Good afternoon, Today is Monday the 20th of October 2025, just
after one O clock. Welcome to UK column News.
I'm your host Brian Garish with me in studio Ben Rubin and we're
delighted to have Diane Rasmussen and everyone Sandy
Adams joining us by live link today.
Now we have got a packed news. There is so much happening.
Plus we want to get a report of the UK column on location event
in York. We want to include something on
that as well. And then of course today the
world has collapsed as a result of problems with Amazon.
So we, we've got a lot in today's news and, and protests
going on. We've got some good news from
Denmark. We're going to take people on a
little bit of a roller coaster, but we promise that we'll end
today's news on a high. Let's just start off with,
sorry, something went wrong, Our end.
And no, it's not the UK column. This is Amazon's back end for so
many websites, and the key statement from Amazon was that
they said the problem appears to be related to DNS resolution of
the Dynamo DPAPI endpoint in US hyphen E hyphen 1.
If you don't understand what that means, and of course many
of us don't fully, but as far as I understand, this is to do with
addressing and, and there was a major problem and it's caused
chaos really. If we talk about national
security, Ben, I look at this sort of thing and I'm thinking
that if we continue this mad drive for power into private
companies, we're going to get a collapse of not only daily life,
but actually security of the nation state.
And so if we can just put that one back on screen.
I just wanted to add here that if it's been a problem with Zoom
and other platforms today, by the time the government gets
going with our digital ID and digital life, that's also going
to be collapsed when these these systems go down.
Absolutely, yes. And it's this specific system as
well, because we've been talking about AWS, Amazon Web Services
now underpinning increasing amounts, probably the majority I
would say at this point, British government, IT infrastructure.
In fact, the guy that ran artificial intelligence at
Amazon went into the UK government as the chief digital
officer for 12 months to embed them as a supplier and to extend
that contract. So if that one partner goes
down, then the whole state goes down.
And you know, I'm not a massive fan of the state and state
delivery of services, but it does feel like that could cause
rather a problem for us actually.
So lots of questions and we'll we'll be on to those questions
in forthcoming news editions, but we're going to leave that
there. Let's get on to positive things.
In the course of the weekend we had really big demonstrations
about digital ID and you've got some images for us here, Ben.
Yes, absolutely, yes. So we were up in York over the
weekend having a fantastic time and there were lots of other
things going on around the country as well.
So Katie Jo Murphin from Hope, Sussex went up to London.
She sent us back some fantastic images and a few little video
clips from the Digital ID March, which is actually very closely
linked into the AWS issue actually, because if Amazon goes
down, Digital ID network goes down, then was anything going to
happen? And it does seem to be the issue
that's united the nation actually.
Like we've got a whole bunch of different types of people out
there on the street. You can see here in central
London, lots of different campaigning groups starting off
at Marble Arch. And the, the, the sound is, I
mean, there was, it sounds like there was someone on the street
with an air raid siren actually. So we've decided to just play
these out so we can get a little bit of a visual of, of what was
happening rather than listening to the noise because it was
quite overwhelming. And but you can see here a
really good turn out actually. And I'm very reminiscent of the
lockdown marches through 2020 and 21.
A lot of the same kind of people, a lot of the same kind
of messages being shared, a similar kind of feel.
And you can see them here making their way down Oxford St.,
ending up obviously at Downing St.
And chanting some rather choice words should we say about Keir
Starmer and his government. But this, this is real passion
and informed people. And of course what is needed is
more and more people, not just millions signing up online.
We need millions of people saying on the streets and
everywhere, no, we're not having this digital ID because it's
people at ground level that can stop it dead in its tracks.
Yeah, absolutely. And the key thing for me is that
while these marches are but a good thing to happen and
certainly enjoyable to go on and create a great sense of
camaraderie, this is the issue that appears to be uniting the
nation. And actually we've got to get
out and talk to our neighbors and people in our local areas
about this. You know, I think that's also a
crucial part of stopping this thing in its tracks.
And actually we had a fantastic little clip here from Andrew,
Andrew Bridgen who was out there on the street, who summed it
things up perfectly. Andrew Bridgen, How do you feel
about today's March? Well.
As always, lovely people. It's probably a better turn out
than I thought we were going to get.
And it's not raining, so we can't really do much better in
Star Wars Britain than that. It's a really important issue.
Dish sliding is a trap. And if we end up in a trap,
it's, it's better to avoid the trap than to try and get out of
it once we're in it. And I honestly believe that if
we say yes to digital ID, we'll be in a position where we'll
never be able to say no to anything the government wants
ever again, because we will. It will lead to a social credit
scoring system. That's the model they're aiming
for, central bank digital currency.
The government will have complete knowledge and, and
control over everything we do. And that's unacceptable.
We'll be giving away our freedom and our rights and our privacy,
and we'll be giving away those freedoms and rights for future
generations who are not here to make that decision.
And it's not for us to give those rights away.
Fantastic, Absolutely key point giving away of rights.
If we give our rights away, we've only got one person to
blame and that's ourselves, each and every one of us.
So brilliant effort by people who are out on the streets and
also great to see people like Andrew Bridgen there.
Diane, let's bring you in because we've also got more
activity on Digital ID and Newcastle coming up.
Yes, thanks, Brian. It's great to be here today.
I think we should note as well that at the March on Saturday we
had UK Collins Patrick Henningsen there as one of the
speakers, which is why he unfortunately couldn't join us
in New York because of the conflict.
But on the 1st of November we will be having another event
here in Newcastle at the monument talking about the the
digital ID issue and I will be 1 of the speakers there.
So I would love to see as many people up here in the North as
we had in London over the weekend.
So please join us in the 1st. Diane, thank you very much for
that. And we'll just put this ad on
screen here for if we can just bring this one up 1st of
November, 12 noon at the Monument, Newcastle.
Protect privacy, protect freedom, reject digital ID.
