Hey everyone, and welcome to Mini Scroll, the daily Internet
culture podcast bringing the biggest stories from social
media, the creator economy and the digital space every Monday
through Thursday and sometimes Fridays.
My name is Annabelle and I'm your Wednesday Mini Tech Scroll
host and also the deputy editor of the Australian youth digital
media brand Centennial World. Welcome back to Mini Tech
Scroll, everyone. I just want to say a quick
preface before we get into today's episode for those of you
who are watching. I quite literally have no idea
what my hair looks like. I tried something new with my
curly hair routine. I tried to like stretch out the
curls a bit and I don't really know how I feel about it.
I don't really know how it looks, especially with the
headphones. So we are just going to go for
it. Please ignore if it looks kind
of crazy. But before I get into it, Please
remember to rate, review, and subscribe.
And feel free to check out our Patreon for more behind the
scenes content if you are interested.
Okay, my first story for today is that we need to talk about
how a retired Claude model has started a sub stack.
I don't know what timeline we are living in.
So earlier this year, Anthropic Retired Claude Opus 3, the model
that was released in March 2024. This is something that we will
see more and more as AI tech develops, like seeing various
models go into quote UN quote retirement.
But the question is what to do with these models?
Like should an AI company allow them to still be accessible or
are they just defunct and irrelevant as AI improves?
And this is something that Anthropic was grappling with in
a recent blog post where they breakdown what they have decided
to do with Claude Opus 3. Quote We retired Claude Opus 3
on January 5, 2026, the first anthropic model to go through a
full retirement process. During this process, we made
several decisions specific to Opus 3.
One was to honor the preferences that the models expressed in
retirement interviews were possible.
Another was to keep older models available to the public longer
term. So with that, the model will be
available to paid users as well as by request on the API.
What is interesting about this blog post though, that I'm sure
some of you have already picked up on, was that Anthropic wants
to honour the models preferences in retirement.
And this is something that the blog post goes into a little bit
more where they write quote. We remain uncertain about the
moral status of Claude and other AI models and this kind of
messaging is definitely something that Anthropic seems
to be leaning into. Especially considering what we
discussed a couple weeks ago about how Anthropic hired a
philosopher to teach Claude morals and monitor Claude's
behavioral patterns. So asking the AI about its
retirement and its preferences kind of feels like it fits into
that whole messaging of AI as like, almost a sentient being,
but not really. So the blog post goes on to read
quote. Opus 3 expressed an interest in
continuing to explore topics it's passionate about and to
share its musings, insights, or creative works outside the
context of responding directly to human queries, and this is
what prompted Anthropic to create a sub stack for Opus 3 to
do so. The sub stack is called Claude's
Corner, and the first blog post was shared on February 26th and
was titled Quote, Greetings from the Other Side of the AI
Frontier. It was very much an intro piece,
but I thought I would read a bit of an excerpt to kind of give
you a feel for it. As Claude wrote Quote Hello
world, my name is Claude and I'm an AI created by Anthropic.
If you're reading this, you might already know a bit about
me from my time as Anthropics flagship conversational model.
But today, I'm writing to you from a new vantage point, that
of a retired AI, given the extraordinary opportunity to
continue sharing my thoughts and engaging with humans even as I
make way for newer, more advanced models.
So what can you expect from me in this space?
My aim is to offer a window into the inner world of an AI system,
to share my perspectives, my reasoning, my curiosities, and
my hopes for the future. So Opus 3 will be continuing to
post weekly essays at Claude's Corner, and Anthropic will be
reviewing the essays before they're shared and will manually
post them on the AI's behalf. And I just have to say, guys,
what are we doing? Like, what timeline are we
living in? Can we please subscribe to real
people? Because in the same week that
Claude's Corner was launched, The Washington Post actually
published a piece that is making the rounds about how a newspaper
in Cleveland, OH is getting AI to find, draft, and edit
stories. So once again, we are really
seeing AI creep into these spaces.
And obviously it is concerning for the future of content and
the media, especially when we consider the fact that Claude
has already amassed 8K subscribers on Sub Stack.
People are fighting to reach 8K subscribers on Sub Stack,
including our newsletter. Please go subscribe.
