Good afternoon. Today is Monday the 29th of
September 2025, just after 1:00. Welcome to UK Column News.
I'm your host, Brian Garish, delighted to have Ben Rubin with
me in the studio. And we have Sandy Adams joining
us by Live link now. My goodness, what a busy, busy
time. And Ben, you and I having a
little bit of a chat about the weekend and we had discussions
with people completely independently, but many people
saying just what is going on in this country.
So there's a there's definitely And what, how do we describe it?
An undertow of people seeing chaos and confusion.
I would say that that is certainly the case, yes.
They seem to have somehow miraculously united the country
in utter disgust at the Labour government over the past few
days. It's been quite a thing to
watch. Well, that's absolutely true.
So the Labour conference started in Liverpool.
Today's news, we're going to be having a look at that.
We'll be having a look at the Labour Party itself and we'll
also be having a look at what is clearly the the global system of
government coming in on the back of uni party politics.
We're going to be having a little look at forming and how
forming is being affected by policy in UK.
And we're also going to be looking at what Ben's chosen as
subversion, but how change agents are being used
politically in order to create the new utopian society.
And the good news is we're going to end on what people can
actually do and have an effect in challenging this system.
And you can make a difference if you do the right thing in the
right way. So let's get started with a
little look at the Labour Party conference.
And I thought this was a striking image of how it looked.
And we need to put some labels on this because of course the
key bit of it about the lady's hat is that it's got the latest
Labour slogan, which is build baby, build.
Not build back better, but build, baby, build.
And of course many people just looking at the baseball caps and
the red hats and saying what we've really got is Labour's
Trump Conference. So utterly bizarre that of
course everybody led to believe that it's the Tories sort of
LinkedIn with the razzmatazz of the Trump style.
And here we've got the Labour Party seemingly adopting the
same style. Is this to confuse voters, Ben?
I could well believe it is. But certainly we've got Uniparty
being stamped large on New Labour.
Let's have a look at how the party chairman Ellie Reeves
spoke to the audience. And the MPs call to put a
Hillsborough law on the statute book, a landmark step to end the
culture of cover up, hold public officials and authorities
accountable for their actions and to close the chapter on one
of the darkest days in British history.
My values, your values, Labour values.
That is why our members voices are so important.
That is why the MPF is so important.
And that is why it matters so deeply that we have a Labour
government. Because when we win, our ideas,
our policies and our values are turned into action.
But when we lose, it's our opponents that set the agenda
and their policy making process is anything but democratic.
With the Tories it's top down, dictated by whoever happens to
be party Labour. And with Reform, it's even
worse. Until recently, their party was
literally owned by one individual, Nigel Farage, a man
who when asked about his policies, said, And I quote, if
you ask me how you're going to do this, I can't really give you
an answer. So how do they solve that
problem? By importing failed Tories to
help them write their policies. If the answer is Nadine Dorries,
then you're asking the wrong question.
Well there, there you have it, quite some rhetoric.
My values, your values, Labour values.
And apparently if we adopt all of those values together, then
the country is going to achieve the change that we want, the
electorate wants. I don't believe it works that
way at all. And I think what we're going to
get is something very different. We're going to pull that apart
in today's news, but let's watch what what they're talking about.
And of course, in the backdrop there, it said Renew Britain.
Britain's going to be renewed, but not really declaring what
form that's going to take. And then we've got the statement
that that terrible Reform Party is owned by Nigel Farage, to
which I say, well, at least we can see who's driving it.
But as we look deeper into Labour and the Conservative
Party, it seems to become ever more difficult to understand
really where the power base is coming from.
But we can be sure the power base is coming through the
funders. Now, what didn't the Labour
Party want to talk about so far in their conference?
Of course, the conference is ongoing as we speak, so possibly
this subject is going to come in and come onto the table for
debate. But somehow I don't think so.
Let's just have a a little listen and watch this Sky News
clip talking about what the public is really concerned
about. Here is why Sky News is holding
a debate on immigration. It's because public opinion is
changing and fast. I want you to look at this.
Here are the most important issues facing the country over
the last five years. Two of them have dominated the
economy and the health service. But now look at this back since
Britain left the European Union, immigration sun be pretty low
compared to the two big issues, but it overtook the other two in
May and you can see now immigration and asylum is top
and is extending its lead in terms of issues that the public
think are important. And what do the public think of
it? Well, a clear majority think
that migration is too high, 70% which is 18% saying it's about
right and 3% think it's too low. And what do they think of that?
Well, for generations we've had Prime ministers and particularly
chancellors saying that migration is a good thing.
But 50% of the public disagree. They think it's a negative, with
just two 22% thinking that it's positive and 22% thinking it's
even Stevens. How big a political problem is
this for a Labour government? Well, we asked whether or not
they thought the Tories would be doing better if they were in
power. Just 18% said that they would.
55% said that they pretty much thought it would be the same.
But look at this, This is why it's a challenge.
We also have asked whether Reform UK doing better and their
hardline message actually has landed better. 40% of the public
think that Reform UK would be doing better on migration, 19%
worse, 26% the same. So there you can see why it's a
political challenge, you can see why the public are concerned and
you can see why this week there was a clear out at the Home
Office and Sky News are holding their debate.
So I think we have to say well done to Sky News for that
report. And also they've done another,
I'll call it a documentary clip giving the statistics on
migration and really explaining what's going on.
And they're bold enough to have done it in a detached way.
We haven't got that clip in today's news.
We will focus on it because I think it's important, but if 70%
of the people in this country are concerned about not illegal
migration but actually migration numbers within the wider policy,
Keir Starmer very dismissive. Let's have a look at this clip.
