Good afternoon. Today is Monday the 15th of
September 2025, just after 1:00. Welcome to UK column news.
I'm your host, Brian Garish, delighted to have Ben Rubin with
me in the studio. And Diane Rasmussen will also be
joining us by live video link. Well, epic events in UK over the
weekend will Saturday very large protests in London.
And let's just have a little look at that on screen.
And as we can see from this aerial picture, a very, very
large number of people attended the demonstration.
Estimates vary. I've had some estimates from
people who were there on the spot saying they thought about
800,000 of the people have said million.
Tommy Robinson claimed 3 million, I'm going to stick at
around that 800 to 1,000,000 people.
But certainly it was a lot of people and clearly a lot of
people felt motivated enough to travel into London in order to
see exactly what was going on and also to meet up with other
like minded people. What's your estimates, Ben?
Do you do you go with the Tommy Robertson 3 million or do you
think that's a bit high? I.
Think it's probably a bit high and but I think the BBC was
saying about 100,000, weren't they?
So somewhere between those two, I know someone on the ground who
said a million. So I think that's probably about
right. Well, I think think the BBC was
about 150,000. Since we're having a discussion
about these events, let's bring Diane Diane in.
Welcome, Diane. You were watching a lot of this
on Saturday, obviously from a distance, but what what was your
feeling about the numbers? Yeah, I watched the whole thing,
I think starting from around 11:30 in the morning until until
it went off around 6:30 in the evening.
And basically what happened was I watched the first part, which
was covered by Steve James or Edge of the Matrix, who started
the live stream, and he was just walking around talking to people
as he normally does. He's a friend of a UK column
asking people about their opinions about gender ideology.
And things aren't necessarily related to what we thought the
protest was for. So it's very interesting just to
get a feel from people on the ground.
And it seemed as though the people who were there generally
that he spoke to were there for the right reasons or they
believed they were there for the right reasons in terms of saving
England, saving the the, the country and, and speaking out
for women's rights and the other issues that we would expect to
hear. But it seemed as though that the
crowds just kept growing and growing.
And it was really, I looked at several different live streams
both from the air and on the ground, the official stream on
Tabby Robinson's ex channel, as well as just some other
individual streamers. And some of them, it was really
hard to difficult to see where it was actually coming from or
who was going or where they were.
I do know one person, a friend of mine who was there and she
said that she was stuck on the bridge over the river and there
were thousands of people both in front of her and behind her and
they were stuck, they couldn't get anywhere.
So it does seem as though it would probably be difficult, I
would imagine, to truly get a a real estimate on the numbers.
OK, thank you for that. Well, certainly all the reports
that I had from people who were present said that overwhelmingly
there was a very friendly atmosphere.
People were getting on extremely well.
The trouble was described to me as some bad boys who were off to
one side doing their own thing. But overwhelmingly for the bulk
of people there, they were there in a genuine protest, but the
mood was very friendly. There was also a great mix of
people, black, white, all other colours, religions, people
mixing without any problem at all, contrary to the way it was
reported. And what about yourself, Ben?
Is that is that the sort of feedback that you had through?
Yeah, absolutely. Yeah.
It was a real mixed, mixed crowd.
Absolutely. OK.
So the key question for you, why do you think people were there?
Well, I think that the concept of Britishness is being
challenged at the moment in a number of different ways.
And actually people were very clearly out on the street
because they wanted to try and reclaim some of their national
identity. But I would say one of the
things that really struck me is coming out of it not quite sure
what national identity was being presented to us.
That was my overriding sense of it.
It's a very good point. Well, if that's your opinion,
Ben, and I think a very credible one.
Let's have a listen to the business Secretary, Peter Karl,
who was being interviewed about the demonstration.
What worries me most is the divisions in our society.
In other societies and other democratic societies there are.
It's not even the left and the right at the moment.
There are communities that are being driven further apart and
there are figures such as Tommy Robinson that is able to touch
into a sense of disquiet and and grievance in the community in
our society. A lot of it was goes back to its
roots in the financial crisis and the impact that had on
communities around the country. And we haven't been able to
bring our communities back together again since.
So I think these are moments that are Claxton calls to us in
public life to redouble our efforts to address the big
concerns that people right across the country have.
And immigration is a big concern.
It's a concern that I and the Prime Minister share very deeply
and we are acting on and other concerns as well.
But we have to do it in a way that can start to bring
communities back together again. So you have a demonstration 108,
sorry, 800,000 people, a million people together and the minister
describes the problem as being as people being split apart.
I find that interesting. But According to him, Ben, the
key problem was financial. Well, yes, and I'm sure it was
all someone else's fault as well.
Nothing to do with Peter Carl and Keir Starmer.
Well, we'll consider that in a minute.
But yeah, let's reinforce that point because of course other
reports in the BBC such as this one, leader of the Lib Dems
saying that, well, all of these trouble with the asylum seekers
and the hotel hotels, this is all Farage's fault and the
Tories fault. So this is the cheap political
blame game. Meanwhile, the unitary, the UNI
party system that we've got in UK continues to do its own
thing. I thought it would be worthwhile
to actually just do a little bit of assessment on what the whole
point of the rally was. And I found that actually I had
to go to ChatGPT in order to see what it said.
And the first point it raised is that the primary thing there was
opposition to what the organisers and many attendees
saw as uncontrolled or illegal immigration, which I think is a
pretty accurate report. But what was the source that
ChatGPT had to use? Well, surprisingly, it was Al
Jazeera. Let's go on to the second one
here because it it said that a key topic for people present in
London was free speech and national identity.
The March has also framed their rally in terms of free speech,
British heritage, national culture and concerns about being
heard. Thought that was quite a
poignant point. People think that they are not
being taken any notice of at the moment and I think they're
absolutely correct. Where, where was the source for
this particular one while it was here, Back to Al Jazeera.
