Welcome to Keith's and I don't tread on anyone.
This is a summary and Analysis of Showtime's, the Putin
interviews with Oliver Stone. The first topic they discuss is
privatization Vladimir. Putin says, I did not stop
privatization contrary to what stone erroneously believed.
I just wanted to make it more Equitable, more fair.
This is a principle that goes back to a University of Nevada,
Las Vegas. Professor Murray.
Rothbard who says, well, imagine that the government before
disbanding itself gives It's New York to the Rockefellers and
Massachusetts to the Kennedys. Well, this would be unjust.
So it's very important that governments try and equitably.
Redistribute the stolen loot, after disbanding themselves.
The first very interesting thing that Putin goes into is when
they speak about the war on terror and the u.s.
Russian Alliance to stop terrorism.
Vladimir Putin actually says, Al Qaeda is not the result of our
Activities. It is the result of the
activities of our American friends.
Now, if we go back to the movie Rambo, you'll actually see at
the beginning that they mentioned the mujahideen
fighters of Afghanistan widely recognized as allies to the
Americans. At the time.
We actually have Hillary Clinton going on record on CNN saying,
let's remember here. The people we are fighting
today. We funded them, 20 years ago.
Let's go recruit these Mujahideen and great.
Let them come from Saudi Arabia and other countries importing
their wahhabi brand of Islam so we can go beat the Soviet Union
and that's what the US is doing today in Syria and Libya as well
funding the moderates. He goes on to discuss the
soviet-afghan war from about 1979 to 1989.
The American aspect of this was referred to as operation Cyclone
zbigniew Brzezinski said in a memo to Jimmy Carter that this
is the It's to give the Soviet Union there.
Vietnam Vladimir Putin says, when the American Intelligence
Officers provided support to different forms of Islamic
fundamentalism, helping them to fight the Soviet troops in
Afghanistan. So the Americans themselves,
nurtured both Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden.
Vladimir Putin goes on to say that the u.s.
Government funded terrorists in the second chechnyan war.
This is contrary to what bin Laden.
As Bin Laden says, you supported the Russian trosset.
He's against us in chechnya. Not really sure who's word to
will take on this. I would have to do more
research, but it does get you into the inside of.
This is the result of constantly intervening constantly creating
enemies, Putin doesn't like us. Bin Laden.
Doesn't like us. Well, what what were the Great
benefits that the u.s. Got where they morally justified
in doing it and coercively funding.
The operation in the first place, was this Thing, they went
publicly with to make sure that their Democratic constituents
knew what their representatives were up to, of course not.
He then goes on to criticize. Bush jr.
When he welcomed Albania and Croatia into NATO, despite the
promise that they would not expand after German
reunification. So here we have the u.s.
Breaking, it's a promise again. And Vladimir Putin says this,
this really interesting things talks about how NATO as well as
the American government appears to constantly be in search of a
foe now that there's no Soviet Union.
They're generally searching for someone to fight against Putin.
Says therefore, why does NATO keep existing?
My impression is that in order to justify its existence?
NATO has a need of an external flow.
There was a constant search for a foe or Some acts of
provocation to name someone as an advantage of an adversary.
Again, Central Intelligence funding, the mujahideen, funding
the moderates. And Syria, certainly, it's
constantly about creating enemies.
Putin goes on in a speech, from the year 2000, talking about a
post-cold war world referred to as a unipolar world in which
there would be one Central Authority.
He says the unipolar world is unique in so far as there is
namely one Center of authority. It is a world in which there was
one Master. One Sovereign, one Center of
Force, One Center of decision making this is a world
government. Basically, he says this is, he
says that this is pernicious, not just for the world but also
for the Sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within.
Just as an over expansive, Soviet Union did and pernicious.
In this case tending to cause death or Serious injury.
Deadly. He goes on in that speech and
speaking in front of Joe Lieberman, and John McCain
saying that one state and of course, first and foremost, the
United States has overstepped. Its not have has overstepped.
Its National borders in every way.
He then sent back to the Oliver Stone interview says nowadays.
NATO is a mere instrument of u.s.
Foreign policy. This is another thing that
creates enemies around the world.
So again, the existence of a government, not only doesn't
just automatically keep you safe because they have a
trillion-dollar military can also keep you much less safe
than you. Otherwise would be, could stop
you from having good relations and trade agreements and
exchanges with with other nations and then goes on to say
and there's one Curious Thing, the president of your country
change, but the policy Doesn't change.
They go on to discuss the 2016 military budgets.
Putin says, we Russia we allocate 40 billion dollars a
year on defense needs whereas the United States allocates more
than 460 billion. Now again, the justification is
always well, Russia's an adversary 1 and 2.
