Good afternoon, Today is Monday the 30th of September 2024, just
after 1:00. Welcome to UK column News.
I'm your host Brian Gerrish, Delighted to have with me Diane
Rasmussen Mccuddy speaking from Scotland and also Ben Rubin
who's coming in on the link from London.
Now one of the things that UK column has been saying to our
audience is it's becoming increasingly clear that it isn't
national governments. It's not the UK government
that's actually running the country.
Our governments are simply the spokespeople for agenda coming
in from the rules based international order of which the
UN forms a key part. So Diane, let's bring you in
straight away with giving a bit of background to what this
pernicious organization is up to.
Yeah. Thanks, Brian, and hello, Ben.
Happy to be here today. So I've been covering the past
week, the UN General Assembly, which officially concludes
today, the 30th of September. For the past week, there has
been a lot of action as we saw last week, starting with the
Summit of the future, which led to the adoption of the Pact of
the Future. And then we spent the last week
in meetings in what was called the general debate of the
General Assembly of the UN. And there's been a lot of
discussions from talks from the heads of state, from around the
world, the 193 member states all participating and all having an
equal vote in the General Assembly.
And it's from the 79th, 79th session of the General Assembly,
just so that we know, so that we're clear, the theme is
leaving no one behind, acting together for the advancement of
peace, sustainable development, and human dignity for present
and future generations. So I spared everyone the video
that they that they created from this past week.
I've just got a couple of still images that I took out of their
video. You can see the full thing on X
if you would really like to. It first talked about the pact
being the landmark new agreement which will redefine global
cooperation for generations. We had the Secretary General of
the UN, Antonio Guterres, saying our world is in a whirlwind, so
talking about the change and acceleration that's happening.
And we also had a special SDG moment with world leaders and
special guests. So I'm sure that was a lovely
time had by all. What I want to focus on is a Sir
Kir Starmer and his address to the General Assembly, which
happened on Thursday last week. Let's hear what Kir had to say.
My message today is this. We are returning the UK to
responsible global leadership because I think the
international system can be better.
We need it to be better. People talk about an age of
polarization, impunity, instability and unravelling of
the UN Charter, and I fear that a sense of fatalism has taken
hold. But our task is to say no, we
won't accept this slide into greater and greater conflict,
instability and injustice. Instead, we will do all we can
to change it. This is the moment to reassert
fundamental principles and our willingness to defend them, to
recommit to the UN, to internationalism, to the rule of
law. That's why the new Pact for the
Future is so important. We must put new energy and
creativity into conflict resolution and conflict
prevention, reverse the trend towards ever greater violence,
make the institutions of peace fit for purpose, and hold
members to their commitments under the UN Charter.
I can announce today that we're creating a new facility, the
British International Investment, which will work with
the City of London to mobilise billions in pension and
insurance funds to invest in boosting development and
fighting climate change. This is a great British
innovation. So we hear from that.
The plan is to take billions from people who didn't ask for
this in the 1st place and channel it to whoever it is that
they want to go with this. But what I want to point out in
particular is to go back into the history, as I've been doing
for the past few weeks over all this comes from at the UN and we
can go back again to the early 1970s.
There's a book that is available through the UN Digital Library,
which you can download for free called In Defense of the Earth,
and it contains three key documents from 19711972 and
19741971 was the first report that started talking about the
relationship between development and environment and looking at
issues of the environment related to what governments
should be doing. And then the first conference
that we had that talked about the issues of climate change and
all these issues around what we need to do to save the planet,
so to speak, was in Stockholm in 1972, which I will come back to
in just a minute. We also had the 26 principles
that were adopted at that conference about the
relationship between the Earth and humans, and there were
recommendations and an action plan.
And then thirdly, in that book, in 1974, we had the Kokiak
Declaration, which resulted in further issues around saying
that things weren't working. And, and they, they actually
concluded in that report that more hung, more people are
hungry, sick, shelterless and illiterate today than when the
United Nations was first set up. So does that mean the UN, is it
actually really helping? So going back to the Stockholm
Conference in 1972, this was a landmark conference.
It was the first place where they started really talking
about what they were going to do about the environment.
So let's hear from Barbara Ward, who was a British economist who
spoke at this conference. And and what did Barbara have to
say to us in 1972? We have got to learn to live
with stabilized populations with a more modest use of resources.
And we cannot cheat by simply saying we're going to carry on
with the same division as we have now.
Because if 2/3 of humanity, as our delegates have been telling
us again and again today, if 2/3 are to stay poor so that one
third can stay rich, my friends, they won't do it.
It's as simple as that. Are we going to hear from our
governments that they're going to sign the environmental
declaration, that they're going to look after the oceans, that
they're going to take a new look at the redistribution of world
resources? OK, it sounds splendid, but what
guarantee have we that you don't mesmerize yourself by saying a
thing is going to happen and then somehow kid yourself that
it has happened, it hasn't happened.
It will be very difficult. And it'll only happen, in fact,
if there are enough citizens and enough people in this world who
have this new vision and are prepared to stay with it, not
only when they are young, but when they're infinitely
decrepit. In other words, right through
and right on. And to me, the great importance
of Stockholm, it is the fantastic number of people
who've come to this place under their own steam, under their own
expense, because they want to participate in saving the planet
that they love. So we see a quite passionate
woman there about these issues. She was one of the first to talk
about the the concept and the idea of sustainability in
relation to the environments. Also in that video from that
conference, there is a man called a Professor Barry
Commoner, who is from Washington University in the States and he
talked quite a bit about colonization.
And what from what I got from this is that he really believes
that colonizing and the effect of colonization.
We speak a lot about decolonization, or at least I
do, talking about what decolonization means for the
West, which is the destruction of our civilization, destruction
of our culture, and I think essentially in the future, our
resources and our money, if that's not what's probably
happening already. And so he had a paper that he
wrote in 1975, which is called How Poverty Breeds
Overpopulation and not the Other Way around.
