Good afternoon. It's Friday the 20th of June
2025, just after 1:00. Welcome to UK called News.
I'm your host Mike Robinson and my Co host today in the studio
is Patrick Hemingson. Welcome to the programme,
Patrick. Great to be with you, Mike.
And journalist Mark Anderson joins us by video link from the
United States. Now later in the programme, I'm
going to be covering the assisted dying bill and both
Mark and Patrick have updates on what's been made public from the
recent Bilderberg conference. But we're going to begin today
with Iran, of course. And Patrick, the situation is
not being de escalated in any way.
Not at all, Mike. And it looks like we'll bring up
on screen, it looks like this is what we are looking at.
And it gives me much pain to say that, especially since we all
have very vivid memories of 2003 in the run up to the Iraq war
and how much people were shouting and screaming.
And who knew that this was an absolute scam being run by the
Bush and Blair regimes. And yet the government's didn't
listen to the people. And for this reason, it's almost
like a repeat. But let's look at where things
are at right now. So this is what the White House
put out just yesterday. So Trump basically saying he's
approved an attack in Iran but holding off on giving final
orders. So basically the president
saying Trump's deciding whether to join in the Israeli strikes
on Iran within two weeks. So he's saying I'm deciding over
the next two weeks whether to jump in or not.
But did he approve them or not? Or is he doing it or not that it
seems to be ambiguity between the headline and that article
and the and the text you put on screen there.
Complete ambiguity. And and so this is what we have
with Trump, the policies of flip flops and swings every, you
know, 12 hours it seems. And who knows what he's going to
put on his social media account. So total chaos here.
So that's what he's saying. Now, do you believe Trump?
I mean, no. Has he built up a rating of
credibility with things that he has said and things that he's
done? No, I really, I'm going to have
to say absolutely not. I don't trust Trump.
So this looks like a ruse and a clue to this may be from the
recent post from award winning journalist Seymour Hersh will
bring this up on screen here. What I have been told is coming
in Iran and this is what Hirsch has published in the last 24
hours. He's saying here.
Quite clearly, this is a report on what is likely to happen in
Iran as early as this weekend. So the window for attacks,
according to Hirsch, is evening, late evening time, United States
East Coast standard up until Monday.
And he says, according to Israeli insiders and American
officials I've relied on for decades, it will until heavy
American bombing. And he goes on with just another
important detail. The longtime US official in
Washington who told me that all will be, quote, under control if
I ran Supreme Leader I, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, quote,
departs, AKA regime change. You can, but.
It's actually much more than that.
It's actually means dead. It means dead.
Yeah. Yeah.
So. So when he says they've already
attempted to kill him at least once already, the Israelis and
so the Americans believe that they can quote, you know, finish
the job, as it were. And it doesn't end there.
We'll just look at this here when we go back and just check
out what has been said. A talk among White House
planning groups that include JD Vance, vice president of
installing a moderate religious leader to run the country.
But Israel demands a political puppet.
So Hersh is insinuating here there's a difference of opinion
between the Israelis and the United States about what type of
regime change needs to happen. So you see, they've already
created a sort of sub debate to get get the media to argue about
what is an appropriate regime change.
So we've gone all the way from no new wars, no wars in the
Middle East, no more forever wars to well, you know, we need
to defend our allies, Israel. And then Iran shouldn't have a
nuke. And now it's Iran can't have any
enriched uranium. And now it's Iran must submit to
full surrender, unconditional surrender.
Otherwise we're going to, you know, bomb Tehran and evacuate
Tehran and so forth. And now it's regime change.
So opinion polls Mike on regime change in America are not
looking good for the MAGA base and there's been a lot of talk
and things published and commentary to that effect.
So there is a definitely a split.
This is not popular with Trumps base, not at all.
And so let's let's look at the other side of the Atlantic in
Israel. And this is what they're, this
is the debate in Israel again, how to kill Iran's leader.
And this is Israel Katz. He's a defence minister
basically saying that Khomeini cannot continue to exist.
So he's calling for the murder of the Iranian leader.
So, I mean, they're still pretending like there's some
possibility for negotiations here.
I mean, this is the crazy part. And so we have this meeting
coming up in Europe. Let's take a look at this.
This is happening right now as we speak in Geneva.
European ministers are holding emergency nuclear talks with the
Iranian Foreign Ministry today, according to sources.
And it's being led by what's called Mike the the Troika, the
Troika. So who are the troika?
UK, Germany, France plus plus Kaliakalis.
So I guess not quite. Well, the Europeans, they need 3
presidents, they need a troika. Better troika is 4.
So how does that work? Yeah, in in Europe, 1 + 1 + 1 =
4, right? It's not made to make, not meant
to make sense, Mike, but that's, that's what Brussels is all
about. So what, what are the chances of
peace between these artful dodgers here?
Keir Starmer, Frederick Mercs, who's already basically said
we're, we're here to do Israel's dirty work.
And then Emmanuel Macron, who quite frankly doesn't know
whether he's coming or going. He doesn't know which way the
door swings on a good day. And Kalia Callis, well, she is
basically a Warhawk. So I'm not, I'm not holding out
much hope for this. Now what?
What do you think this is about here?
And this is the question with this one.
I don't know what they're actually up to here.
I'm very sceptical. I personally, I think that this
is inconsequential. I can't imagine what leverage
any of these Europeans will have on either the United States or
Israel. They've been totally supine when
it comes to to Netanyahu, to the genocide in Gaza and to the
unprovoked war against Iran, an illegal war of aggression.
The very thing that they're, you know, up in arms and raising
cane with Russia over in Ukraine.
They've got nothing to say about Israel.
And not only that, but they're talking about, you know, Israel
wants to assassinate the entire Iranian government.
They've already done half the government on the first day of
the attack. They've killed all the top
officials, half of them. So I mean, this should be a
crisis moment. So the question is, what's
Europe going to do here? That's the big question.
