1 00:00:12,700 --> 00:00:16,600 Alright guys, we are back here. We are on the clock. 2 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:20,000 Truly on the clock here in the 10th round, we did end up 3 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:24,500 grabbing Garrett Wilson in The Ninth round there. 4 00:00:24,500 --> 00:00:26,200 Ended up being a bit of a run there. 5 00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:30,500 We weren't able after we selected Devin single Terry 6 00:00:30,500 --> 00:00:33,800 trailing Burke's win, Sky more win and so before we kind of get 7 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,900 into our 10th round selection guys let's at least just touch 8 00:00:36,900 --> 00:00:40,900 on the Garrett Wilson pick here I feel like we were in pretty 9 00:00:40,900 --> 00:00:42,600 unanimous agreement that we felt. 10 00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:45,600 There was a tear break with these kind of rookies after 11 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,000 Burks sky and Wilson to the point. 12 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:50,100 He was a pretty easy selection for us. 13 00:00:51,500 --> 00:00:52,700 Yeah. And we talked I think when we 14 00:00:52,700 --> 00:00:56,500 took Devon to the he this was a type of receiver that we wanted 15 00:00:56,500 --> 00:01:01,300 to add to the build. After devaugntah who kind of 16 00:01:01,300 --> 00:01:02,600 adds a little bit more of a floor. 17 00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:07,400 This is more of a big big, you know, high ceiling low-floor big 18 00:01:07,400 --> 00:01:10,800 swing. This is a really nice pocket of 19 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:12,600 rookie receivers and drafts. I was just talking about. 20 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:15,000 It was Sean and stealing bananas on a recording today. 21 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:20,800 I'm going to come out but on some episode but in this, this 22 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:22,800 Just like feels like a key. I'm really glad we got one of 23 00:01:22,808 --> 00:01:27,400 them. Yeah, I think we knew when we 24 00:01:27,400 --> 00:01:31,500 took Singletary that that would risk, not getting Berks and Sky 25 00:01:31,500 --> 00:01:35,900 more, but I still feel like Singletary was just such an easy 26 00:01:35,900 --> 00:01:37,800 pick. Their, let's get off to a fast 27 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:41,000 start. Yeah, I'm just a really good 28 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:45,800 value in the late mid to late 8th, but knowing you have that 29 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:48,200 Garrett. Wilson backstop makes a lot 30 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:49,700 easier to pass on Burks and more. 31 00:01:49,700 --> 00:01:52,800 I mean Wilson was the 10th pick in the draft, it's an early 32 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:56,700 declare get a breakout season. He was playing alongside Chris 33 00:01:56,700 --> 00:01:59,000 olave. Obviously, how to draft it as 34 00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:01,300 well, and Chris Hill Ave went one pick. 35 00:02:01,300 --> 00:02:05,100 After them Wilson was far more productive than a Lobby last 36 00:02:05,100 --> 00:02:06,400 year. They were the same age, but 37 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:11,600 Wilson was a year younger in school which matters and also 38 00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:14,200 they have this guy Jackson Smith and Jake but Ohio state who's 39 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,900 going to be a superstar and you know Wilson was was more 40 00:02:17,900 --> 00:02:19,800 productive than him. So yeah. 41 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:22,500 I'm a I'm pretty excited about Wilson. 42 00:02:22,500 --> 00:02:28,100 I feel like getting the discount on him is really nice like he I 43 00:02:28,100 --> 00:02:31,500 guess I don't understand why the Gap is so wide between him and 44 00:02:31,500 --> 00:02:34,000 more, and I think it'll it'll close substantially by the time 45 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:38,200 we get into, you know, post training, camp period, so I 46 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:41,600 think it's nice to get him at this price and yet kind of gives 47 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:44,500 us that home run swing, it wide receiver because we talked about 48 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:48,100 with this run of running backs coming off, it's like all right. 49 00:02:48,100 --> 00:02:50,700 Well we're shot whites probably not coming back. 50 00:02:50,900 --> 00:02:53,500 Back. So do we go ahead and you know I 51 00:02:53,508 --> 00:02:55,800 was like I'll half-heartedly make an argument that we just 52 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:58,400 grabbed them here because he's probably coming back. 53 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:00,200 Gives us some really nice contingent value. 54 00:03:00,300 --> 00:03:03,900 Great 40 running I build but I didn't even really believe in 55 00:03:03,900 --> 00:03:05,600 the argue. Make it sound like we need that 56 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:07,500 home run swing, it wide receiver, and Gary Wilson just 57 00:03:07,500 --> 00:03:09,800 so perfect for that. Yeah. 58 00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:13,100 And the other name that's in the mix here and we're obviously 59 00:03:13,100 --> 00:03:15,500 going to talk about him on the clock. 60 00:03:15,500 --> 00:03:18,400 Here is Chase Claypool. And I'll just say, I don't even 61 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:20,800 know if we could safely do a 2 V. 62 00:03:20,900 --> 00:03:24,400 You ever shot white Chase Claypool verse, you know, 63 00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:26,700 Garrett, Wilson, and what other running back? 64 00:03:26,700 --> 00:03:31,500 We would consider here because I think Chase Claypool probably 65 00:03:31,500 --> 00:03:35,700 goes if Rashad white, doesn't you know what I mean? 66 00:03:35,700 --> 00:03:37,600 Like this drafter here who took him? 67 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,200 I think he definitely could have used another wide receiver and I 68 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:44,500 know claypool's near the top of kind of the ATP Q as well. 69 00:03:44,500 --> 00:03:47,800 So I don't even know if if that would have shaken out for us. 70 00:03:47,900 --> 00:03:50,600 And here, do you guys agree? I do. 71 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:54,200 And if If Wilson had gone. I think I would have argued for 72 00:03:54,200 --> 00:03:57,700 Claypool with our last pick. So I think I would have been 73 00:03:57,700 --> 00:04:00,800 Claypool over white, you know, if we didn't have a chance to 74 00:04:00,808 --> 00:04:04,400 take Wilson in the night, so it's very tough to do to be 75 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:07,000 together. We take white over, both Wilson 76 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:11,500 and Claypool because I don't think we would have But and I 77 00:04:11,508 --> 00:04:13,700 guess just to put a bow on the Wilson thing. 78 00:04:13,700 --> 00:04:16,899 It is crazy. He does seem Miss price to me. 79 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:19,300 We were even just talking about it in an underdog draft where he 80 00:04:19,300 --> 00:04:22,800 has his atp's like 110. And it's it's well after a law 81 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:26,300 of a well after Burks and Sky more, I don't really get it. 82 00:04:26,300 --> 00:04:29,200 I mentioned in our disk or chat, my only thesis for why this is 83 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:32,200 happening is that the market is super, super excited. 