Good afternoon. Today is Monday the 29th of
April 2024, just after one o 'clock. Welcome
to UK Column News. I'm your host, Brian Garrish,
and I'm delighted today to be joined by Diane McCaddy,
speaking from Scotland, and Mark Anderson, speaking from
the United States. Welcome to you both. So,
Diane, we're going to bring you in straight away
because we've got some really interesting events
unfolding north of the border, and it looks as
though Humza is a little bit wobbly. It
looks like he has finally fallen off his scooter once
and for all, Brian. I'm really happy to say that.
So, just to summarize how we
got to this point, just an hour ago, he officially
announced Invute House, which is the official
residence of the First Minister of Scotland, that
he is stepping down as First Minister and will
only remain in post until his replacement is found.
It's been an interesting several
days in Scottish politics, and I've been watching it
very closely. It started out with their
fallout with the Scottish Greens, where they were
looking at the climate issues. So,
the Greens were saying they wanted this net zero agenda
to go on, and S &P were saying it's not possible.
So, S &P pulled out of that
agreement, which made them a majority coalition
government in Scotland. But it seems as though the
issue with the climate has not been the only thing.
There's also been the gender
identity issues, which again, the Greens and the
S &P were having some issues around agreeing on,
but really they should have been a nationalist party,
but they were putting all of these identity politics
in front of the idea of nationalism and in Scottish
independence. So, there have been two
confidence votes that were supposed to be coming up
this week in Scotland. One started by the Tories,
which was no confidence in the First Minister himself.
The second one was the
government in general, which is going to be brought
forth by Labour. The Greens said over the
weekend that they would vote against any vote of
confidence in favour of Hamza or in favour of
anything that he's supporting. And
because of the way the mathematics works out,
there's no way that he could get enough votes
needed. There was the possibility of
Ashregan who defected to the Alba Party, which is
Alex Simmons also nationalist party a while
ago, but she did not also agree with what he was
doing. He certainly wasn't on the
side of the Tories because they all said that, you
know, why should we support him when he's been calling
in the last several months to get all Tory MSPs out
of Scotland, kind of forgetting that we are
still part of the UK up here. So,
it seems as though he just doesn't have enough friends
or anyone backing him. So, he really didn't have any
choice, Brian, but to step down. Incredible
events and I'm going to be watching it with interest
because I felt for a great many years that the aim of
politics inside UK was to break the union apart. And
so, further trouble inside Scotland itself, I think is
welcomed by many people who are following the globalist
agenda. That's my personal opinion. And
let's move on to the subject of universities and
academics because some of his policies been impinging
on that, I believe. Yeah, absolutely. And
just as a bit of a segue into that, I was watching
the resignation speech that he just gave leading up to
coming under the news. And what he was straight into
what I'm going to talk about, quote, people who
looked like me, so not white, were not in
positions of political influence, let alone leading
governments when I was younger. But
we now live in a UK that has a British Hindu Prime
Minister, a Black Welsh First Minister, and for a
little while longer, a Scottish Asian First
Minister of this country. So,
for those who decry that multiculturalism has failed
across the UK, I would suggest the evidence is
quite the contrary. And that is something we should
all celebrate. So what happened recently is
this was in the Daily Mail just over the weekend.
What's happening is that academics
across the UK are getting cut, their jobs are getting
cut, including people like me, saying that they are
in favour of hiring DEI consultants, executives, with
their salaries exceeding, you know, up to 100 ,000
pounds a year, which is even more than a professor
like me makes. And so the vice chancellors are
doing this in favour of subject -based academics and
subject -based teaching. And so this is really difficult
for a lot of reasons. We don't really know what
universities are prioritising, but what I
want to talk about in relation to that is what's
happening in the schools at lower levels in the UK and
what students are going to be learning in schools and
what they reach university level. So
as a result of all this with the departments being
shut down with academics who have subject expertise
being cancelled or losing their jobs completely, the
EDI, Equality, Diversity, Inclusion, and Workforce
seems to be increasing while those of us with
subject expertise appear to be going away. So
here I would like to bring in Dr. Alka
Kuthbert. She is, her family is from
India originally. She's British. She
has been cancelled several times for making people
feel unsafe because she doesn't believe in
discrimination one way or the other. In
fact, she can see that she's the director of this
organisation based in London, Club Dome, Dividus,
which is really, truly based on equality and let's
all work together. Everyone has something important to
say. Everyone has value. We
don't need to be prioritising one way or the
other on issues of race. So
next I'd like to show a video that, thankfully, my
husband John McCathey recorded and edited. I
was presenting with her in March at a Scottish Union
for Education event and I'd just like to play first a
short clip of what she said in our session and
then I'd like to talk about that a bit. They
sat and listened. They sat and allowed themselves
to be lectured in the head for two hours and then all
the primary school teachers were given boxes to go to
their classrooms and remove every book that was not
racially representative. So, which they did and the
fact that the friend that told me this, who was a
teacher there, was almost tears as she was taking
about. So ashamed. She
said she felt violated because she had spent so
many years working up lesson plans and schemes of
work and she knew the books that she had were
traditional fairy tales and stories of the kind of
books that Cambridge and Oxbridge neuroscientists are
now saying helps children read and they were going
to get moved in. They had to think of other
books to replace them with. That
was the afternoon session once they got rid of their
books. And of course, you know, there
isn't, you know, probably there may well be books of
authors by of color which are brilliant, which are
lovely, but the work hasn't been done to look for
them. There's been no actual research or
scholarly work done on looking for them. It's
just find anybody with the right skin color and the
right mongingly Western name. And
you get Laura, what's the name? Alan
Henry Allen type books in there? Like
Stuart said, you cannot educate if this belief
system is allowed to continue. And
that's my concern is that, you know, we're replacing
education, subject -based education, actually teaching
students to be able to do things with these ideologies
and these beliefs. And so as a discussant in that
panel, what I did was I replied with an academic
paper that I have known for several years, which
comes out of cognitive psychology in the 1970s,
which found it's been cited maybe 10 ,000 times in the
academic literature, very well tested. And
what they found was that children describe things
with natural categories. So somebody sees a person as
a child who hasn't learned that, you know, people are
supposed to have different labels or go into different
categories. You see a person, you say
that's a person, you don't say that's a black person
or a white person, you don't say it's a mammal,
you say it's somewhere that is the most recognizable
category. And so from that, we can see
that it just doesn't make any sense, even from a
learning or cognition perspective, to be able to
teach students or to be able to tell them, this
person is black, this person is white, this
person is this other thing. But
what is the literature saying in more recent times
from education and from my field of informatics? Well,
we're looking at how to teach children to be anti
-racist, which of course is racist in itself, because
we're saying that people are different for different
reasons, and mainly because of their skin color. So
we're talking here about how to use books to teach
black children that they are different or different
people of different races are different. And
here's why. This one was a particularly
interesting paper using anti -racism educational methods
during COVID, right? So everything was bad enough
during COVID for education. And
now we've got to put anti -racism on top of teaching
students that were all dying from this apparently
raging pandemic. So the layers of
interestingness, I guess you could say, just get worse
and worse. I have a couple of these
books that I actually have here in print next to me.
