The second question that I have for you is, was Jesus a Jew?
But my first question actually is why does it matter?
Why does it matter? It matters because for 17118
hundred years men have believed that Jesus was just a a Judean
or as we say it today a Jew. Even though men didn't look at
the word Jew 1800 years ago as we do today.
It it's very complex issue. So if we believe Jesus was a
Jew, then we believe that Jews were his people.
If we believe the Jews were his people, then we believe that we
must treat Jews well because of the promises to Abraham that
those who will bless you I will bless.
And Christians today believe that the Jews are his people.
So if they bless Jews, God will bless them.
So they're blessing Jews hoping to get something from God.
But in reality, Jews are not his people and they're His enemies.
Christ told them. John chapter 10 verse 26.
You do not believe me because you are not my sheep.
It's plain and simple that they were not His people.
And there's much more evidence in the New Testament that agrees
with them. They're not his people.
So This is why it matters, because Jews are not his people.
But Jews are given free license and preeminence in our Christian
society based on the lie that they're his people.
What is your background, William?
I'm a 10th grade dropout. I'm an apostate Roman Catholic.
I was raised Catholic. I dropped out of high school
after 10th grade. I went to work loading trucks,
things like that, Got my equivalency diploma, went into
law enforcement, spent 12 years in law enforcement, caught a
civil rights case, spent 12 years in federal prison, spent
my time in federal prison reading scripture and classical
history. And I could spend half an hour
explaining the things that I read and studied in those 12
years over the course of which I had translated the New Testament
and written many of the historical papers that are
available at Christianity Today. So I've done nothing but study
since 1996 and I'm still doing that.
Yeah, so you're effectively A biblical scholar.
Yes. And that's not the background
that people would expect that I have when they speak to me or
hear me. But that's my background.
I'm totally self educated, but when I tell you I can show you
in an old book, that's what's important.
So going back to Jesus being a Jew now, I think it's quite
important to premise this discussion by saying none of
this is about hatred. No, it's not about hatred.
It's about truth. It's simply about truth.
It's about truth, but it's also about behavior, because Jews
have exploited Christians with this idea that they are God's
chosen people. And I don't know if you can see
me, but I'm using coat marks with my hands.
They're God's chosen people and they they get away with
practically anything they want to.
Any political agenda that they deem is moral becomes the
prevailing political agenda across all peoples.
They are controlling the world through the lie that they are
God's chosen people. They have in in their Talmud a
concept called tikkun O lamb, which means to re mold the
world, to heal the world, to correct the world as if we need
correction. It's really an agenda for Jews
to mold the world in their own image.
They have another agenda with with these Noahide laws, which
are a lie, which are a fraud. And they want us all to accept
these Noahide laws as the laws of our nations.
And that would effectively ban Christianity the way that Jews
interpret Christianity, which is the real end goal.
So Jews are truly trying to control the world and and is
tons of evidence about this in their own writings.
And in a way, you're also speaking about Zionism, and by
extension, evangelical Christianity is an even bigger
proponent. Yes, the Jews sold them the rope
that they'll hang themselves with.
That's exactly what's happened. Evangelical Christians blindly
believe that the Jews are God's chosen people, and they blindly
believe in those promises to Abraham that they will be
blessed if they bless the Jews. So the bottom line is that they
are operating out of greed, basically, and they really
believe. They really believe that they
can convert the Jews somehow, that somehow in the last days
Christ will convert the Jews to Christianity.
But that's not what Christ said. Christ said you do not believe
me because you're not my sheep. The Catholic Church has taught
for centuries that they're not a sheep because they don't believe
them. They've inverted the same
sayings of Christ in many areas in Scripture.
They've inverted it and they teach exactly the opposite of
what he said. In order to understand whether
or not Jesus was a Jew, well, you have you have to take me
back to the beginning. Yes, at least to the time of
Isaiah and Ezekiel, but that'll be brief.
And then we'll jump to the 2nd century BC in in Isaiah chapter
34, there's something called the Controversy of Zeon.
And for the controversy of Zion, Yahweh, the God of Israel has a
cause against a Dumia. Why?
Because he knew in his Providence what was going to
happen in the future. Let's jump forward now from
Isaiah, which is those words were probably written around
7:05 BC perhaps or thereabouts. Let's jump to about 600, maybe
590 BC to Ezekiel the prophet who had written in Ezekiel
chapter 3435. I believe it's Ezekiel chapter
35. Probably verses 8 through 10 are
around there. He had written that the
Edomites, that Esau or Edom would say would, would take
these two countries and these two nations for themselves.
And that's a reference to Judah and Israel, most of whom by that
time had already gone off into the Assyrian captivity, and only
the inhabitants of Jerusalem were left.
And according to those words in Ezekiel, the Edomites were
already moving N to take the lands that formerly belonged to
Judah and Israel, which had been for the most part left desolate
by the Assyrians. And the so by the time that the
second temple, that the first temple is destroyed and the
Edomites were responsible for the destruction of the first
temple, it's in the Psalms and it's in second estrus.
It's in first estrus, which is an apocryphal copy of the Book
of Ezra that has more material in it than the Book of Ezra has.
