Ma, my friend Simon Rush, thank you for joining me in the
trenches. It's my pleasure, but I I object
to you calling me a friend because a friend would come
hunting. You have extended the invitation
a few times, but you live in the middle of nowhere.
Simon, it's very tricky to get to you.
I've got to find a very good reason to to drive for 9 hours
to come and visit and hunt with you.
I do live in the sticks, it's true, but it's nice to be here.
Jeremy, thank you for the invitation.
You you say here, but actually you're not in South Africa, are
you? No, I mean here on your, on your
interview, I'm in, I'm in Russia.
I'm in Arkhangelsk Archangel in the far north of Russia.
Yeah, that's where I am. How is it?
It's terrific. Everything is terrific, Jeremy,
I'm telling you the way they've deceived us, it's worse than
than the pandemic and the clock shots, the Russia, the whole
Russia narrative. I mean, everything is just
untrue. There's nothing true about the
tone, if not the words that they employ in talking about Russia
and have done since forever. Obviously when it was Soviet and
Communist, then we could all be forgiven, especially those of us
who are Christians, for hating what that entity stood for.
But Russia as a fiercely Orthodox Christian country and
as a society and as an economy and as a tourist destination is
terrific. It's absolutely splendid.
It's cheap, the food is terrifically healthy.
The people are the friendliest, not not friendliest in a in a
gushing way. They don't walk around with
idiotic smiles on their faces and they don't say I'll see you
for lunch sometime. If they don't mean it.
It's not that friendliness. It's a sort of a doer
friendliness, you know? They have grim set expressions
on their faces until you ask them a question or greet them or
they see you. You're struggling with
something. And then it's all, it's all
help. Big smiles.
You heard just, you know, before we, we started recording, I was
interrupted by a knock at the door and I was all grumpy about
it. Who's interrupting now?
And it was two of the housekeepers come to to give me
the correct key. I'd taken the wrong key and to
double check what laundry I wanted laundering and what
laundry I wanted only repairing some buttons and mending and
dawning and what have you. And that's kind of epitomises
this place. It's, it's, it's embarrassingly
nice. After a while, you kind of feel
a little bit ashamed of of who you are.
You know, it's just everybody's nice and you think I'm such a,
you know, I could never be, you know, in your heart that you're
not as nice as these people are back home.
You know, it's just one of those things.
Speaking of who you are, my UK audience, my UK column audience,
might not know who you are. So, Simon, tell me about who you
are. I'm an employee of State
Landers. I'm a fourth generation South
African from Irish Stock. Saitlanders is a civil defence
organisation constituted under the provisions of the Protocols
additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
So 1949. After the war they came up with
some agreements. We shouldn't do this, we
shouldn't do that, we shouldn't practise whatever evil when
prosecuting warfare. And then 28 years later in 1977,
they added three protocols to dictate the circumstances of
civilians in warfare and and two of those protocols in particular
address civil war and similar circumstances.
And they make provision for identifiable ethnic groups such
as you would have had in the breakup of Yugoslavia, Serbs,
Croats, Slovenes, Montenegrins, Kosovars, Bosniaks, to prepare
for civil war to just to keep it simple.
So 20 odd years ago, our leader and founder, Mr Gustav Miller
thought that it would be a good idea to do that in a very legal,
decent, respectable way. Put together a plan for the
eventuality of the failure of South Africa.
Catastrophic failure which he believed was likely and which
was forecast a long, long time ago by somebody who said that
you know, there will be a black president one day.
And everybody thought that this guy making the forecast had lost
his marbles. And he went on to say that
eventually there would be a catastrophic failure of the
society and ferocious war would break out.
So to answer your question in brief, white South African male,
got a few children. I work for Saitlanders full time
and I'm a paid employee. And to give that some context,
especially in light of your previous question about where I
am, I do foreign work for Saitlanders.
So I get invited to all sorts of places and I spread the good,
the good news of state Landers and trying to tell the truth
about what's happening in South Africa, farm murders, crime
rates, expropriation of land without compensation, and so on
and so forth. That's my little package,
Jeremy. OK, so just for clarity, the
word state Landers is an Afrikaans word.
It translates directly to South Landers, but that doesn't really
work in English. No, it doesn't work in English.
A more poetic translation would be Southerners, that it comes
from a biblical verse in which the Lord says in the end times
my people in the South will bring an offering to me.