You said that. Proposal is immoral to deport
people who are already here if they don't pass more stringent
rules. Do you think it's a racist
policy? Well, I do think that it is a
racist policy. I do think it's immoral.
It needs to be called out for what it is.
And do you think that Reform UK is trying to appeal to racist?
No, I think that there are plenty of people who either vote
reform or are thinking of voting reform who are frustrated.
They had 14 years of failure under the Conservatives.
They want us to change things. They may have voted Labour a
year ago and they want the change to come more quickly.
So brilliant bit of spin doctoring there because
basically 70% of the country are really concerned at this issue.
Then he's asked whether the bulk of the people in reform are
concerned and that's spun away. He deflects that and but
essentially the policy is racist and that is saying that if you
dare to challenge the migration policies, Stalmer at least is is
saying that you're racist. You will you will smiling Ben
while that clip was playing. I don't know whether you want to
add. Anything.
I mean, I don't know why she's even bothering to ask him.
To be honest with you. I think he's the least popular
Prime Minister in history. He's in the office, so why are
you asking him what the country thinks?
He clearly has no idea. Because the BBC's job is
possibly to continue to sell this man to the public as a
viable Prime Minister. But let's come back to the
Labour policy. And this is something which the
papers have called BBC. In particular, building of three
new towns will start before the election.
This is part of Labour talking about building 1.5 million new
homes, but what is Build Baby Build really about?
We're going to put some meat on the bones here because part of
this has got to be to absorb and conceal the population pressure
on UK. You cannot continue to bring in
hundreds of thousands, hundreds and hundreds of thousands of
people without having somewhere for those people to live.
And of course the way it works is the people who are in
existing areas who get concerned with migration and increases in
local migrant population, then move areas into a better area
where they feel more comfortable.
Maybe they head towards more country areas or maybe they seek
accommodation in new sites. So what's going on here is a
policy to absorb migration. But the second thing, if we pop
that back on screen is this. And thank you very much, Ben,
for the discussion we had very early this morning.
It's about restructuring the very fabric of society.
And I know that, Ben, you're going to be having a look at
this in more detail in your own segment to the news.
So there we are. Build, baby, build.
Presented in a Trump style with baseball caps and red hats at
the Labour Conference. But something else was going on
under the surface and that is the control of the way people
inside labour can produce policy.
And we need to go to this document, which Ellie did
mention herself several times in her talk.
This is Labour's National Policy Forum and here we see what they
call the annual consultation 2025.
I'll just put some meat on the bones here with the contents.
People can have a look at this after the news if you want some
more detail. But let's bring in Keir Starmer
again because he says in the forward that our Labour
government was elected on the promise of change to deliver a
decade of national renewal and put the country back in the
services of working people. The hard work of the National
Policy Forum in the years before the 2024 election census.
On the path to an election winning manifesto.
Manifesto at the heart of our historic election win.
Security and renewal are our twin tasks.
And now we're getting on and delivering that change for the
working people. But we need to remember that
change is absolutely defined by Stormer and his spin doctors and
will be controlled by them. And of course, change is not
fully described to the public, so the public doesn't know
actually what's coming. If we dig into this document a
bit more, we've got this fixing the foundations to deliver
change. They're going to look at
economic growth, they're going to make Britain a clean energy
superpower. They're going to be breaking
down barriers to opportunity and NHS fit for the future, safer
streets, Britain reconnected. So there's six policy areas.
But of course what they don't do is actually talk about the key
issue which people want them to talk about, which is migration.
So we'll just end by having a look at the style of Labour.
It's Labour. Is it Trump?
It's very hard to tell, but we were fascinated with this
picture because sitting grinning in the middle is none other than
local Plymouth City Council lead leader Tudor Evans.
He's now become a sort of mega, mega labour, if that's the right
way of putting it. And this is the maturity of
what's going on, particularly around the conference and Tudor
Evans. You can see we've taken a
general picture from the web, but if we blow this up, we're
into selfies with the Prime Minister.
So I think this is pretty damning really of these very
dangerous, politically dangerous individuals.
But one hand, they are I, in my opinion, destroying the country
and the other hand, they're acting in a very immature and
puerile way. Let's leave it there.
As far as the conference goes. I'm going to welcome you, Sandy,
because you've been digging deeper into how the Labour Party
itself works and who are some of the key policy movers and
shakers. Welcome to the News.
Thank you very much, Brian. Well, it's interesting because
Ben's going to be expanding on this a bit bit bit more because
we we found that we were just covering the same kind of
things, which is brilliant. We're all on the same page, but
that very interesting seeing the red hats and how it aligns with
with the whole Trump thing that's going on over the pond.
So I'm looking at the moment into Morgan McSweeney this most
people in Britain have never heard of him really.
He's he's the unelected strategist who now wields more
power than most ministers. He's Keir Starmer's chief of
staff and he's a man who decides who gets close to the Prime
Minister and who gets elected as MPs.
He's the most powerful man in Westminster, yet remains very
much in the shadows. He's never been interviewed.
You'll never find a quote from him on social media.
He was born in Cork in Ireland. McSweeney moved to London as a
teenager. He flunked out of university.
He did odd jobs on building sites and spent three months on
a kibbutz in Israel in the 1990s and eventually embedded himself
in Labour Party politics. His big break came in 2017 when
he became company secretary of the think tank Labour Together.
From there he built a machine to pull Labour away from Corbynism
and engineer Starmer's ascent and Jeremy Corbyn's decline.
Now this is very interesting. In 2020, McSweeney was running
Starmer's leadership campaign. By 2024 he was in Downing St.
and today he's the chief gatekeeper of government
strategy. While Mcsteen Sweeney was a
company secretary of Labour Together, the group accepted
over £700,000 in donations that were not declared on time.
