1
00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:04,640
From India's largest newsroom, 
I'm Arun George, and this is the

2
00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:15,920
Times of India podcast. 
Environmentalism is often 

3
00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:18,880
believed to have its roots in 
the last 50 years or so and is 

4
00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:21,760
often portrayed as originating 
in the Western nations. 

5
00:00:22,200 --> 00:00:24,920
In India, the first prominent 
environmental movement was the 

6
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:28,080
Chipco movement in the 1970s. 
The movement against 

7
00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:31,280
deforestation was the subject of
Professor Ram Guha's first book,

8
00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:34,800
published in 1989, titled The 
Unquiet Woods. 

9
00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:37,400
He then went on to write 
multiple books on history, 

10
00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:40,360
cricket and environmentalism, 
many of which have been 

11
00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:43,760
bestsellers, including India 
After Gandhi and Gandhi Before 

12
00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,080
India. 
Professor Guha's latest book 

13
00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:49,640
argues that environmentalism 
took root in colonial India well

14
00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:52,600
before environmentalism became a
subject of debate in the West. 

15
00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:56,400
His book, titled Speaking with 
Nature, is the story of nine 

16
00:00:56,400 --> 00:00:59,080
personalities who are arguing 
against environmental 

17
00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:02,920
destruction well before India 
became independent in 1947. 

18
00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:06,440
In the book are stories of 
personalities like Rabindranath 

19
00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:11,240
Tagore, Patrick Geddis, JC 
Kumarappa, Varrier Elvin and M 

20
00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:14,560
Krishnan, among others. 
Not all of them were Indian, and

21
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:17,880
each of their stories is unique 
in terms of the larger message 

22
00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:20,640
they attempted to spread. 
The book deals with how these 

23
00:01:20,640 --> 00:01:23,280
personalities attempted to show 
the world the effects of 

24
00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:27,160
industrialization and humankind 
well before terms like climate 

25
00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:30,200
change and pollution became 
everyday topics of discussion. 

26
00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,320
In today's episode, when 
conversation with Ram Guha about

27
00:01:33,320 --> 00:01:37,000
the book and environmentalism, 
we talk about why lessons from 

28
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:40,120
nearly 100 years ago still have 
relevance and why most of these 

29
00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:43,160
personalities are inspiring and 
also noble failures. 

30
00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:46,240
We also discussed the lessons 
that are to be taken from these 

31
00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:49,280
lives at a time when the 
environmental problems we 

32
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:52,160
encounter are far bigger than 
anything they ever did. 

33
00:01:53,360 --> 00:01:58,120
We're in a time where, at least 
as a policy sort of thing, we 

34
00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:01,440
claim to have these lessons 
dating back to our ancient myths

35
00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:04,120
and ancient books in terms of 
how we should preserve our 

36
00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:06,120
ecology. 
And we even now want to export 

37
00:02:06,120 --> 00:02:08,520
it to the world. 
But in your book, you say that 

38
00:02:08,759 --> 00:02:10,919
that's not as far back as we 
want to go. 

39
00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:13,280
We shouldn't be going back to 
our ancient texts and myths. 

40
00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,520
Could you talk about why you 
would argue that? 

41
00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:21,480
Let's assume for a minute that 
our ancient myths, particularly 

42
00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:23,440
Hindu myths, because that's what
our government is most 

43
00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:27,120
interested in and our epics 
preach a concern for nature. 

44
00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:30,800
Then why is the Ganganya Banaras
so polluted? 

45
00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:36,440
Why is the Himalaya, our most 
sacred mountain chain, so 

46
00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:39,800
ravaged? 
So the idea that ancient 

47
00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:44,240
religious scriptures from 2000 
years ago can guide behaviour 

48
00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:46,600
today, this is true not just of 
Hinduism, but of Islam or 

49
00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:48,760
Christianity. 
I mean, you know, you can't 

50
00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:53,200
tackle the problems of 21st 
century America with the with by

51
00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:56,280
taking recourse to the Bible 
later on, the problems of the 

52
00:02:56,280 --> 00:03:00,920
21st century Middle East by 
blindly following the Quran, 

53
00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:02,400
right? 
So I think that's there's a 

54
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,800
conceptual problem there. 
But more substantively, the 

55
00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:10,360
argument to my book is that 
while an aesthetic love for 

56
00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:16,800
nature goes back to the dawn of 
humanity, while some local 

57
00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:20,680
village communities present and 
tribal cultures, you know, 

58
00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:23,920
manage their water and their 
forests and their pasture lands 

59
00:03:23,920 --> 00:03:27,560
with care, environmentalism is a
modern phenomenon. 

60
00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:30,360
It's a post industrial 
revolution phenomenon because 

61
00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:34,200
it's only with the Industrial 
Revolution and the technologies 

62
00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:38,440
and forms of consumption it 
unleashed that human beings 

63
00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:42,400
first realized that the scale of
environmental degradation that 

64
00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:46,160
unchecked industrialization 
could cause would imperil the 

65
00:03:46,160 --> 00:03:49,160
prospects of our life on earth, 
the survival on Earth. 

66
00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:55,120
So if environmentalism is a 
philosophy trying to find ways 

67
00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:59,680
in which human beings can live 
sustainably and only alongside 

68
00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,000
the earth for the long term, it 
only becomes possible with the 

69
00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:04,640
industrial revolution because 
before then you didn't have this

70
00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:06,040
extraordinary scale of 
devastation. 

71
00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:08,840
So the awareness that this was 
the global crisis, an 

72
00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:12,280
existential crisis, only comes 
with large scale 

73
00:04:12,280 --> 00:04:16,320
industrialization, urbanization,
the use of fossil fuels, the use

74
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,440
of new forms of transportation, 
Modern Warfare, which is much 

75
00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,400
more destructive of the 
environment and of human lives 

76
00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:25,960
than older forms of warfare. 
So that's really the largest 

77
00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:31,480
sociological argument I make to 
suggest that environmentalism 

78
00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:33,960
per SE is only possible after 
the industrial. 

79
00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:38,440
Even the Chipco movement you you
argue, is the sort of starting 

80
00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:41,760
point where we see that 
environmental damage is being 

81
00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:44,040
caused by these large projects 
that we are taking up. 