It's probably a better, more original copy of Ezra then what
we know from the canonical Ezra. They both placed the destruction
of the temple, the first temple, on the shoulders of the Edomites
because the Edomites were subject to the Babylonian Empire
and therefore provided soldiers to the Babylonians at the siege
of Jerusalem. So that being said, by the end
of the Persian period into the Hellenistic period, the land of
Edumia had actually moved north and Stabo of Cappadocia.
Strabo, the geographer actually described this in a sort of odd
way when he said that the Edomites or Edumians were
originally Nabatahians who are Arabs in in the southlands in
Arabia, and that the Nabataeans drove them out of their original
country and they came into Judea.
So Strabo, a Greek Pagan geographer who died around 25
AD, understood that the Edomites had relocated from the desert
lands to the South into Judea in the first book of Maccabees.
Now the books of Maccabees start about 160 BC when the Judeans
were able to free themselves from these rule of the Seleucid
Greek kings. Now these Judeans are only the
descendants of 40,000 people that when all of Jerusalem was
taken captive by the Assyrians around 7 O1 BC, all of Judah and
then Jerusalem itself was taken captive by the Babylonians and
whoever remained in 585 BC. 70 years later in 520 BC or
thereabouts, only 42,000 Judeans returned. 42,000 people of
Judah, with some Benjamin and Levi among them, returned to
Jerusalem. That's it.
None of the others ever returned.
So until the time of Ezra, when a few thousand more returned
with him some years later. So basically less than 45,000
people ever returned to Jerusalem and those people
actually became a pretty powerful nation so that by 160
BC they could defeat the Greek Seleucid empire and remain an
independent nation for almost 100 years until the coming of
the Romans. During that time when Jerusalem
was an independent Kingdom, not Judea, but Jerusalem, the kings
called the Maccabees. Maccabee means means hammer.
It's really a nickname for the the first high priest of the
dynasty. From the time that they gained
their independence, Judas Maccabee.
So the real family name was Hasemonian.
So the Hasemonians began to attempt to burn out all of the
Edomites from the cities of Judah, the former cities of
Judah and Israel that they had come to occupy, and they'd burn
them out. But they didn't have the
population necessary to keep those cities.
So they'd burn out the Edomites, and they'd leave the cities
empty, and the Edomites would move right back in.
The policy was failing. It failed for 30 years until the
time of John Herkanis, too. Now when?
I'm sorry, John Herkanis 1. John Herkanis, about 1/29 BC,
comes to be the high priest in Judea, and that's where the Book
of Maccabees ends. And you can see the policy that
I had just discussed in the Book of Maccabees, the first book of
Maccabees, second Book of Maccabees.
Can I just jump in just for a moment?
I hope you don't mind, but when we talk about Judah and Judea,
what is the difference? The difference is that Judah was
a Kingdom and the only legitimate inhabitants of the
Kingdom of Judah, or citizens if you will, were people of the
tribe of Judah, or of the tribe of Levi or the tribe of Benjamin
that was joined to the Kingdom of Judah in the days of the
divided Kingdom. So the 10 tribes were ruled by
Jeroboam. 1 and this is from the time of Solomon.
This is the end of the 10th century BC or the beginning of
the 10th century BC. I'm sorry, no, this is about 900
BC that this happened maybe a little later at the death of
Solomon, that the Kingdom was divided and it remained that way
and Israel went off into paganism.
And I could talk about the his that history at great length if
you ever want to discuss that with citations.
And Judah became known as the Kingdom of Judah, the land of
Judah. And it probably properly should
be Judah or Judahite if you refer to an individual all
throughout the Old Testament. But Judea was never Judah.
Judea was always a mixed race population, which I'm about to
explain, and it was never properly Judah.
And the people, some of them were Judah, some of them were
the descendants of those 45,000 or so Judah Heights and and
Levites and Benjaminites that returned so they could be
properly considered Judah. But as I'm about to explain,
they didn't stay Judah. So if you're now this is going
on today in America, if you're Anglo Irish, a predominant
number of people in America, white people are either German
or English or Irish and dissent. And I happen to be German and
Irish on my father's side and English on my mother's side.
So can I claim to be German? Not really because I'm 3/4
British. Can I claim to be English?
Not really because I'm a quarter Irish and and I'm a quarter
German so I can't claim to be German, Irish or English.
I'm just an Amerimod. But at least I'm all my ancestry
is from from those places in Europe.
So the English and the Germans are really a related people and
so are the Irish, but just a little more distantly.
So I'm not really a mixed race individual so far as I can
determine, of course from my genealogy.
I'm sorry, a wasp just flew by. Happens all the time here where
I live. But the the truth is that I
can't be a German. I couldn't go back to the
Rhineland. I know the exact village where
my think ancestors came from and say I'm German too, because
they're going to look me in you, you, Mick, get out of here.
You because I probably look more Irish and I do German.
I don't know, right? So so they're going to say, no,
you're an American, beat it. You're not German.
If I tried to present myself as German to them that are 100%
German, right? It's just not going to work.
So what is a Judean determined is determined by the the history
which I'm about to present from the time of John Herkanis, about
125 BC. And this is explained in book 13
of Flavius Josephus's Antiquities of the Judeans.
His original title is in Greek is Antiquities of the Judeans.
I don't like to call it Antiquities of the Jews because
that's not true. It's only true up to from a
certain point. So in 125 BC, John Huracanis,
who is the high priest for a good deal of time, I don't
remember the exact duration, probably about 20 years.