And ultimately what he said in this paper is that the West is
responsible for the overpopulation problem due to us
having a low death rate and a high standard of living.
And he identified colonialism as a kind of democratic parasitism.
So we are democratic parasites here in the West.
According to Professor Commoner, he ended with the idea that if
the root cause of the world population crisis is poverty,
then to end it we must abolish poverty.
And if the cause of poverty is the grossly unequal distribution
of the world's wealth, then to end poverty and with the
population crisis, we must distribute that wealth among
nations and within them. So we directly see the the
Marxist language coming in right there.
So this along with the Limits to Growth from the Club of Rome,
which I've covered, as well as Paul Raskin, where Paul Raskin
mentioned in his book Journey to Earthland, which I've cited
previously. He referenced this 1972
conference. And what he said in that book
was that the actions failed to match the rhetoric until the UN
came up with their SDG agenda or the Sustainable Development Goal
agenda back in 2015, which we now see, of course, in Agenda
2021. In 1992, we had the United
Nations Conference on Environments and Development,
which is where Agenda 21 was, was really started to work on
there. That was kind of the the
foundational part of Agenda 21 and it was called the Earth
Summit. So let's see what John Major,
our Prime Minister at the time, had to say at that conference.
The world is our garden, and together we must cultivate it.
This week at Rio, we have made a start.
Beyond Rio, we must continue to carry it through.
Mr. Chairman, for our generation and for future generations.
There can be no other way. Thank you.
So that Earth's summit we see that the concept of sustainable
development was an attainable goal for all of the people of
the world, regardless of where they were at the local,
national, regional or international level that had a
result of 27 principles. The first one being Human beings
are at the center of concerns for sustainable development.
They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony
with nature. And so with the third principle
was the right to development must be fulfilled so as to
equitably meet. So there's the Marxist language
again, developmental and environmental needs of present
and future generations. And what I want to say with this
is that we see there's principles, we see these
actions, we see these statements.
And so then this leads us to this past week when we have the,
the, the Pact for the future, the Global Digital Compact, the
declaration on future generations, which is all the
same language over and over again.
What we're saying, well, we have these principles.
We're going to save the planet, we're going to worship nature,
we're going to worship man and the, and the relationship
between man and nature. And it all just eventually goes
ahead to 2030 agenda and sustainable development.
And So what I'm saying is I don't really see anything any
different from what they were starting to do with us over 50
years ago. But what's next in this in this
particular agenda, which was announced, it was the climate
plans, which are called NDC's or nationally determined
contributions. And in 2025, this will be due.
He told the world leaders that this requires aligning energy
strategies with a 1.5° world, ending fossil fuel subsidies and
putting a price on carbon. So each party that signed up to
the Paris Agreement is required to establish one of these and
updated every five years. The UK does have one.
Yeah. I will have the link to it in
the show notes if you want to see what our national
contributions are. So thanks for that for.
And later on the show I will talk a little bit more about
some detailed points about the pact for the future and and what
this actually means for future generations.
Brian. Diane, thank you very much for
that. And of course, we've got to keep
reminding our audience that Keir Starmer has said his priority is
with you and Davos, these other bodies.
He simply regards national parliament as being a tribal
area which can't really do anything.
So this man is running the globalist of policies, but while
these global policies are being fed to the population of UK, we
are too, well we're to be concerned about things like
this. So this is the Telegraph.
Big thanks to Kenny for pointing me at this particular article.
And as we'll see, a little bit of follow up, but the headline
is that chicken. Chicken keepers you must
register to beat bird flu contact detailed species and
purpose required under new rules to cut disease outbreaks.
So this is all fear factor from the Telegraph.
No serious challenge to the government what's going on?
But it takes social media to actually get into the depths of
things. So here we've got Sasha Yanshins
in saying this. In the UK we have a new law
where you must register any birds on your property with the
government by the 1st of October.
So if you keep chickens or ducks or maybe emus, you must now
register them because of the UK government likes having insane
overreach and enjoys abusing authority.
Absolutely correct. What this man is saying.
What is happening is absolute insanity.
But if we go on, Jeff Buys Cars responded, where is the link?
I want to have a play. I want to encourage my 140,000
subscribers to do the same. Lots of pigeons and pheasants
around here. They need to be represented.
So as social media got some power, well, maybe let's just
have a look at this because thank you, Kenny, for pointing
out that last night the ministry was saying that they were
experiencing an extremely high volume of applications.
We currently aim to process applications within 30 days.
If you haven't already submitted an application to sorry, if you
have already submitted an application, do not submit
another one. And then by today we got this,
sorry, there's a problem with the service which would have
essentially shut down. And we're going to say the
problem is not with the service, the problem is with the
government. And the population of this
country needs to be awake in order to stop this sheer
madness. Now, where does this all head?
Well, one of the things that we're seeing in the background
is madness about animals, whether it's Badgers or indeed
it's culling other animals. And it's a little bit of Ben
here because I'm just going to remind people that in Maoist
China, they targeted sparrows at 1:00 .1958 to 1962.
They killed billions of sparrows.
And as a result, they had severe ecological imbalance which
ultimately helped fuel a famine in the country.
So where does insanity take us? It takes us to this sort of
thing. And if you think that's a little
bit extreme, well, I'm going to remind you of the excellent UK
column documentary Slaughtered on Suspicion, which was about
the obscenity of the a slaughter of millions of farm animals in
this country on the back of a lie.
Let's have a look at a little clip of that documentary.
Another hammer blow for Britain's farmers, The return of
foot and mouth disease. It poses no threat to humans,
but all affected animals, sickly and weakened, are slaughtered to
stop it spreading. So the president is here in this
country and of course you register all your chickens, all
your birds, and this allows the government to carry on and cull
them at their leisure sometime in the future.