So we've got AI at work and it's so desperate to find out what's
happening in a million people March in London.
It's choosing Al Jazeera. Clearly that's telling us
something about our mainstream media.
And if I go on to #3 here, it's people reacting to the current
political climate. And what was the source that our
illustrious AI used for that? Well, it was the National
Newspaper. So I found this very interesting
that AI was struggling to find out what the reports were about
this massive demonstration in London.
And of course with the BBC labelling it about 150,000
people, I suppose we shouldn't be too surprised.
But if we take apart what was what's really happening and why
people are really concerned, we can ask this question.
What is the current political climate?
I've attempted to put some meat on the bones here that the first
one I think is we've got warmongering, we've got a
government ramping up for war whenever possible, wherever
possible. We've also got destruction of
the national identity and mass migration is and positive
discrimination is clearly part of that.
And significantly this is recognised not only by white
British people, this is also recognised by migrants who are
now settled in UK. They realise that mass migration
is dangerous to all our futures. And This is why at the rally we
had people of different cultures and backgrounds and colours.
We've got #3 here the destruction of the male, female
identity and the family. And of course, the woke culture
is helping this destruction. And it's that woke culture
that's being pushed by the government itself.
If we go on #4 we've got the deliberate sexual grooming of
children via religious and sex education and the child
sexuality education which is coming in through UNESCO and the
World Health Organisation. We've got the suppression of
free speech, undercover of the Online Harms Bill and a whole
range of other legislation which has been coming through.
We've got the division of society by malicious targeted
media and propaganda. So this is coming from the state
itself. It's nothing to do with the
demonstrators. It's coming in from the state
and if we go on through we can put #7 in here, we've got state
imposed control by means of fabricated fear.
COVID lockdown and climate change are two key ones of those
#8 we've got state facilitated corruption and perversion of
Westminster civil service and the institutions.
And if I bring in a #9 here state facilitated destruction of
the National Health and well being by corruption of the food
supply and the NHS amongst other things.
So these are all pretty serious and blatantly obvious policies
which are coming in from our own government.
Just summarise this little bit. This actually was the page that
ChatGPT brought up. So you can see how it appeared
to me. I'm just going to drop over the
top of this Gaza and Ukraine because of course it appears
that this particular rally there were there was positive support
for Israel and presumably everything it was doing in Gaza.
And apart from mention of the tragic death of the young
Ukrainian lady, nothing was really being said about stopping
the bloodshed in Ukraine. So there was some rather
interesting undertones. But if I just end this segment
here, I thought it pertinent to bring up the definition which
the government is using of extremism.
We've got one, negate or destroy the fundamental rights and
freedoms of others, undermine, overturn or replace the UK
system of liberal parliamentary democracy.
And three, intentionally create a permissive environment for
others to achieve these results. So the definition to me of
extremism seems to fit our own government in the first instance
much more than it does the demonstrators, the million
people protesting in London. And if I end on this one here
from Protect UK, if we have a look at their definition of
extreme right wing terrorism, of course all of those million
people on the streets were being branded as extreme right wing by
British mainstream media are quite disgusting accusation.
But it seems to me that the label is deliberately designed
to attack society itself. So I'm putting some complex
things in that, Ben, but it seems to me the biggest threat
comes from our own government, not the million people on the
streets. Not all of the million people on
the streets. Actually, I think this is, this
is the issue, right, is that these things get treated by the
the commentariat and by politicians as, as these
homogeneous lumps of people where everyone believes the same
things. And and that's just
fundamentally not true actually. So there's some people in the
chat box pointing out, as we'll get into actually the, the
people behind this heavy Zionist influence, very political, lots
of conflicts of interest, particularly with some of the
big money people involved and, and who were featured.
But the, the, the everyday, you know, man and woman on the
street, I think most of them were there for the right
reasons. Absolutely.
You know, and they, they see their country slipping away.
They want to go out and do something about it.
Good on them. Quite frankly, one of the things
I was particularly happy about looking at this over the weekend
was that there was no violence, no significant violence.
No, there were a few arrests, but there was the potential for
this to go quite badly wrong, actually.
And it didn't. And I'm glad things were kept
calm. And obviously one of the best
people around to help keep things calm is Elon Musk.
Let's have a little listen to what he had to say.
Violence is going to come to you.
You will have no choice. This is a.
This is. You're in a fundamental
situation here where you where whether you choose violence or
not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you
die. You either fight back.
Or you die. And that's.
The truth. Today, Elon, I think we're, I
think the British public are telling the world that they're
ready to fight back. Good.
Yes, Come. On Come on Ray Britain.
Brian just said that's pathetic. I completely agree with you.
Notice he got really very little reaction there from the crowd,
actually. But there's Musk saying you've
got to fight back or die. That's his message.
Isn't that an extreme right wing message coming from Musk?
It's I don't know if it's right wing or whatever it is, but you
know, he's hardly trying to reduce tensions in the country,
which I think would probably be a good idea given everything
that's that's been going on. And let's just have a little
look at his his T-shirt. This really grabbed me.
You got the little, little one eye symbol there.
The full T-shirt says, what would Orwell think?
And I think Orwell would think that Elon Musk is a very
dangerous and very scary man actually, that that that's what
I think Alwell would think. This wasn't just limited to to
masks. There was a lot of incitement
generally around things like the ISIS flag being attacked by some
Maori's on stage who'd been flown in for this purpose.
Again, it's all really stretching the limits.
Britishness here, you know, like there's a very old mixture of
different cultures and, and different, different, different
things happening. And then obviously they went
after the Palestine flag and this is, this is not necessary.