So he decided that he was going to convert these people in these
cities that formerly belonged to Judah and Israel.
He was going to convert them to Judaism and tell them that if
they converted to Judaism that they would no longer be attacked
and they would be 1 nation with the people of of Jerusalem and
everything would be cool and they'd be able to live in peace
together. And basically that's the
overtures that were made to them at that time.
And they, they accepted that. And Josephus Flavius Josephus
wrote that from that time they were known as none other than
Judeans 125 BC. Now most people that can
explain, when I'm explaining, they stop there, but they
shouldn't stop there because a little later another high
priest, a grandson I believe of John Herkanis, I think, came to
the throne. Another has Ammonian high
priest, and he was the first high priest of Judea who called
himself a king and his name was Alexander Janius and he ruled
from about 1:03 BC until about 76 BC.
And Flavius Josephus explains that he went out and converted
the the people who were Edomites and Canaanites and others in
about 30 different regions of Judea, forcibly converted them
into Judaism and made them citizens with the people of
Jerusalem. So basically all of Edomite
Judea was forcibly converted into Judaism.
Is Judaism the correct term? Well, it depends on how you want
to see it. It depends on whether or not
you're you're considering Judaism to be the Talmud, right?
The Talmud began to be recorded a couple of centuries after
Christ, but the process started in in the 2nd century BC, and at
that time it was. Sorry.
And and it was, was it a, an extension, a corrupted extension
of Hebrewism, if, if I'm going to be correct?
Yes, because as soon as you can imagine that people of other
races can be converted into Hebrew Hebrewism, then you've
already violated the laws of God, right?
And who who cursed those people? And his law forbids those
people. There are instances where
certain people, the kindred Genesis 10 nations, can join
themselves to Israel and after three generations they can be
considered Israelites as long as they're conforming to all the
laws. And they could be intermarried
with after three generations. There are circumstances for that
in the law, but it's speaking about other kindred people.
It's not speaking about the Canaanites and the Edomites who
were explicitly eliminated. They were explicitly forbidden
by the law. They were castigated, so it was
prohibited to have relations with them explicitly in law.
And this is what her Countess did.
He went and joined all of these Edomites and other Canaanites or
people of unknown origin who were dwelling in the former
lands of Israel and Judah. He began that policy of
converting them into the Hebrew religion.
And at that point I can no longer call it Hebrew ISM.
It's no longer the religion of Moses and the prophets.
Now it's it's a corruption. And Judaism is probably the best
term we have for it. And Judaism is actually you
Daheus is the what a Greek would call Judea you Daheus.
And and Judaism and the word Judea as we know it come from
those Greek terms. So they don't come from Judah.
They come indirectly through those Greek terms.
Now Alexander Janius converted over 30 districts in and areas
of Judea into Judaism, and he died in 76 BC and I believe at
that time it might have been one.
Later John Herkanis too became the high priest.
Another man named John Herkanis a little later.
So the Romans, the Romans come to conquer the world in, in
their process of conquering the world, they come to Judea.
Of course, it's going to happen eventually.
And the Roman species Judea. And there's a lot of internal
political strife among the Judeans.
And there was a notable Edomite named Archelaus, I believe.
And he had two sons, one named Herod and one named Octopus.
And John Hercanus too, is very friendly to these Edumians.
They were Edomites, and he appointed Herod as the governor
of Galilee, and occupies his other son as the governor of
Jerusalem. And, and I might have those two
names inverted, Archelaus and and Antipas, but it really
doesn't matter for the point of this conversation.
I have all of this in articles at my website, but I'm not
sitting here trying to read them on you.
So anyway, Herod ended up siding with the Romans and he married
John Herconis's niece. So they were intermarrying with
these Edomites. These the people of Judah were
intermarrying with the Edumians because they were all the same
religion. So it didn't matter.
God loves everybody, I guess started back then.
So Herod had a a woman of Judah, the niece of the high priest for
a for a wife, and he nevertheless turned traitor,
sided with the Romans. Judea was defeated, it fell to
Roman rule, and Herod was appointed its king.
When he was appointed its king, he wiped out the nobility of
Judah. He wiped out the family, the
high priest, he killed his own wife.
Now I'm condensing about 25 years of history here, right?
He killed his own wife, that daughter of the niece of the
high priest that he married. He killed her.
He killed the sons that he had with her.
He wiped out the entire nobility, and he and Edumian
became the king of Judea. Judea was the Roman name for the
province. That's what they called it.
They called it Judea and it incorporated Galilee and Judah
proper and the coasts that belong formally to Israel and to
the Philistines in ancient times, and also Edumia.
And you could look up Judea on Wikipedia and even Wikipedia
admits that Edumia is part of Judea.
So at what point did my ancestors stop being German?
I, I would probably say when my German grandfather married my
Irish grandmother and they weren't really German.
My father's not really German because he's half Irish.
So at what point does a Judahite no longer be be a Judahite?
Because he's mixed with all these other races and they mixed
with the Edumians and they've mixed with a lot of other races
since the fall of Jerusalem, which isn't even really
pertinent to this conversation. When does a a Judahite stop
being a Judahite? How many times has he has to
race mix? Of course there aren't any Jews
that are Judah. There aren't any Jews that are
Judah. None 0 Not one of them can claim
I'm of Judah because he's a bastard.
