1 00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:16,800 All right, we're back for another FFPC Main Event Mini 2 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:19,760 Sewed episode. This is a series that we've been 3 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:23,680 doing while on the clock in our first slow draft in the FFPC 4 00:00:23,680 --> 00:00:26,160 main event with $1,000,000 top prize. 5 00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:29,180 To recap our team before the selections we're going to 6 00:00:29,180 --> 00:00:32,100 discuss today, we started out as true piss boys, a J. 7 00:00:32,100 --> 00:00:35,620 Brown CD, Lam Debo Samuel DK Metcalf, Brandon I you, Deontay 8 00:00:35,620 --> 00:00:38,420 Johnson grabbed our first running back James Cook at 7:11. 9 00:00:38,420 --> 00:00:41,980 That one is aged nicefully. Saw him go at the 4-5 turn and a 10 00:00:41,980 --> 00:00:44,340 draft the other night. We got Jordan Addison. 11 00:00:44,380 --> 00:00:48,060 After that Greg Dulcic in the 9th we can talk about how that's 12 00:00:48,060 --> 00:00:50,830 aging. We then went Jalen Warren to A 13 00:00:50,830 --> 00:00:53,790 tag of Aloha as our first quarterback in the 11th, Kendra 14 00:00:53,790 --> 00:00:55,670 Miller. We can talk about that two more 15 00:00:55,670 --> 00:00:58,910 running backs in the 13th and 14th and Deonte Foreman and 16 00:00:58,910 --> 00:01:00,750 Rahim Moster. And today we are going to 17 00:01:00,750 --> 00:01:05,269 discuss our picks in round 15/16/17 and 18. 18 00:01:05,510 --> 00:01:09,310 Guys, how are we doing as we land the plane on our first slow 19 00:01:09,310 --> 00:01:11,950 draft main event? Doing good. 20 00:01:11,950 --> 00:01:14,710 Like you said, some of them have gone well, some of them not so 21 00:01:14,710 --> 00:01:16,350 well. But James Cook thing I'm stoked 22 00:01:16,350 --> 00:01:17,910 about. That was the one where we talked 23 00:01:17,910 --> 00:01:19,750 to Evan Ingram a little bit. Pat was. 24 00:01:20,250 --> 00:01:22,130 On Cook. I'm really, really glad we have 25 00:01:22,130 --> 00:01:24,570 Cook there. I still kind of wish we would 26 00:01:24,570 --> 00:01:26,570 have gotten Ingram with that turn, though, with the way the 27 00:01:26,610 --> 00:01:29,010 things worked out with Dulcet. Because it's not. 28 00:01:29,010 --> 00:01:32,050 Well, sure, yeah. That feels like that was a 29 00:01:32,050 --> 00:01:33,610 little bit of a meaningful tier, but. 30 00:01:36,090 --> 00:01:38,650 Looking for I think the last the other thing I was gonna say real 31 00:01:38,650 --> 00:01:40,610 quick the last time I think we were just saying before we 32 00:01:40,610 --> 00:01:43,530 started we finished up talking through the game well Foreman 33 00:01:43,570 --> 00:01:46,090 most are thing game well did go one pick ahead of us if we 34 00:01:46,090 --> 00:01:49,010 hadn't updated people on that so we I mean we kind of got sniped 35 00:01:49,010 --> 00:01:50,970 I think we were settling on Foreman and trying to hit game 36 00:01:50,970 --> 00:01:54,690 well on the way back or or we were close on that but game well 37 00:01:54,890 --> 00:01:57,610 did go the one pick ahead of us so we weren't able to get both 38 00:01:58,570 --> 00:01:59,890 and that's how we got formative Oster. 39 00:02:00,690 --> 00:02:03,290 We decided on game well as the number one I. 40 00:02:03,930 --> 00:02:05,490 Thing we might have. Yeah. 41 00:02:05,650 --> 00:02:07,050 Yeah. And then he went right before 42 00:02:07,050 --> 00:02:07,970 us. So that was a bummer. 43 00:02:08,210 --> 00:02:10,850 And it's funny like how we already know that when we look 44 00:02:10,850 --> 00:02:13,210 back at this draft board it's going to look hilarious. 45 00:02:13,530 --> 00:02:17,490 But like already like Kendry Miller getting hurt and then 46 00:02:17,610 --> 00:02:20,530 gain Wells rise. Like I would already love to 47 00:02:20,530 --> 00:02:22,890 have gain well at the 1202 instead of Miller. 48 00:02:23,170 --> 00:02:26,450 You know obviously we didn't we know more than we knew then but. 49 00:02:26,770 --> 00:02:29,050 And I never would at the time, never would have thought to do 50 00:02:29,050 --> 00:02:31,150 that, but. You know, just a reminder of how 51 00:02:31,230 --> 00:02:32,990 chaotic. Well, let me let me play like 52 00:02:32,990 --> 00:02:35,790 Devil's Habit and I'm still the Kendra Miller Bowl and maybe 53 00:02:35,790 --> 00:02:38,430 this is going to continue to age poorly, but I mean, like Chase 54 00:02:38,430 --> 00:02:41,830 Brown goes a few picks after, Taji Spears goes a few picks 55 00:02:41,830 --> 00:02:43,270 after. No one is like really been 56 00:02:43,270 --> 00:02:45,710 hoping for a ton of standalone value with those guys. 57 00:02:45,870 --> 00:02:48,310 It's disappointing because we thought Kendra Miller was 58 00:02:48,310 --> 00:02:51,430 mispriced as a guy who could have really standalone value and 59 00:02:51,550 --> 00:02:53,870 crushed down the stretch and that's obviously changed. 60 00:02:54,070 --> 00:02:57,150 But like the late season appeal for me, and I think I said this 61 00:02:57,150 --> 00:02:59,790 on the last minute, so like it, it hasn't changed for me. 62 00:03:00,030 --> 00:03:02,590 Even so, the hits do keep racking up and it is fair to 63 00:03:02,590 --> 00:03:05,110 question his durability I guess, but I don't know. 64 00:03:05,110 --> 00:03:07,470 I still don't mind the pick their relative to who else goes 65 00:03:07,470 --> 00:03:09,750 in this range. I like that take. 66 00:03:09,750 --> 00:03:11,950 I think Jamal Williams looked really slow again in the 67 00:03:11,950 --> 00:03:13,830 preseason. I reminded everyone the only 68 00:03:13,830 --> 00:03:17,150 reason he had really any value last year is he got, I think, 16 69 00:03:17,150 --> 00:03:20,190 more inside the 10 carries than any other player in the entire 70 00:03:20,190 --> 00:03:24,750 NFL or any other running back. I should say maybe like Jalen 71 00:03:24,750 --> 00:03:28,930 Hurts was up there, but. He basically wasn't efficient, 72 00:03:28,930 --> 00:03:30,650 was nothing else. And I was on a team with Tasim 73 00:03:30,650 --> 00:03:31,730 Hill. I don't see why you would like. 74 00:03:31,730 --> 00:03:34,170 I feel like he's like one of the worst picks on the entire board, 75 00:03:34,170 --> 00:03:36,970 Jamal Williams. But the one guy I'm starting to 76 00:03:36,970 --> 00:03:39,450 get concerned about for the Kendry Miller path is Alvin 77 00:03:39,450 --> 00:03:41,210 Kamara because he was still a little bit efficient as a 78 00:03:41,210 --> 00:03:43,010 receiver last year. And Nick Underhill has been 79 00:03:43,010 --> 00:03:46,170 talking up. So, you know, famously Evan 80 00:03:46,170 --> 00:03:49,690 Silva's body, Nick Underhill has been talking up that Kamara had 81 00:03:49,690 --> 00:03:53,550 a unique. Workout regimen this offseason 82 00:03:53,550 --> 00:03:56,110 is feels like he's gotten some burst back and I I mean eye 83 00:03:56,110 --> 00:04:00,310 test, I felt like he had some. Sort of muscle imbalance in his 84 00:04:00,310 --> 00:04:02,350 legs that he like has corrected or something. 85 00:04:02,830 --> 00:04:05,470 Yeah, I thought he looked kind of good in the first preseason 86 00:04:05,470 --> 00:04:06,830 game. And the fact that he was still a 87 00:04:06,830 --> 00:04:09,350 little bit efficient in the in the past catching game, he's 88 00:04:09,350 --> 00:04:12,710 lost some efficiency in the running game, but in part 89 00:04:12,710 --> 00:04:14,950 because he had the biggest workloads of his career the last 90 00:04:14,950 --> 00:04:17,720 couple years as a runner. If you look at his profile, it's 91 00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:20,519 not like it's not clear to me like it was like with Zeke last 92 00:04:20,519 --> 00:04:23,200 year, for example, that like this guy is going over the age 93 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,520 Cliff like he probably is. But I mean, he was really, 94 00:04:26,520 --> 00:04:32,040 really good in his prime, yeah. I also think that Miller, you 95 00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:36,320 know, what if they signed someone now, you know, we 96 00:04:36,320 --> 00:04:38,640 already heard Hunt was visiting there. 97 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,200 And so I was just like, I I do worry with him, like are we 98 00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:46,200 going to be able to hold him? So yeah, The thing is, is like 99 00:04:46,200 --> 00:04:49,360 when you look at how thin our running back depth chart is. 100 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:51,040 Like, yeah, I guess we will be able to. 101 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:54,200 We probably will be because we'll talk about what we did 102 00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:57,640 with some of these later picks. But like the tight end Flyers 103 00:04:57,640 --> 00:05:01,130 are gonna be probably who we quickly churn, even more so than 104 00:05:01,130 --> 00:05:03,690 the running back. So like to set this up. 105 00:05:03,690 --> 00:05:05,810 You know through 14 rounds, right? 