What can Europe do here? And I personally, I'm not
convinced. It almost looks like this is a
distraction because you have to remember they're all working in
concert with Israel. All of these people are diehard
Zionists. They're totally in the tank with
Tel Aviv and Netanyahu. And they're they can't do
anything, I think, to sway Donald Trump.
I can't imagine what, what leverage does Europe have?
Europe doesn't have any leverage on this as far as I can see.
And I mean, this is a very good question.
They're they're putting on a front.
But is this just good cop bad cop exercise going on do you
think? Well, if you consider, Mike,
what Seymour Hersh is published there, wouldn't this be a nice
distraction to try to? They think they can lower the
guard of the Iranians and then come in hard with a bombing
campaign on the weekend. Because isn't that what the
United States and Israel did already with the nuclear talks
in the sixth round of talks? They managed to admit it.
We reported on it last week on this programme, that Israel's
plan was to lull the Iranians into complacency while planning
a surprise attack. Now, do you think the Iranians
will fall for that twice? I don't think so.
No, I don't think so. So we'll see where this goes.
Now. Former Labour leader Jeremy
Corbyn, Mike is, is somebody that could have been the Labour,
could have been Prime Minister. He was ousted by the Israeli
lobby, by the deep state, by the intelligence services.
And certainly the United States was part of that effort, along
with the Tory party, of course, and Rupert Murdoch all happily
work together to oust Jeremy Corbyn.
Now he he has been doing a lot of interviews and he's been
doing sterling work on the floor of the House of Commons.
And it, I, I really can't imagine who would be a better
leader of the Labor Party at this very moment in time if it's
about preserving human life and World Peace.
Here's a video clip of Corbin just laying out just one
important aspect of this whole story that seems to be missing
from the mainstream coverage. Why do you think more hasn't
been made of Israelis nuclear weapons?
Because fundamentally the media narrative on most global
channels is essentially pro Israel.
Despite the genocide findings, despite the continued occupation
of Gaza and the West Bank, despite the deaths of what
60,000 and more people already there, some or other that's now
parked. And we're now into what Keir
Starmer and David Lammy call legitimate self defence.
Secondly, it was only dragged out of Lammy during persistent
questioning from Richard Bergen and myself that he acknowledged
that reluctantly that Israel actually has nuclear weapons, is
not an adherent to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty or to
the Global Ban Treaty. Iran does not have nuclear
weapons. How do I know that?
Because for once, I believe the CIA when they reported to
Congress in March that there are no nuclear weapons in Iran.
The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear
weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the
nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003.
Powerful Corbyn listen, Keir Starmer ousting of Corbin the
the imposing of Keir Starmer on the party.
It seems like a coup at this point.
It honestly does. But what the end was Tulsi
Gabbard, that's the director of national intelligence in the
United States stating unequivocally in her assessment
the the entire intelligence community's assessment in March.
Iran does not have a bomb and is not working on a bomb.
So that should be the policy of the United States government.
But that's what that's not what Donald Trump said when he was
door stepped by ACNN reporter on Air Force One.
Listen to this. But.
How close do you personally think that they were to getting
one because Tulsi Gabbard? Tulsi Gabbard testified in March
that that the intelligence community said Iran wasn't
building a nuclear weapon. I don't.
Care what she said. I think they were very.
Close to having so AM. I Where is he taking his advice
from? From the D and I or from
somebody else? Could be someone else in his
ear, could be Lindsey Graham, could be the Israeli lobby,
could be Jared Kushner, Or could just be that's what Donald Trump
thinks and to hell with the intelligence community.
He just threw Tulsi Gabbard under the bus.
He threw his DNI. It was confirmed by the Senate
under the bus. And they're trying to paper this
over in the media say, oh, there's no at daylight between
them and all of this stuff. So Donald Trump and Tulsi
Gabbard, and this is what Ray McGovern has said here.
He says memo to Tulsi Gabbard, resign.
Trump is trashed. Last vestige of independent
Intel analysis. Don't lie.
You are not on the same page leaving leave lying to Trump.
He knows Iran is not working on a nuclear weapon.
Go public. Americans have a right to know
this. That's Ray McGovern, head of
Veterans for Intelligence Sanity there in the United States.
And so here's this, what the media is kind of dived into this
year. And this is what they're
claiming anyway. In the eyes of the Trump and
some close to him, Gabbard was warning him not to green light
the Israel attacking Iran. Trump even expressed his
disapproval to her personally, the three people said so.
Three sources close to the author here, the authors of this
Politico piece here, and they go on.
Gabbard insisted to reporters Tuesday that she and the
president are on the same page on Iran.
And the persons close to Gabbard denied any tension between her
and the president. So that's the public line.
What's the reality? I think there is there is a
difference. But then again, this could all
be theatre Mike with Trump. This could just be sort of fake
opposition WWF wrestling to make it look like, oh, he has a
restraining voice in the cabinet.
It's Tulsi Gabbard. She's a peacenik.
And she released a video about the Hiroshima bombs a couple of
days before on June 10th. That seemed like very out of
character. Maybe it's legitimate, maybe
it's genuine. But if it is genuine, she needs
to resign and go public and say this is wrong, this is going to
lead to nuclear war. I mean, that would be the right
thing to do for her, seeing that she's been thrown under the bus
by her own president. Or she could play it safe.
Or this is just all theatre, Mike.
It's all theatre. Who knows, Time will tell.
Time will tell. And Mark, let me welcome you to
the programme because something that was announced a few days
ago was the sailing of the USS Nimitz.
That's. True.
Good day everyone. Listeners out in UK column land.
Hello guys. Yes, the USS Nimitz, about a 50
year old aircraft carrier reportedly is going to be
rerouted from Asia to the Middle East.