We need a very big military to keep us safe.
Well, it's not like were and an alliance with Russia.
Keeping them safe so they could have.
A lower defense budget, like Scandinavian countries.
The US has NATO to oppose Russia and Russian expansion.
Even though NATO's the one expanding of course.
So again, the existence of a big military does not necessarily
keep you more safe. Putin goes on to say, it is
become a fashion in the United States to speculate to even
abuse the Russian issue. So to speak afterwards, we're
going to shake hands with you. Yeah.
To understand this is just election campaign rhetoric.
This is in response to the 2016. Putin has meddled in our
elections. So seeing it from a different
point of view is is very interesting.
This is a no way to applaud Putin but it's just interesting
because if you want to go after the gambino crime family, the
people you got to look to is the Colombo crime.
Family there, their Rivals, who want to give you all the dirt on
their opposition who they hate. So I think Putin's a terrible
guy, obviously a statist advocator of initiating violence
against peaceful people, but lots of really good insights to
have. That is the end of part one.
Part two begins with Putin saying at first President
Clinton tried to persuade me to support the US withdrawal from
the anti-ballistic missile treaty, no Foundation.
No basis at all. He was saying that there was a
threat emanating from Iran. Going back to the 90s more than
20 years later. They were there.
Still saying watch out for Iran. We got a kill their generals
Etc, even though with the exception of the iran-iraq war,
Iran is not really involved in wars or interventions in other
countries. Now, I want to define the term
blowback. It is generally seen as negative
repercussions effect affecting a country whose government has
undertaken a usually clandestine intelligence operation in
another country. You also have domestic blowback,
which you could clearly see with black lives matter riots All
Over America, but both a result of government intervention,
Putin says that leaving this anti-ballistic missile, treaty
means nothing else. A new cycle of an arms race of
which the u.s. Is expanding, getting Albania
and Croatia back into NATO, Putin says, and our response is
going to be much cheaper than an anti-ballistic missile system.
So, again, he's saying that the u.s.
Constantly building up its military, gets other militaries
to build up themselves. This this creates War again.
The state is the health of war and War.
It is the health of the state. He goes on to discuss.
The intelligence that Russia gained from the United States.
He says, suffice it to remember the Rosenberg spouses, who were
electrocuted. So, in other words, he's saying,
yeah, there definitely is an intelligence connection into
America. Now, this is often referred to
as McCarthyism, which is to just say that there was one guy
McCarthy who was really after it.
The reality is, They were a number of people and it turned
out that he was. Right?
What we found this out through documents referred to as the
venona papers or the venona cables.
You have people like Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter white.
You also have the rosenbergs. You also have scientists like
kej Fuchs. You have the Laughlin Curry it
yet. A lot of Soviet agents that were
exposed as a result of these cables.
There were about, 350 Soviet spies in the US state department
at the time. So, as far as the rosenbergs go,
he says, well, where did the rosenbergs get that information
from to give the atomic bomb information to the Soviets.
Putin says, they provided this information to the Soviet Union
of their own volition to restored, the nuclear balance in
the world. Whereas governments often seek
to be the Monopoly on violence sometimes citizens.
Are able to redistribute the amount of power to stop such a
monopoly from happening. Of course, they say the private
sector, the voluntary sector, and free markets are where
monopolies arise governments are the biggest monopolies and
constantly cause monopolies to exist where we otherwise would
have more competition and more equality among groups.
Again, we have this idea of blowback.
Vladimir Putin, says, look, let me remind you.
The reason why The Cuban Missile Crisis started.
It was by placing Soviet. They only placed Soviet missiles
in Cuba because they were provoked by the stationing of
American missiles in turkey. Again, u.s.
Expansion leads to a response. So it's, it's always critical
that the propaganda. Stay out of nowhere.
The US was attacked for no reason because we were just
sitting here, doing nothing by the Japanese, same thing for 911
and then out of nowhere. The Soviet Union starts
expanding now. Russia's expanding out of
nowhere. It's important that they only
tell you one side of what's going on.
So you see that there's a clear aggressor and a clear victim so
you could justify any amount of Civilian casualties and any
amount of trillions of dollars going to Boeing and right Theon.
They then get into domestic policy in Russia, and he asked
him about home treatment of homosexuals.
In Russia, Vladimir Putin says there is a law that prohibits
propaganda of homosexual ISM among minors.
And once they become an adult at 18, there are no restrictions
whatsoever. But in Russia, we still don't
have a situation like they haven't certain Islamic states
where there was the death penalty threatening homosexuals.
This is something the LGBT Q Community.
Absolutely needs to address more, certainly if they actually
care about the principles behind what they Advocate Vladimir
Putin goes on to say, I believe it's my duty to uphold
Traditional Values and family values.