So that, that was the source of inspiration for the the name of
the organisation which I've just emphasised is purely and simply
a civil defence organisation constituted under the specific
provisions of international law, to which South Africa subscribed
twice over. A lawyer, a friend of mine
looked into it for me and she came back with her little report
and she said, well, South Africa is a a signatory to the
Protocols, additional to the Geneva Conventions and very
unusually they were adopted into the corpus of South African law
too. She said it's an extraordinary
thing. It doesn't happen very often,
but the African National Congress in its wisdom, and I
say that without facetiousness, when they took power 35 years
ago, 27th of April passed, they, you know, did many dramatic and
drastic things and one of them was to say, hey, this Geneva
Conventions and their protocols additional, not only do we want
to sign up, we want to incorporate them into our legal
corpus. So yeah, we're constituted under
that as a civil defence organisation.
It's basically, you know, butter and and beans and blankets that
we prepare in the eventuality of a massive conflict in our
country. Just for clarity, you said 35
years ago, I think I think we're going to get fact checked on
that 31 OK. So in in in in even simpler
terms, it's a network of white S Africans who are building an
exit strategy in case. Yeah, and I can't embroidery on
that, Jeremy. That's precisely what it is.
Now when you say a network of white S Africans, obviously
people are going to think, oh, that sounds quite racist.
Yeah, racist. Racist.
And they're dishonest because it applies equally to Pygmies, to
Bosniaks, to those among people in that straddle the border
between Vietnam and Cambodia, to the persecuted.
If they are, I've, I've heard stories to say that it's an
absolute nonsense. But those Muslim Uyghurs in the
West of, of, of China, it applies equally to all of the
peoples of the world under the criterion, as I've already
mentioned to you, of identifiable ethnic groups.
And in Africa, whites are about as identifiable as identifiable
gates. It's just a very simple thing.
If, if there was a crisis in this country and it became race
based, I say this country, I'm in Russia.
But if there was a crisis in South Africa and it became race
based and there was a threat to our people, what better than to
remove yourself as a party from the conflict and go to a
desolate as our plan entails? And I apologise to everybody for
the awful lighting. I'm in a cheap Soviet hotel
room. Yeah, at the Arctic Circle.
There's nothing wrong with it. It's spotlessly clean.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with it.
But it's a cheap Soviet hotel room at the Arctic Circle.
The sunset last night at 10:20, it came up this morning at about
2:15. And they're these thin curtains.
So we've got the sunlight blazing in through the window
and these cheap thin curtains. And there's nowhere else for me
to to conduct this interview. So close your eyes and you won't
get archives. What better than to say, you
know what, if there's going to be a conflict, I don't want to
be a hero. I'm going to get my family.
I'm going to go to a safe area. I'm going to be a timid, meek
little thing who doesn't want to to fight, wish to regroup with
like minded people and establish a a critical mess, a critical
mass of human beings to be self sustaining and to create a
defensible, defensible perimeter.
It's the most non kind of actively racist thing possible.
It's completely passive and it applies equally to every
identifiable ethnic group in the world.
That's United Nations law. If you think that's that's
racist, write them a letter. But but why white South
Africans? Jeremy, the nature of our
society is such that if there is a catastrophic, the civil
crisis, violent civil crisis, it is going to rupture or fracture
along racial lines. It it's always like that.
It was like that in Yugoslavia. It was like, you know, World War
Two, World War One, You know, it's, it's the way that it goes.
Ultimately, you revert to your religion, your people, your
place, your language. It's like being here among the,
the Russians. The Slavic identity is much
stronger than I thought it would be.
And the, the, the, the brazen acknowledgement of ethnicity
here in Russia is also much stronger than I thought it would
be. There's no Soviet style
altruistic, you know, we're all one kind of thing.
The Tajiks speak their language and they gather together.
You know, you're, you're around the guy.
Because they will, they will descend on.
I say descend on makes it sound negative, but it's not meant to
be a certain cafe cafeteria on a street corner.
And they'll meet there on a Friday afternoon.
And it won't be 1234, guys. It'll be 12, speaking their
language right after midday Islamic prayers.
It's not unnatural for ethnic groups to find succour and
solace in their in their fellows or or for ethnicities to find
succour and solace among theirs. This is there's nothing abnormal
about it. If you become intrusive, that's
another thing. You know, if you say, well, the,
the whole city has to observe Friday prayers or all Muslims
may not live in a certain area, that's a that's an entirely
different thing. But that's not what we're
talking about. We're talking about, under the
provisions of international law, our boss, our leader, our
founder saying well, if the law exists and if it looks to me as
if South Africa is the shakiest proposition of all, shaky
propositions and it's going to end badly, what could be wrong
with me putting together a national emergency plan that is
completely peaceful? We've never even had it up until
now. An allegation of illegality,
much less a conviction. If we just, we do everything by
the book. We do it decently and
respectively and quietly. And we don't tread on other
people's toes. So, yeah, people can, you know,
say whatever asinine things they, they want to say.
But but it's, it's dishonest by their standards, not mine.
