1
00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:05,200
Do you hate the state by Murray 
and rothbard? 

2
00:00:05,500 --> 00:00:08,300
I've been ruminating over 
recently on what are the crucial

3
00:00:08,300 --> 00:00:12,000
questions that divide 
Libertarians, some that have 

4
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:14,000
received a lot of attention in 
the last few years. 

5
00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:17,900
Our anarcho-capitalism verse 
limited, government abolitionism

6
00:00:17,900 --> 00:00:22,600
verse gradualism natural rights 
of our futility arianism and War

7
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:26,100
verse piece, but I've concluded 
that as important as these 

8
00:00:26,100 --> 00:00:31,500
questions are, they don't really
cut to the nub of The issue of 

9
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:34,100
the crucial dividing line 
between us. 

10
00:00:35,900 --> 00:00:39,400
Let us take, for example, two of
the leading anarcho-capitalist 

11
00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:44,100
works of the last few years. 
My own for a new Liberty and 

12
00:00:44,100 --> 00:00:46,700
David Friedman's, Machinery of 
Freedom. 

13
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:50,500
Superficially, the major 
differences between them are my 

14
00:00:50,500 --> 00:00:55,800
own stand for natural rights. 
And for a rational, libertarian 

15
00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:58,800
lock code in contrast to 
Friedman's, a moralist 

16
00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:03,100
utilitarianism and call for 
logrolling and trade-offs 

17
00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:05,500
between non libertarian private 
police. 

18
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:10,200
Agencies, but the difference 
really Cuts far deeper their 

19
00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:13,400
runs through for a new Liberty 
and most of the rest of my work 

20
00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:16,400
as well. 
A deep and pervasive, hatred of 

21
00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:19,600
the state. 
And all its Works based on the 

22
00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:24,900
conviction that the state is the
enemy of mankind in contrast. 

23
00:01:24,900 --> 00:01:28,100
It is evident that David does 
not hate the state at all. 

24
00:01:28,100 --> 00:01:31,100
That he has merely arrived at 
the conviction that anarchism 

25
00:01:31,300 --> 00:01:34,300
and competing private. 
Police forces are a better 

26
00:01:34,300 --> 00:01:39,000
social, and System. 
Then any other alternative or 

27
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:42,800
more fully that anarchism would 
be better than laissez faire. 

28
00:01:43,300 --> 00:01:46,700
Which in turn is better than the
current system amidst, the 

29
00:01:46,700 --> 00:01:49,400
entire spectrum of political 
Alternatives. 

30
00:01:49,700 --> 00:01:52,900
David Friedman has decided that 
anarcho-capitalism a superior, 

31
00:01:53,300 --> 00:01:57,200
but Superior to an existing 
political structure, which is 

32
00:01:57,200 --> 00:01:59,000
pretty good too. 
In short. 

33
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:02,800
There is no sign that David 
Friedman in any sense, hates the

34
00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:07,300
existing American state or the 
State per se Hits it deep in his

35
00:02:07,300 --> 00:02:10,300
belly as a predatory gang of 
robbers and slavers and 

36
00:02:10,300 --> 00:02:15,200
murderers know, there is simply 
the cool conviction that 

37
00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:18,400
anarchism would be the best of 
all possible worlds, but that, 

38
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:24,200
our current setup is pretty far 
up with it in desirability for 

39
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,200
there was no sense in Freedman 
that the state. 

40
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,100
Any state is a predatory gang of
criminals. 

41
00:02:31,700 --> 00:02:35,000
The same impression shines 
through the writing say of 

42
00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:36,800
political philosopher. 
Eric Mac. 

43
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:40,200
Mac is an anarcho-capitalist who
believes in individual rights, 

44
00:02:40,500 --> 00:02:43,600
but there is no sense in his 
writing of any, passionate 

45
00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:50,100
hatred of the state or a 
fortiori of any sense that the 

46
00:02:50,100 --> 00:02:52,600
state is a plundering and 
beastial enemy. 