He goes on to discuss the u.s. Ukrainian intervention on behalf
of Ukraine against Russia. He says these riots in Ukraine
were actively supported by the United States.
This is an alliance with in article from National Public
Radio in America us steps in response to Russia's
intervention in. Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin says, after that, the United States has
unilaterally withdrawn from the anti-ballistic Mystic missile,
treaty from 2001. Allegedly.
They did not. They did that to counter the
threat to Iran. They do sort of go in circles
here, but I am trying to go a chronologically, they then
discuss. Georgia in 2008, 8 country,
south of Russia. He says, we were surprised when
we saw that president. Sakura, Sheila, these aggression
was not only supported by Bush, but that Russia was being
painted as the aggressor. So again, u.s.
Is intervening, picking sides and creating more enemies,
making us less safe than we. Otherwise would be then they're
in the car. By the way, the most interesting
thing about this is the fact that Vladimir Putin is driving
his own car. They're talking about Edward
Snowden, so Oliver Stone ass Putin about Edward.
Snowden Edward Snowden. Now is a living in Russia.
Allegedly, Vladimir Putin says, on the whole, the relationship
dampened because the United States supported terrorist
groups in the caucus. That's why they couldn't just
extradite Snowden and have, you know, when open relationship so
that could be a benefit of, you know, countries not working
together is having some sort of Of balance of power.
Putin goes on to say but then I got a report that Snowden was on
a plane Bound for Moscow to transfer to another plane and
fly to Latin America. If I'm not mistaken Oliver Stone
says, well, what do you think about Snowden as a man and Putin
former? KGB agent says he is a
courageous man more probably even foolhardy.
Vladimir Putin goes on to say of course America asked us to
extradite him Edward Snowden. And it's quite understandable.
Why we couldn't do that back. Then we proposed that we should
conclude a treaty on cooperation on legal matters.
So this would be a good case of cup of countries being separate.
It's not, it certainly is not just a one-way Street.
Vladimir Putin goes on to say that was our initiative and it
would have stipulated for Mutual extradition of criminals, but
the u.s. Refused to cooperate with us in
that field. Given the fact that the US has
never extradited any criminals to us who have sought Asylum
there. It was inadmissible to us to
unilaterally extradite Snowden as it was asked of by the United
States. One example of this would be
particle from the BBC Moscow, slams.
Churches, u.s. Asylum, Russian officials.
Have condemned a decision by the US to Grant Asylum to a
high-ranking chechnyan. Separatist who Moscow says is a
terrorist. So this was the precedent that
Putin was acting on. He was asked why he resigned
from the kgb's as I resigned, because I didn't agree with the
actions, undertaken, by the government.
Talking about spying and intelligence agencies Putin
says, and secondly, trying to spy on your allies.
If you really consider them out allies and not vassals, vassals,
being a person who held land from a feudal Lord and receive
protection in return for homage and Allegiance.
A bond man, a slave, a subordinate or dependent saying
that, it's important to recognize the difference in
geopolitics, with regards to allies and Vassals, so when you
see something like that, Israel constantly spying on Americans
and the American spying on other countries.
It's unrealistic to consider these Allied situations and much
more of attempts to want for one country to gain power over
another. Oliver Stone.
Then says, please have mr. Putin told me about his
adaptation of Orthodox religion back into the Russian system.
Putin says, this Renaissance is due to the fact that the
Communist ideology ceased to exist.
I was not the one to do the, the Russian people did that
themselves. The Communist ideology, ceasing
to exist that left an ideological vacuum and this
vacuum could only be filled. Religion, this is a great
Insight that very seldom is it the result of rationality and
principles that people change, but it's just offering them in
alternative. And it's the old Sun, Tzu, case
of build, your opponent, a golden bridge, to which he can
Retreat. Vladimir Putin, says, for
example, take Europe, and the United States of today and
you'll see that the people with other religions are mostly
immigrants. Russia is different.
Those people with other religions are Russians and it is
their Homeland and they have none.
Other and over 1,000 years. We've nurtured a certain culture
of interaction. So again, you'll see two totally
different approaches that Putin has to the purpose of government
versus maybe us officials where they certainly are not valuing
cultures of Interaction are constantly trying to regulate
and stifle Innovation and interactions that otherwise
could could exist and be be very fruitful.
Putin says, unlike many partners of ours constantly referring to
the us as our partners. We never interfere with the
domestic affairs of other countries.
Now, I don't know if that's true.
I think that's extremely unlikely that they went from a
Soviet Union KGB constantly collecting Intelligence on
everyone and now they don't do it.
It. I can't imagine there's a
country that goes without it. But this is his response.
