1 00:00:01,560 --> 00:00:04,120 All right, it feels hard to believe, but we have actually 2 00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:08,840 not done a draft on the ship chasing channel in the year of 3 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:10,880 our Lord 2025. Today that changes. 4 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:14,320 Pat Kurain and myself hopping in a big board draft trying to take 5 00:00:14,320 --> 00:00:18,160 down that 250K. Can I get Pat Kurain to battle 6 00:00:18,240 --> 00:00:20,720 with his own draft assistant tool, the sidekick? 7 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:26,880 We're going to find out on today's ship chasing Pat Fryer, 8 00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:32,840 Helmo Anita Hand. Job fix your sight. 9 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:40,000 Jamar and Alpha play Chase. Tony, you can't handle the heat. 10 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:42,080 It looks like we're finally at this point, You're right. 11 00:00:49,480 --> 00:00:53,040 All right, if you want in the draft with us, Pat, and I need 12 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:57,520 five more here for a big board draft, Pat. 13 00:00:57,520 --> 00:01:02,520 I've still been other than my 4 war room slow drafts that I'm 14 00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:06,160 in, I have exclusively been drafting big boards on stream. 15 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:08,440 How many big board deep big boards? 16 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:12,160 Think I'm 25 deep, I need to pick up the pace but did a 17 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:15,040 little traveling. Hadn't drafted too much in the 18 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:18,720 last week or so, but came back and, and gotten a few in. 19 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:24,520 Yeah, some of the, I mean, it's a little bit I'm a little bit 20 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:29,960 torn because I feel like there's still some, some rookie edge 21 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:33,040 that we're that might evaporate like tomorrow and the day after 22 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:34,640 when we start to get this combine stuff in. 23 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:39,560 So I want to hammer a few more today, but it but some of the 24 00:01:39,560 --> 00:01:42,520 big rookie values are already a little bit. 25 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:45,360 I mean, they're not like completely dried up, but there's 26 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:47,800 some spots from like, I wish I took more of this guy, you know, 27 00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:51,840 before his price rose. Yeah, I just, you know, I've 28 00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:56,720 been trying to catch up on rookies with all you guys and it 29 00:01:56,800 --> 00:01:59,480 you know, I, I, I wrote up an article for Fantasy Life for 30 00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:01,720 this week of just like four or five guys who I think will 31 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:05,120 definitely get more expensive in the coming week, some because of 32 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:09,880 the combine, but it you know, so I did well. 33 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:12,360 I'm, I'm, I'm on a I'm on a Travis Hunter kick and we'll 34 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:14,840 we'll talk about him. I actually enjoyed the start of 35 00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:17,480 your guys's conversation. I'm almost done with the video 36 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:20,320 on the deposit Kingdom and I'm going to take some pretty big 37 00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:25,000 stances on on Travis Hunter and build a case for that. 38 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:27,040 We. Just we just raised him up 39 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:30,520 pretty, pretty considerably in the ranks on the Combine Buzz. 40 00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:34,320 I yeah, I highly recommend I listen to that episode this 41 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:35,520 morning, or at least the first part. 42 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:36,640 And I thought there was a good debate. 43 00:02:36,640 --> 00:02:40,440 Sacrilege is kind of offering more the bear side and Daniel 44 00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:44,240 was a little more bullish, but yeah, I I think he's going to 45 00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:47,960 get more expensive. I do too. 46 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:50,800 Who's the I'm see, I can't even pronounce these guys names. 47 00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:52,720 Tootin the running back. I think he's just going to 48 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:57,480 scorch at the comp Interesting. Yeah, like a Thor and some guys 49 00:02:57,480 --> 00:02:59,800 over at Fantasy Life think, you know, he could run like, you 50 00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:00,840 know, a four, three or something. 51 00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:03,320 And we know. Oh, no way. 52 00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:07,680 OK, you know, he's he's funny because my numbers like him, but 53 00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:10,840 I've like I haven't heard much about him and he dealt with some 54 00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:14,320 fumbling issues and stuff. So I've been kind of like, I 55 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:17,080 don't I don't like know enough to be like I'm taking a big 56 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:20,040 stand on bashful Tooten, but he's very much in the draftable 57 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:23,720 mix at the end of the draft. That's that's intriguing that he 58 00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:25,360 might. Yeah, 'cause I was just trying 59 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:27,920 to think like, who are the guys that could have some eye popping 60 00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:31,760 kind of, you know, metrics. The other one is Harold Fannon 61 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:33,760 Junior. I think he's gonna test really 62 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:35,560 well. I do too. 63 00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:39,400 And if he tests well, he's gonna he's gonna really quickly become 64 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:43,240 a a pretty trendy pick. He did really well in the the 65 00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:46,720 zebra tracking data at the Senior Bowl. 66 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:48,720 So that's that's a good shut out. 67 00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:51,000 Yeah. So we'll, we'll obviously talk 68 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,560 about some of these rookies as we get deeper into the draft. 69 00:03:54,000 --> 00:04:00,480 We got the the 111 here, Pat neighbors, Brian Thomas on the 70 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:02,280 board. I've been pretty strongly 71 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:05,520 neighbors over BT, but I'm I'm always open to to having my arm 72 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:07,840 twisted to to. Be we flipped it recently to 73 00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,320 neighbors and I'd like to go neighbors here. 74 00:04:10,320 --> 00:04:16,200 I think the the Giants just are like they're they're serious, 75 00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:18,519 like they're they're not messing around about trying to add a 76 00:04:18,519 --> 00:04:19,760 quarterback. I think they're very much in the 77 00:04:19,760 --> 00:04:23,720 Stafford game and I think they might, you know, be willing to 78 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:26,960 trade up to #1 to get Cam Ward. They don't. 79 00:04:27,040 --> 00:04:29,440 They'll take Shudor probably at three. 80 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:31,800 I doubt he goes. I doubt it goes quarterback 1/2. 81 00:04:31,800 --> 00:04:36,320 So they're going to be adding somebody that might not even be 82 00:04:36,320 --> 00:04:38,400 an exhaustive list of of what they're trying to do. 83 00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:41,880 So if he gets a quarterback upgrade, it's just hard not to 84 00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:43,680 be excited about him after his work a year. 85 00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:46,840 For sure. So the turn goes Brian Thomas 86 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:51,240 Drake London. I love let's see it looks like 87 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:52,960 by rank. Did you guys draw? 88 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:56,080 Is this glitching on me? I think this is glitching on me. 89 00:04:56,480 --> 00:04:58,240 I love this rank of Brock Bowers. 90 00:04:58,280 --> 00:05:01,000 Happy to be heavy on him. Or do you want to grab CMC here? 91 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:05,760 Let's grab Bowers. Yeah, he's yeah, he's such a 92 00:05:05,760 --> 00:05:10,520 smash. And I mean, McCaffrey, there is 93 00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:13,760 a is a strong pick, but I think we we have a good chance to get 94 00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:16,600 a running back that we like in the third. 95 00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:20,600 And if not, you know, there's there's guys that you can get 96 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:22,800 kind of in the 4th, 5th, 6th range that are solid. 97 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:25,880 Yeah, yeah. And I mean, like, if if you're 98 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:29,560 you guys are ahead of market on Bauer slightly, if you're like 99 00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:32,600 me and love taking him at the 1-2 turn or whatever, like 100 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:34,920 you're going to end up with a pretty overweight position on 101 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:37,400 him because you're essentially going to be taking him, you 102 00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:39,600 know, with any of the first three to four picks of the 103 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:42,320 second round. I think you'd want that though. 104 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:47,760 He was so good as a rookie and you know, he, he could have a a 105 00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:50,040 pretty big quarterback upgrade, too. 106 00:05:50,640 --> 00:05:52,640 And at the very least, it won't be Desmond Ritter down the 107 00:05:52,640 --> 00:05:55,840 stretch. This is fertile. 108 00:05:56,680 --> 00:06:02,480 This this Tom Brady reporting of Matthew Stafford Adam to his 109 00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:06,960 What Montana ranch to discuss play Matthew Stafford the block 110 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:09,160 powers would be pure fucking sex man. 111 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:11,240 That would be awesome. Yeah. 112 00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:14,160 The, I mean, this, this starts kind of fun. 113 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:16,480 This is like we're getting Stafford on one of these teams. 114 00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:20,160 We probably want to consider Stafford later, to be honest. 115 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:23,640 Right. You know where you are because 116 00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:25,720 that's one of the things with that I've just noticed through 117 00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:29,840 my handful of drafts is, you know, the there aren't as many 118 00:06:29,840 --> 00:06:32,800 clean stacking partners with how many musical chairs we still 119 00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,560 have with free agency with the draft. 120 00:06:36,480 --> 00:06:39,040 Stafford I think is just a nice value in general. 121 00:06:39,280 --> 00:06:42,120 And if you want to break a tie in favor of a little Galaxy 122 00:06:42,120 --> 00:06:44,480 brain correlation with your second round pick, it doesn't 123 00:06:44,480 --> 00:06:45,760 seem like that's going to hurt anybody. 124 00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:48,240 Yeah, especially if you have both teams. 