82
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:47,920
Could you talk about why these 
personalities ideas appeal to 

83
00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:49,800
you? 
And you know, why did you go 

84
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,480
back to it so many years after 
actually starting on it? 

85
00:04:53,840 --> 00:04:59,000
As a organized social movement 
with people acting collectively,

86
00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:04,400
either starting organisations 
and groups of many individuals 

87
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:08,760
or using a ship coded nonviolent
forms of protest dharnas in 

88
00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:12,600
which hundreds of thousands of 
people come out as a movement as

89
00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:14,680
an organised collective 
activity. 

90
00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:20,400
Environmentalism is a phenomenon
of the 1970s, not just in India 

91
00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:25,520
but in Europe and America too. 
But before environmentalism as a

92
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:32,080
popular social movement began, 
you had individual thinkers from

93
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:37,440
the 19th century who were in a 
sense anticipating what was to 

94
00:05:37,440 --> 00:05:39,200
become a social and collective 
concern. 

95
00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:41,920
Who through their own personal 
experience, through their 

96
00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:44,640
writings, through their 
scholarship, through their 

97
00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:49,680
travels, were warning Indians 
that if you go down the path of 

98
00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:53,040
blindly and imitating Western 
models of industrialisation, 

99
00:05:53,040 --> 00:05:55,960
which are any intensive, capital
intensive, resource intensive, 

100
00:05:56,280 --> 00:05:57,600
you will face all these 
problems. 

101
00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:01,400
So as a movement, as a 
collective activity, as a 

102
00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:04,840
collective social activity, 
environmentalism is born with in

103
00:06:04,840 --> 00:06:07,640
India, is born with Chipco in 
the 1970s, that you have other 

104
00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:10,880
movements afterwards. 
But as a way of thinking, as a 

105
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:15,200
way of anticipating the damage 
that these new technologies 

106
00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:19,760
cause, as a philosophy, I argue 
that there is a prehistory of 

107
00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:23,400
environmentalism not as a 
movement, but of ideas and 

108
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:27,680
thought and reflection. 
Its also that all these people 

109
00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:32,560
are writing more in terms of 
ideas and in letters. 

110
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:35,360
There's no science to it like we
do these days. 

111
00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:38,480
Does that also make those 
arguments harder to accept in 

112
00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:41,400
some ways? 
That they seem very in the air 

113
00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:43,320
and not very direct in some 
ways. 

114
00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:46,200
I mean, you're right, and most 
of them are acting as 

115
00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:47,440
individuals. 
Some of them are doing 

116
00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:50,640
collective work somewhere like 
JC Kumarapa is trying to 

117
00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:54,280
organize villages to use their 
resources more sustainably to, 

118
00:06:54,280 --> 00:06:58,640
you know, recycle their manure 
to be more to practice from the 

119
00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:02,480
water conservation and, you 
know, to be more prudent in the 

120
00:07:02,480 --> 00:07:05,120
use of forest resources and 
grazing resources. 

121
00:07:05,520 --> 00:07:08,400
But by and large, they are 
operating as individuals. 

122
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:12,240
They are also, more importantly,
going against the grain of the 

123
00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:15,240
times. 
So there you could think of them

124
00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:19,280
as intellectual dissidents 
because they tried a different 

125
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:21,600
lesson from our colonization by 
the British. 

126
00:07:21,920 --> 00:07:25,520
So the lesson drawn by most 
intellectuals and almost even 

127
00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:28,840
political thinkers, say by 
Jawaharlal Nehru or by Subhash 

128
00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:33,680
Chandra Bose, so by scientists 
like CV Ramen or the great 

129
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:37,120
engineer M Vishesh Arya, the 
lesson they draw is that the 

130
00:07:37,120 --> 00:07:40,160
British colonized us because 
they were more powerful, they 

131
00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:44,520
were more industrialized. 
And once they go, we have to 

132
00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:47,800
meet them, not just equal, but 
excel them at their own term. 

133
00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:52,360
We have to be larger factories, 
more gigantic cities, more use, 

134
00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,000
more fossil fuel energy to power
our economic growth. 

135
00:07:55,280 --> 00:07:59,000
So these people are intellectual
dissidents because they're going

136
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:02,880
against the grain, they say, no,
actually we have to be. 

137
00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,040
We have to follow a slightly 
different path of development. 

138
00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:08,840
Yes, poverty is a problem. 
Yes, unemployment is a problem. 

139
00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:11,720
Yes, we have to meet the basic 
needs of people for food, 

140
00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:17,440
housing, education, help, but 
because unlike the British and 

141
00:08:17,440 --> 00:08:20,640
unlike the Americans, we don't 
have colonies to conquer. 

142
00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:23,560
I mean American 
industrialization and economic 

143
00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:26,040
growth was made possible because
they went and conquered this 

144
00:08:26,040 --> 00:08:30,520
vast and scarcely populated 
continent and extinguished and 

145
00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:32,840
exterminated the indigenous 
population and built their 

146
00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:35,960
economy. 
British and and French 

147
00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:38,039
industrialization was possible 
because they had colonies in 

148
00:08:38,039 --> 00:08:42,120
Asia and Africa which provided 
them resources and and money. 

149
00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:45,160
Now India had none of that. 
These people are arguing against

150
00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:49,240
the grain, and I think that's 
what makes make their ideas less

151
00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:52,920
influential in their own time. 
But today, when we are 

152
00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:56,400
confronted by these multiple 
forms of environmental crises, 

153
00:08:56,760 --> 00:09:01,880
maybe their ideas need a fresh 
herring and a closer and careful

154
00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:04,320
and critical look, which is what
I have tried to do in my book. 

155
00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:07,720
I want to start with the 
Rabindranath Tagore chapter, 

156
00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:09,360
which is also the 1st chapter of
the book. 

157
00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:12,920
You know you talk about him and 
you given him one more title 

158
00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:14,960
like he didn't have enough 
already. 

159
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,880
You add to him the title of 
being the Indian heading the 

160
00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:20,840
first environmental movement in 
India. 

161
00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:24,440
Given you know, he didn't really
like you said have a 

162
00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:27,120
environmental movement in the 
sense where he went to the 

163
00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:29,040
villages and told people to do 
things. 

