1
00:00:12,700 --> 00:00:15,900
Hello everybody and welcome to 
week. 14 of sad. 

2
00:00:15,900 --> 00:00:20,500
Jason was really interesting 
week to break down. 

3
00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:25,000
We had major quarterback 
injuries for two key contenders 

4
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:28,900
in Baltimore in San Francisco. 
A Jurassic back, you'll shake up

5
00:00:28,900 --> 00:00:31,500
in Buffalo or James. 
Chuck seems up, overtaking 

6
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:34,700
single server for the lead role,
continue to lead wide receiver 

7
00:00:34,700 --> 00:00:37,500
performances from digs Devante 
and tyriq. 

8
00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:42,400
And one more vintage Brady come 
back on Monday night. 

9
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:47,100
Pat, I'm glad glad here to join 
this week for Connor. 

10
00:00:47,100 --> 00:00:51,200
How was, how was your week? 
My week is pretty good, capped 

11
00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:53,700
off with her Rashad white 
game-winning touchdown. 

12
00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:57,300
Probably, you know, probably 
probably a good sign. 

13
00:00:57,700 --> 00:01:00,100
If Tom Brady's about the 
happiest, he's been off. 

14
00:01:00,300 --> 00:01:03,700
Season because of the player you
have the most experience in 

15
00:01:03,700 --> 00:01:05,600
baseball. 
That was so good. 

16
00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:07,900
And then also, you know, we 
could we could use those points.

17
00:01:07,900 --> 00:01:10,600
I think Chris G, he had a sweat 
going where he needed Rashad 

18
00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:14,400
white and he saved the day. 
So I had a lot of ship chasing 

19
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:15,800
fans, they're hurrying on the 
shop. 

20
00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,700
But yeah, that was huge for me 
to I actually had a home League 

21
00:01:18,700 --> 00:01:22,200
where I needed a win to to have 
a chance to make the playoffs 

22
00:01:22,700 --> 00:01:26,800
and I was down by four last play
of the game Rashad white catches

23
00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:28,100
that touchdown. 
I've actually thought it was 

24
00:01:28,100 --> 00:01:30,100
done. 
Yeah, for net. 

25
00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:33,000
I think I'd been in for that 
whole job in the whole drive and

26
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:34,600
bring em in till the very last 
play. 

27
00:01:35,300 --> 00:01:37,600
Yeah, I guess he's a little out 
of shape. 

28
00:01:37,700 --> 00:01:40,800
Fat line couldn't consent last 
couple played on whatever. 

29
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:46,900
No one ever accused me of that. 
Yeah, so yeah good to see white 

30
00:01:47,300 --> 00:01:50,900
good to see James Cook. 
So I think a lot of rookies 

31
00:01:50,900 --> 00:01:55,300
running backs and wide receivers
will get to you seems like yeah,

32
00:01:55,300 --> 00:01:59,000
it seems like my redacted shares
could finally be beyond the up. 

33
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:01,400
So yeah. 
Just to give everyone an 

34
00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:03,200
overview. 
Will we're going to go through 

35
00:02:03,200 --> 00:02:07,100
the normal stature, acing 
charts, and stuff that I do 

36
00:02:07,100 --> 00:02:12,300
every week here and then at the 
end, Pat and I are gonna focus 

37
00:02:12,300 --> 00:02:15,700
in on the underdog playoff 
basketball contest. 

38
00:02:15,700 --> 00:02:19,200
So we'll do some draft screams 
at at the end of the show. 

39
00:02:19,700 --> 00:02:24,200
Yeah, why don't we why don't we 
jump in to, to the charts sort 

40
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,800
of daughter back. 
Cool. 

41
00:02:30,600 --> 00:02:32,100
So here starting with 
quarterback. 

42
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:38,900
Same charge as always, we have 
TD rate here on the y axis, Y, 

43
00:02:38,900 --> 00:02:41,800
axis, X, Y axis, sorry. 
And adjust yards per attempt on 

44
00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:45,400
the x axis as well as 
quarterback. 

45
00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,900
Rushing yards per game shown for
the size of the bubbles here. 

46
00:02:48,900 --> 00:02:52,000
So you see guys like Justin 
Fields, Jalen hurts more the 

47
00:02:52,008 --> 00:02:54,700
Russian quarterbacks really pop 
here. 

48
00:02:55,100 --> 00:02:57,300
Pat, I think a lot of this stuff
at quarterback Back has 

49
00:02:57,300 --> 00:02:59,000
stabilized. 
And for people who watch the 

50
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:02,900
show, I don't think we need to 
to continue to talk about 

51
00:03:02,900 --> 00:03:05,100
players. 
We talked about a lot before. 

52
00:03:05,100 --> 00:03:09,500
So, in the spirit of that, I'm 
curious on your take for two 

53
00:03:09,500 --> 00:03:11,500
quarterbacks that seem like 
there to get some Starts Here, 

54
00:03:11,500 --> 00:03:14,900
down the stretch, for playoff 
teams, and Brock / D for San 

55
00:03:14,900 --> 00:03:18,900
Francisco, and Tyler Huntley for
Baltimore. 

56
00:03:18,900 --> 00:03:22,000
I guess I'll start with humle, 
because he's a little bit more 

57
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:25,000
of a known commodity. 
We've seen a bit of him last 

58
00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:29,000
year in Baltimore. 
How are you viewing Huntley in 

59
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:31,300
sort of like the streaming 
quarterback? 

60
00:03:31,300 --> 00:03:35,300
Mix for the next couple weeks? 
Assuming he gets a few starts 

61
00:03:35,300 --> 00:03:38,600
here. 
I mean the issue is that all of 

62
00:03:38,608 --> 00:03:42,100
the stuff becomes a lot more 
complicated with a lot of 

63
00:03:42,100 --> 00:03:44,800
waivers closing down as we head 
into the playoffs and 

64
00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,300
everything. 
So yeah, it's hard to just say 

65
00:03:47,300 --> 00:03:52,400
like because the simple Take you
know, my the take I want to make

66
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:57,200
is he's a great streaming option
and you know he's he's got the 

67
00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:00,100
exact same type of skill set. 
As Lamar Jackson is just not 

68
00:04:00,100 --> 00:04:04,100
quite as good and you know, we 
saw that last year, he can 

69
00:04:04,100 --> 00:04:07,100
support Mark Andrews, we would 
imagine he certainly did last 

70
00:04:07,100 --> 00:04:10,500
year so there's nothing else 
really to supporting the offense

71
00:04:10,500 --> 00:04:13,800
anyway. 
So yeah, I mean, he feels like a

72
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:17,500
very comfortable streamer. 
The issue is like, are you 

73
00:04:17,500 --> 00:04:21,300
comfortable going into To a 
playoff format with him, as your

74
00:04:21,500 --> 00:04:24,700
backup quarterback. 
You know, you know, and I think 

75
00:04:24,700 --> 00:04:29,900
you probably are because like, 
to be honest, in a lot of these 

76
00:04:29,900 --> 00:04:31,600
formats, if you lose your 
starting quarterback, you're 

77
00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:33,300
going to be in really rough 
shape. 

78
00:04:33,300 --> 00:04:35,600
Anyway, so, might you might as 
well have someone with rushing 

79
00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:39,200
upside to go to war with even 
though there's a worst-case 

80
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:42,000
scenario where Lamar comes back 
then, maybe you wouldn't if you 

81
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:43,900
pick up humbly and now he's 
worth nothing to you. 

82
00:04:43,900 --> 00:04:48,200
So yeah, that definitely 
complicates things but I think 

83
00:04:48,200 --> 00:04:51,500
Huntley will be pretty 
serviceable here for Fantasy 

84
00:04:51,500 --> 00:04:52,800
purposes. 
What are your thoughts? 

85
00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:57,600
Yeah, I feel similarly, you 
mentioned like a similar skill 

86
00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:00,900
set to Lamar. 
I feel like more of a film take 

87
00:05:00,900 --> 00:05:03,300
care but their mannerisms or 
like weirdly similar. 

88
00:05:03,300 --> 00:05:04,400
We're on the when they're on the
field. 

89
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:06,500
I don't know if you feel that 
way, but it's not just like 

90
00:05:06,500 --> 00:05:10,300
they're they're like kind of 
archetype of play but it's like 

91
00:05:10,300 --> 00:05:13,000
their actual physical motion on 
the field looks very similar. 

92
00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:17,100
It's it's funny watching them 
stronger immune system for home 

93
00:05:17,100 --> 00:05:19,800
language. 
Like yes, chakra, immune system,

94
00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:23,600
it seems and maybe maybe he gets
breakfast with Mark Andrews more

95
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:25,500
than Lamar does that out its 
mother? 

96
00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:29,400
It seems really feed him but 
yeah, it's your question. 

97
00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:31,900
I feel the same way. 
There is definitely the Nuance, 

98
00:05:31,900 --> 00:05:33,500
like, you gotta consider your 
format. 

99
00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,200
If I'm in a format where, you 
know, more of a home League 

100
00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:38,300
format where waivers are not 
locked, you can add and drop 

101
00:05:38,300 --> 00:05:40,200
these guys. 
And I need a streamer this week 

102
00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,800
and others, you know, a bunch of
teams on by. 

103
00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:47,300
I think I'm targeting Huntley 
pretty aggressively. 

104
00:05:48,100 --> 00:05:51,100
You know, considering all other 
Alternatives might be like, 

105
00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:53,700
Kenny pick it. 
Brock purdy-like in these 

106
00:05:53,700 --> 00:05:55,700
leagues were a bunch of the 
quarterbacks are scooped up. 

107
00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:59,200
I'm pretty excited about hotly. 
I think I view them as like, a 

108
00:05:59,900 --> 00:06:03,500
low-end quarterback. 
One streamer stream of this week

109
00:06:03,500 --> 00:06:06,800
with all the buys. 
Yeah, that feels right. 

110
00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:10,400
I mean pick it has some nice 
matchups coming up, but I feel 

111
00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:14,200
like you almost have to have to 
crush to, to be as comfortable 

112
00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:16,900
start, as it's only one end up 
being just because the rushing a

113
00:06:16,907 --> 00:06:19,600
rushing so much Republic. 
Yeah Huntley. 

114
00:06:19,600 --> 00:06:23,400
I think had run 40 yards rushing
and a touchdown this past week. 

115
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:28,400
So he's going to give you a lot 
of the Lamar rushing stuff in 

116
00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:30,400
Baltimore which is definitely 
exciting. 

117
00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:33,700
Another guy. 
I really, to be honest, know 

118
00:06:33,700 --> 00:06:37,100
nothing about Brock pretty in 
San Francisco. 

119
00:06:38,500 --> 00:06:42,500
I'm curious if you have like 
any, any thoughts on Purdy and 

120
00:06:42,500 --> 00:06:47,400
now we did like a decent Jimmy G
impression in the game. 

121
00:06:47,500 --> 00:06:51,400
Mmmmm last week, sort of a lot 
of dump offs, you know, lowered 

122
00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:53,700
yards per attempt lower, just a 
desperate attempt, the museum, 

123
00:06:53,700 --> 00:06:58,900
Jimmy G, but he won the game 
against Miami and seemed seemed 

124
00:06:58,900 --> 00:07:00,600
decent enough. 
So, I'm curious if you have any 

125
00:07:01,100 --> 00:07:04,100
takes on Purdy, if you like, 
looked at him at all when you're

126
00:07:04,200 --> 00:07:07,000
looking at Dynasty prospects or 
yeah? 

127
00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:10,100
Any like bigger thoughts and 
pretty curious. 

128
00:07:10,700 --> 00:07:13,400
Now really, I like we have some 
small sample on them. 

129
00:07:13,400 --> 00:07:17,800
I guess he wasn't he wasn't 
terrible, you know, he was Teeth

130
00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:21,600
in EPA per play on the week. 
I believe it was tenth and 

131
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:23,900
success or ninth and success 
rate. 

132
00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:26,500
So you know, he wasn't he wasn't
terrible. 

133
00:07:26,500 --> 00:07:29,900
As far as the efficiency goes, 
even his accuracy was 16th in 

134
00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:33,500
completion percentage over 
expected between Kirk Cousins 

135
00:07:33,500 --> 00:07:38,600
and Justin Herbert. 
So you know, like because he's 

136
00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:42,700
not Kyle Allen, you know which 
which counts for something, I 

137
00:07:42,700 --> 00:07:46,400
guess the issue we're not, I 
don't think we're starting 

138
00:07:46,400 --> 00:07:48,500
pretty anywhere. 
Are, you know, I mean he would 

139
00:07:48,500 --> 00:07:53,500
be kind of a super Flex like 
best ball type of pickup. 

140
00:07:53,700 --> 00:07:57,700
Yeah, active waivers there but 
that mean I don't really see how

141
00:07:57,700 --> 00:07:59,400
it's you're playing. 
So it's more about how we 

142
00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:02,100
supporting the 49ers skill 
players of wish. 

143
00:08:02,100 --> 00:08:04,900
You know there's a ton of guys 
who were interested in a feels 

144
00:08:04,900 --> 00:08:07,800
like maybe this is better for 
McCaffrey than everybody else. 

145
00:08:08,500 --> 00:08:10,800
Probably a lot of checkdown 
stump offs. 

146
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:15,000
He was tied for the team lead 
and targets against Miami. 

147
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:19,300
So you know, that's probably Lee
what's driving that opinion to 

148
00:08:19,300 --> 00:08:21,400
some extent? 
But also I don't know it's just 

149
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:24,800
sort of a logical logical way. 
I think this might go. 

150
00:08:25,700 --> 00:08:29,800
What are your thoughts on them? 
yeah, I think, I think I feel 

151
00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:34,400
similar what I've been trying to
think about and maybe we'll get 

152
00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,400
to it more when we talk talk, 
talk about the best of all stuff

153
00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:43,600
is, how much does the drop-off 
from Jimmy G to Purdy impact, 

154
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:47,800
the 49ers, playoff, All Odds and
chances of making the Super Bowl

155
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:51,500
because before this injury I 
think they were like the 

156
00:08:51,500 --> 00:08:55,900
consensus at least in betting 
markets, number three team of 

157
00:08:55,900 --> 00:08:59,900
the NFC after the Eagles and the
Cowboys to, to make it to the 

158
00:08:59,908 --> 00:09:03,900
Super Bowl. 
So yeah, maybe we can table that

159
00:09:03,900 --> 00:09:06,400
discussion for when we talk with
the best because Jimmy has a 

160
00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:11,000
chance to come back for the 
playoffs writer, for, in the 

161
00:09:11,008 --> 00:09:13,800
playoffs, there was a report 
today about that. 

162
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,300
I thought it was two months, if 
I remember, right? 

163
00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:19,600
Maybe. 
Like for the Super Bowl or 

164
00:09:19,600 --> 00:09:23,300
something? 
Yeah, that's what it seems like.

165
00:09:23,300 --> 00:09:25,600
I guess if you trust that time 
long enough, it could be Super 

166
00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:27,400
Bowl. 
Maybe he comes back a little 

167
00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:31,400
quicker and as Is available for 
the championship game but yeah, 

168
00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:32,900
you're right. 
It's 78 weeks. 

169
00:09:32,900 --> 00:09:35,300
So we put them available around 
the divisional. 

170
00:09:35,300 --> 00:09:40,200
Round or NFC Championship game 
is what we have one rotor world.

171
00:09:41,300 --> 00:09:44,100
Yeah, okay yeah. 
So I don't know. 

172
00:09:44,100 --> 00:09:48,200
I have to think like I have to 
think it hurts their chances 

173
00:09:48,900 --> 00:09:52,900
significantly. 
Jimmy was like playing pretty 

174
00:09:52,900 --> 00:09:57,700
well this year but yeah, I think
that's something interesting to 

175
00:09:57,700 --> 00:09:59,500
monitor over the next couple 
weeks to see. 

176
00:09:59,700 --> 00:10:01,300
We have seen in the past in San 
Francisco. 

177
00:10:01,300 --> 00:10:05,200
When CJ beathard, Nick Mullens, 
these guys come in and they like

178
00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:08,700
seem to do a decent Jimmy G 
impersonation and get San 

179
00:10:08,700 --> 00:10:12,900
Francisco some wins. 
Yeah, we curious to see if 

180
00:10:12,900 --> 00:10:15,500
pretty can continue that trend 
of the backup quarterbacks 

181
00:10:15,500 --> 00:10:18,400
playing well, or if we're going 
to see a major major drop-off in

182
00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:19,900
San Francisco, kind of wait and 
see there. 

183
00:10:19,900 --> 00:10:25,100
I think 5.4 8.4 Brock / D which 
is ultra low. 

184
00:10:25,900 --> 00:10:29,800
Yeah so yeah I mean he certainly
was checking down a lot. 

185
00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,900
I think it's probably pretty. 
I think I you had what nine 

186
00:10:32,900 --> 00:10:37,400
targets or something last week 
so it's fine for him last week I

187
00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:40,100
guess but he would be the guy 
him and kid'll. 

188
00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:43,600
It's Like a little concerning 
for debose. 

189
00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:46,700
Probably maybe Depot gets more 
of that like short, like running

190
00:10:46,700 --> 00:10:50,000
back style stuff so maybe he's 
okay. 

191
00:10:50,300 --> 00:10:51,800
And then I think the calf will 
be fine. 

192
00:10:51,800 --> 00:10:54,200
But yeah. 
It definitely makes all of them 

193
00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:55,200
risk. 
Your bets in the playoff 

194
00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:58,000
formats, for sure. 
Yeah, for sure. 

195
00:10:59,500 --> 00:11:03,100
Cool. 
Let's let's move on to to 

196
00:11:03,100 --> 00:11:08,400
running back here. 
So, looking at this chart we're 

197
00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:10,500
now looking at running back, 
expected fantasy points and 

198
00:11:10,500 --> 00:11:14,700
efficiency here on the y-axis, 
we have receiving expected 

199
00:11:14,700 --> 00:11:18,300
fantasy points per game. 
On the x-axis, we have rushing. 

200
00:11:18,500 --> 00:11:21,200
If you add those together, you 
get a sense of running backs, 

201
00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:25,500
total workload in terms of 
expected points. 

202
00:11:26,700 --> 00:11:29,000
A lot of things here that we've 
seen for a while, Austin. 

203
00:11:29,100 --> 00:11:32,200
Hecklers. 
Receiving usage is insane, kind 

204
00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:35,800
of flapping the field Josh 
Jacobs just receiving monster 

205
00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:38,400
rushing, volume with health, 
receiving volume as well. 

206
00:11:38,700 --> 00:11:41,400
We've been saying that for 
weeks, I think maybe the most 

207
00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:46,500
interesting discussion here in 
the AFC hat is, is the Buffalo 

208
00:11:46,600 --> 00:11:49,000
Back Field. 
I think people may be a sort of 

209
00:11:49,008 --> 00:11:52,800
forgot about it because it was 
on Thursday night, but we saw 

210
00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:59,000
James Cook overtake Singletary 
in that game, sort of all across

211
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:03,300
the a board. 
He saw 16 routes to singletary's

212
00:12:03,300 --> 00:12:05,300
13. 
He Saw six targets to 

213
00:12:05,300 --> 00:12:09,100
singletary's just to and he 
actually out carried Singletary.

214
00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:15,100
14 to 13 in in that game. 
So I guess the question for you,

215
00:12:15,100 --> 00:12:20,300
do you think that's like a 
one-week blip sort of based on, 

216
00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:23,300
you know, we're Thursday, night 
weirdness, or do you think this 

217
00:12:23,300 --> 00:12:26,900
is sort of the beginning of the 
James Cook take over in Buffalo?

218
00:12:28,500 --> 00:12:30,800
Man, I want to think it's the 
beginning of the cook take over.

219
00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:34,200
He looks so good. 
I don't tend to rely on the eye 

220
00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:37,800
test a ton, but like he crushes 
the eye test. 

221
00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:40,500
He's also been running well 
like, you look at Richard's over

222
00:12:40,500 --> 00:12:44,200
expected per attempt which is an
NFL next gen stat that I really 

223
00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:49,800
like, he's been doing very well 
in that the last few weeks for 

224
00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:53,500
the last couple times that he's 
gotten work. 43% of the snaps 

225
00:12:53,500 --> 00:12:56,200
though, this past week which is 
pretty low. 

226
00:12:56,400 --> 00:13:00,200
So it's like Oddly, you know, if
he was, if he was in the 60s or 

227
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:03,200
even the high 50s, I think we 
feel a lot better that this was 

228
00:13:03,200 --> 00:13:06,300
something where they're actually
like, installing him as the lead

229
00:13:06,300 --> 00:13:10,500
guy. 
Instead singletary's at 44% cook

230
00:13:10,500 --> 00:13:15,900
was at 43% and Hines was at 31%,
and they had just been playing 

231
00:13:16,500 --> 00:13:18,400
for. 
I can't remember what the 

232
00:13:18,408 --> 00:13:21,600
status, but they played three 
games in, you know, a short 

233
00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:23,800
period of decline because they 
had the Thanksgiving game, 

234
00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:26,900
Sunday, Thanksgiving, and then 
the following Thursday. 

235
00:13:26,900 --> 00:13:30,900
So, They never you know it could
it could simply be that they 

236
00:13:31,100 --> 00:13:33,900
were trying to preserve 
singletary's Health who played 

237
00:13:33,900 --> 00:13:38,700
78 percent of snaps in week, 12 
played 72% of snaps in week 11. 

238
00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:43,700
So then in the third game of 
these three tightly scheduled 

239
00:13:43,700 --> 00:13:48,900
games, they then go to cook a 
lot more and we also saw 19 

240
00:13:48,900 --> 00:13:52,400
Heinz 31% of snaps when he's 
been really an afterthought. 

241
00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:57,300
So I think you could make like a
fairly strong case that this Is 

242
00:13:57,300 --> 00:14:00,800
like nothing that you know, 
Singletary, still gonna be the 

243
00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:05,300
lead guy will see him this week 
at, like, let's say, 65 percent 

244
00:14:05,300 --> 00:14:09,600
of snaps and yeah, Coke will see
more than a used to, but he'll 

245
00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:12,200
be, you know, in the 30 low 30s 
or something. 

246
00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,200
And there's not much fantasy 
value in that type of role. 

247
00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:18,900
I think that's like, that's 
like, very plausible, but he 

248
00:14:18,900 --> 00:14:21,500
looks so good. 
He also has an elite yards per 

249
00:14:21,500 --> 00:14:24,400
hour, only has like 75 routes. 
So, you know, you take that with

250
00:14:24,400 --> 00:14:26,800
a big grain of salt, but 
everything. 

251
00:14:27,700 --> 00:14:30,900
You know basically no matter 
what phase of the game, you know

252
00:14:30,900 --> 00:14:33,200
what he's being asked to do, 
he's crushing it. 

253
00:14:34,700 --> 00:14:38,800
So yeah I think they'll I think 
they will increase his role. 

254
00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,100
What he it's maybe a little Tony
Pollard and Ezekiel Elliott in. 

255
00:14:42,100 --> 00:14:47,200
That Singletary is pretty good 
in terms of success rate and 

256
00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:49,400
kind of is a decent chunk, play 
Runner. 

257
00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:52,000
But cook is where the explosions
coming from. 

258
00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:55,300
Yeah, I think that's a good cop 
and yeah I think I kind of 

259
00:14:55,308 --> 00:14:57,200
agree. 
Like I do, you think this is the

260
00:14:57,200 --> 00:14:59,500
beginning of James Cook? 
Having a bigger role in the 

261
00:14:59,500 --> 00:15:03,100
offense, but I'm not expecting 
some like linear, take over 

262
00:15:03,100 --> 00:15:06,600
where Singletary gets relegated,
all of a sudden, I think it'll 

263
00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:10,500
be kind of more up and down 
before we see that and the other

264
00:15:10,500 --> 00:15:13,400
thing I wanted to note in that 
game I think just adding up the 

265
00:15:13,400 --> 00:15:15,000
snap counts for these three 
backs. 

266
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:18,600
I think about on 20% of all 
offensive plays or something in 

267
00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:21,800
that range, they actually had 
two running backs on the field 

268
00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:24,600
and I'm watching that game. 
I remember seeing a lot of 

269
00:15:24,600 --> 00:15:28,700
shotgun formations with both 
Hines and James Cook out there. 

270
00:15:28,900 --> 00:15:33,300
And I hadn't remember really 
seeing that at all before this 

271
00:15:33,300 --> 00:15:35,700
past week. 
So I wonder if that was almost 

272
00:15:35,700 --> 00:15:40,300
really like a new offensive 
package that they opened up on 

273
00:15:40,300 --> 00:15:42,800
Thursday night. 
So, I'm curious to see, it's 

274
00:15:42,800 --> 00:15:46,900
funny you mention that, I 
sometimes I would like go too 

275
00:15:46,900 --> 00:15:48,000
far. 
Down the rabbit hole on 

276
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:50,900
something in the walkthrough. 
And then I'm like, you know, I 

277
00:15:50,908 --> 00:15:53,900
probably should have gotten two 
games done in the span that I 

278
00:15:53,908 --> 00:15:57,900
wrote about that one thing. 
And one of those things this 

279
00:15:57,900 --> 00:16:02,400
week was the bills offense of 
personnel. 

280
00:16:02,400 --> 00:16:05,600
Because I noticed two weeks ago 
and I wrote about this in the 

281
00:16:05,600 --> 00:16:06,700
Thanksgiving walkthrough as 
like. 

282
00:16:06,700 --> 00:16:08,900
I don't know what they're going 
to do here because last week 

283
00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:12,600
they want with a lot of heavy 
personnel and kind of a an odd 

284
00:16:12,600 --> 00:16:18,000
way or, you know, way that not 
been very typical at all of what

285
00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:19,700
the bills had done to that point
the season. 

286
00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:24,000
They went back to a lot of 11 
personnel against the Lions. 

287
00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:28,000
They operate out of 11 personnel
and on 88 percent of their 

288
00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:30,800
offensive plays against the 
Lions, which is was actually 

289
00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:35,300
above their rate heading into 
week ten. 