125 00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:51,680 Now, obviously he could just stay with the Rams, which I 126 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:55,280 think is still the most likely. But yeah, this is a fun gal 127 00:06:55,280 --> 00:06:58,680 brain play. Because otherwise, as of this 128 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:01,840 moment there, there's nothing that you can really do for 129 00:07:01,840 --> 00:07:04,040 stacking up Brock Bowers unless you want to be like, oh, I'll 130 00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:06,360 take Jacoby and just like bet on the offense without the 131 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:08,680 quarterback. Right, right, right. 132 00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:11,040 Yeah, which I think it's totally fine to do. 133 00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:14,960 Our guys access Bowers with Stafford would complete the what 134 00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:17,360 if puka has eligibility career arc. 135 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:19,760 We would get to find out once and for all. 136 00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:24,400 God, he just, he's so good at just like feeding the guy he 137 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:26,120 trusts. That would be so fun. 138 00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:30,600 I Trey McBride here goes early 3rd. 139 00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:32,200 I forget what I was listening to you on you. 140 00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:35,800 You were more hyped on Trey McBride than I thought you would 141 00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:37,880 have been. Just one, because I know you 142 00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:41,760 weren't super in on him or not, like you just weren't like balls 143 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:43,360 to the wall in on him last. Year. 144 00:07:43,360 --> 00:07:44,600 No, I wasn't. And then? 145 00:07:44,880 --> 00:07:47,000 Gretchen was the the. McBride Yeah. 146 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,600 But then also like when we talked like you were pretty in 147 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:52,200 on Marvin Harrison. Not that those two have to be 148 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,840 mutually exclusive, but I'm surprised when I heard you as as 149 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:58,600 bullish on him as you were just on a tip to those other things. 150 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:02,680 I just think, I mean, I'm sold on him being really, really good 151 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:04,880 now. Whereas like he you know, he did 152 00:08:04,880 --> 00:08:07,080 it for half a year. He sat by Zach Kurtz. 153 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:09,160 He was a good, not amazing prospects. 154 00:08:09,320 --> 00:08:12,000 And I was like a little bit we've seen some kind of one year 155 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:13,840 wonder flash in the pants stuff at tight end. 156 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,480 But once you like prove it to me for like a year and a half at 157 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:19,640 the level he has, I'm I'm fully in. 158 00:08:19,760 --> 00:08:22,080 Like I do not need any convincing that Trey McBride is 159 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:25,600 awesome. And I am not worried that he 160 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:27,160 didn't score touchdowns last year. 161 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:31,200 Like it's his. It's not like he's like like a 162 00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:34,000 225 tweener or something. 230 tweener. 163 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:37,760 Like he's a legit tight end. He plays on all the plays, all 164 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:40,480 the play action stuff. Like he'll score touchdowns in 165 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:41,919 his career. It was a weird year. 166 00:08:41,919 --> 00:08:44,400 Yeah, it's fine. And it's like, you know, it's, 167 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:45,960 it's kind of OK, we're on the clock here. 168 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:50,200 So we have kind of this mess of not a mess, but we have all 169 00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:51,920 these quarterbacks. So we can probably push 170 00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:53,480 quarterback if we want to go that route. 171 00:08:53,480 --> 00:08:56,120 And then you want to grab 1 of Kyron or Chase Brown here. 172 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:59,640 I'm down to do that. I'd also be down to take TET and 173 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:03,200 see if we can get one of the running backs back and then 174 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:04,600 just. Push, then just push 175 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:06,440 quarterback. Then push quarterback, yeah. 176 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:09,240 Yeah, let's do it. Yeah, this guy, yeah, could 177 00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:14,040 definitely go double running back, but my guess is they 178 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:17,640 probably mix it up a little bit. So you you guys have an 179 00:09:17,640 --> 00:09:20,160 aggressive. So we just took TET at pick 35 180 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:23,720 back into the third round. ADP of 4611 picks ahead of ADP. 181 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:25,440 Obviously we're playing the game here on the side. 182 00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:27,520 And we were right too, because the drafter goes jacks and 183 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:29,760 flowers. Take one of these running backs 184 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:33,120 and then we could talk about TET Kyron. 185 00:09:33,680 --> 00:09:39,360 I like Kyron, yeah. Yeah. 186 00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:42,960 So is this, have you taken TET this high before do you think 187 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:45,760 obviously you think this is well within where he should be going 188 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:47,920 late 3rd? I don't know if I've taken quite 189 00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:50,280 this high, but yeah, I mean, he's I think he's an awesome 190 00:09:50,280 --> 00:09:54,320 prospect. He's like a little bit there is 191 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:58,320 a little bit of a lower floor with him compared to, you know, 192 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:01,400 the top end guys from last year Cuz he's not I don't think going 193 00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:05,120 to be like a big time deep ball winner in the NFL. 194 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:10,760 We'll see what the speed is, but separation isn't like his 195 00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:17,360 strongest asset, especially deep, but he's a really good 196 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:19,800 intermediate route runner and I think we'll be a strong target 197 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:22,920 earner. And that's where you you kind of 198 00:10:22,920 --> 00:10:26,000 look at him as like in that Drake London archetype. 199 00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:30,360 I was I was running comps earlier to start to get those my 200 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:32,960 articles ready on the prospects. And the guy who popped up that 201 00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:36,880 was interesting is kind of a good and bad way actually is is 202 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:42,680 a King Nix, which you know, he was kind of like a bigger but 203 00:10:42,680 --> 00:10:44,560 kind of like possession receiver with juice. 204 00:10:44,560 --> 00:10:47,120 And then he suffered a bunch of lower leg injuries and and was 205 00:10:47,360 --> 00:10:50,560 out of the league quickly thereafter, but was really good 206 00:10:50,560 --> 00:10:53,680 early in his career. And then Juju Smith Schuster 207 00:10:53,680 --> 00:10:58,120 actually popped up as another kind of big bodied like, you 208 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,200 know, he he was running out of slot and Ted will be an X but 209 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:04,840 similar in the sense of like, you know, can produce after the 210 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:10,920 catch and probably going to see like not the highest A dot more 211 00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:13,200 of an intermediate guy. He didn't come to Michael 212 00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:15,560 Pittman, but I think he's kind of also in that the Pittman 213 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:18,160 archetype, but I think a little more juice. 214 00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:23,200 And I guess my my only pushback would just be like, is it even 215 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:27,440 possible for his landing spot to push him any higher than this is 216 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:31,400 going to be able to jump Worthy and Marvin Harrison and JSN? 217 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:34,640 Or is this like kind of the top of where his ADP would settle? 218 00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:37,080 And would you want to just try to grab cheaper shares of him 219 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:41,560 right now? Yeah, I mean, that's a, that's a 220 00:11:41,560 --> 00:11:44,840 reasonable case. I, I guess like if you're 221 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:48,600 playing the CLV game and taking the late 3rd isn't, isn't great. 222 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:54,400 If you're like, hey, I want a pretty high upside wide receiver 223 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:56,880 to bet in the late third round and I can and I know I can get a 224 00:11:56,880 --> 00:12:00,160 running back in the 4th or at least I'm pretty sure I can. 225 00:12:01,040 --> 00:12:03,400 Then I think he fills out the room very nicely. 226 00:12:04,200 --> 00:12:06,760 Yeah, yeah. So we start Malik Neighbors, 227 00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:11,560 Brock Bauer's Tet and Kyron. Nice young trio of pass catchers 228 00:12:11,560 --> 00:12:15,200 there, come back and grab Kyron at pick 38. 229 00:12:15,880 --> 00:12:20,040 The turn team went Lamar and Zay, which is kind of a fun 230 00:12:20,560 --> 00:12:24,640 double tap there. Feel like Zay is going to, you 231 00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:26,480 know, he's almost like the opposite of Xavier worthy. 232 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:29,160 It's like he was out of sight, out of mind during that playoff 233 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:31,880 run, whereas Xavier worthy like really boosted his stock. 234 00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:34,440 But it's like, I still don't think anything's really changed 235 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:37,880 for how good Zay Flowers is. I don't I don't know, I'm not 236 00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:41,720 that into Zay because I think you're kind of like giving up 237 00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:46,920 some of the breakout upside like Zay Flowers in the in the 238 00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:52,960 situation that he's in, like Lamar has played well enough to 239 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:58,520 win back-to-back MVPS and Flowers has been good but not 240 00:12:58,520 --> 00:13:01,280 amazing. This past year. 241 00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:05,400 We had Mark Andrews tail off, especially as a yardage 242 00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:09,720 producer. And I don't know, it's like what 243 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:13,480 what more kind of could have been there for him to like 244 00:13:13,480 --> 00:13:18,000 really break out as a second year player where I think I'm 245 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:21,600 now feeling like Flowers is a good player, but not amazing. 246 00:13:22,160 --> 00:13:26,360 And this is an expensive price to pay for for a wide receiver 247 00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:29,440 like that. Yeah, you're, I think you you 248 00:13:29,440 --> 00:13:32,160 are probably sacrificing like to your point, Zay Flowers isn't 249 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:36,320 going to finish as like a top five 6-7 wide receiver, Like 250 00:13:36,320 --> 00:13:39,760 that's just not in his range. But I also think you're probably 251 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:43,160 getting a much better floor then you're like, I think your floor 252 00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:47,400 is better than Marv. You know, obviously, Ted, I 253 00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:50,040 agree, you know, so that that is I think you're buying a pretty 254 00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:52,280 safe, reliable asset. And what I like about what this 255 00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:54,920 drafter did is you are getting the correlation there. 