So a lot of thought needs to go into this by the population,
particularly people in farming or small smallholding.
At least Ben, let's oh, sorry, just before we bring Ben in.
In contrast to the zealousness of which the government is going
for chickens, the government doesn't want to release
information to do with child abuse and child protection.
This is all to do with Sheffield and environments and the abuse
of children. We've been pointing out that the
gentleman's been asking the Home Office under Freedom of
Information to release information about what was and
was not done in order to protect children, but the Home Office is
still withholding information. This is now going to go to the
Information Commissioner's Office.
But this is the reality of the UK Government.
It's giving us orders about what we can and cannot do with one
hand and the other hand it simply does as it pleases.
Ben, that's probably a good background to bring you in here.
Thanks, Brian. Good afternoon, everybody.
So I'll start off with the question, which is, is the US
State Department deliberately attacking the US Constitution
and trying to undermine free speech?
Let's find out. We're going to start by talking
about Nina Jankowicz, who we've spoken about extensively over
the past couple of years, the former disinformation czar for
the Biden administration, seen here a couple of weeks ago in
Brisbane in Australia, talking about propaganda on which she is
an expert. And she was there to talk about
this report that she's just produced called It's Everyone's
Problem, Mainstreaming responses to technology Facilitated Gender
Based Violence, TF GB V. I'm not going to say that too
many times because it's a bit of a tongue twister, but I am first
of all going to define what it means.
So this comes from the report. We can see here that TF GB B is
any act that is committed, assisted, aggravated or
amplified by the use of information, communication
technologies or other digital tools that results in or is
likely to result in physical, sexual, psychological, social,
political or economic harm or other infringements of rights
and freedoms, Which is an extraordinarily expansive
definition for anything. But actually what it amounts to
is people saying 30 words on the Internet that we don't agree
with, as I'll explain to you as we go along.
Now. The report includes a case study
focused on this woman, Julie Inman Grant, who is the E Safety
Commissioner for the Australian Government, which is why Nina
Jankowitz was doing a tour in Australia.
So Inman Grant is in an unelected position.
She's a civil servant. She's also an American citizen,
and we can find out a bit more about her from her profile on
the World Economic Forum website.
So let's have a little look in the role that she's fulfilling.
She leads the world's first government Regulatory agency
committed to keeping its citizens safer online.
So Australia are taking the lead on this.
Her career began in Washington, DC, working in the US Congress
and the nonprofit sector before she took a role at Microsoft,
where she spent 17 years focused on government relations.
So she's very much in that public private partnership
space. She also went to Twitter, where
she set up and drove the company's policy, safety and
philanthropy programs across Australia, New Zealand and
Southeast Asia, which led her into living in Australia, where
she is today. And in 2020, the World Economic
Forum and apolitical, who we've spoken about previously,
appointed the commissioner as one of the Agile 50.
So agile is a a word used in in digital innovation.
She's very much on in a digital position.
And they described her as being one of the world's most
influential leaders, revolutionizing government,
right. So really, you know, in in the
hot seat internationally in the transformation of our
governments. Now let's go back to the story
in the report. So we, we, as I said, there's a
case study here and they're talking about a specific
instance that happened to Julian Mcgran.
So Australia's E Safety Commissioner woke up for the 7th
day in a row as the target of technology facilitated gender
based violence. The abuse had begun a week
earlier on April 15th when she issued a take down notice to the
social media platform X, formerly Twitter, requiring that
the platform remove a video of a violent stabbing of a Bishop
that had taken place at the church in Wakeley in Australia.
So it was a video of this gentleman here, Bishop Mar
Murray Emmanuel, who was stabbed while delivering a sermon in
church by a young man of Lebanese descent.
And the concern was that this would spark off racial tensions.
And the demand was put into Twitter that the video be taken
down. Elon Musk refused to take it
down, and they ended up in a legal battle.
This was actually escalated quite considerably and Grant
received a tidal wave criticism online about censorship, which
you know, for my money is, is really part of the course.
If you're in a government position looking at freedom of
speech issues and you're demanding that things be taken
down from the Internet, but frankly, I think of public
interest, then you're going to receive some criticism.
That's just par for the course. But this is now become a central
safety issue essentially for the Australian government, right?
So we go to the E Safety Commissioner's Office website on
the front page we can see here they're talking about preventing
gender based violence online. And what is essentially kind of
a personal beef between Musk and Grant has now been elevated into
something that is front and centre in Australian policy, but
also more importantly, in some ways American policy, right.
So Twitter is AUS company and a global digital platform.
And just pulling on the report again here, I can see the
inland. Grant noted that the lack of
regulation, particularly in the United States, is hurting women
around the world. Until the US actually regulates,
she said, the rest of the world is going to be fighting a losing
battle. So that is essentially a demand
to rewrite the US Constitution in order to prevent government
officials from being subjected to criticism online.
Now, I know they dress it up as being a much more expansive
issue than that. And this issue of technology
facilitated gender based violence.
But what she's talking about is the pre decision that she
personally received on the Internet for demanding that this
information be since be censored and is trying to use this to
agitate a change not just to Australian law, but also to U.S.
law and international law as well.
Really, really crucial to understand, not least because of
who is behind the report. Let's just have a little look at
this organization, Vital Voices Global Partnership.
It's a non profit founded according to his website, on the
simple idea that nations and communities cannot move forward
without women's voices in leadership positions.
We invest in women leaders who are taking on the world's
greatest challenges from gender based violence to the climate
crisis, economic inequities and more.
It's an international network. It's funded by global
corporations and philanthropic group including Airbnb, Avon,
Bank of America, Bumble, the Gates Foundation, Google, Uber,
Comcast. Who owns Sky News in the UK?
I'll talk about a little bit later on.
So this is corporate and philanthropic money.