84 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:34,600 About Elijah more. And I get it, like he checks 85 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:38,400 every box that we like as far as a second-year breakout wide 86 00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:42,800 receiver who has good college And who shows efficiency in your 87 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:46,600 one like he, he passes that sniff test as a breakout 88 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:48,900 candidate but like, I just don't think those things have to be 89 00:04:48,900 --> 00:04:51,000 mutually exclusive. And like you said, gear Wilson 90 00:04:51,000 --> 00:04:52,700 might just be fucking really good. 91 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,700 Like this could be you mentioned the Jackson and how do you say 92 00:04:55,700 --> 00:04:59,000 his name in big bow? I mean, it kind of feels, it 93 00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:02,000 feels a little bit like the, you know, the Jamar Chase Justin 94 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:04,000 Jefferson thing where it's like these are too just like 95 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,600 incredible guys, that crushed in college, and we're also like 96 00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:09,900 pulling targets away from each other to. 97 00:05:09,900 --> 00:05:12,200 So I don't know. Like I don't think I want to be 98 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:16,600 taking stabs on these guys just knowing that the upside 99 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:20,400 scenarios for them is so big and I really think Eric Wilson is 100 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:25,900 grossly mispriced in all formats right now, for sure. 101 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:28,700 Yeah, yeah, I mean I think we talked about that in the last 102 00:05:28,700 --> 00:05:32,800 episode 2 but it's a no I guess it's talked about it with Leone 103 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:39,100 on the AFC East pot maybe but yeah I mean at said probably was 104 00:05:39,100 --> 00:05:42,400 shot a little bit so I mean I think Talked about this with 105 00:05:43,300 --> 00:05:45,500 everyone agrees. Like this is it doesn't make any 106 00:05:45,500 --> 00:05:47,300 sense, right? Like it doesn't make any sense. 107 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:51,400 I don't let go push back. Let's talk about our situation. 108 00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:53,700 Here, we mentioned Claypool who's clearly in the next. 109 00:05:53,700 --> 00:05:57,600 Like Pat said, I think knowing we've really wanted another wide 110 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,700 receiver with major upside with one of these selections he would 111 00:06:00,700 --> 00:06:03,900 have been in the conversation with us at pick in the ninth 112 00:06:03,900 --> 00:06:05,500 round. And now we're at a really 113 00:06:05,500 --> 00:06:08,000 interesting juncture because a lot of people will look at this 114 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:10,300 board and be like, you guys are thinking about it running. 115 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:12,200 Back, right? Like you clearly need to add a 116 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,600 second running back and yet what we're actually debating are a 117 00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:19,700 couple of wide receivers here. We mentioned Chase Claypool 118 00:06:19,700 --> 00:06:21,300 Gretsch. Why don't I give you kind of the 119 00:06:21,300 --> 00:06:25,100 floor first about why? Chase Claypool might not be the 120 00:06:25,100 --> 00:06:26,700 selection you'd like to see you later. 121 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:30,500 I'm not I'm actually not thinking in terms of two wide 122 00:06:30,500 --> 00:06:33,300 receivers here. So I'm thinking you mostly in 123 00:06:33,300 --> 00:06:37,500 terms of your comments a while back either in our chatter on 124 00:06:37,500 --> 00:06:40,700 one of the many soaps that it would be really great to Three 125 00:06:40,700 --> 00:06:42,700 running backs in this pocket was Singletary. 126 00:06:42,700 --> 00:06:45,000 And now we're looking at a group of running backs that are 127 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:47,500 available here that we really like and what kind of sitting 128 00:06:47,500 --> 00:06:49,100 them all. But there's a there's a about, 129 00:06:49,100 --> 00:06:51,400 like, eight still, I think or six still. 130 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:53,800 They're going to come up. That I don't think we'll get 131 00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:57,400 back to our 12th pick. And so there's this element 132 00:06:57,400 --> 00:07:00,500 where potentially taking them in both 10 and 11 is great. 133 00:07:00,700 --> 00:07:03,100 Rondell more is the other receiver that we had talked a 134 00:07:03,108 --> 00:07:06,500 little bit about adding to this build with Kyler Marquis as are, 135 00:07:07,300 --> 00:07:09,500 you know, to build out the double stack for Arizona. 136 00:07:09,500 --> 00:07:11,800 And so my thought it was you take a run, one of these running 137 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:14,800 backs here and Ken Walker's gone, as you pull this up on. 138 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:21,100 Ya people watching my video, but there's is that the ATP. 139 00:07:21,100 --> 00:07:24,800 Why is it Rex Burkhead so high. It's so weird. 140 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:28,900 It's like, why? What's going on? 141 00:07:31,100 --> 00:07:33,400 It's like, Isaiah Spiller, Kenny gain. 142 00:07:33,400 --> 00:07:36,700 Well, there's several more. I don't want to necessarily need 143 00:07:36,700 --> 00:07:39,200 them all Michael Carter. I think is really interesting. 144 00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:42,600 I don't know if we Talked about him together tearing Davis 145 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:43,900 price. We talked about there's like I 146 00:07:43,907 --> 00:07:45,600 like Carter. Yeah, yeah. 147 00:07:48,700 --> 00:07:52,300 But my thought was we take a running back here and then we 148 00:07:52,300 --> 00:07:55,200 can still consider taking, you know, I mean, I don't think 149 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:59,700 Claypool makes it back to us at all, but consider taking Rondell 150 00:07:59,700 --> 00:08:03,600 if we do still like a receiver and I was saying, I kind of feel 151 00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:07,700 like I might like Rondell straight up over Claypool at the 152 00:08:07,700 --> 00:08:09,800 same time. I'm not pushing on that too hard 153 00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:11,500 because I think both you guys were pretty excited about clay. 154 00:08:11,500 --> 00:08:13,300 Cool. And he is a really good ATP 155 00:08:13,300 --> 00:08:15,000 value right now. Do you think it's interesting 156 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:17,200 that his teammate? Pat fryer move is a little bit 157 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:18,300 higher a teepee. P. 158 00:08:19,100 --> 00:08:22,800 Could be our Titan to hear. Those are the top two in the in 159 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:26,700 the queue on ffp. See fryer Muth and then 160 00:08:26,700 --> 00:08:28,400 Claypool. Yeah. 161 00:08:28,900 --> 00:08:31,900 And I actually like Frank is a little more than capable to. 162 00:08:32,100 --> 00:08:33,500 I don't know what my issue is with Playboy. 163 00:08:33,500 --> 00:08:35,299 I can't really articulate. Those kind of talking about 164 00:08:35,299 --> 00:08:38,000 threw it in the chat but basically like they haven't 165 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:41,100 given him a full role for two years even though he's been 166 00:08:41,100 --> 00:08:43,900 good. I mean it's kind of like I just 167 00:08:43,900 --> 00:08:47,700 think Tomlin seems to hate him but Pat made some great points 168 00:08:47,700 --> 00:08:50,500 like you know, Ben Definitely not good for Chase. 169 00:08:50,500 --> 00:08:53,100 Click will last year, like, there's the play that I 170 00:08:53,100 --> 00:08:54,400 remembered. I was trying to find the tweet. 