So what's happening? And Diane, thank you very much
for just giving us an update on that.
Now, if, if big things were happening on the streets in
London for UK column, we had an absolutely fantastic UK column
on location in York at the Milder hotel.
Really, really lovely, excellent environment.
Have to say the hotel and the staff were wonderful, looked
after us extremely well but 400 plus people in one place, not
only to listen to the brilliant speakers that we had but also of
course to be together and here we have just part of the view of
the room because this is a really big event centre.
So 400 people seated and just a brilliant atmosphere, people
chatting, laughing, joking with each other, getting to know each
other are very, very well informed people and people who
are adamant that they are there to help make things happen.
So the, the, the whole event was really excellent.
We had a brilliant range of speakers.
Tess Lowry here from the World Council for Health kicking
kicking things off. But I thought we should have
just a little opening clip here. Now these are hand shot videos
from the event. We wanted to bring something
authentic on screen this morning.
So the these were taken by individuals at the time.
Of course the real video clips will come up on UK column in the
next few days. But let's have a little look at
Charles Mallett introducing the event.
We will kick off regardless. Thank you, hand wavers, Thank
you, hand wavers. You've done a phenomenal job and
I'm extremely grateful to you. But the appointed hour has
arrived. So I begin by issuing a very,
very warm Welcome to UK column on location and good morning.
Well done. That of course goes to all of
you here in the lovely Milmer Hotel at York, and those of you
tuned in on the live stream. We are in for an incredible day.
If you've been sent here as a representative from the
Pharmaceutical industry, it may be hard going at times, but
stick with it. So very quickly in that big room
of 400 people, we had laughter. But of course, the speech is all
very, very serious subjects. And what, why are we doing this?
We're doing this to bring people together and to inform them
about what is happening so that they can go afield and help
other people understand what's happening.
Now, you were one of the speakers, Ben, and I thought
we'd have a little clip of you in front of the audience.
Let's have a look. Yes, we've been hearing a lot
about over the past 10 years, the past five years, past few
months really. Actually, people just started to
know who Larry Anderson is. Firstly, people knew who that
was before I founded Oracle or spunning out of the CIA, which
is what happened with parents here as well.
So actually you've got spy agencies finding the health
system. That's quite concerning, isn't
it? And then of course the
consultants, that's the bit I used to operate in, not in the
health system particularly, certainly not in the NHS, and
mainly because it's just too bureaucratic and I didn't mind
spending in all the forms. So important stuff and very on
the button, Ben, because of course today we've see what's
happened, what happens when we bring these global corporations
in amongst vital services. Absolute chaos.
But you're talking about spy agencies now.
We had a number of really excellent speakers.
Doctor Liz Evans was there, Sir Julian Rose as well.
But key speaker Andrew Wakefield.
Let's have a little listen to Andrew Wakefield talking about
some of the horrors that unfolded around him as he tried
to warn people about what was what was happening with
vaccinations and damages and the subject of autism.
They had obtained. Through discovery, all of the
documents, all of the emails, all of the correspondence from
the Royal Free at that time and from Professor Pettis, my new
professor of medicine, who did not approve.
Of me in the slightest and what I found in There was an e-mail
exchange between Mark Pettis and Michael Oldstone, and Michael
Oldstone had written after their discussion about this study.
He had written to. Him Dear Mark, this is going to
cost you 2 pictures. And Mark Pepper's mother was
apparently an artist of some Renan.
She had drawn these two nudes that were coveted by Doctor
Oldstone. This is going to cost you 2
pictures. And then the study came
unravelled and a follow up e-mail from Mark Pepper's.
Michael Old Stone said. Dear Michael, when are you
coming to London? Your pictures await you.
It was a bribe. For intents and purposes, the
research was deliberately sabotaged.
Expense of vaccine safety, Expense of children?
Again, it did not matter because it preserved the status quo.
That's what we were up against and they accused.
Me of fraud. So really serious things when a
health professional stands up to say something is badly wrong and
then what is he describing? The manipulation of studies and
reports and bribery whilst the whistleblower is the man accused
of fraud. So really tremendous address to
the audience, but all the speakers were really excellent
and we'll make sure that our audience can see more, more of
all that in due course. Final thanks to Phil and his
team from Oracle. If we just pop that on screen
because of course, all this filmed and live streamed for the
benefit of our global audience. What an event.
Absolutely fantastic. Now, Sandy, let's bring you in
with us because you're having a look at the demise of human
beings or the destruction of human beings even.
Sounds serious, but we need to know what's happening in order
to fight it. So welcome to today's NEWS.
Thank you. Thank you, Brian and Ben.
Yes, I mean, really, I was looking on the way back from
York. We had five hours to sort of
like digest what had happened really at the weekend.
And my take away with it all and the talk of digital iti was
pondering on exactly what identity really means, because
it's being attacked on all fronts, particularly with our
young with gender identity. And I'll be talking about that a
bit later with I did an interview with with Steve from
Edge of the Matrix. And I'll be, I'll be just having
a word about that later. But I mean, for thousands of
years, human identity was rooted in reality, our bodies, our
biology, our families, our communities and spiritual life.
And that foundation is deliberately being eroded and
subverted. And now our young people are
told that identity is fluid and that biology is negotiable and
that truth itself is relative. I mean, this is kind of a
destabilizing agenda. And it's not, it's not something
that is going to bring cohesion to to to the human world.
A population uncertain of what it is can be easily steered
towards whatever new identity the system requires it to be.
And that's the problem. It's reinforced by network of
technology and policy as we explore in the conference this
weekend, every aspect of life is being datified.
And, and that was clearly obvious with every single
speaker. And, and, and that's what really
was the cohesion of all those talks that we had at the
weekend. Everything's been deatified, our
health, our speech, our movement, our thoughts, you
know, and when our existence is governed through these
algorithms, who owns the data owns us basically.