290
00:16:35,300 --> 00:16:39,700
When they shifted to kind of 
these heavy Personnel sets 

291
00:16:39,700 --> 00:16:43,600
against the Browns. 
But then they went back to it 

292
00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:46,900
against the Patriots and it's 
not just they went back to heavy

293
00:16:46,900 --> 00:16:51,300
personnel which they did their 
use of Even Personnel, fill to 

294
00:16:51,300 --> 00:16:55,700
53%. 
It was at 49 percent against the

295
00:16:55,700 --> 00:16:58,300
Browns. 
So very similar rate. 

296
00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:01,900
And they were there typically up
in like, the high 70s 80s. 

297
00:17:02,300 --> 00:17:06,700
So, you know, a big shift in 
terms of both. 

298
00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:09,599
It's both too tight end. 
And two running backs sets that 

299
00:17:09,599 --> 00:17:11,900
they're shifting away. 
Its kind of, I'd say it's more 

300
00:17:11,900 --> 00:17:15,099
the two running backs, but they 
are using some two tight ends as

301
00:17:15,099 --> 00:17:18,300
well. 
And that those power Personnel. 

302
00:17:18,700 --> 00:17:21,500
Groupings are generally better. 
For running the ball and in both

303
00:17:21,500 --> 00:17:26,000
games they had a - password over
expected those are the only two 

304
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:29,500
games all season that the bills 
have posted a negative pass rate

305
00:17:29,500 --> 00:17:30,800
over expected. 
Not only that the only two 

306
00:17:30,800 --> 00:17:34,900
games, they've been below a five
percent pass rate over expected.

307
00:17:34,900 --> 00:17:38,700
There are almost always like 
they truly pass heavy team like 

308
00:17:38,700 --> 00:17:42,600
every single week, pass, heavy 
pass, heavy game plans. 

309
00:17:43,100 --> 00:17:47,400
But two of the last three weeks 
they've been run first to run 

310
00:17:47,400 --> 00:17:52,300
heavy with power personnel. 
On the field, this matchup kind 

311
00:17:52,300 --> 00:17:57,400
of sets up where you might want 
to go with more power Personnel,

312
00:17:57,800 --> 00:18:00,000
given that we have this very 
strong Jets defense, they're 

313
00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:03,200
actually not that strong on the 
run, the bill struggled against 

314
00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:06,300
them. 
The last time they played the 

315
00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:09,000
pass rush here. 
Could maybe create a little bit 

316
00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:13,000
of trouble in particular. 
The bills are letting up quick 

317
00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:14,900
pressures at a pretty high rate 
in the Jets are decent at 

318
00:18:14,900 --> 00:18:18,000
generating those. 
So I'm kind of thinking of them 

319
00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:19,900
maybe like a little bit more 
like Miami. 

320
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:23,900
When once they got Jeff Wilson 
and not that they went like 

321
00:18:24,700 --> 00:18:26,300
run-heavy. 
I'm in Miami still very much 

322
00:18:26,300 --> 00:18:30,000
like a run first or pass first 
team but they can keep the 

323
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:32,000
defense a little bit more off 
balance. 

324
00:18:32,500 --> 00:18:36,100
And so I'm wondering if they 
might do that again and kind of 

325
00:18:36,100 --> 00:18:40,300
like Pick their spots a little 
bit more with the passing game 

326
00:18:40,300 --> 00:18:43,400
this week and maybe we get more 
rushing attempts than we're used

327
00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:45,400
to with the bills again this 
week. 

328
00:18:46,100 --> 00:18:48,400
Yeah I would buy that. 
That's those are interesting 

329
00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:53,100
notes on the Jets defense didn't
didn't realize that so yeah I 

330
00:18:53,100 --> 00:18:55,400
would definitely be monitoring 
that. 

331
00:18:55,500 --> 00:18:57,000
I think that's two things to 
watch this week. 

332
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:00,100
The split between cooking 
Singletary and just the overall 

333
00:19:00,700 --> 00:19:03,000
sort of structure on the bills 
offense if they continue sort of

334
00:19:03,008 --> 00:19:06,700
trending towards run-heavy that 
certainly would be something to 

335
00:19:06,700 --> 00:19:09,000
know. 
Note, I guess a couple other 

336
00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:15,400
quick hits here in the AFC 
zolomon night on the Jets. 

337
00:19:15,400 --> 00:19:21,300
Continue to show out pretty well
and earned a fairly large role 

338
00:19:21,300 --> 00:19:23,000
in New York. 
I would actually expect at this 

339
00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:27,600
point for him to maintain a role
even when car get comes back 

340
00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:30,600
which could be as early as this 
week. 

341
00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:34,700
But yeah, I think you can can 
fire up zone of the night with 

342
00:19:34,700 --> 00:19:40,300
with relative confidence. 
Then in KC, just wanted to know.

343
00:19:41,300 --> 00:19:44,200
They really are sort of 
continuing to define the roles 

344
00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:47,900
of Pacheco and McKinnon. 
We did. 

345
00:19:47,900 --> 00:19:51,400
Sue McKinnon, get a little bit 
more involved, running the ball 

346
00:19:51,400 --> 00:19:54,400
this week and Pacheco a little 
bit more involved running routes

347
00:19:54,400 --> 00:19:58,100
this week compared to normal, 
but still it's a pretty clear 

348
00:19:59,100 --> 00:20:01,300
split here between the rushing 
and receiving role. 

349
00:20:01,300 --> 00:20:03,100
As you can see in the chart 
Pacheco, all the way on the 

350
00:20:03,100 --> 00:20:06,100
right with basically just 
rushing expected fantasy points,

351
00:20:06,100 --> 00:20:08,500
McKinnon sort. 
Of on that top left side there 

352
00:20:08,500 --> 00:20:10,400
with just receiving so I can 
fantasy points. 

353
00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:12,900
So it's a pretty even funded 
back who can combine these 

354
00:20:12,900 --> 00:20:16,100
rolls, please? 
Oh, man. 

355
00:20:17,400 --> 00:20:18,900
Yeah, that would be fun. 
Ronald Jones. 

356
00:20:18,900 --> 00:20:21,800
Maybe he's not that guy, that's,
I love of. 

357
00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:24,900
He would just be, he was 
literally be even further 

358
00:20:24,900 --> 00:20:28,600
further down than Pacheco is 
already the Baseline. 

359
00:20:29,700 --> 00:20:33,900
Yeah, I guess the only guy that 
I think mechanic can do both and

360
00:20:33,900 --> 00:20:35,900
maybe they're saving that a 
little from the playoffs. 

361
00:20:37,300 --> 00:20:42,000
But yeah, I was going to send 
maybe Melvin Gordon could get a 

362
00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:43,500
role and do a little bit of both
please. 

363
00:20:43,500 --> 00:20:45,500
No. 
I don't think he's been so bad 

364
00:20:45,500 --> 00:20:47,500
as a rusher. 
He's just he's just worse 

365
00:20:47,500 --> 00:20:50,500
McKinnon. 
Yeah, he's yeah. 

366
00:20:50,500 --> 00:20:52,600
Which is also at CHS, there's no
one. 

367
00:20:53,300 --> 00:20:54,900
They don't have anyone who can 
do it. 

368
00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:57,600
Who can do both things, 
unfortunately. 

369
00:20:58,100 --> 00:21:00,900
Yeah, it's it. 
The it's why the most explosive 

370
00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:04,000
running back in this team was 
someone who was widely known for

371
00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:06,600
having dead legs as of three. 
Yeah. 

372
00:21:07,100 --> 00:21:09,900
Becomes dead. 
Dad likes McKinnon like he was 

373
00:21:09,900 --> 00:21:13,600
here two years ago. 
Yeah, I was by far the freshest 

374
00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:17,200
legs, man. 
They need some down there in 

375
00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:19,700
Casey. 
But yeah, anything else that you

376
00:21:19,700 --> 00:21:23,100
want to note on the AFC? 
I think that's all I have for 

377
00:21:23,100 --> 00:21:26,200
these guys. 
I mean Ramon Dre. 

378
00:21:26,900 --> 00:21:30,900
Yeah, to see it. 
What was his snap wasn't it? 

379
00:21:30,900 --> 00:21:33,700
Something crazy. 
Like he had like 97% snap share.

380
00:21:33,700 --> 00:21:36,200
Thanks a lot Harris. 
Only had Kevin Harris. 

381
00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:37,800
Only had one snap and pretty 
sure. 

382
00:21:39,000 --> 00:21:44,400
Yeah that's right. 
Kevin Harris had one snap Madre 

383
00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:48,200
Stevenson had 53 or 54 snaps for
a 98%. 

384
00:21:48,200 --> 00:21:52,200
Snap share 98%. 
Yeah, that's what Kevin Kevin 

385
00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:54,200
Harris is one rod I did remember
cuz I watch this game. 

386
00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:56,500
He like ran. 
And into his own lineman. 

387
00:21:56,500 --> 00:21:59,400
Like really hard almost like, 
not as bad as like the but 

388
00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:01,800
fumble obviously didn't fumble. 
It was like that style of 

389
00:22:01,800 --> 00:22:04,600
running into your own lineman 
and he never played after that. 

390
00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:08,600
So I'm not expecting him to get 
more involved next week. 

391
00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:10,400
No, he's not about to make a 
move. 

392
00:22:10,700 --> 00:22:13,500
Yeah. 
Yeah, that's that's good to know

393
00:22:13,500 --> 00:22:15,300
for montre. 
Yeah. 

394
00:22:15,300 --> 00:22:20,900
Let's take a look at the NFC and
I see chart here again. 

395
00:22:20,900 --> 00:22:23,400
Yeah, I think here, the 
interesting thing to discuss is 

396
00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:26,500
probably similar to Buffalo and 
Tampa Bay. 

397
00:22:26,500 --> 00:22:29,200
We have Rashad white coming on 
strong. 

398
00:22:29,200 --> 00:22:36,900
The past couple weeks for net 
did return and out snapped white

399
00:22:36,900 --> 00:22:42,000
somewhat considerably. 
He had 48 snaps to Richard weitz

400
00:22:42,000 --> 00:22:46,700
Thurman. 33. 
He almost he had 32 routes to 

401
00:22:46,700 --> 00:22:50,100
Richard, White's 21, but white 
did see more targets and 

402
00:22:50,100 --> 00:22:53,400
fournette about the same amount 
of carries nine to ten to 

403
00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:56,000
fournette. 
So, yeah, as I watched this game

404
00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:58,600
pad, I thought it was just sort 
of like a pure rotation of 

405
00:22:58,600 --> 00:23:01,600
drives and the discrepancy in 
snaps could almost be attributed

406
00:23:01,600 --> 00:23:05,400
to just like which running backs
drives lasted longer like there 

407
00:23:05,400 --> 00:23:09,200
was some like substitutions 
within drives but that was kind 

408
00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:10,800
of rare. 
I don't know. 

409
00:23:10,800 --> 00:23:12,000
Did you, did you see like for 
now? 

410
00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:15,600
Really taking a truly Don White 
there or do you think it's like 

411
00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:20,600
basically 50/50 in terms of 
usage, it seemed like a lot of 

412
00:23:20,600 --> 00:23:22,600
fournette at the very end of the
game. 

413
00:23:22,800 --> 00:23:28,300
Yeah, you know we're not only 
are those pretty valuable. 

414
00:23:28,500 --> 00:23:31,100
Well though there weren't very 
many passes to the running backs

415
00:23:31,100 --> 00:23:33,900
as it turned out on those 
particular drives but obviously 

416
00:23:33,900 --> 00:23:38,000
like a hurry up role would be 
important to have when the play 

417
00:23:38,100 --> 00:23:42,000
here is for both guys is they 
need to have the past catching. 

418
00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:43,300
Work. 
So that was definitely 

419
00:23:43,300 --> 00:23:45,900
concerning but then obviously 
white comes in for the final 

420
00:23:45,900 --> 00:23:50,900
play scores, the touchdown. 
I thought ran like a really nice

421
00:23:50,900 --> 00:23:52,700
route. 
You know, like kind of 

422
00:23:52,700 --> 00:23:58,200
understood where he needed to be
and Gets In The End Zone So that

423
00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:01,500
obviously makes you feel like, 
hey, okay, sure for net had the 

424
00:24:01,500 --> 00:24:05,800
edge, you know, this week, but 
maybe that doesn't end up being 

425
00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:07,400
the case going forward. 
We've already seen Richard 

426
00:24:07,400 --> 00:24:10,100
white, start one game over a 
healthy for net. 

427
00:24:10,600 --> 00:24:13,500
I've seen a play. 
Well, He got 90% of the snaps 

428
00:24:13,500 --> 00:24:16,300
when fournette was out, so they 
definitely trust him. 

429
00:24:18,100 --> 00:24:21,800
I wouldn't be like, I think it's
probably you got to consider 

430
00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:27,000
this kind of like a 50/50 
timeshare right now, and I 

431
00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:30,900
wouldn't be too worried that it 
goes to like, fournette. 70/30 

432
00:24:31,300 --> 00:24:37,100
up from 60/40 last week, but at 
the same time, if it is 60/40 

433
00:24:37,100 --> 00:24:40,800
again, we're going to need a 
touchdown for white to pay off 

434
00:24:40,900 --> 00:24:43,100
and he's not going to In The End
Zone every week. 

435
00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:46,800
Yeah, I feel similar. 
I think it's close to 50/50 I do

436
00:24:48,100 --> 00:24:51,000
I do think if I was forced to 
pick one just for the rest of 

437
00:24:51,000 --> 00:24:54,000
the year, like just projecting 
their points out, I think I 

438
00:24:54,008 --> 00:24:55,800
would give a slight Edge to 
Lenny. 

439
00:24:55,800 --> 00:24:59,300
I'd think he's more likely to 
earn the goal line touches. 

440
00:24:59,300 --> 00:25:01,400
I don't actually remember in 
this game, if they had a goal 

441
00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:04,700
line carry, I don't not that I 
can recall, it could be missing 

442
00:25:04,700 --> 00:25:08,600
something, but I don't know. 
Just from the eye test, which is

443
00:25:08,608 --> 00:25:12,200
what have to go off of white. 
Doesn't look great, running on 

444
00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:14,700
the interior and with fournette 
size and sort of history, and 

445
00:25:14,708 --> 00:25:17,400
that offense of have to guess 
that he's more likely to earn 

446
00:25:17,400 --> 00:25:18,900
the goal. 
In short, yardage carriers. 

447
00:25:18,900 --> 00:25:21,500
But again that's more of a guest
on something. 

448
00:25:22,100 --> 00:25:24,800
Yeah, I agree with the idea that
he's got, he's in Better 

449
00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:27,200
position for that work. 
It's just like there isn't. 

450
00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:31,800
That's not really the work. 
You want to have the edge on, I 

451
00:25:31,800 --> 00:25:35,100
think like if white is able to 
take more of the receiving work.

452
00:25:35,600 --> 00:25:40,100
Yeah, and you'd rather have that
in this off but they're so 

453
00:25:40,100 --> 00:25:43,100
effective on the ground. 
They're not this Juggernaut 

454
00:25:43,100 --> 00:25:45,200
offense that he thought that 
they might be in the happen to 

455
00:25:45,208 --> 00:25:47,700
the past. 
They really only look good. 

456
00:25:47,800 --> 00:25:51,000
Good when it's the very last 
Drive of the game and they just 

457
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:52,300
have to pass. 
All right. 

458
00:25:52,300 --> 00:25:55,900
It's not a well like that it's 
not an offense and Coach 

459
00:25:55,900 --> 00:25:57,800
marriage. 
That really works like bowls, 

460
00:25:57,800 --> 00:26:00,200
don't Bulls doesn't want this 
team like he would. 

461
00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:02,800
He would just like trait. 
He would trade himself to the 

462
00:26:02,808 --> 00:26:07,300
Falcons if he could he would 
much rather be doing that bowl, 

463
00:26:07,300 --> 00:26:10,000
do. 
I mean he's punting on like, you

464
00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:13,200
know, the opposing teams, 45 on 
Fourth and five and you can tell

465
00:26:13,200 --> 00:26:15,000
Brady. 
Just hate city is doing all 

466
00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:17,700
these yeah, cowardly things out 
there. 

467
00:26:17,900 --> 00:26:20,000
Radiates. 
And while you might be right 

468
00:26:20,000 --> 00:26:22,500
that for net is a better bet to 
outscore. 

469
00:26:22,500 --> 00:26:24,400
Why? 
I think if one of these guys 

470
00:26:24,900 --> 00:26:28,300
hits big it's white so I would 
be. 

471
00:26:28,300 --> 00:26:30,000
Yeah. 
I would be drafting white ahead 

472
00:26:30,000 --> 00:26:35,600
in Playa formats person. 
Yeah that's fair. 

473
00:26:35,800 --> 00:26:38,300
I don't, I would honestly I flip
a coin. 

474
00:26:38,300 --> 00:26:41,800
I think it's really close but 
yeah, I can see the argument for

475
00:26:41,800 --> 00:26:42,700
T. 
So I think he definitely has 

476
00:26:42,700 --> 00:26:46,100
more upside. 
I guess I'm just thinking like, 

477
00:26:46,100 --> 00:26:48,800
if someone's going to have like,
if the Buck's offense, does come

478
00:26:48,800 --> 00:26:52,400
back and someone's gonna have 
like a three touchdown game from

479
00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:54,900
goal line carries. 
Like I would put the money in 

480
00:26:54,900 --> 00:26:57,600
for that but I definitely think 
white has bigger upside to break

481
00:26:57,600 --> 00:27:00,500
away long runs, you know, rack 
up like 10, catch games or 

482
00:27:00,500 --> 00:27:03,900
whatever. 
So Stephanie is in the chat, she

483
00:27:03,900 --> 00:27:05,500
points out that he had a fumble 
in this game. 

484
00:27:05,500 --> 00:27:08,000
Lost it. 
Yeah, do you think that affected

485
00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:09,200
his? 
Because I don't think it's gonna

486
00:27:09,200 --> 00:27:11,900
affect them in going forward 
after he's the hero, right? 

487
00:27:11,900 --> 00:27:14,500
But it affected the the playing 
time a little bit this week, 

488
00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:17,500
maybe it did on maybe, that's 
why I like fournette. 

489
00:27:17,500 --> 00:27:18,900
Maybe. 
Got back-to-back drives at the 

490
00:27:18,900 --> 00:27:21,600
end before white came in. 
But yeah, I don't the fact that 

491
00:27:21,600 --> 00:27:25,200
he got the game-winning 
touchdown, I don't think that 

492
00:27:26,000 --> 00:27:27,600
that's a fact. 
He was on that on the field for 

493
00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:29,400
that play at all is bullish in 
its own, right? 

494
00:27:29,400 --> 00:27:33,900
And then he did it. 
Yeah, yeah, I agree. 

495
00:27:35,700 --> 00:27:36,600
Yeah. 
I think overall we can feel 

496
00:27:36,600 --> 00:27:39,800
good, feel good about white 
going forward. 

497
00:27:39,800 --> 00:27:42,300
Other things. 
I wanted to note, I feel, he's 

498
00:27:42,300 --> 00:27:44,100
sorry, but he's a little Tony 
Pollard. 

499
00:27:44,900 --> 00:27:47,300
It's a similar thing to like 
cook and Pollard. 

500
00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:52,300
For me with those guys are, it's
like, I don't, it's not all gray

501
00:27:52,300 --> 00:27:55,900
and we're also seeing like The 
Pollard snap shares is getting 

502
00:27:55,900 --> 00:27:58,800
more and more tilting where he's
back to, like a the 40% of a 

503
00:27:58,808 --> 00:28:01,100
60/40 with Zeke and we'll 
probably see it. 

504
00:28:01,100 --> 00:28:03,900
Again, this week is like they're
going to be salting this game 

505
00:28:03,900 --> 00:28:05,900
away against the Texans. 
Why do they need to be? 

506
00:28:06,200 --> 00:28:09,100
They should be honestly like the
intelligent move, there is to 

507
00:28:09,100 --> 00:28:12,600
play Zeke over Pollard, but, you
know, similar thing where you're

508
00:28:12,600 --> 00:28:14,300
like you have the more talented 
back. 

509
00:28:14,600 --> 00:28:17,400
In white and cook and Pollard, 
but you may not have a guy with 

510
00:28:17,400 --> 00:28:19,500
more playing time. 
I still feel like that's where 

511
00:28:19,500 --> 00:28:21,600
you want to be. 
Because we're more confident 

512
00:28:21,600 --> 00:28:23,200
that this the talent is with 
that guy. 

513
00:28:23,200 --> 00:28:26,700
But it's like, it feels a little
shaky for sure. 

514
00:28:27,400 --> 00:28:29,300
Yeah. 
So a couple couple things I 

515
00:28:29,308 --> 00:28:35,400
wanted to go off there, I guess.
Like, first on white, the reason

516
00:28:35,400 --> 00:28:37,900
why I'm hesitant to compare them
to those guys. 

517
00:28:37,900 --> 00:28:40,800
And I know you weren't like 
directly comparing them is I'm 

518
00:28:40,800 --> 00:28:43,100
just followed as much much much 
more explosive. 

519
00:28:43,100 --> 00:28:45,400
Yeah. 
Like I was like You watch white 

520
00:28:45,400 --> 00:28:48,200
versus cook and Pollard like 
they don't look in the same 

521
00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:51,600
caliber of player and it could 
be this time of the offense 

522
00:28:51,900 --> 00:28:56,700
that's holding back white but I 
think he looks okay. 

523
00:28:56,700 --> 00:28:59,300
Like I think he looks like cop 
in as a pass catcher good hands 

524
00:28:59,300 --> 00:29:02,400
like decent route Runner but 
when he gets the ball in space 

525
00:29:03,300 --> 00:29:05,900
it's I don't know if he doesn't 
look that fast. 

526
00:29:05,900 --> 00:29:08,200
That expensive. 
Paul is the fastest guy on the 

527
00:29:08,200 --> 00:29:09,800
field. 
He's probably the best guy on 

528
00:29:09,800 --> 00:29:13,100
the field. 
Well maybe that's hyperbolic 

529
00:29:13,100 --> 00:29:14,200
could see Lambs out there. 
Dad. 

530
00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:16,800
Etc. 
Yeah, he's really good Pollard's

531
00:29:16,800 --> 00:29:22,200
Pollard's way better but it is 
more, but but the talent Gap is 

532
00:29:22,200 --> 00:29:24,300
still pretty big between white 
and for night. 

533
00:29:24,300 --> 00:29:26,000
I think, at least, in my 
opinion. 

534
00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:27,600
Yeah. 
Now that's fair. 

535
00:29:27,700 --> 00:29:31,500
I think, if you look at like the
advanced metrics, they both rank

536
00:29:31,500 --> 00:29:34,800
in like the back half of things 
but formats like near the very 

537
00:29:34,800 --> 00:29:38,100
end and and why it's more like 
middling in general. 

538
00:29:38,700 --> 00:29:42,800
So and whites pop some weeks. 
Yeah, and that so that's similar

539
00:29:42,800 --> 00:29:45,400
to cook. 
Work James Cook And like, for 

540
00:29:45,400 --> 00:29:48,000
the season, it doesn't rank all 
that well, and some stuff, but 

541
00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:49,700
he's had some weeks where you're
like. 

542
00:29:49,700 --> 00:29:52,300
Okay. 
And so I think both those, which

543
00:29:52,300 --> 00:29:54,900
is kind of what you'd expect for
both guys being rookies. 

544
00:29:54,900 --> 00:29:57,200
I think. 
Okay. 

545
00:29:57,200 --> 00:30:00,300
And the other thing I want to 
note on on Dallas. 

546
00:30:00,300 --> 00:30:05,400
So I, I wish I could find this, 
but so, yeah, you mentioned the 

547
00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:09,500
Pollard, snap counts. 
This week were were down to, 

548
00:30:09,500 --> 00:30:14,200
like, the 40% rage, Zeke kind of
considerably out snap-in, but I 

549
00:30:14,300 --> 00:30:16,400
Wondering if I could find the 
first. 

550
00:30:16,500 --> 00:30:18,200
Can't take it up. 
I thought I saw like the first 

551
00:30:18,200 --> 00:30:22,100
half snap counts were pretty 
even and then Zeke pulled away 

552
00:30:22,100 --> 00:30:25,700
in the second half when they 
were up, massively may be able 

553
00:30:25,700 --> 00:30:29,000
to pull that up. 
Yeah, I foresee. 

554
00:30:29,000 --> 00:30:32,000
Don't have that note there but 
yeah, that I mean so the final 

555
00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:35,300
score of the game was what 54 to
18 or something. 

556
00:30:35,300 --> 00:30:39,200
So I'm not sure how much we can 
take from the snap counts there.

557
00:30:39,800 --> 00:30:43,700
But that said, like the dreams 
of Pollard being at like a 70/30

558
00:30:43,700 --> 00:30:48,100
or even 5:35 to Zeke like I 
think I think those are dead, 

559
00:30:48,200 --> 00:30:51,300
it's going to return, you know, 
more 50/50 or even slightly and 

560
00:30:51,300 --> 00:30:54,200
Zeke's favor in terms of snaps 
which is frustrating. 

561
00:30:54,200 --> 00:30:56,600
But I think Pollard is still 
very, very start of all. 

562
00:30:56,600 --> 00:30:59,700
They're a really good offense. 
They're funneling a lot of looks

563
00:30:59,700 --> 00:31:03,100
the running back. 
So I'm not like I'm just still 

564
00:31:03,100 --> 00:31:05,300
starting Pollard every single 
week and not really thinking 

565
00:31:05,300 --> 00:31:08,400
about it. 
They're funneling a lot of of 

566
00:31:08,400 --> 00:31:09,600
carries for sure to the running 
backs. 

567
00:31:09,600 --> 00:31:14,100
Like over the last three weeks 
in sync, Zeke has been back. 

