. 
Pinocchio is a prime example of 

163
00:07:54,600 --> 00:07:58,300
this, the live-action remake 
from the original Pinocchio is 

164
00:07:58,300 --> 00:08:01,300
almost worse than every way. 
The animation was good but 

165
00:08:01,300 --> 00:08:03,300
almost everything with the 
storytelling was worse and 

166
00:08:03,300 --> 00:08:06,200
that's apparent in both the 
critic reviews and the audience 

167
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:09,500
reviews, 28 percent on the 
Tomato Meter is bad enough but 

168
00:08:09,500 --> 00:08:11,500
those are the professional 
critics sometimes they get it 

169
00:08:11,500 --> 00:08:13,900
wrong. 
When the audience has a similar 

170
00:08:13,900 --> 00:08:18,600
score 29%, when both critics and
the audience are both 

171
00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:21,800
unanimously saying these shows 
are not good. 

172
00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:24,800
That should be a clear message 
that Disney's content is not 

173
00:08:24,800 --> 00:08:27,500
going in the right direction and
this issue lends itself to a 

174
00:08:27,508 --> 00:08:29,700
bigger issue, Disney straying 
away. 

175
00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:33,299
Away from its origins in 
storytelling and the CEO needs 

176
00:08:33,299 --> 00:08:35,900
to get this back on track in 
this Wall Street Journal 

177
00:08:35,900 --> 00:08:39,000
interview just a couple months 
ago, the interviewer aptly 

178
00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:41,000
points out. 
This problem with Disney's 

179
00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,400
content know, your people love 
to get out there and say 

180
00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:48,100
Disney's to woke Disney's become
to correct politically correct. 

181
00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:50,800
You know, are they right to 
David Point? 

182
00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:55,000
What's your take on that those 
criticisms and reaching that 

183
00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:58,500
wide span of people that 
interviewer asked a very good 

184
00:08:58,500 --> 00:09:01,000
and specific question? 
The CEO of Disney. 

185
00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:04,200
Many people are criticizing. 
The Disney has become too woke 

186
00:09:04,300 --> 00:09:06,600
and that's making its way into 
the content. 

187
00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:10,300
That's a direct question and 
listen to the way Bob capek 

188
00:09:10,300 --> 00:09:12,500
answers it. 
I think, the more complex 

189
00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:16,200
something is the more you have 
to really drill down into the 

190
00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:21,000
basics and we want our content 
to reflect the rich diverse 

191
00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:25,400
world that we live in. 
And again, I guess that's 

192
00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:29,700
another way of saying catering 
to your to your audience but the

193
00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:33,200
It is a rich diverse place and 
we want our content to reflect 

194
00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:36,100
that. 
And we're so blessed to have the

195
00:09:36,100 --> 00:09:39,300
greatest content creators and 
they see it. 

196
00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:42,800
Similarly, but I think that's 
good from a commercial 

197
00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:47,600
standpoint as well because then 
you appeal to the largest 

198
00:09:47,900 --> 00:09:51,400
possible audience and certainly,
you know, we live in a world now

199
00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:56,100
where everything seems to, you 
know, be polarized, but I think 

200
00:09:56,100 --> 00:09:59,400
we want Disney to stand for 
bringing people together. 

201
00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:02,000
I always A, when someone walks 
down Main Street and you look at

202
00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:05,600
the castle, you're not thinking,
you know, I'm on one side of the

203
00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,800
political Spectrum or the other,
you have a shared belief and all

204
00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:13,200
the wonderful aspects of what 
Disney is and we want to use 

205
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:15,900
Disney to bring people together.
And I think we'll do that by 

206
00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:18,400
diverse stories and diverse 
characters. 

207
00:10:18,500 --> 00:10:22,100
What is this nothingness answer?
He didn't say anything. 

208
00:10:22,100 --> 00:10:25,600
He just threw in the keyword 
diverse and diversity, six 

209
00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:29,500
different times and these type 
of mumbling jumbling nonsense. 

210
00:10:29,500 --> 00:10:31,900
And Answers were routine with 
popche APEC. 

211
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:35,300
It was difficult to get any type
of straight answer from him at 

212
00:10:35,300 --> 00:10:38,000
all. 
He was asked specifically about 

213
00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:42,300
a specific type of content, woke
content making itself into 

214
00:10:42,300 --> 00:10:45,800
Disney repeatedly, and people 
complaining about that. 