256 00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:57,560 Yeah. As far as stacking it, I'm into 257 00:13:57,560 --> 00:13:58,520 it. If you're stacking it, yeah, 258 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:00,760 yeah. But it just feels like a little. 259 00:14:00,920 --> 00:14:03,560 Sorry, someone mentioned. Yeah, the board was frozen there 260 00:14:03,560 --> 00:14:05,000 for us. Sorry, Pat, we are actually on 261 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:06,280 the clock here. My bad guys. 262 00:14:06,280 --> 00:14:08,000 I don't know what happened over there. 263 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:11,880 Judy, Ken Walker, Camara Sutton in here. 264 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:13,640 Sidekick likes this taking a wide receiver. 265 00:14:14,440 --> 00:14:16,840 Yeah, I'd be into either the wide receivers or Walker. 266 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:22,320 Yeah. Let's let's let's do Walker 267 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:24,320 kind. Of the reverse move of of last. 268 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:26,680 Time. Yeah, exactly where I don't 269 00:14:26,680 --> 00:14:29,240 really feel that strongly. And he does go Caleb Johnson 270 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:34,040 right away. So yeah, we grab Walker. 271 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:36,120 We'll see what he does here. Do you, do you have a preference 272 00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:37,760 of Judy or Sutton if we have the choice? 273 00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:44,520 Bo Nix is like, so expensive that it kind of has me thinking 274 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:48,720 Judy, but I'm fine with either one. 275 00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:51,320 Yeah. So he does double tap running 276 00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:52,720 back there, Caleb Johnson, Kamara. 277 00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:55,160 So we have our choice. Cortland Sutton has the higher 278 00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:57,760 ADP just slightly, but you guys have a slightly higher rank. 279 00:14:57,760 --> 00:14:59,760 On So Knicks is 86. When do we pick? 280 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:02,160 Let's just see if the Knicks is realistic. 281 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:07,680 We pick next at 83, so yeah. Yeah, let's, let's take, let's 282 00:15:07,680 --> 00:15:10,800 take Sutton, Yeah. Let's give that a shot. 283 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:14,760 I want to see what happened with that draft board there because I 284 00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:18,840 had this up and it just like it's like nothing happened there 285 00:15:18,840 --> 00:15:21,360 for a while. Let's see if it works here 286 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:24,640 again, what were we talking about? 287 00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:30,840 Oh the the Zay Flowers and and Lamar together as opposed to A1 288 00:15:30,840 --> 00:15:33,240 off. No, yeah, I like that. 289 00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:37,120 I definitely like that. Yeah, why would we pass on Judy? 290 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:40,640 I do I sacrilegious. I still have like sticker shock 291 00:15:40,640 --> 00:15:43,520 every time I see him, like the song and dance we've done with 292 00:15:43,520 --> 00:15:45,040 Jerry. Judy, what was it 2 years ago? 293 00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:47,600 We were taking him at the 3-4 turn and then I was like, oh 294 00:15:47,680 --> 00:15:50,400 this fucking guy, make banish him to the 12th round and now 295 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:52,520 he's back up here to the sixth round and we don't even know who 296 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:57,400 his quarterback is going to be. But like to kind of go back to 297 00:15:57,400 --> 00:15:59,960 the flower stuff, like what's the difference between him and 298 00:15:59,960 --> 00:16:06,360 Sutton, you know? Well, I mean, obviously I think 299 00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:12,000 Flowers younger has I think has a much better chance for 300 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:14,520 touchdown regression, right? Like Sutton has basically lived 301 00:16:14,520 --> 00:16:19,600 off of touchdowns. But yeah, I I see your point. 302 00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:22,240 Like he's always gonna probably be 1B in that offense. 303 00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:24,440 You could continue to see likely expand. 304 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:27,040 Maybe they hit on another pass catcher or, you know, they 305 00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:29,840 strike me as a team that'll continue spending second, third 306 00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:33,520 round picks on receivers. Right, right. 307 00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:35,440 Or him and Judy. I mean, I guess quarterback 308 00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:37,760 plays the difference there, but it's like I. 309 00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:41,720 Still, I still like how his like distribution of points in a best 310 00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:43,480 ball format. Like he popped off for some 311 00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:45,160 really big spike weeks last year. 312 00:16:45,880 --> 00:16:48,120 Yeah, yeah. I remember him against the 313 00:16:48,120 --> 00:16:51,040 Broncos, 'cause that was my team that finished second in the BR 314 00:16:51,280 --> 00:16:53,240 when he went off for like 28 points there. 315 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:55,400 So I don't know. I, I think he's a volatile 316 00:16:55,400 --> 00:17:00,800 asset, but like I like having access to the Ravens and I still 317 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:04,880 think he's he's the best bet. Yeah, Pepper, Tony has a good 318 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:06,280 comment. Yardage is the biggest indicator 319 00:17:06,280 --> 00:17:07,839 of touchdowns. Based on yardage, he should have 320 00:17:07,839 --> 00:17:09,960 scored 8:00-ish. Touchdowns will positively 321 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:11,880 egress. Plus he's attached to Lamar. 322 00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:18,200 That's that's all good stuff. I I do think like in the fourth 323 00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:22,359 round, there's probably a guy who like smashes and and is who 324 00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:24,839 you need. Yeah, it's hard for me to see 325 00:17:24,839 --> 00:17:26,960 him being that guy, but you know, he could definitely, he 326 00:17:26,960 --> 00:17:31,320 has a a really good weekly ceiling being a part of that 327 00:17:31,320 --> 00:17:32,800 offense like you're pointing out, so. 328 00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:37,440 I think he's settling into how you think about Devante Smith or 329 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:39,120 T Higgins or Jalen Waddle. Make sure. 330 00:17:39,120 --> 00:17:41,880 I still definitely prefer TI, think what we've seen from T is 331 00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:44,840 definitely a cut above that, but maybe like Devante and Jalen 332 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:48,640 Waddle. Yeah, I mean, certainly better 333 00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:50,640 than Waddle last year. Yeah. 334 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:55,040 And I guess they, you know, the other thing we kind of had told 335 00:17:55,040 --> 00:17:57,800 ourselves about the Ravens, at least heading into this year, 336 00:17:57,800 --> 00:18:00,840 was like, what if the defense regresses a little bit and they 337 00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:03,960 throw a more? I mean, there's always they, 338 00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:06,360 they were kind of an interesting roller coaster team this year 339 00:18:06,360 --> 00:18:08,760 where the start of the season, their secondary was really bad 340 00:18:08,760 --> 00:18:10,080 and then they kind of shorted up. 341 00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:13,720 They shorted up. So there's still kind of stuff 342 00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:17,160 there where if this Baltimore team had a bunch of injuries or 343 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:20,360 gotten shootouts, it's like, OK, I, I want to start seeing, you 344 00:18:20,360 --> 00:18:22,920 know, Zay Flowers and an offense that more resembles the Tampa 345 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:27,560 Bay box than, you know, the, the, the Steelers or whatever. 346 00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:34,800 Yeah. Yeah, so we start here. 347 00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:38,400 Pretty fun build. We got our 2 running backs, 348 00:18:38,400 --> 00:18:41,080 Kyron and Kenneth Walker in the fourth and fifth round. 349 00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:43,480 We got Brock Bowers in the second and then three pass 350 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,920 catchers, neighbors Tet and Sutton. 351 00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,080 Just as I talked, it looked at Kyra and Kenneth Walker. 352 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:52,120 If this was two years ago or even last year, we would have 353 00:18:52,120 --> 00:18:54,400 talked about the scary dead zone for running backs. 354 00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:57,320 Is that like not even going to be part of the best ball lexicon 355 00:18:57,320 --> 00:18:58,760 this summer? Is anyone going to talk about 356 00:18:59,360 --> 00:19:01,280 any of these picks being dead zone picks anymore? 357 00:19:01,280 --> 00:19:04,520 I don't know, because it's kind of it's kind of been broken up 358 00:19:04,600 --> 00:19:11,480 by like the Kyron and Walker are formerly like four years ago, 359 00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:15,880 probably third round picks. So which wasn't really a part of 360 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:17,760 the dead zone. It was like, I guess that 361 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:21,200 someone's maybe late 3rd. I can't remember Ben's original 362 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:25,080 definition, but this is kind of more like 4th through 6th was 363 00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:28,480 was what I had in my mind. 4th through 7th maybe. 364 00:19:29,120 --> 00:19:32,800 But by the time you get to the 7th, wide receivers starting to 365 00:19:32,800 --> 00:19:35,560 dry up and you're you're kind of dealing with a different profile 366 00:19:35,560 --> 00:19:37,360 than you used to. And then you have like some guys 367 00:19:37,360 --> 00:19:42,480 like Naji is a classic dead zone back, but he goes in like the 368 00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:45,560 9th. So it's a little different 10th 369 00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:47,160 and he was going on like the 11th to start. 370 00:19:47,160 --> 00:19:49,720 It's kind of nuts. That ties into the very first 371 00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:52,520 comment on the stream today. Pete, don't let Karain talk you 372 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:54,120 into Naji. I got your back. 373 00:19:54,120 --> 00:19:55,240 Stay strong. Wow. 374 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:57,440 I didn't know on this field, I don't know that we need him. 375 00:19:57,520 --> 00:19:59,320 I do. I honestly do like him. 376 00:19:59,320 --> 00:20:02,840 As you know at at at cost, when you start pairing him with like 377 00:20:03,120 --> 00:20:06,720 you have Trayvon Henderson and you know Devin Neil and you, you 378 00:20:06,720 --> 00:20:09,040 have Naji in there, he kind of ties the room together. 379 00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:14,040 So I do obviously we want to come away with Bo Nix with one 380 00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:16,400 of these two picks. The questions is do you, do we 381 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:19,360 think the Lamar drafter would take him or can we grab Jalen 382 00:20:19,360 --> 00:20:21,560 McMillan and get Bo on the comeback? 383 00:20:23,080 --> 00:20:27,600 I'd be I'm think I'm Bo just because like we set that up and 384 00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:30,560 it's going to be such a bummer if we lose it and I don't mind 385 00:20:30,840 --> 00:20:33,680 taking Warren, Oregon, Hawkinson even. 386 00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:35,560 You don't. You not minding taking Warren? 