Good afternoon. It's Friday the 14th of March
2025, just after 1:00 and welcome to UK called News.
I'm your host, Mike Robinson. Joining me today in the studio
is Patrick Hennigson. Welcome to the programme,
Patrick. Great to be with you, Mike.
And by video link, we have Mark Anderson.
Now later in the programme, we're going to be covering the
NHS England closure and James Rogusky will be joining us to
discuss vaccines and so on. But we're going to begin with
the response from Russia to the suggestion of a ceasefire.
So yesterday, Putin was meeting with President Alexander
Lukashenko, who's, of course the president of Belarus.
And he was, Putin rather, was answering questions from the
media about the ceasefire plan presented by the US and Ukraine.
And he agreed in principle, but perhaps not in the specifics.
So here's let's have a look at what he said here.
We are also in favour of it, but there are nuances.
The idea itself is right. So in other words, there should
be peace. Well, we think everybody agrees
on that. But he went on to say this.
He said, I must sorry. I think we must talk them over
with our American colleagues and partners, perhaps have a
telephone conversation with President Trump and discuss them
with him. These are the plans we agree
with. The proposals to cease
hostilities proceed from the assumption that the cessation
should lead to long term peace and eliminate the root causes of
the crisis. We also want to guarantees that
the 30. Sorry that during the 30 day
ceasefire Ukraine will not conduct mobilisation and not
train soldiers and will not receive weapons.
And he pointed out that Russian troops are currently advancing
along the entire 2000 kilometre frontline of the war with
Ukraine and halting military action would disrupt ongoing
operations. And he said that Ukrainian
forces could use a ceasefire period to regroup, receive more
weapons, train fresh recruits. And so he said.
So how would these 30 days be used for forced mobilisation to
continue in Ukraine, for more weapons to be supplied there,
for retraining the mobilised units?
Or would none of this be done? And this is a good point,
Patrick. The West has, well the West has
formed here because of the Minsk agreements, as you've talked
about before, being a stalling tactic for war preparations.
And of course we have Odessa and the 100 year pact.
Well, quite right, Mike. And that's another sort of thing
that people aren't paying attention to.
Before Joe Biden left office, before Trump was sworn in, you
have this 100 year deal signed between Britain and Zelensky and
that was Biden in the globalists and NATO giving the nod
basically to Starmer saying go ahead and put that one in there
as a placeholder. So you have a special boat
services, SBS sending their teams in to occupy 8 ports
around Odessa. They're clearly digging in for
some sort of, you know, operation or to defend that
city. Because everybody knows, Mike,
once Odessa falls, that's the end of NATO's southern flank.
It's all over. You might as well close up the
organisation at that point, no matter what you put in Romania.
We'll get on to Romania in a minute, Mike.
But you know, what's interesting about this is, and we'll see
Keir Starmer's statement on this.
This deal was designed to fail. This is like they took they
asked the Israelis for advice on how to do negotiations because
this is a typical Israeli job, which is it's a perfectly good
deal. And we the balls in your court,
they've all tweeted out this slogan.
Mike, if you noticed the balls in Russia's court, the balls
Ursula Vanderline, Starmer even released it.
Rubio, they all said the same thing, all the influences on
Twitter. So it's a total Israeli style
negotiations. We've offered Russia a perfectly
good deal. So they're treating Russia like
Hamas. It's the same thing.
We've offered Hamas a perfectly good deal, but they've rejected
it. So what can more can we do?
And So what does this mean? Sanctions stay in place, aid to
Ukraine stays in place. The money keeps flowing.
The intelligence sharing continues.
Basically, this is the same as Biden.
There's no material change from Joe Biden in Ukraine to Trump in
Ukraine. So we are back to default war of
attrition status quo. Keep the war going.
So let's have a look at what Keir Starmer had to say
yesterday. And that's why everything that
we're doing in relation to Ukraine is so important.
And you've seen the developments in the recent weeks,
developments this week going on even today.
Because I profoundly believe that if we don't secure a just
peace and a lasting peace, then that insecurity which we've
already felt will continue. And that means here, higher
prices, higher bills, the cost of living crisis going on for
even longer, if you like, a chokehold on our future, which
will be much, much harder for us to tackle.
And look, we know some basics. Putin's appetite for conflict
and for chaos is already there and it will only grow.
And Russia is already menacing our skies, our waters, our
streets and our national security.
And that's why I believe the fundamental task of politics
right now is to take the tough decisions on security.
And that's why we raised our defence spending, which we also
need to use as an opportunity to renew our communities.
So you notice there, he said, uh, our skies, our waters, our
streets, uh, well, he's keeping banging on the Skripal drum
there. You know, Russia carried out a
chemical weapons attack on the streets of the UK.
This is the the narrative that that keeps coming from the
British government. When was that was that?
It's a dubious event, to say the least, and we don't want to get
into it, although you've published some great articles
and reportage on this. But is there something else
about that? Very quickly, Mike, there was a
drone attack on Moscow just a couple of days ago.
Massive drone attack hitting civilians in Russia.
And who's behind that drone attack?
Was it just Zelensky or was it another NATO country that was
involved in doing that to sabotage the negotiations?
So menacing the streets of Russia?
Not military targets, civilian targets.
What is Russia supposed to do? Oh, and by the way, one of those
attacks was on a pipeline monitoring station that monitors
the pipeline flow into Hungary and Slovakia to dissenting
European Union and NATO members. What a coincidence.
Isn't that interesting? I don't suppose any chicanery is
going on behind the scenes. It's totally above board.
Right. In the meantime, Maria Zakharova
was tearing strips off the leaders of EU, NATO countries in
her press briefing for continuing demand the escalation
and bloodshed in Ukraine. We regret to observe, she said,
that some political forces in Europe continue to hinder the
emerging process. It could lead to resolution in
the future. And so she said the words peace
and settlement might seem to upset them because their main
goal is evidently to provoke escalation of violence.
