1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,680
Advertising on podcast is proven
to be very effective. 

2
00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:08,400
Research has shown that because 
listeners trust the hosts, they 

3
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:11,200
are more likely to trust the 
content of an advert. 

4
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:15,440
The News Navigators is growing, 
so why not grow with us? 

5
00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:19,360
Get your message out to the 
people who matter while also 

6
00:00:19,360 --> 00:00:24,520
helping to support good 
independent, fact based opinion 

7
00:00:24,880 --> 00:00:31,920
and analysis. 
Call us on 534-2205 or e-mail 

8
00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:49,520
the news navs@gmail.com. 
The News Navigators with me, 

9
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,040
Jeremy Deacon. 
And me, Jonathan Sterling. 

10
00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:57,880
Before we start, we're going to 
have a look at the row over 

11
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:03,440
absentee ballots and the 
proposed Oba legislation. 

12
00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:06,240
There never was. 
And then the ongoing debate 

13
00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:08,880
about CARICOM and this time 
about the referendum. 

14
00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:11,920
Just before we start, Jonathan, 
only to impart a little bit of 

15
00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:15,720
knowledge to you. 
So my sister-in-law was trying 

16
00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:21,320
to search for the News 
Navigators and she sent me what 

17
00:01:21,320 --> 00:01:25,400
it came up with and it's a 
Jeremy Deacon's Bermuda podcast.

18
00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:32,600
Here's the clear up to Sarah, 
that is actually more 

19
00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:34,720
interesting than most people 
realise. 

20
00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:39,000
That's good. 
Thanks AI. 

21
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:43,160
Yeah, thanks, AI. 
If ever there was a backhanded 

22
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:46,520
compliment, that was it. 
Wasn't it really more 

23
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,480
interesting than most people 
realise? 

24
00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:51,600
Well, that's going to feed my 
imposter syndrome a little. 

25
00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:58,640
I mean, it could be our last 
podcast, you know, all that time

26
00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:02,000
and effort. 
That was a nice compliment, even

27
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:04,400
if tad backhanded. 
Was it a compliment? 

28
00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:07,120
I don't know if it was more 
interesting than people 

29
00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:09,039
realised. 
Damned with faint praise, that 

30
00:02:09,039 --> 00:02:14,560
was. 
A good guy, good way to end the 

31
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:18,240
year. 
I hope it's not the way we start

32
00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:21,880
the new year do slightly better 
than that. 

33
00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:26,800
Jonathan, wanting to talk about 
this absentee voting, I think 

34
00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:30,480
it's quite close to your heart. 
Tell us the background and what 

35
00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:34,040
do you want to say about it? 
Right. 

36
00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:37,760
So I mean, the the issue of 
absentee voting, especially for 

37
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:42,040
overseas students, has kind of 
been, I think the right word is 

38
00:02:42,040 --> 00:02:46,320
a perennial issue, But it only 
tends to get raised after an 

39
00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,120
election rate is dropped. 
And then all the students who 

40
00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:51,160
can't vote are like, oh, I can't
vote. 

41
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:53,000
How come we don't have absentee 
voting? 

42
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:57,560
And of course, it's too late to 
change the system after the 

43
00:02:57,560 --> 00:03:02,080
election is called and 
historically attempts to be 

44
00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:05,880
forgotten shortly after the 
election until it's raised again

45
00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:09,600
for the next election. 
This year was a bit different 

46
00:03:09,640 --> 00:03:13,680
because of course, we had the 
general election was called in 

47
00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:17,320
early January and the election 
itself was held in February. 

48
00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:22,360
I think the proximity to the 
students who had just been here 

49
00:03:22,640 --> 00:03:28,000
for Christmas and then having 
left kind of I think that kind 

50
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:32,240
of turbocharged it a little. 
Also it's it should be added 

51
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:36,120
that the Oba, the 1 Bermuda 
Alliance, when they were elected

52
00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:41,320
in the December 2012 election, 
they had in their platform a 

53
00:03:41,320 --> 00:03:43,480
mandate to introduce absentee 
voting. 

54
00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:47,200
They for whatever reason didn't 
get around to it. 

55
00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:48,840
They they did have a lot on 
their plate. 

56
00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:52,280
I understand they did start 
working on it, but they just 

57
00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:57,800
never were able to get it in 
place before the 2017 election. 

58
00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:01,800
But they were the first 
political party, as far as I am 

59
00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:07,040
aware, that was elected with 
that as a platform promise, and 

60
00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:13,960
the PLP only adopted that in the
2025 election, this election, I 

61
00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:19,120
think in response to the 
criticism that they got at the 

62
00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:24,040
time. 
Since then it's been raised as a

63
00:04:24,040 --> 00:04:28,320
continuous issue since the 
February election, which is 

64
00:04:28,320 --> 00:04:30,240
unusual. 
As I said, normally he gets 

65
00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:32,520
raised during the election and 
then it's forgotten about for 

66
00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:36,520
another four to five years. 
And earlier this year, I want to

67
00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:44,440
say it was in October, the Oba 
tabled an act, an opposition 

68
00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:47,240
act. 
The absentee voting Act, Yeah. 

69
00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:49,920
Right. 
So they tabled that. 

70
00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:55,640
The government, the PLP did ask 
them to withdraw it and say, 

71
00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:58,520
look, we're all working on this,
we would like to do this 

72
00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:02,520
bipartisanship wise, can you 
withdraw this and we'll talk and

73
00:05:02,520 --> 00:05:06,800
figure it all out together. 
The Oba refused to do that and 

74
00:05:07,080 --> 00:05:12,640
kept it on the order paper. 
Subsequent to that, the PLP did 

75
00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:16,040
start their process of town hall
meetings. 

76
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,840
There was one a couple weeks ago
at Harrington Workmen's Club, 

77
00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:25,840
which I did at 10. 
There's one next week on Monday 

78
00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,400
I think that's. 
It on the 17th by the way. 

79
00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:32,440
Sorry, I was just listening to 
recording on the 17th. 

80
00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:35,520
I should have clarified that 
there's one on the coming 

81
00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:39,480
Monday, which is December 22nd, 
that's for youth in particular 

82
00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:40,800
is going to be held up at Cedar 
Bridge. 

83
00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:44,400
But there's an online option so 
lots of people can join. 

84
00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:48,960
From what I gathered from the 
town hall meeting at Harrington 

85
00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:51,400
Workman's Club, they're just 
kind of starting and they're 

86
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:54,040
just saying, what do you think 
should be in there? 

87
00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:56,320
And it's not just absentee 
voting in these town hall 

88
00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:58,600
meetings. 
There's also wider election 

89
00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,200
reform, including a campaign 
finance laws. 

90
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:04,720
So that seems to be the wider 
aspect, but the focus is on the 

91
00:06:04,720 --> 00:06:09,360
absentee voting from what I 
could gather more recently. 

92
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:16,320
This is a long recap. 
More recently, last Friday, the 

93
00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:24,600
the Opposition Absentee Voting 
Act was withdrawn because the 

94
00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:27,760
Parliamentary Registrar sent a 
note to, I guess the 

95
00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:30,960
parliamentary Speaker to say 
this would cost public funds and

96
00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:36,040
therefore it is a money bill 
which the opposition is not 

97
00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:39,480
allowed to table. 
Only governments, only the 

98
00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:42,480
governing party is allowed to 
table what are called money 

99
00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:48,360
bills, Independents, individual 
MPs Opposition cannot table 

100
00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:50,960
those. 
I should probably clarify what a

101
00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:53,880
money bill is. 
Anything that spends money. 