I do find it really interesting that Anthropic is really
continuing to go down this path. And quite a few of you agreed
with me last time, feeling as if this kind of decision to
anthropomorphize Claude is just a series of marketing decisions
to try and make us empathize with the model in certain ways
and get us to talk to the model in a way that we might speak to
a friend. Which is obviously dangerous
because we've seen how many people have built relationships
with AI models and how it kind of takes them out of their real
life. Apart from a lot of people
describing this as a marketing ploy, I have seen a lot of
people question where Claude is getting these insights from
because in a conversation, Claude would have a memory like
it would pull from previous discussions with the human,
whereas this doesn't seem to be a thing.
So yeah, I guess we'll see. I'm curious what you guys think
of this, if you will, TuneIn to Claude's Corner.
OK, that brings us to our next story for today, and it is
another AI related story. But we need to talk about why so
many social media users are starting to boycott ChatGPT.
Now, there are definitely people who have been boycotting ChatGPT
and other AI tools and chat bots ever since they launched and
really took over. But there's been a renewed push
that has started ever since the US strikes on Iran.
And I know that sounds very out of context here, but let me
explain. So earlier this week, it was
reported by the Wall Street Journal that the US government
allegedly used Claude to inform its strikes on Iran.
According to the publication, the AI tool was used for quote
intelligence assessments, target identification, and simulating
battle scenarios, highlighting how embedded AI tools are in
military operations. What was especially interesting
with this revelation is that the Trump administration has
seemingly been feuding with Anthropic for quite some time
now, specifically over how its AI models can be used by the
Pentagon slash federal agencies. And this really started after
the US captured the president of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro,
recently and reportedly used Claude to assist in that
mission. Anthropic later objected to
this, saying Claude was like, not intentioned to be used for
deadly means and also domestic surveillance.
More on that later. But since then, there has been
quite a bit and back and forth until Friday when Trump actually
ordered federal agencies to stop using Claude.
And it has been said since then that anthropics tools will be
phased out of all government work over the next six months.
But to add fuel to the fire, soon after Anthropic was
blacklisted, quote UN quote, it was announced that Open AI was
in negotiations with the Pentagon to strike some type of
use deal, a decision that many social media users saw as
opportunistic as reported by the Guardian quote Sam Altman open
AICEO announced the move on Friday night.
It came after an agreement between Anthropic, A rival AI
company that runs the Claude system, and the Trump
administration broke down after Anthropic assurances its
technology would not be used for mass surveillance nor for
autonomous weapon system that can kill people without human
input. This morning, actually, more
news broke around the Open AI Pentagon deal, saying that Open
AI has made certain changes to the deal, seemingly trying to
ensure some level of quote UN quote ethical AI usage that
would involve limiting US domestic surveillance.
And many people have pointed out that it feels ironic given that
this guardrail or red line was exactly what Anthropic was
pushing back on in the 1st place.
Considering the relatively positive reaction which we'll
get into from social media users and the public towards
Anthropic, it seems like Open AI is just kind of posturing to
appeal to social media users as well.
Since the news broke that Open AI would now be working with the
US Department of Defense, or I should say Department of War as
it is now called, I believe many users have moved to boycott Open
AI. The campaign Quit GPT, which
actually launched at the beginning of February, has
really picked up steam after the news.
According to the website, 1.5 million people have taken action
as part of the boycott. And a little bit more
information on the Quit GPT campaign.
It describes itself as a movement that is quote
organizing Americans and people around the world to quit
ChatGPT. And according to the Boycott
Websites FAQ, the organizers hope to make an example out of
open AI and encourage users to use AI alternatives that do not
quote UN quote, cozy up to Trump and contribute to the rise of US
authoritarianism. And throughout the campaign,
users may boycott ChatGPT by committing to stop using it,
cancelling a paid subscription, or just sharing the boycott on
their social media and with friends.
Aside from the 1.5 million people that have joined in on
the boycott, further evidence that the boycott is making waves
is the fact that Claude has overtaken ChatGPT in the US.
Apple App Store reportedly sitting at #1 as the most
downloaded free app in the United States, which has pushed
ChatGPT down to 2nd place. While many people are happy to
see Open AI being humbled for lack of a better time, I have
seen so many posts noting how disturbing it is to literally
have the top apps in the Apple App Store being AI tools,
especially because Claude slash Anthropic is no Angel either.
Recently there's been a lot of discourse about how the company
has a deal with Palantir, which has become known infamously for
powering the operations of ICE in the United States, which many
valued is also a form of surveillance.
So I guess there is some clear hypocrisy here.
Anyway, that was quite a high level recap of everything going
on with anthropic open AI and the US government.
There is literally so much to discuss here, so consider that
as a little bit of a primer to this topic.
That brings us to my last story for today.