Because the people who tend to say those things are the same
people who believe that the United Nations is a force for
good, by and large. So the, the, these are
international laws within the umbrella of, of the United
Nations. It's a, it's a Geneva
Convention. Which way do you want it?
Your laws are good or your laws are bad?
Come on. I remember you and I had lunch
with a certain black politician. I won't mention his name because
it doesn't really matter and he I don't know if he was joking or
not, but he asked if he could join and your answer was no.
The reality, however, is that it's not about hatred towards
others. No, it's it's about the law.
The law says identifiable ethnic groups.
That man MMM is as black as the ace of spades.
Clearly we don't share an ethnic group.
He's married to a white girl and more power to him.
And he told you in me a very interesting story about another
black politician, going by the initials JM, who refused to
allow our acquaintances. Why?
Everybody knows who he is. Julius Malema.
Into his house, we're sitting over lunch and he's telling the
story of of how Julius called him to pop in to discuss
something. I hear you're in the area.
We've got to have a vote on whatever tomorrow in the
Parliament. Please pop past you and our
rivals. But let's endeavour to
collaborate on this particular bill or whatever it was.
So our acquaintance with his white wife went to Julius
Malema's house, presumably his his parliamentary residence
around Cape Town. And Julius said to him, listen,
you're not bringing all that white thing in here.
You can just forget about it right now.
And so our acquaintance's wife was forced to sit in the motor
car for two hours while he and and Julius stretched out this
naughty dilemma or whatever it was that they were were dealing
with. Yeah.
I mean, it's, it's it's all it's all nonsense.
I said to to our acquaintance, your, I should say your friend.
I scarcely know. I've only met him once.
It is simply the rules of the game.
I could sit here, look you straight in your eyes and tell
you all manner of lies, but I'm not going to.
Don't worry. You know, for you, we'll make an
exception. And I'm sure that when they
wrote the law, that didn't really mean this.
I meant more like that. And turn it all upside down and
inside out and perform all sorts of intellectual gymnastics,
warped, warped logic and and syllogism.
But Nah, Jeremy, it's, it's not my style.
The the international law. Subscribe to it.
It's simple. Sorry.
South Africa is an interesting example to the rest of the
world. We are obviously a failed multi
ethnic, multicultural project. There is no such thing as a
rainbow nation, and everybody who thinks that it is a
wonderful thing is very delusional.
Yeah, Jeremy, I just want to apologise for for fitting with
the items on the desk in front of me.
Have bought the stack of coffees and water because with the
continual light coming in the window and only four hours of of
very, very semi darkness, it's extremely difficult to sleep.
And I had to take sleeping tablets just to get enough rest
for the day ahead of me. And so you know the story.
A little bit groggy and croaky and they make you thirsty too.
Jeremy. Yeah.
Thanks, Jeremy. It's, it was always a fiction
there. There has to have been a better
way to pursue the New South Africa Rainbow Nation dream.
I don't have all the answers. I have some ideas, but what's
more clear than the solution is the problem.
I think if Goodman's head rubbed hard against one another with
the right intentions, they might have come up with good
solutions. For now, let it suffice to say
that the problem is conspicuous. Reconciling the OR bridging the
gulf between the broad masses and the white elite, well, it's
always going to be a well known possible task.
The the the suggestion that black people can't do it is
poppycock. It's it's nonsense.
You and I both know black people who are more competent than we
are. But on average, you have a
population of about 40 million people, of whom many are living
in the Iron Age. They have Iron Age cultural
values, Iron Age language, Iron Age abstract concepts and so on
and so forth to hand a country as developed as South Africa
was, you know, world's first heart transplant, etcetera,
citrus. The list is long to a populace
that is, by and large a long way removed from postmodernist
European social not constructs, but social norms.
Let's say the norms that inform the norms of education, the
norms of intellect, the norms of ethics, etiquette, Modi Vivendi,
to, to to reconcile that is impossible.
And so it was that we had a president a few years ago who
notoriously had five wives. Previous wife had committed
suicide, blaming him incidentally.
So he he was six times married and he was at the time, I don't
know whether it fell through or whether it's been concluded.
He was at the time in his late 70s betrothed to one of the
princesses of the king of Swaziland.
And he couldn't, I'm not necessarily against polygamy,
but this guy who's practising this very, very old way
couldn't, couldn't read numbers. And I think that there was a
fallacious understanding among black people at the time of why
white people and white media, etcetera, were so mocking of
President Jacob Zuma, so sneering, so scoffing.
It's not that he's black. It's not that he's primitive,
it's that you've put a illiterate in charge of what was
a late 20th century country with among the finest banking
institutions in the world, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
You've put a guy who can't count properly, as was evidenced in
the Parliament on a number of occasions in charge.
