1
00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:07,600
Hello everybody and welcome to 
week, 9 of Statue acing, the NFL

2
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:11,800
trade deadline erupted with the 
tongue moves today with a lot of

3
00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:13,300
fantasy. 
Relevant players, switching 

4
00:00:13,300 --> 00:00:17,200
teams, we have not him Hines 
going to the bills. 

5
00:00:17,600 --> 00:00:20,400
Jeff Wilson on his way to the 
Dolphins. 

6
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:26,100
Chase Claypool is now Chicago 
Bear and many more I'm here. 

7
00:00:26,100 --> 00:00:29,700
As always with my co-host. 
Connor O'Driscoll also known as 

8
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:33,900
Echo here to break down all of 
the trades to impact the rest of

9
00:00:33,908 --> 00:00:37,800
the fantasy season, as well as 
other important Trends from 

10
00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:39,600
week. 
Eight Connor. 

11
00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:43,300
How's it going with you? 
How are you feeling with this 

12
00:00:43,300 --> 00:00:46,100
crazy NFL trade deadline? 
Well, the yeah, the NFL is 

13
00:00:46,100 --> 00:00:50,800
drunk. 
So I'm on my way as well, I 

14
00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:54,900
actually looked I looked in my 
fridge, trying to grab a drink 

15
00:00:54,900 --> 00:00:57,900
as well as I heard, you're going
to be drinking on the show but I

16
00:00:58,300 --> 00:01:01,200
drink myself clean this past. 
Ken, so unfortunately can't 

17
00:01:01,200 --> 00:01:04,500
can't be joining you but living.
Yeah. 

18
00:01:04,500 --> 00:01:08,100
I mean, I can't this is weird. 
I mean the NFL trade deadline. 

19
00:01:08,100 --> 00:01:10,700
I feel like, historically, has 
been very quiet. 

20
00:01:10,700 --> 00:01:14,200
We always get hyped up for it 
and nothing happens this year. 

21
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:18,400
I mean along with the McCaffrey 
and Tony deals come in a couple 

22
00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:20,300
weeks before it it really feels 
like that. 

23
00:01:20,300 --> 00:01:24,400
I fell is starting to trade more
than they ever have. 

24
00:01:25,300 --> 00:01:27,900
Yeah, I absolutely love it to be
honest. 

25
00:01:28,300 --> 00:01:33,500
I think it's seems to be all 
part of a trend towards more, 

26
00:01:33,500 --> 00:01:36,000
kind of like aggressive going 
for it. 

27
00:01:36,500 --> 00:01:42,400
Like maybe this is bullshit but 
I think of it in terms of well 

28
00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:45,000
teams are going for it. 
Now on fourth down more often 

29
00:01:45,500 --> 00:01:49,000
like teams are more willing to 
pull the Triggers on these 

30
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:52,500
trades. 
And it's, I it's the same to be 

31
00:01:52,500 --> 00:01:56,600
like, hey, You at you can't get 
anywhere unless you're willing 

32
00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:00,400
to take some chances. 
Yeah, I agree with that and it 

33
00:02:00,400 --> 00:02:04,300
seems like they're then sort of 
a long inefficiency and then if 

34
00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:07,300
we're teams weren't willing to 
trade draft picks or proven 

35
00:02:07,300 --> 00:02:10,100
talent, and I like to see, I 
mean, you can criticize some of 

36
00:02:10,100 --> 00:02:13,800
the trades, right? 
Like the lion, the Vikings, you 

37
00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:17,200
know, TJ hogenson. 
Hasn't shown a ton in the NFL 

38
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:18,400
today with the second round 
pick. 

39
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,900
But hey, they're six and one or 
maybe even 71 after last week. 

40
00:02:22,900 --> 00:02:26,100
Either way, there they have a 
great record herb. 

41
00:02:26,100 --> 00:02:28,900
Smith is out and they're going 
for it and I think It's the type

42
00:02:28,900 --> 00:02:32,200
of move that you have to make, 
especially in a year where I 

43
00:02:32,208 --> 00:02:35,900
think like part of this is 
driven by the fact that the NFC 

44
00:02:36,300 --> 00:02:38,900
and an NFL in general feels a 
lot more wide open than it ever 

45
00:02:38,900 --> 00:02:40,800
has been. 
I think that see the bills and 

46
00:02:41,100 --> 00:02:43,900
chief still look pretty strong 
but then I see you have the 

47
00:02:43,900 --> 00:02:46,600
Eagles. 
And then I mean I don't think 

48
00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:49,600
there's any consensus on who and
how you rank the NFC teams after

49
00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:52,500
that. 
So sweet. 

50
00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:56,800
And I saw a tweet earlier today 
that said something along the 

51
00:02:56,808 --> 00:03:01,200
lines of the egos go going for 
it on Fourth and goal in the 

52
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:04,200
Super Bowl. 
Kind of like was it broke a 

53
00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:07,800
plane almost in terms of like 
how team saw fourth down 

54
00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:10,600
decision making, where's the 
Rams? 

55
00:03:10,900 --> 00:03:16,400
Just like saying, fuck them kids
at and winning a Super Bowl. 

56
00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:19,800
I think that that's, that was 
probably a bit of a mindset, a 

57
00:03:19,900 --> 00:03:23,500
mindset shift in, what good team
building. 

58
00:03:23,500 --> 00:03:25,200
It looks like. 
And I'm not saying that it is 

59
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:27,200
good team building but it's 
definitely exciting. 

60
00:03:28,100 --> 00:03:30,800
Yeah. 
Yeah, I'm with you there. 

61
00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:35,300
So anyways, let's we didn't have
time to chat before the show. 

62
00:03:35,300 --> 00:03:37,500
But Connor, I think we do 
something slightly different 

63
00:03:37,500 --> 00:03:39,200
here. 
I know we have a decent amount 

64
00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:41,800
of live viewers tuned in and 
everyone wants to hear about the

65
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:45,400
trade so why don't we jump into 
the running back position to 

66
00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:49,200
start and Skip quarterback so we
can get right after talking 

67
00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:52,700
through some of these trades at 
the running back and wide 

68
00:03:52,700 --> 00:03:55,400
receiver position. 
Is that that sound good to you. 

69
00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,200
So you want to talk through the 
running backs broadly at First 

70
00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:03,500
or just the specific guys who 
were traded? 

71
00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:05,700
Yeah, I think so. 
I'll pull up the charts here. 

72
00:04:07,700 --> 00:04:10,200
Well, is that looking weird too 
or just me? 

73
00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,000
Okay now, okay, sorry about 
that. 

74
00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:16,800
Sorry, what I was what I was 
thinking is Connor. 

75
00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:19,300
We just pull up starting running
back charts and talk through it 

76
00:04:19,300 --> 00:04:22,400
as always. 
But why don't we like make sure 

77
00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:25,100
to cover the relevant trades? 
And yeah, you're like, wouldn't 

78
00:04:25,100 --> 00:04:27,600
normally do kind of like 
injuries and contingent value 

79
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:31,200
that sort of thing? 
Yeah, yeah, that sounds good. 

80
00:04:31,300 --> 00:04:34,900
Okay, so for everyone following 
along, we're jumping right into 

81
00:04:34,900 --> 00:04:37,500
the running backs here, we'll 
jump back to quarterback at the 

82
00:04:37,500 --> 00:04:40,400
end. 
Just a lot of interesting trades

83
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:43,600
situations to discuss here at 
running back. 

84
00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:47,300
So on this chart again we're 
looking Running back, expected 

85
00:04:47,300 --> 00:04:51,400
fantasy points and efficiency on
the y-axis. 

86
00:04:51,400 --> 00:04:53,700
Here, we have receiving 
expecting fantasy points per 

87
00:04:53,700 --> 00:04:56,200
game. 
On the x-axis, we have rushing 

88
00:04:56,300 --> 00:04:59,300
fantasy points per game. 
You put those together, you get 

89
00:04:59,300 --> 00:05:03,600
an idea of a total workload for 
each of the running backs here 

90
00:05:04,100 --> 00:05:09,400
in the AFC, so-called are 
looking at this chart here. 

91
00:05:09,900 --> 00:05:16,100
I think perhaps the first trade 
that we can discuss here is the 

92
00:05:16,100 --> 00:05:19,100
Infants, make the moves the 
Dolphins made today. 

93
00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:23,900
They sent Chase Edmunds to the 
Broncos and sort of swapped him 

94
00:05:23,900 --> 00:05:27,900
out with Jeff. 
Wilson coming to sort of take 

95
00:05:27,900 --> 00:05:32,900
his place, perhaps on the 
Dolphins we had seen in past 

96
00:05:32,900 --> 00:05:36,100
weeks. 
Raheem moster really consolidate

97
00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:39,300
the the snap share and workload 
here in Miami. 

98
00:05:39,900 --> 00:05:43,700
What do you think the overall 
effects on Rahim most it is of 

99
00:05:43,700 --> 00:05:46,400
Jeff Wilson coming in and Chase 
Edmunds leave Ting. 

100
00:05:47,500 --> 00:05:54,900
And so if probably is in that - 
for moster, and I would say that

101
00:05:54,900 --> 00:05:58,800
just because we already knew 
that most are just beat Jack 

102
00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:04,800
Chase, Edmunds, like you just 
better than them and and I think

103
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:07,000
he kind of did that to a Jeff 
Wilson. 

104
00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:09,900
He's already done that to Jeff 
Wilson Drew out his 49ers 

105
00:06:09,900 --> 00:06:17,400
career. 
But and It's the chase Edmunds 

106
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:22,100
was probably the ideal backfield
like not committee will 

107
00:06:22,100 --> 00:06:26,500
committee mate. 
Where's there's probably only 

108
00:06:26,500 --> 00:06:31,300
room for two to be a worse 
situation for most dirt than 

109
00:06:32,300 --> 00:06:37,500
Chase Edmunds. 
And so if I think that it 

110
00:06:37,500 --> 00:06:42,200
probably, you probably have a 
bit of more of it at wonder and 

111
00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:49,900
lightning a Here. 
And but I do think that Mozart 

112
00:06:49,900 --> 00:06:55,500
has been good enough that what? 
Like when he plays it, good 

113
00:06:55,500 --> 00:06:59,700
things happen for the Dolphins. 
And so I think he does have that

114
00:06:59,700 --> 00:07:02,000
kind of security and that like 
as long as he keeps playing 

115
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:04,600
that. 
Well and I'm not particularly 

116
00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:10,800
worried about his like starting 
value and but it's a pretty 

117
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:13,100
probably and this is a total 
guess. 

118
00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:17,800
Probably not the Workhorse after
a game or two maybe to get Jeff 

119
00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:20,700
Lewis in acclimatized. 
Yeah, I think I'm with you 

120
00:07:20,700 --> 00:07:23,300
there. 
Where it's I think there's more 

121
00:07:23,300 --> 00:07:25,800
downside risks in the situation 
where it seemed to be an 

122
00:07:25,808 --> 00:07:28,300
approach to kind of equilibrium 
where most sure to beat out 

123
00:07:28,300 --> 00:07:30,700
Edmonds. 
Now, that equilibrium 

124
00:07:30,700 --> 00:07:35,100
equilibrium is kind of thrown 
into flocks with Wilson 

125
00:07:35,300 --> 00:07:38,200
arriving, I'm just looking at 
the numbers here in terms of how

126
00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:42,900
efficient each bit back has been
on the respective teams most 

127
00:07:42,900 --> 00:07:47,800
yards. 
At according to FS data, -0.1 F,

128
00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:51,800
P0 e per game. 
We're at I'm sorry, most routes 

129
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:55,900
that -0.6 fantasy points over 
expected per game. 

130
00:07:55,900 --> 00:07:58,800
So slightly less efficient than 
you would expect. 

131
00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:03,000
Where Wilson is that -0.1 
fantasy points over expect a 

132
00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:05,800
game. 
So similar similar range there 

133
00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:08,400
for each of those guys, but 
Wilson actually has been 

134
00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:12,300
slightly more efficient. 
So I think there's some risk and

135
00:08:12,300 --> 00:08:16,400
the other thing I'd throw out is
I think Wilson and Mozart have 

136
00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:20,900
really duplicative skill sets in
a way that Edmonds and most 

137
00:08:20,900 --> 00:08:23,000
Ardent. 
So I do think there's some risk 

138
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:27,700
here where they they sort of you
Wilson as a backup and 

139
00:08:27,700 --> 00:08:32,100
complement to what moisture does
and they view maybe miles Gaskin

140
00:08:32,299 --> 00:08:36,000
as the backup to Edmonds and it 
becomes a scenario where maybe 

141
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:38,600
there's a three-man split with 
Gaskin involved. 

142
00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:41,100
I don't think that's likely. 
I think it's I think it will 

143
00:08:41,100 --> 00:08:45,800
probably romantic again but 
Yeah, it's possible now with 

144
00:08:45,900 --> 00:08:48,800
with Edmonds gone that becomes a
three man split. 

145
00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:56,200
So yeah, now go ahead. 
So the only thing I it does seem

146
00:08:56,200 --> 00:09:01,300
like the the Dolphins did 
prepared to have it be a to back

147
00:09:01,300 --> 00:09:06,700
split and am the only reason 
they are. 

148
00:09:06,700 --> 00:09:09,000
The reason the Edmond schools 
getting phased out was just 

149
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:10,400
because he didn't play very 
well. 

150
00:09:12,300 --> 00:09:16,400
So yeah, if the only thing about
the way I'm thinking about it, 

151
00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:20,700
is it Jeff Wilson? 
I think Jeff Wilson has to play 

152
00:09:20,700 --> 00:09:26,300
bad for a ped to wear to crack 
him for touches. 

153
00:09:26,300 --> 00:09:30,400
Whereas I think that most I know
and I know the F P0 e hasn't 

154
00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:32,900
been great. 
I think most is playing good 

155
00:09:32,900 --> 00:09:36,500
enough that he still going to be
like the dominant share. 

156
00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:42,500
Even if even if the I see a 
man's main path to getting on 

157
00:09:42,500 --> 00:09:44,600
the field is Jeff will something
firstly? 

158
00:09:45,500 --> 00:09:47,200
It's how I say that's guess. 
Yeah. 

159
00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:53,000
Yeah, that's good point. 
So yeah, yeah I think I see it. 

160
00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:57,400
Similarly I think we can move on
to another situation but yeah I 

161
00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:00,000
think we see it the same way 
most sure is likely. 

162
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:02,800
If we were to sort of summarize 
our points, their most shirt is 

163
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:06,200
likely to remain the lead in 
this backfield though. 

164
00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:09,600
We think will Austin is probably
better than Edmonds. 

165
00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:14,500
So maybe there's a bit more risk
that it's closer to 5050 whereas

166
00:10:14,500 --> 00:10:16,800
the past few weeks that have 
really been most stirred 

167
00:10:17,300 --> 00:10:20,300
dominating the sort of snap 
share there. 

168
00:10:21,700 --> 00:10:30,500
Moving on to another trade 
within the AFC, we had the Colts

169
00:10:30,500 --> 00:10:35,200
and bills doing a bit of a 
running back swap with the bills

170
00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:39,900
sending Zack Moss along with 
some pics over to the Colts in 

171
00:10:39,900 --> 00:10:46,400
exchange for not him Hines. 
So I think let's start with 

172
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:49,200
discussing the bills Back Field 
here, I think that's the more 

173
00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:53,000
interesting situation. 
Of how it's played out so far is

174
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:55,400
Devin. 
Singletary has taken a pretty 

175
00:10:55,400 --> 00:10:58,900
clear lead in workload, here. 
He shouted sort of the ten to 

176
00:10:58,900 --> 00:11:04,700
Fifteen expected fantasy, points
range and neither James Cook nor

177
00:11:04,900 --> 00:11:07,400
Zack Moss. 
Even really up here on this 

178
00:11:07,400 --> 00:11:11,800
chart, I don't think they even 
appear on our other snap charts 

179
00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:14,900
so it really had been Devon 
Singletary, taking full control 

180
00:11:15,100 --> 00:11:18,700
over this backfield. 
How do you see it now with 

181
00:11:18,700 --> 00:11:20,500
Singletary? 
Cook. 

182
00:11:20,500 --> 00:11:23,000
And hi. 
Heinz, join the mix. 