215
00:10:45,900 --> 00:10:48,300
And his answer is to throw out 
some key buzzwords like 

216
00:10:48,300 --> 00:10:51,200
diversity, five times, and 
Mumble about bringing people 

217
00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:54,500
together, this interviewer goes 
on and even pushes back further 

218
00:10:54,500 --> 00:10:58,700
on this content trying to get a 
straight answer from Bob capek, 

219
00:10:58,900 --> 00:11:01,300
do they like the Type of content
that's coming out. 

220
00:11:01,300 --> 00:11:04,600
And he specifically asks about 
Pinocchio, the new Pinocchio, 

221
00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:07,900
verse the old Pinocchio, you 
mentioned Pinocchio, if I may be

222
00:11:07,900 --> 00:11:12,400
wrong, but I think the new 
Pinocchio, he doesn't change in 

223
00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:13,900
the end. 
He just accepts himself for who 

224
00:11:13,900 --> 00:11:15,300
he is. 
So the ending has changed a 

225
00:11:15,308 --> 00:11:18,000
little bit with sort of 
contemporary mores and that's 

226
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:19,700
correct. 
The new Pinocchio doesn't really

227
00:11:19,700 --> 00:11:21,800
change at all. 
He just accepts himself the way 

228
00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:24,600
he is, which is a dramatic 
difference between the old 

229
00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:26,800
Pinocchio. 
The old Pinocchio's held up as a

230
00:11:26,800 --> 00:11:30,300
masterpiece specifically because
of the morals behind the 3, it 

231
00:11:30,300 --> 00:11:33,600
was about your conscience, being
your guide, following your 

232
00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:37,000
conscience learning, not to lie,
learning not to go with 

233
00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:40,100
untrustworthy individuals and 
Pinocchio, had a learn these 

234
00:11:40,100 --> 00:11:43,100
lessons to become a real boy. 
This story taught us that if we 

235
00:11:43,108 --> 00:11:46,200
grow up and we go to Pleasure 
Island and succumb to every 

236
00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:49,100
worldly Temptation, will 
eventually become a donkey and 

237
00:11:49,100 --> 00:11:51,900
it's not a fun path to go down 
with the new Pinocchio. 

238
00:11:51,900 --> 00:11:55,000
Disney's new version of it. 
There is no such stories taught,

239
00:11:55,100 --> 00:11:58,600
no overriding morals to it. 
There was just things happening 

240
00:11:58,600 --> 00:12:02,100
to Pinocchio and Didn't really 
have control over any of it. 

241
00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:04,500
And as this interviewer points 
out, the new Pinocchio, 

242
00:12:04,500 --> 00:12:06,800
basically learned. 
Nothing he just accepted who he 

243
00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:09,000
was, there's no really 
overarching story. 

244
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:11,300
No cause and effect. 
The new one was just a more safe

245
00:12:11,300 --> 00:12:14,700
less compelling less interesting
rehash of the old original and 

246
00:12:14,700 --> 00:12:17,900
again, this criticism is not 
unfounded audiences are not 

247
00:12:17,900 --> 00:12:20,000
liking this. 
Even the critics are not liking 

248
00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:21,600
this. 
The critics are saying that it's

249
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:25,100
losing the point of the original
film letting your conscience. 

250
00:12:25,100 --> 00:12:28,200
Be your guide, audiences are 
saying, just watch the original 

251
00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:30,700
Pinocchio. 
Instead now I Don't know exactly

252
00:12:30,700 --> 00:12:32,200
how much influence or control 
Bob. 

253
00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:35,500
Capek has had and the creative 
Endeavors, but he is the CEO of 

254
00:12:35,500 --> 00:12:38,100
the company. 
He can, if he wants have direct 

255
00:12:38,100 --> 00:12:41,000
influence over the content of 
the company, and the type of 

256
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:43,300
risks are taking. 
And in this part, Disney has 

257
00:12:43,300 --> 00:12:45,200
been underwhelming further along
in this interview. 

258
00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:49,100
Bob capek basically reveals that
he doesn't understand Disney as 

259
00:12:49,100 --> 00:12:51,100
a company. 
He really doesn't understand the

260
00:12:51,100 --> 00:12:54,400
content portion of it at all, 
which is basically all of 

261
00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:56,700
Disney. 
I always say that one. 