164
00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:32,800
But then why would you argue 
that he is this? 

165
00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:35,960
Actually, I don't say he started
an environmental movement. 

166
00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:39,760
I say he was the first important
environmentalist. 

167
00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:44,200
So the distinction I made in my 
answer to your first question 

168
00:09:44,720 --> 00:09:49,040
between environmentalism as 
thought and environmentalism as 

169
00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:51,920
action, you know, which only 
really starts with the typical 

170
00:09:51,920 --> 00:09:53,840
movement. 
Tagore is really an 

171
00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:58,200
environmental thinker, though of
course he integrates it in his 

172
00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:01,240
educational philosophy. 
So today, you know, every school

173
00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:03,240
and college is taught the 
importance of environmental 

174
00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:05,960
education. 
But in Shantiniketan, and also 

175
00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:08,600
in the school, the Tagore and 
the high school part of Bhavan 

176
00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:11,640
that people like Amarthasan 
studied, you know, interactions 

177
00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:14,800
in nature very much part of it. 
First of all, you know, if a 

178
00:10:14,800 --> 00:10:18,880
person like Tagore is neglected 
because it's in this field, 

179
00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:22,960
because people haven't very 
clearly seen him as an early or 

180
00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:26,320
precocious environmentalist, 
it's because there were so many 

181
00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:28,640
other things to celebrate. 
I mean, there was his poetry, 

182
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:31,560
there were his plays, there were
his novels, there was art, there

183
00:10:31,560 --> 00:10:34,400
was a building of Shantiniketan,
there were his travels, there 

184
00:10:34,400 --> 00:10:38,320
was his influence on Nehru and 
Subash Bose and Mahatma Gandhi 

185
00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:41,120
and his rewriting, his reshaping
of the Bengali language. 

186
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:44,040
So this elevated his work. 
People missed. 

187
00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:48,120
And if at all they saw Tagore as
an environmentalist, they saw 

188
00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:51,720
him only as a nature lover. 
Who are His poems talks about 

189
00:10:51,720 --> 00:10:53,760
the beauty of forests, the 
beauty of mountains. 

190
00:10:54,080 --> 00:10:56,480
But what I've argued, and I 
think I've shown, I hope 

191
00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:59,400
reasonably convincingly, that 
there are many different 

192
00:10:59,400 --> 00:11:01,440
dimensions to Tagore's 
environmentalism. 

193
00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:04,200
First is the pure aesthetic 
dimension. 

194
00:11:04,640 --> 00:11:07,680
He glories in the beauty and 
diversity of nature in his 

195
00:11:07,680 --> 00:11:09,840
poetry. 
Then there is the educational 

196
00:11:09,840 --> 00:11:13,560
dimension, because he integrates
it in how he conceives of school

197
00:11:13,560 --> 00:11:16,520
and college education. 
Then there is the political 

198
00:11:16,520 --> 00:11:19,480
dimension, because he is the 
first person or one of the first

199
00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:22,400
people to recognize that 
colonialism, Western 

200
00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:27,120
colonialism, was a system not 
just of economic exploitation 

201
00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:31,240
and political domination, but of
ecological devastation. 

202
00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:34,120
I mean, there are quotes in my 
books that, you know, the West 

203
00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:36,640
is cannibalistic. 
Europe, Europe is cannibalistic,

204
00:11:36,640 --> 00:11:39,920
it feels on the people and 
resources of the rest of the 

205
00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:43,240
world psychically shows that 
imperialism has an ecological 

206
00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:45,040
dimension. 
You know, it ravages the 

207
00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:48,640
ecologies and landscapes, not 
just of of other countries, not 

208
00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:50,360
just dominates and subjugates 
their people. 

209
00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:52,760
And finally, it is a prophetic 
dimension. 

210
00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:55,960
You know, he talks about how the
whole earth will be goused up 

211
00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:57,960
and they will only be craters 
and no water. 

212
00:11:57,960 --> 00:12:01,120
I mean, in 1922, a hundred years
ago, maybe you should not be 

213
00:12:01,120 --> 00:12:05,240
saying this, but it could be 
that someone like me was able to

214
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:07,800
document Tagos, environmentalism
in all these different 

215
00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:11,800
dimensions because I'm not 
myself a Bengali, you know, I 

216
00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:13,600
come from a slightly adjacent 
perspective. 

217
00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:16,200
So maybe I saw things that 
others had not seen so clear. 

218
00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:21,480
You also write about JC Kumar 
Appam, who is, at least for me, 

219
00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:24,360
the most interesting character 
in this book in terms of his 

220
00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:26,600
whole story. 
What explains this sort of 

221
00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:28,760
staunch holding on to his 
beliefs? 

222
00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:31,840
You know, and at every turn that
he's offered an opportunity to 

223
00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:34,480
do something. 
There is a man who says, no, I 

224
00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:36,760
will not do this, and instead I 
will stick to my beliefs. 

225
00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:40,440
And why wouldn't he sort of 
choose instead to be with the 

226
00:12:40,440 --> 00:12:42,440
government and infect the change
from within? 

227
00:12:43,040 --> 00:12:46,560
Well, he, it could be better of 
personality, was a difficult man

228
00:12:46,560 --> 00:12:51,600
and angular man, but he was, I 
mean, he again, I think his, his

229
00:12:51,600 --> 00:12:53,920
work is really important because
he's taken up much later. 

230
00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:57,880
I mean, people today see him as 
someone who integrated ecology 

231
00:12:57,880 --> 00:13:00,960
with economics. 
I talk about how EF Schumacher, 

232
00:13:00,960 --> 00:13:02,320
for example, was influenced by 
him. 

233
00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:06,200
By the way, I, you know, its, 
its nice to see that you thought

234
00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:08,720
him the most interesting because
other readers have found others.

235
00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:12,600
Someone I talked to recently 
thought that the the couple who 

236
00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:15,720
did agricultural science, Howard
Albert and Gabriel Howard was 

237
00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:18,800
the most interesting. 
A wildlife scholar I who 

238
00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:21,320
interviewed me found M Krishnan 
the most interesting. 

239
00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:23,160
And urban planner might find 
Patrick Eddies. 