This one is one from Laura
Henry Allen, who was the author that Dr. Cufford
mentioned in the segment I showed, called My Skin Your
Skin. And I'm not sure how well you
can see the picture I've taken from one of those
pages. But what you can see is that
the word white, my cousin is white, is a lowercase
w. And you can see my friend is
black is an uppercase and the same with Chinese and
the same with Ghanaian. So we can see here the agenda
going back to Hans's point around multiculturalism and
different people of different races being in
charge. And we can see what's happening
to what is traditionally a white country here in the
UK. The next one I have here is a
lift the flap questions and answers about racism. So
we're talking about children who are reading picture
books young enough to have things like pop -ups and
lift -ups and things where we would expect children to
be learning about, you know, what were the
dinosaurs? What are the seasons of the
year? The things that we expect
children to need to learn at very young ages. Now
we're teaching them how to be activists. And
it says there how to become part of the
situation. So again, we're teaching them
once again that they have to show that they're
different. They have to do these different
things. Here's one from children who are
maybe a few years older about how to do art
projects that allow us to explore anti -racism. And
this is from a chapter on advocacy from the book. So
we see here that it's not just about anti -racism.
It's about all of the social
justice issues that they're supposed to be concerned
with. So instead of making, you
know, creative art projects that express whatever it is
that they're interested in, there's a whole list of
all of the things that adults don't even know what
to do with addiction, ageism, animal oil for
bullying, censorship, guidance, civil rights, it
goes on and on. And so these are all the
things that these kids are encouraged to do art
projects about including a specific set of instructions
about how to make that black fist fighting for
equity. And remember equity and equality
are different things. We are teaching equity, not
equality. And this is what our children
are expected to be exposed to as they grow up
nowadays. So, Brian, I don't know about
you, but I'm happy that I grew up in a different
generation. Diane, thank you very much. Well,
yes, I think I could say that as well as we see
things unfold around us. But
it's very interesting as you were talking through in
detail about what you're seeing and what's in the
books for very young children. Somebody
commented in our chat box and said it's cultural
revolution unfolding right in front of our eyes. And
that is exactly what it is. And
I'll say I'm very encouraged that here we are
in 2024. And it's obvious that many,
many people are seeing that something's wrong and many
people are starting to see exactly what it is. But
what is situation north of the border that we've now
got the friction between the identity of people is
dominating politics, not solving everyday problems of
who's got a job, who's got a house to live in, who
can feed themselves. This has all been overtaken by
the woke agenda. And at the same time, we're
now starting to get rid of academics from the
institutions which should be providing the best education
for our children. It's pretty extraordinary. Dianne,
a quick question for you. Are
there other professionals around you who are also
seeing this? So I know that you've said
before you're feeling quite isolated, but are there any
other academics standing up? Not
that I've seen. Obviously, a friend of the column
like Norman Benton, but he's retired. He
has the freedom to do this. I
do belong to a couple of organizations one is called
the Academics for Academic Freedom. So
I'm on the member of the steering committee of the
Edinburgh branch up here. I'm
also a member of the Scottish Union for
Education, but of course, that entails all levels of
education, not just universities. So
those of us in the Academics for Academic
Freedom group are doing what we can, but we are a
very, very small minority and a big sea of people
that are just going right along with the agenda. And
I don't think that they're seeing what's coming for
them, unfortunately. Okay, Dianne, thank you very much
for that report. Keep going. Now,
we're just going to move over to Ukraine, which is
obviously a horrific war ongoing minute by minute,
hour by hour, day by day. But
of course, in the West, in general, the legacy media
simply not reporting reality. But
unfortunately, this is also the case by the Ukrainians
own internal media. So let's have a look at a
couple of reports. The Kiev independent we've used
before. So if you have a look at the
sidebar, it's talking about Latvia donating energy
equipment to Ukraine. After Russian attacks on
infrastructure, it's talking about military intelligence
where telegram is blocking several Ukrainian government
chatbots. It's got general staff telling
or claiming that Russia has lost 467 ,000 plus troops
in Ukraine since February the 24th, 2022. And
it goes on to talk about the actual number of
Russians killed in Ukraine. But
of course, the reality is that Ukraine is suffering
very badly on the front. Because
of the huge excess of Russian artillery over
Ukrainian artillery, and the fact that Ukraine is now
short of munitions, casualties on the Ukrainian
side, much higher than the Russians. Here's
the Kiev post just come on screen. Russia
must withdraw from Ukraine plain and simple. And
this is based on a statement by Zelensky. So
even in the Ukrainian media itself, we're not seeing
realistic reporting about what's actually happening on
the battlefield. All of the reports are as if
the war is continuing largely in Ukraine's favor.