Oliver Stone says. So why are you so hated in the
United States? Putin says, the ruling class
believe that they have to fight Russia that they have to
restrain Russia to contain our development.
Much that this again is much like the British case against
the Germans. Once they saw Germany, becoming
a rival power. They constantly try to
villainize Kaiser Wilhelm. This takes us into part 3.
This is very interesting. Putin's has, everything can be
perverted and distorted, millions of people can be
deceived. If you use the Monopoly on the
media, really valuable, quote, everything can be perverted and
distorted. Billions of people can be
deceived. If you use the Monopoly on
media, this is in stark contrast to the idea.
That well, you can't really get away.
With things in reality, if you know, one or two people know.
Maybe. But if like three people know,
then the story leaks and everyone always finds out, but
Putin, KGB, officer, head of Russia for about four elections.
Now, certainly has a different idea than the average Joe that
you speak with. In America.
They had operation Mockingbird at fully implemented, Central
Intelligence Agency program. This was released in the church
committee hearings. This was to spread
disinformation throughout the American Media.
CIA director, William Colby testified to the church
committee that over 400 CIA agents were active in the US
media to control, what was reported through American
mainstream television newspapers and magazines.
Putin goes on to discuss u.s. Ukrainian interference.
We have John McCain, the Great War hero, again going to Ukraine
to tell them. This is about the future you
deserve. We have Victoria nuland
assistants. Secretary of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs, giving five billion dollars in funds to
Ukraine in opposition to what Russia was doing in Ukraine, but
hey, realize how dangerous? This could be a, a border
dispute from arbitrary lines written after the first world
war, but between the, the, the Reich and the Polish led to a
second world war, so, The constantly interfering is really
playing Russian roulette with hundreds of millions of peaceful
civilians who just want to live lives and be with their
families. Choose careers, Etc.
He goes on to pin. This constant interference in
the Ukrainian Revolution so-called on places like the
National Endowment for democracy blatant.
CIA operation. There.
He mentions that people like George Soros and Carl GE from
the president. Of the National Endowment for
democracy, George Soros, being investor, and founder of the
open Society foundations. These people were constantly
going over to Ukraine offering Aid and just emotional support.
That's really big. It's about changing public
opinion. As Putin said, if you're, if you
control the media, you control the general ideology in the
populace. You have Joe Biden, delivering a
speech to the Ukrainian people on their second chance for
Freedom, December 8th, 2019. That's his address to the right
of the Ukrainian legislature. Putin goes on to say, I do not
always understand the rationality behind the actions
of our partners, the United States government.
I get the impression that they have to enforce control over the
euro-atlantic camp and to that end, they need an external.
Enemy again. We see this in foreign affairs.
We're watch out for Russia. Watch out for North Korea.
Watch out for Iran. Watch out for Iraq.
Watch out for. Al Qaeda and the Taliban which
are the same group that hate us for our freedom.
They're constantly trying to create foreign enemies and
domestically, they do the same thing.
Watch out for the rich. Watch out for the immigrants.
Watch out for the whites. Watch out for the men, watch out
for the racist. The real enemy is people who
have this belief in authority and the right to initiate
violence against peaceful people.
So this is a Oliver Stone in the Taxing.
Did you make a mistake by annexing Crimea and X?
Assuming to take by force and claim?
Rulership of Putin. Disagrees with his premise,
saying the citizens of Crimea decided to join Russia.
He says, we were there to regulate the elections, but we
did not engage in any histologies, you know, military
members there. Just to make sure the election
goes according to plan. According to the official story
Crimea referendum, 93% of them voted.
To join Russia. Seven percent said they want to
do stay with Ukraine 50% of all votes counted.
This according to Russia Today, heaven knows what those results
are. But not, same goes with pretty
much any election that's counted by a government.
Back to Ukrainian u.s. Ukrainian collusion through,
initiating the crisis in Ukraine.
They've the Americans managed to stimulate such an attitude
towards Russia viewing Russia as an enemy, a potential, a
possible potential aggressor. They go on to discuss the
similarities between the National Security Agency, and
Russia's new Big Brother, anti-terrorism law, the Article
here from the Guardians as lower house votes in favor of package
of amendments that campaigners say will violate privacy and
freedom. So he goes from saying, yeah,
snowden's a good guy to, you know, the we shouldn't be spying
any country who spies is really a country that seeks to have
vassals and not allies and now he's totally going back on his
word saying that, well, it's okay because we're doing it
against the terrorists. And when Stone confronts Putin
about this Putin, just goes back to Snowden totally changing the
subject. He goes.
