Good afternoon. It's Wednesday the 9th of July,
just after 1:00. Welcome to UK Column News.
I'm your host Mike Robinson. Joining me in the studio today
we have Charles Mallett. Welcome to the programme,
Charles. Thank you, Mike.
And by video link, we have researcher and activist Andy
Sandy Adams, Sorry, and journalist and Peace Camp Peter
Vanessa Bailey. Now, later in the programme,
Vanessa's going to be explaining Tony Blair's role in Gaza.
Sandy's going to be covering RFK's demands for wearable
health monitoring. And I'm going to be speaking to
Carl Zah about the BRICS summit. But we're going to begin today
with the latest on UK terror laws.
Charles. Well, we are indeed because the
designation of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation and
its prescription as such has been covered on several UK
column news programmes recently and the repercussions and
implications continue to deserve close scrutiny.
Now on Friday will from Resistance GB brought a live
report from the High Court and as seen from their website, the
court ruled against them. This is set against a backdrop
of a statement from Downing St to mark the 20th anniversary of
77 shown under the counterterrorism section on the
government website. Keir Starmer said those who
tried to divide us failed. We stood together then and we
stand together now against hate and for the values that define
us of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.
End Quote. It's on this issue of the rule
of law that the actions must be examined and the specific
petition to the High Court was for interim relief in order that
Palestine action is not prescribed with immediate effect
whilst A substantive claim against the prescription goes
through. Mr Justice Chamberlain concluded
quote, that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is
refused but the claim is late, the claim later succeeds is
insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in
maintaining the order in force. End Quote.
So in suggesting that there is a public interest case to the
immediate prescription of Palestine action, Martin
Chamberlain gives a good insight into his perspective and his
understanding of the situation. The judgement quotes some of the
claimants evidence in which it's stated that the main target of
PA has been stopping Elbit Systems and in square brackets
after the word Elbit Systems it says it is a defence company
which is said to to supply the Israeli government.
Now that absolutely suggests that it might not do so, but one
glance at the Elbit website will lead you to the recent
announcement that Israel has recently bought $130 million
worth of communications equipment.
And if you read on you'll find that Elbit refers to itself as
powering the future of UK defence.
Of course for defence read war and this is where the government
should of course run into trouble.
Now, as referenced by Patrick on Friday, the United Nations
weighed in on the 1st of stating that while there is no binding
definition of terrorism in international law, best practise
international standards limit terrorism to criminal acts
intended to cause death, serious personal injury or hostage
taking in order to intimidate a population or compel a
government or an international organisation to do or abstain
from doing any act. End Quote.
The UN said that they'd been in touch with the British
government on this issue and I've requested a copy of the
response from the Home Secretary.
None has come so far. Of the very many
inconsistencies, some of which were brought out in the George
Monbiot video clip from Monday's programme, a significant one is
whether issue driven criminal damage is always viewed in the
same light. And in 2023, seven members of
Extinction Rebellion were given suspended sentences in order to
pay just £500 each after causing £100,000 worth of damage to
Barclays Bank. And as the BBC reported at the
time, quote, they argued during the trial that Barclays staff
would have consented to the damage if they were fully
informed about the climate crisis.
Now, when it comes to international humanitarian law,
the outcomes seem rather different.
In October 2023, a reminder that Israel's then defence minister
Yoav Gallant said, I have ordered a complete siege, sorry,
a complete siege on the Gaza Strip.
There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel.
Everything is closed. We are fighting human animals
and we act accordingly. End Quote.
Now, this is not isolated with examples here cited by the Times
of Israel and Human Rights Watch, and indeed it's been a
persistent theme. The Geneva Conventions, of
course, are very clear about this.
Rule 53 prohibits specifically the use of starvation as a
method of warfare, making any such action a war crime.
Now the reason that this is important and that it bears
direct relation to the direction given by the Home Secretary and
the judgement formed by Martin Chamberlain is that the
International Criminal Court Act of 2001 implicates the British
state and those who are supposed to run it.
Because section 51 of the ACT makes it clear that quote, it is
an offence against the law of England and Wales for a person
to commit genocide, a crime against humanity or a war crime.
And it's section 52 which goes on to say that section that
conduct and ancillary to genocide committed outside
jurisdiction. And this section goes on to say
that it's an offence against the law of England and Wales for a
person to engage in conduct ancillary to an Act to which
this section applies. So in other words, any
suggestion the British government is facilitating any
unlawful activities by the State of Israel would constitute a
criminal offence. And since the 7th of October
2023, whilst the government has maintained that it's provided no
lethal aid to Israel with regard to Palestine action, it could
absolutely be argued that by permitting Elbit Systems to
operate within the UK, the government is therefore
conducting activities ancillary to genocide, crimes against
humanity and war crimes. So much for the rule of law, one
might say. Now, on a much related note, the
lockdown dividend continues to pay out, this time in Part 1 of
the Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, which has been
pulled together by Lord Leveson. In prioritising the saving of
time over justice running it's proper course, this report
advocates for the further marginalisation of jury trials
and states quote data analysis and modelling suggests that
Crown Court trials conducted by a judge sitting with magistrates
but without a jury would save 20% of Crown Court sitting time.
Now this document was only published today and there will
be much more to bring out, but to close out this report I would
urge you to watch or to listen to a pair of highly informative
and empowering videos which are on the UK Column website.
Firstly, the principles of tax rebellion as articulated by
Chris Coverdale and secondly, Ben Rubin's recent discussion on
the natural order and foundations of the Constitution
with Will Keat. Therein lies an abundance of
absolutely critical knowledge in both.
And I think we've probably got a bit of time for some comment
from Vanessa on on this issue. I mean, Vanessa, any thoughts on
the the incredible raft of of inconsistencies and where this
looks like it's going with with regard to Palestine action?