So yeah, that's my sort of long winded response to what you
invited with your statement about, you know, there isn't
really a rainbow nation. No, there isn't really a rainbow
nation because to to create that out of such disparate entities
is impossible. I can't think of an example in
history that it has been done. And I'm, you know, I'm not the
world's greatest historian, but I spend probably 30 hours a week
studying history. I've never heard of anything
similar in Roman times, Greek times, Persian times, Babylonian
times, unless interpreted with the benefit of the doubt, unless
you say well in, in in Chaldea in the year, whatever.
There are historical records saying that the Uzbekis passing
through on the Bactrian and camels were really, really nice
people. So we must construe that as a
matter, as a an expression of racial harmony, you know, unless
you do perform some kind of not even mental but moral gymnastics
of judgement, gymnastics of, of estimation and appreciation.
This is just you can't do that. You can't do what they tried to
do in 1994 in South Africa and it's expected to go to all go
swimmingly well. Which inadvertently means that
homogeneous societies tend to do better.
Overall, yeah, well, we know the the evidence for that.
People shriek with fury when you bring it up, but the evidence is
legion about homogeneous societies do best.
And you know, it's terrible to say, but these, the Russians are
facing a a tidal wave of immigration from the Central
Asian republics and from the Kafka's.
The Kafka's people, don't worry them too much.
You know the the doggy people and the Chechens from from the
Caucasus, but the Central Asians, the Tajiks, Uzbeks,
Kyrgyz, Kazaks. Who did I leave out, the Tajiks
or the Kyrgyz? I left one of them out.
Those 5 Central Asian republics are very, very, very, very
different in their behaviour and in their norms to the Slavic
Russians. And they're streaming into
Moscow. For those viewers who don't
know, last year, February, the World Bank released a report as
they report on all sorts of things from time to time on the
Russian economy. And they said that the Russian
economy is now the world's fourth largest.
That was as of February last year.
And the, I forget the exact number, but it was just about $6
trillion, not least 6.16.26.3. I forget the exact number, but
they said we can estimate from what we can observe.
We can estimate what it is that we can't observe, but we can
only report on what we can observe.
So imagine if you, if you see a machine and it's functioning,
it's making chocolate bars or whatever, and the gears are
turning and the conveyor belt is whirring along and they're all
sorts of lights and lamps and, and things telling you how many
chocolate bars are going out. If you're a, an engineer, you'd
probably be able to say to somebody, look, I don't know all
of the inner workings of that machine.
But given the output, it's safe to say that there's probably 3
processors and 4 controllers and nine wheels and six bearings and
12 pulleys. And the World Bank said our
report covers just the $6 trillion.
We shall not speculate on the rest, but we believe it to be
another 6040 to 60%, six sixes or 36.
So the high end estimate would be that the economy is $9.6
trillion strong. The population is about 150
million people, not that's not the Hanul Devi.
I've just mentioned it as a fact for people's reference.
And it's running hot. It's running extremely hot.
The, the prosperity here is something that has to be seen to
be believed, Jeremy, with the result that these Tajiks,
Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs and Turkmens, Turkmen is the one
that I didn't mention are streaming in here by the
hundreds upon hundreds of thousands.
And it's driving the, the Slavic Russians and the Aryan Russians
and related groups crazy because the value systems are so
enormously different. And those people come in here
and they don't when in Rome do as the Romans do.
It's a case of when in Russia do, just as we did in Tashkent
or Samarkand, they project onto the society more primitive, for
want of a better word, norm. The same as Europe, exactly the
same as Europe, and it never makes it better.
Nobody ever said, golly, Gee, thank goodness we've got those
whatever in our society now. Now we'll be able to make music.
Goodness me, now Nobel Prizes will be worth something.
Oh, now we'll be off to the stars when it.
As far as physics is concerned, generally the most homogeneous
societies are the most successful societies.
And sadly for for the early 21st century, we're experimenting in
the other direction, in not only, but certainly to a huge
degree, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, the USA and Western
Europe. And the results are not looking
good. But the, the fraternalists who
hold the reins in their hands, the brotherhoods of
paedophiliac, satanic suicide, death cults, cabals who control
our societies on behalf of the elites, are so sworn to this
suiciding of, of, of Amalek at this time that so you have
people like Keir Starmer dragging his own society to
hell. Emmanuel Macron, this clown from
Germany. I'd love to do an IQ test on
him. Mertz Justin Trudeau as what is
his name? He's not, strictly speaking,
he's not a professor. He's a descent from the
University of Uppsala in Finland.
