All right, welcome back to the Ship chasing Mini soda series.
We kicked this off with our first episode, talking some high
level strategy for the contest and then looking at our
decisions at the 1-2 turn. You guys heard us debating some
of those. Spoiler alert here.
We did end up taking a J. Brown and then CD Lamb comes
back around to us. We were pretty interested in a
Monroe St. Brown as well.
That doesn't happen. But we happily scoop up a J
Brown and CD Lamb and now we are on the clock.
Literally on the clock this time at 311, we see the quarterbacks
come off the board. Josh Jacobs, Keenan Allen, TJ
Hawkinson. How are you guys feeling about
this spot here? Well, there was a potential for
a nice falling value and we didn't really get that.
So that's a little bit of a bummer, but we did get the two
guys we were debating at the 1-2 turn.
Both of them. So that was pretty sweet, yeah.
The recap that we got a J Brown and then CD Lame on the wrap.
So I can't. You know, we can't complain too
much after a pretty sweet first two rounds.
Yeah. And I, so I agree with you, we
don't really get a great phone, but I mean like the the fact
that like Hawkins san or Jacobs with the holdout risk almost
made it backwards pretty exciting I guess sort of just
jumping ahead to where we want to go with it, I mean.
In the last 17 picks, there's only been 4 receivers.
There's only been two receivers through the third round.
We're at FFPC rooms now, right? We got, we got some QB's going.
Lamar ends up going in the third.
We talked a little bit about taking Andrews early to try to
take Lamar. It's not the Andrews drafter who
takes Lamar, The Andrews drafter takes Allen and then Lamar goes
to pick after. But we if we had taken Andrews,
who wouldn't have been able to get Lamar back?
It's very much our type of. Situation where like it's easy
to piss yellow now, like when all this stuff happens for four
receivers in the last 17 picks. And so the guy that that I'm
kind of fixated on with this pick and we talked a little bit
I think even on our 1-2 turn about Keenan and Debo being guys
that we like to the 3-4 turn Keenan goes.
But Debo Samuel is 1 and he's a I think a really similar play to
what Pat made a really good case on a J.
Brown that eventually got me around to it.
And I mean sort of funny, but like, I kind of needed to be
sold on A J. Brown.
But I I have this mindset of like, I want to hit a home run
on every pec. And Pete, you use this
terminology a lot on your streams about like just
sometimes taking the single. And what Pat's point was when we
recorded our first mini so it was like Agent Brown's got a 2.5
yards per out run four straight years.
Like, he's not a single if I don't, if I'm even right that he
can't hit a home run from that ADP, he's still like a
guaranteed triple right? And Debo Samuel sort of similar
when you look at his long term, I mean last year was a down
year, but I mean I just, it's a similar bet in the sense of like
I just think if you start with a J.
Brown CD, Liam, Debo Samuel, you're starting with three
really good football players. There's offensive concerns
through all three of those in terms of like actual ceilings.
But man, like that's that's three really guys that I'm very
confident are very good football players.
Yeah. And are we all in agreement real
quick though, just that this pick is for sure a wide
receiver. I mean, I just tapped through on
the Command Center for those of you guys who are seeing the
video version, I mean. Can you do that slower?
But cuz I wanna say this what you're seeing?
So, so quarterbacks just to rule out borough, fields?
Herbert. Nothing.
There PJ Brown, City Lamb running back.
You have Naji Harris, Joe Mixon, ETN, Aaron Jones, Walker.
I believe Gibbs would have been the one name we would have
considered at this spot and he goes at the 2-3 turn.
I guess we could entertain ETN but it still seems a little
early based on his ADP. Yeah, I think the big case that
could be made is, I think you could DK Metcalf has fallen here
and we see that all ahead of Debo.
And then just to do the tight end stuff, we didn't get the
Andrews that we talked about. You do have Kittle and Pitts.
It puts us in an interesting spot because even coming back
around in the beginning of the fourth they would be reaches by
a DP. However, they are definitely not
coming back to 511 and so that's really the big decision and then
it just gets you back to wide receiver, at least with this
pick for sure wide. And I don't have a lot of DK
Metcalf. I don't take him much.