102
00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:58,480
Yes, anything that would require
the spent the expense of public 

103
00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:04,520
funds and of course absentee 
balloting that would likely 

104
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:08,160
you'd need public funds to 
cover. 

105
00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:12,320
It's not that the and I only say
this because I've seen comments 

106
00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:15,560
online with people saying oh 
what they can't afford absent 

107
00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:18,560
the voting. 
That's not the issue. 

108
00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:22,840
It's a parliamentary procedure. 
Only the government can table 

109
00:07:22,840 --> 00:07:24,640
money bills. 
It's not that the money isn't 

110
00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:27,240
there, it's just that the 
opposition is not allowed to 

111
00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:30,920
table money bills. 
So I just wanted to clarify 

112
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:34,160
that. 
So there's a lot to unpack here,

113
00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:39,640
I think. 
I mean, yes, the Oba refused to 

114
00:07:39,640 --> 00:07:48,040
withdraw its legislation and 
it's subsequently argued against

115
00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:51,840
the the money bill, saying that 
the government had already 

116
00:07:51,840 --> 00:07:57,560
allocated some $55,000 via 
supplementary spending. 

117
00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:01,440
This is a quote to electoral 
reform during the last session, 

118
00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:03,360
making the point quite 
redundant. 

119
00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,560
That's according to Dwayne 
Robinson, who was behind the AB 

120
00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:10,520
as legislation. 
So that's one question that 

121
00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:12,320
hasn't. 
I hadn't really seen an answer 

122
00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:18,280
to for about 55, so the 55,000 
is irrelevant. 

123
00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:20,760
That's a bit of a red herring in
my opinion. 

124
00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,680
It's an irrelevant point. 
It's still parliamentary 

125
00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:26,360
procedure that the opposition 
cannot table. 

126
00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:29,120
A money bill doesn't matter if 
money is already allocated in 

127
00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:31,280
the budget. 
It's a simple parliamentary 

128
00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:36,640
procedure. 
But I do want to give kudos to 

129
00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:40,120
the OBAI do think the PLP was 
proceeding with this anyway. 

130
00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:44,000
But the fact that the Oba did 
table this helped keep it up in 

131
00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:47,600
the public mind. 
And that's certainly probably 

132
00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:51,400
you could argue lit the fire 
under the PLP to really move on 

133
00:08:51,400 --> 00:08:53,720
this. 
So I do want to give kudos to 

134
00:08:53,720 --> 00:08:55,240
the OB. 
I'm not attacking them. 

135
00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:57,280
I'm just saying I'm purely on a 
money bill. 

136
00:08:57,280 --> 00:09:00,840
They can't table it. 
We just so the listeners know 

137
00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:03,920
we're using a, a podcast 
platform here to do this 

138
00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:07,520
discussion remotely. 
And just for a second, Jonathan,

139
00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:10,320
you froze. 
Oh, I'm sorry. 

140
00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:13,320
Just as you were about to talk 
about the red herring and why 

141
00:09:13,320 --> 00:09:16,880
the 55 K was a red herring, can 
you just recap on that in case 

142
00:09:17,320 --> 00:09:19,320
the listeners didn't get it? 
Sure. 

143
00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:23,400
So yes, money has been allocated
in the budget, but that 

144
00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:27,240
irrelevance in terms of 
parliamentary procedure, it's a 

145
00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:31,120
parliamentary rule that the 
opposition cannot table a money 

146
00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:32,960
bill. 
That's, that's all it is. 

147
00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:36,000
Doesn't matter if money's 
allocated or not, they just 

148
00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:37,840
can't table it. 
That's that's it. 

149
00:09:37,840 --> 00:09:41,800
And. 
You you went on to say that this

150
00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:43,360
is something I was going to talk
about as well. 

151
00:09:43,360 --> 00:09:48,800
Was the, was the OB as push for 
absentee voting? 

152
00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:52,960
Was it was it that push that got
government to actually do 

153
00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:54,800
something? 
Because I'm intrigued by this 

154
00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:58,840
because as you say, normally 
it's only ever crops up when 

155
00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:02,000
there's election. 
Normally both parties say yeah 

156
00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:05,080
in favour. 
Nothing happens in the in the 

157
00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:09,680
preceding four or five years 
until the next election when we 

158
00:10:09,680 --> 00:10:13,520
repeat the cycle. 
Isn't there an argument to say 

159
00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:17,120
that what the Oba done has 
actually got the government to 

160
00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:19,120
do something to pull the finger 
out? 

161
00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:22,960
I think the Oba personally can 
probably claim a victory for 

162
00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:27,480
that. 
And I don't want to give the Oba

163
00:10:27,480 --> 00:10:32,400
kudos for for keeping the 
conversation going. 

164
00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:36,840
I personally do feel the PLP was
proceeding with this anyway. 

165
00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:39,040
I mean they just won the 
election in February. 

166
00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:41,880
These things don't get started 
right away. 

167
00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:45,320
You need to do policy analysis, 
you need to get cabinet papers 

168
00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:48,240
before you even proceed with 
some of these things. 

169
00:10:48,240 --> 00:10:51,200
He had the summer break so I do 
think the PLP was going to 

170
00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:54,800
proceed with it anyway. 
However, kudos should be given 

171
00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:59,320
to the Oba for keeping it in the
public public awareness. 

172
00:10:59,680 --> 00:11:04,480
And if it did encourage the PLP 
to like a light, a fire under 

173
00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:07,720
them to keep it going and make 
it more prominent, than yeah, 

174
00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:09,920
sure, I'll give the LBA win on 
that. 

175
00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:12,920
Even if I think the PLP was 
going to do it anyway. 

176
00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:16,800
I think it did raise the public 
awareness, so kudos to the LBA. 

177
00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:20,600
On that, I think the LBA could 
quite plausibly claim victory 

178
00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:24,120
for this one, whether or not in 
the public eye. 

179
00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:27,720
And let's hope, let's hope it 
doesn't go away. 

180
00:11:28,360 --> 00:11:31,480
You know, as we both stated, you
stated at the year I just stated

181
00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:36,160
these things arise in the 
election and then disappear Is 

182
00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:41,360
the the Oba 1 was the Oba 
legislation was quite 

183
00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:44,400
interesting. 
It talked about giving 

184
00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:48,640
registered voters who being 
ordinarily resident in Bermuda, 

185
00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:52,360
but who were temporarily absent 
like for things like study 

186
00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:54,280
employment, medical treatment, 
etcetera. 

187
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:56,960
And they had the right to cast 
an absentee ballot. 

188
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:02,560
Whereas the government's plans 
are a little bit more vague, I 

189
00:12:02,560 --> 00:12:06,720
think, and right in saying that 
they want to implement absentee 

190
00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:11,480
voting for eligible comedians 
and sons and establish clear and

191
00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:14,000
transparent standards for 
political parties and campaign 

192
00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:15,960
financing. 
Well, that's another matter to 

193
00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:18,920
come on to. 
It's not cut and dried. 

194
00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:22,200
Is it the legislation about how 
this would actually work or the 

195
00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:27,000
ideas at least come out yet? 
And are you going to approve for

196
00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:30,440
this? 
Well, I mean, as I said, I did 

197
00:12:30,440 --> 00:12:35,880
attend the Harrington Workmen's 
Club town hall meeting a couple 

198
00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:39,440
weeks ago on this issue. 
And my impression is the 

199
00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:43,480
government is just setting out 
and say what do people want? 

200
00:12:43,560 --> 00:12:45,520
And they're getting the feedback
and then they're going to do the

201
00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:48,960
research on the policy analysis 
to find out what is actually 

202
00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:51,960
practical. 
Can we do all of this and what's

203
00:12:51,960 --> 00:12:54,800
the cost going to be? 
What if we just do this? 