And there are various concerns across left wing, right wing,
centrist websites, so many, it's incredible that the Nimitz will
be quote unquote, the next US Liberty, USS Liberty.
And the, the thinking is that it's an old ship being prepared
for being decommissioned, which evidently will cost up to a
billion dollars to fully tear down because it's a nuclear
powered ship. And so the thinking is that why
not put this derelict out there? Israel might pull off false flag
and attack the ship. And that would much more
solidify and justify getting the US involved in the conflict
between Israel and Iran. So in other words, will history
repeat itself? That's the huge question being
asked. And it's ironic that this came
out right about the time that my interview with Phil Turney, the
USS Liberty Survivor, was released on UK Column News.
And we're showing that screen here, the screenshot from the
article, rather the interview that's now posted at
ukcolumn.org. And we can listen here
momentarily what Phil had to say about why he felt that the USS
Liberty was attacked, what the ultimate motive was, and then
relate that again to some of the theories and concerns about the
Nimitz. So let's go ahead and go with
that. It's incredible to me, given
what you described, that they can still try and claim that
this was a case of mistaken identity when we both know
better, as do your fellow survivors.
And that, evidently, and correct me if I'm wrong, they wanted to
sink the liberty and blame it on the Arab forces during that six
day war in the Mediterranean. That was the evident goal,
correct? Yes, that was that was the goal
Mark and you know we were, we were probably set up a year in
advance, a year in advance have this happen.
It was all pre planned. They wanted to sink our ship,
blame it on the Arabs and get us into nuclear war.
We had sacked aircraft on the way to come bomb Cairo even
before we were attacked. The aircraft were in the air.
Aircraft were in the air even before we got attacked.
So Lyndon Johnson, Leviasco, the premier, Prime Minister of
Israel and a handful of others and both governments did this
and to get us into World War Three, that was the whole plan.
They wanted all of it. They wanted all the land.
What's going on now in Gaza wouldn't be happening right now.
If our ship would have something to take it all, then with the
help of the United States said you got it all.
Yes, indeed. Interesting stuff.
So of course, the parallel that's being considered is that
the ship would be attacked, the Nimitz would be attacked by
Israeli forces and blamed on Iran, thereby to escalate the
war, possibly pointing toward, heaven forbid, something
approaching World War Three. At any rate, there's other,
there's various sources, including the US Naval Institute
news here that have confirmed that the aircraft carrier USS
Nimitz is sailing to the Middle East there.
There was even an earlier article, I don't know if we
still have that slide. Even back in March, before the
conflict reared its ugly head, there was already news that the
Nimitz was going to be decommissioned on for practical
reasons. And at any rate, this national
interest item came up and it's it's a very kind of strange
article in the way that it's written.
They're claiming to have solid knowledge, absolute reliable
knowledge that no, the USS Nimitz will not be destroyed in
a false flag operation, which is pretty ridiculous.
It goes on to say baseless social media theories, baseless
theories, they say, claim the USS Nimitz will be sacrificed in
a false flag attack. But experts dismissed these as
fear driven misinformation amplified by viral algorithms.
But all the people who are concerned about this are saying
is that like with the Liberty and the the main in Havana
harbours that sparked the Spanish American War, Pearl
Harbour, World War 2, Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam, they're simply
saying that there's historical precedent for false flag
operations to start major conflict.
So for someone to say in advance proactively that this won't
happen is really quite ridiculous.
There's really no way around it. And that same national interest
piece happened to cite. And there's so many things that
could be cited, but it happened to cite this X piece by a James
Lee. Many know Israel mistakenly
quote unquote attacked the USS Liberty in 67.
Fewer know he claims it may have been part of a CIA Mossad false
flag op called Project Cyanide to spark regime change in Egypt.
With the USS Nimitz headed to Iran.
You have to wonder, is history repeating itself?
So that's the widely asked question right now guys.
Not a ridiculous question at all, as the national interest so
wrongly implied. But a very important thing to
pay attention to, and it's just ironic this came out right when
my interview with Phil Turney came out, which by the way, is
getting a lot of reads right now, probably more than it
normally normally would have received.
So that's good news in that sense.
So back to you. Thank you, Mark.
And yeah, the question is, can they actually, if they had, even
if they had had this planned, can they actually pull it off
now that this this conversation is happening quite as publicly
as it is? I, I hoped, I hope it would make
a difference if indeed that is one of the sort of nefarious
plans in the back pocket of these two bad actors, the United
States and Israel, also Britain and its allies too.
We can't leave NATO out of this. But so where's Russia on all
this, Mike? That's the question.
Russia has vested interest in Iran.
They have strategic partnerships, economic plans
together. Vladimir Putin is irate.
He's doing shuttle diplomacy. This is a this is a take from a
meeting which happened just in the last 48 hours.
This is Vladimir Putin talking about Russian specialist
scientists that are currently working at the Iranian nuclear
sites. Listen to this.
And. Just to clarify, Patrick, he's
talking about 250 there at the moment.
It could be 600 in the future, but we're talking about civilian
nuclear research here, and nobody has ever suggested
anything, except for, of course, Britain, the EU and the United
States. Not research engineers who are
building, working on the maintenance and building of the
reactors because it's it's Iranian joint project.
So Russia's not happy. They've got a contract with the
Iranian government. And basically he's saying
they're not going anywhere. So he's kind of throwing down
the gauntlet. He has made private
communications with the Israelis.
Let's take a look at this. Just to reiterate where Vladimir
Putin stands here. We'll bring this up, as you
know, Russians picked up where the Germans left off.
And for sure our specialists work there, more than 200
people. We have an agreement with Israel
that they will not be targeted. OK.
So, I mean, do you trust the Israelis?
I don't know. I don't know.
In this case, given Iran's plans to develop a peaceful atom, we
could continue working together and help them in this.
We discussed it with the Israelis and the Americans.
We could fulfil Iran's needs and thus lift Israel's concerns.
