1 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:16,400 Alright guys, we are back for another minisode plugging away 2 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:19,900 here on our Series where we are drafting in the ffp, see main 3 00:00:19,900 --> 00:00:23,300 event, we kicked off a slow draft on the fourth of July, and 4 00:00:23,300 --> 00:00:25,800 we kind of talked through our decision process here. 5 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,800 Every round, when we are on the clock, we are officially on the 6 00:00:28,808 --> 00:00:32,400 clock here in the 11th. Round at the 11:05, I will recap 7 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:35,700 our team here for the audio listeners Jamar Chase, Kyle pits 8 00:00:35,700 --> 00:00:38,300 T Higgins. Marquis Brown, Rashad Bateman 9 00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:41,000 Kyler Murray. Devante Smith did take a running 10 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,100 back detour in the eighth for Devin Singletary. 11 00:00:43,300 --> 00:00:46,600 And then went back to piss in yellow Garrett, Wilson and Chase 12 00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:49,000 Claypool. And I think heading into this 13 00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:51,400 pic, we knew all along this was for sure. 14 00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:55,700 Going to be a running back pick for us and we definitely had 15 00:00:55,700 --> 00:00:59,000 some targets go, I'll pull up the draft board here for our 16 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:01,800 YouTube members. We You know, Damien Pierce, 17 00:01:01,800 --> 00:01:04,900 Isaiah Spiller Nike minds and Darrell Henderson. 18 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:08,900 All, go just on this rap here at the 1011 turn and some of those 19 00:01:08,900 --> 00:01:10,500 boys. They really stung? 20 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:13,300 Yeah, we were excited about Henderson but you identified 21 00:01:13,300 --> 00:01:17,700 this pocket a while back like around randomly took Singletary 22 00:01:17,700 --> 00:01:20,100 that this might be a running back running back turn, we 23 00:01:20,100 --> 00:01:22,400 really like the value on. Claypole, talked about that on 24 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:25,900 our last episode, let's filler and Henderson. 25 00:01:25,900 --> 00:01:27,900 I think we're too that we thought had three down upside 26 00:01:27,900 --> 00:01:30,900 and we're really looking at Heinz was one that That there's 27 00:01:30,900 --> 00:01:32,900 some other ways to play receiving backs a little bit 28 00:01:32,900 --> 00:01:35,700 later that we maybe wouldn't have gone with but they had her 29 00:01:35,700 --> 00:01:37,900 send someone that kind of hit us all the hardest, right? 30 00:01:38,700 --> 00:01:39,500 Yeah. Yeah. 31 00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:42,800 Hit me harder than the ones. I'll go ahead. 32 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:43,900 Pat. No good. 33 00:01:44,900 --> 00:01:48,400 No, I just gotta say it, it hit hard too because this team 34 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:51,100 three, you're looking at his structure, you know, he clearly 35 00:01:51,100 --> 00:01:53,000 values. These very high upside 36 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:54,500 handcuffs. You know, took Tony Pollard. 37 00:01:54,500 --> 00:01:57,400 Alexander Madison Spiller Henderson, guys all with massive 38 00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,400 contingent value. He's doing that on a team where 39 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:01,700 already has Christian. Caffrey Javonte Williams. 40 00:02:01,700 --> 00:02:04,800 And this little thin at wide receiver despite having roll the 41 00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:08,400 clip Sky more so they just kind of stung because it's like it's 42 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:11,800 just one of these pics is a wide receiver then we're getting, you 43 00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:15,300 know, a Heinz or a Henderson you know falling to us and he took 44 00:02:15,300 --> 00:02:16,900 Hopkins. Okay. 45 00:02:16,900 --> 00:02:19,600 Out of this for receiver. Yeah, it doesn't have a QB yet 46 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,900 and it's like, okay, it's so it's to. 47 00:02:22,900 --> 00:02:25,900 Yeah. He took a luxury pick on the one 48 00:02:25,900 --> 00:02:28,300 spot. He didn't actually need the like 49 00:02:29,300 --> 00:02:31,600 he could have even gone with the second side in with shelf. 50 00:02:33,100 --> 00:02:35,000 Yeah, so that one's that was a bummer and specifically 51 00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:37,700 Henderson. I think I agree with you that 52 00:02:37,700 --> 00:02:40,300 they of all the guys. I like him. 53 00:02:40,300 --> 00:02:43,700 The best in a vacuum and then also he gives you a little bit 54 00:02:43,700 --> 00:02:46,800 of that like Heinz profile where you're like maybe I can use him 55 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:50,000 right away. Yeah you know is as a bet that 56 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:55,100 Acres isn't fully back to what he was pre-injury and Then a lot 57 00:02:55,100 --> 00:02:59,900 of contingent value, you know, if Acres were to miss games. 58 00:02:59,900 --> 00:03:02,400 I mean, Henderson. We know, we know what the role 59 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,400 would be and he's talented enough to make, you know, a 60 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:09,200 productive starts in that role. So that's a big bummer. 61 00:03:09,700 --> 00:03:12,600 The other issue with this whole tier and I think one of the 62 00:03:12,608 --> 00:03:16,000 reasons I was leaning Claypool at the last pick is that like 63 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,300 outside of Henderson. I don't really have any 64 00:03:19,300 --> 00:03:20,600 favorites here. You know what? 65 00:03:20,600 --> 00:03:26,700 I kind of picking guys based on ATP and invest ball, kind of 66 00:03:26,700 --> 00:03:29,600 knowing that I'm going to be taking a lot of cracks on. 67 00:03:29,700 --> 00:03:33,500 These guys are sharing some of my exposures with you guys that 68 00:03:33,500 --> 00:03:36,400 I'm overweight on most of the guys that were going to talk 69 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:38,300 about. I'm actually underweight pretty 70 00:03:38,300 --> 00:03:41,700 heavily one of the guys that were discussing that maybe is 71 00:03:41,700 --> 00:03:43,500 just a leak that I should fix that. 72 00:03:43,500 --> 00:03:46,200 But in general, I'm pretty overweight this tier. 73 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:51,100 I mostly you know factoring in my Acts and just kind of 74 00:03:51,100 --> 00:03:54,100 whatever the room gives me. But obviously this is a main 75 00:03:54,100 --> 00:03:55,500 event wraps, we need to be right here. 76 00:03:55,500 --> 00:03:58,000 So I'm kind of struggling with who to take. 77 00:03:58,000 --> 00:03:59,500 No. Yeah. 78 00:03:59,500 --> 00:04:02,700 And I can just to let people know, just kind of based on ATP. 79 00:04:02,700 --> 00:04:05,500 And in the queue we are kind of in like a tight end and running 80 00:04:05,500 --> 00:04:08,000 back pocket here. I'll list off some of the names 81 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:10,300 at the top of the queue. As you know, best available by 82 00:04:10,300 --> 00:04:13,600 ATP might get sticky. Alberta kabuna, Michael, Carter. 