568
00:31:14,800 --> 00:31:18,900
They are combining for an 
average of 31, carries a game. 

569
00:31:19,900 --> 00:31:22,700
Both, both the top two running 
backs, not all running backs, 

570
00:31:22,700 --> 00:31:26,600
just Pollard and zikr. 
Combining 431 cares, a game. 

571
00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:29,900
And the last two games that 
Cowboys have had a minus eleven 

572
00:31:29,900 --> 00:31:34,000
percent pass rate over expected.
They're really leaning on the 

573
00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:36,700
Run game in a really big way. 
They're going to do that again 

574
00:31:36,700 --> 00:31:41,300
this week. 
So yeah, I think I think you are

575
00:31:41,300 --> 00:31:44,200
firing at both guys. 
And by the way, you're right. 

576
00:31:44,700 --> 00:31:47,700
With the first half snaps, I'm 
going to make sure to get this 

577
00:31:47,700 --> 00:31:48,900
in the walkthrough. 
Actually I hadn't talked to look

578
00:31:48,900 --> 00:31:51,500
at that. 
Pollard had 21 snaps which is 

579
00:31:51,500 --> 00:31:53,400
exactly what see cat in the 
first half. 

580
00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:56,500
So yeah. 
But I mean I will say that 

581
00:31:56,500 --> 00:32:03,100
probably doesn't help you this 
week because there's no way 

582
00:32:03,400 --> 00:32:06,300
there's no way the this game is 
close in the second half like 

583
00:32:06,300 --> 00:32:09,600
absolute zero percent chance. 
So he says urgent actions this 

584
00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:12,700
week. 
Yeah the Texans I mean it's a 

585
00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:16,200
it's a joke. 
So I think I mean, just just 

586
00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:20,600
alone like the Dallas defense 
versus Davis Mills are Kyle 

587
00:32:20,600 --> 00:32:23,200
Allen. 
I mean, it's, they probably 

588
00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:27,200
shouldn't even play this game. 
No, it's going to be terrible. 

589
00:32:27,700 --> 00:32:30,900
That's bad. 
I feel like Malik Davis is going

590
00:32:30,900 --> 00:32:32,700
to have like three touchdowns in
this game. 

591
00:32:32,700 --> 00:32:34,100
Somehow. 
It's going to be disgusting. 

592
00:32:35,600 --> 00:32:37,300
It's yeah. 
They uh, they probably should 

593
00:32:37,300 --> 00:32:39,300
play a lot of Malik Davis. 
Yeah. 

594
00:32:39,800 --> 00:32:46,700
But the one thing to that's not 
great for Pollard is So he ranks

595
00:32:47,300 --> 00:32:50,000
awesome in Russia, roads are 
expected pretends he's great in 

596
00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:54,800
Breakaway yards per game. 
He s in both metrics, he's 

597
00:32:55,200 --> 00:32:56,900
running back. 
Seven in yards per route 

598
00:32:56,900 --> 00:33:00,000
running, he's running back one 
in fantasy points of expected 

599
00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:03,700
per game. 
But his success rates, kind of 

600
00:33:03,700 --> 00:33:07,500
whatever, you know, like the 
consistency isn't his strong 

601
00:33:07,500 --> 00:33:09,300
suit. 
It's all is big plays, he's a 

602
00:33:09,308 --> 00:33:12,300
big play, receiver is a big 
player, uh sure Zeke's really 

603
00:33:12,400 --> 00:33:15,500
solid and success rate. 
So you know, No, it's a little 

604
00:33:15,500 --> 00:33:18,300
similar to like, Singletary, 
cooker, whatever, where it does,

605
00:33:18,400 --> 00:33:20,800
it actually does. 
Kind of make sense to abuse both

606
00:33:20,800 --> 00:33:23,700
guys as much as we would, rather
just have the explosive guy out 

607
00:33:23,700 --> 00:33:25,200
there for as much as you can 
handle. 

608
00:33:25,700 --> 00:33:28,300
But like from a coaching 
perspective, I kind of get it 

609
00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:30,500
especially against a team like 
the Texans. 

610
00:33:31,400 --> 00:33:36,800
Yeah, I think it I think it the 
usage kind of makes makes sense.

611
00:33:36,800 --> 00:33:39,100
Like you said like Zeke's not 
playing so bad. 

612
00:33:39,300 --> 00:33:41,600
I mean and you don't want for 
like you're really talented 

613
00:33:41,600 --> 00:33:43,900
receiving explosive back. 
Like why do you want to risk 

614
00:33:43,900 --> 00:33:46,200
giving them? 
You know, ten carries up the gut

615
00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:48,300
for game, especially a Pollard 
sighs. 

616
00:33:48,300 --> 00:33:51,300
Like I think the usage kind of 
makes sense but also you like 

617
00:33:51,300 --> 00:33:53,300
you said, like I think it's a 
good point that, you know, we 

618
00:33:53,300 --> 00:33:56,300
can bring out the first half. 
Step counts, all we want, but 

619
00:33:56,400 --> 00:33:59,500
it's still like takes away from 
running backs up side. 

620
00:33:59,500 --> 00:34:02,500
If they are not the one out 
there to solve the game away, 

621
00:34:02,500 --> 00:34:05,700
like I kind of remember this 
with Chimera you know in years 

622
00:34:05,700 --> 00:34:08,900
past where Ingram will get all 
those touches when the Drew 

623
00:34:08,900 --> 00:34:11,400
Brees lid, let's say it's rough.
Big at the end of games and like

624
00:34:11,400 --> 00:34:13,900
that would cap kamara's upside a
little bit because he's not 

625
00:34:13,900 --> 00:34:16,000
getting the The salt, the game 
away carries, you know, that's 

626
00:34:16,000 --> 00:34:18,900
not like massive because they're
slightly less valuable touches. 

627
00:34:18,900 --> 00:34:21,100
Right. 
But it's still you know you 

628
00:34:21,100 --> 00:34:24,300
can't completely disregard that 
like I don't think Pollard's 

629
00:34:24,400 --> 00:34:27,699
going to ever to get those 
touches based on the usage. 

630
00:34:27,699 --> 00:34:35,400
So yeah I think another, another
thing we should talk about is 

631
00:34:35,400 --> 00:34:40,400
D'Andre Swift and the Lions 
backfield this week. 

632
00:34:40,400 --> 00:34:44,300
We did see Swift back to a 
better role. 

633
00:34:44,800 --> 00:34:47,500
Um I think I actually like you 
think you may have predicted 

634
00:34:47,500 --> 00:34:52,699
this on your good football show 
pod this past week where I think

635
00:34:52,699 --> 00:34:54,800
either you or Kyle or someone 
hadn't nailed it. 

636
00:34:54,800 --> 00:34:57,300
Yeah, said you can upside was 
50% of snakes. 

637
00:34:57,800 --> 00:34:59,500
Yeah. 
I was 50. 

638
00:34:59,500 --> 00:35:05,000
He had that upside of 50% so 
yeah, curious like that's that's

639
00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:07,400
good, right? 
He was at like 20 to 30 range. 

640
00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:09,000
I believe in the weeks leading 
up to this. 

641
00:35:09,200 --> 00:35:11,600
He's back 250. 
Lot of the high-value touches 

642
00:35:12,500 --> 00:35:14,000
that's a good thing. 
I think you can now like feel 

643
00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:15,200
comfortable. 
I'm starting him. 

644
00:35:15,900 --> 00:35:20,200
Do you have any read on if like 
there's you think there's more 

645
00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:22,400
upside now or do you still think
like, the upside is capped 

646
00:35:22,400 --> 00:35:26,600
around around 54 Swift 50%. 
I mean, I think, I think the 

647
00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:30,400
bullish thing here for Swift was
like, I did kind of a back of 

648
00:35:30,400 --> 00:35:34,500
the napkin calculation to be 
like, I think, you know, looking

649
00:35:34,500 --> 00:35:37,400
at week 12, I was like, I think 
is upsides probably around 50 

650
00:35:37,400 --> 00:35:40,200
because you're still going to 
get, like, 40 for Jamaal 

651
00:35:40,200 --> 00:35:43,900
Williams and that leaves 10 for 
Justin Jackson who, you know, we

652
00:35:43,900 --> 00:35:47,000
always want. 
Running back threes to go away. 

653
00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:52,700
They never fully go away, 
usually, so you know, give him 

654
00:35:52,700 --> 00:35:57,600
his ten and maybe that gets 
Swift. 250 Swift got to 51, but 

655
00:35:57,600 --> 00:36:02,300
Justin Jackson was still at 21. 
So Jamal Williams dropped more 

656
00:36:02,300 --> 00:36:05,200
than I thought he might he 
dropped down a 30%. 

657
00:36:05,200 --> 00:36:09,500
That would be awesome if you so 
now, maybe we can get to 60 

658
00:36:09,500 --> 00:36:12,100
percent. 
If Jackson goes away a little 

659
00:36:12,100 --> 00:36:13,800
bit more, maybe even the low 
60s. 

660
00:36:14,500 --> 00:36:18,000
So now I feel like you're 
upside, Target is moved to let's

661
00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:21,900
say, like 60 and that's nice. 
And you probably feel like I'm 

662
00:36:21,900 --> 00:36:27,400
definitely getting 40 to 50 with
DeAndre Swift. 

663
00:36:28,400 --> 00:36:30,600
It's still definitely Shake. 
I don't think it's not like what

664
00:36:30,600 --> 00:36:34,000
we drafted and I don't think 
he's back to being you know like

665
00:36:34,000 --> 00:36:39,100
a locked-in starter but he hit 
he hit the upside projection. 

666
00:36:39,100 --> 00:36:42,700
I think his upside projection 
moves up now and I mean he looks

667
00:36:42,800 --> 00:36:44,300
he looks good and he's 
producing. 

668
00:36:44,400 --> 00:36:48,900
So and I mean, frankly, this 
offense is just pretty good. 

669
00:36:49,600 --> 00:36:51,700
Yeah. 
It's like kind of an offense. 

670
00:36:51,700 --> 00:36:54,500
I don't mind betting on. 
No think the offense is good. 

671
00:36:54,500 --> 00:36:57,300
They also, I mean DJ charts 
back. 

672
00:36:57,400 --> 00:37:00,900
Josh Reynolds is healthier. 
Jameson Williams is going back. 

673
00:37:00,900 --> 00:37:03,600
Like their their offense is 
getting all their guys back. 

674
00:37:04,100 --> 00:37:06,500
So I feel good about continuing 
to bet on offense. 

675
00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:10,300
Yeah, the small room Williams 
roll like almost breaks my chart

676
00:37:10,300 --> 00:37:13,700
here, he's gotten insane 
rushing, workload sort of in the

677
00:37:13,700 --> 00:37:16,200
bottom, right? 
Like below the chart and just 

678
00:37:16,200 --> 00:37:19,200
absolutely no receiving 
workload. 

679
00:37:19,200 --> 00:37:21,200
It's a really, it's one of the 
weirder rolls. 

680
00:37:21,700 --> 00:37:26,400
It does freak, your chart? 
Yeah, yeah. 

681
00:37:26,400 --> 00:37:28,300
Start to think of historical 
comparison to the Jamaal 

682
00:37:28,300 --> 00:37:30,200
Williams row. 
Like, I don't know if it's like,

683
00:37:30,500 --> 00:37:34,200
Jerome, Bettis level roll or, 
like, what you would compare it 

684
00:37:34,200 --> 00:37:37,300
to but it's like insane. 
Insane expecting points from 

685
00:37:37,300 --> 00:37:39,500
goal line. 
Carrying Mike Tolbert. 

686
00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:41,300
Yeah. 
Maybe Mike Tolbert. 

687
00:37:41,300 --> 00:37:43,400
Yeah, I don't know. 
It's bizarre. 

688
00:37:46,000 --> 00:37:50,300
Anyways, couple of quick notes, 
I'll let you react to to any of 

689
00:37:50,300 --> 00:37:54,900
that, that spark your interest. 
First Seattle, I think with the 

690
00:37:54,900 --> 00:38:01,700
Ken Walker injury, I'd be 
prioritizing Travis Homer ahead 

691
00:38:01,700 --> 00:38:04,700
of deejay Dallas and Tony Jones.
But that is a huge toss-up. 

692
00:38:04,700 --> 00:38:08,100
We don't really know the health 
of Dallas or Homer Homer dealing

693
00:38:08,100 --> 00:38:11,800
with the knee injury, Dallas 
dealing with a high ankle injury

694
00:38:11,800 --> 00:38:15,100
I believe and then Tony Jones, I
think is just bad. 

695
00:38:15,400 --> 00:38:17,800
I'll give the slight Edge to 
Homer, just because I think he 

696
00:38:17,800 --> 00:38:21,200
will, you had been running ahead
of Dallas this year up until the

697
00:38:21,200 --> 00:38:23,900
injury. 
So I'm betting that Walker. 

698
00:38:23,900 --> 00:38:27,600
Misses some time and I think 
homers guy you want, but I would

699
00:38:27,600 --> 00:38:33,800
be sort of adding probably, the 
order would be Homer Dallas for.

700
00:38:33,800 --> 00:38:36,300
Yeah, I don't know, Homer Jones,
Dallas, I think maybe it may be 

701
00:38:36,300 --> 00:38:38,400
in that order if you're looking 
for the Seattle running backs, 

702
00:38:41,000 --> 00:38:43,700
Other thing is, I think, I think
it's home, or probably. 

703
00:38:43,700 --> 00:38:47,100
Yeah, yeah, low confidence in 
that. 

704
00:38:47,100 --> 00:38:49,800
Like definitely monitor the 
injuries this week, but if I 

705
00:38:49,800 --> 00:38:51,800
like some leaves and I have to 
make your waiver decisions 

706
00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:57,000
tonight, I would go Homer, but 
because I think he was a bit of 

707
00:38:57,000 --> 00:38:59,500
a surprise inactive this week. 
I know they mentioned the knee 

708
00:38:59,500 --> 00:39:02,400
injury, but it was, I think it 
was ruled out with the illness 

709
00:39:02,800 --> 00:39:05,600
more than the knee. 
So I I don't know. 

710
00:39:05,600 --> 00:39:09,000
But that's, that's a weird one 
definitely monitor at this week.

711
00:39:09,400 --> 00:39:12,600
Other thing off game like 2 or 3
years ago where they leaned on 

712
00:39:12,600 --> 00:39:16,400
him as kind of a every snap guy 
or close to it. 

713
00:39:16,400 --> 00:39:20,000
I think and not much of a 
fantasy relevant, dude. 

714
00:39:20,000 --> 00:39:22,500
He's mostly just soaking up 
snaps but I think they trust 

715
00:39:22,500 --> 00:39:25,400
them. 
Yeah, I think that historically 

716
00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:28,300
like Homer and Alice have been 
on the same team for a couple 

717
00:39:28,300 --> 00:39:30,800
years now. 
I'm not going to do a deep dive 

718
00:39:30,800 --> 00:39:35,100
into Travis home, a deejay 
Dallas but my my God, my God In 

719
00:39:35,100 --> 00:39:38,400
My Memory says that they gently 
like Omer over Dallas. 

720
00:39:39,200 --> 00:39:44,200
I'm not going to waste with that
but yeah, other other gross back

721
00:39:44,200 --> 00:39:47,700
you'll discussion cam Akers. 
You know, shockingly comes back 

722
00:39:47,700 --> 00:39:51,000
to life this week. 
If you have to start a Rams 

723
00:39:51,000 --> 00:39:54,300
running back, you know, you 
probably in your consolation 

724
00:39:54,300 --> 00:39:57,100
bracket if you're looking at 
Ram's running backs now but I 

725
00:39:57,100 --> 00:40:00,500
would go with Acres over copper 
and Williams but it's a bit of a

726
00:40:00,800 --> 00:40:03,700
bit of a ping pong effect, their
back and forth. 

727
00:40:05,200 --> 00:40:09,000
Yeah, I mean I don't know what 
league this would be in but 870 

728
00:40:09,200 --> 00:40:12,600
Two percent of snaps and Karen 
was at 71% the previous week, 

729
00:40:12,600 --> 00:40:15,200
but I'll bet on the guy that's 
got it. 

730
00:40:15,207 --> 00:40:17,700
Most recently. 
Yeah, yeah. 

731
00:40:19,300 --> 00:40:23,000
Cool. 
That's let's move on to wide 

732
00:40:23,000 --> 00:40:25,000
receiver for people falling on 
Along on video. 

733
00:40:25,000 --> 00:40:28,700
I'm flashing up the like running
back snaps and uses charts. 

734
00:40:28,700 --> 00:40:30,600
I will also post these on 
Twitter. 

735
00:40:30,700 --> 00:40:36,000
This is sort of another look at 
running back usage here, but I 

736
00:40:36,000 --> 00:40:38,100
think we covered a lot in these 
in-depth. 

737
00:40:38,100 --> 00:40:41,600
So, I'll post on Twitter for 
anybody who wants to look at 

738
00:40:41,600 --> 00:40:47,000
these these numbers in more 
detail, but won't cover off here

739
00:40:47,200 --> 00:40:50,300
on the pod. 
Let's move on to wide receiver. 

740
00:40:51,100 --> 00:40:53,300
So here, we're looking at Water.
Super opportunity versus fantasy

741
00:40:53,300 --> 00:40:56,900
points for the wide receivers 
with greater than 85 percent of 

742
00:40:56,900 --> 00:41:00,000
their routes run. 
So full-time, wide receivers we 

743
00:41:00,000 --> 00:41:03,400
have fantasy points for game 
here on the y axis and then 

744
00:41:03,400 --> 00:41:06,900
waited targets, for Route run 
here on the x-axis. 

745
00:41:07,100 --> 00:41:10,700
For those who are not familiar 
way to Target for outrun is the 

746
00:41:10,700 --> 00:41:14,600
number of targets, these players
are earning per route but it is 

747
00:41:14,600 --> 00:41:17,300
adjusted for the depth of 
Target. 

748
00:41:17,300 --> 00:41:21,300
So you know, your 40 yards, 
downfield shots DK Metcalfe is 

749
00:41:21,300 --> 00:41:24,200
worth more than your, you know, 
behind the line of scrimmage 

750
00:41:24,200 --> 00:41:28,000
screen to Rondell more and 
that's sort of reflected in that

751
00:41:28,000 --> 00:41:31,600
metric here. 
Pat again a lot of this is sort 

752
00:41:31,600 --> 00:41:34,300
of stabilized. 
I think like we see a lot of 

753
00:41:34,300 --> 00:41:37,000
names. 
We'd expect to see in the top, 

754
00:41:37,100 --> 00:41:39,300
the top right here. 
I think maybe the relevant 

755
00:41:39,300 --> 00:41:43,100
question for this week and we 
touched on a little bit, is the 

756
00:41:43,100 --> 00:41:45,200
San Francisco wide receivers in 
Brandon. 

757
00:41:45,200 --> 00:41:51,300
I uke and debose Samuel. 
How How far are you dropping 

758
00:41:51,600 --> 00:41:54,400
those guys this week? 
And yeah, maybe to make it like 

759
00:41:54,800 --> 00:41:57,500
more concrete. 
How would you rank? 

760
00:41:58,000 --> 00:42:00,600
Say, you have, you know, Gabe 
Davis. 

761
00:42:00,800 --> 00:42:08,100
Michael Pittman DJ more and 
Brandon IU cow, are you ranking?

762
00:42:08,100 --> 00:42:10,600
Iuka amongst those, those four 
guys? 

763
00:42:14,000 --> 00:42:19,000
I think you're on mute Pat. 
So Pittman more gave days, he 

764
00:42:19,000 --> 00:42:22,700
might be forth. 
Okay, honestly might be 4th, I 

765
00:42:22,700 --> 00:42:29,500
just Like, I'm already, I was 
already struggling with the San 

766
00:42:29,500 --> 00:42:32,400
Francisco, guys, you know, it's 
already feeling like, kind of 

767
00:42:32,400 --> 00:42:34,400
roulette. 
Here's know. 

768
00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:37,700
There weren't really any sign of
a very flat waited targets per 

769
00:42:37,700 --> 00:42:42,100
out, run across the whole team 
Kittle Debo. 

770
00:42:42,600 --> 00:42:47,000
I uke Juwan, Jennings is well 
was pretty flat in terms of the 

771
00:42:47,300 --> 00:42:49,700
way to targets per outrun. 
He runs a lot less routes than 

772
00:42:49,700 --> 00:42:52,900
those guys but he's continued to
be involved. 

773
00:42:53,600 --> 00:42:56,900
Which is like not what we need 
and then we lose Jimmy. 

774
00:42:56,900 --> 00:43:02,700
So, you know, I you quiz. 
He ran a route. 100 percent of 

775
00:43:02,707 --> 00:43:06,800
drop backs last week and I think
he's kind of like they're true 

776
00:43:06,800 --> 00:43:11,000
sort of classic wide. 
Receiver one debose hasn't 

777
00:43:11,000 --> 00:43:13,600
really like challenged. 
He hasn't really taken that roll

778
00:43:13,600 --> 00:43:17,600
back this season after starting 
its kind of the hybrid still. 

779
00:43:18,400 --> 00:43:24,300
So I think I think I would have 
I you glass Yeah, that's 

780
00:43:24,300 --> 00:43:27,700
interesting. 
I think I may be a little bit 

781
00:43:28,000 --> 00:43:30,100
more bullish, but I can 
definitely see how the floor 

782
00:43:30,600 --> 00:43:35,300
drops out for those guys. 
I think it just with, are you 

783
00:43:35,300 --> 00:43:39,100
grunting 100% of the routes. 
And I'm just a big believer in 

784
00:43:39,100 --> 00:43:44,100
the talent of him, then then 
Davis and Pittman. 

785
00:43:44,100 --> 00:43:47,200
And it's not like, you know, 
Dave is obviously as good good 

786
00:43:47,200 --> 00:43:50,300
quarterback if you like routes. 
I mean Pittman has literally not

787
00:43:50,300 --> 00:43:52,100
missed a route in the Jeff 
Saturday. 

788
00:43:53,600 --> 00:43:56,500
He hasn't in the entire Saturday
era, the guy's not taking a 

789
00:43:56,500 --> 00:44:01,000
route off. 
Yeah, kind of wild that is that 

790
00:44:01,000 --> 00:44:05,000
it's pretty crazy and gave Davis
is, you know, he's not that far 

791
00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:06,200
out. 
Not that insane level. 

792
00:44:06,200 --> 00:44:09,000
That Pittman's a but he's 
consistently been like close to 

793
00:44:09,000 --> 00:44:12,000
100% rallies. 
He's the round leader in Buffalo

794
00:44:12,100 --> 00:44:15,300
over. 
So yeah, I don't know. 

795
00:44:15,300 --> 00:44:18,400
I I definitely think I like I 
think the point is like last 

796
00:44:18,400 --> 00:44:19,900
week. 
I would have constantly said, I 

797
00:44:19,900 --> 00:44:24,000
you easily over Pittman Davis 
and more and now, like, I am 

798
00:44:24,200 --> 00:44:27,100
kind of waffling what having to 
choose between them and you seem

799
00:44:27,100 --> 00:44:29,300
to be even lower. 
More than me on him. 

800
00:44:29,300 --> 00:44:34,200
So I think overall we can say 
it's a pretty big hit for me. 

801
00:44:34,200 --> 00:44:37,000
Now that we got seemed Arnold 
supporting DJ more. 

802
00:44:37,100 --> 00:44:39,400
We're back in, right? 
Yeah. 

803
00:44:39,500 --> 00:44:42,600
Sam Donald is the it's not a all
alone. 

804
00:44:42,800 --> 00:44:44,800
He's known for string a bunch of
against the other. 

805
00:44:44,800 --> 00:44:48,300
So I think that's what he's 
known for, for sure. 

806
00:44:48,500 --> 00:44:52,100
Yeah, well could go wrong. 
What could go wrong? 

807
00:44:52,400 --> 00:44:57,100
Oh man. 
Nick on the game Davis thing. 

808
00:44:58,300 --> 00:45:02,900
Like I would. 
So next comment is seeing gave 

809
00:45:02,900 --> 00:45:04,300
Davis solo on way to torture 
dot. 

810
00:45:04,300 --> 00:45:07,800
Run is a little worrisome. 
I've been kind of like tuning 

811
00:45:07,800 --> 00:45:10,300
this horn, this whole year, I 
was actually pretty high on 

812
00:45:10,300 --> 00:45:13,900
Gabe, Davis in, like, the 
offseason was drafting 

813
00:45:13,900 --> 00:45:18,200
basketball, whatever. 
But he's just been like really 

814
00:45:18,200 --> 00:45:20,800
bad earning Targets this year. 
Like he's in the say in terms of

815
00:45:20,800 --> 00:45:24,900
like learning targets, he's in 
the same range of guys like Josh

816
00:45:24,900 --> 00:45:29,600
Reynolds, Robert Woods, Adam 
thielen And Mac Holland's dpj 

817
00:45:29,900 --> 00:45:34,300
like, that's what we're talking 
about in terms of like his rate 

818
00:45:34,300 --> 00:45:36,400
stats. 
Obviously, he's on the bills. 

819
00:45:36,400 --> 00:45:39,400
So bump up those great stats by 
Buffalo's volume. 

820
00:45:39,400 --> 00:45:40,800
Like, that's not reflect on the 
chart. 

821
00:45:40,800 --> 00:45:44,200
The fact that Buffalo throws way
more than any of those teams. 

822
00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:49,000
So it's not like, as dire as I'm
describing, but like, it's still

823
00:45:49,200 --> 00:45:51,500
pretty bad like you. 
I don't know. 

824
00:45:51,508 --> 00:45:53,900
It's weird for Davis, right? 
Because he was so efficient on a

825
00:45:53,908 --> 00:45:57,300
per route basis, like his whole 
career leading up to this. 

826
00:45:57,500 --> 00:45:59,400
It's almost like it's flipped 
like used to be this really 

827
00:45:59,400 --> 00:46:01,900
efficient on a per hour basis, 
couldn't see the field. 