Well, they already did that, that following the US withdrawal
from the JCPOA Iran nuclear deal, a perfectly good deal that
Trump tore up because he was instructed to tear it up by the
Israeli lobby. It's as simple as that.
And Russia then offered to basically come to the rescue, if
you remember after that, to handle the Iranian themselves,
to do that sort of deal independently under
international oversight. It was a win win.
But the United States, Donald Trump in his first term said,
no, we won't accept that there's going to be no deal.
And they continue to put sanctions on Iran at the same
time also increasing sanctions on Russia.
That was Trump 1.0. So that's where things stand
there. So who who knows?
I mean, this is a very, very delicate situation for the
Chinese and for the Russians, but I don't think they're able
to intervene militarily at the moment.
That's just way too dicey. But they can help in terms of
supply and I certainly. You don't see this as an effort
to bring Russia effectively bring them into a second
conflict and weaken them in Ukraine, for example?
No, I don't think so, although Russia could strategically put
assets in Iran as a marker, much like they did with Syria limited
assets. But already they're in the
driving seat in Ukraine. And if the US attack Iran,
that's they can kiss Ukraine goodbye.
It's over at that point. Russia's already moving in heavy
on Odessa. We'll see how that goes.
But so this is also brought up the debate in the United States,
Mike, about the United States's relationship with Israel, the
Israeli lobbies, relationship with congressmen and senators.
And there was an interview with Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz.
Ted Cruz is the Zionist Zionist in in the Senate.
He is the art science. He's also the right hand of
President Trump. He's also a Bible thumping
evangelical OK talker. I mean, this is the most
extraordinary interview. He really put him on the spot
on, you know, the Israeli lobby. I pack.
Why, Why is a foreign lobby not registered as a foreign agent?
And Cruz was just doing evasive action, rearguard action the
entire interview. It was a beautiful interview by
Tucker Carlson. Here.
We'll bring Ted Cruz up on. We'll call this Tucker versus
Ted Cruz and Candace Owens, a popular conservative commentator
and YouTube as well. She released just a short on her
YouTube channel that kind of sums this up and it's absolutely
extraordinary. Includes a small clip from the
Tucker Cruz interview. Let's listen to this.
Where does my support for Israel come from #1 because biblically
we are commanded to support Israel.
But #2 hold on, hold on. You're a senator and now you're
throwing out theology and I am a Christian and I am allowed to
weigh in on this. We are commanded as Christians
support the government of Israel.
We are commanded to support Israel.
And we're. What does that mean?
We're told those who bless Israel will be blessed, But
what? Hold on, Define Israel.
This is important. Are you kidding?
This, this majority Christian country define Israel could.
Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you've
asked like 49 questions about. So that's what Genesis, that's
what God is talking about. The nation of Israel.
Yes, and he's so does that the current borders, the current
leadership, he's talking about the political entity called
Israel. He's talking about the nation of
Israel. Yet nations exists and he's
discussing a nation, a nation was the people of Israel.
Is the nation the God is referring to in Genesis?
Is that the same as the country run by Benjamin Netanyahu right
now? Yes, yes it is.
And I'm really happy he said that because when you hear it,
you realise how ridiculous it sounds.
Even if you're not following a theology, if you don't identify
as a Christian, you realise that you have a senator that is
sitting across saying that his number one reason, he didn't
say, one of the reasons said my number one reason that I support
Israel is because the Bible commands me to do so.
And just so you know, the Bible does not command, and this is
what Tucker Carlson is getting to in that clip.
It absolutely does not command you to support the modern state
of Israel. Genesis is is pointing to the
modern 1948 created state of Israel and and you must support
it despite the fact that it is very much involved in what can
only be described as demonic behaviour since its creation,
right. And so you're going to ignore
every other biblical passage. You're going to misinterpret
this one. It's a, a dispensationalist
heresy. Dispensationalist heresy, which
was factually funded by the World Zionist Congress.
And we can do another episode on that.
As I present to you guys all of the evidence that what it guided
the notations. This really stems from the
Schofield Bible about the heresy of the Schofield Bible.
Schofield himself was an absolute fraud who got funded
and was overseas and alleges that he wrote all of these notes
in the Bible and is telling people how to read their Bibles
the first time annotations were put underneath the passages.
So this is what Genesis says and this is what it means.
And this is how this heresy arrived in America.
Then somehow this guy is able to becomes the most printed book
and Oxford Press gets behind it because like a random pastor you
get you get the idea. Here it was very, very much a
funded effort to have Christians misunderstand the Bible, and Ted
Cruz is one of these Christians. This is extraordinary.
So this really takes the mask off.
You can see a religious fanatic, Ted Cruz, saying the Bible
commands him and all Christians to support Benjamin Netanyahu
and the state of Israel. So according to Ted Cruz logic,
Mike, if I, let's say, you know, had a son, I named my son Jesus,
does that mean the Bible commands all Christians to
worship my son as the son of God?
I mean, it's just utterly ridiculous.
I think that should you have a son and call him Jesus, that he
would be more closely related to the Christian Jesus in the
current state of Israel as to any biblical entity.
I mean, you know, it's just ridiculous.
It's the literal, the literal translation or, or subjective
translation and perversion of religious scriptures and texts.
And that's the problem with extremist fanatical
Christianity, Zionist Christianity, and that's the
problem with extremist fanatical Zionism.
So that's why they go together so perfectly.
How can this be forming policy, foreign policy, war policy.
I mean, this is, I dare say this is biblical, but the level of
deceit, the lying, the the support for a genocide has
nothing to do with the teachings of Jesus Christ in my humble
opinion. But that's just me.
Maybe you have a different opinion.
Feel free to weigh in in the chat box.
OK. And that takes us to House
Republicans. Democrats moving to limit Trump,
friend. Is that actually going to
happen? Well, this is an ongoing effort.
