1
00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:02,400
Welcome back everyone. 
We have so much to get into in 

2
00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:06,000
this episode of the Joseph 
Carlson show as you know I made 

3
00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:09,200
some changes to the portfolio, 
the beginning of this year. 

4
00:00:09,700 --> 00:00:13,100
I'm basically trying to up the 
quality of my companies. 

5
00:00:13,100 --> 00:00:16,000
I'm trying to trim down on some 
of the fat and make it so that 

6
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:19,500
every company, my portfolio are 
really top performers. 

7
00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:22,600
Now, what I want to do is 
actually just do an update, see 

8
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:25,600
what's going on. 
Year-to-date we're up five point

9
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:29,500
nine, six percent so far year 
today, that's 22,000 and we're 

10
00:00:29,500 --> 00:00:33,000
going to go By sector by sector 
and category by category and 

11
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,600
just see how these companies are
doing and why they're performing

12
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:37,500
the way they are this year. 
Then of course, we have some 

13
00:00:37,500 --> 00:00:40,500
economic news u.s. 
GDP came out at two point nine 

14
00:00:40,500 --> 00:00:43,100
percent growth is moderating in 
the US. 

15
00:00:43,100 --> 00:00:47,200
Corporate layoffs are spreading 
Beyond just big Tech into the 

16
00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:50,100
entire corporate world and we 
have some earnings reports 

17
00:00:50,100 --> 00:00:52,100
Union. 
Pacific released their earnings.

18
00:00:52,100 --> 00:00:55,200
Microsoft released their 
earnings MasterCard released 

19
00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:57,900
their earnings. 
These are all large Holdings in 

20
00:00:57,900 --> 00:01:00,300
my portfolio and we're going to 
be going through all Of these 

21
00:01:00,300 --> 00:01:02,500
earnings reports and see how 
these companies are doing. 

22
00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:05,500
And then finally, we have an 
update on all of those 

23
00:01:05,500 --> 00:01:08,900
tick-tocks of a day in the life 
of a LinkedIn employee or a 

24
00:01:08,908 --> 00:01:12,600
Google employee. 
Now, employees or rather X 

25
00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:16,900
employees are making videos of a
day in the life of being laid 

26
00:01:16,900 --> 00:01:19,300
off from Google. 
I kid, you not. 

27
00:01:19,300 --> 00:01:22,300
This is the new trend, they're 
making videos about their story 

28
00:01:22,300 --> 00:01:24,600
of being laid off. 
So as always, we have a lot to 

29
00:01:24,607 --> 00:01:26,700
get to in this episode. 
Let's go ahead and start off 

30
00:01:26,700 --> 00:01:29,600
with a portfolio update. 
We gained thousands of new 

31
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:31,300
subscribers. 
Subscribers in the Joseph 

32
00:01:31,300 --> 00:01:34,400
Carlson show every single month 
so if you're one of the new ones

33
00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:37,600
here welcome we do something a 
little bit different here. 

34
00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,800
The most channels we show our 
actual money, we show it. 

35
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,800
Invested we show it 
transparently with every single 

36
00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:45,800
thing that we're buying. 
Every single thing that we're 

37
00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:48,000
selling. 
I not only show what I'm buying 

38
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:51,000
and selling but I also show what
I make mistakes when I have 

39
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,700
Investments that don't turn out.
Well, one of my worst 

40
00:01:53,700 --> 00:01:57,100
Investments right now is Disney.
I'm losing money on this 

41
00:01:57,100 --> 00:01:58,400
company. 
So there's a level of 

42
00:01:58,408 --> 00:02:01,000
transparency here that you don't
get Many other places. 

43
00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:03,700
But what I want to do in this 
video is give an update on the 

44
00:02:03,700 --> 00:02:06,800
performance of my portfolio. 
Year-to-date, we're looking at 

45
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:10,300
the passive income account and 
what I'll say is this 393 

46
00:02:10,300 --> 00:02:14,000
thousand dollars that is real 
money and that makes up my 

47
00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:16,800
largest investment vehicle by 
far. 

48
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:20,700
I have another smaller Tech 
portfolio but that one is much 

49
00:02:20,700 --> 00:02:24,200
smaller than this portfolio. 
Four hundred thousand dollars is

50
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:26,900
a ton of money to me. 
The only thing that even comes 

51
00:02:26,900 --> 00:02:29,800
close is my equity in my house 
where I live. 

52
00:02:29,900 --> 00:02:32,700
Liv and I don't really consider 
that an investment in the same 

53
00:02:32,700 --> 00:02:35,700
way I do the passive income 
portfolio so this is a 

54
00:02:35,700 --> 00:02:38,300
meaningful amount of money. 
And the goal here is to compound

55
00:02:38,300 --> 00:02:40,200
my portfolio as much as 
possible. 

56
00:02:40,500 --> 00:02:43,800
Frankly, I want to beat the S&P 
500 and I want to Beat It by a 

57
00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:45,800
large degree over the next 10 
years. 

58
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:48,700
In terms of keeping track of 
progress, I really started 

59
00:02:48,700 --> 00:02:51,900
paying attention to it and 2022 
and 2022. 

60
00:02:51,900 --> 00:02:54,800
The passive income account was 
down sixteen point, two, two 

61
00:02:54,800 --> 00:02:57,800
percent, and that's with 
dividends being included. 

62
00:02:57,900 --> 00:03:01,100
So, with dividends reinvested, 
we were Sixteen point two, two 

63
00:03:01,100 --> 00:03:06,700
percent time-weighted Returns 
the S&P 500 went down. 18.1 4% 

64
00:03:06,700 --> 00:03:10,800
the same year with dividends 
reinvested so we barely out 

65
00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:14,300
performed it in 2022. 
And that's partially because of 

66
00:03:14,300 --> 00:03:16,200
how well, Texas Roadhouse and 
view cheated. 

67
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:20,100
So a couple Holdings held it up 
last year, but this isn't the 

68
00:03:20,100 --> 00:03:22,100
type of outperformance that I'm 
wanting. 

69
00:03:22,300 --> 00:03:25,500
I don't want to beat the S&P 500
by just a couple percentage. 

70
00:03:25,500 --> 00:03:28,700
I'd like to make the Gap much 
wider over the coming years. 

71
00:03:28,700 --> 00:03:31,900
And so, what I want to do is go 
over my plan for doing that. 

72
00:03:31,900 --> 00:03:36,500
If I flip over to a year to date
so far were up 6.2 one percent. 

73
00:03:36,500 --> 00:03:39,400
The S&P 500 is up, five point 
seven, seven percent. 

74
00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:41,800
So we're basically matching it 
right now and some of my 

75
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:44,400
companies are performing a 
little bit better than others. 

