Hello and welcome to another UK column interview and perhaps
maybe we will call this interview.
You remember the rhyme, Old MacDonald had a farm.
Well perhaps Old MacDonald is losing a farm.
And for those of you that don't know me, I am a retired state
registered nurse and I was also a government advisor at the
Department of Health for five years.
And I'm hoping as I'm talking to you now, we're ending 2024.
And my goodness, what a year it has been.
And I'm hoping that you've all had a happy Christmas and that
you were able to spend some time with your loved ones and enjoy
some lovely food, because that's a lot about what Christmas is
about. Getting together, sharing love,
being thankful for what we have on our plates, being thankful
for the food that we're eating. But of course, the food is
farmed. And whether you eat meat,
whether you eat vegetables, it's all farmed.
So no matter what your preferences, this I hope is
going to be of interest to farmers, in particular to those
farmers that are looking towards the future of British farming.
What are farms to be replaced with?
Are they going and why are they going?
Solar farms, wind farms? Where are the flower farms, the
market gardens, the market farmers, the dairy farms, the
chicken farms? There's far more at play now.
And this interview I hope is going to help farmers who might
not know more of what is going on in the background.
And today I'm absolutely delighted.
It's a double whammy today. And really I'm just here to
facilitate today's interview because this is going to be a
conversation because of a chance encounter between two of our
very well known guests. Roger Meacock, who is a
veterinary surgeon, Natural Healing Solutions, who we've
done many of the interviews with.
And also the wonderful Sandy Adams, who I know you're all
going to be really pleased to see who has done so much work
campaigning and researching and talking about the United Nations
Agenda 20-30. But for those of you who are
Fresh to UK column, to those of you who are farmers, who know
farmers, I'd like to let Roger and Sandy both introduce
themselves to you because you might not have met them before.
But thank you both because because of a chance encounter in
North Devon, they had a chat and they came up with a revelation
and that is what today's interview is all about.
So welcome. Firstly, Roger, Roger Mekok, our
veterinary surgeon. Thank you for joining us.
Roger, do you mind just giving us a very brief introduction
into how we got to today? Hi, Debbie.
Thank you. Thank you very much.
Yeah, I'm, I'm a veterinary surgeon as as Debbie has said,
I've been specialising in natural healing solutions for
the last 25 plus years and I've been awake as to what the
different agendas going on for some time.
And I I started off in my veterinary career as as a farm
vet. So hence my interests and love
of farming and I also love my food.
Those of you who've seen previous interviews will know
that I'm actually on the carnival diet myself.
So potentially losing is is upsetting to me, both from a
professional point of view and and also from a from a personal
point of view. And I had the the pleasure to
share a stage with with Sandy at Cloverly in North Devon.
We both were asked to speak at the same event.
And so yeah, we, we, we bumped into each other there and then
had a chat afterwards. And this is the culmination of
those that brainstorming that we we had at that point.
And I'm very, very pleased that you met together in Clovelly in
North Devon because that brought you together.
And Sandy, welcome yet again to UK Column.
But for those of those of you that haven't met Sandy before,
Sandy, please introduce yourself.
I'm Sandy Adams. I, I used to work in the
corporate world a long time ago, about 1718 years ago and I, I
realised that there was something not quite right and I,
I gave it up and I started doing a deep dive really into what is
going on in our world. I was working for companies like
Microsoft and Google and and Glaxo Smith Kline.
And so I decided to really have a look about what's going on in
the world and I, I drew it all right back to the United
Nations. Really, it seems to be the crux
of it and, and beyond, I mean, the Rockefeller Brothers
Foundation and onwards. So I did this big deep dive and
found where the control is coming from and how.
And then then to my horror, I realised, you know, the whole
Earth Summit and the climate change lie and how it's all been
used as a vector for control. And that's really what my work
is all about, about how really our world has been captured by
these massive organisations who deem themselves to be the
rightful rulers of our planet. So that's it.
Really, thank you, Sandy. And of course, you know, just
recently we've all seen it in the news, the farmers protests.
We've, it's not long been the budget.
And there was this huge uproar, of course, from farmers because
of the inheritance tax, because I mean, I was shocked at the
price of farming equipment, for example, you know, combine
harvester, you know, 3/4 of a million.
I mean, you know, it's, it's extraordinary the prices.
So this, this is a darker agenda, though, isn't it?
And I think when you met in Clovelly, and I'm going to throw
it open now to both of you because I know you've got a
presentation and I know you that you've got some serious concerns
that you want farmers to be aware of.
It's not just about one agenda. This is a far bigger issue that
affects the veterinary service, that affects the business side
of farming, that affects the food chain and it affects the
future. So who's going to start off?
Shall we start off with Roger? You went to North Devon, you
bumped into Sandy. Take us from there and I'm going
to let you 2 take us on into what you've discussed and what
you've found in your revelation. Yes.
I mean, as you say, there's the, you know, it's, it's a bigger
agenda. And obviously everybody talks
about farming and we think of the farming side itself, you
know, in the fields or with the cows or with the chickens or the
barns. But you know, there is a far
bigger industry that surrounds or industries I should say in
the plural that surround farming.
You know, there are all those that provide equipment for
farming. There's those who service the
farmers, whether they be vets, whether they be the feed
merchants. There's, you know, the farming
isn't just what goes on on a farm.
And you know, if, if farming is being attacked, then all these
other industries are being attacked as well.
And I include within that that niche of farm veterinary work
where I started my veterinary career.
So, you know, this is something that we all need to be aware of.