And I think, Patrick, she's absolutely, well, she is
absolutely right. She finished by reiterating the
Russian position on NATO boots in the ground, saying that for
them, foreign troops, foreign bases or so called peacekeeping
missions in Ukraine is unacceptable and that any such
thing would end up with them leading a response.
And, you know, they're very clear about that.
That is a red line. But you know, we keep pushing up
against their red lines constantly and then blaming them
for it when we cross them. And there's no definitive
statements there about NATO membership or the territory in
the Donbass, for instance. So it's a non starter right from
8. From start to finish the whole
thing is a non starter. But you met, you mentioned the
the ball is in their court thing, which of course is an
example of rapid response mechanism and in action.
But what's been going on in Romania?
I wish I had shown those tweets on screen.
Maybe we can do that next week. But the rapid response
mechanism, that's also familiar. I remember that.
We'll bring this up on screen right now.
So Romania's online content removal policy, empowering or
overreaching? Obviously a generous rhetorical
question there. Let's take a look at this.
Romania's National Authority for Administration and Regulation
and Communications has basically put, we'll bring this back, has
basically put a new simulation exercise which is testing a
rapid response system of information control aimed at
swiftly identifying and removing illegal or quote inauthentic
content from social media, particularly in light of the
controversy surrounding Romania's recent presidential
elections. They cancelled the presidential
election results and they're basically tried to ban the front
running candidate, Kaylin Georgia, you hear?
And they go on. And this is where it gets
interested year. This initiative takes its route
from the Rapid Response Mechanism, which ironically was
established during the G7 summit in June 2018, meant to enhance
cooperation among nations in addressing quote crisis moments
and perceived threats to Western democracy.
And who brought it in? That would have been Prime
Minister Theresa May. That is correct.
Who introduced this? So this is extremely worrying on
so many different levels. And we did a little bit more
digging into this MIC and this here we go.
This is the call for proposals from the European Commission
dated October 24th, 2024. This is an advance of the
Romanian presidential elections here.
And so this is kind of like a tender for contracts and we have
identified the company who has the contract.
We'll talk more about that next week.
We'll have more information on this.
And this goes incredibly deep. This is real time censorship of
social media Mic. So in order to defend our
democracy, this is being test run in Romania and this could go
throughout the EU. And by the way, they did a beta
test on this during the recent elections in Germany to test the
concept. So was there real time
censorship in the German elections just now?
According to this, yes. So.
How is that not election interference?
Well, we're one thing is for sure, we're going to get out in
front of the March 27th roll out of this.
We'll be giving you plenty of information before they go live.
We'll be going live with what it's all about.
So that'll be interesting. Now of course, one way to deal
with messages that you don't like is to censor and censor
algorithmically. Another way might be just to
kill the journalists. Now, of course, we don't know
that what happened to Jimmy White in the United States was a
censorship effort, but nonetheless, he was a target.
He was he was a target. We'll bring him up on screen.
This is Jamie White. He's 36 years old, a reporter
for infowars.com. He was murdered earlier this
week. And it's according to his
family, this was a a robbery of some sort, an apartment complex
after he came home from work at in the parking lot in Austin,
TX. I know the area very well
myself, so I'm very familiar with this.
This town and these types of settings is very disturbing.
He's only 36 years old or so, 3637, very nice young men, very
popular, you know, very hard working.
So you know one of us in terms of independent media journalist.
So it's really disturbing. So we'll bring that back up on
screen for a moment here and we'll go here.
And so the coverage basically on this it, it has been pretty
friendly, I would say the coverage.
But the The thing is, he also appeared on one of these
Ukrainian hit lists. And there's a number of these
Ukrainian hit lists which have been listing a journalist in
America or anybody with a dissenting opinion on Ukraine.
Basically, there's the Moravets, the Peacemakers, which a lot of
people know about, but there's a few others.
And it turns out that the funding of these is quite
interesting, being funded by the National Endowment for
Democracy, USAID, and. So that would be the
organisation that just had its funding reinstated.
Yeah, that would be yes, indeed. So this is something Jamie had
tweeted out over the summer. I'm on an Ukrainian enemies list
due to my work at Infowars and with Alex Jones on the Ukraine
proxy war. I mean, just saying proxy war
will get you on that list. And the group who compiled this
list is tied to and funded by the US State Department,
USAIDCIA and George Soros Open Society Foundation.
So, and again, we checked the data on that.
And yes, there's Jamie White. He is definitely on this list,
but it's not more of vets. We did a little bit of digging
and to my surprise, Mike, I found out that this was another
list, which is called texty. OK, This is USAID funded.
Elon Musk, as you can see JD Vance at the bottom there.
He's also on this list. It's got 391 individuals and 100
and something odd organisations, many of the media organisations,
many names that are familiar to you and I.
So we went, did a little bit of a search on here just to Tulsi
Gabbard. She's on this list as well.
The current director of National intelligence texty.org dot UA as
is funded and you can see the heat maps like Kate Starbird.
Do you remember these this sort of stuff when it came out in
2016 with a map individual journalists connect them to
political parties. This is this is basically a very
nefarious operation. This is the United States deep
state who are outsourcing this work to Ukraine using U.S. tax
funder money here and there. It is far right website Infowars
and its editor Alex Jones and many others.
So it lists all of Alex's journalists on here, including
Amy White and others and calls them enemies of Ukraine.
Now they they've had to backpedal on this this
organisation because they've gotten so much pushback.
OK. And Grey Grey Zone just did a
story on this recently, but we actually had reported on this
back in June, Mike, and we basically said they put Daniel
McAdams, Ron Paul and 21st Century Wire on this same list.