You've got a number over 30 Co sponsors.
I believe this is ROH Connor and Thomas Massie, a Democrat and
Republican, a joint effort here to basically stem the tide of
this executive branch of Donald Trump.
And this is what Thomas Massie tweeted here.
Most Americans do not support US involvement in Israel's war
against Iran. Which begs the question, why
doesn't more of Congress oppose it?
Literally no one campaigned on another war in the Middle East.
So this is true. But this is gap between the
public, Mike, and our elected leaders.
Once again we see this strange phenomenon where the public
doesn't reflect their their views aren't reflected in the
leadership here and in America. The answer is right here.
This is basically the explanation here.
The 2020 24 election was clearly not won by the Republicans or
Trump. It was won by IPAC.
Israel won the 2024 elections. You see the black dots in the
middle, That's IPAC. You see the Republicans in the
blue or in the red and the Democrats in the blue.
Those are the two parties. So you have a giant Israeli
uniparty owned by the Israeli lobby and they spent hundreds of
millions of dollars to get those black dots.
I trust, trust me on that. So that's that's the issue
there, Mike. So I mean, that's that's about
all we have to say on this topic as well.
And yeah, I mean, we can throw up here the map of the Middle
East. And these are all US bases
within firing range of Iranian rockets.
And those will all become targets if the United States
decides to bomb the Iranians this weekend.
And if that happens, all bets are off.
How are you going to be able to contain this conflict?
I'm not sure, but I don't know. Do we have time for the?
No, we'll keep the Tony Blair Ben video until extra if that's
OK. OK, well, if we have time, sure.
Yeah, it's former MP Tony Benn. The great Tony Benn.
Yes, OK. Well, this week then, the United
Service, sorry, the Royal United Services Institute held their
land warfare conference and they've had keynotes.
Each is from Secretary of State for War John Healey and chief of
the general staff Sir Roly Walker.
We're allowed to know what these two said, which can be to boil
down to Russia, Iran, kill them all.
That's basically what they said. But RUSI says that the Land
Warfare Conference quotes bring together brings together senior
land and ground forces leaders, policymakers and experts from
the industry and think tanks to discuss and debate the dangerous
security challenges that we are currently facing or sorry that
the the UK and its allies are currently facing.
And that will quote, explore how the land forces can increase
their combat power by leveraging new methods and capabilities to
increase their lethality, enhance their survivability and
regain manoeuvrability. So the question is, what are
these new methods? Well, AI, of course, is right up
there. And so it's perhaps no surprise
that the so called gold sponsors of the conference include
Helsing, A defence technology company providing cutting edge
software and artificial intelligence to protect
democracies. That makes it sound really
great, doesn't it? And Palantir, the world's
leading software platform. These are their words for data
driven operations and decision making.
Their silver sponsors include ARX Robotics which focuses on
the digital transformation of land forces and the development
of autonomous unmanned systems. And bronze sponsors include
Stark a quotes technology driven defence company delivering the
systems that Europe and NATO need now, including unmanned
systems that are designed to meet the realities of modern
conflict. Colon AI enabled software
defined and ready for affordable production at scale.
But as the Times reports here, RUSI was forced by the Starmer
regime to issue a statement on reporting restrictions in place
at the conference. So speeches from John Healey and
Rolly Walker, as I said, were allowed to be reported upon.
But speeches, for example, by Air Chief Marshall, Sir Richard
Knighton, the chief of the Air staff, who's expected to become
head of the armed forces, and General Sir Jim Hockenhall, the
head of the of Strategic Command, we could not be made
public. There were no restrictions on
reporting on military leaders from foreign nations.
So that meant that if people were on a panel with auk based
military leader, everything could be reported about what
that panel said, except for the UK guys.
It's quite incredible. Now this has been described as
unprecedented interference from Downing St and RUSI said in an
email that they sent out on Monday quotes.
We wanted to clarify late change in reporting rules relating to
speakers from the British armed forces which differ from those
which have been applied in previous years and which also
differ from the printed brochure.
The majority of speeches and panel appearances by British
personnel will not be for reporting, whereas those by
individuals from foreign militaries will be.
So this, as I say, absolutely unprecedented censorship of what
is effectively, OK, you've got to pay to buy a ticket to, but
it's effectively a public event and it's normally widely
reported on and they normally stream or at least make
recordings of, of the speeches and put them out afterwards.
Why is the British regime doing this at this stage?
This looks very much like because they are preparing for
war and, uh, they don't want, uh, some of the comments from
some of these military leaders, uh, becoming public.
And and corporate defence contractors.
So the merger of government and corporate interest.
This is just fascist behaviour. And I'm not, I'm not saying that
flippantly right. It is what it is.
So why, why chatter mouse rules? If we're just talking about the
quote defence industry, well, it's not the defence industry,
it's the offence industry. Absolutely OK.
If you like what the UK column does, please head over to the UK
column website and to click on the box at the top of the page
for helping us out. Your help is absolutely needed
and very much appreciated. And thank you again to everybody
that is a member has joined again recently or joined
recently. We do need your support.
Please continue that if you possibly can.
Tonight at 7:00 PM, the weekly banter with Charles, myself and
Germ will go out on the usual live stream places.
And we're talking about immigration and national
identity tonight. So that's potentially
controversial. A reminder of the date for your
diary which is Saturday the 18th of October.
For the next UK column on location event in New York,
health is a topic or health related topics will be the main
theme and you'd be very welcome to come along to that.
Tickets will be on sale very soon.
We will have more details of this shortly.
The Science Beautiful Festival is taking place next weekend in
Wimborne in Dorset, UK Column will be there and well, I'm glad
to say that the Facebook competition has been won for two
free tickets for that and the winner is Madman on Facebook, so
I'm sure the guys will be in touch very shortly to help you
out with that. A quick reminder of the Don't
Let geoengineering go over Your Head event, Picnic in the Park,
which is happening in Hyde Park tomorrow at 2:00 PM.