This is incitement for me. You know, there are horrific
things happening in Palestine right now.
This is a very pro Israel event. Tommy Robinson himself is a
proud Zionist. You know, it's there is a very
strong case to be made that that's ultimately who's
controlling him. And then ultimately, you know,
he's setting this event up. Should we assume that that's
who's behind the the this event? I think it's probably quite safe
to say that it is. Seeing this kind of stuff on
stage is, is not good for me. And, and, and, and this is and,
and this just makes it very easy for people on the other side of
the argument to point out and say, look, violence, look
hatred. And actually that's it's just
fundamentally not helpful, right?
And of course, there was a counter protest, as is always
the way at the moment, right? There's a protest happening.
And lo and behold, there is a counter protest happening.
This is this pattern is repeated every single time one of these
happen. These things happens.
I reported on an event in Plymouth earlier in the year.
Same thing was happening there. I went to an event in Plymouth
last Sunday. We had exactly the same thing
happening. You had the flags on one side
and then you had stand up to racism on the other side.
Stand up to racism behind this, the March against Fascism, Unite
against Tommy Robinson. It's all about Tommy.
Tommy, Tommy. Yeah, He's the figurehead for
all of this. This was run by or certainly led
by Narendra Corps. I hope I'm saying that
correctly. The woman holding the sign up on
the right hand side, there is a Pakistani woman from Newcastle
and this is the feminine left wing.
So this was a women only March. You can just see that it says
women against the far right on the big banner just behind her.
So this is the feminine left wing against the supposedly
masculine right wing. And I think that the Tommy
Robinson March probably dominated by men.
I don't think it was all men, but they're setting this up as a
very deliberate, again, it's another divide and rule, left V
right, man V women. And this is about stopping
effective reconciliation in the country.
That needs to happen in order for us to effectively progress
past this stuff, right? And stand up to racism.
We've talked about before, basically directly linked into
the top of the Labor Party, linked into the military
intelligence agencies. Very unclear where all the money
is coming from for them to churn these signs out.
I mean they're putting hundreds of thousands of these signs out
on a weekly basis. This we can just see here is
very closely linked into the unions.
You got Unison, TUC, UNITE and etcetera, etcetera.
And we need to have a bit more of a look into this for future
shows. But to to get the the supposedly
union aligned sneering in metropolitan liberal progressive
view on the March. Let's have a little listen to
Paul Mason. What you're seeing here is
probably. Oh, is.
Someone going to? Run.
A bit of a problem there. What you're seeing here is
probably the biggest far right demonstration ever held in
Britain. And I've been among this tribe,
and I think it's obvious that many of the.
People here are. Wearing flag as a badge of their
own white identity and as a mark of hatred of our multicultural
multinational society. No, there are more progressive
people than this. What this is, is the radicalised
mass space of the Reformed Party and the Tories.
This. Most people live with a voted
Tory, some mighty voted Labour. But this is by and large a for a
bean. Working class, explicitly racist
demonstration and I'm afraid to say it will very likely descend
into violence when it gets to Whitehall.
Military intelligence asset Paul Mason talking about the flag as
essentially being a symbol of hatred for multi ethnic Britain.
He describes the group as the radicalised mass base of reform
and Conservative voters and he even used the word plebeian.
He called them plebs. Isn't that amazing?
No, it's it's not amazing. Actually, no, it's not.
Amazing. It tells you a lot about what
these people, what these people actually think, right.
And this, the same line of, of, of thought extended to Richard
Bergen, member of Parliament. This, this tweet here I thought
was, was quite amazing talking about the fact that we are in an
incredibly dangerous moment, which I do actually agree with,
by the way, but probably not for the same reasons that he's
saying. And essentially he's goes on to
say we not only face the threat of a far right government coming
to power for the first time in our history, I guess he means
reform, but also a violent far right St movement on a scale not
seen here in decades, if ever. Apparently that's what this
March was. This is a violent far right St
movement. And then goes on to say this
street movement led by convicted criminal Tommy Robinson, who's
not really the leader of this thing he just happened to
organise this March, is especially dangerous for black
Muslim, Jewish and other minority communities.
So there's plenty of black people there.
It was definitely anti Muslim. I will certainly say that the
idea that this is dangerous for Jewish people, I think is
absolutely crazy because very clearly, you know, the whole
thing was was avowedly Zionist. And in fact, we had this guy
Abby Yemeni from Rebel News was wandering around broadcasting.
He was a former IDF sniper and basically bragged about killing
children in Gaza, effectively running a Zionist control
operation, as I would say it. And he may well be the guy who's
pulling Tommy Robinson's strings.
I don't know. And just to sum up, this was a
message that I was sent by a mate of mine who was actually
there and said it was good. There was well over 1,000,000
people, the original police report said over 3,000,000.
MSM said 110,000 all very peaceful majority the police we
came across real decent smiling chatty right Police came out
once most people had left so that they can antagonise and get
reactions for the news. Sounds about right.
It does, yeah. And thank you very much for
that, Diane. Let's bring you back with us,
and what have you got? Yeah, I just have a few comments
and a little bit more coverage to add to this discussion of
Saturday. It.
You know, one thing I want to show is a little bit more from
the Elon Musk confrontation between himself and and the
audience, which was along with Tommy Robinson.
So let's play the rest of that. And then you see how much
violence there's on the left with our our friend Charlie Cook
getting murdered in cold blood this week and people on the left
celebrating it openly. The left is the party of murder
and celebrating murder. I mean, let let that sink in for
a minute. That's who we're dealing with
here. That is who we're dealing with.
So that brings up a couple of things for me.
First of all, the right versus left, of course, but she
repeated several times. And I just want to say, Ben, I
see your point about what you were saying about the right
versus left on in this particular situation.