83 00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:15,300 Matthew Stafford. The one quarterback hanging 84 00:04:15,300 --> 00:04:17,500 around there. Noah Fant Christian Watson. 85 00:04:17,500 --> 00:04:19,300 Really the one. Wide receiver hanging around and 86 00:04:19,300 --> 00:04:22,000 then you got Kenneth gain, well Hunter Henry tearing and Davis 87 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:24,500 price. Tyler LG are Gerald Everett and 88 00:04:24,500 --> 00:04:29,300 Khalil Herbert. So, you know, I think, you know, 89 00:04:29,300 --> 00:04:31,200 the running backs we've been kind of batting around. 90 00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:34,200 The names is Michael, Carter is Kenneth gain. 91 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:37,300 Well, is Terry and Davis price and Tyler algae or would you 92 00:04:37,308 --> 00:04:39,800 guys say that's kind of the four that are short list right now? 93 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:44,600 Yep. And we don't we don't we like to 94 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:47,800 see the merits of all for like I think I've lead them towards all 95 00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:52,400 for it very Sports. Oh my God. 96 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,800 Yeah, so I think like one of the things were wrestling with a 97 00:04:55,808 --> 00:04:58,700 little bit is kind of like the type of profile. 98 00:04:58,700 --> 00:05:02,400 We're looking in here and you know, I like Heinz, I like gain. 99 00:05:02,400 --> 00:05:06,500 Well, I think one of the points that grach has made about some 100 00:05:06,500 --> 00:05:09,200 of these later pass-catching targets that we might like that 101 00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:11,500 we think are undervalued maybe we don't have to hit that 102 00:05:11,500 --> 00:05:14,300 profile right now. Maybe we can take a bigger swing 103 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:17,600 and then our conversation in our disk or check kind of pivoted to 104 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:19,500 looking at like Tyrion Davis price. 105 00:05:19,500 --> 00:05:22,700 First, Tyler algae reverse. Carter kind of ruling out gain 106 00:05:22,700 --> 00:05:25,500 well and then trying to see who's kind of like the bigger 107 00:05:25,500 --> 00:05:28,800 upside swing here. And I still don't know if we've 108 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:31,100 really arrived at anything of a consensus. 109 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,600 Well I actually make you gain wall slightly differently. 110 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:38,900 I don't view him as like a satellite back necessarily 111 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:44,200 certainly that's like the Hope initially but I think I think 112 00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:46,900 kind of all these guys are contingents contingency 113 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:50,500 contingency based plays. I'm not sure the Carter has the 114 00:05:50,500 --> 00:05:53,700 level of Standalone value without a priest whole country 115 00:05:53,700 --> 00:05:57,000 to where we're actually enjoying starting him. 116 00:05:57,100 --> 00:05:59,300 Maybe we have to start them based on this build button. 117 00:06:00,100 --> 00:06:02,100 Like I don't know that he's out scoring a mckissick or 118 00:06:02,108 --> 00:06:05,000 something. If everything's just stable it's 119 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:07,300 more of that. If priests were to go down 120 00:06:07,300 --> 00:06:10,900 Carter is like you know kind of an every down running back, kind 121 00:06:10,900 --> 00:06:13,700 of like what Gio Bernard was in his rookie year. 122 00:06:15,300 --> 00:06:17,700 So and I kind of feel the same way about gain while. 123 00:06:17,700 --> 00:06:21,800 It's like if Sanders were to go down and gain, will consolidate 124 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:25,000 enough of the backfield, he has this receiving ability but also 125 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:29,200 has explosive rushing ability. You know, he could kind of be 126 00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:35,500 like A lead, a 1, a bat like an explosive one, a back is kind of 127 00:06:35,500 --> 00:06:40,700 his upside scenario tearing Davis price would do much better 128 00:06:40,800 --> 00:06:43,600 with Elijah Mitchell out of the way because he's kind of a 129 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:46,200 grinder type. But you know, could consolidate 130 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:50,300 touchdowns Tyler's years, probably the most like 131 00:06:50,300 --> 00:06:53,600 Standalone type of guy because the back ahead of him is really 132 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:57,200 kind of a wide receiver. So maybe he gets I think like 133 00:06:57,200 --> 00:06:59,700 Mike Davis had almost like it was like 190 touch. 134 00:06:59,900 --> 00:07:03,200 Has or something hundred and ninety opportunities targets 135 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:06,300 plus carries just a little bit above that last year. 136 00:07:06,300 --> 00:07:10,300 So that's the one. We're like Algeria could maybe 137 00:07:10,300 --> 00:07:13,700 take on that role and get a little extra because Davis was 138 00:07:13,700 --> 00:07:16,500 phased out as the year went on, because we so bad. 139 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:21,200 So in a weird way, the guy who doesn't really catch passes, I 140 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:23,500 was here, doesn't have like a grinder e yd brought one in 141 00:07:23,500 --> 00:07:25,000 college. He was like, okay is pass 142 00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:29,600 catcher but still probably more Batu down guy is a rookie But in 143 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:33,100 a weird way, I think he might be the best like Standalone value 144 00:07:33,100 --> 00:07:35,900 play. But obviously contingent value 145 00:07:35,900 --> 00:07:39,100 as well. One thing I'm looking at right 146 00:07:39,100 --> 00:07:44,500 now and trying to kind of game out is whether any of these guys 147 00:07:44,500 --> 00:07:47,900 can make it back. So we'll pick it 140 on the way 148 00:07:47,900 --> 00:07:49,200 back. It's a long way away. 149 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:54,300 They are the next four and ATP but working back Carter's atp's 150 00:07:54,300 --> 00:07:59,700 123 were already past that gain Wells, 131, 5-tier Davis, prices 151 00:07:59,700 --> 00:08:05,600 133, and Algiers 135 9. So basically, 136 for pics 152 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:08,600 before we pick again. Then he would seem to be the one 153 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:13,100 that has the shot to come all the way back and kill Herbert's. 154 00:08:13,100 --> 00:08:15,300 Right after that, we're not really considering him here, but 155 00:08:15,300 --> 00:08:18,800 peeve mentioned liking him. He's at 138 think there's a 156 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:21,400 possibility. One of these five makes it all 157 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:23,800 the way back certain like certainly a possibility. 