1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,160
Hello and welcome to the Planner
Pals Podcast, a podcast hosted 

2
00:00:03,160 --> 00:00:05,960
by two true planner pals. 
My name is Mark and I go by Mark

3
00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,280
Your pages. 
And I'm Jess or Jessie Curran, 

4
00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:11,520
and in this episode, we're 
looking at messy versus curated 

5
00:00:11,520 --> 00:00:14,760
planning, considering what the 
pros and cons of each of these 

6
00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:17,320
are, why neither of them is 
right or wrong. 

7
00:00:17,480 --> 00:00:20,240
And we really wanna know where 
you guys fall on the messy 

8
00:00:20,240 --> 00:00:22,240
curated spectrum. 
We're definitely gonna be 

9
00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:25,240
sharing where we fall. 
But Mark, when it comes to this 

10
00:00:25,240 --> 00:00:28,080
topic, why is it actually 
important to talk about? 

11
00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:31,560
I think it's important because 
we're unveiling the reality of 

12
00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:35,400
planning, you know, what you see
online, which typically is going

13
00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:38,640
to be the best of the best 
versus maybe what your planner 

14
00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:41,280
may look like. 
It's on a spectrum. 

15
00:00:41,480 --> 00:00:45,520
Not everyone actually normally 
plans like that, but some people

16
00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:47,880
actually do. 
Like Jess and I fall on very 

17
00:00:47,880 --> 00:00:50,640
opposite sides of the spectrum 
when we're talking about this 

18
00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:53,640
topic is like, what do you mean?
Of course my planner is messy. 

19
00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:58,040
She's like, no, it needs to be 
perfection, but I think just 

20
00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:00,400
really going through and 
normalizing and it's just key as

21
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,240
we're talking about it because 
like we said, what you see 

22
00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:05,760
online maybe looks a little bit 
different than what yours looks 

23
00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:09,080
like, and that's totally OK. 
The biggest part, as we all 

24
00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:10,760
know, is that your planner is 
for you. 

25
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:14,080
So it's really important to make
sure that it's working for you. 

26
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:16,920
But also not saying that I can't
be a little bit of both or 

27
00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:19,520
meeting kind of in the middle, 
especially if you're a 

28
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:22,720
Perspicity biscuit about certain
things like headers or the way 

29
00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:26,120
they look or the way your boxes 
look and kind of falling inside 

30
00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:28,360
of there. 
Yeah, and we definitely want to 

31
00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:31,200
say from the get go, whether 
you're doing messy planning or 

32
00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:33,600
curated planning does not mean 
that your planner isn't 

33
00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,200
functional, right. 
We're not saying that either is 

34
00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:39,280
going to be like better in terms
of your productivity or in terms

35
00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:41,880
of getting things done or 
fulfilling really the purpose 

36
00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,840
that you give for your planner. 
It's more so just thinking about

37
00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:48,080
the overall kind of final 
appearance of your planner, I 

38
00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:49,840
suppose. 
And whether you learn more to 

39
00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:52,840
the messy side, more to the 
curated side or very much smack 

40
00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:55,360
bang in between. 
It can also differ from planet 

41
00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,840
to planner, which I think is an 
important something to consider.

42
00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:01,240
Like some in your lineup might 
be quite curated, quite kind of,

43
00:02:01,240 --> 00:02:04,280
you know, aesthetic leaning, 
whereas other ones might be like

44
00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:06,280
complete scribbly messes and 
such. 

45
00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:09,639
And I think it's kind of also 
nice to be able to have separate

46
00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:12,600
spaces for separate things 
because in a way they also 

47
00:02:12,600 --> 00:02:14,880
fulfill different needs for you.
Or at least that's what I find 

48
00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:17,040
my planners do. 
Oh, completely. 

49
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:19,320
I mean, some of those planners 
are like, OK, I'm writing very 

50
00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:22,400
nicely inside of this one. 
Like it's very intentional 

51
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:25,720
because it has that kind of 
space, like the one I use for 

52
00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:29,200
all of my ink swatches. 
I'm very precise about how I'm 

53
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:31,800
writing. 
I take my time, I go very slow 

54
00:02:31,920 --> 00:02:34,480
because I want it to look 
somewhat normalized, even though

55
00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:37,760
it's different colors. 
Whereas my day-to-day completely

56
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:39,880
different story. 
But just why don't we, maybe 

57
00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:42,120
we'll do something first is like
really kind of define what we 

58
00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:44,960
mean by messy versus something 
that's a little bit more 

59
00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:46,560
curated. 
Because I think that could be a 

60
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:49,120
little confusing, right, 
depending on how you're thinking

61
00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:50,560
about. 
So why don't we go into how you 

62
00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:52,680
define those for us because 
you're you're very good at 

63
00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,680
defining things versus me. 
I'll ramble on for hours about 

64
00:02:55,680 --> 00:02:58,240
what I think it is and then 
double check myself on if that's

65
00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:01,560
really how I feel. 
And repeat ourselves like 3 to 6

66
00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,680
times in between there. 
But in terms of messy planning, 

67
00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:07,200
we're thinking like fast, low 
friction planning. 

68
00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:10,640
It's really get in, write your 
stuff down and get out with not 

69
00:03:10,640 --> 00:03:14,240
necessarily a lot of concern as 
to how it looks. 

70
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:16,320
We're thinking kind of 
scribbling notes. 

71
00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:19,680
It could be crossing things out.
Really just the idea of taking 

72
00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:22,480
your brain and putting it onto 
paper without too much 

73
00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:25,800
consideration of the kind of, 
you know, structure of the 

74
00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,840
layout or the sizing, spacing, 
those kind of things which are 

75
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:32,800
more so considerations that 
might come in with curated 

76
00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,040
planning. 
So for curated planning, we're 

77
00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,600
thinking it's very intentional 
about where information is 

78
00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,560
stored, what information 
possibly is stored. 

79
00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:43,720
It's visually placed in a way 
that is appealing after the 

80
00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:46,040
fact. 
Typically it's a lot neater, 

81
00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:49,320
doesn't necessarily have to have
perfect handwriting or anything 

82
00:03:49,320 --> 00:03:52,920
like that, but the placement of 
pieces within the planner has 

83
00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:55,520
been done with a bit more 
intention I suppose then our 

84
00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:57,920
messy planning kind of 
compatriots. 

85
00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:00,920
And I think when we define 
those, those even sound like 

86
00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,000
very opposite sides of a 
spectrum. 

87
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:04,640
It's like you're either one or 
the other. 

88
00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:07,400
But I think the reality really 
falls that we probably fall 

89
00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:10,000
somewhere in between there. 
And like you said, it might be 

90
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:12,000
depending on the type of journal
that you're using. 

91
00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:15,800
I know for me, it's very much 
about the time that I have to 

92
00:04:15,800 --> 00:04:18,880
accomplish what I'm doing. 
So if I'm trying to write things

93
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:21,079
down quickly because I'm in a 
meeting and I'm taking a 

94
00:04:21,079 --> 00:04:24,440
handwritten notes, that's going 
to look a lot messier perhaps 

95
00:04:24,440 --> 00:04:26,920
than a page that I'm setting up 
very intentionally. 

96
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:30,240
Like we talked about the perfect
header, everything spaced out 

97
00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:32,680
appropriately and trying to 
figure that out. 

98
00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,000
So I think talking next about 
maybe where we fall on that 

99
00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:36,640
spectrum might be a good kind of
space. 

100
00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:38,080
And we're going to start with 
you, Jess. 

101
00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:41,560
I'll give you 3 guesses as to 
where I fall. 

102
00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:45,880
Yeah, I definitely consider 
myself to be more in the curated

103
00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:48,760
kind of space when it comes to 
my everyday journal, everyday 

104
00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:52,280
planner in particular. 
I enjoy having it look nice. 

105
00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:55,400
So I'm making sure to kind of 
pre plan what my layout 

106
00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,680
structures are going to be 
before I get in and actually 

107
00:04:57,680 --> 00:04:59,800
draw things in. 
I want to make sure that the 

108
00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:03,720
boxes are appropriately sized so
that everything fits nicely. 

109
00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:07,480
Which does often tend to 
requiring a lot of pre planning 

110
00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:11,040
before you plan the plans, which
feels just like maybe a little 

111
00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:13,400
bit of overkill. 
But it means that then the end 

112
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:17,200
product is something that is 
very nicely organized, easily 

113
00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:19,280
structured. 
I can find everything I'm 

114
00:05:19,280 --> 00:05:22,640
looking for and it looks good, 
which makes my brain happy 

115
00:05:22,840 --> 00:05:25,560
because one of the things that I
find for curated planning is 

116
00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:28,960
that the curation part is just 
part of the joy of it. 

117
00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:32,160
It's part of the enjoyability of
the process, at least for me. 

118
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,800
Now we're going to get into a 
conversation about when things 

119
00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:36,960
maybe go a little too far. 
That's not right now. 