171 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:57,600 I remember either screenshot or a video, I tweeted or quote 172 00:08:57,600 --> 00:08:59,700 tweet or something. There's a player claypool's 173 00:08:59,700 --> 00:09:01,000 running. Basically, a vertical route, 174 00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:04,000 stopped turned around, and drove back toward the line of 175 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:05,500 scrimmage to try to get to a past. 176 00:09:05,500 --> 00:09:08,200 It was so underthrown. You the kind of thing. 177 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:12,400 You just don't see in the NFL. There was a lot of that 178 00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:15,600 obviously, with been just getting a guy, a quarterback, 179 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:17,400 with a competent NFL arm. I mean, I don't think that's 180 00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:18,400 true. Christian, can you pick it in 181 00:09:18,408 --> 00:09:20,000 your life? World on fire but somebody who 182 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:21,500 could throw the ball 20 yards down. 183 00:09:21,500 --> 00:09:24,400 The field literally might be all Chase. 184 00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:26,000 Claypool needs to have a bounce back. 185 00:09:26,500 --> 00:09:29,000 Yeah I'm more concerned about the fact that they haven't given 186 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:31,700 the big routes and I think the Pickens thing has been more of a 187 00:09:31,700 --> 00:09:39,000 concern in my head for Claypool then then Deonte but there's a 188 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:43,200 certain point right where he's worth the BET and that's the 189 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:45,900 thing like I have right now if you're watching on video just 190 00:09:45,900 --> 00:09:50,400 the wide receivers available and it does Is feel like, you know 191 00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:53,200 not that this has to be the end. All be all but like looking at 192 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:56,800 wide receivers that could legitimately finish as a top 15 193 00:09:56,800 --> 00:10:01,200 wide receiver this year in to me I just see us a massive Cliff 194 00:10:01,300 --> 00:10:05,900 after Claypool as far as like the players here Boyd Watson 195 00:10:05,900 --> 00:10:09,900 Gallop Rondell Jahan Dotson, Patrick Landry Etc that could 196 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,100 reasonably finish as a top 50 wide receiver and I feel like 197 00:10:13,100 --> 00:10:19,000 Claypool has that potential. Yeah, I think I'd be more 198 00:10:19,100 --> 00:10:23,800 interested in the Rondell pivot. If he had a realistic chance of 199 00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:27,300 coming back to us in the 12th because then we could kind of 200 00:10:27,308 --> 00:10:30,300 have our cake and eat it too of getting two of these running 201 00:10:30,300 --> 00:10:34,300 backs in this pocket, we just had this side of the board, go 202 00:10:34,300 --> 00:10:37,400 super running back, heavy on the last turn, maybe they're 203 00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:39,300 satiated. Maybe they're not going to eat 204 00:10:39,300 --> 00:10:42,500 up all these running backs but the other side of the board 205 00:10:42,500 --> 00:10:46,000 might so it wasn't a very running. 206 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:48,800 The heavy side of the board this last time around so they might 207 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,900 go back to the well running back, might be tough for us in 208 00:10:51,900 --> 00:10:54,900 the 12th round but Rondell according to the FPC Command 209 00:10:54,900 --> 00:10:58,200 Center on has a 23% chance of getting back to us in the 12th. 210 00:10:58,800 --> 00:11:01,600 So we can't really plan around that. 211 00:11:02,700 --> 00:11:05,800 I'd be a lot more open to it. If if you look like you know, 60 212 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,000 70 % chance of getting back in the 12th because then we could 213 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:10,000 go to here still get a wide receiver. 214 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,900 I think most likely we're looking at either Claypool a 215 00:11:12,900 --> 00:11:18,500 running back or running back and Rondell And some me, I thinking 216 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,300 we're probably looking at it, unless I guess if there's a 217 00:11:22,308 --> 00:11:25,200 running back that you guys feel very strongly about compared to 218 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:27,900 the rest of the group, that would be one of the big 219 00:11:27,900 --> 00:11:32,000 advantages of taking Rondell. I don't, I don't really have a 220 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:34,500 guy here, then I'm pounding the table for it running back. 221 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:38,400 I mean, what if it was available, why wouldn't you be 222 00:11:38,400 --> 00:11:39,700 open to a running back running back? 223 00:11:41,300 --> 00:11:42,700 Oh, okay. I would be open running back 224 00:11:42,700 --> 00:11:45,000 running back. But then that's sort of my 225 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:48,900 Planet wouldn't get like if running backs went heavy. 226 00:11:50,100 --> 00:11:52,000 I didn't feel like Rhonda was much different than Claypool, 227 00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:54,700 that's what I was kind of trying to say, but I feel like we 228 00:11:54,700 --> 00:11:56,400 should still potentially be going running back. 229 00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:58,200 Running back in this pocket as the plan. 230 00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:02,100 A that's really where I'm coming from and I'm willing to I'm 231 00:12:02,100 --> 00:12:06,400 willing to talk that through. I think to what would make me 232 00:12:06,400 --> 00:12:08,900 feel more comfortable about running back running back. 233 00:12:08,900 --> 00:12:14,400 Here is to identify a couple late targets that we would feel 234 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:18,800 comfortable rostering and holding for, I don't know, at 235 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:21,100 least five or six. Weeks in the season. 236 00:12:21,100 --> 00:12:24,200 You know, we're at we're at six wide receivers right now. 237 00:12:24,500 --> 00:12:26,900 I mean, who are the targets for you? 238 00:12:26,900 --> 00:12:30,300 Guys say we do go running back running back here which I'm open 239 00:12:30,300 --> 00:12:32,400 to. I do think that leaves us with 240 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:37,300 at least one maybe two more wide receiver selections if we don't 241 00:12:37,300 --> 00:12:39,700 get an elite guy here, who we consider Ali? 242 00:12:39,900 --> 00:12:41,600 Who are? You know, if we kind of reverse 243 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:44,800 engineer our in-game who are the guys that you'd be interested in 244 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:48,800 here. I mean, that's not fair because 245 00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:52,400 they all suck. That's kind of my point, right? 246 00:12:52,400 --> 00:12:55,800 The leading question, isn't it? It's a great point. 247 00:12:55,900 --> 00:12:58,400 It's okay. Point taken Pete. 248 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:00,400 All right. Bye Claypool. 249 00:13:01,300 --> 00:13:04,100 No but like I cuz I can get excited about some of these 250 00:13:04,100 --> 00:13:05,800 rookies I think we mentioned them on a previous one. 251 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:11,700 We mentioned Fuller we mentioned Pickens wand all a so like I 252 00:13:11,708 --> 00:13:16,200 mean open to that Fuller and Julio one Dale KJ Hammer Pickins 253 00:13:16,400 --> 00:13:20,100 Of those guys are. I think, you know, worth taking 254 00:13:20,100 --> 00:13:23,700 stabs at, but we are only at six receivers again. 255 00:13:23,700 --> 00:13:25,200 I'm not, I'm not pushing hard here. 256 00:13:26,700 --> 00:13:28,500 Well, you hang on. That's what's awesome. 