262
00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:02,700
Our fans and our audiences, put 
their kids to bed at night after

263
00:13:02,700 --> 00:13:05,900
watching Pinocchio or Dumbo or 
Little Mermaid. 

264
00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:11,000
They're probably not going to 
tune into another animated 

265
00:13:11,300 --> 00:13:13,600
movie, they want something for 
them. 

266
00:13:13,700 --> 00:13:16,400
Yes, you heard that right? 
The CEO of Disney, the most 

267
00:13:16,400 --> 00:13:19,900
creative company on Earth, 
views, animated content, as not 

268
00:13:19,900 --> 00:13:23,300
a medium of entertainment, both 
enjoyed by adults and children, 

269
00:13:23,600 --> 00:13:25,600
but just something to put the 
children to bed. 

270
00:13:25,700 --> 00:13:27,400
Throw on Pinocchio, throw on 
Dumbo. 

271
00:13:27,700 --> 00:13:30,600
Those are just children chose. 
And after they go to bed, then 

272
00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:33,200
the adults can turn on their non
animated series. 

273
00:13:33,300 --> 00:13:35,700
The guy doesn't even understand 
the company that he worked for, 

274
00:13:35,700 --> 00:13:38,100
he didn't even understand, 
animated content. 

275
00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:40,900
And this is a slap in the face 
to his own employees animators 

276
00:13:40,900 --> 00:13:43,900
of the company, working on an 
animated content to suggest that

277
00:13:43,900 --> 00:13:45,600
the only people driving joy out 
of it. 

278
00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:49,600
Our children problem number four
and possibly, the biggest 

279
00:13:49,600 --> 00:13:52,000
problem, bad operating 
performance. 

280
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:54,700
And keep in mind, this was the 
thing that popped a peck was 

281
00:13:54,700 --> 00:13:58,400
supposed to be uniquely good at.
He was the ater of the parks 

282
00:13:58,400 --> 00:14:00,700
business. 
He was good at growing revenues 

283
00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:03,300
growing income on a consistent 
basis. 

284
00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:07,900
Having good operations, that was
what he was uniquely suited for.

285
00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:10,100
So you could give excuses for 
the other thing. 

286
00:14:10,100 --> 00:14:12,100
All right, maybe he's not good 
at dealing with Talent. 

287
00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:14,600
So let's go ahead and give him a
pass on the whole Scarlett 

288
00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:17,900
Johansson suing, Disney thing. 
All right, maybe he's not good 

289
00:14:17,900 --> 00:14:20,200
at politics. 
He lost the battle against de 

290
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:22,800
santis that didn't go. 
Well, that didn't turn out well 

291
00:14:22,800 --> 00:14:25,400
for Disney, but we can give him 
a pass on that because he's not 

292
00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:29,000
a politician, and maybe we can 
even get My pass on, not really 

293
00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:32,100
understanding the content 
because after all Bob, capek 

294
00:14:32,100 --> 00:14:34,800
isn't the creative type. 
You could give them a pass on 

295
00:14:34,800 --> 00:14:37,400
everything else. 
But the one thing this guy is 

296
00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:41,300
supposed to be good at is 
operations, churning out profits

297
00:14:41,300 --> 00:14:44,300
from this large organization. 
So let's go ahead and see how 

298
00:14:44,300 --> 00:14:47,300
the operations of the company. 
The actual numbers look over the

299
00:14:47,300 --> 00:14:49,500
past two years. 
This is about when Bob capek 

300
00:14:49,500 --> 00:14:53,100
took over for Disney. 
Now, we can't blame this large 

301
00:14:53,100 --> 00:14:56,100
loss right here, for these two 
quarters on Bob capek. 

302
00:14:56,100 --> 00:14:57,500
That was because of the 
covid-19. 

303
00:14:57,500 --> 00:15:00,000
Pandemic, the entire park 
operation was shut down for 

304
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,800
about a year, so we can give 
them a pass on that. 

305
00:15:02,900 --> 00:15:05,900
There's nothing you can do about
that, but the last seven or 

306
00:15:05,900 --> 00:15:09,700
eight quarters, Disney has been 
open fully operational. 