So AI is represented as a helper, but it functions as an
instrument of surveillance and prediction.
And I just wanted to just highlight because I think this
sums it up. And I know it's an old, it's an
old video, but it for those that haven't seen, seen it, I think
it sums it up. It's Yuval no Yuval Harari, and
he speaks openly of hackable humans and the end of free will.
So if we could run that, please. Thank you.
Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with
evolution by intelligent design, not the intelligent design of
some. God above the clouds, but our
intelligent design and the intelligent design of our
clouds. The IBM cloud, the Microsoft
cloud, these are the new driving forces of evolution.
And at the same time, science may enable life, after being
confined to for 4 billion years, to the limited realm of organic
compounds, science may enable life to break out into the
inorganic realm. So after 4 billion years of
organic life shaped by natural selection, we are entering the
era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design.
So does the data about my DNA, my brain, my body, my life.
Does it belong to me or to some corporation or to the government
or perhaps to the human collective?
Humans are now hackable animals. You know, the whole idea that
humans have, you know, this, they, they have this soul or
spirit and they have free will. And nobody knows what's
happening inside me. So whatever I choose, whether in
the election or whether in the supermarket, this is my free
will. That's.
Over free will. That's over.
That's. Over.
Yeah, well, there, there we have it.
And I, I, I think he's, you know, this is, this is the way
they, you know, whoever has thought up all of this
transhumanism and the, you know, what's going on in our world,
this is what they, the future they want for us.
And This is why we, we, as Andrew Bridges says, we only
have one opportunity now to push back because the future, this is
the future they want for us. What Yuval Harari was saying is
the future they want for us. And all the more reason why we
have to push back now. I, um, I, I've, I've put
together a little, a little bit here about, um, I did speak to,
um, uh, Steve from the edge of the Matrix about gender identity
and how it's being really pushed and what really, what, what that
really means. And in the transhumanist system,
it depends on people not having fixed identities with a
biological or cultural and by teaching that identity that it's
fluid and self created, the groundwork is laid then for a
digital identity and the programmable self.
And once the concept of self is detached from the body or the
biology, it's become so much easier to merge with the human.
Identity with virtual or AI systems.
And that's what really what Yuval Harari was Speaking of.
And you can be whatever you want.
You can be a digital avatar and that that is the end game for
all of this is your digital twin in on the, in the metaverse.
And this is what young people are not quite getting when they
are giving up their human identity.
You know, it, it, there's many, many things that, that really
come into this. And I think gender ideology in
schools, it's, it's, it replaces the, the authority of the
parent. You know, the parents lose their
authority with state defined morality.
So I think, I think we've, we've got a lot, we've got a lot going
on here, a lot to unpack. You know, you can, you can
affirm new identity and you can transfer it to the guardianship
from the parents to the system. And that's a real problem.
And the, the legal re engineering of personhood,
again, that's a Trojan horse for digital ID and citizenship with
technocratic governance systems. So I was looking at the SDG
goals as well and, and how all of that feeds into it to this
system. Sorry, I've lost.
Oh, you still? You still there?
Hello. Have we lost connection?
No, I've lost. I can't hear you.
We'll just play the second video clip and hopefully Sandy will be
able to rejoin us. Oh, right.
Am I? Oh, surveillance.
People could look back in 100 years and identify the
coronavirus epidemic as the moment when a new regime of
surveillance took over, especially surveillance under
the skin, which I think is maybe the most important development
of the 21st century is this ability.
To hack human beings to go under the skin, collect biometric
data. Analyse it and understand people
better than they understand themselves.
This, I believe, is maybe the most important event of the 21st
century. One of the features of this
fourth industrial revolution is that it doesn't change what we
are doing, but it changes us. Yes, we can see that really when
we were speaking at the at the conference about how the COVID
era changed everything. And I think that really does
that really shows you exactly how how that all happened and,
and and what what it really was about, because it certainly
wasn't anything about a deadly virus.
It was about the control of the human population.
So I did put together this, this little slide here of, of, of
what, what it really means to, you know, to, to be what, what
gender identity really means. And it's, it's portrayed as
inclusivity is the narrative, but actually underneath it,
there's a darker agenda of control and social engineering.
And, you know, gender, gender definitions allows the law to
define what a human being is. You know, once legal identity is
detached from biology, it can be digitized and merged with that
AI system. And this is a legal Trojan horse
for digital ID and citizenship with a technocratic government
governance because it it, it all lines up also with the SGD
goals, which I'll go into in the next slide.
So really the, the, the, the goals, the goals that, that,
that, that seem to hinge on the gender equality, which is goal
5, which promotes equal rights and opportunities for women and
girls and increasingly addresses broader gender identities.
And I think This is why the gender, the whole gender
identity LBGTQ agenda is being pushed because then they, they
can actually get rid of gender in, in order to trans to, to
muted into the, the transhumanism agenda.
And, and you've got SGG 10, which is reduced inequalities,
which seeks fairness across social and economic groups.
So you've got a homogenization of the, of the human race.
And then you've got SGG 16.9, which is the legal identity for
all, which calls for legal identity by 20-30.
This is the real reason for the digital ID.
It is to, to, to, to, to bring these, to, to force these goals
for you to comply to the digital ID.
So let's have a look at the, the, the, the, the, those goals
again. And these are the, these are the
goals that we really need to concentrate on.
It's goal ten, goal 5 and goal 16, and the next slide please,
is yeah, gender 5 is gender equality.
Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.
But what is a woman and girl when they're blurring all the
edges? This is what I'm looking at.
SGD 10 reduce inequality within and amongst countries.
So you're homogenising everything across the board
globally. And then you've got SGD 616.9,
which is to provide legal identity for all, including
birth registration. And that birth registration can
be changed because now you are assigned at birth.
You're not born a man or a woman.
So they're dissolving stable identity to enable
programmability, state ownership of the child, re engineering of
personhood and the distraction and controlled opposition.