76
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,500
If we stay on the year-to-date 
metric here, we can go sector by

77
00:03:47,500 --> 00:03:49,800
sector but we go into the tech 
category. 

78
00:03:49,900 --> 00:03:53,500
I have two companies in this 
category apple and Microsoft 

79
00:03:53,500 --> 00:03:56,400
Apples Up 14% Microsoft is 
lagging. 

80
00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:58,400
The market up only two and a 
half percent. 

81
00:03:58,500 --> 00:04:02,800
I think that Microsoft Right now
is heavily undervalued based off

82
00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:06,000
the quality of the company and 
its future growth prospects. 

83
00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:09,500
And I say that, after seeing 
their last earnings, that were a

84
00:04:09,508 --> 00:04:12,800
bit disappointing to investors. 
If we look at Microsoft's latest

85
00:04:12,800 --> 00:04:15,900
numbers, they are a little bit 
lower than last year, the 

86
00:04:15,900 --> 00:04:18,399
earnings were down 11% 
year-over-year. 

87
00:04:18,500 --> 00:04:20,700
The ibadah was a little bit 
lower, that's a little bit 

88
00:04:20,700 --> 00:04:23,600
concerning, even the top line, 
revenue had an incredible 

89
00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:26,800
deceleration. 
It only grew at two percent two 

90
00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:29,900
percent year over year. 
But most of all I think the The 

91
00:04:29,907 --> 00:04:32,900
most concerning thing is in the 
cash flow of the company, the 

92
00:04:32,900 --> 00:04:36,100
cash flows plummeted. 
Look at this last quarter. 

93
00:04:36,500 --> 00:04:38,300
Doesn't that put it in 
perspective? 

94
00:04:38,300 --> 00:04:41,600
There the cash flows, like a 
third of what it was the prior 

95
00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:44,200
quarters. 
Now, over the full year, it was 

96
00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:48,000
a pretty good year for Microsoft
in 2022 but the fourth-quarter 

97
00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:51,200
shows a strong deceleration. 
Then in addition to all these 

98
00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:53,700
slowing Trends with this 
quarter, we have the CEO of the 

99
00:04:53,700 --> 00:04:57,300
company Sachin, Adela he goes on
the earnings call and he 

100
00:04:57,300 --> 00:04:59,700
basically does everything in his
power. 

101
00:05:00,100 --> 00:05:02,300
To torpedo the company's stock 
price. 

102
00:05:02,600 --> 00:05:06,300
He talks about how everything 
slowing down and the company's 

103
00:05:06,300 --> 00:05:09,700
going to basically take a break 
for the next two years that Tech

104
00:05:09,700 --> 00:05:11,400
spending. 
Slowing down the economy, 

105
00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,700
slowing down, every time someone
talks to him about something 

106
00:05:14,700 --> 00:05:17,100
exciting. 
He basically pores cold water on

107
00:05:17,100 --> 00:05:19,100
it. 
So he was not enthusiastic in 

108
00:05:19,100 --> 00:05:21,100
this earnings report. 
Now there's something that I 

109
00:05:21,100 --> 00:05:24,200
want to mention that I think is 
an often missed point, but I 

110
00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:28,300
think it's very important in 
regards to CEOs, like such an 

111
00:05:28,300 --> 00:05:32,800
Adela talking In negatively 
about his own company saying 

112
00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:36,600
that that growth is slowing. 
That competition is coming that 

113
00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:38,900
they're struggling through the 
times. 

114
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:43,400
Let me put it this way, once 
you're the CEO of a company that

115
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:46,200
is monopolistic and Incredibly 
powerful. 

116
00:05:46,700 --> 00:05:51,000
It's as if you get invited to a 
secret Club, a secret Club of 

117
00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:56,300
CEOs of monopolistic companies 
and they highlight the rules, 

118
00:05:56,400 --> 00:05:58,300
right? 
When you enter in the club they 

119
00:05:58,300 --> 00:06:02,300
say, rule one. 
Being part of a monopolistic 

120
00:06:02,300 --> 00:06:07,000
company is you do not talk about
the monopolistic nature of your 

121
00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:10,300
company. 
Rule, two is to not break. 

122
00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:14,600
Rule 1, do not talk about the 
monopolistic nature of your 

123
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:17,400
company. 
You have to tell the public that

124
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:19,700
you're a company, that faces 
lots of competition. 

125
00:06:19,700 --> 00:06:21,700
You don't have a Stranglehold on
the market. 

126
00:06:21,900 --> 00:06:24,300
You are struggling. 
You're just hanging in there. 

127
00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:28,500
That's what you do as the CEO of
a monopolistic company. 

128
00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:31,000
So with that, in mind, your 
We're going to hear a CEO like 

129
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:35,000
such an adult, come out and say,
Microsoft, basically, controls 

130
00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:36,400
everything in the corporate 
world. 

131
00:06:36,500 --> 00:06:39,000
We have all of the most 
important applications, we Face 

132
00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:42,300
minimal competition that we can.
Frankly, just by, if they ever 

133
00:06:42,300 --> 00:06:45,900
actually threatened us and all 
things are running as normal, we

134
00:06:45,900 --> 00:06:48,400
basically don't have to do much 
to maintain our Monopoly. 

135
00:06:48,700 --> 00:06:51,100
He's never going to come out and
say that you have to read that 

136
00:06:51,100 --> 00:06:54,400
between the lines. 
Tim Cook will never come out and

137
00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:57,900
say that iOS is a monopoly, 
he'll never come out and say 

138
00:06:57,900 --> 00:07:01,100
that even though it kind of is 
Is you're never gonna have the 

139
00:07:01,100 --> 00:07:04,700
CEO of MasterCard which is 
clearly monopolistic and they 

140
00:07:04,700 --> 00:07:07,800
own a duopoly with Visa. 
The CEO of MasterCard is never 

141
00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:11,300
going to come out and say look 
we control the payment rails. 

142
00:07:11,300 --> 00:07:14,100
Everything flows through us, we 
have a natural monopoly. 

143
00:07:14,300 --> 00:07:16,400
People, use our products, we 
have incredibly little 

144
00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:20,500
competition and anyone that 
tries to go around us, instead 

145
00:07:20,500 --> 00:07:23,000
of through US does to their own 
detriment. 

146
00:07:23,100 --> 00:07:25,900
He will never say that. 
The CEOs of monopolistic 

147
00:07:25,900 --> 00:07:29,300
companies are often the ones 
that talk mostly about all the 

148
00:07:29,300 --> 00:07:30,200
challenges. 
Changes. 

149
00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:34,200
They face they talk about all 
the problems of company has all 

150
00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:36,800
the competition they face and 
they do so because they know 

151
00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:38,900
publicly that's what's best to 
highlight. 