307
00:15:09,800 --> 00:15:14,000
The parks are open business as 
usual and the earnings have been

308
00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:16,500
abysmal. 
Quarter after quarter a 

309
00:15:16,500 --> 00:15:19,500
continual disappointment, 
especially now that investors 

310
00:15:19,500 --> 00:15:22,500
are trying to focus on profits 
for the corporation, Disney's 

311
00:15:22,500 --> 00:15:24,200
not producing any profits we 
can. 

312
00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:26,400
Look at the free cash flows of 
the company and over the past 

313
00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:28,800
couple of years it's been Really
pathetic. 

314
00:15:28,900 --> 00:15:33,000
Last quarter was 187 million 
dollars in free cash flows. 

315
00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:35,700
When we factor in stock based 
compensation act, based 

316
00:15:35,700 --> 00:15:38,200
composite actually higher than 
their free cash flows. 

317
00:15:38,500 --> 00:15:41,300
For the first time in a long 
time for Disney, this is no 

318
00:15:41,300 --> 00:15:43,700
longer profitable. 
Company costs are going up. 

319
00:15:43,700 --> 00:15:47,500
Cash flows are going down and 
Bob capek, the great operator. 

320
00:15:47,500 --> 00:15:50,100
The person that supposed to be 
good at turning out profits, the

321
00:15:50,100 --> 00:15:52,800
seeing a continual decline in 
cash flows. 

322
00:15:52,900 --> 00:15:54,300
How much of this you can blame 
on Bob? 

323
00:15:54,300 --> 00:15:58,100
Capek is debatable, the company 
is going through a Transition 

324
00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:01,100
and I don't think he deserves 
100% of the blame but I don't 

325
00:16:01,100 --> 00:16:03,000
think that he's blameless in 
this situation. 

326
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:06,000
Bob capek has done a lot of 
changes operationally to the 

327
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:09,700
company and so far every report 
and every piece of data we can 

328
00:16:09,700 --> 00:16:13,700
look at says, that most of them 
are negative, Disney's New World

329
00:16:13,700 --> 00:16:16,200
Order leads to confusion and 
bruised egos. 

330
00:16:16,500 --> 00:16:19,800
What Bob capek did immediately 
when taking over was 

331
00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:22,800
restructuring the company? 
And so far this restructuring 

332
00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:24,600
looks like it has been a 
disaster. 

333
00:16:24,700 --> 00:16:27,400
Disney's reorganization of its 
media and entertainment. 

334
00:16:27,500 --> 00:16:30,400
Business into three, distinct 
content creation, groups, 

335
00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:33,400
Studios general, entertainment, 
and sports has caused 

336
00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:36,100
consternation for some senior 
managers, as well, as those 

337
00:16:36,100 --> 00:16:39,400
doing business with the company.
The reorganization was aimed at 

338
00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:42,200
better positioning Disney for a 
future that would be determined 

339
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:46,200
by its success in streaming. 
The goal at least on paper was 

340
00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:49,200
to have people work, more 
harmoniously across mediums, 

341
00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:51,400
from television to film to 
Disney. 

342
00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:53,300
Plus, the results have left. 
People. 

343
00:16:53,300 --> 00:16:56,400
Deeply confused about how to 
navigate the New Order, the 

344
00:16:56,400 --> 00:16:59,200
restructuring has made A lot of 
their employees upset and it's 

345
00:16:59,200 --> 00:17:00,900
actually made Executives in the 
company. 

346
00:17:00,908 --> 00:17:04,800
Try to keep themselves a little 
bit separated from what Bob 

347
00:17:04,800 --> 00:17:07,599
capek has been doing quote. 
Everyone is becoming more and 

348
00:17:07,599 --> 00:17:10,500
more differential tugce Peck 
things are radically different 

349
00:17:10,500 --> 00:17:14,000
than they were six months ago 
and this Insider who has an 

350
00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:16,700
executive said that they're 
trying to become more insulated 

351
00:17:16,700 --> 00:17:19,099
from the upheaval from the 
creative teams. 

352
00:17:19,099 --> 00:17:21,599
And again, you can try to make 
excuses for everything else. 