204
00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:58,040
What's that cost going to be? 
So I don't think the PLP has a 

205
00:12:58,040 --> 00:13:02,240
clear plan yet because they are 
doing the public consultation, 

206
00:13:02,480 --> 00:13:04,120
which, you know, I think that's 
great. 

207
00:13:05,920 --> 00:13:11,320
Yeah, I suppose to the Oba one 
that if you're very registered 

208
00:13:11,400 --> 00:13:13,320
to vote, you're not ordinarily 
resident. 

209
00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:17,800
And ordinarily resident means 
you are resident in Bermuda for 

210
00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:21,080
six months plus one day. 
Yeah, my understanding, it's not

211
00:13:21,080 --> 00:13:25,680
a, that's just my understanding.
I I don't think there's a pure 

212
00:13:25,680 --> 00:13:28,640
legal definition, but that's the
general understanding of what it

213
00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:30,240
was. 
Just wondering, verification of 

214
00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:35,480
that might be quite difficult. 
And that's the cost as well as 

215
00:13:35,480 --> 00:13:37,400
how is absolutely voting going 
to be? 

216
00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:40,200
Is it a mail in ballot? 
Is it going to be an online 

217
00:13:40,200 --> 00:13:43,640
thing? 
Is it going to be maybe there's 

218
00:13:44,360 --> 00:13:50,640
a polling station in one city in
whatever country for medians 

219
00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:53,240
happen to be in. 
So say all the university 

220
00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,520
students in Canada, are they 
just going to go to Toronto to 

221
00:13:56,520 --> 00:13:59,360
vote or is there going to be 
multiple polling stations or is 

222
00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:03,000
it going to be an online system?
No sense, wouldn't it? 

223
00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:04,680
It's going to be interesting if 
this happens. 

224
00:14:04,680 --> 00:14:07,680
I mean, we're led to believe, 
well, we're led to believe that 

225
00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:10,160
thousands of Canadians have left
the country. 

226
00:14:10,880 --> 00:14:13,600
You know, there was, there was a
story, was it last year, the 

227
00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:16,720
year before that? 
I think the UK found it has 

228
00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:19,040
something like 6000 Canadians 
registered. 

229
00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:21,280
Well, we have the census next 
year. 

230
00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:24,040
Well, I won't get the results 
next year though, will we? 

231
00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:26,600
Yeah. 
It'll be some time before we get

232
00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:31,160
the results, but it's kind of 
interesting given how close some

233
00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:35,080
of the votes are in these 
constituencies, it's kind of 

234
00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:36,680
make a serious amount of 
difference. 

235
00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:39,640
Well, these are questions that 
have to be kind of figured out. 

236
00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:43,680
So if it's a university student 
overseas, that's more or less 

237
00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:47,360
easy enough to do because you 
know, they're registered where 

238
00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:51,760
they lived in Bermuda. 
So they would, they would vote 

239
00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:56,920
in their constituency where 
they, yeah, yeah. 

240
00:14:56,920 --> 00:15:00,640
Someone who had moved, who has 
like immigrated overseas to the 

241
00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:03,520
UK or whatever. 
Are they ordinarily resident? 

242
00:15:03,520 --> 00:15:06,560
Should they vote? 
If they, if we are going to give

243
00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:08,280
them the vote, where do they 
vote? 

244
00:15:08,680 --> 00:15:11,640
Is their vote going to be in 
their their constituency of 

245
00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:14,480
their last place of residence? 
I don't know. 

246
00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:16,080
These are things that we need to
figure out. 

247
00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:20,800
So I suppose in that respect 
it's probably better that the NB

248
00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:22,720
AS legislation did not get taken
up. 

249
00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:24,960
Yeah. 
I mean, I thought the OB as 

250
00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:29,960
legislation and IA lot of 
politics is performative. 

251
00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:36,120
And yeah, and as you said, we 
can give the Oba win on this, 

252
00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:38,840
whether the PLP would quibble 
and say we were going to do this

253
00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:44,120
anyway, so whatever. 
But the kudos to the Oba is that

254
00:15:44,120 --> 00:15:47,320
they kept it in the public 
domain and the public thinking. 

255
00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:50,840
But yes, the actual work to 
figure out how it's going to 

256
00:15:50,840 --> 00:15:55,200
work is not as simple as someone
might think. 

257
00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:58,200
It's not like we can just pass a
legislation tomorrow. 

258
00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:00,040
We need to figure out the 
mechanics of how it's going to 

259
00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:03,840
work. 
You know, where where will the 

260
00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:07,240
people vote? 
Like physically, but also where 

261
00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:09,160
would their vote count and which
constituency? 

262
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,200
I don't think that was a point 
made by the minister Diyala 

263
00:16:12,200 --> 00:16:15,600
Rabin that they would rather the
PLP. 

264
00:16:15,600 --> 00:16:19,360
The government would rather get 
all the legislation sorted so 

265
00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:22,440
that everything was ready to 
implement on day one. 

266
00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:29,360
The Oba legislation said would 
generate absentee voting but 

267
00:16:29,360 --> 00:16:32,880
then leave all the details to be
sorted by the parliamentary 

268
00:16:32,880 --> 00:16:36,240
registrar. 
And I do think I mean the, the, 

269
00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:40,120
the PLP minister Diyala Rabin, 
as you mentioned, he is being 

270
00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:43,000
quite consistent throughout this
to say he wants to do this 

271
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:47,840
bipartisan, he wants to work 
with the OBAI. 

272
00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:49,960
I'm going to give him the 
benefit of the doubt and say we 

273
00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:54,880
take that at face value. 
I think that they, I do believe 

274
00:16:54,880 --> 00:16:58,800
that the OB and the PLP will be 
engaged throughout this process.

275
00:16:59,160 --> 00:17:04,119
So kudos to the Oba and we're 
going to keep moving on. 

276
00:17:04,319 --> 00:17:08,480
Kudos to the PLP for also 
proceeding with this and being 

277
00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:11,040
open to bipartisan. 
Let's hope it does carry on. 

278
00:17:11,040 --> 00:17:14,599
Let's hope we get a resolution. 
We see legislation hopefully 

279
00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:17,800
sometime next year. 
Yeah, there was an article, I 

280
00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:21,520
want to say it was actually in 
yesterday's paper, which it was 

281
00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:26,000
December 16th, where the 
minister Robin was talking 

282
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:29,120
about, You know, we're really 
making a push for this for next 

283
00:17:29,120 --> 00:17:32,080
year. 
We highlighted a bunch of town 

284
00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:33,960
hall meetings scheduled for 
January. 

285
00:17:34,280 --> 00:17:37,680
So I, I think the momentum is 
there and as long as people keep

286
00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:42,240
pushing forward. 
One good thing about the youth 

287
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:47,240
town hall meeting scheduled for 
Monday, December 22nd is there 

288
00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:50,360
are going to be a lot of youth 
on island for. 

289
00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:53,960
So hopefully they're able to 
attend and get their voices 

290
00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:56,000
heard. 
If they can't attend that 

291
00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:59,000
meeting, then I would encourage 
them while they're on island to 

292
00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:04,040
reach out to their MP who has 
this Christmas holidays. 

293
00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:08,040
They may not get a response, but
I would still encourage them to,

294
00:18:08,120 --> 00:18:10,480
you know, while they're here, 
take advantage of that, go speak

295
00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:12,960
to their MPs and say, look, we 
want this. 

296
00:18:13,280 --> 00:18:15,240
Absolutely. 
No, I totally agree. 

