Alright guys, we are back for another ship.
Chasing minisode. We are back at our computers so
better audio better visuals Pat will be hopping on with us in a
second. We are going to be on the clock
here in the fifth round and a second will be, you know,
debating with Pat some options but circling back with grass
because Gretchen wasn't here for our Marquis Brown pick.
But Gretsch, how are you feeling about this?
Interesting team so far Jamar. Chase, Kyle pits T Higgins and
Marquis Brown through for. Yeah, I'm really, I'm really
liking it. I mean, it was a little bit of a
bummer to lose AJ Brown in the third.
I think we talked through some reasons we would have probably
preferred Brown. They're maybe not as excited
about stacking Jason Higgins. In this format, as you might be
in like best ball or something. And so Brown was a target for
three Marquis brown and round for was it was an excited that
Community either of our picks for good.
I really like deante Johnson as well, but very comfortable,
going with Marquis Brown, Deion Sanders opponent.
Like 412, we're, I'm always very comfortable with the 0r B build.
You know, we're starting to head now, back to our fifth round,
pick, and all the top options are receivers what you guys
talked about on the last mini. So, yeah, and you know, The I
think the big thing with the Chase and Higgins now is you
know kind of what we do at quarterback.
I know all of us prefer getting one of those Elite quarterbacks
we obviously have some very viable stacking candidates as
Pat enters here Pat we just started talking here but I think
one of the interesting things in Christian actually just posted
in the chat in the ship chasing Discord that he seen a wide
range of ATP for burrow. He said he went at 76 in one
draft in. L've in another but the Cuyler
kind of setup is pretty nice too because Kyler went 72 in 84.
So you know that that eighth round spot for a quarterback is
starting to look kind of nice knowing like oh maybe Kyler
slips or maybe we just lock up Borough there but I don't know.
How are you guys thinking about quarterback as we kind of head
into what looks to be another wide receiver selection?
I mean I I'm I'm way higher on Cuyler than bro and I'm excited
about the potential to get Kyler we were talking about how we
don't feel like we have to force Borough.
Certainly the quarterback is the least important part of that
stack. We still get some of that
element of, you know. This offense goes great.
We still get the two important pieces of that we get Jason
Higgins going. Great burrow can be covered by
Kyler frankly, you know, there's a lot of scenarios were both of
these offenses. Go.
Well and kind of betting on that as well with our mark.
He's round pick at the same time.
I think this element of like the QB is at least important part of
the stack type thinking is a little bit relative to the
situation. And when when we're talking
about the the bangle specifically which I'm picking
both Jason Higgins, we're talking about the offensive line
being better talking about this team continuing to get better.
They improve their defense a little bit.
But being potentially a more pass, heavy team as well like
the Bengals outcome. I think our think they're
positive outcome for their passing game includes.
Basically them saying look to keep up with the chief.
In the bills, in the AFC, we got to be as pass heavy as these
teams we have to, you know, our password over expecting you to
be pushing 10% like those guys are, if that happens, that's
great for us with Jason Higgins. It also means Burrows, probably
throwing for, you know, five close to 5,000 yards and 40 TDS
in that scenario. And I think this is one where I
don't want to reach for Borough, but as soon as I have both Jason
Higgins, I do think you kind of want to be bringing Borough
along, right? If this goes well, in any kind
of way, feel like pros. Having a really, really strong
here, like in the MVP discussion Pepe year.
Yeah, especially over a three-week period, right.
We're going to take down the main event.
We need Jason Higgins to go off in a way that 40 these combined.
Yeah. Because we I mean that we were
talking on the last episode about, you know, the upside
isn't quite as high with Higgins is with AJ, brown with this
build because the chances of hitting and Chase going nuclear
together isn't super, super high, but it does exist.
And in that scenario, Burrows, like the quarterback one that
Pretty easily. So I agree.
I think having Jason Higgins makes makes burrow more of a
priority. It's a little unfortunate that
like the way, the ADP lines up, we'll have to make a decision on
burrow in the eighth with no real, good back up behind him.
If wanted to push it to try to get them in the night.
So, you know, like Kyle will already have been gone.
If we end up with Bateman here. Lamar Jackson would obviously
already be gone as well. So, I don't know, we'll have to
have to kind of cross that bridge when we come to it.
And one other thing to kind of, think about, and I noticed this
play out way more, in Underdog drafts, where people are really
prioritizing stacking, but there is often a dynamic.
When you end up with Jason Higgins, it's not like the mix
and owner is going out of his way to stack.