He's mixed in with not only a Dunians, but all of these other
races along the way. How could it be a Judah?
How could Christians think they're a Judah?
They're not so Christ. The ministry of Christ comes.
Christ and all of his apostles are born into this new
multicultural Roman province of Judea, where you have Edomites
in the South. Just before you continue,
William, if you don't mind, at this point you're talking about
the various people groups. How, how did they look?
Did they all look similar or did they look quite?
Different the apostles couldn't tell them apart.
John marvelled at Christ for being able to know what what was
in a man. He knew what they were he he
could tell them apart. He's God.
The apostles couldn't tell them apart.
Even Judas, at the night of the Last Supper, Christ told Judas,
go do what you have to do, because Christ knows he's going
to betray him and bring the high priests and the armies of
Jerusalem in on him. He knows it's going to happen.
It doesn't happen until they get to the garden of Dissammanae,
but Judas is there and he brings these armies with them.
Christ knew what he was going to do.
But if you read the Gospel of John, when Christ told that to
Judas, the apostles imagined that Judas was going to give
money to the poor or to do something good.
And John discusses this in his gospel.
I think it's might be in chapter 14, chapter 15.
I forget chapter 17, maybe. I really don't remember where
stuff is in the Bible as well as I remember what's in the Bible.
So I think it's chapter 17 or 18, the scene at the guard,
just, well, it's in chapter 14, perhaps the Last Supper scene
where the apostles imagined that Judas was going to do good
things and instead he went to betray Christ.
But the apostles didn't see that coming, right?
So that being said, Christ and the apostles were born into this
multicultural Judea, which was now a Roman province.
And the Romans drew the lines and said this is Judea and
everybody that lives in here is a Judean.
And all the people that lived in there, whether they converted to
Hebrewism or not, they eventually became associated
with all of these other Judeans who were mixed races.
There was still some pure Judahites at the time of Christ,
and there were a lot of Edomites in Judea, probably a predominant
population of Edomites in Judea at the time of Christ, along
with other Ishmaelites, Canaanites, people from other
ancient tribes that but themselves by that time were
mixed so. Because so, so, so did they look
different like the Edomites and the Ishmaelites, etcetera?
That the Edomites and the Ishmaelites all that time would
have been virtually indistinguishable from the
Judahites in that time. They were still white.
That there were no big infusions of blood from sub-Saharan Africa
that had come into the Arab world, but not until the rise of
Islam. And that's what a lot of people
don't understand is that the ancient Near East and the
ancient Middle East were white, predominantly white until the
rise of Islam. Egypt and Ethiopia were
originally white, but they went darker a lot sooner that they
had large influxes of Nubian blood.
Probably as soon as these. Well, Ethiopia even sooner.
But Egypt during the reign of the 25th dynasty, the Kushite
dynasty. The Kushites were originally
white. They were from Mesopotamia.
They mixed themselves with the Nubians and invaded Egypt, and
they were both Kushite and Nubian soldiers in Egypt under
the 25th dynasty. So that brought a lot of black
blood into Egypt, probably in the 7th century BC.
And can I just quickly add to what you're saying in terms of
how demographics can change, My own country, South Africa, 500
years ago had no white people, and now it has a substantial
white population. So it's very easy for this kind
of thing to happen, right? Going back to the 1st century
Paul of Tarsus in Romans Chapter 9, he's writing that in 57 AD.
Yes, I can date it pretty accurately.
He he, he writes in Chapter 9 and in chapter 4 he writes about
the promises to Abraham and he explains that the promises to
Abraham that his seed would become a multitude of nations
was already fulfilled by his time as it is written.
In other words, the Catholic Church teaches that people of
other nations can become Abraham's seed if they believe
in Jesus. But that's not what Paul said.
Paul said in Romans chapter 4 that the promises are fulfilled
as it is written, which means that there are no substitutes
for Abraham's seed. Abraham himself tried to
substitute for a seed by one of his own wider kinsmen, and he
was rejected. So as it is written means that
the people who are Christians today, true Christians, are
Abraham's physical seed. And Paul was writing to Romans,
and I could discuss at great length how that happens in
history, but that's definitely a topic for another time.
In Romans Chapter 9, Paul said that he prays for his brethren,
for his kinsmen according to the flesh, his kinsmen according to
the flesh or his brethren, the people of his same race and
family are his brethren, that they would accept Christianity.
And basically I'm summarizing. And and then he went on in the
same place to discuss the promises, and he said they are
not all Israel who are in or of Israel.
And he went on to compare Jacob and Esau.
Why would Paul compare Jacob and Esau in that context?
Praying for his kinsmen according to the flesh.
And the answers are found in not only Flavius Josephus, but also
in Strabo of Cappadocia. Strabo of Cappadocia was a Greek
geographer. And when and and.
He has no axe to grind. Strabo died in 25 AD.
He was a Pagan Greek, he was a Stoic.
He had nothing to do with Judaism, Christianity.
He had no dog in a race. And he explained that Edomites
and Judea were all living in Judea, sharing the same customs.
But Ptolemy, I have a citation here, but I only have the
citation in Greek. I don't know if it exists in any
English work. It it's, I don't know if there's
an extant translation in English, so I had to translate
it myself. But people that know me, people
that know me would understand that I could do that, right?
So Ptolemy, Ptolemy, I don't have a degree.