297
00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:18,400
And I think the more people 
involved in the election, the 

298
00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:20,720
better as the population gets 
older. 

299
00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:25,840
You know, what was it something 
like last year where the 600 

300
00:18:25,840 --> 00:18:29,680
people died and 400 people were 
born in Bermuda? 

301
00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:35,200
And I think like 100 of those 
400 were two expats, right? 

302
00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:39,240
So the greater the involvement, 
the better everybody concerned. 

303
00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:42,400
Otherwise the elections might 
come a little bit pointless. 

304
00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:49,520
So Jonathan, what do you think? 
CARICOM big Hoo ha, it's a, it's

305
00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:53,160
a continuing topic for us on 
this podcast, but there's a big 

306
00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:58,120
Hoo ha now about the fact that 
there will not be a referendum. 

307
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:02,880
Michael Fahey, the shadow Home 
Affairs minister, has insisted 

308
00:19:02,880 --> 00:19:06,640
that his party says the people 
of Bermuda should determine the 

309
00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:09,320
matter. 
The Premier says no, it will be 

310
00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:12,360
dealt within the House. 
What do you think? 

311
00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:17,120
I don't think it requires a 
referendum. 

312
00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:21,520
I think not everything needs a 
referendum. 

313
00:19:21,520 --> 00:19:23,280
We put it that way. 
A lot of things can be done 

314
00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:26,400
within Parliament. 
There is a precedent for this to

315
00:19:26,400 --> 00:19:32,600
be done through Parliament. 
I was reading earlier today a 

316
00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:37,240
2002 document which you can find
in the archives, which was a 

317
00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:41,440
discussion paper concerning 
Bermuda moving from observer 

318
00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:44,760
status at CARICOM to associate 
member status. 

319
00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:49,240
And that was a, that was 
initiated under the first PLP 

320
00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:55,120
government. 
It was initiated in 2001 and the

321
00:19:55,120 --> 00:19:59,120
decision was done through 
Parliament in 2003, I believe 

322
00:19:59,120 --> 00:20:01,440
was the actual parliamentary 
motion. 

323
00:20:02,120 --> 00:20:05,560
So I, I think the precedent is 
there for it to be done through 

324
00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:08,360
Parliaments. 
I think there's a lot of 

325
00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:12,520
ignorance about what CARICOM 
actually involves. 

326
00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:18,480
I also want to look at the 
European Union, and I think 

327
00:20:18,480 --> 00:20:21,320
you've mentioned this elsewhere.
Jeremy, I don't want to steal 

328
00:20:21,320 --> 00:20:23,960
your Thunder, but you talked 
about the European Economic 

329
00:20:23,960 --> 00:20:30,600
Community and the UKI. 
Did and that under the then Tory

330
00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:35,400
Conservative Prime Minister 
Edward Who UK join what was then

331
00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:40,720
called the EEC via a debate in 
the House of Parliament. 

332
00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:46,600
Now I laid that out as just to 
add context, that it was 

333
00:20:46,600 --> 00:20:51,960
perfectly legit for 
parliamentarians to decide 

334
00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:54,400
membership of organisations such
as this. 

335
00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:58,440
It was kind of interesting then 
though that I had quite a lot of

336
00:20:58,880 --> 00:21:03,920
kickback on it. 
We joked actually about how many

337
00:21:03,920 --> 00:21:06,240
down votes I get. 
I only got 1 down vote on the 

338
00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:08,920
comment. 
This is quite funny, no? 

339
00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:09,720
Well, they. 
Didn't want to. 

340
00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:11,440
They didn't want to validate 
your. 

341
00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:14,560
I know, I know, it was a double 
bluff on my behalf. 

342
00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:19,040
Peter Sanderson, I'm assuming 
you see the the legit Peter 

343
00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:21,840
Sanderson, the lawyer, he 
replied to me. 

344
00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:23,320
He said there's a key 
distinction. 

345
00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:26,800
Edward Heath had an electoral 
mandate to take the UK into the 

346
00:21:26,800 --> 00:21:29,320
EEC. 
He said it was a core plank of 

347
00:21:29,320 --> 00:21:32,360
the Conservative 1970 election 
manifesto. 

348
00:21:32,800 --> 00:21:36,800
He said the PLP did not even 
mention Caricom in their 2025 

349
00:21:36,800 --> 00:21:43,320
electoral electoral platform. 
So I kind of replied and said 

350
00:21:43,320 --> 00:21:46,720
that the Caricom plan was 
unveiled sometime before the 

351
00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:49,880
election. 
It was actually in 2023, in that

352
00:21:49,880 --> 00:21:52,520
year's throne speech. 
It then became government policy

353
00:21:52,520 --> 00:21:56,840
and remained government policy 
until past the election. 

354
00:21:57,800 --> 00:22:00,280
He said the throne speech 
committed only to have 

355
00:22:00,280 --> 00:22:03,640
consultation. 
Now this is this is the crucial 

356
00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:05,560
bit I think as far as I'm 
concerned. 

357
00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:08,360
And I went back and looked at 
the group at that friend's 

358
00:22:08,360 --> 00:22:10,360
piece. 
And he said the vision of former

359
00:22:10,360 --> 00:22:13,520
Premier the on Dame Jennifer 
Smith was the Bermuda to 

360
00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:16,600
strengthen the historic, 
familial and cultural ties to 

361
00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:19,240
the Caribbean. 
This year marks the 20th 

362
00:22:19,240 --> 00:22:22,040
anniversary of Bermuda's entry 
into CARICOM as an associate 

363
00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:25,000
member. 
In this anniversary year the 

364
00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:28,120
Government will renew the vision
of Dame Jennifer and this is the

365
00:22:28,120 --> 00:22:32,040
key bit, initiating consultation
process leading to full 

366
00:22:32,120 --> 00:22:36,120
membership of CARICOM. 
So he came back and this was 

367
00:22:36,120 --> 00:22:39,320
quite a, this is quite a lengthy
conversation as you can tell. 

368
00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:42,720
He said they are committing to a
consultation. 

369
00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:46,800
There will then be a proposal 
informed by that consultation 

370
00:22:47,280 --> 00:22:50,080
and they've taken democracy 
seriously or to be approved 

371
00:22:50,160 --> 00:22:54,080
either by a referendum or being 
part of the electoral platform. 

372
00:22:55,320 --> 00:22:58,000
That's an interesting point, 
isn't it? 

373
00:22:58,360 --> 00:23:02,960
I mean, the BLBS been quite 
consistent since the 2000s that 

374
00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:07,640
they want full membership of 
CARICOM and even what the throne

375
00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:10,880
speech, if I, if I remember what
you just said, a consultation 

376
00:23:10,880 --> 00:23:14,200
leading to full membership. 
So it was clear that the 

377
00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:17,400
government policy is to move to 
full membership, but that we do 

378
00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:21,640
a consultation as a process. 
And then after the consultation 

379
00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:27,360
move to full membership. 
So are we conflating the two 

380
00:23:27,360 --> 00:23:30,080
here? 
Are we just, is this just now a 

381
00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:33,520
consultation which may then lead
to full membership? 

382
00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:35,640
We carry on. 
Or has the government gone 

383
00:23:35,640 --> 00:23:38,640
further now beyond the 2023 
throne speech? 

384
00:23:39,560 --> 00:23:42,440
And so we are definitely going 
to be members or going to go for

385
00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:44,800
membership. 
It's a it's a moot point. 

386
00:23:44,840 --> 00:23:46,720
You know, it's, it's semantics, 
isn't it? 