So a lot of times you can get burrow to drop because you are
the most likely candidate to want burrow.
And it's not like there's a third wide receiver, you know,
pushing up there, boy. Hasn't already gone and someone
could justify a stack there. So it's kind of also trying to
feel out the room. We have seen in recent years.
People prioritize stacking and season-long a little bit more.
You see Bitcoin here from the to whole did grab Justin Herbert
with Keenan Allen, but then you also see stuff like team nine
here, that just kind of took unstack Josh, Alan, you know,
getting that Elite quarterback. So it can be a little game of
chicken here because I don't think, you know, a room on the
whole is just gonna be like I'm passing on Joe burrow because I
don't have one of Chaser Higgins.
So we're going to have to kind of feel All that out.
I would, I would anticipate the priority here being on a teepee
value rather than yakking. So once bro, gets a few pics
past ATP, it starts to become a concern that someone just might
scoop it right. I know, I guess, I'm very
comfortable, taking Tyler. Like I said, I guess.
I don't want to wind up in a scenario where we get neither
because getting Kyla with Marquis Brown is definitely a
way to play this team without getting Borough.
Be very comfortable with that. There's not a lot of other ways
I'd like to play this team without having Borough as a key
be, you know what I mean? Yeah, well, I'll go ahead.
I mean, we have a decision to make here with Gabe Davis and
Bateman potentially, although we were not on the clock yet, so
maybe the Dobbins owner, grabs Bateman or something and decides
for us. But if we end up with Bateman
that would open up another possibility up for an elite
quarterback. Yeah.
And it's again, that's something I like to do a lot.
Lot in the best ball contest is I definitely break ties in favor
of you know, more outs for stacking.
So yeah, let's let's get into it here.
Let's table the, the quarterback conversation because we are
going to be selecting a receiver here.
This is a really nice pocket of the draft for receiver.
You've heard us mention Gabe, Davis and Bateman.
I think that's who we're honing in on but DK Metcalfe also
available. Jerry Judy also available.
I think those guys are strong selections as well but Ric Like
we're all in agreement. This is a wide receiver pick for
sure, right? Yeah, yeah, it's kind of I mean
the like your squarely in The Dead Zone with facts like Jacobs
Gibson, Elijah Mitchell. I think he can make cases for
taking shots on guys like Gibson and Elijah Mitchell but
typically those are dead zone type backs, where we've actually
seen them produced to a certain level and yet drafters are still
not buying in the ones that you do want to Target.
The Dead Zone. Tend to be the ones that are
like have the chance to be first-time stars, like etm was
Earlier, he's not really dead zone anymore, but like, yeah.
So looking most, he's back some like, JJ Dillon, goes a little
bit behind them. He's a guy who could do
something this year that we haven't seen from him yet.
And that's maybe what wide Rafters are a little skeptical.
The other backs that we have to pick from there.
They just look like the types of facts that have been dead zone
backs in the past that the hit rate is very, very low on.
So I'm like intrigued by that but there's no way I would take
any of them over the receivers. Yeah, I've taken a fair amount
of Elijah Mitchell, invest ball. It's, you know, usually at least
around later than this. If not two.
So in we can look at this room and we mentioned Bitcoin here.
He has a true, 0r B, build going here with just four wide
receivers one quarterback. But the, for the most part, for
everyone watching this, the YouTube member seeing this the
board up here, like all these other drafters are prioritizing
running backs. You know, we see David
Montgomery. Go in the third round etn.
Going the third round. This is a pretty running back
hungry. Room and I do feel like this is
where you can start to punish some of the early running back
drafters, because we're going to keep hammering wide receiver,
they're gonna, you know, be like, Antonio Gibson does look
pretty nice here. And so, I think this is where we
can really compound our advantage.
Let's hone in on the conversation here, the two names
we've really zeroed in on our Gabriel Davis and Rashad
Bateman. I am shocked Pat being one of
the original hardcore Bateman truthers that that I am on
Bateman Island here. But why don't you guys first
make your case for Gabe Davis and just for the love of God
don't bring up the week 17 matchup with the Bangles.
Well it is. I mean we were we were obviously
so Bateman. I love Bateman, I think he's you
know in line for a huge increase in his role obviously with
Marquis Brown out of town. I do think with Bateman you have
like very small concern that they could bring in another
receiver. I think they're they're one of
The candidates to bring in Julio or will Fuller which I don't.
I mean is a is a guy really likes Bateman.
