Thank you very much. Now some of you may have
realised that in my more mature years, I've become a bit croaky
of voice and this is not helped by there are so many of you want
to talk to me. So I've I've got to preserve a
little bit of my audio capacity. So I'm I'm just going to talk
quite quietly. If you can't hear, put a hand
up, but otherwise I just want to talk to you in a quiet way so
that I have voice to talk to the rest of you for the rest of
today. OK, brilliant.
Thank you all for coming. It's fantastic.
We are going to do more events. There'll be another event in the
autumn. Next year is the 20th
anniversary of the UK column and we are going to do a special
event. We want to do a weekend event
and early commitment will make a big difference to us doing that.
So if today goes well for you and you think it'd be fantastic
to be away for a weekend with normal people and we're working
on it now, I've really got to watch the time because I I've
got a lot of information. Gemma talks about the UK column
Information Cascade, and I'm going to give you one of those.
You might have to wait till the video comes out to go back
through it, to pause it because I'm going to talk through some
of the slides. But I want to be sure that
basically information and research that we've done as the
column appears on the screen. You had a brilliant personal
testimony to start off. You knew Roger was telling the
truth from personal experience. And for me, I've got to put some
evidence up on the screen and I've got some videos.
But first I have to tell you off.
Some of you have been very casual with your code books.
This, this book has got to stay with you.
Don't share it because you'll regret it, OK?
So don't leave it under your chair.
Keep it with you. You'll find out why right before
I get started. Many people do not know that the
UK column used to publish a newspaper.
This is 2010. And what does it say?
Three parties, one police state. With respect, Sir, there is no
Labour Party. There's only one party, the UNI
Party. This was the UK column in 2012
pointing out that an Asian man had tried to protect white
children. And that newspaper went to every
mosque in the country. We didn't send it there, the
communities did. This was this warning what Brown
was doing? Brown's treason.
I believe that what we are talking about today is treason.
And here was a mix of by Mike, of David Cameron and Nick Clegg,
half and half for the face quizzlings, Quizzlings for
change, collaborators in treason.
We've been there. We've told people about this.
But we printed nearly 1,000,000 newspapers.
And there's a lady called Kate here who was part of the
original UK column team that helped us mail out those
newspapers. So if you get a chance to meet
Kate, she'll tell you what it was like in the early days.
Let's start. So I chose not to have the
doughnut because I thought this was a nicer picture and we
needed something to lighten it up.
So where is this? Alex?
This is. Yeah.
Bude Cornwall. Anyway, listening to keep us
safe. Who believes that?
OK, It's a shame the girl's not here, isn't it?
So this is what they tell us. Trust us.
You're safe in our hands. But the key thing is who is the
deep state, really? This is part of the problem.
Can you see it? Can you touch it?
Do you know what it does? Well, what we can do is we can
play a bit of video. Let's.
I'm intrigued because there should have been some commentary
on that video maker that what you like.
However, this is how they sell themselves, the soft sell.
Trust us, we're nice people. I'm sure many of them are, but
we've got to be a lot more discerning about who we allow to
control us and monitor us. And I don't have any confidence
in the doughnut down the road, whichever direction it is, and
I'm going to try and explain why.
But if we think that there's something wrong in society.
We've just heard about the massive abuse of children, but
apparently our intelligence services and our security
services don't know this is going on.
They're monitoring millions of conversations, but they don't
know the child abuse is going on.
That's remarkable, isn't it? It's only a coincidence.
What should society be like? Well, Ben Rubin was kind enough
to record a little bit of video for me.
Let's see what he has to say. A healthy society, the market
and the state. The state is concerned with
power, the market concerned with money, and the church is
concerned with spirit. And the trick is to achieve an
even balance between the three. If you have too much market,
things become unequal very quickly.
Too much state, things become rigid and inflexible and
inhumane. Too much church and nothing ever
gets done. And today we live in a
completely unbalanced society because we're governed by what's
known as a public private partnership, A conspiracy if you
will, between the markets and the state, what I call an unholy
alliance between money and power.