And if it's not entirely in
their favor, it will be all right at some stage in
the future. And Ukraine will retake Crimea,
complete nonsense. If we have a look at Western
reports, I've just taken one newspaper article here.
If we can pop that one on
screen, please. Ukraine, Russia, war live. Putin's
troops advance as Kiev's commander -in -chief says the
frontline situation is worsening. Well,
this is the independent, they've virtually got it
there. But if we compare it with the
really accurate reports that have been coming in from
social media, so this is military summary channel,
we've got Weeb Union. What are they talking about
Russian breakthroughs on key areas of the front? And
of course, the Russians are managing to do this by the
fact that they can use an extraordinary amount of
artillery to destroy Ukrainian defensive positions
before they move forward. But
also it's now very clear that Russians are able to
deploy large numbers of very large guided aerial
bombs, which are simply destroying the Ukrainian
strongpoints. So massive Ukrainian casualties.
But this is not being reported
at all in Western media, or it appears in Ukrainian
media. If we have a look at the
UK's Ministry of Defence, really just pure propaganda,
I've chosen a little bit from the Twitter or X as
it's now called. But what are they talking
about? Since 2023, there's been a record
30 % increase in Russian men, aged 31 to 59, with
disabilities. So the British Ministry of
Defence crowing about injuries to Russian
servicemen and women, the one that's just come in on
screen, we've now got reports on the number of
civilians that have been killed in Ukrainian areas.
So there's nothing which is a
substance about the war on the ground. There
is nothing talking about the advances of the
Russians, which is now happening on an hour by
hour, day by day basis. So we pour in the weapons and
munitions, we extend the war, but the outcome is
clear. Ukraine is going to lose, and
Ukraine is being devastated as this happens. Now,
something that's been occurring over the last
couple of days that's caused the West immense
embarrassment is the fact that captured Western
equipment has now been taken to Russia. So
let's just play this little clip from the mail. I'll
talk you through it. But essentially, here is Western
equipment, which Russia has taken off the battlefield,
cleaned it up, and has now put it on display for
Russians to see that the Western wonder weapons,
including the German and the American main battle
tanks have simply failed to make any difference at all.
Abraham's on screen, and, sorry,
Leopard on screen, but also the Abraham's tanks have
completely failed to deliver the successes, which the
West and the US in particular, as said, would
come with the weapons. So as long as the war goes
on, and as long as the West, the UK, the US, and
the EU pump in the weapons, the more Ukrainians
are going to die, and the less is going to be left
to that country. Mark, I'm going to bring you in
at this point because you've been having a look
at really the emergence of a new Cold War. But
this one is a hot Cold War, if that's not too
confusing a statement. Thanks,
Brian. Good day to everyone. Yes,
the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, as I've
noted, is among the busiest, if not the
busiest, globalist think tanks in the entire world,
let alone in the United States. So
I follow them very closely. In
real time, I covered it firsthand last Thursday, I
believe it was, it was April 24, if memory serves.
But New Cold War is a
conversation with David Sanger, that's a referral
to a veteran New York Times reporter. New
Cold Wars in the plural means, as he explained to
Eval Dalder, the CEO of the Chicago Council, the
old Cold War was basically binary. The
US versus the USSR, and it was the arms race and that
big strategic standoff. The New Cold Wars is plural,
where the US is, or the West, you might say, led
by the US, is facing not just Russia, but China, and
now Iran is aligned with Russia and China. So
without going into too much geopolitical shuffling,
that's what David Sanger explained. This
slide here explains a little bit about David
Sanger himself. He's the White House and
national security correspondent for the Times,
reporting on President Biden and his administration with
a particular focus on foreign policy, and that
intersects with technology politics and superpower
conflict. He is a rather candid
reporter, and he had some things to say, Brian, that
underscore the idea that actually Russia is doing
quite well in this conflict and Ukraine is losing. He
didn't say Ukraine is absolutely losing, but he
did concede that they're not on the winning side.
This is a photo I took here, a
couple original photos through the screenshot
function of the program that's Sanger on the left
with Eval Dalder. Now moving on from there, I'll
just explain a couple things before we get into
a couple quick video clips. Another
thing that Mr. Sanger mentioned of interest,
you've reflected back to the George W. Bush
years of 2002, Brian, and mentioned that at that time
there was even a NATO Russia Council, which later
became the NATO Ukraine Council, no surprise there,
and there was US Russia counterterrorism coordination
meetings just after 9 -11, and Sanger was covering and
Russia was considering joining NATO back then. Mr.
Sanger reminded the audience, and
Russia was considering joining the European Union.
He's saying how quickly we
forget these strange geopolitical circumstances,
and he said that the West misread Putin, thinking that
he would not be aggressive militarily, that he would
not want to risk the oil and gas revenues that are
such an important part of the Russian economy. And
he also claimed that the US failed to understand
that China would act like it's democratizing its
country by allowing more local elections through
different means, but it was really just a steam valve,
and China was acting as if it's democratizing, but the
Chinese Communist Party actually isn't. That's
another point Mr. Sanger made, an interesting one
to consider. And now we'll play the video
clips, and then I'll have some commentary from there.
Bush and Putin were talking
about Putin joining the European Union. You
remember the discussions about whether Russia would
join NATO? There was a NATO -Russia Council
inside the gate of NATO. It's
now the NATO -Ukrainian Council, but at that time
it did not seem out of the realm of possibility
that they would join NATO. There's
a similar and parallel story we'll get to later
about China, but we went from that 22 years ago to
Putin warning in 2007 at the Munich Security
Conference that there were parts of Peter the Great's
Russia that had been separated from the
motherland and had to come back, and we ignored it.