240
00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:27,040
I think delighted when different
readers find, you know, because 

241
00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:30,560
I think each of them is 
interesting and timely and 

242
00:13:30,560 --> 00:13:33,080
relevant in their own way. 
But Kumar, the answer to your 

243
00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:35,600
question was Kumar Appa was a 
difficult man. 

244
00:13:35,680 --> 00:13:37,880
You know, some people are not 
team players. 

245
00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:40,520
Some people are not 
compromising. 

246
00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:44,160
You know, it may. 
The question you posed is quite 

247
00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:47,360
interesting. 
Would he, if he had worked 

248
00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:51,480
within the government, if he had
not abandoned of the Planning 

249
00:13:51,480 --> 00:13:54,520
Commission committee he was 
asked to join, would he have 

250
00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,760
moderated economic development 
in a way that would have been 

251
00:13:57,760 --> 00:14:00,200
more sensitive to village 
concerns and environmental 

252
00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:01,320
concerns? 
Yeah. 

253
00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:06,080
But you know, I think it was it 
he was a stubbornly independent 

254
00:14:06,080 --> 00:14:11,360
minded man and I think that was 
both his strength and his 

255
00:14:11,360 --> 00:14:15,560
weakness because it made it gave
his work a certain integrity and

256
00:14:15,560 --> 00:14:18,560
wholeness. 
If you had been compromising or 

257
00:14:18,560 --> 00:14:21,160
cut corners wouldn't happen. 
The other hand, possibly what 

258
00:14:21,160 --> 00:14:24,680
you suggest may have been the 
case that in terms of concrete 

259
00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:30,120
policy implementation and he 
couldn't have any kind of 

260
00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:40,760
tangible influence. 
We're back in conversation with 

261
00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:44,240
author and historian Ramachandra
Guha about his latest book 

262
00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:47,400
titled Speaking with Nature, 
which is about 9 personalities 

263
00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:50,880
who attempted to raise awareness
about environmental degradation 

264
00:14:51,080 --> 00:14:53,560
well before it was a topic of 
debate in homes. 

265
00:14:54,040 --> 00:14:56,400
In this segment, we're in 
conversation about cities, 

266
00:14:56,560 --> 00:14:59,600
forest rights for tribals, and 
whether it is the curse of an 

267
00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:03,080
environmentalist to always be 
portrayed as an enemy of 

268
00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:06,960
progress. 
With a Patrick Geddes, we get an

269
00:15:06,960 --> 00:15:10,400
insight into the sort of town 
planning that is almost against 

270
00:15:10,400 --> 00:15:12,840
the grain of what we consider 
town planning. 

271
00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:15,640
Now. 
You add more greenery, you kind 

272
00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:18,880
of make touch ups to things 
rather than making these massive

273
00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:21,320
changes. 
But then for you, why does 

274
00:15:21,320 --> 00:15:25,920
someone like a Geddes fail? 
And is it that we always wanted 

275
00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:29,280
our cities to be these big grand
places which now we are again 

276
00:15:29,280 --> 00:15:34,160
suffering for? 
Actually, I must say that I have

277
00:15:34,160 --> 00:15:38,160
often been attracted by failure,
by heroic and noble failure in a

278
00:15:38,160 --> 00:15:40,200
lot of my work. 
I've written about people who 

279
00:15:40,200 --> 00:15:43,760
are extraordinary individuals 
who didn't really reach the 

280
00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:46,800
pinnacle, the Dalit cricketer 
Palwankar Balu, who was never 

281
00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:49,480
appointed captain of the Hindu 
team, you know, very rarely it 

282
00:15:49,480 --> 00:15:51,760
was done support margin. 
So maybe there's something 

283
00:15:51,760 --> 00:15:55,400
heroic and noble failure, you 
know, attracts me because this 

284
00:15:55,480 --> 00:15:57,960
again, I assist the integrity of
their work and their vision, 

285
00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:01,520
which appeals to me. 
Now again, Geddies, the colonial

286
00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:05,920
urban town planners, didn't find
him easy to work with Noddy, the

287
00:16:05,920 --> 00:16:08,600
Princess, but he left. 
Again, like Kumarapa, he left 

288
00:16:08,600 --> 00:16:11,520
behind his legacy. 
And in some ways he's the odd 

289
00:16:11,520 --> 00:16:16,080
man out in that in my book, 
because all the other nine are 

290
00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:19,840
dealing with rural landscapes, 
dealing with farms, with 

291
00:16:19,840 --> 00:16:23,760
forests, with water, with 
agriculture, with the 

292
00:16:23,760 --> 00:16:26,360
wilderness. 
And Geddes, he's saying, look, 

293
00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:29,320
hey, India is also an urban 
civilization. 

294
00:16:29,560 --> 00:16:32,320
He's telling the Gandhians, he's
telling indirectly telling 

295
00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:36,480
people like Kumarapa that and 
Gandhi himself, that you don't 

296
00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:38,520
like city life, but other people
do. 

297
00:16:38,600 --> 00:16:44,840
And you know, the whole logic of
urbanization will shift a larger

298
00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:48,800
number of Indians to the city. 
And that the question is not I 

299
00:16:48,800 --> 00:16:52,280
want to dispense to city life, 
but how do I make it more 

300
00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:56,560
inclusive, more habitable, more 
environmentally friendly, where 

301
00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:58,520
there's democratic 
accountability, which the, you 

302
00:16:58,520 --> 00:17:00,840
know, the mayors and the 
politicians have, the citizens 

303
00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:04,200
have some say. 
And how do we build cities that 

304
00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:07,480
reduce that? 
What the term that is now used 

305
00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:10,520
ecological footprint on the 
countryside that try and use 

306
00:17:10,520 --> 00:17:13,040
their own resources for their 
water, for their energy, for 

307
00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:14,560
their housing, for their 
consultation. 

308
00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:18,359
Indian cities and cities 
everywhere have this ecological 

309
00:17:18,359 --> 00:17:20,880
footprint where it's the 
countryside that provides them 

310
00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:22,200
all the resources for their 
growth. 

311
00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:24,480
And of course, they create jobs,
they create money. 

312
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:27,400
So all that's also true. 
But are they sustainable? 