I would hardly make me like off him, but from an ATP value
perspective, it would certainly open up opportunities to get him
at a better price later. And then, yeah, the Bengals to
play the bills in week 17 there to be kind of a fun sweat if
we're about to take down the main but I think we're Gabe
Davis. It's that he yeah, he hasn't
like really done it. Yet.
But he's a day, three pick. As a rookie he got on the field
right away had a had a big old wasn't bad, wasn't amazing but
but was like decently efficient actually a little bit more
efficient yards per hour on then Bateman was last season and then
last year including the playoffs he was he had a yours /.
I ran over to in his second year, playing with Josh Allen
now entering the season, kind of like I guess Twitter has been
sort of loudly arguing about Gabe Davis but Don't feel like
not like are we fully like internalizing the fact that in
his third season he really has no competition for the secondary
outside role in this offense. It's also interesting, reading
the athletic and stuff. They're talking about maybe
using more to tight end sets and that would be a big concern for
Crowder and Mackenzie who may be splitting that slot roll, it
would be awesome for digs and Davis if they're competing
against like OJ, Howard for four targets instead of crowder or
Mackenzie Hayden wakes has done some good research showing yards
per hour, run spikes into wide receiver sets compared to three.
So I think that was that mildly interesting but But also, just
like locks in the fact that like he is the number two option.
He is the secondary outside wide receiver Crowder's, not going to
be playing over him on the outside.
I see that I was gonna go there that I think you're a little too
certain of that because they can just split knocks outside and
put both receivers on the same side of the formation.
They've done that with Beasley before, I think like maybe they
didn't run a lot of to wide receiver sets but he was for a
stretch, a guy that they were out.
Like if you're going to run two tight ends sets, you think
they're lining them up both in line or do.
They splitting knocks out, potentially It's basically what
I'm saying is a wide receiver. Yeah, Knox is getting split out
into the slot, probably into this, like he doesn't spread out
like outside at all. I mean, I just, I don't think
that's like an exact thing in every snap.
I think you're right, but and I'm on the day beside as well
but that's probably not something that happens every
single time with a slot guys just don't yeah maybe not every
single time. Yeah but I think it's like maybe
a little lost right now and people that like Crowder's
running with the second team. Mackenzie right now is running
with the first team. Like if you they can't it's so
stupid. The way the NFL does this but
like they're not allowed to just be like MacKenzie's on the first
team crowd was on the second team but if you read the stuff
it's like Crowder's catching passes from Chad Henne
MacKenzie's catching passes from from Josh Allen, the beach do
think. Crowder will pass Mackenzie
eventually there. They've been impressed with him.
You know Crowder's kind of the guy who can Beat Zone coverage,
very easily. Gets open underneath, you know,
Crowder's Crowder but it's like, Crabbers, not coming for Gabe.
Davis, he's still trying to earn a starting role in this offense,
MacKenzie's not coming for gave Davis either.
So, I just think the two time and stuff for me is, is kind of
a way of also just like talking about how locked in Davis's is
the number 2. So the reason I'm coming at it,
a bit from the Bateman side and you do bring up a good point
that I wasn't really thinking through about how much Bateman's
projection would change if they brought in a Julio or A Fuller
and, you know, some legit Target competition because that's
really what I want to hang my hat on.
I mean, I have been taking Gabe. Davis ahead of Bateman in best
Ball Mania, just because of the quintessential hashtag.
Better invest ball where I do think Gabe.
Davis is going to have massive games.
I just think he's going to be a little harder to know when to
start. And I know we're going to be
headed toward, you know, 78, legit, wide, receiver, build.
And I just feel like the upside case for Bateman were he emerges
as Target hog in that offense. He's just going to be, you know,
when we always talk about, what are we trying to do is your RV.
We're trying to get you know, seven you know top 15 wide
receivers or however many top 15 receivers.
It feels like Bateman would be such an easy Plug and Play start
that even in Davis's like high-end outcomes that don't
involve a digs injury that he still a little volatile from a
week-to-week standpoint. Not that I'm, you know, running
away from the volatility but it just seems like it Bateman hits
his high-end range of outcomes. He's just such an Easy Plug and
Play start in the same way. Like DJ more has become that I
just did my projections for both these teams and I would this is
the exact type of players that I don't want to pay a lot of
potential attention to the projections or similar to the
the DeadZone hack stuff. We're talking about because
they're back there guys. That were betting on to do
something we haven't seen yet. It's very hard to capture that
in a projection. I thought about this a lot with
Sean on our recent stealing bananas, I made a comment about
Wanda more. We're like I want to project him
higher. He asked me specifically, how
can you get these upside stuff in a projection?
