What does it mean? Germany's think of economic
developments in the states in America has never served as
President Roosevelt in Vegas. In the task, underscores the web
shop Vision sociology, problem a lot.
I think the feel me, Leonardo B laws in the is a platter and
then machine and you didn't control 14.
Even happened. We're on it Alton herbage,
different sorts of you, and that's come next.
Align, the private initiative abolishing.
The often house Larkin is, does the Urban League and the
positive mass number and engraved.
Dr. Gilbert says that people in Germany are keenly interested
and follow very closely, the economic development in the
United States and they believe that President Roosevelt and his
advisors. Us are on the right way.
Because here we are, in fact, concerned with the greatest
economic problem, economic, and social problem, which the world
has ever had to solve namely, to reinstate in the process of
production, the millions of people who have lost their jobs
in factories and shops, and offices.
And in order to solve this problem, it is not sufficient to
leave. To private initiative.
But the government must take the lead in some countries.
It is here that this may produce inflation.
Kindness Lakes as Bob. Dammit, each team industry are
going on in flood zones. Abundances.
I'm in here arguing with so Clues lie in productive, only
unproductive, yogurt shop became a cinnamon sugar industry in
America, President Roosevelt in Santa Barbara.
I do not think so. It is not necessarily inflation
that must be the consequence of such action because if the
government's are wise, they will undertake productive work and
not unproductive. Way that at any rate is what is
being done in Germany. And as far as I know, President
Roosevelt and his advisers are following the same course, the
only consistent definition of socialism is the in To signalize
interference with or aggression against private property and
private property claims. Another words, you build a
business, you build a factory, and you sell it to a group of
workers, who turns it into a Cooperative, or there's an
immense amount of profit sharing to incentivize employees to come
work for you. There's nothing anti-capitalist
about that. So that's totally justified.
The socialism part is whether goods are acquired through
voluntary Exchange. JH or initiating coercion
against peaceful people. That's where the difference lies
where as capitalism is a social system based on the explicit
recognition of private property and non-aggressive, contractual
exchanges between private property owners.
Let's go through some of the National Socialist program
points from 1920. Point number seven.
We demand that the state shall above all undertake to ensure
that every citizen have the possibility of living decently.
And earning a livelihood, nice and vague.
So, at any point you can say this doesn't count as living
decently. This doesn't count as earning a
livelihood there for State intervention is Justified at
every turn. If it should not be possible to
feed the whole population. Then Aliens non-citizens Must Be
expelled from the Reich perfectly planning up a future,
scapegoat to justify further intervention.
Point number 10, the first duty of every citizen what quickly on
point number seven just because you don't support the state
making it so people can earn a living and earn a livelihood
doesn't mean you're against those things.
Just because you're against the government, controlling religion
doesn't mean you're against religion.
Just because you don't want the government.
Controlling food, doesn't mean you're an Thai food.
Point number 10, the first duty of every citizen, must be to
work mentally or physically work makes you free as the gates of
Auschwitz. Said, no individual shall do any
work that offends against the interest of the community to
benefit of all to the benefit of all.
This is collectivism, 101? No respect for the individual,
no respect for private property Point, eleven that all unearned
income, and all income, that does.
Arise from work, be abolished. In other words, if I work for 20
years to build a business and that business starts making
money. I'm at that point not working.
So the state can abolish that income and by that, of course,
they mean steal. Does this apply to government?
If Government just makes a law, give us a trillion dollars.
Is that work? Government has no earned income.
What? What does earned mean?
Ridiculous Point number 12 since every war imposes, on the people
fearful sacrifices and Blood and treasure all personal profit
arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the
people. So if Germany benefits from the
war by, you know, acquisition of lands and further territory,
does that mean, Germany must then give up those profits, the
profit of land. What about all the soldiers?
Who made money do are their profits to be abolished.
Well, this is just creating two different.
From sets of values one for certain profit ears and other
profit ears, a different set of rules.
We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
We demand the nationalization of all trusts remember antitrust
legislation. This is socialism.
This is the state intervening in the economy.