I'm sorry. Ptolemy said Edumians and
Judeans are different. At first, concerning Herod the
king, he said that because Herod, when he became king, took
all of his own cronies and appointed them into all the
positions of power. After he wiped out the nobility,
he appointed all of his Edomite buddies into all the positions
of power and they became the first black nobility.
They became the new nobility of Judea, and they were the
nobility from that time forward. So Ptolemy recognize the
differences here, understood they were historical differences
in these people. In Judea the Christians don't
consider, even though these things are mentioned in
encyclopedias on Wikipedia. Even Christians don't consider
the consequences when it comes to the Jews being God's chosen
people. They just accept that blindly as
if all all Jews are Judah. It's not true.
Dunians and Judeans are different at first concerning
Herod the King. Indeed there are Judeans who
from the beginning are natives. Now Ptolemy is writing before
the time of Christ. However, Edumians in the
beginning are certainly not Judeans, but Phoenicians and
Syrians. Now Ptolemy was confused but
about the identity of the Edumians, and he tried to
describe them in Greek terms from a Greek outsider's
perspective, but he recognized that they weren't Judeans.
And it goes on to say that he had been.
They had been ruled over by them, meaning by the Judeans,
and compelled to be circumcised and to enjoin in the customs,
and having been raised in these practices they are called
Judeans. That's very similar to what
Strabo of Cappadocia had written concerning the Edumians and the
Judeans all living in Judea, dwelling and sharing in the same
customs. And that's in Strabos geography.
In Book 16, there were two passages that say essentially
the same thing. So there's all sorts of
historical witnesses to this, but Flavius Josephus gives us
all of the historical details. He doesn't discuss the politics
behind the scenes as to how those policies evolved.
He does say that at the time of John Hakanis that that's where
he puts the beginning of the parties of the Pharisees and the
Sadducees. That's when political parties
arose in Judea at the same time that this was going on.
And in my opinion, the word Pharisee means separatist.
That's what it means. That's not an opinion, that's a
fact. And in my opinion, they took
that name because they were originally the racial purists,
the separatists to stay separate from the Edomites.
And eventually they only became religious purists, kind of like
American politicians do They change, they change their their
fundamentals to adapt to the situation.
Instead of keeping their principles, they just change
them to adapt them to a historical situation.
They they that that is basically negotiating with the world.
It's caving in to the, to the what's going on in the world.
It's not Christian at all, so Christians should not consider
these Jews who are primarily Edomites and Christ spoke in
Revelation chapter 2. Chapter 3.
These quotes are very common in our circles.
Those who say they are Judeans but are not, but are the
synagogue of Satan. But William, this is a this is a
hard sell because just about every single Bible.
Has the word Jew in it? Yes, and it's wrong.
It should never be there. It it is true that Jew is sort
of a slang shortening of the word Judean.
That's how that worked out in history.
But the Jews aren't Judah. Judea was the name of a
multicultural Roman province. You can.
Jesus was, and Jesus was was the king of the Judeans.
Yes, he was the king of the Judeans because that was also
the the word used for Judah. But he was he never called
himself the Judeans. He never called himself that.
None of his disciples ever called him that.
His enemies called him that pilot called him.
That pilot was a Roman, based on the claims of his enemies.
Obviously. So where does the word Jew come
from then, and how? For how long has it been in the
English language? It's been in the English
language since the first Bibles. It was i.e.
Wes Jews in in. If you open a Geneva Bible or an
older Bible than that because there were some English Bibles
before the Geneva Bible in 1560, i.e.
Wes is Jews UES and it's a contraction for you Daheus,
which is what the text says. You die here for Judean or for
Judea. You Daheus for Judean, for
Judean man. So you die here was sort of
contracted into you ES or Jews. What we say I was Jews back in
in in German, AJ, when it appears at the beginning of a
word is an I sound or AY if it's followed by a vowel, right?
And and that's also the case in English.
The J letter didn't appear in printing until the 16th century,
I believe, And before that it was always an I.
So you daya so. But why did they use the word
Jew? Was it sloppy translation work?
Yeah, you know, ever since the 2nd century, the apostles did
not teach that the Jews were God's chosen people.
They never taught that they only were sent to the people of Judea
in general and to to the European world.
So that's another long story. But the people of Judea were
Israelites and Edomites, and the apostles didn't have the ability
to tell them apart. If if an Edomite said I'm a
Judean, it was commonly accepted because that was the political
circumstance of the time. And if you can't prove he's not
an Edomite, then you just have to accept him as a fellow
Judean. So the apostles preach to
everybody. But Christ said my sheep hear my
voice in John chapter 10. And he told his adversaries who
rejected him, You do not believe me, because you're not my sheep.
So we have to. If you go through the book of
Acts, you'll see in Acts chapter 20 or 21 when James is talking
to Paul of Tarsus, it's in Acts chapter 21.
He says look at how many converts there are, meaning
Christians. And Speaking of Jerusalem, he
explained them as myriads. There were myriads of Christians
in Judea in 58 AD, which is when that conversation happened.
Myriads are 10 thousands in the plural.
So it's 10 thousands and then some that there was a a very
large following. There were very many thousands
of Christians. The Jews want to obscure this
history. They don't want you to know
this. They were in the minority for a
great number of years in the Christian period.