158 00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:27,100 But the same time, I look at the board and I see a lot of tight 159 00:08:27,100 --> 00:08:30,000 ends on this side already. Checked off couple teams already 160 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:33,200 have to lot of quarterbacks already checked off one team 161 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:37,100 already has two, probably going to be a lot of receivers and 162 00:08:37,299 --> 00:08:42,200 Running backs in this next stretch, so I also don't know 163 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:44,900 that I feel comfortable than anyone's going to make it back. 164 00:08:44,900 --> 00:08:48,000 And one of the things I said, because initially sort of, as a 165 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:52,600 tie-break in my mind was that Carter is the one that I feel 166 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:55,700 very confident won't come back, gain will almost certainly won't 167 00:08:55,700 --> 00:08:57,900 either. I think after that with the, 168 00:08:57,900 --> 00:09:01,000 with the rookies, you're, you're not likely but there's maybe a 169 00:09:01,008 --> 00:09:03,100 possibility people aren't really into tearing Davis. 170 00:09:03,100 --> 00:09:07,500 Pricer, and Tyler algae here. And there a TPS Are a little 171 00:09:07,500 --> 00:09:09,600 lower so maybe those are. That's where we get to. 172 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:12,500 Like, maybe there's a shop you get this, you know, sliding 173 00:09:12,500 --> 00:09:15,100 value and get two of these guys still somehow. 174 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:20,500 But looking at the board I would say I'm not confident in that 175 00:09:20,500 --> 00:09:22,500 the fact that a lot of these guys have already hit the ones, 176 00:09:22,500 --> 00:09:26,100 he positions behind us. Yeah, I'm not confident either. 177 00:09:26,100 --> 00:09:28,200 I do agree with you. I think there's a chance, like, 178 00:09:28,500 --> 00:09:31,500 I would say, I mean, looking at the Explorer like for our next 179 00:09:31,500 --> 00:09:35,300 pick or the command center, it's given us about like an 8% chance 180 00:09:35,300 --> 00:09:39,400 that an LG row. Gives you a 16% that Herber is 181 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:43,100 there, I would say, like, my guess would be like a 20% chance 182 00:09:43,400 --> 00:09:46,000 analogy or Herbert, you know, Falls to us. 183 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:47,800 Maybe slightly better. I don't know. 184 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:50,200 It seems possible but not likely. 185 00:09:50,500 --> 00:09:52,900 Yeah, yeah. It probably takes somebody 186 00:09:52,900 --> 00:09:56,800 liking a running back later than them like going down to James 187 00:09:56,800 --> 00:10:01,100 Robinson for some reason. Yeah, in like he said, I mean, 188 00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:04,700 there's still a couple of these. I mean, the the seven whole 189 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:07,100 who's been, you know, structurally drafting pretty 190 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:09,200 Nicely. He only has three running backs. 191 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:13,500 The nine hole who kind of went away for from running backs. 192 00:10:13,500 --> 00:10:16,100 Only has three. So, like these guys are like 193 00:10:16,100 --> 00:10:19,100 Prime candidates to tack on their fourth running back. 194 00:10:19,100 --> 00:10:23,000 Same with Team, 11, potentially, fourth, and fifth 11 is like, 195 00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:29,400 yeah, yeah. So I do think with that is I'm 196 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:31,000 torn. I always love to try to play the 197 00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:33,900 ADP game, but I really do think we should probably just draft 198 00:10:33,900 --> 00:10:37,100 our favorite. That said, it doesn't seem like 199 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:39,900 We have I think like if this was just my own team and I was just 200 00:10:39,900 --> 00:10:41,900 like coming along, I think I'd be like shit. 201 00:10:41,900 --> 00:10:44,200 This is a girl spot and then take Terry and Davis price. 202 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:46,600 That's just like what I would do without much thought. 203 00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:49,500 Doesn't mean it's right. That's just kind of my like Snap 204 00:10:49,500 --> 00:10:53,000 like biggest swing here. Yeah, we all had kind of a 205 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:54,900 different Lane there, right? Because I think Pat, you said it 206 00:10:54,900 --> 00:10:57,200 would be kind of algier for you, for me. 207 00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:01,000 I did immediately sort of lean car, because he was good last 208 00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:03,500 year, obviously. Adding Breeze Hall is not great, 209 00:11:03,500 --> 00:11:06,100 they still have tied Johnson and Tevin Coleman in the backfield. 210 00:11:06,100 --> 00:11:10,000 It's not a great offense, it's not amazing, but he was a good 211 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:13,300 receiving back in college. I've been projecting them out as 212 00:11:13,300 --> 00:11:17,800 if Carter would catch, would lead in the on like third downs, 213 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:21,400 and catch more balls than Hall. Maybe, you know, Paul's not a 3D 214 00:11:21,500 --> 00:11:23,300 I'm back right away. We've seen that with some other 215 00:11:23,300 --> 00:11:24,300 rookies. I mean, even like, Jonathan 216 00:11:24,300 --> 00:11:27,400 Taylor when he came out. So, I'd be like a Taylor Hines, 217 00:11:27,400 --> 00:11:29,400 or might be like a Gibson mckissack a little bit. 218 00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:32,400 That's what Carter was in college to Javonte Williams, 219 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:33,000 right? Pat. 220 00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:35,900 Yeah, that's like exactly what he was. 221 00:11:35,900 --> 00:11:37,900 Yeah. So, yeah. 222 00:11:37,900 --> 00:11:41,300 I mean, that's, which is not. It may be, that's all he is. 223 00:11:41,300 --> 00:11:44,900 You've made the Geo calm and