I do tend to take him over Debo Samuel because he's just Debo's
often here and D K's rarely here is really what it just comes
down to. So building out a best Paul
portfolio, I'm like I'll take my DK when I get my chance, but in
order for me to take DK. Everyone except Keenan Allen has
to be off the board. Like I I'm not really that into
him. I don't take him until I feel
like like I'm willing to take him as the first wide receiver
of this post T Higgins Tier, but really only because the market
likes him so much. So I guess what I would say is
if we are planning on going wide receiver, wide receiver here,
then I would. Say we should at least talk
through DK Metcalf because Debo Samuels more like to make more
likely to make it back. So it's sort of like what's the
who's our, who's our backup wide receiver to Debo Samuel.
How big is that gap? Does that make it worth gambling
to try to get both DK Metcalf and DK Debo Samuel?
And and how big is the gap between Debo and DK for you
guys? I think that does make What
makes this hard for me is I have Debo, I had a Metcalf, but I do
have these guys kind of like in a similar tier.
But then after Debo I would be Metcalf over Ridley, Amari, Judy
probably in that range. I've been very scared of
Metcalf's prices in underdog in the early 3rd.
I am very worried about what JSN is going to do to him.
But like you're saying, you are getting a nice discount here and
it makes it hard because it's that it's almost like the Amanra
St. Brown problem from the 1-2 turn,
right where we really like him. But we thought, can we play the
ADP game and get two guys we really like.
I have a feeling if we go Debo here, DK Metcalf gets snapped
up. If we go DK Metcalf and Debo
gets snapped up, now all of a sudden we didn't get our
preferred player and we're getting a secondary non
preferred player after that. Yeah, that's that's the really
tricky element. Is like you, the last thing
you'd want to do is not take your preferred player and then
have Debo go. And I understand trying to play
for Debo. The DK thing that I would ask, I
haven't been taking him a lot of underarch either.
I've heard both of you guys make that case.
I've yet to talk to a lot of people who like his price.
I think when you're building an underdog portfolio, this is a
great example of 1 where when he falls, you take a little bit of
him. Cuz you're like, yeah, I mean
I'm building a huge portfolio. These are cheap drafts.
Like I'm gonna get some of him. But like where do we actually
think he should go? Because I think with JSN like
he's mispriced by us like a a solid round.
I think I would have Debo ahead of him as well straight up.
I think it's a pretty significant mispriced by the
market which is largely because and we see in this draft, once T
Higgins goes off the board there's not really a clear wide
receiver 15, right? And so it's been Debo all
offseason in this draft the way that the high stakes drafters
responded with seven straight non wide receiver picks and then
Keenan Allen goes late 3rd. But Debo, I mean DK has been
filling that in in best ball and and consistently sitting there
and he's not going to fall too far from there because when he's
does start to fall in an individual draft people just
scoop him up from structural reasons.
Yeah they want to get some exposure whatever.
I do feel like his I would way rather be open to taking like a
JSN later and not feeling like I'm you know over well.
I mean, we could, we could obviously double stack Seattle,
but you're less likely to do that and.
And manage then, you know, obviously an underdog, it's like
an easy Click to to to like stack up an offense.
But we might not want to necessarily do that.
I would rather play Seattle through the cheaper pieces is
sort of the way that I put it. That's kind of stealing that
from Sean Siegel. That's the way he usually puts
that stuff to me. It's just like I don't see how
Debo makes sense in the third round even as he's behind ADPI.
Do agree that like. You know, from a value
perspective and a structural build perspective, this gives us
something unique at least. Yeah, it's it's an interesting
point that his ADP is, like, so egregious that it's actually
keeping his ADP in place. Because, yeah, I take him at the
top of this wide receiver tier not because I like him the most,
but because he's often taken ahead of Breese Hall, Andre
Stephenson and Mark Andrews. And I'm like, not taking him
ahead of those guys. So yeah, I end up like.
Taking him earlier than even I think he should go.
I mean, I I would take Keenan Allen over him.
I like Terry Mclaurin more than him.
Like that's, you know, like and that feels kind of gross to say.
But I mean Mclaurin is I think the clear number one on an
offense that's going to be more concentrated than the Seahawks
will be. Now like I I think JSN is a
really good prospect. I think he's going to carve out
a role very quickly, very quickly, meaning at some point
this season he'll have a meaningful role that's going to
hurt Metcalf some. So and then some of my stuff
lock it comes out as the higher is the better bet.
Now I I think I don't think he's the better bet because I think
he is more at risk of JSN than Metcalf like in terms of routes
and stuff. But like if you just look at the
efficiency stuff, I mean it's a big premium you're paying for
Metcalf over lock it. So I guess I don't.