And so Daniel wrote a great piece for the Ron Paul Institute
on this, which you can find up at 21st Century wire.com.
And there they are, Daniel McAdams, Ron Paul.
And of course, there's my website, 21st Century Wire.
They're listed in there as well as myself and by the way, in
very good company with some very good pundits and journalists
here. But look at that.
This is a doxing operation. And what's interesting about
this, Mike, is that there's more than one of these.
This one's funded by USAID, OK, and the National Endowment for
Democracy, but it's not the only one.
There are more nefarious ones that are connected with this as
well. So we'll go and maybe if we have
more time, but this one is, is called Mofar, OK, This is
particularly nasty, this one, it doxes individuals post their
personal details on the dark web, we're told.
I have not had access to the level of doxing on this, but
this is one of those. Again, you can see the Times,
PBS, Reuters, They're affiliated with mainstream media
organisations and we've done a little research on this.
Enemies of Ukraine, foreign propagandists, AKA journalists.
This is an open source type thing here.
So this is, you know, really kind of dangerous in a certain
way, Mike, because of the, the, the fact is disclosing people's
names, where they live, personal details.
And it's funded by the US government, but it's outsourced
to Ukraine. And our, our investigation this
has found that that these are a lot of these are functioning as
money laundering outlets. These are money laundering
outlets. They're using US and Western
cash and then feeding this information to Western
journalists in the mainstream media or activists who want to
harass or target people who are on these blacklists, let's say.
So this is just one of those here.
I'm on this one as well as a number of other journalists and
people as well. So the Grey Zone did a good
expose on this recently, which was done.
I forgot which journalist did that.
You can see USAID, they're very proud of that affiliation.
Even after the whole scandal, they still haven't removed that
from their website. So it's just incredible.
So you can just see the funding there.
It's unbelievable, Mike. So this is basically where
things are at on this. So, you know, it's, it's there's
too many of these going and they haven't been taken down.
And what what kind of message does this send in terms of the
West? Well, it's, it's clearly
intended to have a chilling effect on people that are
speaking out for sure. And but Malfar, by the way, runs
an OS int training programme which is available on some of
the online platforms, sort of training skills platforms.
It's, it's appallingly bad, I have to say.
But nonetheless, they clearly have people working for them
that that are able to troll this data and and and expose it as
you say. I think it it reminds me of
Bellingcat as well. Similar funding channels,
similar kind of attitude, very belligerent and no, no respect
for rights and norms and Western, you know, democracies,
so to speak. So yes, OK, well, look, let's
move on to health matters and welcome Mark to the programme.
Mark, let's talk vaccines and and discuss that with James
Rogowski. Thanks gentlemen. g'day to you.
G'day to the viewers. Yes, my my guest today is James
Raguski. I'll sort of be the sub host
right now. A little less than a year ago,
James and I both gave some input to the Health and Human Services
as they were gathering public comment about the international
health Regulations and related matters.
That was a little less than a year ago.
I've known Jim and about and about his very fine work for at
least two years. But welcome, Jim, I think you've
been working at these matters, the the rags and the treaty for
the better part of three years or even longer, correct?
Correct, and thanks again for having me.
Yeah, I've got the clicker. By the way, just a quick
comment, but I got 4 slides today and let's go through
those. And this one here, this is just
a start. You've got a letter to President
Trump dated early March, and a letter to the new Secretary of
Health and Human Services, RFK Junior.
I'm just pointing out that through your Sub Stack website
that people, viewers can, from any country, anywhere in the
world really, can read your letters to them and use it as a
model or a guidepost for writing their own correspondence.
In a couple minutes, we'll show how to contact President Trump
on these matters. Of course you can write to your
members of Congress and anyone else, anyone else that you see
fit. But Jim, you can outline the
website addresses on that, but go ahead and walk us through.
I've got a couple slides coming up.
I'll show in just a minute of the actual physical effects of
MRMRNA injections. 1 is a photo of a Pfizer effect and the other
is a Moderna outcome. Both pretty grisly, that's for
sure, and they weren't the worst ones.
But go ahead and walk us through your latest about posting and
the activism that you're recommending and some of those
mRNA, you know, tragic physical outcomes that that happened.
Thank you. Well, the root of this, you
know, all actually goes back well before Thanksgiving of last
year where I realised that when I was doing searches online and
not just using Google, but, you know, alternative, you know,
search engines and such, it was becoming harder and harder to
find the information that I knew existed out there.
And so I, I went looking around to see if anybody had put
together a compendium of, you know, all of the many things
that I know and you folks have reported on and you know, many
others that these things were just gradually maybe not
disappearing from the Internet, but being pushed so far down on
any kind of a search result that they were for all intents, you
know, invisible. And so I started asking people,
you know, where do you go to get information about, quite
frankly, the history of at this point, COVID of, of the jabs and
the harms. And, you know, so many things
had disappeared off the Internet.
They've even disappeared off of archive.org.
So I put them all together on one, you know, website where I
ran a series of 27 articles and it's all available for everyone
at Not safe and not effective.com.
I had just gotten, you know, tired.
I'd heard one too many times. Oh, the jabs are safe and
effective. Safe and effective.
No, they're not. But if you bury the information
and one of the key pieces of the information is that with The Who
they have a coding system. You know, the I CD10 codes where
one of the codes that probably nobody on the planet is aware of
is U 12.9, which is the code that doctors are supposed to use
when someone shows up at their office with a vaccine injury or
unfortunately, you know, if they're filling out a death
certificate, you know, a death due to a vaccine.
And So what I, what I realised was with all of this
information, when I dug into some of the gory and gruesome
photos that are in the letter to Donald Trump, I, I realise that,
you know, yes, I've seen these things.