They are extraordinarily wealthy as an organization.
So in 2021, they opened a global headquarters building in
Washington, DC in this 8 Storey townhouse right in the centre of
US Imperial power, in walking distance to the White House, the
US Capitol, the World Bank, the Aspen Institute, the IMF, Black
Lives Matter Plaza. These are the organizations and
buildings and locations that that vital Voices reference in
their own literature. So this is how they're
positioning themselves, being part of this ecosystem.
Really importantly, they've had an enormous reach over the past
28 years. They've been operating for 28
years now. They claim to impact 3 million
people each year. They were operating in 185
countries and territories and they have 20,000 change makers
across their global network. Change makers being a very
important word, right? So this is common purpose
language. These are the networks that we
see who are radically shifting governance and economic activity
and culture across the Western world.
And they're doing that from the very top levels.
So people on their Advisory Board includes leaders in global
politics and, and global business, including from some of
the companies that we've already mentioned.
But also they're recruiting very actively from younger
generations as well, with networks and, and chapters and
clubs popping up in universities across the US and, and, and
further afield, right? So they're actively recruiting
into their program. And what does that program
deliver for the young women who are engaged on it?
Well, quite a lot actually. So this is again from from their
website and they talk about holistically investing in women
leaders, providing an enabling environment, giving them
leadership training, providing visibility and credibility
through awards programs and that kind of thing.
Providing access to a global network, giving them a backing
in a crisis situations, providing them with access to
money so that they can bring their vision to life shift
culture. So we're on the outside of this
thing now, outside of this diagram.
Now we can see that the these these, the women in the
programme are going to shift culture and that's the stated
aim here. They're going to reinvest in, in
their communities and beyond and they're going to gain global
recognition, right. So this is women, young women
and, and, and, and less young women who want to be at the
centre of the global conversation.
I think that that draws on very particular type of individual.
But let's hear a little bit about them from the short film
produced in 2011. Now, women worldwide in many
areas of society are diligently working to improve the quality
of their lives and the lives of other women.
And each year the non governmental group Vital Voices
Global Partnerships recognizes some of these women.
This year's recipients for the 10th annual Vital Voices Global
Leadership Awards hail from India, Israel, Afghanistan,
Burma and Cameroon. They're working to halt the
trafficking of girls, brokering peace between Israelis and
Palestinians, breaking into the male dominated field of
carpentry, maintaining the fight for justice and running for
president, all to make life better for women and children.
So again, this is international network which is purely about
women helping other women. And the thing I find slightly
confusing about this is, is where are all the men in these
countries? Now, I'm not suggesting for a
second that men aren't responsible for acts of violence
or anything like that, and absolutely they are.
But just excluding them completely from the conversation
seems counterproductive to me. But let's find out a bit more
about one of the founders of Vital Voices, Hillary Clinton.
The United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a strong
advocate for women's rights and a founder of Vital Voices,
commended the recipients achievements.
Acknowledging that there's still work to be done, Secretary
Clinton pledged to continue advancing women's causes.
This is not only an urgent foreign policy challenge for me.
It is not simply a social justice issue.
The most important, in my view, for the 21st century, but it is
a personal mission as well. So former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton is one of the founders of this organization.
Absolutely critical, as we'll come on to in a moment.
And then let's finally hear from Alice Nelson, who is the chief
executive of Vital Voices. We invited 500 of the next
rising generation, young women and girls.
Are you out there? I hope.
That you will leave here knowing that you have the power, you
have the voice, and you also have the responsibility to stand
up and make change. So young women and girls
actually, she says they're shifting culture, wielding power
and making change. That was Alice Nelson.
As I said. She is the chief executive of
Vital Voices. She's been there pretty much
since it's inception 25 years ago.
And before that she was working on the Vital Voices Global
Democracy Initiative program as a deputy director at the US
State Department. So this was initiated
department. The US State Department under
the Clinton administration has built a global network of female
change makers who are actually many of them are actually
currently engaged in agitating to rewrite US legislation and
suppress free speech. Ben, thank you very much.
Lots to think about there, but let's move on.
If you like what the UK column is doing, we need your financial
support and that is best done as joining us as a member.
So if you get online, have a look.
You can make a date donation, of course, that helps us, but it's
monthly memberships that count. So if you're watching you like
what we're doing and you'd like to support us, then do think
about that monthly membership. You can also do an annual
membership or you can be bold and take a lifetime membership,
which many people have and we're immensely grateful.
You can of course, buy something from the shop.
It's getting colder here in UK at least, so you might like one
of those hoodies. And we're also working with
Clyde de Carl, who's course advertising his health products,
which you can buy via the site. And that helps us.
Now we'd also like to say share the material.
This is why we do it. So we'd like this little visual
of Bob Moran with Charles and Mike.
But of course all these little links here show the comments and
it shows where these things are linked.
So you can help us enormously by helping to spread the
information that we're putting out with recognition of the
column. Oops, beg your pardon.
Let's just go back one. So we've got we've got coming
out tomorrow. This is Mike's interview with
David Seagal, who did the climate change conferences,
which were very successful. In this one, they're going to be
talking more about health related issues.
And this one here is with Ben and Diane.
Ben, I don't know whether you'd like to give a little bit of
commentary about this little interview you 2 did.
Sure thing. Yeah.
So Diane and I had a fantastic conversation about the attack on
higher education and what needs to be done to, to, to, to, to
defend our academic institutions and to, to rebuild them.
Ultimately in a way that is, is for the, for the benefit of our
society. Ultimately.
I mean, we're talking about really fundamental
civilizational problems that we've got and how to fix them.
And, and this is at the pattern sub stack, which is one of the
projects that that I run. And you can find that at Pattern
18, PATTERN 18.substack.com. It's a great list and there's a
bunch of other stuff on there as well.