106 00:05:05,810 --> 00:05:09,290 We only had James Cook, Jalen Warren, Kendra Miller, Deontay 107 00:05:09,290 --> 00:05:12,890 Foreman and Raheem Moster at running back. 108 00:05:13,050 --> 00:05:16,210 The two positions we had punted the most are quarterback to what 109 00:05:16,210 --> 00:05:19,090 we took in the 11th and then Greg Dulchitz tied in, we took 110 00:05:19,090 --> 00:05:21,650 in the 9th. And so heading here with down 111 00:05:21,650 --> 00:05:24,570 this home stretch, I think we were, we all knew we were going 112 00:05:24,570 --> 00:05:27,210 to crank purple, right? But we had a quarterback who was 113 00:05:27,210 --> 00:05:31,740 sitting here in the 15th who was a huge ADP faller that lined up 114 00:05:31,740 --> 00:05:33,740 a stack for us and we all kind of looked around the room and 115 00:05:33,740 --> 00:05:36,180 we're like, we should probably take this guy. 116 00:05:38,460 --> 00:05:43,540 Yeah, and I think, you know, the issue with taking Tua was like, 117 00:05:43,540 --> 00:05:46,100 we weren't lining up a stack there. 118 00:05:46,100 --> 00:05:49,220 And you can kind of argue about how much that matters. 119 00:05:49,340 --> 00:05:51,100 And you're getting a really nice value. 120 00:05:51,620 --> 00:05:53,060 Like 2 is an eighth round basketball pick. 121 00:05:53,060 --> 00:05:56,100 We're getting in the 11th round and arguably he's a better 122 00:05:56,100 --> 00:05:58,100 managedly pick because if he gets hurt, you cut him. 123 00:06:00,530 --> 00:06:04,490 But then to be able to go ahead and get Gino Smith with DK 124 00:06:04,490 --> 00:06:09,370 Metcalf, I I can see us being psyched about that in the 125 00:06:09,370 --> 00:06:11,850 three-week Sprint. That seems a pretty easy one for 126 00:06:11,850 --> 00:06:13,930 us to be like all right, we got this, this is an awesome stack 127 00:06:13,930 --> 00:06:16,610 to have. Even if like JSN emerges, I 128 00:06:16,610 --> 00:06:20,090 think you know, certainly Gino de Metcalf single could be 129 00:06:20,250 --> 00:06:24,250 really high upside. Yeah, and this, I think, is a 130 00:06:24,250 --> 00:06:26,730 good lesson on something that I've heard you guys say a lot 131 00:06:26,730 --> 00:06:28,850 and I've thought about more as I'm. 132 00:06:29,270 --> 00:06:32,710 Slower to the best ball game. You guys talk about setting up 133 00:06:32,710 --> 00:06:34,550 stacks and taking different receivers and something we 134 00:06:34,550 --> 00:06:36,470 talked about on the early mini. So it's where a lot of our 135 00:06:36,470 --> 00:06:39,910 receivers here gave us the flexibility at quarterback cuz 136 00:06:39,910 --> 00:06:41,950 we had a lot of stack options. One of the ones that we were 137 00:06:41,950 --> 00:06:45,230 really targeting was we had both Debo and IU Can. 138 00:06:45,230 --> 00:06:48,950 We were thinking pretty made for a really natural second QB here. 139 00:06:49,830 --> 00:06:51,670 There were reasons why we were a little bit. 140 00:06:51,750 --> 00:06:54,070 I know I was a little bit concerned he might not make it 141 00:06:54,070 --> 00:06:57,390 all the way back to us cuz the guy right in front of us has 142 00:06:57,390 --> 00:06:59,150 kittle. And so it was like possibly he 143 00:06:59,150 --> 00:07:01,270 could get all the way back and then go one pick ahead of us, 144 00:07:01,270 --> 00:07:04,430 like game Walk did. And because we're on the end, 145 00:07:04,430 --> 00:07:06,830 like it was a little tougher to navigate that we would for sure 146 00:07:06,830 --> 00:07:08,590 get him. Still seemed like we would get 147 00:07:08,590 --> 00:07:09,950 him. And as we're sitting here in 148 00:07:09,950 --> 00:07:12,390 like the 18th round, he still hasn't gone, but we probably 149 00:07:12,390 --> 00:07:14,750 could have got him. But we had all these doors open, 150 00:07:14,750 --> 00:07:18,510 and what that led to was the flexibility to grab Gino stacked 151 00:07:18,510 --> 00:07:20,980 up with DK. And it was the latest Geno's 152 00:07:20,980 --> 00:07:23,820 gone any in any draft and it was the latest by like 8 picks I 153 00:07:23,820 --> 00:07:27,580 mean he I think we got him like 40 picks behind ADP so really 154 00:07:27,580 --> 00:07:29,700 significant discount to get him at 1511. 155 00:07:29,700 --> 00:07:32,660 So the ability to stack him to grab that and to have a couple 156 00:07:32,660 --> 00:07:35,740 different stacks set up or we had some late round options led 157 00:07:35,740 --> 00:07:38,780 to something where like Gino shouldn't be going 1511. 158 00:07:39,620 --> 00:07:42,820 I did a in my. TK at a value, right? 159 00:07:42,820 --> 00:07:45,740 And it's a 0 running back team like this could be a really 160 00:07:45,740 --> 00:07:48,910 unique Geno, yeah? I did a plot earlier this 161 00:07:48,910 --> 00:07:52,270 offseason with JJ Zacharisan. He made a comment about Qb's 162 00:07:52,270 --> 00:07:55,750 that have three pass catchers as high as Gino does tend to really 163 00:07:55,750 --> 00:07:57,430 hit. And so he was like Gino's one of 164 00:07:57,430 --> 00:07:58,990 my favorite mid round quarterbacks and it's kind of 165 00:07:58,990 --> 00:08:00,550 stuck with me. I think it's an interesting stat 166 00:08:01,270 --> 00:08:03,790 to get that guy at 1511. He has three pass catchers in 167 00:08:03,790 --> 00:08:04,710 the top. I mean that's that's very 168 00:08:04,710 --> 00:08:08,110 logical, right? Like, I like that and the other 169 00:08:08,110 --> 00:08:09,510 thing that's kind of fun about this for me. 170 00:08:09,510 --> 00:08:12,070 So you know, when you think about it and manage right, 171 00:08:12,070 --> 00:08:13,710 there's basically three ways to play quarterback. 172 00:08:13,710 --> 00:08:17,120 You get the elite guy and you start him every week you take a 173 00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:19,600 or you stream right. That's another thing we've done. 174 00:08:19,600 --> 00:08:22,240 Or you take the elite guy, he whiffs and it's Tray Lance or 175 00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:23,760 Kyler or whatever. Then you have to stream 176 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:27,200 otherwise or you take kind of two mid range guys and you play 177 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:29,920 the matchups each week. Like if you look back over how 178 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:32,400 we've played the main event historically over the years, we 179 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,840 don't do this that much where we take the two guys, we play the 180 00:08:35,840 --> 00:08:38,960 matchups, and I think this is actually a really fun pairing to 181 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:40,640 do that. And I think even last year a lot 182 00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:43,840 of the Dolphins games kind of lined up in a cleaner way of 183 00:08:43,840 --> 00:08:46,480 knowing like, hey, this is a really good spot for two, and I 184 00:08:46,480 --> 00:08:48,840 think Seahawks too. I think these will just be two 185 00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:51,560 very fun teams that we're going to get to, look at the totals, 186 00:08:51,560 --> 00:08:54,280 look at the matchups and feel really good about which one of 187 00:08:54,280 --> 00:08:57,400 these guys is going to give us a top ten week each week. 188 00:08:58,960 --> 00:09:01,200 Yeah. And I, in a way, I think we have 189 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:03,360 done this sometimes, but it's usually that we pick up the 190 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:07,180 second guy off waivers, right? And I like that we just went 191 00:09:07,180 --> 00:09:10,620 ahead and grab Gino here because yeah, I think I, I take a lot of 192 00:09:10,620 --> 00:09:14,820 Gino and best ball. I think he makes a lot of sense 193 00:09:14,980 --> 00:09:17,580 for the the point that JJ is making of like hey we're betting 194 00:09:17,580 --> 00:09:20,220 on these receivers. I don't always buy into that 195 00:09:20,220 --> 00:09:23,180 like you know hey these guys receivers are going here is the 196 00:09:23,180 --> 00:09:25,340 quarterback should be following along but Gino's got a little 197 00:09:25,340 --> 00:09:27,460 bit of mobility. He's very accurate. 198 00:09:27,940 --> 00:09:31,140 He's not like going to set the world on fire, but is a guy who 199 00:09:31,140 --> 00:09:33,250 can. You know, be in a high total 200 00:09:33,250 --> 00:09:34,410 game. Like, we know the Seahawks can 201 00:09:34,410 --> 00:09:37,130 be in high total games and we can feel very good about putting 202 00:09:37,130 --> 00:09:41,130 him in the lineup. So after making the Geno pick, 203 00:09:41,130 --> 00:09:43,810 we knew, all right, it is time to crank purple. 204 00:09:43,810 --> 00:09:46,090 We, you know, queued up some tight ends there. 205 00:09:46,090 --> 00:09:48,530 We had some targets. And then of course we do see a 206 00:09:48,530 --> 00:09:50,570 bit of a tight end run. Jake Ferguson, who I know we 207 00:09:50,570 --> 00:09:52,570 were talking about, he immediately goes after us. 208 00:09:52,690 --> 00:09:53,890 Hayden Hurst comes off the board. 209 00:09:53,890 --> 00:09:55,730 Hunter Henry, Trey McBride. Michael Mayer. 210 00:09:55,730 --> 00:09:57,890 Three of our collective favorite tight ends. 211 00:09:57,890 --> 00:09:59,850 I'll go boom, boom, boom there in the 17th. 212 00:09:59,970 --> 00:10:03,490 Then Dawson knocks, gets peeled off and we are sitting on the 213 00:10:03,490 --> 00:10:05,490 clock here at the end of the 17th round. 