183
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:26,100
How do you think this vacuole? 
Is going to shake out the rest 

184
00:11:26,100 --> 00:11:32,900
of the way so and I think it's a
little bit similar in that 

185
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:35,500
Singletary. 
Had like just taking this down 

186
00:11:35,500 --> 00:11:39,800
and grab of the backfield 
because at particularly Zack 

187
00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:44,200
moss on the performed and now 
you're bringing in somebody who 

188
00:11:44,700 --> 00:11:48,900
is unlikely to underperform to 
that same degree. 

189
00:11:49,300 --> 00:11:55,600
So, You just have to it's Zach. 
And he times is going to play 

190
00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:58,800
more snaps, get more 
opportunities than Zack monsters

191
00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:05,400
getting. 
And I think that he it like, 

192
00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:11,100
it's pretty clear that Hans was 
brought in to be the kind of 

193
00:12:11,100 --> 00:12:14,100
like receiving back and that 
they've been looking for a 

194
00:12:14,100 --> 00:12:19,200
receiving back, the compliment 
Singletary for quite a while and

195
00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:26,400
looking pretty hard. 
And so I think that I think that

196
00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:30,000
Heinz is probably going to play 
that role and one thing. 

197
00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:33,600
So one thing that I had to look 
at and had a look at this for a 

198
00:12:33,608 --> 00:12:36,200
couple of the running back. 
So I just use the rotor, this 

199
00:12:36,200 --> 00:12:38,700
Greener. 
Which, what's fun about the 

200
00:12:38,708 --> 00:12:42,900
screener is that you can, you 
can narrow down these static 

201
00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:45,600
expected points. 
That's the stuff like turned 

202
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:48,200
down. 
And so what I did was I actually

203
00:12:48,700 --> 00:12:55,000
at narrow down expected It's 
tutored and 4-door longer, and, 

204
00:12:55,300 --> 00:13:02,700
and on 3rd and 4th or longer. 
At the Buffalo, running backs 

205
00:13:03,100 --> 00:13:06,200
have 48 games for last eight 
games. 

206
00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:08,200
I've had just five expected 
points. 

207
00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:14,800
And so if that's if, if the, if 
it's the kind of like clear 

208
00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:19,800
passing down roll that what you 
call it Heinz is going to come 

209
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:22,100
in for. 
I don't I don't think that's 

210
00:13:22,200 --> 00:13:24,000
like that valuable for both of 
them. 

211
00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:32,400
And just because it they they're
pretty efficient. 

212
00:13:32,500 --> 00:13:36,600
So those kind of third and long 
that they don't get in those 

213
00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:40,800
situations, as often as other 
teams and then they use our 

214
00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:44,800
running backs in those situation
way less than other teams just 

215
00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:47,400
because they've got other good 
options. 

216
00:13:47,800 --> 00:13:53,000
And so it really comes down to 
how much of the are lie down 

217
00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:57,400
work. 
Can that Heinz take and I'm sure

218
00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:02,600
he can take a little bit of it, 
but am I? 

219
00:14:02,700 --> 00:14:05,800
I do think that it's still going
to be. 

220
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:08,800
I think he's definitely going to
be kind of the one, a single 

221
00:14:08,800 --> 00:14:10,100
there is still going to be the 
one. 

222
00:14:10,100 --> 00:14:13,900
A just probably not quite as 
valuable as he was in the last 

223
00:14:13,900 --> 00:14:17,800
few weeks. 
Yeah, I agree. 

224
00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:20,600
That's the most likely median 
outcome. 

225
00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:23,800
I do want to bring up with with 
Singletary. 

226
00:14:23,900 --> 00:14:26,800
I did a quick sort of look at 
fantasy points over expected. 

227
00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:31,200
Again, comparing Singletary and 
cook and and this is a small 

228
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:34,200
sample for cook, right? 
Relatively few touches. 

229
00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:39,400
But for the season Singletary is
underperforming, his expected 

230
00:14:39,400 --> 00:14:44,700
fantasy points at -1 fantasy 
points under expected per game. 

231
00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:50,400
Whereas cook, Is over performing
his role with .8 fantasy points 

232
00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:53,800
over expected per game. 
So I just wanted to bring that 

233
00:14:53,800 --> 00:14:57,300
up to point out. 
That while Singletary has 

234
00:14:58,800 --> 00:15:03,400
emerged as clearly the top back 
by percent of snaps by how the 

235
00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:05,700
coaching staff use him. 
Maybe that's sort of a trust 

236
00:15:05,700 --> 00:15:09,000
Factor Don passing downs and 
pass blocking, whatever it might

237
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:12,100
be, he's clearly emerged there 
from a staff perspective, but he

238
00:15:12,108 --> 00:15:15,400
has not emerged from an 
efficiency perspective. 

239
00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:19,700
So if I Can give one piece of a 
push back or just slight 

240
00:15:19,700 --> 00:15:23,500
disagreement. 
And so I always like to look at 

241
00:15:23,500 --> 00:15:27,400
and the expected points in terms
of one thing that is nice about 

242
00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:31,100
PFF, they give you the expected 
points for yardage and then the 

243
00:15:31,100 --> 00:15:35,500
expected points from it. 
Touchdowns and so, one of the 

244
00:15:35,500 --> 00:15:39,900
big reasons that Singletary has 
a negative fantasy points over 

245
00:15:39,900 --> 00:15:43,100
expected, is because his 
expected touchdowns he showed 

246
00:15:43,100 --> 00:15:45,900
have by their models two 
touchdowns. 

247
00:15:46,300 --> 00:15:50,000
When he has that are two rushing
touchdowns, he does have a 

248
00:15:50,008 --> 00:15:53,300
receiving touchdown and what he 
has zero. 

249
00:15:53,600 --> 00:16:00,400
So that's that that is that's 
like - 12 at points and and he's

250
00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:03,800
slightly under on the receiving 
touchdowns and I guess to me 

251
00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:06,900
that's like the obviously the 
touchdowns are really important 

252
00:16:06,900 --> 00:16:13,600
but that's like the most 
volatile hard to roll, forward 

253
00:16:13,600 --> 00:16:16,000
project forward, part of the 
expected. 

254
00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:18,600
Points. 
Sure, or over expected. 

255
00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:26,600
And so I guess and I see if he's
over his expected, receiving 

256
00:16:26,600 --> 00:16:34,600
yards and buy a decent amount. 
So he actually not maybe not 

257
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:37,900
decent, he has 323 rushing 
yards. 

258
00:16:38,100 --> 00:16:45,300
Where is he should have expected
205 rushing yards and Yeah. 

259
00:16:45,900 --> 00:16:47,800
Now that a good way to look at 
it. 

260
00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:51,800
Yeah that's that's very pushed 
back and I guess other point is 

261
00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:54,600
it's oh yeah I see that a large 
part of his under expectation is

262
00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:57,700
do two touchdowns. 
I also do think though that we 

263
00:16:57,700 --> 00:17:01,400
have a lot of data so that's 
supporting the fact that Devin 

264
00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:03,900
Singletary is just not. 
He's kind of a nothing in the 

265
00:17:03,900 --> 00:17:06,200
passing game. 
He showed that last year, I 

266
00:17:06,208 --> 00:17:08,900
think it was one of the worst 
wide receiver running backs in 

267
00:17:08,900 --> 00:17:14,099
terms of yards per outrun again.
This year 0.98 yards per out. 

268
00:17:14,099 --> 00:17:17,200
Ron Singletary versus 2.79 for 
cook. 

269
00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:21,700
So, again, small sample, right? 
You know, I don't think cook 

270
00:17:21,700 --> 00:17:24,800
would maintain that on a larger 
role but I do think there is 

271
00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:29,600
something here where the bills 
want to upgrade their passing 

272
00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:32,400
down back. 
It's weird that they didn't just

273
00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:35,400
do that by giving James Cook a 
bigger role because it seems 

274
00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:40,500
like he's shown enough now on 
his snaps to deserve that. 

275
00:17:40,900 --> 00:17:45,800
But I do think there's some risk
to, to your Point you know, 

276
00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:50,200
where he started things off, 
we're Hines will get more snaps 

277
00:17:50,200 --> 00:17:53,900
and Zack Moss. 
Did I think that is the risk 

278
00:17:53,900 --> 00:17:56,800
here for Singletary? 
Where if this becomes a 

279
00:17:56,800 --> 00:18:01,200
three-man committee instead of 
just the two men, I think 

280
00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:06,000
Singletary, could sort of lose 
his, his weekly viability. 

281
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:09,100
I think he's the median outcome 
again, is that he maintains the 

282
00:18:09,100 --> 00:18:11,400
lead here. 
We've seen that last year. 

283
00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:14,900
We've seen at this, thus far 
this year, but I think Take that

284
00:18:14,900 --> 00:18:17,900
snap share again. 
If we go forward to this slide, 

285
00:18:18,300 --> 00:18:22,600
he's had a top-five role in 
terms of percent of routes and 

286
00:18:22,600 --> 00:18:24,800
Rush attempts of any running 
back in the league. 

287
00:18:25,300 --> 00:18:28,800
I have a really hard time 
believing that will hold going 

288
00:18:28,800 --> 00:18:31,100
forward. 
I'd see him more unlike the, the

289
00:18:31,100 --> 00:18:34,000
far right-hand side of this 
chart verse that, the far left 

290
00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:40,200
hand side going forward. 
So, I do think he takes a decent

291
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:43,500
hit just by, not being on the 
field. 

292
00:18:43,500 --> 00:18:48,000
Yeah. 
I mean, they've replaced that 

293
00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:52,500
they've replaced Zack Moss. 
So it probably does look closer 

294
00:18:52,500 --> 00:18:55,800
to how the split was area in 
the. 

295
00:18:55,800 --> 00:18:59,800
And I know we're still early 
season but in weeks, let's say 1

296
00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:03,300
thru tree. 
Donna has for True eight. 

297
00:19:03,700 --> 00:19:07,300
Yeah, and I think Stephanie had 
an interesting question in the 

298
00:19:07,300 --> 00:19:09,700
chat. 
Will Hines bees in the slot to 

299
00:19:09,700 --> 00:19:11,700
you. 
Think I'm always skeptical of 

300
00:19:11,700 --> 00:19:13,400
the running back being used in 
the slot. 

301
00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:16,900
I'll kind of believe. 
It when I see it, but that's 

302
00:19:16,900 --> 00:19:18,900
something I'm going to closely 
watch next week. 

303
00:19:18,900 --> 00:19:22,500
Does Hines, get some slots 
that's at the expense of Isaiah 

304
00:19:22,500 --> 00:19:24,700
Mackenzie. 
I think Mackenzie is sort of had

305
00:19:24,700 --> 00:19:29,800
some bad plays, just fumbles 
drops that sort of thing the 

306
00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:33,500
past couple weeks. 
So maybe maybe there's a chance 

307
00:19:33,500 --> 00:19:35,600
that Heinz gets involved there 
in the slot. 

308
00:19:35,600 --> 00:19:37,800
But again, with these running 
backs, be used as a wide 

309
00:19:37,800 --> 00:19:40,200
receiver. 
I want to see it before. 

310
00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:42,700
I really buy into that. 
Are you on the same page there? 

311
00:19:42,700 --> 00:19:44,700
And you think yeah, yeah. 
I am. 

312
00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:47,600
Yeah, you know, like it's always
one. 

313
00:19:47,600 --> 00:19:51,800
It's one of those things that's 
always easy to like Envision and

314
00:19:52,100 --> 00:19:56,000
at have an idea in your head up,
like them using this Dynamic 

315
00:19:56,000 --> 00:20:01,500
playmaker in that way. 
But teams just seemed hesitant 

316
00:20:01,500 --> 00:20:05,800
to give their running back 
significant receiving steps. 

317
00:20:06,600 --> 00:20:09,800
Yeah, yeah. 
It's it's very, it's very rare 

318
00:20:09,800 --> 00:20:12,800
that we see that sort of 
narrative work out. 

319
00:20:13,100 --> 00:20:17,300
Who knows with Buffalo. 
It will definitely track that 

320
00:20:17,900 --> 00:20:21,500
going forward. 
I think the final thing I guess 

321
00:20:21,500 --> 00:20:26,000
were to hit on AFC running backs
here, I do you think this this 

322
00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:29,500
situation has gone a bit under 
the radar, compared to the other

323
00:20:29,500 --> 00:20:32,300
teams, the Colt. 
Let's talk about the Colts so 

324
00:20:32,300 --> 00:20:35,800
they lose nine him Hines. 
I also think Jonathan Taylor 

325
00:20:35,800 --> 00:20:39,400
suffered a bit of a setback in 
the game with his ankle injury. 

326
00:20:39,700 --> 00:20:42,300
It's not clear if that's going 
to keep him out, I think he 

327
00:20:42,300 --> 00:20:44,200
taped it off and continue 
playing. 

328
00:20:44,400 --> 00:20:45,800
Yeah. 
But you know, we saw that was 

329
00:20:45,800 --> 00:20:48,700
equal two weeks ago, right? 
Where he suffered in game 

330
00:20:48,700 --> 00:20:51,900
injury, he finished the game and
then was out the next week 

331
00:20:51,900 --> 00:20:53,400
because of that in-game injury, 
right? 

332
00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:55,700
So I'm the adrenaline for these 
guys and they return to the 

333
00:20:55,700 --> 00:20:57,500
game, then this can still be 
out. 

334
00:20:57,900 --> 00:21:00,700
So, we'll see you on Taylor but 
I'm interested in the the 

335
00:21:00,700 --> 00:21:05,900
running back to situation now in
Indianapolis with, with Taylor 

336
00:21:05,900 --> 00:21:10,500
potentially injured or limited 
going forward, we have Zack Moss

337
00:21:10,500 --> 00:21:13,900
coming in. 
We have Deon Jackson Who flashed

338
00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:18,400
Big receiving upside in his one 
game as a stop a spot starter. 

339
00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:21,800
Think we still have Phillip 
Lindsay in the mix as well. 

340
00:21:22,200 --> 00:21:26,300
Are there any of these Colts 
running backs that you're 

341
00:21:26,300 --> 00:21:30,900
interested in going forward as 
the rb2 and in the app and 

342
00:21:30,900 --> 00:21:35,600
Indianapolis? 
And I think it probably is Deon 

343
00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:38,300
Jackson right where they've 
traded away. 

344
00:21:38,500 --> 00:21:44,400
And In Hinds and they've traded 
for Zack Moss. 

345
00:21:44,700 --> 00:21:50,000
But if I'm being honest, I will 
find it whatever way I can, I 

346
00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:53,400
can use and leverage the fade 
Zack Moss. 

347
00:21:53,900 --> 00:21:57,600
I'm gonna, I'm gonna push that 
foot in every time like for as 

348
00:21:57,600 --> 00:22:00,600
long as he's in the NFL, I'm 
going to look for ways of that 

349
00:22:00,600 --> 00:22:06,800
against him flying. 
Yeah, he's really not, not very 

350
00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:09,600
good. 
I think that's yeah, I'm in the 

351
00:22:09,600 --> 00:22:12,700
same boat, like we saw a little 
bit of upside for Deon Jackson. 

352
00:22:13,100 --> 00:22:16,700
Aye, I think the Zack Moss thing
was just a throw-in in the deal.

353
00:22:16,900 --> 00:22:19,100
I don't have the Colts, you 
know, we're going out of their 

354
00:22:19,100 --> 00:22:22,000
way to get sack Moss. 
It was maybe something to make 

355
00:22:22,000 --> 00:22:27,500
the salaries work, I don't know.
But yeah, I like Deon Jackson. 

356
00:22:27,600 --> 00:22:30,100
And yeah, I this is a good thing
to bring up JT's. 

357
00:22:30,100 --> 00:22:33,200
Ankle look pretty swollen. 
Yeah, he after that. 

358
00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:36,100
Injury. 
He doesn't look quite right out 

359
00:22:36,100 --> 00:22:38,600
there and you just start to 
wonder. 