We have a state that issues diktats and a market that
profits from enforcing them without any kind of democratic
scrutiny or oversight. That is the deep state in
effect. And this system, this public
private partnership, has delivered levels of inequality
that are unprecedented in human history in a manner that is very
reasonably described as anti human.
Citizens pay for it through our taxes and by being subjugated to
the public private partnership and the church.
The third pillar is nowhere to be seen.
So that that was Ben's version of society.
And I think it's a very interesting one.
We have to have it in balance for it to be working properly.
And clearly it's not in balance. And what what we call a deep
state, this was one definition. A deep state is a type of
government made-up of potential unauthorized secret networks of
power operating independently of a state's political leadership
in pursuit of their own agenda and goals.
I think we'll cross out potential because it's reality.
But I I thought that this was quite a good definition.
Now, what are we talking about in the really deep part of the
state? Well, this is an overview of how
things are linked together. You've got the doughnut, it's
got listening stations. We've seen those.
BBC monitoring is part of it. Yes, the BBC is part of the
state's spying apparatus. We've got a political charity
called Common Purpose, which I'll come on to.
And then we've got the overseas links with the National Security
Agency, CIA, et cetera, et cetera.
But the point I was making on this slide originally was we had
a British politician, Brooks Newmark, reported in the Daily
Mail as going overseas on the border with Syria in order to
talk to people who were connected to terrorists.
And we asked on what basis he went and where the minutes of
the meeting were. And that was never revealed to
us. But there was other stuff going
on. And we're going back in time
here. What are we looking at?
Well, we're looking at Malcolm Rifkin.
And a statement in the Guardian for the chair of the
Intelligence and Security committee to discuss working for
a bogus Chinese company is very odd indeed, to be frank.
I can't believe that the ISC members are allowed outside
interests. They are.
They see more sensitive information than most government
ministers. Now the point being made here is
the people with oversight and regulation and control of the
security services not doing their job.
And if I expand that a bit, this is another problem going on at
the moment. And this is showing the links
between the security services and Israel right now.
What we've got to ask ourselves here is, well, hang on a minute,
if if all our data or data is being shared with Israel, who's
actually in control? Who is in control?
It doesn't matter that it's Israel, because if it was Italy
or Germany, I'd still be making the same statement.
But this was never discussed with the public.
It was just something that was set up and now we know that the
state spies on us as individuals.
We have to be very sure where this data is going.
But of course nothing works without money.
And this is going back to June 2013 where the Bilderberg Group
met in Watford, in the Grove Hotel in Watford.
And I produced this slide at the time to just show you some of
the bankers who were there. We've no idea what was discussed
with government ministers, secret meetings, but here were
the faces. And then on the bottom left
you've got Peter Sutherland, no longer with us past as they say.
He was the man that thought mass migration was great to breakdown
the homogeneity of the nation state.
So a man who believed in using mass migration as a political
weapon, sitting down behind closed doors with a mass of
bankers and ministers, No minutes.
This is outrageous. And basically the whole country
should be up in arms about that. Or put inverted commas around
that. But here, here is the reality of
how this state controls itself. And this is a little bit of a a
just an overview. It's a slide from about 2000
where somebody produced an excellent little graphic that
was essentially saying, well just be careful of who controls
the media because Disney, Time Warner and another 4 big outfit
outfits are basically taking the whole of the media under
control. So these are global corporations
controlling right down to your local newspaper.
In fact, if you try and find a local Independent newspaper now
in this country, it's very difficult because they've all
been snapped up by by the big global companies.
And this means, of course, that if those global companies are in
bed with the government and as Ben Rubin said in the public
private partnership arrangement, then what you have got is total
state globalist control of the media.
And that means we are not going to get the truth.
We're not going to see what's really happening in the country
now. We the UK column warned and
warned what was happening when we saw the initial setup for
control of the press. And here this slide is
indicative of the setup for the Leveson inquiry where all of a
sudden we couldn't trust the existing press.