In a very significant way. Does this count as unearned
income when you nationalize a bunch of businesses?
Other people have worked for Point.
Number 14, we demand profit-sharing in large
Industries. So whether or not the industry
can afford it, Sears was a large industry block.
It was a large industry. Myspace was just because you're
big, doesn't mean you're going to be profitable in the future.
Doesn't mean you might not be able to afford profit-sharing in
the present. But by doing this it allows the
state to intervene in the economy in ways that otherwise
wouldn't be able to point number 15.
We demand a generous who generous nice and vague
increase, who also vague one percent, 10% 90%, in old age.
What is old? Pensions.
If it's done voluntarily, that's perfectly capitalist.
If it's done violently, well, then that is socialism and back
to did the old people are in this money.
Does this count as unearned income Point number 16, we
demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle
class who perfectly nice and vague defined sound Define
middle class. Is it relative to other people
in the Reich or people in the world?
The immediate communal ization of large stones?
Wars, which will be rented cheaply to small trades.
People, taking from those who have made the money, made the
factories did all the marketing did.
All the research took all the risk and giving it to others and
the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that the
small Traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the state,
the provinces and that municipalities.
Point 17, we demand an agrarian reform.
Oh man would be very prepared in accordance with our national
requirements and the enactment of a law to expropriate the
owners without compensation. Hmm, government taking from the
rich, the evil, one percent sounds, very familiar of any
land needed for the common purpose who another cry for
collectivism, the abolition of ground rents.
So if I Just a ton of money and build a building and then rent
it out to people. That can't happen.
So what's that going to do to disincentive for me to build in
the future creates more poverty. Less places for people to live.
Supply goes down price increases and the prohibition of all
speculation in land point. Number 18.
We demand that ruthless War be waged against those who work to
the injury of the common welfare Define common welfare, who gets
to decide, obviously the fuhrer. Our who so kind and Brilliant
Traders users profit ears. Etc.
So Define traitor, was Hitler a traitor when he tried the beer
hall to push users. So it's okay for me to not lend
anyone, anything, but I can't lend someone something on
interest. Profit ears.
So if I spend 50 cents on gasoline driving to work and
earn $100 a day, I've Paratha, Ted $99.50.
Would that be outlawed are to be punished with death, regardless
of creed or race Point, 20 in order to make it possible for
every capable and industrious, German to obtain higher
education. And thus, the D to reach into
positions of leadership. The state must assume the
responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural
system of the people. Government involvement in
education. The curricula of all education,
establishment, shall be adopted to practice life to practical
life, the conception of the state idea, science of
citizenship must be taught in schools from the very beginning.
So it's not brainwashing. Obviously.
They're just teaching people things.
What's wrong? That we demand that specially
talented children of poor parents, whatever their station,
or occupation, be educated at the expense of the state, and
that's how you buy him off. And that's how you make them
dependent. You don't give them Freedom.
You will guarantee them propaganda.
Point 21. The state has the duty to help
raise the standard of National Health by providing maternity
welfare centers. Now, is it because Hitler was
such a nice guy or is trying to get the feminine support in
society. Prohibiting juvenile, labor by
increasing physical fitness through the introduction of
compulsory games and gymnastics so slavery.
If I force you to perform labor, you otherwise wouldn't perform.
That's obviously slavery, prohibition of a juvenile labor.
He just talked about kids being forced to work in schools.
Run by the state. Is that juvenile labor, so they
can't work for money. They can't try to get their foot
in the door and get some experience as a young child, but
they can be propagandized and the greatest possible
encouragement of associations concerned with the physical
education of the young, of course, more vague nonsense.
The assumption is the state gets to tell you what your health
should be as opposed to the other way.
Around Point 23. We demand that there be a legal
campaign against those who propagate deliberate political
lies and disseminate them. Through the press, in order to
make possible the creation of a German press, we demand all
editors and their assistants on newspapers.
Published in the German language shall be German citizens.
Here. Again, we have one set of rules
for one people. Another set for a different
people. Not in German newspaper shall be
published with the express permission of the state.