360
00:22:38,900 --> 00:22:41,900
It's looking like a Lost season 
for the colds, they're trading 

361
00:22:41,900 --> 00:22:45,700
away, you know, they're bringing
in Sam ehlinger at quarterback, 

362
00:22:45,700 --> 00:22:49,200
the trading away, not him Hines,
like, you have to wonder if 

363
00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:53,700
they're going to be cautious 
with JT on sort of a Lost season

364
00:22:53,700 --> 00:22:56,800
where maybe they're even 
outwardly tanking to some 

365
00:22:56,800 --> 00:23:00,900
extent. 
So, I'm pretty interested in 

366
00:23:00,900 --> 00:23:02,600
Deon Jackson. 
I think he's probably available 

367
00:23:02,600 --> 00:23:06,300
in a lot of leagues. 
Eggs, and I'll be making some 

368
00:23:06,300 --> 00:23:08,800
some bids for him where he's 
available. 

369
00:23:11,100 --> 00:23:13,000
All right. 
I mean, I'm sure. 

370
00:23:13,500 --> 00:23:16,000
Yeah. 
Okay. 

371
00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:20,700
That was hitting on all the 
trades in the AFC. 

372
00:23:20,800 --> 00:23:22,800
I don't think we covered the one
we did in corporate. 

373
00:23:22,800 --> 00:23:26,100
Was that we did not cover. 
Chase Edmunds. 

374
00:23:27,300 --> 00:23:28,600
Good point. 
Chase Edmunds. 

375
00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:29,800
The Broncos? 
Yep. 

376
00:23:32,100 --> 00:23:38,600
Yeah, I had some thoughts on it 
and so the the Broncos coaching 

377
00:23:38,600 --> 00:23:42,900
staff, they've said that the 
tape Is Marie and Melvin Gordon.

378
00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:48,000
Are you going to be the 1A 1B 
and early down starters? 

379
00:23:48,400 --> 00:23:52,400
And they brought in Chase 
Edmunds to be the the layer that

380
00:23:52,700 --> 00:23:57,700
the turd down back. 
And so actually this is why this

381
00:23:57,700 --> 00:24:02,100
is the first reason that I had 
my look at a which teams use our

382
00:24:02,100 --> 00:24:08,200
running backs entered for or 
longer and and so there's a 

383
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:13,400
Broncos actually 9th and And the
percentage of expected points 

384
00:24:13,700 --> 00:24:18,800
going to running backs on 3rd 
and 4th or longer and they've 

385
00:24:18,800 --> 00:24:23,000
actually generated among the 
highest amount of points for for

386
00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:24,800
backs are. 
So they expected points for 

387
00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:30,200
backs in that situation. 
But the problem is that, that is

388
00:24:30,200 --> 00:24:36,600
still a mending to only tree 
expected points per game and so 

389
00:24:36,800 --> 00:24:41,500
to be fantasy viable. 
And in that, Roll. 

390
00:24:41,700 --> 00:24:45,800
You either need to be able to be
really good, really efficient, 

391
00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:50,100
or you also need to be able to 
crack the area or down work. 

392
00:24:50,700 --> 00:24:54,700
And I think that given what 
we've just seen from Chase 

393
00:24:54,700 --> 00:25:00,500
Edmunds and the, it's neither of
those things look too likely. 

394
00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:06,600
And so I think for me I'm not 
too interested especially given 

395
00:25:06,900 --> 00:25:11,100
the that's the Broncos. 
And the offense is not Nothing 

396
00:25:11,100 --> 00:25:14,800
good and and you have the two 
running backs to? 

397
00:25:16,100 --> 00:25:20,600
Yeah, I agree. 
It's not a situation that jumps 

398
00:25:20,600 --> 00:25:25,800
out to me as interesting. 
Look, I mean, we assume a bunch 

399
00:25:25,800 --> 00:25:30,100
of our listeners play in these 
super deep leaves long benches. 

400
00:25:30,100 --> 00:25:34,800
Like I think Edmonds is 
certainly worth a roster spot if

401
00:25:34,800 --> 00:25:38,900
he got dropped by somebody, you 
know, I don't think he's the 

402
00:25:38,900 --> 00:25:43,000
worst end of your bench. 
Liar, just because I think 

403
00:25:43,000 --> 00:25:46,500
Gordon has been really bad. 
I know people have talked about 

404
00:25:46,500 --> 00:25:49,500
how bad Edmonds has been, but 
Gordon has had major fumbling 

405
00:25:49,500 --> 00:25:51,500
issue. 
They've seen the team just 

406
00:25:51,500 --> 00:25:54,800
outright bench him for off the 
street latavius Murray. 

407
00:25:54,900 --> 00:25:59,200
He's at almost - to fantasy 
points under expected per game 

408
00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:05,600
so far this year, like, I don't 
think we're that far away from 

409
00:26:05,600 --> 00:26:09,700
him being a healthy scratch. 
And maybe I think what Edmonds 

410
00:26:09,700 --> 00:26:13,900
biggest strength was it. 
At least in Arizona seem to be 

411
00:26:13,900 --> 00:26:17,100
his past catching ability and 
maybe that part of his game 

412
00:26:17,100 --> 00:26:20,600
which is completely muted by the
fact that the Dolphins don't 

413
00:26:20,600 --> 00:26:22,900
really use running backs and 
their passing game and they have

414
00:26:22,900 --> 00:26:24,200
Tyree kill him. 
Jill and waddle. 

415
00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,600
So maybe Edmonds can do some of 
the receiving stuff we saw out 

416
00:26:27,600 --> 00:26:31,700
of Javonte earlier this year. 
But again, I'm just sort of 

417
00:26:31,700 --> 00:26:34,500
trying to make a case for him. 
I guess, if you're, if you were 

418
00:26:34,500 --> 00:26:38,300
to force me to say, you can pick
one Denver, Broncos, running 

419
00:26:38,300 --> 00:26:40,700
back to stash on your bench 
right now. 

420
00:26:40,700 --> 00:26:44,900
I I think I would pick Edmonds 
just because it's the highest 

421
00:26:44,900 --> 00:26:47,300
upside play. 
But the floor is really low. 

422
00:26:47,300 --> 00:26:49,400
Like, you're not starting him 
over all. 

423
00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:56,800
I'm like, not, not that excited.
Yeah, makes sense. 

424
00:26:57,000 --> 00:26:59,300
And I do think it's worth 
pointing out as well. 

425
00:26:59,300 --> 00:27:02,600
Got a Miami, they do really 
have. 

426
00:27:02,600 --> 00:27:09,300
This is a low total pie expected
points for running backs or at 

427
00:27:09,300 --> 00:27:13,500
least so far this year and 
whereas Denver have been a good 

428
00:27:13,500 --> 00:27:18,100
bit higher than that. 
And so in terms of like 

429
00:27:18,100 --> 00:27:21,700
expected, it's probably a better
expected points environment. 

430
00:27:21,900 --> 00:27:23,000
Yeah. 
That Miami. 

431
00:27:23,300 --> 00:27:31,000
And probably, I guess what you 
call it worse at competition or 

432
00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:34,700
better competition for if you 
want to bet against them. 

433
00:27:35,400 --> 00:27:43,700
And And I guess it is still one 
where and I'm pretty wary of, 

434
00:27:43,700 --> 00:27:48,900
but yeah. 
Maybe on a deeper bench. 

435
00:27:49,900 --> 00:27:52,600
He, he does deserve to be 
trusted. 

436
00:27:53,000 --> 00:27:56,900
Yeah, I think like if you know 
if I chase them into my team I'm

437
00:27:56,900 --> 00:28:00,200
I'm more excited than I was 
about it in Miami right because 

438
00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:02,900
he was toast. 
Yeah, he was done in my he was 

439
00:28:02,900 --> 00:28:07,000
done in Miami barring injury. 
Now I think he has like a some 

440
00:28:07,000 --> 00:28:09,700
path to Fantasy relevance even 
without injury. 

441
00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:13,100
And if that back heel goes down 
to two running backs, like, you 

442
00:28:13,100 --> 00:28:15,500
know, people have been hating on
the Broncos but it's still a 

443
00:28:15,500 --> 00:28:19,400
team that is Lying a decent pie 
of total fantasy workload. 

444
00:28:19,400 --> 00:28:23,500
To the running back position, so
it's yeah, it's just like, it's 

445
00:28:23,500 --> 00:28:26,400
a slight wind for admins but not
like something. 

446
00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:32,000
I'm celebrating. 
If I have him on my team, okay, 

447
00:28:32,300 --> 00:28:35,700
they traded them away. 
Would you say he was so bad? 

448
00:28:35,700 --> 00:28:37,000
They were happy to get rid of 
them? 

449
00:28:37,000 --> 00:28:39,700
Yeah, he was, he was really bad 
but a lot of the, the advanced 

450
00:28:39,700 --> 00:28:45,100
metrics he which I don't have up
right now, but I've heard cited 

451
00:28:45,100 --> 00:28:48,000
multiple times just how he's Art
of ranks as one of the worst 

452
00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:50,400
running backs in the league, 
across a ton of rushing 

453
00:28:50,400 --> 00:28:52,100
receiving metrics at the 
position. 

454
00:28:52,100 --> 00:28:57,100
So not somebody we should have 
too much faith in the other 

455
00:28:57,100 --> 00:28:59,200
running back and they say I want
to hit on. 

456
00:28:59,200 --> 00:29:03,900
Before we go on to the NFC was 
Ramon, Dre. 

457
00:29:03,900 --> 00:29:08,900
I think it's notable now that 
we've had two weeks of Damien, 

458
00:29:08,900 --> 00:29:14,400
Harris, being active and Ramon 
Dre has remained in sort of this

459
00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:21,700
near Workhorse roll. 
Or again he out snaps Damien 

460
00:29:21,700 --> 00:29:24,900
Harris, quite significantly in 
week eight. 

461
00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:32,800
He had 49 snaps to Harris's 3125
routes Terraces 17, you know, so

462
00:29:32,800 --> 00:29:36,100
on and so forth. 
Seven targets for to freres. 16 

463
00:29:36,100 --> 00:29:39,900
carries first, 11 for Harris. 
So yes, here it is. 

464
00:29:40,000 --> 00:29:44,200
Harris is getting more workload 
than the Pierre strong. 

465
00:29:44,200 --> 00:29:48,200
Kevin Harris guys were getting 
But it's really exciting to see 

466
00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:50,900
your Madre. 
Hang on to this one, a role with

467
00:29:50,900 --> 00:29:54,800
the passing down work in this 
offense. 

468
00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:58,800
So wanted to bring that up and 
any thoughts on honor Madre, or 

469
00:29:59,300 --> 00:30:00,800
any other guys you want to talk 
about here? 

470
00:30:02,200 --> 00:30:05,700
And not really definitely agree,
exciting. 

471
00:30:05,700 --> 00:30:09,400
The Sierra Madre, get this 
stronger workload. 

472
00:30:09,700 --> 00:30:14,700
And I will say, I'm a little bit
surprised that he's that dusting

473
00:30:14,700 --> 00:30:20,000
Damien, Hirst, this sad this 
hard given that Damon Harris has

474
00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:24,500
just been a good NFL player. 
And so I there is a part of me 

475
00:30:24,500 --> 00:30:27,100
that wonders. 
If there is some kind of 

476
00:30:27,100 --> 00:30:29,600
niggling injury for Damien 
Harris and as the season goes 

477
00:30:29,600 --> 00:30:35,400
on, it goes back to 50 split and
but having said that I've got 

478
00:30:35,400 --> 00:30:38,600
I've definitely got a ton of 
room Andre and been super 

479
00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:41,800
excited to see ya, how well he's
been playing. 

480
00:30:43,700 --> 00:30:46,100
Agreed. 
All right, let's move on. 

481
00:30:46,100 --> 00:30:53,300
Then to to the NFC version of 
this chart, and again, let me 

482
00:30:53,300 --> 00:30:55,600
quickly check my notes, are 
there any running backs? 

483
00:30:55,600 --> 00:30:59,900
And then if I guess the 49ers 
situation, we can talk about 

484
00:30:59,900 --> 00:31:04,000
because Jeff Wilson departed. 
I thought tweetdeck that you 

485
00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:08,300
should you should pick up CMC 
and start him with confidence in

486
00:31:08,300 --> 00:31:10,100
every day. 
Yeah, yeah. 

487
00:31:10,100 --> 00:31:12,200
For all those leagues, where 
people dropped. 

488
00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:14,800
You know, I dropped Christmas. 
Traffic Christian McCaffrey in 

489
00:31:14,800 --> 00:31:17,800
my leagues after you only got 10
carries in its first week. 

490
00:31:17,800 --> 00:31:20,500
The San Francisco I thought it 
was I thought it was droppable 

491
00:31:20,500 --> 00:31:24,600
so you should pick him back up 
in those type of leagues. 

492
00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:27,600
You're forwarding a five dollar 
five did. 

493
00:31:27,800 --> 00:31:32,900
Yeah. 
And your for team, you're 14 

494
00:31:32,900 --> 00:31:34,300
leagues. 
He's definitely worth the pick 

495
00:31:34,300 --> 00:31:38,800
up now but I do think that like 
again, this this show is kind of

496
00:31:38,800 --> 00:31:42,800
catered towards deeper leagues. 
I think we should talk about the

497
00:31:42,800 --> 00:31:47,300
San Running back to situation 
because you know we know San 

498
00:31:47,300 --> 00:31:49,500
Francisco there looked like a 
pretty good team that's an 

499
00:31:49,500 --> 00:31:53,200
offense that were McCaffrey to 
go down you would definitely 

500
00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:56,400
want a piece of that backfield. 
Do you have thoughts? 

501
00:31:56,400 --> 00:31:58,200
They're sort of a bunch of guys 
to talk about here. 

502
00:31:58,200 --> 00:32:02,100
You li Mitchell is may be back 
at some point TDP. 

503
00:32:02,300 --> 00:32:04,700
I think it's either been healthy
scratch or not really playing 

504
00:32:04,700 --> 00:32:07,300
much. 
I don't know who else is still 

505
00:32:07,300 --> 00:32:09,000
there. 
They signed a bunch of guys, the

506
00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:11,100
practice squad. 
Do you have thoughts on how to 

507
00:32:11,100 --> 00:32:15,800
play the SF? 
going back to situation on the 

508
00:32:15,800 --> 00:32:24,800
waiver wire this week and I mean
I guess if somebody drops a 

509
00:32:24,800 --> 00:32:30,000
larger Mitchell definitely work 
and definitely weren't rostering

510
00:32:30,700 --> 00:32:37,600
and outside of that, it's a 
tricky one because CMC for 

511
00:32:37,600 --> 00:32:41,900
Carolina for so many years when 
he's healthy is just T. 

512
00:32:41,900 --> 00:32:46,000
So good, that he counts for this
massive share of the ring back 

513
00:32:46,000 --> 00:32:49,400
work. 
And like you, if he's on your 

514
00:32:49,400 --> 00:32:51,600
team, you want to use them on 
the go along. 

515
00:32:51,600 --> 00:32:56,300
You want him using it as a, 
receiving back and it it's kind 

516
00:32:56,300 --> 00:32:59,500
of hard to see a lot of value 
left over. 

517
00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:05,000
And, and so then you're left 
with pure contingency. 

518
00:33:06,000 --> 00:33:10,900
Ace. 
And the problem with, for me at 

519
00:33:10,900 --> 00:33:13,800
least would have contingency 
playing the situation is okay. 

520
00:33:13,800 --> 00:33:17,100
Well, first you have to rewrite 
that Christian McCaffrey go 

521
00:33:17,100 --> 00:33:21,100
down, and then you have to be 
right about which player to use.

522
00:33:21,600 --> 00:33:26,600
And in my mind, with some, what 
the kind of caliber of, some of 

523
00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:31,600
these guys are not being, I get 
the pedigree, isn't that high? 

524
00:33:31,900 --> 00:33:37,000
And so This would be a Back 
Field where I would expect if 

525
00:33:37,000 --> 00:33:40,300
CMC goes down with the exception
of a larger Mitchell then a 

526
00:33:40,308 --> 00:33:46,900
larger mesh up becomes probably 
those become and the and the 

527
00:33:46,900 --> 00:33:53,700
clear starter and but yeah 
outside of that likey even if 

528
00:33:53,700 --> 00:33:59,400
the the Red Sea opens up for TDP
it does feel like to me that 

529
00:33:59,400 --> 00:34:03,100
they're just bringing in this 
clown car of like practice squad

530
00:34:03,100 --> 00:34:06,300
room. earning backs, and it's 
going to be at reform on 

531
00:34:06,300 --> 00:34:09,199
committee and I know there's no 
such thing as a for my 

532
00:34:09,199 --> 00:34:14,400
community, but at it's still 
hard for me to see even in that 

533
00:34:14,400 --> 00:34:19,000
situation of there being enough 
Yeah I agree. 