I'm not going to pound the table for us scooping the value here.
I just, I do think we should at least talk it through because
that kind of sitting at the top of the the applet and then it's
Naji Harris, Calvin Ridley, Joe Mixon, Amari Cooper and then
Debo. So it feels at least 50-50 that
we would get Debo. I would.
Like to say with the Metcalf for sure, just like literally just
now, like everyone, even in the ship chasing discord, they're
talking about this Devo quote that went out to where Again,
not that this should change anything, but I do feel
obligated to read this pull up, this Shafter thing, which is
very funny. But the point is, is that Debo
is going to be talked about and on everyone's mind. 49ers wide
receiver Devo Samuel has been determined to prove to head
coach Kyle Shanahan and others he will be better prepared this
season. Never had a grown man sent me so
many pictures of himself with his shirt off, but he looked
good. That's, I mean, that's one of
the best quotes of the offseason.
Right, I mean. Right.
That's, I know we're. Not going to let that quote
affect us, but we are taking Debo Samuel now, right?
Now that we've read that, so to me, like if we all feel
similarly that there's other guys we can make cases for over
Metcalf even with Debo off the board.
Like to me that just pushes us like we take Debo here.
If the room gives us DK Metcalf on a silver platter at 4 two, we
say thank you and we move on. And if not, we talk through
Mclaurin, Judy, whatever other wide receivers we think can
hang. Or can part of the reason I kind
of like taking the receiver we like is at 402, I do think
that's where you could get into a Travis ETN or a reach on a
tight end discussion at least, but.
I don't think we, we like, necessarily have to go that way.
But it does leave U.S. Open if like the turn goes
receiver. Receiver, maybe, I guess.
I don't know who that would. I mean it, it would leave Naji
Harris as the guy on ABP. And I'm not gonna make a case
for Naji Harris, but yeah. But they could go receive a
receiver and we could still feel OK, right?
I mean, yeah, we could, depending on who those receivers
are. I we should definitely do a mini
so for that one, because I don't.
I'm not as into Judy as you guys.
I think maybe I'm more open to Ridley than you are.
Cooper's a little bit gross. Well, based on our, based on our
schedule, I get stuff guys, of the fact that we'll probably be
on the clock like an hour after this.
We need to have this conversation now.
OK, All right. OK.
Well, so to me I would take Ridley.
So wait, are we confirmed on Debo I?
I'm 100% Debo on this pic. We're all we all prefer Debo, I
think, right? Yeah.
Pat Even like. I like, no, I like Debo.
I just like Debo more like he's the guy I want.
Yeah, I don't know that we have enough cover to justify scooping
DK. Like none of us can make that
compelling. I mean, DK is really good, but
target distribution, we don't expect them to be a ton of
passing attempts there. Yeah, I don't know.
Let's go. And we don't have the conviction
when you think about how it plays out too would just how
many ways they use Debo as like a Swiss army knife that too like
he's always going to be live for that big game.
It was even during the FFPC playoff challenge we talked why
he was going to be such a popular pitch because people
felt good about him. The scenarios were DK Metcalf,
yes, he's always going to be live for a big two touchdown
game. Like he has that obviously in
his arsenal. But if JSN is bearing down on
him, how you feel about that in those clicks and putting them in
your starting lineup toward the end of the season especially
could feel extremely you're starting to say like the outs
for Metcalf ceiling game. Yes, they're there, but they
keep getting smaller and smaller where I feel like that ceiling
for Debo is going to exist based on no matter what his teammates
do, essentially. I think that's really well put.
So if we take Debo here, then we can talk through a little bit of
contingency about what the turn does and where that leaves us.
What case were you going to make?
Well, I guess I probably good to order the wide receivers going
forward because I do think we can talk about ETN and and a big
tight end reach. But the tight end reach given
that they're kind of all down at the far end of the board, it's
not like a three, four pick reach.
It's like a big old reach and we're going to have drafts down
there at that side of the board. We're going to be doing some non
tight end premium drafts too or we can maybe even scoop these
guys like a real value, so. My big case just on that with
this goes with the Debo over DK thing is that I think right now
we are at the start of a very flat tier and that people are
going. To make those reaches.
That's true. I all agree with super flat
through this for I agree Yeah yeah, real quick.
Should I put this Debo pick in and maybe?
There's a chance this guy snap picks and makes this a little
easier. Yeah.
I'll put that in.
All right. Yeah.