These things don't make it to mainstream media.
They don't make it to alternative media.
They're gruesome and gory. And these images are not some
TikTok video. They're not, you know,
somebody's claim. These are case studies that are
published in, in well respected journals.
They can all be found on pub Med.
It's part of the United States database information, and nobody
freaking seems to care. Now, I'm not saying people don't
care, but because most people don't even know these things
exist. So I figured that for President
Trump, I put together some pictures I think he could
understand, 40 photographs of the harm that has been caused by
the result of Operation Warp Speed.
This is due to his initial action with Operation Warp Speed
to ram through essentially a biological weapon to be
inflicted upon Americans. Now for the Kennedy letter, it's
a bit longer, it's got a lot more detail and it's all
information that again is available from Pfizer, from
Moderna, from the FDA, from the CDC, from, you know, all of the
various, you know, National Institutes of Health and all of
the the databases that we have, the various reports.
And when you see that very specifically what I put together
for Kennedy was in relationship to children because number one,
there never ever was a risk for children.
You know, certainly under 12 or, or any teenagers, the risk was
inconsequential. So all of the, you know, risk
benefit ratio from these injections is 100% risk.
Well, when you have 30 or 40 reports of death of children
where none of them were ever going to die from COVID, they
are clearly been murdered by the jabs that were rammed through.
And here's the real kicker, OK? The real kicker is these are not
safe and effective. No one can say that these
products are safe and effective because they are not FDA
approved. They went through the PREP Act
and the emergency use authorization pathway.
They're only legally allowed to say that they may be effective.
Well, with the PREP Act and the way that the governance
structure is in the United States, it doesn't matter if
people in the United States and around the world are wondering
why, you know, everything occurred the way it did.
It's because the Prep Act, by a declaration made by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, gives everyone
immunity from prosecution. It doesn't matter if you
accidentally injected the wrong person with the wrong jab.
It doesn't matter if you, you know, inject a child even though
they don't have their mother's or father's consent.
It doesn't matter if you inject, you know, someone in a rest home
who's unaware of of their circumstances.
It doesn't matter that all of these harmful, you know, results
occur. Everyone has immunity from
prosecution. And and that is the biological
warfare under which we've been operating for the last five
years. Thank you for that, James.
A very thorough explanation and let's go on and show a couple of
these results. And this is psoriasis flare up
associated with the second dose of Pfizer.
Bioentech through Pub Med and NIH is in that web address
there. And of course, these links will
be posted in the show notes most likely.
But go ahead and comment on that one very briefly, Jim, and I'll
show another one in just a moment.
I, I believe I included 40 images and you know, some of
them are unbelievably gruesome, but there are thousands more.
And, and so I, I took a, a smattering of them, you know,
essentially thousands upon thousands of people, you know,
have suffered similar impact. But ask yourself, how often do
you go to your doctor and your doctor says, Oh my goodness, I'm
going to write this up in a journal.
You know, this is, this is worthy of a case study.
So obviously, you know, these are the worst of the worst, but
you know, they're right there in the letter to President Trump
because, you know, pictures speak 1000 words whether, you
know, it's all, all body inflammation.
Many of the people ended up with necrotic tissue, dead, dying,
you know, black, you know, gangrenous tissue.
You know, these are not for the squeamish, but it, it also is
needed. You know, these are just
swelling on, on a man's torso. You know these are not for the
squeamish, but you also need to shock people into an awareness
because why in the world would anyone walking around town, you
know, unaware, not reading medical journals, not digging,
not searching for this stuff ever have any idea?
People say, oh, it's safe and effective.
It's safe and effective the, the millions, if not billions of
people around the world who have been harmed by not just Pfizer
and Moderna, but AstraZeneca and J&J and all the other jabs and
not to mention remdesivir and everything else.
These people cannot be forgotten.
You know, yes, we're five years on and we're four years on into
the jab and, and, you know, now they're talking about hundreds
of other jabs, you know, for everything else under the sun as
if the, you know, jabs for COVID were safe and effective, which
they most certainly were not. And here's one other image.
Let's get that other image up there.
And this is a bolus drug eruption.
That one there from this one from Moderna, I picked out one
Pfizer and one Moderna. That's the side of somebody's
hip just above the buttocks and the upper leg there.
And just to give one more example, they're quite shocking.
And as you say, these are not doctor, these are official.
No, no hanky panky with the photos, but you had to dig for
them to show people the reality. And so it's obviously not just
death from injection it as bad as that is, but also these these
tremendous side effects and outbreaks.
But anyway, there's one other slide there with a contact info
for Donald Trump and this, this will also be available through
the show notes. But there's Truth Social and
other links to get a hold of Donald Trump one more time,
James, on that website, that one stop shop that people can go to
to read more about this and get involved.
What was that again? It's it's very simple.
It's not safe and not effective.com.
OK, thank you James for a most enlightening and in depth
explanation of what's going on. Thanks for having me.
Sorry, thank you James. Thank you, Mark.
OK, let's move on then to NHS England and well here he is.
Keir Starmer, he was giving this speech yesterday.
Let's he's announced the end of NHS England.
So let's have a look at how NHS England fits into the NHS
bureaucracy. So basically what we have is the
Department of Health and Social Care at the top funnelling money
into NHS England, who funnels money into local integrated
health boards and then into the various service providers.
But basically those service providers might be dentists, GPS
and pharmacies, hospitals, district nurses and district
nurses and so on. On the other side of the coin,
money flows from DHSC into local authorities and then also into
slightly different service providers.
In this case, you know, social care as well as healthy
lifestyle programmes and so on. Now NHS England is a quango.