257 00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:31,100 Okay, good. No, no, go ahead because I was 258 00:13:31,100 --> 00:13:33,300 going to shift it to, I was going to shift it to talking 259 00:13:33,300 --> 00:13:35,700 about running back, so, but did you have anything about wide 260 00:13:35,700 --> 00:13:39,300 receiver targets down the road? No, I was going to shift it 261 00:13:39,300 --> 00:13:41,800 towards towards Claypool, talk. So, let's get in the running 262 00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:45,000 backs, worse. Well, so, yeah, so I do agree 263 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:48,100 with Gretchen has premise here that like, we are. 264 00:13:48,300 --> 00:13:50,600 Are so we're picking in the 10th round and then we're going to 265 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:52,500 come back on the rap in the 11th. 266 00:13:52,500 --> 00:13:56,100 And then when it comes back to us in the 12th, I really think I 267 00:13:56,100 --> 00:13:58,600 have the command center up here and I see Khalil Herbert who's 268 00:13:58,600 --> 00:14:00,500 one of my kind of preferred targets. 269 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:03,800 I really think Khalil Herbert and everyone above him. 270 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:07,400 Here is going to be gone by the time we come back in the 12th. 271 00:14:07,400 --> 00:14:10,600 So then you're looking at the James Robinson, mckissick Marlon 272 00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:13,700 Mac like this is a tier break, we feel on Underdog as well. 273 00:14:14,400 --> 00:14:17,400 And so, to me, then that question really comes to 274 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:19,600 Gretchen's point. Ain't I do think we can get two 275 00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:22,600 of these guys above him. You know, Pierce, hind Spiller. 276 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:25,600 Carter Henderson gain, will TDP, Algeria, and Herber. 277 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:27,600 Do we want to lock up two of those guys? 278 00:14:27,900 --> 00:14:31,500 Or are we comfortable with some of these other ones? 279 00:14:31,500 --> 00:14:32,900 We're going to have to be comfortable with some of these 280 00:14:32,900 --> 00:14:34,800 other ones because we're going to take them, but I just mean, 281 00:14:34,800 --> 00:14:36,800 do we want to from this grouping? 282 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:41,400 Yeah, I mean so yeah why I was thinking about is like we pick 283 00:14:41,400 --> 00:14:42,600 our favorite. I think, we all really like 284 00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:45,100 Darrell Henderson like say we decide that's our favorite out 285 00:14:45,100 --> 00:14:46,900 of this whole group. We take Darrell Henderson. 286 00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:50,400 And then on the way back, we're like, okay, we're open to a few 287 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:54,300 of these guys might go Spiller Carter game, welp Davis price. 288 00:14:54,300 --> 00:14:57,300 This, like, young tear that we really, like, I even kind of a 289 00:14:57,308 --> 00:15:00,400 for algae or and Herbert who I think you're right to include. 290 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:02,800 But maybe are just a half step behind that other group. 291 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:05,100 Yeah. And then we get one of one of 292 00:15:05,100 --> 00:15:07,100 the young ones coming back as well, right? 293 00:15:07,100 --> 00:15:09,200 And so it's like okay, that's a Now we have Singletary, 294 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:12,700 Henderson and a youth player with some upside, you know, some 295 00:15:12,700 --> 00:15:18,400 unknown upside but I don't know. I mean I your other your other 296 00:15:18,400 --> 00:15:22,700 argument about claypool's like top 15 potential versus all the 297 00:15:22,700 --> 00:15:26,100 other receivers after rooms hit me as well, like that wide 298 00:15:26,100 --> 00:15:31,100 receiver list like kind of Boyd, I love, but I mean, he's Triple 299 00:15:31,100 --> 00:15:35,600 Sec what happened? I'm saying, I love it, but I 300 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:37,900 don't think he has stopped right, right. 301 00:15:37,900 --> 00:15:40,200 You got to make that case necessarily even with one of the 302 00:15:40,200 --> 00:15:41,900 other guys going down. I don't think Tyler, boy, 303 00:15:41,900 --> 00:15:44,600 finishes top 15 and thinking properties in both to go down. 304 00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:48,600 So it is, it is crazy. Like if we pull back because I'm 305 00:15:48,600 --> 00:15:50,800 sure there and I'll just I'll just read off the team for the 306 00:15:50,800 --> 00:15:52,800 people who are a little disoriented right now. 307 00:15:52,800 --> 00:15:55,100 So we have Kyler Maria quarterback, we have one running 308 00:15:55,100 --> 00:15:57,600 back Tevin Singletary. We have Kyle pits at tight end 309 00:15:57,700 --> 00:15:59,700 and then we have these 6 wide receivers tomorrow. 310 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:02,000 Chase T, Higgins. Marquis Brown, Rashad Bateman, 311 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:04,200 Devante Smith Garrett Wilson. Look, we get it. 312 00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:06,600 We know a lot of you are like, hey, you guys are jacked up at 313 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:09,900 wide receiver, you're good, but like, as, as Sean off and says 314 00:16:09,900 --> 00:16:14,000 about FPC, FPC is a 4 wide receiver format whether people 315 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:15,700 want to come to grips with that or not. 316 00:16:15,800 --> 00:16:18,200 And right now we have six wide receivers and when you talk 317 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:22,400 about Buys in injuries, we're not just being wrong. 318 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:24,500 We were wrong about someone we took. 319 00:16:24,900 --> 00:16:28,700 Yeah, I mean, this our depth at wide receiver evaporates so 320 00:16:28,700 --> 00:16:31,600 quickly and our goal. Isn't to fill four spots. 321 00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:36,000 It is too, fucking Pummel people at four spots and to me 322 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:37,800 Claypool, is this tier break of someone? 323 00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:40,000 We can Pummel our opponents with. 324 00:16:40,300 --> 00:16:43,000 It's also someone that we can kind of punish the room for 325 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:45,500 letting us have because like the room saying to us, you're done 326 00:16:45,500 --> 00:16:47,200 at wide receiver. You need to, you need to get 327 00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:50,200 your running backs now. And, you know, you look back at 328 00:16:50,200 --> 00:16:53,300 like the guys who just like clay befall to us, to me, I'm looking 329 00:16:53,300 --> 00:16:56,200 at their teams, I'm like shit. Taken Claypool, should have 330 00:16:56,200 --> 00:16:58,200 taken claypole. Should have taken Claypool, so 331 00:16:58,900 --> 00:17:05,500 they didn't I think we should he what Claypool is done in his two 332 00:17:05,500 --> 00:17:08,599 years with Ben Roethlisberger is like super impressive. 333 00:17:08,599 --> 00:17:14,000 To me one point, 90 yards per hour run as a rookie 1.67 last 334 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:18,200 year, which was a letdown but, you know, I think you could 335 00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:21,099 really benefit from the upgrade at quarterback. 336 00:17:21,099 --> 00:17:22,500 It's probably gonna be an upgrade for him. 337 00:17:22,500 --> 00:17:25,400 Even if you know, maybe the office is a whole isn't like a 338 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:27,400 huge upgrade. But the other thing that's 339 00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:31,700 interesting to me with Claypool, is he He led the Steelers last 340 00:17:31,700 --> 00:17:33,700 year in yards per hour on from the slot. 341 00:17:33,900 --> 00:17:36,300 Had one point 75 yards per hour from the slot. 342 00:17:36,300 --> 00:17:41,700 Deante Johnson only 1.07 Rave MacLeod was next 027 Juju was at 343 00:17:41,700 --> 00:17:45,100 0.76. We're all these excuses for Juju 344 00:17:45,100 --> 00:17:47,900 about you know, Ben was so bad for him and he's gonna have this 345 00:17:47,900 --> 00:17:51,500 bounce back here. Claypool was actually good house 346 00:17:51,500 --> 00:17:54,800 lot with with been you know, 1.75 very solid. 