47
00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:54,600
Perhaps the word that best 
defines. 

48
00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:59,500
Our distinction is radical 
radical in the sense of being in

49
00:02:59,500 --> 00:03:02,500
total root and Branch off. 
Addition to the existing 

50
00:03:02,500 --> 00:03:06,400
political system and to the 
state itself radical in the 

51
00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,300
sense of having integrated 
intellectual opposition to the 

52
00:03:10,300 --> 00:03:14,400
state, with a gut hatred of its 
pervasive and organized system 

53
00:03:14,600 --> 00:03:19,500
of crime and Injustice. 
Radical in the sense of a deep 

54
00:03:19,500 --> 00:03:23,400
commitment, to the spirit of 
Liberty, and anti, statism that 

55
00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:28,000
integrates reason, and emotion, 
heart and soul. 

56
00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:34,000
Furthermore, in contrast to what
seems to be true nowadays, you 

57
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:36,900
don't have to be an anarchist to
be radical in our sense, just as

58
00:03:36,900 --> 00:03:39,400
you can be an anarchist while 
missing the radical spark. 

59
00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,300
I can think of hardly a single 
limited government, a list of 

60
00:03:42,300 --> 00:03:45,200
the president day, who was 
Radical a truly amazing 

61
00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:48,500
phenomenon, when we think of our
classical liberal forbearers who

62
00:03:48,500 --> 00:03:52,600
were genuinely radical, who 
hated statism, and the states of

63
00:03:52,600 --> 00:03:56,700
their day with a beautifully, 
integrated passion, the 

64
00:03:56,700 --> 00:03:58,800
levellers, Patrick Henry, Tom, 
Paine. 

65
00:03:59,300 --> 00:04:03,500
Joseph Priestley, the 
jacksonians Richard Cobden and 

66
00:04:03,500 --> 00:04:08,400
on, and on a veritable roll, 
call of the Great's of the past.

67
00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:10,200
Tom pains radical hatred of the 
state. 

68
00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:13,700
And statism was and is far more 
important to the cause of 

69
00:04:13,700 --> 00:04:16,600
Liberty than the fact that he 
never crossed the Divide between

70
00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:20,899
laissez-faire and anarchism and 
closer to our own day. 

71
00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:23,500
Such early influences on me as 
Albert. 

72
00:04:23,500 --> 00:04:25,800
J. 
Knock HL Mencken, Frank Shorter 

73
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:29,600
of were magnificently and sir. 
Terribly. 

74
00:04:29,900 --> 00:04:35,500
Radical hatred of our enemy, the
state knocks title and all of 

75
00:04:35,508 --> 00:04:40,800
its Works shown through all 
their writings like a beacon 

76
00:04:41,100 --> 00:04:43,500
star. 
So what if they never quite made

77
00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:48,200
it all the way to explicit 
anarchism far better one Albert 

78
00:04:48,200 --> 00:04:49,300
J. 
Knock that 100 

79
00:04:49,300 --> 00:04:52,200
anarcho-capitalists who are all 
too comfortable with the 

80
00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:57,900
existing status quo. 
Where are the pains and captains

81
00:04:57,900 --> 00:05:01,600
and knocks of today? 
Why are almost all of our 

82
00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:04,400
laissez-faire, limited 
governmental lists plunky, 

83
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:07,400
conservatives and Patriots. 
If the opposite of a radical is 

84
00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:11,300
a conservative, where are our 
radical lazy Ferris? 

85
00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:14,900
If our limited status were truly
radical, there would be 

86
00:05:14,900 --> 00:05:16,600
virtually. 
No splits between us. 

87
00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:20,300
What divides, the movement. 
Now the true division is not 

88
00:05:20,300 --> 00:05:23,400
Anarchist first, Minnick men 
artists but radical versus 

89
00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:25,800
conservative. 
Lord give us radicals. 

90
00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:29,700
Be they anarchists or no to 
carry our analysis. 