152
00:07:39,100 --> 00:07:42,200
Because in many cases the main 
challenge these companies face 

153
00:07:42,500 --> 00:07:46,100
is legislation the government 
coming in and breaking up their 

154
00:07:46,100 --> 00:07:48,900
natural monopolies. 
Now on the contrary many cases 

155
00:07:48,900 --> 00:07:52,100
the CEO's that talked about 
their company being a monopoly 

156
00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:55,600
and facing no competition and 
they can't even see competition 

157
00:07:55,600 --> 00:07:58,600
with a telescope are in many 
cases, the companies that faced 

158
00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:03,100
the most Competition. 
So a lot of this is completely 

159
00:08:03,100 --> 00:08:06,500
in verse to what you would 
suspect as an investor, when 

160
00:08:06,500 --> 00:08:08,800
you're listening to earnings 
calls and you're listening to 

161
00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:11,900
companies, talk about their own 
company, the ones that are the 

162
00:08:11,900 --> 00:08:15,800
most confident in their Market 
position are the ones that need 

163
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:17,900
to speak. 
The least amount about how 

164
00:08:17,900 --> 00:08:20,900
powerful their business model. 
Is the companies that have the 

165
00:08:20,900 --> 00:08:24,100
least powerful Market positions 
are the ones that have to 

166
00:08:24,100 --> 00:08:27,300
convince investors. 
They have to talk openly about 

167
00:08:27,300 --> 00:08:29,200
how powerful of a company they 
are. 

168
00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:32,299
So keep that in mind when you're
listening to earnings reports. 

169
00:08:32,500 --> 00:08:36,400
Either way, a lot of investors, 
don't get this subject and what 

170
00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:40,100
such a Nadella did speaking down
about Microsoft had the effect 

171
00:08:40,100 --> 00:08:42,600
of throwing cold water on the 
earnings report. 

172
00:08:42,700 --> 00:08:45,000
And I don't think that that 
paints an accurate picture for a

173
00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:47,300
company of this quality. 
The main thing that I'll mention

174
00:08:47,300 --> 00:08:50,500
about Microsoft's report is even
though things are decelerate in 

175
00:08:50,500 --> 00:08:53,600
a little bit, they're slowing 
down the core products. 

176
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,600
The most profitable products in 
the most meaningful ones are 

177
00:08:56,600 --> 00:09:00,100
still going really well. 
The server products, and Cloud 

178
00:09:00,100 --> 00:09:03,400
services, they increased Revenue
by 20%. 

179
00:09:03,700 --> 00:09:06,400
All of their server products 
still grew at a twenty percent 

180
00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:10,100
rate, the Azure business, their 
primary cloud service. 

181
00:09:10,100 --> 00:09:14,600
Revenue growth was 31% and 
that's with currency being 

182
00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,300
adjusted. 
If you held constant currency, 

183
00:09:17,300 --> 00:09:20,200
which basically means if you 
took out foreign exchange rates,

184
00:09:20,500 --> 00:09:24,300
it grew at 38%, that's an 
astounding level of growth for 

185
00:09:24,300 --> 00:09:26,200
Azure. 
So, their core products are not 

186
00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:29,700
decelerate in that much, that is
still very strong growth. 

187
00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,000
'The so my opinion, even though 
this is a slow down this 

188
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:35,200
quarter, I think we can exercise
a little patience here because I

189
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,300
don't think this slowdown is 
going to last forever. 

190
00:09:37,500 --> 00:09:40,600
The core businesses of Microsoft
are still doing really well. 

191
00:09:40,700 --> 00:09:43,800
A lot of the things that slow 
down where their Hardware Sales 

192
00:09:44,000 --> 00:09:46,800
things that I don't think are as
critical for the core business 

193
00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:48,800
for Microsoft. 
Now, moving on, we're still 

194
00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:50,600
looking at the year-to-date 
performance here. 

195
00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:52,500
I want to go into the financial 
category. 

196
00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:56,200
This is another one that I've 
built up heavily this year, SP 

197
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:59,300
Global and MasterCard. 
If you haven't studied these 

198
00:09:59,300 --> 00:10:02,800
businesses, Is I recommend doing
so because the more that I look 

199
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:06,900
into them the deeper, I dive the
more I like these companies they

200
00:10:06,900 --> 00:10:09,300
fit basically. 
Every characteristic I look for 

201
00:10:09,300 --> 00:10:13,200
in a compounder they have 
pricing power real pricing power

202
00:10:13,300 --> 00:10:16,600
where they raise prices for 10 
years straight and they don't 

203
00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,100
lose customers. 
As a consequence, they have 

204
00:10:19,100 --> 00:10:22,400
almost no capex requirements. 
So these companies are 

205
00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,200
incredibly Capital efficient. 
They have pricing power their 

206
00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:26,900
monopolistic. 
They're highly entrenched 

207
00:10:26,900 --> 00:10:29,600
businesses that I think, will 
grow their earnings per share. 

208
00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,900
Air and free cash flow per share
at a rate far exceeding. 

209
00:10:32,900 --> 00:10:35,300
The S&P 500 over the next 10 
years. 

210
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:39,600
I truly believe these companies 
will trounce the S&P 500 over 

211
00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:42,100
the next 10 years. 
MasterCard, just reported their 

212
00:10:42,100 --> 00:10:45,600
earnings and it was basically in
line with expectations, which is

213
00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:48,800
exactly what I'm looking for. 
The CEO had commentary, that's a

214
00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,100
little bit different than what 
we're seeing in the economic 

215
00:10:51,100 --> 00:10:53,600
reports. 
He says that the economy overall

216
00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:56,100
is pretty resilient that 
consumers are holding up and he 

217
00:10:56,100 --> 00:10:58,900
speaks about travel. 
He said, quote as we look at the

218
00:10:58,900 --> 00:11:01,700
broader economy, We see the 
continued recovery of 

219
00:11:01,700 --> 00:11:05,900
cross-border travel with volumes
up 59 percent versus a year ago,

220
00:11:06,100 --> 00:11:09,800
and we're encouraged by Asia 
opening up further, while macro 

221
00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:12,500
economic and geopolitical 
uncertainty persists, consumer 

222
00:11:12,500 --> 00:11:15,300
spending has been remarkably 
resilient. 