They'd been naughty boys, they hacked people's phones.
And So what was happening was a mix of political interests and
private interests in order to set up an inquiry to control
press and media. That means free speech.
We're back in sort of 2015, I think it was here was was being
grabbed and taken away from us. Now, Roger mentioned the sort of
layers, so I'm going to call it the networks.
If you want to understand the deep state, you've got to be
able to think in terms that it operates as a sort of big BLOB.
But there's layers, there's networks, and the only way we
could deal with this was by starting to break it apart in
order to show these networks. So I'll talk over this slide as
it animates. But this shows you how complex
the state's arrangements were to grab control of the press.
And what you're seeing here is from the bottom left hand corner
where a political charity called Common Purpose started a work
with an organization called Hacked Off and then Brian
Leveson was all part of that mix.
They eventually started down the route of state control of the
media, something Mike Robinson has been warning and warning and
warning about in recent UK column news programmes.
So Max Moseley there, you might be surprised, but he was a
naughty boy at one stage and did something a little bit
embarrassing, which I can possibly talk about, but he
ended up thinking he was the right man to help fund this
embryonic growth in state control of the media.
And have a look at this, this man here, this is Leveson what
the initial opening video of the SIS system, the intelligence
system. I was expecting a narrative for
some reason it wasn't there. But of course they talk about
our views and values. Trust us because our values are
good, but this man was involved in the network to take control
of the press. And then when we go into who
regulates the intelligence services and the police, well
what a surprise because the same old faces keep popping up.
Now there may be nothing in this, but it is rather a
coincidence that everywhere you see the control coming in, you
often see the same faces. Now children have been mentioned
and why are children part of the mix?
I believe for two main reasons. One is destruction of the family
unit. That is an objective.
They want the children and how do you get the children and how
do you get vulnerable children? You destroy the protective
family unit of mum and dad. That's one reason this is going
on. The other reason is that if they
can get the children away from a protective mother and father,
those children can be trafficked and abused and sold.
They become money, big money. It's a billions, multi billion
pound industry. Child trafficking in this
country, not external in this country.
And you may, sorry, you may remember a while back that there
was a big so-called Westminster VIP paedophile ring.
And most of this is is to the left.
It was to do with a guest house called Elm Guest House.
It all went into the long grass. But it was revealed at the time
that the men going to that guest guest house to abuse young boys
came from a variety of interesting places.
There was politicians, there were police, an MI five person,
that's interesting. And military people were
involved. A whole heap of people were
coming in in order to engage in the abuse of children.
Now I'm going to put a label over this.
I know you're not going to be able to read all of that, but if
you watch the video later, you can freeze it and see the
detail. This is under the surface at the
moment. Although it happened years ago,
the implications of who in the state was involved in the abuse
of children has never gone away. And I'm going to tell you today
there's a powder keg sitting under the surface to do with the
politicians, the security, sorry, the national security
people and the police, senior police officers who were abusing
children. The government made a big effort
to cover this up. This is another slide of recover
up of abuse, but this one isn't about Elm Guest House.
This is about Dolphin Square in London where politicians in
particular were abusing young boys, right.
This is also sitting under the surface and the moment some
very, very brave people have said no, we're not going to let
this go. We are going to get this
information out. The people who are denying the
evidence which they hold in their possession of the police.
And when we get to the point where it's not the police are
incompetent or corrupt, when they are actually protecting
people who abuse children, the police service as a whole is
nearly gone. And this is the reality of UK in
2025. Now, a bit of Five Eyes.
And I'm going to say a big thank you to Matt Erett.
This was part of a very interesting little documentary.
I'm really going to play a clip of it.
Go to Rumble and you can see the full Five Eyes.
See what it's On March 6th, 1946, the UKUSA Signals
Agreement established what became known as the Five Eyes.
That soon involved the global dragnet of intelligence
agencies, led by Britain's GCHQ into MI 6.