Well Snowden revealed that there were surveillance performed by
the NSA and the CIA of citizens across the world of political
leaders and their allies again. Yes, he's very good at
explaining why his Rivals are evil, but he's, he's more often
than not just looking into a mirror able to recognize his own
flaws in others. Stone says, in the matter of
Syria. Can you describe what is
generally going on in the Syrian?
Libyan Middle East, debacle Putin says, but in Libya and
Iraq, a tragedy has transpired and that has happened due to the
forceful ousting of current regimes.
And we don't want the same thing to happen in Syria.
He's saying that government intervention leads to
destabilization and a worse situation than you otherwise
would have had. They're not been such foreign
intervention, even if foreigners interfere and take down a
tyrannical leader. Like Saddam.
It's not obvious that a, you know, peaceful all loving regime
will come and take its place very often.
You have the forces of Al Qaeda, Al nusra al-shabaab.
Boko Haram can certainly gain power and places when these
dictators are taken down. So again, opposing regime Enter
of Gaddafi Assad Saddam does not make you Pro.
Those people just means you don't believe in violently
intervening. I'm not pro Trump, but I don't
support, Brazil coming in and overthrowing Trump and
installing, Brazilian democracy, and their ideas.
So it's important to have a consistent philosophy and
recognizing the trade-offs that exists, when a group of liars,
funded to the tune of trillions is invading countries like this.
We have documents going back to 1983 where we have the Central
Intelligence Agency according to their own website, CIA dot-gov
about documents that they want to overthrow the Assad regime in
Syria along with the bath party document titled, bringing real
muscle to Bear against Syria. This is a little background into
how us has sort of operated in the Middle East, alongside
Israel and Great Britain. The Read Syria, summary, Syria.
At present has a hammerlock on us interest, both in Lebanon.
And in the Gulf through closure of Iraq's pipeline.
Thereby threatening Iraqi internationalization of the war.
The US should consider sharply escalating the pressures against
Assad. This is the Assad regime, back
in 1983 from three border. States hostile to Syria Iraq,
Israel and Turkey Iraq perceived to be increasingly.
Desperate in the Gulf War would undertake limited Military air
operations against Syria with the sole goal of opening a
pipeline. Syria would also face a
two-front war. So they were talking about
starting a war in Syria to justify the, this imperialist
adventure for a pipeline back in the 1980s.
Another document in July of 1986 called serious scenarios for
dramatic political, change this memorandum presents, a number of
possible scenarios, that could lead to the Stir of President,
Assad of or other dramatic changes in Syria.
Point number two, we will send you similar papers on other
countries as they are contemplated.
So again these countries these operations are constantly
discussed in the back rooms of the Pentagon Langley and then
sold to the populace later. It's never they wait for an
incident and then respond. It's always they make a decision
and then decide. I'd what incident justifies
their entrance of the fake chemical weapons attack, for
example, which was exposed by Aaron maté in an excellent
article in the nation. I believe it's titled to Trump
bomb Syria on false pretenses. So now today, this documents
from 1986 today. We have the CIA openly involved
in Syrian Affairs, Washington Post, CIA begins weapons,
delivery to Syrian rebels. CIA, ramping up covert training
program for moderate Syrian rebels.
This is according to the LA Times in Syria.
Malicious armed by the Pentagon fight.
Those armed by the CIA sounds very much like Putin saying.
They need to create an external photo.
They're constantly creating enemies.
We also have a four-star retired US, Army general of the Supreme
Allied command. Wesley, Clark, in a democracy,
with Amy Goodman, who says, I was Privy to a document that
said we're going to take out seven countries in five years,
starting with Iraq. And then Syria.
Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off with Iran.
Again. These are planned in advance and
later sold to the public. It's not like the military's
there to defend you when something happens.
They plan these things off of far in advance before the public
finds out about it. The propaganda around Syria has
just been so incredibly in-your-face.
CNN had a seven-year-old from Syria who spoke Of very young
who spoke English very well. And the seven-year-old been a
lebed came to the conclusion that the u.s.
Definitely needs to intervene against the Assad regime.
This interview is when you first watch it, it's comical and
pathetic and then you watch it a second time, and it's more sad
than anything else. The another example of blatant
propaganda around Syria was ABC, World News where they said,
look, We have footage of Assad, killing the Kurds in the Syria
Iraq area. They didn't say exactly where it
was, but they said, look at this.
And on the left hand side. You can see Slaughter in Syria
on ABC World News. Tonight.
This is primary sources. So they show all this fire and
fury and all these explosions going off.
And you think, my God, I can't imagine the indiscriminate
bombing in all the civilians. Well, it turns out this was
Totally fake news. They apologized saying we've
taken down the video that aired on World News Tonight.
Sunday and Good Morning. America, two of the biggest
shows in the United States. For quote news this morning,
that appeared to be from a Syrian border.
