Welcome to Keith's night. Don't tread on anyone.
This is a book summary of the most dangerous Superstition by
Larkin. Rose page 3.
The belief in Authority, which includes all belief in
government is irrational and self-contradictory.
It is contrary to civilization and morality and constitutes the
most dangerous destructive Superstition that has ever
existed rather than being a force for order and Justice.
The belief in Authority is the arch enemy of humanity.
So as far as Government goes, We're not talking about a group
of people coming together. We're not talking about schools
or roads, or defense what makes government a unique institution.
Is it makes laws and imposes obligations on other people.
They do not consent to that. Is what makes government a
unique institution Mark passio in response to what Authority
is? He says, the religion of
authority is based upon the illusion and falsehood that some
are Masters who makes that arbitrary dictates which are not
based on. Morality and enforced by
violence. While others are slaves who have
a moral obligation to obey the arbitrary dictates set by the
Masters. So we're not talking about here
are the rules for my body. And if you don't treat me this
way, I'm going to not spend time with you.
We're not talking about people who have rules in their house.
We're not talking about people who sell things out of their
house or their property called a business.
We're talking about individuals who initiate aggression.
Physical Uninvited, coercive interference with the peaceful
interactions of other humans. That is what the belief in
Authority is that's not my opinion of what it is that, that
is what it is. And this is a falsehood.
It does not exist in reality. It is an illusion.
It is a mental construct of an imbalance mind and an imbalance
psyche. In other words.
He's saying that it's not in Balance because you're holding
some people Masters, lawmakers government Congress to a
different standard than you. Slaves citizens, or, you know,
the people arrested for victimless crimes and the
biggest manifestation of this Universal world religion, in the
belief of the belief in Authority is government from
Mark. Pass to go back to Lark and Rose
the most dangerous Superstition. He says that when many people
hear about this Theory referred to, as anarchism, they'll say,
well, you know what, we need government because people are
bad luck and Rose responds with if human beings are so careless
stupid and malicious. That they cannot be trusted to
do the right thing on their own. How would the situation be
improved by taking a subset of those?
Very same careless, stupid and malicious human beings and
giving them societal permission to forcibly control.
All the others. He continues saying that this is
like a religion much like Mark passio says, the religion of
authority. It is a religion.
He says, perhaps most telling is that if you sir It's to the
average person that maybe God does not exist.
He will likely respond with less emotion and hostility then if
you bring up the idea of life without government this
indicates, which religion people are more deeply emotionally
attached to and which religion they actually believe in more
firmly. In fact, they believe in it.
So deeply in government that they do not even recognize it as
a belief at all. Imagine.
If I said, the Catholic church has rights, that no one else has
Because that's the way things have been.
And if you don't like it, you should move.
And the Colombo crime. Family also has rights, and they
can take a portion of your income.
Even if you've never voluntarily contract with it with them
because they provide a general amount of security for our
neighborhood. That is a religious belief that
is not based in Morality or consistency, or ethics at all.
It's completely irrational. He also well Compares it to a
religion saying it's worse than a And because Many religious
people will sooner let you burn in hell for all of eternity
before. Forcing you to attend their
Bible study, attend their Church force you to pay their Pastor
force you to chip in for Bibles. They say, hey, if I can't
convince you voluntarily. Well, I don't own you but when
it comes to government, it's like, oh, I'm so terrified that
a road won't be paved. As often as it should that I
need to forcibly. Take half of your income.
Your you should be free to burn in hell for all of eternity.
But I'm so worried that Cal won't be put on the sides of
food that. Yeah, we need government that an
FDA violently dominating people like and Rose then goes on to
discuss what it means to be free and really have a right to
something and exercise. This Freedom.
This is the philosophy of positive rights.
Verse - writes. He says, if for example, someone
has a right to housing and housing comes only from the
knowledge skills and efforts of other people.
It means that one person has the right to force.
Another person to build him a house.
So I have a right to health care in the way of I have a right to
pursue things. That could be called Help
medical devices without someone coercively interfering called
the FDA or OSHA or Department of Agriculture.
That means that I have a right to freely associate with people
and make trades with them. So, if there's any rights
violation in the healthcare industry, it's because the
government forcibly stops people from making trades.
They also have patents which are totally illegitimate as far as
saying I have a right to healthcare.
That only comes about because doctors exist because people
manufacture things. So, if I have a right to
something, that means I have a right to forcibly.
Take your property. So long as I use a percentage of
the stolen property to pursue Health Care, 50, right to
education. I can take your laptop so long
as I use it to do research because, you know, I'm just
exercising my rights positive rights, totally immoral - rights
only morally Justified position. He then goes on to discuss left
versus right political views, or big government versus small
government Advocates. He refers to them as status.
This is a belief that government has legitimate Authority.