Soon other Anglo-Saxon spy agencies such as Canada's
Communications Security Establishment and RCMP joined
into the alliance, along with partner agencies in Australia
and New Zealand. It is no coincidence that March
6th, 1946 was also the same day that Winston Churchill delivered
his infamous Iron Curtain speech in Fulton, MO, setting into
motion the framework of the Cold War.
In the Baltic to Trieste, in the Adriatic, an Iron Curtain has
descended across the continent. Behind that line lie all the
capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe.
Under this new order ushered in by President Truman and
Churchill, America's OSS was disbanded and President Franklin
Roosevelt's dream of AUS, Russia, China Alliance to shape
the post war world was destroyed.
In this new scheme for a new world order, America's closest
allies that fought by her side to prevent the success of the
Nazi war machine were now rebranded as America's enemies,
while America's enemies became her closest allies.
So I'm going to say that is a really excellent documentary,
but you've got the twist there right at the end.
Suddenly the bad people became the good people and the good
people became the bad people. Absolutely on the button.
Let's have a look at the doughnut you.
Now know more about how the three agencies listen to or read
communications in order to guard.
But who guards the guards? In the UK, Parliament makes the
laws the agencies should abide by.
The newly empowered Intelligence and Security Committee then
tries to ensure they do just that.
The former head of GCHQ says today's historic hearings are a
test. In a curious way, the committee
itself is as much on trial as the three witnesses because they
have to demonstrate to the public that they are capable of
oversight of this very difficult, delicate area.
And if they can't, then public anxiety following the
revelations will undoubtedly grow.
I'm confident they can. The details revealed by the
former CIA contract worker Edward Snowden about the
capacity of the UK to Hoover up vast quantities of electronic
data has caused concern. Are the agencies going beyond
the letter of the law? So David says no, but that staff
need to be constantly reminded about the law and ethics.
The two are complementary. The legal oversight comes from
very senior judges who can descend on and do descend on the
agencies who not only look at the papers but go and interview
individual analysts. Ask them why you intercepting
that target. Prove to me that it's a
proportionate and necessary in the light of the task you've
been given. So very clever little response
to camera there because he said, well, the basically the problem
isn't the security services themselves, it's whether the
political system is competent enough to evaluate our delicate
work. I'm going to say never seen that
clip before myself until a couple of days ago and I thought
what a devious, dangerous man. Because we need oversight of
what is actually happening. Now there is apparently some
oversight through Parliament, but of course where most
politicians go is to the House Commons library because they're
lazy, they don't want to research on their own.
So briefing documents like this are what the average MP accepts
as truth. And this is This is why the
average MP at the moment is absolutely failing because they
don't know anything. They only believe what the
government and their their national offices tell them.
So that document for me indicative, but if you get into
the panel here, the Intelligence and Security Committee, this is
the the front page of a report. These are the people supposedly,
supposedly keeping oversight of the intelligence and security
services. If you read this particular
report that I've got on screen, excuse me, they are talking
about their inability to do the job because people are keeping
information from them. So we are talking breakdown of
the full system. The security services at the
moment are playing fast and loose because the politicians
either won't do their job or don't know how to do it.
What's the result? This is just a table of how much
money GCHQ sucks up and that's not the important bit with this
report. The committee talked about this.
You can't read that text, but I assure you what's here is
diversity training, getting in young people to break up the
homogeneity of GCHQ, bringing more diverse people.
What does that do? Well, I'll give you a
demonstration, but you need the Telegraph from a couple of days
ago, because at the bottom of the front page was this tiny
article. Top Secret GCHQ files taken away
by intern when you got inside. This is the main article and it
tells how this person had come in on one of these special
schemes and suddenly started to help himself to top secret data.
But down at the bottom in one tiny parent and one tiny
sentence was this, that there was also a connection with
indecent images of children. But inside GCHQ, Meanwhile, what
does GCHQ do to the public? They send out this nonsense.
Get your children. Can your children crack the the
GCH code puzzle? This is something designed by
children, but it's very dangerous because it's trying to
make out that what they do is just nothing.