Again, we're getting that. I'll just in on in in the final
video, you'll see how Steve is being attacked and what what
division it's causing on our on our on our on our streets.
So if we can just look at what Steve has to put up with on on
the streets of the UK. Thank you.
Why hope? You.
Fucking Irish. What the fuck is?
That is assault. You will make it.
That is absolute assault. Fucking country.
You would make everything worse. What the fuck why are you doing
this? My friend fucking died like you.
Yes, and, and, and that woman didn't get charged for that
assault. That was chili sauce in his eyes
and all over him and this is what it's doing.
It's causing massive division all round, as is everything.
It's it's order out of chaos is what we're looking at.
Well, that's exactly what they hope to achieve.
However, if we're willing to form Sandy, I think we can bring
a different order out of that chaos, one that's to our
advantage and terrible things. And thank you for taking us
through that section. Now Diane, let's bring you on
the screen because although the BBC is very big at the moment on
back on the subject of abuse under Epstein, it seems that if
you're a Scottish lady who was abused as a young girl at
Fernethy House in Scotland, the BBC is absolutely not so keen in
informing the public exactly what took place and the sheer
numbers involved. So welcome to today's news.
Thanks, Brian. Yeah, I just wanted to, I guess,
touch a little bit first on the Epstein coverage that we've been
seeing recently, just in the past day actually.
So this article was posted yesterday, the 19th of October.
This is again Virginia Giuffre, who we've all seen by now
talking about the memoir that she has written saying that she
thought she might die a sex slave quote at the hands of
Epstein and his circle, which of course is absolutely terrible.
But again, looking at the issues of what's going on in Scotland,
that's not quite a priority for the BBC, as you said.
We've also seen yesterday Prince Andrew, or I guess who is now
just Andrew because he's given up his title because of the
investigation, the Met Police looking into claims that Andrew
sought information on his accuser, Virginia Giuffre.
So again, further coverage on that we did see, however, now
that we have a verdict in on the criminal case against Patricia
Robertson from the Fanathi Residential School, former
teacher who is now 77 years old. She was found guilty of 18 of 25
charges in the court last week in the High Court in Glasgow,
which I'm going to go into in some detail today.
But I think it's worth noting how this all ties in with the
mainstream media issues that we're seeing in in terms of of
any full coverage of, you know, what is arguably one of the
biggest scandals in Scotland, if not all of the UK.
We have here a 76 year old woman, according to the BBC,
facing trial over school abuse claims.
This is from the 13th of January 2025 and the BBC and then we we
see finally that there was a little bit of coverage from the
BBC, the verdict on the retired teacher convicted of abusing
pupils on the 15th of October 2025.
So that's the BBC coverage. We see a couple of articles
again covering over 10,000 girls that were potentially abused
under the hands of the teachers at Neffy.
So when we go into some of the Scottish mainstream media
coverage, we see basically the same repetition over and over
again saying the same thing about the abuse charges.
So we have again 18 of 25 counts of which she was found guilty.
The other ones were, but they basically didn't have the
evidence to support what they were saying.
And that's not because it didn't happen, but it was because of
the fact that several of the women who wanted to testify
against Patricia Robertson to talk about the very serious
counts of abuse, including the sexual and the hard physical
abuse, was not covered in the trial.
Because even though there were, I believe, over 70 women who
wanted to testify and hundreds who they could have found to do
so because of the amazing organization that the women have
been doing, we were told by the the PF and the court that they
could not testify. So several of them were taken
off the schedule and only the ones that had sort of the sort
of middle of the road abuse, if we can say that of course, all
abuse was horrible. But the middle of the road
counts were the things of which she was found guilty of which
they called cruel and unnatural treatment of the girls at for
nothing residential school. Those were the the the center
around the most of the charges that were given the guilty.
But that was only because the the women who had again, that
serious, bit more serious allegations of abuse were not
able to take the stand. And so therefore they weren't
able to get the justice that they deserve for those those
those crimes as well. So different mainstream media
sources, STV, the Daily Record talking about this and also as
well, and this is interesting saying that the former Finetti
House headteacher, Pearl Fletcher, who was the one who
ran Finetti Residential School for many years.
Now they're saying after this guilty verdict has come out
against Patricia Robertson, who was not the head teacher Pearl
Fletcher was, she died, I believe it was in 2021.
And now they're saying she would have faced action had she not
died. Well, you know, it's this was
just something that came out in the last few days after the
guilty verdict. So again, interesting timing, I
would say, in terms of what happened.
It's it's, it's it's very important as well to highlight
the fact that UK column for the first time and it's almost 20
years of existence has finally been credited and recognized by
mainstream media. And this was in America of all
places. And this is because Ali
Flanagan, who was one of the women who testified over
Interpol connections from Florida, who was originally from
Glasgow but has lived in the United States for many, many
years, contacted her local ABC affiliate, Tampa Bay 28 in
Florida to talk about the allegations and the fact that
she was going to testify. So this is the first time that
this had ever been covered or even was been made aware of this
issue of this case happening over in America.
So this was an incredible breakthrough for UK, I have to
say, unfortunately under very bad circumstances.
But it does show that we were able to, you know, have this
amazing reach, which is important that the only thing
that I really care about is get the story, getting the story
out. One thing that I would say about
the coverage, however, is that there was there was a bit of
some inaccuracy, inaccuracies. And I'm not necessarily saying
that the reporter over on the Tampa Bay side of things did
anything horribly wrong. But it is a very complex case
with a lot of details and a lot of intricacies that need to be
considered. And so it would be difficult, I
would think, to get so much into a report, even though it was, as
far as mainstream media goes, fairly extensive.
So I guess we could see from here.