OK, excellent. So thank both of you for doing
that. Now a reminder that we do still
have some tickets for the UK column on location in Bristol on
the 19th. Not many.
So if you haven't bought a ticket, you've been thinking
about it, we'd love you to come and join us, get online and make
that purchase. It is going to be a phenomenal
event. So I was told yesterday Kim
Isherwood from Public Child Protection Wales is going to
come and join us as well. So if you haven't got a ticket,
I'm saying to you think you should get on and get a ticket
before those actually disappear. Now, as I've said before, yeah,
sorry, I lost track of my days. Saturday, Charles Mallet and
myself were at the Heritage Party conference.
We went because we believe the party's doing some good work.
We were invited as guest speakers.
What I will say to the audience is we're willing to support any
individual or small political party that's really doing good
work. On this occasion it happened to
be the Heritage Party. We spoke on the subject of
fighting the new New World Order, the rules based
international order as it's often called now, Charles
particularly talking about free speech.
And a key part of what I was talking about to the audience is
you can't fight what you cannot see and you don't understand.
And This is why we think the UK column news is so important
because if you understand what's happening around you, you're
capable of standing up and doing something about it.
And ultimately, of course, the battle is for our minds.
This is what we face. This is what the attack is by
the deep state and the rules based international order.
It's for our minds and the minds of the children.
Now, what was so important about the Heritage Party conference
was this is the first time I have ever seen a political party
get into the real agendas that people are being people are
facing in this country. So they weren't holding back.
They were getting into all the key subjects, including the
rules based international order and they were being very frank
in their delivery to the audience.
Let's have a little listen to party leader David Curtin.
Well, as I've said before, we're against war.
But how much does that cost? 3 billion a year promise to the
Zelensky regime, Scrap that and we'll have that for our nation.
5 million a year on migrant hotels for illegal migrants.
Scrap that. Migrants who come to this
country illegally should not be rewarded.
They shouldn't even be here. And we can scrap that and we can
scrap the foreign aid budget, which in total is another two
£12 billion which we have for this country.
Let's get rid of all the diversity, including and ecology
officers. That's the natural waste of time
and money and all around it. We couldn't scrap the Equalities
Act. We put in place this two tier
system that we don't need because we already have a a
common law where everyone's equal before the law anyway.
We don't need the Equality Act 2010 brought in by Tony Blair,
Harriet Harman or Harriet Harperson as she's often known
and then ratified by Theresa May.
We don't need it. Let's get rid of all the climate
subsidies which are a massive waste to come into the black.
Hole. Solar barons, the wind barons
and the 12 billion that they have pledged to send abroad.
I mean, this is absolutely crazy.
They're they're saving 1 1/2 billion pounds from targeting
pensioners, but they're giving 8 times that away.
To. Foreign wind barons.
It's insane and it is disdain for the people of this country
needs to stop. And let's define all the NGOs
and all the quangos, which are just enough a waste of money
that are paid by the government for logging the government in a
vicious circle where they then are used to put in more
draconian regulations and increase totalitarianism in this
country. Well, interesting isn't it?
Because essentially he's talking about the madness which we've
heard in relation to the chicken policy at the start of the news.
And, uh, he's saying we've got to cut all of this nonsense out
in order to get our country back under control and operating
normally. But alongside him, some other
excellent speakers. I can't do them all, but I've
just taken some of the other speakers of which doctor Liz
Evans, absolutely fantastic. And my goodness, warning about
horrors of doctors surgery, sending letters to children as
young as 11 to engage them in supposedly looking after their
own health. Let's have a listen to what she
said. Public health During COVID
elderly people were starved of touch and many died alone,
uncomforted by loved ones. Children were denied an
education, were forced to wear face masks for hours a day when
they did return school and were robbed of months of
socialisation and playing with their friends.
And basic rights such as travel and even entry to shops were
made contingent on taking a vaccine, being tested or wearing
a mask. As a Christian, and I know I
think Brian said this earlier, you, I believe you can judge a
tree by its fruit. So to understand if a policy is
right or wrong, we must look at the impact.
And looking at these pictures, we see pain, suffering and
cruelty. This is what unethical.
Looks like. And most importantly, this was a
choice. Political and medical decisions
were made in a moral and ethical vacuum.
So that was, of course, only a short excerpt, but she covered
some really, really disturbing things.
And this was the importance of the conference in my mind.
It was dealing with the reality of what's happening in this
country. Let's have a listen here to Kim
Isherwood talking about what's been going on with children in
UK in 2024. Not only did we get him
cancelled, we owned him. He turned to Twitter to
complain. And that is a direct quote from
Peter Tatchell, by the way. In 30 years I have never been
cancelled. We all did the bed until I tried
to go to wins. So not only did we get him
cancelled and then he went to. Twitter.
He then deleted his tweet because he didn't want to bring
an attention to it. So that, ladies and gentlemen,
is one hell of an achievement and that proves what you can do
when you won't put up with this in your own country.
So the LSPCC has finally given in and they have finally given
me that research in the form of two studies by a female in NSW
and Australia, Walsh. These two studies are simply
surveys of sexual prevention programmes.
Ladies and gentlemen, this does not safeguard this rooms.
They say, Oh no, they don't teach masturbation to four year
olds. No way will they do that.
Not straight out, no. They go out.
Around the domain. So here we've got self
stimulation. They sit 241 schools in England
and I'm going to read this out to you.
There are rules about touching yourself too.
Well, if people don't know about Public Child Protection Wales
and the work of King Kim Isherwood and her team, have a
look on the UK column website, search for her name and you can
see the interviews that we've done.
Last little clip. This is a very interesting film
maker Richard Jeffs and this he was talking about his film
exposing all of the rule, rules based international order and
the globalists. Great.
Reset campaign. And we just want to put this
film out with all this information.
And that went out and it's called the new normal.