However, I would like to point out that I am not on the left
because I am a woman and I want to preserve my own rights as an
actual woman as opposed to some women who put themselves on the
left or those who say they are women.
And that's a very different situation.
So, but but the problem I think is that when I was seeing some
of the sort of counter demonstration going on, counter
protests where, where are these women of actual or trans who
were sort of trying to take their own position on situation,
but they were so small in numbers compared to the actual
official part of the demonstration.
I think it's interesting also to note the timing of this event
with this being on the 13th of September.
So we've got just two days after the anniversary of 911, which is
still a very sore spot for lots of people around the world,
particularly Americans. Of course, we had the Charlie
Kirk situation. And I know there's a lot of
speculation circulating around the Internet at this point
around a lot of all of the things surrounding whatever
happened with Charlie Kirk. But the timing is also, again,
very interesting. That was on the eve of 911 and
we we see the all the Charlie Kirk messages were weaved
throughout the entire day. As I said, I watched all of it.
We also see here there's another photo of him saying, God bless
Charlie Kirk, never forgotten. So it's like 911 never forget.
And this was a man holding this photo of him on the stage behind
where Tommy and the other speakers who again, of course,
were as, as has been said earlier, Israeli supporters,
Zionist supporters, generally speaking, the we're the ones who
were who were out there. And we also have the death of
the Iranis Zariska situation, the Ukrainian refugee who was
supposedly stabbed in the in the North Carolina in recent times.
So all of this they're they're they're positioning Tommy as the
hero, as the God. And all of the people who were
speaking and introducing him throughout the official event
were saying, oh, we wouldn't be here without Tommy.
Tommy is he's like this, this God worship almost figure that
they were making him out to be as though he's just this average
working class chap who's going to save the country.
But actually, again, I think that most of people in
attendance were probably in that situation, situation of, of just
being, wanting to do what's best for the country and, and
returning to a more traditional form of, of Britain and England.
But I also think that if you look at who actually organised
the event and how it was supported and how an average
person could not take over London at this level.
And then to have all of this happening while just the, the,
the scope of the event, there was video screens all the way up
and down where you could watch the events of for people who
couldn't get close to the stage. And there's absolutely no way
that an individual person who doesn't feel so they can even
speak up for themselves in the country at this stage would be
able to take over the capital city at this level.
So I think there's some questions to ask about what's
behind this and what's what drove it.
And, you know, again, what is actually going on in the
background. So I those people who say what
they were out for the looking at the Tommy and and trying to help
him because he's done all these great things for us, I think
needs to maybe reconsider their position just a bit, Brian.
Diane, thank you for that. And we'll certainly be talking
about this more in extra after the news today.
But key bid is a lot of very, very good people on the streets.
They need to know exactly what is attacking them in this
country. And I think getting information
across is everything that's happening through and with the
UK's government is the right way to go.
But we'll do, we'll deal with this more in extra time now.
Big thank you as always to everybody, wherever you are in
the world. Who's supporting UK Column?
We can only do what we do with your financial support and help.
If you're watching or listening in to us for today's news and
you're not already a supporter, then if you go to the UK Column
website and click here to support our work, you can become
a member or make a donation or both or purchase through the
shop and we'll be very grateful for that.
Now tonight at 7:00 PM, we've got a repeat with Germ Warfare
talking about all big events being fabricated.
That's with Nick Hudson, which I think is an interesting topic
and something we should all keep our attention on because nothing
at the moment is quite as it seems.
Also UK Column on location in York coming up Saturday the 18th
of October. Excuse me.
The key thing is that tickets are now sold out.
So we're looking at the live stream.
I'm going to emphasise this, the tickets are now sold.
Well, hey. Yes, a huge thank you to
everybody who's bought 1 and we really look forward to seeing
you. But we're also encouraging
people to join us for the online view.
And of course, if you do that, we will be speaking to
everybody, whether you're with us in person or further afield.
Diane, you've got this one here for the Food and Health Festival
coming up on the 28th September. Yes, I've mentioned this in the
last couple of weeks as well, but just as a reminder that this
is coming up as sponsored by Commodile Edinburgh, of which
I'm a member of the executive committee.
It will be a focus on alternative health solutions,
local foods, the importance of real food, the importance of
farming. So there'll be some vendors,
there'll be some talks throughout the day, including
Charles Mallett, who is coming up to join us to speak from his
perspective on farming. So I think it'll be a great day.
Tickets are free. It's from from 10:00 AM to 4:00
PM and the location and the post code are right there on the
flyer, so please join us. Brilliant.
Thank. Thank you, Diane.
Well, Ben, back to you and the subject is chaos, the undertone
of UK. Yes, Chaos Agents again, I think
I used the same title last week and I'm going to pull together a
few of the threads that I talked about last week back to this
guy, Sir Paul Marshall and GB News and I'm going to link him
to Radical Marxism, Common purpose, old bit of an old UK
common favourite in there, the Fabian Society, the World
Economic Forum, Gates Foundation on majority of the UN.
And actually posed the question once again is what is GB News
actually up to and how is this guy's interests aligning with
all of those organisations that I've just mentioned?
Now I'll use the same image last week, well, I talked about
Marshall's relationship with George Soros who put money into
Marshall's hedge fund and essentially created him as as a
significant financial force in the UK.
While at the same time funding left wing organisations like
Black Lives Matter, the International Rescue Committee.
And the fact that these two wings to the beast are creating
chaos in our discourse and in our society and ultimately out
on the streets basically. So the people like Marshall and
Soros can profit from this. And I also talked about this
organisation to the Black Black Equity Organisation which was Co
founded by David Lammy. This is about delivering equity
which is beyond equality and this is about equal outcomes.