214 00:10:05,810 --> 00:10:09,050 And I believe there was kind of a clear guy here in Tyler 215 00:10:09,050 --> 00:10:11,770 Conklin that all kind of jumped out to us. 216 00:10:11,770 --> 00:10:13,970 I don't even know if we discussed anyone other than 217 00:10:13,970 --> 00:10:15,930 Conklin. Here, well, at that Gino 218 00:10:16,010 --> 00:10:18,840 Musgrave turn. One of the things we did talk 219 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:20,760 about, and I think, Pete, you're the one who floated, it was 220 00:10:20,840 --> 00:10:23,200 going tight and tight then because we were my bad, I 221 00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:24,840 skipped over the Musgrave pick on accident. 222 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:25,880 Thank you. Yeah, yeah. 223 00:10:25,880 --> 00:10:28,960 So we grabbed, we decided to grab Luke Musgrave out of this 224 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:30,880 tier along with Gino at that turn. 225 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:32,720 And then we were saying, OK, some of these guys are 226 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:35,120 definitely gonna go off, but we have the Ferguson, Hurst, Henry 227 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,920 McBride, Mayor Knox Conklin kind of group as a tier. 228 00:10:39,340 --> 00:10:41,820 And they all went and Kaufman got left as sort of the last 229 00:10:41,820 --> 00:10:43,260 one. It was kind of like the way that 230 00:10:43,260 --> 00:10:46,140 I thought of it, but we almost got them all back to us. 231 00:10:46,140 --> 00:10:49,940 Four went in the six picks before us that that stretch with 232 00:10:49,940 --> 00:10:51,780 Hunter, Henry, Trim McBride and Michael Mayor right in the 233 00:10:51,780 --> 00:10:53,580 middle of the round. Was that hurt? 234 00:10:55,100 --> 00:10:56,820 Partly because mayor was the guy, right? 235 00:10:56,820 --> 00:10:59,140 Like I've been drafting a ton of mayor. 236 00:10:59,700 --> 00:11:02,340 I don't have enough Musgrave. I was late to the party on 237 00:11:02,340 --> 00:11:05,140 Musgrave. I've been at the party the whole 238 00:11:05,140 --> 00:11:06,900 time with mayor and no one's showing up. 239 00:11:09,680 --> 00:11:11,800 You know, so I was. Like I'm starting to. 240 00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:15,960 I'm finally starting to. OK, welcome. 241 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:20,920 Very good. Help yourself to anything. 242 00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:27,440 Yes, the the Musgrave thing you guys pointed out like Ben, you 243 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:31,240 kind of noted that you know the the Rager Jefferson thing has 244 00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:34,760 been a lesson for us. We're like he was in my dynasty 245 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:35,920 stuff. I was pretty. 246 00:11:36,350 --> 00:11:38,070 Exposed to both. But then it comes over to 247 00:11:38,070 --> 00:11:39,750 redraft and I just took way too much rager. 248 00:11:39,750 --> 00:11:42,790 I talked to send away too much rager and as like how much do I 249 00:11:42,790 --> 00:11:46,750 even like Rager over Jefferson? Not that much. 250 00:11:46,790 --> 00:11:49,550 And yet we're our portfolio doesn't reflect that and it's 251 00:11:49,550 --> 00:11:51,990 just such a huge error we never want to have that happen again. 252 00:11:52,630 --> 00:11:55,390 Musgrave I think like there's a bigger gap between mayor and 253 00:11:55,390 --> 00:11:59,470 Musgrave in my mind in terms of their prospect but like Musgrave 254 00:11:59,470 --> 00:12:00,950 is a field stretcher. He's very athletic. 255 00:12:00,950 --> 00:12:03,030 He was highly drafted and he seems to have opportunity right 256 00:12:03,030 --> 00:12:04,870 away. So at tight end. 257 00:12:05,370 --> 00:12:07,690 That's pretty good profile. Like do I wish he was more 258 00:12:07,690 --> 00:12:08,890 productive? Yeah for sure. 259 00:12:08,970 --> 00:12:11,610 But tight end's kind of volatile and he looks like he's going to 260 00:12:11,610 --> 00:12:15,610 get opportunity out of the gate. So I was just glad that you guys 261 00:12:15,610 --> 00:12:18,490 floated him as he cuz he probably wouldn't have been who 262 00:12:18,490 --> 00:12:22,050 I would have probably been on Jake Ferguson like it was just 263 00:12:22,050 --> 00:12:25,410 me. Jake Ferguson mayor probably 264 00:12:25,410 --> 00:12:28,170 Hunter Henry. But Musgrave is a really high 265 00:12:28,170 --> 00:12:29,570 upside way to play this. Yeah. 266 00:12:29,810 --> 00:12:32,700 And I think a very fun thing. And shout out to Pete for that 267 00:12:32,700 --> 00:12:34,900 cuz I probably would've done the exact same thing you did, but 268 00:12:34,900 --> 00:12:36,220 Pete's the one who kind of pound the table on it. 269 00:12:36,220 --> 00:12:39,740 But on the the Reger Jefferson analogy, I mean I think the big 270 00:12:39,740 --> 00:12:43,780 lesson from that is when like it's not that it's wrong to be 271 00:12:43,780 --> 00:12:46,340 that hyped on Reger. It's that when you do take a lot 272 00:12:46,340 --> 00:12:49,060 of guys like that, you have to be considerate of who are the 273 00:12:49,060 --> 00:12:52,700 guys that I'm not getting enough of in this same range because 274 00:12:52,700 --> 00:12:54,420 I'm taking so much of this pick that I like. 275 00:12:54,420 --> 00:12:56,540 And if there are aren't guys that's fine. 276 00:12:56,540 --> 00:12:59,780 But obviously there was a Jefferson player in hindsight 277 00:12:59,780 --> 00:13:01,580 that as you always talk about when you bring up. 278 00:13:01,700 --> 00:13:04,260 Like, I really liked his profile too and just didn't get a lot of 279 00:13:04,260 --> 00:13:06,860 him because I was getting a lot more rigger similar here. 280 00:13:06,860 --> 00:13:09,220 We were like, yeah, I mean maybe mayor is a lot better than 281 00:13:09,220 --> 00:13:11,820 Musgrave, but we do want exposure to Musgrave as a late 282 00:13:11,820 --> 00:13:13,060 round Titan. There are other late round 283 00:13:13,060 --> 00:13:14,860 Titans that we really like. We think there's a lot of 284 00:13:14,860 --> 00:13:17,180 options back here. So it was a good time to layer 285 00:13:17,180 --> 00:13:18,420 one in. Pete makes a great point that 286 00:13:18,420 --> 00:13:21,140 Musgrave seems to be rising. It's probably going to be going 287 00:13:21,140 --> 00:13:25,630 higher than this you know by the time we're in Vegas and and that 288 00:13:25,630 --> 00:13:28,750 was a big thing for me too and we had just had the data point. 289 00:13:28,750 --> 00:13:32,550 We did our main event draft the, you know, we're recording this 290 00:13:32,590 --> 00:13:35,790 on a Monday, but we had our done our main event on that Wednesday 291 00:13:35,790 --> 00:13:39,590 with the stat chasing guys and Musgrave went into 16th. 292 00:13:39,790 --> 00:13:42,350 And so I had already noticed that like Pat joking about no 293 00:13:42,350 --> 00:13:44,670 one showing up to the party for Michael Mayer like that's been 294 00:13:44,670 --> 00:13:46,390 happening. Whereas Musgrave has been moving 295 00:13:46,390 --> 00:13:48,190 up on underdog. He's now going early. 296 00:13:48,350 --> 00:13:52,070 And so I was like, hey, if this is a guy we might not choose 297 00:13:52,070 --> 00:13:54,870 straight up over mayor, but he's going to end up being the one 298 00:13:54,870 --> 00:13:56,630 more expensive. It's like let's grab our share 299 00:13:56,630 --> 00:13:59,070 now before he's like a fourteenth round pick and then 300 00:13:59,070 --> 00:14:01,630 it's like we're going to have plenty of chances to get mayor 301 00:14:01,630 --> 00:14:03,470 because it just doesn't seem like people are going to get as 302 00:14:03,470 --> 00:14:06,190 stoked as him because of Jimmy G and that offense. 303 00:14:07,390 --> 00:14:10,630 Yeah and he's banged up a little bit and you know one of the 304 00:14:10,630 --> 00:14:15,510 reports is he got absolutely smoked in a blocking drill by 305 00:14:15,510 --> 00:14:17,750 what's his name you know the really good blocker or the 306 00:14:17,750 --> 00:14:23,310 really good edge guy Crosby. So you know, I don't know like I 307 00:14:23,390 --> 00:14:25,030 I still think mayor could be a pretty good pick. 308 00:14:25,030 --> 00:14:27,190 But yeah, like, why wouldn't you take the guy who's gonna who 309 00:14:27,350 --> 00:14:29,190 you're not gonna have access to at this point again? 310 00:14:29,190 --> 00:14:32,910 And we all would like to have an, you know, a a share of for 311 00:14:32,910 --> 00:14:35,230 sure. Yeah, and likely was already off 312 00:14:35,230 --> 00:14:37,070 the board at that point. You look at, you know, and then 313 00:14:37,070 --> 00:14:38,710 the guys coming right off the board after it. 314 00:14:38,710 --> 00:14:40,950 There's room. There was no tight ends that 315 00:14:40,950 --> 00:14:43,150 went in the 13th and 14th in our draft year. 316 00:14:43,470 --> 00:14:46,110 I mean, there's room for Musgrave to move up and fill 317 00:14:46,110 --> 00:14:48,230 that void if the hype is, you know, keeps building. 