So let's let's talk about it because I do think if if we
consider a reach to me it's for the tight ends, you know, I
think I'd feel much more comfortable with talking about
pits or kittle than I would even ETN.
So to me, it's kind of like a tight end reach verse, our
favorite of this very flat wide receiver tier.
The biggest reason I want to think through it is what I
talked about on ship chasing last night and you guys have
really sold me on the first couple.
Like I think it was two years ago, first couple times we did
these drafts, even maybe last year.
I don't think I fully internalized as well.
What your guys's point was, you guys have played FFPC a couple
years longer than me about when you go without an anchor running
back and without an anchor tight end, how you really wind up
trying to hit both in the same round.
And it's it's it becomes really difficult to build structurally.
It was tough for Pete. Even though you had an anchor
running back in an anchor tight end, it still kind of became
tough because you went a bunch of receivers in a row after that
point. So I think we have to talk
through okay what? Do we do at 5, you're talking
Pete's Pros versus Joes that that was last night for us, not
for, not for the sorry. Yeah, not for people listening
for Pete's Pros versus Joes that was on the stream or on the
YouTube channel. I think we could talk through a
little bit about if we did go wide receiver again, talk
through a little bit about what we might want to do at 5-6 cuz I
think we might want to be running back there.
I mean, I think there's some potential options, some.
JK Dobbins, maybe even we were reaching on Javante Williams now
that he hasn't started on PUP like is that something that
doesn't be open at the 5-6. So we we really like the seven
eight as well for potential receivers.
Although we talked a little bit about JSN on the first mini
Sewed just since then couple days I was talking to Sean a
little bit and in more recent ADP.
Sean was telling me something that they have on FFPC.
He's seen Jason at 704 and I was like OK, he's probably not
making it back to the 711. We were towards the end of our
our first mini so conversation. He's skeptical that he would
fall back to us at 7:11. I don't think that's probably
likely, but that's still a decent receiver range at 7-8.
The question I'm I'm long windedly getting back to is if
we don't take a running back or a tight end here?
Are we going like what? What are we setting ourselves up
45678 and then in that range where we would have to hit a lot
of 0 RBS and tight end options in nine 10/11/12.
Yeah, you're definitely right. Like a guy like Dobbins will be
there most likely in the early six.
You know, looking. I know it's not the same format,
but I'm just looking at. My Can you show the FFPC command
center board? Yeah, yeah.
I can even show the OHH, this is the grid here.
But if I slide over, we can even see the the percentage chance
that these guys are available in two picks here.
Let me see the full thing here. So you do start to see, yeah,
Dobbins, 31% chance, but this a DP might be a little anchored
before getting placed on POP, yeah.
He's probably more like 5050 right now.
I do. I do.
Hear your point, Andre Swift is maybe an option.
We took A J. Brown Yeah.
I think just like how it plays out structurally.
I do, man. I do really think the tight end
this is is nice to have even as a reach, because my whole thing
is like you saw the wide receivers that I was cranking
last night and like even then is Judy and you know Drake London
and those guys, are they that different from that caliber wide
receiver that will just happily double tap at the 5-6 turn,
probably the 7-8? Are we already in a flat area of
wide receiver? Where the the difference?
I think that's sort of what we were all saying with Debo is we
can all see scenarios like this is a guy that was an early
second round pick last year for a reason, had a tough year.
He's above it. But we can all see scenarios
where he's above the the rest of these guys, but the rest of the
names at wide receiver on the board, you start to get into
this range and we can include Metcalf in this I think a little
bit. Maybe he's above it, maybe
Ridley's above it. But it starts to get market
feels. I don't really, personally, but
I'm yeah, yeah. I'm kind of willing to be like,
OK. All the way, all the way down to
Pete's point, to the guys. We could get a 5-6.
Like a Chris Godwin maybe, or you know who like?
I think it's a it's a pretty flat group.
See all these guys? The percentage chance of over 50
at that next pick, Deonte Johnson, Christian Kirk, Mike
Williams, I you Tony's Dunzo. I do see a bit of a tear break.
I see my view on it is there's sort of a tear break after
Higgins and that that that tier sort of ends.
Around Christian Kirk and Brandon and I Yuk or slightly
before that. And then maybe they kick off a
tier that then includes Godwin and Lockett and Marques Brown
and and Deontay Johnson. I'm not quite as high on on
Godwin as you guys, but I mean do like to me he's not in the
same tier as Drake London. Like Drake, London has, I think,
quite a bit more upside. He's easily in the same tier to
me, so yeah, that's just a difference of opinion there.