He says all status believe that the people who make up
government have an exemption from basic human morality and
not only may do things, which others have no right to do, but
should and must do things for the supposed good of society,
the type of degree of aggression varies, but all status Advocate
aggression. In other words, you might have
two rapists one, a serial rapist, and other person who
just does it once either way, what Lark and roses saying is
that this Inherent belief in aggression is inherently
immoral. So you might, so when you say
slavery was bad, what we're saying, is the ownership or
initiating violence against a peaceful person to coerced
labor. Out of them is inherently bad.
Yeah, some slave owners had terrific conditions.
Others had horrible conditions and killed their slaves were
talking about the principal here.
So responding with well, what about big verse smaller left?
First writer, Trump versus Hillary or Corbin verse Boris
Johnson. That is not getting at the root
of the cause which is the belief in violence or the belief in
authority authority. Lorcan Rose continues,
discussing the side effects of the myth.
So yes, this thing is inherently immoral but historically if we
look at the belief in Authority, it leaves in its ruin Mass death
and mass economic ruin and lives absolutely destroyed.
So, for example, the world wars are an immediate example
countries getting nuked or firebombed or country.
Going to war together. This is often the result of
people thinking that some people have the right to do things.
No other group has the right to do because that cannot be
consistently defended. If I don't have the right to do
something. I don't have the right to vote
for Saddam Hussein to do it on my behalf.
And well you could take the Communists position and say,
well, you know, what? Yeah theft is.
Okay property is inherently theft.
Well, if you have the right to steal, then other people have
the right to steal. So from you, you cannot have
this consistently applied. If you own other people than
other people own you, and you don't have the right to form
your own opinion about theft being justified.
Unless you get permission from other people because they own
your body. The belief in Authority is
immoral. It is inconsistent only
voluntourism and free-market libertarianism and anarchism are
morally, Justified, ways to arrange Society.
Other side effects of the myth, our commercial regulations were
much poorer, because a group of people, The government,
coercively stops us from pursuing our dreams and having
our own business, through the FDA.
Through OSHA, through Licensing Laws, that make it so
competitors, or rather big companies have the resources to
compete. Well, smaller competitors.
It makes it harder for them to get their foot in the door and
compete. So, we have fewer goods and
services because we have left fewer businesses offering
Alternatives, we have prices. Is higher than they.
Otherwise would be most likely. We have less job opportunities
less competition. So well, yeah, that gives us
less Choice, making it all of this is because people believe
government has the right to coercively interfere with
voluntary exchange. We have schooling.
When you're forced to fund something in your kids are
forced to attend it. This thing is not going to
improve, so when it turns out, well, the American people have,
and people across the world really have trouble using logic
and thinking clearly, and knowing about history.
A philosophy morality after 12 years.
They don't have a lot of this info.
Well, that's what we'd expect. We also have truancy laws, which
separate children from their parents, which I guess is
something that became bad in the year 2017 and will go back to
being, okay. Once Kamala Harris is doing it.
We also have the drug war, people getting kidnapped for
victimless crimes. You have SWAT raids.
I just met a guy at University Club who had his house swatted
while he was out of town because he was suspected.
Don selling Bitcoin in exchange for cash without a license or
things. Like, Randy, Weaver.
You have Waco, Eric Garner. Those are obviously peaceful
people. That police felt they were
justified in initiating violence because they have a false
religion called Authority. It's okay.
Because this group called The Congress group said, we can do
it. You have post-traumatic stress
disorder that a lot of soldiers have after being enslaved.
Called the draft in slave to fight Wars based on a Gulf of
Tonkin lion. Vietnam.
For example, I met a guy who was a hundred.
I think it was 100 years old, and he was crying to me about
how he killed the Japanese fighter pilot in the Second
Great War. He says, he can see his face
today and he cries thinking about him because he that guy
could have gone on to have children, and he was just sort
of a poor guy like him, who was just drafted and not there
because they wanted to ooh, but because other people believed in
Authority, he didn't make the final point about Authority, but
you get the point. We also have false divides
constantly being pushed in society.
For example, constantly being divided on race.
This race is a pressing that race.
Therefore, the state is morally justified in expanding the
amount of power. It has.
Even if that's true. It's a non sequitur to say
therefore that groups power should increase.
We have false divides. Based on income.
The goal is to divide people one this Called cultural Marxism or
just regular economic Marxism that group over there is so
dangerous. So evil.
Only a very big government can come in and save us.
So the idea that well without government or authority chaos,
might happen or bad things might happen.
Well, you also have to concede. Yes, that's possible, but under
government bad things always happen.
So, the existence of bad things does not justify a state or
authority Larkin. Rose ends the book saying in
summary to quickly review people.
Not delegate rights. They do not have, which makes it
impossible for anyone to acquire the right to rule Authority.
If I don't have X, I cannot give you X.
If I don't have the right to make laws that apply to Peaceful
people. Interacting.
I don't have the right to vote for Doug Ducey to do it on my
behalf. People cannot alter morality,
which makes the laws of government devoid of any
inherent Authority, Ergo Authority.
The right to rule cannot Not logically exist.
Thank you for watching. Keith Knight.
Don't tread on anyone, please visit Lark and Rose at the Rose.
Channel.com Link in the description.