318 00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:50,760 I was just gonna say the same thing like Jake Ferguson, 319 00:14:50,760 --> 00:14:52,920 another guy who had a really good first preseason game. 320 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:55,720 From a usage perspective, like, how does he not move up into the 321 00:14:55,720 --> 00:14:56,600 13th round? Yeah. 322 00:14:56,720 --> 00:15:02,080 You know, yeah, he's gonna. You already did that on underdog 323 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:04,880 too, to your point about Musk, Ferguson's already moved up some 324 00:15:04,880 --> 00:14:59,560 on Underdog. Jake Ferguson should be moving 325 00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:00,840 up, too. That would be another. 326 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:08,290 Yeah, yeah. Especially like you got guys 327 00:15:08,290 --> 00:15:10,290 like Hayden too, pounding the drum for Ferguson. 328 00:15:10,290 --> 00:15:12,890 That's always going to move to the market on underdog. 329 00:15:13,050 --> 00:15:15,970 But I will say, you know, we get Musgrave, which I feel good 330 00:15:15,970 --> 00:15:17,570 about. And then, you know, we were 331 00:15:17,570 --> 00:15:19,890 bummed because I think Henry McBride, mayor, those guys would 332 00:15:19,890 --> 00:15:22,050 have all been interesting. But I don't know how you guys, 333 00:15:22,090 --> 00:15:24,010 we haven't had like a ton of talks about Conklin. 334 00:15:24,010 --> 00:15:28,250 Like I view him as kind of like even maybe like similar to 335 00:15:28,290 --> 00:15:30,570 Hunter Henry, but maybe even slightly more upside. 336 00:15:30,570 --> 00:15:33,650 But I was pretty excited to get Conklin here, just considering 337 00:15:33,650 --> 00:15:38,330 the other tight ends available. I think Conklin's like a pretty 338 00:15:38,330 --> 00:15:41,210 good pick. Still like the the this is the 339 00:15:41,210 --> 00:15:44,370 play seems to be intact. Like I think Ruckerts made a 340 00:15:44,370 --> 00:15:46,730 little bit of noise, but I don't think the preseason stuff was 341 00:15:46,730 --> 00:15:49,330 super strong for him. And then it's like CJ Uzama 342 00:15:50,930 --> 00:15:53,370 maybe it maybe gets a little bit more than he did last year as a 343 00:15:53,370 --> 00:15:57,490 blocker. But you know, Rogers is 344 00:15:57,490 --> 00:16:00,650 generally thrown to the tight end a decent amount and we don't 345 00:16:00,650 --> 00:16:02,770 think that much of the other wide receivers other than 346 00:16:02,770 --> 00:16:06,900 Garrett Wilson here. Hardman actually like, as far as 347 00:16:06,900 --> 00:16:09,940 like who can be interesting. Like Hardman would be probably 348 00:16:09,940 --> 00:16:12,740 #2 on my list, and he seems to be probably like a rotational 349 00:16:12,740 --> 00:16:15,340 wide receiver 4. So if it's Corey Davis, Alan 350 00:16:15,340 --> 00:16:19,620 Lazard and Garrett Wilson out there with Conklin, like I think 351 00:16:19,620 --> 00:16:20,900 Conklin might are in some targets. 352 00:16:21,380 --> 00:16:23,460 So I like him. Yeah. 353 00:16:23,460 --> 00:16:26,300 The big thing with the way they approached tight end last year 354 00:16:26,300 --> 00:16:29,660 is they brought in both Conklin and Zama and I noticed doing the 355 00:16:29,660 --> 00:16:32,120 projections. Something that was surprising to 356 00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:32,920 me. It's not really how I 357 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:34,160 remembered. I guess I thought you Zama 358 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:36,680 missed something like more time. I know he was a little bit 359 00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:41,120 dinged up, but I want to see exactly how many games he played 360 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:43,240 before I make this point. But yeah, so he played fifteen 361 00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:47,520 games, so he missed two games. Conklin ran 487 routes, you Zama 362 00:16:47,520 --> 00:16:50,560 ran 225. So we had more than double the 363 00:16:50,560 --> 00:16:52,880 number of routes. It was a lot more consolidated 364 00:16:52,880 --> 00:16:54,840 than I kind of remembered. I mean, I knew Conklin was used 365 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:57,870 a decent amount last year, but. He's not have played a lot and 366 00:16:57,870 --> 00:17:00,550 just didn't run a lot of routes. So I mean, if we're assuming 367 00:17:00,550 --> 00:17:03,190 that they kind of just go with that same sort of vibe this 368 00:17:03,190 --> 00:17:05,750 year. Like Complan has a potential 369 00:17:05,750 --> 00:17:07,349 like you guys are saying. I mean, he's playing with Aaron 370 00:17:07,349 --> 00:17:09,950 Rodgers now to be with a much more efficient quarterback and 371 00:17:09,950 --> 00:17:12,349 running a lot of routes, I mean it's definitely a viable play. 372 00:17:13,109 --> 00:17:15,829 And then our our play on the way back though Pat you you were 373 00:17:15,829 --> 00:17:18,349 saying well we weren't really setting up the stack, but what 374 00:17:18,349 --> 00:17:23,589 about? Yeah, we look, I mean. 375 00:17:24,310 --> 00:17:29,510 Durham Smythe has been an under the under the radar brand play 376 00:17:29,510 --> 00:17:33,230 for me now for like 2 years. I'm just constantly and no one's 377 00:17:33,230 --> 00:17:38,750 sure if it's a bit including me. Yeah, but like his. 378 00:17:39,510 --> 00:17:44,670 The thing with Smythe is that he is like a blocking tight ends 379 00:17:44,710 --> 00:17:49,990 who may now get to emerge as the pass catcher by default because 380 00:17:49,990 --> 00:17:53,770 Mike Kasiki is out of there and. I just had an article come out 381 00:17:54,570 --> 00:17:59,490 on these tight ends that I did the I didn't dive into the the 382 00:17:59,490 --> 00:18:02,650 late season or sorry, the late draft tight ends. 383 00:18:02,650 --> 00:18:05,250 I just looked at the early drafted tight ends. 384 00:18:05,250 --> 00:18:09,330 But using this profile and just pointing out when we look at 385 00:18:09,330 --> 00:18:11,250 like the profile of tight ends we've made an impact in years 386 00:18:11,250 --> 00:18:13,970 past. It's helpful for them to be good 387 00:18:13,970 --> 00:18:19,090 run blockers because play action passing attempts make up a lot 388 00:18:19,090 --> 00:18:21,890 of the touchdowns that we see at the tight end position. 389 00:18:22,420 --> 00:18:26,700 You know, and if you have access to those snaps, which Smythe 390 00:18:26,700 --> 00:18:28,860 does, right, that he was hurting to stick. 391 00:18:28,860 --> 00:18:31,300 He's upside last year because he's the guy that's going to 392 00:18:31,300 --> 00:18:33,620 come out there and blocking those heavy sets. 393 00:18:34,180 --> 00:18:38,580 If Tyler Croft isn't ahead of Smythe in passing situations, 394 00:18:38,580 --> 00:18:41,140 which I don't think he is because they rested Smythe as a 395 00:18:41,140 --> 00:18:45,180 starter and did not in Croft, played a bunch, then like I 396 00:18:45,180 --> 00:18:49,580 don't know, maybe he's like super poor man's George Kittle 397 00:18:49,580 --> 00:18:52,920 or Dallas Scotter like a. Blocking tight end who also gets 398 00:18:52,920 --> 00:18:55,800 to run routes. Super Poor man's George Kittle. 399 00:18:55,800 --> 00:18:58,640 He's fucking. He's fucking welfare George 400 00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:00,840 Kittle. He's welfare George Kittle like 401 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:06,440 you're getting, you might be getting access to a 7075% route 402 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:10,320 participation guy and he's getting the play action stuff 403 00:19:10,320 --> 00:19:12,800 around the goal line. So you feel okay about plugging 404 00:19:12,800 --> 00:19:16,680 in and praying for touchdown. Is he that high upside? 405 00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:17,800 No. Is he low floor? 406 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:20,720 Yes, but. You know, it's like a scratch 407 00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:22,520 off guy. I think we're gonna know 408 00:19:22,520 --> 00:19:25,960 quickly, does this dude have a full time role? 409 00:19:26,360 --> 00:19:28,920 And if he does, like, well, shit, he might be the number 410 00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:31,360 three target earner on the Dolphins, right? 411 00:19:31,840 --> 00:19:34,960 So there's no high upside, but it's not no high upside and 412 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:37,600 tight and premium. Yeah, there's no one there. 413 00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:40,880 This is the part that really sold me as you were making this 414 00:19:40,880 --> 00:19:42,390 case. There's no one. 415 00:19:42,390 --> 00:19:44,790 When I went through my projections from Miami like 416 00:19:44,950 --> 00:19:48,110 Tyreke and Waddle already have soaked up so much of the volume 417 00:19:48,110 --> 00:19:49,710 from last year. They're going to again this your 418 00:19:49,710 --> 00:19:52,910 Tyreke was led the NFL and way to target spout run by a lot. 419 00:19:52,910 --> 00:19:55,590 Waddle was not far behind and he's like 10th or 12th or 420 00:19:55,590 --> 00:19:58,070 something. You and and Gossicky was their 421 00:19:58,070 --> 00:20:00,790 third producer last year. They didn't really have a fourth 422 00:20:01,150 --> 00:20:04,150 and now he's gone. And so I kind of have like in my 423 00:20:04,150 --> 00:20:06,670 notes and have kept in the back of my mind like somebody else in 424 00:20:06,670 --> 00:20:09,470 Miami has to do something. Gosicky scored five touchdowns 425 00:20:09,470 --> 00:20:12,060 last year. I think that stat you pulled, I 426 00:20:12,060 --> 00:20:15,220 did read a good amount of that tight end article you wrote. 