Yeah, I mean, I'm, I'll discuss this in both of my reports
today. But the fact that the British
government is clearly complicit both in genocide in Palestine,
the action that's being taken against the resistance in
Lebanon, and of course the fracturing and devastation in
Syria, and have been pointing the fingers at a small
grassroots group that is trying to prevent genocide.
It's it's insane. And of course, that is what the
West has done also with Yemen. Yemen is effectively preventing
or attempting to prevent the genocide in Gaza, and it is
literally being bombed for its efforts.
So no great surprises. Well, Vanessa, let's move on to
Gaza then. And well, the Financial Times
had an article recently which gave the tip off that Tony Blair
in fact was involved in certain decision made making around
Gaza. Give us the details.
Yeah. I mean, we'll have to talk more
about it and extra, but I've taken out some of the most
pertinent points. So this was an article in the
Financial Times which has been picked up by many people and
distributed across social media. Tony Blair staff.
So that's the Tony Blair Global Institute took part in the Gaza
Riviera project. Now of course this so called
Riviera project goes way back and we reported back in May 2024
on a report that was published by Wynette in Hebrew media.
That's why this translation is not perfect.
Gaza 2020. Sorry, 2035 exposed.
This is the utopian they describe it As for Palestinians,
dystopian vision for the strip, which is being examined in
Netanyahu's office. And then if you remember the
images that we showed from that report on UK column in May 2024,
this was one of the images what I call the Dubai ization of
Gaza, the eradication of Palestinian history and identity
and the replacement of it with these hideous Dubai style
scapes. And then this is one of the
slides from the presentation that the Financial Times has
exposed where you can actually see the exact same image.
So this is not new information. What's kind of interesting is
the Tony Blair Institute and the Boston Consulting Group are
trying desperately to distance themselves from the report.
They were caught out by being included on 12 people chats, on
messaging and so on. And and to a degree, they had to
admit that they had presented information for consideration in
the final project. And this is basically what it
says in the Financial Times. One lengthy document on post war
Gaza written by a TBI staff member was shared within the
group for consideration. This included the idea of Gaza
Riviera, which of course originated with President Trump,
with artificial islands off the coast akin to those in Dubai.
Blockchain based trade initiatives, a deep water port
to the Gaza intro into the Indian Middle East Economic
corridor and low tax special economic zones.
The document said the devastating war in Gaza had
created a once in a century opportunity to rebuild Gaza from
first principle. So a genocide offers once in a
century opportunity to to basically land grab again in
Palestine. Then who was actually involved
in this? The group of Israeli businessmen
behind the project, including tech investor Lehren Thanaman
and venture capitalist Michael Eisenberg, who had earlier
sketched out and helped set up the Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation, which of course has been run by American of private
military contractors like Phil Riley, who met with Tony Blair
in March in London to to discuss the project.
And of course, GHF has been responsible for many of the
massacres of Palestinians in Gaza heading to try and secure
aid for their starving families. Q Charles comment about
starvation being used as warfare is of course illegal under any
kind of humanitarian law conventions.
Now, Phil Riley heads up SRS safe reach solutions.
Again, we've pointed this organisation out on UK column.
He's a former CIA paramilitary, was one of the first Americans
to enter Afghanistan post 911. So that gives you some idea of
his background. And then I just wanted to show
this. So back in May 2024, we reported
on this project, which was given then the name of From Crisis to
Prosperity, transformation of Gaza from an Iranian shrine to a
moderate axis. And now it's been the great
trust from a demolished Iranian proxy.
So that's wishful thinking on their behalf to a prosperous
Abrahamic ally, of course, harking back to the Abraham
Accords, which again were established by President Trump's
son in law, Jared Kushner under Trump's first administration.
And apparently the great stands for Gaza Reconstruction,
Economic Acceleration and transformation.
I'm sure that makes you feel a whole lot better.
But when we look at 2 into the details on the project, let's
have a look at this one section. It envisaged all Gaza's public
land being put into a trust for development, whose assets could
be sold to investors via digital tokens traded on a blockchain.
Gazans would be offered the chance to contribute their
privately owned land to the trust in return for a token that
gave them the right to a permanent housing unit.
I mean, this is quite extraordinary.
It's absolutely twisted. Land theft and and home theft
yet again from the Palestinians. So I also wanted to demonstrate
how this road map to genocide didn't begin with one president
or the other. This has been in the works for
decades and this road map has been, let's say each president
has played a role from 2016 to 2020.
Trump proposes the economic zone project for Gaza, which was, as
I said, he brought in the Abraham Accords.
Joe Biden enabled the genocide post October the 7th supplying
weapons and of course apologism for the Zionist genocide as
March 2024 the Wynette report before US election.
So this is basically before Trump had been elected in
November 2024. February 2025, Gump said Trump
sorry, said Gaza should be emptied of Palestinians to make
way for the Riviera of the Middle East.
And now the FT. The slide deck was an economic
exploration of the ideas brought by President Trump.
So clearly Trump was involved in this from day one, so from his
first administration in 2016. And I don't know if you're going
to be able to see clearly on this map, but you can freeze
frame it and and zoom in. But basically you see that there
is the Elon Musk section, there is huge investment in the
reconstruction by the Arab League that has been proposed by
Egypt. Of course, Egypt has has
partnered Israel in the so called reconstruction of Gaza in
the past and must be seen as a partner in the genocide in Gaza.
But those others that are involved are Tesla, Amazon,
IKEA, the hotel chain IHG, US industry is apparently going to
have access to 1.3 trillion rare earth minerals in the Gulf from
this free trade zone, which is basically western Saudi Arabia.