353
00:17:21,599 --> 00:17:24,300
But this was the thing that Bob 
capek was supposed to be good at

354
00:17:24,300 --> 00:17:27,400
the operations. 
After this most recent earnings,

355
00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:32,000
Report Disney shares drop like 
15 percent in a single day 

356
00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:34,200
because of how disappointing the
earnings were. 

357
00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:36,200
It was creating around like a 
penny stock. 

358
00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:39,100
And this is Disney. 
This is one of the best 

359
00:17:39,100 --> 00:17:42,700
properties and Assets in the 
globe and its trading like a 

360
00:17:42,700 --> 00:17:44,600
penny stock. 
And that's how we get to where 

361
00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:47,400
we are now. 
Bob capek was fired. 

362
00:17:47,600 --> 00:17:51,500
Bob Iger is back. 
Both of this to me was shocking 

363
00:17:51,500 --> 00:17:53,700
and I think it's shocking to 
most everyone that's been 

364
00:17:53,700 --> 00:17:56,100
following this company. 
Cbc's David Faber. 

365
00:17:56,100 --> 00:17:58,900
What his thoughts are? 
Sauron this because he told you 

366
00:17:58,900 --> 00:18:01,000
no way. 
Did you always think that there 

367
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:05,500
was a way way back for four? 
I don't know what he's not 

368
00:18:05,500 --> 00:18:06,700
necessarily your friend but you 
know him. 

369
00:18:06,700 --> 00:18:08,700
Well did you think there was a 
way back? 

370
00:18:08,700 --> 00:18:10,800
David it? 
No. 

371
00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:14,200
I it seemed highly unlikely 
certainly you'd have to imagine 

372
00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:16,500
of course this scenario like the
one that has played out and we 

373
00:18:16,500 --> 00:18:20,200
can talk a bit more about that 
but even with the idea that his 

374
00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:24,300
successor, mr. 
Champak would not succeed. 

375
00:18:24,300 --> 00:18:27,300
So to speak the idea that that 
Iger would then come back. 

376
00:18:27,500 --> 00:18:34,000
I think even as little as a few 
weeks ago, Joe, I think would 

377
00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:37,600
have been hard to imagine. 
I agree 100%. 

378
00:18:37,600 --> 00:18:38,700
In fact, we just heard this 
year. 

379
00:18:38,700 --> 00:18:41,500
The Bob capex signed another 
three-year extension to a CEO 

380
00:18:41,500 --> 00:18:43,700
role, so this is a complete 
shock. 

381
00:18:43,700 --> 00:18:47,000
I did not see this coming. 
I didn't see Bob jpg being fired

382
00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:49,600
right now and I didn't see Bob 
Iger coming back. 

383
00:18:49,700 --> 00:18:52,700
But the way these things work in
most cases is you have the CEO, 

384
00:18:52,700 --> 00:18:55,000
the supposed to guide the 
company, the right direction, 

385
00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:57,100
but the CEO works for the 
shareholders. 

386
00:18:57,400 --> 00:18:59,400
And the board protects the 
shareholders. 

387
00:18:59,700 --> 00:19:02,800
In this case, the board, 
obviously, felt along with many 

388
00:19:02,800 --> 00:19:06,000
other shareholders and many 
Disney customers, that the CEO 

389
00:19:06,000 --> 00:19:08,100
is not doing a good job running 
the company. 

390
00:19:08,300 --> 00:19:11,400
So Friday evening, they 
contacted Bob Iger and said, 

391
00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:12,900
hey, do you want to come back 
in? 

392
00:19:12,900 --> 00:19:14,900
What do you like to replace? 
Bob capek. 

393
00:19:14,900 --> 00:19:18,200
We don't like what he's doing. 
Once they confirmed that Bob 

394
00:19:18,200 --> 00:19:20,300
Iger was willing to step back 
into the role. 

395
00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:24,400
They fired Bob jpg, and they 
fired him Sunday evening. 

396
00:19:24,500 --> 00:19:27,300
So he only knew Sunday evening 
that he was losing his job. 