A quango for those who don't know, is a quasi autonomous non
governmental agency. There are more than 300 of these
across the United Kingdom. And anyway, we'll come on to why
that's significant in a second. But W Streeting then yesterday
in the House of Commons said this.
We inherited an NHS going through the worst crisis in
history, so there's no time to waste.
We inherited public finances with a £22 billion black hole so
there's no money to waste. Well maybe if they stop wasting
it on Ukraine that wouldn't be such a problem.
But anyway, he went on to say today the NHS delivers worse
care for patients but more expensive than ever before.
The budget for NHS England staff and admin alone has sorts £2
billion. Taxpayers are paying more but
getting less. Work has already begun to strip
out the duplication between the two organisations and bring many
of NHS England's functions into the department.
That's the Department of Health, no?
In the meantime, that was in the morning, then Keir Starmer was
on his travels. We've seen a little bit of what
he had to say already, but let's see what he said on this
particular topic. Politicians almost not trusting
themselves, outsourcing everything to different bodies
because things have happened along the way to a point where
you can't get things done. And I accept that all parties
have done a bit of this, including the Labor Party, and
therefore today's got to be a line in the sand for all of us.
But I also think that in government there was a clear
moment when the Tories crossed the Rubicon.
It was early and it was decisive and it sent a signal across
Whitehall that was never undone. So today I'm going to reverse it
because I don't see why decisions about £200 billion of
taxpayer money on something as fundamental to our security as
the NHS should be taken by an arm's length body, NHS England.
And I can't in all honesty explain to the British people
why they should spend their money on two layers of
bureaucracy of that money could and should be spent on nurses,
doctors, operation, GP appointments.
So today I can announce we're going to cut bureaucracy across
the state, focus government on the priorities of working
people, shift money to the front line.
So I'm bringing management of the NHS back into democratic
control by abolishing the arm's length body NHS England.
That will put the NHS back at the heart of government where it
belongs, freeing it to focus on patients.
Less bureaucracy with more money for nurses.
NHS refocused on cutting waiting times at your hospital.
So if you're listening carefully to that, you'll understand what
the point I'm about to make. But so you know, because the
question is, what is this all about?
Is it about the 8000 unfilled doctors posts and 27,000 nursing
vacancies? Or is it about NHS waiting lists
or any waiting lists or ambulance response times?
Probably not, because he says he's got to talk.
He's got to cut bureaucracy right across the state.
Those were his words. I'm going to cut bureaucracy
right across the state where we heard this before.
It's fascinating to watch as some kinds of policies are
rolled out on both sides of the Atlantic at exactly the same
time. First, Starmer announces the
building of data centres to run massive AI systems and why?
In order, he said, to provide personalised cancer care.
And then a week later, Larry Ellison announces that the new
Trump regime will launch Operation Stargate to build data
centres to run massive AI systems in order to provide
personalised cancer care. And then here we have, and then
we have Elon Musk in the United States running his Doge
operation that cut bureaucracy right across the federal
government. And just a few weeks later,
Starmer's announcing exactly the same policy with NHS England as
the first to fall. And I've got to ask, is this a
coincidence? You know, if it could it be that
Starmer has looked at Doge and said, well, that looks popular,
let's do that. Or is it that actually there's
something else going on, something else which is
happening at a more deeper, at a deeper level of the state, which
is deciding that certain policies need to be implemented
on both sides of the Atlantic. And my main question is, is this
actually about reorienting things more onto a war footing?
I think he wants to give the look of Doge Mike, he wants to
give the doge vibe, but no real dodging going on.
What I think you've nailed it, Mike.
This is also about creating that militarization of healthcare or
vaccine roll outs mRNA. You know, boutique customised
vaccines like they did with operation and warp speed in here
in England and Europe as well. That was a military operation
during that period. So that that's that looks like
what it is and behind that big corporations.
So what softening up the public for the next part of the
conversation later, which is well we think that privatisation
might be more efficient in some of these areas.
So this is a constant bait and switch exercise with the NHS,
with, let's face it, this is the most emotional central issue in
the country for everybody because everybody is involved or
dependent on it or connected with it in some way, shape or
form. So it becomes a political tool
in a way in a political football from administration or
government to government. And but the the long range mic
trend is privatisation with that's what we've seen over the
years. So I is it is that reversing?
Has Keir Starmer made a pledge that the NHS will not be or
never be privatised? I'm not hearing that part of the
conversation. If you're intending to privatise
something, the first thing you do is to strip out all the fat
because that makes it more attractive.
So. But anyway, we, we'll, we'll
keep you posted on this. If you like what the UK column
does, you'd like to support us, support.ukcolumn.org is the
place to go. There are various options.
You can make a donation, join us, a member of the community
and that of course gives you access to UK column news extra
that'll follow this programme. Other ways to support us would
be pick something up at the UK column shop or from Clive to
carl.com. But if you can't do any of that,
then please share the material that you find on the various
platforms, but particularly from ukcolumn.org.
There's lots of content going up on that website on a regular
basis. The share links are in the
content. Now, of course, we have an event
coming up. Let's watch a quick
advertisement for that. Dictator UK column This is an
advert. Morals are for vegans.
I'm a steak man OK Dumas News flash on 5th of April UK column
that debauched band of reprobates hosting a conference
for fellow truthers and shakers in Cheltenham called on location
speakers will be a rogues gallery of experts that the
government still hasn't killed yet on topics ranging from the
WEF 8 My Homework to house Loser guy in 10 Stages of Paranoia.
There will also be an exclusive evening event where plebs can't
come in where you can knob eating, a call on the cob,
gobbing off on how to hobble the UN, using a doorknob shaped key
fob to break into the Secretary General's office to rob the
COVID files to DOB them all in, leaving them sobbing and mopped.