387 00:20:35,560 --> 00:20:36,360 What a shocker. Yeah. 388 00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:37,440 Sure. I don't mind it. 389 00:20:37,440 --> 00:20:39,600 I don't mind it. I don't think he was going to 390 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:41,560 take him. I still like McMillan. 391 00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:43,720 We talked about this on our episode last week. 392 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:47,200 I thought you you brought up some good cases against him. 393 00:20:48,520 --> 00:20:50,720 But I still am interested, especially at this price. 394 00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:54,000 Right now he's sliding almost 10 picks past ADP. 395 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:57,000 So Michael Dubner's gonna have an article out on legendary 396 00:20:57,000 --> 00:21:03,320 upside probably tomorrow. And he so he's writing up 397 00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:06,880 mispriced players. And McMillan is someone he had 398 00:21:07,520 --> 00:21:10,440 written up as a mispriced player, meaning he's overpriced 399 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:14,600 because of the, the risk that Chris Godwin could sign there. 400 00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:18,880 But we're getting him here about 10 picks past ADP. 401 00:21:18,920 --> 00:21:21,520 I'm I'm into it at this price. Yeah. 402 00:21:21,600 --> 00:21:25,280 So, yeah, so he does fall back to us and, you know, on a team 403 00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:28,200 where we did take, again, I don't know if these words are 404 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:32,160 allowed or relevant anymore, but dare I say detours away from the 405 00:21:32,160 --> 00:21:35,280 wide receiver position there. I think getting McMillan as our 406 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:38,360 wide receiver 4 at pick 86 makes sense for this build. 407 00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:43,440 For sure, Lil Dodger says how come it's Pete and Pat, not Pat 408 00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:45,960 and Pete? I was talking with with Britt 409 00:21:47,520 --> 00:21:49,560 and we're like, she just, she just goes. 410 00:21:50,280 --> 00:21:54,080 How do you think we are to people like are we Pat and 411 00:21:54,080 --> 00:21:57,440 Britt, Pat and Brittany, Brittany and Pat like how, how 412 00:21:57,440 --> 00:21:59,480 do you like? And we're kind of like 413 00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:01,800 discussing like, how do you think like this couple or that 414 00:22:01,800 --> 00:22:04,200 couple would say, have you ever, have you ever had this 415 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:06,440 discussion with Lauren? I haven't. 416 00:22:06,480 --> 00:22:09,720 I mean to answer little Dodgers question, Pat and I actually did 417 00:22:10,200 --> 00:22:14,920 a best out of 100 Rochambeau series before titling this video 418 00:22:14,920 --> 00:22:17,280 and I won. So we did Pete and Pat. 419 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:21,840 I will say I do agree now that Pat and Pete I think the shorter 420 00:22:22,680 --> 00:22:27,320 name always sounds better first, but. 421 00:22:27,360 --> 00:22:29,760 It's double, double short, right? 422 00:22:30,880 --> 00:22:32,800 It's more syllable. Pat, though, actually does sound 423 00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:33,960 better. Britain. 424 00:22:33,960 --> 00:22:36,240 Pat versus patent. Britt we, we came to the 425 00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:39,560 conclusion that if she's Britney to people it's Pat and Brittany, 426 00:22:39,760 --> 00:22:42,240 but if they know her as Brit, which would be more kind of 427 00:22:42,240 --> 00:22:45,160 people or like closer friends then should be Britain, Pat. 428 00:22:46,600 --> 00:22:49,480 I think our friends Pete and Lauren, Lauren and Pete. 429 00:22:49,480 --> 00:22:51,160 I think our friends say Pete and Lauren. 430 00:22:51,640 --> 00:22:54,560 OK. Because we live in a male 431 00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:57,840 dominated society. Because the patriarchy, yeah. 432 00:22:58,640 --> 00:23:01,640 Because of the patriarchy, I correct anyone if they say my 433 00:23:01,720 --> 00:23:10,760 wife's name first. But yes, I I'm sorry, you know 434 00:23:10,760 --> 00:23:12,880 what it's it's very meta right now. 435 00:23:12,920 --> 00:23:15,520 You got to you got to maximize YouTube thumbnails. 436 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:20,560 YouTube does actually have an AB title, or at least a thumbnail 437 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:22,920 function. I think what I should do is AB 438 00:23:23,280 --> 00:23:26,880 test these two titles, see which one leads to a higher click 439 00:23:26,880 --> 00:23:29,680 through rate, then we'll settle it. 440 00:23:30,000 --> 00:23:31,880 We'll settle it. YouTube algo. 441 00:23:37,480 --> 00:23:40,360 It's always. Weird writing title, not not a 442 00:23:40,360 --> 00:23:43,560 fan of that. It it is this weird thing like 443 00:23:43,560 --> 00:23:46,720 when I title my videos on my YouTube channel, like I would 444 00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:50,080 never write Pete drafts a best ball team as the title. 445 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:52,840 But like over on ship chasing, like somehow my brain 446 00:23:52,840 --> 00:23:56,440 immediately switches to like more of this third person like 447 00:23:56,560 --> 00:23:59,320 omnipresence talking about the ship chasing universe. 448 00:23:59,320 --> 00:24:01,920 So I'm like Pete and Pat like I turn into a different person 449 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:03,840 when I write the titles for these videos. 450 00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:09,480 All right, there you go. Naji Harris off the board at 451 00:24:09,480 --> 00:24:13,480 pick one O 1 to goods. Seems like a nice pick there, as 452 00:24:13,480 --> 00:24:15,800 is RB3. It's pretty good. 453 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:18,080 And that way we don't have to draft him, so it works out well. 454 00:24:18,920 --> 00:24:21,080 You see, Sacral just comment. I have people refer to my wife 455 00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:23,000 like she's a character in Handmaid's Tale. 456 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:28,920 She's of Zack, of Zack. I met Zack and his wife and she 457 00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:32,240 was like, people just call him Zack now. 458 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:33,400 I hate it. Yes. 459 00:24:35,520 --> 00:24:36,680 Well, yeah, that's probably weird. 460 00:24:37,720 --> 00:24:39,800 That's the thing too. Like when I, I'm, I'm literally 461 00:24:39,800 --> 00:24:44,360 having cooter doodle on after dark on my channel this weekend. 462 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,160 And I, I like calling her Amanda, but then people like 463 00:24:47,160 --> 00:24:48,920 freak out because they don't hear Amanda. 464 00:24:48,920 --> 00:24:51,480 But I'm just like, I can't just keep calling you Cooter doodle. 465 00:24:51,600 --> 00:24:53,680 And I certainly can't abbreviate it to Cooter. 466 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:57,040 Like there's there's no winning in this situation with these 467 00:24:57,040 --> 00:24:58,880 online pseudonyms. I think you you could maybe 468 00:24:59,000 --> 00:25:03,440 abbreviate to Cooter couldn't. Hey, Cooter, it just like that. 469 00:25:03,440 --> 00:25:05,200 It just, it doesn't, it doesn't work. 470 00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:11,360 All right, we got a, we got a 1241 build Cook in here about to 471 00:25:11,360 --> 00:25:15,000 pick at the end of the ninth round here. 472 00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:16,640 Some quarterbacks at the top of the board. 473 00:25:16,640 --> 00:25:22,240 The sidekick likes us grabbing either JK Dobbins or securing 474 00:25:22,360 --> 00:25:26,280 the stack, with Mims, Keenan, Allen and Kelsey also kicking 475 00:25:26,280 --> 00:25:27,720 around. Here what what are your thoughts 476 00:25:27,720 --> 00:25:28,960 on Kelsey? Because I'll, I'll tell you 477 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:30,960 this. If Kelsey's ADP was higher, he'd 478 00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:33,880 be higher in the ranks. We're going to kind of be riding 479 00:25:33,880 --> 00:25:35,600 him up on the announcement that he's playing. 480 00:25:35,960 --> 00:25:43,120 Are you into him at all? I can I say this, can we can we 481 00:25:43,120 --> 00:25:45,600 lock up Mims? Sure, let's do it. 482 00:25:46,280 --> 00:25:50,240 I like Mims here. Let's do that. 483 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:52,000 But yeah, so let let's talk through the Kelsey stuff. 484 00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:55,080 I I'll be honest, I haven't like really like recircled back to 485 00:25:55,080 --> 00:25:58,560 thinking about this post him clarifying that he's coming back 486 00:25:58,840 --> 00:26:01,000 ADP 118. You guys have him one O 8. 487 00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:05,040 He's now right around the Nejoku gotter range. 488 00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:08,000 Price seems fine to me. It sounds like you're kind of 489 00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:11,600 excited about him at this price. Well, not, not like excited, but 490 00:26:11,640 --> 00:26:14,360 man, I mean, he's he was still projecting pretty well to close 491 00:26:14,360 --> 00:26:17,600 the year and had, you know, some decent production. 492 00:26:19,280 --> 00:26:22,360 And it's like the bar is so low, a tight end and he's and he's 493 00:26:22,360 --> 00:26:25,720 playing like the risk is now. There used to be risk of of 494 00:26:25,720 --> 00:26:30,560 straight zeros and that's gone. So he'll he's going to get more 495 00:26:30,560 --> 00:26:31,840 expensive than this, I would say. 496 00:26:33,280 --> 00:26:36,720 And Drake May went, this is how we calibrate the sidekick is as 497 00:26:36,720 --> 00:26:38,560 long as you have naked Drake May at the top. 498 00:26:38,600 --> 00:26:42,560 We know it's working correctly. But yeah, I'd probably be Kelsey 499 00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:45,320 here. Yeah, I'm fine with Kelsey. 500 00:26:45,440 --> 00:26:48,720 Not a popular pick in the chat. Chad does not like Kelsey. 501 00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:50,800 One other little feather in the cap. 502 00:26:50,800 --> 00:26:53,200 We are building out a Denver stack. 503 00:26:53,200 --> 00:26:56,520 So breaking ties in favor of AFC West correlation. 504 00:26:56,800 --> 00:27:00,200 Never a bad idea. Now have Bowers and Kelsey as 505 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:03,280 part of this. I don't think he's a bad pick, 506 00:27:03,280 --> 00:27:07,000 but I do actually wonder how much room his ADP actually has 507 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:10,320 to run just based on comments like this. 508 00:27:10,320 --> 00:27:12,360 He was retired on the field this year. 509 00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:19,720 Yeah, I mean, he certainly was not Kelsey, but the dude like 510 00:27:19,720 --> 00:27:23,240 let me just pull up the the game log and I'll I'll do underdog. 511 00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:29,280 In the divisional rounds, he scored 21 point to underdog 512 00:27:29,280 --> 00:27:31,800 points, half point PPR he scored 18. 513 00:27:36,040 --> 00:27:43,880 Hope you got muted. All right, while Travis, while 514 00:27:43,880 --> 00:27:48,000 Pat is back, maybe I could look up the Travis Kelsey box score 515 00:27:48,360 --> 00:27:52,160 and tell you what he did. Here's the recap of the team so 516 00:27:52,160 --> 00:27:55,680 far. We have Bonex at quarterback, 2 517 00:27:55,680 --> 00:27:58,920 running backs Karen Williams and Kenneth Walker, our five wide 518 00:27:58,920 --> 00:28:01,440 receivers, Malik Neighbors, Ted McMillan, Courtland Sutton, 519 00:28:01,440 --> 00:28:03,440 Jalen McMillan. Look at all the Mcmillans here, 520 00:28:03,640 --> 00:28:06,200 Marvin Mims, and then our two tight ends, Brock Bowers and 521 00:28:06,200 --> 00:28:09,320 Travis Kelsey. Sorry, yeah, I unplugged the 522 00:28:09,320 --> 00:28:13,360 monitor with my foot. The no. 523 00:28:13,440 --> 00:28:17,600 So yeah, he had 18 points in Week 17 against the Steelers, 21 524 00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:23,080 points against the Texans. Like then he sucked for the last 525 00:28:23,080 --> 00:28:26,960 two games, which you know, is a risk. 526 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:30,560 But as far as like spike week potential goes, you're getting 527 00:28:30,560 --> 00:28:33,000 him in the 10th round. I don't know. 528 00:28:33,000 --> 00:28:35,400 I think he's, I think he'll move up a little bit for sure. 529 00:28:36,280 --> 00:28:39,120 Is it that crazy? Zach says did not expect a year 530 00:28:39,120 --> 00:28:42,320 ago that Travis Kelsey would turn into 2025 Hertzgerald The 531 00:28:42,360 --> 00:28:44,880 like when you click Travis Kelsey right now you are hoping 532 00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:47,240 he has the Zach Ertz sees it from last year. 533 00:28:47,280 --> 00:28:50,080 Like that would be a really nice outcome for Travis. 