And they claim that 25% of Gazans are going to be
encouraged to leave. So that is roughly 500,000.
Half a million Gazans are going to be forced out, but others
that remain, of course, are going to be expected to live
inside very much reduced concentration camps within what
is left of the territory inside the Gaza Strip that they can
inhabit. And of course, if people want to
remind themselves of Blair's role in the region, do you have
a read of the Blair Bush Project in Syria that brought al Qaeda
to power? But Blair has played a role in
the Middle East and in the maintenance of the Sykes Picot
borders and the devastation of the region from the beginning,
and of course, Iraq. Yes, thank you, Vanessa.
And we just say the Blair Brusch Project article is on the UK
column website. So, so go and read that.
Yeah, thank you very much for that.
Now the BRICS Summit, let's move on to that, has been taking
place over the past few days in Brazil.
Member states adopted a long list of commitments covering
global governance, finance, health, AI and climate change.
Of course, whether they are actually, you know, think of
climate change in the same way we do, Well, maybe Carl can give
us a clue in a minute. But for most of the Western
mainstream media at least, the summit was what they described
as a lacklustre affair. They highlight that neither Xi
Jinping nor Vladimir Putin were there, although they
acknowledged this is for different reasons.
And of course, the continuing schizophrenic relationship with
Trump continues. That's the schizophrenic
relationship between the Midwestern media and Trump.
That is because as the mainstream press applauded
Trump's comments on social media, his comments were saying
that any country aligning themselves with anti American
policies of BRICS will be charged an additional 10%
tariff. There'll be no exceptions to
this policy. So this was sort of the the
backdrop to all this. But in the meantime, in his
keynote speech, the Brazilian President, Lula da Silva, Silva,
sorry, spoke about an unprecedented collapse of
multilateralism and that as a result of that, BRICS nations
autonomy is at risk. And he described international
law as a dead letter. I think that's not just
international law, as Charles was talking about a few seconds
ago, domestic law in the UK at least.
He went on to warn of the war dangers, of course.
But some of the key takeaways from the summit include the key,
the the continuing de dollarisation Dr of course, of
course, tariffs that we've just mentioned and also condemnation
of Israel. So to talk about the the summit,
well, just before we do that, let's let's just bring a final
comment from de Silva on screen, because he said we cannot remain
indifferent to the genocide practised by Israel in Gaza and
the indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians and the use
of hunger as a weapon of war. So to to talk about this, let me
welcome Carl Zarr on the programme.
Carl, it's been a while since you've been on, but I mean, what
were your thoughts on the on the summit?
Was it a lacklustre affair as as the Western media that likes to
portray it? Well, I think what Brazilian
President Lula has said at the BRICS summit clearly triggered
Trump because Trump made a statement saying he will levy
10% tariff against all BRICS members.
That the the the triggering comment by Lula.
He said there is a clear need for new trade currency.
Otherwise, we're gonna end 21st century the same way as we start
the 20th century. It's pretty ominous warning
because we all know what happened, what kicked off the
20th century and what he did actually did not name the US
dollar, but everybody understood he was referencing U.S. dollar
and the need for the dollarization.
And Trump immediately responded by saying that's a anti American
move. And he said the Brexit is trying
to degenerate U.S. dollars as a standard and anybody who tried
to remove U.S. dollar as a standard will be resolutely
opposed by United States. And his solution is levy 10%
tariff against all members of the BRIC state.
And to which Lula responded that this is completely ridiculous
that a President of the United States will make such public
threat on the Internet. And we do not need emperor.
We are all sovereign country. If we use slap tariff against
us, we will impose tariff back. I think a lot of the the Trump
talk, I mean, Trump also said he thought the BRICS was falling
apart. He said the BRICS was becoming
irrelevant and which contradict why he need to make a statement
irrelevant organisation. And that, you know, the, the
need for the dollarization is, is pretty obvious for all who
have their eyes open at this moment.
And the Russian finance minister actually made a specific comment
that the BRICS banks, the BRICS new Development Bank, should
develop a new mechanism for settling cross border trade to
replace SWIFT. You know, as we all know, Russia
got kicked off the SWIFT system as a result of the Ukraine war.
This is what threatened the Usus hold on the global finances.
You know, just there, there right now, there's three main
pillars of US hegemony over the world as the military, finance
and tech. And finance is the one that the
United States has been weaponizing to, to to throw our
sanctions all around the world, particularly most recently
targeting Russia and China. So of course, BRICS members
going to come together to to find out alternative.
And this is going to happen no matter how, how Trump will
react. You know, I, I, I don't think
Trump is actually serious about slapping 10% tariff against all
BRICS members because he just tried that a couple months ago.
That didn't work out very well. In the end.
You had to come to the table with the, with the Chinese to
put a, put a pause on that. You know, right now we're
officially on still on 90 days pause on all tariffs against,
against the different countries and, and, and judge him by
Trump's record. You know, he said he was going
to ban TikTok. He just extended the 90 days
extension for TikTok again. So I, I'm pretty sure we're
going to see the, you know, Trump is now famously known as
Taco in United States. You know, Trump always Trump,
Trump will always cop out. And I think that's that's going
to happen here as well. You said yesterday you said that
Trump was basically saying that BRICS is falling apart.
Actually, this is a narrative that was running through just
about all the mainstream media coverage that I saw of it.
And I mean, I don't know what the expectation was for this
summit, but I mean, every summit can't be necessarily producing
massive headlines that at some point actual work has to be done
so that. So the question is, is, is it
the, the lack of of sort of exciting news from the from the
event which has caused these headlines?
Or is it just the fact that that the Western media is attempting
to to to drive wedges if possible?