347 00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:59,700 So I think like if he ends up playing in the slot is a bigger 348 00:17:59,700 --> 00:18:02,400 part of his role this year which they're talking about him doing 349 00:18:02,400 --> 00:18:06,100 and he's played 20% of his his career snap so far this lot. 350 00:18:06,100 --> 00:18:08,100 So it wouldn't be like a totally new thing. 351 00:18:08,900 --> 00:18:11,900 I think that could maybe make him a little bit more consistent 352 00:18:12,100 --> 00:18:16,000 than we think of him as and he won't be quite so big play, 353 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:18,600 touchdown dependent but that's still going to be in the mix for 354 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:21,200 him, given his size, given his athleticism, given some of the 355 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:26,100 goal line stuff we saw times. So I think just the path, Him 356 00:18:26,100 --> 00:18:28,100 being like a plug-and-play starter for us. 357 00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:30,800 Compared to guys that I like later, you know, I like Josh 358 00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:33,900 Palmer later, right. But like, he needs an injury to 359 00:18:33,900 --> 00:18:36,900 be a plug-and-play starter and kind of on and on down the list. 360 00:18:36,900 --> 00:18:39,900 Like even will Fuller, you know, unless he's signed somewhere 361 00:18:39,900 --> 00:18:44,400 awesome tougher path to just like us locking him in kind of 362 00:18:44,408 --> 00:18:47,700 no-brainer ranked as a top 15 wide receiver every week I think 363 00:18:47,700 --> 00:18:51,700 Claypool has that path. It's not the most likely path 364 00:18:51,700 --> 00:18:54,200 but that's also why he's available in the 10th round. 365 00:18:55,400 --> 00:19:01,400 Yeah, see I still think I mean I agree with you guys and I think 366 00:19:01,400 --> 00:19:04,200 he has that path. I think it's like quite a bit 367 00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:07,400 less likely, I think than you guys do but I do think it's 368 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:09,200 there. I he's shown a lot of talent so 369 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:13,300 far, I still think Deonte is the clear Target Hagen the offense, 370 00:19:13,300 --> 00:19:17,000 and then Pickens Edition and Firearm within your to is like 371 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:21,000 almost squeezes Claypool out in a way that maybe should be 372 00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:23,100 getting talked about more than it is, especially since he can't 373 00:19:23,100 --> 00:19:25,100 even earn a full time. Role you know through last 374 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:30,100 You're but I do agree. Like especially from the 375 00:19:30,100 --> 00:19:32,600 physical perspective and the stuff that he's done already 376 00:19:33,900 --> 00:19:38,200 that it's there. I just think of it as being a 377 00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:41,200 narrower path. I I'm with you guys that we 378 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:44,000 should add him to this build over the running back. 379 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:47,500 The only other question, I want to throw it back to you. 380 00:19:47,500 --> 00:19:49,800 Is the one that I didn't talk about in the chat at all, but I 381 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:51,300 already mentioned at the beginning of the show because it 382 00:19:51,300 --> 00:19:54,000 just noticed it. When I opened up the draft app 383 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:58,400 is that it can make the same case about punishing the room 384 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:01,700 for letting Pat fireman full as far and their teammates. 385 00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:04,800 So I wanted to, yeah, I wanted to Circle back my only thought 386 00:20:04,800 --> 00:20:07,500 and you guys tell me if you disagree with this and I just 387 00:20:07,500 --> 00:20:10,100 have Kind of like a teepee brain right now. 388 00:20:10,300 --> 00:20:15,900 But I view this tight end here like pretty flat from basically 389 00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:20,300 fryer move to Gerald Everett like this crew of fry Muth 390 00:20:20,300 --> 00:20:24,700 kiseki actually Poonam fan Henry and Everett feel so flat to me 391 00:20:25,200 --> 00:20:27,300 and that's why I have a hard time taking the first guy in 392 00:20:27,300 --> 00:20:28,700 that tear. But do you guys have for our 393 00:20:28,700 --> 00:20:30,900 booth and a significant to your ahead of those guys? 394 00:20:32,800 --> 00:20:38,900 I don't, which is probably why I'm so Claypool here because I 395 00:20:38,908 --> 00:20:42,900 don't II agree with you. I think he's kind of in that 396 00:20:42,900 --> 00:20:47,000 tear and it would be nice to me. Get like if we don't get one of 397 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:49,000 the running backs that we like to call to us in the 12th, maybe 398 00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:51,200 that's where we take our second tight end or maybe we take our 399 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:55,800 second side in the 13th. If we have a, we have enough 400 00:20:55,800 --> 00:21:01,000 cover to push it. I think I toss it back to grach. 401 00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:04,400 I mean both fry. Vermouth and Claypool our ATP 402 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:07,600 values right now. I mean, we're at pick 116. 403 00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:10,700 Both of them. Have a 10 1 and a 1 0, 2 ATP. 404 00:21:10,700 --> 00:21:14,400 So like we're value hounding this regardless of. 405 00:21:14,400 --> 00:21:17,900 Yeah. Dealers player II think I do 406 00:21:17,900 --> 00:21:20,300 have farm with, at least a half to your head of those. 407 00:21:20,300 --> 00:21:25,200 Guess I do like those other guys before I'm with is definitely my 408 00:21:25,200 --> 00:21:29,700 preferred of that grouping I would not say, like, definitely 409 00:21:29,700 --> 00:21:31,800 down to like fan, I would not say friend with his. 410 00:21:32,100 --> 00:21:34,900 And flip for me and I like that. I think fans been undervalued 411 00:21:35,200 --> 00:21:37,600 Alberto is interesting, I don't think, I think I would pretty 412 00:21:37,600 --> 00:21:39,500 clearly take fire move gets sick. 413 00:21:39,500 --> 00:21:45,000 He's the one maybe he's in the same tier, it was interesting. 414 00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:47,300 I was looking at their stats Farm, we did play one more game 415 00:21:47,300 --> 00:21:51,700 but And he scored a few more. A handful more touchdowns is 416 00:21:51,700 --> 00:21:55,700 probably the biggest difference, but like playful last year 166 417 00:21:55,700 --> 00:21:59,000 fantasy points for our movies like 151 as a rookie tight end 418 00:21:59,300 --> 00:22:00,900 like and he was a good tight end process. 419 00:22:00,900 --> 00:22:02,400 Pretty good. Yeah he wasn't. 420 00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:06,100 And that's and that's by the way in single PPR, this is tight 421 00:22:06,100 --> 00:22:07,700 Imperial. I think if I pull up side and 422 00:22:07,700 --> 00:22:10,900 premium that essentially be friend with would be ahead of 423 00:22:10,908 --> 00:22:14,100 it. I think last year, but he played 424 00:22:14,100 --> 00:22:17,700 one extra game, he had a good rookie year. 425 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:22,500 I mean, the touchdowns a big part of it, but Yeah. 426 00:22:22,500 --> 00:22:25,100 I mean the concern for me is like we didn't see it in your to 427 00:22:25,100 --> 00:22:28,600 with Claypool and I am like you actually saw step back and we 428 00:22:28,608 --> 00:22:33,700 did sits in commit to him and routes And maybe, maybe it's 429 00:22:33,700 --> 00:22:35,800 sort of a similar but to give Davis though and I've made the 430 00:22:35,800 --> 00:22:37,700 argument that gave us is worth making the bet on. 431 00:22:37,700 --> 00:22:41,100 So I'm not I'm not opposed to click, I'm really not. 432 00:22:41,100 --> 00:22:43,200 I'm just kind of think it's like a similar bet to. 433 00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:46,400 Judy is well, in a way we're like, we're probably, I think it 434 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:50,200 was an 80% routes run Claypool last year, which is not what we 435 00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:53,100 want. We want them to be like 90 95. 