91
00:05:29,700 --> 00:05:31,300
Further. 
Radical anti-state. 

92
00:05:31,300 --> 00:05:35,100
It's are extremely valuable. 
Even if they could scarcely be 

93
00:05:35,100 --> 00:05:37,800
considered Libertarians in any 
comprehensive sense. 

94
00:05:38,500 --> 00:05:41,900
Thus many people admire the work
of columnist, Mike. 

95
00:05:41,900 --> 00:05:46,300
Royko Nick von Hoffman because 
they consider these men 

96
00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,400
libertarian sympathizers and 
fellow Travelers that they are. 

97
00:05:50,700 --> 00:05:54,100
But this does not begin to 
comprehend their true importance

98
00:05:54,100 --> 00:05:56,800
for Without the writings of 
royko and von Hoffman, as 

99
00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:00,400
inconsistent as they undoubtedly
are, there runs in all-pervasive

100
00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:04,300
hatred of the state of 
politicians bureaucrats and 

101
00:06:04,300 --> 00:06:08,300
their clients, which in its 
genuine, radicalism is far truer

102
00:06:08,300 --> 00:06:12,700
to the underlying Spirit of 
Liberty, then someone who will 

103
00:06:13,100 --> 00:06:17,600
Cooley go along with the letter 
of every syllogism and every 

104
00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:20,600
Lemma down to the model of 
competing courts. 

105
00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:25,800
Taking the concept of radical 
versus conservative in our new 

106
00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:28,000
sense. 
Let us analyze the now-famous 

107
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:30,400
abolitionism first gradualism 
debate. 

108
00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:34,500
The latter jab comes in the 
August issue of Reason, a 

109
00:06:34,508 --> 00:06:40,100
magazine, every fiber of who's 
being exudes conservatism in 

110
00:06:40,100 --> 00:06:42,800
which editor. 
Bob pool asks Milton Friedman. 

111
00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:46,800
Where he stands on this debate 
Friedman takes the opportunity 

112
00:06:46,800 --> 00:06:50,200
of denouncing, the intellectual 
cowardice of failing to set 

113
00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:53,600
forth feasible method. 
Of getting from here to there, 

114
00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:57,500
pulling Friedman have between 
them managed to obfuscate. 

115
00:06:57,600 --> 00:06:59,600
The true issues. 
There is not a single 

116
00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:03,000
abolitionists who would not grab
a feasible method or gradual 

117
00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:06,000
gain, if it came his way, the 
difference is that the 

118
00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:09,300
Abolitionist always holds High. 
The banner of his ultimate goal,

119
00:07:09,500 --> 00:07:13,400
never hides his basic principles
and wishes to get his goal as 

120
00:07:13,400 --> 00:07:17,400
fast as humanly possible. 
Hence, while the abolitionists, 

121
00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:20,700
will accept a gradual step in 
the right direction, if that is 

122
00:07:20,700 --> 00:07:23,300
all he can. 
Eve, he always accepts it 

123
00:07:23,500 --> 00:07:27,200
grudgingly as merely a first 
step towards a goal which he 

124
00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:29,800
always keeps blazingly. 
Clear. 

125
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:33,500
The Abolitionist is a button 
Pusher, who would blistered his 

126
00:07:33,500 --> 00:07:36,400
thumb pushing a button that 
would abolish the state 

127
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:40,400
immediately, if such a button 
existed, but the Abolitionist 

128
00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:44,600
knows that alas such a button 
does not exist and that we will 

129
00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:46,300
take a bit of the loaf of 
necessary. 

130
00:07:46,500 --> 00:07:50,200
While always preferring the 
whole loaf, if he can achieve 

131
00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:54,100
it. 
It should be noted here. 

132
00:07:54,300 --> 00:07:57,700
That many of Milton's, most 
famous graduate programs such as

133
00:07:57,700 --> 00:08:00,400
the voucher plan, the negative 
income tax, the withholding tax 

134
00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:04,300
Fiat, paper money are gradual or
even not. 