some of our little chats prior 224 00:11:44,900 --> 00:11:48,000 to this recording, and maybe that's because that he is, but 225 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:49,600 he had a little more than that last year. 226 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:55,000 If Hall were to go down, There's still like I think up the 227 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,700 contingent upside for, you know, scenarios for Carter probably 228 00:11:58,700 --> 00:12:02,100 and I actually should say he wasn't exactly like a Hinds in 229 00:12:02,100 --> 00:12:04,600 college because he was used as a director as well and it's pretty 230 00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:07,100 solid rusher. So yeah. 231 00:12:07,100 --> 00:12:10,900 I think of them kind of as a Geo type partly because like you 232 00:12:10,900 --> 00:12:13,700 know when Geo actually got the chances of rookie to be a rusher 233 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:18,700 He was pretty good but then the team immediately drafted Jeremy 234 00:12:18,700 --> 00:12:20,200 Hill. And we're like, no, you're a 235 00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:22,100 satellite back. And I feel like Carter's kind of 236 00:12:22,108 --> 00:12:25,600 the same thing where it's like if he's if he's forced into that 237 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:28,600 role for, you know, even if it's a two or three games stretch, I 238 00:12:28,608 --> 00:12:34,300 think will be really, really capable and and easy start for 239 00:12:34,300 --> 00:12:35,400 us. Yeah. 240 00:12:35,500 --> 00:12:38,300 But I don't think the teams ever really going to want that to be 241 00:12:38,300 --> 00:12:40,500 the case. Yeah, obviously now yeah. 242 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:43,000 And just kind of comparing another Market, we kind of 243 00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:45,600 talked about this. I had listened back to our mini 244 00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:47,800 talking about Marquis Brown, and we were kind of talking about 245 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:50,000 how he's going higher on Underdog over there. 246 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:53,500 And, you know, that we we trust that market a lot just because 247 00:12:53,500 --> 00:12:56,500 there's so much, you know, liquidity and drafts over there 248 00:12:56,500 --> 00:12:58,500 and it's a pretty good gauge of things. 249 00:12:58,500 --> 00:13:01,300 And so kind of just looking at this running back pocket on 250 00:13:01,300 --> 00:13:04,300 Underdog, it is interesting. Carter is definitely in like a 251 00:13:04,300 --> 00:13:09,000 teepee tear ahead of algier Tyrion Davis price in these 252 00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:12,200 other guys were talking about here and which is interesting to 253 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:14,300 me because Carter I do think you're hanging your hat. 254 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:17,900 On the pass catching a little bit more with him. 255 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,100 And of course Half Point PPR versus the full PPR here. 256 00:13:21,100 --> 00:13:24,800 So and he does have the highest ATP here as well. 257 00:13:26,900 --> 00:13:29,200 I'm definitely like coming around on him. 258 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:32,400 Just if if we do think there's a 20% chance, we could get an 259 00:13:32,400 --> 00:13:34,300 algae or Tyrion Davis price coming back. 260 00:13:34,300 --> 00:13:37,900 I'm like, kind of inclined to do Carter and see if one of those 261 00:13:37,900 --> 00:13:42,100 guys comes back, I will say just pull, it was game log because I 262 00:13:42,100 --> 00:13:46,100 am very torn as well like I'm I'm certainly like leaning, 263 00:13:46,100 --> 00:13:48,100 Carter. I mean, none of us is really 264 00:13:48,100 --> 00:13:50,200 advocating for Gabriel. He might be the one that we all 265 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:52,400 are both comfortable with. Like kabaddi might be like all 266 00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:55,300 of our number two, I don't know. But like he's I think we don't 267 00:13:55,300 --> 00:13:57,600 know who my number one is but I'm pretty sure game holds my 268 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:06,200 number two right. But I looked up Carter's game 269 00:14:06,200 --> 00:14:09,000 log, he had eight games with double-digit carries last year. 270 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:11,200 Three more with nine, another one with eight. 271 00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:14,300 He actually had two games with fewer than eight carries. 272 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:16,800 Saying, you know, coaching staff. 273 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:22,800 I mean is there a scenario where like he and Bruce Hall or kind 274 00:14:22,800 --> 00:14:27,500 of closer to 5050 on carries? Obviously last year? 275 00:14:27,500 --> 00:14:28,600 Breeze Hall wasn't in the offense. 276 00:14:28,700 --> 00:14:32,600 I mean, huge caveat. Well one other thing too and is 277 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:35,800 also thinking about week and we I always kind of think of the 278 00:14:35,800 --> 00:14:39,600 Jonathan Taylor Knight him Hines Dynamic to early on where they 279 00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:43,000 were easing in briefs hall or sorry Jonathan Taylor a little 280 00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:44,700 bit. I do think it's safe to say like 281 00:14:44,700 --> 00:14:46,800 they're not just going to turn Bruce Hall into a full-blown 282 00:14:46,800 --> 00:14:49,700 Bell cow. Back week, one in like, the way 283 00:14:49,700 --> 00:14:53,000 this team is set up as a 0 or B build like with Singletary, 284 00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:56,000 giving us a fast start. Like maybe there is a benefit to 285 00:14:56,000 --> 00:15:00,400 where we get contingent upside with Carter but he might just 286 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:03,700 have a little more work right out of the gate, just, you know, 287 00:15:03,700 --> 00:15:05,400 kind of Veteran the federal government. 288 00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:07,400 Yeah. Yeah. 289 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:10,600 I mean, like, as we make the like, then he Minds comparison 290 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:12,600 or like you know, other passing backs. 291 00:15:12,600 --> 00:15:15,400 Like Heinz is not a guy who's gotten I mean he's had 10 karat 292 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:19,400 games, but that type of rushing Were you after I think Carter 293 00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:22,400 must average 10 carries a game last year and it's games played 294 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:26,100 that's a little bit different. It's the you know you said 295 00:15:26,100 --> 00:15:28,800 satellite baggett's the satellite back you know plus or 296 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:32,800 whatever you rang the Saints the there's a little bit of the 297 00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:35,300 rushing. Yeah. 298 00:15:35,300 --> 00:15:38,200 Ten-and-a-half attempts a game in his 14 games played last 299 00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:40,100 year. He ran 147 times. 