223
00:11:15,500 --> 00:11:18,400
We are well prepared to adjust 
our investment profile quickly 

224
00:11:18,400 --> 00:11:20,900
if needed. 
That's another thing that being 

225
00:11:20,900 --> 00:11:23,300
Capital, light allows you the 
company has a ton of 

226
00:11:23,300 --> 00:11:25,100
flexibility. 
One more thing that I'd 

227
00:11:25,100 --> 00:11:28,000
highlight from this earnings 
report is their return of 

228
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:30,900
capital to shareholders because 
MasterCard is such an 

229
00:11:30,900 --> 00:11:33,600
efficiently ran business. 
What they're essentially able to

230
00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:37,900
do is reinvest very little back 
into their business and return 

231
00:11:37,900 --> 00:11:41,000
all of their massive amounts of 
profits back to the investors, 

232
00:11:41,300 --> 00:11:46,100
MasterCard, repurchased, 7.4 
million shares at a cost of two 

233
00:11:46,100 --> 00:11:49,800
point, four billion dollars and 
paid four hundred and seventy 

234
00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:52,700
three million dollars in 
dividends if the stock price 

235
00:11:52,700 --> 00:11:56,000
ever dips for a company like 
this, you know, that they're 

236
00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:58,900
buying back, the shares 
aggressively, they will work on 

237
00:11:58,900 --> 00:12:00,900
getting that stock. 
Back up through share 

238
00:12:00,900 --> 00:12:04,500
repurchases, MasterCard is such 
an officially ran business that 

239
00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:07,600
aside from some type of horrible
disruption to their core 

240
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:09,700
business model. 
I think the company will 

241
00:12:09,700 --> 00:12:13,700
continue to compound, it's free 
cash flow per share at 15 

242
00:12:13,700 --> 00:12:16,500
percent over the next 10 years. 
And in terms of core risks to 

243
00:12:16,500 --> 00:12:19,500
the business model, I believe 
the biggest one is government 

244
00:12:19,500 --> 00:12:21,300
intervention. 
Now again we're still looking at

245
00:12:21,300 --> 00:12:23,700
year-to-date here and we're 
going on to the next category 

246
00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:26,600
which is consumer. 
This is a category that I have 

247
00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:29,900
not been adding to this year. 
In fact, all I've done in In 

248
00:12:29,900 --> 00:12:33,400
this category so far is trim 
different positions. 

249
00:12:33,700 --> 00:12:37,400
I've trimmed my Nike position by
a pretty substantial amount. 

250
00:12:37,500 --> 00:12:40,700
I really like Nike as a stock 
and a company, I think it's 

251
00:12:40,700 --> 00:12:42,800
phenomenally. 
Well ran the metrics are 

252
00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:44,900
incredible. 
The profitability ratios are 

253
00:12:44,900 --> 00:12:47,200
incredible. 
The balance sheet is solid, 

254
00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:49,500
there is nothing wrong with this
business. 

255
00:12:49,900 --> 00:12:52,800
But this stock price is just 
hard for me to wrap my head 

256
00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:54,900
around no matter which way I 
looked at it. 

257
00:12:54,900 --> 00:12:59,000
The stock is just expensive. 
It trades at a 36 Ford PE ratio 

258
00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,900
the free cash. 
Close at like 1 percent right 

259
00:13:01,900 --> 00:13:04,300
now, I've even ran through 
different discounted cash flow 

260
00:13:04,300 --> 00:13:06,000
metrics based on different 
assumptions. 

261
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:08,600
Oh, no matter what way I look at
the company, I keep coming to 

262
00:13:08,600 --> 00:13:11,000
the conclusion that it's just a 
bit expensive. 

263
00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:13,600
I thought it was time to take 
some gains and move the money to

264
00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:16,800
other companies that I think, 
present, a better risk reward in

265
00:13:16,800 --> 00:13:19,700
the restaurant category. 
Again, this is just year to date

266
00:13:19,700 --> 00:13:23,100
on these companies. 
I'm up and total over 6,000 on 

267
00:13:23,100 --> 00:13:26,600
Texas, Roadhouse and 3,000 on 
Starbucks and I've not been 

268
00:13:26,600 --> 00:13:28,400
buying or selling either of 
these companies. 

269
00:13:28,400 --> 00:13:31,400
I've simply been holding them 
I'm very bullish on Texas 

270
00:13:31,400 --> 00:13:33,300
Roadhouse. 
I still think this company is 

271
00:13:33,308 --> 00:13:36,500
going to widely outperform the 
market, over the next couple of 

272
00:13:36,500 --> 00:13:40,400
years, especially if demand 
stays relatively strong for 

273
00:13:40,400 --> 00:13:42,300
restaurant spending. 
So we'll see how this one does 

274
00:13:42,300 --> 00:13:44,400
the earnings reports. 
Next month, I'll give an update 

275
00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:48,100
on it, but my assumption is it's
going to be out growing a lot of

276
00:13:48,100 --> 00:13:50,300
growth companies. 
I think Texas Roadhouse will be 

277
00:13:50,300 --> 00:13:53,800
outgrowing the majority of big 
Tech once again after the 

278
00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:55,800
restaurant category we have my 
real estate holdings. 

279
00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:59,200
These are real estate investment
trusts I only hold one company 

280
00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:03,000
right now which is Vici so far 
up, 6.8% year-to-date. 

281
00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,500
This is a very large holding of 
mine and I have not bought any 

282
00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:09,500
or sold any this year and I 
don't plan on trimming. 

283
00:14:09,500 --> 00:14:12,900
This holding any time soon. 
I'm still incredibly bullish on 

284
00:14:12,900 --> 00:14:16,000
beachy, although the company 
employs leverage because it's a 

285
00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:19,900
real estate company, it has 
baked in pricing power, every 

286
00:14:19,900 --> 00:14:23,000
single year they have 
contractual agreements to raise 

287
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:25,300
prices above the rate of 
inflation. 

288
00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:28,900
So right there, we have the 
pricing power question solved 

289
00:14:28,900 --> 00:14:30,900
and we also have a growing Oh, 
that aspect, because they 

290
00:14:30,900 --> 00:14:34,200
continue to buy new properties. 
So, overall, I still like the 

291
00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:36,500
valuation of the company, I 
still like the dividend 

292
00:14:36,500 --> 00:14:38,500
payments, I like the growth 
prospects. 

293
00:14:38,700 --> 00:14:41,700
And then last but not least the 
category, that's performed. 

294
00:14:41,700 --> 00:14:45,300
The worst this year is the 
Industrials, which are actually 

295
00:14:45,300 --> 00:14:48,800
in the red this year down 1.5 
percent year-to-date. 

296
00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:52,200
I don't normally love industrial
Investments and the reason that 

297
00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:55,600
I don't love them is because of 
their incredibly high amounts of

298
00:14:55,600 --> 00:14:59,200
capex. 
They require a ton of capital to

299
00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:02,400
run these This is lots of 
reinvestment back into the 

300
00:15:02,400 --> 00:15:06,200
business year over year over 
year, for example, Union 

301
00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:10,600
Pacific, and Canadian Pacific. 
The average capex that they have

302
00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:14,700
to spend proportionate to their 
revenue is around 15% per year. 