And seven years later, this
chapter called the Seven -Year Itch with apologies to
Marilyn Monroe, he takes Crimea, and there are no
sanctions for a year. And then after there are a few
mild ones, the Germans immediately sign up,
Chancellor Merkel signs the Nord Stream 2 agreement to
bring gas directly from Russia into Germany, going
around Ukraine, so they got none of the revenue, and
she calls Putin a reliable supplier. So
what was he supposed to conclude if he tried to
take all of Ukraine? That the US would kind of roll
over with NATO? They complain a lot, they do a
few sanctions, and they'd go away. He
was not taking a wild bet. Some
interesting remarks there. It's
interesting on the one hand, Brian, that he
admitted that there's a historical reason, going
back to Peter the Great, that Russia might want to
acquire or reacquire parts of Ukraine. We've
often said that whether you agree with Putin or not,
he does have matters of state and statecraft to
consider in this, but it's also interesting that he
just says while they invaded Crimea, the Russian
story is that there was, of course, Russian -leaning
people in Crimea, just like in eastern Ukraine, that
really desired to be back with Mother Russia, and
that Ukraine, the Kiev government, was basically a
criminal imposter regime. So that's some things that we
could counter or offer as counterpoint to that video
clip. Now we have one other video
clip of particular interests. We
sent last year a bunch of American -made drones and
gave them to the Ukrainians for both surveillance and
delivering ordnance. By that time, the Russians who
had terrible electronic warfare at the beginning of
the war had figured out what they were doing wrong.
They took every American drone
down in about 90 minutes. This
was one of those programs where some good contractor
from Silicon Valley had come along and said, Dad,
don't worry, these things are invulnerable. This
is going to work. It didn't last from two hours.
That's a lesson. It's
a lesson. I mean, part of the lesson
is the US is getting a lot of good information on
the cheap, including the destruction of much of the
Russian army. Yeah. So there again, it shows
the US failure on the technological realm. Much
could be said about this. The
speaker, Mr. Sanger, lastly, just for this
segment, Brian mentioned that Google had a project
for drone targeting, but it ultimately rejected it
called Project MAVEN, MAVEN. That
was moved to Palantir in about 12 to 15 other
contractors. Palantir, Alex Carp, attends
Bilderberg every year. He's the head of Palantir. By
the time the Ukrainian war breaks out, they've got
this incredible picture of how troops are laid out.
Anyway, Project MAVEN is all about
less human involvement in drone targeting and more AI
targeting. That's precisely what failed versus
the Russian army. So there'll probably be more
on this that I can unpack for maybe one more report
next week, Brian, but that's sufficient for now.
Thank you very much for that,
Mark. And the other thing that came
into my mind as you were talking is that some people
have always felt that Putin and the West were all
working together. That the war in Ukraine even
was something that the Russians wanted to happen.
And Russia is really working
with the West. But when you start to dig into
it and you see this massive change from Russia
coming on board with NATO and the European Union to
Russia at war in the Eastern part of Europe, we
start to see that things are by no means as simple
as that. So a lot more to discuss, but
I just wanted to make that quick point. Thank
you very much for the segment, Mark. Now,
as we always do, a very big thank you to everybody
that supports the column financially. We
can only do what we do with your financial help.
And it's due to a number of
very generous people that take out a subscription and
are providing us with the funding we need. So
if you're watching UK column and you're not yet
a member, perhaps we can ask you very nicely to
join and become part of our team to help us not
only continue going, but to expand. And
of course, you can always go into our shop and make
a purchase as that helps us financially as well.
Now, we do what we do for
information to be shared. But
please, if you do put our information out, will you
make sure that it's attributed to UK column?
This is a nice city for us.
It's something which also we
think is reasonable. We go to the effort of
producing it, but do we want other people to see
and share our material? Yes,
we do. So we'll leave that there.
Now, I just wanted to say once
again that we've got the playing God video, Jackie
Devois and our team and investigation into medical
democide in the UK. That's now being seen by a very
large number of people worldwide. But
you can still click on the UK column website and have
a look at that. Tomorrow at one o 'clock, I've got
an interview which is in my gutsy women's series.
It's with a lady called Rosie.
And she's going to be talking
about the White Rose Organization, which is doing
some really excellent work in educating people about
what is happening in the UK and indeed worldwide,
where our society is being attacked and broken down.
And ultimately, what can we do
about it? So this is one lady's story
about how she went from watching to standing up and
be counted. So please join me for that.
Now, where does that bring us?
It brings us on to the topic
of mainstream media, legacy media. And
a big thank you to one of our viewers who sent me
over the weekend, a link through to a Times article.
Let's bring it up on screen. So
here we are. It had it's a long article.
It's got a lot of images in
it. The headline is exposed to the
illegal school teaching children conspiracy theories.
At a grimy former nightclub,
pupils are told how to survive a plot against
humanity. This is what our undercover
reporter saw. So let's start off by having
a look at the embedded video. I've
broken it into two clips. Let's
have a look at the first one. This
is not a playgroup. If you're not learning, there's
no point in us doing this. And
at the end of the day, we're bringing up a
generation of children that do know the truth. They
won't have to be woken up because they've never been
asleep. An undercover investigation by
the Times has discovered a school in Manchester being
run by a group of conspiracy theorists under
the radar of the authorities. I
applied for a teaching post at Universal Kids via an
advert I saw in the light, a newspaper that peddled
conspiracies and misinformation. I
was invited for an interview by LaDanne
Ratcliffe, a former teacher who set up the school in
2020. Hello, I'm Tong. I'm
here to meet LaDanne. I was out. I
was in the city. Love me to meet you. Ratcliffe
told me that the purpose of the school was to de
-inductrinate pupils from all of the lies that they were
taught by the system. After two interviews and a trial
lesson, I was then offered a position. So,
does it the plague it, aunt? Any
of the both one that side as well? She
helped parents to withdraw their children from
mainstream education, register as home educated,
then send them to Universal Kids. Parents
pay £30 a day for tuition at her school. Teachers
at the school adhere to the Great Reset Theory, a
conspiracy which claims that a shadowy cabal of
bureaucrats and financiers are trying to depopulate
and enslave the earth. Well,
it was pretty clear there because he's straight into
the subject of the Great Reset and as far as he's
concerned, it's all conspiracy theory. Now,
one of my big criticisms of this piece of work by
the times is, of course, they never get into proper
discussion with the people about why they're doing
what they're doing and what they're seeing worldwide
that means that we should be doing these sorts of
things. So, it's a hit piece. There's
no question of that, but I just wanted to flag up for
our audience that the Great Reset is apparently just a
big conspiracy theory as according to the Times and
the journalists there, Tom Ball. Let's
have a look at the second little clip from the video.