And Sonya Poulton will be live streaming that as well.
But get along to think the weather's going to be very
pleasant for that. So get along to that if you can.
And coming soon is that Andrew Bridging will be at the Seven
Stars Hotel in Totnes on the 25th of July, 7:00 PM Doors.
Doors will be opening at 6:30. Get along to that if you
possibly can. Not to be missed as it says at
the end there. OK, let's come on then to
assisted dying. And of course, MPs are debating
and voting on the final stage of the assisted dying bill today.
And the question is, is the assisted dying bill going to be
euthanized? Well, if Kim, Kim Bledbetter and
her supporters win the vote today, the bill will go to the
House of Lords for consideration.
If the vote is lost, that will end it for now.
But in November, if you remember, MPs voted to back the
bill and that went to the next stage and they voted by a
majority of 55. Ledbetter says she's confident
the bill's going to pass today and she may have grounds for
that confidence because that 55 majority was larger than
expected. And most consider it unlikely
the 28 will have changed their minds, although some clearly
have. There have been amendments to
the bill and some of these will be voted on today.
And of course, the main amendment is that instead of
having a court having to approve an assisted dying request
supported by two doctors, it will be decided by a panel
consisting of a lawyer, a consultant psychiatrist and
social workers. Other amendments include a
requirement for any doctors assessing assisted dying.
Requests have gone through training on domestic abuse,
including coercive control and financial abuse.
As if that's going to make a difference if somebody's
particularly interested in pursuing that kind of agenda.
And another one, making independent advocates available
for anybody that might be experiencing substantially
substantial difficulty and understanding the processes.
So that's that is going on at the moment.
We wait to see what the final result of that is going to be,
but it's looking like it might proceed to the House of Lords.
We'll see. Let's move on then.
And Mark, let's bring you back and some more information is
coming out on Bilderberg since the conference ended.
What have you got for us? Well, this is.
First hand information, pretty much my own research across the
board. I was looking around at some
people whose names are not real common at Bilderberg and looking
at the economic angle. Since I mentioned Congressman
Jason Smith in last week's report, head of the Ways and
Means Committee, they write the tariff laws and so on.
I thought, well, what else economic might have happened and
there was a speech, and we'll show this here, by the European
Commissioner, Maria Albuquerque. For the High Level Conference on
European Financial Integration, we've talked before about
European Central banks integrating and fiscal fiscal
integration in the EU over the years.
Well, this is more of that advancing the Savings and
Investment Union, very important, jointly organised by
the European Commission and the European Central Bank.
And what I've got here on this is that this was on June 12th,
just before Maria Albuquerque left Portugal, where she's from,
and went to Stockholm for Bilderberg.
And this speech, of course, would be of particular interest
to some of the other attendees, which included the Bank for
International Settlements GM elect Pablo Hernandez, World
Economic Forum President Boris Brenda, and the Eurogroup
President Pascal Donahue, as well as the European Investment
Bank President Nadia Calvino. And Maria Albuquerque also noted
that financial integration could not be more relevant.
Today's discussions on the eve of Bilderberg are centred on the
Savings and Investment Union, or SIU, and she says the political
momentum is behind that. Now they're talking also about a
more power concentrated single supervision of the Savings and
Investment Union and so on and so forth.
And what they're saying is that this would help shore up the
more fragmented capital markets in the European, in the European
Union compared to the US capital markets by tapping in or
leveraging or somehow using the savings of Europeans, typical
everyday Europeans bank account savings to put a financial
muscle behind this. Sorry, just to just to sort of
I'm understanding this, obviously in the 2008 financial
crash, we saw Greece and other countries experiencing bail
insurance and money, people's money effectively being nicked
in order to shore up the failing financial system.
We're talking about a formalisation of this process.
It does look that way. It smells like that.
It remains to be seen a little bit.
But yeah, there there was those negative interest rates.
There were people in Cyprus having their bank accounts
syphoned. And at that time, the viceroy
overseeing the Cyprus situation was a long time.
Bilderberg attendee Joseph Ackerman out of Germany, a
banker we may recall. At any rate, Maria Albuquerque
revealed something very interesting in that report that
I cited the title of a moment ago.
At the end of 2023, EU financial assets totaled 34 point €34.5
trillion with AT, which sounds totally amazing to me.
I thought maybe it was a typo, but that's what she wrote.
Household financial assets in the U in the EU.
Excuse me, totaling €34.5 trillion.
Of that around €11.5 trillion sits in cash and low yield
deposits. And there's no surefire way of
knowing whether EU citizens, you know, will directly benefit from
this. Would they get an investment
prospectus in the mail saying we've we're going to invest your
savings money this way and is it going to be totally voluntary?
These are some of the questions. Would they actually get
dividends with, would their money bring returns or would it
be something much more underhanded like you mentioned a
moment ago, Mike and the, the excuse me, the publication GIS
Reports, which is more or less an impartial journal, also
expressed some concern about this.
As highlighted in the European Commission's Competitive
Competitiveness Compass, the EU will require an annual
investment of up to €800 billion by 2030 to modernise what's
called as chronically distressed economy.
These figures stem from a September 2024 report by career
European banker and past Bilderberg attendee Mario
Draghi, which underscore the urgency for groundbreaking,
groundbreaking innovation across the board.
And so it does appear highly possible that European citizens
savings could be pilfered in some way to shore up these
fragmented capital markets in the EU and to help to help EU
meet its investment goals, its investment future, you might
say, with regards to all the defence spending that it's being
called on to make. So that this is something very,
very curious, something that deserves very close attention.
Now, there's another aspect of this concerning Congressman
Jason Smith. I got a letter back because when
you see the Bilderberg attendance list, you have to
keep in mind that that's more of the invitation list.