313
00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:28,920
I mean, I'm speaking to you from
Bangalore, right? 

314
00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:31,800
Later this week, I'll be in 
conversation at the Bangalore 

315
00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:35,200
International Center with a very
fine ecologist, Harini Nagendra,

316
00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:36,720
who's written a very good book 
on Bangalore. 

317
00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:41,040
You know, on how we destroyed 
our lakes and our parks and our 

318
00:17:41,040 --> 00:17:43,960
water sources. 
Now, Bangalore is in many ways 

319
00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:47,200
the most economically dynamic 
city in India. 

320
00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:50,880
It's a city that is replaced 
Bombay as a city of dreams or 

321
00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:53,120
young people. 
You young people, all of India. 

322
00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:56,400
But how sustainable is this? 
Our lakes are gone. 

323
00:17:56,680 --> 00:17:59,280
We used to get our water from a 
reservoir close by. 

324
00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:01,920
Then we went to the Kaveri. 
Then we have Kaveri, second 

325
00:18:01,920 --> 00:18:06,360
stage, fourth stage, fifth stage
with water pumped up 1000 feet 

326
00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:09,920
to the plateau where Bangalore 
is, you know using cross whole 

327
00:18:09,920 --> 00:18:12,480
amount of energy. 
Now we are saying Bangalore 

328
00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:14,640
needs to go to the Saravati 
which is in the Western guards 

329
00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:16,760
now. 
I mean, the idea of ecological 

330
00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:20,480
town planning to reduce the 
dependence of the city on the 

331
00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:23,440
resources of the countryside, 
town planning that is more 

332
00:18:23,440 --> 00:18:27,000
egalitarian, more democratic, 
more participative town planning

333
00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:30,240
that finds a way of conserving 
great ancient buildings too. 

334
00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:32,040
You know, I mean, Bangalore had 
some beautiful buildings that 

335
00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:34,040
are all gone, right? 
I mean, I think some other 

336
00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:37,720
place, cities like maybe Mumbai 
and Delhi have done a slightly 

337
00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:42,360
better job of conserving their 
architectural and aesthetic 

338
00:18:42,360 --> 00:18:45,160
heritage. 
So I think guide is as an 

339
00:18:45,240 --> 00:18:47,840
ecological town planner, as a 
democratic town planner. 

340
00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:50,160
I think again, he speaks to us 
today. 

341
00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:55,240
I'll again say one thing, that 
my book is a work of historical 

342
00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:58,600
scholarship. 
Its not a work of policy and 

343
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:00,800
advocacy. 
I mean, that's there. 

344
00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:03,160
That's obviously there 
indirectly, indirectly, and 

345
00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:07,440
readers will draw their own 
lessons about the present from 

346
00:19:07,440 --> 00:19:09,480
what I say about the past. 
They will draw their own 

347
00:19:09,480 --> 00:19:13,520
conclusions about what ideas 
among all these 10 individuals, 

348
00:19:13,520 --> 00:19:16,160
which of their ideas may have 
some resonance or relevance with

349
00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:19,240
our situation today. 
But I think Gary's is one of the

350
00:19:19,240 --> 00:19:20,440
most interesting figures in the 
book. 

351
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:22,040
I mean, he's a very interesting 
man. 

352
00:19:22,040 --> 00:19:24,200
I mean, if you look at his 
story, I mean, for a biographer,

353
00:19:24,800 --> 00:19:28,840
he was a celebrated urban town 
planner in Europe. 

354
00:19:29,360 --> 00:19:31,960
He was invited to show his 
exhibition on town planning in 

355
00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:34,280
Europe. 
Here the exhibition is sunk by a

356
00:19:34,280 --> 00:19:36,720
German destroyer and he had 
nothing to show. 

357
00:19:36,720 --> 00:19:40,120
So he says, I'll study Indian, 
Indian cities and talk about 

358
00:19:40,120 --> 00:19:42,520
them, talk about their past, 
their present and their future. 

359
00:19:42,800 --> 00:19:45,720
So I think each of these 
individuals has a very 

360
00:19:45,720 --> 00:19:49,480
interesting and to be a poignant
individual trajectory. 

361
00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:51,840
You know, the ideas are of 
course, the main emphasis of the

362
00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:52,920
book. 
I mean, the main emphasis of the

363
00:19:52,920 --> 00:19:55,600
book is not in the lives and not
the biography, but on their 

364
00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:57,600
ideas. 
But I think they're already very

365
00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:00,800
unusual people. 
You also write about Vernier 

366
00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:05,280
Elvin, who is actively working 
towards letting tribals. 

367
00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:09,560
Stay the way they would like to 
stay, rather than the central 

368
00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:12,920
government telling them how to 
live, imposing lots of rules on 

369
00:20:12,920 --> 00:20:15,360
them. 
You also write about how that 

370
00:20:15,360 --> 00:20:19,720
sort of imposition of rules and 
a sort of lack of freedom for 

371
00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:22,400
tribals is what resulted in 
something like the Maoist 

372
00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:24,400
movement. 
We are now at a stage where we 

373
00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:26,520
are talking of ending the Maoist
movement. 

374
00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:31,160
What then does that mean for 
Indias future forest planning 

375
00:20:31,160 --> 00:20:34,280
and even the present forest 
planning in that sense? 

376
00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:37,920
That's a very good question. 
I should say straight away that 

377
00:20:37,960 --> 00:20:40,720
I've never been a fan of the 
Maoists. 

378
00:20:40,720 --> 00:20:44,760
And I think they were a savage 
and nihilistic group of radicals

379
00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:48,320
who actually worsened the tribal
predicament because they, the 

380
00:20:48,320 --> 00:20:52,640
tribals, became caught in a 
crossfire between the Indian 

381
00:20:52,640 --> 00:20:54,960
states, paramilitary and the 
Maoists. 

382
00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:58,000
But you know, how do you 
envisage the future for the 

383
00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:02,760
Adivasis who live close to or 
within the forest now in right, 

384
00:21:02,760 --> 00:21:06,760
in the end of the book in the 
Epidogue, I talk about what is 

385
00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:09,520
happening in the Gachiroli 
district of Maharashtra, which 

386
00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:13,280
was a Maoist infested area, but 
which is also an area in which 

387
00:21:13,360 --> 00:21:16,200
the Forest Rights Act was 
properly and honestly 

388
00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:19,320
implemented and where community 
forest rights were given to 

389
00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:23,280
dozens of villages once they got
back control the forest. 