And, you know, This is why Sandy and I had this conversation and
said, you know, really we need to get this message out to
farmers particularly. And we know how busy they are
and how little time they've had perhaps to dive down the rabbit
holes that we've had a look down.
And so we decided that it would be a good idea to put together a
presentation and say that the vast majority of the slides are
Sandy's. I've added a few in, but Sandy
has, you know, one of the reasons we got together and we
sort of gelled, if you like, at the meeting was, you know, Sandy
was saying stuff that that I knew already.
And I think in my talk I was saying stuff that standing you
already as well. So, you know, it was good to get
that reinforcement that we've maybe gone down these rabbit
holes separately. We've actually come to the same
conclusions and we can see what's going on.
And actually the conclusions aren't difficult to come to
because actually it's written in the documentation.
And that's why we've decided to do this presentation to to talk
everybody through it and step everybody through it and show
what's going on. So let's get going.
Exactly what what you said, I mean, you real 1 realises that a
big part of this agenda is to take over the food production
and make it a big corporate entity.
And, and to get rid of, of traditional farming and
traditional farmers and particularly, you know, smaller
farms, you know, a medium sized farms.
And, and to make it, make it impossible for farmers to, to
pass their farms down to, to their, to their family, umm, to
make it a family business that gets passed down through
generations, which historically it's always been that way.
And what they, what they intend to do is, is to take that
facility away from the farmers and, and literally turn them
into corporate, corporate entities.
And it will it, you know, it's going to initially really impact
on our, our food supplies. I think, you know, they're,
they're just trying to cover our land with these renewable,
renewable energy facilities like solar farms, wind farms,
housing. Housing is a big one.
And you look at the, the land use mapping in local, you know,
authority land use mapping, you'll find that there's very
little provision for food security.
And that is the biggest problem at the moment that we're facing
is food security. In 2025 and onwards we are going
to really, really be challenged. That's and that's why we're
here. That's really helpful.
Thank you both so much for that. And I'd probably just add that,
you know, the sustainable goals and you've just mentioned food
security there, Sandy. And I'm seeing that far from
sustainable, we're becoming, we're being made deliberately
very unsustainable. The plot to seize your farm.
So the idea is this isn't a new idea.
It's a technocratic plan that originated nearly 100 years ago.
So the following presentation is a conspiracy but it's not been
constructed by us. It was initiated decades ago
with the ultimate aim to main control of the growing masses by
the few. The slides show the proof taken
from government documents and those of undemocratically
established global organisations that were set up to achieve
their goal for a new world order.
Who will dictate global governance in a partnership with
non governmental organisations? Which is Mussolini's definition
of fascism. The dominant politicians,
financiers and industrialists have been groomed to implement
the plan in every country, regardless of which party has
been elected within the Union party system.
It gives the bogus impression of democracy when none exists in
reality. How it all began.
It's been a very long term plan, this whole agenda of a of a
carbon based economy and it started in the 1930s with the OR
just after the depression in America.
And it was led by a political scientists and engineers, a guy
called MK Hubbard and Howard Scott from Columbia University.
They proposed a replacement of capitalism with an energy based
economy as opposed to price based economy.
It was reintroduced by the Trilateral Commission, Zubigny
Brzezinski in 1973 as the new economic order known as
sustainable development and the green economy.
Many illumini of Columbus head up the present agenda like Klaus
Schwab, Amitay Etsioni, he's the communitarian guy, George Soros,
David Rockefeller. They were an elite group of
techcrats trying to implement what was then global warming to
create a new carbon based economy.
So they already the the seeds of it were actually back in the
1930s. Their whole agenda didn't
actually come to anything. It kind of fell at the beginning
of the set at the end of the Second World War because people
weren't ready quite to give up capitalism.
But what's interesting is is Joshua Haldeman is Elon Musks
great grandfather and he was heavily involved in this, in
this whole technocratic movement.
And they called it Technocracy Inc.
It was a a big push to to really get onto this carbon based
economy. And he was Elon Musk's great
grandfather. He was a maverick, an
entrepreneur. He flew his family all over the
world in his plane. And Elon's father LED a very
unconventional life in the 1930s through it right the way up to
1947. Haldeman headed up Operation
Columbia, named after the university.
He supported Howard Scott and Alexander King in the
Technocracy movement. Alexander King, by the way, was
also a member of the Club of Rome.
He had already set up his Social Credit party.
So that's that. That tells you a lot about him.
He organised Operation Columbia, funded by the Freemasons of the
United States with a convoy of cars to drive from California to
Vancouver, stopping at every Masonic temple along the way to
preach the new economic economic order of an energy based
economy. It failed because as I said,
people weren't ready to give up capitalism.
This is just a picture of this very strange grey convoy that
went literally from California to Vancouver and they they used
to dress in long grey overcoats and, and do not see salutes to
each other. It was all a bit strange.
The technocracy movement. Anyway, it, it had to be given
up. And I'm just going to quote
Fritz Springmeyer, who's done a deep dive into Freemasonry.
The Kabbalah is a foundational doctrine underlying Freemasonry.
And a lot of these are cult organisations.
People don't understand that the capitalism, they believe that
they are going to be two, there's going to be two saviours
of this world and one of those saviours is going to be
technocracy. And we wonder who the other
one's going to be anyway. One of them is going to be
technocracy, the saviour of the world.
And that's a bit bit worrying really.
Now I just want to make make it clear who's behind the United
Nations because it is interesting that the Rockefeller
brothers were responsible for the building of the UN
headquarters in New York. In 1946.