120
00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:40,160
That's a future topic point. 
But there are other spaces that 

121
00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:43,440
I do messy planning, or at least
what I would consider to be 

122
00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:46,200
messy planning. 
I know that to the outside eye, 

123
00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:48,360
it still probably looks fairly 
curated. 

124
00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:49,880
It still probably looks fairly 
neat. 

125
00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,560
But for me, anytime I feel like 
I'm using my natural 

126
00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:56,920
handwriting, which I have very 
slowly kind of gravitated 

127
00:05:57,000 --> 00:06:01,120
towards in my everyday planners 
and such, because I felt like my

128
00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:04,200
natural handwriting was not 
consistent enough, quote, quote 

129
00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:07,200
wasn't consistent enough to put 
in my planner or you know, all 

130
00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:10,280
the letter forms didn't have the
same sizing and spacing and all 

131
00:06:10,280 --> 00:06:12,840
of that kind of thing. 
It would add to that feeling of 

132
00:06:12,840 --> 00:06:16,080
messiness. 
So I was kind of tending towards

133
00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:19,480
doing all caps writing because 
all caps I could find that it 

134
00:06:19,480 --> 00:06:21,080
would be very consistent 
looking. 

135
00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:22,400
Everything looked equally 
spaced. 

136
00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:24,560
And then there was that kind of 
cheerleader effect with all of 

137
00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,120
the letters. 
So the curated part there, yeah,

138
00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:30,120
was kind of shining through. 
Nowadays, though, I use my 

139
00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:33,440
regular handwriting in all of my
journals except my five year 

140
00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:34,720
journal. 
And that's because it's a five 

141
00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:36,520
year journal and I still want it
to be matchy, matchy. 

142
00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:38,160
And I've done three years so far
of all caps. 

143
00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:40,360
So I'm going to continue. 
I mean, I've been an all caps 

144
00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:43,200
person ever since I started my 
bullet journal almost nine years

145
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:45,160
ago. 
I think we may have talked about

146
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:48,280
it on a previous episode, but if
not, you know, when I started, I

147
00:06:48,280 --> 00:06:50,320
was very intentional about a 
handful of things. 

148
00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:53,960
I was very intentional about 
thinking about grid spacing and 

149
00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:56,280
layouts and how I wanted that to
be structured. 

150
00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:59,160
And my handwriting was one of 
the other really big things. 

151
00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:01,680
And the third was experimenting 
and using different types of 

152
00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:03,760
pens and tools and things like 
that. 

153
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:06,080
But the handwriting part was 
something I actually adopted 

154
00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:09,920
from my dad because all my life 
growing up, he always wrote in 

155
00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:12,640
all caps. 
And when you're in school and 

156
00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:15,360
you're going through, that's 
never an option. 

157
00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:17,920
You know, everything has to be 
grammatically correct and 

158
00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:20,360
uppercase and lowercase and all 
these different things. 

159
00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:23,480
And then suddenly, for whatever 
reason, when I started the 

160
00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:26,120
Bullet Journal, I just made that
decision to start doing that. 

161
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:30,640
And it's so because I have to 
really think about drawing or 

162
00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:33,440
writing anything in lowercase. 
I was doing something with the 

163
00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:36,280
Uniball the other day and I was 
writing Uniball, which their 

164
00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:43,480
logo is all lowercase letters. 
And I was like you and, and like

165
00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:46,560
it was, I was like almost like 
forcing my hand to write these 

166
00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:49,640
lowercase letters. 
It's just impossible for me 

167
00:07:49,640 --> 00:07:52,320
sometimes. 
So it's just really funny how my

168
00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:54,440
handwriting is kind of changed 
in doing that. 

169
00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:58,160
But I feel similar to you, not 
because it looks matchy, matchy 

170
00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:00,880
your uniform. 
For me, it's just as like that's

171
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:04,240
how I'm writing and it's odd for
me to go and do something 

172
00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:07,560
different. 
But I also really love the way 

173
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,600
like some people write in like 
the squares. 

174
00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:14,040
So like say you have like a line
grid square page. 

175
00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:16,880
They write like each letter 
inside of each one of those 

176
00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:18,320
squares. 
And I've always loved the way 

177
00:08:18,320 --> 00:08:20,360
that it looked, but I could 
never accomplish that. 

178
00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:23,960
And so I'm just like, well, all 
caps looks better in something 

179
00:08:23,960 --> 00:08:26,240
like that too. 
I've seen some really beautiful 

180
00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:27,880
lowercase letters in there too, 
like that. 

181
00:08:27,880 --> 00:08:30,240
But it's just like you see those
things and you're like, I'm 

182
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,000
going to try that. 
I'm going to try to do that. 

183
00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:35,320
And then like, either you're 
really good at it or I feel like

184
00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:36,880
you're, you're really bad about 
it. 

185
00:08:36,919 --> 00:08:39,760
But like adopting those things 
in your journal or making a 

186
00:08:39,760 --> 00:08:42,559
decision, I think is an 
important part of it too. 

187
00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:45,400
Because that really kind of 
hurts to guide the direction 

188
00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:51,200
and, and can be curated without 
like overly curated to like a 

189
00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:54,440
entity degree where like you 
forget for a second that you 

190
00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:56,480
said you were going to do that 
and you're like, burn this to 

191
00:08:56,480 --> 00:08:57,920
the ground. 
Yeah, definitely. 

192
00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:00,640
I think that for me, when it 
came to writing in all caps in 

193
00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:03,360
my journal, it was very much one
of those as seen online type 

194
00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:05,800
things. 
The main creators that I was 

195
00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:09,000
seeing creating bullet journal 
layouts and such used all caps 

196
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:10,840
and there's. 
So when I got started, I'm like,

197
00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:13,320
OK, well this seems to be 
something that is common to this

198
00:09:13,320 --> 00:09:16,680
system, so I will do that too. 
And then because of that 

199
00:09:16,680 --> 00:09:19,160
cheerleader effect and the 
letter forms looking nicer with 

200
00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:22,320
just writing in all caps, I 
figured I'd just stick with it. 

201
00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:25,840
Mainly because my regular 
everyday handwriting, if I am 

202
00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:29,160
not kind of like, consciously 
aware of what I'm doing, the 

203
00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:33,480
italicization of it will change,
and that lack of uniformity 

204
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:36,240
across a page will give me the 
heebie jeebies. 

205
00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:38,360
It's not the kind of curation I 
like. 

206
00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:40,120
If it's going to be italicized, 
cool. 

207
00:09:40,120 --> 00:09:42,640
But it all has to be on the 
exact same angle of slant, 

208
00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:45,520
otherwise I will get irked. 
Oh yeah, see, this is where I 

209
00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:48,560
fall my complete opposite 
spectrum of you with those kind 

210
00:09:48,560 --> 00:09:50,880
of things. 
I'm like, meh, it's whatever. 

211
00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:53,600
I mean, I've taken it using like
different type of letter forms. 

212
00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:56,360
So even though I don't write in 
lower case letters, I have this 

213
00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:58,280
font that I like to use. 
I call it Big Little. 

214
00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:02,120
It's stupid because it's like 
it's uppercase bigger but still 

215
00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:05,560
uppercase, but smaller than the 
other one and and then uppercase

216
00:10:05,560 --> 00:10:07,000
and you know, and kind of go in 
like that. 

217
00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:10,280
And it kind of gives us really 
fun like visual effect of 

218
00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:13,320
something being, you know, the 
start of a sentence or start of 

219
00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:15,280
a header. 
But I still get to run in all 

220
00:10:15,280 --> 00:10:18,520
caps, just in different sizes. 
And it's like a really fun way 

221
00:10:18,520 --> 00:10:21,080
to kind of do it. 
It takes away for me, it also 

222
00:10:21,080 --> 00:10:24,160
takes away the stress of having 
to have perfect letter form 

223
00:10:24,400 --> 00:10:27,960
because the whole purpose of a 
font like that is to be fun and 

224
00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:29,960
kind of exciting and a little 
bit different. 

225
00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:32,800
I use it a lot when I'm doing 
like Halloween spreads because 

226
00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:35,720
it has a little bit of like a 
spooky kind of feel to it, but 

227
00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:39,160
it's just really fun and easy to
do with something like that. 

228
00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:43,280
So I find that over time with my
letters, again, I'm not overly 

229
00:10:43,280 --> 00:10:45,240
worried about every header 
looking the same. 

230
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:49,360
But I also personally feel like 
I let go a lot of that like 

231
00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:53,840
curatedness when I started using
fountain pens and different inks

232
00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:56,640
and different nib sizes because 
every single week look 

233
00:10:56,640 --> 00:10:59,200
different. 
So no longer do I have probably 

234
00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:04,120
maybe my first 3 or 4 bullet 
journals are all in just black 

235
00:11:04,120 --> 00:11:06,320
ink, right? 
I may have experimented with 

236
00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:08,800
some layouts or whatever, but 
that as I've gone on and used 

237
00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:11,840
different pens every week is a 
different color, you know? 

238
00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:14,080
So it's just like, OK, well, I 
don't have to worry about 

239
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:18,480
feeling overly worried about 
that feature anymore because I 

240
00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:21,400
know that's how I'm going into 
it and I'm totally OK with it. 