Doctor Edward not Dowd, that's the Black Rock fund manager
Edward Dutton has demonstrated very persuasively and the videos
can be found on YouTube. This is the the spiteful mutants
of our society, the genetic detritus that takes a shortcut
to success through fraternal organisations and sells its soul
in the process, and is hell bent on on destroying everything good
around them. They hate themselves, they hate
their mothers and they hate the paternal ecosystem, the the
inheritance of their fathers, the their countries, their
societies, their value systems and they're hell bent on
destroying them. It's as simple as that.
It's not this case. I see it in the media all the
time, Jeremy, and it's starting to really get to me.
And the right wing, I mean to say, golly Gee, I don't
understand why Kia Starmer would do something so stupid.
You know, it's the it's the mentality of the retarded.
It's where the philtre doesn't keep out.
People who are, are are severely mentally compromised.
And so you find them among us asking questions like that, you
know, like watching a a football match and saying, I don't know,
whoever. So Alex Ferguson, I just can't
understand. He's so stupid and I'm so
clever. Sitting on the couch here eating
crisps and drinking beer. I can see the whole problem.
I don't know why he can't see it.
It's not that Keir Starmer, stupid.
Keir Starmer has 165 IQ points on you.
It's not that he's stupid. It's that he's a pervert.
It's that he's devoted to the destruction of himself and his
paternity. Likewise Boris Johnson.
Boris Johnson did a Trivium or a quadrivium at at at Oxford
University. Boris Johnson's got more, more
brains than many average cities. He's not stupid, he's a pervert.
It's not that these people don't know what they're doing.
They're not precisely what they're doing.
But they are. They've made blood oaths to
paedophiliac, satanic, suicidal death cult cabals that suit the
genetic perversity, the the genetic this, this thing that,
as I say, Professor Edward Dutton describes as the mutant,
the mutants, the mutants, genetic mutants within our
societies. If we look at the site Landers
and what it represents in South Africa, as we said earlier, this
network of of white people preparing with an exit strategy
just in case, it's sort of like a microcosm of something a lot
bigger worldwide. Some people might know something
called the Kalogi Plan, but there definitely appears to be
an attempt to to remove white people altogether, which which
makes the sidelanders even more important.
Let me give you a statistic I found earlier. 100 years ago,
1925, Simon of the world's population around 27 to 30% was
white. And when we say white, we
generally mean of what European ancestry it's, I think it's
fairly obvious what a white person is today.
In 2025, of the world's population, it's around 10 to
12%. Yeah, yeah, You know Jeremy, the
the, the success of of Europeans was very much a self originated
thing. Nobody gave anybody a hand.
They're exceptions, of course. The exceptions every know,
everybody knows that one form of ink originated in China and
gunpowder originated in China. There.
There are exceptions, roofs, roof towels, roof towels in
Korea. But by and large it was a self
made success. Our dependence upon other
peoples was very, very low. At a certain point we attracted
ethnic groups that hated us from far away lands.
Those ethnic groups came to form a very strong voice, almost a
choir or an orchestra. And from the very beginning, we
know this from the Frankfurt School for instance, they began
to criticise our norms and more race.
It's as if I was a tick when I jumped on the back of a dog,
started sucking his lifeblood out, all the while muttering and
murmuring about the poor quality of the blood.
So we had an enormous success in terms of birth and live births
and reduction in infant mortality.
We did have some blips along the way.
I mean, the emergence of surgery in the 18th century had
tremendously bad consequences for women and childbirth, for
example. Hitherto midwives ensured that
that childbirth was a relatively successful process for both
mother and child. Along come surgeons and they
say, stand one side, I know everything and you have the
sudden emergence of purple sepsis.
Purple sepsis was at one point like one in every six mothers
died of purpural sepsis and apparently it's one of the most
painful ways to go suffering septicemia of the, of the the
vulva or or the vagina, the cervix and the cervix is
apparently beyond painful and these women would die in
absolute shrieking pain. So our societies and our modes
were not flawless, but by and large, we were able to achieve
that tremendous ascendancy. It's important to point out the
exceptions, like I've just said, with peripheral sepsis.
So we get this tremendous ascendancy and then along come
these aliens and they say, oh, golly Gee, you, you say, you say
love your neighbour, but it seems to me that you don't love
your neighbour not nearly as much as I think you should love
your neighbour. And so it was that during the,
the 40s, fifties, sixties, 70s, et cetera, you can the, the, the
dates are malleable. You had a circumstance in which.
Aliens were telling white western society you are over
breeding out of the left hand sides of their mouths and out of
the right hand sides of their mouths.
They were saying it's only because you don't hate black
people that you that you don't love black people.
But your Bible says that you should love everybody equally,
that you don't spend money on Natal clinics in Africa.
See beauty. Beauty is 8 years old.
Beauty lives in Uganda. Beauty has a beautiful smile.
But beauty is really very sad inside.
If you would send $10, beauty could eat for one whole year and
there would be change leftover poor beauty.