427 00:20:15,220 --> 00:20:18,260 Great article for anyone who's not, you know, reading those. 428 00:20:18,260 --> 00:20:19,140 You should have checked that out. 429 00:20:19,140 --> 00:20:24,140 I really enjoyed that Pat it that that stat you just 430 00:20:24,140 --> 00:20:25,580 mentioned about the run blocking snaps. 431 00:20:25,580 --> 00:20:27,620 Another thing that's very logical and makes sense right 432 00:20:27,980 --> 00:20:29,340 there. The teams are going to play the 433 00:20:29,340 --> 00:20:31,380 same tight ends that they're playing and run looks because 434 00:20:31,380 --> 00:20:34,060 they want to show the for the play action they want to sell 435 00:20:34,060 --> 00:20:36,060 that they're running the ball And so that's why we see these 436 00:20:36,300 --> 00:20:39,620 secondary tight ends for those those goal line touchdowns a lot 437 00:20:39,620 --> 00:20:42,340 like freaking Lee Smith and these dudes you know throughout 438 00:20:42,340 --> 00:20:45,060 history in in and we're like, God, that guy scored the 439 00:20:45,060 --> 00:20:46,460 touchdown. Well, you just showed 440 00:20:46,460 --> 00:20:49,300 statistically why that happens. It's because the run blocking 441 00:20:49,300 --> 00:20:51,420 snaps actually correlate to the receiving Td's. 442 00:20:51,810 --> 00:20:55,050 It's a great stat for tight ends and it's a great point on Smythe 443 00:20:55,050 --> 00:20:58,050 and somebody. Again, when I go back to the 444 00:20:58,050 --> 00:21:01,850 projections, the other issue I had with Tua, his efficiency was 445 00:21:01,850 --> 00:21:04,650 so high last year. I already regressed it some that 446 00:21:04,650 --> 00:21:07,290 I had to have somebody else in their passing game be efficient 447 00:21:07,530 --> 00:21:09,450 because get sick. He was pretty efficient per 448 00:21:09,450 --> 00:21:11,330 target last year. I didn't want to make like 449 00:21:11,330 --> 00:21:14,530 Robbie Anderson hyper efficient. And so you do wind up saying, 450 00:21:14,530 --> 00:21:16,810 well is it Durham Smythe? Is it like Cedric Wilson, who's 451 00:21:16,810 --> 00:21:19,920 going to be this third guy? But yeah, I mean if if two is 452 00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:22,960 gonna, if like Mike Mcdino's gonna design a good offense and 453 00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:25,400 two is gonna be efficient and those types of things, Smythe 454 00:21:25,400 --> 00:21:28,320 could get those touchdowns at least and then hopefully you 455 00:21:28,320 --> 00:21:31,000 know enough targets and enough of a role where he has a decent, 456 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:33,680 you know, value here. But the real lesson is when you 457 00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:36,840 take your 11th round quarterback, it's important to 458 00:21:36,840 --> 00:21:39,760 or it's to set up the stack with their spike at the end. 459 00:21:40,720 --> 00:21:43,650 Yeah, exactly. All jokes aside, I do think 460 00:21:43,650 --> 00:21:46,330 that's how you should be thinking about correlation in 461 00:21:46,330 --> 00:21:49,130 this specific tournament, right? Where the way this format is 462 00:21:49,130 --> 00:21:51,250 structured, you don't need to be going out of your way to 463 00:21:51,250 --> 00:21:52,930 complete stacks. I don't really think it makes 464 00:21:52,930 --> 00:21:55,610 sense to reach to complete stacks the way this is 465 00:21:55,610 --> 00:21:59,290 structured, but when you take an unstacked quarterback like Tua, 466 00:21:59,530 --> 00:22:03,050 could he have a top 12 season ping ponging weeks with Waddell 467 00:22:03,050 --> 00:22:04,530 and Tyree Kill having solid years? 468 00:22:04,900 --> 00:22:07,260 Absolutely. But if he finishes as a top five 469 00:22:07,260 --> 00:22:09,900 quarterback, which I think we'd all agree is like within the 470 00:22:09,900 --> 00:22:12,460 range of outcomes, if he stays healthy in this offensive 471 00:22:12,460 --> 00:22:15,060 clicks, someone else is coming along for the ride. 472 00:22:15,400 --> 00:22:17,400 In this offense, I mean, we've even seen it with like the 473 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:20,120 Bengals over the years, very concentrated with Chase and 474 00:22:20,120 --> 00:22:21,680 Higgins. Like you'll have the Hayden 475 00:22:21,680 --> 00:22:23,240 Hearst weeks, the Tyler Boyd weeks. 476 00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:26,360 Like these guys can pop up and then you look at our tight in 477 00:22:26,360 --> 00:22:29,080 room like Dolce and Musgrave. As much as we're excited about 478 00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:31,960 them, they might be a little slow to come along or carve out 479 00:22:32,200 --> 00:22:35,360 like a full playing time role. Guys like Conklin and Smythe. 480 00:22:35,360 --> 00:22:38,160 Like, I wouldn't be surprised if we're playing those guys as our 481 00:22:38,160 --> 00:22:41,080 two starting tight ends for the first few weeks of the season. 482 00:22:41,680 --> 00:22:45,320 So yeah, I think making this bet cheaply on the Dolphins. 483 00:22:45,840 --> 00:22:48,000 Through these onesie positions makes a lot of sense. 484 00:22:49,120 --> 00:22:52,240 Yeah, I also think that you know there's best ball and there's 485 00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:55,480 managed and like when we were looking at the other tight ends 486 00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:59,160 available here, it's like do we want to take K Dotten? 487 00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:02,480 Do we want to take know a fan? Do we want to take one of these 488 00:23:02,480 --> 00:23:07,040 guys who is a little bit more of like a known commodity and know 489 00:23:07,040 --> 00:23:11,320 a fan or a little bit better of a bet to have some kind of pass 490 00:23:11,320 --> 00:23:14,280 catching role that we feel like OK about in K Dotten? 491 00:23:15,090 --> 00:23:18,930 But Smythe is the dude who could be in a good offense and 492 00:23:18,930 --> 00:23:21,970 consolidate all the tight end routes like, and I don't know 493 00:23:21,970 --> 00:23:23,650 what the percentage that he does that is. 494 00:23:23,650 --> 00:23:26,130 And I don't even know that I need to dial it in because it's 495 00:23:26,130 --> 00:23:28,530 the 18th round. Like let me just see if it 496 00:23:28,530 --> 00:23:30,010 happens. You know, like what's the 497 00:23:30,010 --> 00:23:32,050 opportunity cost? Let me just see if he has it. 498 00:23:32,370 --> 00:23:36,210 If he doesn't has it, I am happy to cut him like he's the easiest 499 00:23:36,290 --> 00:23:40,690 cut ever. If he does have it, then given 500 00:23:40,690 --> 00:23:42,560 the way this. These these work. 501 00:23:42,560 --> 00:23:44,680 I don't know. He's like a 12th, 11th, 12th 502 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:46,360 round value. Yeah. 503 00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:48,840 So and stacked, I mean what do you get when you're right to 504 00:23:48,920 --> 00:23:51,200 Pete's point then we then we actually have to a stacked, 505 00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:52,720 which is something we wanted to accomplish. 506 00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:55,040 Yeah, right. And I guess someone might be 507 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:57,000 listening and saying, well, you could have stacked. 508 00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:00,200 Gino would know a fan. But I think what Pat's saying 509 00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:02,960 too is like Fant most realistically is a contingent 510 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:05,000 play. Like you need an injury for him 511 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,880 to really reach his potential, where like Smite doesn't need an 512 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:09,600 injury. Like he could just be. 513 00:24:10,020 --> 00:24:12,140 Their third target earner, and it's honestly probably the 514 00:24:12,140 --> 00:24:14,860 safest bet that he is. Yeah, I mean they rested him 515 00:24:14,860 --> 00:24:18,620 with the starters like you know. And so my point again with the 516 00:24:18,900 --> 00:24:21,780 consolidating the routes, just put some numbers to it, he had 517 00:24:21,780 --> 00:24:25,580 40% route participation last season and Mike Issicki was at 518 00:24:25,580 --> 00:24:28,620 55%. So we don't think of the 519 00:24:28,820 --> 00:24:33,420 Dolphins tight end role as valuable, but you know, not that 520 00:24:33,420 --> 00:24:36,140 he would keep every route he had last year and take over every 521 00:24:36,140 --> 00:24:37,820 route that Mike Issicki had, but. 522 00:24:38,610 --> 00:24:41,450 If he takes the majority of what the sick he had, we could be 523 00:24:41,450 --> 00:24:47,050 easily talking about him going from 40 to 75 and 40 to 75 would 524 00:24:47,050 --> 00:24:52,930 be a huge meaningful, let's fucking go type of outcome for 525 00:24:52,930 --> 00:24:54,410 an 18th round correlated tight end. 526 00:24:55,930 --> 00:24:58,690 So let's, because all we have left is kicker and defense, 527 00:24:58,690 --> 00:25:00,930 let's kind of zoom out a little bit. 528 00:25:01,090 --> 00:25:03,090 Look at this team. You know, people on Twitter 529 00:25:03,090 --> 00:25:06,610 would say love your wide receivers, a little worried 530 00:25:06,610 --> 00:25:09,210 about your your running backs and tight ends here. 531 00:25:10,210 --> 00:25:13,090 How how do you guys overall feel about this Bill? 532 00:25:13,090 --> 00:25:15,650 Because we did end up in the scenario we kind of envisioned 533 00:25:15,650 --> 00:25:18,970 at the start, which is like we could end up punting 3 positions 534 00:25:18,970 --> 00:25:21,570 here. I think the room did not punish 535 00:25:21,570 --> 00:25:24,450 us at quarterback, so we made that one back quickly. 