390
00:21:23,360 --> 00:21:26,480
I mean, instead to extraordinary
resurgence of the ecology, 

391
00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:29,040
particularly species like bamboo
and those associated with 

392
00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:32,040
bamboo, which is led to a 
thriving artisanal economy, 

393
00:21:32,040 --> 00:21:36,160
which is replenished the 
springs, that is enhanced 

394
00:21:36,160 --> 00:21:39,120
biodiversity. 
So it is renewed the ecology and

395
00:21:39,120 --> 00:21:42,280
also provided opportunities for 
economic livelihood so that 

396
00:21:42,720 --> 00:21:44,720
tribals who are migrating cities
have come back. 

397
00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:49,040
And now this is only a Model 1 
can follow that you use tribal 

398
00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:52,680
culture, which is based on a 
deep understanding of nature, 

399
00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:56,040
which is egalitarian, which is 
participative to generate 

400
00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:59,960
economic growth in livelihoods. 
Now there was talk recently, I 

401
00:21:59,960 --> 00:22:03,240
don't know what will happen to 
it, about taking a steel mill to

402
00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:05,280
Gadchiroli. 
Now what is that going to do, 

403
00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:07,880
you know? 
So you know, a wild steel mill 

404
00:22:08,040 --> 00:22:10,160
with a kind of massive 
fortification, you know, a few 

405
00:22:10,160 --> 00:22:12,760
100 people employed, most of the
engineers will come from 

406
00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:14,160
outside. 
And we know tribals are going to

407
00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:19,000
get skilled work, community 
forest rights in Adivasi areas 

408
00:22:19,360 --> 00:22:23,440
that you can think of new models
of economic development that 

409
00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:27,880
enhance the livelihood security 
of the Adivasi communities that 

410
00:22:27,880 --> 00:22:31,040
provide them dignified 
employment and at the same time 

411
00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:33,920
don't ravish the environment. 
So its not free. 

412
00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:36,320
You know, sometimes there's a 
there's a caricature. 

413
00:22:36,440 --> 00:22:39,080
You want to keep the tribals in 
a zoo, you want to keep them as 

414
00:22:39,080 --> 00:22:42,000
a museum piece. 
So people who argue in that way,

415
00:22:42,240 --> 00:22:44,520
I would ask them to go to 
Gachiroli and look at what is 

416
00:22:44,520 --> 00:22:46,320
happening there. 
And what is happening in 

417
00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:49,160
Gachiroli can also should be 
emulated in, you know, 

418
00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:52,880
Chhattisgarh and in Orissa and 
in, you know, other places where

419
00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:57,440
you can actually revive, I mean 
use and often using science. 

420
00:22:57,440 --> 00:23:01,040
So the Gadchiroli experiment, I 
used modern ecologist. 

421
00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:03,120
So it's not as if it's only 
tribal knowledge. 

422
00:23:03,360 --> 00:23:05,720
You know, modern ecologist like 
Madhav Gadgil and his colleagues

423
00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:08,280
have gone there and said these 
are the species you can grow, 

424
00:23:08,280 --> 00:23:11,160
these are the methods you can 
follow and and so on and so 

425
00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:13,720
forth. 
So I think there is a, you know,

426
00:23:13,760 --> 00:23:16,560
this caricature that 
environmentalists are against 

427
00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:20,320
development, that tribal rights 
activists want to keep tribals 

428
00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:23,160
in a kind of museum. 
This is utterly fallacious. 

429
00:23:24,520 --> 00:23:28,320
One thing that kind of runs 
through the book is also this 

430
00:23:28,320 --> 00:23:31,560
sort of opposition to the 
centralization of management of 

431
00:23:31,560 --> 00:23:34,840
natural resources. 
Was it just colonialism and like

432
00:23:34,840 --> 00:23:37,920
you said, the British and French
colonialism we having spread? 

433
00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:41,720
Was it that which made all these
personalities so clear eyed 

434
00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:45,000
about the centralization of 
resources? 

435
00:23:45,680 --> 00:23:50,120
Yeah, because the British, you 
know, took over 20% of Indias 

436
00:23:50,120 --> 00:23:53,280
land area and said this is state
forest and this is owned by the 

437
00:23:53,280 --> 00:23:56,560
government and local communities
have very marginal rights. 

438
00:23:56,840 --> 00:23:59,920
And we will police the forest 
from the local community with 

439
00:23:59,920 --> 00:24:03,520
guns and the Indian Forest 
Service because it is called 

440
00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:05,600
heritage where khaki like 
policeman. 

441
00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:11,200
So centralization is anti 
democratic and it also goes 

442
00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:13,080
against the grain of sustainable
management. 

443
00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:16,120
You know, I mean, I think so, 
you know, so for example, in 

444
00:24:16,120 --> 00:24:18,600
many parts of India you had 
local communities managing the 

445
00:24:18,600 --> 00:24:21,440
water resources but the state 
irrigation department took it 

446
00:24:21,440 --> 00:24:22,760
over. 
So there was number 

447
00:24:22,760 --> 00:24:25,560
responsibility, no incentive for
the local community. 

448
00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:27,880
Likewise with other forms of 
planning. 

449
00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:30,320
I have talked about town 
planning and how one needs a 

450
00:24:30,320 --> 00:24:34,400
much more participatory, you 
know, involvement of citizens in

451
00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:38,040
how to use a city's financial 
and other resources. 

452
00:24:38,200 --> 00:24:41,360
So yes, absolutely. 
I think a responsible 

453
00:24:41,600 --> 00:24:44,360
environmental management 
requires political 

454
00:24:44,360 --> 00:24:47,760
decentralization now. 
It requires a reactivation of 

455
00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:51,640
the 73rd and 74th amendment. 
Right now the 73rd and 74th 

456
00:24:51,640 --> 00:24:55,520
amendments which allow for 
panchayats and municipalities to

457
00:24:55,800 --> 00:24:59,560
have the elected bodies, you 
know they have those bodies have

458
00:24:59,560 --> 00:25:01,760
no teeth, they have no policy 
making powers. 