828
00:46:02,000 --> 00:46:05,600
Now, it's like he sees the field
all the time and like can learn 

829
00:46:05,600 --> 00:46:07,900
targets. 
So I'm trying to understand like

830
00:46:07,900 --> 00:46:09,400
maybe longer term view with 
Gabe. 

831
00:46:09,400 --> 00:46:12,300
Davis, like what what kind of 
player like, do you think we're 

832
00:46:12,300 --> 00:46:15,000
looking at? 
Do you have any way to like 

833
00:46:15,400 --> 00:46:17,700
explain? 
You know, sort of how bad he's 

834
00:46:17,700 --> 00:46:19,600
been on a per hour basis of 
here? 

835
00:46:20,800 --> 00:46:25,900
Well, he has a first retarget 
this year on 10% of his routes 

836
00:46:26,400 --> 00:46:29,800
which is not high. 
At all Stefon Diggs at 22 

837
00:46:29,800 --> 00:46:33,800
percent which is a really good 
rate, Isaiah MacKenzie's at 11% 

838
00:46:33,800 --> 00:46:38,600
so higher than Gabe Davis. 
So that's that's concerning 

839
00:46:38,600 --> 00:46:41,100
that's like a concerning lie, 
low rate and I think it helps 

840
00:46:41,100 --> 00:46:44,800
explain why he has a 15% Target 
rate. 

841
00:46:45,100 --> 00:46:47,700
He's a true deep threat with a 
16.3 a taut. 

842
00:46:47,700 --> 00:46:53,100
So you know, he's not he's not 
drawing a lot of targets and the

843
00:46:53,100 --> 00:46:54,900
way to Target per hour on 
accounts for the a dot. 

844
00:46:54,900 --> 00:46:57,300
But in general, like, you know, 
you shouldn't get like 22. 

845
00:46:57,500 --> 00:47:00,800
Started with a low Target rate 
of 15% because he is when he 

846
00:47:00,800 --> 00:47:04,700
judged us draw, Target tends to 
be pretty valuable to that 

847
00:47:04,700 --> 00:47:08,600
point. 
I would know he's seeing middle 

848
00:47:08,600 --> 00:47:12,800
of the field targets traveling. 
At least 10 are yards on four 

849
00:47:12,800 --> 00:47:14,400
point. 
Five percent is Right rates, 

850
00:47:14,400 --> 00:47:17,900
which is actually pretty high 
rate its highest on the bills. 

851
00:47:18,400 --> 00:47:22,500
So it's like when he is getting 
deep shots, he's tending to get 

852
00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:25,700
high value, like middle of the 
field deep shots that he can, 

853
00:47:25,800 --> 00:47:29,400
you know, take to the house. 
Potentially Or aren't going to 

854
00:47:29,400 --> 00:47:33,100
necessarily always be like the 
super tough catches Amari Cooper

855
00:47:33,100 --> 00:47:35,000
rates really low in this metric,
by the way. 

856
00:47:35,000 --> 00:47:37,300
Like, you think about like him. 
He's always having to do. 

857
00:47:37,400 --> 00:47:39,500
So it's kind of like, super 
underneath stuff or like really 

858
00:47:39,500 --> 00:47:41,200
difficult, sideline catches? 
Yeah. 

859
00:47:41,200 --> 00:47:45,400
So, I think, you know, it's not 
quite as dire for Gabe in some 

860
00:47:45,400 --> 00:47:49,500
ways, but also, like he is not 
the offense is not designed to 

861
00:47:49,500 --> 00:47:51,600
run through gave David's. 
The offense is not designed to 

862
00:47:51,600 --> 00:47:55,300
run through Stefon Diggs. 
Gabe Davis has his role is to 

863
00:47:55,300 --> 00:47:59,900
help take pressure off of Stefon
Diggs Diggs is only been 

864
00:47:59,900 --> 00:48:03,800
double-teamed on 23% of his 
routes which is like it's a high

865
00:48:03,800 --> 00:48:06,600
rate but it's much lower than 
you see from a guy like Jamar 

866
00:48:06,600 --> 00:48:10,400
Chase, who leads the league with
like I think 33 percent rate. 

867
00:48:10,800 --> 00:48:12,100
Yep. 
All right around there. 

868
00:48:12,500 --> 00:48:14,300
So I feel like Davis is kind of 
doing his job. 

869
00:48:14,300 --> 00:48:16,100
He's drawing coverage not 
drawing. 

870
00:48:16,100 --> 00:48:19,500
It is super high rate, but he's 
drawing coverage enough to keep 

871
00:48:19,500 --> 00:48:21,400
digs its kind of the engine of 
the offense. 

872
00:48:22,500 --> 00:48:25,000
They're calling plays with to 
get, digs the ball, a lot more 

873
00:48:25,000 --> 00:48:29,400
than Davis the so I don't know. 
I mean I think you throw them 

874
00:48:29,400 --> 00:48:32,200
out there and you hope that this
is a week where he has a spike 

875
00:48:32,200 --> 00:48:37,300
week, like that's that's who he 
is but he's he's that guy 

876
00:48:37,400 --> 00:48:40,100
playing with Josh Allen so you 
feel okay about it. 

877
00:48:40,100 --> 00:48:42,700
And then the last thing I would 
note is that I mentioned a heavy

878
00:48:42,700 --> 00:48:47,100
Personnel stuff with the bills. 
He might benefit from that 

879
00:48:47,100 --> 00:48:49,700
because he didn't Wings has 
shown, you know, if you're into 

880
00:48:49,700 --> 00:48:52,700
wide receiver sets that that's 
good if you're one of those wide

881
00:48:52,700 --> 00:48:55,500
receivers your now competing 
with not a wide you know there's

882
00:48:55,500 --> 00:48:58,100
not a third wide receiver on the
field which is good for you to 

883
00:48:58,100 --> 00:49:03,000
be able to earn targets and so 
with that in mind you know he's 

884
00:49:03,000 --> 00:49:05,900
had seven targets, get seven 
targets against the Browns, get 

885
00:49:05,900 --> 00:49:07,500
seven targets against the 
Patriots. 

886
00:49:08,500 --> 00:49:12,500
So I actually feel like maybe 
this is a week that could be a 

887
00:49:12,500 --> 00:49:15,300
good week for Gabe Davis, even 
though they shift to the Run, I 

888
00:49:15,800 --> 00:49:19,100
may be off of that run off of 
those running plays, we get some

889
00:49:19,100 --> 00:49:20,700
big plays for Gabe Davis, 
downfield. 

890
00:49:21,200 --> 00:49:25,200
Yeah, I like that. 
And also people in the chat 

891
00:49:25,400 --> 00:49:27,900
matching the injury and Liam 
saying, I think 11 days off is 

892
00:49:27,900 --> 00:49:31,700
big for the bills. 
I have seen, like, some people 

893
00:49:31,800 --> 00:49:34,400
splice Clips together of gay 
Davis, running routes, and like,

894
00:49:34,400 --> 00:49:36,800
seemingly limping and stuff. 
So it, maybe there is some, like

895
00:49:36,800 --> 00:49:39,000
ankle or something going on with
them too. 

896
00:49:39,000 --> 00:49:44,000
And maybe after, you know, 11 
days of rest that that gets 

897
00:49:44,000 --> 00:49:45,200
better, I know he's been banged 
up this. 

898
00:49:45,300 --> 00:49:49,100
But yeah, that that all makes 
makes a lot of sense. 

899
00:49:51,000 --> 00:49:54,700
Okay, cool moving. 
Moving on to the next chart. 

900
00:49:56,000 --> 00:50:00,700
Again, a lot of things that sort
of, we've seen a lot Tyree kill 

901
00:50:00,700 --> 00:50:03,600
this. 
Absolutely breaking my chart, 

902
00:50:03,600 --> 00:50:07,600
once again, at 88% waited to 
Archer outrun, he's got the best

903
00:50:07,700 --> 00:50:09,600
role in the league. 
We see, you know, modern Rock 

904
00:50:09,600 --> 00:50:12,600
crushing it Jalen waddle having 
a pretty strong role, we've seen

905
00:50:12,600 --> 00:50:16,700
all these things for weeks. 
The Thing I wanted to ask you, 

906
00:50:16,700 --> 00:50:18,900
Pat, maybe this is, you know, 
jumping ahead a little bit, get 

907
00:50:18,900 --> 00:50:22,400
into the realm of Dynasty. 
I think we have a big enough 

908
00:50:22,400 --> 00:50:26,200
sample on some of these rookie 
wide receivers to, to have some,

909
00:50:26,200 --> 00:50:29,400
like Dynasty takes about them 
going forward. 

910
00:50:29,400 --> 00:50:32,900
So just, you know, putting on 
the spot here. 

911
00:50:32,900 --> 00:50:35,200
But off the top of your head, 
how would you rank? 

912
00:50:35,500 --> 00:50:37,900
I'm thinking of the five wide 
receiver, five rookie wide 

913
00:50:37,900 --> 00:50:41,700
receivers at a flashed the most 
this year and in my head that is

914
00:50:41,700 --> 00:50:45,100
pretty clearly Crystal Ave 
Garrett Wilson. 

915
00:50:45,500 --> 00:50:50,600
Christian Watson Trail on Burks 
and Drake London. 

916
00:50:50,600 --> 00:50:52,600
I think you put them in here 
just for a sort of his rate 

917
00:50:52,600 --> 00:50:56,800
stats. 
How are you thinking about those

918
00:50:56,800 --> 00:50:59,400
five going forward and maybe 
like a ranking, you know, off 

919
00:50:59,400 --> 00:51:02,800
the top of your head, one 
through five for dynasty Wilson,

920
00:51:02,800 --> 00:51:08,400
one then I think you have to 
have a lava to and I wasn't that

921
00:51:08,400 --> 00:51:12,400
high on a lava coming in but 
like, I mean, I don't know what 

922
00:51:12,400 --> 00:51:13,700
else you're looking for at this 
point. 

923
00:51:13,700 --> 00:51:16,200
Yeah, he looks like a stud. 
Yeah. 

924
00:51:16,800 --> 00:51:22,000
Then I would have Burke's 3. 
I think if he hadn't had that 

925
00:51:22,000 --> 00:51:25,000
concussion he would he was that 
was going to be explosion game 

926
00:51:25,000 --> 00:51:27,300
for him. 
Yeah, I really liked him as a 

927
00:51:27,308 --> 00:51:30,900
prospect and I feel like he's 
shown you know it's all about 

928
00:51:30,900 --> 00:51:32,900
like deep over the middle of 
field targets. 

929
00:51:32,900 --> 00:51:34,900
That's like all he's getting, 
it's beautiful. 

930
00:51:38,900 --> 00:51:45,000
I think I'd put I think I'm 
Watson for I mean yeah very 

931
00:51:45,000 --> 00:51:48,600
similar profile to a Lobby where
he's getting a ton of deep looks

932
00:51:48,600 --> 00:51:51,400
and he's also the number one 
target or not on the team. 

933
00:51:52,000 --> 00:51:54,600
You could argue that he, I mean,
if anything, I feel like you 

934
00:51:54,600 --> 00:51:56,300
could argue, I have Watson too 
low. 

935
00:51:57,100 --> 00:52:03,600
So like apology, Cedric London, 
but when, when George, when Kyle

936
00:52:03,600 --> 00:52:07,900
Pitts was healthy, they were 
going to him with their first 

937
00:52:07,900 --> 00:52:09,400
read. 
Target's over London. 

938
00:52:10,100 --> 00:52:13,800
London had a lot of targets last
week, but old al-ahmad eggs, 

939
00:52:13,900 --> 00:52:16,600
olamide zaccheaus was, was 
getting a ton of targets over 

940
00:52:16,600 --> 00:52:21,300
him two weeks ago and like 
Arthur Smith probably not 

941
00:52:21,300 --> 00:52:23,900
getting fired. 
So, we're doing this all over 

942
00:52:23,900 --> 00:52:27,200
again next year, and dynasties 
very much a year-to-year game, 

943
00:52:27,200 --> 00:52:30,100
like, your you are. 
If you're investing in one of 

944
00:52:30,107 --> 00:52:32,900
these rookies, you need to be 
thinking about, what is their 

945
00:52:32,900 --> 00:52:35,300
value going to be at this time 
next year? 

946
00:52:35,600 --> 00:52:38,800
Yeah. 
And I think another Are like 

947
00:52:39,300 --> 00:52:42,900
almost year of dealing with this
Arthur Smith offense. 

948
00:52:43,700 --> 00:52:47,400
It's not going to have his all 
that excited about Drake wanted 

949
00:52:47,400 --> 00:52:49,800
potentially. 
So I think I'd rather invest in 

950
00:52:49,800 --> 00:52:51,800
the other guy's not the Drake 
lawn and isn't good. 

951
00:52:51,800 --> 00:52:54,600
I think he's good, but I would 
have him five right now. 

952
00:52:55,100 --> 00:53:00,700
Yeah, I think I think I would 
have it very, very similar. 

953
00:53:00,700 --> 00:53:03,800
I think you can like nitpick 
here there, maybe flip a lot of 

954
00:53:03,800 --> 00:53:06,800
in Wilson, maybe flip Watson and
perks, but I think that's like 

955
00:53:07,100 --> 00:53:09,600
the right order. 
Yeah, just a couple notes on, 

956
00:53:09,600 --> 00:53:13,500
like, London verse verse Watson.
And again, it's still relatively

957
00:53:13,700 --> 00:53:16,300
rough sample or small sample for
just the rookie year. 

958
00:53:16,300 --> 00:53:20,000
But London is sitting at one 
point seven, two yards, for 

959
00:53:20,000 --> 00:53:23,100
outrun this year, which is good 
for a rookie. 

960
00:53:23,100 --> 00:53:26,400
Definitely not something. 
I'd be like scared off of but 

961
00:53:26,400 --> 00:53:30,900
Watson I think is up at 2.3 
yards for outrun which is a 

962
00:53:30,900 --> 00:53:34,700
really Elite rate for a rookie 
and yeah like you said he's 

963
00:53:34,700 --> 00:53:38,500
going to be tied to Rogers. 
I think that's why I would Like 

964
00:53:38,500 --> 00:53:43,200
similar to the argument of 
Arthur Smith being back in 

965
00:53:43,200 --> 00:53:47,300
Atlanta, I think, you know, 
variable and his schematics be 

966
00:53:47,300 --> 00:53:49,800
back in Tennessee. 
I think I would actually say 

967
00:53:49,800 --> 00:53:54,700
Watson over Burke's just for the
trade value side of things. 

968
00:53:54,700 --> 00:53:57,700
I think Watson is the guy that's
going to have a higher redraft 

969
00:53:57,700 --> 00:54:00,700
price next year than Barracks. 
I think, you know, just for 

970
00:54:00,700 --> 00:54:04,300
being on the Packers offense and
you know, when he's actually 

971
00:54:04,400 --> 00:54:07,700
been on the field for a 
full-time role, he's absolutely 

972
00:54:07,700 --> 00:54:09,900
just It's exploding in terms of 
fantasy points. 

973
00:54:09,900 --> 00:54:12,700
I think people will have that in
their mind from the trade value 

974
00:54:12,700 --> 00:54:15,300
perspective. 
So the push back out have there 

975
00:54:15,300 --> 00:54:17,300
and I think that's a totally 
fair take. 

976
00:54:17,800 --> 00:54:19,900
I don't really, I think it's 
fine. 

977
00:54:19,900 --> 00:54:22,400
But the reason I would go Burks 
ahead. 

978
00:54:23,500 --> 00:54:25,900
He also has an elite yards per 
hour on right now. 

979
00:54:26,100 --> 00:54:31,200
Both guys are at a sample level 
where like, you'd really love to

980
00:54:31,200 --> 00:54:34,700
see more routes to feel like 
confident about saying, you 

981
00:54:34,700 --> 00:54:37,100
know, this is reflective of the 
true Talent level, but it's 

982
00:54:37,100 --> 00:54:40,100
still a really good sign. 
Even even right now. 

983
00:54:40,800 --> 00:54:45,900
And so, you know, compared to 
London, Burke's is up at 2.19. 

984
00:54:46,100 --> 00:54:48,700
So he's much closer to Watson, 
then London. 

985
00:54:49,800 --> 00:54:53,100
And we're also seeing, you know,
the offense starting to go 

986
00:54:53,100 --> 00:54:56,200
through him more and then like 
the thing with Burke's, I really

987
00:54:56,200 --> 00:54:59,200
like them as a prospect. 
I thought that he could be kind 

988
00:54:59,200 --> 00:55:04,200
of this big downfield weapon for
the Titans replacing. 

989
00:55:04,200 --> 00:55:07,000
You know, some of what AJ Brown 
was doing for them to see him 

990
00:55:07,000 --> 00:55:10,600
like doing exactly. 
Really that is like very is very

991
00:55:10,600 --> 00:55:12,000
exciting. 
And then you also think about 

992
00:55:12,000 --> 00:55:14,500
like what what's his team look 
like when Derrick Henry is gone,

993
00:55:15,000 --> 00:55:17,500
you know, is he are they 
potentially going to have to 

994
00:55:17,900 --> 00:55:21,600
throw a little bit more. 
So I start to see kind of the 

995
00:55:21,700 --> 00:55:23,800
ultra run heavy part of this 
team. 

996
00:55:23,900 --> 00:55:26,900
Maybe it's a little shaky or 
here before it does in Atlanta. 

997
00:55:26,900 --> 00:55:30,600
But I agree with you about the 
redraft thing, I think Watson 

998
00:55:30,600 --> 00:55:32,200
probably will go ahead of 
Burke's. 

999
00:55:32,500 --> 00:55:35,500
I think we're talking about like
second round pick London. 

1000
00:55:36,000 --> 00:55:39,700
Probably too. 
Maybe maybe early third for a 

1001
00:55:39,700 --> 00:55:42,200
lobby waiting me? 
Well as markers that you said 

1002
00:55:42,200 --> 00:55:44,700
second on London's you mean well
so I'm sorry I meant Wilson. 

1003
00:55:44,800 --> 00:55:47,400
Yeah. 
Second round Wilson Early. 

1004
00:55:47,400 --> 00:55:54,400
Third olave. 
Third, fourth, turn Watson, and 

1005
00:55:54,400 --> 00:55:57,800
then they have works in the, in 
the, maybe 45. 

1006
00:55:58,000 --> 00:56:02,900
So, I feel right, that feels 
like directionally right to me. 

1007
00:56:04,200 --> 00:56:06,900
Yeah, I'm trying, I guess I'm 
comparing, like, waddle was two,

1008
00:56:06,900 --> 00:56:10,700
three turn this year so, yeah, I
don't see it was more like 3/4 

1009
00:56:10,700 --> 00:56:12,700
turn. 
Oh, that's right. 

1010
00:56:12,700 --> 00:56:15,500
He was 23 turn before Tyree cut 
sign and then Tire you got sign 

1011
00:56:15,500 --> 00:56:17,500
you got bumped back, right? 
Okay yeah. 

1012
00:56:17,500 --> 00:56:22,700
So that all seems right to me. 
I think like waddle, I think, 

1013
00:56:22,700 --> 00:56:25,900
you know Wilson's rookie years, 
like comparable to Waddles. 

1014
00:56:26,000 --> 00:56:29,000
I think Allah basis is to enough
to dig more into it but that all

1015
00:56:29,000 --> 00:56:32,300
sounds right to me. 
So yeah, we're going to I mean 

1016
00:56:32,300 --> 00:56:35,000
this is a really now I'm talking
about I'm just realizing like 

1017
00:56:35,000 --> 00:56:38,100
those top five, that's a really 
strong wide receiver class. 

1018
00:56:38,100 --> 00:56:42,100
I think some of the other guys 
obviously Sky more Pickens It's 

1019
00:56:43,100 --> 00:56:46,700
Dotson have disappointed, but 
having five guys that have 

1020
00:56:46,700 --> 00:56:49,100
showing this much promise and 
we'll all be. 

1021
00:56:49,100 --> 00:56:51,100
I think like, I think we can 
comfortably say they're all 

1022
00:56:51,100 --> 00:56:54,900
going to be top six, seven round
best of all fix next year. 

1023
00:56:54,900 --> 00:56:57,000
Like that's a pretty exciting 
class. 

1024
00:56:57,700 --> 00:57:00,100
I'm more by the way, unless 
something changes. 

1025
00:57:00,100 --> 00:57:03,500
I think he's, we've got to be 
the Gada. 

1026
00:57:03,900 --> 00:57:05,400
I want to be betting again on 
him. 

1027
00:57:05,400 --> 00:57:06,500
He tied to the Chiefs and 
everything. 

1028
00:57:06,500 --> 00:57:09,400
He's actually flashed on a per 
hour basis, but like, you got to

1029
00:57:09,400 --> 00:57:11,400
keep the price cheap on Sky 
more. 

1030
00:57:11,400 --> 00:57:15,400
He's It's very concerning that 
he was the guy who got his price

1031
00:57:15,400 --> 00:57:17,200
yet. 
We're all trapped by the guys in

1032
00:57:17,200 --> 00:57:23,300
this is literally my but yeah I 
mean I think like 13th. 

1033
00:57:23,300 --> 00:57:25,600
Rounds is probably like what 
we're looking at right now, 

1034
00:57:25,600 --> 00:57:28,900
maybe 14th. 
Unless again, unless he can find

1035
00:57:28,900 --> 00:57:30,100
out. 
If he finds a way to get on the 

1036
00:57:30,100 --> 00:57:32,500
field and maintains the 
efficiency, he's shown, I'm 

1037
00:57:32,800 --> 00:57:36,000
willing to get quite a bit more 
bullish, but right now, the fact

1038
00:57:36,000 --> 00:57:38,700
they just have no interest in 
playing him is like extremely 

1039
00:57:38,700 --> 00:57:42,700
concerning one thing. 
I just want to talk to of the 

1040
00:57:42,700 --> 00:57:44,500
other hi. 
Hi, guys. 

1041
00:57:44,500 --> 00:57:47,500
Real quick because Pickens 
people would ask about him in 

1042
00:57:47,500 --> 00:57:52,400
the chat and also note Jahan 
Dotson, both those guys aren't 

1043
00:57:52,500 --> 00:57:56,500
Aren't getting open. 
If you look at this ESPN rolled 

1044
00:57:56,500 --> 00:58:00,800
out an open score, that uses the
NFL player tracking data and I 

1045
00:58:00,800 --> 00:58:03,700
listened to an interview where 
they're describing it and it's 

1046
00:58:03,700 --> 00:58:07,300
actually pretty interesting. 
Like they use like their measure

1047
00:58:07,300 --> 00:58:09,800
of open changes based on like 
the situation. 

1048
00:58:09,800 --> 00:58:13,900
So like if your if your speed is
increasing and you have a step 

1049
00:58:13,900 --> 00:58:17,100
on your man downfield like 
that's open so it's not just 

1050
00:58:17,100 --> 00:58:19,300
like separation. 
It's actually pretty it's a 

1051
00:58:19,300 --> 00:58:22,400
pretty nuanced score using the 
player track. 

1052
00:58:22,600 --> 00:58:24,500
Data. 
So I think it's pretty 

1053
00:58:24,500 --> 00:58:27,800
interesting to look at you're 
saying if you look at George 

1054
00:58:27,800 --> 00:58:32,400
Pickens among all wide receivers
and tight ends, he ranks 93rd 

1055
00:58:32,900 --> 00:58:37,000
this season in open score. 
If you look at Johan Dotson, 

1056
00:58:37,000 --> 00:58:42,200
he's at 103rd. 
There's only 111 guys that they 

1057
00:58:42,200 --> 00:58:45,200
have in here. 
AJ Green is the lowest on the 

1058
00:58:45,200 --> 00:58:48,600
list, a degree in and Robbie 
intercept for Cardinals or the 

1059
00:58:48,900 --> 00:58:51,600
the two lowest on the list. 
Marcus voltage, scaling is third

1060
00:58:51,600 --> 00:58:56,300
last, Gary Wilson ranks 10th, he
leads the rookie class Crystal 

1061
00:58:56,300 --> 00:59:00,900
Lobby ranks 13th. 
He s, AJ Brown leads the league 

1062
00:59:01,900 --> 00:59:03,600
title. 
Locket is actually tied with him

1063
00:59:03,600 --> 00:59:05,900
now and then Terry kill is is 
third. 

1064
00:59:05,900 --> 00:59:08,800
So I don't know. 
It's pretty interesting and that

1065
00:59:08,800 --> 00:59:13,100
doesn't sound of kind of fits 
with what we're worried about 

1066
00:59:13,100 --> 00:59:15,200
with Pickens. 
I think and Dotson is that 

1067
00:59:15,200 --> 00:59:18,200
they're just not getting open. 
So those guys would definitely 

1068
00:59:18,200 --> 00:59:20,300
be. 
You're getting the low yards per

1069
00:59:20,300 --> 00:59:22,900
hour on with those guys. 
Plus a metric saying They're 

1070
00:59:23,100 --> 00:59:25,600
they're not getting open, I 
would be definitely be 

1071
00:59:25,600 --> 00:59:28,900
concerned. 
Yeah, be considered, it's it 

1072
00:59:28,900 --> 00:59:31,900
strikes me that Pickens like if 
he's going to break out it's 

1073
00:59:31,900 --> 00:59:35,300
going to be in like the Mike 
Williams type of way where he 

1074
00:59:35,300 --> 00:59:38,800
finds a quarterback that's 
willing, just get em huge volume

1075
00:59:38,800 --> 00:59:40,900
even when he's not open because 
he's such a good contestant, 

1076
00:59:40,900 --> 00:59:44,200
catch guy. 
But yeah, that archetype is like

1077
00:59:44,500 --> 00:59:46,600
pretty pretty rare. 
And as we've seen with Mike 

1078
00:59:46,600 --> 00:59:49,600
Williams, like hasn't always 
been consistent. 

1079
00:59:49,600 --> 00:59:53,200
So yeah, that's I think that's 
kind of what you're betting on 

1080
00:59:53,200 --> 00:59:57,600
with Pickens but yeah, you know,
players can develop. 