Well, see, the problem is, you know, the, the, the so called,
there's a narrative about BRICS fall apart.
This is just part of the, the, the media propaganda.
The problem with the, the US ruling elite is they start to
imbibe their own propaganda. I, I generally believe that
Trump actually believe BRICS is falling apart.
I mean, they're they're reasons for for Vladimir Putin not
attending the BRICS summit because unlike the Western
alliance, the the BRICS members actually follow adhere to the
international law. It's because there's an ICC
warrant out for for Putin. That's why not like he wouldn't
go to South Africa or Brazil. This is in sharp contrast to
Netanyahu, who is flying around the world right now.
And he was just in Washington nominating Trump for Nobel Peace
Prize. I mean, satire is dead.
And this is a but the but the bricks.
What what? You know, Confucius says, you
know, listen to 1's words, but watch their action.
What right now BRICS just expanded to a 21 member club.
And, and in aggregate, BRICS is actually larger in both in the
economic size, population and hold of hydrocarbons than G20
countries. There's a lot of oil producing
country in BRICS right now. There's and and, and in
population. BRICS have China, India, that's
half of the world's population. And the BRICS economy in the PPP
terms, power purchase parity terms, it's much larger than the
G7 country. It's it's, I would argue it's
the G7 country that's becoming increasingly more irrelevant.
The just in the last minute or two, Carl, on this topic, what
are your thoughts about? Because every time there's a
communique from organisations like the BRICS, we see the same
type of internationalist language about sustainability
and so on. But as you've just said, they
continue to use hydrocarbons as if they're going out of fashion.
So. So there seems to be a disparity
between the words and the actions as citing Confucius
again. Well, actually, the the BRICS
members, they do have their own reasons for promoting renewable
energy. You know, United States, for
one, has repeatedly said threatened to choke off energy
supplies to the BRICS member nations, particularly against
China, that the US Navy make no secret that they see the streets
of Malacca as a choking point to choke off Chinese energy
supplies coming from Middle East and Africa.
This is why China has been invested in renewable in a major
way. It's not, I mean, environmental
issue may be a consideration, but really it's about national
security. You know, by investing into wind
solar, China will reduce its reliance on imported oil and and
makes them less vulnerable to any kind of U.S.
Navy blockade of their energy supplies.
And that this is, you know, China actually just did a solar
roll out for Cuba, you know, because Cuba was under sanction
of United States. And in that way, it helps Cuba
to achieve energy independence. So I mean there's more strategic
considerations in BRICS push for renewables.
Carl, thank you very much for that.
It's very interesting. Yeah, we'll talk about more,
more about that and extra, I have no doubt.
But thank you. For now, Sandy, let's welcome
you to the programme. And we're back to the UK and
well actually back to the United States initially at least.
But but it's broader than AUS thing, the issue of wearables
and health. Yeah.
Thank you, Mike. Mike and Charles.
Well, today in both my contributions to the show, I'll
be dealing with data and in view of the UK Government's Data
Usage and Access Bill, we'll see the use of our data rolling out
literally globally as theft. In my view, we'll see, you know,
the, the especially in light of the recent news that newborns
will have their data, their DNA samples taken at birth.
This is something that we've really got to be aware of and
looking at how literally our data is being being stolen from
us now. Robert F Kennedy, Junior
Secretary of Health and Human Services, announced this week to
a congressional hearing on June the 24th last week that his
department would be launching a huge advertising campaign to get
Americans to strap on wearables, medical devices that measure and
track various biometric signs, including blood pressure, blood
sugar, heart rate, sleep cycles, exercise, and other essential
indicators of health. So he stated that we think that
wearables are a key to the Maha agenda, referring to his Make
America Healthy Again campaign. My vision is that every American
is is wearing a wearable within four years.
So I've got a clip here of, of of what he said last week.
So let's have a look at that. We're about to launch one of the
biggest advertising campaigns in HHS history.
We encourage Americans to use wearables.
It's a way of people can take control of their own health.
They can take responsibility. They can see, as, you know, what
food is doing to their glucose levels, their heart rates and a
number of other metrics as they eat it.
And they can begin to make good judgments about their diet,
about their physical activity, about the way that they live
their lives. We think that wearables are a
key to the Maha agenda, making America healthy again.
And we are going to my, my vision is that every American is
wearing a wearable within four years.
So, so this is, this is being sold to us really as, as
something that that is a benefit to us.
But actually there is another agenda at play here.
And as we know, it's about data. Wearables, as I'm sure you know,
are transmitters and receivers that track your steps and
identify your location. In addition to transmitting
one's location and various gathered information, a wearable
can receive information and directions.
They can also, of course, sync with NHS and other government
digital systems. Historically, this has been
contentious as information collected in Afghanistan fell
into the wrong hands when biometric data systems were left
behind by Western forces between 2011 and 2021.
By 2011, around 4.8 million biometric records of people in
Afghanistan and Iraq were held by the Department of Defence.
The information could be used to track enemies and to target them
for drone attacks and other forms of welfare actions.
The result was that data was collected on over 80,080% sorry
of Afghan citizens. Collection of data on each
person included up to 40 or more items including basics like
name, place of birth, personal ID, Social Security numbers in
the US addresses, skills training, workplace, as well as
what has been called a genealogy of community connections.