459
00:25:01,760 --> 00:25:04,920
They have no money generating 
powers, they have no finances. 

460
00:25:04,920 --> 00:25:07,800
All they have is you have an 
election and but is the MLA and 

461
00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:10,800
the minister in the state 
secretariat or in in Delhi who 

462
00:25:10,800 --> 00:25:13,720
decides everything? 
Other people who understand 

463
00:25:14,080 --> 00:25:16,680
these things better than I may 
use some of the arguments of 

464
00:25:16,680 --> 00:25:20,560
these thinkers to make a more 
substantive case of political 

465
00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:24,200
decentralization as being good 
not just for democracy but for 

466
00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:26,440
environmental sustainability. 
But I think all these thinkers 

467
00:25:26,440 --> 00:25:30,720
saw that the damage that sent 
the colonial system of resource 

468
00:25:30,720 --> 00:25:34,000
management, which was based on 
excessive centralization, which 

469
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:37,520
was based on according enormous 
powers to the state bureaucracy,

470
00:25:37,920 --> 00:25:41,040
which was based on arrogance 
that ordinary people don't know,

471
00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:44,080
that peasants and tribals know 
nothing about how to manage 

472
00:25:44,080 --> 00:25:46,280
forests or water or anything 
else. 

473
00:25:46,320 --> 00:25:51,840
I think that is in a in a 
democracy like ours, to still 

474
00:25:51,840 --> 00:25:54,920
have this coronary system of 
resource management, I think is 

475
00:25:55,360 --> 00:25:58,720
is a huge problem. 
But, you know, in the current 

476
00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:02,120
age, with the problems that 
we're facing, especially with 

477
00:26:02,120 --> 00:26:05,880
climate change and things, a lot
of that sort of pressure is now 

478
00:26:05,880 --> 00:26:09,400
again, back on that sort of 
centralization because we feel 

479
00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:12,760
that, you know, without a sort 
of large effort that's concerted

480
00:26:12,760 --> 00:26:15,640
from the top, you can't manage 
something as big as climate 

481
00:26:15,640 --> 00:26:17,360
change. 
So how do you view that 

482
00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:20,640
argument? 
It's true that you need some 

483
00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:24,080
amount of centralization, you 
need some amount of macro 

484
00:26:24,080 --> 00:26:26,160
thinking, but it is more a 
balance. 

485
00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:28,600
And I think, again, this is 
something I only allude to 

486
00:26:28,600 --> 00:26:31,080
towards the end of the book, 
because the bulk of the problem 

487
00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:33,760
that India faces are not 
connected to climate change. 

488
00:26:33,880 --> 00:26:36,160
I mean, air pollution in Delhi 
is not connected to climate 

489
00:26:36,160 --> 00:26:37,800
change. 
The depletion of groundwater 

490
00:26:37,800 --> 00:26:39,800
aquifers is not connected to 
climate change. 

491
00:26:39,800 --> 00:26:42,960
The chemical contamination of 
the soil is not connected to 

492
00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:45,680
climate change. 
The invasion of our forests by 

493
00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:48,800
exotic weeds like Lantana is not
connected to climate change. 

494
00:26:49,160 --> 00:26:53,040
So I think in some ways the 
obsession with climate change 

495
00:26:53,040 --> 00:26:56,320
now climate change is real, it 
is visible, it is affecting the 

496
00:26:56,320 --> 00:26:57,760
whole world. 
I mean, look at the floods in 

497
00:26:58,120 --> 00:27:00,000
the cyclones in Florida very 
recently. 

498
00:27:00,040 --> 00:27:02,880
Of course, what happened in 
Kerala a few months ago is real,

499
00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:05,280
it is visible, it is it can be 
extremely damaging. 

500
00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:13,920
But the environmental crisis 
that India faces today, much of 

501
00:27:13,960 --> 00:27:16,080
it has nothing to or little to 
do with climate change. 

502
00:27:16,280 --> 00:27:20,960
And unfortunately our whole way 
of thinking, regardless of which

503
00:27:20,960 --> 00:27:23,520
political parties in power. 
I mean, I would, this is 

504
00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:26,360
something I don't take up in my 
book, but I would take it up in 

505
00:27:26,360 --> 00:27:29,680
a, in a conversation like this, 
I would hold economists 

506
00:27:29,680 --> 00:27:32,040
accountable because economists 
have become a priesthood. 

507
00:27:33,000 --> 00:27:35,360
And this is regardless of left 
wing or right wing. 

508
00:27:35,360 --> 00:27:38,080
You know, India has produced 
great left wing economies and 

509
00:27:38,080 --> 00:27:41,720
great right wing economies or 
celebrated left wing economists 

510
00:27:41,720 --> 00:27:43,920
who have got the Nobel Prize. 
Right wing economists have got 

511
00:27:43,920 --> 00:27:46,680
many great awards. 
What is common to them? 

512
00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:49,320
Ecological illiteracy. 
They believe that either the 

513
00:27:49,320 --> 00:27:51,800
state or the market can solve 
everything and there is no 

514
00:27:52,160 --> 00:27:53,720
environmental problems are 
ephemeral. 

515
00:27:54,200 --> 00:27:57,600
That is actually they affect the
bulk of the Indian society. 

516
00:27:57,600 --> 00:28:00,720
You know, environmental 
degradation has enormous 

517
00:28:01,480 --> 00:28:03,680
negative impacts in the 
livelihood and health of 

518
00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:06,520
ordinary Indians. 
So I think economics has become 

519
00:28:06,520 --> 00:28:09,200
a kind of priesthood, esoteric 
priesthood priesthood. 

520
00:28:09,480 --> 00:28:13,200
And they are the people who, you
know, advise governments. 

521
00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:16,960
You know, it is not urban 
planners or community ecologists

522
00:28:16,960 --> 00:28:20,040
or, you know, people working on 
democratic decentralization 

523
00:28:20,520 --> 00:28:24,160
advise government. 
So I mean, this is this is in my

524
00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:25,320
book. 
It is a work of scholarship. 