Amusingly enough, given the theme is Deep State thrombosis,
the conference will take place next to GCHQ and we're in the
midst of a battle of counter surveillance in escalating
measures. Of course there is a gulf in
budget between US and them, so the methods have varied.
They sent an Agent Provocateur in Argent Provocateur to seduce
our top guy, get the deepest darkest secrets of the bizz
whilst we sent someone in the pantomime calcosh and write into
the lobby to see how far they could get.
They bugged our entire venue with the most cutting edge
equipment and have all the details down to the width of the
seat screws whilst we said one elderly pigeon flying over their
roof and managed to find out the gym the security guard likes
tea. That was a coup.
So in the end we thought to help with it, let them know, let them
know and we're going ahead with it and we'd like you to join us.
Be there or be scared. I'm dictator and you're all
idiots. Thank you, Dick.
Thank you very much for that. Everybody needs to be there.
Patrick will be speaking, of course, Catherine Gunn, Raja
Maya and Alex Thompson, Brian Garish speaking.
We will all be there to. Have offline discussions as
well, so please get there if you possibly can.
Now quickly a mention of the interview that went out
yesterday, Unmasking Autism with Sinead Murphy is on the website
at the moment. If you didn't see it yesterday,
please have a look at it. And a reminder that this, that
Sunday, March the 16th, we have Supporting Farmers for Food
Security Symposium in Cheltenham and Charles Mallett, Sandy Adams
have been taking part in that. So if you can get along to that
one, please do. OK, let's move on then.
And where do we go now, Trump and Ruta, Because Mark Ruta, the
secretary general of NATO, was visiting Washington.
Yeah, he is. This is the successor, the heir
apparent to Jans Stoltenberg here.
And so the question is, Mike, of course, what is this?
Is this, is this anything but NATO appeasement?
They like to use that word appeasement a lot these days
about Putin's aggression taking territory in Europe and and the
sovereign rules based international order.
And so here's Reuter with Trump and no protesting against
anything that Trump is saying, which is absolutely bombastic.
Watch this this discussion. So but when it comes to
Greenland, yes or not joining the USI would leave that outside
for me this discussion because I don't want to drag NATO in that,
but we're. Going to have to make a deal on
that. And Denmark is not able to do
that. You know, Denmark's very far
away and really has nothing to do.
What happens? A boat landed there 200 years
ago or something and they say they have rights to it.
I don't know if that's true. I'm not.
I don't think it is actually. You know, we have a couple of
bases on Greenland already and we have quite a few soldiers.
And maybe you'll see more and more soldiers go there.
I don't know. What do you think about that,
Pete? So don't answer that piece.
Don't answer that question, but we have, we have bases that we
have quite a few soldiers in Greenland as a state.
It would be one of the great states anyway.
This would be the most incredible country visually.
If you look at a map, they drew an artificial line right through
it between Canada and the US, Just a straight artificial line.
Somebody did it a long time ago, many, many decades ago and makes
no sense. It's so perfect as a great and
cherished state keeping, oh Canada, the national anthem.
I, I love it. I think it's great.
Keep it. But it'll be for the state, one
of our greatest states, maybe our greatest state, but there'll
be a little disruption, but it won't be very long.
But they need us. We really don't need them.
I and we have to do this. I'm sorry, we have to do this,
yes. He said, he says we don't need
Canada, they need us to. Why you annexing it if you don't
need it? So I mean, it's just totally
insane. Like, and, and, and Mark Rutte
just stood there in his suit and just basically said nothing,
nothing, nothing really substantial.
So I mean, it's just kind of ridiculous.
Is that because it was basically impossible to respond to?
You can't. Yeah, obviously you can't.
You can't object to the king while you're sitting in his
court, right? I think King Abdullah from
Jordan learned that lesson the hard way.
Zelensky tried. He did.
He tried. So I, I, I it really makes a
mockery of NATO. It makes a mockery of
international law, Canadian sovereignty.
Canada is a NATO member and so is Denmark.
So nothing to say from the NATO secretary general.
So he's doing his job. OK.
Well, we're going to have a NATO related aspect to the next item
which is all about Bilderberg. Mark bring us up to date.
Well, good day gentlemen. Once again, thanks again to
James Roguski. Basically.
Well, moving along here, I'm doing some clicking on my end.
I, I wrote a news brief and the the main part is in yellow.
The chief negotiator for Sweden's accession to NATO,
Oscar Strandstrom, who officially took part in the 2023
Bilderberg Conference in Lisbon and at last year's conference in
Madrid, reportedly is helping to organise the 2025 summit in
Stockholm on behalf of billionaire Marcus Wallenberg.
Wallenberg, of course, owns the Majestic Grand Hotel in
Stockholm, or the meeting, by all indications, will be held.
It's not ultra official, of course, until the obscure
Bilderberg meetings media department announces it.
But that's very late in the game of the Guardian did run an
article on Christmas Day just this past December, which
probably didn't get much play, all but confirming that it'll
take place in Stockholm. So that's the going knowledge
right now. We'll move forward from there
and we're kind of, we're going to cover a little more than just
the meeting. The meeting will come, of
course, soon enough. And moving on here, the part in
red is another little news brief that I wrote here.
The Trump administration has previously claimed it wants to
reduce America's military presence on the European
continent, and exercises in Sweden are also reportedly
expected to be affected by the decision.
This matter is all but certain to be a hot official or
unofficial Bilderberg topic this year in Stockholm, although NATO
is always a general topic and has been for a long time.
Simply NATO, just that one word on the official Bilderberg
topics list. And from there we've got we're
branching out a little bit. This is this is a picture of of
Oscar Strandsum for the Stenstrom.
Excuse me, Oscar Stenstrom. Get that right.