241
00:11:21,640 --> 00:11:24,040
It's definitely weird flipping 
through notebooks and being like

242
00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:26,280
all black, same fought. 
And then you get to the ones 

243
00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:28,520
like all different sizes, all 
different colors. 

244
00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:30,320
Look, Mark, what a little crazy 
over here. 

245
00:11:30,560 --> 00:11:32,600
Oh dear. 
So I guess we could probably 

246
00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:35,120
safely bet that you would 
consider yourself more in Camp 

247
00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:37,800
Messy. 
Yeah, I think if you're looking 

248
00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:41,000
at that scale where you have, 
you know, messy over here and 

249
00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:44,200
you have, you know, completely 
curate on the other side, I'll 

250
00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:48,680
say I'm messy leaning maybe 
because I do enjoy a curated 

251
00:11:48,680 --> 00:11:51,040
page. 
I and I think when I set up my 

252
00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:53,680
Ebola journal spreads for 
instance, for the week, it's 

253
00:11:53,680 --> 00:11:57,080
very set up nicely. 
I'm measuring things. 

254
00:11:57,240 --> 00:12:00,120
I have a straight edge ruler. 
You know, I'm using certain 

255
00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:01,760
pieces. 
I want them to look nice. 

256
00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:04,480
I think the only time where I 
start to get like a little OK 

257
00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:07,960
with the messy is when I'm using
stamps and those just innately, 

258
00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:10,800
you know, you have wet ink and 
things can happen and you don't 

259
00:12:10,800 --> 00:12:13,120
put them on straight. 
And at first that really 

260
00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:15,120
bothered me a lot. 
But then I just started to just 

261
00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:17,080
say, well, that's the 
personality of stamps. 

262
00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:20,040
Sometimes it's perfect. 
Sometimes it's, you know, cock 

263
00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:22,960
eyed one way, maybe got a 
fingerprint over here. 

264
00:12:23,560 --> 00:12:26,840
So I think for me it's just been
like slowly introducing myself 

265
00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:30,400
into being OK with it, 
especially when I'm writing 

266
00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:31,600
notes. 
You know, I use my bullet 

267
00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:33,680
journal for work almost 
exclusively. 

268
00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,320
So when I'm writing things and 
handwriting notes, I can't spend

269
00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:40,640
the time making sure every 
single letter is in line and 

270
00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,080
perfect. 
If I write something wrong, I'm 

271
00:12:43,080 --> 00:12:46,160
not grabbing the correction tape
and going over it and then 

272
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:49,040
rewriting when it's dry, just 
crossing it and I keep going 

273
00:12:49,040 --> 00:12:50,920
with it. 
I mean, how many times I spell 

274
00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:53,280
things wrong and I'm like, oh, 
I'm missing AE and I like draw a

275
00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:56,160
little, a little E in between, 
like some of the letters. 

276
00:12:56,720 --> 00:12:58,800
No one cares, no one's seen my 
nose. 

277
00:12:58,800 --> 00:13:00,520
But like, to me, I know it 
should be there. 

278
00:13:00,680 --> 00:13:02,840
I should learn how to sell, you 
know, basic words. 

279
00:13:03,160 --> 00:13:05,600
But I think like those kind of 
things, just it'd be more of a 

280
00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:09,160
functional, usable journal. 
I don't care really kind of what

281
00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:12,440
it looks like when I'm into it. 
And and to me personally, that 

282
00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:15,160
just is more fun. 
I think it's just a really easy 

283
00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:17,120
way to go about it. 
It worries less about again, the

284
00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:19,400
visualness of it. 
And I also think it just looks 

285
00:13:19,400 --> 00:13:23,200
like a really well used journal 
page when you're done with it. 

286
00:13:23,560 --> 00:13:25,120
It's just full of ink and 
everything else. 

287
00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:27,480
Like I feel productive when I 
see pages like that. 

288
00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:30,040
No, that's very fair. 
And I think it is also good to 

289
00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:32,880
note that like, you know, just 
because you lean and can't messy

290
00:13:32,880 --> 00:13:35,680
or lean can't curate it or 
whatnot, does not mean that your

291
00:13:35,680 --> 00:13:38,000
journal is not functional, does 
not mean that your journal isn't

292
00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:41,080
working for you. 
But sometimes when we do see 

293
00:13:41,080 --> 00:13:43,760
people who are, you know, 
primarily sharing one type or 

294
00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:47,120
the other, it can lead us to 
question, am I actually doing 

295
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:49,560
this right? 
Like am I actually a real 

296
00:13:49,560 --> 00:13:51,840
planner or have I gone astray 
somewhere? 

297
00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:54,000
Am I doing something wrong 
because of that? 

298
00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:57,840
And I think that social media in
particular has a big role in 

299
00:13:57,840 --> 00:13:59,520
this. 
You know, the idea that the 

300
00:13:59,520 --> 00:14:03,520
things that do get widely shared
or often kind of like put right 

301
00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:06,680
in front of our face, are those 
things that possibly just look a

302
00:14:06,680 --> 00:14:09,280
little more curated. 
You know, they have that kind of

303
00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:11,400
visual appeal to them, 
especially if we're thinking 

304
00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:13,720
places like, you know, Pinterest
and Instagram and such. 

305
00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:19,240
Those places are very kind of 
aesthetic first as opposed to I 

306
00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:21,480
want to say like value first 
because I think there is value 

307
00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:23,960
in aesthetics. 
You know, I said it kind of like

308
00:14:23,960 --> 00:14:25,960
adds to the joy of planning or 
whatnot. 

309
00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:28,920
But if we're thinking about like
form and function, yadda yadda. 

310
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,080
I think that the form part of 
that comes first on those 

311
00:14:32,080 --> 00:14:34,600
platforms, which if those are 
the places you're getting your 

312
00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:38,800
main source of inspiration for 
your planner, then oftentimes if

313
00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,720
yours does not look like that, 
it can not necessarily like 

314
00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:46,240
fully consciously, but maybe 
subconsciously you're like, my 

315
00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:48,680
planner doesn't look like that. 
I don't think my planner is like

316
00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:52,400
a real planner or it's not 
really planning because it 

317
00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:55,720
doesn't look or like fit the 
mold of what these other things 

318
00:14:55,720 --> 00:14:57,800
that I'm saying online are kind 
of presenting. 

319
00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:00,560
Oh, 100%. 
Actually one of the first times 

320
00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:05,040
early, early on in my bullet 
journaling career on Instagram, 

321
00:15:05,560 --> 00:15:08,960
supermassive black ink was a 
page I love so much. 

322
00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,520
I don't know that she post as 
much anymore, but she used to 

323
00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:14,560
and you know, you would see 
these awesome pages that she 

324
00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:17,320
would do and she only uses black
ink. 

325
00:15:17,640 --> 00:15:19,880
That's it. 
And I was like, oh, like she was

326
00:15:19,880 --> 00:15:22,240
actually I think the first 
person when I bullet was 

327
00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:26,560
starting a bullet journal that I
was like, oh, I'm going to only 

328
00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:29,040
use black ink. 
Like if she can make her pages 

329
00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:32,680
look that awesome only in black 
ink, I can too. 

330
00:15:32,680 --> 00:15:34,640
Like she was a huge inspiration 
early on. 

331
00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,160
And I remember like found her 
for a super long time and I 

332
00:15:37,160 --> 00:15:40,400
remember one time she was 
showing her other pages. 

333
00:15:40,400 --> 00:15:43,880
So what she was showing on her 
feed was, you know, perfect 

334
00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:46,080
black ink lettering all nights 
and all of that. 

335
00:15:46,280 --> 00:15:48,520
And she flipped to a different 
page, and that's where she was 

336
00:15:48,600 --> 00:15:52,040
working, like actually working. 
And it looked nothing like that.

337
00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:54,840
It was just like a everyday 
journal with someone writing 

338
00:15:54,840 --> 00:15:56,440
down their notes and task and 
stuff. 

339
00:15:56,520 --> 00:16:01,160
And that moment for me was like,
oh, OK, and this is well before 

340
00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:04,040
I fully understood like the 
social media of bullet 

341
00:16:04,040 --> 00:16:06,360
journaling and or the bullet 
journaling of social media, 

342
00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:10,000
whichever way that is where, 
yes, what you're presenting 

343
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,240
looks beautiful and perfect. 
It is art, right? 

344
00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:14,840
You're, you're going to show and
always put your best foot 

345
00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:17,120
forward. 
But the reality of what that 

346
00:16:17,120 --> 00:16:21,760
looked like was just like, oh, 
good, I'm not, I'm not wrong in 

347
00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:23,960
what I'm doing. 
I was like, she's just showing 

348
00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:26,880
her best work on her pages. 
But when she's actually working 

349
00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:30,880
in it, she's a human being. 
And like that was, I was like, I

350
00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:32,800
was like, oh, it's OK now. 
I was like, that permission 

351
00:16:32,800 --> 00:16:34,760
almost. 
I had to see that to be like, 

352
00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:38,080
yes, I don't have to be perfect 
in this journal for it to be a 

353
00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:40,680
journal. 
I think that, you know, one of 

354
00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:43,360
the things that gets me about 
this kind of point of 

355
00:16:43,360 --> 00:16:46,880
conversation in particular is 
the idea of like, Oh well, the 

356
00:16:46,880 --> 00:16:49,600
plans you see online are fake or
something or the planning that 

357
00:16:49,600 --> 00:16:52,080
people is doing online, you 
know, presenting that's like 

358
00:16:52,160 --> 00:16:54,560
overly curated or very visually 
appealing or whatever. 

