Good afternoon. It is Monday the 12th of
February 2024, just after 1:00. Welcome to UK Column News.
I'm your host Brian Gerrish with me in the studio, Mike Robinson,
and we're delighted to be joined by Mark Anderson from the
States. Well, we're going to get started
straight away with what's really disaster in the Royal Navy.
We've got quite a strong report on defence today and I'm going
to say we are making the statements we're making out of
respect to the member of members of our armed forces, because
it's blatantly apparent that service men and women are being
betrayed by the British government.
But let's kick off with the latest disaster.
Well, a little while ago of course the Queen Elizabeth
aircraft carrier wasn't able to sail due to a propeller shaft
problem. I was interested with this
headline from Business Insider because it said the high profile
failure of a £3.7 billion sorry billion dollar aircraft carrier
shows how Britain is struggling to keep up with first rate
militaries. What a true statement there.
But this is really the rub, because of course the second
carrier, HMS Prince of Wales, has now also been unable to sail
due to what I would suspect is the same or similar problem.
Yes, but hold on a second. HMS Princess Wales is only out
of dry dock for exactly that problem.
Are you suggesting this recurred after the fact?
After, it hasn't sailed anywhere.
It's just. I could believe so.
My because I think this is a, this is an original design
problem and this is going to cause big problems because
because the people we've spoken to, there's no easy fix around
this. So this is design trouble and
they're in big trouble. So no aircraft carriers for the
UK. So obviously the Houthis are not
going to be seeing this tremendous weapon out in their
neck of the woods. I've titled this orchestrated
breakdown, but not to worry, We can't get an aircraft carrier to
see. But according to the Telegraph,
defence journalist Danielle Sheridan, the Royal Marines new
vessel to deliver a lethal punch.
There we are. There's a picture of the lethal
new vessel for the UK. I'm having difficulty keeping a
straight face, but this is the reality of the madness.
What are we looking at? We're actually looking at an
upgraded rubber boat with some machine guns on it.
But according to the defence correspondent of the Telegraph,
here she is, Danielle Sheridan. And if we have a look at her
experience, she's been defence editor for a year and 10 months
before that political and defence correspondent.
But I'm going to say that this young lady can't cut the mustard
because she should be ripping the Ministry of Defence to
pieces. What does she do instead?
Well, this is a bit more of her article with some astonishing
information. This little boat has been
repainted in greater to help it hide.
Mike. It's incredible, isn't it?
It's got new engine so it can do 200 miles of 40 knots.
It's got a new configuration of the driving position.
It's a bit like selling a car. It's got new cooling systems, a
mast and a trim for better protection in sea conditions.
This is remarkable. And the CRC has three crew who
rotate on long journeys. Well, presumably they're going
to be doing longer journeys than the 2 aircraft carriers.
Let's have a look at some video clips in order to get an idea of
who has been saying what. And these are astonishing We've
we've given you a little compendium of videos.
Let's start with the first one, which is Grant Shapps.
Well, apologies, he wasn't actually speaking, but that was
from his Twitter page. And what is he talking about?
He's talking about the latest and greatest missiles which
apparently shooting down the Houthi drought.
The only problem is information coming into the UK column says
that there's a problem with toxic fumes on board the Royal
Navy ships firing these. That is the allegation.
We're going to do our very best to see whether we confirm that.
But clearly it seems there's some sort of problem there.
There's certainly a problem with the carrier.
Well, let's have a look at what Admiral Radakin had to say about
his duties. We showed this a few months ago.
First of all I do. Love your office.
Did you choose it to make it as like being on a?
Ship as possible without actually being open.
So I suppose we're lucky. So this is a fantastic place to
base a Navy headquarters. So we're at the top of the
harbour, we're on Whale Island and it's fantastic to have large
windows and it's great for me to be able to look out and see our
ships. I think it's less good for our
ship CEOs to know that they're they're under the gaze of the of
the headquarters. In a way it's reassuring that
when you go back to a ship and whether it's the ladders or it's
the food or it's the smell, Personally I don't like going to
ships and not not going. Up to the bridge.