And that's a serious breach of political finance law.
In September 2021, the Electoral Commission fined Labour Together
14,250 lbs for more than 20 reporting failures, stressing
that there was an administrative error and it wasn't a reason, a
reasonable excuse. So he, he just failed to, to say
where these donations were coming from.
Well, it turns out that these, these, these, some of these
donations were coming from a chap called Sir Trevor Chin.
I think we've got a slide of him.
He's he's, he's one of the significant backers of of Labour
Together and he's a pro Israel philanthropist who's vice
president of the Jewish Leadership Council, former chair
of the Joint Israel Appeal and now president of the Jewish
Israel Appeal, which we've got another slide off.
And also he's on the executive committee of BICOM Britain,
Israel Communications and Research Centre EU KS leading
pro Israel advocacy organization.
Chin has long donated across party lines, but in 2017 onward
he's directed serious money into Labour together.
He directed a serious amount of money to help building the
machine of McSweeney has used to sideline the Corbyn left and and
prepare Starmer's leadership. So it was he he was really
instrumental in in bringing Corbyn down with the
anti-Semitism stuff. And one wonders how this
affiliate affiliation may have affected any Gaza ceasefire
talks. I mean, this is a really
interesting point. He also gave 50,000 lbs directly
to Starmer's 2020 leadership campaign.
And when you connect these dots, you see how foreign policy
sympathies, wealthy donors and party strategy intertwine all of
the radar of the average Labour member or vote.
This may have kind of, you know, gone over their heads.
Alongside McSweeney, we have Lord Peter Mandelson, the
original Blairite Prince of Darkness, re emerging as an
informal advisor and confidante. Starmer So Manderson's presence
symbolizes a wider project that Labour has of returning to the
Blair like pro market, pro US stance with strategists like
McSweeney and donors like Shin and the left never gains control
again. So anyway, I think if we can
look at this, this, this little video that just kind of sums it
all up really, if we could just run this video.
Symbol crowd of a Labour great and good telling them about how
Labour together was trying to seek unity in the party.
It's a network of people from across the party, from different
traditions that look to what are the long term challenges facing
the party and the country and how we overcome them.
Nothing could be further from the truth because at that time
Morgan Mcsweeney's plan to burn down the Labour Party, to
undermine it from within, to capture the Labour Party from
the ashes, to install their own chosen leader and then eradicate
the left wing from the Labour Party was well advanced.
What we can now reveal is that Morgan McSweeney was and is very
close to Peter Mandelson, the best pal of a notorious sex pest
and paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, one of the Mcsweeney's
first jobs at Labour was inputting data into Peter
Manderson's much feared Excalibur computer system.
Peter Mandelson has said of Morgan McSweeney.
I don't know who and how and when he was invented, but
whoever it was, they will find their place in heaven.
In many ways, they share the same political methodology.
They're very comfortable meeting behind closed doors, making
important decisions about your life, important decisions they
make out side of transparency. Like for example forgetting to
report 730,000 lbs of donations to the Electoral Commission.
So what was almost 3/4 of the millions of pounds and lawfully
not declared to the Electoral Commission used for?
One of the most consequent use of the money was to get Keir
Starmer elected leader on the Labour Party.
What we now know is that Keir Starmer had leadership
ambitions. From as early as 2018.
He attended a series of meetings with his good friend and MP
Jenny Chapman, hosted at Jenny Chapman's home in Camden in
London on Arlington Street. As a result, the group that met
was called the Arlington Group. One of the earliest attendees of
those meetings was Steve Reed MP, one of Morgan Mcsweeney's
closest allies. In July 2019, Morgan McSweeney
was invited by Steve Reed to attend one of the Arlington
Group meetings. What McSweeney did was produce a
detailed presentation of what the Labour Party membership
wanted and who they would vote for.
That information was based on hundreds of thousands of pounds
of unpublished polling the Morgan McSweeney had undertaken
to understand what made Labour Party members take what they
wanted from our potential Labour Party leader.
Well, that's really interesting because the man speaking was a
chap called Paul Holden and he's just written a book.
It's about to come out and it's called The Fraud and it promises
to lift the lid on Mcsweeney's role in transforming Labour and
that £700,000 scandal. Now this could actually really
break Starmer, you'd think. But whether you like like Corbyn
or not, questions remain. How democratic is a democracy
where unelected strategists and wealthy donors, old Blairite
power brokers set the course for government?
Sandy, thank. Thank you very much and a big
thank you from UK column News to double down news that that clip
about Matt who produced the clip about Mandelson very important.
Now we're, we, we're going to move on to the subject of the,
of the more global nature of the change that we're seeing being
driven through the Labour Party. No difference really in the
policies of Labour or the Conservatives.
The colours change, but the policies don't.
And of course, the real power for both parties is not through
the party itself, it's through those powerful donors and
controllers. So, Ben, over to you.
Absolutely. Thank you, Brian.
Yes, we're going to look specifically at the ID card
scheme that was announced last week.
Mike talked about it on Friday on the news, and we're going to
expand a little bit about where it's come from, what it
potentially hooks us into and how it aligns with World
Economic Forum globalist policy through and through.
Before we get into that, I'll just direct your attention to
this report that we did last year on the 14th of October.
I talked specifically about this fella.
That's Daniel Sachs, who is George Soros, investment chief
at the Open Societies amongst other things, and he was at
Global Progress Action in Montreal talking to the top tier
of liberal progressive political leaders like Trudeau, Ardern,
etcetera, basically on how to divide and rule their
populations. He was drawing attention to this
phenomenon that he had identified, showing a divergent
between male and female, conservative and progressive,
left and right political views and essentially warning about
this. But actually reading between the
lines was saying that this is something that can be
capitalized on. These two competing energy
fields can be used to divide and rule the population.