This is communist. It can only be delivered by a
totalitarian state intervening in the social order on a
constant basis. Yeah, it's, it's, this is what
this is. There's no other way to
understand it. Black equity organisation.
And it's directly linked to Paul Marshall actually.
So I delivered those two separate segments last week.
This week I'm going to tie them both together.
Right. So we've got equity, black
equity organisation, it's trustee board, very interesting
people. You're going to have a look at
this. You'll provide a link.
And what we're particularly interested in today is this chap
here, this is Rick Lewis, who is a British American mixed race
guy. And Bieber, he leans very
heavily on the black bit, right? Obviously he's on black equity
organisation. He's trading very heavily on on
this side of his identity. And his background is he's a big
time real estate investor. He's the executive chairman of
this thing which is Tristan Capital Management, hundreds of
millions of dollars of assets under management.
He's also got a load of other interest to play.
He runs something called the Black Heart Foundation.
And he's also importantly for the interests of today, on the
Board of Governors of something called King Solomon Academy.
And King Solomon Academy is an Academy school in Marylebone in
central London, which, if we just look at the landing page
here, is pushing quite a specific demographic agenda, I
would say is central London. Let's have a look at the little
girls on the front page of the website here.
And this is run by Arc Schools. Yeah, which is, I think, quite
well known to us. We've covered it on the column
before. And Arc Schools run a lot of
these academies around the UK. This is the Arc Schools website.
And who's on the board of trustees for Arc Schools?
Paul Marshall and also Ian Waste as well, which is the Marshall
Waste hedge fund that George Soros helped create to bring it
back to where we started. It's interesting how the big
money and the hedge funds are always somewhere there in the
background. Indeed, it is so poor Marshall
through radical Marxism, and now we're going to take him on to,
oh, actually, no, before I go ahead, the the the gentleman I
was just talking about, Rick Lewis is also on the board of
the Earth Shop Prize, which is Prince William's big
sustainability play and that has done work with Common purpose at
the end of last year. So it's LinkedIn there as well.
Also, Marshalls is working with the LSE, amazingly so London
School of Economics, which was founded by the Fabian Society
back in 1895 S the LSE is a Fabian Society organisation on
this. They're hammering, hammering out
a new world apparently. And you know, this just takes us
directly into Arch Fabian and Tony Blair and half of the
Labour cabinet in all, every single Labour Prime Minister
that's ever served as Prime Minister of the country.
And Marshall, he's very closely linked to them.
He's been delivering lectures for them.
This one which provide a link to was actually given.
This was an interview by Manoush Shafiq, who's just been
announced as chief economic adviser to Keir Starmer.
And this is part of his role, formal role at the LSE running
something called the Marshall Institute.
And he's actually built a whole huge building for the LSE,
right? So it's not some kind of casual
relationship that he has with the line of School of Economics,
which was founded by the Fabian Society.
He's actually spending 10s, potentially hundreds of millions
of pounds building physical infrastructure.
This is this is the Marshall Institute.
The Marshall Institute's particularly interested in
social impact, which is the transformation of society.
That's literally what this institute has been set up for
and it is run by Go to the People page.
This guy was one of the directors, Kieran Boyle, who is
a very, very, very naughty boy into a lot of very bad things.
Mr Boyle, who, amongst amongst many things, is a young global
leader of the World Economic Forum.
Yeah, this is shadow government. Effectively this is the
powerhouse running out of sight of most of the public.
It's there when you go looking for it, but it's something which
needs to be brought to the surface if we're going to be
able to explain what is causing all this mayhem and chaos in UK.
Absolutely. And I would certainly imagine
that the vast, vast, vast, vast majority GB News viewers, I have
no idea and would object quite strenuously to the idea that
Paul Marshall is working with like Equity Organisation and the
World Economic Forum. Because these are the World
Economic Forum particularly. I mean, these are the bad guys,
right? And surely if you're a
nationalist, GB News, you should be protecting the interests of
the country, but actually working behind the scenes and
actually hand selecting. Sure.
Paul Marshall was intimately involved in finding and hiring
this guy. Kieran Boyle knows exactly what
he's about. Make that make sense?
You can't. Then finally, back to the GB
News website. Let's have a look at their
investors. Lagartum describes itself as a
global partnership with a mission at its core.
And you know, some classic corporate guff.
Go to their website. They're a team of people bound
together by shared desire to make the world better for
everybody. Apparently it's basically a slug
of tax efficient money based in Dubai, wanting to change your
life without your permission, quite frankly.
Run by these people. Mark Stollison, Alan McCormick,
who's actually the chairman of GB News.
So this, this Lagarten thing, he's not just funding it.
He's also got executive responsibility for the how the
how The thing is being run to other investors.
Philip Vasilu, Christopher Chandler, all fascinating.
We don't have time to get into it in a huge amount of detail.
How did Lagarten go about transforming the world?
They have these three funds, Luminos Fund, the end fund, the
Freedom Fund. And where does that take us to
straight into this world, Phil. Melinda Gates Foundation on the
GR Network, UNICEF Children's Investment Fund Foundation,
which is Chris Hoehn, another Blair ally, and ultimately the
US State Department, amongst many, many, many others.
Yeah, and that's who Paul Marshall, the founding investor
of GB News, owner of Unheard, owner of The Spectator, is
directing a lot of his time, money and attention in the
background. Ben, thank you very much.
Many, many questions there. We'll talk a little bit more in
extra on this one as well, but this is the key to understanding
what is unfolding inside UK. The idea that the government in
Westminster is controlling the country is becoming more and
more laughable. It's clear that these powerful
organisations are operating under the surface in their
networks and of course they can only do it on the scale.