Headteacher Ackliffe advertised the
school primarily by word of mouth, but also through
social media groups for like -minded conspiracists.
There were 13 children aged
between 8 and 14 whilst I was working at the school
in January, though there have been as many as 28
in the past. Despite this, universal kids have
been able to operate for more than three years
without any supervision or intervention from local
authorities or Ofsted, the school's inspectorate. Have
you had much trouble with Ofsted's here? Oh,
no, no. No, I've just told them we're
not, we're not in, we're not doing things that
Ofsted would want. Ofsted inspectors don't have the
power to force their way onto the premises of
suspected legal schools, war -sees and criminating
materials. The inspectorate believes that
there are hundreds of illegal schools in England
exploiting the fact that there is very little
oversight of home -educated children under current
legislation. The vast majority of
institutions prosecuted by Ofsted are religious
schools, but in recent years inspectors have found
a growing number of non -religious schools that have
been set up by individuals radicalized by the COVID -19
pandemic into an anti -state and sometimes conspiratorial
ideology. Well, he gets there ultimately
because this is all about regulation of anybody who's
trying to provide an alternative education for
their children and notice how he's now talking about
people who've been radicalized during COVID and
have become anti -state. Diane,
I'll just give you few seconds to come in and
comment if there's anything you'd like to say, having
watched those clips. And of course, that's not the
full video that the time shown, it is two clips. So
there were other points, but what do you think?
Well, Brian, I was just sitting
here laughing partially because I'm about to debunk
what they've said here just a few minutes later in the
news. I think it's just absolutely
hilarious. This time's broadcast, whatever
this was, was just absolutely off the mark
when it comes to facts. Absolutely.
Okay. Well, of course, the music in
that report was one of the things that I couldn't help
reacting to because it's that mind -numbing music in
the background to allow the propaganda, as far as I'm
concerned, to sink in. Mark,
I'm watching your face. I'll
send to you just a couple of seconds if you'd like
to respond. The best thing to say is that
they always use this technique of stating
something as if it's self -evidently false. Like
one day, you'll be eating cockroaches if Claus Schwab
has his way. They don't ever look to see
what Claus Schwab had to say. They
just state this, attribute it to the so -called
conspiracy theorists, and make the reader believe
that by definition, what these conspiracy theorists
are saying is false, rather than exploring the issue to
see whether it might have some truth to it. That's
a common technique. Okay, Mark. Thank
you very much for that. We're
a good team because you were spot on the point
that I'd lined up. Let's put the slide on screen.
So here's Tom Ball. I
know he does look a bit like Harry Potter, but I
think he is the Times journalist. He
said in a history lesson, I saw the children being
told by their teacher just in that they would one day
be eating cockroaches if Claus Schwab, head of the
World Economic Forum and Bill Gates have their way.
So your point is absolutely
correct, Mark, that no investigation into this by
him at all, he simply states things as if it is
fact. He goes on to say, in recent
years, inspectors have found a growing number of non
-religious schools set up by people radicalised during
the COVID -19 pandemic into, and here's the key
expression, anti -state and sometimes conspiratorial
ideology. Now, I'm sure if Mike Robinson
was with us, we'd be saying, you've got to watch
out for this anti -state label because more and more
legislation is coming in place to close down anybody
who challenges the state. But
he flags up the real problem. They're
worried about the increase. At
the same time, the number of homeschool children has
increased rapidly from 60 ,000 in 2018 to 86 ,000 in
2023, according to the most recent figures published by
the government. But he doesn't investigate why
more and more parents are pulling their children out
of school. He simply ignores that. And
if we go on, he then reinforces his attack on
homeschooling. Sorry, come back to the slide you
just put on screen, please, Stephanie. That's
the one. He reinforces it by quoting
Samartin Oliver, the off -stead chief inspector, who
said in the article, the quotas of him in the
article, the 2022 schools bill would have given us
additional powers to investigate and close down
illegal schools. But that legislation was
dropped. Without those powers, I remain
concerned that thousands of children across England are
still attending illegal schools. So
the state is getting very worried it can't control
education of children. The point reinforced here by a
quote in the article from Bridget Phillipson, who's
the shadow education secretary. It's
frankly shocking that this school has been operating
with impunity for so long and poisoning the minds of
these young people. A labour government would
legislate without delay for a register of children not
in school. So vote labour, you're going
to get more state control and more focus on your
children and what's happening to your children.
So if we bring Tom Ball back
on screen, he was crowing the article the last year,
the Times exposed another what it said was suspected
illegal school set up in Sussex by anti -vaccine
activists and members. Here's
the dig of the far right. What's
he talking about? Well, he's talking about hope
Sussex. So this is very close to home
for the UK column. But oh my goodness, they're
teaching people how to use tiny crossbows. He
doesn't seem to want to comment on the fact that
we've got relatively young children being used to
being trained to use real weapons before they're put
into the early days of the armed forces in a lot of
schools. So no proper investigation by
this man. Let's bring in the next quote
here. He said, if schools like Eaton
and Winchester were established to educate the
future administrators of state, universal kids were
set up with a very opposite purpose. It's
a training ground for a resistance movement where
children are instructed in foraging self -defense and
natural remedies to survive and defy this supposed plot
against humanity. But of course, he doesn't
investigate the plot. If we have a look at him in
more detail, this is his LinkedIn page here. He's
a specialist in the Russian language. He
spent, I think, time in Russia. But
basically, this appears to be the best that the Times
can do. And if you have a look at his
Twitter account, well, he's bringing in stories which
are hit pieces on Russia. And
he's also bringing in stories which are hit
pieces on Andrew Bridgen by Callasley using comments by
Andrew Bridgen's wife in order to undermine that
Andrew Bridgen himself. So I'm not impressed. But
did Tom Ball do any investigation? Clearly
no. Let's pop on the screen evidence
that's in front of our eyes. This
one here says, in an effort to be more
sustainable, elementary schools are serving insects
during lunch. These issues are important. So
this is not conspiracy theory. And
the time knows it. Let's pop the times on screen.