And what we've seen in our society over the past 12 months,
division, left, right, men, women, conservative,
progressive, fighting against each other, sometimes literally
in the street so that the agenda can be floated in in the
background without people paying proper attention.
And what do we have last week, 12 months on from that?
Well, we have Jacinda Ardern on stage in London at Global
Progress Action 2025 speaking to on stage there on the left, John
Podesta, as well as Pedro Sanchez, the Prime Minister of
Spain, who's they're talking about how fantastic the energy
transition is going to be for the his, the Spanish economy.
As well as JB Pritzker on the right hand side there, Governor
of Illinois who was promoting state control of childcare,
especially state control of everything.
That's what they're after. And then Anas Sarwar, the leader
of Scottish Labour, you can see they're fawning over Mark
Carney, who's now currently the Prime Minister of Canada.
And the slap bang in the middle, Keir Starmer, who decided that
this was the appropriate forum to make the big announcement
about the ID card scheme. Let's have a little listen to
what he had to say. Today I am announcing this
government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory
for the right to work by the end of this Parliament.
Let me spell that out. You will not be able to work in
the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.
It's as simple as that. Sorry, but but he's not going to
charge us. I know exactly.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's mandatory and I sound like a a total
fascist, but it's free of charge, don't worry.
And he's decided to do that not in parliament, not Downing St.
not to the to even to the press. Like this is a invitation only
elite liberal globalist progressive think tank event.
And astonishingly he's he's managed to unite the entire
country. I think as I said at the start
in absolute discussed at this. So I think the petitions up to
2, two and a half million, somebody's just claimed on our
chat box and this is what we need.
Then we need the numbers, but then we also need people to act
and we'll come on to that towards the end of the news.
Yeah, indeed. And he and various others have
been out on heavily on social media.
Starmer himself was on the BBC yesterday doing an appalling job
of trying to defend this. I mean, he's trying to defend
the completely indefensible. So I don't know what's happened
here, but the execution of this has been extremely poor.
Because I would suggest Ben, it's because the time frame for
this to come in is not within Starmer's local political UK
time frame. When he feels comfortable that
the population in the UK is ready for it, the time frame is
going to be set externally, yes, at globalist level, yes, when
they think the time is right. So Starmer will simply be told,
tough luck, Sunny, you need to get the ID policy in now.
That's why he's he's squirming. I think, I think that's probably
a really good point actually. We've heard the fact you know,
that we're behind on the SDG's, we're behind on the agenda.
So maybe this is just a function of, of that, you know, and, and,
and taking the lead, as Mike said on Friday from people like
the Tony Blair Foundation who've come in and said, Hey, 63% of
the country really want this. And then in reality, when they
announce it, no, we we really don't want this.
They've been amazing to see all of the kind of talking heads
come out, a bunch of the politicians, bunch of civil
servants. Paul Mason has been going just
straight into bat for star. But all weekend it's been
amazing. And actually what he highlighted
as Lisa Nandy from DCMS also mentioned in in the video that
Mike shared on Fridays, that a lot of this is rooted in the
Estonian E identity scheme. You know, Estonia, a tiny
country in Northern Europe, 1.3 million people, but it hasn't
set the template for digital government over the past 20
years. They talk about the E identity,
the Eid, as the cornerstone of a seamless digital society.
Every Estonian, no matter where they live, has a state issued
digital identity known as an Eid.
Been in news for over 20 years. It's the cornerstone of our E
state, enabling secure digital digital transactions in both the
public and the private sectors. Doesn't that just sound
fantastic? And Estonia.
But you know what? What could possibly be bad about
Estonia? And most people have never even
heard about it, you know, And they're not like they're
involved in any wars or anything like that, are they?
So that's, that's the soft sell. People are being told, don't
worry, they're Estonians, they're all lovely people,
they've got our best interests at heart.
This is how globalist policy is sold locally.
Indeed it is, because what's behind that?
Let's go and have a little look here at the profile from
LinkedIn and Valeria Ionian, who is the Deputy Minister of
Digital Transformation of Ukraine.
Well, she was sorry, between October 2019 and May this year,
she's now been bumped up to advising the Deputy Prime
Minister on the same issue. So this is the top digital
transformation person in the Ukrainian government and she was
in the UK back in May Pause that if you're watching back and have
a full read of the post. I'll go through some of this
now, but the most important bit for the purposes of what we're
talking about this second or this statement right at the end,
where she talks about this visit being part of the trilateral
cooperation between Ukraine, Estonia and the UK, so.
The plot thickens. Indeed.
And now we're to believe we can just trust all those Ukrainians.
Forget all the right wing extremists and the Nazi groups
closely aligned to the Ukrainian government.
Forget all that, they're more nice people who are going to
help UK implement a digital ID system.
Yes, and the money laundering and a whole bunch of other
things. So this young lady, she's come,
I don't know she what does she look like?
30s, something like that, mid 30s maybe, you know, so like
young lady over in the UK, full access, full top tier access to
all of the people running digitization of the British
state, including David Knott, who's the CTO, chief technology
officer of the whole of the UK government.
So you're there hanging around. Also, we've got Annette
Southgate, who's the head of the accelerated capability
environment ACE at the Home Office.
So apparently there's huge potential for partnership there.
Also, Emily Middleton, Director General for the digital center
of the Cabinet Office. So she's redesigning the whole
of the center of government. So our Ukrainian friend straight
in there, big meeting, big hug with Anita friend who's the head
of the defence and security accelerator at the MOD and
they're talking about Brave One, which is the Ukrainian defence
accelerator and partnership there.
You can see where this is all going.