387
00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:50,640
But initiating A consultation 
process leading to the full 

388
00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:54,320
membership of in CARICOM could 
easily be assumed to be two 

389
00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:57,240
different steps. 
And therefore those those Peter 

390
00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:01,200
Sansom have a point that 
something like CARICOM should be

391
00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:04,800
an electoral platform. 
To me, I would just go back to 

392
00:24:04,800 --> 00:24:09,480
the 2001 when when they 
initiated the decision to move 

393
00:24:09,480 --> 00:24:12,720
from observer status to 
associate member. 

394
00:24:13,480 --> 00:24:15,680
I believe that was a Thorn 
speech commitment for a 

395
00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:18,080
consultation. 
I don't believe it was in the 

396
00:24:18,080 --> 00:24:24,560
1998 election platform of the 
PLPI don't even have access to 

397
00:24:24,560 --> 00:24:28,320
that right now. 
So to me it's the same then 

398
00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:32,720
Parliament is fine, however, and
using your European Economic 

399
00:24:32,720 --> 00:24:37,160
Community EEC system. 
So when the UK joined, that was 

400
00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:43,160
in, I want to say in 1972, they 
joined with two other countries 

401
00:24:43,160 --> 00:24:46,160
whose names I cannot remember 
right now, but there was a 

402
00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:48,840
fourth country that also was 
looking to join. 

403
00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:53,280
That was the only country that 
was Norway that held a 

404
00:24:53,280 --> 00:24:57,000
referendum on the issue. 
They they voted against joining 

405
00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:00,400
the European PEC, but the other 
countries all did it through a 

406
00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:02,640
parliamentary act. 
So. 

407
00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:06,680
I think the the point people are
arguing is whether they should 

408
00:25:06,680 --> 00:25:11,680
or should not be a referendum. 
I don't think it's required. 

409
00:25:12,120 --> 00:25:15,680
I don't know if people. 
Demand it then fine, but I don't

410
00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:18,120
think it's necessary. 
I don't think it's necessary, 

411
00:25:18,120 --> 00:25:20,960
but I think there is a proviso. 
You and I both agree I don't 

412
00:25:20,960 --> 00:25:23,960
think it's necessary for a for a
referendum and get that. 

413
00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:28,520
But there is a proviso. 
And I think as Peter Sanderson 

414
00:25:28,520 --> 00:25:32,440
pointed out, there were a lot of
green papers and white papers, a

415
00:25:32,440 --> 00:25:35,800
lot of consultation, a lot of 
discussion that the MPs in the 

416
00:25:35,840 --> 00:25:41,200
UK at the time were able to use.
I think that before we get 

417
00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:44,000
anywhere near a discussion or 
debate or a vote in the House, 

418
00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:47,400
we've got to have those green 
papers and those white papers, 

419
00:25:47,800 --> 00:25:49,360
yeah. 
That means the government 

420
00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:53,000
government committed to public 
consultation that hasn't even 

421
00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:54,840
started yet. 
Well, it hasn't been. 

422
00:25:54,840 --> 00:25:58,560
We don't quite know why. 
I mean, we're assuming and this 

423
00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:02,640
was the case several months ago,
I think we're assuming still 

424
00:26:02,760 --> 00:26:05,960
that the terms of the agreement 
are still not being delivered by

425
00:26:05,960 --> 00:26:11,200
CARICOM. 
You know, my experience in 

426
00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:13,640
government is that things take 
time. 

427
00:26:13,880 --> 00:26:17,600
Civil service is not. 
And this is no, no attack on the

428
00:26:17,600 --> 00:26:19,360
civil service. 
You want things to be done 

429
00:26:20,800 --> 00:26:22,680
carefully. 
You don't want to rush into 

430
00:26:22,680 --> 00:26:25,800
things. 
It's going to take some time. 

431
00:26:25,920 --> 00:26:29,160
I would imagine that we would 
see the public consultation on 

432
00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:32,640
this probably launched in 
January or February. 

433
00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:35,640
I think it's going to dominate 
2026 along with the absentee 

434
00:26:35,640 --> 00:26:39,280
voting. 
Well, I think, I think this will

435
00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:44,120
be the dominant discussion 
through 2026 that and who the 

436
00:26:44,120 --> 00:26:45,960
new leader of the PLP is going 
to be. 

437
00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:47,880
Yeah. 
Those are the the three things 

438
00:26:47,880 --> 00:26:50,440
for next year. 
Well, that and CIT and what it's

439
00:26:50,520 --> 00:26:52,960
incorporating tax and what that 
means for the budget. 

440
00:26:54,120 --> 00:26:57,440
Well, we haven't digressed, but 
we're going to get a budget 

441
00:26:57,440 --> 00:26:59,360
update. 
Well, we've seen one or not. 

442
00:26:59,920 --> 00:27:04,760
Anyway, we digressed. 
I, I think referendum is moot. 

443
00:27:05,240 --> 00:27:08,240
The Green and White Paper and 
proper discussion and 

444
00:27:08,240 --> 00:27:11,480
transparency over the terms of 
agreement is absolutely crucial.

445
00:27:12,160 --> 00:27:16,600
We vote MPs into power. 
I think the original idea of an 

446
00:27:16,600 --> 00:27:18,960
MP, Jonathan, and you'll know, I
think your point is better than 

447
00:27:18,960 --> 00:27:22,800
me, is the community. 
The idea became that a community

448
00:27:22,800 --> 00:27:26,600
wanted representation so they 
would pick the person that they 

449
00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:28,200
thought could represent them 
best. 

450
00:27:28,600 --> 00:27:31,120
So that carried on, that 
principle carried on. 

451
00:27:31,120 --> 00:27:34,080
If we pick these people because 
we think they can represent us 

452
00:27:34,080 --> 00:27:38,240
in the best way, decision like 
this is made for them is for 

453
00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:42,200
them to make on the proviso that
I just mentioned, without that, 

454
00:27:42,480 --> 00:27:43,960
then there should be a 
referendum. 

455
00:27:45,120 --> 00:27:49,400
I mean, I also think there's a 
lot of, I mean, and again, this 

456
00:27:49,400 --> 00:27:52,680
is where the public consultation
will probably dispel some of the

457
00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:54,960
myths about CARICOM and what it 
is. 

458
00:27:55,400 --> 00:27:57,960
I mean, to me, it's not that 
much different from Bermuda 

459
00:27:57,960 --> 00:27:59,480
joining the World Health 
Organization. 

460
00:28:00,120 --> 00:28:04,280
You know, it's just a, an 
organization, it's a membership 

461
00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:06,360
body. 
I It's not like it's a political

462
00:28:06,360 --> 00:28:08,920
union at the moment. 
I personally would support a 

463
00:28:08,920 --> 00:28:12,000
political political union and 
the Caribbean Federation, but 

464
00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:14,680
that is not what the CARICOM is.
Well, you'd have a political 

465
00:28:14,680 --> 00:28:16,240
union with Cuba if you had your 
way. 

466
00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:18,120
Wouldn't you? 
They're part of the Caribbean. 

467
00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:22,080
So yeah, Caribbean Federation. 
I don't think you can have a 

468
00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:24,280
proper Caribbean federation 
without all the Caribbean 

469
00:28:24,280 --> 00:28:25,240
islands. 
I agree. 

470
00:28:25,240 --> 00:28:26,760
I was pulling your leg, comrade.
Yeah. 

471
00:28:27,160 --> 00:28:29,720
I am wearing red. 
I know the listeners can't see 

472
00:28:29,720 --> 00:28:31,240
that, but. 
Yeah, yeah. 