Here we are. Their
headline is eating insects, my creepy, crawly breakfast
bowl. But apparently Tom Ball is
completely unaware of this stuff. He's
also unaware of the real fears that parents have got
of their children being groomed within the very
education system controlled by Ofsted. And
for our audience, we'd encourage you to get back
onto the UK Column website and have a look at our
interviews with Kim Isherwood from Public Child
Protection Wales, where she's been talking about
how the minds of our children are being attacked,
how they're doing that inside schools. Now,
before I leave the times, I just wanted to highlight
that a little while ago, 2022, we were under attack
by the Times, COVID conspiracy theories run wild
on the channel for lockdown skeptics. This
was a truly disgusting piece of journalism, which
was just designed to smear. If
we bring in a little bit more text, we can see the
sort of stirring music plays as images of Boris
Johnson presidency and laboratory appear on screen.
Two news presenters sit at a
desk with papers in front of them, while a ticker
tape scrolls below. Now, we did challenge the Times
at the time over this disgraceful article, and
we'll share a little bit of the comment that we
made. This was their headline, if we
bring that in. UK Column conspiracy conspiracy
theories run wild on the channel for lockdown
skeptics. An ex Tory councillor is
behind an online news service that spreads
misleading information. Now, part of our response to
the Times was this, Brian Garrish is not and has
never been a Conservative Tory councillor or member
of the Conservative Party. More
ever, he's never been a Conservative Party candidate.
William Colesill, creator of
Resistance GB, the ex Tory councillor mentioned in the
article, has no operational control or commercial
relationship with the UK Column. The
UK Column and its directors did not incite the alleged
accosting of BBC reporter Nick Watts on the 14th of
June, 2021, and the UK Column and its directors
were not present during the alleged accosting of Nick
Watts. And finally, the UK Column and
its directors did not organise or attend the
Clapham Common protest. We raised a lot more points,
but really showing our audience today is to
underline the fact that the Times is capable of some
pretty appalling reporting. And
in the case of the articles, I've just, the
article I'm just showing you, this was the
journalist, Ben Ellery. We'll
leave it there. My advice, don't bother buying
a Times because you're not going to get facts and the
truth about what's happening. But
that's just my personal opinion. So,
Diane, I think that brings us back to you and you're
going to come in on some of these points from your
own experience. Absolutely, Brian. Yes,
I'm looking, well, not looking forward to the news
that is within this, but what I want to go through
is it's sort of an exercise in truly fighting
misinformation and finding correct facts. And
I'd like to introduce this firstly by reminding people
about the webinar that happened on Friday evening
that was sponsored by Andrew Bridgen and Pee
around COVID vaccines, the devastating health crisis in
the Channel Islands and around the world. And
I have, it was an hour and a half long, it's
Unrumble and other channels if you want to look it
up. I'm sure it's not on YouTube.
But if you want to see the
whole hour and a half webinar, it's available for
you. But I'd like to highlight just
three short clips from three very prominent
speakers who I've been following since 2020, 2021.
The first one is Professor
Angus Dalglish, who is a Professor of Oncology at
St. George's University of London. I
was just all over the world from Australia, from
South Africa, from America, from Canada, South America,
Europe. They all said the same thing.
And they all said that they
were told it was just coincidence or a selection
of anecdotes and to be quiet. Now,
this is what the problem has been with this
pandemic. It is being Orwellian control
and denial of the facts and total prevention of
debate. Science is debate till you come to
the right conclusion. So following the science or
scientific consensus, these are complete misnomers. They
are incredible that we've had to put up with this.
I've had plenty of doctors come
up to me and said, I would love to do what
you're doing. I would love to join you,
but I've got a mortgage and two kids at school I
have to put through. That's what's been going on.
They've been going for the doctors
that speak out. That's definitely been my personal
experience as well. So next we have Dr. Ryan
Cole, who is an American pathologist. So
first we've heard from the cancer expert. Now
we'll hear from pathology. We
need to change this. Synthetic
DNA and modified RNA injections are not vaccines,
never have been, never will be. They
are genetic transfection agents and therapies
according to the filings of Moderna and Pfizer. They
know this. We don't know the long -term
consequences of these, and they're still being
developed for hundreds of other conditions. It's
not just these COVID shots. I
know everybody has COVID fatigue. I
understand that. What we need to do is stop
this platform. It's not meant for human use.
It's not ripe for human use.
For a successful technology,
reality must take precedence over public relations for
nature cannot be fooled. We are fooling ourselves and
we're fooling nature. More injections, plain and
simple, equals more infections due to immune
suppression. The Dr. DeGleish
covered. Cleveland Clinic showed this in a
very straightforward study on their 50 ,000 employees.
I'm not here to judge anyone
that did or didn't get a shot. I'm
just saying no more genetic shots. And
finally, I'd like to show a short clip from Dr.