It's all a bit of a gain. So, you know, here we are.
GCHQGCHQ can entertain our children, but it's unable to
protect the country from subversion.
Whereas we've heard with the opening speaker thousands of our
children are being abused and yet the listening station down
the road says it's no idea what's going on.
Well, what about this as an organization?
An organization believes in these things.
It's setting up useful idiots. It's using two or three
determined 5th columnists on the inside, expert idiots, building
coalitions and conspiring. And if you challenge them, they
say run over them, undermine them, go round them, discredit
them. That's exactly what Roger was
talking about. Do you think UK should support
an organization that believes in those things?
Because I don't what? What am I talking about?
Well, I'm talking about the doctrine book from the political
charity Common Purpose, Right? And this organization got all
over the country and we warned and warned and warned what was
going on, but they got somewhere else.
So let's bring GCHQ back on screen, because we showed many,
many years ago that that organization seeking to conspire
and overturn and produce 1/5 column had penetrated GCHQ
itself. And these are not idle
positions. They had got hold of the Policy
and Coordination and Development Programmes individual from GCHQ
and they'd also got hold of the head of software engineering.
This can't be right. This is an organization which is
says it's there to break things down, to conspire.
And yet they got into GCHQ. Now we warned what was going on.
We even showed the extent of this political charity across
the country. And so a red dot, if you can
just make it out on the map that that is a, that is a group of
individuals trained by this totally unaccountable
organization. Now, one of the things they were
doing was breaking apart silos. And what they meant by that is
if you have an organization that's working perfectly well
and happily, they are going to get in and destabilize it.
Why do you need to do that? Because if you want to take over
or control the direction of a big organization, you have to
shake it, you have to destabilize it, and then you can
manoeuvre that big organization. You can't change the NHS
overnight. They had to destabilize it,
break it down, make it all unstable so that they could then
bring it to where it was going to go.
I put out many years ago a video of a man talking about
disruption. Let's hear what he has to say.
Edited by Mike Robinson so nothing is taken out of context,
but there is a little bit of editing.
Hi I'm. Going to do that very uncool Ted
thing of saying this is really exciting for me to do this.
You don't often hear that at the beginning of Ted videos, but I
think you should a bit more. So I'm going to talk to you
about some of the work that we do.
My name is Dominic Campbell. I run a small phone called
Future Gov and I'm lucky enough to work with a small gang of
cool people who are really interested in how we can use
technology in the web to transform government and
politics. This is my personal story.
This is where I started nine years ago.
Very, very classic local government story.
That's Barnett Town Hall in North London, doesn't look like
the hotbed of innovation and disruption.
So this is also me. The other side of my life is my
web obsession and in particular Twitter.
And those two, the last two slides have really the
foundation of my career and the foundation of future government
and also me being lucky enough to be part of this movement
that's now often called Gov 2O Government 2 point O building on
how do you, how do you transform the web government using Web 2
point O technology? So Twitter has been pretty
fundamental to why I'm here tonight in so many ways, which I
can't really go into because there's so many of them.
But it's, it's fascinating just from a personal journey, how
disruptive to my life this this disruptive technology has been.
To actually Take Me Out of being in the back office of the town
hall in North London to suddenly being here three years later is
phenomenal. What is the kind of culture that
we're all striving for? What is the new world that we're
pushing for? So I think that we're at a point
now where you're either with us or you're against or are we
actually going to transform government into something
entirely different, so. If you don't understand
breakdown in the NHS, breakdown in government, holes in the
road, it's because the whole system in this country
deliberately targeted by disruptors, that's what they
call themselves in order to destroy what is in place.
And of course, if you disrupt in a hospital, people get hurt.
Now somebody saw this video, his name's Alex Thompson.
This was many years ago. And Alex said to me was later to
say to me, I'll watch the video and, and my jaw just about hit
the floor. And when Alex speaks in a
minute, I hope he's going to tell you why his jaw nearly hit
the floor when he watched that man speaking on that video clip.