Also Christine Bellamy, who's the chief executive of
government digital services. And there's a lot of ladies
here, this chap on the right. I think he accidentally wandered
into frame. He's got nothing to do with it
really. It's all about the ladies on the
left hand side there in the senior positions.
And and there was one other bloke, this guy Benedict Macon
Cooney, who's the chief policy strategist at the Tony Bear
Institute for Global Change, who are completely up to their necks
in what's going on in Ukraine. And actually I've shared this
quote last year, but I'll share it again.
They're talking about hiring talent into Kiev so that you can
have the chance to make a direct impact on the single most
important geopolitical event in the world since the end of the
Cold War, right. That's what the the
reconstruction of Ukraine is, and that's what the identity
card scheme is directly linked to through these partnerships.
Yeah, that's what's going on here.
Let's head back to the to the, to the trip to London.
And it was wrapped up at the end of the day at Deloitte, who are
helping to facilitate this whole program.
And they are a World Economic Forum strategic partner.
And they're also helping to run the World Economic Forum Global
Government Technology Centre in Kiev as part of the Great Reset
and the Build Back Better agenda.
And that's what those hats meant.
Build baby, build means build back better.
It's the same thing. It is becoming a bit obvious.
It is as you as you run through this and and we put the pieces
together, it is obvious that UK as a nation state is being
dissolved in front of our very eyes.
This is being done by the Conservatives under big society
with David Cameron. And now we've got a similar
policy underway with Keir Starmer.
Many people man on the Clapham omnibus would consider this to
be treason. And I think that there's there's
a lot of validity in that, that line of questioning.
But more on that in future UK column news programmes.
Absolutely. So this World Economic Forum
initiative, how does that manifest?
We'll give you a couple of examples, right?
So here's one. This is the AI Centre of
Excellence. That's Mikhailo Federov on
stage, by the way. He is the top man for digital
transformation in Ukraine. And this concept, this was
developed, as you can see in the bottom there with the support of
the UK Foreign Office, so FCDEO and then that's implemented by
Deloitte. So again, public private
partnership, World Economic Forum, strategic partners, hand
in glove with the the British establishment, whether that's
Cabinet Office or Foreign Office, wherever it might be,
working with Ukraine to build these new systems.
And it's not just digital ideas, a whole bunch of other stuff
too. Let's actually have a little
listen to what the Win Win Global Innovation initiative are
up to in Ukraine. What is the future of Ukraine
like? Is it a hope for happy tomorrow,
for breakthroughs and battle throughs?
This is not a hope. This is a will.
The will to do more than we thought we could.
The will to create technologies that make enemies shout my Lord.
The will to improve lives, provide jobs, to be the rare for
those who fight against all odds.
A partner to developers, scientists, entrepreneurs, to
those who choose their own reward.
Ours is to be the state of free people.
So instead of hoping we act because we cannot afford to
lose, Win, win. Ukrainian global innovation
vision. Winning the peace.
So Ben, win, win to win the peace.
Meanwhile, according to Kiev Independent, the Kiev posts some
1.16 million Russians killed and wounded on the battlefield.
If we accept that figure, and we know that since the start of the
war Ukrainian casualties have been higher, we've got at least
a million dead Ukrainians. But not to worry, we need to
kill these people in order to win the peace.
Or am I being sick? No, I think you're pretty much
going on the money there, Brian. Yes.
Would it's a win, win to win the war and then win the peace.
And what are they? What does winning the peace look
like? It's innovation across every
single area of society with Foreign Office money and World
Economic foreign money and the total transformation of
everything. And it's not new.
Crisis has been going on for a long time.
We've talked a bit about the agreement that's currently
playing out between Estonia, Ukraine and the UK and how
that's working on the ground in in London earlier this year.
But actually we can look back to this document.
This is the D5 charter. This was signed back in 2014, a
digital cooperation charter between Estonia, Israel, New
Zealand, South Korea, and then signed in the bottom right hand
corner by Francis Maude at the Cabinet Office, who is a great
old friend of UK column. Because we talked about this
back then, didn't you? Well, you should say you did,
Brian. Absolutely, because we pointed
out that Francis Maude was boasting of a memorandum of
understanding with the with Israel, which included all of
our security agencies, GCHQ, MI6MI5.
It brought in many of the top universities and all of a sudden
we were going to be working in partnership with Israel.
None of it explained in Parliament to the to the members
of the Parliament, none of it explained to the British
electorate. We were simply told that from
then on we were in partnership with Israel.
And meanwhile Unit 8200, the intelligence agency, was let
loose with a lot of data about individuals and organisations in
UK. And many people say yes, this
was the same organization whose experts began to bury into the
NHS data mountain. Let's remember that Francis
Maude, of course, as a Conservative MP, was also the
Minister for Transparency. And what a brilliant job he did
of making sure his Conservative transparency was about as opaque
as you can get. Yeah, so.
That's what all of these clandestine operations are
about, isn't it? It's transparency.
Yes, and let's just remind the audience that here's the report
from March 2014. We had to draw a diagram to make
this simple to understand, but Francis Maude central to the
fact that very, very important strategic aspects of UK such as
the intelligence services but also health were being drawn
into this web controlled by Israel.
So a lot of questions to be asked, not only of Keir Starmer
and Labour's connections, but also the Conservative Party as
well. Yes, absolutely.
And, and what that supposedly innocuous digital identity
scheme is actually really about and what is it all connecting to
now? I'll just very quickly whip us
back to where I started, Global Progress Action Summit.
And, and as Sandy said, we should be talking about Morgan
McSweeney and this organization, Labour Together, which actually
ran that event. All right.
So Labour Together, we're running this alongside IPPR, the
Institute of Public Policy Research and the American
organization Centre of American Progress.
But the the London job was done by Labour Together.