473
00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:33,080
There are a couple of things 
here actually, you know, but we 

474
00:28:33,080 --> 00:28:35,680
don't know. 
Again, filling this information 

475
00:28:35,680 --> 00:28:41,080
vacuum, we know the UK gave a 
letter of entrustment allowing 

476
00:28:41,080 --> 00:28:44,160
negotiations to start with no 
idea how this might affect 

477
00:28:44,160 --> 00:28:45,840
foreign policy. 
And for listeners that don't 

478
00:28:45,840 --> 00:28:50,200
know, they cannot have a foreign
policy because strictly speaking

479
00:28:50,200 --> 00:28:53,920
it is part of the UK and has to 
abide by UK foreign policy. 

480
00:28:53,920 --> 00:28:57,960
And I would imagine if if 
there's an opt out clause that 

481
00:28:57,960 --> 00:29:00,080
would have to be used because I 
can't believe the government 

482
00:29:00,080 --> 00:29:04,080
would allow economy a dependent 
territory to have his own 

483
00:29:04,280 --> 00:29:07,240
foreign affairs policy. 
Yeah. 

484
00:29:07,240 --> 00:29:10,560
So the I have two big questions 
about CARICOM that I would like 

485
00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:13,120
to have answered. 
One of them is the cost of a 

486
00:29:13,120 --> 00:29:16,160
membership fee and the other one
is on foreign policy. 

487
00:29:16,680 --> 00:29:19,240
We do have the letter from 
entrustment as you mentioned. 

488
00:29:19,240 --> 00:29:24,000
I think that was provided either
in 2023 or 2024. 

489
00:29:25,120 --> 00:29:27,520
We don't. 
I haven't had sight off the 

490
00:29:27,520 --> 00:29:30,520
actual letter from trust but 
I've only seen like government 

491
00:29:30,520 --> 00:29:34,560
statements and about what it is.
I looked for it, I couldn't find

492
00:29:34,560 --> 00:29:37,440
it anywhere. 
And all I can see is that the UK

493
00:29:37,440 --> 00:29:44,680
has given Bermuda the right to 
proceed with moving to full 

494
00:29:44,880 --> 00:29:48,760
membership of CARICOM. 
So my interpretation of that is 

495
00:29:48,760 --> 00:29:53,280
that foreign policy would still 
be controlled by the UK, but 

496
00:29:53,280 --> 00:29:58,720
they would devolve foreign 
policy as it relates to CARICOM 

497
00:29:58,760 --> 00:30:01,480
issues. 
But I don't know how that's 

498
00:30:01,480 --> 00:30:03,960
really going to play out, 
especially as we're seeing 

499
00:30:03,960 --> 00:30:05,760
what's happening in the 
Caribbean right now. 

500
00:30:06,040 --> 00:30:09,600
We have America with their war 
of aggression going on and 

501
00:30:09,600 --> 00:30:12,480
they're dividing CARICOM. 
We got Trinidad at the moment. 

502
00:30:12,480 --> 00:30:15,480
And I think the Dominican 
Republic has just allowed 

503
00:30:15,480 --> 00:30:19,920
military troops as well. 
So is Britain going to be 

504
00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:22,920
willing for Bermuda to get 
involved in that, in the 

505
00:30:22,920 --> 00:30:27,760
potential friction between 
CARICOM and the United States? 

506
00:30:28,240 --> 00:30:30,120
Does Britain does? 
Is there going to, are they 

507
00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:34,160
going to risk their special 
relationship with the US on 

508
00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:35,440
that? 
I don't know. 

509
00:30:36,000 --> 00:30:38,640
I think the answer to that will 
be no, they won't risk it. 

510
00:30:39,240 --> 00:30:41,880
But then how can we have full 
membership of CARICOM? 

511
00:30:41,920 --> 00:30:43,720
This is this. 
Is a big question to answer, 

512
00:30:43,720 --> 00:30:45,400
isn't it? 
I, I can't believe, I mean I 

513
00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:48,440
don't think it'll ever happen, 
but I can't believe that the UK 

514
00:30:48,440 --> 00:30:53,120
would let the government here 
issue or sign an anti Trump 

515
00:30:53,760 --> 00:31:01,040
statement and. 
Maybe they maybe we'll have the 

516
00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:04,720
right to foreign policy on all 
issues except when the UK 

517
00:31:04,720 --> 00:31:06,160
disagrees. 
I don't, I don't know. 

518
00:31:07,520 --> 00:31:09,320
UK will have the veto every 
single time. 

519
00:31:09,520 --> 00:31:11,680
Right. 
I, I really, I don't know. 

520
00:31:11,920 --> 00:31:15,760
As far as I'm aware, there are 
no colonies that are members of 

521
00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:17,880
CARICOM. 
They're all independent states. 

522
00:31:18,320 --> 00:31:20,640
There. 
Are associate members like 

523
00:31:20,640 --> 00:31:26,360
Bermuda came in and a few others
but they are which are colonies 

524
00:31:26,360 --> 00:31:28,440
but they're only associate. 
Yeah. 

525
00:31:28,600 --> 00:31:31,160
Full membership, I think Bermuda
would be the first one if we do 

526
00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:34,520
join, then probably came in and 
Turks and Caicos and a couple 

527
00:31:34,520 --> 00:31:36,280
others will also try to follow 
our lead. 

528
00:31:36,360 --> 00:31:38,960
I imagine so, yeah. 
We're probably watching with 

529
00:31:38,960 --> 00:31:40,600
great interest. 
Yeah. 

530
00:31:41,120 --> 00:31:44,880
So that's the big question for 
me is how's the whole foreign 

531
00:31:44,880 --> 00:31:47,080
policy thing going to work? 
I don't know. 

532
00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:49,880
And again, we won't know until 
we see these terms of agreement 

533
00:31:50,480 --> 00:31:51,960
and then get the British view on
it. 

534
00:31:52,040 --> 00:31:53,800
It's so frustrating. 
You said the wheels of 

535
00:31:53,800 --> 00:31:57,400
government turn slowly. 
I, I, they do, I agree. 

536
00:31:58,040 --> 00:32:00,880
But the problem is it creates 
this information vacuum and then

537
00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:02,880
we get all these kind of 
debates, all which are 

538
00:32:02,880 --> 00:32:07,360
misinformed, a lot of them or. 
The fact that I see so many 

539
00:32:07,360 --> 00:32:10,880
people who are so 100% against 
CARICOM membership. 

540
00:32:11,160 --> 00:32:13,480
Without. 
Any information that to me tells

541
00:32:13,480 --> 00:32:17,080
me their position is not based 
on an informed position, it's 

542
00:32:17,080 --> 00:32:19,400
just based on a prejudice 
against CARICOM. 

543
00:32:20,040 --> 00:32:22,920
I don't think any emotional 
position one way or the other, 

544
00:32:22,920 --> 00:32:24,520
right? 
Now I agree, I think most of the

545
00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:27,880
Brexit Brexiteers were basing 
their votes on emotion. 

546
00:32:28,040 --> 00:32:32,560
Yeah, and emotion can be good. 
Emotion can inform, but it has 

547
00:32:32,560 --> 00:32:35,200
to be balanced with evidence at 
the same time. 

548
00:32:35,200 --> 00:32:37,200
And. 
I think you know my last point 

549
00:32:37,200 --> 00:32:38,960
to make here. 
I mean, I would say this, I'm 

550
00:32:38,960 --> 00:32:42,200
slightly biased because I'm kind
of in this business as well, but

551
00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:46,120
we government spent a fortune 
hiring an overseas US PR company

552
00:32:46,120 --> 00:32:51,640
to explain CARICOM amongst other
things and they don't yeah to. 

553
00:32:51,640 --> 00:32:54,000
Explain CARICOM. 
It was a bunch of things. 