This is a picture of him with Magdalena Anderson, the PM of
Sweden at the time, in Lisbon in 2023.
This Swedish NATO negotiator is left off the Bilderberg list,
but he gets in anyway. He's an unofficial person who's
been there the last two years. That's fairly commonly known now
that the Bilderberg attendees list is by no means complete.
Something always to keep in mind.
And now again, we'll branch out some more.
And this is the Nordic Times, which is doing some pretty good
work lately, concerns over Bilderberg executives influence
on Trump, and that's, of course, Peter Teal.
And the Trump administration has quite a few Teal associates,
people that have been involved in Palantir and other companies.
Of course, Teal helped found Palantir.
And Palantir is run by Alex Karp, who is a Bilderberg
regular now a perennial there, and he's on the steering
committee and moving on from there.
I noted here that tech mogul and multi billionaire Peter Thiel
wields significant influence over President Trump's
administration. And Bloomberg brought out a
brand new review on this, saying that at least 15, I counted 16
representatives in the new US administration have clear ties
to the Palantir founder, Mr Thiel, who unlike Elon Musk,
prefers to keep a low profile. So going on from there, we have
the picture of the cover page of the Bloomberg investigation.
Now I inserted the lettering in yellow and green up at the top
from the Bilderberg steering committee, currently, not
former, but currently Peter Thiel is still on the steering
committee. So is Marcus Wallenberg, who's
kind of overseeing this year's conference, and Alex Karp, very
involved in Ukraine logistics and things like that, high
technology in Ukraine, of course, leading Palantir that
Teal Co founded. Now, of these 16 people closely
associated with Teal in the Trump administration, I listed
what I felt were the 8 top ones. And let's just go through those
real quick. I'm calling it the Teal 16.
That's my own name, A Clark Minor, former Palantir software
engineer, now the chief information officer at the
Department of Health and Human Services.
So he's a couple notches below Kennedy, Colin Carroll, formerly
of Andro, which is another non traditional defence contractor,
kind of like Palantir doing deals with the Pentagon.
He's now chief of staff to the deputy deputy secretary of
Defence, excuse me again, a pretty high position chief of
staff to the deputy defence secretary and a Gregory Barbasia
or Barbarcia formerly with Palantir and Elements.
Elements is a reference to volunteer itself, as I
understand it. He's now chief information
officer at the Office of Management and Budget.
Again, a rather high office for these privateers and we'll move
on from there. Jacob Helberg, he's now Under
Secretary of state for Trump for economic growth, energy in the
environment. He's married to a Keith Raboy,
an early PayPal executive and former general partner at the
Teal initiated Formers Fund. Founders Fund, Excuse me.
He was senior advisor to Palantir CEO Alex Carp and
national security and a fellow at the Palantir Foundation.
Of course, JD Vance himself vice president of the US.
He saw Teal speak at Yale Law School back in law school back
in 2011 and later joined Teals Mithrill Capital.
Teal became a mentor and bankrolled Vance's Ohio Senate
run with a record $15 million. And in 2021, as word has it,
Teal brought Vance to Mar a Largo to patch up his
relationship with Trump. And I've got just a couple more,
three more. In fact, Barbasia ended up in
there twice. So excuse me on that.
Let me go down to Jim O'Neill. He's now the deputy secretary of
Department of Health and Human Services.
He served in roles at education and the Health and Human
Services departments. He's been in government before.
He joined Teals Clarion Capital in 2008 and in 2010 he Co
founded the Teal Fellowship. And last but not least, a
Michael Obeidall, nominated in March to be the Army's number
two civilian official. At Andrell, the defence
contractor, he worked on next generation command and control
projects with the Army and he's a 27 year Army officer.
So these are the well connected, that is well teal connected
people in the current Trump government.
You guys are talking about the privatisation of government
services on both sides of the pond.
And this seems to fit that pattern.
And I've got a couple things that are sort of a cherry on
top. It turns out that Jens
Stoltenberg has stepped down from the Co chair of the
Bilderberg Steering committee and the builder Bilderberg Group
announced that it I didn't happen to get that same email.
Usually I get a number of their emails.
That one I did not get. People can check out the source
I listed there and the show notes that they want to know
more about it. And the last item is almost
comical Comic Relief. And we have, we're talking about
Canada, while, while Trump is actually sounding serious that
he wants to absorb Canada. Well, Canada has got what
amounts to a new Bilderberg government.
As we know, the Canadian Prime Minister, Mark is now Mark
Carney, a long time banker formerly on the Bilderberg
steering committee. He attended Bilderberg in 2018
as the Governor of the Bank of England and in 2022-2023 and
2024 under Brookfield Asset Management under that banner.
And Chrystia Freeland, his so called opponent to be PM,
attended Bilderberg the last two years as Canada's Deputy Prime
Minister. And it's supposed that she she
still holds alongside Carney. So basically the Prime Minister
and the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada are both in essence
Bilderbergers. So that that's an interesting
optic, you might say, for Trump wanting to absorb Canada and now
Canada's becoming more under open Bilderberg control,
although their Bilderberg affiliations, of course, are not
the whole story. But it it's a curious alignment
of the stars, that's for sure. But anyway, that's the latest on
Bilderberg. I've got a couple of Bilderberg
articles posted on the UKUKC website that explained a lot
more of their meddlings and connections in AI and in big
media. So back to you guys.
Thanks Mark. And we should not forget that if
we want to add another name to Peter Thiel network list, that
would be Nigel Farage. Oh really?
Are they? Absolutely.
They are best buddies, Yes, so apparently so.
So there we go. Now let's move on then.
And what's Tulsi up to? Well, not so much, but this is
an incredible story. Bring this up on screen.