It doesn't necessarily confirm that everyone actually showed
up. But Bilderberg wrote me back
saying, as it shows here, Congressman Jason Smith did
indeed attend, as mentioned in the participant list that was
published, and EU Commissioner Maria Albuquerque also attended
as listed. I wanted to make sure of that
because this Savings and Investment Union thing that I
cited was announced in Portugal right before Stockholm became
the site of the 2025 Bilderberg meeting.
Moving on from there, it's interesting also that Jason
Smith was there along with the EU counterpart in a way, Mauro
Sefkovic, he's the EU Commissioner for Trade and
Economic Security, as we show here.
As I noted, Jason Smith from the 8th District of Missouri chairs
the House Ways and Means Committee, trade laws, tariff
laws, customs regulations, things like that, while they
they met under the same roof. And after that, Sefkovic, who
had already been to the United States more than once this past
spring, he spoke to the American Enterprise Institute.
You might recall, while AEI, the Enterprise Institute, sent a
emissary to Bilderberg this year.
From Bilderberg, Savkovic went over to Alberta, Canada to the
G7 and met with Jameson Greer, the trade representative of the
US on the side. And he also met with Greer
earlier in the year when he visited the US and Robert
Lighthizer, who was Trump's trade representative during
Trump One point O he was also at Bilderberg.
And at any rate, the what appears to be happening is that
with a July 9 deadline being imposed by the Trump
administration, the transatlantic allies are rushing
to clinch a deal before Washington hits the EU block
with tariffs up of up to 50%, five, zero, 50%.
And Trump's import duties would affect about 70% of EU exports
to the US. So it appears that's why Jason
Smith was mainly at Bilderberg, to talk with Seth Kovic and
provide input and collaborate a bit.
So Seth Kovic could go to the G7 and try and stem the tide of
these tariffs affecting a lot of EU imports going into the US and
doing that at the G7. Now, another dimension of this,
of course, is accountability. And Jason Smith, I did a pretty
in depth search. There seems to be no indication
that any of the Missouri Meet Missouri media, either newspaper
or broadcast. They appear to have no idea that
their beloved congressman went to this elite confab in
Stockholm known as Bilderberg. And something like that happened
in 2018, which is the last time I was in the UK.
John Hickenlooper, the Colorado governor, went to Bilderberg and
he got cited by the state ethics Commission.
And 2025 is the five year anniversary of Hickenlooper
being cited by the ethics Commission in Colorado precisely
for attending Bilderberg, among some other misdeeds.
And here's a little bit of what that report had to say.
Hickenlooper had paid $1500 for travel and lodging, but he also
enjoyed luxury accommodations that were far beyond that cost.
He should have realised that he was receiving a gift from Fiat
Chrysler, the sponsor. There's one other call out quote
from that report, if we might show that the the commissioners
of the Ethics Commission report also said unanimously found that
Hickenlooper had violated the gift ban with his attendance to
the Bilderberg meetings in Turin, Italy.
And that was again in 2018. So the all important question
now as I'll show here, come to find out, Missouri also has an
ethics Commission. And I've already placed a call
to them and some of the Missouri media to see if they're going to
take an interest or at least see if they're already looking at
Jason Smith's participation at Bilderberg and whether something
similar to what happened to Hickenlooper might come down to
ensure some accountability here. So there they'll be much more to
report on that very soon. Go back to you guys.
Yeah, Patrick, what have you got on this?
Well, on the Bilderberg front, if you're looking for a good
sort of wrap up, a good review of what happened at Bilderberg,
a great summary along with original photos as well.
We've got this up on 21st Century, wired.com, a review of
Bilderberg 2025, AI, Drones, Technocracy and the
Transatlantic Alliance. This is by journalist Hannah
Borno, and this is up on our website right now.
Fantastic summary and analysis as well as naming all the names
and what everybody got up to and some great photographs as well
from her and some of her colleagues.
So we've got that up at 21 wire and as it as it goes, this is
another article that people I think need to also take a look
at here. And this is on the Guardian.
This is by Charlie Skelton, who's been covering Bilderberg
for a very long time as well. China haunts, Bilderberg talks
as usual, suspects plot, world domination.
This is a fantastic article and it just shows you the pivot
towards Asia along with all the 5th generation total warfare,
the AI, the drones, etcetera. So if you really want to kind of
get a good sort of rounded scope of what went on and what this
meeting really has been all about this year, those are two
articles I highly recommend. Hopefully we'll have those in
the show notes. OK, Thank you, Patrick.
Now let's come on to the issue of propaganda.
And the government's media complex continues to promote the
war narrative, of course. Let's have a look at a couple of
examples. First of all, we have the Mirror
here making sure we all know that first of all, World War 3
is coming and that when it arrives, conscription will be a
thing. So this whole conscription
narrative continues to sort of rumble under the surface without
any admission that it's actually going to be a thing.
But apparently, according to the Mirror, if you're a Baker, a
farmer, a doctor, a nurse, or an engineer, you'll be all right,
although I suspect the latter isn't 100% safe.
But in the meantime, gov.uk is very excited to tell us that the
nuclear bomb is great because jobs are a thing.
And so new figures, they say, reveal that 1500 skilled roles
have been created at the in the last year at the UK's Nuclear
Weapons Technology centre. AWE and they claim to have
carried out a study which shows that people working on weapons
of mass destruction receive 20% above the the UK salary, the
average UK salary. So that's good news.
They decided to announce this alongside what they describe as
a landmark £15 billion investment within this
Parliament to renew the U KS sovereign nuclear warhead.
And this was confirmed through the recent Strategic Defence
Review. To keep, they say, Britain's,
the British people safe while supporting almost 10,000 UK
jobs. Because don't forget, the first
role of government is to keep people safe.