It's really hard like for both Bateman and Davis.
The the scenario we're talking about is probably that they beat
the projection I have from them for by like 50% and I can't bake
that in really. So believe the fact that I have
Davis projected about 20 points, higher is not.
The reason I would make this case.
The thing about my projections that I'm really interested in.
I want to talk to you guys about is actually trying to drill down
into what the Ravens will do from a past perspective and I
actually should probably just share my screen here and show
you guys my projections in there.
Yeah, and level numbers. Because it's it's pretty
interesting. I think Pat did a really good
job with the Gabe Davis bull case and I agree with almost all
of that even though I was going to talk about that 12 wide
receiver set thing, but let me zoom in, this is the, the Ravens
team stuff in the middle here that I want to highlight can
because you can see this poisonous.
No, not. Yeah, yeah.
Oh yeah yeah we're gonna go this stuff here.
So first of all 2021 their plays per game, led the NFL so that
was part of the reason they threw so much more was that they
ran a ton of place. They they've been very
fast-paced before back in 2018. They are not exactly slow Place
team but I do expect that comes down.
I'm projecting it to come down to like 65.5 still well above
League average. Their pass rate called pass
rate. 63 percent last year, under 50%, of the last two
years. I don't know where to put That
right. So then you look at their
password over expected. This is another really
interesting thing. They're actually not like pass
heavy relative to expectation because they only had an eighth
win season. They Trail the lat they're
Vegas. Total for this year is 9.5 and
this is just a little linear regression Iran, where they're
expected pass rate. Where last year, it was up
around 63% at a 9.5 win. Total would expect it to be more
like, 59 or 60 percent and they weren't even positive in the
pyaari category. I think a lot of that was Team
level that pushed it. Their Pace was Team level or
trailing. They were playing fast and a lot
of these games, they were also a little bit slightly past heavier
in the games that Lamar missed. You missed five games last year,
but you look at these PR oh, he's right.
Three years in a row - 6 percent, 7 percent 10 percent.
Those are very very - I'm not saying again that I think for
sure they're going to be negative but I don't know where
to put this pass, right? I ended up going with 58% just
slightly negative but even just doing that ended up, putting
them back to a team that with Lamar scramble, right?
And everything. Is basically 50/50 past run.
I have the Bateman at a twenty percent Target share.
I have them I think pretty comfortable because if you look
at the the stuff like targets per hour, run yards per hour,
run Bateman the other part of the Bateman concern.
And I want to be on him for sure, is that he didn't have a
great rookie year. He Davis, his rookie year was
actually better his rookie year. And then his second year was a
big step forward in yards per hour run for Davis.
He looks closer from those perspectives to like a big break
out. I still think you want to be on
that year too. Seaver but with Bateman it feels
like a two-step. We gotta get him playing better
and we got to get this passed right stuff to where they don't
regress too much and I think because there's the play volume
and the actual pass rate element.
I'm pretty concerned about how much they're going to lose in
terms of overall past volume. And the other part of that that
I would add as well as look Josh Oliver was decent last year for
them and they went out and they drafted two tight ends.
This is there receiver room right now and they went heavier
on Titans again. They've been very too tight and
heavy in the past. They already have Nick Boyle
coming back and they still drafted, two tight ends you go
over to their their depth chart. And I'm looking at that I'm
going I can't even name their fifth time.
I can't even in their fifth receiver, as easily as I can in
their fifth tight end right now. Like, this is a team that looks
like the Ravens teams that were very tight on heavy and looks
like they want to get back to running the ball.
You think about from a team perspective last year didn't go
well for them. And the years before did I think
they probably are saying? We want to get back to playing
the way we played in 2020, in 2019, from a team perspective.
It's I don't want to be too in, on team volume ever, but I think
these numbers are really interesting, especially the play
volume was one that really caught my eye.
Now you guys that you're definitely, you know, Swang me
here to and again just thinking about you know, it's the same
thing with the best ball stuff. It's like our objective is to
win a million dollars in this tournament and just because, you
know, Bateman could be averaging, you know, two to
three more targets a game, then gave Davis down the stretch and
have a higher Target floor. It doesn't change the fact that
it's far more likely that gave Davis puts up a 40 Burger weeks,
15 through 17. When we're chasing a million
then Bateman who might desire for.