303
00:15:14,700 --> 00:15:19,000
When you look at a company like 
Mastercard, or VISA or SP 

304
00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:21,200
Global, it's less than a percent
per year. 

305
00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:25,300
So, these companies, spend a 
fortune in capex, they have lots

306
00:15:25,300 --> 00:15:27,300
of heavy Investments, they have 
to make back into their 

307
00:15:27,300 --> 00:15:29,300
business. 
The reason why I still invest in

308
00:15:29,300 --> 00:15:31,600
these companies Knees. 
Despite them having high capex 

309
00:15:31,800 --> 00:15:34,300
is because of their monopolistic
Market structure. 

310
00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:37,000
The fact that they're highly 
entrenched and I think they face

311
00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:39,800
very little competition and 
chance of disruption. 

312
00:15:39,900 --> 00:15:42,200
I thought the earnings report 
was fine, it was nothing, 

313
00:15:42,200 --> 00:15:45,000
amazing, the market, didn't seem
to like it that much. 

314
00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:48,100
The stock was down a couple 
percentage afterwards, but for 

315
00:15:48,100 --> 00:15:51,800
the full year of 2020 to the 
company grew Revenue by 8%, 

316
00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:54,900
which I think is good for Union 
Pacific because they struggle 

317
00:15:54,900 --> 00:15:57,500
with that top line, revenue 
growth and their operating 

318
00:15:57,500 --> 00:16:00,000
income was up six percent. 
Now, what I actually, At the 

319
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:04,300
market didn't like, the most was
comments, that the CEO made soon

320
00:16:04,300 --> 00:16:06,900
after the earnings release. 
He went on to CNBC and he spoke 

321
00:16:06,900 --> 00:16:11,400
about the overall economy. 
Yeah, so unlike say, the past 

322
00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:14,700
three or four years, you've got 
this Dynamic of the FED raising 

323
00:16:14,700 --> 00:16:18,700
interest rates very rapidly, 
which ultimately will destroy 

324
00:16:18,700 --> 00:16:23,900
demand across markets and you've
got consumers that have been 

325
00:16:23,900 --> 00:16:26,500
telling us for quite some time 
that they're concerned. 

326
00:16:26,700 --> 00:16:29,100
But they've been flush with 
cash. 

327
00:16:29,700 --> 00:16:32,300
Mostly about transfer payments 
from the government, but also 

328
00:16:32,300 --> 00:16:36,100
from a very hot jobs market. 
So you put those two together 

329
00:16:36,500 --> 00:16:39,000
and it does appear, that 
consumers are starting to pull 

330
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:40,900
in their horns. 
On Goods, consumption. 

331
00:16:41,100 --> 00:16:44,400
They're still consuming at a 
high rate on experiences and 

332
00:16:44,400 --> 00:16:48,800
travel and entertainment and 
it's just not clear yet. 

333
00:16:48,800 --> 00:16:52,800
Exactly what the impacts going 
to be of the FED interest rate 

334
00:16:52,800 --> 00:16:55,300
increases. 
Although clearly, you can see 

335
00:16:55,300 --> 00:16:58,100
early Innings, it's having an 
impact on things like housing. 

336
00:16:58,100 --> 00:17:00,900
You see the commonality here 
another CEO of a company that's 

337
00:17:00,900 --> 00:17:04,300
widely considered an oligopoly 
and has entrenched Market 

338
00:17:04,300 --> 00:17:08,700
position is not talking 
glowingly about the future, he's

339
00:17:08,700 --> 00:17:11,300
saying that things are a little 
bit less predictable. 

340
00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:15,000
We have some employment issues 
and he's highlighting all the 

341
00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:18,099
challenges but he can't 
highlight the strengths of his 

342
00:17:18,099 --> 00:17:20,300
company. 
The CEO is not going to come out

343
00:17:20,300 --> 00:17:23,000
and say we Face very little 
competition. 

344
00:17:23,099 --> 00:17:25,200
So we can continue to employ 
pricing power. 

345
00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,600
We can raise prices because our 
customers unfortunately can't 

346
00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:31,200
really go to anyone else. 
Yes, you simply not going to say

347
00:17:31,200 --> 00:17:32,300
that. 
Now, if I go back to the 

348
00:17:32,300 --> 00:17:34,900
earnings release, I want to jump
to what I actually consider to 

349
00:17:34,900 --> 00:17:36,600
be the most important thing to 
me. 

350
00:17:36,700 --> 00:17:38,000
This is what I'm looking for 
here. 

351
00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:41,200
The 2023 guidance, what they 
outline here is full. 

352
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:44,000
You're operating ratio 
Improvement, so they're saying 

353
00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:46,000
that margins are going to go up 
there. 

354
00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:50,300
Operating efficiency is going to
go up and that is the story of 

355
00:17:50,300 --> 00:17:53,600
the railroads becoming more and 
more efficient every single day.

356
00:17:53,900 --> 00:17:57,300
Then we have that next, very 
difficult thing that I look for 

357
00:17:57,300 --> 00:18:01,400
in companies pricing power. 
The ability to raise the price 

358
00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:05,300
of your product, above the rate 
of inflation for 10 years, 

359
00:18:05,300 --> 00:18:09,200
straight without losing 
customers to competition, they 

360
00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:13,100
outline that they're expecting 
to price dollars in excess of 

361
00:18:13,100 --> 00:18:16,000
inflation dollars. 
So they're raising their prices 

362
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:20,000
in excess of inflation and they 
state that openly why are they 

363
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:21,800
able to do that? 
Because their railroads and 

364
00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:25,100
their customers frankly don't 
have many other options and then

365
00:18:25,100 --> 00:18:27,700
in terms of capital allocation 
like I outlined they spend a 

366
00:18:27,708 --> 00:18:29,400
significant amount of their 
revenue. 

367
00:18:29,700 --> 00:18:32,000
On capex. 
And this case they're aiming for

368
00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:34,900
less than 15%. 
That's a lot of money spent on 

369
00:18:34,900 --> 00:18:36,900
capex. 
This is a downside of the 

370
00:18:36,908 --> 00:18:40,200
company but overall I really 
liked the fact that they pay a 

371
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,400
dividend with a low payout 
ratio. 