Nelson and David Rockefeller bought the site at East River
with an $8.5 million donation from their father JD
Rockefeller. The Rockefeller Brothers
Foundation also donated $2,000,000 to the original
League of Nations to buy the land in Geneva, which is where
the the UN building now stands in Geneva and The Who that
happened in 1927 where the UN now stands.
The Rockefeller Brothers founded the UNI.
Just want to make that clear because not many people realise
that that actually it was all built on the foundation of the
Rockefeller Brothers Foundation. So that is, you know, that's
quite something. I don't think many people
understand that. Now I'm going to mention this
because this is all very important when you realise the
corporatocracy that we're now facing and how it's emerged and
why the the public private partnerships that are now being
created is all part of this. This is a a secret in U.S.
intelligence report that proves that the Nazis plan to
forthright by creating a European economic order by
bankrolling industrialists to take control of nation states in
Europe in 1944. Top SS officers in the Nazi
Party distance themselves from Hitler.
The war couldn't be won militarily, so they planned to
take over the world in a different way.
At a meeting in the Maison Rouge, Strasbourg, they invited
all the top industrialists in Germany.
At the time. This included Krups Flick, Dame
Lebenz, IBM, Siemens, Volkswagen and IG Farben a lot among more.
With the backing of the United States through Operation Paper
Clip, these top corporations were told to grow many companies
and create a corporate ocracy to take over Europe using the EU as
the means. Before the Common Market EU
could be could be formed, the Nazi industrialists had to be
pardoned. The bankers and officials were
sort of pardoned in in that in that process and were able to
carry on doing business in the US.
In 1957, John Mcclay, the American High Commissioner for
Germany, issued an amnesty for convicted war criminals.
This included the above mentioned corporations.
This is why we have BlackRock and Vanguard now.
This is like the, IT all started really then when the United
States bankrolled all the big industrialists from Germany.
So we now see that we're living under that corporatocracy and
that kind of links in with the, what's happening now.
The, the, you know, the, the big takeover, the corporate takeover
of everything literally in our world.
The Club of Rome seemed to be be behind a lot of this.
It was formed as a sort of crisis think tank for the United
Nations. It's a global think tank and it
was founded on the Malthusian principle that the Earth has
limited and finite. Resources it was.
Founded in 1968 at the Rockefellers private estate in
Bellagio, Italy, by Aurelio Peche, an Italian industrialist
for the Rockefeller Foundation and the UN, the main purpose for
the counts for the Club of Rome is to formulate a crisis through
which the world could be united under A1 world government.
Global problems require global solutions, so they just sort of
Chuck around ideas about, and it's usually on this kind of
problem reaction solution model. Various Club of Rome reports
paved the way for Agenda 21, the intended agenda for the 21st
century. This was called the Global
Report for the President in the year 2000.
They wanted to figure out a way of reducing the population.
And I've got a copy of this somewhere.
Yeah, there it is. There we are.
And it's a it's quite you know, it's, it's, it's and it was
really given to Jimmy Carter and it was really a way of, of, of
saying, right, we're going to reduce the, the population of a.
It said the US population figure of 100 million emerged again on
the CIA linked website called Deagle, that Deagle's a
different, different thing. And we'll get on to that later.
But the Global 2000 report was really going into depopulation
and and how it could be reduced using population control like
this, decreasing population, but also manipulating population by
by using other means. And they used the Vietnam War as
an example in this book of how they could actually reduce the
population. So it's pretty, pretty heavy
stuff. This is quite interesting.
This is the Deagle report that was published.
About 10 years ago, a decade ago, it suddenly appeared on the
Deagle website. It's a true intelligence
operation for the United States government run by the CIA in
2014 to 2018. It came down in, Yeah, just just
before the pandemic, actually. Their website predicted a
massive 50 to 80% global depopulation by 2025.
The CIA in the World Bank contributed to these forecasts.
These predictions have been taken down in late 2021 with no
explanation. The UK population forecast was
to go from roughly 65 million in 2019 to 15,000,000 in 2025,
later revised down to 15,000,000 in 2021.
These forecasts were for 179 countries with varying degrees
of reductions and increases. Now these Deagle forecasts.
No one knows how they came up with these figures for the
population forecasts of 2025. It's, it would seem that
America, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and the
UK were, were significantly hit by these lowered population
forecasts. And you know, we, we, we don't
know what, what, where, how they came up with these at all, but
it's, it's just worrying. It's concerning that these
forecasts and the fact that they took them down in around 2021
and with no explanation at all as to why they were up there for
a good four or five years, no more than that.
But anyway, that's where they were.
Now one of the other major Club of Rome reports was Limits to
Growth. Now these, these Club of Rome
reports came just before the Earth Summit and they made the
bones up of Agenda 21 and Limits to Growth was published in the
1970s. It was 1971 and it was really
again, it was about population and how population needs to be
controlled. It's a bit like the the Global
2000 report. It was using computer models,
flawed computer models about how there wouldn't be enough
resources to go around and by 1980 there wouldn't be enough
food, there wouldn't be enough anything to go round.
So it was basically saying that that we need to do something, we
need to use contraception, we need to use ways of of of
decreasing the population. And it was, it was really a bit
Malthusian, this whole this whole thing, but deeply flawed
because it was at a time in the 1970s where there was a great
debate going on about population and that a guy called Paul
Ehrlich had written the Population Bomb, a book.
And that bomb didn't ever go off again.
It was, it was based on flawed computer models.