And so you had the West recriminating with itself or
aliens within the West recriminating against the West
for being successful, for being self sustainable, for being able
to, to sponsor itself to the point that it was putting, if
you believe the story, men on the moon, but certainly men in
outer space. Anyway, you know, this is
conceptually an unbelievable thing.
We, our success was so great that we left.
This was the success of Western society.
But we were told you're bad because you don't allow Chinese
students to, to study in your universities at your cost.
You, you don't sponsor neonatal or OBGN clinics in, in, in
Central African Republic, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
We all know the narratives. So they, they told us to stop
breeding just as they convinced us to fund the breeding of
Central America, South America, Africa and and Asia broadly
speaking. None of that medicine originated
in in the Amazon jungle, none of those procedures, none of those
developments, none of that progress.
But we were held emotional hostage over other people.
You're so successful and you just don't care that your
neighbour suffering. Look at poor beauty.
You know, this was the I don't like to do these theatricals and
I hate it when other people do it.
But sometimes you have to spread the butter thick on the bread.
This you only have to man in your mind's eye.
Imagine, Jeremy, those images in I'm, I'm from South Africa.
We didn't have much of this, obviously, during apartheid, but
we did get Reader's Digest. And there would sometimes be an
insert in the Reader's Digest in the doctor's waiting room with
the dentist's waiting room, a little piece of cardboard
between the pages with a picture of a 15 year old Chadian girl.
Girl from from Chad is saying whatever her name might be, I'll
use the Zulu name Tandy. Tandy is 16.
Tandy has six children. Tandy is hungry.
Tandy's children are also hungry.
And somehow they would weave into the wording.
You're fat Westerner, not you and your patrimony, the work of
your father's have succeeded in making things cushy.
Nobody did nothing for you, but you're fattened.
A woman who can't control her libidinous activities is hungry.
And by the way, Jeremy, did you know Jeremy?
Jeremy, when mothers don't get enough nutrition, it affects the
quality of their breast milk. I'm just saying, but you could
change that if you weren't so selfish, Jeremy, send your money
to this address over here, and we'll make sure that Tandy and
all of her friends can procreate abundantly at your cost with no
risk to them. So that's my theatrics for
today. Jeremy, in reply to your your
observation. Well.
What you're saying, Simon, is that the West, AKA white people,
have been demoralised. Yeah, Yeah.
We were told for so long that we were, we were successful and
nobody else was. And that's unfair that we began
to believe the conspicuous, the conspicuously irrational.
I mean, the syllogism within that short sentence, you know,
it's a, it's a perversion of reason.
But they said it enough times that we began to believe it.
Now with this demoralisation and clear decrease in the white
population globally, how does farm murder segue into that and
of course, by extension, Trump's discussion a week or two ago
with the South African president?
You know, Jeremy, I'm a pragmatist and a realist.
I find Donald Trump extremely charming, but I don't believe a
word that he says. And it's a source of endless
dismay to me that conservatives fall for his stories.
He's got this Doge thing going on in with in with which he's
saving about £7.57 cents, 8 or $9 while he's managed to get Joe
Biden to sign off. And this is what happened, $100
billion increase in the military from just under 800 billion to
now 895 billion. And he's proposing a military
budget of $1.4 trillion. So this is a man who says to
you, please congratulate me for I don't know what.
Please congratulate me for sweeping the floor.
I'm such a an earnest little happy helper elf in the
household. Meanwhile, he's dragged in a 25
kilogrammes of, of mud in, in the, in the laundry or
something. I'm struggling to come up with a
good little parable, but it's a bit like this Ukraine story at
the moment. And it's just so, so, so false.
This is not my war. This is Joe Biden's war.
The the, the donations to Ukraine made by the United
States of America, by the Trump administration between 2017 and
2020, inclusive. Those four years, we're more
than double the president that came after him and the president
that came before him. This is exactly Donald Trump's
war, and the Russians know it. And you know, when you speak to
Russians here, oh, they're not mentally retarded people.
These are genuine readers, writers and counters.
As one guy said to me, it's not as it used to be, but there was
a time when, when the plumbers were reading Don Quixote, which
as your viewers may or may not know, is arguably the greatest
work of literature of all literature.
Arguably. I think the times of London had
a thing once we came number one out of 100.
These people are not idiots. They know full well that that
the things that are being said in the West are absolute
rubbish, but they're just to fool us.
Everybody knows the Russian government does, doesn't believe
a word and the Russian people don't believe a word.
It's only we who are this, you know, the net effect of years of
overly successful breeding the, the, the mentally retarded
people of of the West who fall for any of the, the stuff that's
that's said is similarly with the, the white emigres being
offered asylum, the 49 people. It's a meaningless number.