But let's do a little bit more in the short time we got left
because of course, the big thing these organisations keep telling
us is they keep us safe. We're not allowed to know what
they do, but they can tell us they keep us safe.
We've foiled 1000 attacks. Where's the proof?
Oh, we can't tell you. I mean, it's a good business,
isn't it, when you think of it. All right, so let's hear one of
the previous operatives talking. I spent.
My entire life working against covert threats to this country,
and we are well equipped to do that.
And we have powerful agencies across government and powerful
friends and allies. Most importantly, we have our
values, which we cannot relinquish under any
circumstances. But we need to give ourselves
the best modern chance for dealing with these issues.
And a frustration for me, I'll be honest with you as I dealt
with this stuff, was the ambiguity, the ambiguity that
existed legally around all of these issues, particularly as
time went on, they were manifest in the digital space and the
people were exploiting our open society to plot and carry out
acts of aggression and harm against citizens.
And of course, there's a few vivid examples of that that you
have seen. Moments after the attack in
Salisbury. They remain in a critical.
Condition after being exposed to the substance Novichok.
The three suspects are believed to be in Russia.
The attack by the Russian military intelligence service in
Salisbury against British citizens, one of whom died as a
result, I think tells you all you need to know both about the
nature of the adversaries that we're up against and the fact
that this is going on. I.
Sensed you enjoyed that, right? But he said something very
telling. Did you pick up open society
right? This is straight out of George
Soros World Economic Forum book. And what he's telling you is
that his job is protecting open society.
That's not our society. It's something different.
Before I get a bit more detail on that, let's just remind
ourselves about the whole of the scribble poisoning affair.
The UK column did quite a lot because apparently, and I say
this as an ex military man that went through the nuclear,
biological and chemical warfare training where we knew how
dangerous some of these products were, you were dead in seconds.
But apparently for script all the script all case, you could
use baby wipes to just clean off the handles, right.
So this excellent article from the Grey Zone encourage you to
read it because in it he's got some really phenomenal
information which is showing that the official narrative was
complete rubbish. But if you've heard open Society
from one man, this is Richard Moore.
So the latest incumbent, the 17th C.
If you look at the bottom of the small print, you can't read.
But don't worry, I'm going to tell you what it is.
He says that they're there to help preserve the rules based
international system. That's nothing about you, me,
our families, It's nothing about UK.
He's telling you that these powerful security agencies are
there to protect the international globalist system,
right? We're paying the billions for
these people to operate at the moment.
And the other thing on their particular page, it's right down
at the bottom, so it's very small, but it says this.
We are #secretively like you. This is nudging.
This is applied behavioural psychology to get the reader to
believe that they can trust these individuals.
Why shouldn't we trust them? Well come back to Alex Thompson
because many years ago he sent me a book which was a bit of an
eye opener when I opened it because it was called A Secret
History of Torture. I recommend you buy a copy.
It's not quite what you think it is.
This is about Britain's involved in evolvement, in torture around
the world, and it opens with the fact that immediately at the end
of the Second World War, our intelligence services took over
Gestapo facilities and tortured people.
Evidence is there. And so as he says, and yet the
evidence is irrefutable. When faced with potential
threats to their that's the word he used to their national
security. The gloves always come off.
That book full of footnotes full of the evidential reports
describing the most disgusting things that our government and
the intelligence agencies carried out, apparently to keep
us safe. It's disgusting.
Now I've mentioned interaction with other countries, but this
was Francis Moore to gayly announced to the to the to the
UK and the world that our intelligence forces had now been
LinkedIn with other elements of of Israeli intelligence
gathering, including linking British and and Israeli
universities in order to share data.
Who voted for this? Did any of you vote for This Was
Just done? And why were we interested in
Francis Maude? Well, Francis Maude was helping
to promote that charity Common Purpose, right?
It's coincidence, just a coincidence.