536 00:25:24,830 --> 00:25:28,150 And so then it really comes down to how do you guys feel about 537 00:25:28,150 --> 00:25:30,350 punting both running back and tight end? 538 00:25:30,350 --> 00:25:31,630 Do you think we can survive this? 539 00:25:32,950 --> 00:25:36,470 I feel like it's not running back in full because I feel very 540 00:25:36,470 --> 00:25:38,190 good about James Cook as our RB one now. 541 00:25:38,190 --> 00:25:41,810 I mean I'm getting really excited about him and it's funny 542 00:25:41,810 --> 00:25:43,930 for anyone who listened to ship chasing last week and I I made a 543 00:25:43,930 --> 00:25:46,770 case for Damien Harris. I was telling you guys in a chat 544 00:25:46,770 --> 00:25:49,610 like it's changed over the last like 4 days pretty pretty 545 00:25:49,610 --> 00:25:52,050 drastically. Where while we were talking 546 00:25:52,050 --> 00:25:54,610 about that Cook had gone in the sixth round in that draft and we 547 00:25:54,610 --> 00:25:57,770 were saying I or I. I know I was saying if you if 548 00:25:57,770 --> 00:26:00,610 you feel this poorly about Harris and you should be taking 549 00:26:00,610 --> 00:26:02,050 Cook in the sixth round of every draft. 550 00:26:02,050 --> 00:26:03,930 And that's sort of just where I'm I'm heading now, where I 551 00:26:03,930 --> 00:26:06,730 think he belongs quite a bit higher than 711 where we got him 552 00:26:06,730 --> 00:26:09,250 here. So I feel really bad. 553 00:26:09,250 --> 00:26:11,880 Where you. You probably wanna apply a 554 00:26:11,880 --> 00:26:14,200 managed league bonus to Cook, right? 555 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:16,280 If Cook isn't the guy, he's not the guy. 556 00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:17,840 Whatever. You probably can figure it out. 557 00:26:17,840 --> 00:26:21,120 Like in the sixth round, you can survive it if he's not the guy 558 00:26:21,720 --> 00:26:22,920 much more easily than in Best Bowl. 559 00:26:22,920 --> 00:26:26,720 But if he's the guy like he's gonna pay off a sixth round tag. 560 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:29,840 Yep, he definitely is. And then you got so the question 561 00:26:29,840 --> 00:26:32,400 is RB 2 and tight end. I'm a little concerned about 562 00:26:32,400 --> 00:26:34,640 tight end. The dole such thing is a little 563 00:26:34,640 --> 00:26:36,800 concerning and sometimes when we finish these are like which pick 564 00:26:36,800 --> 00:26:39,160 would you undo? I think I still would undo the 565 00:26:39,160 --> 00:26:41,480 Addison pick. I still, I think I still would 566 00:26:41,480 --> 00:26:44,840 be fine with just the six receivers and and part of the 567 00:26:44,840 --> 00:26:46,680 Ingram discussion. None of us thought he was a 568 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:50,760 superstar but it was guaranteed routes and a good offense and 569 00:26:50,760 --> 00:26:52,960 and you know this potential for a strong floor or not 570 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:55,520 necessarily guaranteed routes cuz pat you made a strong case 571 00:26:55,520 --> 00:26:58,200 that maybe he'd be someone who comes off in some of those slot 572 00:26:58,200 --> 00:27:01,810 snaps. But the potential for a pretty 573 00:27:01,810 --> 00:27:04,730 solid floor that I as much as we like the later on tight ends, I 574 00:27:04,730 --> 00:27:09,490 didn't feel as comfortable with. I I I kind of wish we still had 575 00:27:09,490 --> 00:27:10,850 Ingram. That would probably be the one 576 00:27:10,850 --> 00:27:13,450 decision that I would say, oh, in hindsight like if I can 577 00:27:13,650 --> 00:27:15,370 change one thing, it might be that. 578 00:27:16,090 --> 00:27:18,450 But part of that's because the dosage run out has just been 579 00:27:18,450 --> 00:27:19,890 unfortunate since we took dosage. 580 00:27:20,290 --> 00:27:22,970 Yeah we were excited about dosage when we took him and so 581 00:27:22,970 --> 00:27:26,160 we got to play tight end a little bit tough RB 2 stuff. 582 00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:28,920 I mean I'm, I'm really into Warren, I know we all are. 583 00:27:28,920 --> 00:27:30,160 Pat, you're you're really into them. 584 00:27:31,120 --> 00:27:35,040 Moster is a guy that I think we we now another guy we have tied 585 00:27:35,040 --> 00:27:37,240 to two and we could potentially even play early in the years 586 00:27:37,560 --> 00:27:39,920 early because they're not signing anyone else, you know, 587 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:41,960 so. I I mean, I think we can kind of 588 00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:43,920 make that work even though the Kendra Miller stuff hasn't 589 00:27:43,920 --> 00:27:46,000 worked. Deontay, Foreman, Moster, I 590 00:27:46,000 --> 00:27:48,560 think was a pretty big turn to give us some early season stuff 591 00:27:48,560 --> 00:27:51,320 for, you know, to maybe bridge us to Warren and Miller. 592 00:27:51,320 --> 00:27:54,080 I mean, I guess tight ends, where I'm concerned is what I'm 593 00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:56,810 getting at. Yeah, I'm with you. 594 00:27:56,810 --> 00:27:59,650 I'm looking at this too and trying to figure out like ways 595 00:27:59,650 --> 00:28:01,450 you would change it. The other thing I'm looking at 596 00:28:01,450 --> 00:28:04,170 here is like this run of running backs before the Dolcech pick 597 00:28:04,170 --> 00:28:06,490 like P Ryan, A J Dylan, a chain penny. 598 00:28:06,810 --> 00:28:08,850 That was tough. Like I look at this team and I'm 599 00:28:08,850 --> 00:28:11,650 like, God, this team could use Semaj AP Ryan like he would be 600 00:28:11,650 --> 00:28:13,530 the well. Kaleo Herbert over over. 601 00:28:13,530 --> 00:28:17,730 Warren might be one, and I love Warren, but Khalil Herbert, 602 00:28:17,730 --> 00:28:20,250 someone we strongly considered there kind of. 603 00:28:20,250 --> 00:28:23,850 We're like we can go get Foreman later, which we did, but and 604 00:28:23,850 --> 00:28:27,130 then it looks like that gap is I I remember asking when we were 605 00:28:27,130 --> 00:28:29,570 there, like, is there, is there a three round gap there? 606 00:28:29,570 --> 00:28:31,010 And now it's like, yeah, there probably should be. 607 00:28:31,130 --> 00:28:33,930 Yeah, yeah, yeah. He looks like the starters, so 608 00:28:33,930 --> 00:28:35,210 come like coming out of the gates. 609 00:28:35,410 --> 00:28:37,930 If we had Cook and Herbert, is there two starting running 610 00:28:37,930 --> 00:28:40,370 backs? I feel like we're like a fast 611 00:28:40,370 --> 00:28:41,930 start team. We're like a fast start 0 612 00:28:41,930 --> 00:28:43,850 running back team. So the way you do get there, 613 00:28:43,850 --> 00:28:47,850 right, is you go Ingram instead of Addison and then we're taking 614 00:28:47,970 --> 00:28:51,130 knowing like, hey. Both Herbert and Warren. 615 00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:54,720 Is probably the switch. There is probably how it would 616 00:28:54,720 --> 00:28:57,520 have gone but Pat you Pat was very anti Ingram like. 617 00:28:57,520 --> 00:29:02,600 Pat was not that. I'm still Addison over Ingram, 618 00:29:02,600 --> 00:29:05,680 even with the way it came out because part partly because like 619 00:29:06,520 --> 00:29:10,040 we got Musgrave and we got Conklin, you know, and Dulcich. 620 00:29:10,040 --> 00:29:11,800 The Dulcich stuff is definitely concerning. 621 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:17,120 But like my optimism for our ability to get tight ends that 622 00:29:17,120 --> 00:29:20,440 we felt like had either upside or usability right out of the 623 00:29:20,440 --> 00:29:23,050 gate. I think was founded like we 624 00:29:23,450 --> 00:29:26,530 spent very little and we got The Jets starting tight end and 625 00:29:26,530 --> 00:29:29,410 probably the Packers starting tight not probably he's looks 626 00:29:29,410 --> 00:29:33,370 like the Packers starting tight end and you know Musgrave gives 627 00:29:33,370 --> 00:29:35,850 us gives you a little upside as like the field stretcher guy as 628 00:29:35,850 --> 00:29:38,570 well. So yeah like we definitely 629 00:29:38,570 --> 00:29:41,930 wouldn't start a little faster with Ingram but I was put I was 630 00:29:41,930 --> 00:29:44,330 sort of pound the table for late season upside with Addison. 631 00:29:44,930 --> 00:29:47,410 I think he provides that he's had I mean he looks like pretty 632 00:29:47,410 --> 00:29:48,810 good pick. We're happy to have Addison. 