372
00:18:42,600 --> 00:18:45,800
And then everything else goes 
back to share repurchases, which

373
00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:49,100
they repurchased over four 
percent of the shares 

374
00:18:49,100 --> 00:18:52,200
outstanding over the past year. 
So, even though the railroads 

375
00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:55,400
haven't surge like the rest of 
the market this year so far, I'm

376
00:18:55,400 --> 00:18:57,900
still very bullish on them. 
And I'm still buying these 

377
00:18:57,900 --> 00:18:59,300
companies. 
I'll be adding to these 

378
00:18:59,300 --> 00:19:01,500
positions. 
And as long as they lack the 

379
00:19:01,500 --> 00:19:03,700
rest of the market. 
So this is what the portfolio 

380
00:19:03,700 --> 00:19:05,400
looks like. 
Year-to-date you can let me know

381
00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:07,700
what you think of it. 
If you agree with my byes, if 

382
00:19:07,700 --> 00:19:11,000
you disagree, I'd be interested 
to know and I'm happy with the 

383
00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:13,000
performance year to date as well
as all time. 

384
00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:14,600
I think we're headed in the 
right direction. 

385
00:19:14,900 --> 00:19:16,300
Now let's go ahead and move on 
to some news. 

386
00:19:16,300 --> 00:19:18,700
We have the headline news that 
u.s. 

387
00:19:18,700 --> 00:19:23,400
GDP Rose 2.9 percent in the 
fourth quarter and there's a lot

388
00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:27,900
of different takes on this news 
like most economic data, you can

389
00:19:27,900 --> 00:19:29,600
look at it positively or 
negatively. 

390
00:19:29,700 --> 00:19:32,500
Lee, I'll give you the basic 
argument for each side. 

391
00:19:32,500 --> 00:19:34,800
The argument that the Wall 
Street Journal makes and what 

392
00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:37,800
most economists are making right
now, is that this news really 

393
00:19:37,800 --> 00:19:40,200
isn't as good as it. 
Seems the overall economy 

394
00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:43,100
slowing down and we're coming 
out of an environment. 

395
00:19:43,100 --> 00:19:45,500
That was really easy going into 
environment. 

396
00:19:45,500 --> 00:19:48,100
That's really difficult. 
They say the fourth quarter, 

397
00:19:48,100 --> 00:19:51,300
capped a year of economic 
slowdown in part reflecting a 

398
00:19:51,300 --> 00:19:55,000
return to a more normal pace of 
growth after output surge amid 

399
00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:58,300
business, re-openings fiscal 
stimulus and waning pandemic in 

400
00:19:58,300 --> 00:20:01,000
2021. 
All right, so Just got done with

401
00:20:01,000 --> 00:20:04,400
our pockets, being filled with 
money and being locked up in our

402
00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:06,300
homes. 
And finally, we are able to 

403
00:20:06,300 --> 00:20:08,600
spend that money. 
We're able to travel. 

404
00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:12,100
So naturally, the economy is 
rebounding a little bit but then

405
00:20:12,100 --> 00:20:15,400
they go on to highlight that the
economic output grew one percent

406
00:20:15,400 --> 00:20:18,700
in the fourth quarter of 2022 
compared with a year earlier 

407
00:20:18,900 --> 00:20:23,100
down from five point seven, 
percent growth in 2021 and 2.6 

408
00:20:23,100 --> 00:20:27,500
percent growth in 2019. 
So overall the longer-term 

409
00:20:27,500 --> 00:20:30,500
trends are that the economy is 
slowing. 

410
00:20:30,500 --> 00:20:32,400
It's actually moderating and 
Pace. 

411
00:20:32,700 --> 00:20:35,800
Whether you look at that as a 
good or bad thing is up to you, 

412
00:20:36,100 --> 00:20:38,800
in my opinion, I actually think 
that this is a good thing. 

413
00:20:39,100 --> 00:20:42,000
If we have an overheating 
economy, that would be basically

414
00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:44,500
an invitation to the FED to 
raise interest rates 

415
00:20:44,600 --> 00:20:46,900
dramatically more. 
So, I think the economic growth 

416
00:20:46,900 --> 00:20:49,700
actually, moderating is a good 
thing in terms of the feds 

417
00:20:49,700 --> 00:20:53,300
interactions, and then the other
bit of news is the layoffs, this

418
00:20:53,300 --> 00:20:56,300
is the more sad news. 
I really don't enjoy, seeing 

419
00:20:56,300 --> 00:20:59,600
people get laid off from work 
even when it's Justified from, 

420
00:20:59,600 --> 00:21:02,200
Company even when it's 
responsible move by the 

421
00:21:02,200 --> 00:21:05,900
employer, it's still not a fun 
thing to see people losing their

422
00:21:05,900 --> 00:21:08,100
livelihood, losing their income 
stream. 

423
00:21:08,100 --> 00:21:11,000
That's basically like a worst 
nightmare for anybody. 

424
00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:13,700
That depends on that income 
stream and that's part of the 

425
00:21:13,700 --> 00:21:17,100
reason building this channel is 
trying to help people find a 

426
00:21:17,100 --> 00:21:18,800
different way to find passive 
income. 

427
00:21:18,800 --> 00:21:23,000
The ability to at least survive 
without your primary job with 

428
00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:25,800
enough effort and time we can 
get to a point where we're not 

429
00:21:25,808 --> 00:21:29,200
totally reliant on our primary 
income but layoffs have been 

430
00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:30,900
picking up. 
Up and they started off with the

431
00:21:30,900 --> 00:21:34,900
biggest companies that are the 
trendsetters once big Tech does 

432
00:21:34,900 --> 00:21:38,000
anything, everyone else follows.
That's the way these things 

433
00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:39,800
work. 
A lot of companies simply 

434
00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:44,000
modeled their covid policies. 
After big Tech if big Tech was 

435
00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:46,500
working for home, all the other 
companies would work from home. 

436
00:21:46,500 --> 00:21:49,600
If big Tech required wearing 
masks in the office, other 

437
00:21:49,600 --> 00:21:52,200
company said, you had to wear 
masks in the office other 

438
00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:55,800
companies, basically copied 
their HR policies and their 

439
00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:59,000
corporate policies and now other
companies have the leeway to do 

440
00:21:59,000 --> 00:22:01,200
layoffs. 
Because big Tech has done 

441
00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:03,600
layoffs. 
So this is a concerning trend of

442
00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:05,900
rising layoffs. 
In, in my opinion, I think this 

443
00:22:05,900 --> 00:22:08,100
is gonna continue. 
I think a lot of these companies

444
00:22:08,100 --> 00:22:10,700
that did a big round of layoffs 
are going to be doing another 

445
00:22:10,700 --> 00:22:12,200
round of layoffs. 
When you look at the 

446
00:22:12,208 --> 00:22:14,600
fundamentals of them, many of 
them hired. 

447
00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:17,700
So many more employees than the 
fundamentals of the companies 

448
00:22:17,700 --> 00:22:19,600
justify. 
And I think we're going to see a

449
00:22:19,600 --> 00:22:22,100
pretty big reversion over the 
next year. 