But yeah, I think, I think we all agree though that we would
like a couple wide receivers there at that 5-6 turn.
Yeah. Although I guess I don't, I mean
I would probably personally prefer the two V twos of you
know, like Ridley and Swift versus ETN and Godwin or
something like I think I. Probably, but what about tight
end? Are are you pretty out on tight
end here at 402 or no? That's what I I'm more I'm more
open to that because with the tight end premium you know all
the sudden pits starts to look like you know he's scoring like
these wide receivers. He gives us the positional
advantage. We can make up that wide
receiver scoring or even come close to make up the wide
receiver scoring. That's probably that's a win for
us if if we hit on pits. I also feel like, again to the
point I was making earlier about how you sold me on A J Brown.
I feel like our first three receivers do feel more like
triples than home runs. Pitts could be the home run.
You know what I mean? Like he feels like a home run
pick. It's it's a way above ADP.
But if he hits, he hits. I still firmly believe that Kyle
Pitts has overall tied in one in his range of outcomes.
That probably requires Travis Kelsey to fall off and miss a
little bit of time. But like I firmly believe he can
outscore the rest of the position pretty you know in his
ceiling cases. Obviously Andrews is also very
good. We've been talking very
favorably about him on recent shows, but it it kind of
requires a down, a down season for those two, but I think pits
right behind them as far as ceiling cases.
Yeah, I mean, Pitts, he had a lot of really kind of hopeful
stuff in his profile. He he missed a lot of there was
like. High percentage of his deep
targets were uncatchable which has been that's something I'm
citing badly from various people putting out on Twitter so I
don't remember the exact percentage but he had a really
high targets per route run 26 1/2% that's that's awesome.
You know he is a deep threat. He had a 13.7 a dot last year.
I mean, that's high for a wide receiver, he.
Spent 34% of his snaps out wide as a rookie, 28% last year.
That's really high for a tight end.
I mean, he's still like he is who we thought he was.
You know he doesn't get open as easily as I was hoping it is
open scored and wasn't that great.
I think he might be more of like a like AT Higginsy type wide
receiver separation might not be like jumpsuit but like with
athleticism and and we're getting tight end eligibility,
right? Yeah.
I mean, if Pete Higgins had tight end eligibility and was on
the phone, I think we'd be pretty jumping over our head.
Yeah, yeah, so the the stat per Fantasy points new data suite,
which is pretty sweet, so shout to them. 64.9% catchable target
rate for Kyle Pitts. Second lowest among 169 wide
receivers and tight ends with 150 plus routes.
So I mean that's like almost 200 of you know, 150 plus routes.
Not a huge number. Pits obviously didn't run a ton
of routes either. He had the second lowest
catchable target rate, like a full third of his targets were
uncatchable. That's part of why his
efficiency was down. Some of those things.
That's one of the stats and particularly deep targets as you
mentioned, Pat, I think Ian, that's what he does.
It's it's not just to say like, oh you know, his deep targets,
like he is a deep threat. Essentially he's there.
He's their deep threat. Which is also makes him
interesting with Drake London as his counterpart.
Because I'm very high on Drake London I think he like.
I just feel like I don't have to choose, I can just make the bet
on both these guys. They both have awesome profiles,
things can can move my direction in terms of the regression with
the passing plays and everything.
But Drake London I think is more of an intermediate type player.
He had 11.2, a dot. His profile was that he's going
to. Come in and be able to win with
precise route running as a bigger body player in the
intermediate area of the field. Like that was kind of his thing,
like a sort of a possession player with a bit of pop.
I mean, that's like a perfect compliment for Kyle Pitts as a
deep threat. So anyway.
Two, just pulling out of the like the micro stuff on pits cuz
you guys don't have to sell me on him at all.
There like some of those listeners.
One on just last night, the way my pros vs Joes went in like.
At first I was a little hesitant to do the like Andrews thing and
then the way the board came into where I was even like praying
for Dolcech to get to me as like a second tight end.
Like you realize like you really start to sweat some bullets.
As much as we like the late tight ends this year, like
getting even the guys that have some upside.
Like I had my eye on La Porter and he flew off the board a
little earlier. Like tight end drafters start to
get itchy fingers there. And it is.
We get another. Yeah, it did.
It did. If we get another value though,
we could just take a second tight end as well at any time.