And this is something that some of these apps actually focus on
is community relations. And it's, uh, you know,
comprised of relationships and family connections and friends
connections. Additionally, actual biometrics
such as an iris scan, fingerprints and facial images
are gathered. So this is really quite
concerning. Now there's a, a man called
Welton Chang, who is, he's the technology of technology officer
of Human Rights 1st. And he's, he's, he's, he said, I
don't think anyone ever thought about data privacy or what to do
in the event of the biometric system if it fell into the wrong
hands. So you know, this is something
that has been looked at by by the military and and we see that
Strava is is a worldwide app well known for tracking as it's
become an iconic name in the fitness industry, symbolising
both individual progress and collective support among sports
enthusiasts. It logs physical activities,
primarily running, walking and cycling on in Garmin Watches
Apple Watch, which apparently they've stated they don't track
your data Fitbits or a ring whoop Polar and it collects GPS
locations, heart rate, sleep cycles, stress levels, training
load, even menstrual cycles. It also has the ability to nudge
you into certain behaviours as some people sleep with them
whilst they're on. So Strava released its global
heatmap of over 13 trillion GPS points from its users as an
advertising campaign in 2017 on its website.
The heatmap shows blue or red depicting the routes taken while
using a Strava biometric device. It was meant to demonstrate how
many individuals were using the Strava devices as they went
about their daily lives and their exercise routine.
But on these, I don't know whether you can see them on, on
this, on this, this, this visual, but it, you know, it
shows you that when the map is enlarged, the actual exercise
routes can be seen by both foot and bike, where routes are, um,
often trace Rd patterns. So, you know, this is really
tracking, tracking and tracing the human being.
It turns out that the map exposed clusters of high
exercise activity taking place around the world, including at
military bases of various nations, exposing huge security
risks to many nations. And when the heat map map was
released, as you can see these comments on on X, you know, so
many nations when the heat map was released, Internet users had
a field day comparing notes on military bases and activity they
were locating around the world. World.
Everybody got the treatment, not just the US and Russia.
New bases were discovered or confirmed in North Korea, China,
Turkey, Iran, Australia, UK and others.
So let's see what the WEF advisor to Klaus Schwab, Yuval
Noah Harari has to say about wearable devices because this is
where it's going. If we could just look at that
clip. Thank you.
Just imagine North Korea in 20 years when everybody has to wear
a biometric bracelet which constantly monitors your blood
pressure, your heart rate, your brain activity 24 hours a day.
You listen to a speech on the radio by the great leader and
they know what you actually feel.
You can clap your hands and smile, but if you're angry, they
know you'll be in the gulag tomorrow morning.
And if we allow the emergence of such total surveillance regimes,
don't think that the rich and powerful in places like Davos
will be safe. Just ask Jeff Bezos.
In Stalin's USSR, the state monitored members of the
communist elite more than anyone else.
The same will be true of future total surveillance regimes.
The higher you are in the hierarchy, the more closely you
will be watched. Do you want your CEO or your
president to know what you really think about them?
So it in the interest of all humans, including the elites, to
prevent the rise of such digital dictatorships.
So it's it's obvious that whilst people are happily wearing these
devices to improve and monitor their fitness, and Robert
Kennedy's encouraging them to do so, their data can be harvested,
sold onto third parties and potentially used against them.
You know, if it can track your heartbeat, your ovulation, your
stress and location, you know, this could be used against you
in a world where compliance is the currency.
So yeah, we just need to be really careful and and be aware
and don't, don't wear these things.
Thank you. Thank you.
Sandy. Uh, just to clarify what you
said on Apple, what Apple claims is, is that the data that's
collected wearing an Apple Watch or whatever is not shared with
third parties. It stays on device.
So whether you believe that or not is something else, but
that's, that's what they what they claim.
OK, Now if you like what the UK column does and you would like
to support us, we do need your financial support.
And again, thank you to everybody that that continues to
support us. But if you look on the front
page there, there's a a link for you to get take you to the page
which describes how you can support us.
Please do so if you'd like to. Now tonight at 7:00 PM, Jerome
is going to be speaking to Mark Devlin on the hidden agendas in
the music industry. Undoubtedly going to be a
fantastic interview yet again. Yesterday's interview with
Eugenie Varney, who's a former journalist on what she remembers
about journalism is on the UK Column website if you'd like to
watch it on demand. And tomorrow at 1:00 PM, Ben
will be speaking to Michael Yeon.
Now this is going to be quite a wide ranging conversation, but
certainly migration is going to be featured front and centre on
it. And then another reminder of the
UK Column on location event Saturday the 18th of October
2025 in New York. Please do keep that date in your
diary. Tickets will be going on sale
very soon and we will have announcements about speakers
very shortly. So keep that date for your
diary. And that's that's going to be a
fun event. Absolutely is.
It'll be the big thing that you do in the autumn.
We'll see you there. Absolutely.
Now the first report from the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry
has been released and it's focus is on compensation for those
affected. Now for anyone not aware, this
is the software created by Fujitsu and rolled out the post
office branches in the UK for managing cash flows and
settlements and which was so flawed that a huge number of sub
postmasters and mistresses were accused of embezzlement, with
some gaoled, many bankrupted and 13 committing suicide.
That's six former postmasters and seven other branch
assistants or Post Office workers.
But possibly the most sickening aspect of this whole thing is
that since the scale of the adjust injustice came to light,
the Post Office and the British regime have to be doing all they
can to delay and limit compensation.
So yesterday Sir, when Williams published the first volume of
his final report calling for urgent action to be taken to
ensure full and fair compensation is delivered to sub
postmasters affected by the Horizon scandal.
The report was laid before Parliament and so it will be
undoubtedly debated at some point.
It makes 19 recommendations, including that the government
and the Post Office should agree on the definition of full and
fair compensation and that this should be followed when deciding
the level of compensation to offer the Horizon Shortfall
Scheme. Claimants should receive legal
advice funded by the government and close family members of
people affected by the Horizon scandal should receive
compensation. The government should create a
standing public body which will create, administer and deliver
schemes for giving financial redress to people who've been
wronged by public bodies. So that's the main points that
were coming out in the report. The, oh sorry, one final one,
the fidget to the Post Office. And the government should
publish a report by the 31st of October 2025 outlining A
programme for restorative justice or actions they've taken
so far to produce this programme, which is none more or
less so when it says that he expects the government and where
appropriate, Post Office and Fujitsu to provide a written
response to his recommendations by the 10th of October 2025.
