Is equality. A worthy goal by Bradley Thomas
published by the libertarian Institute?
Probably the most frequently used on covid.
Buzzword in 2020, was the term social justice.
You couldn't escape it from the George.
Floyd protests turned riots even to the World of Sports, the
notion of social justice and its key component.
Equality was everywhere. I can just imagine the late
great Murray rothbard cringing. On turning on a basketball game,
only to see the word equality, emblazoned on the backs of
players jerseys indeed. One of rothbard's most iconic
essays was his 1974 tracked. Entitled egalitarianism as a
revolt against nature, egalitarianism as defined by
dictionary.com is the belief in the equality of all people,
especially in political social or economic life.
So make no mistake. When rothbard critiqued
egalitarianism. Had his sights set on the
equality being espoused. By today's social justice
movement. This is to be distinguished from
equality of rights in the Jeffersonian lockean.
Hop. Ian sense, even in 1974,
rothbard had identified. The fact that equality was a
rallying Cry of the left and that few were willing to
challenge these supposed moral superiority of such Desires in
no area. Has the left been Did Justice
and morality as extensively and almost universally as in its
espousal of massive equality? It is rare indeed in the United
States to find anyone especially in intellectual challenging, the
beauty and goodness of the egalitarian idea.
He wrote Such broad acceptance, led rothbard to declare that the
goal of equality has for too long.
Been treated uncritically and axiomatically as an ethical
ideal, a problem rothbard said about Fixing in his essay.
So is equality and ethical idea. So morally pure that it is
beyond questioning rothbard replied to this query.
If an ethical idea is inherently impractical that is, if it
cannot work in practice, then it is a poor ideal in should be
discarded for with In short, rothbard insisted, there can be
no ethical superiority of a nonsensical goal.
The goal of equality cannot work because it violates the very
nature of man. It should be summarily,
dismissed for the sake of clarity.
Rothbard explains. Just exactly what equality means
the term has been much invoked. But little analyzed, A and B are
equal. If they are identical to each
other, with respect to a given attribute.
He explained Example, if two people are both exactly six feet
tall. They can be said to be equal in
height as such rothbard continues.
There is one and only one way then in which any two people can
really be equal. In the fullest sense.
They must be identical in all of their attributes.
Anyone with the faintest acquaintance with reality.
However, realizes that the human species mankind is uniquely.
Characterized by a high degree of variety diversity,
differentiation in short, any quality.
As he noted rothbard, adds. The age old record of inequality
seems to indicate that this variability and diversity is
rooted in the biological nature of man included.
In these human inequalities and differences are traits like
intelligence ambition, work. Ethic skill, sets, ability, Etc,
to underscore the point. Both part quotes biochemist.
Roger Jay Williams from his 1953 book, free and unequal
individuals differ from each other.
Even in the minutest details of anatomy and body chemistry and
physics finger and toe prints. Microscopic texture of hair
character of brain waves and so on ad infinitum, it is not only
possible but certain that every human being possesses by
inheritance and exceedingly complex.
X Mosaic composed of thousands of items, which is distinctive
for him. Alone.
In light of this, rothbard references, the iron law of
oligarchy, the Insight, that in every organization or activity,
a few generally, the most able and or the most interested will
end up as Leaders with the mass of membership, filling the ranks
as followers, great book, published in 1943, called the
Machiavelli ins by James Barnum where he goes into the iron, Of
oligarchy saying, well, you might have, you know, a big
Corporation where there's, you know, investors and then a CEO
and then people who, you know, have only been on the job a week
or a year. So we can see clear, sort of
like an oligarchy even though it's voluntary and no one's
rights are being violated. We can see that as an oligarchy
but then he goes into a union meeting and says, and actually
looks at the minutes of a real union meeting and it turns out
not Not all of these workers attended the meeting it was
after work. They would rather spend time
with their family. So already not everyone's
involved. And then you look at who ends up
doing, most of the talking, a small percentage of the people
end up doing the talking and influencing the voters of the
union. And then you end up looking at
the rules and the offers that, you know, labor gives to
management at the end of the meeting.
And it's like not even one percent of the workers and up.
Fluent saying the union. So under any system, syndicalism
voluntourism men are Chasm. Anarchism Monarch is MM fascism.
There is an iron law of oligarchy rothbart.