633 00:29:49,220 --> 00:29:50,580 Yeah. It's gonna be hilarious to look 634 00:29:50,580 --> 00:29:53,100 back on this when Addison's like, a clear hit rookie. 635 00:29:53,100 --> 00:29:55,460 And me and Peter like we want a memory hole. 636 00:29:55,460 --> 00:29:57,820 This whole discussion about a boring tight end over him. 637 00:29:58,380 --> 00:29:59,900 Like we feel we backfilled the tight end. 638 00:29:59,900 --> 00:30:02,660 We did it. Well, and I'm doing the thing we 639 00:30:02,660 --> 00:30:05,710 always tell people. That not to worry about, right? 640 00:30:05,710 --> 00:30:07,630 Like I'm doing the thing where I'm like looking at our starting 641 00:30:07,630 --> 00:30:09,870 lineup and being like how could we have made our starting lineup 642 00:30:09,870 --> 00:30:12,190 slightly better. But the whole point of 0 RB and 643 00:30:12,190 --> 00:30:15,950 what we did here is that we are dominating people so much with 644 00:30:15,950 --> 00:30:19,350 those four wide receiver spots that us getting six points on 645 00:30:19,350 --> 00:30:22,350 average from our RB2 doesn't even matter and so. 646 00:30:22,840 --> 00:30:25,280 In doing that, it's like OK, well, Addison, Deonte, Johnson, 647 00:30:25,280 --> 00:30:28,400 it's like from this cohort of seven wide receivers we took 648 00:30:28,400 --> 00:30:30,720 through 8 rounds. We're trying to find 4 smashes 649 00:30:30,920 --> 00:30:35,320 and if we find 4 smashes for top 20 guys it will honestly not 650 00:30:35,320 --> 00:30:37,760 matter what RRB to us. It just and it doesn't have. 651 00:30:38,160 --> 00:30:39,960 And one of the things that is involved for me over the years 652 00:30:39,960 --> 00:30:42,040 is it doesn't have to be 4 for the full season. 653 00:30:42,040 --> 00:30:44,920 So like to Pat's point with Addison's a late season upside 654 00:30:44,920 --> 00:30:48,520 play where early we could potentially find 4 smashes and 655 00:30:48,520 --> 00:30:51,400 then maybe one of our receivers like unfortunately tears is ACL 656 00:30:51,400 --> 00:30:53,880 in Week 8. But then were able to backfill 657 00:30:53,880 --> 00:30:56,320 that with the Addison upside that you can't just find on 658 00:30:56,320 --> 00:30:57,440 waiver. So that's part of it. 659 00:30:57,440 --> 00:31:00,440 You have to have redundancy because things can happen where 660 00:31:00,440 --> 00:31:02,840 guys can be good for part of the season and then get hurt. 661 00:31:03,240 --> 00:31:08,120 Yeah, yeah, 100%. So I, I I kind of wish we'd just 662 00:31:08,120 --> 00:31:11,160 gone Herbert over Warren a little bit for the early season 663 00:31:11,160 --> 00:31:14,480 stuff but then honestly like if most if they if they don't sign 664 00:31:14,480 --> 00:31:19,040 anybody in Miami most are would he could easily cover that early 665 00:31:19,040 --> 00:31:22,190 part of the season for us and. Again, late season upside like 666 00:31:22,190 --> 00:31:25,750 Jalen Warren has it. So I honestly feel pretty good 667 00:31:25,750 --> 00:31:27,590 about this team. I think I was the most 668 00:31:27,910 --> 00:31:31,710 comfortable with like let's just take the profiles we like and 669 00:31:31,710 --> 00:31:35,070 like let the rest figure out itself a little bit of running 670 00:31:35,070 --> 00:31:37,550 back in tight end. So it doesn't surprise me that 671 00:31:37,550 --> 00:31:40,790 I'm like more comfortable now that we kind of did that because 672 00:31:40,790 --> 00:31:42,630 I was sort of pushing us that direction. 673 00:31:42,630 --> 00:31:45,310 But I like this team. I think we did. 674 00:31:45,960 --> 00:31:47,760 Look, we got. We got the upside guy and Cook 675 00:31:47,760 --> 00:31:48,960 that already seems to be coming together. 676 00:31:48,960 --> 00:31:50,960 We have upside a tight end. We have upside. 677 00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:57,320 A quarterback our you made a. We're thin, but you made a clip 678 00:31:57,320 --> 00:31:59,920 for Greg Dulcich, so you're not buying any fears there. 679 00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:03,640 No, I am buying fears. He was someone that you want to 680 00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:05,320 talk about. A guy that could not be playing 681 00:32:05,320 --> 00:32:08,000 much on on play action snaps around the goal line. 682 00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:09,760 I am actually worried about Dulcich there. 683 00:32:09,880 --> 00:32:12,280 He's someone I kind of wish we knew. 684 00:32:12,400 --> 00:32:16,030 Knew what we know now. But but Musgrave, if Musgrave, 685 00:32:16,630 --> 00:32:18,630 That's the guy. If he hits first, this team's 686 00:32:18,630 --> 00:32:21,910 gonna be fun. It is that of all the preseason 687 00:32:21,910 --> 00:32:26,150 like overreactions and all that like the dolt, like specifically 688 00:32:26,150 --> 00:32:30,390 doltchic in managed leagues is probably by one concern of all 689 00:32:30,390 --> 00:32:32,830 the preseasons like. Is still gonna have the two 690 00:32:32,830 --> 00:32:34,630 touchdown games. He could still be the guy you 691 00:32:34,630 --> 00:32:36,870 need in the playoffs. Like none of that has changed, 692 00:32:37,070 --> 00:32:41,030 but like his usage, could be so herky jerky in such a maddening 693 00:32:41,030 --> 00:32:45,560 way for managing. And and yes, I completely agree 694 00:32:45,560 --> 00:32:47,560 with that. And like you know, would I 695 00:32:47,560 --> 00:32:51,000 rather just have Dalton Schultz just to plug him in or even like 696 00:32:51,000 --> 00:32:53,640 Sam Laporta? Yeah, I think I would just 697 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:57,320 rather have Sam Laporta. But like, at least we got him at 698 00:32:57,360 --> 00:32:59,920 kind of a value. You know, like Kincaid went at 699 00:32:59,920 --> 00:33:02,920 the a 12. You know, I don't, we didn't 700 00:33:02,920 --> 00:33:05,320 like pay the full price for for adults, did we? 701 00:33:05,520 --> 00:33:06,520 For sure. We get a little bit of a 702 00:33:06,520 --> 00:33:07,280 discount. Yeah, we did. 703 00:33:07,400 --> 00:33:08,990 We did. Just a smidge. 704 00:33:09,070 --> 00:33:11,710 A smidge. Maybe it'll all be okay. 705 00:33:11,790 --> 00:33:13,750 Maybe it'll all be okay. I mean, it is now. 706 00:33:13,750 --> 00:33:15,830 It's just so funny going back to some of that language. 707 00:33:15,830 --> 00:33:17,670 I wrote about it in the Fantasy Life newsletter today. 708 00:33:17,670 --> 00:33:20,190 Like I looked up the quote again, that Sean Payton was 709 00:33:20,190 --> 00:33:23,750 talking about the evaluation being hard on Dulce and all 710 00:33:23,750 --> 00:33:25,470 that. Now I'm like, I don't really 711 00:33:25,470 --> 00:33:28,670 like how this is sounding. And then Nathan Jakey at PFS 712 00:33:28,670 --> 00:33:30,990 pointing out that Man Hurts wasn't even playing. 713 00:33:31,350 --> 00:33:33,990 He could get some more blocking tight end snaps and I'm like, 714 00:33:34,630 --> 00:33:36,430 this could be just such a fucking headache. 715 00:33:36,590 --> 00:33:39,790 That was that was part of my take early in the offseason was 716 00:33:39,790 --> 00:33:43,070 that we in the fantasy community probably thought he was the the 717 00:33:43,070 --> 00:33:46,470 clear Titan one more than you know the new coaching staff was 718 00:33:46,470 --> 00:33:50,030 necessarily going to because Hackett loved him so much as 719 00:33:50,030 --> 00:33:51,710 part of the clip that we played for Dolcech. 720 00:33:51,710 --> 00:33:53,710 The big Yeah. This reason that's included 721 00:33:53,710 --> 00:33:56,990 fucking loved him. And we're always like, yeah, I 722 00:33:56,990 --> 00:33:59,230 mean this guy was a part of the old regime when these new 723 00:33:59,230 --> 00:34:02,420 regimes take over. And then when he brought in 724 00:34:02,820 --> 00:34:05,580 Troutman, who he has coached before, Peyton. 725 00:34:05,580 --> 00:34:07,140 Sean Payton brings him in from the Saints. 726 00:34:07,140 --> 00:34:10,060 It's like and early in the Aussies I was worried about 727 00:34:10,060 --> 00:34:12,860 Alberto, but he isn't like, doesn't even exist anymore. 728 00:34:12,860 --> 00:34:14,460 He's just a figment of our imagination. 729 00:34:14,460 --> 00:34:17,380 But it does seem like Sean Payton doesn't really see 730 00:34:17,380 --> 00:34:19,500 Doltage as as clear of a number one as we do. 731 00:34:19,500 --> 00:34:21,340 Which doesn't mean he's not worth drafting. 732 00:34:21,659 --> 00:34:24,620 But probably he should, I think, be following a couple rounds and 733 00:34:24,620 --> 00:34:26,219 managed to. To Pete's point, I I'm worried 734 00:34:26,219 --> 00:34:28,060 about it too. Yeah, I mean. 735 00:34:28,679 --> 00:34:31,679 Just he brought a packet and the hard knock stuff on him. 736 00:34:31,719 --> 00:34:37,600 I mean we if we had known last year that this dude's favorite 737 00:34:37,600 --> 00:34:44,760 movie was Austin Powers Gold member the the third one like 738 00:34:44,840 --> 00:34:49,159 that's not true. Yes he plays Gold member for for 739 00:34:49,159 --> 00:34:51,199 the team. He's constantly referencing Gold 740 00:34:51,199 --> 00:34:53,679 member and Rogers loves it, of course. 741 00:34:54,130 --> 00:34:56,650 But, like, yeah, he has all these facts that he shares with 742 00:34:56,650 --> 00:34:57,970 the team about, like, gold members. 