And the Jews had used the Romans to persecute Christians, and
early Christian apologists had written that the Roman
persecutions of Christians were all instigated by the Jews.
And that's written in Tertullian in his Apology and by Minutius
Felix in his Apology. And that's two Christian writers
of the late 3rd century, ADI believe.
If Jesus was not a Jew, what was he?
Christ was of Judah, but you can't say that he was a Jew
because the people that we identify as Jews are from that
mixed race polyglot. And OK, right now I'm, I was
born in Virginia Beach, OK, I was grew up in Jersey City.
I spent most of my life in Jersey City, NJ, the first, most
of my first 36 years of life. So maybe I would have associated
myself as a New Jerseyan In the 1960s, Jersey City was almost
all white. There was only one small little
section of, of Negroes. So when you said I'm from Jersey
City, back then most people would assume that you're white.
But today Jersey City is like predominantly black and
Hispanic, and the whites are a minority.
So if I say from Jersey City, you might say, well, what are
you? Well, what are you?
If you want to know, if you want to know what my background was
or or who I was and you didn't see me, you'd say, well, what
are you? I have to say, well, I'm
Hispanic or I'm black or I'm Irish or whatever.
And the word Jew should not be in the Bible.
All throughout the Old Testament, wherever the word Jew
appears, it should be Judahite or Judea.
And all throughout the New Testament, wherever the word Jew
appears, it should be Judean. That's the meaning of the
original Greek term, which is simply, at that time, in its
proper historical context, A multicultural Roman province.
That's what Judea was. Now, I've got a Bible.
It's an interlinear Bible, and a lot of people don't know what
that is, but it's effectively a a very direct translation of
Hebrew and Greek, and it doesn't have the word Jew in it anyway.
In the Old Testament or the New Testament, it uses, as you just
said, Judahite, Judean, Edomite even.
Right. And and that that's a better
Bible. It really is, because it doesn't
create a lie that these Jews are God's chosen people.
They're not and and they've mixed with many other people
along the way. Jews were in Arabia mixing with
Arabs. Jews were in Khazaria mixing
with Khazars and and Turks and people of other races.
Jews race mixed wherever they went.
How many times or over how many centuries can you race mix and
get away with identifying yourself at as a as a Judean, as
a Judahite, as a child of Abraham when the Bible forbids
that race mixing? They're not Judah.
So you mentioned Jacob. You mentioned Jacob and and Esau
earlier and in the Bible it says that God loved Jacob and hated
Esau. Yes, because God knew Esau was a
race mixer, that he would be. He would marry Canaanite woman.
So he hated him even while he was in the womb.
Now Esau had had sold his birthright to Jacob for a pot of
porridge, and that might be true, but that's not why he lost
his inheritance. It says very explicitly in
Genesis, and this is in Genesis chapters 2627 and 28, I believe,
from the end of 26 to the beginning of chapter 28.
And I'm going to check myself on that real quick.
Well, not on that screen, I'm sorry.
Well, anyway, in Scripture Rebecca explains that her heart
is troubled on account of the daughters of hath.
I'm sorry, that's at the very end of Genesis chapter 27.
And her heart was troubled on account of the daughters of
hath. If Jacob takes a wife of the
daughters of hath, such as these which are daughters of the land,
what good shall my life do me? She despaired of her own life.
If Jacob took wives of the Canaanites, The daughters of
hath were Hittites. They were a branch of the
Canaanites. If you go back to Genesis
chapters 2627, you'll see that Esau took his wives of the
Hittites and that troubled his mother Rebecca, who thought that
her life was good for nothing if Jacob did the same thing.
So Rebecca and compelled Jacob to steal his brother's blessing
when his father, who is old and frail and blind went to bless
his sons. Jacob got the blessing because
Rebecca wanted Jacob to have the blessing because Esau was a race
mixer period. So when that's all said and
done, and this is not Genesis 28, I believe it's at the
beginning of Genesis chapter 29. No, I'm sorry, it is 28.
I don't remember this right. I can't remember where stuff is
in the Bible. I just remember the Bible.
So I'm sorry. At the beginning of Genesis
chapter 28. And Isaac called Jacob and
blessed him and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not
take a wife of the daughters of Canaan, because Esau had done
that. Jacob.
I was getting this instruction from his father, but his mother
was the one that realized it and said, Hey, Jacob can't do this
like Esau did his mother. His mother basically saved the
family. Lies Danaram to the House of
Bethewell, my mother's father and take a wife from Nets of the
daughters of the bond, my mother's brother and they were
Lebanon in scriptures called Lebanon the Syrian.
The Syrians were kindred people to the Hebrews, but Lebanon was
really only a Syrian by geography because they lived in
the far north in Padanaram, which is on the other side of
the Euphrates River. It's quite far north in the
foothills of the Caucasus Mountains and and not too far
from the Black Sea. Padanaram was a plain, it's
called Plain of Arum and it was a plain just South of the
foothills of the Caucasus Mountains.
And, and that's where Abraham was from.
That was where a lot of the Hebrews dwelled that didn't have
like a demarcated country of their own, right.
Not every tribe gets their own nation, right.
You should know that being being South African and and European,
that even in Europe not every tribe got its own nation.
They were folded in a lot of them to other bigger tribes,
more powerful tribes like the the the Germans are Saxons and
Swabby and and several other tribes all allied in Germany and
and under one culture and language basically.