Peter McCulloch, who is one of
the most highly -sighted cardiologists in the world,
Easton, Texas. In Unconvinced is the tip of
the iceberg, the tip of the iceberg. The
biggest published series of myocarditis before the
pandemic, across decades and decades of accumulating
data, was 500 cases. In my practice before the
pandemic, I had only seen two cases of myocarditis
and one of them was fatal. Now
there are papers laying at all in the British Medical
Journal Open, 18 ,000 cases in a single manuscript. I
am seeing dozens and dozens of cases. In
my practice, I have well more than several hundred
cases with myocarditis. That is how common it is. And
it's sad to say I don't have a chance to see all
of those who've died of a cardiac arrest. In
the Holstcher paper that I've quoted, the cause of
sudden adult death syndrome is very likely to be
vaccine -induced myocarditis. And
it may be so sufficiently subtle it couldn't be
detected on an MRI even if we got one. Right.
So with those quotes in mind, I'd like to think
that the UK column audience has been on top of this
for the last three or four years. So
these are things that maybe we saw coming, we already
knew. But I'm really happy to see
that the rest of the world is starting to wake up and
starting to see what's going on. So
going back to the times and the great reset so
-called theory, this was a published book called COVID
-19, The Great Reset. I do not quite understand how
Klaus Schwab and his colleague managed to have
an entire book published in July 2020 about something
that had apparently only happened in March 2020. So
a quote from that book, which is published, the
most recent biotechnology techniques using RNA and
DNA platforms make it possible to develop vaccines
faster than ever. They might also help with the
development of new bioengineered treatments. So
what did we see at the end of last week? We
saw MNRA injections for cancer being rolled out.
And so this is something from
the World Economic Forum's website, a global risk
report, which was done in collaboration with two
insurance companies. So they're saying a variety of
things here based on global risks both for the next
two years and the next 10 years. Now,
first of all, the next two years, the highest global
risk is misinformation and disinformation. And
we see all these other horrible things that can
happen to us the next two years. The
next 10 years, you know, as you can see that the
top major risks the next 10 years mean that weather
and climate and biodiversity loss is going to make the
world blow up and fall apart anyway. So
I'm not quite sure why misinformation information
will matter when it's number five, when the rest
of the world has blown up. But
there we go. So when we look at what's
going to happen from here, I want to take the viewers
through an exercise in truly fighting misinformation
and truly finding what is fact and what is not. So
something that we've all been wondering about if
you've been watching Twitter in the last couple of
weeks is where is Klaus Schwab himself? Well,
it was first published a couple of weeks ago on
this website called The Weekly Cryer, which is the
first website that I can find that mentioned Klaus
was hospitalized and maybe died. But
we also see that they issued a retraction of that
story, which you can see it on the right. You
can also see another clue when you're looking for the
validity and credibility of websites is that they
usually have bad grammar and spelling. So
you can see in their correction or their
retraction, they spelled Klaus as KALS K -A -L -I -S.
If you look at The Weekly
Cryers About Us page, it says there very clearly
that they also feature satire and comedic opinion
pieces and editorials. So from this, we can see this
is maybe something more like the Babylon bee or
the onion or something that is not meant to be taken
100 % seriously. So this spreads to a couple
of other websites, some other Twitter accounts,
things like that. So of course, all the fact
checkers came in. So here's one from the
Associated Press who said that it is not true that
he was hospitalized and might have died. And
they quote here, as they say, satire, comedic opinion
pieces and editorials, where they didn't directly mention
the name of the website that started spreading this,
but they did say that the WF spokesperson told the AP
that the claims are untrue. But
if we go down to the bottom of their claim here,
and they said the word bug, so going back to your
point in your segment, Brian, appears to be
emphasized in reference to another false claim that
the WF wants to replace meat with bugs. And
we see here on a Twitter feed, which was, we had
two million views talking about clouds being seriously
ill on other accounts. But if we go on from there,
and we look at a previous fact check, the next slide
from the AP, this was from, I think it was the
2023, I believe, January meeting in Davos, where
they said all the conspiracy theories are
circulating because all the elites are arriving in
Davos, and everyone else is talking about this. And
then they said, well, meanwhile, the popular claim
that the forum wants people to replace meat with bugs
is a distorted reference to an article once published
on the organization's website, which is mentioned
in the text of that so -called fact check. But
if you go to the World Economic Forum website
itself, and the point that I want to make is to go
back to the original source as closely as possible to
get the closest to whatever the truth actually is. And
I just did a quick search for eating insects. And
we get there almost 300 results in the WEF search
engine about eating insects and why it can reduce
climate change and so on and so forth. So
it's really, really important to go back to
our sources. And so from here, when I was
fact checking, I just happened to see that the
WEF is in the progress of, I think the special meeting
ends today. So it was a special meeting
in Saudi Arabia around energy. And
so there are three themes that were going, I was
looking to see if maybe Klaus was on the agenda,
but I couldn't find his name. Unfortunately,
I was hoping that would be one, one of the ways to
verify whether or not he is still alive. But
we do have three themes that are important to look
at apparently. One is a compact for inclusive
growth. Not quite sure what that means.
Revitalizing global corporation and the
one that catalyzing action energy for development, I
want to say that catalyzing that misspelling was the
WEF's not mine. And here we can see once again
that they are trying to affect the livelihood and
lives of people, quote, the number of people without
access to energy, without access to energy is not
decreasing at the pace needed to achieve the
sustainable development goals, particularly in
developing economies. So we need poor people to
have less access to energy to meet the sustainable
development goals. So once again, language is is
inverted sustainable means unsustainable, at least when
it comes to human life. The
closing plenary, which I think might have just gone
on just recently today, features among other
prominent speakers, the CEO of Moderna, David Cameron,
and the president of the World Economic Forum. So
all those recordings from the meeting over the
weekend and today are available online if you
should so wish to direct yourself to them, Brian.