So Tulsi Gabbard had already selected a deputy for the
Director of National Intelligence, DNI, and his name
is Daniel Davis. A lot of people might know him
as Colonel Daniel Davis. He has a very successful podcast
which is on YouTube. He's also a senior fellow at
Defence Priorities. This is a think tank in
Washington generally known in that kind of Douglas McGregor
vein of a pretty good straight talking, common sense guy, a
decorated combat veteran, which is rare in Washington to find
such people in politics, very experienced.
And it's kind of been on the right side of most issues over
the years. And something happened, Mike, he
was basically appointed and all of a sudden the appointment was
scuttled a couple of days later. And it turns out it was because
he wasn't hawkish enough, we're told, on the issue of guess
what? Israel.
Yes, Israel. He's not supportive of Israel,
not hawkish enough against Iran. So this is what we understood
and there was a campaign run. We'll bring this up on screen
here. The ADL was involved in
basically smearing Daniel Davis. So the Anti Defamation League
involved in defamation, interesting, isn't it?
And then you had top Fox hosts like Mark Levin here, he's up on
stage basically doing victory laps afterwards after lobbying.
So all these influencers like Laura Loomer and all these like
MAGA Zionist, pro Israeli influencers all piled in and
went after Daniel Davis and what is clearly a coordinated attack.
So this is incredible. So they've managed to basically
veto a top pick for intelligence, the Israeli lobby
and all these influencers, and they put pressure on Trump and
the White House and, you know, work through social media.
Unbelievable. So this is incredible.
So that's not foreign interference.
That's not foreign meddling in the US government.
Of course, that's what Russia does, right?
We're told. So anyway, I think it's
important that people will bring his is show up on screen here.
The best thing we can do at this point is to support Daniel Davis
and it's go visit his YouTube channel, Daniel Davis Deep dive.
It is absolutely one of the best shows on online like Judge
Napolitano, I think even better than than some of these other
programmes, quite frankly. But it's incredible that he
nearly got the job and that would have been such a great
thing. But what does it show you, Mike?
Why would Israel want to keep someone like this out of a job
where their cure creating intelligence and we talked about
this on this programme in previous weeks.
And that's because there is an agenda to wage war and to do a
pre emptive strike on Iran. And where's the intelligence
coming from for that Israel? It's coming from Israel.
So will will Tulsi Gabbard be compelled to act on what quote,
credible threat intelligence about something Iran is supposed
to do? And if not, who would be there
to check that? Would some could be someone like
Colonel, Colonel Daniel Davis to offer a second opinion on that.
That's basically what Tulsi probably selected him to do.
And sure enough, the Israeli lobby got wind and scoppered the
whole thing. So it's it's unbelievable.
And it makes me worry that something is coming down the
pipeline. There's an agenda to confront
Iran militarily in Washington and in Tel Aviv.
And this is a this is a big red flag, Mike.
So 2 questions. Any suggestion about who might
be put in place as an alternative?
And the other is does this say anything about Tulsi's chances
for staying in the role? Good.
Two good questions, Mike and I will say that Eldridge Colby who
is another person who is up for a national high national
security post to be the President's advisor, that's been
stalled and the rumour is because he is not pro Israel
enough, OK, that's one of them. And then the hostage envoy,
Trump's, but who is talking to Hamas?
I think he's been sacked. And he's Jewish, by the way.
So he wasn't because he was being too friendly to Hamas and
not giving enough deference to Netanyahu, apparently.
So he's been kicked out. So who's running US foreign
policy? That's pretty clear.
Is it Trump or is it somebody else?
Is it Miriam Adelson? Is it the Israeli lobby?
Is it Benjamin Netanyahu? So if Benjamin Netanyahu is
having the final veto on US foreign policy and military
affairs, then who's the president of the United States?
Really. Very good question.
I suspect it's Elon Musk. Well, let's bring this up on the
screen here, Mike. And there's this thing called
the conflict of interest. So Musk just pledges to dump
$100 million into a a mega super PAC.
Trump's not even running. For the for the British
audience, you better just mention quickly what a PAC and a
super PAC is. Well, Super PAC is because of
the legislation. Super PAC is where people can
put an unlimited amount in a super PAC and the Super PAC and
donate that to a candidate. Individuals couldn't do that.
But if you go through this thing called a super PAC, it makes it
all legal, basically. So it's basically buying
democracy. Corporations and oligarchs can
buy candidates through super PACs.
It's all legal in our democracy, right?
So, So what does Trump do? He's promoting Tesla here in
this video. You can see Elon's got his child
there as the human shield against any media criticism.
He's such a good family man. He's got lots of wives, mothers
and children. So he's a big Family Guy.
But Trump's promoting Tesla here after while getting a bung of
$100 million. I mean, does this not look good?
Imagine if this was George Soros doing this with Biden or Biden
Kamala or something. Yeah.
Or Alex Soros's company is getting plugged by Biden, and
then Alex Soros drops 100 million into a Biden super PAC.
What would the right be doing? They'd be screaming bloody
murder on Fox News. But for some reason, for a lot
of people, this is OK. I can't afford to drop 100 mils,
so I guess I don't have access. Do you have 100 mil?
We, none of us do, so we can't. We don't have access to
democracy in the same way that some people do.
Is that fair? Is that a meritocracy?
What is this exactly? Or is it a plutocracy?
This is the question. Very good questions.
We'll talk much more about this and the other things we'd be
talking about on the news today in extra in a few minutes.
If you're AUK column member, stick around on the live stream
and you can watch. If you're not AUK column member,
maybe you'd like to join. Do pick up tickets for the April
event if you can, but we're going to leave it there for
today. I would say thank you very much
to Mark and to Patrick and to James Rogowski for joining us
today. Have a great weekend and we'll
see you on Monday as usual. Bye bye.