359
00:16:54,720 --> 00:16:58,360
That's not their real plans. 
And I mean, in her case, she had

360
00:16:58,360 --> 00:17:00,680
functional pages that she was 
working in that did look a 

361
00:17:00,680 --> 00:17:03,400
little bit different. 
But I do also feel that for a 

362
00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:05,960
lot of the people who are 
presenting their planner online,

363
00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:09,359
given the time it takes to make 
that they're not spending more 

364
00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:12,480
time setting up another one. 
I'm certainly not. 

365
00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:16,079
So my curated pages or whatever,
those are my planning pages. 

366
00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:18,079
That is where I am doing my 
planning. 

367
00:17:18,280 --> 00:17:21,119
It's just that I'm also quite 
mindful as I'm going through to 

368
00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:23,640
make it look nice. 
One, because sharing on the 

369
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:27,640
Internet, but also 2 for own 
personal journaling fulfillment 

370
00:17:27,839 --> 00:17:30,760
and enjoyment and such. 
So it's one of those things that

371
00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:33,800
like, yes, some of the planning 
that we're seeing online or the 

372
00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:36,760
planner layouts or whatnot, 
those ones that do have a lot of

373
00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:40,000
visual appeal, some of them 
don't represent the real life 

374
00:17:40,160 --> 00:17:42,720
for those people. 
Them also made in the kind of 

375
00:17:42,720 --> 00:17:45,520
like aspirational planning kind 
of space. 

376
00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:48,680
Whereas for some people, sure, 
it may look nice and have visual

377
00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:50,760
appeal and whatever, but they're
still actively using it. 

378
00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:52,480
That is still how they're 
getting things done. 

379
00:17:52,640 --> 00:17:55,280
It's just that that visual 
appeal aspect is something that 

380
00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:58,760
adds some kind kind of like 
purpose fulfillment for them in 

381
00:17:58,760 --> 00:18:01,720
their planner, whether that be 
joy or the fact that if they 

382
00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:04,000
like the way it looks, they're 
actually going to use it or like

383
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:06,200
whatever it is. 
For me, it's very much the idea 

384
00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:08,680
of if I like the way it looks, I
will actually come back to and 

385
00:18:08,680 --> 00:18:11,040
use it, whereas if I don't like 
the way it looks, I will not 

386
00:18:11,040 --> 00:18:13,600
come back to and use it. 
It's definitely interesting when

387
00:18:13,600 --> 00:18:15,400
you do sit back and take a look 
at it. 

388
00:18:15,440 --> 00:18:18,560
I was trying to think there was 
like probably over the past 

389
00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:20,600
several years. 
And if you remember the names of

390
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:23,600
these, Jess, tell me or maybe 
you'd even see it. 

391
00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:25,880
I don't remember. 
Or again, Planner Pals, if you 

392
00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:28,360
remember seeing these people, 
but they used to do like these 

393
00:18:28,360 --> 00:18:33,120
full spreads for like their 
monthly overviews and they truly

394
00:18:33,360 --> 00:18:40,280
were art like the most beautiful
line detail coloring all these 

395
00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:44,000
pieces. 
But it took them weeks to be 

396
00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,200
able to make that one page. 
And there's like two people that

397
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:50,760
I there's again, it's like in my
mind, there is one I remember. 

398
00:18:50,880 --> 00:18:54,200
There was Isabel Hoops. 
She was, she's an art teacher, 

399
00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:56,680
so the work she was doing was 
just crazy awesome. 

400
00:18:56,800 --> 00:19:01,240
And then there was Love with 
Miss Jay or Love by Love with 

401
00:19:01,240 --> 00:19:04,200
Miss Jay. 
Gosh, her work was gorgeous. 

402
00:19:04,280 --> 00:19:08,880
It was in a corettable like it 
truly was and then I remember 

403
00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:12,240
one time she had it like half 
done and it was like middle of 

404
00:19:12,240 --> 00:19:13,840
the month. 
She was like still working on my

405
00:19:13,840 --> 00:19:17,400
monthly overview and I was like,
girl, don't even call it a 

406
00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:20,240
monthly overview anymore. 
This is straight up art. 

407
00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:21,920
Like you don't need to worry 
about. 

408
00:19:21,920 --> 00:19:26,120
Isabella is a whole other level.
I mean, Oh my gosh, hers. 

409
00:19:26,680 --> 00:19:28,520
I swear. 
Like I don't even have words 

410
00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:32,120
like she would draw like horses 
for April and you were like, I'm

411
00:19:32,120 --> 00:19:34,640
sorry, is that a photograph? 
She's like, no, I didn't color 

412
00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:37,040
pencil. 
Like damn, that is awesome. 

413
00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:40,280
But like this things like that 
though, where you have to look 

414
00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:43,280
at it from that perspective 
though and appreciate it for 

415
00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:46,960
what it is, because at no point 
ever was I going to ever draw 

416
00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:49,920
anything that looked like that. 
It inspired me to look into it 

417
00:19:49,920 --> 00:19:54,200
more or to think about it or 
whatever, but I knew this that 

418
00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:57,800
was not happening over here. 
So I just looked at it and said 

419
00:19:57,800 --> 00:20:01,200
I appreciate the art of it. 
I appreciate the time. 

420
00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:03,520
I appreciate them sharing it and
going through with it. 

421
00:20:03,760 --> 00:20:06,760
For me, it never made me mad or 
feel like I wasn't doing 

422
00:20:06,760 --> 00:20:09,320
anything the right way. 
I will say there are some 

423
00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:12,480
stamping artists like that, that
used to like stamp out whole 

424
00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:14,960
pages and I'm like, well, that 
looks perfect. 

425
00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:17,000
Why can't I get mine to look 
like that? 

426
00:20:17,320 --> 00:20:19,080
You know, you're just like it's 
stamping. 

427
00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:20,600
You have to practice it, you 
know, but. 

428
00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:22,440
I think that's a really big 
thing too. 

429
00:20:22,440 --> 00:20:25,000
But I know there's people who 
hated on those people that were 

430
00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:26,720
like, oh, like, this is 
ridiculous. 

431
00:20:26,720 --> 00:20:29,480
That's a waste of time. 
Why would you ever do that? 

432
00:20:29,480 --> 00:20:33,400
And I was like, chill out, my 
friend, appreciate this artwork.

433
00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:36,360
Like that's what it is. 
I think that the thing that 

434
00:20:36,360 --> 00:20:38,920
always got me about those this 
is a waste of time comments. 

435
00:20:38,960 --> 00:20:43,880
I'm like bra, pot, kettle black.
Like it was a waste of time to 

436
00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:46,120
write this comment. 
Go touch some grass. 

437
00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:49,000
Do something with your life. 
Well, it is. 

438
00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:52,000
It's just like for anyone to 
look at anybody of work and say 

439
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:53,560
that. 
Now I would say that if they 

440
00:20:53,560 --> 00:20:56,120
were spending more time 
designing those pages and 

441
00:20:56,400 --> 00:20:59,240
completely flopping on their 
work and their life and their 

442
00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:01,920
other things that they had to 
accomplish because they were 

443
00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:05,600
more focused on that, then yes. 
Like if you're, if the point of 

444
00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:08,080
doing that was to make a 
functional page that you were 

445
00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:11,320
using and again, helping you 
improve kind of your day today 

446
00:21:11,320 --> 00:21:13,680
and you were failing at that, 
absolutely. 

447
00:21:13,680 --> 00:21:17,240
That is not a productive spread 
that you made for yourself. 

448
00:21:17,600 --> 00:21:19,800
I definitely was guilty of that 
early on. 

449
00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:22,640
I remember one time somebody had
posted, it was like something 

450
00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:25,440
with like clouds and they had 
like really cool drop shadows 

451
00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:27,360
and something. 
And I was like, oh, I'm going to

452
00:21:27,360 --> 00:21:30,040
do something like that too. 
And then I went to go like right

453
00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:33,080
in the cloud and I was like, 
there's only like I can fit 3 

454
00:21:33,080 --> 00:21:36,200
words inside of this. 
I was so focused on like how 

455
00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:40,520
this cloud looked, I was not 
even thinking about how will I 

456
00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:43,520
write inside of this cloud. 
Yeah, definitely. 

457
00:21:43,520 --> 00:21:45,760
And I think that's one of the 
things that I've had to learn 

458
00:21:45,960 --> 00:21:49,040
over time with, you know, 
sourcing inspiration online, 

459
00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:53,960
whatnot, is that some layouts 
look absolutely gorgeous and 

460
00:21:53,960 --> 00:21:56,040
they would not work for me at 
all. 