534 00:28:50,080 --> 00:28:51,960 Exactly. Exactly. 535 00:28:53,480 --> 00:28:55,960 Pat, I think your mic is maybe plugged into a different source 536 00:28:55,960 --> 00:28:57,520 or or whatever. Now you sound different. 537 00:28:59,000 --> 00:29:06,200 Yeah, thanks. Yeah, Kelsey with Bauer seems 538 00:29:06,200 --> 00:29:10,240 super greedy. Greed is good, I believe is the 539 00:29:10,480 --> 00:29:12,200 term I've heard. So yeah, we're definitely 540 00:29:12,200 --> 00:29:16,960 getting greedy. Yeah, plus Omega King says what 541 00:29:16,960 --> 00:29:18,280 is this, Kelsey Spike week these days? 542 00:29:18,280 --> 00:29:22,160 14 points? I mean, he hit 18 plus in two of 543 00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:24,440 his last four games. Yeah. 544 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:27,040 So I don't know. I feel like a little. 545 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,880 So the the thesis is kind of you're saying like, hey, you're 546 00:29:31,880 --> 00:29:35,400 going to probably have some really low scores during the 547 00:29:35,400 --> 00:29:38,200 regular season, but you're playing it as they ramp them up 548 00:29:38,200 --> 00:29:40,200 again, load management when it matters. 549 00:29:40,560 --> 00:29:43,360 Travis Kelsey is out there. And the other thing is like they 550 00:29:43,360 --> 00:29:45,200 were running away with the BI this year. 551 00:29:45,920 --> 00:29:47,880 If they play in a more competitive environment where 552 00:29:47,880 --> 00:29:52,600 they actually have to win games Weeks 14 through 1718, you could 553 00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:54,280 maybe see his role a little bit bigger then. 554 00:29:56,120 --> 00:30:00,720 Yeah, and you also say like what if he if OK, so he he has been 555 00:30:01,160 --> 00:30:04,240 the engine of the offense and that's not working anymore. 556 00:30:04,680 --> 00:30:07,480 But if the off if what if like if worthy stepping up and Rice 557 00:30:07,480 --> 00:30:10,840 coming back could honestly be good for him as like he's he is 558 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:12,920 moving to the Rich Gerald phase of his career. 559 00:30:13,840 --> 00:30:19,440 But like, OK, like we're we're taking Mark Andrews, who clearly 560 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:22,880 just like is not the Andrews of old and is, you know, more of a 561 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:26,120 bet on touchdowns and being a a trusted piece of the offense. 562 00:30:28,320 --> 00:30:31,920 Andrews did he already go? When did he go? 563 00:30:33,480 --> 00:30:34,880 Yeah, he went in the Mark Andrews. 564 00:30:35,280 --> 00:30:36,520 Yeah, Mark Andrews went in the eighth. 565 00:30:36,920 --> 00:30:38,600 Yeah, yeah. It's like the same. 566 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:41,360 If Kelsey's playing, he's like he's isn't he just Mark Andrews 567 00:30:43,320 --> 00:30:44,840 you? Hate the Ravens? 568 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:48,240 Zayflower sucks. Mark Andrews overdrafted. 569 00:30:48,240 --> 00:30:50,520 Look at you. He's not running all the routes 570 00:30:50,560 --> 00:30:55,440 and you know these, these, he's dropping critical, critical 571 00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:57,560 catches in playoff games. You know this this seems like 572 00:30:57,560 --> 00:31:01,560 Travis Kelce could do that all. Right, we're about to pick at 573 00:31:01,560 --> 00:31:08,320 11:11. We got a 1252 cooking here, No 574 00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:13,080 other obvious stacking stuff. I do love the price of Christian 575 00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:15,560 Kirk here. He's still one of my favorite. 576 00:31:15,560 --> 00:31:19,320 And I think the guy behind us has two quarterbacks, so we 577 00:31:19,320 --> 00:31:21,800 could be able to grab Kirk Lawrence here if we like. 578 00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:27,320 Let's try it. I like it all right. 579 00:31:28,040 --> 00:31:30,000 Yeah. Paul said. 580 00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:34,240 Isn't he just Zachritz? Zachritz is a free agent, so 581 00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:37,320 that's one reason he's not because we don't know for sure 582 00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:44,920 he's going to be back. If he if he is back, then yeah, 583 00:31:44,920 --> 00:31:48,600 I mean, he should go higher. I don't know if I would take him 584 00:31:48,600 --> 00:31:53,640 in like the 9th or whatever, but yeah, there's some, there's some 585 00:31:53,640 --> 00:31:54,920 additional downside with ertz all. 586 00:31:56,400 --> 00:31:59,640 Right, we do get Trevor Lawrence coming back to us, so that works 587 00:31:59,640 --> 00:32:03,720 out nicely there. Bonex double stack with Sutton 588 00:32:03,760 --> 00:32:08,560 and Mims got Lawrence skinny stacked up with Christian Kirk 589 00:32:09,960 --> 00:32:13,560 and some nice pieces around it. Yeah, I this team is coming 590 00:32:13,560 --> 00:32:17,040 together in a pretty clean way. Love it. 591 00:32:18,600 --> 00:32:21,360 Who is your who's your most? I know you said you're just like 592 00:32:21,360 --> 00:32:24,800 25 drafts through, but who is your most drafted player so far? 593 00:32:25,400 --> 00:32:32,120 Let me pull it up. Hunter, Henry and Drake. 594 00:32:32,120 --> 00:32:34,960 Drake Mays not far behind. So there you go. 595 00:32:35,080 --> 00:32:39,200 Yeah. Brock Purdy, I have it at 36%. 596 00:32:39,200 --> 00:32:44,360 Jalen Wright I'm at 36% on. I've drafted a decent amount of 597 00:32:44,360 --> 00:32:50,320 Gabe Davis, which is kind of gross, but he was free and we'll 598 00:32:50,320 --> 00:32:54,200 be there. So had some spikes last year. 599 00:32:54,680 --> 00:32:58,640 Yeah, 32% Bowers. I've taken some Michael Wilson 600 00:32:58,840 --> 00:33:01,600 as another guy who's got a role free. 601 00:33:04,000 --> 00:33:08,800 Evan Ingram, Kyler. I have a bunch of Kyler. 602 00:33:09,720 --> 00:33:12,520 He's very cheap for what he can do on a weekly basis. 603 00:33:12,520 --> 00:33:15,000 Yes. Yeah, I mean, Caleb Williams 604 00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:18,840 goes ahead of him here. Brock Bonex definitely getting a 605 00:33:18,840 --> 00:33:22,320 nice. It's funny how that stuff works 606 00:33:22,320 --> 00:33:24,600 where it's like, you know, I understand he was a 607 00:33:24,600 --> 00:33:26,800 disappointment last year, especially when you could have 608 00:33:26,800 --> 00:33:29,800 just waited 3 or 4 rounds and taken Jayden Daniels instead. 609 00:33:30,120 --> 00:33:33,800 But he's gotten cheaper and I think the offensive outlook is 610 00:33:33,800 --> 00:33:36,480 getting better. You know, Marv in year 2, Trey 611 00:33:36,480 --> 00:33:41,080 McBride's ascendants who maybe they add another piece running 612 00:33:41,080 --> 00:33:43,960 game still good. Like getting the discount there 613 00:33:43,960 --> 00:33:49,080 seems nice. Yep, people, people not into 614 00:33:49,080 --> 00:33:53,880 Jalen Wright in the chat. I mean, he wasn't that great 615 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:58,400 last year, but you have Mostert moving on and a lot of the stuff 616 00:33:58,400 --> 00:34:01,560 on a Chan who's very expensive is like, hey, man, don't you 617 00:34:01,560 --> 00:34:03,360 know that their offensive line sucked? 618 00:34:03,960 --> 00:34:08,600 Like, yeah, I, I do, but like it might suck again. 619 00:34:09,400 --> 00:34:13,040 And so I'm I'm not that into paying like high second round 620 00:34:13,040 --> 00:34:15,239 prices for a back who wasn't efficient. 621 00:34:15,840 --> 00:34:18,840 But you're getting at the same time like if you're going to 622 00:34:18,840 --> 00:34:23,000 offer me much cheaper prices for a piece of a backfield that has 623 00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:25,440 been very productive under Mike McDaniel. 624 00:34:27,480 --> 00:34:29,080 At that point, I'm like, yeah, what if the offensive line is a 625 00:34:29,080 --> 00:34:31,159 little better and they're able to actually run the ball a 626 00:34:31,159 --> 00:34:33,440 little bit more as opposed to just like doing all this like 627 00:34:33,440 --> 00:34:38,360 short dump off stuff to Janu and and HN and get back to kind of 628 00:34:38,360 --> 00:34:41,440 more of the identity I think they want I think right, could 629 00:34:41,440 --> 00:34:45,679 be a part of that. So yeah, just a a second year 630 00:34:45,679 --> 00:34:50,080 breakout bet at running back. Not not overly expensive to 631 00:34:50,080 --> 00:34:51,520 make. Right. 632 00:34:51,520 --> 00:34:54,639 And it's like, obviously if they add someone in the draft or free 633 00:34:54,639 --> 00:34:57,360 agency, like you adjust. But we've also seen situations 634 00:34:57,360 --> 00:34:59,960 like this where nothing gets added and you're like, holy cow, 635 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:03,240 his price needs to start to rise rapidly because he's a 636 00:35:03,240 --> 00:35:07,640 contingent upside bet at worst in an offense that generates a 637 00:35:07,640 --> 00:35:09,280 ton of points for the running back position. 638 00:35:09,680 --> 00:35:11,720 Exactly. And they could add somebody, but 639 00:35:11,720 --> 00:35:14,800 that's another reason why I'm not that into a Chan, right? 640 00:35:14,800 --> 00:35:18,920 Like if I if I'm eating it on a 13th round pick and then he 641 00:35:18,920 --> 00:35:22,120 drops to like the 18th round or whatever, OK, you know? 642 00:35:23,480 --> 00:35:26,800 By the way, if you guys didn't check out ADP Chasing on Monday, 643 00:35:26,800 --> 00:35:29,120 highly recommend it. Had some very good debates on 644 00:35:29,120 --> 00:35:31,400 there, actually posted a clip on YouTube and. 645 00:35:31,560 --> 00:35:32,880 Twitter earlier Yeah, it's a fun episode. 646 00:35:33,440 --> 00:35:37,200 Yeah, Pat and Mike arguing there and then also a lot of pushback 647 00:35:37,200 --> 00:35:41,440 in the comments about the A Chan stuff, so recommend listening to 648 00:35:41,440 --> 00:35:43,160 that. People like a Chan. 649 00:35:43,880 --> 00:35:47,120 They do Anthony Richardson and we got some running backs here. 650 00:35:47,120 --> 00:35:49,120 Quorum. If you want to stack up the 651 00:35:49,120 --> 00:35:52,560 running backs, Algier, Ray Davis, the best receiver is 652 00:35:52,560 --> 00:35:54,520 Restrepo. A little bit of a reach Seems 653 00:35:54,520 --> 00:35:58,680 like a running back pick here. Yeah, I think Algier, we don't 654 00:35:58,680 --> 00:36:03,440 want to take quorum. Yeah, Yeah. 655 00:36:05,720 --> 00:36:08,360 Those are the spots where it's like if, if quorum like really 656 00:36:08,360 --> 00:36:12,400 slid, I wouldn't be opposed, but slightly I had ADP when there's 657 00:36:12,400 --> 00:36:15,880 comparable players like Ray Davis, yeah. 658 00:36:16,080 --> 00:36:18,600 I just assume with the sidekick there, he's actually getting 659 00:36:18,600 --> 00:36:20,960 docked as the teammate, like, cuz we're not trying to get you 660 00:36:20,960 --> 00:36:28,280 the, you know, he's the handcuff, but we needed a 661 00:36:28,280 --> 00:36:32,760 running back there. So I, I, I think Richardson or 662 00:36:32,760 --> 00:36:35,960 yeah, or Davis, but Richardson adds some, some, some upside. 663 00:36:35,960 --> 00:36:39,640 I don't take a ton of them, but let's get them way past ADP 664 00:36:39,640 --> 00:36:41,440 here. That's true. 665 00:36:41,560 --> 00:36:43,160 I mean, I there's a reason it's happening. 666 00:36:43,160 --> 00:36:45,920 Let's take Ray Davis. I mean, the goods brings it up. 667 00:36:46,960 --> 00:36:49,640 You know, there was the article that came out about the Colts 668 00:36:49,640 --> 00:36:53,000 saying it is going to be an open quarterback competition between 669 00:36:53,000 --> 00:36:56,000 whoever they bring in. That is bad when they're like we 670 00:36:56,000 --> 00:36:59,520 don't know between who. Yeah, that, that was a huge red 671 00:36:59,520 --> 00:37:02,360 flag where they're like, whoever the hell walks through this door 672 00:37:02,360 --> 00:37:04,160 is going to have a chance to start over at the. 673 00:37:04,200 --> 00:37:06,680 Area, that's a good point. That's a very good point. 674 00:37:07,080 --> 00:37:08,200 We might need to bump them down even. 675 00:37:08,200 --> 00:37:11,760 More I I I'm with you though, like I still think as your QB 676 00:37:11,760 --> 00:37:16,120 three what you're getting it it. The problem is it starts to inch 677 00:37:16,120 --> 00:37:18,960 closer and closer to the Justin Fields bet right where the 678 00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:21,680 upside is there. But it's not even just like the 679 00:37:21,680 --> 00:37:23,200 question of the spike week potential. 680 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:25,240 It's like when do those spike weeks happen? 681 00:37:25,680 --> 00:37:27,760 Yeah. No, you're right. 682 00:37:27,880 --> 00:37:32,080 There's a chance that he's not an early season starter. 683 00:37:32,120 --> 00:37:34,960 Before we were like, yeah, he's he's an early season starter, 684 00:37:34,960 --> 00:37:36,720 but he might lose his job by the end of the year again. 