It was a very, it was, it was a very fashionable thing to be
talking about in the 1970s that there were too many of us.
And it's, it's interesting now we're not even at replacement
level in Europe. So there is there certainly in
Europe, there's no, no population problem at all.
And we'll go on to the other club of Rome's after this next
slide, which I think I think Roger could could talk about.
Yeah, this is Doctor Dennis Meadows, who actually was one of
the main authors of the Limits to Growth report that Sandy's
just been talking about. And he did an interview that was
recorded on video. And this is just a short excerpt
from it where he talks about how the population needs to be taken
down. At the time he was doing the
interview, it it was saying that, you know, we've got 7
million and we need to get down to 1.
And he did this original report, obviously in in 1972 that he
revised the book in 2004. And, you know, he certainly
hadn't changed his opinions by that time.
So you know, this little excerpt is is part of a much longer
interview which he did. The planet can support something
like a billion people, maybe 2 billion, depending on how much
liberty and how much material consumption you want to have.
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to
have fewer people. And conversely, you can have
more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or
9 billion probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which
is smart. That's unfortunately, you never
have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid.
So, but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard
of living, you can have a but, but we want to have freedom and
we want to have a high sentence. So we're going to have a billion
people and we're now at 7:00, so we have to get back down.
Back to you, Sandy. This is about Zubini Brzezinski
because he was the one, the person who reignited the whole
new economic order, the technocracy movement of the
1930s and he wrote a book called Between Two Ages, America's Role
in a Technocratic Era. He studied political science at
Columbia University with MK Hubbard and Howard Scott.
He was key in forming the New economic order, resource based
economy, CO2, carbon taxing. Resources are more valuable than
money in the technocratic age. They must be controlled and
owned. And that's, that's his, that's,
that was his contribution. He was very, very pushing this
whole new economic order which actually became big society with
David Cameron and and and Tony Blair now in in 1987.
Now that the yeah, the, the sorry, the limits to growth and
between two ages within the 1970s.
And then we, we, we go forward to 1987 where Grow Harlem
Brunland, Prime Minister of Norway at the time, and she
worked very, very closely with Maurice Strong from the United
Nations. He was the at that time, he was
the secretary general and they both wrote this book together.
But although Grow Harlem Brunland takes all the credit
for it. And it was the the report on the
World Commission on Environmental and Development by
Grow Harlem Brunland. And it's often known as the
Brunton Report. Now, Prince Charles still uses
this and quotes it. It's almost like his Bible.
And it's all about really levelling up the wealth of all
the nations. Wealth needs to be distributed
from wealthy countries to poorer nations as wealthy countries are
destroying the planet. That's that was the idea.
India and China, which is interesting.
It was, it was, it was this whole shift from wealth to be
given over to poorer countries like India and China.
It was a commentarian plan to bring equity, not to be confused
with equality, to all countries. The West has too was too rich
and was polluting and had to become poorer and less polluting
to meet with the Third world. It came under the scrutiny
during the Paris climate conference when the disparity of
emissions between the West and India and China had become A
cause for concern. The Secretary General of the
United Nations, Moristrong called it a second Marshall Plan
and that's exactly what it was. It was a way of just shifting
over the money. And so our industry became
destroyed really because everything went to China.
Now after the the our common future, the next Club of Rome
report to be published was just before the Earth Summit in 1991.
It was this book where the quote, you know, about humanity
being the enemy of humanity, man being the enemy of humanity
because they literally were looking for a scapegoat.
They were this whole club of Rome report was about trying to
find scapegoats because at the end of the day, we needed
enemies. The the the Wall had come down,
the Berlin Wall had come down, the world wars had finished and
there were no enemies. So they had to create one.
And they created us as the enemy.
So climate change was chosen as a vehicle behind which to unite
the people through an existential fear to accept
restrictions to freedoms and rights with higher taxes that
wouldn't otherwise be accepted. So they, they did identify us in
this club, what Rome report as the enemy of the planet
basically. So, and that's why we we are
being attacked right now. And then of course, we then had
the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, sometimes called the unsaid
conference UNCED. And it was the birth of global
governance. This is where really it kicked
in. This is where they got together.
And sort of like this is it we're going to really make a
plan to to have global governance.
This is a quote from Maurice Strong at the Earth Summit.
He was the secretary general. We may get to the point where
the only way of saving the world would be for industrialised
civilizations to collapse. Isn't it our responsibility to
bring this about? That is what he actually said.
Now. That's what we're seeing now is
the the, the Western civilization collapsing.
And that's, it's all controlled and it's all, it was all meant
to collapse. That's what we're seeing now.
Now who was Maurice Strong? Well, he was the grandfather of
Agenda 21. He headed up the Earth Summit in
Rio. He was an oil billionaire and he
worked for the Rockefeller Brothers for 17 years.
He was a member of the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,
the Council for Foreign Relations, a member of the
Fabian Society. He was a self concept, he
confessed communist in ideology and capitalist in methodology.
So that's a true communitarian. That's that's how he thinks.
It's a new communism and it's communitarianism.
He was exiled to China to avoid prison in the US for being
involved in the oil for Food scandal in 1995, where the UN
Security Council made a resolution to supply Iraq with
food in exchange for oil. There were revelations of
corruption, of funds involving Maurice Strong, Adnan Khashoggi
and many other oil billionaires. He loved China and the communist
system and he was friends with Chairman Mao.
His cousin actually lived with Chairman Mao.
So he ended his days in China and he loved the whole Chinese
Communist system, social credit system, everything.