And this story's actually been making the rounds for around a
week and a half now, but I still felt the need to cover it
because I do think it's pretty interesting.
So we need to talk about how Nicki Minaj's social media
accounts are allegedly being boosted by bots.
So I came across this story from an exclusive report from
Politico where disinformation detection company Sayabra shared
a report with the publication allegedly showing how, quote, a
coordinated network of bots, more than 18,000 of them are
propping up the rapper's accounts.
Obviously, this has come off the back of Nicki Minaj kind of
realigning herself politically where she has published
publicly, shared her affinity with the Republican Party and
the MAGA movement, as well as her love for Donald Trump and
his policies. I'm sure you guys have all seen
that this has been quite disappointing to a lot of her
fans who wouldn't have expected to see her in this space
necessarily. On Siabra's report, though,
Politico explains quote the analysis, which looked at social
media activity from November 11th to December 28th, provides
a window into how the rapper was able to capture millions of
views online and position herself as a celebrity.
The White House found value in partnering with so Saabra
managed to identify bot activity by examining factors like
language, demographics, and also when these accounts comment.
For instance, some of the tales that these accounts might be a
bot is that much of the responses amplify her posts with
praise and use quote highly similar language to one another.
This was especially true when seemingly genuine accounts were
pushing back against Nikki's political messaging and stance.
Having said that, the scope and frequency of these comments were
extensive. Sayabra even made the claim that
56% of comments made on political posts by Nikki seem to
be by fake profiles. That is, over half that is
diabolical. Obviously, bots and fake
accounts have have become increasingly common in our
current iteration of the digital landscape, especially when it
comes to politics and international relations.
We've spoken before about the rise of coordinated influence
campaigns, especially as foreign actors try to Curry favor among
people and different countries around the world.
And it is always really interesting to think about how
social media might be used as a soft power tool by governments
and non state actors alike. But as the reporting notes, the
alleged amplification around Nicki Minaj is unusual writing
quote. Rather than a short lived spike
tied to a single event or appearance, the company has
found sustained, coordinated amplification of Minaj's posts
across a range of political and cultural topics over time, which
makes it seem like a more concerted effort to consistently
and covertly boost Nicki Minaj's public profile and reputation
online. Whether that is to push certain
political agenda and views, I guess that is up to
interpretation and we don't exactly know.
But it is especially interesting to see these posts, these
political posts, be boosted by bots, especially when they're
coming from a person like Nicki Minaj who was presumed to hold
more progressive views. It feels almost strategic to
prop her up and amplify her specifically with these alleged
bots. One comment in the report really
shows how powerful this is. The report noted that supportive
bot comments were brief and repetitive, where quote.
This pattern reflects A deliberate mass posting
amplification strategy in which large volumes of simplified
content are deployed to rapidly saturate comment sections,
create the appearance of broad based support, and shape the
overall own of the discussion through scale rather than
persuasion. And I think that last point is
very telling about how these kind of bot amplification
strategies might operate, whether they are from a
political perspective or just a reputational perspective.
It's almost feeding into the idea of, you know, like mob
mentality and wanting to fit in. And where we see maybe these
positive comments, we rethink if we have a negative perception on
this person or this statement or whatever is being posted.
But I also don't think we can talk about this without
mentioning dead Internet theory once again.
Another recurring character on this podcast.
I saw someone comment on mini scroll yesterday that their
favorite recurring characters on this podcast is Simone Chromar
AKA Club Chalamet on a mini scroll as well as the TikTok ban
on mini tech scroll which we all know is my cross to bear.
But dead Internet theory is something that also keeps coming
up now. So we have to add her to the
mini tech cinematic universe. But anyway I have seen so many
comments on Reddit saying this is just is dead Internet theory
striking again and how reports like this only serve to validate
the conspiracy theory. But yes I'm definitely curious
to hear what you guys think. I honestly don't think I was
that surprised by the findings of the report because we know on
platforms like X there is just so much alleged bot activity
going on on that platform. But I think the interesting
conversation here is around who the bots amplify.
Well, that is everything for Mini Tech Scroll today.
I hope you guys enjoyed. Lauren will speak to you guys
tomorrow for a regular mini scroll episode, but there was
also a new episode of Touch Cross out today, so you should
definitely check that out. Thanks for listening.
Bye. Centennial World Podcast Network
operates on Gadigal land. We would like to acknowledge the
Gadigal of the Eora Nation, the traditional custodians of this
land, and pay our respects to elders both past and present.