Here's where we can bring Churchill back in, he wrote a My
point was, the costs seldom outweigh the potential benefits.
September 1st of 1939, Hitler goes to reunite a 95% German
city, Danzig. That's according to Encyclopedia
Britannica. It was 95% German at the time.
So he invaded Poland on September 3rd Neville
Chamberlain, who we're told is like this dumb dove who never
did anything. Neville Chamberlain declares war
against National Socialist Germany as a result of this
invasion 'cause they promised to give a war guarantee to Poland.
It was not a war guarantee because the Soviets invaded on
September 17th of that year and there was no declaration of war
against the Soviets. It was trying to provoke a war
with Germany. So notice the independence of
Britain is already violated. The decision to go to war for
Britain is now put in the hands of Polish colonels.
That's a violation of independence if I have ever seen
one. So the war ends and Churchill
doesn't just thank everyone for all the taxes and apologize for
all the deaths and how we could have done this peacefully, he
says on Page 3, the preface of his first Second World War
memoir. He says the human tragedy
reaches its climax in the fact that after all the exertions and
sacrifices of hundreds of millions of people and the
victories of the righteous, 'cause we have found neither
peace or security, and we lie in the grip of even worse perils
than those we have surmounted. Meaning we declared a war for
Polish independence. You can read the text of
Chamberlain's Declaration. Poland then ends up under Soviet
occupation. Churchill brings this up to
Stalin at the Yalta meeting. He says, look, we fought a war
for Polish independence. 8 million Poles have been killed
from that favor. We were doing them.
Can we have elections in Poland? You got to host those to which
Stalin says, oh, free elections like in British occupied Egypt.
And that was Stalin's response to Churchill.
This is according to a book titled Stalin's War by Sean
Mcmeegan. So that was just looking at the
costs and benefits. Not to mention the Soviets
occupied half of Europe on the east.
So that is just looking at Churchill, who by the way,
Churchill was not elected, Chamberlain was elected and then
kicked out after the Narvik debacle.
So the fight for democracy had unelected Winston Churchill,
unelected Joseph Stalin and like 20 term President Roosevelt,
right, Right. It was 4 terms.
So it I'm going to stop there and see if you have to comment
on anything. This Churchill myth is so
deadly. People say, oh, he's a hero.
The modern day Churchill is this guy.
So let's just follow him and do whatever he does.
Well, it does seem like the idea of democracy has become the
modern justification for statism in general.
And look, I, I think that if you look at it from kind of a more
broader, you know, reaching perspective from pre democratic
norms up until today, you'll get a clearer picture of what the
state really is. So you'll, you know, like today,
people kind of cling to democracy as this thing that
makes the state legitimate. But even like today, you know,
look Kamala Harris at is she where she is because of some
democratic norm? You know, no, I mean, I, I don't
know the whole Democratic primary just on, on the side of
the capital D Democratic Party was no, they wouldn't even allow
a real, you know, democratic process.
And they just, but then you'll hear people today, like 18
million people voted for, you know, Joe Biden, you're like,
okay, well, I, I thought you told me 75 million people voted
for him. Okay, whatever, but they voted
for him. Some people within his party
decided he was too old and they kicked him out.
Seymour Hersh has written a really interesting piece about
this lately. Is so OK but so democracy has
nothing to do with. But really, you'll recognize
democracy has nothing to do with anything.
This is all just an excuse for why it is OK that this
government rules over you. And particularly if you look at
governments of the past, obviously it says that has
nothing to do with it. It's just that these were the
strongest people with the most guns and they were able to take
control of their people. That's all it is.
Democracy is the sales pitch that works, and the way they
really get their sales pitch was summarized perfectly by Thomas
Sowell when he said these issues are seldom, if ever, discussed
empirically or economically or on principle.
What people are looking for are people to vilify and hate and to
admire. So that's why the Churchill myth
gets so heavily circulated. It was the Churchill cabinet
which on May 15th of 1940 initiated the bombing of
civilians in Germany. And the Blitz didn't happen
until September of 1940. So this policy was summarized by
a science advisor to the war government, Charles Percy Snow.
He gave a series of lectures at Harvard called Science and
Government, and here's how Snow summarized the paper.
The paper on bombing went out to top government official
scientists. It described in quantitative
terms the effect on Germany of a British bombing offensive in the
next 18 months. The paper laid down strategic
policy. The bombing must be directed
essentially against German working class houses.
Middle class houses have too much space around them and so
are bound to waste bombs. Factories and military
objectives had long since been forgotten except in official
bulletins since they were much too difficult to find.
The paper claim that given a total concentration of effort on
the production and use of bombing aircraft, it would be
possible in larger towns of Germany, those with 50,000
inhabitants, to destroy 50% of all houses.
These are the fighters for democracy.
They are so worried that you won't get a one in 10 million
vote to determine which liar sits on the throne next.
Constantly justifying mass murder.
This is the actions of the heroes of democracy.
I'm not even pointing to well, Napoleon did well actually,
Napoleon was after the French Revolution for liberty, equality
and fraternity. So whoever they think the
villains are, are, let's just say, villainous.
The heroes of democracy are constantly engaging in the most
evil crimes. There's a book entitled The
Complete War Memoirs of Charles de Gaulle where he actually says
that Winston Churchill one night was shaking his first at the sky
saying why won't they come? De Gaulle looks at Churchill and
says are you really, Are you not having any patience to see your
cities get destroyed? To which Churchill responds,
according to Charles de Gaulle. You don't get it.
Once the Americans see Oxford and Coventry getting bombed,
they'll have to come in. The state will even justify the
mass murder of its own civilian population, which it pledges
allegiance to defend. They will justify them getting
killed. The case is with Pearl Harbor.
The case is with the British getting bombed.
Churchill even authorized Operation Catapult, which was
killing 1200 French servicemen and and his justification at the
National Churchill Society is, well, if we didn't kill them,
those Subs might have gotten in German hands.
So these are the crimes that people will justify engaging in
when they have a legal monopoly on printing money, conscripting
people, and they control the education system, which is how
they're able to hide these things for so long.