So we now realise who was behind the Earth Summit where all this
was, this global governance was was brought in.
So this is it. This is Agenda 21.
It was launched then and it's the agenda for the 21st century.
That's why it's called Gender 21.
It's also called sustainable development.
That's where the term sustainable development came in.
It's written as a 42 chapter document.
On the face of it, it talks of sustainability, environmentalism
and conservation. But at its heart, it seeks to
divide man from nature and control all resources, taking
control of land, sea, minerals and just about everything on the
planet under the deception of saving the world.
Prior to this summit, many of the oil billionaires and bankers
had invested in the carbon credit banks.
Obama had set up the Chicago Climate Exchange, so it they'd
already invested in this new economy that they'd been trying
to get going since the 1930s. And now there, this was their
flagship launch of this agenda and it worked.
It worked. Now this is interesting.
This is some Prince Charles. Now there's a picture there of
him with fat Clav Havel from Czechoslovakia and Klaus Schwab.
Is that that chap in the back looking very young there.
Prince Charles was in with all that lot and he was, he was he
was at the Earth Summit, in fact, before the Earth Summit.
This is quite interesting. I'm going to just say this like,
just like the Red House report, this is a corporate takeover of
the world. In 1990, Prince Charles set up
the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum as a model for
public private partnerships. It was called the Public.
The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum became immensely
powerful worldwide, bringing together over 50 powerful
corporations, partners and members and funders.
In 1991, a year before the Rio Summit, Prince Charles hosted a
meeting on Royal Yacht Britannia where where the Summit was going
to be held in 92. And he hosted this meeting with
members of the UNWEFIMF, World Bank and key executives of Shell
and BP, as well as European leaders to push the idea of
sustainable development, referencing the UN Brundler
report as the road map for the future world's economy.
The following year, in 1992, he hosted the same oligarchs in the
Rio de Janeiro harbour to celebrate the successful signing
up to Agenda 21 of 178 countries.
And that's what happened at the Earth Summit.
They managed to get 178 leaders of countries to sign up to
Agenda 21, the agenda for the 21st century, to save the
planet. And of course who wouldn't want
to save the planet? All the leaders signed up to
this. It was to to save the planet and
revolutionise the world's economy to that of a carbon
based economy controlled by private corporations.
There was a whistleblower blower called George Hunt and he said
as they chinked their champagne glasses on Royal Yacht
Britannia, they applauded themselves saying yes, we did
it. We got the whole world to sign
up to global governance. So unfortunately that's that's
what happened and that's why we're in the state we're in now.
Public private partnerships by via NGOs are undermining
politics. That's non governmental
organisations and all western governments.
So they're undermining politics and all western governments.
They are the big business that's destroying representational
government in the form of an oligarchy.
These extremely powerful multinationals have the ability
and are taking over the national governments globally to create
global driven by greed. Corporate structure will
undermine everything if we allow it.
It's a new form of corporate communism.
Also referred to by Klaus Schwab of the WEF as stakeholder
capitalism. So they're transitioning us from
shareholder capitalism, which is a normal price based economy
into into stakeholder capitalism, which is corporate
LED capitalism. So it gets rid of small and
medium sized businesses, It gets rid of small farms.
And and what they really want is to corporatize it and have these
massive super farms and massive super corporation, you know,
sort of businesses so that you know that the High Street will
will die. You know that the small, small
businesses will die. And this is what we're facing
now. Just to go back, I always talk
about this because it's, it is important.
The global diversity assessment of 1995, which I have a copy of
here. It's a very, very big book.
And it's, it's got all the, it really is.
It's a, it's a, it was published after the Earth Summit, but
obviously it's, it's over 1000 pages.
It took, it costs $3.3 billion to produce and it is a control
and inventory of everything on our planet.
So it's almost like an inventory really of everything, every
mineral, every, every, every animal, every plant and how they
are going to manage it, how the, you know, the how the globalists
are going to manage our planet. And there's nothing in here
except on page 993 about human beings.
And on page 933 they talk about the the humans that have
destroyed the planet. They'll be put into what they
call human settlement zones. And these human settlement zones
will have corridors in between. And that is that was all part of
something called the Wildlands project, which I'll go on to in
a couple of slides time. So it was really a way of of
cataloguing everything and how it needs to be managed and
controlled. Bill Gates depopulation equation
based on CO2 and this is obviously Bill Gates equation.
I don't really understand it. I think he obviously it's made
up. It's basically CO2 equals people
times services per person times energy per service times CO2 per
unit. I mean it's an absolute
nonsense. Bill Gates has been buying up
huge areas of farmland in the USA and met with Keir Starmer
the week before the budget that announced the IHT change.
That's the inheritance tax. He has invested heavily in
Frankenfoods, yet also in methane reduction in cows.
He is a climate alarmist causing this this as leverage to ensure
success of his wild ideas and investments EG jimming the sun
with chemtrails. He has invested in The Who, the
World Health Organisation to promote his vaccine investments.
And there's been has been implicated in a number of
scandals surrounding this, including in Kenya, where
tetanus and Gardasil vaccines were used to sterilise young
girls. I believe some of them died.
I mean, it was, he was actually thrown out of India because his,
his vaccinations killed so many, so many young people.
Bill Gates is heavily invested in this whole agenda of, of
control of the planet, control of the land, taking away
farmland. And and it is a huge land grab,
corporate land grab of monstrous proportions.