534
00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:25,000
I think maybe you know, one to 
ten dollar bids on TDP is fine. 

535
00:34:25,000 --> 00:34:28,100
This week if a if a larger 
Mitchell was dropped, nearly guy

536
00:34:28,100 --> 00:34:32,699
think he is a priority. 
Add I just saw this report, you 

537
00:34:32,699 --> 00:34:35,699
know, I haven't looked into it a
ton but apparently according to 

538
00:34:35,699 --> 00:34:39,800
CBS, he is aiming to play in 
week 10. 

539
00:34:40,199 --> 00:34:45,400
So that's only a few more weeks,
I guess one more week without 

540
00:34:45,400 --> 00:34:47,400
integral. 
So that's interesting too. 

541
00:34:47,600 --> 00:34:50,400
Me. 
I think I would be you know in 

542
00:34:50,400 --> 00:34:54,600
the hundred fish range out of 
1,000 budget for Eli Mitchell 

543
00:34:54,600 --> 00:34:58,900
just because I think there could
be some Standalone value. 

544
00:34:58,900 --> 00:35:02,400
If you're really desperate like 
he's not someone you want to 

545
00:35:02,408 --> 00:35:06,900
start but I think they could you
know just just look at the snaps

546
00:35:06,900 --> 00:35:10,900
from this week. 
They did have I think 20% of the

547
00:35:10,908 --> 00:35:13,300
snaps they had two running backs
on the field. 

548
00:35:13,300 --> 00:35:16,300
If I'm doing the math correctly,
out of a total of 53, snaps 

549
00:35:16,300 --> 00:35:20,000
McCaffrey got B3, Jeff Wilson 
got 19. 

550
00:35:20,100 --> 00:35:24,600
So that's a decent overlap of 
both those guys in the same 

551
00:35:24,600 --> 00:35:28,600
field. 
Anyways, we're getting in really

552
00:35:28,600 --> 00:35:31,800
into the weeds here, but I think
Mitchell just be mostly. 

553
00:35:31,800 --> 00:35:34,100
Because the condition upside, I 
agree with the most your point 

554
00:35:34,100 --> 00:35:36,600
that it's basically a contingent
upside play. 

555
00:35:36,900 --> 00:35:41,500
I think he's sort of a priority,
add off the waiver wire just 

556
00:35:41,500 --> 00:35:43,600
because of how they've used them
in the past, I think he's 

557
00:35:43,600 --> 00:35:47,400
talented and yeah, I think this 
is a good point. 

558
00:35:47,600 --> 00:35:50,200
By historical anomalies that it 
makes sense. 

559
00:35:50,200 --> 00:35:53,000
That if they traded Wilson, they
think Mitchell is closed. 

560
00:35:53,900 --> 00:35:56,400
I kind of agree with that. 
That logic that I think the 

561
00:35:56,400 --> 00:35:59,600
49ers value the running back 
depth and they probably wouldn't

562
00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:01,900
have shipped off Wilson. 
If they thought Mitchell was 

563
00:36:01,900 --> 00:36:05,000
still months from from 
returning. 

564
00:36:06,200 --> 00:36:07,500
Yeah. 
I think that makes sense for 

565
00:36:07,500 --> 00:36:16,500
sure and Yeah, I and I guess it 
does make sense to have some 

566
00:36:16,500 --> 00:36:22,400
value on a contingent play like 
that, where we know that absent 

567
00:36:22,400 --> 00:36:26,500
CMC, he Elijah Mitchell would be
the Workhorse. 

568
00:36:27,300 --> 00:36:31,200
Like there's very few situations
in finding and, and fantasy 

569
00:36:31,200 --> 00:36:36,400
football or the NFL where, you 
know, that this guy is the 

570
00:36:36,400 --> 00:36:43,600
Workhorse. 
If the sr2 goes down, but it 

571
00:36:43,600 --> 00:36:48,000
does seem like to me that it is 
kind of like a pure Cure 

572
00:36:48,000 --> 00:36:52,000
handcuffed yeah it's yeah I 
think it's one of the best. 

573
00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:54,700
It would be one of the best 
handcuffs that I can think of 

574
00:36:54,700 --> 00:36:56,100
right now. 
Outside of, you know, the super 

575
00:36:56,100 --> 00:37:00,600
obvious mass and Pollard agent 
Dylan, you know, those type of 

576
00:37:00,600 --> 00:37:05,100
guys I think I think Mitchell 
joins that tier of elite elite 

577
00:37:05,100 --> 00:37:10,600
handcuffed once he comes back 
and to be honest, people were 

578
00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:14,000
drafting those guys like 
early-ish. 

579
00:37:14,300 --> 00:37:19,900
Like maybe maybe not, I in some 
cases, I am like Tony Pollard. 

580
00:37:19,900 --> 00:37:23,300
I think was expected to have a 
sound of on Roll, whereas 

581
00:37:24,800 --> 00:37:30,500
Alexander Madison was drafted. 
Earley enough just on pure 

582
00:37:30,700 --> 00:37:35,500
handcuff value. 
So getting him for fob is 

583
00:37:35,500 --> 00:37:40,000
definitely good and you don't 
really want to drop them unless 

584
00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:43,300
you're absolutely desperate. 
But I don't, I don't think you 

585
00:37:43,300 --> 00:37:47,200
really want to drop them. 
No, but I definitely saw 

586
00:37:47,500 --> 00:37:49,000
Double-check our statue Racing 
League. 

587
00:37:49,000 --> 00:37:51,200
I feel like I saw him dropped 
that. 

588
00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:53,400
I've definitely seen him drop in
some other leagues. 

589
00:37:54,500 --> 00:37:57,100
So anyways that's definitely I'm
double checking on that 

590
00:37:57,100 --> 00:38:02,200
situation and all my leagues. 
If you lie, what Eli Mitchell is

591
00:38:02,200 --> 00:38:08,800
out there, Connor moving on from
the 49ers, I think with Ronnie 

592
00:38:08,800 --> 00:38:11,900
Rivers showing up in the chart 
for the first time it's 

593
00:38:11,900 --> 00:38:16,100
appropriate we talk about the 
Rams clusterfuck at running 

594
00:38:16,100 --> 00:38:20,100
back. 
I think Ronnie Rivers actually 

595
00:38:20,100 --> 00:38:26,200
led the team in carries this 
past week and let me pull this 

596
00:38:26,200 --> 00:38:27,500
up, just double check. 
Yes. 

597
00:38:28,400 --> 00:38:32,000
Ronnie Rivers, led, the team in 
carries with eight Henderson, 

598
00:38:32,000 --> 00:38:35,500
still slightly out, snapped him,
24 to 21. 

599
00:38:35,700 --> 00:38:38,400
Malcolm Brown also mixed in with
13 snap. 

600
00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:42,600
So this was really like a true 
three-man committee. 

601
00:38:42,600 --> 00:38:44,300
I don't know how cool sick 
right. 

602
00:38:45,000 --> 00:38:47,300
Yeah. 
It's I think he had like about 

603
00:38:47,300 --> 00:38:51,000
like flew in over 700 did. 
Yeah. 

604
00:38:51,900 --> 00:38:57,300
Okay I miss that regardless. 
I think like we've seen this a 

605
00:38:57,300 --> 00:39:01,300
lot with Henderson this year 
where he leads the team in snaps

606
00:39:01,800 --> 00:39:05,700
and just doesn't really do shit.
Like I guess with we're you 

607
00:39:05,707 --> 00:39:11,300
drafted him, he's been okay. 
But I don't know I don't know 

608
00:39:11,300 --> 00:39:14,600
what it is like, is it a symptom
of the Rams offense just being 

609
00:39:14,800 --> 00:39:17,500
Look in that they can't really 
generate any points at running 

610
00:39:17,500 --> 00:39:22,100
back is Henderson. 
Just I made this comp last week 

611
00:39:22,100 --> 00:39:25,400
when I saw him was on the show 
that Henderson's almost playing 

612
00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:29,800
like that Daria Goomba male role
from the box, you know, from 

613
00:39:29,800 --> 00:39:31,800
four or five years ago, that of 
a deep cut. 

614
00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:35,300
But basically like a past 
catching back that runs all the 

615
00:39:35,300 --> 00:39:38,300
routes, but doesn't get targeted
and like, doesn't really get 

616
00:39:38,300 --> 00:39:41,300
carries. 
It's just weird like high snap 

617
00:39:41,300 --> 00:39:44,600
chair, but terrible like Fantasy
Point. 

618
00:39:44,700 --> 00:39:48,700
Usage roll. 
Anyways, I'm sort of stumbling 

619
00:39:48,700 --> 00:39:52,300
around here, but do you have any
read on this Rams backfield or 

620
00:39:52,300 --> 00:39:54,500
any way to attack it going 
forward? 

621
00:39:54,500 --> 00:39:57,300
It just seems like a lost cause 
to me at this point. 

622
00:39:58,600 --> 00:40:07,400
And yeah, I I largely agree and 
I do think that maybe when him 

623
00:40:07,400 --> 00:40:12,100
there are Henderson, maybe maybe
on a week where he, he's not 

624
00:40:12,300 --> 00:40:17,000
sick in the lead-up, maybe there
is still something there and but

625
00:40:17,400 --> 00:40:22,200
it is still such a yellow. 
It's kind of a nightmare 

626
00:40:22,200 --> 00:40:26,300
situation for Fantasy Football, 
where they don't give this high 

627
00:40:26,500 --> 00:40:29,300
percentage of expected. 
It's two running backs in the 

628
00:40:29,300 --> 00:40:34,200
first place and except for going
on calories and they haven't 

629
00:40:34,200 --> 00:40:40,200
been getting their doubt often 
and them if they're, if it's 

630
00:40:40,200 --> 00:40:45,300
going to be little it, I mean 
even even them. 

631
00:40:48,300 --> 00:40:52,600
How do I say this? 
even if it's getting split up in

632
00:40:52,600 --> 00:40:58,000
in, in When he if it's still 
getting split up like that when 

633
00:40:58,000 --> 00:40:59,500
he's not sick. 
Yeah. 

634
00:40:59,500 --> 00:41:04,900
And it's, there's better. 
This better fishing territory, I

635
00:41:04,900 --> 00:41:06,300
guess. 
Yeah. 

636
00:41:07,200 --> 00:41:11,300
Yeah, I agree. 
And again, we're now looking 

637
00:41:11,300 --> 00:41:13,700
moving on for those following 
Along on video. 

638
00:41:14,500 --> 00:41:18,400
We're now looking at the running
back snaps and usage chart just 

639
00:41:18,400 --> 00:41:20,400
quickly quickly want to pull 
that up to make the phone with 

640
00:41:20,400 --> 00:41:23,600
Henderson that I don't know what
you, I mean to come up with a 

641
00:41:23,607 --> 00:41:25,700
term for this type of role. 
It's kind of similar to 

642
00:41:25,700 --> 00:41:30,600
Singletary where they have high 
routes and Russia Thames 

643
00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:34,800
percent, but it's mostly routes 
and it's mostly empty routes. 

644
00:41:35,100 --> 00:41:39,600
So they're kind of Henderson and
Singletary or these unique 

645
00:41:39,600 --> 00:41:42,300
weird, sort of backs where 
they're out there for a lot of 

646
00:41:42,308 --> 00:41:45,600
snaps in theory. 
You would think they're like, 

647
00:41:45,600 --> 00:41:49,400
decent by Lowe's, but the team 
just doesn't really give any 

648
00:41:49,400 --> 00:41:51,200
points to the running back 
position. 

649
00:41:52,500 --> 00:41:54,700
And, you know, singletary's on 
the bill. 

650
00:41:54,700 --> 00:41:57,600
So he has that upside at least 
where I think he could stumble 

651
00:41:57,600 --> 00:42:00,800
into a two touchdown game just 
because he's on the bills. 

652
00:42:00,800 --> 00:42:04,800
Whereas Henderson on the rims 
broken, ol0 line right now, 

653
00:42:04,800 --> 00:42:10,300
it's, it's hard to see that 
happening for him, but anyways, 

654
00:42:10,300 --> 00:42:17,200
I think that was, that was good 
coverage of the Rams before you 

655
00:42:17,200 --> 00:42:21,400
move onto water Seaver. 
I wanted to make a couple a 

656
00:42:21,400 --> 00:42:26,600
couple Points one, I think the 
Kenneth Walker stuff is really 

657
00:42:26,600 --> 00:42:29,700
exciting again. 
He's still somewhat muted on 

658
00:42:29,700 --> 00:42:32,900
this chart. 
With only about 40% of his 

659
00:42:32,900 --> 00:42:39,600
team's route / Rush attempts but
this week, he passed the test of

660
00:42:40,000 --> 00:42:47,400
having Travis Homer wrote in 
return from ir, and he still led

661
00:42:47,400 --> 00:42:50,600
the team and staff. 
So I think even had more a 

662
00:42:50,600 --> 00:42:51,800
higher percentage of Team 
staffs. 

663
00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:54,600
Add weeks passed out of 64 
snaps. 

664
00:42:54,600 --> 00:42:58,900
He had 49 to only 14 for Homer 
52. 

665
00:42:58,900 --> 00:43:02,300
DJ at Dallas. 
He doubled up, Travis Homer and 

666
00:43:02,300 --> 00:43:05,900
routes run, doubled them up in 
targets, just two to one and 

667
00:43:05,900 --> 00:43:11,200
obviously led the team in carry.
So this Kenneth Walker role, I 

668
00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:14,600
think, is actually better than I
even expected because he's sort 

669
00:43:14,600 --> 00:43:17,800
of icing these. 
These passing down specialist 

670
00:43:17,800 --> 00:43:21,300
more and more. 
And yeah, I'll take a question 

671
00:43:21,300 --> 00:43:25,300
to you do. 
You think he is a top? 

672
00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:30,600
Top 10 running back for the rest
of season in fantasy. 

673
00:43:32,000 --> 00:43:39,100
You know I think he's a top ten.
Yeah yeah for sure top five top 

674
00:43:39,100 --> 00:43:51,700
five, let me see. 
I think he could be yeah I think

675
00:43:52,000 --> 00:44:00,600
ordering I think, in terms of 
like, if I think about running 

676
00:44:00,600 --> 00:44:05,300
backs, who could end up scoring 
a lot of touchdowns and haven't 

677
00:44:05,300 --> 00:44:08,100
massive place to get them there.
Like he's deaf. 

678
00:44:08,200 --> 00:44:14,100
He's definitely up there and 
what Yeah, it's a tough. 

679
00:44:14,100 --> 00:44:15,700
Tough five might be a little 
bit. 

680
00:44:16,400 --> 00:44:19,100
That's, that's a bit tougher to 
be confident in. 

681
00:44:19,500 --> 00:44:21,700
Yeah, I think it's tough eyes. 
May be a little aggressive just 

682
00:44:21,700 --> 00:44:25,200
because there's there's guys 
just with much higher, you know,

683
00:44:25,200 --> 00:44:27,900
projectable receiving workloads 
that, right? 

684
00:44:29,500 --> 00:44:32,000
But yeah, yeah. 
He's kind of like a Nick Chubb 

685
00:44:32,000 --> 00:44:36,600
plus role and he's kind of like 
doing the Nick Chubb thing where

686
00:44:36,600 --> 00:44:42,000
you just you know his efficiency
almost seems projectable I know.

687
00:44:42,000 --> 00:44:43,000
It's tough to say that other 
guy. 

688
00:44:43,100 --> 00:44:46,100
Guys played seven, career games,
whatever and Kenneth Walker. 

689
00:44:46,100 --> 00:44:48,900
But he's kind of almost entering
that territory for me, where I 

690
00:44:48,908 --> 00:44:52,400
think the right over performance
is somewhat projectable. 

691
00:44:53,100 --> 00:44:55,700
So I think. 
Yeah. 