436 00:22:53,100 --> 00:22:56,400 I think Beyonce was a 95. I checked it earlier today. 437 00:22:56,400 --> 00:23:01,900 And yeah, I mean I had a computer but not not enough. 438 00:23:02,800 --> 00:23:05,400 I was looking at his game log and he has some 95 games and 439 00:23:05,408 --> 00:23:08,000 then he has some 50 games like out of nowhere and I'm like, 440 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:11,500 hmm, that was what happened with Claypool last use. 441 00:23:11,700 --> 00:23:14,300 And that's what happened, I think is his rookie year as well 442 00:23:14,300 --> 00:23:16,300 late in the year. Just suddenly he was a part-time 443 00:23:16,300 --> 00:23:19,200 player even after you had a huge start to his rookie year. 444 00:23:20,400 --> 00:23:22,600 I'm definitely reading tea leaves off the field stuff. 445 00:23:22,600 --> 00:23:26,000 It's just this weird concern, but I told you guys in the chat, 446 00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:27,400 I was kind of thrown it out because you guys are pretty 447 00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:29,400 stoked that he was following it. I was kind of thrown it out like 448 00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:33,700 just sort of seeing if you guys. Were kind of biting that that 449 00:23:33,700 --> 00:23:37,800 line I was casting and we're agreeing with me or, or not. 450 00:23:37,800 --> 00:23:39,800 Because if you weren't that, I was like, I mean, this is the 451 00:23:39,800 --> 00:23:42,200 obvious pick. I do think it will. 452 00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:47,400 I compare him to I compared with Tony in the chat and I was using 453 00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:51,800 a buddy Anthony Miko's Claire comp tool and it was interesting 454 00:23:51,800 --> 00:23:56,300 just how in his tool just how similar their their projections 455 00:23:56,400 --> 00:24:00,300 coming out to be if you graph them out but it does it just 456 00:24:00,300 --> 00:24:04,600 sort of feels intuitively. Like a similar bet we're home. 457 00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:08,000 I mean, Tony could be like a cut, you know, you could be just 458 00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:12,700 completely cutting Tony but then there's like some outcomes where 459 00:24:12,700 --> 00:24:14,300 he's not, you're not feeling great about him. 460 00:24:14,500 --> 00:24:17,700 Starter and then there's plenty of outcomes where you're easily 461 00:24:17,700 --> 00:24:20,200 starting kit, areas, Tony. And I kind of feel the same way 462 00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:23,600 with Claypool, you're trading a little bit of that like super 463 00:24:23,600 --> 00:24:27,000 super cut this guy down side and I think you're probably giving 464 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:31,300 away like I think Tony probably has a clearer path because he's 465 00:24:31,300 --> 00:24:34,000 just flashed that Talent probably a little stronger. 466 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:37,400 Even the Claypool has so you know your you maybe don't have 467 00:24:37,400 --> 00:24:40,600 is quite a clear path to him being that locked in starter but 468 00:24:40,700 --> 00:24:43,300 very similar bet to me and you know we're getting a three round 469 00:24:43,300 --> 00:24:46,100 discount compared to toe Ernie. And if we have to cut on some 470 00:24:46,100 --> 00:24:47,400 point, we have to kind of let the clearest point. 471 00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:50,100 You guys have made as well as like we're, we don't want any 472 00:24:50,100 --> 00:24:51,400 other receivers after this point. 473 00:24:51,400 --> 00:24:54,500 Like, if rods, I give here, I'm basically arguing that I 474 00:24:54,500 --> 00:24:57,000 wouldn't take him in any scenario and I'm not really 475 00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:01,200 trying to argue that he, and we're 25 minutes into this 476 00:25:01,200 --> 00:25:04,900 minisode and none of us have pounded, the table, for one, 477 00:25:04,900 --> 00:25:07,300 specific running back. Like, we're all clearly an 478 00:25:07,300 --> 00:25:10,500 agreement that this is a flat tier of Zero, running back 479 00:25:10,500 --> 00:25:13,200 targets and we're happy with like six to eight of them. 480 00:25:13,300 --> 00:25:16,500 Yeah, I am. Expand on, I think if we don't 481 00:25:16,500 --> 00:25:23,500 take people, we should take fire move probably because as much as 482 00:25:23,500 --> 00:25:26,700 I kind of see the tight end group is fairly flat. 483 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,000 We are getting the ATP discounts. 484 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:31,900 You know maybe there's something to be said for just taking that 485 00:25:32,300 --> 00:25:37,200 I did pull up his stats from last year. 180 .7 Half Point. 486 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:40,600 PPR points or not have point point Half Point, PPR points, 487 00:25:40,600 --> 00:25:44,300 and FPC scoring, pretty good. I think part of it. 488 00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:47,900 From his life, Tyler higbee like scored like three less points 489 00:25:47,900 --> 00:25:49,500 and goes four rounds later or something. 490 00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:53,500 So you know I I don't know. I feel like yeah. 491 00:25:53,500 --> 00:25:55,500 But rookie tight ends don't do that. 492 00:25:55,500 --> 00:25:57,300 That's true. Yeah it's a good point. 493 00:25:57,300 --> 00:26:00,300 Like this could be a year to take off it could be a year to 494 00:26:00,300 --> 00:26:06,300 take off for sure yeah but I yeah good no I think like the 495 00:26:06,300 --> 00:26:08,700 room handed us a couple values and we should take one of those 496 00:26:08,700 --> 00:26:12,000 values. Yeah and like to me just kind of 497 00:26:12,000 --> 00:26:15,900 plotting this out a few Down the road. 498 00:26:15,900 --> 00:26:22,800 So you know we're picking right now at pick 116, right? 499 00:26:22,900 --> 00:26:33,000 And then so our next pics are going to be at to do 125 and 140 500 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:36,200 we can sell like it 125. I think, as we want to get out 501 00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:39,900 fast, I think we're a lock for a running back at 125. 502 00:26:39,900 --> 00:26:41,500 Like, you look at this sweet spot here. 503 00:26:41,500 --> 00:26:48,100 Heinz 121 Spiller 121 Carter. T4 hendo 124 gain well 130 TDP 504 00:26:48,100 --> 00:26:52,700 132 like, we're like a lock to take a running back there and so 505 00:26:52,700 --> 00:26:59,700 then the question is, when we come back at pick 140, you know, 506 00:26:59,700 --> 00:27:02,200 looking at the pockets there because that's where I think it 507 00:27:02,200 --> 00:27:05,500 gets like a little interesting here, you're looking now, we're 508 00:27:05,500 --> 00:27:10,600 to the James Robinson, tear your in the Evan engram Jameson, 509 00:27:10,600 --> 00:27:14,100 William Jacobi Myers JD mckissick, and then you are to 510 00:27:14,100 --> 00:27:18,400 like, At Tyler higbee so we do like I mentioned that tight into 511 00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:20,400 your being flat. We mentioned that running back 512 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:24,500 to your we could win. It comes back to us in that 513 00:27:24,500 --> 00:27:27,200 round miss both that tight end and running back. 514 00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:30,900 Yeah so I mean I think I would make a case that after Gerald 515 00:27:30,900 --> 00:27:32,800 Everett, there's not a ton of know what a draft. 