Now, this came out of the global diversity assessment I just
showed you. This is a map of America, and
this was put forward as a project called the Wildlands
Project of North America. I used to include these over 10
years ago, 11 and 12 years ago in my slide presentations.
And people used to go, oh, that's a bit of a conspiracy
theory that'll never happen. But you know, it's all of the
stuff that we've been talking about for so many years is
happening. And I began to question myself
at one point, but actually it is all it all is rolling out.
Unfortunately, I don't, you know, didn't want it that way.
This particular slide is, is important because it's a
simulated reserve and corridor system protect to protect
biodiversity. Most of the map you see there is
yellow and red. Well, those are the areas that
humans aren't allowed to be in. And you've got the red areas, a
core reserves and corridors, little or no human use.
And then the yellow bit of buffer zones, highly regulated
use, which means it's for military and federal use.
And then you've got these little green dots all over the country
and they are normal use. This is where the humans are
allowed to be in these little green dots, which are zones,
they call them human settlement zones.
And then the, the pink ones are Indian reservations.
So it's almost like they're treating everyone like
indigenous. You know, they need to be put in
reservations. And then you've got the grey
ones, which are a few there, which are military reservations.
Now this was produced by David Foreman of Earth First.
Now we know what Earth First is all about.
It's it's all part of just stock oil and Extinction Rebellion.
And it was financed by Big Oil. The UN Wildland project was very
controversial at the time. 75% of the US to be given over to
self willed land and restocked with wild boar walls, bears and
wild vegetation. On page 993 of the US Global
Diversity Assessment I mentioned this.
The Wildland project plans to remove 50% of the United States
population into urban areas or human settlement zones
consisting of high rise dwelling units that are to be situated
near railway tracks. The railroad will be the main
means of transportation. Private automobiles will not be
permitted. The Obama stimulus was a major
source of funding for this project.
EU plans to rewild 1,000,000 hectares of land, 2.47 million
acres and farmers in the UK now paid to rewild their land.
So this is where the rewilding has come in.
You know that, you know, if farmers aren't putting these
renewables on their land or housing, then there are, they're
being asked to rewild their land and where is the food?
You know, this is what we have to ask.
Where is the food? And they don't want, they want
to starve us basically. Now there's a number of these
world wilderness conferences that happen all around the
world, UN based they call wilderness conferences.
They had one in Jaipur in 2020. Actually.
It had to go online in the end because of the pandemic, but
they plan to rewild 50% of the earth by 2050.
Co hosted by China unveiling a global leadership committee.
So they they hold these big, big conferences all over the world.
You know that they do it all the time, the UN they hold these
conferences and they make decisions on our behalf that we
have no idea about. So, and that's just to prove
that we there is world wildernesses conferences going
on. Wow.
I mean, Sandy, there is one heck of a lot of information there
and a lot to unpack. And I'm sure people will
probably have to go back and watch again because the history.
But now we've got the background, which is really
important. So you farmers out there that
are watching, don't panic and think this is so much.
We just want you to know what the background is, OK?
So that if you do want to go and research it, and you do want to
go and look at these documents, these huge, great, big thick
books. And I'm sure you haven't got
time knowing what a farm, what a farmer's life is like to do all
this incredible research. But I just want to come back on
a few things because I think in Part 2, where we're going to go
is where we are now. So sustainable goals and how
we're going to end hunger. Or are we going to end hunger?
Are we going to be in the future looking forward to a famine or
is it going to be a feast of bugs?
Are our animals going to be injected with things that are
dangerous to them and to us? So this is all this is all the
material that we'll be covering in Part 2.
But I just think for the last few minutes today and thank you
so much for that amazing presentation.
Let's just have a quick conversation and I'm going to
throw it open to to Roger in a minute to make some comments.
But my comments initially are that I'm fascinated that you of
course mentioned the Rockefellers and perhaps farmers
don't know the significance of the Rockefellers and the
Rothschilds. And believe me, while all this
may sound like conspiratorial theories, it isn't.
This is science fact, not science fiction.
So everything you're hearing today is real.
But when we go back to the Rockefellers, for people in the
UK, you might be interested to know actually that the NHS
wasn't really founded in 1948 by Nye Bevan.
It was actually created by David Rockefeller when he was sent
across from America to the London School of Economics and
he and William Beveridge cooked up the whole social welfare
reform that we now see the NHS. So that's just a reference to
the Rockefellers and I think also your references to the then
Prince Charles. Sandy, we've done a lot of work
on UK column and for anybody that wants to have a little bit
more in depth look at our King Charles, we have a five part
series which is growing all the time.
There'll be a part 6 soon of a series called The Green King
where we look at the backgrounds of what our King has been doing
in his long reign, 50 years on the Royal Yacht Britannia.
He's been up to a lot on the Royal Yacht Britannia, an awful
lot. And I just want to say to people
that Sandy mentioned there the Earth Summit and this kind of
new religion that we're kind of looking at, that seems to be the
Earth. That's the new religion, Mother
Nature, and of course the Earth charter as well.
We now have an earth charter. And the Earth Charter is
otherwise known as terracotta, which belongs to King Charles.
And King Charles has all the land, right?
So farmers, especially for me down here in Cornwall, the
Dutchie, a lot of the farming land is Dutchie land.
And our King is very much involved, very much involved.
And I think it was absolutely fascinating as well when you
brought up the Trilateral Commission, because as we're
speaking right now, Sakir Starmer, our Prime Minister, of
course, is a member of the Trilateral Commission.
So you can see how everything's dovetailing in.