554
00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:57,640
It was to help with PR and 
things like dangerous dogs, the 

555
00:32:57,640 --> 00:33:00,360
blue economy, CARICOM, and a 
couple of other things. 

556
00:33:00,640 --> 00:33:05,120
OK. 
Yeah, and here we are discussing

557
00:33:05,120 --> 00:33:10,880
an information vacuum. 
The the other question is 

558
00:33:10,880 --> 00:33:14,120
membership fees. 
Right now we pay, I want to say 

559
00:33:14,120 --> 00:33:17,520
about 1/4 of a million a year as
an associate member. 

560
00:33:17,960 --> 00:33:21,080
I said it's probably more like 
227,000 but. 

561
00:33:21,080 --> 00:33:21,960
Something like that. 
Yeah. 

562
00:33:22,120 --> 00:33:25,240
Yeah, it is. 
The I I've been looking on 

563
00:33:25,600 --> 00:33:27,560
various sites. 
I've been trying to find the 

564
00:33:27,560 --> 00:33:32,120
actual formula by which full 
membership fees are calculated. 

565
00:33:32,520 --> 00:33:35,800
I cannot find it anywhere. 
I can tell you what the 

566
00:33:36,520 --> 00:33:41,880
countries do pay and it seems to
be a some sort of formula 

567
00:33:41,880 --> 00:33:47,680
between population and your GDP,
but the exact weighting between 

568
00:33:47,680 --> 00:33:50,840
those two and how the exact 
thing is calculated, I don't 

569
00:33:50,840 --> 00:33:56,640
know. 
We do have a relatively high 

570
00:33:56,640 --> 00:34:00,280
GDP, but we also have a very 
small population. 

571
00:34:00,440 --> 00:34:04,440
So comparisons with Barbados and
Bahamas are difficult. 

572
00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:08,800
Their GDP is similar to ours, 
but their population is much 

573
00:34:08,800 --> 00:34:10,600
bigger. 
I want to say Bahamas is about 

574
00:34:10,920 --> 00:34:14,400
1/4 of a million people and 
Barbados, I want to say is about

575
00:34:14,400 --> 00:34:19,920
300,000 people, whereas we are 
what, 65,000 people? 

576
00:34:20,639 --> 00:34:23,639
So my guess would be that our 
membership fee would be 

577
00:34:23,639 --> 00:34:29,760
somewhere between 750,000 a year
and 1.5 million a year. 

578
00:34:29,760 --> 00:34:32,719
Barbados pays about 1.5 for 
example. 

579
00:34:32,840 --> 00:34:35,440
Membership fees are a bit moved.
It depends what you get for your

580
00:34:35,440 --> 00:34:38,159
membership. 
Yeah. 

581
00:34:38,239 --> 00:34:40,040
I mean, there are benefits now, 
one? 

582
00:34:40,320 --> 00:34:42,639
.5 million could be really good 
value for money. 

583
00:34:43,159 --> 00:34:45,639
Yeah, I know. 
There's also becoming a full 

584
00:34:45,639 --> 00:34:50,360
members means you sign up to all
240 articles of the Treaty of 

585
00:34:50,840 --> 00:34:53,239
I'm going to mispronounce it 
Shagwa Lama. 

586
00:34:53,840 --> 00:34:56,239
You are good I I would have 
mispronounced it as well, so 

587
00:34:56,280 --> 00:34:58,320
don't. 
It. 

588
00:34:58,840 --> 00:35:01,080
Except you can opt out of 
freedom of movement. 

589
00:35:01,560 --> 00:35:03,040
Yeah. 
Well, I mean, that's not 

590
00:35:03,040 --> 00:35:05,440
necessarily that's, I don't 
think that's actually an article

591
00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:09,000
in the treaty. 
That's like a CARICOM policy. 

592
00:35:09,360 --> 00:35:13,800
And not all of the 240 articles 
are going to be directly 

593
00:35:13,800 --> 00:35:16,920
relevant to Bermuda. 
Something like 30 or 40 of them 

594
00:35:16,920 --> 00:35:21,640
are specifically on agriculture.
We do have agriculture here, so 

595
00:35:21,640 --> 00:35:25,240
it will have an effect, but we 
don't have like big banana 

596
00:35:25,240 --> 00:35:28,800
plantations or as agriculturally
dependent as some of the other 

597
00:35:29,120 --> 00:35:33,520
islands are. 
One key thing is you're not 

598
00:35:33,520 --> 00:35:37,080
supposed to have custom duties 
per SE on goods produced by 

599
00:35:37,080 --> 00:35:39,960
other CARICOM countries. 
I don't think we import a lot 

600
00:35:39,960 --> 00:35:44,040
from CARICOM as is, but maybe 
this would encourage us to 

601
00:35:44,280 --> 00:35:48,080
import more from CARICOM so. 
If I were the. 

602
00:35:48,080 --> 00:35:50,920
Government. 
I would do a discussion paper 

603
00:35:51,120 --> 00:35:54,560
looking at every 240 articles 
and say how is this going to 

604
00:35:54,560 --> 00:35:58,520
apply to Bermuda? 
This won't, this might and maybe

605
00:35:58,520 --> 00:36:01,280
you could do a cost benefit 
analysis, I don't know. 

606
00:36:01,440 --> 00:36:03,600
So I don't know but. 
It probably should be because 

607
00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:06,200
people will read that like you 
and ask those questions. 

608
00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:07,760
Do you? 
Where did you find that, 

609
00:36:07,760 --> 00:36:09,400
Jonathan? 
Was that just a simple Google? 

610
00:36:09,400 --> 00:36:13,880
Search it's on Caricom's 
website. 

611
00:36:14,160 --> 00:36:16,440
It's on Caricom's website. 
OK, we haven't. 

612
00:36:16,560 --> 00:36:19,640
We are going to get a newsletter
one day and what we do, we'll 

613
00:36:19,640 --> 00:36:21,920
put the information like that in
it. 

614
00:36:21,920 --> 00:36:25,120
But at the moment, if you're 
just going to have to Google and

615
00:36:25,400 --> 00:36:28,800
and find out, I mean, it's a 
good .240 articles, some, some 

616
00:36:28,800 --> 00:36:31,000
won't need discussing because 
they won't be relevant to 

617
00:36:31,000 --> 00:36:34,120
Bibilia quite obviously. 
But you're right, it comes back 

618
00:36:34,120 --> 00:36:37,160
again that there's got to have 
this green paper, you've got to 

619
00:36:37,160 --> 00:36:41,120
have public consultation, so. 
And even on the treaty, it does 

620
00:36:41,120 --> 00:36:44,440
talk about employing CARICOM 
workers. 

621
00:36:44,440 --> 00:36:46,360
In other CARICOM states. 
It does. 

622
00:36:46,760 --> 00:36:50,000
But you're allowed to set like I
want to say they use like the 

623
00:36:50,000 --> 00:36:53,480
term quotas or something. 
You can have exceptions, but you

624
00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:58,040
are still supposed to treat them
more preferentially than non 

625
00:36:58,040 --> 00:37:01,560
CARICOM. 
But that doesn't mean that we're

626
00:37:01,560 --> 00:37:03,280
gonna be flooded by CARICOM 
workers. 

627
00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:07,880
It just means that in the work 
permit process the CARICOM 

628
00:37:07,880 --> 00:37:11,680
worker is gonna be slightly more
at an advantage than a non 

629
00:37:11,680 --> 00:37:13,960
CARICOM citizen. 
That's all. 