685 00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:40,800 And now it's like, I don't know, is he definitely the starter by 686 00:37:40,800 --> 00:37:44,560 Week 4? So yeah, that's a good point. 687 00:37:44,800 --> 00:37:49,560 I'm glad we took Davis. Yeah, he's, he's a tricky one, 688 00:37:49,560 --> 00:37:52,160 those ones. Like that's a thing that has 689 00:37:52,160 --> 00:37:54,840 happened with Best Ball over the years where and I do think that 690 00:37:54,840 --> 00:37:57,400 Justin Fields and those things have been good examples of it 691 00:37:57,400 --> 00:38:00,400 where it's like you can justify a lot of things saying, hey, I'm 692 00:38:00,400 --> 00:38:02,720 playing to win first and $250,000. 693 00:38:02,720 --> 00:38:06,920 I do it all the time. But if you stack these really 694 00:38:06,920 --> 00:38:10,440 risky bets over and over and over again, you're really going 695 00:38:10,440 --> 00:38:14,080 to burn a hole in your portfolio of teams. 696 00:38:14,760 --> 00:38:20,400 Yeah, yeah. And I think with onesies, the 697 00:38:20,400 --> 00:38:25,800 risk of them not playing like straight up not playing because 698 00:38:25,880 --> 00:38:29,560 like, so, for example, I wasn't into Kelsey when he was like had 699 00:38:29,560 --> 00:38:31,880 not announced right after the Super Bowl that he was playing. 700 00:38:31,880 --> 00:38:34,640 I was like, I'm out. He's he might retire and I'm 701 00:38:34,640 --> 00:38:37,400 taking two to three guys and one of them just is a zero all 702 00:38:37,400 --> 00:38:38,680 season. Like no thanks. 703 00:38:39,840 --> 00:38:41,840 And I feel the same way at quarterback with the week 17 704 00:38:41,840 --> 00:38:43,480 stuff. Like if you're, if you're giving 705 00:38:43,480 --> 00:38:48,520 me a guy who's a real risk of missing the end of the season 706 00:38:48,520 --> 00:38:51,440 and I only have two other guys. It's also February and so maybe 707 00:38:51,440 --> 00:38:53,200 I have like one other guy because I'm dealing with an 708 00:38:53,200 --> 00:38:55,680 injury or something. It's a huge problem. 709 00:38:56,320 --> 00:39:00,040 So typically I've been fairly wary on the guys with late 710 00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:02,360 season bench risk. Richardson's a little different 711 00:39:02,360 --> 00:39:05,080 because he has such a high weekly ceiling when he plays. 712 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:07,680 But you're right. I mean it's it's pretty similar 713 00:39:07,680 --> 00:39:09,840 to Fields, although Fields goes just after and. 714 00:39:12,080 --> 00:39:15,160 It it will we'll be able to make those comps more clearly. 715 00:39:15,160 --> 00:39:20,200 When we do find out who the mystery competitor is, we'll 716 00:39:20,200 --> 00:39:21,840 have a. Frankly, you could be fields 717 00:39:21,840 --> 00:39:24,240 now. That would be interesting. 718 00:39:24,920 --> 00:39:26,640 I know dude. Then then you just. 719 00:39:26,760 --> 00:39:28,920 Then you just take both Fields and Richardson with your last 720 00:39:28,920 --> 00:39:30,560 couple of picks. Yeah, in a, in a draft. 721 00:39:30,840 --> 00:39:32,040 That's fun. Seriously. 722 00:39:34,040 --> 00:39:37,520 It for sure Ferris saying his ADP could plummet if they signed 723 00:39:37,520 --> 00:39:38,800 a legit competitor. Absolutely. 724 00:39:38,800 --> 00:39:42,320 Like if they bring in the Darnold type, he's in trouble. 725 00:39:42,480 --> 00:39:45,080 He's he's in big trouble because Darnold's a bigger impediment 726 00:39:45,080 --> 00:39:49,640 than even Russ would be, I would think for for fields. 727 00:39:50,280 --> 00:39:53,280 Yeah, yeah, I'm going to, we're going to lower Richardson a 728 00:39:53,280 --> 00:39:56,280 little bit. Not like, you know, I think he's 729 00:39:56,280 --> 00:40:01,880 fine at some point in the late rounds, but it's, it's just a 730 00:40:01,880 --> 00:40:04,560 lot of risks to take on when they're like openly talking 731 00:40:04,560 --> 00:40:07,240 about competition in a week where you could like you might 732 00:40:07,400 --> 00:40:10,040 expect them to get up at the podium and be like, he's our 733 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:12,000 guy. Like we, we like the the 734 00:40:12,000 --> 00:40:13,280 Seahawks are kind of talking with Gino. 735 00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:15,040 Like we expect him to be our guy, you know? 736 00:40:15,120 --> 00:40:17,760 Yeah, They're not. That's not how they're talking. 737 00:40:18,920 --> 00:40:23,640 Yeah, yeah, yeah, Vibes much better on Gino and just kind of, 738 00:40:24,080 --> 00:40:27,200 I know they they ended up firing their coach and yadda, yadda, 739 00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:31,240 but still, like Gino never imploded in the way Anthony 740 00:40:31,240 --> 00:40:33,760 Richardson imploded where the franchise is like holy cow. 741 00:40:34,000 --> 00:40:37,560 As you know, Brett says here, the GM coaches jobs on the line. 742 00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:41,080 We're on the clock, Stafford goes. 743 00:40:41,280 --> 00:40:41,960 That would. Have been our. 744 00:40:42,040 --> 00:40:45,600 Galaxy brained Jordan Whittington here, if we want to 745 00:40:45,600 --> 00:40:48,720 pair him, he's top of the ranks and a nice ADP value. 746 00:40:48,720 --> 00:40:50,920 And then we could see if Shadur comes back. 747 00:40:51,520 --> 00:40:53,200 Or do you want to prioritize Shadur? 748 00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:55,360 What do you think? You could also, yeah. 749 00:40:55,600 --> 00:40:58,120 Whittington's fine. Wandale's fine too. 750 00:40:59,280 --> 00:41:02,400 Do you like Shadur? He's OK. 751 00:41:02,880 --> 00:41:04,080 All right, let's do Whittington then. 752 00:41:06,080 --> 00:41:09,320 I'm just trying to think I guess with with Bo Nicks, Trevor 753 00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:11,280 Lawrence. I mean I think I'm generally 754 00:41:11,280 --> 00:41:13,760 leaning 3 Q BS here but but how do you feel? 755 00:41:14,160 --> 00:41:17,720 Yeah, I, I, I'd be down and take Shudor I, I do take him in this 756 00:41:17,720 --> 00:41:24,200 spot a reasonable amount. He scares me a bit like looking 757 00:41:24,200 --> 00:41:28,280 at his comps and stuff. It's like guys who weren't that 758 00:41:28,280 --> 00:41:31,680 good and then also like didn't do much right away cuz his style 759 00:41:31,680 --> 00:41:36,000 of play, he takes sacks, he makes mistakes, but then he also 760 00:41:36,880 --> 00:41:39,800 I think is going to score most of his points on like as like a 761 00:41:39,840 --> 00:41:45,120 higher volume passer. It could it could be not the 762 00:41:45,120 --> 00:41:47,160 best rookie sees it. Bryce Young is it was his top 763 00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:51,360 comp for me and I think it could be got like that where he has to 764 00:41:51,360 --> 00:41:52,760 get his feet under him a bit. But. 765 00:41:53,200 --> 00:41:56,560 I think just positionally where we're at, getting a guy we feel 766 00:41:56,560 --> 00:41:58,760 pretty comfortable is going to be starting in the playoffs as 767 00:41:58,760 --> 00:42:02,160 our QB 3 is good. Here, Yeah, yeah, I know. 768 00:42:02,200 --> 00:42:05,840 I, I, I do like him as kind of filling this role on your team 769 00:42:05,840 --> 00:42:09,520 and we're getting him past ADP. Yeah, take him at pick 182. 770 00:42:09,520 --> 00:42:11,600 So we're up to three quarterbacks here, Bonex, Trevor 771 00:42:11,600 --> 00:42:15,840 Lawrence and Shudur, 4 running backs, Kyron, Kenneth Walker, 772 00:42:15,840 --> 00:42:18,160 Tyler Algier, Ray Davis. Probably going to have a nice 773 00:42:18,160 --> 00:42:21,040 spray and pray approach at running back down the stretch 774 00:42:21,040 --> 00:42:23,760 here with only four up to seven wide receivers. 775 00:42:23,760 --> 00:42:26,520 Think we recovered their neighbors, Tet, Courtland 776 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,680 Sutton, Jalen McMillan, Marvin Mims, Christian Kirk and Jordan 777 00:42:29,680 --> 00:42:33,480 Whittington and then Bowers and Kelsey that tight in there, so 778 00:42:33,640 --> 00:42:37,440 in good shape positionally. Historical anomalies asked of 779 00:42:37,440 --> 00:42:39,880 how it was a good pick two years ago, we were on opposite sides 780 00:42:39,880 --> 00:42:42,600 of the Hal wars. I was very anti Hal because I 781 00:42:42,600 --> 00:42:46,360 thought he was going to get benched, but the Hal, the Hal 782 00:42:46,360 --> 00:42:48,600 Bulls thought he's going to score a bunch of points before 783 00:42:48,600 --> 00:42:50,560 that both happened. Both happened. 784 00:42:50,560 --> 00:42:53,760 So I don't know. I mean, I think it's kind of, I 785 00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:57,560 think he was someone you probably were happy enough to 786 00:42:57,560 --> 00:43:00,400 have because he scored enough points. 787 00:43:00,400 --> 00:43:03,560 Like he he across the threshold for the price. 788 00:43:05,400 --> 00:43:08,280 But I don't personally want to have to like be in that position 789 00:43:08,280 --> 00:43:12,080 of like, hey, especially on a guy who's not like a fully 790 00:43:12,080 --> 00:43:17,880 mobile quarterback where, yeah, like Daniel Jones last year I 791 00:43:17,880 --> 00:43:21,520 was out on. I know like Eric Beinfort, who 792 00:43:21,520 --> 00:43:23,160 was in on how was also in on Jones. 793 00:43:24,040 --> 00:43:25,320 I think it's a little philosophical. 794 00:43:25,320 --> 00:43:28,080 It's like, you know what you're getting into. 795 00:43:28,080 --> 00:43:29,640 The guy's probably getting benched in the year, but he 796 00:43:29,640 --> 00:43:31,320 might score enough points to where you're good. 797 00:43:31,320 --> 00:43:33,160 So if you build a team that way, it's probably OK. 798 00:43:33,160 --> 00:43:37,520 But I tend to be like, I'm only taking two or three of these 799 00:43:37,520 --> 00:43:41,440 players total and I don't really want the guys who are strong, 800 00:43:41,440 --> 00:43:43,960 have strong chances of of getting benched to close the 801 00:43:43,960 --> 00:43:46,000 year. I'm to that reason that you got 802 00:43:46,000 --> 00:43:47,920 to kind of twist my arm with Derek Carr because I think he's 803 00:43:47,920 --> 00:43:49,600 probably not playing at the end of the year this year. 804 00:43:50,080 --> 00:43:52,480 Yeah. I think the other thing that's 805 00:43:53,040 --> 00:43:55,400 that's, you know, going back to the Anthony Richardson thing, 806 00:43:55,400 --> 00:43:58,080 right? I mean, we saw a good sample 807 00:43:58,080 --> 00:44:01,000 size play out last year of him being the starter and actually 808 00:44:01,000 --> 00:44:03,600 not flashing the ceiling we wanted. 809 00:44:03,960 --> 00:44:06,640 Whereas like with Justin Fields, it did feel a little more 810 00:44:06,640 --> 00:44:10,000 binary, like give him the starts and he's going to RIP off these 811 00:44:10,000 --> 00:44:12,840 40 yard explosive runs. Like a 30 ball is going to be 812 00:44:12,840 --> 00:44:15,760 happening every couple of weeks. Like Richard said, you you want 813 00:44:15,760 --> 00:44:17,840 to pull up a box score, like you can go pull it up. 814 00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:21,200 Like I was trying to make the case for him and he had that one 815 00:44:21,200 --> 00:44:24,840 game against The Jets and like one other game over 23 points. 816 00:44:24,840 --> 00:44:27,120 I want to say like he did not show a high ceiling. 817 00:44:27,120 --> 00:44:30,560 So even if you win and he wins the job, like you make the 818 00:44:30,560 --> 00:44:32,760 correct bet. It's like, are you winning 819 00:44:32,760 --> 00:44:35,280 enough to take on the bench risk? 820 00:44:35,560 --> 00:44:37,640 And I'm starting to worry with Anthony Richardson that like, 821 00:44:38,480 --> 00:44:40,920 because of his passing struggles, that the ultimate 822 00:44:40,920 --> 00:44:43,840 ceiling we all, you know, salivated over is not there. 823 00:44:44,680 --> 00:44:47,920 That's totally fair, man. He's been it's weird because 824 00:44:47,920 --> 00:44:52,200 when he has a good passing day, he does tend to have like quite 825 00:44:52,200 --> 00:44:56,280 a good day and it's it's like usually he he gets like a deep 826 00:44:56,280 --> 00:44:58,560 pass in there, but they happen pretty infrequently. 827 00:44:58,560 --> 00:45:02,960 It feels like like one out of four, one out of five weeks. 828 00:45:03,600 --> 00:45:09,600 You get the passing day and he doesn't he doesn't run like all 829 00:45:09,600 --> 00:45:12,360 the time. So he is he's he's much more 830 00:45:12,360 --> 00:45:15,280 boom bust than I was hoping he would be. 831 00:45:16,640 --> 00:45:21,280 We're on the clock here. I do like the idea of Troy and 832 00:45:21,280 --> 00:45:24,400 just triple stacking Denver after kind of taking the plunge 833 00:45:24,400 --> 00:45:27,400 and then you want to just like spray out running back down the 834 00:45:27,400 --> 00:45:28,600 stretch. Yeah. 835 00:45:32,480 --> 00:45:36,320 Grab Troy Franklin here as our 8th wide receiver sidekick. 836 00:45:36,640 --> 00:45:39,920 Seeing where we're at is well likes a couple of these rookies 837 00:45:39,920 --> 00:45:43,680 up here, La Quinta Allen, that's me adding the egg. 838 00:45:44,120 --> 00:45:47,920 Fun to say La Quinta kind of had to get ahead of that. 839 00:45:48,480 --> 00:45:50,520 Brashard Smith and then you're into Shipley. 840 00:45:50,520 --> 00:45:53,120 We got estimate. Khalil Mullings. 