397
00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:30,700
Disney no longer the CEO of the 
company, and I can't imagine it 

398
00:19:30,700 --> 00:19:33,300
feels good to have a surprise 
firing from being the CEO of 

399
00:19:33,300 --> 00:19:36,700
Disney on a Sunday evening. 
I don't know how Bob jpg feels 

400
00:19:36,700 --> 00:19:39,100
right now, but I don't envy that
but either way, it was something

401
00:19:39,100 --> 00:19:43,100
that needed to be done, but this
was a board Joe that felt like 

402
00:19:43,100 --> 00:19:45,100
it didn't have a lot of choices 
at this point, is my 

403
00:19:45,100 --> 00:19:47,000
understanding, you know, after 
speaking to a number of people 

404
00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:49,500
close to the situation, this 
came together pretty quickly, 

405
00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:53,200
but the board did have concerns 
for some period of time. 

406
00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:56,900
Those concerns were heightened. 
Of course, after this most 

407
00:19:56,900 --> 00:20:00,200
recent, Earnings report. 
It was not a well-received 

408
00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:02,400
report. 
The conference call was not 

409
00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:05,300
well, thought of the losses 
associated with 

410
00:20:05,300 --> 00:20:07,700
direct-to-consumer. 
Obviously having grown, even 

411
00:20:07,700 --> 00:20:10,300
though the promise to be 
profitable by fiscal year, 

412
00:20:10,300 --> 00:20:14,300
twenty four Remains the board 
got more and more concerned that

413
00:20:14,300 --> 00:20:18,000
board led by Miss Arnold made it
clear to mr. 

414
00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:21,100
Chae, Peck last night that he 
was out. 

415
00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:25,300
My understanding is the only 
approach tiger on Friday Friday 

416
00:20:25,300 --> 00:20:30,100
night and sealed. 
Able to bring him back as of 

417
00:20:30,700 --> 00:20:34,200
last night, Friday, the board. 
Contacted Bob Iger asked him if 

418
00:20:34,208 --> 00:20:36,700
he would do the job, he said he 
would and then Sunday evening, 

419
00:20:36,700 --> 00:20:40,500
they fired, Bob, capek, and Bob 
Iger right now is tentatively 

420
00:20:40,500 --> 00:20:42,100
going to be working for two 
years. 

421
00:20:42,300 --> 00:20:44,200
So here we are with Bob Che pick
out Bob. 

422
00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:48,700
Iger back in the stock is up 7 
to 8% and on this subject I want

423
00:20:48,700 --> 00:20:51,400
to highlight one clip from 12 
days ago. 

424
00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:55,500
This interview here was from 12 
days ago right after Disney's 

425
00:20:55,500 --> 00:20:58,900
terrible earnings and I 
Highlight this and I think 

426
00:20:58,900 --> 00:21:02,200
daringly. 
So, as possibly an example of 

427
00:21:02,200 --> 00:21:06,100
Jim Cramer being right, can I 
propose that is that safe to 

428
00:21:06,100 --> 00:21:07,800
propose that he was correct on 
something? 

429
00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:10,700
Jim Cramer was asked what needs 
to happen with Disney. 

430
00:21:10,700 --> 00:21:16,200
And again, this was 12 days ago,
Disney, if they have ESPN, if we

431
00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:19,800
were on ESPN, we would say he's 
got to be fired. 

432
00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,100
That's pretty cut and dry. 
You're firing. 

433
00:21:24,100 --> 00:21:27,200
Bob jpac, is that we were saying
absolute absolute. 

434
00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:32,900
Absolute because I thought that 
he had a couple of years, the 

435
00:21:32,900 --> 00:21:35,300
teams going downhill. 
I mean that was incredible. 

436
00:21:35,300 --> 00:21:38,300
Last night was really team has 
been going downhill. 

437
00:21:38,300 --> 00:21:41,600
I had Faith semi faith and Frank
Reich in the Colts and I still 

438
00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:43,700
do it with Frank's, you know, 
winning record. 

439
00:21:44,100 --> 00:21:47,000
But there is just a doubt, no 
doubt that he did. 

440
00:21:47,000 --> 00:21:48,800
He has to go. 
I mean, that was just 

441
00:21:49,100 --> 00:21:51,600
unconscionable. 
There's no doubt that Bob jpeg 

442
00:21:51,600 --> 00:21:53,700
has to go. 
Absolutely, no doubt. 