Let's watch a clip of an interview with me talking to
Lynn Sharon earlier today. Lynn Sharon is, of course, one
of the leaders that has been leading the the justice group
for many years. And she was in court every
single day of the trial. And let's hear what she had to
say. And then when we come back, I'd
like to talk about my day that I spent in the court last week
watching some of the witnesses speak.
Lynn, thanks for joining me today to talk about the recent
verdict of the 18 guilty counts and some that were not guilty
from the recent trial under Patricia Robinson.
I know that you were attending court every single day along
with a lot of the other survivors from For Nothing
residential school. And so I just wanted to take a
couple of minutes to kind of talk to you about some of the
things that happened in court at the outcome and some of the the
media coverage around this, the mainstream media.
So I guess first of all, being in court every single day, I was
only there for one day and I found it very difficult to sit
in the gallery because of the way the the the police were
acting and that just the overall environment was very tense.
How did you survive it for all of that time, for all those days
you were there? It was very, very tiring, but at
the same time, because we were all together, we've kind of drew
strength for each other. We had a lot of tears, but we
had like some laughs as well along the way.
And the girls, the support feat or the girls was amazing how we
all just came together. But as I say, it was very, very
tiring. Every day, you know, up and
away, up and away, up and away. But I mean, I must have the
world. I just had to be there every
day. So yeah, we all felt the same.
We had girls that had travelled quite far just to be there, you
know? So.
Right. Yeah.
And you know, I think as
well-being really close to Robertson herself must have been
incredibly stressful. Yeah, it was very stressful
because she didn't show any empathy at all.
She just basically just strolled in and out of court as if it was
nothing, you know, no, nothing at all.
No sympathy, no sorrow, not one ounce did she show throughout
the whole trial, which for us, that just reminds us back to
exactly how she was. We as you know, you never see
the woman smiling. You never seen her ever like
joining on anything. She would go into court in the
morning, she would smile and kinda giggle with the people
that worked in there. But when she minutes she went
into that courtroom, nothing. Not a thing.
Just blank, just that expression.
Just totally blank, hard and stern, you know, It was no nice.
It did. It did bring a lot of memories
back, a lot of like, you know, all of a sudden you sit there
and you see that face again and you think, Oh my God.
Basically for me, the first day that I saw, I thought I didn't
know how I would feel like after like 50 years passed by.
And then I actually get to see it again face to face.
But the fear and the emotions and all that is all it's, it's
right there. So it never ever leaves.
You can go through your life and have eases in your life where
none of us will think about it at all.
But the minute we all see that it was totally different, really
different. And yeah, I'm not surprised with
the the trauma that you all went through.
And I think that's common for trauma that, you know, I have
trauma myself from my childhood and I understand that sometimes
it you don't think about it and then something will trigger it
and it comes back. And so you, you ladies were
incredibly brave to sit there with her in the room for all of
that time. So I mean, you were.
All. Together, you know, so, yeah, we
were all there together at the end.
Yet it's yeah, amazing and so great that you could support
each other. What what are your thoughts on
the 18 charges of guilty and the others that were not found
guilty? Well, the 18 charges are guilty.
Absolutely amazing. And we're so happy for the girls
that got the guilty. They deserved it because what
she did to them, it's just, it's just amazing we got her in there
and we got that guilty verdict for the 18 girls, 6 of them not
proven. One in particular, I actually
felt really that's happened a bit because we get always only 5
and what she went through was near 5 year old should ever ever
have to go through anything like that.
She was there with her sister and it was not proven.
That's just it doesn't make any sense.
It does not for the ones like that never got their day and the
court, they never got to testify against her.
Well, here we go again. The fight will start all over
again and we are not going to let that go.
That's that's no way of you letting that go.
You know, we've fought all this time to get in court.
We got the 18 guilties, sex, not Provence.
Hopefully something can get done about that.
But for the rest that are never got that in court.
Sad, but the fight goes on. So quite a disturbing interview
there, you know, hearing about their experiences.
I will just say quickly, Brian, that I was in court for one day.
As I said before, we played that clip and it was quite
distressing. There was a police officer
controlling the gallery. Nobody was allowed to even show
any emotion. If you even, you know, sighed or
looked looked at something, or even opened your bag, the
policeman would come over and tap you on the shoulder and tell
you to leave until you could compose yourself.
The witnesses who were actually examined by a Crown Prosecution
were basically, I think showing that the women were somehow
uncivilized, saying they didn't know how to use utensils, saying
that they need to be stripped naked and de loused before they
were admitted fully into the school.
Saying that, you know, we had to do all these things and you know
how to would that was that potentially the reason why they
were treated the way they were, the reasons that they were force
fed, which was one of the charges that she was found
guilty of. So I think there's still a lot
to uncover, Brian, that there. The woman will be sentenced on
the 3rd of December and they will be following up with the
civil case after this as well. So we will continue to support
the women in any way possible. And I think that we're very
privileged and happy to to do so as we continue to fight for
justice for these amazing ladies.
Brian. Don, thank you very much for
that report. And yes, tremendous work by the
Finetti ladies alongside the results of the court case, of
course. UK column highlighting that for
some very strange reason, the BBC and other mainstream media
do not want to report on this case.
Thousands of little girls involved, thousands of lives
destroyed in some cases and yet no reporting by the mainstream
media. So, Ben, in my mind, the
question is it does this thing go to the real heart of the
Scottish establishment and this is this why they are so
reluctant to talk about it and they would prefer to focus on
Epstein and what what's happened on the other side of the pond.
We'll have more reports on that. We'll leave that.
Now let's come onto the subject of support for the UK column.
We in in all of our supporters worldwide, but we're still
finding that people are not visiting the website.
And yet the website is a huge resource of thousands of
articles and videos and we're encouraging people to come to
the website but also to use the search bar.
If there's a topic being reported in the news in 2025,
try searching in the search bar in the UK column and see what
articles come up because very often you will find that we were
on the case years ago and there's much very good
information there. Now we can only do what we do
with your financial support and it's the people who are paying
for monthly or annual memberships that keep us going.