But what was he also doing? He unleashed applied behavioural
psychology and I've talked about this many times because we were
warning and warning back in 2013 the government said it could
change people's minds and behaviours and they wouldn't
know about it. This is the document, it's
online as APDF. If you haven't read it, get
online and read it because it's truly astounding.
They are using applied psychology everywhere, including
on civil servants and politicians.
And when you hear strange phrases coming out of the mouths
of politicians, it's because you're dealing with a reframed
person. This technology.
Technology is real. And the British government said
we are leading the world on the ability to change the way people
think. UK column did a huge amount of
work showing the layers, the networks.
So this is the top with Francis Maude and the top civil servants
at the time. But we also highlighted that.
Let's bring it on down. That was Bob Kerslake came in to
replace the head man at the top. But we also showed that in the
background there was dialogues going on with French behavioural
change experts, never declared to the public, but it was
declared to another charity called the Franco British
Council. Never put in the press, never
talked about and the man on screen, Olivier Williere, if
I've pronounced that correctly, was a neuro man.
He wasn't just a psychologist or a psychiatrist, he was neuro and
they were talking about UK and the French working together to
change the way people think and behave.
And if we take it through, this was the Behavioural Insights
team that was set up in this country under David Halpern in
order to run the agenda in UK. And if I follow it through, very
quickly it took us to David Cameron's Big Society.
But if you want to see the Frenchman, here he is.
This is the article on the UK column.
British Cabinet Office collaborates with French
brainwashing guru to change the way we think.
This is a phenomenal book. Talking about this is very
expensive now because it seems to have sort of been retracted,
but it's written by PhD university people.
They've got tables of how this pernicious behavioural change
penetrated all parts of of the civil service.
Now the worst thing is that very often the attack on society has
been in our faces. So this was a quote from Nicola,
the Nicholas Bowles MP back in 2013.
And he said the Prime Minister and his deputy, Nick Clegg want
their people power revolution to unleash chaotic effects across
local communities. I don't know where Roger is now,
but he's been in the middle of those chaotic effects.
Chaos or chaotic, therefore, in our vocabulary, is a good thing.
And I'll bring up another one, Danny Kruger.
The Conservatives plan to introduce a period of creative
destruction. This is this is sedition, this
is treason, we were told. What were the security services
doing? Where were they?
I think they were complicit. Let's have a look at this man
Michael Gove, a revolutionary communist could lead Ofsted.
So if the right candidate for any public appointment happens
to be a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party or
someone who's been generous enough to support a political
party with their hard earned cash, think about what Roger was
telling you. If they're the right person, he
or she will be appointed. I ask who checked him and I will
end on this one, which is Eric Pickles.
So what was his message? Well, I mean it.
It was just everything. We are going to shake up the
balance of power in this country.
We are going to change the nature of the Constitution, be
in no doubt about our commitment to localism.
I know I look like an unlikely revolutionary, but the
revolution starts here. Isn't this sedition right?
You wonder why the country's falling apart.
They told you they were going to destroy the country and you've
had a glimpse of how how that was done.
I've got to finish, but I just want to end on this.
The Tories, big society, people think it was a sort of busted
flush and it disappeared. Oh no, it didn't.
You're living big society now. And this was a model based on
another provocateur, Saul Alinsky.
I'm not making this up. This is in the Conservative.
This was in the Conservative home blogspot.
They admitted it. And once again, the UK column
warns what was going on here. The dissent, Interstate media
control. And last bit, I'm sorry for the
Labour Party is if you think this was only being carried out
through the Labour, through the Conservative Party.
No, because exactly the same Solinsky policy was being
unleashed through the through Labour.
And I'll end with this, this slide, which is just to say, are
we really to believe that our security services with billions
of pounds of surveillance and monitoring couldn't work out
that this country was being destroyed by subversion and
sedition from inside the country?
So as they say, I put it to you that this is this cannot
possibly be the case. And if it's if it's the case
that the Security Service is new, then they are complicit in
the subversion and what we have called the treason against this
country. I'll end there.
Thank you.