300 00:15:40,100 --> 00:15:43,100 He again he was the lead back last year, it's different for 301 00:15:43,100 --> 00:15:44,700 sure. I don't even think I would 302 00:15:44,700 --> 00:15:49,700 expect this amount. Over seven like it's Mike Davis, 303 00:15:49,700 --> 00:15:52,400 Stevie right? We're like you'd expect him to 304 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:54,800 get it's not. He wouldn't be my Davidson 305 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:58,000 Carolina where he's playing the CMC role, but I think it'd be 306 00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:02,300 like similar dish where he'd probably be getting enough 307 00:16:02,300 --> 00:16:05,700 targets or it was pretty sweet pea and then sufficient rushing, 308 00:16:05,700 --> 00:16:08,300 on top of that like he's a capable Russia where they're not 309 00:16:08,300 --> 00:16:11,500 going to like just have Ty Johnson come in as like a to 310 00:16:11,500 --> 00:16:13,600 down grinder or whatever or Tevin Coleman. 311 00:16:13,900 --> 00:16:16,000 It's kind of interesting to to, like part. 312 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:20,900 Again I'm definitely not trying to steer steer us this way too 313 00:16:20,900 --> 00:16:24,500 much but part of the appeal for tuned, a surprise for me was the 314 00:16:24,500 --> 00:16:26,100 Niners. Tend to use multiple backs. 315 00:16:26,100 --> 00:16:29,000 I do think he's going to have a role as sort of like the the 316 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:31,200 grinder alongside Elijah Mitchell, right? 317 00:16:31,500 --> 00:16:34,000 That the size of that role will be interesting because, like, 318 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:36,300 you still have Jeff Wilson, are these kind of competing with for 319 00:16:36,300 --> 00:16:39,100 that role and I guess Trea sermon you have trained, Lance 320 00:16:39,100 --> 00:16:40,700 probably getting some design carries. 321 00:16:40,700 --> 00:16:43,700 You potentially stop Debo rushing some and Elijah Mitchell 322 00:16:43,700 --> 00:16:46,600 still probably, you know, kind of get plenty of work. 323 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:52,200 But the Jets sort of the have a coaching staff that came from 324 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:55,000 San Fran and sort of did that last year like a little bit with 325 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:57,200 multiple backs. Like they saw it as a multiple 326 00:16:57,200 --> 00:16:59,800 back committee. You can kind of make the same 327 00:16:59,800 --> 00:17:02,800 argument about the tearing Davis price thing for Carter as that 328 00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:05,300 number 2 in his running back room, that this is a team that 329 00:17:05,300 --> 00:17:08,400 might split a little bit. Maybe priests Halls workload, 330 00:17:08,400 --> 00:17:11,800 won't be massive halt. I mean, I still really like, I'm 331 00:17:11,808 --> 00:17:14,200 not trying to like I'm basically making a case that gets out on 332 00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:16,700 Hall and I'm drafting also doesn't make any sense, right? 333 00:17:16,700 --> 00:17:20,300 It's it like, Hall's upside, is that but scenario-based, right? 334 00:17:20,300 --> 00:17:22,599 Like you're our scenarios were Hall fails. 335 00:17:23,099 --> 00:17:26,300 I'm drafting Hall to, but there are centers where he fails, I 336 00:17:26,300 --> 00:17:29,600 think, what makes it hard to and why the Henderson one sting so 337 00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:32,000 much. As Henderson had, just the 338 00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:35,500 obvious contingent values. Not to mention like we were 339 00:17:35,500 --> 00:17:38,900 saying the benefits of hey maybe Acres just isn't fully ready. 340 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:41,500 He gets a lot of work out of the gate, but I mean just a home. 341 00:17:41,500 --> 00:17:44,200 Run contingent play. We can poke holes in the 342 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,500 contingent value of all these guys were discussing. 343 00:17:46,500 --> 00:17:49,300 We were saying, you know, Ted Coleman or tied Johnson eating 344 00:17:49,300 --> 00:17:51,600 in Jeff Wilson, eating into tearing David Price. 345 00:17:51,600 --> 00:17:54,600 Who knows what the Falcons are going to Cobble together, you 346 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:56,300 know, with Patterson and whoever else. 347 00:17:56,300 --> 00:17:59,800 So it's just not clear contingent value which does make 348 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:03,400 me think should we just be taking the biggest high upside 349 00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:05,000 swing? That's why I kind of come back 350 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:07,500 to Tyrion Davis price. Just knowing like we have zero 351 00:18:07,500 --> 00:18:09,500 questions about the effectiveness of that running 352 00:18:09,500 --> 00:18:14,900 game, but it's tough. I don't have it, I don't have an 353 00:18:14,900 --> 00:18:19,000 answer. So pop over you leave, I don't 354 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:22,100 really agree there about the contingent value is Carter, I 355 00:18:22,100 --> 00:18:24,800 think Carter has legit contingent value. 356 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:27,600 He was like he was good last year we had one point four eight 357 00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:31,500 yards per hour on that was what DeAndre Swift had last year. 358 00:18:31,500 --> 00:18:35,300 I had 26 percent Breakaway percentage that was one percent 359 00:18:35,300 --> 00:18:39,500 higher than Javonte Williams. He was pretty elusive, not 360 00:18:39,500 --> 00:18:42,800 quite, as elusive, as those guys, you know, pretty solid 361 00:18:43,300 --> 00:18:48,200 more loosen the Christian McCaffrey So yeah, I mean to me 362 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:50,800 like, Carter was impressive in his rookie season. 