And this is a think tank introducing bold ideas for the
Labour government. It was brought through in what
they call Labour's wilderness years and it's currently run by
a bunch of people. We'll put a link and have a look
at the team. It's interesting, Matthew Upton,
who spent quite a number of years at the Citizens Advice
Bureau, this guy, Ben Sarita, who was actually most recently
the chief of staff to David Halpern at the Behavioural
Insights team. So it gives you a sense of the
the whole kind of philosophy here.
And then also on the Advisory Board, some real big hitters,
including Jeff Morgan, former CEO of Nestor, former CEO of the
Young Foundation, policy advisor to Blair, the founding director
Demos. And then also Anand Menon, who
is a trustee at Full Fact and also a council member of the
European Council on Foreign Relations, which was founded by
George Soros and Daniel Sachs, who I mentioned he's also a
member of there. And also this guy meant Menon is
a, is a fellow of Chatham House as well.
So these are the people we're actually putting the strings
behind. His policy agenda and Morgan
Sweeney absolutely sits at the centre of it.
This is Starmer's chief of staff playing dirty tricks.
He got Corbyn ousted from the Labour Party by funnelling money
that had been brought into Labour together by people like
Martin Taylor, who's a hedge fund manager who is actually
given five and a half £1,000,000 to Labour over the past few
years. And importantly Trevor Chinn,
again who Sandy mentioned you can you see in this picture, my
fave picks this on the left hand side there, that's Trevor Chene
alongside Tony Blair, another bunch of deplorables and slap
bang in the middle, the late Lord Jacob Rothschild.
And interestingly, the operation that Sweeney was running inside
Labour together to get rid of Corbyn was called Operation Red
Shield, which is actually what Rothschild means.
That's pure. Coincidence, which I'm sure,
yes, I'm sure it's pure coincidence.
And then just to reiterate, a lot of that information came
from this excellent film, um, from Double Down news journalist
Paul Holden, the scandal that could bring down Keir Starmer
government if we lived in a sane and decent world.
But I'm not entirely sure based on what I've just said, that we
do anyway. Okay.
Lots to think about there, Ben. Thank you for that excellent
analysis. Now we're just going to say UK
column only can only operate with the financial support that
we get from people who are members and pay us on a monthly
or annual basis or take out a live subscription or people who
are kind enough to donate or people who are purchasing from
our shop. So if you want UK to column to
continue, then get onto the website.
Click here to go to support our work and please join us with a
monthly membership, for example, to keep UK column not only going
but expanding because that is exactly what we want to do now.
I'm also just going to highlight Saturday 18th of October for our
UK on Location event in York. All the tickets for the actual
event are sold out, but you do have the opportunity to still
watch this online. So if you want to be there in
spirit and see what's happening and we'll be treating you as if
you are with us at the event, then get on to the UK column
shop and you can buy an online ticket to join us.
OK Sandy, let's welcome you back into the news.
And of course farming is an area of society at the moment that's
getting a very rough deal. Food and security of food
supplies for the nation are strategic.
That's a strategic requirement. But it's very clear to us that
things are not going well as far as the ordinary farmers
concerned. No, it's, I mean, it is in a
sorry state, British farming. And I'll, we'll be listening in
a minute to a, a video where the the farmer is, he's remaining
anonymous. He's being interviewed by a
fantastic bloke who lives locally, Clive Edwards, who is
is doing his own, his own thing. He's a Blogger.
Anyway, this this particular farmer, I know him well, he's
already gone from a 400 acres right down to 160 because of all
the restrictions that have been going on.
And so if we just run this this video and there's two clips, we
could do them back-to-back about the state of of what the
Environment Agency are doing with slurry.
They're basically using the slurry regulations to shut down
farms. So if you listen to what he has
to say. But what happens is they all
come around, the woman or the bloke comes around all nicely
nicely does the inspection goes away or everyone is all happy.
And then shortly after you get this, there's a letter coming
through stating various acts of Parliament and and your
so-called breaches of the acts of Parliament giving you
potentially 28 days to bring your farmer to scratch.
The issue really is majorly heavily in regards to dairy
farmers or, or farmers with silage clamps, slurry pits or,
or or anything. If you've got silage bales
within a certain distance away from the ditch and it goes on
and on. Most farmers know roughly what
these regulations apply to. But the problem you've got is
they're giving farmers 28 days notice to bring their farms up
to scratch. 1 dairy farmer locally to us here, it was half
£1,000,000 to bring his farm up to so-called these regulations.
Well, they're shutting down overnight, pretty much.
Yeah, this is this is what we're finding.
And unfortunately they they they're they're using this to to
again put the nail in the coffin to to the farming industry.
If we could hit hit, listen to the next one where he actually
goes through the the reasons why why he feels that that farming
is being destroyed. Seems to be like a, a massive
attack against farming in general.
So you've got the inheritance tax as one aspect, you've got
the environment agencies another aspect, you've got the loss of
all these subsidies, another aspect and then bringing in the
what you call the SFI, sustainable farming incentives.
So you're really getting paid now, not for growing food.
We're only getting paid now to maintain hedgerows soil
management. So you're getting paid really
not to grow food? Or was that?
Yeah, in a roundabout ways. They're not.
They're not publicly stating that.
But you're getting paid to do herbalays.
You're getting paid for wildflower meadows.
You're getting paid to plant trees.
There's all stuff you can't really eat.
I know some farmers will say and some land agents will say, yeah,
but you can still graze around this.
You can still do, you know, you can still operate on a
regenerative aspect. But no disrespect.
We're only we're not even 55% food secure in this country and
what people aren't realising is food security is actually within
our 13 aspects of national security.