We don't want to just keep going or want to expand.
So have a look on the column at the Support our Work box and if
you click there you can join up and become a member and be part
of the UK Column team. And as we've just shown this
morning, fantastic support and we will be having more live
events in the future. Now you can also make a purchase
through UK Column shop. So have a look and see whether
you fancy something from the shop.
Everything is there to help support the UK column.
Now, tonight at 7:00 PM, we've got germ warfare and weekly
banter with Mike Robinson and Charles Mallett.
So tune into that. Really excellent discussion as
always. And Ben, you're being streamed
tomorrow at 1:00 PM, The corporate takeover of Music and
Culture. Yes, well, how?
How the music scene and industry has been weaponized against us,
it's probably the best way to to describe it and.
Particularly against the minds of young people.
Thank you for that. Now we've just got a little
promotional video clip here for the thousand word podcasts which
we've been talking about on previous UK column news.
Let's have a look at this little clip.
I've kind of had enough already. Yeah.
Is what I'm thinking. Well, he stuck around for the
duration. Is this my most challenging
portrait yet? TuneIn on Sunday at 7:00 PM for
the first episode of 1000 Words with James Delimper.
I don't mind what people think. I do mind if they cannot produce
a coherent explanation for it. Now the fascinating thing is
that some of the UK column team are going to be the subject of
the artists brush and a little bit of an interrogation at the
same time. So stay posted on that.
And with that, Ben, I think it brings us to you and the subject
of, well, Ed Miliband. Rite Aid.
If the audience is ready and braced.
Yes, the the swivel eyed lunatic that is our Energy Secretary.
Get up, get him up on screen. There he is.
You know who he is. He used to be the leader of the
Labour Party. He's now the Secretary of State
for Energy. Very importantly, he's also a
member of the Fabian Society, one of the 141 Fabians elected
into office last year, including half of the cabinet.
Actually, right. There really is a Fabian
government we're being subjected to.
And let's just remind ourselves who the Fabian Society are.
This is the secret or semi secret society founded in 1884
with the express purpose of establishing A1 World Socialist
government. That's what they've been there
to do. They are wolves in sheep's
clothing. That is the their sigil on the
right hand side. That's how they think about
themselves. That's how they describe
themselves. That's how they behave.
So when they come to you bearing gifts, they're not gifts have to
understand it like that. And importantly, the there,
there are other sigils, this thing and their motto was when I
strike, I strike hard. So they are, they had the
tortoise and this motto when I strike, I strike hard, which is
decided. They move slowly.
They've been going for over 100 and was 140 years now, right?
So they've been at this for a long time, but they're moving
methodically and slowly and bringing through this socialist,
ultimately communist agenda, right.
And Ed Miliband is absolutely in the midst of this.
He was born and raised in a communist household.
His father Ralph was a left doing academic and heavily
involved in socialist organising in the UK.
He actually stood at his own father's graveside back in 1940,
saying that he, with his fist clench, swearing a private oath
on his father's graveside that he would be faithful to the
workers cause. And Ed is certainly his father's
son. He's still faithful to the
workers 'cause as he would see it anyway, with this recent
announcement just coming out yesterday, talking about a new
wave of clean energy jobs, state jobs with good wages, strong
trade unions. No need to leave your hometown
because these are going to be popping up all across the
country and this is part of the Labour government's change
agenda. Let's hear Ed Miliband talking
about it on Sky News yesterday to Trevor Phillips.
And what's so exciting about what we're unveiling this
morning is so many people in our country, Trevor, have been
asking this question for a long time, which is where are the
good jobs of the future going to come from?
What's the job my son or daughter can do in the future?
This is the answer. Clean energy jobs, working on
nuclear power stations, working on offshore wind, working on
carbon capture. And, you know, this goes to the
heart of what I think this government's mission is, which
is to change our economy. So it doesn't just work for the
wealthiest in our society, but it works for everybody and
answers these fundamental questions people have about
Britain and the good jobs that good wages that people want to
see. Good jobs, good wages, your
sons, your daughters are going to be working for the government
as essentially what we're looking at through public
private partnerships because we haven't got any money.
This is all going to be coming from international investors in
order to build supposedly sustainable energy systems with
experimental technologies that don't work and almost certainly
completely unnecessary. It's incredible.
We could have, we could have an instant 20 minute debate on why
Miliband is in fantasyland and trying to deceive the public.
But did say there it's not just for the wealthy.
So he absolutely knows at the moment all this is being run by
the wealthy. We're talking about global
corporations, not necessarily individuals.
It's for their benefit. It's not for the benefit of of
the wider population in UK. Unbelievable arrogance from that
man, as usual. As as exactly as per usual and
he took to the mirror as well. We can see here to say turn this
into a political point ultimately, right.
So Labour and the Greens actually, as we'll come onto in
a moment, supposedly the party of the workers and anyone who is
against our policies essentially are anti worker.
And this is described drivers of green jobs bonanza.
But actually the discussion I've seen on this suggests that the
kinds of jobs that we're talking about here, compared to existing
jobs in the energy system, they're much less secure on much
lower wages. And actually this is just a huge
spin operation, unfortunately, by the by the Labour government
that is also, of course, going to pave over huge swathes of
productive farmland. This again from last week to the
UK's largest is solar farms just been announced in Lincolnshire
and this is going to cover 3000 acres.
It's been classified as a nationally significant
infrastructure project, which means central government, IE Ed
Miliband at the moment, get to make the planning decisions
about whether these things get built and, and those 3000 acres
of productive farmland and now no longer going to be producing
food, they're going to be producing very unreliable solar
energy. And this really just makes me
think about things like Collodomor because one of the
key strategies of communist regimes is to attack populations
in particular to go after the food supply.
And this ends up in mass starvation and displacement.