516 00:27:34,100 --> 00:27:36,900 I don't know, the whole rest, I mean, I think Casey's like 517 00:27:36,900 --> 00:27:41,100 higbee's totally fine. You know, why would you take him 518 00:27:41,100 --> 00:27:43,700 over a running back a comparable running back like Marlon Mac. 519 00:27:43,700 --> 00:27:45,400 I would way rather Either take Marlin back. 520 00:27:45,400 --> 00:27:49,100 Wait, yeah, I'm with you. I'd rather take Marlin Mac with 521 00:27:49,100 --> 00:27:51,400 this bill, for sure. I think part of it for me is, 522 00:27:51,600 --> 00:27:54,300 I'm comfortable pushing in a tight end because we have pits, 523 00:27:55,000 --> 00:27:57,000 right? Look, we made a huge bet on 524 00:27:57,000 --> 00:27:59,100 pits, totally comfortable, pushing it there. 525 00:27:59,100 --> 00:28:04,400 Like if we have to grab, you know, like Austin Hooper I don't 526 00:28:04,400 --> 00:28:08,000 like a great hidden her first. He can expect the Cincinnati 527 00:28:08,000 --> 00:28:12,300 thing. Logan Thomas, you know, his knee 528 00:28:12,300 --> 00:28:16,000 injuries, not great but like I mean, I think at some point is 529 00:28:16,008 --> 00:28:17,800 going to be there everywhere outside end again and then 530 00:28:17,800 --> 00:28:20,900 broken Jordan is like, you know, I think those guys like, if that 531 00:28:20,900 --> 00:28:25,000 has to be our time into not ideal, but I think that's fine. 532 00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:30,100 And then maybe we get a value in round 13 in my only thing with 533 00:28:30,100 --> 00:28:32,600 the kind of the tight end. And I'm not, I obviously want to 534 00:28:32,600 --> 00:28:35,200 like, tack on a second Titan, at some point, but you're almost 535 00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:37,000 having to hit a three leg parlay. 536 00:28:37,000 --> 00:28:39,700 Right? Because you're trying to, first 537 00:28:39,700 --> 00:28:43,200 of all, we have to nail pits, which I think we are based on 538 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:46,200 where we took him because we need him to be a flux play for 539 00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:47,800 us at that point. Not a tight end. 540 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:52,100 Then we need to hit the tight end pick late and they fill our 541 00:28:52,100 --> 00:28:54,600 tight end spot. And then on top of it we need 542 00:28:54,600 --> 00:28:58,600 our wide receivers to be weak because Pitts is displacing one 543 00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:00,600 of those wide receivers we're starting Weekly. 544 00:29:00,900 --> 00:29:02,500 Right? Because instead of starting four 545 00:29:02,500 --> 00:29:04,900 wide receivers were starting 3 plus pits. 546 00:29:05,100 --> 00:29:08,400 It just is like, it seems like a little bit of a thinner. 547 00:29:08,400 --> 00:29:11,300 Run out to me when you're making them. 548 00:29:11,300 --> 00:29:14,900 The receiver point is the same as the one for the Reason to 549 00:29:14,900 --> 00:29:17,000 take Claypool, we could be wrong, there's bias because it 550 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:18,900 be injuries. So you just sort of replacing 551 00:29:18,900 --> 00:29:21,900 that with a second tight end as that additional Flex? 552 00:29:21,900 --> 00:29:26,300 I should write, I guess, maybe. Maybe I have a blind spot, but 553 00:29:26,300 --> 00:29:31,900 I'm still just, like, thinking that the window tell me if you 554 00:29:31,900 --> 00:29:35,100 guys think this is a wrong take. But, like, in my head I'm like, 555 00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:39,000 when the wide receivers hit they hit in a more obvious way. 556 00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:41,600 Whereas, when the tight ends hit like, even in the seasons where 557 00:29:41,600 --> 00:29:44,600 fryer move hits, it still feels to me like it's going to be Like 558 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:47,600 pretty touchdown dependent and pretty volatile, like, he could 559 00:29:47,600 --> 00:29:50,700 have like a high touchdown season but like are we going to 560 00:29:50,700 --> 00:29:54,000 feel comfortable knowing when to start and hit those weeks? 561 00:29:55,700 --> 00:29:57,900 Probably not if he's in the bottle touchdown guy. 562 00:29:58,300 --> 00:30:01,700 I mean I hear that for sure. I think that the upside case for 563 00:30:01,700 --> 00:30:05,300 Farm because again this is your to take off kind of in a passing 564 00:30:05,300 --> 00:30:08,900 game that he becomes the second option is basically s clear 565 00:30:08,900 --> 00:30:10,800 option and some of the concerns I have it. 566 00:30:10,800 --> 00:30:13,700 I've said about Claypool actually proved to be pretty 567 00:30:13,700 --> 00:30:17,400 accurate and he gets 120 targets like I don't think that's out of 568 00:30:17,400 --> 00:30:19,400 the question around with YouTube. 569 00:30:20,200 --> 00:30:22,400 No I agree. I think that that's the upside. 570 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:24,400 That's the reason to take for our myth is that maybe you have 571 00:30:24,400 --> 00:30:29,100 a Breakout K strong rookie year, good draft Capital, decent 572 00:30:29,100 --> 00:30:33,100 enough Prospect. So that's that's definitely 573 00:30:33,100 --> 00:30:39,900 possible I guess like I mean, for me, like, if we ended up 574 00:30:39,900 --> 00:30:42,200 with like no joke, ooh, or something is our second tight 575 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:44,500 end. It was like, a really lame ATP 576 00:30:44,500 --> 00:30:47,000 here. I guess. 577 00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:50,300 I'm just like pretty comfortable with that, and I don't see it as 578 00:30:50,300 --> 00:30:52,500 like, huge. I want to be clear, you guys get 579 00:30:52,500 --> 00:30:55,000 B, VI Claypool like 15 minutes ago were third. 580 00:30:57,900 --> 00:31:00,100 I'm not really pounding the table for fryer. 581 00:31:03,900 --> 00:31:08,300 Yeah, that's a beauty because we do now, The game it out. 582 00:31:08,300 --> 00:31:10,000 We named it out. Yeah. 583 00:31:10,100 --> 00:31:13,000 Yeah. And I think, I think where we're 584 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:17,600 at in the reason it makes it a little easier as we kind of know 585 00:31:17,600 --> 00:31:20,700 that like we could just be in a gross spot in the 12th round, no 586 00:31:20,700 --> 00:31:24,200 matter what, you know like at any position, the 12th round 587 00:31:24,200 --> 00:31:28,700 could feel a little gross to us. Yeah it could but like I will 588 00:31:28,700 --> 00:31:32,000 say, you know, TDP 21% chance to come back. 589 00:31:32,000 --> 00:31:38,200 I was year 33, Khalil 41. It could happen, you don't wanna 590 00:31:38,200 --> 00:31:41,300 stay put for a long time. Could you could be at a gross 591 00:31:41,300 --> 00:31:50,400 pop and the other thing too, I mean, yeah, we did see like, on 592 00:31:50,400 --> 00:31:54,400 this side of the board, we finally saw a quarterback run, I 593 00:31:54,408 --> 00:31:59,300 mean the 1/1 hasn't taken a tight end yet, you know. 594 00:31:59,300 --> 00:32:02,700 They're you know, the 12 whole hasn't taken a tight end, like 595 00:32:02,700 --> 00:32:05,700 there is things that can push one of these guys down. 596 00:32:05,800 --> 00:32:07,600 Down to us. And that's where we, we hit the 597 00:32:07,600 --> 00:32:11,400 nuts if it's like we get say we take Claypool here. 598 00:32:11,400 --> 00:32:15,200 We get like a preferred Target at the 11th whether that's like 599 00:32:15,200 --> 00:32:18,300 a TDP or Spiller. And then like a Khalil Herbert 600 00:32:18,300 --> 00:32:21,100 or gain, well Falls to us in the 12th like that outcome is 601 00:32:21,100 --> 00:32:24,300 possible. Yeah, and that is that's the 602 00:32:24,300 --> 00:32:27,400 nuts and then we all do, you know to me? 603 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:30,700 It's like it just like makes the Singletary pick perfect. 