363 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:55,200 If they had not drafted priests Hall, I would be really excited 364 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:58,000 about him. I would I'm trying to figure out 365 00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:00,500 where I'd be taking him but like I'd rather have them then 366 00:19:00,500 --> 00:19:06,700 Antonio Gibson, you know, to me, probably, he probably wouldn't 367 00:19:06,700 --> 00:19:10,000 go much after we res Halls is going like, I'd probably 368 00:19:10,000 --> 00:19:13,600 fifth-round pick in this. In this draft would be a price 369 00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:15,900 too steep for me to actually pay but I would have been like yeah, 370 00:19:16,100 --> 00:19:19,300 That seems that seems fine. So I don't know. 371 00:19:19,300 --> 00:19:22,800 Okay, I think that's kind of what you're getting if if he's 372 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:26,300 the starter. So and you had some comments in 373 00:19:26,300 --> 00:19:29,500 our chat earlier about Davis price, I had the impression that 374 00:19:29,500 --> 00:19:31,600 he was like a really good athlete but that he was maybe 375 00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:36,700 not as good of a prospectus. So what as you say that like I 376 00:19:36,700 --> 00:19:41,400 think again like what would David Price in Algiers part of 377 00:19:41,400 --> 00:19:46,600 the Part of the appeal taken a rookie running back here is the 378 00:19:46,600 --> 00:19:52,600 huge wide band of outcomes. They can be really good, right? 379 00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:58,300 But you they're not in a tearing dates prices in a good situation 380 00:19:58,300 --> 00:20:00,600 algae or not necessarily a great situation. 381 00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:05,700 But you just basically describe their upside scenario, it's 382 00:20:05,700 --> 00:20:08,100 like, Michael Michael Carter already was really good and a 383 00:20:08,100 --> 00:20:10,300 lot of the advanced stuff, right? 384 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:12,700 Yeah. Now he had a really good rookie 385 00:20:12,700 --> 00:20:16,900 season like I didn't think he was as good a prospect is Kenny 386 00:20:16,900 --> 00:20:19,800 gain well, but he had a better rookie season than Kenny game. 387 00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:22,600 Well, can you give me a lecture? Was pretty good on limited 388 00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:24,100 touches. He had one point five, three 389 00:20:24,100 --> 00:20:26,800 yards per hour run slightly better than Carter wasn't quite 390 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:31,800 as good as a rusher and obviously the team seemed like 391 00:20:31,900 --> 00:20:34,800 less interested in him. Although you know, after 392 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:38,000 drafting Bruce Hall that cases in super strong for Carter 393 00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:40,500 either. But yeah, I think I think it's a 394 00:20:40,508 --> 00:20:44,800 little cleaner for Carter than gain well and after Rookie 395 00:20:44,800 --> 00:20:48,600 season and the prospect profile stuff that kind of evens out I 396 00:20:48,600 --> 00:20:52,100 shared with you guys. The graph from Anthony Miko's 397 00:20:52,100 --> 00:20:57,500 tool that basically shows like, you know, game walls, got a 398 00:20:57,508 --> 00:21:01,000 lower floor and then it comes up and then Carter kind of through 399 00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:04,000 like most of the distribution that you want is like Mom much 400 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:08,700 much more outcomes, its much meteor. 401 00:21:09,100 --> 00:21:12,600 And then you get to like the super, super tail and outcomes 402 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:15,300 that are good. And it's like All gained well, 403 00:21:15,300 --> 00:21:18,000 and that does feel like intuitively right to me where 404 00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:21,400 like if gain well is the prospect of it looked like he 405 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:25,500 could be, which is this explosive rusher really really 406 00:21:25,500 --> 00:21:29,000 strong in yards per outrun. Big play threat through the air 407 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:33,900 and on the ground. If he basically like Takes Over 408 00:21:33,900 --> 00:21:36,300 The Back Field, whether you know, let's say a Sanders 409 00:21:36,300 --> 00:21:39,600 injury, and gain will get some run and he looks awesome. 410 00:21:40,100 --> 00:21:42,300 You know, this is an offense that could support a really 411 00:21:42,300 --> 00:21:45,800 efficient rushing attack with with It hurts, you know so you 412 00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:48,700 get this explosive little bit undersized but very explosive 413 00:21:48,700 --> 00:21:52,400 back. Like you can dream one gain. 414 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:54,800 Well, in a way that I can't really dream on Carter. 415 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:58,700 Even if Bruce Hall goes down Carter's in his acquisition 416 00:21:58,700 --> 00:22:01,700 offense and Zack wasn't really throw the running back that much 417 00:22:01,700 --> 00:22:04,600 and they're not scoring a ton of points and it's just he's gonna 418 00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:07,400 be fine star for us but he's not as fun game on that. 419 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:14,000 Like 98% 99th percentile outcome is pretty fun but I don't know. 420 00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:17,200 I mean I think like maybe that the 80th isn't even that fun. 421 00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:19,200 So that's kind of what I struggle with there. 422 00:22:22,900 --> 00:22:24,800 I'm nowhere closer to a decision. 423 00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:32,400 I know, I do think if we are so kind of hands up in the air, I 424 00:22:32,400 --> 00:22:36,900 do think we should probably just play the ATP play, the ATP game 425 00:22:36,900 --> 00:22:40,300 and take Carter and see if one of these guys just Miracle, 426 00:22:40,300 --> 00:22:45,000 makes it back to us. That's where Eileen Eileen one 427 00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:50,200 of Carter or gain. Well, because the other two guys 428 00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:54,500 have such lower atp's, but and game, right game called has 429 00:22:54,500 --> 00:22:56,700 basically no chance to get back. Yeah. 430 00:22:56,700 --> 00:22:59,700 And I, we can't even break a teammate correlation on that 431 00:22:59,700 --> 00:23:02,500 because we have gained well with Devon to Smith and Gary Wilson. 432 00:23:02,500 --> 00:23:05,000 Michael Carson is hilarious. They're either like the exact 433 00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:07,200 same thing where like it's sort of a bed against the widest 434 00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:10,000 river one, if you want to say, it's correlated like they could 435 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:12,700 be upside scenarios for the wide receiver to that also relate to 436 00:23:12,700 --> 00:23:14,300 the running. Others, running back to you 437 00:23:14,300 --> 00:23:16,100 like, but like it's exact same scenario. 