1081
00:59:58,000 --> 01:00:00,600
He can, he can figure that part 
of the game map, but early 

1082
01:00:00,600 --> 01:00:03,800
returns, like I think are a bit 
bit concerning with them. 

1083
01:00:05,900 --> 01:00:07,200
That's, that's finished off with
side. 

1084
01:00:07,200 --> 01:00:09,800
And here, I know we wanted to do
some playoff basketball drafts. 

1085
01:00:10,900 --> 01:00:15,600
So I didn't have a ton of notes 
at tie down this week here, 

1086
01:00:15,600 --> 01:00:19,600
we're looking at tie-down 
utilization and efficiency for 

1087
01:00:19,600 --> 01:00:21,600
gossip greater than 60% of 
routes Ron. 

1088
01:00:21,600 --> 01:00:25,300
So these are all sort of the 
All-time tight ends. 

1089
01:00:26,900 --> 01:00:30,000
The big thing I want to note 
this week is actually not for a 

1090
01:00:30,000 --> 01:00:34,100
guy that comes up on this chart.
But I think for the, the tight 

1091
01:00:34,100 --> 01:00:38,100
end premium sickos out there for
which, I know there are many 

1092
01:00:38,900 --> 01:00:42,700
chigga cock. 
Whoa, is someone that is maybe 

1093
01:00:42,800 --> 01:00:45,500
going to be a little bit off 
people's radar, but I think 

1094
01:00:46,000 --> 01:00:48,200
should people should be paying 
attention. 

1095
01:00:48,200 --> 01:00:52,300
He actually led the Titans and 
snaps this week at tight end. 

1096
01:00:52,600 --> 01:00:55,100
Which had not happened all 
season, he was like very much 

1097
01:00:55,100 --> 01:00:58,600
rotational player. 
He ran 21 of 35 routes to 

1098
01:00:58,600 --> 01:01:03,600
Hooper's 20, soft 55 targets. 
Like once again ripped off like 

1099
01:01:03,600 --> 01:01:07,400
a 40-yard chunking, the game, 
he's been really explosive. 

1100
01:01:07,400 --> 01:01:11,500
I think he has like five 
straight games of a play longer 

1101
01:01:11,500 --> 01:01:18,700
than 30 yards and if you go to 
this chart here he has the rates

1102
01:01:18,700 --> 01:01:21,300
that's really good with him. 
He has a 25% targets for Route. 

1103
01:01:21,300 --> 01:01:24,000
Run is a towel. 
It is not by 9.5. 

1104
01:01:24,000 --> 01:01:25,800
So he's being used down the 
field. 

1105
01:01:26,400 --> 01:01:28,800
He's a guy like I know the tight
end, Waiver Wires. 

1106
01:01:28,800 --> 01:01:30,200
And these leagues is pretty 
Barren. 

1107
01:01:30,400 --> 01:01:33,600
I think he's a guy that has like
a lot of upside to earn a full 

1108
01:01:33,600 --> 01:01:37,500
time. 
Role down the stretch and yeah, 

1109
01:01:37,600 --> 01:01:38,700
tie down. 
There's not a lot of upside out 

1110
01:01:38,700 --> 01:01:41,900
there, so he's one guy. 
I would put a flyer on if you if

1111
01:01:41,900 --> 01:01:44,800
you need upside at tight end, 
any thoughts on Shag? 

1112
01:01:46,600 --> 01:01:48,500
I like him. 
Yeah he is. 

1113
01:01:48,500 --> 01:01:51,700
He seeing a first retarget on 
17% his routes which is actually

1114
01:01:52,200 --> 01:01:56,100
just one percent lower than then
Burke's and so he's second on 

1115
01:01:56,100 --> 01:01:57,700
the team. 
He's ahead of Robert Woods 

1116
01:01:58,500 --> 01:02:02,400
they're looking to get him the 
ball when he's on the field he 

1117
01:02:02,400 --> 01:02:05,900
has a 25 percent Target rate 
which is really good. 

1118
01:02:06,500 --> 01:02:09,700
He's got 2 point 75 yards per 
hour on which is really good 

1119
01:02:09,900 --> 01:02:12,000
he's all small sample size 
stuff. 

1120
01:02:12,100 --> 01:02:15,800
He's yeah Ron he's on he's Run 
100 Route so it's like all small

1121
01:02:15,800 --> 01:02:16,500
sample size. 
Stuff. 

1122
01:02:16,500 --> 01:02:20,500
But now with these rookies, like
we do want to be paying 

1123
01:02:20,500 --> 01:02:24,000
attention when they're flashing 
Elite efficiency that will come 

1124
01:02:24,000 --> 01:02:26,900
down. 
Yeah, but their role can also 

1125
01:02:26,900 --> 01:02:29,700
increase a lot and send the. 
We just saw the role increase. 

1126
01:02:30,100 --> 01:02:32,000
Also like Burke's might miss 
this game. 

1127
01:02:32,000 --> 01:02:35,300
Burke's might miss you a matchup
with Jacksonville who is 

1128
01:02:35,300 --> 01:02:38,100
terrible against the past. 
I mean, that would be very 

1129
01:02:38,100 --> 01:02:41,300
bullish for chick Okonkwo if 
he's able to take on a bigger 

1130
01:02:41,300 --> 01:02:43,700
role. 
And I think, I think what we saw

1131
01:02:43,700 --> 01:02:46,200
last week was partially driven 
by Burke's being out. 

1132
01:02:46,400 --> 01:02:49,400
So obviously went out very early
in that game and so they needed 

1133
01:02:49,400 --> 01:02:54,800
someone else they could go to 
Robert Woods and Nick Westbrook 

1134
01:02:54,800 --> 01:02:57,900
akina, I believe combined for 10
yards in that game. 

1135
01:02:58,200 --> 01:03:02,000
So it was absolutely disgusting 
so they have no play making 

1136
01:03:02,000 --> 01:03:02,800
right now. 
Yeah. 

1137
01:03:02,800 --> 01:03:05,300
Technically literally combined 
for two catches for 10 yards. 

1138
01:03:07,400 --> 01:03:09,000
I think he's I think he's pretty
interesting. 

1139
01:03:09,000 --> 01:03:10,900
I actually going to float him in
the NFC team. 

1140
01:03:10,900 --> 01:03:12,400
We like we're desperate for a 
tight end. 

1141
01:03:12,400 --> 01:03:14,300
I'm going to float him. 
There is a pickup that's not 

1142
01:03:14,300 --> 01:03:16,200
even side and premium. 
Yeah, yeah. 

1143
01:03:16,300 --> 01:03:19,400
Yeah he's yeah even even 
non-solid premium I think he is 

1144
01:03:19,400 --> 01:03:20,800
like worth add in deeper 
leagues. 

1145
01:03:22,200 --> 01:03:24,400
Yeah. 
Like he's like I think also 

1146
01:03:24,600 --> 01:03:29,400
variable we might get frustrated
with his usage in terms of being

1147
01:03:29,600 --> 01:03:32,900
you know leading very run-heavy 
offenses but I do think Grable 

1148
01:03:32,900 --> 01:03:35,300
the Titans coaching staff is 
smart and getting their best 

1149
01:03:35,300 --> 01:03:37,500
players on the field like we saw
Burke's. 

1150
01:03:37,500 --> 01:03:39,800
I'm a very limited role. 
Once you started playing well 

1151
01:03:39,800 --> 01:03:43,300
that grew to a full-time role. 
Like I don't, yeah, I've less 

1152
01:03:43,300 --> 01:03:45,800
confidence in some coaching 
staffs like, you know, the 

1153
01:03:46,400 --> 01:03:49,200
Fucking Colts tight ends when 
Jelani Woods is 100 yards and he

1154
01:03:49,200 --> 01:03:52,000
goes back the next week to 
playing like 20% of snaps for no

1155
01:03:52,000 --> 01:03:55,200
reason. 
Like I don't think the the 

1156
01:03:55,200 --> 01:03:59,300
Titans coaching staff is doing 
sort of like do something as 

1157
01:03:59,300 --> 01:04:03,700
stupid as that. 
So yeah, I know that that was 

1158
01:04:03,700 --> 01:04:05,100
still doing. 
Yeah. 

1159
01:04:07,200 --> 01:04:12,100
Yeah. 
Anyways, any like other macro 

1160
01:04:12,100 --> 01:04:14,500
thoughts are like any 
interesting nuggets on tight 

1161
01:04:14,500 --> 01:04:16,500
ends as you've been going 
through the walkthrough This 

1162
01:04:16,500 --> 01:04:17,700
week I didn't have a whole lot 
else. 

1163
01:04:17,700 --> 01:04:20,600
There is some some buzz in the 
chat about McBride. 

1164
01:04:20,600 --> 01:04:24,100
If you have any thoughts there? 
Yeah leave it to you for final 

1165
01:04:24,100 --> 01:04:26,600
word on tight ends this week 
will McBride. 

1166
01:04:26,600 --> 01:04:29,400
I mean check out the ship 
chasing from last week if you 

1167
01:04:29,400 --> 01:04:31,500
want to hear my thoughts and 
McBride, I'm just like nervous 

1168
01:04:31,500 --> 01:04:37,200
that he hasn't earned any 
Targets All Season like stuff. 

1169
01:04:37,200 --> 01:04:39,900
That's what, these vac up tight 
ends like, especially a guy was 

1170
01:04:39,900 --> 01:04:42,200
trapped in the second round. 
Like, when he gets on the field,

1171
01:04:42,200 --> 01:04:44,000
he would actually have like a 
really high Target proud run 

1172
01:04:44,000 --> 01:04:46,200
because he's there for like a 
specific package of plays. 

1173
01:04:46,700 --> 01:04:49,000
Yeah but he just hasn't been 
involved as a pass catcher 

1174
01:04:49,000 --> 01:04:52,100
whatsoever. 
The Cardinals also like didn't 

1175
01:04:52,100 --> 01:04:55,000
really use the tight end much 
before Zach ertz got there so I 

1176
01:04:55,000 --> 01:04:58,600
don't necessarily buy. 
There's a like a a role that he 

1177
01:04:58,600 --> 01:05:03,600
like has to be in whatever I do.
So I'm not like all that bullish

1178
01:05:03,600 --> 01:05:05,700
on McBride but he was a pretty 
decent Prospect. 

1179
01:05:05,700 --> 01:05:07,700
I thought he was the best tight 
end Prospect in the class. 

1180
01:05:07,700 --> 01:05:11,100
Although Titan prospects, I'm 
like really willing to change my

1181
01:05:11,107 --> 01:05:13,500
mind on pretty quickly on 
depending on what, you know, the

1182
01:05:13,500 --> 01:05:16,200
information we get in the NFL 
pretty hard to project. 

1183
01:05:17,600 --> 01:05:19,900
But I mean that's still any was 
a second-round picks. 

1184
01:05:19,900 --> 01:05:22,900
Oh yeah, yeah. 
I mean I definitely think he he 

1185
01:05:22,900 --> 01:05:25,400
could be something. 
He just hasn't flushed anything 

1186
01:05:25,400 --> 01:05:27,400
so far. 
I would note, Daniel Bellinger 

1187
01:05:27,500 --> 01:05:32,900
was back after brutal eye injury
like broken bone in his face. 

1188
01:05:33,700 --> 01:05:37,400
83%, route rate, last week, 
that's pretty sweet. 

1189
01:05:37,900 --> 01:05:40,500
Also not getting targets at a 
really high rate or anything, 

1190
01:05:40,500 --> 01:05:43,500
but he saw five targets last 
week, which, you know, you'd be 

1191
01:05:43,500 --> 01:05:45,100
pretty psyched about if you have
McBride. 

1192
01:05:45,100 --> 01:05:47,600
So he's definitely Someone to 
keep an eye on. 

1193
01:05:48,400 --> 01:05:49,700
Yep. 
Nice. 

1194
01:05:49,700 --> 01:05:51,600
That make sense. 
Yeah, I think I'm with you. 

1195
01:05:52,100 --> 01:05:54,600
I'll McBride a bit concerning 
still has a decent role. 

1196
01:05:54,600 --> 01:05:57,600
Will see if he at least keeps 
that be out there. 

1197
01:05:57,600 --> 01:05:59,300
Yeah. 
Yep. 

1198
01:06:00,300 --> 01:06:03,000
Last you guys, I guess like 
Super Duke leads, deep leaks. 

1199
01:06:03,000 --> 01:06:06,600
Mitchell Wilcox was the Hayden 
Hearst replacement. 

1200
01:06:07,200 --> 01:06:10,900
And Kate Austen had a pretty big
role with braids out so maybe 

1201
01:06:11,000 --> 01:06:13,900
two other like desperation 
plays, you can look at this week

1202
01:06:14,800 --> 01:06:18,700
at tight end. 
Okay, let's move on to the 

1203
01:06:18,700 --> 01:06:21,300
playoff basketball stuff. 
So yeah, like I mentioned the 

1204
01:06:21,300 --> 01:06:24,200
top of the show, we're now going
to talk through underdogs 

1205
01:06:24,200 --> 01:06:28,400
playoff basketball contest. 
So they have the wild card out 

1206
01:06:28,400 --> 01:06:31,500
now has 15 K up top the first 
place. 

1207
01:06:31,500 --> 01:06:35,000
I think like a twelve thousand 
dollar or sorry 1200. 

1208
01:06:35,100 --> 01:06:37,100
Sorry, 12,000 entrance, eyes 
tournament. 

1209
01:06:37,100 --> 01:06:39,800
So so pretty big tournament 
that's out there already. 

1210
01:06:40,900 --> 01:06:44,900
We're going to start Pat a 
before we draft a team, with 

1211
01:06:44,900 --> 01:06:50,500
looking at, Sort of a macro view
on what teams we want to attack 

1212
01:06:50,900 --> 01:06:54,200
in this contest. 
And to go through that, I have 

1213
01:06:54,200 --> 01:06:59,400
this chart here, which shows 
these green bars shows, the 

1214
01:06:59,400 --> 01:07:02,900
team's percent chance of making 
the playoffs with the lighter 

1215
01:07:02,900 --> 01:07:05,200
green color. 
Their chance of making the Super

1216
01:07:05,200 --> 01:07:07,600
Bowl. 
I chose that over winning the 

1217
01:07:07,600 --> 01:07:10,300
Super Bowl because that's really
sort of like the important 

1218
01:07:10,300 --> 01:07:12,300
probability here. 
That's the probability that 

1219
01:07:12,300 --> 01:07:15,500
these players get either three 
or four games. 

1220
01:07:16,400 --> 01:07:18,400
So that's really what we want to
care about when we're evaluating

1221
01:07:18,400 --> 01:07:20,400
these teams thoughts of making 
the playoffs. 

1222
01:07:20,400 --> 01:07:22,300
Also important to you. 
Like, you are going to have 

1223
01:07:22,300 --> 01:07:25,000
some, you know, you're gonna 
drop some players and teams that

1224
01:07:25,000 --> 01:07:27,600
you maybe just banking on for 
the first or second-round game. 

1225
01:07:27,600 --> 01:07:29,500
So that's something we want to 
look at as well. 

1226
01:07:30,000 --> 01:07:32,800
And then, on the bottom of this 
chart here, in order to sort of 

1227
01:07:32,800 --> 01:07:35,700
look at what teams are 
potentially undervalued or 

1228
01:07:35,700 --> 01:07:38,100
overvalued. 
I looked at the number of 

1229
01:07:38,100 --> 01:07:41,800
players on each team that are 
currently being drafted in this 

1230
01:07:41,800 --> 01:07:43,800
contest looking at the underdog 
ATP. 

1231
01:07:44,100 --> 01:07:46,800
So, the number of players that 
are going in the top He picks by

1232
01:07:46,800 --> 01:07:51,800
ATP the top 40 and the top 60 
and as if you look at this chart

1233
01:07:51,800 --> 01:07:55,200
left to right, I think the 
market is not stupid, like 

1234
01:07:55,700 --> 01:07:59,800
Philly Buffalo case D Dallas. 
A ton of players are going in 

1235
01:07:59,800 --> 01:08:06,300
the top 20 and top 40 of ADP off
those teams because those are 

1236
01:08:06,300 --> 01:08:08,100
clear of the teams with the best
odds of making the Super Bowl. 

1237
01:08:08,100 --> 01:08:10,100
I think that, that totally makes
sense. 

1238
01:08:10,500 --> 01:08:13,000
But as you go further to the 
right on this chart, I think we 

1239
01:08:13,000 --> 01:08:18,300
can find some potentially Teams 
in the AFC. 

1240
01:08:18,700 --> 01:08:23,800
I wanted to highlight Baltimore 
and Tennessee where Baltimore 

1241
01:08:23,800 --> 01:08:27,000
only has 20 players go in the 
top 20. 

1242
01:08:27,899 --> 01:08:30,100
And just two players going out 
in the top 60 picks. 

1243
01:08:30,100 --> 01:08:34,100
That's Lamar Jackson and Mark 
Andrews, even though 538 still 

1244
01:08:34,100 --> 01:08:36,899
has them and even betting 
markets, still have them as a 

1245
01:08:36,899 --> 01:08:42,700
decent odds to make the Super 
Bowl at around like 8 to 10%, 

1246
01:08:42,700 --> 01:08:44,000
depending on what you're looking
at. 

1247
01:08:44,300 --> 01:08:48,500
So who do we take? 
Yeah, it's supposed to trap. 

1248
01:08:49,500 --> 01:08:51,200
That's a gross of. 
Yes, let's talk about Baltimore.

1249
01:08:51,200 --> 01:08:53,899
That's I think that that 
obviously is like why there's a 

1250
01:08:53,907 --> 01:08:57,200
lot of new players going? 
Because it's it's so gross. 

1251
01:08:58,399 --> 01:09:02,000
But I think in both Tennessee 
and Baltimore like there's an 

1252
01:09:02,000 --> 01:09:05,200
edge where those T like the 
betting markets are telling us. 

1253
01:09:05,200 --> 01:09:08,300
The 538 model is telling us like
these teams have decent chances 

1254
01:09:08,300 --> 01:09:11,399
to make the Super Bowl and 
nobody wants to draft them. 

1255
01:09:11,899 --> 01:09:15,600
So like I think there is some 
Edge and taking like three 

1256
01:09:15,600 --> 01:09:17,899
player, you don't have to, you 
don't have to like over sack. 

1257
01:09:17,899 --> 01:09:21,000
Then you have to take five guys 
but, you know, throwing your 

1258
01:09:21,200 --> 01:09:25,600
Duvernay, Isaiah likely Dobbins,
and Baltimore on Tennessee. 

1259
01:09:25,600 --> 01:09:28,899
Maybe throw in your conc. 
Well, like Burke's isn't even 

1260
01:09:28,899 --> 01:09:31,100
getting drafted 10. 
L is not even getting drafted. 

1261
01:09:31,100 --> 01:09:34,000
Like, I think. 
Say, all right now we're 

1262
01:09:34,000 --> 01:09:35,600
talking. 
Yeah, give me some perks. 

1263
01:09:35,600 --> 01:09:39,100
And well that's what that's 
really only got me excited about

1264
01:09:40,100 --> 01:09:42,700
Dobbins Dobbins jumps out there.
Yeah. 

1265
01:09:42,700 --> 01:09:46,200
I mean he's definitely someone 
who like, you can tell yourself 

1266
01:09:46,200 --> 01:09:50,800
a story where he's like, healthy
for the playoffs and I mean, 

1267
01:09:50,800 --> 01:09:54,100
they would, they've already been
leaning on the Run game, so, 

1268
01:09:55,200 --> 01:09:57,100
Yeah. 
Okay, that's that's a third guy.

1269
01:09:57,100 --> 01:09:59,400
We can draft. 
Yeah. 

1270
01:10:00,100 --> 01:10:04,300
And yeah, the pass catcher. 
It's so it's so gross. 

1271
01:10:04,300 --> 01:10:06,100
Like, I don't know how I pick up
a Skechers? 

1272
01:10:06,100 --> 01:10:08,500
Like, I think you would narrow 
it down to probably Demarcus, 

1273
01:10:08,500 --> 01:10:12,600
Robinson Duvernay and likely as 
the top three, non Andrews pass 

1274
01:10:12,600 --> 01:10:17,100
catchers, but yeah, that feels 
like flipping a coin. 

1275
01:10:17,800 --> 01:10:21,100
I do most rather just go with 
like an NFC receiver. 

1276
01:10:21,600 --> 01:10:23,600
You know what I mean? 
Like you're yeah, in these 

1277
01:10:23,600 --> 01:10:26,200
drafts. 
Like your Like if you do a 

1278
01:10:26,200 --> 01:10:32,900
Baltimore stack or something you
might end up, you know, having a

1279
01:10:32,900 --> 01:10:38,400
choice between like Tyler 
Lockett and Demarcus Robinson or

1280
01:10:38,400 --> 01:10:40,400
something, you know, because the
Seattle guys have been going 

1281
01:10:40,400 --> 01:10:43,100
really late. 
So I don't know. 

1282
01:10:43,100 --> 01:10:47,300
I can't do it again. 
Yeah that's and that's like what

1283
01:10:47,300 --> 01:10:50,500
every like gut instinct when I'm
drafting it. 

1284
01:10:50,500 --> 01:10:53,400
Like it's so gross and I don't 
do it often like taking as a 

1285
01:10:53,400 --> 01:10:56,300
likely over Tyler. 
Like it's so hard to make that 

1286
01:10:56,300 --> 01:10:58,900
click, but something, I'm trying
to think through in these 

1287
01:10:58,900 --> 01:11:02,500
tournaments is just like if 
Baltimore makes the Super Bowl, 

1288
01:11:03,100 --> 01:11:06,400
they're getting for games and 
like, in one of those four 

1289
01:11:06,400 --> 01:11:12,200
games, I think like the Duvernay
are Demarcus or likely is gonna 

1290
01:11:12,500 --> 01:11:14,400
help you advance. 
And it might not even be a spike

1291
01:11:14,400 --> 01:11:16,700
week, right? 
It might just be like, you're 

1292
01:11:16,700 --> 01:11:20,300
in, you know, the third round of
this tournament you're playing 

1293
01:11:20,300 --> 01:11:23,700
against like 10 other like nine 
other teams, half of them like 

1294
01:11:23,800 --> 01:11:26,300
can't even feel the roster. 
Cuz I picked the wrong teams, 

1295
01:11:26,400 --> 01:11:29,200
right? 
Like the other half like didn't,

1296
01:11:29,200 --> 01:11:31,600
you know, pick sort of more 
concentrated players and you get

1297
01:11:31,600 --> 01:11:35,400
Demarcus, Robinson's like 60 
yards and a touchdown game that 

1298
01:11:35,400 --> 01:11:37,500
no one else has like, I don't 
know. 

1299
01:11:37,500 --> 01:11:39,800
That's what I'm trying to think.
If you just pick. 

1300
01:11:39,800 --> 01:11:42,600
Like, we're just kind of 
thinking about like we're in the

1301
01:11:42,600 --> 01:11:45,000
scenario where Baltimore makes 
the Super Bowl. 

1302
01:11:45,000 --> 01:11:48,800
Like I probably want more than 
just like two players on their 

1303
01:11:48,800 --> 01:11:51,200
team, just for like the 
cumulative points aspect. 

1304
01:11:51,200 --> 01:11:54,600
So Yeah, I don't know. 
What are your thoughts on 

1305
01:11:54,600 --> 01:11:56,500
Baltimore in Ghent? 
Like, because they with this 

1306
01:11:56,500 --> 01:12:01,000
Lamar injury, are these odds, 
reflective of the fact. 

1307
01:12:01,000 --> 01:12:05,700
So, there are 8 & 4 & Lamar 
might miss potentially like 

1308
01:12:05,700 --> 01:12:09,500
three games. 
So now, they get the Steelers, 

1309
01:12:10,000 --> 01:12:13,800
the Browns and the Falcons. 
So even without Lamar, they 

1310
01:12:13,800 --> 01:12:17,600
could go to and one. 
Yeah. 

1311
01:12:17,600 --> 01:12:23,200
And then I lost to the Browns 
there, but Yeah, it seems like 

1312
01:12:23,200 --> 01:12:26,800
there. 
Yeah, the Ravens do seem a bit 

1313
01:12:26,800 --> 01:12:30,200
risky because there are 
scenarios where they I guess if 

1314
01:12:30,200 --> 01:12:35,500
the Jets and Patriots or like 
Chargers finished. 

1315
01:12:35,500 --> 01:12:37,900
If one of like the Patriots are 
Chargers and the Jets finish 

1316
01:12:37,900 --> 01:12:41,600
hot, the Ravens could fall out 
of the playoff picture 

1317
01:12:41,600 --> 01:12:45,000
completely. 
I do think like what the 538 

1318
01:12:45,000 --> 01:12:48,000
model seems to be doing is it 
it? 

1319
01:12:48,200 --> 01:12:51,700
You can like adjust their model 
like for the quarterback 

1320
01:12:51,700 --> 01:12:53,500
adjustment where they're 
actually like you see this in 

1321
01:12:53,500 --> 01:12:58,500
the 49ers They're adjusting the 
49ers, Super Bowl odds heavily 

1322
01:12:58,500 --> 01:13:01,200
because they're like baking in 
the fact that Jimmy G is going 

1323
01:13:01,200 --> 01:13:04,000
to be out for the for the entire
playoffs are like, based on the 

1324
01:13:04,000 --> 01:13:06,500
odds that seems to be what 
they're doing for the Ravens. 

1325
01:13:06,500 --> 01:13:10,800
The model seems to be like not 
like they're their Super Bowl 

1326
01:13:10,800 --> 01:13:14,300
odds don't change when you do 
like the current quarterback 

1327
01:13:14,600 --> 01:13:17,400
adjustment or not. 
So I think what that feels wrong

1328
01:13:17,400 --> 01:13:18,900
to me. 
It should change. 