And this is going to make for a very interesting conversation in
Part 2. So I do hope you'll join us for
Part 2. But Roger, give give us a
message from a vet to farmers about all of this that's going
on, you know, containing people into into zones and corridors
and and land that you can't go on.
I mean what is the future for the farmer that you that you go
and serve the farmers animals that you go and look after?
Yes, Debbie. Yeah, very concerning.
I mean, sort of one of the reasons why we decided to put
this presentation together really was to was to give the
history of of it all. And, you know, if if we start
talking straight away about what the current situation is and and
what's intended, it would sound so ridiculous and outlandish
that no one would take us seriously.
And, you know, that's been a problem with which I know we've
all had individually when we've been trying to speak to people,
you've only got a few minutes and you try and give them a few
facts and, and they tend not to want to believe you because it
sounds so dystopian. And and yet we've seen it all
actually in some of the movies and things from Hollywood.
You know, how many of those have been based on a dystopian
reality that actually when we look back at it, it's actually
starting to come true. And I watched the BBC version of
1984 and it was on telly not so long ago.
And I did it as my O level English lit book.
And it was just hit me as to how much, how, how when I did it,
you know, as a teenager, but O levels, how, how bizarre it
sounded, how unrealistic it sounded.
And then actually watching the film of it now actually
realising how much of they've missed out.
You know, we've got so much more already that that that's already
going on. And, you know, farmers and
people perhaps coming across some of this material for the
first time. You know, we're not expecting
you to learn it and understand it and quote it back at all by
any means. But but what we're trying to do
is just give you some proof that what we're going to go on and
say in Part 2, what we're saying now in this discussion, it isn't
based on our fanciful ideas that we've plucked out of some
dystopian nightmare that we've dreamt up some night.
You know, this, this has come from all these documents which
are step by step taken through what the plan is.
And it just happens that we've got to that stage in, in
industry and development of, of tech that the facility for using
technology for surveillance control is, is now come to a
point of reality. And although it may not have
been fully implemented here, there certainly has been in
other countries. We only have to look at the
Chinese social scoring system. We know that India put in a
system during COVID for monitoring their citizens and
that was put in by Infosys, which is a company owned by
Rishi Sunak's father in law's company.
So you know, these, these coincidences, inverted quotes
aren't happening by chance. You know, there is a, there is a
definite plan in place. There are step by step issues
here and all these things are connected.
And so, you know, we do need to wake up because I went to the to
the to the demonstration, the first demonstration, but for the
farmers about the inheritance tax.
And I listened to some of the speakers there.
And that was one of the things that really hit me when I was
there, that a lot of the farmers were obviously very concerned
about their future and what was being planned and said in the
budget, etcetera. But I didn't really get a
feeling that there was an understanding or a grasping that
there was a much bigger picture. And the idea that the that the
inheritance tax has been a miscalculation based on figures
that have been, you know, mistakenly picked up from the
wrong department of government is, is what they want us to
think. You know, this is very much a
planned approach. They have absolutely every
intention to do what they're trying to do.
And that's why we need to be aware of the bigger picture and
to realise that it is all part of a much bigger plan.
And although we're approaching this very much from the farming
perspective, you know, other small businesses which have
been, you know, included within the the last budget as well, you
know, any small medium enterprise businesses is now
being attacked by, by the similar sorts of measures.
You know that. So this is really what what
we're trying to get across is, is, you know, you don't have to
learn all the details, I say, but just understand that this
isn't being fabricated by us. This is documents which Sandy's
obviously got copies of from all her research there.
And some of these books can't be got hold of anymore because
they're trying to hide and stop people from getting hold of the
proof. But they had to distribute it to
those they wanted to. So they had to print it
originally. So, you know, this is this is,
you know, the message we're trying to get across is this is
the definitive plan which is going ahead step by step.
And you know, we need to to know what it is so that we can resist
it and understand where it's headed and, and realise that
that it is much part of a big agenda.
So that's that's my perspective on, on what we've where we've
got to so far. Thank you so much, Roger, for
that. And This is why Part 2 is going
to be incredibly important. And you know, as we've said
before, today we've bought you 2 experts with a huge amount of
knowledge who have done thousands of hours, work,
research, all of all that you've heard today is evidenced.
It's all real. And I just want to, before I go
to both of you for your last word, as we always do, I just
want to answer a question for Sandy because you put out a
question earlier when you were talking about Technocracy Inc
and my ears were pricking up and you were talking about there
were two saviours of the world and Technocracy Inc was
apparently one of them. Well, I can reveal we have
revealed it before on UK column. But the other saviour of the
world is King Charles, and there is a statue of King Charles as
the saviour of the world. This is real.
I'm not making this up. King Charles, he was then.
Prince Charles knew about this statue.
It was commissioned. He was presented with it.
It is now in place in the Brazilian rainforest and some of
you may be quite interested to see the picture.
So in the little article that goes beneath this interview,
there will be a picture of the saviour of the world.
So I think there's a lot more to be said about the King's
involvement, the Commonwealth's involvement, the United Nations,
the World Economic Forum, and maybe we'll talk about that
moving forward. But in Part 2, it's going to be
what's happening now and what's going to be affecting your farm
and your future. So please come back for Part 2.
But for now, I'm going to throw first to Rodger, and then we're
going to go straight to Sandy for your last word.
And our grateful thanks for doing all the research, for
putting out the message and also for making the presentation to
show people. And if you like what the UK
column are doing and you can share the material, please do
because the message really does need to get out.
So thank you again, both of you. And it's over to you first,
Roger, for your last word. Thank you.