That was in 2020, late 2020. I was a bit concerned because
I'm exposing all these people as being cropped tyrannical.
In this series, I discover what stakeholder capitalism is and
how it's inclusive and sustainable policies are
changing our society. The noise that you think that
trans. Rights.
Are human rights. People are dying.
Children are starving. Families are fleeing their.
Homes. I also investigate an initiative
called the Great Reset of Capitalism for transitioning us
to full stakeholder capitalism by 20-30.
So all the common reform is now very much engaged into this
initiative of shaping a great descent.
This is a time for a great reset.
Reset the ways in which we live. Join me as I investigate the
Great Reset transition to stakeholder capitalism.
So really fascinating film. Lot of detail, really excellent
work by that filmmaker. And of course, did you hear
those present booing the King as he appeared on screen in the
little film clip? Now, something I push to the
audience, I think it's absolutely true, is if we look
in history, it's only a few people that have taken control
of countries, nations, groups of nations in the world.
And the Devil's disciples, as I've got them here with, it only
takes a few. We need to be fully aware that
it only takes a few politicians in order to take control of a
country to do truly horrific things.
But of course in the background, as we've been covering in the UK
column news in recent weeks, we've got to be aware of the New
World Order and what it means and the organisations involved
here. We're calling it the Underworld
Order because of course criminality is an inherent part.
And just to remind our audience that Mike Robinson back in 2009
was highlighting the emergence of the New World Order.
And this is an independent article where the journalist is
saying that Joe Biden caused up Roy uproar by using the phrase
of the New World Order. But he said it was an
unfortunate choice of words. Well, it wasn't an unfortunate
choice of words. It was the real thing.
This is the sort of journalist, this is Joe Sommerlad.
He's really interested in US politics or cinema novels,
Insolent noise, but basically another man who appears ignorant
to what's actually going on. Let's just have a look at this
little clip with Gordon Brown to understand that when they talk
about a new World Order, rules based international order, they
absolutely mean what they say. All these new challenges are
bringing together about the biggest restructuring we have
ever seen, not just of the global economy but of the global
order as a whole. And 200 years ago, a famous
British Foreign Secretary said that the new world had been
called into existence to redress the balance of the old.
In 1990, another old world ended, dominated by the Cold
War, and people taught them in 1990 of a new world order.
What they actually meant then was a new political order.
And what was not foreseen then, but it's obvious now from
everything that we see and do, what we experience in every day
of our life, is the sheer scale and speed and scope of
globalization. And it's only now that we can
begin to understand that the world order that globalization
brings and what it's going to look like, it's driven forward
now not just by the balance of military strength, the Cold War
times, or ordinary political power.
It's being driven forward by a seismic shift in economic power
that we see around us. But what does the new world
order mean for countries like ours who are looking to succeed?
I suggest that the countries. Well, I think we've heard enough
of that. We get the point.
I just like to say to the audience that of course it's the
UK column that's been warning and warning about what's been
happening. And this was our report at the
time of the New World Order coming, Gordon Brown talking
about it. And we deliberately use the
colours of red and black. And I'll just very quickly say
that at the conference, many people talking on key areas
where we have to fight in order to fight against this rules
based international order, whether it's free speech or
sticking up for the state and the nation.
OK, we had to eat, but also here protecting our children, looking
after the constitution, looking after animals, an important part
of staying well and mentally healthy.
The New World Order wants to destroy faith in God.
But at the end of the day it's the local councillors who are
fighting the battle which are important.
And I also reminded people to be happy whilst they are standing
up to be counted. Ben, very briefly, you've got a
little video clip here, but you're aware of yet more parts
of our fundamental infrastructure being closed.
Absolutely, yes. So I took this short film
earlier, not this week. Last week I was up in Nottingham
for a few days and this was on the coach journey on the way
back. You can see the video on the
right hand side there and that is Ratcliffe on Saw Power
Station. And today marks the day when it
will be closed and we will transition into a coal free era.
And you can see a little post from LinkedIn on the left hand
side from E3G, which is a climate group run by former
Blair people. They were advising him while he
was in #10 which is also directly linked to the Club of
Rome. The president of the Club of
Rome, Sondri and Dixon de Clev sits on the board of E3G.
So this is part of delivering this international agenda.
And I'll just read out a couple of key points while the video
plays. It does look quite majestic.
I think the, the, the power station there on the right hand
side. You know, I always thought it
was a bit of an eyesore growing up, but it feels quite poignant
looking at it here. So as they say in the post here,
as we approach October 1st, the UK will celebrate an historic
milestone, the first day of the coal free power era following
the closure of the Radcliffe on Soil coal power plant and
midnight on September 30th. This coal phase out moment marks
a significant turning point in our energy transition, how we
achieved it. I'll just riff on a couple of
these points here by setting ambitious climate targets.
So the 2008 Climate Change Act marked the beginning of the
phase out journey that was obviously under Blair critical
regulations. In 2009 Energy Secretary Ed
Miliband announced the end of new unabated coal projects,
significant in a decisive shift away from coal investing in
alternatives. So this is a multi party thing.
So the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government in
2013 invested heavily in the wind industry to make coal less
attractive. And then they introduced market
reforms for renewables, which facilitated huge investments in
power infrastructure and allowed greater integration of renewable
energy into the grid. And they see this as a template
for International Development. And this is really crucial for
people to understand. The UK is at the vanguard of
this transformation. And they talk here about the
Powering past coal allowance, which includes 181 national, sub
national and non state actors who are committed to ending
unabated coal power, who are going to be implementing similar
plans over the coming years. So this is the end of an era and
I will certainly be interested to see what happens next.
But as you said, Brian, it feels like a deliberate degradation of
national sovereignty and capability.
And and of course, Ben, this is not national policy.
This is international globalist policy wrecking our
infrastructure in our country. Diane, what's the future hold?