1329
01:13:21,000 --> 01:13:26,200
Yeah but I think like if we 
assume that what I'm saying is 

1330
01:13:26,200 --> 01:13:28,600
like I think it's assuming that 
Lamar is back to full strength 

1331
01:13:28,600 --> 01:13:30,400
for the oh I see I see, I see 
ya. 

1332
01:13:30,600 --> 01:13:36,600
Okay, which I think is like the 
Right assumption to make. 

1333
01:13:36,600 --> 01:13:40,300
But I'm going to their ELO 
ratings, they have Huntley. 

1334
01:13:40,500 --> 01:13:45,300
They have Lamar 875 points of 
Hilo and humbly at 46, so they 

1335
01:13:45,300 --> 01:13:47,000
must just be assuming we get 
Huntley. 

1336
01:13:47,300 --> 01:13:50,100
Are we get one more back? 
But yeah, but their odds of 

1337
01:13:50,100 --> 01:13:53,400
making it have to go down 
especially if Lamar is not fully

1338
01:13:53,400 --> 01:13:56,700
healthy when he comes back. 
Yeah, let's see. 

1339
01:13:57,900 --> 01:14:00,900
It does. 
So the odds of them making the 

1340
01:14:00,900 --> 01:14:05,700
playoffs drop by 2%. 
If I like I could share this in 

1341
01:14:05,708 --> 01:14:08,100
my screen, but if I flip between
the two models, like quarterback

1342
01:14:08,100 --> 01:14:11,200
adjusted or not, the odds of 
making the playoffs dewdrop, put

1343
01:14:11,200 --> 01:14:13,900
the odds of winning, the 
Superbowl, don't drop. 

1344
01:14:13,900 --> 01:14:15,400
So what I'm assuming that make 
sense? 

1345
01:14:15,600 --> 01:14:18,100
Yeah, I think that's like the 
right way to do it, right? 

1346
01:14:18,300 --> 01:14:21,000
Yeah. 
So yeah, I don't know. 

1347
01:14:21,000 --> 01:14:23,800
Like there's a reason around and
like it feels gross about in 

1348
01:14:23,808 --> 01:14:25,600
Baltimore right now. 
Like there's a reason. 

1349
01:14:25,600 --> 01:14:27,900
They're undervalue their offense
is not Look. 

1350
01:14:27,900 --> 01:14:29,800
Even though they've won a bunch 
of games are offensive, not 

1351
01:14:29,800 --> 01:14:32,200
look, great, even with Lamar and
now he's hurt. 

1352
01:14:32,200 --> 01:14:38,600
So like it definitely feels like
a gross bet, but I'm gonna like,

1353
01:14:38,600 --> 01:14:42,600
I think that's like two big tin 
to the players atp's of this 

1354
01:14:42,600 --> 01:14:46,800
point to the point where I think
I'm going to like draft a couple

1355
01:14:46,800 --> 01:14:48,900
Baltimore teams in this tree. 
I like it. 

1356
01:14:49,200 --> 01:14:52,000
Yeah, yeah. 
Nick in the comments here since 

1357
01:14:52,000 --> 01:14:54,500
I've been telling myself stories
about jobs getting healthy since

1358
01:14:54,500 --> 01:14:57,500
May, which yeah, that's fair. 
But I do, I think Dobbins is 

1359
01:14:57,700 --> 01:15:01,400
Interesting. 
Because when like, when you do, 

1360
01:15:01,400 --> 01:15:03,500
when we do the FPC playoff 
contest? 

1361
01:15:03,500 --> 01:15:05,400
We're picking only one player 
from each team. 

1362
01:15:06,200 --> 01:15:09,100
The thing to think about is 
like, what is this pic sort of 

1363
01:15:09,100 --> 01:15:11,900
say about what I'm betting on 
with this team? 

1364
01:15:11,900 --> 01:15:15,900
Like yeah, like, is this team? 
You know, for example, like if 

1365
01:15:15,900 --> 01:15:19,700
you pick the Titans and you are 
sort of doing it and I'm in a in

1366
01:15:19,700 --> 01:15:22,200
your mind where I'm betting on 
the Titans to win, like three 

1367
01:15:22,200 --> 01:15:26,700
games, we probably have Derrick 
Henry, you know, because there 

1368
01:15:26,700 --> 01:15:29,600
are countries like the The 
engine of their offense, right? 

1369
01:15:30,300 --> 01:15:33,100
Yeah, if you have, if you have 
chick Okonkwo, you're hoping 

1370
01:15:33,100 --> 01:15:35,700
that you get one, nice tight and
premium game. 

1371
01:15:35,700 --> 01:15:37,400
And then they lose like the most
have to lose. 

1372
01:15:37,400 --> 01:15:39,200
And, you know, you get lucky in 
that game. 

1373
01:15:39,400 --> 01:15:44,900
So if the Ravens go to the Super
Bowl, like I'm not saying 

1374
01:15:44,900 --> 01:15:48,300
Dobbins is definitely healthy, 
but you know, if Dobbins is 

1375
01:15:48,300 --> 01:15:51,200
healthy and they're able to lean
on him, their odds of making a 

1376
01:15:51,208 --> 01:15:53,300
Super Bowl are probably pretty 
underpriced. 

1377
01:15:53,800 --> 01:15:56,600
So it's kind of a nice 
correlated bet in that sense, 

1378
01:15:56,600 --> 01:15:58,300
you're making this team. 
Make a run. 

1379
01:15:58,300 --> 01:16:00,100
What would really help them 
healthy dogs. 

1380
01:16:00,900 --> 01:16:04,500
Yep, I like that Dobbins is 
definitely my favorite third 

1381
01:16:05,000 --> 01:16:07,600
Ravens pick. 
Okay. 

1382
01:16:07,600 --> 01:16:12,200
And yeah, any thoughts on the 
on, on the Titans? 

1383
01:16:13,300 --> 01:16:16,400
I guess, like more. 
That girl, like the models, the 

1384
01:16:16,400 --> 01:16:19,200
betting markets are saying, 
like, they have a better chance 

1385
01:16:19,200 --> 01:16:22,900
of making the Super Bowl than 
the Dolphins, you know, Tampa 

1386
01:16:22,900 --> 01:16:26,900
Bay, Seattle, some of these like
more fantasy friendly teams, 

1387
01:16:28,300 --> 01:16:32,100
Would you be making any like 
Titans Titans bats in this 

1388
01:16:32,100 --> 01:16:35,600
format? 
One thing I've noticed I've only

1389
01:16:35,600 --> 01:16:38,200
done like a handful of these. 
But one thing I've noticed is 

1390
01:16:38,200 --> 01:16:43,100
that the AFC teams tend to get 
snapped up like way quicker than

1391
01:16:43,100 --> 01:16:45,000
the NFC. 
It's like way more Comfort. 

1392
01:16:45,000 --> 01:16:47,600
Like, if you're doing a bills 
thing, it's really comfortable 

1393
01:16:47,600 --> 01:16:51,700
to go over and grab a couple, 
NFC teams on ship chasing. 

1394
01:16:51,700 --> 01:16:54,300
We got a bill stack, that's 
probably going to be blown up 

1395
01:16:54,300 --> 01:16:55,400
now that they're going to get 
the by. 

1396
01:16:55,600 --> 01:16:59,700
But we got a bill stack we I 
think it was Mike Evans, Chris 

1397
01:16:59,700 --> 01:17:02,900
Godwin, Richard white, Tyler 
Lockett Kenneth Walker DK 

1398
01:17:02,900 --> 01:17:05,900
Metcalf, that mean that's pretty
sweet. 

1399
01:17:05,900 --> 01:17:08,900
You're getting like the whole 
offense but you can't really do 

1400
01:17:08,900 --> 01:17:11,900
that on the. 
You can't like build the same 

1401
01:17:11,900 --> 01:17:16,700
thing where you go Eagles and 
then go get like the core of two

1402
01:17:16,700 --> 01:17:20,900
AFC teams much harder to do, at 
least from the drafts that I've 

1403
01:17:20,900 --> 01:17:24,100
done. 
So, in that sense, the Titans 

1404
01:17:24,100 --> 01:17:27,200
are kind of interesting to me. 
Where at least I know, I can get

1405
01:17:27,200 --> 01:17:29,900
a bird Works, who's the 
number-one receiver on his team?

1406
01:17:30,300 --> 01:17:32,200
You know, for a team is 
definitely making the playoffs. 

1407
01:17:32,200 --> 01:17:35,400
That feels that feels nice to 
have in your back pocket and 

1408
01:17:35,400 --> 01:17:40,700
then I guess the Bengals the 
Bengals work on it easy like 

1409
01:17:40,700 --> 01:17:42,200
they were kind of the fallback 
option. 

1410
01:17:42,200 --> 01:17:45,500
I wonder how much you know, 
pricier they are now after they 

1411
01:17:45,500 --> 01:17:48,900
beat the Chiefs. 
Yeah, I think the Bangles prices

1412
01:17:48,900 --> 01:17:51,300
are way up. 
I have a ton of Bengal seems 

1413
01:17:51,300 --> 01:17:52,400
already. 
I think that's a team of the 

1414
01:17:52,400 --> 01:17:55,600
most exposed to because there 
was a while where they're like 

1415
01:17:56,100 --> 01:17:57,700
playoff. 
All Odds were only like The 

1416
01:17:57,700 --> 01:17:59,200
percent or something. 
And yep. 

1417
01:17:59,400 --> 01:18:01,300
Now we I think we can be pretty 
confident. 

1418
01:18:01,300 --> 01:18:04,600
They're going to make the 
playoffs and I think the prices 

1419
01:18:04,600 --> 01:18:07,600
are rising in those guys. 
Do you have the teams we built 

1420
01:18:07,600 --> 01:18:10,700
the last time we did this, it 
might be fun to pull this up but

1421
01:18:10,700 --> 01:18:14,000
yeah I can pull those up. 
Yeah, we should definitely look 

1422
01:18:14,000 --> 01:18:15,700
at those. 
I think we did do a Bangles team

1423
01:18:16,200 --> 01:18:21,100
maybe 2 bangles teams. 
Anyways, last thing I wanted to 

1424
01:18:21,100 --> 01:18:25,200
to know for pull that up San 
Francisco is clearly over value.

1425
01:18:25,200 --> 01:18:27,300
And look at the look at this 
chart that's obviously because 

1426
01:18:27,300 --> 01:18:32,100
of The the Jimmy G injury like 
the betting markets in the 538 

1427
01:18:32,100 --> 01:18:34,300
model. 
Think that's a massive. 

1428
01:18:34,300 --> 01:18:36,600
Hit to their like, chances of 
making the Super Bowl. 

1429
01:18:37,000 --> 01:18:40,400
So there were so many 49ers 
going early in these drafts, and

1430
01:18:40,400 --> 01:18:44,200
I think it'll like McCaffrey's, 
I think just by anchoring 

1431
01:18:44,200 --> 01:18:46,600
effect. 
He's going to stay up in the top

1432
01:18:46,600 --> 01:18:49,600
10 picks for a while. 
These drafts, I am, like, that's

1433
01:18:49,600 --> 01:18:51,700
like the biggest fade right now.
I think in these drafts, is 

1434
01:18:51,700 --> 01:18:54,800
McCaffrey, and, and you can see 
it at like the player level on 

1435
01:18:54,800 --> 01:18:57,800
this next chart. 
We're looking at here, Here 

1436
01:18:57,800 --> 01:19:02,700
Underdog ATP on the y axis and 
then all odds of advancing to 

1437
01:19:02,708 --> 01:19:06,000
the Super Bowl on on the x-axis 
here. 

1438
01:19:07,700 --> 01:19:10,900
And yeah McCaffrey McCaffrey's 
going like way to I when you 

1439
01:19:10,900 --> 01:19:13,400
factor in their chances of 
making the Super Bowl. 

1440
01:19:13,400 --> 01:19:18,100
Now unless we get some like 
Magic news on on Jimmy G the 

1441
01:19:18,100 --> 01:19:24,600
next couple weeks, Yeah, any I 
think I think we should jump 

1442
01:19:24,600 --> 01:19:28,900
into some drafts here. 
Now Pat any any other thoughts 

1443
01:19:28,900 --> 01:19:32,300
before you go into it now let's 
let's do it. 

1444
01:19:32,500 --> 01:19:36,900
Okay, do you want to? 
I see you already have the your 

1445
01:19:36,900 --> 01:19:38,400
TAP hold up. 
Do you want to take over for? 

1446
01:19:38,407 --> 01:19:42,100
Yeah we can do it on mine. 
I got yeah I'll look to pull up 

1447
01:19:42,100 --> 01:19:44,400
those teams that we drafted at 
the end. 

1448
01:19:47,900 --> 01:19:49,400
We got to know our exposures, 
you know. 

1449
01:19:52,300 --> 01:19:55,800
First, I was just there. 
Two drafts is really important. 

1450
01:19:55,800 --> 01:20:02,400
Yeah, you gotta manage them. 
I think I did the dumb thing 

1451
01:20:02,400 --> 01:20:05,600
where I didn't label the drafts 
that we did so I might take some

1452
01:20:05,600 --> 01:20:09,900
more investigative work too. 
Okay to figure out what I have 

1453
01:20:09,900 --> 01:20:12,800
like 10 of these teams so I'm 
not sure exactly what ours were.

1454
01:20:15,900 --> 01:20:17,800
You know, if he was drafted were
so good that I just 

1455
01:20:17,800 --> 01:20:21,100
intentionally didn't want to 
label them so I can take the 

1456
01:20:21,100 --> 01:20:25,300
money. 
Hit that, oh wait, no, I lied. 

1457
01:20:25,300 --> 01:20:29,500
I did label them. 
Hey wait, let me let me screen 

1458
01:20:29,500 --> 01:20:39,000
share of them, quickly. 
Let's see. 

1459
01:20:46,300 --> 01:20:53,400
Okay, so You're able to see the 
underdog tab now, right? 

1460
01:20:54,500 --> 01:20:55,500
No. 
I'm still seeing. 

1461
01:20:55,800 --> 01:20:57,500
I'm still seeing the underdog 
odds. 

1462
01:20:58,200 --> 01:20:59,200
Oh shit. 
Okay. 

1463
01:21:02,800 --> 01:21:06,300
Sorry guys, I'm still new stream
yard. 

1464
01:21:07,600 --> 01:21:11,400
Give me one second. 
Nick pointing out the 

1465
01:21:11,400 --> 01:21:14,800
Commander's it 69 percent chance
seems like a great cheap back 

1466
01:21:14,800 --> 01:21:17,800
door. 
I think those feel pretty 

1467
01:21:17,800 --> 01:21:21,500
decent. 
Yeah I was I was going to 

1468
01:21:21,500 --> 01:21:25,300
mention that to like I think at 
least McLaren should be like 

1469
01:21:25,300 --> 01:21:28,200
you're seeing Eckler and even 
like Jacob strapped in some of 

1470
01:21:28,200 --> 01:21:33,100
these like that seems dumb. 
Like McLaren should be the pic. 

1471
01:21:33,100 --> 01:21:35,900
If you're looking for like the 
guy who has a big ceiling in 

1472
01:21:35,900 --> 01:21:39,000
round one to advance some teams,
right? 

1473
01:21:40,600 --> 01:21:43,900
Yeah, and I do like the 
Dolphins. 

1474
01:21:44,100 --> 01:21:45,100
I wonder where they're going 
now. 

1475
01:21:46,400 --> 01:21:48,800
Yeah, okay, iPad. 
I don't know why the screen 

1476
01:21:48,800 --> 01:21:51,300
sharing is not working. 
So why don't we just do you want

1477
01:21:51,300 --> 01:21:53,500
us to blow up the draft and I 
can just verbally say what our 

1478
01:21:53,500 --> 01:21:55,300
teams were for some reason. 
Yeah. 

1479
01:21:55,300 --> 01:21:57,500
But you have to bring my screen 
out because I'm not logged into 

1480
01:21:57,500 --> 01:22:00,300
streaming. 
Okay, there we go. 

1481
01:22:00,300 --> 01:22:01,900
Alright so we got mind going, 
okay. 

1482
01:22:07,300 --> 01:22:08,900
Oh wait, I figured out how to 
get mine. 

1483
01:22:08,900 --> 01:22:12,100
Okay, I'm gonna hit. 
Here's our team's figured out, 

1484
01:22:12,100 --> 01:22:16,900
finally, we'll make sure our 
draft doesn't fill, but we so we

1485
01:22:16,900 --> 01:22:24,400
did a eagle stack hurts sander 
dress, it, Bill AJ Brown, and 

1486
01:22:24,900 --> 01:22:26,500
the draft filled. 
Okay, we'll go back to the SEC. 

1487
01:22:26,600 --> 01:22:29,000
So we got Eagles and Baltimore 
with all, right? 

1488
01:22:29,100 --> 01:22:33,600
Some we got Tegan's in that, 
that seems We took a lot of 

1489
01:22:33,600 --> 01:22:36,100
Baltimore players, we're just 
talking about how gross that is 

1490
01:22:36,100 --> 01:22:39,900
and we took a lot of them, only 
an idiot would do. 

1491
01:22:39,900 --> 01:22:45,000
It took 24 night and likely and 
then Roberto stack we got to 

1492
01:22:45,000 --> 01:22:48,200
Philly and Cincinnati stack. 
This team is sexy. 

1493
01:22:48,200 --> 01:22:52,000
This seems sick dude and Miami 
three of the best. 

1494
01:22:52,000 --> 01:22:54,400
My holy crap. 
All right. 

1495
01:22:54,400 --> 01:22:56,200
I don't even know if we need to 
do anymore man. 

1496
01:22:57,000 --> 01:23:00,700
Yeah we might be done. 
We're not gonna get that. 

1497
01:23:00,700 --> 01:23:06,100
Cincinnati Bell is amazing. 
Saturday that we got Nixon to 

1498
01:23:06,100 --> 01:23:10,300
Marty Huggins and burrow and 
then hurts Goddard. 

1499
01:23:11,300 --> 01:23:12,500
Yeah. 
The Philly part of it is a 

1500
01:23:12,508 --> 01:23:15,200
little weak. 
It's hurts gain, well and 

1501
01:23:15,200 --> 01:23:16,800
Goddard. 
But if it's a filly Cincinnati, 

1502
01:23:16,800 --> 01:23:19,100
Super Bowl. 
We have so many good players in 

1503
01:23:19,100 --> 01:23:22,500
that matchup. 
So I mean, plus we have a waddle

1504
01:23:22,500 --> 01:23:27,000
and tyriq so we're good with the
yeah that's in this working. 

1505
01:23:27,400 --> 01:23:29,300
What's going on? 
Okay, we just started. 

1506
01:23:29,400 --> 01:23:32,800
We just yeah, okay. 
Okay. 

1507
01:23:33,500 --> 01:23:34,700
So who's your number to pick 
now? 

1508
01:23:37,000 --> 01:23:41,700
It's it's either Allen or mom's,
I think hurts. 

1509
01:23:41,700 --> 01:23:45,900
The only reason I go Alan over 
Hertz is because the Eagles have

1510
01:23:45,900 --> 01:23:49,200
a 76 percent chance of getting 
the by now and the bills are 

1511
01:23:49,200 --> 01:23:52,300
only at like 45. 
So I think that gives me. 

1512
01:23:52,300 --> 01:23:55,600
Are you building to quarterback 
teams with Alan or just one? 

1513
01:23:56,900 --> 01:23:58,200
I think you can do it either 
way. 

1514
01:23:58,200 --> 01:24:01,600
I think, I think I would go to 
this early in the year. 

1515
01:24:04,100 --> 01:24:07,300
Because it's not like the second
quarterback isn't like dead to 

1516
01:24:07,300 --> 01:24:10,800
help you. 
Even if Alan does, you know, 

1517
01:24:10,800 --> 01:24:12,400
doesn't get the by, you know 
what I mean? 

1518
01:24:12,400 --> 01:24:16,000
Like, there could be a week 
where I don't know. 

1519
01:24:16,000 --> 01:24:17,800
Josh Allen has a bad game and 
the bill. 

1520
01:24:17,800 --> 01:24:22,600
Still beat the Jets in round and
round one and you needed like 

1521
01:24:22,600 --> 01:24:26,100
points from Tom Brady to advance
or something. 

1522
01:24:26,100 --> 01:24:29,200
So I think I don't think you 
have like if you get completely 

1523
01:24:29,200 --> 01:24:32,000
boxed out of quarterback like I 
think it's okay to just take 

1524
01:24:32,000 --> 01:24:36,400
Josh Allen at a 45 percent 
chance but I think I would lean 

1525
01:24:36,400 --> 01:24:40,400
to what are your thoughts. 
There I've been doing the dumb 

1526
01:24:40,400 --> 01:24:42,900
thing where I'm just going. 
I'm going one. 

1527
01:24:46,700 --> 01:24:49,300
Is this like one of these? 
You know your kind of you give 

1528
01:24:49,300 --> 01:24:52,200
yourself the chance of building 
a team like we just all do that 

1529
01:24:52,200 --> 01:24:56,000
team does have two quarterbacks 
so I don't know. 

1530
01:24:56,100 --> 01:24:59,400
I'm fine either way I'm fine to 
build to maybe we maybe I should

1531
01:24:59,400 --> 01:25:01,700
go to since you're you're being 
prudent about it. 

1532
01:25:03,200 --> 01:25:09,200
Yeah, I don't know. 
I think I think it can be sort 

1533
01:25:09,200 --> 01:25:12,200
of a game-time call based on 
like if you really need a player

1534
01:25:12,200 --> 01:25:15,400
from an opposing team or a bills
pass catcher to like make your 

1535
01:25:16,100 --> 01:25:19,300
Super Bowl makes sense, I think 
it's justifiable if it feels 

1536
01:25:19,300 --> 01:25:21,700
like kind of a luxury pick 
either way. 

1537
01:25:22,300 --> 01:25:24,300
I think like you might as well 
go with the quarterback. 

1538
01:25:25,000 --> 01:25:27,500
Yeah. 
But yeah. 

1539
01:25:27,600 --> 01:25:28,900
Okay. 
I think we're going to have the 

1540
01:25:29,200 --> 01:25:31,000
I don't even care if he's life. 
Someone slaps us. 

1541
01:25:31,000 --> 01:25:34,300
We're gonna have the Gabe. 
Davis decision here at either 

1542
01:25:34,300 --> 01:25:40,000
picked or pick three. 
I've been fading, Dave On Josh 

1543
01:25:40,000 --> 01:25:46,500
Allen teams and that might be 
stupid but like man it's just so

1544
01:25:46,500 --> 01:25:48,800
hard for me to take like Gabe 
Davis over. 

1545
01:25:49,400 --> 01:25:50,300
Let's see. 
Who would that us? 

1546
01:25:50,300 --> 01:25:53,900
You guys be here. 
We're going to see you guys. 

1547
01:25:53,900 --> 01:26:01,200
Got a lot tougher with Debo you 
know. yeah, cuz DeVos not really

1548
01:26:03,000 --> 01:26:08,000
do we go Delvin, or Gabe, or 
Pollard? 

1549
01:26:10,400 --> 01:26:13,800
We could go Pollard and play for
Dallas and see if I like that. 

1550
01:26:13,800 --> 01:26:17,900
I think I like that. 
Man, it's with SF. 

1551
01:26:17,900 --> 01:26:22,300
Like, so, ding now that makes 
that makes us pick pretty tough.

1552
01:26:23,300 --> 01:26:26,400
Yeah, we need to get something 
on the NFC side and it's not 

1553
01:26:26,400 --> 01:26:29,700
going to be Eagles. 
Probably doubt, I mean, Dallas 

1554
01:26:29,700 --> 01:26:32,400
looks so good. 
Yeah. 

1555
01:26:32,900 --> 01:26:36,300
And that the ADP valleys have 
not caught up on like Schultz 

1556
01:26:36,300 --> 01:26:38,900
and Gallop. 
Now they'll probably die from us

1557
01:26:38,900 --> 01:26:41,300
but you can get those guys 
pretty late and like gallops 

1558
01:26:41,300 --> 01:26:45,500
roll and like production as 
really ticked up lately. 

1559
01:26:45,500 --> 01:26:47,800
So while it really has, yeah. 
Yeah. 

1560
01:26:49,700 --> 01:26:51,800
And you know, they're they're 
like smoking things right now, 

1561
01:26:51,800 --> 01:26:54,900
but in the playoffs, Both them 
in the Eagles are like kind of 

1562
01:26:55,200 --> 01:26:59,100
exciting and that they might be 
actually pushed for a full four 

1563
01:26:59,100 --> 01:27:03,200
quarters. 
I think we should go Gabe now. 

1564
01:27:04,800 --> 01:27:09,100
Okay. 
Like we get a stack. 

1565
01:27:10,000 --> 01:27:12,200
I don't know. 
Feels like yeah, I'm fine with 

1566
01:27:12,200 --> 01:27:14,700
that. 
I think like we could have 

1567
01:27:14,700 --> 01:27:17,300
played it by taking Sanders or 
cook. 

1568
01:27:17,300 --> 01:27:20,900
I think. 
And then like We can set up like

1569
01:27:20,900 --> 01:27:23,800
either Dallas or failure. 
Either Dallas or Minnesota in 

1570
01:27:23,800 --> 01:27:26,500
the NFC, but I think this is 
fine. 

1571
01:27:27,600 --> 01:27:29,900
Yeah, I think Gabe Davis still 
has a huge ceiling. 

1572
01:27:30,500 --> 01:27:34,300
So right, he's not gonna last to
our next pick now. 

1573
01:27:34,300 --> 01:27:40,100
He definitely won't Wow, so CD 
DAC. 