Well, the language thing's a complicated story, but.
But what about all the customs that you read about in the
Bible? Circumcision was a way to
preserve the race. Circumcision ensured that when a
woman became a man's wife that she knew she was marrying an
Israelite and not an Edomite or or somebody of a Canaanite or
somebody of another race. The Egyptians were already
practicing circumcision even before Moses had it as a law.
So circumcision and circumcision wasn't the circumcision that we
have today, and I don't want to get too much into the anatomy of
a man's penis, but circumcision, the way the Hebrews had
practiced it, only cut the skin from the tip of the foreskin
that extends beyond the head of the penis.
You only cut that off. And Josephus wrote that Judeans
were able to pull down the foreskin to, to appear as if
they were not circumcised because a lot of the Judeans
wanted in in the in the 1st century BC, a lot of the Judeans
had Hellenized and wanted to appear to be Greeks.
And you can see that in the New Testament.
There's a lot of figures in the New Testament who have Greek
names. Mark the apostle Mark, that's a
Greek name. And Mark was a cousin of of
Peter and his original name was Simon, which which was a a
Hebrew name and and Simon eventually got into Greece too,
actually in the in BC a long time ago.
But Simon was originally a Hebrew name, Simeon and and Mark
was a Greek name. A lot of the people in the New
Testament who are Hebrews had Greek names and were Hellenized
to a degree. So, Josephus wrote, the Judean
men can draw down their foreskin to appear not to be circumcised.
But what about the other customs that will that you'll often get
told about? Well, I mean, the animal
sacrifice and just about everything else the Hebrews did
were also extant in the wider Mesopotamian and and Greek
world. The Greeks sacrificed animals.
The Greeks did a lot of those same Pagan practices which had
come from Mesopotamia because that's where they came from.
The Greeks came from Mesopotamians and from
Israelites, depending on which tribe of Greek we're talking
about. So they kept a lot of those same
customs. The Romans kept a lot of those
customs, the Pagan customs that they're not.
Most of those customs are not peculiar to Hebrews.
The circumcision custom was peculiar to Hebrews and to
ancient Egyptians. That is true.
So Herodotus explains, and and this is also found elsewhere,
especially in Josephus, that the Tyrians practice circumcision.
The Tyrians were the famous mother city of the Phoenicians
that had colonies all throughout the Mediterranean.
They were Israelites. That's why they practice
circumcision. The Canaanites didn't practice
circumcision. Yeah.
You know, it's amazing to me that for 300 years Jews
persecuted Christianity, and then as soon as the persecutions
ended, Christians esteemed the Jews as authorities on
Scripture. How could that be?
But they did. Because most Christians couldn't
read Hebrew, they turned to the Jews as authorities on Scripture
and the meanings of the Hebrew words.
And speaking to those Jews, you would believe that the Jews were
God's chosen people. The Church has held that view
for 17 and in some cases 1800 years.
And it's not the view of the original apostles of Christ who
understood was a mixed race society.
But wasn't Jesus also referred to as Rabbi?
Yeah, but that's an old Hebrew term that means teacher.
The Jews, the Edomites, I can't say that they adopted the Hebrew
language. In ancient Mesopotamia there was
something called the Akkadian Empire in the third Millennium
BC. I'm going back to about 2425
hundred BC, and the kings of the Acadian Empire compelled all of
their subjects to speak Acadian. So all of the Canaanite tribes
who had their own languages, native languages that are now
for the most part lost. There are some remnants of the
Hittite language that had been discovered in inscriptions, but
for the most part the Canaanite languages are lost to history.
The Syrians, which is primarily the tribe of Arum from Scripture
and Aram is translated Syria in English Bibles, which is wrong
to do, but they've done it the and that's common.
So the the Syrians and the Assyrians and the Hebrews and
the Canaanite tribes and the Edomites and even some of the
Ishmaelite tribes that were all at one time or another subjects
of the Akkadian Empire. Akkadian became the lingua
franca of the ancient world, and it remained the lingua franca,
meaning the language of trade and diplomacy from perhaps 2500
BC all the way to the end of the Assyrian period and the 8th and
7th centuries BC when Aramaic eclipsed it.
But Aramaic was just another dialect of Acadian.
They have a a plethora of common words, common roots common.
They have common grammar. So Hebrew is a dialect of
Acadian. The original Edomite language
was a dialect of Bacadian and and they spoke Aramaic.
And that's why from the the Jewish period, Hebrew was fate
had phased itself out and the rabbis of the Talmud wrote in
Aramaic. They don't write in Hebrew.
And isn't ancient Celtic quite similar to ancient Hebrew?
I've never studied ancient Celtic, but a lot of other
identity Christians have, and they've drawn a lot of
parallels. And I have some of that
literature on on my website, books written in the 1800s,
several of them comparing Celtic to Hebrew, the ancient Gaelic
languages, or the Welsh language to Hebrew.
Yes, but this. Why would that then be
significant? Why would it be significant is
because, as I had said, the Tyrians were circumcised.
They were, they were Israelites. They weren't Canaanites, which
is what the Jews want you to believe.
Because the Phoenicians had settled not only the the islands
of the Mediterranean and the coast of Africa, they settled a
great part of the river valleys in modern France.