604 00:32:30,700 --> 00:32:33,200 If then we take the Claypool value that we only took because 605 00:32:33,200 --> 00:32:35,600 we are going to get Singletary and then you know, we take 606 00:32:35,600 --> 00:32:38,200 Claypool because we're pushing it running back in then we get 607 00:32:38,200 --> 00:32:40,200 that running back to fall to us on the 12th. 608 00:32:40,800 --> 00:32:44,100 I mean it's kind of how you set yourself up for to feel really 609 00:32:44,100 --> 00:32:48,000 good about this trap. One thing I'm going to set you 610 00:32:48,000 --> 00:32:52,000 guys up for is if we take Claypool and some of those tight 611 00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:55,500 ends go Then we get into like an Austin Hooper first and actual 612 00:32:55,500 --> 00:32:57,900 upside running back discussion. Basically at any point 613 00:32:57,900 --> 00:33:00,600 throughout the way I'm probably going to argue that we just go 614 00:33:00,600 --> 00:33:03,000 one tight end because I think there are these backup Titans. 615 00:33:03,000 --> 00:33:05,900 Yeah emerge through August like I don't I don't think we have to 616 00:33:05,900 --> 00:33:07,300 leave this draft for the second tied up. 617 00:33:07,500 --> 00:33:09,800 If you just take as many running backs as we can, we know we're 618 00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:14,400 going to cut them, try to find this year's, you know, ambiguous 619 00:33:14,400 --> 00:33:17,400 Titan situation where like the Giants No One's Gonna draft 620 00:33:17,400 --> 00:33:20,500 Daniel Bellinger or Ricky Smith, Jones, or whoever, they might 621 00:33:20,500 --> 00:33:22,500 throw a lot. One of those guys gets the roll 622 00:33:22,600 --> 00:33:24,900 Well, alright, it's kind of interesting, you know, and maybe 623 00:33:24,900 --> 00:33:27,100 we make that pick up as our backup in the season. 624 00:33:27,400 --> 00:33:29,600 Have you ever heard of a guy named Greg dulcich? 625 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:34,100 I mean, it's kind of kind of, for real though. 626 00:33:36,800 --> 00:33:41,500 I'm completely with you. I have I have zero desire to 627 00:33:41,500 --> 00:33:44,600 force a Titan to pick, like I haven't even been thinking about 628 00:33:44,600 --> 00:33:45,800 tighten. It would just be if there was 629 00:33:45,800 --> 00:33:48,500 like this screaming value, where it's like, yeah, that's a that 630 00:33:48,500 --> 00:33:50,000 tear. And it's like holy shit. 631 00:33:50,100 --> 00:33:52,500 It's like we're choosing between JD mckissick. 632 00:33:52,600 --> 00:33:55,600 Take or you know, Gerald Everett or something, then I'm like, all 633 00:33:55,608 --> 00:33:58,600 right maybe maybe we take the Gerald Everett value here. 634 00:33:58,700 --> 00:34:03,500 Just knowing that the ceilings pretty high I guess I'm more 635 00:34:04,800 --> 00:34:08,100 intrigued by taking like, you know, like a bread and Jordan 636 00:34:08,100 --> 00:34:10,900 like I think brother Jordan is kind of got some upside as a 637 00:34:10,900 --> 00:34:14,000 second-year player who's now going to be in a larger role? 638 00:34:15,000 --> 00:34:17,800 Yeah, kind of like really cheap really cheap cost. 639 00:34:17,800 --> 00:34:21,500 Yeah. I think his ATP is 186, like, 640 00:34:21,500 --> 00:34:25,500 I'm talking about, you know, if he, if he happens to be there 641 00:34:25,699 --> 00:34:27,500 and, you know, when we don't feel great about the running 642 00:34:27,500 --> 00:34:30,699 backs, a guy like him, I think makes a lot of sense, but sure. 643 00:34:31,100 --> 00:34:33,300 But I'm also with you guys, we don't have to force that at all. 644 00:34:33,400 --> 00:34:35,699 You know, we probably are in a position where any upside at 645 00:34:35,699 --> 00:34:37,699 running back, is what we're going to be prioritizing as 646 00:34:37,699 --> 00:34:39,300 opposed. I was talking more that Dusty 647 00:34:39,300 --> 00:34:44,300 old, you know, I'll see ya in the one thing like I've, you 648 00:34:44,300 --> 00:34:47,300 know, we're gonna do chicken and I just I just scoop them up and 649 00:34:50,199 --> 00:34:53,100 over the years though. Like one of the things, the 650 00:34:53,100 --> 00:34:56,100 mantras I've internalized with ffp, C. 651 00:34:56,100 --> 00:35:00,600 Waivers is like running back to and streaming tight ends are 652 00:35:00,600 --> 00:35:03,000 ready. Available on the waiver wire. 653 00:35:03,100 --> 00:35:06,000 It's just like year after year there there. 654 00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:08,900 Yeah. And it doesn't if, if pits is a 655 00:35:08,900 --> 00:35:13,600 smash, it doesn't preclude us from drafting or picking up a 656 00:35:13,600 --> 00:35:16,300 tight end streamer off the waiver wire that we slide into 657 00:35:16,300 --> 00:35:18,200 the tight end. And then we Flex pits. 658 00:35:18,200 --> 00:35:22,000 Like, that is completely viable. And so I would almost rather not 659 00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:25,400 pay for it because the production that these mid-round 660 00:35:25,400 --> 00:35:27,700 tight ends are going to give us over a tight end. 661 00:35:27,700 --> 00:35:30,800 Streamer that we identify is that Gap, isn't that big? 662 00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:33,900 Big. This is a great but Pat Buttram 663 00:35:33,900 --> 00:35:36,300 how much we love. James ocean Odyssey and then did 664 00:35:36,300 --> 00:35:39,600 Arnold right after it. Like, whatever, Jacksonville 665 00:35:39,600 --> 00:35:41,800 tight ends up. I remember whenever I'm nothing. 666 00:35:41,800 --> 00:35:43,500 Evan engram, man. Yeah. 667 00:36:06,300 --> 00:36:08,500 Totally with you pee. Like there's no no reason to 668 00:36:08,508 --> 00:36:10,700 like freak out. Like a roster is not done when 669 00:36:10,700 --> 00:36:13,400 we when we finish this draft and you said the RV to in the tight 670 00:36:13,400 --> 00:36:17,500 end completely agree. Obviously, we took Kyle pits, 671 00:36:17,800 --> 00:36:22,400 all we took was Devon Singletary, so far the the bets 672 00:36:22,400 --> 00:36:27,300 we want to make prior to August. Lean more towards running back 673 00:36:27,300 --> 00:36:29,400 because that's where if we get an answer, it's a bigger. 674 00:36:29,400 --> 00:36:33,100 Yeah, yeah, yeah. And I do go back to the point 675 00:36:33,100 --> 00:36:36,400 Pat made like just, again, talking about value, you know, 676 00:36:36,400 --> 00:36:39,900 Claypool here, being, you know, 15 some pics after ATP. 677 00:36:39,900 --> 00:36:43,800 Like, I want to punish the room for passing on this guy that 678 00:36:43,800 --> 00:36:46,800 clearly fits their builds. And it's like, we're going to be 679 00:36:46,800 --> 00:36:51,000 able to recover our running back to way, way easier than you're 680 00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:53,500 going to be able to recover your wide receiver, four or five. 681 00:36:55,200 --> 00:37:00,600 Yeah, I I mean, no one is shocked to hear this, but I do 682 00:37:00,600 --> 00:37:02,500 struggle to understand you. If you got like four wide 683 00:37:02,500 --> 00:37:04,600 receivers James claypoole comes by. 684 00:37:04,600 --> 00:37:07,400 It's like, hey, I'm free in the 10th round like no, thanks. 685 00:37:08,300 --> 00:37:09,900 Yeah. Let's let's scoop him up. 686 00:37:09,900 --> 00:37:12,200 Let's go. If I were you, I would 687 00:37:12,200 --> 00:37:17,100 definitely be taking cheese. All right. 688 00:37:17,400 --> 00:37:19,400 Let's do it. Chase Claypool. 689 00:37:19,400 --> 00:37:22,500 Welcome to the squad. We are fucking jacked up at 690 00:37:22,500 --> 00:37:23,200 wide. Receiver. 691 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:26,300 The piss boys are back. Kyler Marie, Devin Singletary. 692 00:37:26,300 --> 00:37:30,600 Kyle pits at her. Onesies please, a petition to 693 00:37:30,600 --> 00:37:32,200 change. You have a PC to a single 694 00:37:32,200 --> 00:37:36,100 running back. Build barking barking, he's 695 00:37:36,100 --> 00:37:37,400 proud. Da gets. 696 00:37:37,400 --> 00:37:40,500 Chase Claypool Jamar chased about this myth, Rashad Bateman 697 00:37:40,500 --> 00:37:42,800 Garrett Wilson. If you are in our league, we 698 00:37:42,800 --> 00:37:45,200 will beat your ass at Wide Receiver, right? 699 00:37:45,200 --> 00:37:47,500 Fellas? That's that's our guarantee. 700 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:50,900 All right? Just you like top tier and David 701 00:37:50,900 --> 00:37:56,200 Price comes on. I will see you guys in the 11th. 702 00:37:56,200 --> 00:37:56,800 Peace out.