438 00:23:16,100 --> 00:23:17,800 It's a wide receiver. Do running back to. 439 00:23:19,900 --> 00:23:24,000 Yeah, I was looking at that too. But yeah, Carter is going 8.2 440 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:31,500 pics before gain. Well, 10 picks before TDP 12.6 441 00:23:31,500 --> 00:23:35,100 before algier? And you can get us a reasonable 442 00:23:35,100 --> 00:23:37,900 time. Secret value, hands to tie 443 00:23:37,900 --> 00:23:42,400 Breakers that I can think of is. Yeah, so one would be who's 444 00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,400 actually going later and ffp, see because we're going to draft 445 00:23:45,400 --> 00:23:47,700 a bunch of these. So, you know, if it's going to 446 00:23:47,700 --> 00:23:50,000 be harder for us to get card, or maybe we should take Carter 447 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:51,400 because he's going a little earlier. 448 00:23:51,400 --> 00:23:54,400 But then the other type, very good would be just either of 449 00:23:54,408 --> 00:23:58,100 these guys have the potential really move up in drafts, in a 450 00:23:58,108 --> 00:24:00,400 big way and that would go the other way. 451 00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:02,900 I think like game was the only one who could move up. 452 00:24:02,900 --> 00:24:06,000 I don't know if it's Not likely, but is not hard. 453 00:24:06,700 --> 00:24:12,300 I think, I think, I think TDP can definitely do people Bop 454 00:24:12,700 --> 00:24:15,700 just with how excited people get about the Niners and you can 455 00:24:15,700 --> 00:24:19,900 already see, I mean, old old fantasy Community would be 456 00:24:19,900 --> 00:24:22,000 drafting like Eli Mitchell and the fourth round. 457 00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:24,300 And they're like showing restraint just because they're 458 00:24:24,300 --> 00:24:29,600 like, respecting both TDP and Shanahan Shenanigans, which is 459 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:32,100 like the market is definitely gotten Smarter with that. 460 00:24:33,700 --> 00:24:36,400 Gain. Well, it feels like we had Mi 461 00:24:36,400 --> 00:24:39,300 Sanders literally come out the other day and say, don't draft 462 00:24:39,300 --> 00:24:42,500 me and like gay, dwells ATP didn't really budge or anything 463 00:24:42,500 --> 00:24:43,700 everyone. Just like, yeah, this give you a 464 00:24:43,700 --> 00:24:45,700 gross committee, I don't want anything to do with it. 465 00:24:46,500 --> 00:24:49,700 So it's what's your, what's your TMP sort of bull case? 466 00:24:49,700 --> 00:24:53,800 Like he's getting goal line work, he's like, Shanahan was, 467 00:24:53,800 --> 00:24:56,400 the coach went out for Morris was great with Robert Griffin. 468 00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:01,500 Like, he's the physical back, the event that benefits from the 469 00:25:01,500 --> 00:25:04,400 rushing efficiency boost when you have a And quarterback 470 00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:07,000 because demons have to respect Lance you know they're doing 471 00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:09,400 some read option. Is that sort of like you're 472 00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:12,500 thinking might be a pretty efficient Runner and my bull 473 00:25:12,500 --> 00:25:16,100 case is almost just purely contingent like if Eli Mitchell 474 00:25:16,100 --> 00:25:18,700 stays fully healthy. I don't really see super 475 00:25:18,700 --> 00:25:22,900 high-end outcomes for TDP but if like, Eli Mitchell does what 476 00:25:22,900 --> 00:25:26,200 where he most her did in the first game last year and was 477 00:25:26,200 --> 00:25:28,800 out? Like the runway could just be 478 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:32,400 massive for TDP, you know, being the lead guy there. 479 00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:35,700 Obviously Jeff Wilson, wouldn't go away. 480 00:25:35,700 --> 00:25:38,100 But like what do you guys think? Like couldn't you see if if you 481 00:25:38,108 --> 00:25:42,700 like Mitchell got her like TDP, 70% of the touches to like Jeff 482 00:25:42,700 --> 00:25:48,000 Wilson, 30% kind of thing. I could see it like yeah, yeah. 483 00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:50,900 I could also see it go the other way, but I think you could maybe 484 00:25:50,900 --> 00:25:53,200 see sermon there involved as well. 485 00:25:53,700 --> 00:25:54,600 Yeah, you know. Yeah. 486 00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:57,200 See I think that's whatever. Is you look at, like, if you 487 00:25:57,200 --> 00:25:59,300 look at like, Carter I feel I mean even gain. 488 00:25:59,300 --> 00:26:02,200 Well, I feel like, Boston, Scott could get in there like the 489 00:26:02,200 --> 00:26:04,100 shirt. If you think, I think of Carters 490 00:26:04,100 --> 00:26:07,400 mentioned, we started, they might they could sign Jordan, 491 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:11,900 Howard off the street if yeah, the Eagles, I mean, yeah, Carter 492 00:26:11,900 --> 00:26:14,300 feels like because he had such a good rookie year because they 493 00:26:14,300 --> 00:26:16,600 took him in the second round. Last year and played him and he 494 00:26:16,600 --> 00:26:19,100 was good and then they added haul it all. 495 00:26:19,100 --> 00:26:22,000 It feels like they just like both like a to back system, 496 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:26,000 maybe not necessarily they hate Carter but maybe they do hate 497 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:27,300 card. I mean, who knows. 498 00:26:27,300 --> 00:26:31,400 But it feels to me more like the 70/30 thing with the other backs 499 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:33,600 feels easier to project with Carter. 500 00:26:35,900 --> 00:26:40,200 But yeah, but yeah, if we need ya we need an injury to. 501 00:26:40,300 --> 00:26:43,000 I mean because the thing with Carter that's difficult is like 502 00:26:43,700 --> 00:26:47,900 there's no path. That doesn't involve upper Esau 503 00:26:47,900 --> 00:26:51,700 injuries, it's all doing Travis etn last year and getting hurt. 504 00:26:51,700 --> 00:26:54,700 Yes that's the only witch then I mean then I do think Carter's 505 00:26:54,700 --> 00:26:57,100 probably like a sixth-round pick. 506 00:26:57,700 --> 00:27:01,400 So There would be some some value in that. 507 00:27:01,400 --> 00:27:07,200 But yeah, it's just not as it's not a sexy feeling like you 508 00:27:07,200 --> 00:27:11,200 can't he's not talented enough to displace the starter and he's 509 00:27:11,200 --> 00:27:13,300 not talented enough. That if the starter went down, 510 00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:16,200 he'd be a pick in the first round. 511 00:27:16,200 --> 00:27:20,600 So it's like you're kind of, you know, it isn't, it isn't a home 512 00:27:20,600 --> 00:27:24,400 run cut, although to get a guy, you know, if that were to happen 513 00:27:24,400 --> 00:27:27,200 to get a guy in the 11th, who would be kind of a plug-and-play 514 00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:30,100 starter for us, out of the gate would still be Be a home run. 515 00:27:30,100 --> 00:27:33,100 So, yeah, and that's our purpose here. 516 00:27:33,700 --> 00:27:38,200 Roto virus has the tool that has that pulls in the FPC drafts. 517 00:27:38,200 --> 00:27:45,600 There's been 13 main events so far, obviously, we're one of 518 00:27:45,600 --> 00:27:48,000 them. The Gap. 519 00:27:48,100 --> 00:27:50,900 In ATP is closer in the main defense. 