And the track record for this kind of action is absolutely
there. So I think we're living in
extraordinarily dangerous times, certainly as far as the the
government in power is concerned, but also because of
this, the rise of this eco populist narrative from the left
wing of society. So let's have, should I say the
left wing of the political system?
Let's just have a little. Listen now to Zack Polanski, the
new leader of the Green Party. I grew up in the North, not far
from here. I remember I used to wake up
with this hopeful feeling. Not like I was in a Cornflakes
advent or anything, but there's something in the air back then,
a kind of ordinary hope. I've spent the last five years
up and down the country listening to people on.
Streets like this, I'm not sure we feel like that anymore.
There's more a hopelessness, people who are too tired to
fight, too tired to sleep, kids going to bed, hungry parents
lying awake in the next room, knowing powerless to change
things. And people say to me, hey, Zach,
you're the leader of a political party, what are you not going to
do about this? And I say we need a fair
taxation system. We need to tax the people with
the broader shoulders in a fairway.
But they cut me off. Hey, I'm a plumber.
I've been working 30 years. I'm finally doing OK.
Why are you making me the problem?
Or a hairdresser? I've just opened my first hair
salon. Why are you taxing me?
Why are you taxing my ambition? And I wondered.
Why did they think I was talking about them?
And now I get it. It's because it's too hard to
picture. It's too hard to picture a world
where people like that aren't going to come after your hard
earned money. He does in that video go on to
talk about sorry, Brian. He goes on to he goes on to talk
about the Super wealthy, right. And there is this narrative at
the moment, which is that if we just take we just do a bit of a
wealth tax, we want to tax people's assets.
If we do that, then that will just fix everything.
And that's been coming from a number of different areas on the
political left, but most notably over the past few weeks from
this guy Polanski, who's just popped up our basically our no
way, actually, Yeah. Well, I just smiled because he's
walking along an empty St. saying that he's been speaking
to people on streets like this, so presumably he spoke to
nobody. And he certainly wasn't present
at the protests in London, I don't think.
No, he certainly wasn't. No, I think he probably doesn't
talk about ID cards too much, to be honest with you.
So any who is this guy like this getting back on screen, have a
little look at him. Zach Polanski was actually born
David Paulden. I never.
I always find it really old. And people change their names,
particularly politicians. Like, why?
Why have you done that? Like, are you trying to hide
something? You know, it just seems a bit
odd. He's a former hypnotist, so he
used to charge women money under the pretext that he could help
them increase the size of their breasts under hypnosis, which in
my money, makes him a con man. And I suppose does beg the
question, is he trustworthy? Can we believe anything that he
says? Do we want people like this
running the country? He's also a trained actor and
economically illiterate, like a lot of people in this area.
And I can prove both of those points to you.
So the first one in terms of him being a trained actor, is that
that was a party political broadcast.
And there was someone that I came across on LinkedIn saying
how proud he was to have written and directed the Ordinary Hope
film. So, you know, presented as
Polanski, the great orator and the person who's talking to the
common man. But actually, she's been written
by a scriptwriter. Right.
Is this EU KS version of Zelenskiy?
So we've destroyed Ukraine using an actor and now we're about to
bring one in for UK. Yeah, maybe.
I think, you know, it could be the he's, well, he calls himself
an eco populist, right? And, and this is the, you know,
populism is the idea that as a political leader, you're, you're
there to to go into bat for the common people and to help them
fight against the corrupt international elite, which is
actually a valid analysis of what's happening in the country.
But then what you need to look at next is what, what's the
policy recommendation? And this film, which you provide
a link to that was just the first sort of minute and 1/2 of
a 3 minute clip. And you should go and watch the
whole thing. He's all talking about a wealth
tax. And he introduces the concept of
this elite who, when they go to sleep in one night, earn more
than one person, one street or even 1 neighborhood doing an
entire year, right? And that's very emotive because
people are certainly feeling the pinch at the moment and they can
see that there are people in the country and further afield
who've got a lot of money. But just going off to wealth is
not going to fix things, unfortunately.
And I can do some basic sums to prove that that's the case,
right? So we just take ourselves to the
Internet and get it to do some sums for us.
Looking at the top 350 individuals and families
featured in The Sunday Times, rich there.
So these are the top richest people in the country.
All of the billionaires and the significant, significant number
of of multi millionaires as well.
Their total combined wealth is 772 billion total wealth.
And he's saying I want to do a 1% tax on that to help alleviate
the problems of the country. Well, The thing is 1% of 720 two
172 billion is 7.7 billion. And based on current government
spending that will keep you going for two days.
So it's not a solution. It sounds nice, but it's not
actually going to fix anything. And what he never talks about is
an actual industrial strategy in a way to fix the economic system
and redistribute capacity and wealth back out into society
that way, which is how you would actually go about fixing
something like this. But he's become extraordinarily
popular. He's been very heavily pushed
algorithmically, right? So he's in a lot of people's
timelines. Like I say, he's connecting
emotively with with people across different generations.
In particular, he's been put in front of what they call Gen.
Z. So basically anyone under under
sort of 3025, thirty years old. And he was actually one of the
headline speakers of the My Life, My Say Next Generation
conference, which was held on Saturday, same day as our
conference. But this was held at the
Ministry of Sound in South London.
And that organization, as I've spoken about many times
previously, is essentially a front for MI 6, the US State
Department, Rothschild family, David Cameron, Tony Blair's
floating around in the background.
But this supposed populist leader, man of the people is
being held up to the younger generation, someone that they
could realistically vote for. And it's going to affect change
in the country when that's fundamentally not the case.
And it's certainly not what those people that I've just
listed want to happen, right? And this is resonating with
them, you know, the youth that are getting on board with this.
We've had this guy here, Hayden Osborne, Brooks talking about
the extraordinary growth in Green Party membership.
Let's have a little listen to to to Hayden speaking now.