461
00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:58,480
And being able to figure that 
out for yourself, it does kind 

462
00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:00,520
of come with, you know, reps 
time in the game type of a 

463
00:22:00,520 --> 00:22:02,760
thing. 
Like I know that horizontal 

464
00:22:02,760 --> 00:22:05,320
layouts, while they look cool, 
aren't going to work for me 

465
00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:07,120
because I love a long ass 
checklist. 

466
00:22:07,120 --> 00:22:09,880
It needs to be like a full 
length of the page for just one 

467
00:22:09,880 --> 00:22:12,320
day of the week kind of a thing 
because your girl got stuff to 

468
00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:15,520
write down. 
But in looking at those layouts 

469
00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:18,680
and looking at the kind of, you 
know, functional stuff that they

470
00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:21,280
have in there, all the 
structures or whatnot, just 

471
00:22:21,280 --> 00:22:24,000
because it doesn't match the 
style of planning I need for 

472
00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:27,000
myself doesn't mean that it is 
not functional for that person. 

473
00:22:27,120 --> 00:22:30,320
Even if it is curated or even if
it is messy kind of a thing. 

474
00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:33,920
I think that one of the things 
that we've kind of edged into 

475
00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:37,480
and touched on is this idea of, 
well, if you've got camp messy 

476
00:22:37,480 --> 00:22:40,240
and camp curated, what happens 
if you go to the extremes of 

477
00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:41,720
those? 
What happens if you kind of take

478
00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:45,240
it too far in either direction? 
Because I think that both of 

479
00:22:45,240 --> 00:22:48,400
them do have their kind of 
innate pros, but if you get a 

480
00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:52,560
little bit too aggressively into
either side, you can kind of run

481
00:22:52,560 --> 00:22:56,160
into some decent cons. 
So I'm gonna let you start. 

482
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:58,480
What do you think the cons of 
curated planning are? 

483
00:22:59,160 --> 00:23:01,320
Well, I talked about this. 
I did a previous episode. 

484
00:23:01,320 --> 00:23:04,400
I think if you are so focused on
how it looks, then you don't 

485
00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:06,200
actually write down the things 
that you need to. 

486
00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:07,960
And I was very guilty of this 
before. 

487
00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:10,320
I was talking about like 
headers, for instance, for pages

488
00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:13,640
where I'm like, well, hold on, I
had this theme that I was going 

489
00:23:13,640 --> 00:23:15,640
for with this certain lettering 
and I don't have that pen with 

490
00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:18,760
me right now. 
So I wouldn't write it like 

491
00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:20,720
that's pointless. 
That doesn't make any sense. 

492
00:23:21,040 --> 00:23:23,800
So, you know, big part of that 
is just going in and like 

493
00:23:23,960 --> 00:23:28,520
getting it done or you have to 
be so like on point that like 

494
00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:31,760
that pen or that marker or 
whatever tools you're using are 

495
00:23:31,960 --> 00:23:37,680
always with you. 
So I think for, for from my 

496
00:23:37,680 --> 00:23:41,240
perspective, that is kind of it.
I think if it's holding you up 

497
00:23:41,240 --> 00:23:44,280
from writing things down and 
kind of getting into it, it can 

498
00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:46,240
cause more of a mess. 
You know, if you're like, oh, 

499
00:23:46,240 --> 00:23:48,560
well, I can't write this in my 
notebook, so I'm going to write 

500
00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:51,680
on the scrap piece of paper and 
then you lose said scrap of 

501
00:23:51,680 --> 00:23:54,440
paper because it's not attached 
inside of your notebook. 

502
00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:58,320
Well, that's completely defeated
the purpose of what this planner

503
00:23:58,320 --> 00:24:00,840
is for or that type of planner, 
if it's one that you're writing 

504
00:24:00,840 --> 00:24:04,240
in often, like you said, if you 
have an intentional planner that

505
00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:09,320
is there to to help you, you 
know, be intentional to help you

506
00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:11,880
focus on a skill to do something
like that, that's a different 

507
00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:14,720
story. 
You know, I can't really think 

508
00:24:14,720 --> 00:24:18,000
of any other negative other than
really just kind of it holding 

509
00:24:18,000 --> 00:24:20,240
you back from doing things. 
I don't know if you have any 

510
00:24:20,240 --> 00:24:23,640
examples as a curated planet 
yourself where you've had a 

511
00:24:23,880 --> 00:24:26,400
little bit of a can't move 
forward moment. 

512
00:24:26,520 --> 00:24:28,480
Yeah. 
No, I think that you've kind of 

513
00:24:28,480 --> 00:24:30,040
hit the nail on the head with 
most of it there. 

514
00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:34,120
It's that idea of just like 
fueling perfectionism, I feel 

515
00:24:34,120 --> 00:24:36,480
like is a big one. 
It's like if you turn your 

516
00:24:36,480 --> 00:24:40,240
planner into such a curated 
space where if things don't look

517
00:24:40,240 --> 00:24:43,040
a certain way or you don't have 
the right pain or something like

518
00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:46,800
that, you can kind of just build
this almost avoidance for being 

519
00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:49,280
able to use your planner or your
journal or whatnot. 

520
00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:51,760
Because if you can't do it 
right, you're not going to do it

521
00:24:51,760 --> 00:24:54,560
at all, which is definitely a 
problem area. 

522
00:24:54,840 --> 00:24:58,560
I also kind of find that 
sometimes, depending on the kind

523
00:24:58,560 --> 00:25:00,440
of layouts you're going with, 
and if you haven't very 

524
00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:03,840
intentionally picked your 
layouts or you know, if you're 

525
00:25:03,840 --> 00:25:05,920
making it yourself, drawing them
up in a way that is going to 

526
00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:08,560
match your planning style 
because you've just done it for 

527
00:25:08,560 --> 00:25:11,560
an overall visual. 
Then sometimes you can have like

528
00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:14,600
missing details. 
You might not be able to Add all

529
00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:16,000
of the things in that you need 
to. 

530
00:25:16,120 --> 00:25:18,520
You might not be able to, I 
don't know, just jot down a 

531
00:25:18,520 --> 00:25:21,040
quick note or something that's 
going to be important for future

532
00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:23,920
you to remember. 
But you tell yourself, I'll just

533
00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:27,280
remember it because there's 
nowhere in your kind of very 

534
00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:32,240
laid out structured setup for 
those kind of like quick drop 

535
00:25:32,240 --> 00:25:34,120
note type things. 
The stuff that you can't 

536
00:25:34,120 --> 00:25:37,040
necessarily predict if you are 
or aren't going to need it. 

537
00:25:37,360 --> 00:25:40,200
You can also get into the realm 
of like performative planning in

538
00:25:40,200 --> 00:25:42,520
a way, if you're very, very 
caught up on that idea of the 

539
00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:46,360
curation of the information and 
you know, making look visually 

540
00:25:46,360 --> 00:25:49,120
appealing or whatnot. 
Are we doing this in such a way 

541
00:25:49,120 --> 00:25:51,600
that it is going to fulfill the 
purpose we've given for the 

542
00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:54,760
planner or are we just doing it 
because because it looks good or

543
00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:58,280
the kind of like visual aspect 
of it is appealing in some way? 

544
00:25:58,600 --> 00:26:01,600
That's probably what kind of 
worries me the most. 

545
00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:05,160
What I get worried about in 
terms of my personal curated 

546
00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:09,280
planning is the kind of time 
taken to pre plan a structure 

547
00:26:09,280 --> 00:26:12,880
before I put it into my planner 
to then write down my plans to 

548
00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:15,560
then go and execute on the plans
to get the plans done. 

549
00:26:16,160 --> 00:26:17,880
That's the part that worries me 
the most. 

550
00:26:18,120 --> 00:26:21,200
I had an instance the other week
where somebody was sharing some 

551
00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:23,840
information with me and I was 
like, oh, I need someone to put 

552
00:26:23,840 --> 00:26:27,040
this, but there's nowhere on my 
current weekly to put it. 

553
00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:29,520
And it didn't occur to me that I
could just, you know, whip out 

554
00:26:29,520 --> 00:26:31,960
Notion or whatever and jot it 
down into my notesbook over 

555
00:26:31,960 --> 00:26:33,960
there. 
At the time, I wasn't at a 

556
00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:36,880
computer or whatnot, but I kind 
of had this panic moment like, 

557
00:26:37,040 --> 00:26:39,120
Oh my gosh, I feel like I need 
to write this in my planner, but

558
00:26:39,120 --> 00:26:40,760
I don't have anywhere in my 
planner to write this. 

559
00:26:40,760 --> 00:26:42,240
So then I can't write it in my 
planner. 

560
00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:44,120
So do I just remember the plans?
Because I'm not going to 

561
00:26:44,120 --> 00:26:46,120
remember the plans, but I don't 
have anywhere in my planner for 

562
00:26:46,120 --> 00:26:47,400
it. 
Spiral, spiral, spiral. 