443
00:21:53,700 --> 00:21:57,000
And he was saying this a week 
ago and the quartered self the 

444
00:21:57,000 --> 00:21:59,700
way he handled it. 
I mean, made it sound like he 

445
00:21:59,700 --> 00:22:06,300
was just a 4-star quarter 
delusional and I believed and I 

446
00:22:06,308 --> 00:22:10,300
was wrong. 
I was like, let me just go back 

447
00:22:10,300 --> 00:22:12,600
for a second. 
Do you think that it's shape? 

448
00:22:12,600 --> 00:22:14,700
Heck the man or do you think it 
is? 

449
00:22:15,100 --> 00:22:17,900
The I think he's a cyclical and 
secular headwinds that are 

450
00:22:17,900 --> 00:22:19,800
facing. 
There's no, no way. 

451
00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:21,300
You think? 
Yes, like a bad team. 

452
00:22:21,400 --> 00:22:23,600
It's the same team. 
What happened here? 

453
00:22:23,600 --> 00:22:27,300
Is that even the the stuff that 
he was good at the stuff that I,

454
00:22:27,300 --> 00:22:29,400
that I know, it's a little 
harder to control theme park, 

455
00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:34,400
but the the losses Here, Andrew,
we're just mind-boggling. 

456
00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:37,700
I mean, when you're going over 
the quarter, it's stunning. 

457
00:22:38,900 --> 00:22:41,900
And that's why I say, if it 
worked, if this was the NFL 

458
00:22:41,900 --> 00:22:44,900
where they have tremendous, 
tremendous accountability, and 

459
00:22:44,900 --> 00:22:47,900
we were watching their program 
of Sunday morning. 

460
00:22:47,900 --> 00:22:51,700
We would everyone together would
say he should be fired. 

461
00:22:51,700 --> 00:22:53,600
There's got to be something 
really wrong with the world. 

462
00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:55,900
When even Jim Cramer's, getting 
such a correct call. 

463
00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:58,600
Now with all of that that brings
us back to where we are now 

464
00:22:58,900 --> 00:23:01,700
again, Disney's one of my larger
Holdings in my portfolio. 

465
00:23:01,700 --> 00:23:04,200
It's a company that I think has 
great assets. 

466
00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:06,900
That's the biggest reason that 
I've bought into this company. 

467
00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:09,400
I think that all of their Teas 
and their intellectual 

468
00:23:09,400 --> 00:23:12,500
properties backed up and 
supported by their Parks, plus 

469
00:23:12,500 --> 00:23:15,400
the asset of ESPN. 
I think all of that is 

470
00:23:15,400 --> 00:23:19,700
incredibly incredibly valuable 
with ESPN, with Hulu, with 

471
00:23:19,700 --> 00:23:22,000
Disney plus, with all of their 
various Parks. 

472
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:25,500
I think this company just has 
great asset after great asset, 

473
00:23:25,700 --> 00:23:28,600
and a company with this, many 
good assets, should be using 

474
00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:31,400
them to generate profits. 
That's what companies do that 

475
00:23:31,400 --> 00:23:32,600
have. 
Amazing assets. 

476
00:23:32,900 --> 00:23:37,100
So this is a solvable problem, 
in my opinion, Disney should be 

477
00:23:37,100 --> 00:23:39,700
a highly profitable. 
Penny right now, I don't think 

478
00:23:39,700 --> 00:23:42,200
the current economics of the 
company reflect its true 

479
00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:45,600
potential and I do think that it
will take time, this isn't going

480
00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:48,900
to be an instant fix by Bob. 
Iger, it's not going to be an 

481
00:23:48,900 --> 00:23:51,100
overnight thing. 
I think it will take a number of

482
00:23:51,100 --> 00:23:54,700
quarters to correct this issue, 
but I expect a better outcome 

483
00:23:54,700 --> 00:23:57,200
with him at the helm and it will
give Disney. 

484
00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:00,200
And the board of directors, time
to find a more suitable 

485
00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:04,100
replacement than Bob capek. 
So, in my opinion, I don't see 

486
00:24:04,100 --> 00:24:07,500
any downside with this move. 
I don't see any potential 

487
00:24:07,500 --> 00:24:09,800
problems. 
I think this was a great move by

488
00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:12,000
the board of directors to 
protect the shareholder. 

489
00:24:12,300 --> 00:24:14,800
At the end of the day, that is 
who they serve. 