The Green Party, under the leadership of Zach Polanski, is
now officially the third largest political party in the UK.
This comes after Zach announced on Laura Kuenssberg this morning
that we have 124,000 members, which is more than the
Conservative Party. We're standing for social,
economic, environmental and racial justice and this bold
message can take us beyond reform and beyond Labour.
We've already beaten Labour in certain polls.
If this message resonates with you, join us today at
join.greenparty.org.uk and become a part of the largest and
fastest growing left wing political movement in the UK.
I just sorry, I'm laughing. I I do wonder whether that was
Harry Potter actually speaking to us at that.
This is serious. This is very serious stuff.
There's a rebranding of the whole political system in UK.
Destroy Labour, destroy UK, Leave us with this mush.
Yeah, well, I see it. Absolutely.
Yeah, Well, they're in and they're in the ascendant, right?
So it's connecting with the youth.
And now the third big, biggest political party, they're there
to deliver what he described as social, economic and racial
justice, which is generally the opposite of what that should
actually mean. And you know, Hayden, he seems
like a lovely chat, but he does rather beg the question, which
is this, which is, are the Greens to middle class?
Because I think that they've always been tarred with that
brush, but apparently not because we've got most and Ally
here. Sorry, most.
And Ally, who is a solid working class Yorkshireman, um, and this
is what a solid working class Yorksman looks like these days.
And um, we'll put a link to that.
It's an interesting little clip. You're talking to Owen Jones.
Owen Jones appears to be backing this group as well and has
interviewed Polanski over the past few weeks and it appears to
be travelling around the country with him.
So you can see the the kind of stars are aligning around
Zelanski and the Greens at the moment.
But this guy, Ali, he actually popped up last year on the news
because if you remember the Walthamstow protest where Ricky
Jones, the Labour councillor, was calling for violence to be
committed against his political opponents.
Well, the the woman standing next to him smiling and clapping
while he did that was this woman, Joe Cardwell, who's a
radical Marxist. She was the chief steward of
that event and she was actually one of the main campaign
organizers for most of the alley when he was running to be a
councillor for Gibson and Hair. It was Green Party and he's now
the deputy leader of the party. So I think it seems pretty clear
the types of people and the agenda that is at play in the
background of Zach Polanski and his eco populist rhetoric.
Thank you very much, Ben. Serious stuff and a lot more
work for the UK column News to do on that particular subject.
We did promise our views at the start of the news that we're
going to end on some happy notes.
So we're going to jump forward to our section on Denmark.
And Sandy, let's bring you back in again, because it does seem
something very interesting has taken place in Denmark.
Yes, this is actually the, the, the, the slide I have is from
the, the June 1 of the June episode from the, from the
Guardian in June. And it, it was, it's just that
the Danish government's culture ministry headed up by Jacob
Engel Schmidt, announced around June 2025 that it will submit
for consultation a bill to amend the Copyright Act so that
everybody has the right to their own body, their own voice and
their own facial features, which is really interesting.
I mean, this originally came through to, to address deep
fakes, which is what happened to the Pope in that sort of puffer
jacket thing, because that was manipulated.
So out of that, that sort of deep fake fake thing.
It is now being looked at to, to, to address broader
implications for breaches of GDPR privacy laws, freedom of
expression. And this is this is actually
being read. The legislation is reported to
have broad parliamentary support in Denmark and will be scheduled
for submission in the autumn of 2025 after consultation.
So although it's not actually in law at the moment, it's not
fully enacted in law as of now. There remains open questions
about the details and the scope and the implement implementation
of this. So you know, it's it's there,
it's on the table. And this could be a way of, of
looking at everything and opposing facial recognition and
data harvesting and data mining of our of our personal data.
OK. Thank you for that, Sandy.
And of course, people should look into this for themselves,
but it does seem that there's another possible wedge to get
into the system to help break apart the centralised policies
that would would have us controlled by the state now.
Final comment will be back to UK column on location in York.
It was absolute wonderful event. It was so lovely that we had a
full house 400 plus people with us.
Lots of really fascinating discussions.
The thing I always find from beating people is that no matter
who you speak to, they've got some fantastic information,
they've got life stories, they've got professional
experience to share, different views, but everybody really now
seeing through the terrible propaganda and these malicious
policies that the government system is coming.
But key to it all was that there was laughter and everybody who
came along said it was an absolutely fantastic event.
They really enjoyed it, they loved the speakers, they loved
the location, they loved meeting with the UK column team.
We enjoyed meeting with the audience and we came away
feeling that well. We got so much out of it.
It was a huge boost for us and we have had already a lot of
emails coming in about the event.
We'll try and trickle those through the forthcoming UK
column, News editions, but it was very clear that this event
was a major, major success. Thank you to the hotel and it's
given us a big boost to set up our 2020 year event, which will
be in Plymouth in 2026. We first started the column in
January 2006, so 20 years coming up and we're aiming to make the
event in Plymouth very, very special.
So yes, there will be serious stuff and speakers, but we're
also looking to really make it an event over a few days where
people not only can meet and chat and laugh with other with
other people and new friends, they can also enjoy a little bit
at least of the wonderful scenery and coast and seaside
that we've got in the Plymouth area.
So more on that in due course. But the UK Column team did a
roughly 700 mile round trip to get up in York and to do our
pick ups and drop offs. So we had a very busy weekend.
We were back quite late yesterday.
And yes, UK Column news is Live Today and it's our pleasure to
be here on the case delivering to our audience.
I will just say we did have a few minor glitches in the
programme. We were also affected by this
Amazon problem this morning and it just goes to show that if we
allow these global corporations to control our lives in this
way, nothing is really safe. And so a lot of reordering
necessary. We must end there.
Huge thank you to our audience today.
If you're AUK column member, we'll be back for UK column
extra in a few minutes. Otherwise, we'll see you for the
news 1:00 on Wednesday. Bye bye.