1574
01:27:40,100 --> 01:27:43,500
And then burrow that's in see, I
wouldn't take although I wonder 

1575
01:27:43,500 --> 01:27:46,600
when we took Borough on that 
hurts team but that feeling 

1576
01:27:48,000 --> 01:27:53,200
yeah, I think pretty late. 
Yeah, dude, you're competing 

1577
01:27:53,200 --> 01:27:56,400
against our Borough team. 
Yeah, you can't, you can't drop 

1578
01:27:56,400 --> 01:28:00,100
Pearl in this format. 
You just can't drafting that we 

1579
01:28:00,100 --> 01:28:04,700
got them. 
So cheap even though we drafted 

1580
01:28:04,700 --> 01:28:07,900
him, and we actually dropped him
in the way to really wild card 

1581
01:28:07,900 --> 01:28:10,900
and this is the wild card but 
this is different for you. 

1582
01:28:10,900 --> 01:28:14,800
Still can't ornament, okay? 
But you still I wouldn't advise 

1583
01:28:14,800 --> 01:28:16,900
it. 
I wouldn't advise it it's not a 

1584
01:28:17,700 --> 01:28:28,300
screenshot or is that like Do it
the same toilet, man? 

1585
01:28:28,400 --> 01:28:32,600
All right. 
Um, so what are we doing? 

1586
01:28:35,800 --> 01:28:41,700
Juju just went I have an idea. 
I've got him. 

1587
01:28:42,700 --> 01:28:46,600
I have some thoughts if you 
scroll down a little bit. 

1588
01:28:47,000 --> 01:28:59,100
Yeah want to see is still okay. 
Fuck. 

1589
01:28:59,100 --> 01:29:01,400
Is this what I wanted? 
Yeah, that's that. 

1590
01:29:01,400 --> 01:29:02,500
Would have been a really nice 
pick. 

1591
01:29:03,600 --> 01:29:08,100
We could go with McKenzie. 
We could go with waddle could go

1592
01:29:08,100 --> 01:29:10,900
with Andrews. 
I guess thoughts. 

1593
01:29:13,500 --> 01:29:16,700
They have see stuff. 
So this is all flipped it sucks.

1594
01:29:18,800 --> 01:29:25,500
I guess I'll go with waddle, 
just play for play for Buffalo, 

1595
01:29:25,500 --> 01:29:28,600
Miami in the AFC Championship 
game. 

1596
01:29:28,600 --> 01:29:33,200
And yeah, I guess I just feel 
like they're it's like taking 

1597
01:29:33,200 --> 01:29:36,600
Mackenzie or Singletary. 
When we get like, Knox or cook 

1598
01:29:36,600 --> 01:29:41,100
later just feels like, I don't 
know, I agree. 

1599
01:29:41,100 --> 01:29:45,100
Yeah, I don't want Singletary. 
I think I'm Mackenzie here is 

1600
01:29:45,100 --> 01:29:49,400
our next pick. 
Mackenzie, or we could go with 

1601
01:29:49,400 --> 01:29:52,000
something NFC, but I think it 
has to be NFC now. 

1602
01:29:53,400 --> 01:29:58,200
Yeah, I have a I'm going to wait
till this guy picks. 

1603
01:30:05,200 --> 01:30:07,800
Well, whatever if he stops just 
like, I actually know, I know we

1604
01:30:07,800 --> 01:30:11,800
should've done Gallop Gallop or 
Schultz Williams picks like is 

1605
01:30:11,800 --> 01:30:16,500
it way too early? 
Probably, I think we might be 

1606
01:30:16,508 --> 01:30:18,600
able to get at least one of 
their next pick. 

1607
01:30:18,700 --> 01:30:22,000
Okay, what were you thinking 
Godwin? 

1608
01:30:23,300 --> 01:30:27,200
Godwin. 
I like that gets us to an NFC 

1609
01:30:27,200 --> 01:30:31,100
team and I agree. 
I think we can tack on a second 

1610
01:30:31,100 --> 01:30:33,500
bill later. 
Yep, let's see that. 

1611
01:30:37,300 --> 01:30:43,500
Yeah. the water, it's always 
tough with the waddle pictures 

1612
01:30:43,500 --> 01:30:46,500
doesn't feel as like clean but I
think just get it at some point 

1613
01:30:46,500 --> 01:30:50,200
just getting the guys going to 
be projected for like The most 

1614
01:30:50,200 --> 01:30:53,400
points in a week makes sense. 
And if buffaloed Miami, make it 

1615
01:30:53,400 --> 01:30:56,700
to the championship game like 
that can be really valuable but 

1616
01:30:57,400 --> 01:30:59,400
yeah it does it's tough because 
you don't feel good. 

1617
01:30:59,400 --> 01:31:01,000
You're like oh that's such a 
dumb pick. 

1618
01:31:01,000 --> 01:31:05,300
If these guys play each other, 
you know and like what the first

1619
01:31:05,300 --> 01:31:07,700
or second round? 
Yeah, I guess they wouldn't be 

1620
01:31:07,700 --> 01:31:09,600
able to play each other in the 
first round, right? 

1621
01:31:11,100 --> 01:31:13,600
I don't know. 
It's so fluid in the AFC. 

1622
01:31:14,100 --> 01:31:18,700
Yeah we're not pretty going at 
fifth draft. 

1623
01:31:20,100 --> 01:31:23,100
That's going to be a real shame.
And Josh Johnson is starting 

1624
01:31:23,100 --> 01:31:26,600
next week. 
Yeah. 

1625
01:31:30,100 --> 01:31:34,500
Hmm. 
But but I do, I mean, yeah, the 

1626
01:31:34,900 --> 01:31:37,300
the Waterpik stuff because you 
can see it paying off, but it's 

1627
01:31:37,300 --> 01:31:42,800
just like harder too. 
Harder to know. yeah, it's just 

1628
01:31:42,800 --> 01:31:48,700
like any of the good pics there 
were so far down and like I 

1629
01:31:48,700 --> 01:31:51,300
don't see any names here that 
have gone yet that I was like oh

1630
01:31:51,300 --> 01:31:55,800
I wish we took him instead of 
waddle like Nixon Debo like none

1631
01:31:55,800 --> 01:31:57,600
of these other guys make sense 
or I guess we could have gone 

1632
01:31:57,600 --> 01:32:01,300
Goddard but then like there was 
no other Philadelphia guys to 

1633
01:32:01,300 --> 01:32:09,100
pair him with really right like 
Yeah, I don't know. 

1634
01:32:09,200 --> 01:32:12,400
Also, I will point a waddle, I 
don't know, fuck Gallop. 

1635
01:32:12,400 --> 01:32:19,600
When that's annoying. 
What'll did leave with an injury

1636
01:32:19,600 --> 01:32:22,700
last week to, right? 
Yeah, he's kind of dinged up 

1637
01:32:22,700 --> 01:32:23,900
though. 
I don't think it's the type of 

1638
01:32:23,900 --> 01:32:26,000
thing that would affect a 
playoff run. 

1639
01:32:26,900 --> 01:32:31,300
So I think we should when we 
could go on Mackenzie We could 

1640
01:32:31,300 --> 01:32:36,700
also go with another Buccaneer 
or or Schultz. 

1641
01:32:38,000 --> 01:32:39,900
Do you want to grab Mackenzie 
here this pretty bored 

1642
01:32:39,900 --> 01:32:41,600
Singletary. 
I kind of like getting a tattoo 

1643
01:32:41,600 --> 01:32:44,200
from a guy and then we get her 
pick of the Buffalo running back

1644
01:32:44,300 --> 01:32:47,700
just to get a running back with 
Joshua Allen, okay? 

1645
01:32:47,800 --> 01:32:50,400
You want to do Mike Evans? 
Yeah, I like my cabins. 

1646
01:32:51,200 --> 01:32:54,000
All right? 
Because I think there is about 

1647
01:32:54,000 --> 01:32:57,000
like I think we should get a 
buffalo running back here 

1648
01:32:57,000 --> 01:33:00,100
because that way, we're like 
guaranteeing to at least have 

1649
01:33:00,100 --> 01:33:02,800
like one running back squat in 
the Super Bowl of the bills. 

1650
01:33:02,800 --> 01:33:04,700
Make it right. 
That's smart, huh? 

1651
01:33:05,000 --> 01:33:07,700
That gives us some flexibility. 
We're like, we don't need to get

1652
01:33:07,800 --> 01:33:10,000
A Tampa Bay, running back. 
If we get boxed out or something

1653
01:33:10,000 --> 01:33:12,000
like that. 
Do you have a preference between

1654
01:33:12,000 --> 01:33:15,000
them? 
I'll go cook. 

1655
01:33:15,400 --> 01:33:24,600
Yeah, it's just more fun. 
And I don't know, like, I just 

1656
01:33:24,600 --> 01:33:27,000
think they're content. 
Like I think in the playoffs, 

1657
01:33:28,500 --> 01:33:30,500
Things just seem to be trending.
The direction that would go 

1658
01:33:30,500 --> 01:33:31,500
cockle. 
I think it's definitely a 

1659
01:33:31,508 --> 01:33:36,400
toss-up but nothing my ATP here 
to get Singletary at a pic. 38 

1660
01:33:36,400 --> 01:33:40,400
is got 22.7 ATP. 
Does that does that factor in 

1661
01:33:40,400 --> 01:33:44,000
for you at all? 
It's a market efficient. 

1662
01:33:44,400 --> 01:33:46,900
I don't think the markets 
efficient remotely. 

1663
01:33:46,900 --> 01:33:48,700
What do you would you be cook or
Singletary? 

1664
01:33:49,700 --> 01:33:52,000
I mean, Cooks way more fun. 
Yeah. 

1665
01:33:53,900 --> 01:33:55,900
I think simply cannot Market. 
You don't know any of the 

1666
01:33:55,900 --> 01:33:59,800
market, the market stop. 
I think, I don't think the 

1667
01:33:59,800 --> 01:34:03,100
markets Tom, but I do think ATP 
takes a little while to like 

1668
01:34:03,100 --> 01:34:06,100
there's not a huge volume of 
drafts all rise. 

1669
01:34:06,500 --> 01:34:10,100
Like, I think I think it's a 
pretty justifiable pick. 

1670
01:34:12,000 --> 01:34:15,300
It may just be me doubling down 
on what I did this summer, which

1671
01:34:15,300 --> 01:34:18,900
was take zero Singletary and 
take only cook and that has 

1672
01:34:18,900 --> 01:34:22,000
blown up in my face, but maybe, 
maybe not, Maybe, not, maybe it 

1673
01:34:22,008 --> 01:34:23,800
hasn't. 
You just got Advanced the teams 

1674
01:34:23,800 --> 01:34:26,000
with cook with other players and
all the sudden you get to be 

1675
01:34:26,000 --> 01:34:31,400
like, I got a lone guy, dude. 
This is the, I have a team. 

1676
01:34:32,400 --> 01:34:36,200
One of my redacted teams that I 
have checked occasionally, and I

1677
01:34:36,200 --> 01:34:38,300
took cook over moderate 
Stevenson in that League. 

1678
01:34:38,300 --> 01:34:40,500
It's pretty early journalism. 
Yeah. 

1679
01:34:40,700 --> 01:34:44,400
But It's in first place. 
And I'm like, maybe that was 

1680
01:34:44,400 --> 01:34:46,400
genius. 
That was actually you. 

1681
01:34:46,500 --> 01:34:47,900
Yeah. 
That was always the thesis of 

1682
01:34:47,900 --> 01:34:50,700
the play that you knew cook 
would be a bad pick. 

1683
01:34:51,100 --> 01:34:53,700
Another picks were so good. 
I should make a bad pick here. 

1684
01:34:55,700 --> 01:34:57,600
I'll take off on a bit of a 
rant, but I've seen all like 

1685
01:34:58,000 --> 01:35:01,000
best of all guys here and 
Twitter being like guys. 

1686
01:35:01,000 --> 01:35:04,000
Like you should actually like 
not be excited about the high 

1687
01:35:04,000 --> 01:35:07,100
Advance rate players like he had
low and it's bad if you have 

1688
01:35:07,100 --> 01:35:08,400
Jacobs. 
Yeah, it's bad. 

1689
01:35:08,400 --> 01:35:10,400
If you have all the good players
don't like, okay. 

1690
01:35:11,100 --> 01:35:13,300
Ali, I get it but like how is it
actionable guys? 

1691
01:35:13,300 --> 01:35:15,900
Like how are you? 
How are you, predicting the low 

1692
01:35:15,900 --> 01:35:19,700
Advance rate players? 
Like like if anyone can tell me 

1693
01:35:19,700 --> 01:35:25,300
how to how to do that? 
Then like yeah it's just seems 

1694
01:35:25,300 --> 01:35:28,300
like a ridiculous. 
Yeah, it's a bit, isn't it? 

1695
01:35:30,700 --> 01:35:32,000
All right. 
I think we have an easy pick if 

1696
01:35:32,000 --> 01:35:34,500
it gets to us. 
Yeah, I did too. 

1697
01:35:35,600 --> 01:35:37,900
And then oh sorry. 
I keep forgetting to put the 

1698
01:35:38,300 --> 01:35:39,800
drop or back on. 
Sorry. 

1699
01:35:39,900 --> 01:35:45,400
Sorry. 
Viewers We got Jake Schultz, 

1700
01:35:45,400 --> 01:35:46,600
right? 
Is that everything I think 

1701
01:35:46,600 --> 01:35:48,900
Schulz is kind of a no-brainer? 
Yeah. 

1702
01:35:51,200 --> 01:35:53,300
I think Dallas. 
Yeah, that's like the most 

1703
01:35:53,300 --> 01:35:55,800
likely Super Bowl scenario. 
We have an NFC going. 

1704
01:35:56,500 --> 01:35:58,500
No, we're live for two 
different. 

1705
01:35:58,500 --> 01:36:05,300
Super Bowls. yep, and then let's
say I'm going to go back to 

1706
01:36:05,300 --> 01:36:14,900
here, so we could go knocks, we 
could go Rashad White, I think 

1707
01:36:15,700 --> 01:36:19,700
probably done on Dallas. 
Dallas is tough. 

1708
01:36:23,600 --> 01:36:25,900
What are the quarterbacks that 
are left just thinking about? 

1709
01:36:25,900 --> 01:36:32,700
Oh, that's a good point. 
So Gino is our last chance at 

1710
01:36:33,400 --> 01:36:36,700
the quarterback but like, wait, 
what are the Seahawks odds of 

1711
01:36:36,700 --> 01:36:38,400
making it? 
It's not even guaranteed. 

1712
01:36:38,400 --> 01:36:45,900
Oh, it's 80%. 
I think we should go with white 

1713
01:36:45,900 --> 01:36:49,100
or fournette here and then if 
Gino is available for us in the 

1714
01:36:49,108 --> 01:36:52,100
very last round, I would 
consider it, but I like locking 

1715
01:36:52,100 --> 01:36:56,100
up another tip. 
What about what about Knox is 

1716
01:36:56,100 --> 01:36:56,700
that? 
Hold any. 

1717
01:36:57,500 --> 01:36:59,300
We have. 
We already have two bills but 

1718
01:36:59,300 --> 01:37:02,300
they'll be a third. 
Via forthright way. 

1719
01:37:02,300 --> 01:37:04,500
We have three. 
Do we? 

1720
01:37:05,600 --> 01:37:07,700
We have Davis gave. 
Oh, sorry. 

1721
01:37:07,700 --> 01:37:09,300
You mean plus Allen? 
Yeah. 

1722
01:37:10,700 --> 01:37:13,800
I would go, I would go white, 
but Knox is fine. 

1723
01:37:14,800 --> 01:37:17,100
Alright we got white couldn't 
find a second. 

1724
01:37:17,100 --> 01:37:20,800
I started to panic. 
Getting out of drafted, George 

1725
01:37:20,800 --> 01:37:24,200
get a little bit, pretty brutal.
Pretty bad way to end this team.

1726
01:37:25,500 --> 01:37:28,400
We have to take Josh Johnson and
this expect to just, oh God. 

1727
01:37:29,100 --> 01:37:31,400
All right. 
So I think we could go Gino here

1728
01:37:31,400 --> 01:37:36,400
and we could go I think at this 
point we didn't get Gino. 

1729
01:37:36,400 --> 01:37:41,000
I would say Knox, but we'll see.
Yeah it's Knox is available. 

1730
01:37:41,000 --> 01:37:44,700
I'm not even I don't know knocks
first you know. 

1731
01:37:45,500 --> 01:37:49,200
No I'd be Gino to but I think we
have I'd be knocks over the rest

1732
01:37:49,200 --> 01:37:52,800
of the yeah I mean trencher 
field just one. 

1733
01:37:52,800 --> 01:37:57,100
So yeah like that who would the 
Dallas pick be? 

1734
01:37:57,100 --> 01:37:58,900
Would it be? 
I guess would be Noah brown or 

1735
01:37:58,900 --> 01:38:03,600
brown Washington? 
The. 

1736
01:38:05,100 --> 01:38:09,100
Other, like at Tampa, I guess 
you could go Julio for not, but 

1737
01:38:09,100 --> 01:38:19,700
that seems like kind of gross. 
Yeah, I think we have to we 

1738
01:38:19,700 --> 01:38:22,500
couldn't go for that. 
We have to kind of make that bad

1739
01:38:22,500 --> 01:38:24,300
but Julio I guess would be in 
play. 

1740
01:38:25,400 --> 01:38:27,600
Although then it's like, we 
should probably have Brady. 

1741
01:38:28,900 --> 01:38:30,700
Yeah, maybe a huge Deck with 
enough. 

1742
01:38:32,000 --> 01:38:35,900
On the books. 
The thing about Tampa that's 

1743
01:38:35,900 --> 01:38:39,000
great is like they have such a 
good chance of hosting a 

1744
01:38:39,000 --> 01:38:44,800
first-round playoff game at this
point that like I think you can 

1745
01:38:44,800 --> 01:38:48,800
feel even though the team's not 
great, I feel pretty good about 

1746
01:38:48,800 --> 01:38:50,600
like their chances of getting 
two games in the playoffs. 

1747
01:38:50,600 --> 01:38:54,000
Just because that home playoff 
game, I guess it would be 

1748
01:38:54,000 --> 01:38:57,700
against Dallas, which is maybe 
something that we fucked up. 

1749
01:38:59,000 --> 01:39:00,000
All right, so we're on the 
clock. 

1750
01:39:01,600 --> 01:39:04,400
So not so the decision point is 
knocks and we play for the 

1751
01:39:04,407 --> 01:39:07,500
bills, not to get the by the 
team's basically dead if it does

1752
01:39:08,100 --> 01:39:11,400
or Gino because the bills are 
going to get the by. 

1753
01:39:12,100 --> 01:39:14,500
But then the, that gives the 
bills better odds of making the 

1754
01:39:14,500 --> 01:39:16,600
Super Bowl, which is what we 
need to happen. 

1755
01:39:16,900 --> 01:39:20,900
I think we should go knocks 
because I'm pretty if I'm 

1756
01:39:20,900 --> 01:39:24,500
thinking about this, right? 
I'm pretty sure like we stacked 

1757
01:39:24,500 --> 01:39:28,500
up Dallas and Tampa Bay, which 
is actually maybe kind of Dumb. 

1758
01:39:28,500 --> 01:39:30,700
Right? 
Because if Tampa Bay wins their 

1759
01:39:30,700 --> 01:39:33,300
division and Dallas is the best 
wild card team, that means they 

1760
01:39:33,300 --> 01:39:38,800
play around one. 
Oh yeah, that's bad. 

1761
01:39:40,200 --> 01:39:45,600
So I'm saying because we, 
because we did that, we want to 

1762
01:39:45,600 --> 01:39:48,000
like maximize the number of 
players we have laughed in 

1763
01:39:48,000 --> 01:39:51,100
future rounds, which I think 
leads us to knocks over G. 

1764
01:39:51,100 --> 01:39:54,900
No. 
But that sounds nice when the 

1765
01:39:54,907 --> 01:39:56,400
NFC East. 
Yeah. 

1766
01:39:56,600 --> 01:40:02,200
Yeah. 
Or San Francisco needs to 

1767
01:40:02,200 --> 01:40:04,400
Crater. 
So that, I mean I really need a 

1768
01:40:04,407 --> 01:40:06,100
greater. 
Let's do, let's do another one 

1769
01:40:06,100 --> 01:40:09,000
of these before I call it. 
Yeah, yeah. 

1770
01:40:09,000 --> 01:40:12,400
It's not really good to end the 
draft with that was, that was 

1771
01:40:12,400 --> 01:40:14,700
pretty dumb, so, one half of 
your team. 

1772
01:40:16,300 --> 01:40:18,600
Oh, F of Doom was saying, that's
what I was trying to say. 

1773
01:40:18,700 --> 01:40:20,000
Yeah, all right. 
Well, you know what? 

1774
01:40:20,000 --> 01:40:23,300
We learn by doing on this trip, 
on this show, we learn by doing 

1775
01:40:23,800 --> 01:40:26,300
well. 
Your husband's to do, is stack 

1776
01:40:26,300 --> 01:40:28,200
up, two teams have played each 
other round 1. 

1777
01:40:28,400 --> 01:40:30,700
Now we have Actually to this 
Ridge, actually it sort of like 

1778
01:40:30,700 --> 01:40:32,400
a teaching moment for all of you
guys. 

1779
01:40:32,400 --> 01:40:39,700
Yeah yeah you guys know. 
Yeah, I do remember though like 

1780
01:40:40,500 --> 01:40:43,000
like so the Cowboys still have a
21 percent chance of winning 

1781
01:40:43,000 --> 01:40:44,900
their division. 
Like I remember last year trying

1782
01:40:44,900 --> 01:40:48,100
to do all this like mapping out 
of what teams are going to play.

1783
01:40:48,100 --> 01:40:50,200
What? 
There's four weeks left, are not

1784
01:40:50,200 --> 01:40:51,600
five weeks left in the regular 
season. 

1785
01:40:51,600 --> 01:40:55,000
Like there's gonna be so much 
chaos that like getting 2 micro 

1786
01:40:55,000 --> 01:40:58,700
about being like, oh, this seems
going to play that team like it.

1787
01:40:58,900 --> 01:41:01,700
It's a lot as up in flux, I 
probably would try to stay away 

1788
01:41:01,700 --> 01:41:05,300
from like Dallas, Tampa Bay 
Stacks because of like the you 

1789
01:41:05,300 --> 01:41:07,400
know more than likely chance are
going to play each other but 

1790
01:41:07,400 --> 01:41:10,200
it's where I don't think it 
really matters that much that's 

1791
01:41:10,200 --> 01:41:14,300
probably only one the one that 
we just did. 

1792
01:41:15,800 --> 01:41:20,000
Yeah, that's the only thing. 
She literally only thing to 

1793
01:41:20,008 --> 01:41:24,100
avoid is what we just did. 
We gotta, we gotta headline for 

1794
01:41:24,100 --> 01:41:26,900
our show, at least the one thing
to not do, don't don't. 

1795
01:41:26,900 --> 01:41:28,900
Yeah, the one mistake not to 
make. 

1796
01:41:32,800 --> 01:41:35,900
Yeah, there you go. 
This will be 0. 

1797
01:41:35,900 --> 01:41:38,800
We are going to sell the chance 
that one of the quarterbacks 

1798
01:41:39,200 --> 01:41:42,600
thought maybe. 
Justin Jefferson. 

1799
01:41:42,600 --> 01:41:45,100
That's an interesting one. 
All right. 

1800
01:41:45,400 --> 01:41:48,600
Jill hurts. 
Yeah, I think it's, I think not 

1801
01:41:48,600 --> 01:41:50,000
ever thinking that one. 
Makes sense. 

1802
01:41:50,000 --> 01:41:53,100
Yeah. 
Get yourself some Philly. 

1803
01:41:56,400 --> 01:41:57,900
Getting hurts for is kind of 
nice. 

1804
01:42:01,000 --> 01:42:02,200
Yeah, a little easier build with
them. 

1805
01:42:05,300 --> 01:42:09,100
Yep. 
And then, what are you? 

1806
01:42:09,100 --> 01:42:14,100
So okay. obviously, if we have a
chance to stack a stack in, but 

1807
01:42:15,500 --> 01:42:17,100
We don't have a chance to do 
that because I'd your brown, 

1808
01:42:17,100 --> 01:42:21,800
just went. 
Yeah. so I feel like a fc wide 

1809
01:42:21,800 --> 01:42:24,800
receiver makes sense and we've 
got a bunch of dudes to pick 

1810
01:42:24,800 --> 01:42:28,700
from Yep. 
Level on options. 

1811
01:42:30,200 --> 01:42:33,500
I think Kelsey is going to go. 
He would be the I think 

1812
01:42:33,500 --> 01:42:36,500
no-brainer if he's available but
then after that it's like a 

1813
01:42:36,500 --> 01:42:38,000
bunch of guys that we can go 
with. 

1814
01:42:39,400 --> 01:42:40,400
What are? 
What are the? 

1815
01:42:40,400 --> 01:42:42,100
What's Miami's odds of making a 
Super Bowl? 

1816
01:42:45,900 --> 01:42:48,200
They're lower than the Bangles 
considerably. 

1817
01:42:48,900 --> 01:42:53,400
So, probably go Jamar. 
I would I would strongly and Jim

1818
01:42:53,400 --> 01:42:56,300
are here. 
Over Tyreke. 

1819
01:42:59,000 --> 01:43:00,800
I think that's I think like 
that. 

1820
01:43:00,800 --> 01:43:03,300
There's this anchoring effect in
these atp's for the Bengals were

1821
01:43:03,300 --> 01:43:06,500
also low when they like we're 
50/50 and even make the playoffs

1822
01:43:07,000 --> 01:43:10,400
and it just hasn't caught up yet
like mix in is way too low in 

1823
01:43:10,400 --> 01:43:16,100
these things still Cincinnati 
Cincinnati looks really good. 