It's a good question, Brian. Apparently the UN wants to tell
us what's going to happen with generations who haven't been
born yet. But what I'd like to talk a
little bit now, again is about children who are here now and
what's happening with them. On Thursday evening I attended a
talk through Common Knowledge Edinburgh, which is a group that
I'm involved in. I'm the speaker was Stewart
Baird, who is a high school teacher from the Scottish Union
of Education, which is a group I'm also involved in.
And Stuart was talking about what is known as in Scotland is
called the Curriculum for Excellence, which has been
around for 20 years. And he was investigating what
was going on in Scottish education and, and basically the
abject failure of the curriculum for so-called excellence.
And it was actually called I think the end of excellence or
something like that. Please end excellence.
And what he was talking about in relation to this curriculum in
Scotland was it's we've kind of seen an end to subject based
education where they've discontinued subjects like
geography and, and, and things that students really need to
know where you learn facts and you learn how to do things and
in favor of other things. For example, one area of the
Curriculum for Excellence is called relationships, sexual
health and parenthood, which is known as RSHP in Scotland.
And it's really, really, really unfortunate when you look into
some of this content and it ties back to what Commissioner Wood
was, was covering up the Heritage Party conference around
things that our children should not be exposed to.
And I just want to go into some examples here in Scotland and
and in other countries and what this means for what the UN has
said about the future and the pack for the future.
One of the examples of the Curriculum for Excellence
curriculum, which is actually from directly taken from
materials. And I want to thank the group
Scott Pegg for this, which is that professionals who are from
health education and social work who have concerned about the
approaches to trans ideology and gender dysphoria.
Here's a photograph from some of the curriculum which says babies
can't talk, so grown-ups make a guess by looking at their
bodies. So then we go into those issues
around assigned at birth. No, we're not assigned at birth.
We are born something or other, right?
One or one or the other. Essentially some of the other
materials that they are teachers are instructed to cover is about
transphobia and it says to teachers to introduce the word
transphobia. This is a word that explains
when someone is hurt or put down because they are transgender.
Key point to get over. Acknowledge that for people who
are transgender things can be difficult when other people are
cruel or rude to them. Remember, this is for children
in Scotland. If we go back to the UN and
they're back to the future on what they've been promoting.
This has been on Twitter this week through the UN Geneva
Twitter account, X account. Every child has the light, the
right to learn in the safe environment.
It says children, civilians and schools are hashtag not a
target. They must be protected at all
times under international humanitarian law.
But we see what's actually happening, right?
If we look at some of the other materials that I've just seen
from the past week, just just like looking online and being on
social media. Over in the US we have a period
party for ages 8 to 13 in a library in Pennsylvania.
September the 24th is for all of our cisgender friends.
October the 1st is for our trans and non binary friends.
Please sign up for the party that is most appropriate for
your child. Again, this is for ages 8 to 13.
Regardless of how you identify or as you think your child
identifies. We also see in Ireland we have
Libraries Ireland where there are subject headings, which is a
a library term if you're looking in library catalogs, sex
instruction for children, juvenile literature, sex
instruction for children, miscellanea, sex instruction for
children, study guide, sex and structure for children with
mental disabilities and so on and so forth.
And what's interesting about this as well is if we go back to
the Global Digital compact that is in the pack for the future,
where they said we commit by 20-30 to prioritize the
development and implementation of national online child safety
policies and standards in compliance with international
human rights law, including the Convention on the Rights of the
Child. And of course, that means the
child is an individual and can basically do or say or, you
know, look at whatever they want to look at online and otherwise.
And they do specifically mention child sexual exploitation
material as well as solicitation or grooming for the purpose of
committing a sexual offense against a child.
Obviously, we're not supposed to do that.
They tie this directly to Sustainable Development Goal 3
which ensures healthy lives and promotes well-being for all at
all ages. My interpretation of this the
The unsustainable Goals as I did for UK column several weeks ago,
It basically means you will be modified, which could mean it
could mean, you know, transgenderism.
It could mean a lot of other things, right?
If you look at a book that has been featured as well in this
this book from the The Libraries Ireland catalogue, which I found
is called the Everybody Book. This is for children ages 8 to
12. It is the LGBTQ plus inclusive
guide for kids about sex, gender, bodies and families,
inclusive of all sexual orientations and gender
identities. It will help answer children's
questions and spark open discussion with parents as well
as carers and teachers. In the Scouts here in the UK,
there is a game that is available called Pronoun Pairs.
And what you're supposed to do with pronoun pairs, the games
playing the Scouts, is you have different sets of cards that you
give to the children. And Sam the dog is a he, him.
Leslie the lady Bird, is she her?
Billy the butterfly is non binary.
To play, the dealer will flip over an animal card and a topic
card. Whoever says the sentence on the
topic using the correct pronouns for the animal gets to keep the
topic card. For example, if it was Billy ate
a sandwich, the answer would be they non binary ate a sandwich.
This is for as young as Cub Scouts, which starts at 8 years
of age. Over in the United States, we
have the top number one challenge book in 2023 according
to statistics from the American Library Association, which is
gender queer, which has been complained about by parents for
having too much LGBTQ IA plus content and claimed to be
sexually explicit. The author uses E am air
pronouns. I'm not sure what those mean,
but the content includes bonding with friends over erotic gay fan
fiction. Facing the trauma and
fundamental violation of pap smears.
Started as a way to explain to air family what it means to be
non binary and asexual is a useful and touching guide on
gender identity. So there we have just a few
ideas there of, you know, kind of what's going on.
I just a quick note if, if we haven't had enough attack on the
children, we are now attacking space according to the UN.