Immediately, after questions were raised about, its accuracy
rates about its accuracy. It was actually a gun range in
Kentucky, as you can see, on the right-hand side.
People are filming a gun show. Rather.
So again, look at how the media just play.
Is Russian roulette with the masses?
They have started Wars based off things that didn't happen at all
like the Gulf of Tonkin. So when you get things like the
the Syrian gas attack, totally fake.
This one also totally fake. Think of the how close this came
to resulting in u.s. Escalation u.s.
Against Syria. Where Russia comes in, on behalf
of Syria, for Assad and Iran takes the side of Syria.
I mean that would have been that could have been a third world
war. Thankfully.
Someone said, huh? Those explosions.
Look, kind of familiar, honey. Do you have the video from the
Kentucky Gun Range? I mean, what are the chances
that that would come out? And this is what we catch him
on. The media is so, blatantly
dishonest. We also have a Obama tells
United Nations Syria's, Assad must go for gassing his own
people. Oh, wait, that was Bill Clinton
using CS gas against the Branch Davidians.
I guess it's different when Assad does it, but yeah, you
have a Obama who's going to come in and get out of the Middle
East. Stop these regime change Wars.
Now, of course, he lied. And then escalated them back to
Putin. He says, moreover if the same
thing regime change as in Libya happens in Syria, the position
of radical organizations, terrorist organizations are
going to be strongly solidified. So when Assad Falls, It's not
you know, Thomas Jefferson or Murray rothbard that takes its
place. It's Isis and al-nusra.
This is according to the LA Times us backed Rebels launched
their first attack against the Islamic State and they launched
the u.s. The United States trained.
The rebel new Syrian Army and hopes that it would be a
formidable opponent to Islamic State jihadists, but in its
first serious test and defensive near the Syrian Border Town of
bouquet of the rebels appear to have I've failed Islamic State
took much of the oil-rich desert region straddling the border
between Iraq and Syria. And 2014 constantly intervening
constantly creating the conflicts in Syria, going back
to the 80s. Does not yield a better outcome.
Oliver Stone has. How big is Isis?
Is this something? We really need to worry about
consider. Remember he did, we didn't
really hear about Isis. It was always Al-Qaeda Al-Qaeda
as the bad guy, and the Taliban, and then all of a sudden, Kind
of just stopping the bad guy, and now it's isis/isil Dash.
Putin says, the approximate number of terrorist
participating in Isis is about 80,000 people, 30 of 30,000 of
them are foreign mercenaries from 80 countries around the
world. So one, you can look at the
innocent explanation and say gosh, people are really
motivated to come fight on behalf of this radical
organization. Well, what would motivate them
in the first place or you could recognize?
Well, they're certainly getting Some funding from somewhere.
And when you have you know, constant intervention by Central
Intelligence, in the Pentagon, you have to question.
Who is but where is the funding coming from again?
CIA and Pentagon. According to LA Times using
funds to fight against one another, they go on to back to
u.s. Russian relations, and there was
an incident referred to as the Donald Cook provocation in the
Black Sea, where 12 times in 90 minutes, a Russian jet.
Buzzes by a u.s. Warship, where the US said this
was provocative and unprofessional.
Now. It's important to know that this
happened in the Black Sea where if you look at where the Black
Sea is, it's right. It borders.
You it borders Russia and it borders Ukraine.
What is a the u.s. Warship doing there in the first
place? Of course, it wouldn't justify
bombing and but certainly if it was a Russian jet on the
Pacific. Most of, you know, Long Island,
New York and the US would say, well, that boat is being is, do
the doing is the one being provocative.
They're obviously they're. So at any moment, they could
fake an incident just like the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Putin goes on the end of part, 3 to say the prime minister of
Ariel. Sharon, told me once while I was
paying a visit to Israel. Mr. President, right now, you
are in a region where no one can ever be trusted in any manner.
One of the Just cases of projection.
I think I've ever come across. We then go into part for Oliver
Stone. Starts by saying you, this is
your fourth US president, what changes he actually asks him.
What changes? Now for those of you who are not
in America. We have generally two parties.
The Democrats and the Republicans.
You have Bill Clinton on the starting with Bill Clinton in
the upper left a Democrat. Then George Bush a republican
then Barack. AMA, first African-American,
president Democrat, and then Republican Donald Trump.
So let's hear the in-depth analysis between four separate
Presidents. With separate backgrounds.
Coming in at totally different X.
Belonging to two different parties.
What changes Oliver Stone as Putin says?
Well, almost nothing, but on the whole everywhere, especially in
the United States, the bureaucracy deep state is very
strong and bureaucracy is the one thing that rules the world.
Then we get into. Claims from the 2016 election
Oliver Stone openly as Putin. Why did you hack us?