That's never precluded from doing too tight.
Will you pull up the percentages at tight end on you have the we
isolate tight end real quick before.
I know we gotta out here pretty quick, but.
Pitch isn't gonna Yeah, you have.
Sub 10% for all the next four or I guess got her to 11 but Kittle
1% hit 7% chance Waller 6% got her 11% and then we would be
looking then at like Friarmuth. It's more one that you wait for
7-8 on, but if he doesn't make it back to you at 7-8 then
you're like now we're I mean what are we taking in Jokeu?
Maybe he's already gone in the 7th as well, The fact that we
have the long wait until that 7th, because we wouldn't take
for him with that 5-6. I think his eighty piece right
around 7-8. Right, exactly.
This is right before we pick. Is the so we would be reaching
at the 5-6 if we wanted to do tight end or more practically
getting our anchor running back at the 5-6 if we don't go tight
end here. And at which point, I mean we're
still, we're probably still gonna want to take multiple
tight end shots in the rounds 10 to 14 range and also still
needing to build out running back depth in the round 10 to 14
range, you know? I will say, I think I'm still
Metcalf over pits. If we just get that if we get
that value I mean. I I'm at peace with that.
That was kind of, I'm OK with that, the room.
Gifts US42-D K Metcalf which is gonna be pretty abnormal I'm I'm
willing to take that but then. If Metcalf isn't there, like I
think, I just. Wanted to Let's just take this.
Let's just take this for the structural reasons.
It's a huge reach, but for the structural reasons it means we
can avoid tight end if no other values come and hit the running
backs that we need to hit as we start to build this sort of 0 RB
build and the receivers right. Yeah, cuz we don't have really
quarterback either, so it's just helpful.
It's it's not only are I think the other times when we got in
trouble with chasing players up the draft board or whatever, it
was because we were often passing on better players at
other positions just for the structural concern.
But if we have both the structural concern and we think
this is a very flat tier at wide receiver and that these tight
ends totally belong in a tight end premium format alongside
them, I'm fine dancing around a tier for structural purposes.
I mean Pitts in non PP, non tight end premium, I'm looking
at my projections right now. He's like 30 points behind these
guys in tight end premium. I have that number.
Kyle Pitts, I have projected for basically the same numbers.
I mean my projections, projections are what they are,
but basically the same number as Calvin Ridley, basically the
same number as DK Metcalf. They actually have them a little
bit ahead of those two guys, very slightly like five points
ahead of those two being tight in premium.
Now my projection on pets is bullish.
Obviously I'm a pits bull. Shocking, Shocking.
He has a 45% target share in my projections.
But you know. Yeah.
No, I actually have London for more targets.
So it's not like it's not, it's not that crazy bullish, it's, it
is bullish, but because I have those two concentrated, I wrote
a little bit about the RPO stuff.
You're not that bullish on, I mean I would.
Expect that you don't have a ton of passing attempts for the
Falcons, right? No, no, I pits at 118 targets,
let's put it that way. OK, OK.
I mean it's not like in in tight end premium.
And then I just have his his efficiency regress sum a high a
dot right with the highest a dot of any tight end that I
projected. And so then his yards per target
is naturally even though I he's not even close to the highest
yards per target I projected for a tight end.
But the high a dot pulls the yards per target up if he hits
on some of those deep balls. And so I mean, I think it's a
very defensible projection is what I'm getting at 1. 18
targets is a rookie. I think that's incredibly
fensible. It's very defensible and
relative to my my Ridley, DK in this range of receivers, Jerry,
Judy, all these guys are right in that range in my wide
receiver projections. Like I think there's a really
decent case to be made that pits in tight and premium projects,
you know, to the point of it being a flat tier projects the
same as these guys. Then he adds A structural
advantage because he feels tight end, right?
Yeah. Alright guys, I have to run.
Obviously we are going to huddle personally before we submit this
next pick, but I'm guessing next time you hear from us will be
when we're on the clock or close to at 511.
Seems like we are very much on board with DK Metcalf and Kyle
Pitts. I guess this person double
tapping Metcalf and Kyle Pitts with that would be.
That would be a meltdown. Well done 12.
If you're listening to the audio version of these, we do make the
video versions with the draft boards in the road of his
Command center that we're looking at available, as well as
our pretty faces available to YouTube members there.
Otherwise, appreciate you guys falling along in our FFPC Mini
Store series. We'll see you guys next time at
the 5-6 turn.