520 00:27:50,900 --> 00:27:53,500 So far, let me find it because I just looked it up. 521 00:27:53,500 --> 00:27:57,900 It looked closer. Carter's one twenty eight point 522 00:27:57,900 --> 00:28:02,200 eight so far gain well tearing Dave's price right behind him so 523 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:06,400 he's been drafted 19. June has been drafted 81 29.5 524 00:28:06,400 --> 00:28:10,500 lesson and pick behind him. Algeria one 29.6 right behind 525 00:28:10,500 --> 00:28:12,600 that game. Well one 30.8. 526 00:28:12,600 --> 00:28:14,700 So this draft form a BP were looking at. 527 00:28:14,900 --> 00:28:18,100 They're actually all within two spots in the 8. 528 00:28:18,500 --> 00:28:21,100 Main events that have got it. So screw this ATP game 529 00:28:21,100 --> 00:28:24,500 everything that we said is out the window start over with one 530 00:28:24,500 --> 00:28:28,700 out, and I can't work That said I need I literally don't care at 531 00:28:28,700 --> 00:28:30,800 this point. I will capitulate to any 532 00:28:30,800 --> 00:28:34,000 argument. Oh my God, they're super close. 533 00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:36,900 That does concern me. He's going later in. 534 00:28:38,100 --> 00:28:41,100 The main event so far. The small small sample. 535 00:28:43,800 --> 00:28:46,900 That I mean yeah. Alright we're only getting one 536 00:28:46,900 --> 00:28:48,700 of these for. Yeah. 537 00:28:48,700 --> 00:28:51,400 Who are you 14? Get let's say let's just let's 538 00:28:51,400 --> 00:28:53,600 just do it. We don't have this as it doesn't 539 00:28:53,600 --> 00:28:55,900 have to be. We all break them Wonder for and 540 00:28:55,900 --> 00:29:01,200 then average it Yeah, maybe we should do that. 541 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:05,300 Like, all right, not, not 80, he ain't, but just like, you are 542 00:29:05,300 --> 00:29:08,400 only getting one. What is your preference? 543 00:29:08,700 --> 00:29:11,200 Wait. All right, let's let's, let's 544 00:29:11,200 --> 00:29:13,500 write ours down. All right, give me a minute 545 00:29:14,700 --> 00:29:26,500 actually. I feel like I'm playing a lot 546 00:29:26,500 --> 00:29:28,000 and thinks. All right, I have my answer. 547 00:29:30,700 --> 00:29:54,200 Hang on. I don't know what my answers 548 00:29:54,200 --> 00:30:01,400 are. I used to think of that. 549 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:08,900 Yeah, I still think that I don't fucking know what I want. 550 00:30:12,400 --> 00:30:17,200 All right, let me do it. Like, it's all right. 551 00:30:18,100 --> 00:30:18,900 Okay. Drago. 552 00:30:18,900 --> 00:30:20,400 Another. I don't even know if it's my 553 00:30:20,400 --> 00:30:22,500 actual answer. All right. 554 00:30:22,500 --> 00:30:24,800 What's our scoring system? So we could have just a clean 555 00:30:24,800 --> 00:30:26,100 ending to this. What? 556 00:30:27,200 --> 00:30:29,300 Four, three, two pocket. Our three? 557 00:30:29,300 --> 00:30:30,200 Two one. Yeah. 558 00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:36,100 Okay. What George are we going? 559 00:30:49,800 --> 00:30:52,200 I stuck to my comment. That I would put gain will to, 560 00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:56,300 I've TDP three Carter gain. Well, TD P. 561 00:30:56,300 --> 00:31:01,500 LG or was mine. I have to. 562 00:31:01,800 --> 00:31:07,400 So what's you had Carter won? No, I've heard Ben had Carter 563 00:31:07,400 --> 00:31:10,800 one. I did I stuck in Carter one wins 564 00:31:10,800 --> 00:31:13,000 because I had car talk to and you had Carter to. 565 00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:16,300 All right? So that's our product. 566 00:31:16,400 --> 00:31:20,400 I don't feel good about that. I just pressed, I just press 567 00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:24,700 select, so we could wait. So what if you incur who's your 568 00:31:24,700 --> 00:31:26,800 10? You had Algebra 1 Algebra? 569 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:35,300 I adore you, I just came out to me is like So I'm just not. 570 00:31:35,500 --> 00:31:39,200 I'm like, I have 18% of GDP in Festival Mania. 571 00:31:39,200 --> 00:31:41,700 I'm not feeding him. I feel better about it says 572 00:31:41,700 --> 00:31:43,500 he's, he don't have a stack with him. 573 00:31:43,500 --> 00:31:46,100 It's like the one team we didn't have a stack so that's how I 574 00:31:46,100 --> 00:31:46,700 broke. Yeah. 575 00:31:47,100 --> 00:31:48,700 I feel better about going T to Pete. 576 00:31:48,700 --> 00:31:51,400 You made some compelling arguments but if Pat was also 577 00:31:52,100 --> 00:31:55,600 well, honestly the thing that these are vinyl fabric is just 578 00:31:55,600 --> 00:32:00,200 yeah the situation is awesome but I do it is like sobering 579 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:03,200 when you know Pat saying he's just like not actually that 580 00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:06,900 interesting of a As far as like from an athletic standpoint and 581 00:32:06,900 --> 00:32:09,900 stuff like that, like it's it's more when you dive into the 582 00:32:09,900 --> 00:32:13,100 specifics like if you just look from a macro lens he's got 583 00:32:13,100 --> 00:32:17,700 decent size here and a sub. 45 40, he's in a system where like, 584 00:32:17,700 --> 00:32:19,600 you don't need to be the best running back Prospect in the 585 00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:22,900 world and some film evaluators really liked him. 586 00:32:23,000 --> 00:32:25,500 So any he was a what, add a toothpick. 587 00:32:25,500 --> 00:32:29,800 So, I mean, you don't have to overthink it beyond that and 588 00:32:29,800 --> 00:32:31,000 invest my money. I'm not. 589 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:33,400 But if you do you dive into look his Breakaway percentage, it 590 00:32:33,400 --> 00:32:35,400 sucked yards. Iran is atrocious. 591 00:32:35,700 --> 00:32:38,700 So some of the other stuff that I like makes him seem more like 592 00:32:38,700 --> 00:32:42,000 a little bit of a lower ceiling type of type of that ultimately 593 00:32:42,000 --> 00:32:45,200 long-term Dynasty with. All right I need to go to bed. 594 00:32:45,200 --> 00:32:48,100 This is another classic 32-bit it did he sewed? 595 00:32:48,300 --> 00:32:51,000 Don't ever say that. We don't provide you guys who 596 00:32:51,000 --> 00:32:54,700 hit back cross side. Seriously, we will be back in 597 00:32:54,700 --> 00:32:56,700 the 12th round. Hopefully, with an easier 598 00:32:56,700 --> 00:32:58,500 decision. If you guys are listening to the 599 00:32:58,500 --> 00:33:01,000 audio of this on the ship chasing podcast feed, you can 600 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:03,900 get access to the video versions of these, which also released 601 00:33:04,000 --> 00:33:05,500 much. Earlier, if you guys want to see 602 00:33:05,500 --> 00:33:08,000 what we're up to in these drafts, that is for YouTube 603 00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:10,700 members. So, for Gretsch, for Pat, I'm 604 00:33:10,700 --> 00:33:13,000 Pete, Michael Carter. Welcome to the squad.