450
00:22:22,100 --> 00:22:24,500
Now on the subject of layoffs 
with these companies like 

451
00:22:24,500 --> 00:22:26,700
Google, one of the things that 
I've been highlighting over the 

452
00:22:26,700 --> 00:22:29,500
past year are these videos of a 
day in the life. 

453
00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:32,800
Life of a Google employee. 
And the reason I've been 

454
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:35,300
highlighting this is because I 
think they're so incredibly 

455
00:22:35,300 --> 00:22:39,400
revealing of the problems with 
the culture of these companies, 

456
00:22:39,800 --> 00:22:42,600
you can even see from watching 
any of these videos basically 

457
00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:45,500
all they're doing or at least 
all they're showing here is 

458
00:22:45,500 --> 00:22:48,700
eating tons of good food hanging
around and doing minimal. 

459
00:22:48,700 --> 00:22:51,600
Work it to the office at around 
6, a.m. to beat the traffic and 

460
00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:53,100
just get a nice workout and 
around 7:00. 

461
00:22:53,100 --> 00:22:54,400
A.m. 
I'm getting ready to the locker 

462
00:22:54,400 --> 00:22:55,700
room. 
Getting breakfast at this really

463
00:22:55,700 --> 00:22:56,900
cute. 
Cafe at ADM. 

464
00:22:56,900 --> 00:22:59,500
Got some Crepes iced Americano, 
which is so. 

465
00:22:59,800 --> 00:23:01,900
And at around eight, Twenty 
Eight got to work. 

466
00:23:01,900 --> 00:23:03,700
I usually get a snack at around 
10 a.m. 

467
00:23:03,800 --> 00:23:05,100
And today, I forgot a charging 
cable. 

468
00:23:05,100 --> 00:23:07,800
So I went to the vending machine
to get one and 11:30 is usually,

469
00:23:07,800 --> 00:23:10,000
when I eat lunch, I got a whole 
hodgepodge of things including 

470
00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:12,800
pizza and this is the view that 
I like to eat with at 12:00, I 

471
00:23:12,800 --> 00:23:14,800
guess some more caffeine and 
just spend the afternoon doing 

472
00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:16,400
some more work. 
I like to do stress at the end 

473
00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:17,800
of the day. 
And today I booked a massage 

474
00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:19,300
appointment. 
So I have it for an hour and 

475
00:23:19,300 --> 00:23:21,800
then go home at 5:30. 
These are the type of videos 

476
00:23:21,800 --> 00:23:24,300
that we've looked at. 
And I've repeatedly said, I 

477
00:23:24,300 --> 00:23:26,200
don't think these videos are a 
good idea. 

478
00:23:26,500 --> 00:23:29,000
I think they represent the 
company poorly. 

479
00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:32,400
It's bad PR for the company 
because it makes it look like 

480
00:23:32,400 --> 00:23:34,300
the employees. 
There are wasting money and 

481
00:23:34,300 --> 00:23:36,400
resources and I think if 
employees are going to make 

482
00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:39,400
these videos, they should focus 
more on the work that they do. 

483
00:23:39,400 --> 00:23:40,700
What do they actually do at 
work? 

484
00:23:40,700 --> 00:23:43,100
I think that'd be very 
interesting to see, I'm sure 

485
00:23:43,100 --> 00:23:45,000
they do. 
Lots of high-level things things

486
00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:46,600
that are very important 
highlight. 

487
00:23:46,600 --> 00:23:49,800
Some of that stuff, it would 
look a lot better to people that

488
00:23:49,800 --> 00:23:51,400
are watching this on the 
sidelines. 

489
00:23:51,500 --> 00:23:54,100
Now, this employee hair gets to 
the end of this day in the life 

490
00:23:54,100 --> 00:23:56,000
of video. 
And then she has an important 

491
00:23:56,000 --> 00:23:59,400
update for us at 5:30 Big Life 
Update. 

492
00:23:59,700 --> 00:24:04,000
Got laid off yesterday. 
So, that's the end of that. 

493
00:24:04,100 --> 00:24:05,600
And now we're seeing more and 
more of these videos. 

494
00:24:05,600 --> 00:24:07,800
Pop up of people getting laid 
off from Co. 

495
00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:10,900
I started off with a cinnamon 
Galaxy churro and so she gets 

496
00:24:10,900 --> 00:24:13,300
laid off from Google and heads 
to Disneyland for the day. 

497
00:24:13,400 --> 00:24:16,000
Now, what she said here was 
correct as far as I can tell, 

498
00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:19,500
there was no performance-based 
layoffs at Google. 

499
00:24:19,700 --> 00:24:22,700
Lots of people that had very 
high marks got laid off. 

500
00:24:22,800 --> 00:24:25,200
Lots of people that were tenured
that worked at Google for a long

501
00:24:25,200 --> 00:24:28,700
period of time, got laid off and
the CEO of Google. 

502
00:24:28,700 --> 00:24:32,200
Sundar pichai, is taking a lot 
of heat right now for the way. 

503
00:24:32,300 --> 00:24:34,300
At this happened. 
In fact, Google just recently 

504
00:24:34,300 --> 00:24:37,300
held a town hall where they 
described it as animated because

505
00:24:37,300 --> 00:24:41,100
there's a lot of very frustrated
employees and in this case I 

506
00:24:41,100 --> 00:24:44,000
actually agree with many of the 
employees complaints in the town

507
00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:45,000
hall. 
Sundar pichai. 

508
00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:47,500
Is taking a lot of heat and a 
lot of different accusations and

509
00:24:47,500 --> 00:24:51,500
questions and he tries to 
justify the reason that they 

510
00:24:51,500 --> 00:24:55,500
over hired and he tries to 
explain why Google over hired 

511
00:24:55,500 --> 00:24:58,700
and this is an explanation that 
I just don't understand. 

512
00:24:58,800 --> 00:25:03,000
Pichai said that 20:21 marked 
quote, one of the Longest years 

513
00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:06,000
we've ever had in the history of
the company. 

514
00:25:06,300 --> 00:25:10,300
With 41 percent Revenue growth 
Google increased headcount to 

515
00:25:10,300 --> 00:25:14,100
match that expansion and pichai 
said that the company was 

516
00:25:14,100 --> 00:25:19,300
assuming growth would persist. 
Now, first of all, did Sundar, 

517
00:25:19,300 --> 00:25:23,100
pichai really believe? 
That growth would continue at a 

518
00:25:23,100 --> 00:25:26,800
rate of forty one percent for a 
company, the size of Google 

519
00:25:27,100 --> 00:25:29,700
because I have a very difficult 
time believing that any 

520
00:25:29,700 --> 00:25:32,200
reasonable person would believe 
that growth would? 