525
00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:28,600
I kept out this polemic. 
But my personal belief is that 

526
00:28:28,880 --> 00:28:31,240
economists, regardless of 
whether they are left wing or 

527
00:28:31,240 --> 00:28:34,600
right wing, free market or 
welfarist, Indian economists, 

528
00:28:34,600 --> 00:28:40,040
are a esoteric peace stood that 
has blinded us to the the the 

529
00:28:40,040 --> 00:28:42,600
massive scale of the 
environmental crisis that India 

530
00:28:42,600 --> 00:28:46,320
faces. 
Another theme that again runs 

531
00:28:46,320 --> 00:28:49,960
through the book is this sort of
opposition to a sort of top down

532
00:28:49,960 --> 00:28:53,600
model of governance and also an 
acceptance of slow growth rather

533
00:28:53,600 --> 00:28:59,520
than, you know, 15% GDP growth. 
Does such views also make, say, 

534
00:28:59,520 --> 00:29:02,160
even these personalities and 
even the modern day 

535
00:29:02,160 --> 00:29:05,240
environmentalists much less 
acceptable to the general 

536
00:29:05,240 --> 00:29:07,760
public? 
That may be so, but that will be

537
00:29:07,760 --> 00:29:10,600
to our cost. 
I would say, notwithstanding 

538
00:29:10,600 --> 00:29:12,920
what I've said about the 
economic profession, that the 

539
00:29:12,920 --> 00:29:15,080
younger Indian economists are 
much more alert to this. 

540
00:29:15,080 --> 00:29:18,680
You know, there's a network of 
environmental economists, mostly

541
00:29:18,680 --> 00:29:21,880
composed of people in their 30s 
and 40s who do much more field 

542
00:29:21,880 --> 00:29:24,680
work, who are aware of the 
condition of the soil, the 

543
00:29:24,680 --> 00:29:27,920
water, the air, and what 
economic costs it exacts and why

544
00:29:27,920 --> 00:29:30,520
they need to, you know, be much 
more ecologically responsible. 

545
00:29:31,200 --> 00:29:34,960
But yes, it is at the moment. 
It's kind of going against the 

546
00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:37,920
grain. 
But as the problems deepen 

547
00:29:38,080 --> 00:29:41,360
10/15/20 years from now, I mean,
I talked about who knows if 

548
00:29:41,360 --> 00:29:44,880
Bangalore will be habitable, you
know, in the next 15 or 20 

549
00:29:44,880 --> 00:29:47,080
years, who knows? 
I mean, look at the Punjab, once

550
00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:49,760
a grain, the bread basket of 
India. 

551
00:29:49,760 --> 00:29:52,120
Look at, you know, the condition
of the soils in the groundwater 

552
00:29:52,120 --> 00:29:54,280
aquifers. 
So these are real issues that 

553
00:29:54,320 --> 00:29:56,800
are coming up and this is where 
it may be. 

554
00:29:57,080 --> 00:29:59,560
You know, some of the thinkers 
in my book, they can't tell you 

555
00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:03,000
exactly what to do because they 
were working a long time ago. 

556
00:30:03,480 --> 00:30:05,440
But they can provide you clues, 
they can provide you a 

557
00:30:05,440 --> 00:30:08,600
framework, they can provide you 
a, you could say, a moral and 

558
00:30:08,600 --> 00:30:13,360
ecological philosophy which will
help us get a clearer 

559
00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:15,600
understanding of where India is 
today. 

560
00:30:16,560 --> 00:30:19,080
Is it the curse of an 
environmentalist to always be 

561
00:30:19,080 --> 00:30:22,520
seen as the enemy of the people?
As in you will always be branded

562
00:30:22,520 --> 00:30:24,600
one not. 
Enemy the people, because I 

563
00:30:24,600 --> 00:30:26,320
would argue that 
environmentalists are the real 

564
00:30:26,320 --> 00:30:29,040
people are speaking on behalf of
the majority of the people. 

565
00:30:29,520 --> 00:30:33,800
They see this enemies of a very 
conventional, narrow minded, 

566
00:30:34,360 --> 00:30:38,120
outdated version of what is 
progress and development. 10% 

567
00:30:38,120 --> 00:30:40,800
growth is not long term 
progress. 

568
00:30:40,920 --> 00:30:43,880
I mean, of course you need 
growth, you need innovation, you

569
00:30:43,880 --> 00:30:47,360
need entrepreneurship, you need 
the product, you know, greater 

570
00:30:47,360 --> 00:30:50,360
efficiency. 
But I think they are really 

571
00:30:50,480 --> 00:30:53,960
they're posing very large 
fundamental questions about what

572
00:30:54,120 --> 00:30:57,080
kind of growth we need, how to 
make it environmentally 

573
00:30:57,080 --> 00:30:59,240
sustainable, how to make it more
participative. 

574
00:30:59,840 --> 00:31:02,880
Early in the book, I quote Anil 
Agarwal, who is one of our 

575
00:31:02,880 --> 00:31:05,880
pioneering environmentalists, 
who said environmentalism in 

576
00:31:05,880 --> 00:31:08,920
India is not about pretty trees 
and tigers. 

577
00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:12,080
It's about the livelihoods of 
the majority of Indians, of slum

578
00:31:12,080 --> 00:31:15,640
dwellers or workers or artisans 
or peasants or tribals or 

579
00:31:15,640 --> 00:31:18,640
pestilists. 
It's about, I think that's what 

580
00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:21,480
many other thinkers in this book
really also argue. 

581
00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:26,000
It's a livelihood concern more 
than much more than it's a 

582
00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:31,600
merely aesthetic concern. 
Today's episode was produced by.

583
00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:34,760
Jayaraj Singh and Sahil. 
Gupta for a daily. 

584
00:31:34,760 --> 00:31:38,080
Spotlight on people, ideas, and 
stories that matter. 

585
00:31:38,200 --> 00:31:40,880
Subscribe to us. 
We're available on the Times of 

586
00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:45,640
India website, Spotify, Apple, 
Amazon, or wherever else you get

587
00:31:45,640 --> 00:31:47,520
your podcast. 
For any new. 

588
00:31:47,520 --> 00:31:52,320
Steps of feedback Mail me at 
arun.george@timesgroup.com.