The the Siberian peninsula, Ireland and and Cornwall in
Wales and probably points beyond that.
We're all established by the Phoenicians.
The ancient Greek writers wrote of the Phoenician tin mines in
Cornwall and the islands off the coast of of Britain.
So it could be established pretty well in history that the
Phoenicians had settlements in all of those places.
Once you make that realization you must conclude that the
people that are known as proto Celts by anthropologists today
were Phoenicians and Israelites. The Kamarians, the the word for
Kamarian is Kimaroy in Greek and it was Komri in Assyrian.
And Qomri is the identification, the Assyrian identification of
the Israelites they took into captivity.
The Kamarians are Israelites and they were the first of the
Germanic tribes to cross into Europe and settled in Germany.
And they didn't only settle in Germany, they were also went to
Britain and and points beyond Germany.
The the Romans were fighting the Camarians in Germany in in the
1st century, 2nd century AD. I'm sorry, maybe the 1st century
BC the Romans were fighting the Camarians in in and living and
other Roman historians record those battles and they identify
them as Camarians. They're the Comrie.
Later waves were called Sacca and Skidians of Israelites from
the captivities into Europe, but the first wave was called the
Kumari or the Kamarians. How is this relevant today?
It's relevant today because most of the white evangelicals who
think that Jews are God's chosen people and thereby the enemies
of Christ, have political preeminence in the entire world
today. You must understand that they
are actually God's chosen people and that the enemies of Christ
were considered by Christ himself to be devils.
And these eat of my Jews who have rejected Christ for 80
generations are never going to be converted to Christ because
they're not his sheep as he told them.
He was never intent on converting them.
He confronted them and made an example of them, as Paul of
Tarsus explains, but he was never intent on converting them.
They can't be converted. Does that therefore suggest that
Israel today doesn't have a the the Jews don't have a claim to
Israel today? No, not on the basis of
Scripture, no, they had no claim because Esau shouldn't have been
there in the 1st place. But there is a, a prophecy in
Malachi chapter 1, which is really, really interesting and,
and I would like to take a moment with that it it's if you
don't mind, because this describes what we know is
Christian Zionism perfectly. It describes it perfectly.
Malachi chapter 1, the burden of the word of Yahweh to Israel by
Malachi, I have loved you saith Yahweh.
Yet you say, wherein has thou loved us?
Was not Esau Jacob's brother, saith Yahweh.
Yet I love Jacob, and I hated Esau and laid his mountains and
his heritage waste for the Dragons of the wilderness.
Speaking about the original land of Edom, what's going on there?
What's going on there is Yahweh, God telling Israel that he loves
Israel, and Israel saying, hey, what about Esau?
Wasn't he Israel's brother? And that's exactly what's going
on in the world today, where these unwittingly unknowing
Israelites, descendants of the true Israelites, are pointing at
these Jews, descendants of Esau, and saying, don't you love them?
God loves them. There is chosen people, Malachi.
Malachi right there describes that situation and then it goes
on. Whereas a Dom says we are
impoverished but we will return and build the desolate places,
saith Yahweh of hosts. They shall build but I will
throw down. What's that talking about?
There were no desolate places ever rebuilt since Malachi's
time, except for the desolate places that Christ said to the
Jews, His enemies. Your house is left to you
desolate. Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, the
modern cities of today are the desolate places rebuilt by these
Edomite Jews. In Malachi chapter 1, Malachi
explains exactly what's going on in the world today in those few
short verses. Do you think that some Christian
and Jewish elite know this? I think they do.
I think they do Jews right in, in, in their own publications.
I'm, I'm, I'm going to, I can't, I don't have this like in my
wallet. I can pull it out.
In the 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia there's an article and it says a
Dom is found in modern jewelry. Well, I would agree with that,
but I would also say that my jewelry is basically a Dom mixed
with a lot of other races that aren't Israel.
Yeah, there's some Judahite in there.
Some Judahites as as I discussed with the family of John
Hurricanes too, some Judahites intermingled with the Edomites
to become Jews. So they had some Judahite blood
among them, but they're they're a majority at that time of these
Edomite mongrels. So now today, I can't imagine
any of them are pure Judahites. My most rational conclusion is
Jesus was not a Jew who for for all those reasons, he was not a
Jew because he's not a mixed race Edomite.
He is a true Judean or Judahite. He's a pure member of the tribe
of Judah as opposed to these mixed people of the of Roman
Judea. His parents, too, obviously.
Right, he's not a Jew, and and he's certainly not a Jew at
heart. Everything in the Talmud is 100%
diametrically opposed to everything in the Torah.
The The entire spirit of the Talmud is diabolical.
If people would actually go to safaria.org and read it, anybody
could read it for themselves. That the the Talmud is a
complete perversion of the law of God that actually inverts it
in many ways. Where the Rabbi's are actually
justifying sin and some highest sins and using their perceived
position as the people of God. They want to use that position
in the Talmud to rule over all the nations.
Every Jew is going to have hundreds or thousands of goyum
slaves and and it's horrible. What is your website, William?
How can I follow your work? Crystalgenia.org.
That's Christ, CHRISTOGENEA, crystal Genia.
And that word has three different meanings.
It means it can mean race of Christ, it can mean birth of
Christ or it can mean anointed race.
OK, well, on that note, William Pink, thank you.
Thank you for joining me in the trenches.