743 00:34:57,970 --> 00:35:01,690 I don't understand why the guy's obsessed with the wrong Austin 744 00:35:01,690 --> 00:35:08,730 Powers movement. So I mean, yeah, red flag for 745 00:35:08,730 --> 00:35:12,210 his coaching, Red flag for his evaluation of all kinds. 746 00:35:12,210 --> 00:35:14,730 I mean, dulcets. Could be, could be totally dust. 747 00:35:15,730 --> 00:35:18,370 Yeah, could just be a yeah, could just be a Hackett thing. 748 00:35:18,810 --> 00:35:22,610 And he's gonna be a tough one because some of these other 749 00:35:22,610 --> 00:35:24,630 guys. We're going to be able to cut 750 00:35:24,670 --> 00:35:28,110 and move on from pretty easily. Like Dulcich is going to be a 751 00:35:28,110 --> 00:35:32,470 little harder to part with, especially if the Bronco, like 752 00:35:32,710 --> 00:35:35,430 if Ross and the Broncos bounce back and like the Sean Payton 753 00:35:35,430 --> 00:35:38,510 thesis, hits. Like if the Broncos suck, it's 754 00:35:38,510 --> 00:35:40,870 like whatever, you know. But if the Broncos are good and 755 00:35:40,870 --> 00:35:43,590 Dulcich is like his usage is all over the place, that's going to 756 00:35:43,590 --> 00:35:47,150 be a very hard cut based on the offensive upside and where we 757 00:35:47,150 --> 00:35:49,830 took him. Yeah, and I think the guy that 758 00:35:49,830 --> 00:35:52,470 brought up in the article with the with that I wrote about. 759 00:35:53,680 --> 00:35:55,600 For legendary upside when I was talking through Dulcich's 760 00:35:55,600 --> 00:36:00,360 profile is Jared Cook. And I think that Jared Cook, 761 00:36:00,400 --> 00:36:06,640 probably Jared Cook ran around on 66% of dropbacks in 2020, I 762 00:36:06,640 --> 00:36:10,240 believe. And he was, he actually had a 763 00:36:10,240 --> 00:36:15,240 pretty good year. And he just was, you know, he 764 00:36:15,240 --> 00:36:17,600 was kind of a field stretcher, big wide receiver. 765 00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:20,400 And I think that's probably what we're going to find Dulcich 766 00:36:20,680 --> 00:36:24,880 playing, but. In order for him to hit he, he 767 00:36:24,880 --> 00:36:27,280 needs to like basically break out, like have a secondary 768 00:36:27,280 --> 00:36:31,040 breakout to get to where Jared Cook was in terms of like how 769 00:36:31,040 --> 00:36:34,360 good he was. And I think you're also thinking 770 00:36:34,360 --> 00:36:37,440 about like low routes, but you're you're hoping for a high 771 00:36:37,440 --> 00:36:40,440 target share. It does strike me as something 772 00:36:40,440 --> 00:36:43,120 that's going to be inconsistent. You know, like if you don't have 773 00:36:43,120 --> 00:36:45,240 the routes and you're just hoping you get that really high 774 00:36:45,240 --> 00:36:48,760 targets per outrun, that might be skiing, you know? 775 00:36:49,270 --> 00:36:53,510 Cook, by the way, pulling up his 2021 target share, we said 13%. 776 00:36:55,030 --> 00:37:00,830 He was at 12% in 2020. So Jared Cook with the Saints is 777 00:37:00,830 --> 00:37:02,790 his bowl case. I think it's just, it's just 778 00:37:02,790 --> 00:37:05,870 going to be, it's going to be tough to know when to start him, 779 00:37:06,750 --> 00:37:08,110 yeah. Well. 780 00:37:08,720 --> 00:37:12,200 That is our you know, we did a we've done a couple drafts on 781 00:37:12,200 --> 00:37:15,120 stream, but this was the first draft we hopped in this year for 782 00:37:15,120 --> 00:37:18,480 our managed leagues and always fun to get this one in the 783 00:37:18,480 --> 00:37:20,240 books. You guys have any other kind of 784 00:37:20,240 --> 00:37:21,680 parting shots? I know people have been 785 00:37:21,680 --> 00:37:24,320 disappointed to see us drafting running back so much on our best 786 00:37:24,320 --> 00:37:26,000 ball streams. We finally did a throwback for 787 00:37:26,000 --> 00:37:27,320 the people here. Cranked it. 788 00:37:28,120 --> 00:37:32,640 True 0 RB piss boy. Yeah, I mean, it's A J. 789 00:37:32,680 --> 00:37:34,880 Brown. C lamb is a very fun start. 790 00:37:35,290 --> 00:37:37,450 You know, if we didn't, if we didn't spend enough time on 791 00:37:37,450 --> 00:37:39,090 that, that's that's pretty exciting. 792 00:37:39,690 --> 00:37:42,690 Got DK Metcalf and Gino Smith, the cheapest those two are going 793 00:37:42,690 --> 00:37:45,490 to be in combination in the entire main event probably, Yep. 794 00:37:45,850 --> 00:37:47,970 So wide receiver, we are looking good. 795 00:37:48,810 --> 00:37:51,810 Scratch any final Yeah, I mean, I think that's a great thing. 796 00:37:51,810 --> 00:37:53,810 Like there's some, there's some parts of it that feel like this 797 00:37:53,810 --> 00:37:56,170 is really going to have a hard time. 798 00:37:56,690 --> 00:38:00,210 But also the ones that like like are not like a really hard time 799 00:38:00,210 --> 00:38:03,450 but like for how close it is to a finishing the draft. 800 00:38:03,720 --> 00:38:05,920 You know you'd love to have everything still feel perfect 801 00:38:05,920 --> 00:38:10,080 and there's a couple things that don't feel perfect, but you see 802 00:38:10,080 --> 00:38:12,080 the teams that end up winning these things and you look back 803 00:38:12,080 --> 00:38:15,440 and you're always reminded that like it isn't every single pick 804 00:38:15,440 --> 00:38:16,960 goes perfect. That's not the way it works. 805 00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:19,800 And we did build a team with all the early receivers as we're 806 00:38:19,800 --> 00:38:22,240 talking about that can withstand some of the bumps and you know 807 00:38:22,840 --> 00:38:26,480 bruises throughout the season. We have some contingent based 808 00:38:26,480 --> 00:38:28,880 upside plays late. We have you know rookie tight 809 00:38:28,880 --> 00:38:31,880 end that that has upside. We have a lot of paths to 810 00:38:32,470 --> 00:38:35,790 hitting on certain things. It's not probably a perfect 811 00:38:35,790 --> 00:38:40,270 construction but like in hindsight, with the benefit of 812 00:38:40,270 --> 00:38:42,910 hindsight, but it is something that or it is a team I think 813 00:38:42,910 --> 00:38:46,350 that can go far if it gets the brakes and I mean that's like 814 00:38:46,390 --> 00:38:48,460 ultimately you have to get the brakes as part of it, you know. 815 00:38:48,580 --> 00:38:50,460 Yeah, well, you say perfect construction. 816 00:38:50,460 --> 00:38:52,620 I'll pull this one up because we're doing another slow draft 817 00:38:52,620 --> 00:38:55,020 with a couple guys in the Discord. 818 00:38:55,020 --> 00:38:58,700 We got Clay and Gormanji and this, what I would say is like 819 00:38:58,700 --> 00:39:00,980 shaping up as the perfect construction where we're out of 820 00:39:00,980 --> 00:39:04,180 the four hole here, Tyree Kill, Tony Pollard, Breeze Hall, Kyle 821 00:39:04,180 --> 00:39:06,220 Pitts. And then we get we catch up at 822 00:39:06,220 --> 00:39:07,820 wide receiver, Chris Godwin, George Pickens. 823 00:39:07,820 --> 00:39:10,540 Jahan Dotson, trailing Burks. I mean, like, you want to start 824 00:39:10,540 --> 00:39:13,540 masturbating over a starting lineup, Like, no further than 825 00:39:13,540 --> 00:39:17,740 the four hole right here. Yeah, that's a fun team. 826 00:39:18,250 --> 00:39:21,450 So, well, this is always a super fun exercise. 827 00:39:21,450 --> 00:39:23,370 We we know we were a little slow. 828 00:39:23,410 --> 00:39:25,170 I didn't know we had trailing Burkes there because I was on a 829 00:39:25,170 --> 00:39:27,490 DP chasing. And we didn't even check. 830 00:39:27,490 --> 00:39:29,570 In with but I started bringing up trailing Burkes in the sixth 831 00:39:29,570 --> 00:39:34,040 round, so it's not like. Well, we had brought, we had 832 00:39:34,040 --> 00:39:36,680 brought Trail and Burks up when we were debating whether to take 833 00:39:36,680 --> 00:39:38,160 Brees Hall. And we were wondering are we 834 00:39:38,160 --> 00:39:39,880 gonna feel too behind that wide receiver? 835 00:39:40,080 --> 00:39:42,720 And like Trail and Burks was the guy we had like feathered away 836 00:39:42,720 --> 00:39:45,760 for, like he's the one that's going to help us unlock this 837 00:39:45,760 --> 00:39:48,080 second detour here. And so for that to to play out 838 00:39:48,080 --> 00:39:49,240 definitely helps. So nice. 839 00:39:49,280 --> 00:39:52,520 Plus we also had a debate about Godwin Verse Hopkins. 840 00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:54,200 Yes, so nice. I don't. 841 00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:56,280 I don't want the double stacking managed from the title. 842 00:39:56,280 --> 00:39:57,200 Yeah, I don't want that. So. 843 00:39:58,600 --> 00:39:59,790 So. There it is. 844 00:39:59,790 --> 00:40:01,630 If you guys are listening to the audio version of this, we do 845 00:40:01,630 --> 00:40:03,070 have all the video ones available. 846 00:40:03,070 --> 00:40:05,790 If you're wanting to check out the board, which we have shared 847 00:40:05,790 --> 00:40:09,150 when we do these mini sodas, we are, like I said, recording this 848 00:40:09,150 --> 00:40:11,270 on August 14th. We're going to have plenty of 849 00:40:11,270 --> 00:40:15,350 main events and NFC prime time drafts coming up over the coming 850 00:40:15,350 --> 00:40:17,750 weeks. Appreciate you guys as always 851 00:40:17,750 --> 00:40:21,550 for being YouTube members and for supporting us as we rip off 852 00:40:21,670 --> 00:40:25,150 a bunch of drafts. I'm Pete for Pat for Gretch. 853 00:40:25,350 --> 00:40:26,230 See you guys next time.