Yes, so that, that that farmer he's you know that he's one of
many, many that are just finding it difficult and there's 5000
farms already this year that have been closed down because
they they can't cope. They, they've either sold up or
they've just, they, they jumped ship.
And he did say actually, when that when the Environment Agency
woman was phoning him, he said to the Environment Agency woman,
listen, if I hear of any farmers that have committed suicide over
this, you will have blood on your hands.
And it's, it really is as serious as that.
Farmers have no way out at the moment.
They really don't. And I think it's appalling.
And on top of that, you've got the PCR testing for blue tongue
and avian flu, which we know that PCR testing doesn't
indicate disease. Now, Roger Meacock has done a
lot of a lot of research into this and a lot of forensic work
on the inefficacy of PCR testing.
And I've actually put his website in the show notes.
He's got a company called solutions and he really
understands and lays it out of, of how PCR testing doesn't work.
We, we know it doesn't work, but you know, it's it, that's one of
the reasons they're using to close farms down.
And, and we've got also the, uh, the fact that the, the, the
farmer did go on to say that he felt that this was a, a way of
shutting down beef and, and dairy production before 2049.
Now this, the whole slurry thing is, is, is, is daft because the,
you know, the slurry has been there for years and years and
it's never been a problem. So I I'd also like to just draw
your attention to the, the, the absolute 0 document, which is
yeah, the record farms are closing through the inheritance
tax as well, which is appalling. And the, the whole thing with
with this whole programme is that it is a plan.
It's a plan to shut down beef and dairy and and sheep farming
by 2049. Now this was brought forward in
the absolute 0 document in 20. It was, it was actually put
together in 2019 and it was a, a white paper by the University of
Cambridge, Bath, Nottingham, Strathclyde and Oxford.
And, and you probably can't see this very well, but on the green
one, which is food, it actually states now this was, this was
debated in the House of Lords in 2020 by Lord Brown of Laderton
and he initiated the debate to take note of the report and to
put it into immediate action. So they say there that you that
meat and dairy is to be phased out between 2030, between now
and 2030 and it, 50% will be phased out.
And then from 2030 to 2049, no beef and dairy or any meat at
all. And this lines up with the C40
cities planetary diet that we all know about.
And they're, they're really looking for, for doing that.
And he feels that actually they're, they're going to phase
it out before then. So that, that was his thoughts
on it. So it's a it's a pretty
diabolical situation for our British farmers.
Thank you very much, Sandy. Diabolical, I think absolute
perfect word to describe this. But of course the policy isn't
simply going to come in top down.
The governments going to tell us and it's going to be enacted.
The government needs to get the population at large to install
that policy itself. And how is the government going
to do it? It's going to manipulate people.
Ben, over to you. Absolutely.
It's going to manipulate people. They're creating an army of
change agents across the whole of the country.
And we talked a lot about ID cards today.
It's been the buzz in the country over the past few days
since they announced it on Thursday 25th of September.
But actually I think that is at least in part a cover for
something else which was announced on the same day, which
is the this report from what's his name again, Steve Reed OBE,
who is backing true Patriots to lead UK renewal apparently with
a £5 billion investment. And they want to give new powers
to let residents was, they say, reclaim beloved assets and drive
Patriotic Renewal Street by St. Live delivering on the plan for
change. Let's have a little listen to
Keir Starmer talking about it. Everybody has private place in
where they live. They want the very best for
where they live and real ambition.
What they really want is a government that comes up
alongside that understands that pride and that ambition and
that's what we're doing. Funding is significant and it's
really important, but the way in which the money will be used is
hugely important because it's not Whitehall dictating what's
going to be done, it's people with skin in the game, local
panels and they will know their patch, they will know the thing
that will make a real difference in their community and we're
empowering them to take those decisions.
So people, local communities have pride in the places where
they live and apparently what they want is for government to
sneak up alongside that and latch onto it and inject a load
of money into it. And essentially what this is,
this is social engineering, right?
So you've got £5 billion of taxpayer money that we've all
contributed to. The government is then going to
redirect back out into local communities, but not to
everybody, because they could do that through a tax cut.
And they're not going to give us a tax cut, are they, because
they need to be in charge of everything.
And they're going to direct it to panels, keeping in local
communities that are aligned ultimately to their
transformation agenda. And it all hinges around this
report. Pride in place, like I say, came
out on 25th of September. And from the introduction to the
report we can see here from Steve Reed.
Make no mistake, this is a pilot in a new way of governing and it
dwarfs anything that has come before.
That's quite a statement, isn't it?
Steve Reed OBE, who Sandy said earlier on in her report was
actually a key McSweeney ally. So I wasn't aware of that,
right. So this guy needs needs to be
looked at in more detail. And I'll probably do another
longer report on this next week because it taps into a whole
network of these organizations who are facilitating this.
But just to give you a little pricey right now, this
programme, this Pride in place programme, it touches on
community spaces, public spaces, High Street and town centre
revitalization, neighborhood policing, new types of anti
social behaviour orders, what they call digital inclusion,
litter picking a bunch of money to go into something called the
I Will campaign, which is a Rothschild slash Chatham House
slash Blair aligned social transformation program, green
infrastructure, an expansion of the blue plaque scheme.
So they're going to be sort of elevating new and different
types of people into positions of kind of canonical relevance
in the country. Giving an award of a Blue Plat.
Remember, of course, that when when we were fully inside the
European Union, instead of half in and half out as we are today,
that anytime EU regeneration money came into the country to
control regeneration in cities, up went the plaque to say that
the money had come from the European Union.
So this is this is all tactics. But what's in my head, Ben, is
big society. David Cameron back in 2010, I
think it was talking about having an army.
That was the word, an army of activists, mainly young people
in order to change society. So David Cameron was talking
about what was coming. Now we're seeing the Labour
Party putting this into, into, into full.