It's absolutely meaningless. It will make no difference to
anything. It's purely and simply APR
stunt. As you say, there is a
connection between this, this demographic crisis and what's
happening in South Africa. One illustration of that is one
example is the we know from the 2017 land audit that the number
of white commercial farmers left in South Africa is about 25,000.
We have about 33,000 commercial farmers, 8000 of which are black
coloured Indian and 25,000 white.
And we know from year in and year out, you've seen all the
little Excel spreadsheets that they put out, the number of
farmers, not their wives, children, just farmers,
commercial farmers murdered in farm attacks Every year is
somewhere between upper 30s and early 50s.
Let's take 45 as as an average. the United Nations mention
measures intentional homicide in per 100,000.
So if you multiply 25,000 by 4 to get 100,000, and you multiply
45 by 4 to get a percentage or a proportion of that 100,000, then
the murder rate of white South African farmers is something
like 180 per 100,000. You can be conservative and say
150 per 100,000. Compare that to an average
murder rate in Europe. It's a false comparison because
we're comparing a specific group with a broader population, but
it gives some reference. The the murder rate or the
intentional homicide rate in Europe is under 3.
The the intentional homicide as as the United Nations puts it
right in the USA is just about 5, hovered around 4.1 for many
years, but it's gone up a little bit.
Call it 5 for the sake of a round Number.
The the death rate, it's not homicide, it's just death in
what is supposedly the world's most dangerous occupation,
namely logging is 97.8. Now you tell me what is wrong
with that And you have a president going around the world
telling people, no, they no attacks on white farmers.
They know it's very, very, very bad and it's very wrong.
And it is symptomatic of what's happening in the broader Western
world. People are being told don't over
breed. He has the abortion clinic if
you need it. But please donate to poor little
beauty in Angola because she doesn't have Natal, Natal clinic
for miles around. And just look at her smile.
Doesn't she have a beautiful smile?
Similarly, we want your land in South Africa, but we refuse to
acknowledge your true circumstances.
You know, this perversion of reality.
No, no, no, no. You're not being killed.
But by the way, it would be handy if you would give up your
land for free. You know, expropriation without
compensation. There's this this muddle up of
ideas that could never have been successful in preceding
generations. They've had to depend very, very
heavily upon rapeseed oil and refined sugar and refined wheat
and, and the clot shots and adulterated water and very, very
poor breeding strategies among white people in over the past
four generations to, to, to manufacture a generation.
That is to say, us stupid enough to believe those conspicuously
inverted lies, Jeremy. So the word genocide has been
thrown around a lot. Now I know that you take
exception to it. Why?
Well, excuse me, Jeremy, I apologise again for the terrible
light quality and for the drinking coffee on camera, but
my, my voice is really on its last legs after a sleepless
night and then too many sleeping pills.
It is. Strictly speaking, people can
look this up, they can verify it for themselves, but what's
happening in South Africa would fall into the category or within
the definition of genocide very, very, very, very, very easily.
It is a word that has been, under international law, has
been permitted to become almost an umbrella term.
But sorry, who, who, which, which specific group falls into
that category very very easily. I mean, we're the white people.
So in other words, if you if you look it up how the United
Nations defines genocide, if I look at you sideways with
malicious intent, it's practically genocide according
to the United Nations. I'm exaggerating, but genocide
means the wiping out of the people.
It means the last of the Mohicans the day after he dies.
It in, in real English, that's what it means.
It means that if I take the Armenian people and I kill all
of them and there are none left with no exceptions, that is
genocide like suicide, like fratry side, like matrix side.
It means when the the object in question, in this case an ethnic
group, is extirpated with no exceptions.
However, the United Nations have broadened that category to take
everybody's feelings into account, with the result the.
Technically speaking, what is happening to white people in
South Africa can be described as a genocide, particularly the
Boer farmers as a class because they are more of a class than a
group. They are more an involuntary
entity than a voluntary entity. However, I never use the word
genocide because I don't like the fact that the United Nations
plays fast and loose with the English language to suit itself.
I don't think that what's happening in South Africa now,
not I don't think it's, it's, it's just mathematics and it's,
you can look it up. Oxford, Shorter Oxford
Dictionary. It's not genocide.
Not every last white person is being killed or has already been
killed. Some of I'm still alive.
All three of my sons are, now that you mention it, Jeremy.
So it's not a, a genocide. And it's a great pity that they
do play so fast and loose with with language.
But is there an orchestrated campaign against the white South
African farmers? Unquestionably, on the 23rd of,
of January, the Minister of Agriculture sent through a, a
bill that became an act called the, The Development and the
Preservation or the Development and the Protection of
Agricultural Land, which basically turns all agricultural
land in South Africa into ultimately the, the steward of
the Department of Agriculture. They may call the shots, if it
so behoves them, on what crops may be planted, what, et cetera,
et cetera, et cetera. So it's a, it's a draconian
thing. On the 24th of January the
following year, the expropriation without
compensation bill was passed to make it an act of law.