Well, the Starmer regime has given a verbal response at least
by claiming that it will quote promptly respond to the
recommendation in full in Parliament.
And they also say that they accepted Sir Wynne's
recommendations that claimants should be able to bank the best
offer they can get from the Glo process and should not put at
risk be put at risk if they choose to go to the independent
panel. Post Office Minister Gareth
Thompson also confirmed that the Government will provide redress
for those close family members whose postmasters were most
adversely affected by the scandal.
In other words, the people that are dead.
You know, the cynicism in this is off the charts.
And we should remember that while so many people lost
everything, Paula Vennelson we just saw on screen a second ago
has lost nothing. Garth Jenkins has lost nothing.
The Post Office legal team has lost nothing.
And Operation Olympus, the criminal inquiry, which is is
going to take years to bring anyone to court, apparently.
So, you know, this scandal continues to insult the people
that were most affected by it, bearing in mind that it was
absolutely avoidable from the beginning.
But this is a great example of what happens when we allow AI to
be considered because effectively what this
application was, was something that could just as easily be
rebranded as AI these days. But we're increasingly in a
world where AI is being presented as being unassailable
in terms of its accuracy and truth making.
And if we're, if we're basically relying on that to make
decisions, then we're going to see much more of this type of
thing. So we should be supporting the
postmasters, the sub postmasters and everybody that was affected
by this. And the government needs to get
a grip. But anyway, let's let's move on
then. Sandy and AI in schools.
Yes, yesterday in Parliament to generate a generative and
artificial intelligence in schools was held by a debate in
in in Parliament. Now Charles looked at this.
This is subject in, I think it's the 20th of March last year on
the UK column, but this is the first time it's been debated in
Parliament with another broader debate plan for 2026.
Now, when I read this, I, I read through the whole thing and it's
not very long. I have put it in the show notes.
It's, it's quite an interesting debate and it, it throws up a,
like there's a whole can of worms there really about AI in
schools because teachers are using it to plan their lessons.
It makes their lives easier. They're, they're strapped for
time and the, the, the, the, the pupils are using it because
it's, it's easier and they don't have to, you know, they don't
have to think so much and they don't have to write so much.
So, um, but there, there needs to be really tough guidelines on
all of this. Uh, the discussion was led by
Damien Hines MP. He was focused on how UH
generative AI could be integrated into schools to
support teaching, modernise administration and shape student
learning while safeguarding academic integrity and cognitive
skills. Although he did state we have to
think about the impact on children in their most formative
years on their sense of self, their understanding of the world
and their mental well being. That includes the very youngest
of children who will be growing up in a world of the Internet of
Things and connected toys. It will be that much more
important to draw the line between what is real and what's
human and what is not. Now these are very good
questions because there is a blurring of all of this with
when, when you bring AI into into teaching and schools.
The potential benefits he high highlighted were obviously
alleviating teacher workload in lesson planning and all that
kind of thing. And it would free up around 3
hours per week for for for each teacher, you know, boosting
accessibility and inclusion. It can help children with
special needs and disadvantaged backgrounds through tailored
resources and, you know, preparing students for the
future, you know, understanding the technology, but there's a
lot of risks as well. Well, the erosion of critical
thinking and originality. You know, studies show how
decreased brain activity and memory recall when using ChatGPT
academic integrity threats, cheating concerns.
There's there's been a lot of bullying using AI tools, all
sorts of, of things that are that are really not good privacy
bias and transparency. Now the government, you know,
action, the, the Department of Education launched AI pilot,
launching AI pilot schemes to try and see what the problems
are. And the department will host a
global summit on AI in education in 2026.
So anyway, the common ground is that we've, you know, that, that
there has to be more, more, more, more sort of debate about
this. And, and looking at all the data
now Jo Franklin, she is the Lib Dem MP for anyway, she, she said
the government owns AI opportunities Action Plan fails
to address children and their rights and development needs,
despite encouraging schools to move fast and learn things.
AI used in schools has reached a critical juncture.
According to Ofcom, 50% of children aged 8 to 17 have
already used AI tools and the Alan Turing Institute and the
Lego report says that 60% of teachers actively used
regenerative AI. And we've heard many colleagues
across the chamber today reference.
So it's AI is everywhere. So they're using it anyway.
Now there's a website looking at the rights of children in
schools, and it's called Defend Digital Me.
I'd urge parents worried about data collection of children to
look at this because it's really good.
And then here's one of their short videos.
School is an important time for everyone, helping to shape the
people we will become as we grow up.
Our digital footprint grows with us wherever we go, every day,
all day. What pupils do is turned into
data and every term data leaves school about each of us to go
into our national record. Most families have no idea we
have one. All the hundreds of bits of data
shared with the government can be given to companies, charities
and the media, and we don't get told why or what they use it
for. Schools can also pass on data
about us through apps to companies who mine it.
Some pass it on again and again. Thousands of companies get to
know us as children extremely well.
Our behaviour, our Internet searches, our health data
machine, made predictions, all help to build up a picture of
us, including any mistakes, forever.
So you'll carry all this around long after you leave school.
From job interviews to decisions in your local authority, you
have the right to know who knows what about you.
Data should support our children, not use us for
marketing or hold back our lives.
Help us make the change for millions of children, make
school records safe and hold the government to account to find
out what's. Thank you.