692
00:44:55,700 --> 00:44:58,700
I think like maybe in the 
running back, like eight, eight 

693
00:44:58,700 --> 00:45:01,200
to 12 range of sort of how I 
would probably project him for 

694
00:45:01,200 --> 00:45:05,200
us to season, but I think he has
top five upside of some things 

695
00:45:05,200 --> 00:45:07,600
for sure. 
And I think it's been hot, it's 

696
00:45:07,600 --> 00:45:11,400
been pretty positive for him, 
because when Penny went down, we

697
00:45:11,400 --> 00:45:16,100
called them a dollar store. 
Rick job and then we're calling 

698
00:45:16,100 --> 00:45:18,700
him. 
I don't know like Target at Nick

699
00:45:18,700 --> 00:45:20,300
Chubb. 
Let's see what's where did the 

700
00:45:20,300 --> 00:45:27,200
rich people shop? 
Yeah, I don't know, department 

701
00:45:27,200 --> 00:45:30,900
store next to Apartment Store, 
Nick Chubb, Whole Foods. 

702
00:45:30,900 --> 00:45:33,300
Nick Chubb or yeah. 
That's a good one. 

703
00:45:35,300 --> 00:45:37,300
Yeah. 
Now I agree that at least and 

704
00:45:37,300 --> 00:45:40,300
and again, like to be cleared, 
I'm not calling a better Talent 

705
00:45:40,300 --> 00:45:44,000
than Nick Chubb, I think. 
Stuff to say that with 

706
00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:47,100
confidence but I'm saying that 
the role that he has right now 

707
00:45:47,100 --> 00:45:49,700
is pretty clearly better than 
chub. 

708
00:45:51,400 --> 00:45:53,300
Yeah. 
Wild that chub is not even on 

709
00:45:53,300 --> 00:45:54,500
this page. 
Yeah. 

710
00:45:54,500 --> 00:45:59,800
That that's what we're going on 
past weeks where Chubbs role is 

711
00:45:59,800 --> 00:46:05,500
just its unique right? 
In that he's still he only has 

712
00:46:05,500 --> 00:46:11,900
like 30 percent of his team's, 
you know, 30% routes and Russia 

713
00:46:11,900 --> 00:46:14,200
temps as a percentage. 
His team plays. 

714
00:46:14,200 --> 00:46:16,800
But when he's on the field, he's
getting the ball like probably 

715
00:46:16,800 --> 00:46:20,300
every time he's out there close 
to it so it's slightly 

716
00:46:20,300 --> 00:46:26,400
misleading but I didn't the 
first week where he's not on the

717
00:46:26,400 --> 00:46:29,700
front page, right? 
He wasn't he wasn't last week 

718
00:46:29,700 --> 00:46:36,600
either the way you missed. 
But yeah, it's also because His 

719
00:46:36,600 --> 00:46:39,700
role as I think. 
So, I'm now showing this at just

720
00:46:39,700 --> 00:46:42,400
weeks five through eight. 
I think you had a couple weeks 

721
00:46:42,400 --> 00:46:46,200
to start the year where his role
as a bit stronger because 

722
00:46:46,200 --> 00:46:47,700
they're in positive game 
scripts. 

723
00:46:49,200 --> 00:46:55,500
So anyways, any other running 
back points, you wanted to hit 

724
00:46:55,500 --> 00:47:00,000
on Connor, I think we can can 
move on to wide receiver if not 

725
00:47:01,300 --> 00:47:06,600
And I think it's interesting 
looking at this stat where James

726
00:47:06,600 --> 00:47:13,500
Conner is following in where 
yeah, he's been mostly a root 

727
00:47:13,500 --> 00:47:18,700
only player and the the rush 
attempts is super though. 

728
00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:21,600
That's probably because of the 
game script and stuff like that 

729
00:47:21,600 --> 00:47:23,300
but still, that's so 
interesting. 

730
00:47:23,900 --> 00:47:27,100
Yeah, I think that that one is 
maybe a little misleading to 

731
00:47:27,100 --> 00:47:29,700
because so this is weeks five 
through eight. 

732
00:47:29,700 --> 00:47:32,500
I'm guessing one of those games.
This is when he went out early 

733
00:47:32,500 --> 00:47:36,200
for injury but regardless the 
jams Connor role has just not 

734
00:47:36,200 --> 00:47:39,400
been, you know, even excluding 
that the James Conner role is 

735
00:47:39,400 --> 00:47:44,200
not been as strong as expected. 
He took, you're getting a lot of

736
00:47:44,207 --> 00:47:47,100
go on calories and you haven't 
gotten them. 

737
00:47:47,200 --> 00:47:49,600
Yeah. 
Yeah, and you thought that with 

738
00:47:49,600 --> 00:47:52,900
Edmonds gone, he would get a 
bigger workload. 

739
00:47:54,100 --> 00:47:56,700
It actually that has not been 
the case with, you know, 

740
00:47:56,700 --> 00:47:58,600
Benjamin sort of emerging a 
little bit. 

741
00:48:00,400 --> 00:48:05,500
Yeah. 
So, anyways, looking now at wide

742
00:48:05,500 --> 00:48:09,800
receiver. 
For those following along, we're

743
00:48:09,800 --> 00:48:12,300
looking at wide receiver 
opportunity, reversed fantasy 

744
00:48:12,300 --> 00:48:15,300
points, and starting with the 
wide receivers that have Ron 

745
00:48:15,300 --> 00:48:19,600
more than 85% of their team's 
routes on the y-axis. 

746
00:48:19,600 --> 00:48:21,400
Here, we have fantasy points per
game. 

747
00:48:21,400 --> 00:48:25,000
And on the x-axis, we have 
waited targets per outrun to 

748
00:48:25,000 --> 00:48:28,300
explain that metric. 
It is targets per outrun. 

749
00:48:28,400 --> 00:48:31,500
So for the percent of times on a
route, the players earning a 

750
00:48:31,508 --> 00:48:35,500
Target, but waited by the 
players, average depth of 

751
00:48:35,508 --> 00:48:39,600
Target, such that a screen pass.
Ass, you know doesn't count as 

752
00:48:39,600 --> 00:48:42,500
much as a 50-yard bomb down the 
field. 

753
00:48:42,500 --> 00:48:46,200
It sort of Weights opportunity 
based on how far down the field,

754
00:48:46,300 --> 00:48:49,300
you are getting that Target that
opportunity at the wide receiver

755
00:48:49,300 --> 00:48:51,400
position. 
So that's the chart. 

756
00:48:51,400 --> 00:48:56,100
Those are the metrics before. 
We, there's a couple of Trades 

757
00:48:56,100 --> 00:48:58,100
we can hit on here again, 
Connor. 

758
00:48:58,100 --> 00:49:00,700
But I wanted to start with 
DeAndre Hopkins. 

759
00:49:00,700 --> 00:49:04,000
I mean, that's not. 
Yeah, it's crazy, right? 

760
00:49:05,300 --> 00:49:09,300
He's for those, you know, 
listening along gives 85% 

761
00:49:09,600 --> 00:49:14,700
weighted targets for outrun that
is the best in the NFL, besides 

762
00:49:14,700 --> 00:49:18,800
Tyree kill. 
He is nearly breaking this chart

763
00:49:20,600 --> 00:49:25,200
at at that extreme opportunity. 
So yeah, I was skeptical of 

764
00:49:25,200 --> 00:49:30,300
d-hop, a little bit coming into 
the year, but he clearly, I 

765
00:49:30,308 --> 00:49:33,000
don't know. 
He's clearly performing better 

766
00:49:33,000 --> 00:49:35,400
than he was last year, and he's 
clearly outperforming. 

767
00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:40,000
What Marquis Brown was doing in 
that offense, embarrassed to say

768
00:49:40,000 --> 00:49:43,400
this, but the first game I saw 
him play back. 

769
00:49:43,900 --> 00:49:46,800
He looked and this is 
embarrassing to say almost. 

770
00:49:46,900 --> 00:49:53,500
He looked angry and that he was 
trying so hard to make up for 

771
00:49:53,500 --> 00:49:56,500
lost time. 
Like and and then you saw the 

772
00:49:56,500 --> 00:50:00,100
stuff on Twitter where he said 
something like, oh yeah, I'm 

773
00:50:00,100 --> 00:50:02,900
only turd. 
I'm 30 years old, I'm past my 

774
00:50:02,900 --> 00:50:04,700
Prime. 
I'm practically there. 

775
00:50:05,900 --> 00:50:10,600
And then obviously watched too 
much a ship chasing over the 

776
00:50:11,100 --> 00:50:15,600
summer and it just got I don't 
know what it is. 

777
00:50:15,600 --> 00:50:18,900
Well he just liked looked like 
he was trying to make every play

778
00:50:18,900 --> 00:50:23,400
that he could and definitely and
this is embarrassing is like one

779
00:50:23,400 --> 00:50:28,200
of the most motivated players 
I've seen and and it's 

780
00:50:28,200 --> 00:50:31,300
definitely it's definitely 
coming across in the performance

781
00:50:31,700 --> 00:50:37,600
and It's is a seasonal is 
obviously one of the best 

782
00:50:37,600 --> 00:50:42,900
players and he's fine like it. 
Yeah, I agree. 

783
00:50:42,900 --> 00:50:46,100
And I was going through the 
exercises today of, you know, 

784
00:50:46,100 --> 00:50:49,400
thinking through how many wide 
receivers if I was to draft an 

785
00:50:49,400 --> 00:50:51,200
see today, how many wide 
receivers or by pick ahead of 

786
00:50:51,200 --> 00:50:53,700
Hopkins? 
You know, let's pretend cup is 

787
00:50:53,700 --> 00:50:55,800
is healthy. 
I'm not going to throw the 

788
00:50:55,800 --> 00:50:57,800
injury into their I would take 
cop over him. 

789
00:50:58,100 --> 00:51:02,200
I would take Jefferson over him.
I think I would take AJ, Brown 

790
00:51:02,200 --> 00:51:07,200
over him and then Tyree kill and
digs, but then after that, I 

791
00:51:07,200 --> 00:51:10,600
think I would take him over to 
Vontae out, take him over my 

792
00:51:10,600 --> 00:51:14,200
cabins, take him / D Bo, you 
know, anyone else, you want to 

793
00:51:14,207 --> 00:51:17,200
throw out there, Jalen waddle, I
think Hopkins would come, you 

794
00:51:17,200 --> 00:51:20,300
know, right in there at sort of 
my water Seaver, 5 or wide 

795
00:51:20,300 --> 00:51:22,600
receiver 6, right? 
Agreed. 

796
00:51:23,100 --> 00:51:25,500
Yeah. 
He's okay. 

797
00:51:25,600 --> 00:51:27,600
Yeah, Ron Waldo is where I'm 
starting to go. 

798
00:51:28,700 --> 00:51:35,000
Maybe probably what it doesn't 
feel that as that as, as 

799
00:51:35,000 --> 00:51:38,200
comfortable. 
So, that's probably exactly 

800
00:51:38,200 --> 00:51:41,100
where he should be. 
Yeah, yeah. 

801
00:51:41,100 --> 00:51:46,100
It's really Ben, you know, a 
perfect start for for DeAndre 

802
00:51:46,100 --> 00:51:50,700
Hopkins and his return, let's 
move on now to their region and 

803
00:51:50,700 --> 00:51:53,400
you move on past erect. 
Posture cover boy. 

804
00:51:54,400 --> 00:51:56,700
Are you not going to give me my 
20 minutes to talk about? 

805
00:51:57,200 --> 00:51:58,700
All right. 
All right, take it away with 

806
00:51:58,700 --> 00:52:01,800
Rondell more, who I'll just 
slowly. 

807
00:52:02,400 --> 00:52:04,900
Let it be said that he does show
up here in the cardio, 

808
00:52:04,900 --> 00:52:08,600
specialist tab, but go off on 
Rhonda. 

809
00:52:09,100 --> 00:52:12,900
So obviously he's getting, he's 
completely dusted. 

810
00:52:12,900 --> 00:52:19,100
And AJ Brown, actually, not AJ 
Brown and not a Drew Brown, and 

811
00:52:19,700 --> 00:52:22,600
Robbie Anderson. 
Who said, who said he was the 

812
00:52:22,600 --> 00:52:25,600
only major green AJ Green. 
Yeah, Easter. 

813
00:52:25,600 --> 00:52:30,400
He dusted him and snap share and
he's averaging about 

814
00:52:30,400 --> 00:52:35,600
six-and-a-half targets, a game 
and which and I guess maybe you 

815
00:52:35,600 --> 00:52:39,800
do want to see a bit higher and 
but he, he's been, he's been 

816
00:52:39,800 --> 00:52:42,100
playing well with it. 
And he obviously had the big 

817
00:52:42,100 --> 00:52:48,400
game last week and I think that 
one thing that's maybe a little 

818
00:52:48,400 --> 00:52:57,200
bit disappointing, is that? 
So Last week last week, he he 

819
00:52:57,200 --> 00:53:01,300
had he had the big week but his 
at average that the target was 

820
00:53:01,300 --> 00:53:06,900
just one and a half but he did 
turn those at those one and a 

821
00:53:06,900 --> 00:53:11,800
half and he had just of that he 
had this 11 are yards then he 

822
00:53:11,800 --> 00:53:15,800
gave monkey to. 
He had 92 total yards so 85 

823
00:53:15,800 --> 00:53:23,200
yards off the couch and so I 
guess obviously And strong 

824
00:53:23,200 --> 00:53:28,300
performance for him and getting 
the Holly Roots getting the 

825
00:53:28,300 --> 00:53:32,700
targets at proud. 
Not really going to crack maybe 

826
00:53:32,700 --> 00:53:36,700
top 20 receivers on the season 
and I hope that's what that's 

827
00:53:36,700 --> 00:53:41,400
wrong and but definitely very I 
would consider a very startled 

828
00:53:41,800 --> 00:53:48,700
at receiver Yeah, I agree. 
And yeah he's I think there were

829
00:53:48,700 --> 00:53:55,400
some concern that he would you 
know I think Greg dorit was 

830
00:53:55,400 --> 00:53:58,500
involved, AJ Green, they brought
Robbie Anderson and I think 

831
00:53:58,500 --> 00:54:01,800
there was some concern that 
Rondell wouldn't hold on to this

832
00:54:01,800 --> 00:54:04,200
massive role. 
But he's running all the routes 

833
00:54:04,400 --> 00:54:07,200
on this offense. 
I think this this team runs very

834
00:54:07,200 --> 00:54:09,800
high percentage of three wide 
receiver sets. 

835
00:54:10,300 --> 00:54:12,900
So rondelle's going to be out 
there all the time and I think 

836
00:54:12,900 --> 00:54:16,700
with y'all Andre Hopkins out 
there instead of Marquis Brown. 

837
00:54:16,700 --> 00:54:21,500
It sort of allows it allows 
Rondell to do stuff that he's 

838
00:54:21,500 --> 00:54:22,900
more comfortable with the 
shorter. 

839
00:54:22,900 --> 00:54:27,800
A DOT targets with DeAndre 
Hopkins, taking a ton of tension

840
00:54:28,400 --> 00:54:30,800
down field from the team's best 
cornerback. 

841
00:54:30,800 --> 00:54:34,600
So I like, you know, I like 
Rhonda like going forward again.

842
00:54:34,600 --> 00:54:38,700
I think like it's a little bit 
of the, I don't know why 

843
00:54:38,707 --> 00:54:43,500
Lawndale Robinson, Curtis Samuel
type effect where the low a DOT?

844
00:54:43,700 --> 00:54:47,600
Gets are going to limit his 
upside but that doesn't mean he 

845
00:54:47,600 --> 00:54:52,400
can't be a good PPR starter. 
He's just probably never get on 

846
00:54:52,400 --> 00:54:57,400
merge into this Elite wide 
receiver, one wide receiver to 

847
00:54:57,400 --> 00:54:59,800
territory, you know, hard mode. 
If he goes. 

848
00:54:59,800 --> 00:55:02,800
He has to be truly. 
A truly exceptional. 

849
00:55:02,800 --> 00:55:07,900
Really Claire like people. 
Yep, I agree. 

850
00:55:08,900 --> 00:55:12,700
So the one wide receiver trade 
to break down. 

851
00:55:12,700 --> 00:55:18,200
Here was Chase Claypool going to
the Bears. 