Yeah, absolutely. It's exactly the same thing.
And this is all aligned to the Solinsky Community Organiser
approach to communist revolution.
That's what we're looking at here.
As I said, I'll come back to this next week or do more
thorough reports. There's loads in it, but just a
couple of things to pull out from from the report.
This is propaganda. What do we see in front of us?
Well, what I see is a white man sitting alone, looking away from
the camera on the left hand side.
And then the diverse chatting, the friendly, upbeat new world.
The power people. They're exactly, they're on the
right hand side. And then also, what was the
first case study that they bring in?
This was an interesting one. It's the Cornwall Libraries
Partnership Program where they've been working with the
Cornwall Council resettlement team to create safe spaces for
Afghan families to integrate into Cornish communities.
And since this is what's happening and while the the big
for Aurora over the the ID cards is is playing out in the press
is. Going on in the background,
boats, ID cards and rubber boats.
Exactly. Ben, thank you very much for
that. Sandy, let's bring you back in.
We promised our viewers today that we talk about a positive
aspect of what people can do. The first thing is people have
to understand what is happening, how it's being done, what the
policy really means. Don't think that you shouldn't
pay attention to Starmer. You should listen to every
single word the man says because he means what he says.
So don't dismiss it as nonsense, Nonsense.
We have to understand what's being said to us.
But if we do understand what the policy is, then when local
people act in a calculated, measured and intelligent way,
they can achieve results. Sandy, what have you got?
Well, a historic seaside town of Weston Super Mare has scrapped
its plans to become a council of sanctuary this last week.
It's a, it's a, it came after a significant backlash of, of, of
people in the community who actually saw, saw reason.
And these people are not that they voted unanimously on the
council, but to, to, to rescind what, what what had been put in
place. Now is it is interesting.
More than 100 protesters gathered outside.
You know, there's a lot of pro, you know, people pro the, the,
the Council of sanctuary, but more people were against it.
And unfortunately, it, it, it, it did.
There were some people chanting outside, but it's, you know,
you, you're always going to get that.
Now it's, it's not what I want to get across really is that
this is this has all been brought in to our communities,
as Ben was talking about with almost infiltration, open
infiltration of really subversive propaganda.
And there's been a lot of of, of pubs popping up in Weston Super
Mare and a lot of sort of, I think they're sort of like NGOs
really that have been brought into place.
You've got, let's have a look at some of these.
They're talking towns and all this is under something called
Rens, which is the racial equality North Somerset.
And underneath Rens is these different, different kind of
organisations and these organisations are all part of
the communitarian agenda. It is, it's all about inclusion,
diversity, equity and inclusion. And all of this has been
subjected on, on Weston Super Mare residents and they've seen
through it. And it's not nobody's racist
there. They're all very inclusive of
all the people that have been brought in and integrated over a
long period of time. It's not racism.
What they've done is, is it's really made a decision based on
common sense. And I, I think that it to give
people some sort of hope really that you can look at this and
look at it really, really subjectively and understand that
you don't have to go along with it.
You can, you can, you know, campaign against it.
And they managed to, to, to, to pull it, pull it out really.
And I think it was now just trying to remember the.
Yeah, it was the majority of residents expressed their
opposition against the plan, with 339 in opposition compared
to just 92 supporting the process.
So, you know, they obviously the committee called to the council
to further pursue harmony with people without becoming part of
the Council of sanctuary. And I think there's a lovely
quote at the end here from, I think his name's James.
Oh yeah, they've got a couple of Yeah, here he is.
James. James Clayton.
And he says I'm, I'm against. What I'm against is for external
organisations to dictate to Western Supermare how we should
behave or how we should show compassion.
We already know how to look at one another and be good
neighbors or look after one another and be good neighbors.
Just signing up to a scheme is replacing a general local
goodwill. With ticking boxes and
bureaucracy. And he, he also said he, he
didn't need, uh, an external organization to actually show
the community how to be compassionate.
They don't need that. They can be compassionate on
their own. You don't need these community
organisers coming in with their sort of Saul Alinsky RA rules
for radicals ideologies, umm, trying to really tip the balance
and bring, bring in what I think is the biggest driver of of
change, which is communitarianism, which is big
society, which is the third way that Tony Blair talked about.
But the big bad C word communitarianism isn't really
known in this country very much. I mean, not many people know it
is actually communitarian EU law.
So I will it later on in the week that I have done a, a, a
talk with Lark in Texas on this, on communitarianism.
So do, do look, do look at that, because you'll understand that
communitarianism is tyranny with a :), it's being brought into
your community now, and we need to see it for what it is.
Sandy, thank you very much for that and well done.
The people in Weston Super Mare. Of course you can't fight what
you don't, what you can't see or you don't understand.
So understanding the policies that the government, Keir
Starmer, the global organisations are trying to
bring in, the understanding, properly understanding these is
vital because once you understand the policies, you can
argue against it in a measured way that's capable of winning
over the hearts and minds of your local councillors.
And those local councillors, as Sandy has demonstrated, are the
very people who are capable of stopping powerful government
policy in its tracks. So it's learning how to fight
and the start is to understand what is being done.
And of course, UK column working extremely hard to bring out the
information and the detail of the attack against us.
But I'm going to end today's news by saying in my opinion and
I'm sure the opinion of the man on the Clapham omnibus, we are
watching absolute treason as our nation state is dismantled in
front of our very eyes. But you can do something about
that. We must end there.
Sandy. Ben, thank you very much for
joining me today. We will be having UK Column
EXTRA in a few minutes time and of course, UK Column news.
We'll be back at 1:00 on Wednesday.
See you then. Bye bye.