1824
01:43:16,900 --> 01:43:20,900
Yeah. 
There are and the coaching is 

1825
01:43:20,900 --> 01:43:26,400
better than I thought. 
They'd be yeah see yeah, see 

1826
01:43:26,400 --> 01:43:29,400
this is like CMC. 
You're going to there's value in

1827
01:43:29,400 --> 01:43:32,700
doing these drafts now while the
SFA DPS or way up there like 

1828
01:43:33,500 --> 01:43:36,800
McCaffrey and the second round. 
I'm sorry for whoever's with you

1829
01:43:36,800 --> 01:43:39,500
know over this is watching this 
but I think that's just like an 

1830
01:43:39,500 --> 01:43:44,400
unjustifiable pick, you did. 
I thought maybe you were gonna 

1831
01:43:44,400 --> 01:43:47,600
kind of like there. 
I'm sorry, you might be watching

1832
01:43:47,600 --> 01:43:50,500
but you're a fucking woman. 
Actually, I changed the name of 

1833
01:43:50,500 --> 01:43:53,000
the YouTube. 
The two things to not do an 

1834
01:43:53,000 --> 01:43:56,100
underdog. 
Yeah we only made one of them. 

1835
01:43:59,700 --> 01:44:02,800
It's just like their path of the
Super Bowl, is so thin now with 

1836
01:44:02,800 --> 01:44:06,800
property that like you're taking
player in the second round, he 

1837
01:44:06,800 --> 01:44:11,000
was like, so likely to not make 
it far in the playoffs like 

1838
01:44:11,600 --> 01:44:18,400
you're just gonna lose. 
I think I've with you. 

1839
01:44:18,900 --> 01:44:20,600
I agree. 
Sorry. 

1840
01:44:20,700 --> 01:44:27,000
Sorry to listeners. 
If you think like a free You can

1841
01:44:27,100 --> 01:44:29,000
rip us in the chat for what we 
did in our last. 

1842
01:44:29,000 --> 01:44:31,600
Yea, we are, we made an 
unjustifiable draft. 

1843
01:44:31,600 --> 01:44:33,900
That's only one thing you're 
doing. 

1844
01:44:33,900 --> 01:44:35,700
All right, all right. 
What are we doing here? 

1845
01:44:35,700 --> 01:44:39,200
We got, I think maybe we could 
do go Devonte, we could go 

1846
01:44:39,200 --> 01:44:42,900
Higgins. 
We got Mi centers there to could

1847
01:44:42,900 --> 01:44:45,000
also go bro. 
We probably need another 

1848
01:44:45,000 --> 01:44:46,900
quarterback. 
I know, I just made fun of Jake 

1849
01:44:46,900 --> 01:44:47,300
for. 
Yeah. 

1850
01:44:47,300 --> 01:44:48,600
I wouldn't. 
We just don't think I could core

1851
01:44:48,600 --> 01:44:52,000
of I'd be between Sanders 
Hagen's or devaugntah. 

1852
01:44:52,200 --> 01:44:54,700
I kind of like Sanders just for 
the running back points like 

1853
01:44:54,800 --> 01:44:56,700
yeah. 
Scarcity argument. 

1854
01:44:57,700 --> 01:45:01,200
Let's do Sanders. 
I just really like the 

1855
01:45:01,200 --> 01:45:04,300
quarterback running backs tax in
these way more than I do and 

1856
01:45:04,300 --> 01:45:07,700
like a traditional format just 
because like those are kind of 

1857
01:45:07,700 --> 01:45:10,100
the two scarce positions in a 
way. 

1858
01:45:10,100 --> 01:45:12,000
And if you're just like if the 
yields are making the Super 

1859
01:45:12,000 --> 01:45:17,300
Bowl, like I think a Sanders 
team like I don't know, just in 

1860
01:45:17,300 --> 01:45:19,600
the weeks for at heart hurts 
like doesn't have a massive 

1861
01:45:19,600 --> 01:45:22,000
game. 
Like Sanderson really help you, 

1862
01:45:22,000 --> 01:45:24,200
I don't know. 
The Eagles are also. 

1863
01:45:24,200 --> 01:45:28,300
So willing to shift their 
approach like maybe more than 

1864
01:45:28,300 --> 01:45:29,600
any other team in the league 
though. 

1865
01:45:29,800 --> 01:45:32,500
Play the match up so you could 
have and we're going to be 

1866
01:45:32,500 --> 01:45:33,600
drafting a second quarter back 
here. 

1867
01:45:33,600 --> 01:45:37,200
Anyway, yeah. 
So we could think it makes 

1868
01:45:37,200 --> 01:45:38,700
sense. 
So we still have a choice of 

1869
01:45:38,700 --> 01:45:44,900
green tea and Devon Tahir. 
I think I'm Devon te Yeah, I 

1870
01:45:44,907 --> 01:45:49,000
think AB to right, get the stack
now with that, probably we're 

1871
01:45:49,000 --> 01:45:51,600
probably done on the Eagles. 
I think we have to be done, 

1872
01:45:52,200 --> 01:45:55,800
which is yeah, this is a very 
high value stack that we're 

1873
01:45:55,800 --> 01:46:01,000
getting Are you are you having 
second thoughts? 

1874
01:46:01,800 --> 01:46:03,100
No. 
I like to Malta. 

1875
01:46:03,500 --> 01:46:08,300
Okay, yeah. 
The got like I was going to say 

1876
01:46:08,300 --> 01:46:11,800
like we forgot her but the 
Goddard injury thing kind of 

1877
01:46:11,800 --> 01:46:17,500
scares me a little bit and I 
think like, devaugntah I don't 

1878
01:46:17,500 --> 01:46:20,900
know like the vodka and AJ, 
Brown has been a lot closer than

1879
01:46:20,900 --> 01:46:22,500
I thought it was going to be 
this year. 

1880
01:46:22,500 --> 01:46:25,200
Like, obviously AJ Brown, it's 
still like the alpha, but it's 

1881
01:46:25,200 --> 01:46:27,800
kind of like Trying to think of 
a good compare. 

1882
01:46:27,800 --> 01:46:30,200
It's a little bit like the Jamar
Higgins thing where I think like

1883
01:46:30,200 --> 01:46:33,300
it is a bit Smith can be the 
Higgins and have like a massive 

1884
01:46:33,300 --> 01:46:34,700
weak. 
Like he showed that this year a 

1885
01:46:34,700 --> 01:46:37,600
little bit, you know, like that.
Calm. 

1886
01:46:38,000 --> 01:46:41,700
Yeah. 
All right, I feel like there's 

1887
01:46:41,700 --> 01:46:46,200
two really strong pick and goes 
mixing with, so I was gonna say,

1888
01:46:46,400 --> 01:46:49,300
yeah, that would've been good. 
What about Baroque here? 

1889
01:46:52,100 --> 01:46:54,200
We're now applying force in see 
Philly Super Bowl. 

1890
01:46:54,900 --> 01:46:57,100
I like we're all here. 
We need to get a second 

1891
01:46:57,100 --> 01:46:59,900
quarterback, kind of you get a 
second quarterback and it's not 

1892
01:46:59,900 --> 01:47:05,300
like there's not an obvious if 
like mixing was still there then

1893
01:47:05,900 --> 01:47:08,400
I would definitely be mixing. 
But if without another obvious 

1894
01:47:08,400 --> 01:47:12,500
next pick you like Yeah, we're 
kind of picking a second AFC 

1895
01:47:12,500 --> 01:47:15,400
team or tacking on gutter, but 
we can't really afford attack on

1896
01:47:15,400 --> 01:47:17,300
God. 
I don't think it's gonna buy 

1897
01:47:17,700 --> 01:47:20,600
they're getting the B. 
Yeah, 76 percent chance. 

1898
01:47:23,600 --> 01:47:25,100
Yeah. 
I mean like there's there 

1899
01:47:25,100 --> 01:47:28,300
obviously is the universe where 
the Cowboys or the Vikings get 

1900
01:47:28,300 --> 01:47:30,800
the by interesting 5:30. 
It actually has a cowboy's as a 

1901
01:47:30,808 --> 01:47:32,800
higher chance of getting the 
bottom, the Vikings do. 

1902
01:47:33,000 --> 01:47:37,000
I guess it's because they play 
the Eagles head to head once in 

1903
01:47:37,000 --> 01:47:38,600
their lives better. 
Yeah. 

1904
01:47:38,900 --> 01:47:40,700
They're just really good there. 
Yeah. 

1905
01:47:40,700 --> 01:47:42,900
And they're better that deal. 
Yeah. 

1906
01:47:42,900 --> 01:47:47,000
But the record is like the point
being the Cowboys record is 9 

1907
01:47:47,000 --> 01:47:49,500
and 3 in the Vikings are 10 and 
2 so just thought was 

1908
01:47:49,500 --> 01:47:51,200
interesting. 
The model says they have a 

1909
01:47:51,208 --> 01:47:53,900
higher chance again the by even 
with like the actual Extra game 

1910
01:47:53,900 --> 01:47:58,400
they have to make up, but okay. 
Should we go Baltimore and get 

1911
01:47:58,400 --> 01:48:00,500
the other AFC team? 
That's kind of was thinking? 

1912
01:48:00,500 --> 01:48:06,100
Yeah, we can get Andrews here. 
Get are no other AFC team here. 

1913
01:48:06,200 --> 01:48:10,300
I like that and then we can tack
on I guess we could go NFC as 

1914
01:48:10,300 --> 01:48:13,000
well because we do have a bro 
Chase. 

1915
01:48:13,000 --> 01:48:16,200
So why not? 
I kind of like Andrews over 

1916
01:48:16,200 --> 01:48:18,100
Godwin. 
Yeah let's do it. 

1917
01:48:18,100 --> 01:48:20,900
Let's we talked about Baltimore 
to start the show. 

1918
01:48:21,000 --> 01:48:27,500
Tampa Bay looks so weak they do.
Baltimore looks I mean the Vault

1919
01:48:27,500 --> 01:48:30,200
or just barely beat the Broncos.
So I'm not that fired up. 

1920
01:48:30,800 --> 01:48:33,600
That's true too. 
But the park is actually at 

1921
01:48:33,600 --> 01:48:35,800
least have a good defense. 
They did all the Getty fancy, I 

1922
01:48:35,800 --> 01:48:40,700
maybe maybe Dobbins, maybe 
diamonds, it is so funny that if

1923
01:48:40,700 --> 01:48:44,600
the Broncos just had like If 
they had like Detroit, I'm 

1924
01:48:44,600 --> 01:48:46,700
trying to think of like an 
average offense, like Detroit's 

1925
01:48:46,700 --> 01:48:49,300
even maybe better than average 
like if the Broncos would like 

1926
01:48:49,300 --> 01:48:52,200
the Jags offense, I think they 
would be like a team for this 

1927
01:48:52,200 --> 01:48:53,200
year. 
Yeah. 

1928
01:48:54,000 --> 01:48:56,500
Yeah. 
They would be it. 

1929
01:48:56,500 --> 01:48:57,500
Fizzes Jack. 
That's a good. 

1930
01:48:57,500 --> 01:49:01,500
That's a good one, because the 
Jags defense is so bad as well. 

1931
01:49:01,700 --> 01:49:03,300
Like, what do they have? 
The Raiders offense? 

1932
01:49:03,600 --> 01:49:08,400
Would they like my people died? 
And three, they might be like, 

1933
01:49:08,400 --> 01:49:10,400
that'd be like the Vikings like 
level. 

1934
01:49:10,400 --> 01:49:11,900
Yeah. 
That's right. 

1935
01:49:11,900 --> 01:49:13,100
That's essentially what the 
fuck? 

1936
01:49:13,200 --> 01:49:16,100
Things are yeah although they 
did. 

1937
01:49:16,100 --> 01:49:19,300
I mean they don't even have the 
I mean the Vikings defense is 

1938
01:49:19,300 --> 01:49:20,800
much worse than the Broncos. 
Yeah. 

1939
01:49:20,800 --> 01:49:24,500
The Broncos defense man. 
What a wasted year. 

1940
01:49:26,800 --> 01:49:28,100
All right. 
What do we got? 

1941
01:49:28,100 --> 01:49:31,700
What do we looking for? 
We're looking for some Ravens, 

1942
01:49:31,700 --> 01:49:35,700
some Bangles. 
Not a ton, I guess. 

1943
01:49:39,800 --> 01:49:43,200
I like I guess I would like Boyd
here. 

1944
01:49:44,000 --> 01:49:48,400
It's a I don't think we ATP 
matters that much that just feel

1945
01:49:48,400 --> 01:49:52,700
out of the teams we have that 
feels like the best player 

1946
01:49:52,700 --> 01:49:56,100
available. 
Yeah we're making a big bet on 

1947
01:49:56,100 --> 01:50:02,700
the Bengals. 
Yeah. 

1948
01:50:04,000 --> 01:50:05,600
Yeah, that feels It Feels. 
Alright to me. 

1949
01:50:08,400 --> 01:50:10,900
Like the other players I'm 
thinking about not too. 

1950
01:50:11,300 --> 01:50:14,000
So we get sniped later would be 
like for the teams we have, like

1951
01:50:14,000 --> 01:50:15,900
Dobbins, I think, is in play 
later. 

1952
01:50:16,200 --> 01:50:19,700
I think perine is actually even 
potentially in play later. 

1953
01:50:20,200 --> 01:50:22,200
That's an interesting thought. 
Yeah. 

1954
01:50:24,200 --> 01:50:28,700
Just as like a guy that could 
get us seven points in a week at

1955
01:50:28,700 --> 01:50:31,700
the Bangles Advance. 
Plus the contingent upside like 

1956
01:50:31,700 --> 01:50:34,200
no one's taking pure on in this 
format which I think is somewhat

1957
01:50:34,200 --> 01:50:38,200
interesting. 
We know his role is like, 

1958
01:50:38,200 --> 01:50:40,100
massive. 
If something happened to Nixon, 

1959
01:50:44,000 --> 01:50:49,900
We probably could go with like 
an NFC extra piece, which I 

1960
01:50:49,900 --> 01:50:54,700
guess would be Berkeley, but I 
don't love that, I don't love 

1961
01:50:54,700 --> 01:50:57,200
that either. 
If we're going to go to like 

1962
01:50:57,600 --> 01:51:01,500
random NFC running back, I would
probably go back to like the 

1963
01:51:01,500 --> 01:51:03,100
Leonard fournette, or Rashad 
white. 

1964
01:51:03,100 --> 01:51:06,700
Well, before I went with 
Berkeley on about Walker. 

1965
01:51:06,900 --> 01:51:07,800
Yeah. 
Yeah. 

1966
01:51:07,800 --> 01:51:13,100
Our Walker Walker, is a good 
one. actually, I like I don't 

1967
01:51:13,100 --> 01:51:15,700
hit Walker here is just a way to
get running back points and help

1968
01:51:15,700 --> 01:51:20,900
us Advance because I think the 
other guys be like, like Dobbins

1969
01:51:20,900 --> 01:51:23,800
and perine and stuff we can get 
later. 

1970
01:51:24,600 --> 01:51:26,900
I like Walker or like white 
here. 

1971
01:51:26,900 --> 01:51:30,400
I think would be my two guys. 
Let's go Walker. 

1972
01:51:30,700 --> 01:51:32,700
Yeah, I feel like we've done a 
lot of Tampa Bay. 

1973
01:51:33,400 --> 01:51:35,800
Yeah. 
Yeah. 

1974
01:51:35,800 --> 01:51:36,800
All right. 
I like that. 

1975
01:51:37,100 --> 01:51:39,500
Then we could maybe go through 
running back I guess. 

1976
01:51:40,300 --> 01:51:43,800
I mean, at this point we could 
eat like lock, it wouldn't be a 

1977
01:51:43,800 --> 01:51:46,300
horrible pick either because we 
know that's, that's an 

1978
01:51:46,300 --> 01:51:49,500
interesting thought we would. 
Technically be in play for a 

1979
01:51:49,500 --> 01:51:52,600
Cincinnati, Seattle, Subaru, 
rule. 

1980
01:51:55,300 --> 01:51:57,900
We need things to break right 
here with like who plays. 

1981
01:51:57,900 --> 01:52:02,000
Whoo but we're still limiting 24
teams which I think. 

1982
01:52:02,000 --> 01:52:08,100
Yeah, I think it's fine Seattle 
would be yeah, I don't know. 

1983
01:52:08,100 --> 01:52:09,900
Predicting Seattle seat is 
really tough right now. 

1984
01:52:09,900 --> 01:52:14,300
They can be they could win the 
division now with pretty in it. 

1985
01:52:14,300 --> 01:52:19,000
And for the 49ers, they could 
also be Wild card team. 

1986
01:52:19,200 --> 01:52:27,700
That's a tough one to predict. 
So we could go Dobbins here or 

1987
01:52:27,700 --> 01:52:30,900
we could go lock it here. 
I would rather play that. 

1988
01:52:32,600 --> 01:52:37,000
I would go lock it. 
Just for the I just like to put 

1989
01:52:37,000 --> 01:52:40,100
like the the points that lock it
yet. 

1990
01:52:40,100 --> 01:52:42,300
That's and I think we can just 
like that he's gonna wildly 

1991
01:52:42,300 --> 01:52:46,000
outscore balance. 
It seems like a fair reason to. 

1992
01:52:46,000 --> 01:52:51,500
Yeah because if we get slapped 
on Dobbins like gossip I don't 

1993
01:52:51,500 --> 01:52:52,800
know. 
It's got said words that differ 

1994
01:52:52,800 --> 01:52:58,100
from a pic from Dobbins or is 
pure on that much different with

1995
01:52:58,100 --> 01:53:00,100
pick. 
I think like I think we should 

1996
01:53:00,100 --> 01:53:03,400
take a running back here like I 
like Dobbins the most but I'm 

1997
01:53:03,400 --> 01:53:05,900
okay with one of those two other
guys I think. 

1998
01:53:08,900 --> 01:53:12,400
P Ron's interesting because like
we did a one-off Andrews witch. 

1999
01:53:13,300 --> 01:53:17,400
He's, he's just he's Andrews, 
like it kind of makes sense. 

2000
01:53:17,500 --> 01:53:19,000
You know? 
If they play two or three games,

2001
01:53:19,000 --> 01:53:20,700
like he could be awesome. 
Yeah. 

2002
01:53:22,700 --> 01:53:24,900
But that doesn't necessarily 
mean. 

2003
01:53:24,900 --> 01:53:28,800
We need to make this big bet on.
Baltimore, especially since we 

2004
01:53:28,800 --> 01:53:32,300
already have burrow. 
So yeah, maybe adding we have 

2005
01:53:32,300 --> 01:53:33,900
Boyd. 
So maybe PR on. 

2006
01:53:34,300 --> 01:53:37,400
Would voters, not yet? 
To your point, is it? 

2007
01:53:37,400 --> 01:53:42,300
I guess like the math only works
for a filly Baltimore Super 

2008
01:53:42,300 --> 01:53:44,700
Bowl. 
If we take another Baltimore 

2009
01:53:44,700 --> 01:53:49,200
player here, right? 
Because if we want to keep that 

2010
01:53:49,200 --> 01:53:51,500
outcome in play, where it can be
Philly Baltimore and we have 

2011
01:53:51,500 --> 01:53:53,700
five players in the finals. 
We need to take a Baltimore 

2012
01:53:53,700 --> 01:53:56,300
player here. 
I think we're dead if it's 

2013
01:53:56,300 --> 01:54:00,600
filling Baltimore, right? 
Like, we're we have burrow Chase

2014
01:54:01,900 --> 01:54:05,600
and boy. 
But if it's still a quality, or 

2015
01:54:05,600 --> 01:54:08,500
do we have? 
Like, and and hurts as it gets 

2016
01:54:08,500 --> 01:54:11,000
right back, we have hurts. 
Yeah, they've heard Sanders, 

2017
01:54:11,000 --> 01:54:14,700
devaugntah and Andrews. 
Like, I don't think that's 

2018
01:54:14,700 --> 01:54:16,700
crazy. 
What it would be in play for, 

2019
01:54:17,300 --> 01:54:18,800
all right. 
Maybe Dobbins is the move. 

2020
01:54:20,200 --> 01:54:23,600
Yeah. 
Because like yeah, there could 

2021
01:54:23,600 --> 01:54:25,500
be aware like a fault more. 
Makes the Super Bowl there. 

2022
01:54:25,500 --> 01:54:28,200
Probably like doing it and kind 
of a gross way. 

2023
01:54:28,200 --> 01:54:30,400
That's just a ton of Andrews 
points and not much else but 

2024
01:54:30,400 --> 01:54:33,600
you'd still would want like some
player to get you points in the 

2025
01:54:33,600 --> 01:54:41,000
finals, which could be Dobbins. 
Yeah, Ryan is saying since the 

2026
01:54:41,000 --> 01:54:42,800
in Baltimore pretty unlikely to 
play each other. 

2027
01:54:43,300 --> 01:54:49,200
So that makes diamonds more 
interesting, makes sense, I 

2028
01:54:49,200 --> 01:54:52,600
trust Justin. 
All right, so I feel like we did

2029
01:54:52,600 --> 01:54:53,800
this one. 
This one was better. 

2030
01:54:53,800 --> 01:54:57,600
This one was not a mistake that 
you must avoid this. 

2031
01:54:58,200 --> 01:55:01,600
That's wise step. 
I like, no. 

2032
01:55:01,608 --> 01:55:04,400
This one's it. 
Because if we have We could be a

2033
01:55:04,407 --> 01:55:07,200
sin. 
See we have four Super Bowls. 

2034
01:55:07,200 --> 01:55:10,900
I think that all work like we 
call you four Super Bowls. 

2035
01:55:10,900 --> 01:55:12,500
Yeah which is kind of 
interesting. 

2036
01:55:12,500 --> 01:55:15,500
I think so. 
Now and we need to run hot. 

2037
01:55:15,700 --> 01:55:17,400
Obviously, these four teams need
to advance. 

2038
01:55:17,400 --> 01:55:19,300
We basically need to run hot to 
wear. 

2039
01:55:19,300 --> 01:55:22,600
These teams are actually in line
to play each other and then do 

2040
01:55:22,600 --> 01:55:24,000
play each other in the 
championship games. 

2041
01:55:24,400 --> 01:55:26,300
Now we're at work. 
We're cooking here. 

2042
01:55:26,700 --> 01:55:28,700
Yeah. 
Brian says both Ravens and 

2043
01:55:28,700 --> 01:55:30,300
Bengals. 
Have tiebreaker over Titans for 

2044
01:55:30,300 --> 01:55:32,000
what would be the 3 verse 4 
seed? 

2045
01:55:32,900 --> 01:55:37,200
So wow, Ryan already knows his 
play at I register 3. 

2046
01:55:37,200 --> 01:55:38,900
Verse or see? 
That's pretty impressive. 

2047
01:55:39,500 --> 01:55:48,000
I need to get on that level. 
I wonder why the Bengals beat 

2048
01:55:48,000 --> 01:55:51,000
the Titans I think is that that 
must be what it is, the Bangles 

2049
01:55:51,000 --> 01:55:52,600
and Ravens, both would be in the
Titans. 

2050
01:55:52,700 --> 01:55:56,500
I'm guessing, I don't know. 
Yes, and let's see. 

2051
01:55:58,400 --> 01:56:03,800
All right, so this one. 
Yeah, this is our the one, 

2052
01:56:03,808 --> 01:56:04,500
right? 
Yeah. 

2053
01:56:06,400 --> 01:56:09,100
Yeah, I like this team is fun. 
I like it. 

2054
01:56:12,800 --> 01:56:17,000
What's taking this? 
Do you want to say? 

2055
01:56:17,300 --> 01:56:19,400
It's gonna look a lot better 
than we're screenshot. 

2056
01:56:19,400 --> 01:56:21,500
In this team that want to thank 
this one. 

2057
01:56:21,500 --> 01:56:24,900
I got I did before the week and 
I just like when I was like, I'm

2058
01:56:24,900 --> 01:56:28,700
going hurts, one solo 
quarterback and then then they 

2059
01:56:28,700 --> 01:56:32,900
won in big and huge fashion and 
now it seems dead, but, uh, 

2060
01:56:33,000 --> 01:56:35,900
yeah, kind of fun team. 
Yeah. 

2061
01:56:36,400 --> 01:56:38,600
Yeah, you never know I'm 
betting, you never know, come on

2062
01:56:38,600 --> 01:56:43,100
down that team, that was fun. 
All right, well, so did for 

2063
01:56:43,100 --> 01:56:48,200
these drafts. 
Their fun would recommend. 

2064
01:56:49,600 --> 01:56:51,800
Cool. 
Well, that was a lot of fun. 

2065
01:56:51,800 --> 01:56:54,400
Fun path. 
Thanks for, for hopping on. 

2066
01:56:54,900 --> 01:56:59,800
I know, obviously you guys will 
be doing ship chasing tomorrow 

2067
01:56:59,800 --> 01:57:02,800
night. 
What what are we talking about? 

2068
01:57:02,800 --> 01:57:06,300
Playoffs scenarios for the teams
or what are we doing there? 

2069
01:57:06,400 --> 01:57:10,700
Talking playoffs? 
Yeah, we're going to be probably

2070
01:57:10,700 --> 01:57:16,000
without Pete, I would assume 
I've not heard any news but yeah

2071
01:57:16,500 --> 01:57:20,800
we'll assume no peak tomorrow 
but Still swing by check this 

2072
01:57:20,800 --> 01:57:22,400
out. 
We'll have be doing shell, 

2073
01:57:23,400 --> 01:57:26,000
awesome sounds good. 
And yeah, like I mentioned the 

2074
01:57:26,000 --> 01:57:30,200
top, you can follow me at 
Sherman F, FB for all the 

2075
01:57:30,200 --> 01:57:33,000
charts, I'll post the playoff 
charts. 

2076
01:57:33,000 --> 01:57:36,000
I showed quickly, as well as the
normal weekly statutes in 

2077
01:57:36,000 --> 01:57:39,900
charts. 
But, but yeah, go have fun in 

2078
01:57:40,400 --> 01:57:42,800
trap. 
Some of these classical teams 

2079
01:57:42,800 --> 01:57:47,700
and good luck to everybody in 
the fantasy playoffs this week. 

2080
01:57:47,700 --> 01:57:49,600
We'll see you all next week. 
Week.