Thanks, Debbie. Obviously what we've been
presenting today, as I say, we've decided a little bit as a,
as a step towards a dystopian future.
So, but I don't want anybody to have no nightmares about it.
You know, we're aware of it. And I think it is all going to
come crashing down. And I don't think they're going
to achieve what they want to achieve.
But that will that will happen more more quickly if if more of
us are aware of it. So, you know, I wouldn't urge
people to share what they're what they're learning and and to
do their own research too. You know, we'll, everything that
we've managed to research can be found out there.
So, you know, we're not, we're not saying anything that that
we've only got access to. So, you know, my view, overall
message, you know, sort of leaving really is, is one of
hope is, is that, you know, I do think we're already seeing it
where we're people are starting to perhaps look to local farms
and, and to and to source directly and, and, and
understand what's going into, into the food that they're
actually putting on their own table.
And so my, my sort of message really is an encouragement to,
to farmers who are perhaps feeling a little bit in despair
over what's happened with inheritance tax and wondering
whether to carry on farming. My, my message to you is, is
carry on. You know, we need your food and
you know, we love your food. And so please carry on and find
your own ways of, you know, whether you join with local
farmers around you, whether you do your own farm shop or whether
you find other ways of, of supplying direct, then that
would be my, my message would be to urge you to do that as well.
And for, for consumers, for all consumers, farmers as well, but
it's easy for them to find their own food on their own farm.
But those people who are local to farms, you know, please do
look for, for local farmers who are trying to make their food
more available to you directly. You know, it is better profit
for them so that they can survive and, and carry on
farming the way they want to, not the way they're going to be
dictated to. And it's better food for you
because it's not being travelled, it's fresher, you
know where it's come from and it's all lovely and healthy
because, you know, UK farmers are the best farmers in the
world. So that's my message of hope
really. And, and those who are in
industries that are sort of para farming, for want of a better
phrase, you know, those industries around, you know, you
need to wake up too and to support your farmers as I know
you do in your businesses. But but but to consider, you
know, these wider implications because if farming goes, then
your businesses are under threat too.
And I include the veterinary profession certainly on the farm
side with that too. And, you know, if they go for
farm animals and then they'll be going for horses.
We've already heard some ridiculous stories about finding
avian flu in Mongolian horses that could possibly being
transmitted to people. I mean, it's all rubbish.
And you know, we need to be aware.
Otherwise, if they if they if they're successful in getting
rid of farms, they'll they'll be looking to to go for the rest of
our animals if we're not careful.
Thank you, Roger. Thank you so much.
I think that's a very poignant message, question everything.
And now Sandy Adams, thank you so much again for the wonderful
presentation for joining us today.
And it's over to you for your last word.
Thank you, Sandy. Thank you for the opportunity
for this, because if we can reach as many farmers as we can,
because farmers, you know, they work hard, They haven't got time
to really go into a deep dive as to what is really happening in
our world and what's been happening for many, many
decades. And hopefully this presentation,
you know, and, and, and please, as as Roger said, don't believe
us, Do your own research. I mean, I, I, I, you know, I
haven't been, I, I don't get, I don't get paid for doing this.
It's something that I feel passionate about that I've been
doing on my own part time for the last 17 years and and
horrified at the way it's been unfolding.
So what we really need is numbers and we need farmers.
We've done the research for you do check it out, but we've done
the research for you so that you can have a better understanding
that it's not just about inheritance tax.
It's about a whole agenda to literally de to deincentivize
farmers, which they've seen with the SFI.
We know that the, you know, that they've been told that their,
their subsidies are going and that they, they have to create
these businesses on their farms that don't involve for food
production, particularly meat and dairy.
So what, what we're, what we're asking farmers to do is to look
at this critically and realise that actually where is the food
going to come from? Because there's no provision for
it. There's no food security.
And that they need to really think about that before they
think about putting solar panels on their farm and selling out to
the big corporations and getting the, the money from them.
And to really think about perhaps, you know, just
understanding that, you know, there's other ways the, the
British public will support them, you know, and there's a
massive awakening of people looking at what they're eating,
as Roger said, looking at the, the stuff that's been put into
our food. And people want pure food.
They don't want, they don't want fake meat and, and, and, and
stuff that's putting milk to, to, to stop cows from farting or
all that horrible stuff. And it's in a way it's doing us
a favour. The more, the worse it gets, the
more people are waking up. But we do need that, that mass,
mass awakening of the farmers to, to really understand that
there is another way, There's another way of farming.
And The thing is that if they, if they, if they, if we don't do
this, what will happen is the Super farms, which we'll be
talking about in the next, the next tranche of, of, of, of
slides and presentations is what, what the, what the future
of farming entails. And it is so dystopian that
nobody in their right mind would want that.
So we have to find another way. And we have to do this together
with the public. No one else is going to help us.
The government aren't, no one's going to save us.
It's us and the farmers. And I believe, as Roger said,
that we can do this, we can actually have hope that we can
have a future for our rural communities and, and for the,
for the people in, in cities that serve, that are served by
the rural communities. So I think we, we need to really
sort of hunker down and understand where this is coming
from, where it's going and just say no, don't consent to all
this nonsense. Because if we do, I know they're
going to try and, and push to this avian flu thing, you know,
we will end up in the same way that we did with foot and mouth
and with and with mad cow disease, with pyres of perfectly
healthy animals, you know, being destroyed.
And we cannot go down that route anymore because that will be the
end of UK farming. So that's all I've really got to
say. And thank you so much for this.