They are doing it by having, by the fact they have access to
huge amounts of money through these private hedge funds and
others. But we, we'll continue to keep
lifting the lid on it. This is the sort of information
that the million people on the streets of London need to
understand because what's happening to them, what they're
experiencing is more complicated than the simplistic message
being put across. Well, if we're concerned about
how the government operates, it was the Daily Express headline
which really caught my eye today.
It says Khan must quit over grooming failure.
And this is about a whistleblower revealing the
horrific extent of capital rape, gangs and demands.
Now, when I read the small text on screen, I was very interested
to see that the whistleblower was in fact former Met detective
John Wedger, a man who the UK column knows extremely well.
And we've done a number of interviews with John.
Let's just remind ourselves of what he was talking about.
Now remember, this is a former Met policeman who discovered
widespread child abuse in London.
Children being taken out of the protective care system.
Given drugs, prostituted via various groups, but when he
brought a report together to take the lid off what he saw
happening, the police turned on him.
This is just a brief quote from what John Wedger has had to say
back in 2018. What happened from the time that
you whistle blew on this, this really outrageous abuse of
children in London? Well, I mean, like I mentioned
in our audio interview, I generally thought that soon as I
whistle blew that things would start going in the right
direction. I thought I'd get the back in.
I mean as well, I mean I'm coming forward in respect to
some really, really horrendous and serious crimes.
Having worked as an investigator for many years and realised the
protection that we would afford our victims, our informants and
our witnesses of crime, I thought the same would be
afforded to me. And it was a total opposite.
I was also warned by other police whistleblowers that I was
put in contact with. And it's namely Lenny Harper who
exposed the hot de la grin, Maggie Oliver who was the one
who sort of brought forward about the, the Rochdale child
abuse cover ups. And they both said the same
thing, that they're going to come for you and they'll come
hard. And they did.
And the, the onslaught was just, it was just unbelievable.
But what was said to me and by my sort of OCU commander at the
time, and he turned and said, you know, you're looking at you
carry on. You're looking at losing your
home, your job and your children.
And as the years prevailed, you know, the next three years that
I went through this campaign of bullying against me, they.
Were led led by the Metropolitan Police.
Yeah, solely led by the Met Police.
The words were predicted because whoever was behind it, I nearly
lost my home because I was I was.
My wages were stopped. They tried on three major
occasions. Each time there was 3 offences I
was accused of, which was said to me by both Maggie and Lenny.
Look, they'll serve you what I call gross misconduct, which
would each one would have caused me to lose my job and each one I
would have a dual purpose of being an internal investigation
also would be passed to the Crown Prosecution Service.
So I nearly lost my job on 9 occasions.
And also, if I can elaborate at some point that there was a
campaign because I was bringing up 4 kids on my own to sort of
undermine my role as a parent. This is quite an extraordinary
interview with John Wedger and the key point here is that when
he as a police officer tried to expose the institutional abuse
of children, which included the local authorities and so called
care homes, it was the police and those institutions which
turned on him. So what we see is that the whole
structure permitting the abuse of children, whether it's via
Asian gangs or not, the structure is the structure of
abuse. And this is so important for
people to grasp that the rape gangs that have been made such a
a a big thing off, particularly by Tommy Robinson, are one small
subset of a system which can only exist, an abuse system,
which can only exist by virtue of the fact that the
institutional system, including the government, including local
authorities, including the police, is itself corrupt.
So in the just hold it up for you.
This is the actual paper double page spread inside on this
article. But of course the Daily Express
says, well it's only Sadiq Khan that's the problem when the
reality in John Wedger's testimony is the whole system,
including politicians and Westminster and the local
authorities and the police were all involved in the cover up of
child abuse. Why?
Because they are part of that abusive system.
Now let's just remind ourselves that a couple of days ago I
highlighted the fact that Harriet Harman had been called
forward to produce a report on sexual harassment and abuse
within the the legal system amongst barristers.
This was the actual BBC report where a lady was complaining
that she'd been molested actually by a barrister and
Baroness Harriet Harman Casey had been booked forward in order
to produce a report. Now we reminded our audience
that of course Harman could not be considered a safe pair of
hands in any way due to her history with history with
support towards the Paedophile Information Exchange, where we
asked very clearly was she a safe pair of hands.
And we pointed out that the National Council for Civil Civil
Liberties, which she she was part of, continued to defend
having Π as a member. And as late as September 1983
and an NCCL officer was quoted in the Daily Mail saying that
the group was campaigning to lower the age of consent to 14.
Now you've just heard an ex policeman, John Wedger speak.
Let's have a listen to what's Bill Maloney, a man who was
abused in the so called care system along with his siblings,
had to say to Harriet Harman. Well, I'm going to get the other
side. OK, Harriet.
Right. If I can just give you one
minute. We're talking about child abuse.
We're just about to talk to you about the cuts and how it's
going to affect child abuse. Harriet, you don't want to talk
about child abuse. I understand that, Harriet.
But you've got you're here to talk to people on the street and
we represent. So Harriet Harman doesn't want
to talk to us about child abuse today.
Say that. OK.
At the moment she doesn't. Well, that's what he said to me.
I gave her a chance. I gave her a chance.
Mind your own business. Let's go again, let's go again.
Let's go again. Chop, chop.
You gotta get the face, Get the face.
Harrier That's common assault. You'll get arrested for that.
I'm. A.
Woman Harrier get on me Harrier. Harrier.
I need to pussy on this. Harriet, why won't you talk to
us about child abuse? Harrier?
You're part of the you're part. Of the government.
But don't touch me because that's don't you just touch me,
right? So Harriet, you are not Harriet
is not willing to talk about child abuse and what how are the
cuts? How are the cuts going to affect
child abuse? How are the cuts?