Observed that the egalitarians would respond to these emerging
societal hierarchies by insisting that culture and not
natural. Human differences is to blame
for such inequalities since egalitarian means begin with the
a priori Axiom that all people and it's all groups of people
are uniform and equal, then it follows for them that any and
all group differences than status, Prestige or authority.
In society, must be the result of unjust oppression and
irrational discrimination. Eliminate.
The supposed institutions that generate said oppression
according to the left egalitarians and Society will
achieve the equality of results that social justice demands
through this reasoning, the egalitarians have convinced
themselves that their goal of equality and Society is
attainable through the means of changing cultural institutions
such as the market economy and the patriarchy what the
egalitarians Pharaoh failed to realize.
However, Is that the institution responsible for society's
greatest? Depression?
Is their chosen tool to create equality.
The state to be clear rothbard by no means assigns all
inequality to diverse and unique, nature of individual
humans, he of all people has pointed out the oppressive
nature of the state and how it dispenses suffering and favors
in unequal distributions, calling out.
The state's role in creating injustices is a Worthy.
Pursuit where the egalitarians go wrong according to rothbard,
is there complete dismissal of human diversity to explain any
in equality of outcomes and their unwillingness to use
unjust means and I'm sorry and their willingness to use.
Unjust means to enforce their ideal of a society, compromised
of undifferentiated and uniform people.
So, this would be the difference between The Young Turks have
more views than Keith. Don't try it on anyone.
So what we're going to do is try and promote this show.
We're going to try to not watch The Young Turks.
We're going to Tweet it out. We're going to put it on our
alternative media sites. We're going to send email list
to try and make things more equal.
I don't know if that's necessarily a good, a good thing
just because something's unequal.
But it's totally different in a moral sense to say there for
people, with more views than me, have to stop, creating content.
Put all their videos. He owes on private until I catch
up with them because this creates an inequality in
society. They get billions of people
saying their views and they have an ability to influence the
world and I get much less of one.
This is terrible and people should be forced to watch me by
law and other people should be banned from being viewed.
Just until, you know, things are equal at the heart of the
egalitarians left. Rothbard road is a pathological
belief that there is no structure of reality.
And further that The egalitarians believe that the
reality of human diversity can be transformed by mere wish or
the mere exercise of human. Will someone made a great point
on Twitter? The other day?
They said, if you think, embracing socialism will give us
equality. Well, first of all, the most
unequal institution is government, they claim the right
to initiate violence against peaceful people.
You don't have the option of the not chipping, in to the welfare
state of the Warfare state. So, on its face, it's pretty
unequal. They make laws.
You have to obey if you try to make laws against them and
enforce it on them. You are literally a terrorist by
definition and you go to jail. So total of inequality right
there. However, if you just look at
what the state produces like, let's say in America, there is
compulsory education. It is totally unequal in
distribution. So giving the state, even the
rains for any sort of Industry. You're not going to get
equality. I'm sorry, you're not going to
get quality. Nor will you get equality?
Naturally to impose his will on the of the egalitarians
requires, an application of violence and coercion from a
powerful ruling Elite and egalitarian society can only
help to achieve its goal by totalitarian methods of coercion
rothbard concluded. This imposition of force
Conformity is anti-human according to rothbard and
therefore the goal of egalitarianism or equality is a
revolt against the biological reality of our uniqueness from
this. He's able to dispense his final
verdict, since their methodology and their goals deny, the very
structure of humanity and of the universe, the egalitarians are
profoundly anti-human, and therefore, their ideology and
their activities may be set down as profoundly evil as well.
Look, Adele is a much better singer than I am.
Totally unequal. It's good that we Embrace that
difference. Brian Regan is Times funnier
than I am. We need to embrace that and
reward him and make sure we have a free market.
Whereas many people can see the brine Riggins of the world as
they want same for engineers. I mean, how many Engineers can,
you know, create the iPhone, how many people are willing to put
in the time and effort, very few.
Let's just Embrace these differences and make sure
there's a free market where there's a division of labor
where we could trade so we could get access to the products.
And services, the Brilliant Minds of the world have have
given us Bradley. Thomas is the creator of the
website, erase the state.com. And author of the book tweeting,
Liberty libertarian tweets to smash status and socialist.
He is a Libertarian activist who enjoys researching and writing
on the freedom philosophy and Austrian economics.
Follow him on Twitter at erase State.
Thank you for watching Keith Knight.
Don't tread on anyone.