Diane, thank you very much for
that. I'm wondering whether I should
phone the Times up and say, do you want a proper
investigative reporter to look at information because
clearly Harry Potter, sorry, Tom Ball from the Times
needs replacing. But the Times can't do this
investigation. You're able to do it. And
thank you very much for providing that through the
UK column. Mark, we've got to an appropriate
point to bring you back in because, of course, if
we're talking about these matters and health, we need
to be looking at the World Health Organization. Thank
you, Brian. The WHO pre pandemic treaty, of
course, they want to negotiate that May 27
through June 1 at the 77th World Health Assembly. As
that approaches, they're getting very strident. You
might even say militant about worldwide vaccinations
with all inclusive language, vaccinate everyone
everywhere. So I learned this this past
Wednesday, the 24th of April, covering in real
time a WHO press conference UK column is a registered
media there. And we'll just go on from
there. We'll get right into the meat of
it in the interest of time. The
big thing, the big takeaway, global partners
are now say new effort, the big catch up to
vaccinate millions of children and restore
immunization progress lost during the pandemic. The
clip you're looking at from the WHO is from one year
ago. But when they had the press
conference last week, that's when they really put it
into motion. Now, this is from that press
release of a year ago. And I'll just hit the
highlights. The pandemic saw essential
immunization levels decrease in over 100 countries. Oh,
you know, perish the thought, the big catch up
is an extended effort to lift vaccination levels
among children to at least pre pandemic levels and
endeavors to exceed those led by a broad range of
national and global health partners, much of it big
pharma. The big catch up also aims to
ensure stronger primary health care services for
essential immunization in the future. It
involves Gabby UNICEF, the WHO, the Gates Foundation
going on pushing toward agenda 2030, the strategic
or sustainable development goals rather and so on.
The effort aims as it says in
this next slide to reverse the declines in childhood
vaccination recorded in over 100 countries since the
pandemic. And bumping down to the bottom
of that, well, in the top part, it mentions vaccine
hesitancy as another problem. People
aren't even supposed to hesitate. They're
just supposed to put that mRNA needle in their arm
without even thinking. And then they mentioned with
over 25 million children missing at least one
vaccination in 2021 alone. Oh,
oh, the humanity, right? Outbreaks
of preventable disease, including measles,
diphtheria, polio and yellow fever are already becoming
more prevalent. Now, that can be a problem,
true. But the narrative is that
vaccines are the only answer and we'll move on
from there. This is Dr. Moaz
Sana. He spoke, these are original
photos I took. And he spoke at that press
conference last week. And this is representative of
what was said as our other quotes that are coming up
in a minute, Brian. He said this, we're launching
the big catch up with 290 million from the GAVI board
in support of wanting to achieve the big catch up
by 2024, 2025, moving on from there. GAVI,
of course, is the vaccine alliance. This
explains a little bit more about what he was talking
about. The successful start to
Nigeria's HPV vaccine introduction in November and
other introductions in Bangladesh, Cambodia,
Indonesia, Togo and other countries are crucial steps
toward our target of reaching over 86 million
girls by 2025 with HPV, with those vaccines, so
-called vaccines. These efforts will be further
boosted by the board's approval. That's
the GAVI board of an initial US 290 million
drawn from covax savings that can now be reinvested
to fully fund doses for children to catch up on
routine vaccinations that were missed during COVID
-19. So that's a little bit more
about that 290 million dollars and we'll go from
there. And these are other quotes to
round out what was said at that press conference. This
is Violane Michelle of the Gates Foundation itself. We
are truly on course for a world of vaccination for
all, she said, parenthetically, while
recognizing field workers who work to vaccinate all
children everywhere. She wanted that to be
recognized and we'll go from there. And
here's Tadros himself, the director general. He's
really on a messianic mission as the pandemic
tree, a World Health Assembly comes up where
they also want to talk about the IHR regs. He
said, more support is needed from donors, the who
is dedicated to the life -saving nature of vaccinating
everyone everywhere. Quote, end quote. And
this is Dr. Kate O 'Brien on another apiracic
at the WHO. This is more of a paraphrasing.
She spoke on misinformation as
Diane mentioned a minute ago. On
the measles vaccine, she called it a safe vaccine,
countering the misinformationist and said
the measles are highly infectious. Vaccines
she stressed are the only way to go, while
complaining that backsliding by the public has curbed
widespread vaccinations. And we'll move on from there.
Dr. Michael Ryan, who's the WHO Health
Emergencies Program Director, also spoke at the press
conference. Again, these are all photos I
took. We must have a candidate
vaccine ready at all times and be ready to act
really, really quickly. A candidate vaccine, which
makes it sound like it's something tentative that
perhaps hasn't been tested much. Meanwhile,
I received this while it was still embargoed. On
the 26th of April, the WHO held its first high -level
meningitis meeting hosted by the government of France.
And as it says in the headline
there, it's a joint news release. The
WHO and France convene high -level meeting to defeat
meningitis, and that's primarily a vaccine
-preventable way of doing that, they're claiming. And
then lastly, although I've got an announcement about
the World Health Assembly, the joint FAO -WHO
Preliminary Assessment of Recent Influenza H5N1
Viruses. And what this says without
getting into the details too much, Brian, is that
for now, the candidate for the next pandemic repeatedly
is H5N1 or the bird flu. And
what was stated was that it's not contagious at all.
It has a very low contagious
factor. But if a human catches it,
it's now being claimed by the WHO that this would be
more deadly than COVID -19, and they're keeping a close
watch on it, don't you worry. So
Brian, you might have a point. Mark,
thank you very much for that. I
know you've got an extra update. What
I'd like to do is cover that update in UK column
extra after the news. We've run over just a little
bit, if you're happy to do that. But
I'm going to say thank you for an excellent update,
and we can see the power coming into play from the
World Health Organization and of course our own
governments simply denying that there is this global
power base under the control of the World Health
Organization. So lots more warnings to be
given. We must end there. So
Diane, Mark, thank you both very much for joining me
today. It's been a really interesting
news. Great to have you both here on
UK Column News today. Biggest
thanks goes to our wonderful audience, wherever
you are in the world. Thank
you very much for joining us. Please
share the information, as I said. And
if you're not a subscriber, consider joining us and
being part of the team to make UK Column happen.
Thanks for joining us. We'll
be back in a few minutes for UK Column Extra. Bye
-bye.