852
00:55:19,300 --> 00:55:24,400
Let's start on the Bears side of
things with Chase, Claypool 

853
00:55:24,400 --> 00:55:29,300
coming into the mix it. 
You know, it's tough because I 

854
00:55:29,300 --> 00:55:32,300
want to ask, how does it impact 
Darnell Muniz fantasy season? 

855
00:55:32,300 --> 00:55:34,800
But people aren't even starting 
Mooney. 

856
00:55:34,800 --> 00:55:39,100
Anyways like I don't know, do 
you think maybe the more 

857
00:55:39,100 --> 00:55:42,700
interesting question is do you 
think Claypool has any life as a

858
00:55:42,707 --> 00:55:46,000
fantasy asset on the Bears? 
He's probably going to a 

859
00:55:46,008 --> 00:55:48,600
situation that's going to wear. 
The team's going to pass a ton 

860
00:55:48,600 --> 00:55:51,700
last Also has less competition 
for targets. 

861
00:55:52,000 --> 00:55:54,400
So yeah. 
Is it you have any hope for 

862
00:55:54,400 --> 00:55:57,900
Claypool in in Chicago or how 
are you approaching the 

863
00:55:57,900 --> 00:56:02,500
situation? 
And I think it's probably a lot 

864
00:56:02,500 --> 00:56:08,500
better for the order to cago 
Bears down is for Claypool and 

865
00:56:09,000 --> 00:56:13,800
because I'm the biggest issue 
with with the Bears is they have

866
00:56:13,800 --> 00:56:18,100
this their last in kosrae over 
expected and like is extremely 

867
00:56:18,100 --> 00:56:20,000
low. 
I think it's like mud To 17 

868
00:56:20,400 --> 00:56:25,100
percent. 
And we're like, they should be 

869
00:56:25,100 --> 00:56:28,500
one among the highest in the 
league in pass rate, but they're

870
00:56:28,500 --> 00:56:34,400
actually like laughs and pass 
rate and which it that's kind of

871
00:56:34,408 --> 00:56:38,000
hard to do. 
And it's hard to, it's hard for 

872
00:56:38,000 --> 00:56:41,100
a receiver to really produce in 
that environment. 

873
00:56:41,600 --> 00:56:48,000
And I mean, if I think about it,
the fact that the other 

874
00:56:48,000 --> 00:56:51,600
receiving options, So bad. 
I mean they're so bad. 

875
00:56:51,600 --> 00:56:53,100
It's like, what's his name is 
Quinn? 

876
00:56:53,500 --> 00:56:58,100
Economists are saying Brown. 
Yeah, and I know I said that 

877
00:56:58,100 --> 00:57:01,700
wrong and I think you feel very 
lucky. 

878
00:57:01,700 --> 00:57:04,500
Larry actually ran as the water 
sea route to last week. 

879
00:57:04,500 --> 00:57:07,700
I think, or he was up there. 
It's great. 

880
00:57:07,700 --> 00:57:10,800
Drago. 
And, and you got these fires 

881
00:57:10,800 --> 00:57:15,900
that are so bad that you like, 
in terms of like a way to Target

882
00:57:15,900 --> 00:57:20,200
for a run and I think he's 
definitely to improve and that 

883
00:57:20,200 --> 00:57:24,200
metric because the competition 
gets substantially worse like 

884
00:57:24,300 --> 00:57:30,300
incredibly worse. 
And it probably is quite helpful

885
00:57:30,300 --> 00:57:33,700
to the old offensive arel just 
because the other players are so

886
00:57:33,700 --> 00:57:39,300
bad and he does he is he does 
seem like a pretty good fit for 

887
00:57:39,300 --> 00:57:41,700
Fields. 
Where like I kind of See Fields 

888
00:57:41,700 --> 00:57:46,600
as this like kind of like 
playmaker where and he's got 

889
00:57:46,600 --> 00:57:50,000
this really good deep ball and 
when I said of the pocket, he 

890
00:57:50,000 --> 00:57:54,400
makes things happen and I think 
that could be like there could 

891
00:57:54,400 --> 00:57:59,900
be things were to link up at and
boost each other in that way. 

892
00:58:00,400 --> 00:58:07,700
And and maybe having Claypool 
and encourages and passed more 

893
00:58:08,300 --> 00:58:11,000
just because it's not like, okay
well like what are we going to 

894
00:58:11,000 --> 00:58:13,500
are we going to game plan around
trying to it and kill? 

895
00:58:13,500 --> 00:58:22,400
Hurry and so maybe there's like 
a booster And I think I'm like 

896
00:58:22,400 --> 00:58:27,400
some what so it may be my 
basketball team and Chase. 

897
00:58:27,400 --> 00:58:31,200
Claypool, I'm like, somewhat 
encouraged of like oh, maybe 

898
00:58:31,200 --> 00:58:36,000
maybe that could that could be a
good thing for him and but in 

899
00:58:36,000 --> 00:58:39,700
terms of like starting him I 
think you have to be in a tough 

900
00:58:39,700 --> 00:58:42,200
spot to at the Stark Claypool 
still. 

901
00:58:42,500 --> 00:58:46,000
Yeah, yeah, I drew up to the ton
of Justin fields to chase 

902
00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:48,800
Claypool Stacks predicting. 
This trade would happen. 

903
00:58:49,600 --> 00:58:52,400
In week 7. 
So I'm really excited for my 

904
00:58:52,400 --> 00:58:56,800
best Bell shares there but 
joking aside. 

905
00:58:56,800 --> 00:58:59,500
Yeah, I kind of see it, similar 
Claypool. 

906
00:59:00,100 --> 00:59:04,000
I think there's some I mean you 
weren't starting in Pittsburgh 

907
00:59:04,000 --> 00:59:06,400
and maybe give him a couple 
weeks and you can feel. 

908
00:59:06,400 --> 00:59:09,700
Okay. 
Starting him in Chicago I think 

909
00:59:09,700 --> 00:59:13,700
it's unlikely but it at least 
opens up that possibility. 

910
00:59:13,700 --> 00:59:16,900
They gave up a second round pick
for him which is pretty high 

911
00:59:16,900 --> 00:59:19,800
compensation. 
So you I think that they had a 

912
00:59:19,800 --> 00:59:22,200
clean overpay. 
Yeah, certainly seems like I'll 

913
00:59:22,200 --> 00:59:24,400
repay. 
But you think it would mean they

914
00:59:24,400 --> 00:59:29,200
have plans to use him right? 
Well, we'll see. 

915
00:59:29,500 --> 00:59:32,800
They have a vision for how he 
fits into their team. 

916
00:59:33,200 --> 00:59:35,400
Yeah. 
And again, the last point I want

917
00:59:35,400 --> 00:59:37,500
to make in Chicago, I wish I had
the stats to back this up. 

918
00:59:37,500 --> 00:59:40,400
I don't have the team stats 
pulled up right now, but it does

919
00:59:40,400 --> 00:59:43,200
seem like they're they're 
trending a little bit more pass.

920
00:59:43,200 --> 00:59:46,500
Happy obviously. 
Still very run-heavy team, but 

921
00:59:46,600 --> 00:59:48,900
there are some truly ridiculous 
games to start the year. 

922
00:59:49,100 --> 00:59:53,300
Here in terms of Russia tabs, or
lack of passing attempts. 

923
00:59:53,300 --> 00:59:56,400
And it's been a little less 
extreme recently. 

924
00:59:56,400 --> 01:00:02,700
So we'll see if they wanna, you 
know, at least test what they 

925
01:00:02,700 --> 01:00:04,300
have in, Justin Fields as a 
pastor. 

926
01:00:04,300 --> 01:00:08,200
Maybe there's some chance they 
open up the offense but I'm not 

927
01:00:09,000 --> 01:00:17,700
I'm not holding my breath there.
Okay, let's move on to the next 

928
01:00:17,700 --> 01:00:23,600
chart. 
And touch on a couple quick hits

929
01:00:23,600 --> 01:00:28,900
here. 
I wanted to, you know, first I 

930
01:00:28,900 --> 01:00:32,600
think we should talk about 
Tyreke Hill and how and say we 

931
01:00:32,600 --> 01:00:35,500
just talked about how insane 
Hopkins with targets for outrun 

932
01:00:35,500 --> 01:00:39,600
is Tyree, kills is even higher. 
He's fully breaking this chart 

933
01:00:39,900 --> 01:00:45,000
and he has a 8 week sample size 
or set maybe seven weeks sample 

934
01:00:45,000 --> 01:00:48,700
size verse just to for DeAndre 
Hopkins. 

935
01:00:49,100 --> 01:00:54,100
So this is truly an insane. 
Season The Tyree kill is having 

936
01:00:55,400 --> 01:00:57,600
I didn't expect this at all. 
I think he's on Pace for 2,000 

937
01:00:57,600 --> 01:00:59,400
plus yards, I don't really know 
what to say. 

938
01:00:59,400 --> 01:01:00,400
Look, there's nothing 
actionable. 

939
01:01:00,400 --> 01:01:02,600
You can do. 
If you have Tyree kill, you're 

940
01:01:02,600 --> 01:01:07,600
not right if no silly comment, 
body low because there's no way 

941
01:01:07,600 --> 01:01:11,500
to actually action that. 
And but for his strong, as his 

942
01:01:11,500 --> 01:01:14,900
yardage and receiving and all 
that has been, he's only scored 

943
01:01:14,900 --> 01:01:20,200
two touchdowns and eight get 
seven games, and which given his

944
01:01:20,200 --> 01:01:25,900
yardage Lumber like and his big 
play ability, it does Like 

945
01:01:26,200 --> 01:01:30,000
there's actually there's 
actually positive a ton of 

946
01:01:30,000 --> 01:01:34,700
positive regression and not you 
but that you would have kind of 

947
01:01:34,700 --> 01:01:38,900
like expect for the second half 
of the year which is insane to 

948
01:01:38,900 --> 01:01:42,800
say given how good he's been. 
Yeah, I agree with that. 

949
01:01:43,100 --> 01:01:46,100
Yeah, I'm not selling Tyreke 
like I don't think anybody is 

950
01:01:46,100 --> 01:01:49,300
but yeah maybe the actual bus 
for like your home leagues where

951
01:01:49,300 --> 01:01:53,600
you can trade like send out a 
digs for Tyreke plus another 

952
01:01:53,600 --> 01:01:55,200
asset. 
Send out a cop for. 

953
01:01:55,300 --> 01:01:59,200
For Tyreke plus another asset. 
Like, obviously digs and cough 

954
01:01:59,200 --> 01:02:02,300
up are amazing, too. 
And I'm not like, selling those 

955
01:02:02,300 --> 01:02:05,500
guys, but if you can, maybe get 
the Tyree kill manager to give 

956
01:02:05,500 --> 01:02:08,600
you, I don't know. 
Tyree kill and eat en4 digs 

957
01:02:08,600 --> 01:02:11,800
maybe, you know, again, it 
depends on your league. 

958
01:02:11,800 --> 01:02:15,200
Like that trade, might be 
quickly rejected by the manager 

959
01:02:15,200 --> 01:02:17,900
if they're paying attention, but
to someone who's just box score 

960
01:02:17,900 --> 01:02:20,900
watching, they might be like, 
oh, I'd give up, you know, Ty 

961
01:02:20,900 --> 01:02:24,000
reeks, only giving me 20 points 
a game verse 25 for digs. 

962
01:02:24,000 --> 01:02:26,800
I'll give up Tyreke. 
And a big piece to get up to 

963
01:02:26,800 --> 01:02:30,600
digs like I would I would maybe 
look at that type of moves as 

964
01:02:30,600 --> 01:02:33,400
maybe some actual advice because
I agree with you Connor. 

965
01:02:33,400 --> 01:02:36,900
I think Tyree kill is like 
underperforming his expectation,

966
01:02:37,100 --> 01:02:40,200
which is insane because he's at 
over 20 fantasy points a game 

967
01:02:40,200 --> 01:02:43,300
right now, definitely a guy who 
were you? 

968
01:02:43,700 --> 01:02:46,000
You want to play him in DFS you 
want? 

969
01:02:46,000 --> 01:02:50,200
I guess you have to be careful 
about and ownership and whatnot.

970
01:02:50,700 --> 01:02:54,900
And but definitely something 
where like, when he hits It's 

971
01:02:54,900 --> 01:03:00,100
like a 50 it is not you I would 
expect it to be multiple 

972
01:03:00,100 --> 01:03:01,900
50-point games, rest of the 
year. 

973
01:03:03,400 --> 01:03:05,600
Yeah. 
Wow, multiple 50-point games. 

974
01:03:05,600 --> 01:03:07,100
I love that. 
Wow. 

975
01:03:07,300 --> 01:03:11,700
It's going to get these huge 
bombs 200 yards receiving. 

976
01:03:12,100 --> 01:03:14,300
Yeah. 
With the decayed bonuses to? 

977
01:03:14,600 --> 01:03:19,000
Yeah. 
Yeah, I also want to say on Hill

978
01:03:19,000 --> 01:03:22,700
that like also what this is 
under selling because he had, I 

979
01:03:22,707 --> 01:03:25,000
think you'll like five Rush 
attempts last week. 

980
01:03:25,000 --> 01:03:28,000
Let me double check that now. 
Did you have? 

981
01:03:28,600 --> 01:03:32,100
I think he might have had five 
Rush attempts a week before and 

982
01:03:32,100 --> 01:03:35,800
he had one this week. 
So sorry, maybe maybe I just 

983
01:03:35,800 --> 01:03:38,600
made that up in my head, but I 
do think he has gotten some, 

984
01:03:38,600 --> 01:03:40,800
like backfield snaps. 
I specially like just 

985
01:03:41,000 --> 01:03:43,500
tangentially. 
I've seen it in the Red Zone 

986
01:03:43,500 --> 01:03:45,900
where they're like, scheming 
them up with these routes out of

987
01:03:45,908 --> 01:03:50,100
the backfield. 
So anyways, I mean, it's just 

988
01:03:51,100 --> 01:03:54,900
crazy. 
You should for Tyreke, let's 

989
01:03:55,000 --> 01:03:57,400
let's keep going through this. 
I want to make sure we have time

990
01:03:57,400 --> 01:04:00,400
to hit on the tight ends before 
are hard enough. 

991
01:04:02,400 --> 01:04:04,200
Yeah. 
Back up tight ends. 

992
01:04:05,400 --> 01:04:06,900
This last wide receiver chart 
here. 

993
01:04:06,900 --> 01:04:11,000
So this is the rotational guys 
did have a Russia sent last week

994
01:04:11,200 --> 01:04:13,700
by the way, you gotta rush time 
last week. 

995
01:04:13,700 --> 01:04:15,500
Yeah. 
Okay. 

996
01:04:15,500 --> 01:04:18,500
I must have dreamed. 
The five Tyreke Hill carries up 

997
01:04:18,500 --> 01:04:21,400
in my head somewhere. 
I don't know. 

998
01:04:23,600 --> 01:04:29,200
Yeah, anyways, last last wide 
receiver chart, man. 

999
01:04:29,200 --> 01:04:32,100
This isn't that. 
On to talk about. 

1000
01:04:32,100 --> 01:04:36,300
But I did want to say that, like
the WAN Dale stuff was a little 

1001
01:04:36,300 --> 01:04:38,800
disappointing. 
Now I'm not giving up on him by 

1002
01:04:38,800 --> 01:04:44,600
any means because it's a week 
wide receiver room, certainly in

1003
01:04:45,700 --> 01:04:50,600
in New York, but he ran, I 
believe like a Full Slate of 

1004
01:04:50,600 --> 01:04:55,600
routes last week and only got 
three targets. 

1005
01:04:55,600 --> 01:04:58,900
So sometimes your I get 
concerned about these guys who 

1006
01:04:58,900 --> 01:05:03,000
have limited targets, And our 
sorry, limited staffs and they 

1007
01:05:03,000 --> 01:05:05,300
get these huge Target rates and 
then when they get a full-time 

1008
01:05:05,300 --> 01:05:08,400
role, it doesn't, it doesn't 
last. 