Floor but are the Ravens pass offense going to be able to
support just in a Russian. So that's it.
That's where I wanted to go with Landing that plane.
Sorry, was that you were talking about the Vault Tilly the upside
Center, for payment is a ton of targets, but if they don't throw
as much as last year, which is going to be too hard to do a
really high rate in and I'm in a ton of place per game Bateman, I
think Sunday fallible to think of all the years of Marquis
Brown and Mark Andrews, being a lot more volatile until just
last year, right? And he still probably pretty
clearly behind the Andrews in a way.
Marquis Brown for some some time was.
Maybe they would like to talk to you guys.
Thank you. Gotta think that Andrews is
probably their clear top option. I think Bateman's even in a
scenario where he's really good, if the team stuff does regress.
And while trying to highlight is that it seems very likely to
regress that he's going to be volatile to and the sheer past
volume for Davis who I the way other way, I'd put it as from a
personal perspective. I think I am projecting Bateman
sort of closer to his ceiling. He can definitely Be that twenty
percent market share but I didn't project Davis very high
but that's a team that looks very comfortably, like they're
going to throw enough that. There's room for him to beat his
projection in for me a lot more than there is for Bateman when
I'm looking at it from those perspectives.
Yeah, I have. Oh God.
The the past attempts, I have for the Ravens.
I think I had 529 pass attempts for the Ravens switches.
I think what seven less than you had.
So like yeah we're in agreement on where I think the Ravens will
go and I was you know, I've been probate and despite the
offensive, you know, low volume situation.
But but yeah, I think I think it's regressing in the same way
that you do. He's got a merge As a Target on
her in a way, he didn't really last season, the athletic had a
good nugget, you know, pointing out that his Target for Ron was
quite a bit higher. It was 19% with Jackson last
year to like 14 and a half percent with Huntley.
So I think, you know, he's finally getting healthy Jackson
goes out, he has to deal with Huntley and I think that really
hurt his rookie season but but still generally like Bateman's
rookie season, I think sets him up more for like a year.
Three breakout it gets type of year where you're in year 2,
he's he looks good and then going into year three, we're
like, okay, this guy could this guy could break into being like
a true wide, receiver want, maybe in the same way like we're
projecting for Michael Pittman or something like that.
Like, I think he's maybe on more like that trajectory.
So then just kind of one. I mean, you guys have sold me on
Davis over Bateman obviously, we have to see what this team for
does here. But let's just say they take
Dave The only other name that, you know, kind of could fit
similar criteria would be, would we consider Jerry Judy over
Bateman or is Bateman still a really, really nice, consolation
prize for you guys. Yeah, I don't want to be out on
Bateman for the second year stuff.
I was actually kind of sharing that stuff not to say that my
opinion is like ingrained. I was kind of curious what you
guys thought about that. Like, where would you put is the
pastor and so padded, thank you for sharing your past attempts
because I struggled with that big Time I still want to be in
on Bateman your to. It was interesting that you just
said that his Target spot on a lot higher.
With Jackson about 19.5%. I just pulled a marquis Brown
three straight years. Over 20 percent.
You actually went 20 21 22 and 23 years in Baltimore was a good
pick last year, but even that second season for him, a lot of
people were targeting and him in this range and he was a pretty
big disappointment because of the team level stuff.
Even though it's targets print, run, we're good, they were up
over 21%, his yards per outrun, strong that would be a step
forward for The type of stuff for you were just talking about
and and it's better than what he had even with Jackson and those
splits, it would be a pretty clear step forward.
It can will be which we need. Yeah.
And but that's that's the idea of a second.
Your breakup to an extent is that you you would see a jump
and I think the 19% numbers it's bullish in a sense like he if
he's at 19 percent this year, he's failed like straight up.
He will have a failure of a year if he's at 19 percent but
Getting to, like, 22% from 15% or whatever.
He was at with Huntley is like, that's a really, that's a really
big leap that you need someone to make getting there from 19%.
Where it was a Jackson, is like, much more realistic.
So, that's, that's why I think it makes me feel better even
though, yeah, he's definitely take a step forward but Pete, to
get back to your point. I mean, I think I'm still
comfortable getting Bateman I just I guess the way that I
would argue it as I think he is a little bit overpriced and yet
I still want to have exposure to these year.