How are the cuts going to affect child abuse, Harriet?
Harriet. Harriet.
How are the cuts?
How are the cuts going to affect child abuse, Harriet, how are
very sorry? She's talking to people who've
come here. So, okay, so Harriots going to
the police officer here and we do carry a press pass and
Harriet Harman does not today wish to talk to us about child
abuse. Okay, thank you very much.
Thank you, officer. That was Harriet Harman.
She didn't want to talk to us about child abuse and I think I
know why. In 1978, when she became a
solicitor, she urged ministers to make it legal for people to
be allowed to take sexually explicit images of children.
And she wanted that to be made legal as long as the children in
the images hadn't been harmed or abused.
So that's Harriet Harman. Harriet Harman was in favour of
making sexually explicit images of children and she urged
ministers to do that. So maybe that's why Harriet
Harman didn't want to talk to us about child abuse.
Thank you very much. So my question is that if this
lady's been promoted by the government in order to
investigate abuse, how do how do they see her?
Now let's have a look at how she describes herself.
Well, to win a lifetime achievement award in law, it
feels like such an honour and a privilege, and even more so to
be amongst all these women who've been nominated for and
winning awards in every different aspect of the law,
Especially as because it's not so long ago that really there
were hardly any women in the law.
So these women are all inspiring pioneers.
So the key point here, and it's a very simple point, is if these
are the types of people that are not only in government, but
they're helping to control how other people are educated and
trained in serious positions as barristers, for example, is it
any wonder that the country is at the point of breakdown?
And if we come, we come back to John Wedger there in that expose
article, clearly describing that the child trafficking system is
run through government itself. We're not talking about an Asian
system. We're talking about a system
that operates and did operate through a largely white ruling
class, both politically and through the wider establishment.
We'll discuss this more. Over to you, Ben.
Over to Diane I. Think.
Oh, I beg, I beg your pardon, Diane.
I've spoken enough. Right.
Well, no, OK, getting a little bit, getting a little bit
passionate on that one. And I think it's justified,
absolutely. It's justified, yes.
Diane, of course, you're on the hot subject of UNESCO and what
it's up to in its indoctrination.
What's the word indoctrination capacity?
Something like that. Yes, I, I would, I mentioned
last week that I would do some more investigation into the
digital Education Week that took place in in Paris with UNESCO
the earlier this month. But first I want to go back to
2023 when this this report was published.
This is called guidance for Generative AI in Education and
Research. So this was kind of one of the
first things that we saw with UNESCO trying to look at how AI
would be used in education. So we look at what it said and
and again, these are all very long reports, as is my typical
habit, I have read these reports so that nobody else has to and
what this says for just some quotes from a few of these
reports that I'll go through. This says that it is going
toward a human centred approach to the use of generative AI.
Quote The guidance which is this policy document which is many
many pages, stresses the need for educational institutions to
validate generative AI systems on their ethical and pedagogical
appropriateness for education. It calls on the international
community to reflect on their long term implications for
knowledge, teaching, learning and assessment.
So this was 2023. These tools, the educational
tools were, were just starting to come out.
So then we come into 2025 where they've obviously been doing a
lot of work for the past two years.
This is the event again that I mentioned last week, Digital
Learning Week 2025, which was called AI and the Future of
Education Disruptions, dilemmas and directions.
So if we just take a little bit from the synopsis of this
Digital Learning week, that is from what I just shared in the
slide, it says that this is charting pathways for equitable.
So again, there's that word equity, which is not the same as
equality, of course, ethical and human driven AI integration and
education, ensuring technology serves as a force for inclusive
progress. So there's that word inclusive
once again. We see these words over and over
again as when we look at globalist language around
education, which of course ties to Agenda 2030 and the
Sustainable Development Goals. So if we go on from there, I, I
want to talk a little bit about the opening session.
So this this is an AI generated image of of this lady here.
Her name is Stefania Giannini. She is the assistant director
general for education at UNESCO. When she opened the conference
on the 2nd of September, it was live streamed that it's now
available on YouTube. If you want to watch the whole
thing. She starts with a sort of AI
image of herself with her voice in the background and sort of
opening up and saying AI has become a new actor and it's the
future of education. It's disruptive.
And then suddenly by somehow some sort of miracle, Stefania
herself, the actual person, walks out on the stage.
So how about that? That was surprising.
She makes a joke about how that AI Stefania was really the real
Stefania and she was just the fake one, the real 1.
So there's our inversion of language once again.
And she goes on to give a speech about talking about the use of
AI in education. So I just want to read a little
bit of what is essentially the transcript from part of this
talk. And she says, for example, let's
meet a student. Cristiano is a secondary school
student in Ghana. His school uses Rory, which is
an AI tutor on WhatsApp. And Cristiano can ask questions
at any time in his only language, which is, which is a
very important, not obvious point.
And for the first time, we can say a student has something like
a private tutor in his pocket. This is a revolution, really.
Now move to Princeton and meet Professor Bernard.
He is a colleague teaching history of science.
He actually asked his students to use AI on a test and the
system could analyse arguments, connect different ideas, all the
dots through history and society, and also engage in what
I would define as a Socratic dialogue interaction with the
students. He described this experience
quoting his words. Exhilarating, terrifying, even
sublime. So she goes on to give these
examples and talks about how AI is this major disruptor in
education and what it's going to do.
And so it, it raises a lot of questions which I will continue
to investigate. The obvious one first of all for
me is what are teachers for? What is the point of the teacher
if AI is going to be in the student's pocket or professors
are asking students to use AI to actually do their exams?
Well, there's a, a couple of ideas about this.
One is that, and I experienced this myself before I left the
education sector, is that the idea is that AI is apparently
going to take over the easy stuff.