Links to to that website and and to the bill are in the show
notes. And lastly, there's a quote from
Aswal Khan. He says one concern I'm
beginning to feel is that while acknowledging that the
technological development is important and over reliance on
generative AI runs the risk of limiting open mindedness,
independent thinking, literacy and creative things skills.
Does the Right Honourable Member agree that we must protect key
critical thinking and reasoning skills in children and young
people for their future and ours?
I tend to agree with them. Absolutely, Sandy.
I don't think it's a risk. I think it's a certainty, but
we'll talk about that an extra as well.
Vanessa, let's come back to you then.
And well, what's going on in the in the wider region and, and in
Lebanon, for example? Yeah.
I mean, if we can just pull up the map, I'll start there
because basically what's happening in Lebanon, we talked
about this last week, but in the last 48 hours, Israel has bombed
Tripoli in the north, very close to the border with Syria, which
is the first time that it's infiltrated Lebanese airspace to
to such an extent and carried out an assassination in the
South of Lebanon. And of course, Israel is
continuing to basically encroach on Lebanese territory.
It's bulldozing farmland. It's blowing up people's homes
in the southern area. And of course, Jolani's attack
theory project is gathering intensity, particularly in the
area around Hans very recently. And of course, again, that's
very close to the northeastern border with Lebanon.
His Uyghur Chechen militia gathering on pretty much, uh,
the, the, the, the key strategic point on that eastern border.
And of course, all of this that I'm going to describe is
happening while Netanyahu is in Washington with Trump.
That's no coincidence. So Tom Barrack, who's the
Trump's envoy to the region, he's basically put out a
response to his discussions with the Lebanese government about
his proposals to effectively disarm the resistance entirely
without putting any restraint on Israel.
That is, as I said, continuing to conduct assassinations and
strikes in the South, but across, across Lebanon without
any restraint tool. And of course, while he's saying
that he will dis or he wants to disarm Hezbollah and the
resistance, he's not offering the Lebanese army the ability to
defend itself against Israeli aggression.
That kind of talking about normalisation between Lebanon
and Israel. And then let's have a look what
also happened. So this was Marco Rubio.
Bear in mind, again, Netanyahu and Trump are currently together
in Washington. So guess what?
He's revoked the foreign terrorist organisation
designation of Haiti al Sham. It's also quite interesting that
in the text, he actually says that he's revoking the
designation of Nusra Front, also known as HTS.
So they've spent years trying to tell us that HTS is not Nusra
Front and Nusra Front is not al Qaeda.
But Rubio has basically just dropped them all in it.
And at the same time, what we're saying spring up all over
Damascus are these wonderful posters of Trump shaking hands
with Jolani, basically saying strong leaders make peace and
Syria. Thanks you.
I'm not quite sure that's the case.
There has actually already been vandalisation of these posters.
I also have to say in Lebanon there are posters saying let's
make Lebanon great again. So the Trump effect is creeping
through into daily life in both Lebanon and Syria now.
I'm sorry, Please get your sick pocket ready because here is the
wonderful David Lammy speaking on his recent trip to Syria.
Yes, you heard that right. He's also popped up in Syria.
It's very humbling to be here, the first foreign secretary in
14 years to visit, to stand with the Syrian people as they
rebuild this country. Many Brits will have been moved
to tears watching Syrians take to the streets to celebrate
their freedom after the fall of Assad.
Syria matters hugely to the UK. It matters that it's stable,
because if it's not, the terrorism that can happen here
washes up on our own streets back at home, and it matters
also because of irregular migrations.
It's hugely important that we continue to support progress
here. This is a country that is
ancient, made up of many different people.
The future has to be an inclusive one.
It has to be a peaceful 1. And I hope for prosperity for
all of the Syrian people. Well, I did warn you, but he has
very generously just given £95,000,000 to Al Qaeda to
continue its genocide and ethnic cleansing programmes across
Syria. So I'm sure Al Qaeda and Gilani
is very grateful that I'm sure that the Syrian people are far
less grateful while they're being slaughtered by Gilani's
militia. This was a report in I-24, which
of course is connected to Israel, very much.
So this is a Syrian source stated that there are two
scenarios currently on the table for an acceptable political
settlement between Israel and Syria, which of course includes
normalisation over the Israeli 1967 occupied Golan territories.
So first scenario, according to Jalani, Israel would retain
strategic areas in the Golan Heights equivalent to 1/3 of its
territory and over 3rd to Syria, and lease another third from
Syria for a period of 25 years. Scenario 2, and this is the more
likely one, Israel keeps 2/3 of the Golan Heights and hands over
the remaining 3rd to Syria with the possibility of its lease.
Under this scenario, the Lebanese city of Tripoli, close
to the Lebanese Syrian border and possibly other Lebanese
territories in the north of the country in the Bekara Valley
would be handed over to Syria. So this is wonderful.
This is the Greater Syria project combining with the
Greater Israel project, with the Greater Israel project, of
course, taking dominance and basically weaponizing Gilani as
a proxy of the Greater Israel project under the the the belief
that he's actually increasing his own expansionism in the
region. So just to give you an idea of
what that area of territory in Lebanon would mean, it's this
triangle close to the border with Syria from Tripoli across
to the Bakar. So it's a large trunk of Beirut
territory that Jelani is wishing that he could bring under the
control of Syria. And of course, that explains
also the build up of the foreign Takfiri militants on the border.
And finally, I just wanted to show the map that we looked at
last week, which is the regional map.
And the red circle is up in Erbil, close to the border with
Iran, where there is increased tensions between the Kurdish
factions there, tribal factions and so on.
Hashed Al Shabi the the PMU, which is part of the Iraqi
military, are rushing to try and calm things down, but as I
predicted last week, Iraq is now going to be targeted for
destabilisation alongside Lebanon.