Then we discovered that there will be an October and a bill
passed which I forget the correct name, but it's equal
redistribution of property for equality purposes.
In other words, where the whereby the government is
entitled to to dictate the property be expropriated for nil
compensation and given to another party to dictate and
determine and ensure or some kind of economic parity.
This is not disputed. It's not disputable whether
there is or isn't a campaign against large scale property
owners in South Africa, namely the Afrikaner bull folk farmers.
It's indisputable. And just to those people who
watch this and say, yeah, but they've got so much from got so
many farms. So it's a fallacy, It's a
fiction. Even during apartheid, outside
of the black townships in this province from which I come,
which was then called Natal, which means birth, like neonatal
clinic because it was named on Christmas Day by the Portuguese
500 years ago. The Zulu people, even during
apartheid, outside of their townships, whatever property
they may have owned individually.
Owned 32% of the province. This notion that since wherever
black people, 90% of the population had 10% of the land
and so on and so forth is an absolute fiction, absolute more
the that's one that's one example since then.
So it's always been 32% during the darkest, most evil days of
white racist supremacy, South African apartheid, 32% of the
land just in the form of that, that trust in that province
alone, besides any other farms or Township housing or whatever,
the huge townships of South Africa, the, the enormous from
horizon to horizon townships of South Africa.
So the, the, the property held by blacks even at that those
dark days, the land property was, I don't know, some people
say as high as 60% in that province.
Since then we had a 19 year process of redistributing land
based upon land claims. So we, Jeremy, as a black man
would go to following very heavy advertising, endless promotions
on black television channels, radio stations and newspapers
would go along to the local office or not go along to the
local office because they even had mobile kiosks, mobile, you
know, trucks and trains driving around the country to every last
remote rural community for 19 years, saying if Simon's father,
great grandfather, knocked your great grandfather over the head
and stole his land and you wish to claim it back, fill in this
form, we'll assist you. And so it was that many hundreds
of thousands of hectares of land were given to their owners.
Then the process was terminated because it had come to its its
conclusion. It was exhausted.
All of the land claims were addressed.
Every outstanding, unfairly taken, owed, indebted piece of
land was compensated. If that's the the correct word,
the land was given back or they could choose the money in lieu
the community. Done, end of story.
Done, Done, done, done, done. And now the government is
saying, well, golly Gee, life is unfair to black people, we are
going to have to expropriate land without compensation and
the basis will be, I forget the name of the act that I gave to
you 2 minutes ago, Jeremy, which they say will be passed in
October. I don't know.
I've been ranting for a little while now and I've kind of lost
my train of thoughts, partly because it's just such a
frustrating topic and partly because I'm running on 3 1/2
hours sleep or whatever in the land of the midnight sun over
here. Jeremy what?
Is the moral of the story. The moral of the story is that
since the beginning of time, the only way that in fleshly terms
that just causes can prevail in the face of unjust men is by
creating critical mess in the face of the onslaught upon
Caucasian Christianity, as the paedophiliac satanic suicide
death called Kabul expresses it. The only way that we're going to
survive is if we stick together to create critical masses to
have organisations like Saitlanders or not like
Saitlanders. If you want a different style of
thing, you don't want a national emergency plan.
You don't think there's going to be a, a catastrophic civil
crisis in your society, then fine, but there's nothing else
to be done. Keyboard warrioring is not going
to help you. Preparing alone is at the end of
the day, not going to help you. You've got to get people to come
together to defend their, their own interests.
And I say that in synopsis, Jeremy, as you as you say, we're
coming into land, so I won't wax too much about it.
Oh, OK, so that was the end of your sentence.
Yeah, sorry, Sorry, Simon. How then can I find out more
about this head tenders? Sorry about that Jeremy.
The the Inflexion was going the wrong way.
Saitlanders.org, SUID landers.org, and I'd like to
make a heartfelt plea to anybody who has who wishes to support
us. I'm in our Khangulsk in Russia
at the moment, carrying this word to the ends of the earth.
We work very hard and we box well above our weight to carry a
standard for conservative Caucasian Christianity in the
world, and it doesn't happen by magic.
If you wish to donate, please, please, please donate.
When you go to that that site SUID landers.org,
sitelonders.org. When you log in there, go to the
first page, scroll to the bottom.
You can make donations so that we can continue to do do our
work. Yeah, you take international
currency. Yes, we do.
Yeah. On that note, Simon Rush, thank
you for joining me in the trenches.