630
00:37:14,880 --> 00:37:18,240
I mean, we already have a kind 
of a gradiated system of 

631
00:37:18,240 --> 00:37:21,360
Vermedians at the top spouses or
Vermedians are slightly below 

632
00:37:21,360 --> 00:37:26,080
that PRC and then people from 
overseas. 

633
00:37:26,240 --> 00:37:29,480
So it just adds another layer 
of, OK, well, it's a CARICOM 

634
00:37:29,480 --> 00:37:32,920
person, let's wait that into it.
We go to the top of the key. 

635
00:37:33,400 --> 00:37:35,440
Yeah. 
Or under a spouse, under a 

636
00:37:35,440 --> 00:37:38,480
Vermedian. 
Now I do think there's as we, as

637
00:37:38,480 --> 00:37:41,240
I've noted, there's a lot of 
prejudice against the Caribbean 

638
00:37:41,240 --> 00:37:46,040
and Bermuda, not universal, it's
in certain segments. 

639
00:37:46,320 --> 00:37:49,680
And no, no amount of public 
information campaign or 

640
00:37:49,680 --> 00:37:53,320
consultation is gonna dispel 
some of that prejudice. 

641
00:37:53,560 --> 00:37:55,680
That's the nature of prejudice. 
It's irrational. 

642
00:37:55,960 --> 00:38:00,360
It's just there. 
But an information campaign will

643
00:38:00,760 --> 00:38:04,840
reduce the ability of non 
prejudice people. 

644
00:38:05,240 --> 00:38:09,320
So that's what you're saying. 
In an information vacuum, the 

645
00:38:09,320 --> 00:38:13,840
latter's voices carry the the 
the mob, I guess you could say. 

646
00:38:15,920 --> 00:38:19,040
But an information campaign will
reduce the ability for those 

647
00:38:19,040 --> 00:38:22,760
prejudice voices to dominate. 
Totally agree, totally agree, 

648
00:38:22,800 --> 00:38:25,640
and it's going to happen. 
And I think it will. 

649
00:38:26,160 --> 00:38:27,120
I think it will. 
I hope so. 

650
00:38:27,480 --> 00:38:29,400
Otherwise it's could be, well 
not. 

651
00:38:30,080 --> 00:38:33,400
I think a lot is going to 
depend, isn't it on I'll I'll 

652
00:38:33,440 --> 00:38:36,880
rephrase that will a lot depend 
on who the new leader of the PLP

653
00:38:36,880 --> 00:38:39,720
is. 
Well, there might be an argument

654
00:38:39,720 --> 00:38:44,520
that the Premier wants to get 
this done before he leaves as 

655
00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:46,880
part of his legacy. 
His legacy I. 

656
00:38:47,080 --> 00:38:50,800
Kind of suspect that's one 
reason why the PLP is pushing 

657
00:38:50,800 --> 00:38:54,160
heavily on the electoral reform 
as well as a bit of a legacy 

658
00:38:54,160 --> 00:38:57,880
thing because a new leader may 
not think that that is such a 

659
00:38:58,720 --> 00:39:02,640
such an important thing to focus
on, including CARICOM. 

660
00:39:03,040 --> 00:39:06,160
I think the legacy thing might 
be a good, good point actually, 

661
00:39:06,160 --> 00:39:08,120
Jonathan, I wonderful fevers 
speed it up. 

662
00:39:09,160 --> 00:39:11,520
Yeah. 
And push before next October. 

663
00:39:12,920 --> 00:39:14,280
It's going to be an interesting 
year. 

664
00:39:14,680 --> 00:39:17,520
We should have a lot of 
information to talk about on 

665
00:39:17,520 --> 00:39:18,200
the. 
Podcast. 

666
00:39:18,440 --> 00:39:19,720
You know what? 
Caricom fuck. 

667
00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:22,480
I I just, I just said 
deliberately, it's going to be 

668
00:39:22,480 --> 00:39:25,480
an interesting year. 
Yeah, because I wanted to go 

669
00:39:25,480 --> 00:39:30,080
back to we started this podcast.
It's actually more interesting 

670
00:39:30,080 --> 00:39:33,960
than people realise. 
So we are going to have an 

671
00:39:33,960 --> 00:39:37,120
interesting podcast next year. 
We are because we're going to be

672
00:39:37,160 --> 00:39:39,320
more interesting. 
Well, coming up to the 

673
00:39:39,320 --> 00:39:42,920
anniversary of the podcast, I 
think it was January this year 

674
00:39:42,920 --> 00:39:46,400
that you and Michael Fay started
it. 

675
00:39:46,440 --> 00:39:48,240
Yep. 
It was around about January the 

676
00:39:48,240 --> 00:39:50,000
20th. 
We've got to think of what to do

677
00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:53,880
for our first birthday. 
Yeah I I joined after the 

678
00:39:53,880 --> 00:39:58,920
election when Michael Fay was no
longer able to to sit as a Co 

679
00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:00,360
host. 
Well, maybe. 

680
00:40:00,400 --> 00:40:02,320
Maybe we get him and you 
together. 

681
00:40:02,680 --> 00:40:05,160
That'll be interesting. 
Yeah, we can do a whole birthday

682
00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:07,200
celebration. 
We can wear funny hats. 

683
00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:10,040
Have some. 
Definitely not on video though. 

684
00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:13,440
No, that's true. 
That is absolutely for sure. 

685
00:40:14,080 --> 00:40:16,720
This will be our last podcast I 
think before Christmas. 

686
00:40:16,840 --> 00:40:23,000
I'm heading off to the UK for a 
holiday to see my mum and going 

687
00:40:23,000 --> 00:40:24,800
to stay on for a couple of 
months over there. 

688
00:40:25,520 --> 00:40:29,880
We will be back though, very 
early in the new year when we'll

689
00:40:29,880 --> 00:40:34,600
be doing our end of year review,
which are our favorite podcasts,

690
00:40:35,040 --> 00:40:37,360
our favorite interviews, our 
best interviews. 

691
00:40:37,640 --> 00:40:41,720
Just recapping on all those and 
getting our crystal ball out, 

692
00:40:43,040 --> 00:40:46,200
see what we think is going to be
the most interesting aspects of 

693
00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:48,880
2026. 
So I think we've given the game 

694
00:40:48,880 --> 00:40:52,280
away a little bit on that one. 
We'll have to think of something

695
00:40:52,280 --> 00:40:55,800
new. 
So just from me personally, I 

696
00:40:55,800 --> 00:40:57,960
hope you all have a wonderful 
holiday. 

697
00:40:58,440 --> 00:41:00,080
I hope you all get what you 
want. 

698
00:41:00,280 --> 00:41:03,040
I hope the New Year's fantastic 
for everybody. 

699
00:41:03,040 --> 00:41:05,640
And thank you very much for 
listening to us, Jonathan. 

700
00:41:06,160 --> 00:41:10,840
Yeah, I'm, I'm going to copy 
everything you just said. 

701
00:41:10,840 --> 00:41:14,800
Happy holidays to everyone and 
it's certainly been a year and 

702
00:41:14,840 --> 00:41:17,040
hopefully 2026 is better for 
everyone. 

703
00:41:17,480 --> 00:41:19,880
As good as this year it may have
been, let's hope that next 

704
00:41:19,880 --> 00:41:21,760
year's even better. 
Hear, hear to that. 

705
00:41:22,600 --> 00:41:26,400
Have a great holiday. 
Goodbye The News Navigators with

706
00:41:26,400 --> 00:41:29,880
Jeremy Deacon and Jonathan 
Starling distilling and 

707
00:41:29,880 --> 00:41:32,000
discussing the issues of the 
day. 

708
00:41:32,480 --> 00:41:35,800
We help Bermuda navigate the 
news.