Two guys, there are scenarios as you've alluded to where he's
just really, really good and that would impact their pass
rate if Bateman is just that good if they traded Marquis
Brown because they actually saw something that we're not really
seeing. In the numbers, they took them
in the first round last year. There are these, you know, these
arguments, right? So Judy and Metcalfe are
intriguing to though. I mean it's Where did where did
you didn't land for you in the projections been?
I have not done Denver yet. I did do Seattle and I'm not
optimistic on that cast projection.
I had a really hard time with Jerry Judy and the Denver wide
receivers just projecting the routes.
Like there's just not enough routes on that team and they're
talking about like the buzz right now is that Judy is not a
starter in to wide receiver sets.
He would he would be starting probably of the slot and three
wide receiver sets but I also like don't on the one hand like
that's bad because he also have a Handler.
He also have like I like dulse, it's a lot which you know, maybe
they run some more to wipers too tight, it's too tight ends sets,
you know, in there there isn't. It's quite as much 11 personnel,
which would hurt you T if these reports are true.
But on the other hand like I think Judy might be their best
receiver, so I don't want to get carried away with, you know,
July Personnel, projections and stuff like yeah.
I'm kind of struggling with what to do with Judy.
Judy is a hard one and you know a couple Pros for Judy would be
one again. He gives us another really nice
stacking candidate. You know, Russell Wilson's going
about around after Joe burrow right now on FF PC so that gives
us another backstop if we miss out on.
Burro, you also have kind of similar to the Gabe.
Davis, some pretty big contingent upside, right?
Like if you know, Patrick or Sutton got hurt in Judy really
could kind of elevate to Target hog as Russell Wilson's.
Number one option. That's pretty tantalizing as
well, but I do agree that it could be a little rocky
otherwise, Yeah, yeah, I'm with you guys.
I don't really know how to place the the roles in that offense.
There's probably upside, regardless, there's contingent
upside for all of them, if, you know, not everybody's healthy,
and it's not as much of a log Jam as we think, I'm also, maybe
just not completely sold on Judy as a talent yet, but he was
pretty hurt last year. And, and so, I, you know, I
wasn't really necessarily sold after his rookie year.
And so that could, that could be That I'm just wrong on and, you
know, I'm willing to definitely hear Pro Arguments for him.
I think the bull case for Judy would be there's optimism about
this offense. I mean, obviously Russell Wilson
coming as a gigantic upgrade, but you're also seeing that
optimism reflected in fact that Sutton went in the mid 4th here.
And so there's like optimism and probably over confidence in the
way the targets break out. So to get Judy who's like, I
think probably like a very equal like if we're just like
projecting, who's the better player like Judy.
And Sutton to me that feels super close.
So to get him around after Sutton is pretty nice.
I think for me gave Davis is more intriguing.
But Judy verse Bateman is definitely, definitely tough,
and I feel like I'm kind of like flipping coins there.
Invest ball, where I know, I can get them both.
Over a large portfolio. Are you guys pretty out on
Metcalf? Just because like you feel like
his price might fall even more. Well, they're not getting Baker.
So what's happening? You know, I think losing that
out is, is a big deal? Yeah.
And, and I mean, again, I the similar kind of thing I do with
the underdog. I mean, I'm viewing this
tournament through, like, who can put up a couple 30-point
weeks, weeks, 15 through 17 and it just feels like gay Bateman
and Judy are all better candidates to do that.
Then whoever's throwing DK Metcalf the ball.
I mean, we know he's capable of it.
As a player but man that it's the reason he's going here in
the first place, but it's almost like I don't think it's a bad
value per se. But man, I just the way we're
going to load our team up with wide receivers.
He's another one that just feels like it was just like whatever.
Breakout guy we take later, you know, our Elijah more, our Drake
lighted. It feels like by the end of the
season, we're just for sure. Starting that guy over DK.
Metcalf well idk metcalf's. Good weeks are going to be like
480 and to, right. You know what I mean?
Like you're just kind of I don't think we're getting any, any
kind of like, you know, 8 420 + 1.
You know what I'm saying? Yeah, that seems hard.
Um, I actually have to get running, I have a call, I forgot
about, but I felt like this was a good discussion.
It seems like we've definitely landed on Gabe Davis here, and,
you know, maybe we can, we'll have a little final combo if
Gabe does go, and we need to decide between Bateman and Judy.
But, feeling good about this one.
And And I like how this team is shaping up, guys.
All right, guys, if you are listening to the audio version
of this, you can get access to the video ones by becoming a
ship chasing member, YouTube member also get you access to
our Discord. We will see you guys when we are
on the clock for our sick from thing.
These