521
00:25:32,300 --> 00:25:35,600
Would persist at anywhere close 
to this level that there would 

522
00:25:35,600 --> 00:25:39,200
be no reversion to the mean, I'm
not Sundar pichai. 

523
00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:42,200
I'm not as knowledgeable as him,
I'm not as smart as him but I've

524
00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:45,400
highlighted many times of my 
channel, the anomaly of growth 

525
00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:49,400
they had in 2021 and how that 
was likely not going to continue

526
00:25:49,600 --> 00:25:52,000
when things like that happen. 
There's almost always a 

527
00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:54,500
reversion. 
So surely Sundar pichai knew 

528
00:25:54,500 --> 00:25:57,500
that this growth was not going 
to persist and him saying that 

529
00:25:57,500 --> 00:26:00,600
he hired thirty thousand extra 
employees on the assumptions, 

530
00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:04,100
growth would just continue In 
perpetuity I think is a little 

531
00:26:04,100 --> 00:26:07,300
bit upsetting, I don't buy that 
excuse at all but that was the 

532
00:26:07,300 --> 00:26:09,500
decision that was made in that 
context. 

533
00:26:09,500 --> 00:26:12,100
We made a set of decisions that 
might have been right? 

534
00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:17,100
If the trends continued again if
the trends continued if Google 

535
00:26:17,100 --> 00:26:22,200
kept growing at 40%, if YouTube 
Revenue kept growing at 40% per 

536
00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:24,800
year, there's no way these 
Trends were continuing at that 

537
00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:27,800
rate of speed aside from that. 
There's another problem. 

538
00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:30,000
I have with Sundar pichai, is 
assumptions here. 

539
00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:33,000
He says, you have to remember 
that if If the trends had 

540
00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:36,700
continued and we had not hired 
to keep Pace, we would have 

541
00:26:36,700 --> 00:26:39,200
fallen behind in many areas of 
the company. 

542
00:26:39,800 --> 00:26:42,700
Now this part I'm a little bit 
baffled at as well. 

543
00:26:42,800 --> 00:26:45,900
I don't understand it. 
Google is a highly scalable 

544
00:26:45,900 --> 00:26:49,400
business with a ton of operating
leverage with an extremely 

545
00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:52,800
efficient Core Business in 
Search and YouTube, the 

546
00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:56,300
properties that they own are not
like Amazon's they don't have to

547
00:26:56,300 --> 00:26:59,500
hire warehouse workers. 
They're not like Union Pacific. 

548
00:26:59,500 --> 00:27:02,100
They don't have to lay Railway 
to grow their business. 

549
00:27:02,700 --> 00:27:06,100
Their company, that is 
incredibly efficient, Google 

550
00:27:06,100 --> 00:27:09,000
searches one of the best highest
margins most efficient 

551
00:27:09,000 --> 00:27:11,600
businesses on Earth. 
So I have a difficult time 

552
00:27:11,600 --> 00:27:14,700
understanding, why they would 
have fallen behind if they 

553
00:27:14,700 --> 00:27:18,100
didn't hire, as many employees. 
So I think a lot of this is the 

554
00:27:18,100 --> 00:27:20,400
fault of a management. 
And I think it's something that 

555
00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:23,700
a lot of the bigger tech 
companies did Amazon over hired 

556
00:27:23,700 --> 00:27:26,900
as well, Microsoft, probably 
over hired in parts of their 

557
00:27:26,900 --> 00:27:29,000
company. 
But Google I think was the one 

558
00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:31,400
that did this to the most 
extreme now for those of you 

559
00:27:31,408 --> 00:27:33,900
that might accuse me A of having
hindsight bias and saying 

560
00:27:33,900 --> 00:27:37,600
everything's 20/20 in hindsight.
I wasn't just saying this. 

561
00:27:37,600 --> 00:27:41,800
In hindsight, I have videos mid 
last year over six months ago, 

562
00:27:41,800 --> 00:27:44,400
questioning why the company was 
still hiring. 

563
00:27:44,400 --> 00:27:47,800
So many employees, this has been
an ongoing problem that I've 

564
00:27:47,800 --> 00:27:50,200
highlighted time and time again 
with Google. 

565
00:27:50,200 --> 00:27:52,200
And they say, in terms of the 
employees, that was laid off. 

566
00:27:52,200 --> 00:27:55,200
There was a lot of things 
considered their skillset, how 

567
00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:58,800
crucial, their role Buzz, their 
experience, their relationships,

568
00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:00,700
their performance, so on and so 
forth. 

569
00:28:00,700 --> 00:28:04,300
So there is no one Saying that 
determined it, I think a lot of 

570
00:28:04,300 --> 00:28:06,900
it just came down to where they 
could cut costs the most. 

571
00:28:06,900 --> 00:28:09,000
Now, the last thing that I want 
to mention is a note from 

572
00:28:09,000 --> 00:28:12,300
Morningstar, and I want to give 
Morningstar an award hair for 

573
00:28:12,300 --> 00:28:15,900
this note, the award that I'll 
give them is being latest to the

574
00:28:15,900 --> 00:28:18,000
game. 
The latest one to figure 

575
00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:21,100
something out that the last 
person to actually figure out 

576
00:28:21,100 --> 00:28:24,700
the obvious, they have apple 
here, which they currently give 

577
00:28:24,800 --> 00:28:27,500
a three star rating. 
And then just recently, they 

578
00:28:27,500 --> 00:28:31,900
decided to upgrade Apple from a 
narrow economic moat to a wide 

579
00:28:31,900 --> 00:28:33,600
economic. 
Anomic mode and they've raised 

580
00:28:33,600 --> 00:28:36,900
the fair value to $150. 
So, there you have it from 

581
00:28:36,900 --> 00:28:39,700
Morningstar. 
They finally acknowledge the 

582
00:28:39,700 --> 00:28:42,200
obvious and I thought we should 
take some time and appreciate 

583
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:44,000
them for doing that. 
Now, that's all for this 

584
00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:45,800
episode. 
I hope you enjoyed and I'll see 

585
00:28:45,800 --> 00:28:33,600
you in the next one. 
Anomic mode and they've raised 

586
00:28:33,600 --> 00:28:36,900
the fair value to $150. 
So, there you have it from 

587
00:28:36,900 --> 00:28:39,700
Morningstar. 
They finally acknowledge the 

588
00:28:39,700 --> 00:28:42,200
obvious and I thought we should 
take some time and appreciate 

589
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:44,000
them for doing that. 
Now, that's all for this 

590
00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:45,800
episode. 
I hope you enjoyed and I'll see 

591
00:28:45,800 --> 00:28:46,500
you in the next one.