So teachers teaching facts, for example, is going to be taken
over by AI to allow teachers to do.
And this is actually in some of the policy documents that I've
got coming up next. If we look at these next very
long policy documents that were published just this year, AI and
the future of education disruptions, dilemmas and
directions. So this is a very long book with
several chapters written by different people.
What does this say in it? It says, well, for example,
shaping the use of AI in education through collective
dialogue. So in the introduction, this is
it says that it explores the philosophical, ethical and
pedagogical dilemmas posed by destructive influence of AI in
education, bringing together insights from global thinkers,
leaders and change makers. The collection challenges
assumptions, surfaces frictions, provokes, provokes contestation
and sparks audacious new visions for equitable.
There's that word again, Equitable human machine Co
creation. So now we're starting to see
humans and machines working together.
We're this is not a teacher and a student.
This is not students working together.
This is machine and people working together for equitable
Co creation, creating together with machines.
So what does that sound like? Does that sound like
transhumanism? Potentially We can leave it
there with that topic, but what it does say is that teachers are
going to be used for human development relating to
students. This involves of course the
topic of social emotional learning, which needs to be a
few other segments I think I will need to do in the future.
But essentially social emotional learning is one of the things
that we are fighting against in curriculums across the West,
which involves these 5 main points, self awareness, self
management, social awareness, relationship skills and
responsible decision making. So now teachers are taking over
the things that really parents should probably be doing and not
necessarily being left up to the schools.
They also put one other document that they produced for the, I
guess the results of this conference or before this
conference is called AI in education Protecting the rights
of learners. This says that they are
safeguarding the right to education in the digital era.
Quote, the rapid digitalization of education accelerated by the
COVID-19 pandemic. So there's that again.
And the development of generative artificial
intelligence is reshaping education and learning.
These advancements also come with challenges, including the
risks of exacerbating existing inequalities, privacy and safety
concerns, and emerging issues relating to ethics, governance.
And there's that word again, equity.
This report emphasises that all efforts must prioritise a human
centred and rights based use of digital technology to benefit
all learners. Now what I will say about the
idea of right to education, on the surface of course that
sounds fabulous. Of course we want children to
have whatever education they need.
But when we look at things like the UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child, it basically gives children, it does give children
the same rights as adults, which could then lead to things like
consent to viewing inappropriate content, looking at, you know,
the sexualisation of children potentially, you know, child
abuse, sexual child abuse. And that opens it up because
children have the same right to do whatever adults do according
to this particular piece of documentation.
So we need to continue to look at this.
Diane, thank you very much. And we've got a little bit of
amusement to end on. Thankfully, I think we need it
today. This was an article that was in
BBC Earth. It was published on the 5th of
September and I put this on my Facebook page a few days ago and
it's created quite a bit of discussion from some of the UK
column audience that follow me on Facebook.
The, The article is titled How Eating insects became a
Conspiracy Theory. And so it, the, the headline
underneath that sort of the sub headline secondary headline says
insect protein is healthy and sustainable, but it is now also
at the centre of a far reaching conspiracy theory.
So if they're staying on the one hand, it's healthy and
sustainable, but it's also part of a conspiracy theory, which is
the case. And what's really interesting
about this article, it's quite long and I would encourage
people to look at it themselves because there's too much that we
can, we can't discuss here at our time left.
But it does talk about the World Economic Forum and the Great
Reset, which they claim in the article was an effort to reduce
global inequality and advanced environmental initiatives during
the COVID-19 pandemic. So whatever they were doing
while we were locked up in our houses.
But to conspiracy theorists, they say it was proof that they
were trying to use the pandemic as a way to reorganise society,
according to the ADL Centre on Extremism.
And it goes on to say that the WF did in fact publish an
article saying that insects are more sustainable than meat, both
in terms of tackling climate change and food insecurity.
And it goes on to explain from Professor Steven Lewandowski
from the University of Bristol how to fight conspiracy
theories. And that I've read a lot by him.
He's a professor of cognitive science.
And what he said was to the advice to people is that you
have to keep pushing your family.
So he said, quote, you're not going to be successful if you
say, Uncle Bruce, you're crazy. Don't believe this utter
nonsense. But instead, you can ask what
functions your beliefs serve and why are you believing this.
And he says it's not the kind of thing that you can do over a
single dinner conversation, apparently.
So I think some people might have some workout for them if
they have an Uncle Bruce who is a conspiracy theorist.
So there's some tips for you. OK, Joanne, thank you very much
for that. We're going to leave our viewers
today with a lovely image which you took countryside into the
far, far distance. Just a quick description, Diane.
Yeah, this is Heartside Pass, sort of up here in the north of
England. I didn't take the soda, but I
took one very similar to it. But the weather was terrible
when I was up there yesterday. But it's over 1900 feet.
You can see the Lake District. You can see the Solway for if
you can maybe see South of Scotland and it's very high and
very beautiful. And yesterday was very cold and
windy. But I just want to say a
reminder to our viewers to get out there and enjoy nature and
just remember that the world is out there for you to explore and
enjoy and, and not to get yourself too caught up into all
of this because it's best for all of us if we have a little
bit of a break now and then. Brilliant.
Thank you very much for that, Joanne.
Thank you also, Ben. And I'll just end by saying that
if you're one of the, we'll say, the million people who turned up
in London to demonstrate about things, you're concerned about
what's happening to your country.
Well done and a special well done.
If you were there and enjoyed a social day with people in a well
behaved way. And I'm sure that was 99.99% of
those present. So we'll end on that positive
note for members of UK column. We'll be back for UK column
extra in a few moments. For everybody else that's joined
us for the news, thank you so much.
Share our material and we'll be back with another news on
Wednesday at 1. See you then.
Bye bye.