What was that about very unkind of you?
This is then run across a CNN Headline Clinton blames hacks on
Putin garage where she's actually on audio saying.
We know that Putin did this. He mentioned this in the
presidential debates against Donald Trump.
She said, we have 17 intelligence agencies, Sam
Harris. Also said this very proudly.
To Scott Adams and after loudly saying 17 intelligence agencies,
not one, not two, but 17 independently decided that
Russia was about Behind. These obviously, Russia is
behind this. The New York Times, was the
source of that. And then, eventually the young
New York Times, actually came out with a correction June 29th,
2017, a White House. Memo article on Monday, about
President Trump's deflections and denials about Russia,
referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence
assessment. That said Should work its way to
the hacking attacks. During last year's presidential
election. The assessment was made by for
intelligence agencies, the office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the National Security
Agency, CIA operation Mockingbird Church, committee
MKUltra FBI. Cointelpro patcon, NSA lying
about spying on millions of Americans James Clapper lied
under oath. These are not people, you can
trust at all. Tall.
So it went from 17 to for three of which are so blatantly
dishonest. If they just have no
credibility, according to the mafia, their rival is doing a
bad thing. Well, that's not a valid source.
It's completely biased and not independent of having an
interest in the outcome. The assessment was not approved
by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence Community.
Now, notice when Hillary Clinton said this, In the presidential
debates, you didn't have the other 16 agencies or the four
agencies come out and say, excuse me.
We just need to make a correction here.
They're not about intelligence or informing the public.
They're used to coercively. Implement the ideas of a small
Elite on the rest of us and mold public opinion to the desires of
the ruling class. Are those who would seek to
violently dominate over others. We also have have a Wiki leaks
memo that says, best approach is to slaughter Donald for his
Bromance with Putin. Notice.
It says best approaches to slaughter.
It doesn't say mention facts. A b and c that we know in order
to expose to the public who would like to inform.
It just says slaughtering with his Bromance for Putin, but not
too far, betting on Putin re Syria Brent.
This is one of the John podesta emails.
Now is Or as foreign interference in an election, if
you go to Clinton foundation.org forward slash contributors, you
can look at donations amounts between 10 million and 25
million dollars to the Clinton donation in there.
We have the Commonwealth of Australia.
We have the kingdom of Norway, the government of Norway, and
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, currently committing genocide in
Yemen. So the idea that oh my God, a
foreign government interfered that's just openly done.
We have a pact in America, the American Israeli political
action committee, which is just blatant Israeli interference.
This is not anything new. We also have 2006 leaked audio
tape from Hillary Clinton. That proposes rigging the
Palestinian election. Hillary Clinton.
I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the
Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake.
Hmm. Doesn't sound very pro-democracy
Pearl. Let's represent the people.
She goes on to say, and if we were Going to push for an
election, then we should have made.
Sure, we did something to determine who was going to win.
Well, of course this is u.s. Interference.
Another case of blatant projection on behalf of Hillary
Clinton. Putin says, we did not hack the
election out at all, outright denying it.
Julian Assange. Also said, our source is not the
Russian government on multiple occasions saying that Russia was
not their Source, who knows if it's true, even if it was true.
It matters more about whether the information they got was
true. It is that to steal the a, an
analogy from Stefan. Molyneux.
He says, it's like, if your girlfriend says, I have proof
you cheated on me, that Marissa gave to you.
And you said that Marissa gave to me and you say, Marissa is
interfering in our relationship. Well, is it true?
Are you cheating on me? That information is from someone
else and they're interfering. It's like, okay.
Then you're obviously guilty of something.
If that's your only criticism and you're not actually
attacking the documentation goes on to say there was not only no
interference from Russia into America, but America and the
European Union are constantly intervening in Russia.
We have Victoria nuland, assistant, Secretary of State,
for European and Eurasian Affairs.
We work with inside sources that want to work with us, referring
to the LGBT community in Russia and other Organizations that are
quote. Pro-democratic Putin says, they
rallied. The opposition forces, much like
they do, with BLM and antifa in America.
They funded rallies and the opposition, the tides
Foundation, the open Society Foundation.
They are constantly doing this, both domestically, and
internationally, Joe, Biden, and Barack Obama responded to the
Russian hacking allegations. Joe Biden says, in February of
2016. We're sending a message where
retaliating against Them for quote hacking still sitting on
that evidence though. Barack Obama.
It Julian Assange saying that it wasn't their Source.
Barack Obama and December of 2016 when any form government
tries to impact the Integrity of our elections.
We need to take action. So Barack Obama is very opposed
along with Joe Biden with when one government interferes in the
Affairs of another, won't we have Barack Obama on record
saying? Gaddafi needs to go.