They must not be published in the German language, all
Financial interests. In or in any way affecting
German newspaper shall be / Fittin, forbidden by non-german
law and we demand that the punishment for Trans dressing.
This law shall be immediate suppression of the newspaper and
the expulsion of the non-germans from the Reich.
Not respecting private property initiating aggression against
private property and free trade. This is not right when
capitalism. This is statism.
This is socialism newspapers transgressing against the common
welfare. I'll be suppressed
transgressing, nice and vague common welfare, nice and vague,
who determines it? Obviously the fuhrer increasing
his power. We demand legal action against
those Tendencies and art and literature that have a
disruptive influence upon the life of our folk who decides
disruptive. So we either have the fuhrer
deciding what's disruptive and illegitimate to read.
And look at as far as art goes. Why?
Why not just have people before he to judge by themselves, if
you're really care about the people of Germany, shouldn't you
let them decide or is it you claim to care?
And this claim to care, is really a guys for taking on
power for yourself. Same thing.
We see in America today and that, any organizations that
offender against offend, against the foregoing demands shall be
dissolved Point. 25 common, good before the individual, more
Collective. Some in order to carry out this
program. We demand the creation of a
strong central Authority in the state.
So people who say states rights are all about oppressing people,
as they support the European Union and hate the Briggs of
Tears, the unconditional Authority, by the political
Central parliament of the whole state, and all its
organizations, the formation of professional committees and of
committees representing. The several Estates of the realm
to ensure that the laws Promulgated by the central
Authority, shall be carried out by the federal states, the
leaders of the party, undertake to promote the execution of the
foregoing points at all costs self-sacrifice.
If necessary, at the sacrifice of their own lies lives, here is
Mussolini's. The doctrine of fascism from
1930 to Benito. Mussolini started his political
Life as a socialist, in 1912. Well, just because you started
doesn't mean You are currently I was a socialist in the past.
But did he come out and say, Here's why I was wrong.
I'm so sorry Whittaker. Chambers did that in his book
witnessed? Sorry.
I was a communist. Here's why I was wrong Max
Eastman did it? Why I left socialism editor of
Avanti a leading socialist newspaper during the Great War
Mussolini was expelled from the Socialist Party.
Hmm, didn't leave because he had ideological differences expelled
from the Socialist Party. For advocating Italy's entrance
into the battle. He organized the fascist party
immediately following the war by exploiting General fears of
Labor, unrest and communism. Mussolini gained his followers,
among War veterans, and the middle class Mussolini
organized, his march on, Rome in 1922.
See this whole middle class thing.
Again, as Hitler mentioned earlier.
If you really care about the poor, wouldn't you care about
the poor? Not the middle class for you,
really care about the downtrodden?
Or would it be just as Bernie Sanders and acacio Cortez say,
they use the middle class because the average person
considers themselves middle class.
So when they hear them, they go. Well, they must be representing
me on middle class. They say they represent me.
Whereas, if you really cared about the poor, when you care
about the poorest people in order to bring down the
government King. Victor Emmanuel fearful of a
civil war appointed Benito, Mussolini prime minister.
So here's a couple notes on. Mussolini doctrine of fascism
Point number seven. He says, fascism is against
individualism, opposed to Classical liberalism, liberalism
denied, the state, in the interest of the particular,
individual fascism reaffirms, the state, as the true reality
of the individual. Unbelievable.
So, individuals don't know what's right for themselves, but
Mussolini knows what's in the interest of, you know, millions
of Italians who has never Been met psycho Liberty of the state
and of the individual within the state.
So you have freedom according to us.
So that means the individual is not Supreme.
The state is supreme. What species is the state made
out of this is just slavery us. We have the Liberty the state to
control the individual. Why do they get the freedom to
tell us what to do? But we can't decide for
ourselves. Everything is in the state and
nothing human. Our You will exist.
So much less has value outside of the state.
So unless government says it's good moral and virtuous.
You can't do it. In summary International,
socialism, communism is based on class.
National socialism is socialism based on race.
Thank you for watching Keith, and I don't tread on anyone.