841 00:45:53,760 --> 00:45:57,000 Do you have a a favorite running back who's available right now? 842 00:45:57,960 --> 00:46:03,200 Yeah, it'd be Brashard Smith would be my favorite of these 843 00:46:03,200 --> 00:46:03,720 guys. Yeah. 844 00:46:04,680 --> 00:46:06,200 All right, let's go ahead and grab him. 845 00:46:06,200 --> 00:46:08,760 Can you give me a little elevator pitch? 846 00:46:08,760 --> 00:46:10,160 I do not know anything about him. 847 00:46:10,560 --> 00:46:14,160 Former wide receiver actually going to be working out with the 848 00:46:14,160 --> 00:46:20,800 wide receivers for part of the combine is hit The the buzz out 849 00:46:20,800 --> 00:46:23,280 of the Senior Bowl was like, this dude's a running back like 850 00:46:23,280 --> 00:46:25,760 he is. He looks good running the ball 851 00:46:27,320 --> 00:46:31,840 and decent size. I think we'll test pretty well 852 00:46:31,840 --> 00:46:34,840 as well. I was looking real analytics has 853 00:46:34,840 --> 00:46:38,640 some like MPH stuff and he's, he has a play where he hit like 854 00:46:38,680 --> 00:46:40,480 really fast. I think it might have been, it 855 00:46:41,320 --> 00:46:45,480 was like 21 plus at least. And he was, you know, he, he 856 00:46:45,480 --> 00:46:50,200 looks like maybe we're going to see him test and better than 857 00:46:50,200 --> 00:46:52,440 people expect anyway. And just so you get, you're 858 00:46:52,440 --> 00:46:55,280 getting the versatility, you're getting a guy who can probably 859 00:46:56,280 --> 00:46:58,560 be, you know, kind of this year's Tyrone Tracy as far as 860 00:46:58,560 --> 00:47:03,160 the bed goes. Sold a lot of these picks. 861 00:47:03,160 --> 00:47:07,000 We saw a run on them here. Jordan James, another guy that I 862 00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:09,920 just continues to rise. You know, Bruegler had him I 863 00:47:09,920 --> 00:47:12,520 believe as his RB5 in his big board. 864 00:47:13,560 --> 00:47:15,040 So definitely some steam coming there. 865 00:47:15,040 --> 00:47:18,120 We mentioned Tooten earlier here. 866 00:47:18,600 --> 00:47:21,560 Pretty fun late running back class to to throw darts on. 867 00:47:22,240 --> 00:47:26,440 Yeah, Jordan James, I don't think is a very exciting 868 00:47:26,440 --> 00:47:28,080 prospect. He has the lowest breakaway 869 00:47:28,080 --> 00:47:31,960 percentage of any running back that I have, you know, going 870 00:47:31,960 --> 00:47:35,440 back years. And so that's not fun, but he 871 00:47:35,440 --> 00:47:38,640 has a really good success rate and he pops for a lot of guys on 872 00:47:38,640 --> 00:47:42,560 tape I think cuz he's like a super consistent runner and he 873 00:47:42,560 --> 00:47:45,120 played with Bucky Irving have heard stuff or like, you know, 874 00:47:45,120 --> 00:47:47,840 he looks kind of better than Bucky to me, you know, when 875 00:47:47,840 --> 00:47:49,120 they're sharing the backfield together. 876 00:47:49,120 --> 00:47:55,200 So he could be the type of running back who, you know, I 877 00:47:55,200 --> 00:47:58,000 tend not to be as into this like the churning out consistent 878 00:47:58,000 --> 00:48:00,240 positive gains, but not a ton of explosiveness. 879 00:48:01,200 --> 00:48:03,680 But but really surprising in terms of the draft capital that 880 00:48:03,680 --> 00:48:08,400 you're getting, making him a pretty clear target at this 881 00:48:08,400 --> 00:48:11,720 price. If he were to run up, then no 882 00:48:11,720 --> 00:48:15,200 thanks. But you know, like Tyrion Davis 883 00:48:15,200 --> 00:48:17,680 price was a lot more fun when you're if you're getting him in 884 00:48:17,680 --> 00:48:20,800 the 20th round, you know, instead of post the steam. 885 00:48:21,440 --> 00:48:23,560 And that's kind of where I'm like, I think he could be 886 00:48:23,560 --> 00:48:27,520 basically nothing even if he gets capital, but he also might 887 00:48:27,520 --> 00:48:30,600 be a guy who goes like third round and is installed as a 888 00:48:30,600 --> 00:48:33,120 starter and you're getting it for free. 889 00:48:33,120 --> 00:48:35,800 So he's kind of a no brainer in the final rounds right now. 890 00:48:36,800 --> 00:48:40,120 Yeah, and to me, like, you know, where we took Ray Davis and then 891 00:48:40,120 --> 00:48:41,840 you're kind of sliding down here. 892 00:48:41,880 --> 00:48:44,480 You know, we took him at 1:58 and then you're to Ollie Gordon 893 00:48:44,480 --> 00:48:48,400 at 165. Gorendo, RG, Harvey Eckler. 894 00:48:48,640 --> 00:48:51,800 You know, I, I would just make the case to like once you're in 895 00:48:51,800 --> 00:48:56,240 this say like fourteenth round range, it's like go get your 896 00:48:56,240 --> 00:48:59,640 guys, you know, like either the opportunity cost is, is 897 00:48:59,640 --> 00:49:02,160 essentially nothing there. I agree. 898 00:49:02,960 --> 00:49:04,520 Yeah, I. Think the other you don't want 899 00:49:04,960 --> 00:49:07,000 you would. You would have an an you would 900 00:49:07,000 --> 00:49:09,600 have an absurd bag if you were constantly taking Jordan James 901 00:49:09,600 --> 00:49:11,720 in the 15th round. You'd have to have a lot of 902 00:49:11,720 --> 00:49:13,440 conviction and not much humility. 903 00:49:13,600 --> 00:49:16,400 But like, I don't think in any individual draft that would 904 00:49:16,400 --> 00:49:18,240 necessarily be a mistake I guess is what I'm saying. 905 00:49:20,080 --> 00:49:22,960 Right. And I would say if I was going 906 00:49:22,960 --> 00:49:27,000 to say like reach 2 rounds for a guy, it would be a guy who you 907 00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:29,840 haven't taken much of, but who you think is a good bet. 908 00:49:29,840 --> 00:49:31,720 And you're like, I'm keep getting sniped on this guy. 909 00:49:31,720 --> 00:49:34,360 Just go ahead and get him. And that would actually be a 910 00:49:34,360 --> 00:49:37,320 little bit Jordan James for me because I like it's been like I 911 00:49:37,320 --> 00:49:39,440 said, I haven't drafting much as much recently. 912 00:49:39,440 --> 00:49:41,880 And he's someone that recently we've moved up in the ranks 913 00:49:41,880 --> 00:49:44,240 quite a bit. So but my personal portfolio, I 914 00:49:44,240 --> 00:49:47,960 don't have so much of them. So he's someone like I would be 915 00:49:47,960 --> 00:49:50,640 very comfortable taking in the 16th round to make sure I get 916 00:49:51,160 --> 00:49:54,200 because I think generally you want to be mixing up these bets. 917 00:49:54,440 --> 00:49:56,840 There's no one in this range. We were talking about this on 918 00:49:56,840 --> 00:49:59,680 the pod with with Daniel and Zach where it's like what's 919 00:49:59,680 --> 00:50:02,120 going to happen post combine And as we get closer to the draft is 920 00:50:02,120 --> 00:50:04,920 we're going to start to understand that like, hey, this 921 00:50:04,920 --> 00:50:08,440 guy that we thought was like live for like round two or or at 922 00:50:08,440 --> 00:50:13,280 least round 3 is maybe like not guaranteed to get drafted. 923 00:50:13,720 --> 00:50:15,800 And this other guy who we thought was more of a day three 924 00:50:15,800 --> 00:50:19,400 guy is now consistently being mocked in day 2. 925 00:50:20,520 --> 00:50:23,120 So we're going to and, and it's going to be more of the first 926 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:26,440 bucket where like these guys are all useless, but there's going 927 00:50:26,440 --> 00:50:28,800 to be some big, big hits. And so spreading out the bets 928 00:50:28,800 --> 00:50:32,120 just makes a lot of sense. Yeah, and there are. 929 00:50:33,160 --> 00:50:35,360 You're not getting a lot of guys free anymore. 930 00:50:35,360 --> 00:50:38,080 I mean, here's another guy. Can you give me something about 931 00:50:38,080 --> 00:50:41,600 Phil Mafaw? I think it's Phil Mafa. 932 00:50:41,600 --> 00:50:45,000 He's big back out of Clemson, kind of like one of the there's 933 00:50:45,000 --> 00:50:47,320 like a bunch of, like big backs who didn't like, fully 934 00:50:47,320 --> 00:50:50,240 distinguish themselves in college and he's one of them. 935 00:50:51,600 --> 00:50:52,640 Yeah. So not someone I've really 936 00:50:52,640 --> 00:50:55,080 drafted. All the fun ones are off the 937 00:50:55,080 --> 00:50:58,400 board unless you have a little love for rookie Rookie marks. 938 00:50:58,560 --> 00:51:02,640 Woody Marks estimate would be the correlation bet. 939 00:51:03,240 --> 00:51:04,960 I like Terry. Gibson, Yeah. 940 00:51:05,000 --> 00:51:10,960 Yeah. Man, it's crazy seeing, you 941 00:51:10,960 --> 00:51:14,680 know, Jaleel McLaughlin too, Like you're thinking about that 942 00:51:14,680 --> 00:51:18,400 Denver backfield heading into last year and how you you really 943 00:51:18,400 --> 00:51:19,360 did. Like if you would have gone to 944 00:51:19,360 --> 00:51:21,560 my head, I'm like one of these guys is going to be a winner. 945 00:51:21,800 --> 00:51:23,120 There's good one of these guys easily there. 946 00:51:23,280 --> 00:51:24,200 Were no. Winners. 947 00:51:24,200 --> 00:51:26,200 No winners. At all. 948 00:51:27,000 --> 00:51:31,120 No winners. So one more pick, Mr. Irrelevant 949 00:51:31,120 --> 00:51:35,480 here, Pat. We got a 3682 brewing here. 950 00:51:35,480 --> 00:51:38,760 Sidekick doesn't mind a quadruple stack with Valet or. 951 00:51:38,760 --> 00:51:39,720 Do I don't? Either. 952 00:51:40,200 --> 00:51:44,040 Yeah, I honestly don't either. I mean, I think Peyton spreads 953 00:51:44,040 --> 00:51:45,840 the ball around among these wide receivers. 954 00:51:48,120 --> 00:51:50,600 We didn't invest a ton in Franklin. 955 00:51:50,600 --> 00:51:54,400 And so you're kind of like, it's like 2 stabs at who has a good 956 00:51:54,400 --> 00:51:57,400 role between him and Franklin. I don't mind it either. 957 00:51:58,720 --> 00:52:03,800 Let's do it. I, I like the big I did. 958 00:52:04,400 --> 00:52:07,520 I, I think it's different because I used way more draft 959 00:52:07,520 --> 00:52:09,840 capital. So I, I, if anyone pushed back 960 00:52:09,840 --> 00:52:11,760 on it, I would not put up much of a fight. 961 00:52:11,760 --> 00:52:15,080 But I did the like premium triple with Baker in one of my 962 00:52:15,080 --> 00:52:20,040 war room drafts where I had Evans, Godwin and McMillan, 963 00:52:20,200 --> 00:52:22,560 which is a lot of capital to spend on that offense. 964 00:52:22,560 --> 00:52:26,800 But just conceptually, I love the like onslaughts in the big 965 00:52:26,800 --> 00:52:29,600 board draft. I do too, because this can be, 966 00:52:29,640 --> 00:52:31,800 it's very hard to stack in the big board. 967 00:52:31,960 --> 00:52:36,600 Like I, it's kind of stuff tends to get blown up and we don't 968 00:52:36,600 --> 00:52:39,480 obviously know all the teams and where everyone is. 969 00:52:39,480 --> 00:52:45,480 So it's just like hard to stack. And at the same time, if Denver 970 00:52:45,480 --> 00:52:49,600 pops off in one of these weeks, it would be awesome to have a 971 00:52:49,600 --> 00:52:52,360 bunch of Denver pieces and and you're going to be going against 972 00:52:52,480 --> 00:52:55,400 fewer teams that are like overstacked on that team. 973 00:52:56,560 --> 00:52:58,800 And the, the thing I like about it too is, and I kind of feel 974 00:52:58,800 --> 00:53:01,680 the same way as you we mentioned like bro Nix is a little pricey. 975 00:53:01,680 --> 00:53:04,680 Like I, I don't think it's bad, but it, it definitely is a 976 00:53:04,680 --> 00:53:06,880 smidge pricey. So when we are investing in him 977 00:53:06,880 --> 00:53:09,160 and we're saying he's going to return essentially 4th or fifth 978 00:53:09,160 --> 00:53:13,560 round value like at least two of these pass catchers are are 979 00:53:13,560 --> 00:53:17,640 smashing in that scenario. Yeah, I do like the Shidor pick, 980 00:53:17,880 --> 00:53:19,920 by the way, because we because that whole thing we talked about 981 00:53:19,920 --> 00:53:22,080 with Stafford just applies to Shidor. 982 00:53:22,080 --> 00:53:24,320 Like what if he's on the Giants? What if he's on the Raiders? 983 00:53:25,000 --> 00:53:26,280 Yeah, that's true. Yeah. 984 00:53:27,040 --> 00:53:28,400 So we have, we potentially have that. 985 00:53:28,400 --> 00:53:29,880 Two outs at it. Yeah. 986 00:53:31,000 --> 00:53:36,080 Yeah, let me let me read the final team here. 987 00:53:36,080 --> 00:53:41,080 We can get some of your thoughts in on how this build shook out 988 00:53:41,080 --> 00:53:44,200 36923 quarterbacks. Bone Knicks, Trevor Lawrence, 989 00:53:44,200 --> 00:53:47,560 Shuder Sanders got up to six running backs, Kyron and Kenneth 990 00:53:47,560 --> 00:53:50,400 Walker anchoring things there. Then Tyler Algier, Ray Davis, 991 00:53:50,640 --> 00:53:55,000 Prashad Smith and Estimae are wide receivers neighbors Tete a 992 00:53:55,000 --> 00:53:59,120 quartet of Broncos, Cortland Sutton, Marvin Mims, Troy 993 00:53:59,120 --> 00:54:01,920 Franklin and Valet. The other wide receivers their 994 00:54:02,320 --> 00:54:06,840 Jalen McMillan, Christian Kirk, Jordan Whittington and then two 995 00:54:06,840 --> 00:54:09,960 tight ends, Brock Bowers, Travis Kelsey seems like a good team to 996 00:54:09,960 --> 00:54:11,480 me. Seems like a good team. 997 00:54:11,720 --> 00:54:14,800 Yeah, I like we, we got some correlation, very strong on 998 00:54:14,800 --> 00:54:19,160 tight end running backs a little bit shaky, but we have like 2 999 00:54:19,160 --> 00:54:23,440 guys like two week 1 starters. So we need, we have some high 1000 00:54:23,440 --> 00:54:26,320 end contingent bets. I think Broussard Smith is a 1001 00:54:26,320 --> 00:54:31,400 nice kind of Lotto ticket. A couple things on the sidekick 1002 00:54:31,400 --> 00:54:33,200 that Jordan said. Pete, we need you directly 1003 00:54:33,200 --> 00:54:34,600 clicking on it to cure the players. 