1009
01:05:08,400 --> 01:05:12,500
So I'm a little bit worried 
about that with one Dale, but 

1010
01:05:12,600 --> 01:05:16,000
I'm still holding him. 
I just think again like to the 

1011
01:05:16,000 --> 01:05:18,500
Rondell more discussion. 
It's sort of a low, a DOT like 

1012
01:05:18,500 --> 01:05:22,800
more scheme, touches roll. 
I don't think there's like crazy

1013
01:05:23,000 --> 01:05:26,400
League winning upside with him. 
I think it's more like Star 

1014
01:05:26,400 --> 01:05:30,600
double PPR type stuff with with 
him. 

1015
01:05:32,300 --> 01:05:37,300
But we'll see. 
Connor any gross got I know 

1016
01:05:37,300 --> 01:05:39,500
you've been dying to talk about.
Dennis Houston, right. 

1017
01:05:40,100 --> 01:05:43,500
Dennis Houston. 
No, I actually met him two weeks

1018
01:05:43,500 --> 01:05:45,700
ago. 
Very nice guy. 

1019
01:05:47,500 --> 01:05:50,700
Yeah, he's actually he's a car 
salesman and in the Greater 

1020
01:05:50,700 --> 01:05:54,400
Columbus Ohio area. 
Yeah, he's got he won't stop 

1021
01:05:54,400 --> 01:05:56,600
chasing and that we need to keep
up the great work. 

1022
01:05:58,000 --> 01:06:00,000
Okay, let's move on to tight 
ends. 

1023
01:06:00,300 --> 01:06:03,200
I did have Have a ton of notes 
on Keith Kirkwood, but we'll 

1024
01:06:03,200 --> 01:06:08,600
have to save that for next week.
Tight ends we're looking at here

1025
01:06:08,600 --> 01:06:12,400
now, tie down utilization and 
efficiency for all the tight 

1026
01:06:12,400 --> 01:06:16,100
ends with greater than 60% of 
routes run. 

1027
01:06:16,600 --> 01:06:19,600
So to be clear in the start, 
this is just weeks five through 

1028
01:06:19,600 --> 01:06:24,000
eight for the route. 
Percentage numbers, the targets 

1029
01:06:24,000 --> 01:06:27,500
per out, Ron and a DOT numbers 
are the full season numbers 

1030
01:06:27,500 --> 01:06:30,500
because we see those as more 
sort of sticky. 

1031
01:06:31,600 --> 01:06:35,600
The larger sample size is useful
there, whereas for the snap 

1032
01:06:35,600 --> 01:06:38,300
numbers, we just kind of want 
the most recent snapshot of 

1033
01:06:38,300 --> 01:06:41,100
what's happened over the last 
four weeks for those teams and 

1034
01:06:41,100 --> 01:06:44,800
how they're thinking about their
tight end rooms. 

1035
01:06:45,900 --> 01:06:52,500
So, a couple things we can talk 
about here, what jumps out to me

1036
01:06:52,500 --> 01:06:59,200
is the Foster Moreau contingent 
upside is really strong as far 

1037
01:06:59,200 --> 01:07:01,100
as Titans Go. 
He is out there. 

1038
01:07:01,100 --> 01:07:03,900
Running all the routes without 
Waller, you know, 80% of his 

1039
01:07:03,900 --> 01:07:07,000
team's Pastor outs. 
He has an 18% targets for about 

1040
01:07:07,000 --> 01:07:10,200
Ron, which is passable, not 
amazing, but but decent for a 

1041
01:07:10,207 --> 01:07:13,400
tight end, super low a dot. 
But again, you know. 

1042
01:07:13,400 --> 01:07:16,300
And the leaves we play, we're 
tight end is Really dry in the 

1043
01:07:16,300 --> 01:07:19,900
waiver wire. 
I think, false rumor row is a 

1044
01:07:19,900 --> 01:07:23,600
good ad this week in hopes that 
you get one more start without 

1045
01:07:23,600 --> 01:07:26,900
Waller. 
Yeah. 

1046
01:07:26,900 --> 01:07:28,000
Connor. 
Anything else. 

1047
01:07:28,100 --> 01:07:31,900
You wanted to talk through here 
at tight end? 

1048
01:07:31,900 --> 01:07:34,400
I know, we'll get to the the 
Hawkinson trade at some point, 

1049
01:07:34,400 --> 01:07:37,500
but anything else outside of 
that you wanted to talk about? 

1050
01:07:37,700 --> 01:07:42,800
So I know and in general we want
to kind of like more called out 

1051
01:07:43,100 --> 01:07:49,500
and pop positive place that like
People can go after and rather 

1052
01:07:49,500 --> 01:07:53,700
than like Rye gone on players 
put one thing that does strike 

1053
01:07:53,700 --> 01:08:00,000
me here is this High really high
route, share for Dawson Knox and

1054
01:08:00,000 --> 01:08:05,300
then one of the lowest that 
Target for right run on that on 

1055
01:08:05,300 --> 01:08:09,500
this chart and I think only 
kokum it is over at 11 and 

1056
01:08:09,500 --> 01:08:15,300
thousand ducks is 12%. 
And I guess a possible 

1057
01:08:15,800 --> 01:08:24,700
Seven-and-a-half 7.5 a.m but 
given how much it costs to draft

1058
01:08:24,700 --> 01:08:28,899
have how highly drafted us and 
Knox was I do think that's 

1059
01:08:28,899 --> 01:08:33,600
pretty disappointing. 
Yep I agree. 

1060
01:08:33,600 --> 01:08:39,600
There on the more positive side 
at, may be actionable side for 

1061
01:08:39,600 --> 01:08:42,100
for the Casual leagues out 
there. 

1062
01:08:42,500 --> 01:08:45,500
Greg dosages roll. 
Looks amazing to me. 

1063
01:08:45,800 --> 01:08:48,300
He's running again a ton of 
routes. 

1064
01:08:48,399 --> 01:08:51,100
You know, is in the Travis Kelce
range for four rounds for on, 

1065
01:08:51,100 --> 01:08:54,399
which is a good sign. 18% 
targets were outrun which is 

1066
01:08:54,399 --> 01:08:56,500
solid. 
But then, the edad is what's 

1067
01:08:56,500 --> 01:08:59,700
really exciting to me. 
Thirteen point three eight dot. 

1068
01:08:59,700 --> 01:09:03,200
I know he's running a lot of 
slot, staffs on that team 

1069
01:09:03,200 --> 01:09:06,100
because they don't have a great 
wide receiver three, there in 

1070
01:09:06,100 --> 01:09:09,399
Denver, he's truly being used as
more of a wide receiver than a 

1071
01:09:09,407 --> 01:09:12,100
side, and that's how he profiled
out of college. 

1072
01:09:12,100 --> 01:09:14,700
So, I'm more willing to buy into
that, high, a DOT. 

1073
01:09:14,899 --> 01:09:17,899
I think it tight. 
And we're you know, the floor is

1074
01:09:17,899 --> 01:09:21,399
low for every tight end outside 
of, you know, your Kelsey 

1075
01:09:21,399 --> 01:09:24,000
Andrews types that the ceiling 
is really what matters. 

1076
01:09:24,000 --> 01:09:28,200
And when I see a guy there with 
a near 15, a taught at tight 

1077
01:09:28,200 --> 01:09:31,000
end, that's a signal that he can
get some Splash plays down the 

1078
01:09:31,008 --> 01:09:35,399
seam score, some long TVs for 
for that team in Denver. 

1079
01:09:35,399 --> 01:09:37,899
So I'm really excited about 
those Stitch. 

1080
01:09:37,899 --> 01:09:42,100
I'm really happy for pack train 
who I know. 

1081
01:09:42,100 --> 01:09:48,800
I think he actually took out Out
a loan to invest in Greg dulcich

1082
01:09:49,000 --> 01:09:52,100
Dynasty shares. 
So I'm really happy for his long

1083
01:09:52,100 --> 01:09:54,600
and India. 
There's his hair out of his 

1084
01:09:54,600 --> 01:09:56,200
apartment. 
That's what I heard. 

1085
01:09:56,900 --> 01:10:00,700
Yeah, it's Clay. 
He's slowly collecting pieces of

1086
01:10:00,700 --> 01:10:05,500
Greg Dahl search in his house. 
Yeah, he's going to clone them 

1087
01:10:06,000 --> 01:10:10,400
and free through the funny thing
about that. 

1088
01:10:10,400 --> 01:10:13,400
Speaking of Greg dosage clowns, 
I think they have some kind of 

1089
01:10:13,400 --> 01:10:18,600
like hairstyle policy. 
See on the Denver Broncos, tied 

1090
01:10:18,600 --> 01:10:22,300
and room because I got a bunch 
of guys with this long, long 

1091
01:10:22,300 --> 01:10:25,600
flow, catching passes a tight 
end that I've been fooled once 

1092
01:10:25,600 --> 01:10:28,300
or twice, where I think it's 
still such and it's, you know, 

1093
01:10:28,500 --> 01:10:31,600
backyard Sauber door. 
I'm not gonna pretend to know 

1094
01:10:31,600 --> 01:10:37,400
who all these guys are, but it's
interesting there and Denver the

1095
01:10:37,400 --> 01:10:40,700
way we the wavy hair and group. 
Yeah. 

1096
01:10:42,100 --> 01:10:43,000
Yeah. 
Okay. 

1097
01:10:43,800 --> 01:10:45,800
Tight end. 
Let's move on. 

1098
01:10:45,900 --> 01:10:49,800
Then to 0. 
Now we got to talk about TJ 

1099
01:10:49,800 --> 01:10:53,100
hogenson for. 
Oh yeah we did want to talk 

1100
01:10:53,100 --> 01:10:54,800
about. 
I think that's kind of 

1101
01:10:54,800 --> 01:10:57,800
emblematic of this whole charade
that we are so excited to talk 

1102
01:10:57,800 --> 01:11:00,500
about the other trades. 
But this Hopkinson to the 

1103
01:11:00,500 --> 01:11:03,200
Vikings thing is just it's so 
boring to me. 

1104
01:11:03,200 --> 01:11:10,500
I don't know why one thing it's,
you know, let's start with. 

1105
01:11:10,500 --> 01:11:13,300
Let's start with Hawkinson on. 
On the Vikings and then we can 

1106
01:11:13,300 --> 01:11:15,900
maybe get into the lions deep 
cut stuff. 

1107
01:11:15,900 --> 01:11:18,800
One way I want it to look aren't
that. 

1108
01:11:18,800 --> 01:11:20,200
I thought it would be good to 
look at. 

1109
01:11:20,200 --> 01:11:25,600
This was what percentage of 
expected receiving points. 

1110
01:11:26,100 --> 01:11:33,400
And those tight end is a whole, 
make the lines and receiving and

1111
01:11:33,400 --> 01:11:39,600
the Vikings receiving. 
So for the Detroit line, lines 

1112
01:11:40,000 --> 01:11:46,100
moons and The the expected 
receiving share for tight ends 

1113
01:11:46,100 --> 01:11:51,300
as a whole is 23%. 
And then for the Vikings, it's 

1114
01:11:51,300 --> 01:11:56,800
21%. 
And what I've a, what is very 

1115
01:11:56,800 --> 01:12:01,200
apparent that is that outside 
of, like, let's say the top five

1116
01:12:01,200 --> 01:12:05,600
teams for a tight end usage, 
it's extremely flat. 

1117
01:12:06,000 --> 01:12:10,100
These teams are very similar. 
These middle of the pack to like

1118
01:12:10,100 --> 01:12:14,100
even lower in teams. 
Are very similar in the 

1119
01:12:14,100 --> 01:12:17,300
percentage usage for their tight
ends. 

1120
01:12:17,600 --> 01:12:23,300
So moving from one of those 
mid-pack teams to another is, it

1121
01:12:23,300 --> 01:12:27,400
doesn't mean a whole lot to me. 
Yeah. 

1122
01:12:28,800 --> 01:12:32,400
Yeah, I wish I had a different 
more exciting take. 

1123
01:12:32,400 --> 01:12:35,200
But I'm with you there, it 
doesn't mean a whole lot. 

1124
01:12:35,500 --> 01:12:36,300
It. 
Yeah. 

1125
01:12:36,400 --> 01:12:41,200
If I have to jog in cinema 
teams, I'm like I don't know how

1126
01:12:41,200 --> 01:12:43,600
to think about this trade. 
Like, it seems like it seems 

1127
01:12:43,600 --> 01:12:48,500
like a wash but it's also it's a
mystery box, right? 

1128
01:12:48,700 --> 01:12:50,500
Yeah. 
Maybe there's some unknown 

1129
01:12:50,500 --> 01:12:53,500
upside there. 
I mean, maybe the reason that 

1130
01:12:53,500 --> 01:12:56,200
they try to the second round, 
pick Freedom forum is like, oh, 

1131
01:12:56,200 --> 01:13:02,000
we think this guy is awesome. 
We haven't we talked that we 

1132
01:13:02,000 --> 01:13:04,400
went into this year thinking 
that teal and was going to be 

1133
01:13:04,400 --> 01:13:08,300
the same register on the Red 
Zone trap that he always was. 

1134
01:13:08,900 --> 01:13:12,000
And we discovered that's not 
quite the case anymore. 

1135
01:13:12,400 --> 01:13:16,300
And here's a guy who's a big 
fast, hot end and maybe he's 

1136
01:13:16,300 --> 01:13:23,000
that guy for us and and you win 
there and but that that I'm 

1137
01:13:23,000 --> 01:13:25,100
really kind of stretching the 
tell a story here. 

1138
01:13:25,500 --> 01:13:28,200
Yeah. 
Yeah, I think. 

1139
01:13:28,200 --> 01:13:31,000
Yeah. 
Of to sort of stretch to tell a 

1140
01:13:31,008 --> 01:13:36,200
story with Hawkinson. 
Yeah. 

1141
01:13:36,200 --> 01:13:38,800
Okay. 
I think there was one other. 

1142
01:13:38,800 --> 01:13:41,000
Oh, yeah. 
The other thing I want to talk 

1143
01:13:41,000 --> 01:13:47,200
about is the Lions, back up, 
back up tight and situation 

1144
01:13:47,400 --> 01:13:51,600
actually the chat, the chat is 
clamoring for the backup tight 

1145
01:13:51,600 --> 01:13:55,900
end chart is that sham sermon? 
I don't I've no, I don't 

1146
01:13:55,900 --> 01:13:58,400
recognize that that. 
Let me what's shot. 

1147
01:13:58,600 --> 01:14:03,500
Theremin doing in our shop, he 
must be a new VIP that that was 

1148
01:14:03,500 --> 01:14:06,500
brought by statues thing. 
I haven't heard of that guy, but

1149
01:14:06,500 --> 01:14:09,800
yeah, as we talk about the 
backup tight, end chart, I don't

1150
01:14:09,800 --> 01:14:12,700
think they're gonna be on there,
but we were going back and forth

1151
01:14:12,900 --> 01:14:16,400
on on disk, or chat earlier 
about the Lions tight, end 

1152
01:14:16,400 --> 01:14:21,400
situation. 
We got Brock right and help me 

1153
01:14:21,400 --> 01:14:23,300
out here, who was the other, 
who's the other guy? 

1154
01:14:23,600 --> 01:14:27,700
James Mitchell, James Mitchell. 
And so before we get into this, 

1155
01:14:27,700 --> 01:14:32,900
I do want to tell The listeners 
just have much at Sam and stop 

1156
01:14:32,900 --> 01:14:36,000
chasing cares, about delivering 
accurate. 

1157
01:14:36,300 --> 01:14:38,300
Back up, tighten information for
you. 

1158
01:14:38,600 --> 01:14:44,800
So BFF if a player doesn't 
receive a Target and a game, 

1159
01:14:45,100 --> 01:14:48,400
they shut them as not having 
played the game in their week by

1160
01:14:48,400 --> 01:14:51,500
week Dada. 
So we went back in and 

1161
01:14:51,500 --> 01:14:55,900
redesigned our entire 
spreadsheet and charts system so

1162
01:14:55,900 --> 01:14:58,400
that we could get you the most 
accurate back. 

1163
01:14:58,600 --> 01:15:02,600
Tight end information possible. 
So just just, just make sure 

1164
01:15:02,600 --> 01:15:07,300
that you appreciate that. 
Yeah, we put ours in each week. 

1165
01:15:07,300 --> 01:15:10,000
Looking at all the backup tight 
ends. 