135
00:08:04,300 --> 00:08:08,000
So gradual steps in the wrong 
direction away from Liberty and 

136
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:12,600
hence the militants of much 
libertarian opposition to these 

137
00:08:12,900 --> 00:08:15,200
schemes. 
His button-pushing position 

138
00:08:15,900 --> 00:08:20,400
stems from the abolitionists 
deep and abiding, hatred of the 

139
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:24,800
state and its vast. 
Of crime and opposition with 

140
00:08:24,800 --> 00:08:28,600
such an integrated world view. 
The radical libertarian could 

141
00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:32,400
never dream of confronting 
either a magic button or any 

142
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,600
real life problem. 
With some a red cost-benefit 

143
00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:39,100
calculation. 
He knows that the state must be 

144
00:08:39,100 --> 00:08:44,400
diminished as fast and as 
completely as possible period, 

145
00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:49,400
And that is why the radical 
libertarian is not only an 

146
00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:51,800
abolitionist. 
But he also refuses to think in 

147
00:08:51,800 --> 00:08:56,600
such terms as a four-year plan 
for some sort of stately and 

148
00:08:56,600 --> 00:09:00,100
measured procedure for reducing 
the state, the radical, whether 

149
00:09:00,100 --> 00:09:03,500
he be an artist or laissez-faire
cannot think in such terms as 

150
00:09:04,100 --> 00:09:06,000
well. 
The first unit will cut the 

151
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:08,900
income tax by 2% abolish the ICC
and cut. 

152
00:09:08,900 --> 00:09:11,100
The minimum wage. 
The second year, will abolish 

153
00:09:11,100 --> 00:09:14,400
the minimum wage cut the income 
tax by another two percent and 

154
00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:18,700
reduce welfare payments by 3%, 
excetera the radical cannot 

155
00:09:18,700 --> 00:09:21,900
think in such terms because the 
radical regards, the state, as 

156
00:09:21,900 --> 00:09:27,100
our mortal, enemy, which must be
hacked away at wherever. 

157
00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,100
And whenever we can to the 
radical libertarian. 

158
00:09:30,300 --> 00:09:34,600
We must take any and every 
opportunity to chop away at the 

159
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:38,300
state, whether it's to reduce or
abolish attacks, a budget 

160
00:09:38,300 --> 00:09:41,300
appropriation of a regulatory 
power and the radical 

161
00:09:41,300 --> 00:09:45,100
libertarian is insatiable in 
this appetite. 

162
00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:48,600
Until the state has been 
abolished or form in Turkish 

163
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:51,300
dwindle down to a tiny 
laissez-faire. 

164
00:09:51,500 --> 00:09:55,500
Role, many people have wondered,
why should there be any 

165
00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:58,500
important political disputes 
between anarcho-capitalism 

166
00:09:58,500 --> 00:10:01,700
Anarchist? 
Now, in this world of statism, 

167
00:10:02,100 --> 00:10:05,600
there was so much Common Ground,
why can't the two groups work in

168
00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,800
complete Harmony? 
Until we shall have reached a 

169
00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:12,400
cob denied world after which we 
can air out our disagreements, 

170
00:10:12,700 --> 00:10:16,900
why quarrel over courts excetera
now, The answer to this. 

171
00:10:16,900 --> 00:10:20,400
Excellent question is that we 
could and would March hand and 

172
00:10:20,400 --> 00:10:25,000
hand in this way. 
If the men Arcus or radicals as 

173
00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,900
they were from the birth of 
Classical liberalism down to the

174
00:10:27,900 --> 00:10:32,600
1940s, give us back the anti 
status, radicals and Harmony 

175
00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:35,500
would indeed rain triumphant 
within the movement. 

176
00:10:35,500 --> 00:10:36,700
Thank you for watching Keith 
Knight. 

177
00:10:36,700 --> 00:10:37,700
Don't try it on anyone.