Now Lisa Nandy was a guest on this morning's BBC Today
programme and at the end of her segment she was asked about the
pro Palestine protesters who broke into Brize Norton, RAF
Brize Norton this morning and she couldn't help herself.
She described these processors as being irresponsible and hoped
the full force of the law would be imposed because national
security is so important and quotes the first role of
government is to keep people safe.
This has become a term of sheer propaganda.
We're hearing it everywhere now. We've got to keep people safe.
That's the role of government that began that principle began
to be rolled out with with COVID.
It's now being continued through the various conflicts that we're
seeing around the world now and it's being used to justify this
increased defence spending, which is actually war spending
and just sheer propaganda. It's total Orwellian inversion.
So so activists wanting to stop the UK from sending weapons and
defence parts to Israel. Who is committing A genocide,
literally slaughtering 10s of thousands of women and children
and innocent civilians that somehow keeping people safe by
by by by clamping down on those those concerned citizens who are
doing basically, I don't know, civil disobedience I think is
probably the right word for it, but no.
Mark was talking about accountability.
What they're doing is attempting to hold people to account, but
they don't want to be held to account.
So prosecute them. Put them in prison instead.
Oh, they'd love to delete the word accountability from the
great digital archives of humanity once the opportunity
arises and replace it with Hutzpah.
We'll leave it there. Yes.
Well, look on screen at the moment is Sir Richard Moore, the
current head of the Secret Intelligence Service, otherwise
known as MI 6. And as I mentioned on Monday's
programme, he's to be replaced by Blaise Metrovelli later this
year, I think at the end of September.
Now the Prime Minister has appointed him to be the next
chair of the Kennedy Memorial Trust for a period of five
years. For those who don't know, the
Kennedy Memorial Trust was established in 1964 to
administer money raised in the United Kingdom as a tribute to
the late John Kennedy, whatever Britain's role was in his death.
Maybe it's some kind of, you know, some kind of exercise in
trying to absolve themselves of responsibility in some way.
But anyway, part of this fund was used to create and maintain
the Kennedy Memorial site Running made and the rest is
used to provide Kennedy scholarships, which enable
British postgraduate studies students sorry to to study at
Harvard and at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Now the recruitment process for for trustees of which Moore has
now won, of course, being the chairman, they're run this
recruitment process run by the board of the trust and approved
by the Prime Minister. And in this case, the
recruitment panel was chaired by Marianne Sieghart, who's a
senior independent trustee of the Kennedy Memorial Trust,
apparently. And of course Mary Anne is also
a journalist. She's served on Ofcom's board in
the past and written for the Times and so on.
So she's a pretty establishment figure as well.
Anyway, getting back to Richard Moore, he has ABA in philosophy,
politics and economics from Oxford University.
And leaving Oxford he won a Kennedy scholarship.
So isn't it appropriate therefore that he has now become
chairman giving out these gifts? So he then went off to the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and then in
2007 he attended Stanford Executive Programme.
So Patrick, what is this? Is this AUK equivalent of the
Rhodes Scholarship programme? Deep state and action grooming.
It's next generation. Is that what this is all about?
Yeah, we're the Chevening Scholarship Programme run by the
British embassies overseas or the the British Council.
Yeah, that's exactly what it is. It's it's a career path and by
putting the head of head of intelligence in charge of that
programme, that's talent spotting, grooming and getting
people prepared for a position in the deep state.
So maintaining the transatlantic Anglo American shape that is
represented in confabs like Bilderberg and others.
So that's exactly what it looks like.
Yes, OK, well, let's let's leave it then with this story because
I mean, everybody has seen the headlines over the last couple
of days as we've been experiencing relatively warm
temperatures for the UK, at least that you know, the BBC
here is typical temperatures to hit 32 C again as heat wave
grips UK. Now this article, if we're
talking about war propaganda, this is absolute climate
propaganda because if you read through the text of this, it's
got the usual stuff about wildfires, about how we're all
going to die and so on. And although the headline is a
little less sensationalist than others, it's absolutely
reinforcing this, this propaganda narrative.
So look, let's look at this then this came out from Sky
yesterday. Amber Heath.
Sorry, Amber heat health alert issued across England with rise
in deaths likely read more, right?
And now I strongly recommend everybody goes and looks at this
Twitter thread. We just put that back on screen.
I'm going to show a couple of the responses to this, but this
is just two of the more polite responses, so here's one.
Nobody's going to die from 30° heat.
Calm down. Fair fairpoint.
And another one here. Not gullible enough to read
more. It's summer you worthless
idiots. And those were the politest of
what is on there. Hundreds and hundreds of replies
on that, basically telling Sky News to wise up.
Because highs this weekend M24 I just checked the weather report.
Where are they getting this 32 for this weekend?
Or is this sometime in the in the unknown future?
Is that? No, I think there's probably a
couple of places around the country where the temperatures
have been a little bit higher. But Even so, the British people
spend hundreds, if not thousands of pounds every year getting out
of this country to go to Spain, to Portugal, to, to Greece to,
to experience 30° temperatures. And, and so they don't die in
the process. Now, many of the tweets in
response were highlighting the fact that actually the number of
people that die from the cold is orders of magnitude worse in
this country than those who die from, from heat stroke or some
kind of heat related illness. So, you know, it's ironic that
we are being force fed this kind of propaganda while, you know,
elderly people and, and people living in poverty continue to to
literally die during the winter from not being able to switch
their the heating on in the house.
It is quite an incredible situation.
Remember Frank Butcher and Peggy two weeks in Benidorm?
How do you say beans and chips in Spanish?
Yes, anyway. Yeah, I know.
Yes. Well, look, we got to leave it
there for today. Patrick, Mark, thank you very
much for joining us. We will be back in a few
minutes. If UK column member for some UK
column news extras, stick with the live stream.
Otherwise, have a great weekend. We'll see you 1:00 PM as usual
on Monday. See you then.
Bye. Bye.