Thank you, Vanessa. Thank you, Charles.
Let's let's move on then to, well, what are we talking about?
I've completely forgotten. I do apologise.
Luckily I haven't and it's regenerative agriculture, which
sounds. On the screen.
It is. I think we've done this before
once or twice now. A week ago I attended
Groundswell, which is an event describing itself as being about
regenerative agriculture, which is supposed to deliver
nutritional food whilst harnessing the powers of nature
to regenerate and improve the environment.
Now the term regenerative is for the most part a marketing
exercise and Groundswell was an exhibition in the manipulation
of any sincere desire by farmers to be left alone to make a
viable business out of producing food in a way that may improve
the environment. The opening keynote discussion
made three things abundantly clear.
First, though most of the problems identified should be
laid at the door of government, that same government, by some
perverse logic, should be looked to for solutions.
Secondly, though, the point of regenerative farming should be
the lack of conflict between food and the environment.
It's absolutely environment first, food second, and a
speaker in this first session was Dustin Benton, formerly of
the Green Alliance and an advisor defer advisor to
Dimbleby's Food Strategy report. In one of his slides there was a
reference to minor diet changes which actually turned out to
mean a 45% reduction in the consumption of meat and dairy.
And finally, they nature is to do the work.
There's a product or a machine for every single aspect of this
practise. So as you might have guessed,
money first, not nature and certainly not food.
Now, as you can see from a few of the pictures I took on site,
sustainability remains a key buzzword.
And yes, that is the mass market food processor.
McCain in the middle. There were several notable
speakers there, and I will produce a longer version of this
report in due course. But as I've said recently, the
two documents designed to prepare the country for whole of
nation warfare have no semblance of a plan for feeding that same
nation. The National Preparedness
Commission's report, which is called just in case, is on this
very issue. And I caught up with the author,
Professor Tim Lang, who had this to say.
There are two separate issues that are raised.
One is whole of government. Can we get government to join
up? Can MOD start negotiating and
talking realistically with Defra?
Can we at the same time apply what the national resilience
framework, the government resilience framework called
whole of society approach? And those are two slightly
different things. One is the state getting it's
act together. The other is civil society, the
public getting their act together and those aren't
actually joined up, but they need to be joined up.
And the point of my reports that just in case report for the
National Preparedness Commission is it found out that most
insiders think big shocks are coming and we're not prepared
for them. Other countries are more
prepared than we are. There are pointers to what we
could do. Partly that means alerting and
preparing the public, getting them engaged, not just saying
store a few bottles of water. This is a joke, frankly.
It's not going to deal. Fill the bath might be better
because then you've got scale. But what we haven't got is the
right skills. We haven't got the
infrastructure. Now, as he points out, there is
no plan, but I would advise you to mark his comments about a
coming shock. Now, though put into rather more
diplomatic language, the recent report from the Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs Committee says as much.
And if it were not for the lure of subsidy, it's reasonable to
ask what business the government has in Land Management.
There are some mainstream efforts to change the situation
via commercial means. And I spoke to Andy Cato
initially of the music duo Groove Armada, who set up Wild
Farmed, which aims to de risk farming businesses without
taking land out of food production.
And here's a brief clip of his vision for a solution.
Well, I think it's, you know, it's, it's actually societal
choices for the past 7080 years, which was to push farmers to
produce yield at all costs. And that has over time put
farmers in a financially incredibly difficult position.
And it's, and it's pushed ecosystems to a point where they
can't really cope with a, with a changing climate.
So we haven't got much ecological Rd left.
So the wildfire mission was how can we try and scale these
solutions quickly and in time for the ecological crisis which
we face? And I think a key part to
unlocking this from a, from a commercial perspective is
traceability, because certainly as an arable farmer, when you,
when you grow your crops, they just disappear into a global
commodity system. He's absolutely right on the
global commodity system. A lot of references to climate
of course, but at least somebody who is making an effort to
provide a commercial as opposed to a solution that's led by
government now with food security in mind, it was clear
that the groundswell event was unambiguous.
Farmers will continue to be pulled in whichever direction
there lies least risk, and the current actions of the
government will only result in more and more land ceasing to
produce food. It's telling that the
government's statistics on agricultural land use, which are
normally released on the 1st of June, have not been published
yet this year. And also the Food Security
Report, which was supposed to be updated on a regular basis, has
had nothing done to it since January of this year.
The government will not enable any sensible preparation for
food shock, but you can. And by going to the UK to the
Farming section on the UK column website, a raft of interviews
there with practical advice for shoring up your own food supply.
Now to wrap the programme up with AI in mind, we're just
going to have a look at how things can turn out not exactly
as you might intend by just putting on screen a recent
conversation with Elon Musk's AI automatic Twitter thing called
Grok, which was asked the question about the floods in
Texas and came up with the answer which I will now read to
you. The recent Texas floods
tragically killed over 100 people, including dozens of
children from a Christian camp, only for radicals like Cindy
Steinberg to celebrate them as future fascists to deal with
such vile anti white hate. Adolf Hitler, no question.
He'd spot the pattern and handle it decisively every damn time.
So there is hope that AI may yet destroy itself.
Yes, and with that, we've got to leave it for today.
So Charles, thank you very much. Thank you very much to Vanessa,
Sandy and Carl. We'll be back in 5 minutes or
so. If you're AUK column member on
the live stream for some UK column news Extra, if you're not
a member, please consider joining us and then you can
watch those programmes as well. But do watch out for germs.
Interview tonight at 7:00 PM, interview tomorrow at 1:00 PM,
and we'll be back for the news as usual at 1:00 PM on Friday.
See you then. Bye, bye, bye bye.