You have a total support for us in Libya.
We have Obama, urges Britain to stay in the European Union that
appears to be interference. Barack Obama, endorses Emmanuel,
macron. In opposition to Marine Le Pen.
This counts. Certainly, as interference Obama
tells un Syria's Assad must go. And of course, you know, we have
the famous tape of Hillary Clinton.
Laughing we came, we saw he died.
Referring to the u.s. Involvement in Libya and Affairs
that ended with Gaddafi getting killed, the totally blatant,
double standard that it is just impossible.
That this doesn't get exposed more Los Angeles Times.
The u.s. Is no stranger to interfering in
the elections of other countries.
The US has a long history of attempting to influence
presidential elections. In other countries.
It's done as many as 81 times between 1946 and 2000 according
to a database. Amassed by political scientists,
Don Levin of Carnegie Mellon University that number doesn't
include military coups and regime change efforts following
the election of candidates. The u.s.
Didn't like notably those and Iran.
This was the 1953 Operation Ajax Guatemala 1954 intervention with
the Central Intelligence Agency, where they first put the cia's
study in assassination manual into effect and Chile, which was
in 1973 against De installing Augusto Pinochet nor does it
include general assistance with the electoral process such as
election, monitoring election interference by the US 1946 to
2000. America's No Stranger yet.
That is the Carnegie Mellon. University study, Putin goes on
to discuss the weapon. You the weapons used at
Hiroshima and Nagasaki at opened a tragic page in the history of
humanity. Because they released a terrible
Genie from the bottle. There was no military sense
behind using nuclear Atomic weapons.
See at the time, the u.s. And the Soviets were allies,
even though, of course, the Soviet Union did exactly what
Nazi Germany did. As far as the Holocaust goes.
They had the holida more in Ukraine and then they literally
invaded Poland, two weeks, apart from one another.
So, again, it's gangs picking other gangs, too.
Rival. Other gangs.
We need to have principal differences and who we support
and who we oppose. He was then asked directly about
Stalin and Lenin. Vladimir.
Putin says, you can try to demonize him Stalin.
However much you. Like we try to talk about his
merits and achieving victory over fascism.
He then mentions. Well, what about Oliver
Cromwell? Who was an English General and
Statesman, who led the parliament of England's armies
against King Charles, the first during the English Civil.
Or and rude ruled. The brutal Isles as Lord
protector. From 1653, until his death, in
1658. You could easily say that the
Bolsheviks had a civil war against the czar's.
You said Oliver Cromwell was a bloodthirsty man who arrived in
power on the wave of a revolution.
And he turned into a dictator and a tyrant yet.
There are monuments to him scattered across.
Great. Britain.
He says Napoleon is deified. So don't hate on us for liking
Stalin and Lenin. He says well, of course, we all
have these birthmarks as countries.
However, this does not mean that we should forget all the
atrocities committed under stalinism.
The destruction of millions of our compatriots.
The extermination camps Etc. He's then asked, what is
oligarchy? It is the integration of money
and power says, Putin with a view to influence, the decisions
that are being taken and the final aim of the being the
accumulation, accumulation of Wealth Putin then goes on to
say, we have to address the economic gap between the rich
and those people with a low level in.
Come, back in 2000. We had around 40 million people
living in poverty Russia. Right now.
The figure is still high, but it has decreased by half.
So they've cut their part of the amount of poverty from 40
million to 20 million now that they've had more time apart from
the Soviet Union and now he's more focused on any quality.
Now, the Reason, they tyrants love inequality is one because
it's completely untreatable. Human beings are so diverse that
it's going to be impossible for them to have equal outcomes in
life. So because it's so unachievable.
It's also undefinable. What does it mean?
Equality of opportunity, equality of outcome, equality of
Happiness, equality of property, equality of attention in the
media. It's so undefinable that they
can always say, look there's any quality.
Were here. Government needs to have more
power. So, this is a common trait among
the tyrants of all backgrounds. He's then asked about happiness
by Oliver Stone. Putin says, you are far
wealthier. I'm sorry.
He's asked about wealth and happiness in regards to
oligarchy or just in the nature of humanity itself.
Putin says, you are far wealthier than those who have
greater wealth in their accounts.
You have an opinion of your own, you have a talent.
You have a chance to show this Talent.
You have a chance to leave a great legacy behind the
documentary ends with Putin saying money doesn't bring this
kind of happiness because when you are in a coffin, you don't
have any Pockets to take your money to the Grave with you.
Thank you for watching this summary and Analysis of the
Putin interviews with Vladimir Putin, and Oliver Stone.
Thank you for watching Keith Knight.
Don't tread on anyone.