1166
01:15:10,300 --> 01:15:13,100
I can't even tell you how many 
hours of Josh Oliver in Jack 

1167
01:15:13,100 --> 01:15:16,200
stole film. 
I watched in all 22 this week, 

1168
01:15:16,700 --> 01:15:19,400
we told our parents and ask 
them. 

1169
01:15:19,400 --> 01:15:22,200
Hey, what do you think your son 
is going to do this week Terry? 

1170
01:15:22,200 --> 01:15:24,800
Yeah, character interviews. 
We want to know about these guys

1171
01:15:24,800 --> 01:15:28,400
as people not just as objects in
our spreadsheet. 

1172
01:15:28,500 --> 01:15:30,300
Sheets and on the football 
field. 

1173
01:15:31,300 --> 01:15:34,700
So yeah that that's just a 
little behind-the-scenes statue,

1174
01:15:34,700 --> 01:15:36,300
sitting back up, tight end 
process. 

1175
01:15:36,800 --> 01:15:39,400
We will give you the best 
Eric's. 

1176
01:15:39,400 --> 01:15:42,500
Albert takes the whole business,
so you know, subscribe to the 

1177
01:15:42,500 --> 01:15:44,500
Discord. 
DM. 

1178
01:15:44,500 --> 01:15:48,700
Me about John Bates and we can 
have a lot of fun on the 

1179
01:15:48,700 --> 01:15:49,600
Discord. 
This year. 

1180
01:15:49,800 --> 01:15:53,600
Anyways, getting to some real 
advice for the backup tight ends

1181
01:15:55,600 --> 01:15:56,700
Harrison Bryant. 
Yeah. 

1182
01:15:56,900 --> 01:16:00,200
Historical anomalies brings up 
Harrison Bryant has been 

1183
01:16:00,200 --> 01:16:03,400
canceled. 
That was a huge brand, hit four 

1184
01:16:03,400 --> 01:16:06,200
statues. 
We talked up his contingent 

1185
01:16:06,200 --> 01:16:11,400
upside for four weeks and he 
just goes out and Duds so hard 

1186
01:16:11,400 --> 01:16:14,500
that we had to change our entire
spreadsheet system to account 

1187
01:16:14,500 --> 01:16:18,400
for him. 
So he has been canceled. 

1188
01:16:18,700 --> 01:16:21,500
Yeah, he's clear. 
I had a bad take their you know,

1189
01:16:21,500 --> 01:16:25,700
his peripherals looks similar to
and Joe Coos, but he did not 

1190
01:16:25,700 --> 01:16:27,900
nearly have the snap share that 
joke. 

1191
01:16:27,900 --> 01:16:32,700
We did as A starter heated earn 
zero Targets on I think like 

1192
01:16:32,700 --> 01:16:36,400
close to 50% of the team route 
so they do not view him as one 

1193
01:16:36,400 --> 01:16:38,700
to one replacement Fringe oku, 
it's not a foster Moreau 

1194
01:16:38,700 --> 01:16:41,600
situation. 
You can safely leave Harrison 

1195
01:16:41,600 --> 01:16:45,400
Bryant on the waiver wire even 
in your in your deep leaves 

1196
01:16:45,500 --> 01:16:50,500
deeply except think and sadly. 
As you know we put 100 percent 

1197
01:16:50,500 --> 01:16:55,300
guarantee behind every back up. 
Tighten take a weekend so you 

1198
01:16:55,300 --> 01:16:58,100
lose money on our backup to a 
dentist contact there. 

1199
01:16:58,600 --> 01:17:01,000
In. 
Yeah, we'll be in touch. 

1200
01:17:01,200 --> 01:17:05,000
We it's actually Pete, then 
Moses you if you lost that you 

1201
01:17:05,000 --> 01:17:07,600
lose money on any of her back, 
since we're not being paid for 

1202
01:17:07,600 --> 01:17:09,500
this, any money you lose them 
back up. 

1203
01:17:09,500 --> 01:17:11,600
Tight ends, Pete actually 
directly bed most you. 

1204
01:17:11,600 --> 01:17:15,200
So yeah, I would just go 
directly to him, say, hey, I 

1205
01:17:15,200 --> 01:17:19,200
lost money on Harrison. 
Brian Sam said, you're good for 

1206
01:17:19,200 --> 01:17:22,200
it and he should fully recoup 
you for that. 

1207
01:17:23,500 --> 01:17:27,800
Yeah. 
Anyways the other thing I'd like

1208
01:17:27,800 --> 01:17:29,200
kind of serious. 
Thing I want to talk about 

1209
01:17:29,200 --> 01:17:32,700
before we go, we have to talk 
about these players for now, we 

1210
01:17:32,700 --> 01:17:35,600
have to go. 
We have to, we have to Shag. 

1211
01:17:35,600 --> 01:17:38,400
I we can't go without talking 
about David kenshin's, favorite 

1212
01:17:38,400 --> 01:17:41,800
player, shig a conch. 
Whoa, I actually do think this 

1213
01:17:41,800 --> 01:17:44,400
one is like, this is more of 
like, a Dom. 

1214
01:17:44,700 --> 01:17:47,400
We've been, we've been doing. 
We have a special segment for 

1215
01:17:47,400 --> 01:17:51,300
backup tight ends every week, 
and we just had a major 

1216
01:17:51,300 --> 01:17:54,700
shake-up. 
We're back up tight ends and 

1217
01:17:54,700 --> 01:17:59,000
could now foreseeably be 
prominent, we We have to talk 

1218
01:17:59,000 --> 01:18:03,600
about them. 
But we have to talk about them. 

1219
01:18:04,100 --> 01:18:05,800
Isaiah likely you're talking 
about? 

1220
01:18:06,800 --> 01:18:10,900
No, I'm talking about checks 
notes Brock, right? 

1221
01:18:10,900 --> 01:18:15,400
And then Jennifer oh, yeah, 
yeah, yeah, Brock, right. 

1222
01:18:15,400 --> 01:18:20,700
Okay, okay. 
I think the take is quickly 

1223
01:18:20,700 --> 01:18:24,500
because we're kind of guessing. 
I think add James Mitchell 

1224
01:18:24,500 --> 01:18:29,700
speculatively for like a $115 
and don't touch. 

1225
01:18:29,800 --> 01:18:33,800
Walk, right, probably. 
So I actually, there is a, there

1226
01:18:33,800 --> 01:18:36,300
is stocks available on James 
Mitchell. 

1227
01:18:36,800 --> 01:18:41,500
So, in his junior year, at 
Virginia Tech, he actually did 

1228
01:18:41,500 --> 01:18:46,200
have a 32% Dominator rating and 
and mostly because of the 

1229
01:18:46,200 --> 01:18:49,600
touchdowns. 
Yeah, just a 24%, and receiving 

1230
01:18:49,600 --> 01:18:54,900
market share, and then early in 
his senior year, he tore his ACL

1231
01:18:55,500 --> 01:19:02,800
and and he was unable to add To 
perform like the 40-yard dash at

1232
01:19:02,800 --> 01:19:05,500
the combine because of that. 
What he did? 

1233
01:19:05,500 --> 01:19:10,500
He, he did get taken in the 
fifth round this year and, and 

1234
01:19:10,500 --> 01:19:14,200
he's also a two-time first team 
All Conference basketball 

1235
01:19:14,200 --> 01:19:16,200
player. 
Oh, wow. 

1236
01:19:16,300 --> 01:19:18,400
So G's like the next Jimmy 
Graham basically. 

1237
01:19:18,600 --> 01:19:23,500
Yeah. 
More or less and so, I mean, he 

1238
01:19:23,500 --> 01:19:29,700
is a rookie coming off an ACL 
share and but it's interesting. 

1239
01:19:29,800 --> 01:19:32,400
It's a little bit interesting in
your kind of like tight and 

1240
01:19:32,400 --> 01:19:36,300
premium leaks. 
Yeah, if you're desperate side 

1241
01:19:36,300 --> 01:19:39,400
and he's he's, you know, worth a
couple bucks. 

1242
01:19:39,400 --> 01:19:43,400
I think that's interesting, I 
knew nothing about his profile 

1243
01:19:45,300 --> 01:19:49,800
before we go. 
Brock it, we both agreed that at

1244
01:19:49,800 --> 01:19:53,500
Brock right is without even 
looking at anything. 

1245
01:19:53,900 --> 01:19:59,100
It's the name of a blocker is 
their first name even rhymes 

1246
01:19:59,100 --> 01:20:02,100
with block. 
It should be block right in my 

1247
01:20:02,100 --> 01:20:03,600
opinion. 
Yeah. 

1248
01:20:03,600 --> 01:20:08,500
You see a name like Brock right?
Or like Jack stole or even like 

1249
01:20:08,500 --> 01:20:11,500
Cole Turner and you see the name
and you can just tell it's a 

1250
01:20:11,500 --> 01:20:13,100
blocking tight on. 
You don't have to you know, have

1251
01:20:13,100 --> 01:20:16,200
to check any stats. 
It's a full just sort of name 

1252
01:20:16,200 --> 01:20:19,200
based analysis. 
If your name, you know, is 

1253
01:20:19,200 --> 01:20:22,700
generally like one syllable for 
the first and last name. 

1254
01:20:22,700 --> 01:20:26,000
Jack stole Brock, right? 
That's a blocking tight end. 

1255
01:20:26,000 --> 01:20:27,700
You don't even you don't even 
think about adding him. 

1256
01:20:29,100 --> 01:20:32,600
There is some So he was actually
coming at a high school. 

1257
01:20:33,000 --> 01:20:36,700
He was a number one, they're 
ranked tight end but then he 

1258
01:20:36,700 --> 01:20:41,800
went to Notre Dame and as a 
four-year player and I think it 

1259
01:20:41,800 --> 01:20:43,200
might've even been more than 
four years. 

1260
01:20:43,200 --> 01:20:47,700
In 40-something games, it was 
only a starter for 11 of those 

1261
01:20:47,700 --> 01:20:51,300
games. 
So when you're at a backup tight

1262
01:20:51,300 --> 01:20:54,600
end in Notre Dame, That's what 
you know. 

1263
01:20:54,600 --> 01:20:57,000
We're going to be excited to 
talk about you in a stop 

1264
01:20:57,000 --> 01:20:58,500
chasing. 
I like this from Josh. 

1265
01:20:58,500 --> 01:21:02,000
He's he's sort of a big lie. 
He's doing the, not in my league

1266
01:21:02,000 --> 01:21:05,600
thing to me about, back up tight
and he's been stashing. 

1267
01:21:05,800 --> 01:21:10,300
James Mitchell sense. 
The second Bush Administration 

1268
01:21:10,300 --> 01:21:14,500
apparently, yeah, I gotta get in
some, a Josh's leagues because 

1269
01:21:15,100 --> 01:21:17,900
apparently in those James 
Mitchell was drafted in like the

1270
01:21:17,900 --> 01:21:21,200
fifth round. 
So yeah, I will easily. 

1271
01:21:21,200 --> 01:21:25,900
Yeah, this is a tight end 
premium At deviled egg 

1272
01:21:26,300 --> 01:21:29,600
development where he's had them 
since his freshman year. 

1273
01:21:30,000 --> 01:21:31,600
Yeah. 
So we'll bring will bring on 

1274
01:21:31,600 --> 01:21:37,300
Josh the show next week I want 
to talk to him about Mason 

1275
01:21:37,300 --> 01:21:41,500
Shrek, who is definitely a real 
person and not someone Connor 

1276
01:21:41,500 --> 01:21:44,000
just made up to try to trick me 
this week. 

1277
01:21:44,000 --> 01:21:51,200
That is definitely a real and 
I'll better fake tight ends and 

1278
01:21:51,200 --> 01:21:54,400
track is. 
Yeah, that's Okay we've gone off

1279
01:21:54,400 --> 01:21:56,700
the rails. 
I did I did have one real point 

1280
01:21:56,700 --> 01:22:00,300
before we go check Aqua for your
Dynasty sickos. 

1281
01:22:00,800 --> 01:22:05,000
He's been kind of interesting. 
22% are throughout Run Deep, a 

1282
01:22:05,000 --> 01:22:10,000
DOT. 
And like as far as contingent 

1283
01:22:10,000 --> 01:22:13,200
plays go, I would like monitor 
if Hooper went down I would be 

1284
01:22:13,200 --> 01:22:17,000
kind of excited about him, maybe
at some point Tennessee throws 

1285
01:22:17,000 --> 01:22:20,300
in the towel on their season and
he gets more run, but I know he 

1286
01:22:20,300 --> 01:22:23,300
was sort of a trendy Prospect 
and dying. 

1287
01:22:23,400 --> 01:22:26,300
See circles and he's, he's 
flashing a bit as a receiver. 

1288
01:22:26,400 --> 01:22:29,100
Obviously again on a super 
limited role. 

1289
01:22:31,800 --> 01:22:36,000
Yep, he's been on he said on 
Stephanie's taxi for the last 10

1290
01:22:36,000 --> 01:22:39,100
years. 
So this is probably need a 

1291
01:22:39,100 --> 01:22:41,800
panel, we need a backup Titan 
panel next week. 

1292
01:22:44,100 --> 01:22:47,000
Yeah, we need to make it happen.
I mean, our viewership is 

1293
01:22:47,000 --> 01:22:51,200
clearly just skyrocketing. 
Once we start talking about the 

1294
01:22:51,208 --> 01:22:53,900
backup tight ends, our 
engagements have been out of 

1295
01:22:53,907 --> 01:22:57,500
control. 
Anyways, that was fun. 

1296
01:22:57,500 --> 01:22:59,600
Connor, I think we're going to 
skip quarterback. 

1297
01:23:00,100 --> 01:23:05,900
This week I don't think anything
major to talk about their you 

1298
01:23:05,900 --> 01:23:08,800
know as we're sort of 
approaching our our end time 

1299
01:23:08,800 --> 01:23:13,800
here that was a ton of fun guys.
A lot of fun going over all the 

1300
01:23:13,800 --> 01:23:18,500
trades, you know, I think I 
think I got a better grasp of 

1301
01:23:18,500 --> 01:23:21,800
some of the Situation's, they're
from talking through it and 

1302
01:23:21,800 --> 01:23:25,300
yeah, just a quick couple quick 
plugs, you can check out more 

1303
01:23:25,300 --> 01:23:28,400
analysis and if you want to see 
these charts to look over them 

1304
01:23:28,400 --> 01:23:30,100
yourselves, you can find it on 
my Twitter. 

1305
01:23:30,200 --> 01:23:34,200
Here at Sherman underscore F 
FBI, post those charts every 

1306
01:23:34,200 --> 01:23:38,700
week with a couple bullets and 
takeaways on each position. 

1307
01:23:39,600 --> 01:23:41,500
So yeah, you can find that their
Connor. 

1308
01:23:41,500 --> 01:23:44,200
Anything else you wanted to plug
before we head out? 

1309
01:23:44,600 --> 01:23:52,000
And no, I guess that subscribe 
to the at ship chasing YouTube 

1310
01:23:52,000 --> 01:23:53,600
channel. 
If you're watching this live, 

1311
01:23:53,600 --> 01:23:56,900
you already are. 
And we have a lot of fun with 

1312
01:23:56,900 --> 01:24:00,000
the chat every week and that 
ship chasing. 

1313
01:24:00,100 --> 01:24:03,100
Do you get to see it live on the
interact with us? 

1314
01:24:04,500 --> 01:24:07,200
Yep. 
And yeah we'll be bringing on 

1315
01:24:07,500 --> 01:24:10,400
guest next week to talk about 
Mason Shrek so you can also join

1316
01:24:10,400 --> 01:24:12,900
for that. 
Anyways, that sounds fun guys. 

1317
01:24:13,400 --> 01:24:16,000
We'll see you here. 
Next week. 

1318
01:24:16,000 --> 01:24:05,000
Good luck in week 9. 
Yep. 

1319
01:24:05,200 --> 01:24:08,600
And yeah we'll be bringing on 
guest next week to talk about 

1320
01:24:08,600 --> 01:24:10,900
Mason Shrek so you can also join
for that. 

1321
01:24:11,100 --> 01:24:15,000
Anyways, that sounds fun guys. 
We'll see you here. 

1322
01:24:15,100 --> 01:24:18,200
Next week. 
Good luck in week 9.