So we covered in 2023 back on UK column King Charles unveiling
the astrocarda, which was obviously to welcome astronauts
and BSS leaders and so on. This was a space sustainability
event at Buckingham Palace. Yes, Recarta is to create and
accelerate sustainable practice across the global space
industry. And the reason I brought this
back is because in the Fact of the future, it mentions space as
action number 56, which is the very last action point in the
fact of the future. We did have the UN's Outer Space
Treaty in 1967, which identified the exploration and use of outer
space as the province of all humankind.
But we have had several space conferences since then, which
are called Uni Space or Conference on the Peaceful
Exploration of Outer Space. So now what we're going to see
in 2027 is that working on the Space 2030 agenda, which is also
going to be looking at these peaceful uses of outer space as
work streams on the long term sustainability of outer space
activities. Space resources and sustainable
lunar activities converge. And we have 4 main areas here,
the space economy, the space society, space accessibility and
space diplomacy. So if it wasn't enough to be
attacking our children and generations that haven't been
born yet, we are now going to make sure that outer space is
sustainable. Brian, I don't know how you feel
about that, but I'm a little bit concerned.
I'm just about to slump onto the desk actually, Diane, because
some of this stuff now is just, it's in our faces.
It's utter, utter madness. These people have got to be
stopped. In the nicest way.
Of course, Ben, none of this could happen without big money
circulating to pay for all of these non government
organization, think tanks, charities, foundations, what
have you got? Yes, absolutely.
So, yeah, The, the, the, the, the people who are funding the
economic, cultural, psychological destruction of the
nation are doing it in the name of philanthropy.
Isn't that hideous? Frankly.
And we've seen a an accelerating economic collapse in the UK.
According to the Financial Times, 3 million people last
year fell in fell into financial difficulty.
So we now have more than 20 million people in Britain who
are living in what they call vulnerable circumstances, right?
This is an absolute catastrophe. But fear not, Gordon Brown is
here. We've been speaking about Gordon
Brown quite a lot, which is remarkable given he is an
unelected figure and never won a general election.
That he's been put front and centre on some of these big
initiatives. As we spoke about last week.
He's a Fabian. We saw him earlier in the show
talking about the New World Order and he's just launched
what they're calling a multibank.
This is like a food bank, but it does more.
It gives you access to all sorts of different things, from basic
foods to baby products and toiletries.
They've modelled this on a test case that they delivered in
Scotland in Fife over the past couple of years.
They just launched one in London.
They're going to be popping up all around the UK.
Go to their website. They're all about fighting
poverty, fighting pollution. They accept donations of, of
money and also products that can be distributed by teachers,
social workers, charities. They're going to get this all
all around the country to families in need.
They think that they're going to have a really big impact and in
particular they they've developed this thing called
social return. So they think they're going to
deliver a social return of £5.96 for every 1 LB invested.
I'm interested to dig into that a little bit more.
And isn't this nice, Isn't this altruistic?
But who's behind it? Well, we've talked about Gordon
Brown. Well here's Shaheen Syed, the
chief executive of Accenture in the UK.
Accenture is one of the biggest global technology consultancies
and it's a strategic partner of the World Economic Forum.
So that's who's behind it. Who else is behind it?
Sky. So Donna Strong, group chief
executive of Sky. We did a big launch event for
this program last week at their headquarters, I believe it was.
Sky is owned by Comcast. Comcast is a partner of Vital
Voices, the US State Department backed organization that I spoke
about earlier on, and that event was attended by, amongst other
people. Chris Bird is the UK country
manager of Amazon. Matt Britton, who's the UK
country manager at Google. More people from Accenture.
Mark Reed from WPP, who's a young global leader of the World
Economic Forum. GAIL Reebok, who's the mother of
Georgia Gould and the widow of Lord Gould.
Former adviser, close adviser to Tony Blair.
Eric Salamat from Berrien Group, I've spoken about extensively on
the show this year, people from Tata Consulting, the Financial
Times, all of whom are directed into the World Economic Forum.
So for me, this feels like a front.
Basically, we've destroyed your society, we've destroyed the
economic system, we're attacking your culture on a daily basis.
But here's a few free things to keep you quiet while we carry on
doing more of the same. Ben, thank you very much for
that excellent analysis. It's truly disgusting what we're
seeing unfold. We've got to keep taking,
lifting the stone, showing what's really happening.
And I'm going to say to people, hold your MPs to account.
You're getting all of this fantastic information, facts,
analysis. What do you do with it?
Get on the doorstep of your MPs because they need to understand
what they're part of. Many of them don't.
Diane, you've got a video for us to end on.
Yes, hopefully this will end the those the news in a bit of a
happy note today. I'm hoping.
Let's see what happens. Hello everyone, this is Diane
Asmussen Mcatty from UK. Column reporting to you live
from Edinborough, away with this station.
It's after 10:30 at night. I just spent.
The day in the North of England meeting some amazing like minded
people. We had an amazing time and they
were amazing to me. They bought my food, they bought
my drinks, they even bought my extra train ticket when both of
my trains were cancelled in both directions.
But the most important thing is I'm back here in Edinborough
tonight and I will be hopefully on the news in the morning if I
can make up in time. My message here is that it
doesn't matter whatever happens. I know we report some really
hard news. I know things are difficult, We
really struggle, I struggle, we all do.
But the most important thing to remember is that we have each
other and we have to remember, as Brian says, to love one
another, to give each other a hug, to care for one another.
And even if you can't stand in the park, as we did way back in
the early days of You Know what, you can always sit in the pub as
we did today. Thank you so much for being a
part of UK column. I love you all, have a great
day. Diane, thank you very much.
And that message, very poignant, very reminiscent of the of the
feel and the environment in that Heritage Party meeting on
Saturday. So lots of good people out there
and as we said at that conference, be happy because the
rules based international order is terrified of informed, happy
people. We'll end today's news there.
If you're a member of UK column, we'll be having UK see extra in
a few minutes. But thank you to the audience,
wherever you are in the world, thank you.
Bye bye.