563
00:26:48,280 --> 00:26:49,320
Yeah, it didn't work out well 
for me. 

564
00:26:49,800 --> 00:26:53,480
So we've talked about the 
negatives of curated I shared, 

565
00:26:53,480 --> 00:26:57,680
but I think it would be so Jess,
as a non messy planner, what do 

566
00:26:57,680 --> 00:27:00,520
you think are the big negatives 
for that type of approach? 

567
00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:04,360
I think that in thinking about 
the negatives of messy planning 

568
00:27:04,600 --> 00:27:07,200
is mainly kind of like Jess. 
What are your personal reasons 

569
00:27:07,200 --> 00:27:10,880
for not messy planning? 
And for one, it's just mainly 

570
00:27:10,880 --> 00:27:12,840
the idea of being able to 
reference things later. 

571
00:27:13,040 --> 00:27:16,640
When it comes to messy planning,
I find that when I start to lane

572
00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:19,960
messy, I usually get too messy, 
and then trying to find 

573
00:27:19,960 --> 00:27:22,800
information after the fact 
becomes very difficult for me. 

574
00:27:23,600 --> 00:27:27,440
Either that or because I'm just 
jotting things down very fast 

575
00:27:27,440 --> 00:27:31,000
and very scribbly or whatnot, I 
often won't be as intentional 

576
00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:33,040
about what information gets 
added there. 

577
00:27:33,160 --> 00:27:37,120
Which means that then really key
important things can get lost in

578
00:27:37,120 --> 00:27:40,840
a swamp of everything else. 
Because it was also quick and 

579
00:27:40,840 --> 00:27:43,880
easy to write down. 
Like yes, frictionless writing 

580
00:27:43,880 --> 00:27:46,640
things down quick, love that. 
But then actually being able to 

581
00:27:46,640 --> 00:27:49,280
go and use that information 
after the fact becomes kind of 

582
00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:52,120
difficult. 
I also find that with the messy 

583
00:27:52,120 --> 00:27:55,920
planning, because there is such 
a joy and a kind of appreciation

584
00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:58,800
of things that are visually 
appealing, I will come back to 

585
00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:00,200
things if they are visually 
appealing. 

586
00:28:00,440 --> 00:28:04,000
If it's scribbly and messy, I 
feel it's very disposable and 

587
00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:06,600
thus I won't come back to it and
actually reference the stuff 

588
00:28:06,600 --> 00:28:08,960
I've written down. 
So it might give me kind of 

589
00:28:09,200 --> 00:28:12,240
instant relief about being able 
to get things out of my head and

590
00:28:12,320 --> 00:28:14,720
onto paper or whatnot, which 
could be a benefit. 

591
00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:17,640
But in the long run, actually 
using the information coming 

592
00:28:17,640 --> 00:28:20,920
back to it and such I won't be 
inclined to do because I won't 

593
00:28:20,920 --> 00:28:26,240
want to work in the system when 
it looks too chaotic or not laid

594
00:28:26,240 --> 00:28:29,840
out in a way that kind of works 
later for future Jess's brain. 

595
00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:31,240
Interesting. 
Yeah. 

596
00:28:31,240 --> 00:28:35,960
So I would say like my 
resolution for that in my case, 

597
00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:38,680
because I've kind of been a 
little all over the place, is 

598
00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:42,120
utilizing my index pretty 
hardcore with those special 

599
00:28:42,120 --> 00:28:45,000
ideas. 
Because a while back I always 

600
00:28:45,000 --> 00:28:48,960
thought like entry into my index
had to be an entire page of 

601
00:28:48,960 --> 00:28:51,480
content. 
And what I've realized over 

602
00:28:51,480 --> 00:28:53,800
time, especially with the way 
that I plan, because I don't 

603
00:28:53,800 --> 00:28:57,000
always have a dedicated page for
every idea because maybe it's 

604
00:28:57,240 --> 00:29:01,560
not that many grouped ideas to 
be a collection page yet, is I 

605
00:29:01,560 --> 00:29:05,360
will start writing those things 
or those ideas into my index. 

606
00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:08,360
Because I also felt like my 
index had to be perfectly 

607
00:29:08,360 --> 00:29:11,360
curated with like exact lines 
and numbers and all of that. 

608
00:29:11,360 --> 00:29:13,960
And I'm realizing again, more 
and more over the years is like,

609
00:29:14,120 --> 00:29:17,000
it is more important to be able 
to find that information again 

610
00:29:17,240 --> 00:29:19,760
than worry necessarily where it 
falls in line. 

611
00:29:20,280 --> 00:29:24,000
I sometimes will skip pages in 
my journal, especially if like 

612
00:29:24,000 --> 00:29:26,400
I've had like bleed through or 
something that just doesn't look

613
00:29:26,400 --> 00:29:28,760
great for my next page. 
And then I will come back to 

614
00:29:28,760 --> 00:29:31,040
those for like messy notes or 
something like that. 

615
00:29:31,440 --> 00:29:35,240
And then I go into my index. 
I'm like, oh, I have page, you 

616
00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:39,120
know, whatever through 20 right 
now, but the page I skipped was 

617
00:29:39,120 --> 00:29:42,440
on page 15. 
And I'm like, but I'm like, 

618
00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:44,360
Mark, that's not what this is 
about. 

619
00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:46,160
It's about the topic and where 
to find it. 

620
00:29:46,440 --> 00:29:49,080
So that it, for me has always 
been a really important part of 

621
00:29:49,080 --> 00:29:52,160
planning is that if I have an 
idea that I'm looking for or 

622
00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:56,080
trying to keep in my mind, 
regardless of how the rest of 

623
00:29:56,080 --> 00:30:00,000
that page looks, I'll be like, 
oh, this topic was on this page,

624
00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:03,040
just a part of my weekly page, 
but just to be able to reference

625
00:30:03,040 --> 00:30:04,960
it again. 
But I understand what you're 

626
00:30:04,960 --> 00:30:07,160
saying about it. 
But I feel like that the counter

627
00:30:07,160 --> 00:30:10,320
to that is to be a little bit 
more organized about how you 

628
00:30:10,320 --> 00:30:12,520
keep your journal. 
And then that we don't have to 

629
00:30:12,520 --> 00:30:15,680
worry about it being on a 
perfect page or a perfect spot 

630
00:30:15,680 --> 00:30:18,200
when you go into it. 
You can just write and then come

631
00:30:18,200 --> 00:30:19,600
back to it later. 
Excellent. 

632
00:30:19,600 --> 00:30:21,280
So curate your mess. 
I've got it, can do it. 

633
00:30:22,240 --> 00:30:24,200
There you go. 
That's all you got to do is, you

634
00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:27,720
know, think about it that way 
and everything can lean curated 

635
00:30:27,960 --> 00:30:31,480
if you really want it to. 
Yeah, I I think that given the 

636
00:30:31,480 --> 00:30:35,320
fact that either of the extremes
does have some kind of negatives

637
00:30:35,320 --> 00:30:38,880
associated with it, there is 
really decent benefit of having 

638
00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:41,400
a happy medium like falling 
somewhere in the middle, whether

639
00:30:41,400 --> 00:30:44,160
it be more kind of messy leaning
or curated leaning. 

640
00:30:44,360 --> 00:30:47,000
Because both of them do have 
their pros and do have their 

641
00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:50,600
cons, finding a blended or 
hybrid system can be a just 

642
00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:54,160
happier place to exist in. 
Yeah, and I feel you completely 

643
00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:56,080
on this idea of like messy and 
curated. 

644
00:30:56,080 --> 00:30:58,640
Like a great example, for 
instance, I was jotting down a 

645
00:30:58,640 --> 00:31:03,600
list of I was signing my team up
for some training classes, but 

646
00:31:03,600 --> 00:31:06,320
everybody had to volunteer for 
that training class. 

647
00:31:06,320 --> 00:31:08,400
So they had to message me and 
say, Mark, I would like to be 

648
00:31:08,400 --> 00:31:10,680
signed up for that. 
So I went ahead and started 

649
00:31:10,680 --> 00:31:13,000
writing down a few names and I 
drew a little line. 

650
00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:15,320
I was like, oh, I have a table, 
You know, once they're signed 

651
00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:18,640
up, I'll check off over here. 
The thing is, I didn't think 

652
00:31:18,920 --> 00:31:21,160
that I have 13 people on my 
team. 

653
00:31:21,480 --> 00:31:25,560
I was like, well, not everyone 
may message me, so I'm not going

654
00:31:25,560 --> 00:31:30,520
to save 13 spaces for this. 
The problem is, you know, 13 

655
00:31:30,520 --> 00:31:33,520
people did. 
And so I had probably enough 

656
00:31:33,520 --> 00:31:36,280
space for like 10 people because
I was like, some people might 

657
00:31:36,280 --> 00:31:38,400
not. 
And then I had to like go a bit 

658
00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:40,560
beyond that. 
And I had already written notes 

659
00:31:40,560 --> 00:31:42,640
below this little like mini 
chart that I made. 