490
00:24:14,900 --> 00:24:17,400
They serve the shareholder of 
the company and whether or not 

491
00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:20,400
Che Peck was a great guy or not.
He wasn't doing a good enough 

492
00:24:20,400 --> 00:24:22,700
job in Disney's much bigger than
he is. 

493
00:24:22,900 --> 00:24:25,100
So, he's got to go. 
We have someone in there that 

494
00:24:25,100 --> 00:24:27,300
has proven to do the job for a 
long period of time. 

495
00:24:27,500 --> 00:24:28,900
You can do it for another two 
years. 

496
00:24:29,100 --> 00:24:31,300
So, as of right now, I'm going 
to continue to still hold this 

497
00:24:31,300 --> 00:24:33,000
company. 
Now moving on, we have the news 

498
00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:35,300
that Elizabeth Holmes was 
finally sentenced. 

499
00:24:35,300 --> 00:24:38,100
She was sentenced to eleven and 
a quarter years in prison. 

500
00:24:38,500 --> 00:24:41,600
Defrauding investors. 
And a lot of people argue about 

501
00:24:41,600 --> 00:24:43,800
whether or not this sentence is 
appropriate. 

502
00:24:43,800 --> 00:24:45,400
So let me share my quick 
thoughts on it. 

503
00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:47,500
First of all, I'm happy to see 
that. 

504
00:24:47,500 --> 00:24:49,700
It's at least not a slap on the 
wrist. 

505
00:24:49,800 --> 00:24:53,200
If she got four years, five 
years for this type of thing, I 

506
00:24:53,200 --> 00:24:56,000
think that would have been a 
real problem, 11 years as a 

507
00:24:56,000 --> 00:24:59,100
federal sentence, which usually 
don't get cut short too often. 

508
00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:02,300
That's a real sentence. 
She's going behind bars. 

509
00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:06,000
For a long amount of time that 
is a serious punishment. 

510
00:25:06,300 --> 00:25:08,000
Is it as bad as it could have 
been. 

511
00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:11,200
Absolutely not a lot of 
different analysis shows that 

512
00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:14,000
many people are sentenced to a 
lot longer for the same crimes. 

513
00:25:14,100 --> 00:25:16,900
So you can argue that Elizabeth 
Holmes did get off easier than 

514
00:25:16,900 --> 00:25:20,400
expected, but I still think that
11 years is better than it could

515
00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:22,200
have been. 
I think there's a good chance. 

516
00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:24,900
It could have been six or seven 
years if the judge wanted to go 

517
00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:27,200
extra lenient. 
Honor the big problem. 

518
00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:30,200
I have overall with this entire 
case is not really the 

519
00:25:30,200 --> 00:25:32,900
sentencing. 
But the convictions Elizabeth 

520
00:25:32,900 --> 00:25:35,800
Holmes was only found guilty on 
four separate charges. 

521
00:25:36,100 --> 00:25:38,300
She was found guilty on three of
the nine fraud. 

522
00:25:38,500 --> 00:25:40,100
Counts. 
And one of the two conspiracy 

523
00:25:40,100 --> 00:25:43,000
counts and then you look at her 
partner in crime and her love 

524
00:25:43,000 --> 00:25:46,300
interests on eBay Lonnie, who 
she had literally a romantic 

525
00:25:46,300 --> 00:25:48,400
relationship. 
There is so close together for a

526
00:25:48,408 --> 00:25:50,300
number of years. 
But in his case, he was 

527
00:25:50,300 --> 00:25:53,000
convicted of all 12 counts of 
fraud. 

528
00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:55,500
They convicted Sunny bhawani 
with everything and Elizabeth 

529
00:25:55,500 --> 00:25:58,000
Holmes with only four. 
So even before we got to 

530
00:25:58,008 --> 00:26:00,400
sentencing, I see a huge 
discrepancy in the amount of 

531
00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:03,500
convictions, but if you take 
that out, I think the sentencing

532
00:26:03,500 --> 00:26:06,300
of 11 years was at least decent.
So that's all the news for now. 

533
00:26:06,300 --> 00:26:08,200
I hope you enjoyed the episode, 
I'll have more content. 

534
00:26:08,400 --> 00:26:10,200
Out in the future and I'll see 
you in the next one. 

535
00:26:08,400 --> 00:26:10,200
Out in the future and I'll see 
you in the next one.