1004 00:54:34,600 --> 00:54:36,040 That is a feature. You can do that. 1005 00:54:36,440 --> 00:54:38,880 I do know that. I just don't know why Jordan, 1006 00:54:39,080 --> 00:54:43,320 why Jordan cares. It's kind of like a Peter patter 1007 00:54:43,320 --> 00:54:47,480 patter Pete situation here. That's true. 1008 00:54:47,480 --> 00:54:54,640 You don't have to and I do, I do like, you know, we, we, we went 1009 00:54:54,640 --> 00:54:58,120 against it in some, some ways, but we also, you know, like, I 1010 00:54:58,120 --> 00:55:00,840 love that Bele sitting there at the top, even if you don't, you 1011 00:55:00,840 --> 00:55:04,840 know, he was second. But I think I find it very fun 1012 00:55:04,840 --> 00:55:07,160 to draft with for that reason because you're like, I'm, I'm 1013 00:55:07,200 --> 00:55:11,720 going sometimes, you know, second, third down the list, but 1014 00:55:12,640 --> 00:55:14,600 it's hoping to keep track of what, what you're trying to do 1015 00:55:14,600 --> 00:55:15,800 in terms of the correlation and all that. 1016 00:55:16,640 --> 00:55:19,880 Yeah, yeah. And I do think like the the 1017 00:55:19,880 --> 00:55:24,760 estimate and valet, what they cost you, you know, relative. 1018 00:55:24,760 --> 00:55:27,080 We always use the auction dollar analogy. 1019 00:55:27,080 --> 00:55:31,400 I mean, these are hitting me of $1.00 things where we've made 1020 00:55:31,400 --> 00:55:35,840 such a massive bet on Bo Nicks becoming the next great fantasy 1021 00:55:35,840 --> 00:55:40,160 quarterback. Yeah, and and Javonte's gone and 1022 00:55:40,160 --> 00:55:41,440 we don't know what they're going to do. 1023 00:55:41,440 --> 00:55:43,600 Like he keep, he keeps talking about the Joker role and 1024 00:55:43,600 --> 00:55:47,400 everything and like, look, I mean, they could add Genti and 1025 00:55:47,400 --> 00:55:50,080 then that changes everything. And or they could add a second 1026 00:55:50,080 --> 00:55:56,000 round running back who would probably just just completely 1027 00:55:56,000 --> 00:55:58,560 replace Estimate because that's like the archetype of guys in 1028 00:55:58,560 --> 00:56:01,400 the second round is kind of Estimate but better. 1029 00:56:01,720 --> 00:56:04,520 But once you start to get in the third round, like what if they 1030 00:56:04,520 --> 00:56:07,960 add an RJ Harvey, you know, and it's like, and now Jaleel's the 1031 00:56:07,960 --> 00:56:11,600 dude who's out of a job. And so it it is a deep running 1032 00:56:11,600 --> 00:56:13,880 back class, taking some of the handcuff types as like a little 1033 00:56:13,880 --> 00:56:17,080 shakier than you know, it. Would it be in in like last 1034 00:56:17,080 --> 00:56:19,840 year's class? But given the way the Broncos 1035 00:56:19,840 --> 00:56:23,000 have run a committee, as long as you avoid some of like the clear 1036 00:56:23,000 --> 00:56:27,920 landmines, the Genti Hampton type of landmines, then estimate 1037 00:56:28,120 --> 00:56:31,640 feels like he he could be pretty good at very, very little cost. 1038 00:56:31,640 --> 00:56:34,680 And it's correlated. Yeah, I mean, if you, if you can 1039 00:56:34,680 --> 00:56:39,080 bank assist a season where he's just like sneaking his way into 1040 00:56:39,080 --> 00:56:41,960 like six goal line touchdowns at this price or something like 1041 00:56:41,960 --> 00:56:43,240 you're you're you're pretty stoked. 1042 00:56:43,240 --> 00:56:46,600 And preferably two of them come in the same game in week 15 1043 00:56:46,600 --> 00:56:47,840 through 17. That sounds great. 1044 00:56:48,320 --> 00:56:51,640 Yeah, sign me up. Cool. 1045 00:56:51,640 --> 00:56:53,080 Yeah. I'm, you know, this is what 1046 00:56:53,080 --> 00:56:57,320 always happens to me. I've been slow trying to, you 1047 00:56:57,320 --> 00:56:59,720 know, moderate my best ball drafting this early. 1048 00:56:59,720 --> 00:57:02,280 And then you you start doing more of these and the combine 1049 00:57:02,280 --> 00:57:05,760 hits and then you start talking about CLV and price movement. 1050 00:57:05,760 --> 00:57:07,880 Next thing you know, you're like, maybe I'd just enter a few 1051 00:57:07,880 --> 00:57:11,400 slots, you know, just a few, you know, not that bad, just a few 1052 00:57:11,400 --> 00:57:13,280 more slows. I was hoping you were going to 1053 00:57:13,280 --> 00:57:15,680 name this team Tet and the Quartet, by the way. 1054 00:57:15,680 --> 00:57:17,200 Tet and the Quartet. I know. 1055 00:57:17,200 --> 00:57:18,160 Yeah. We need the. 1056 00:57:18,160 --> 00:57:19,520 It's like the. Yeah. 1057 00:57:19,520 --> 00:57:21,520 Tet and the the Quartet. I like it. 1058 00:57:21,520 --> 00:57:22,760 All right, All right. I'll make the change. 1059 00:57:22,960 --> 00:57:25,560 I'll make the change. I don't. 1060 00:57:25,560 --> 00:57:29,760 Care about the. No, I I like this in the. 1061 00:57:30,200 --> 00:57:33,040 OK, hang on, we're going to go 227. 1062 00:57:33,160 --> 00:57:35,840 I mean, I'll never forget. I'll never forget that this was 1063 00:57:36,760 --> 00:57:38,640 Tet in the quartet. There you go. 1064 00:57:38,720 --> 00:57:41,440 The new ship chasing jam band. Tet in the quartet. 1065 00:57:43,440 --> 00:57:44,720 I think I had another. Yeah. 1066 00:57:44,720 --> 00:57:48,920 Getting both Mcmillan's too is a nice little fun thing. 1067 00:57:48,920 --> 00:57:51,520 Now double McMillan. Double McMillan. 1068 00:57:52,400 --> 00:57:54,120 I, you know what? No one you know what? 1069 00:57:54,120 --> 00:57:57,760 You know how we, we finally things have actually normalized. 1070 00:57:57,920 --> 00:58:01,120 It was around this time last year that everyone was saying 1071 00:58:01,120 --> 00:58:05,760 who is the rookie that ship chasing is going to mush with 1072 00:58:05,760 --> 00:58:07,480 the curse. Like there was, you know, Davis 1073 00:58:07,480 --> 00:58:10,160 was loading all of his names this year. 1074 00:58:10,160 --> 00:58:12,960 I haven't heard that talk yet, which means people are either 1075 00:58:12,960 --> 00:58:15,800 too terrified or the curse has officially been broken. 1076 00:58:18,040 --> 00:58:21,040 Yeah, I don't know if it has, but I think it's been we put a 1077 00:58:21,040 --> 00:58:24,200 dent in the curse. I'll say that I'm not 100% sure 1078 00:58:24,200 --> 00:58:29,280 the curse is is has been vanquished, but I feel better 1079 00:58:29,280 --> 00:58:32,920 about last year was it seemed for some reason it was just 1080 00:58:32,920 --> 00:58:34,520 followed the struggle. I think maybe we didn't draft 1081 00:58:34,680 --> 00:58:37,920 early enough or something. I was just like unclear who we 1082 00:58:37,920 --> 00:58:41,680 have, I mean. Well, this this year it could 1083 00:58:41,680 --> 00:58:43,840 formally. Because The thing is, is we had 1084 00:58:43,840 --> 00:58:45,800 to, you know, with, with Gretch too. 1085 00:58:45,800 --> 00:58:48,040 When, when you add an extra person, we all have to arrive at 1086 00:58:48,040 --> 00:58:51,160 a consensus too of a player we all love, which is adding that 1087 00:58:51,240 --> 00:58:55,960 extra wrinkle you and I could end up getting on a player 1088 00:58:56,360 --> 00:58:59,520 quickly that we can't stop drafting over and over again. 1089 00:59:01,480 --> 00:59:03,160 We shall see. We shall. 1090 00:59:05,680 --> 00:59:07,320 My God, that means he's he's playing. 1091 00:59:07,720 --> 00:59:10,720 That actually is we we should strongly consider Travis Hunter 1092 00:59:10,720 --> 00:59:13,920 only playing wide receiver in the clip when he plays 1093 00:59:13,920 --> 00:59:17,280 cornerback. I'm pretty sure the the ship 1094 00:59:17,280 --> 00:59:22,040 chasing curse has been so strong that it has forced some of our 1095 00:59:22,040 --> 00:59:25,080 players to convert positionally. It honestly has. 1096 00:59:25,400 --> 00:59:29,240 It's not the first time. I know I like if we had been 1097 00:59:29,240 --> 00:59:31,720 doing ship chasing way back when, I'm sure we would have had 1098 00:59:31,720 --> 00:59:35,120 a Jordan Matthews clip and then he would have converted to tight 1099 00:59:35,120 --> 00:59:37,120 end. We definitely would have. 1100 00:59:37,880 --> 00:59:41,440 We definitely would have. What do you got going on? 1101 00:59:41,440 --> 00:59:45,000 I I, I mentioned I listened to you guys had a little big board 1102 00:59:45,000 --> 00:59:49,840 pre combine round table, this this fabled proton pod. 1103 00:59:49,840 --> 00:59:52,360 Is this just never happening? No, it's gonna happen. 1104 00:59:52,360 --> 00:59:56,720 But the combine got in the way and yeah, my, my travels and 1105 00:59:56,720 --> 00:59:58,840 stuff got in the way. So we will. 1106 00:59:58,840 --> 01:00:01,160 I will be talking to Proton at some point. 1107 01:00:02,880 --> 01:00:06,840 And we're going to be, like I said, Michael Dudner is going to 1108 01:00:06,840 --> 01:00:10,600 have an article coming out probably tomorrow. 1109 01:00:11,560 --> 01:00:14,880 That's that's the plan. And yeah, it's really good. 1110 01:00:15,000 --> 01:00:18,320 Miss Price, players in basketball right now talks to 1111 01:00:18,320 --> 01:00:20,960 some of the guys we were talking about in in this draft, 1112 01:00:20,960 --> 01:00:24,320 actually. And I've got my prospects stuff 1113 01:00:25,320 --> 01:00:28,840 ready to, it's kind of, it's kind of like, you know, in the 1114 01:00:29,560 --> 01:00:33,680 I've, I've loaded it in for post combine so that I can write up, 1115 01:00:34,600 --> 01:00:36,480 you know, I got to tweak it with the combine stuff. 1116 01:00:36,480 --> 01:00:40,280 But after that, it's going to start going out there, probably 1117 01:00:40,280 --> 01:00:42,800 start with the quarterbacks and then roll out to the other 1118 01:00:42,800 --> 01:00:45,600 positions. So post combine, look for those 1119 01:00:45,960 --> 01:00:48,840 dynasty rankings, basketball rankings all over at 1120 01:00:48,840 --> 01:00:50,840 legendaryepisode.com. And we got the sidekick going 1121 01:00:50,840 --> 01:00:52,680 for 100 bucks a month right now if you're interested in checking 1122 01:00:52,680 --> 01:00:56,040 that out. Yep, we drafted today with leg 1123 01:00:56,040 --> 01:00:58,640 up rankings in the sidekick in there. 1124 01:00:59,200 --> 01:01:02,720 Super valuable, especially if you're doing a bunch of slow 1125 01:01:02,720 --> 01:01:05,240 drafts and you need to get in there and quickly get 1126 01:01:05,480 --> 01:01:07,440 reoriented. And remember that you drafted Bo 1127 01:01:07,440 --> 01:01:09,560 Nicks and should stack him with Devon Vaile. 1128 01:01:10,320 --> 01:01:12,880 Highly recommend some other housekeeping stuff. 1129 01:01:13,280 --> 01:01:16,240 I'll have basketball breakfast and then ADP chasing on Monday. 1130 01:01:16,320 --> 01:01:19,080 No ship chasing next week. Can't offer you a ship chasing, 1131 01:01:19,080 --> 01:01:22,160 but I can maybe offer the people a photo of you and me out to 1132 01:01:22,160 --> 01:01:25,840 dinner for Omakase. That's going to be the trade off 1133 01:01:26,000 --> 01:01:29,040 of content for next week since I'm going to be I'm going to be 1134 01:01:29,040 --> 01:01:31,200 in San Diego, but we are going to meet up and go to dinner and 1135 01:01:31,200 --> 01:01:33,840 I'm very much looking. Forward to I know me too me. 1136 01:01:34,440 --> 01:01:36,400 Too. So yeah, no ship chasing next 1137 01:01:36,400 --> 01:01:38,040 week. We'll be back in the saddle 1138 01:01:38,040 --> 01:01:39,880 after that with our usual Thursdays. 1139 01:01:39,880 --> 01:01:42,480 And I think when we come back, I mean that's when we're going to 1140 01:01:42,480 --> 01:01:45,160 be in the heart of kind of dynasty season. 1141 01:01:46,200 --> 01:01:50,000 We got to get our our crew back together obviously for the mock 1142 01:01:50,000 --> 01:01:53,920 draft, get some guest appearances from JJ Ron, the 1143 01:01:53,920 --> 01:01:56,480 Rotovis guys, lots of guests that we got to get swinging on 1144 01:01:56,480 --> 01:02:01,800 through all right appreciate all of you guys hanging out in the 1145 01:02:01,800 --> 01:02:03,320 chat. If you guys want to become 1146 01:02:03,800 --> 01:02:08,200 YouTube members, you can unlock the exclusive access to the ship 1147 01:02:08,200 --> 01:02:11,040 chasing discord that is housed within the deposit Kingdom 1148 01:02:11,040 --> 01:02:12,640 discord. We have our own private channel 1149 01:02:12,880 --> 01:02:15,320 in there. There's an FAQ about how to sync 1150 01:02:15,560 --> 01:02:18,280 your YouTube account with your discord account and then that 1151 01:02:18,280 --> 01:02:22,240 Channel will pop up magically. There's also a survey in there. 1152 01:02:22,240 --> 01:02:24,040 I've been referencing this on a few shows. 1153 01:02:24,040 --> 01:02:26,920 It is pinned. We're trying to nail down the 1154 01:02:27,120 --> 01:02:29,360 dates for the 2025 ship chasing meet up. 1155 01:02:29,640 --> 01:02:32,800 Looking like we are going to be in Florida sometime in early 1156 01:02:32,800 --> 01:02:37,560 August, but we will still love some input on that and shout out 1157 01:02:37,960 --> 01:02:40,200 to Charlie and Chris G who are kind of helping us behind the 1158 01:02:40,200 --> 01:02:42,720 scenes to get that organized and get that rolling. 1159 01:02:42,960 --> 01:02:45,840 Got some fun stuff planned for this summer. 1160 01:02:46,800 --> 01:02:50,400 All right, appreciate you all. We'll see you guys next time on 1161 01:02:50,400 --> 01:02:51,680 ship Chasing Peace.