660
00:31:42,840 --> 00:31:47,640
And I was like, now this looks 
ugly, but I was just like, it's 

661
00:31:47,640 --> 00:31:50,200
OK, You know, like yes, would I 
have preferred that? 

662
00:31:50,200 --> 00:31:53,200
It looked really nice because I 
spent the time to be like, oh, 

663
00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:55,000
names and checked when it's 
done. 

664
00:31:55,000 --> 00:31:56,600
Like yes, it would have looked 
very cool. 

665
00:31:56,840 --> 00:31:59,360
But at the end of the day, I 
just made sure the people's 

666
00:31:59,360 --> 00:32:01,480
names were there, and then I 
signed them up for it. 

667
00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:03,920
But that was a moment where I 
was like, oh, I should have 

668
00:32:03,920 --> 00:32:07,200
taken a beat and I should have 
just said, OK, Mark, what are 

669
00:32:07,200 --> 00:32:10,320
the possibilities with this? 
I didn't want to hold me back 

670
00:32:10,320 --> 00:32:12,200
because again, I was in the 
moment and doing it. 

671
00:32:12,200 --> 00:32:14,480
I wasn't truly really worried 
about it. 

672
00:32:14,720 --> 00:32:17,200
But like that I think is a great
example where like, I should 

673
00:32:17,200 --> 00:32:19,600
have just waited a little bit 
and curated like that little 

674
00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:22,120
piece, a little bit of my notes 
and it would have just like 

675
00:32:22,120 --> 00:32:24,440
fulfilled me a little bit more. 
I'm fine with it. 

676
00:32:24,440 --> 00:32:25,200
It worked. 
It did. 

677
00:32:25,200 --> 00:32:28,160
It's a job, but I would have 
liked to be a little more more 

678
00:32:28,160 --> 00:32:30,320
perfect. 
Yeah, whereas if you're someone 

679
00:32:30,320 --> 00:32:32,320
like me, you would have held off
until you had all the 

680
00:32:32,320 --> 00:32:34,160
information before you made the 
table. 

681
00:32:34,160 --> 00:32:36,560
Which doesn't necessarily help 
you in the moment though, does 

682
00:32:36,560 --> 00:32:38,080
it? 
Because then you're kind of like

683
00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:41,800
kicking work to future you who 
already has enough problems like

684
00:32:41,800 --> 00:32:44,760
future you doesn't want you to 
pile on, stop piling on future 

685
00:32:44,760 --> 00:32:46,200
you. 
But I do that very often when it

686
00:32:46,200 --> 00:32:49,520
comes to my planning and making 
things look and kind of like 

687
00:32:49,800 --> 00:32:53,560
encapsulate all the information 
possible, Which I mean, I guess 

688
00:32:53,560 --> 00:32:56,760
this is just one of my my 
biggest weaknesses is feeling 

689
00:32:56,760 --> 00:32:59,400
like I have to have all the 
information before I can take 

690
00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:01,400
action on things. 
And that does definitely 

691
00:33:01,400 --> 00:33:03,800
manifest in my planning and my 
layouts and such. 

692
00:33:04,040 --> 00:33:06,800
You know, in thinking about 
setting up for a new month or 

693
00:33:06,800 --> 00:33:10,040
whatever, one of the things that
I like to do is put in project 

694
00:33:10,040 --> 00:33:13,360
collections or effectively just 
checklists of stuff that I need 

695
00:33:13,360 --> 00:33:15,800
to do in order to reach certain 
goals or work on sort of 

696
00:33:15,800 --> 00:33:18,440
projects or whatever else. 
And rather than just draw up a 

697
00:33:18,440 --> 00:33:22,360
space in my layout and call it a
day, I will jump into my layout 

698
00:33:22,360 --> 00:33:24,120
planner, which is a digital 
document. 

699
00:33:24,320 --> 00:33:26,160
I will type out all the things 
that I need to do. 

700
00:33:26,160 --> 00:33:28,600
I will structure them on the 
page to make sure it looks nice.

701
00:33:28,600 --> 00:33:31,080
I will know exactly what 
dimensions of box I will need. 

702
00:33:31,160 --> 00:33:34,400
Then I will go and draw the box.
So it's like, cool, you've pre 

703
00:33:34,400 --> 00:33:36,480
planned your list before you put
it into your planner, which was 

704
00:33:36,560 --> 00:33:38,200
supposed to help you planning 
out your list. 

705
00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:41,640
Yes, that is exactly what I did.
Well, see, the thing I get into 

706
00:33:41,640 --> 00:33:45,360
is like, then isn't, I mean, 
technically you're doing work 

707
00:33:45,360 --> 00:33:47,360
with it, but then I feel like it
almost moves into that 

708
00:33:47,360 --> 00:33:51,320
performative part because you 
have all the information to get 

709
00:33:51,320 --> 00:33:53,680
there. 
So really all you're doing in a 

710
00:33:53,680 --> 00:33:57,240
way is just rerunning that 
information for yourself. 

711
00:33:57,560 --> 00:34:00,880
I guess if you're going to use 
it again later, I can see a 

712
00:34:00,880 --> 00:34:03,440
benefit to that. 
But I think it's like when it's 

713
00:34:03,440 --> 00:34:06,760
in the moment though, that 
you're just like, well, wait, 

714
00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:09,960
you know, in my instance there, 
if you're like, OK, well, I need

715
00:34:09,960 --> 00:34:12,920
to have everyone's name and know
they're going to sign up before 

716
00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:15,159
I make this chart. 
But for me it was I need the 

717
00:34:15,159 --> 00:34:16,880
name and I would just sign them 
up instantly. 

718
00:34:16,880 --> 00:34:20,440
I wasn't waiting for like the 
full list to then do it. 

719
00:34:20,639 --> 00:34:23,560
So like it wasn't helpful 
necessarily in that part. 

720
00:34:23,560 --> 00:34:26,239
But then I would have felt like,
well, I already did all the 

721
00:34:26,239 --> 00:34:28,560
tasks for that. 
So why am I going to come back 

722
00:34:28,760 --> 00:34:31,639
and rewrite that inside of my 
journal if I've already done it?

723
00:34:31,639 --> 00:34:33,199
The point of it was the 
checklist. 

724
00:34:33,520 --> 00:34:36,080
So like I feel like sometimes 
that's where I get a little like

725
00:34:36,360 --> 00:34:39,360
back and forth on it where like 
I see the benefits of it, but 

726
00:34:39,360 --> 00:34:40,840
it's not helping me in that 
moment. 

727
00:34:40,840 --> 00:34:43,920
So I think maybe it's important 
for you to know kind of what you

728
00:34:43,920 --> 00:34:46,920
want from it before you start to
do it, which is, like I said, 

729
00:34:46,920 --> 00:34:50,400
maybe sometimes just taking a 
beat and being like, OK, do I 

730
00:34:50,400 --> 00:34:52,280
need to plan this out or do I 
just need to go for? 

731
00:34:52,280 --> 00:34:54,159
It. 
Yeah, To clarify, I'm not 

732
00:34:54,159 --> 00:34:57,320
writing a full project plan in 
my journal after the project has

733
00:34:57,320 --> 00:34:58,560
already been done. 
All right. 

734
00:34:58,560 --> 00:35:01,160
If that's anything that anybody 
was picking up there, no, that's

735
00:35:01,160 --> 00:35:03,400
not the case. 
Also just making sure I know 

736
00:35:03,400 --> 00:35:06,320
exactly what goes on the list so
that then I can plan the layout 

737
00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:08,160
so it will accommodate the full 
list. 

738
00:35:08,360 --> 00:35:10,760
As opposed to putting in a 
section that I think will 

739
00:35:10,760 --> 00:35:13,640
accommodate the list and then 
finding, oh actually you needed 

740
00:35:13,640 --> 00:35:17,320
like 2 columns for this or you 
only needed one column for this.

741
00:35:17,600 --> 00:35:20,480
One instance of that I can think
of is when I was making a guest 

742
00:35:20,480 --> 00:35:22,240
list for my birthday 
celebration. 

743
00:35:22,240 --> 00:35:24,680
I drew in the amount of space I 
was actually going to need for 

744
00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:27,520
the number of guests I was 
inviting and then I just had 

745
00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:31,200
this like weird, awkward space 
below it and like what do I do 

746
00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:34,160
with that? 
I I got out a sticker, put it 

747
00:35:34,160 --> 00:35:37,080
over the top and made the box 
longer, even though I had no 

748
00:35:37,080 --> 00:35:38,840
intentions of inviting more 
people. 

749
00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:41,640
I just wanted to fill the space 
up so that it looked nice. 

750
00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:45,120
So we've got the ass box with 
four guests solid. 

751
00:35:45,520 --> 00:35:47,800
Yeah, I mean, there's definitely
ways to go about it. 

752
00:35:47,800 --> 00:35:49,680
I mean, I think like, that's a 
great example. 

753
00:35:49,680 --> 00:35:52,240
It's like wasted space. 
You know, it's like, well, I 

754
00:35:52,240 --> 00:35:55,040
plan for this to be one thing 
and it went a different way. 

755
00:35:55,320 --> 00:35:58,640
And so like, I have to like, 
retrofit the space to do 

756
00:35:58,640 --> 00:36:01,280
something else. 
Now that can kind of get in your

757
00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:04,480
way a little bit where you're 
like, OK, well, if I would have 

758
00:36:04,480 --> 00:36:06,720
just kind of went with it, I 
could have drew a box around it 

759
00:36:06,720 --> 00:36:09,640
later and said, oh, pretty. 
Exactly. 

760
00:36:09,680 --> 00:36:11,640
But it's all good. 
It's, I think it's one of those 

761
00:36:11,640 --> 00:36:14,600
like it's a process that you 
learn over time, you know, and 

762
00:36:14,600 --> 00:36:19,760
I, I think that throughout my 
planner history or whatnot, I 

763
00:36:19,760 --> 00:36:21,640
have tended more into the 
curated space. 

764
00:36:21,640 --> 00:36:23,720
I have tended slightly more into
the messy. 

765
00:36:23,880 --> 00:36:27,080
I think in terms of the 
messiness of it, the only things

766
00:36:27,080 --> 00:36:30,160
that I would consider messy in 
my everyday journals and such a 

767
00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:31,840
layouts that I made that I 
didn't like. 

768
00:36:32,320 --> 00:36:33,440
That's just because I didn't 
like them. 

769
00:36:33,440 --> 00:36:35,000
It's not because they're 
actually messy. 

770
00:36:35,160 --> 00:36:37,560
It's just that something about 
it gave me the ick and I'm like,

771
00:36:37,560 --> 00:36:40,640
no, I'm not going to use that. 
So regardless of where you fall,

772
00:36:40,680 --> 00:36:42,320
it's all good at the end of the 
day. 

773
00:36:42,320 --> 00:36:44,960
It's really just making sure 
that your planning system term, 

774
00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:47,320
your planners or whatnot, or 
fulfilling the needs you give 

775
00:36:47,320 --> 00:36:48,880
them. 
Whether that be, you know, the 

776
00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:52,000
joy of having curated spaces in 
there that look very nice, 

777
00:36:52,160 --> 00:36:54,680
Whether it be that idea of being
able to think on paper and just 

778
00:36:54,680 --> 00:36:57,400
get things down really quickly 
and all of that type of thing. 

779
00:36:57,600 --> 00:37:00,960
Both are valid, both can work. 
Just make sure that in either 

780
00:37:00,960 --> 00:37:03,440
camp, you're not falling into 
the major cons that are 

781
00:37:03,440 --> 00:37:05,320
associated with going to the 
extremes. 

782
00:37:05,520 --> 00:37:08,240
So not being able to find your 
information again because you 

783
00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:10,760
wrote things down messy and now 
you can't even read your own 

784
00:37:10,760 --> 00:37:13,880
handwriting anymore. 
Or not curating to the point 

785
00:37:13,880 --> 00:37:16,880
where it's like OK cool, I have 
to make three like mock ups of 

786
00:37:16,880 --> 00:37:19,920
my layout before I put my layout
into my journal to then write 

787
00:37:19,920 --> 00:37:22,920
out my perfect plans. 
Both of those are problems, and 

788
00:37:22,920 --> 00:37:25,160
they're probably not aligned 
with the functionality that you 

789
00:37:25,160 --> 00:37:27,160
want for your planning system. 
Yeah. 

790
00:37:27,160 --> 00:37:30,320
And I think just knowing that 
it's absolutely OK to be 

791
00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:34,720
somewhere in the middle or some 
leaning way with it is to say 

792
00:37:34,720 --> 00:37:37,000
like it's absolutely OK that 
this looks this way. 

793
00:37:37,320 --> 00:37:40,400
And I think also too like 
something I've done, I have a 

794
00:37:40,400 --> 00:37:42,000
handful. 
I know you've talked about like 

795
00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:45,000
R&D journals too, like if you 
really want to plan something in

796
00:37:45,000 --> 00:37:47,680
advance and just have like a 
resource for that, you know, 

797
00:37:47,680 --> 00:37:50,600
grab another journal and kind of
sketch those things out and 

798
00:37:50,600 --> 00:37:54,320
allow yourself to be messy as 
you are exploring that. 

799
00:37:54,520 --> 00:37:57,040
Because it's almost like we 
said, you're giving a purpose to

800
00:37:57,040 --> 00:37:58,840
a journal. 
You're saying, OK journal, you 

801
00:37:58,840 --> 00:38:02,080
are my messy sketchbook journal 
where I just think out ideas or 

802
00:38:02,080 --> 00:38:04,120
do whatever with. 
But like you can work that all 

803
00:38:04,120 --> 00:38:07,240
out there so that when you go to
like set up a new weekly or 

804
00:38:07,240 --> 00:38:10,560
daily or monthly, you have that 
and you're like, oh, here's the 

805
00:38:10,560 --> 00:38:12,440
spacing. 
It looked nice. 

806
00:38:12,440 --> 00:38:16,040
It works well, you know, like I 
used to have a version where I 

807
00:38:16,040 --> 00:38:19,120
would actually take notes, like 
inside of the empty space, you'd

808
00:38:19,120 --> 00:38:21,720
be like, this worked out really 
well for me or this wasn't 

809
00:38:21,720 --> 00:38:25,040
enough space, maybe rethink this
and almost kind of like critique

810
00:38:25,040 --> 00:38:26,520
each week as I went through with
it. 

811
00:38:26,520 --> 00:38:29,560
But that's what's really helped 
me get to a point to say, OK, 

812
00:38:29,560 --> 00:38:31,800
let's be thoughtful about what 
we're doing, but know that it 

813
00:38:31,800 --> 00:38:34,480
also needs to be workable too. 
So I think for all the planner 

814
00:38:34,480 --> 00:38:37,920
pals, just know like you don't 
have to be one way or the other.

815
00:38:38,120 --> 00:38:40,640
You might change over time or 
you might just change 

816
00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:42,880
day-to-day. 
And if you feel like sometimes 

817
00:38:42,880 --> 00:38:46,200
you want to be a little extra 
buttoned up, absolutely create a

818
00:38:46,200 --> 00:38:48,160
page. 
Take your time, have fun with 

819
00:38:48,160 --> 00:38:49,720
it. 
But if you want to let loose, 

820
00:38:49,720 --> 00:38:51,840
you know, let your hair down a 
little bit and have fun. 

821
00:38:52,080 --> 00:38:54,880
If you need to give yourself 
permission to that on a separate

822
00:38:54,880 --> 00:38:57,800
page that no one will ever see, 
I say go for it. 

823
00:38:57,800 --> 00:39:00,400
Live on the wild side, see what 
happens. 

824
00:39:00,800 --> 00:39:02,560
And we, of course, would love to
know Planet Pals. 

825
00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:05,200
Where do you think you fall? 
Do you learn more curated, more 

826
00:39:05,200 --> 00:39:06,920
messy? 
Very much in between. 

827
00:39:07,200 --> 00:39:09,320
If it depends on a different 
space or a different journal, we

828
00:39:09,320 --> 00:39:11,200
would love to know. 
Let us know either in the 

829
00:39:11,200 --> 00:39:14,320
comments on YouTube or you can 
hit us up at Planet Pals Podcast

830
00:39:14,320 --> 00:39:17,200
at Gmail dot com or over on 
Instagram at Planner Pals 

831
00:39:17,200 --> 00:39:19,440
Podcast. 
An awesome episode as always, 

832
00:39:19,440 --> 00:39:21,560
great talking about these 
different pieces and planner 

833
00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:22,920
pals. 
If you want to get these 

834
00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:26,000
episodes in advance, you can now
take part because you can be a 

835
00:39:26,000 --> 00:39:29,120
part of our official planner 
pals podcast YouTube membership 

836
00:39:29,320 --> 00:39:32,320
where you'll actually get 
podcast in advance before they 

837
00:39:32,320 --> 00:39:35,680
launch on the days that they do.
We also are letting you pick 

838
00:39:35,680 --> 00:39:38,440
some of the future topics as 
well as we go through, which is 

839
00:39:38,440 --> 00:39:41,280
a giant perk because I mean, we 
want to make sure you're getting

840
00:39:41,280 --> 00:39:43,360
what you want. 
So make sure you click the join 

841
00:39:43,360 --> 00:39:45,760
button right next to the Planner
Pals name on YouTube. 

842
00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:48,960
We also have you there, and we 
can't wait for you to share some

843
00:39:48,960 --> 00:39:50,520
of your cool stuff with us in 
the future. 

844
00:39:50,600 --> 00:39:52,600
Whether you're part of the 
membership or not though, we 

845
00:39:52,600 --> 00:39:54,520
want to hear from you. 
Planner pals, Do let us know 

846
00:39:54,520 --> 00:39:57,080
your thoughts on whether you are
a messy or curated planner. 

847
00:39:57,360 --> 00:39:59,120
And as always, thanks for 
watching.