I love this. This is a brilliant graphic and
to me this describes the world that we're actually in, which is
a world dominated by the sea. And the different colours
represent the different trades that go around the world on the
sea. What do you make of that, Mike?
I don't know what to say. I mean, he likes looking out his
window at the ships. We can't get the carriers to see
the Type 40 fives can't go into warm water.
We've got problems with missile systems, propeller shafts,
recruiting, but the colours on the map are just wonderful.
So where did we send Admiral Radican?
We sent him somewhere special to give his expertise on how to
fight a land war. Let's just remind ourselves of
this little Guardian report here.
And there we are. That's our guy.
How UK military chief became key NATO liaison in Ukraine.
He can't keep his fleet at sea, so we sent him off to Ukraine to
tell the Ukrainian army how to fight the Russians.
And of course, what's happened and utter disaster.
Well, meanwhile, how is the British Army doing?
Well, let's go back to a little piece of video clip with General
Sir Patrick Saunders to see what he's learnt.
And if you're in the army now, you Join Now.
The army you join will look radically different in the
course of the next six or seven years.
And just to give you a sense of of the pace of that, we've now
got a really clear sense of our purpose.
So the army's purpose is to fight and win wars on land.
Well, there we are, astonishing news from General Sanders.
Apparently the army is supposed to fight and win wars on land.
It's a remarkable I I was under the impression it could have
been at sea, but he's happy with that.
So. So what sort of politicians have
brought this madness to the military?
Let's have a look at our old friend Ben Wallace.
There's a rumour there's a reshuffle tomorrow.
The day after. Yeah, In which case this will be
your last hurrah. In that case, I'll just be over
there on the seating with everyone else.
Why did you decide that you'd had enough?
Well, there's a man over there that slightly inspires me to go
on your own terms. I think I'd done four years.
I'd done three years as security minister.
That's seven years of so 24/7. So seven years, which was enough
to help the general carnage ripping apart Britain's armed
forces and then following the lead.
I think he's referring to Tony Blair in that particular
scenario. He just walks away, leaving the
chaos and the madness. Let's have a look at another
one. This is Jane Cartilage talking
about procurement. Well, as the new Minister of
State for Defence procurement at the Ministry of Defence, I
thought I'd come to Abbey Wood to see DNS, which is about as
close to the front line of procurement as you can get.
Doing all these amazing things, procuring new equipment for
armed forces, maintaining the stuff that's already there.
It's been really interesting and I look forward to working them
in the future. I was incredibly inspired to
meet the staff because I mean particularly the ones involved
in involved in procuring for Ukraine.
They've worked so hard to get stuff out there and it's made a
real difference in theatre, made a difference in what is, you
know, a full on war in Europe today.
They should be very proud of what they're doing, but we've
got to keep doing that and I'm here to work with them and make
sure we can keep delivering for Ukraine but also for the British
armed forces and what they do around the world.
Well, as we're going to be hearing a little bit later in
today's news, procurement is not working in any shape or form.
And if material has been supplied to Ukraine, it's
certainly not reaching the the front line of the UK armed
forces. So another massive failure.
But let's just come back to our old friend Ben Wallace, because
he mentioned NATO. Let us move on to the
substantive issues of NATO and what is happening in.
Ukraine I would, I suppose the one thing that has happened
that, you know, I think. It was Emmanuel Macron who was
saying that NATO was brain dead and no one would say that now
it's found its reason to be in a way that was unimaginable prior
to the invasion by Russia of Ukraine.
Is NATO in a stronger position? And we'd hear about the fraying
of NATO unity. What is wrong more remarkable in
your mind, the fraying or the extent of the unity?
Well, first of all, NATO has worked throughout this war.
Well, of course NATO hasn't worked throughout the war in
Ukraine. Because of course, Ukraine is on
the verge of defeat. Terrible carnage on the
battlefield, and it's obvious that the power of the Russian
military, even facing the help that NATO can give it, the
Russians are coming out on top. Meanwhile, all of the ammunition
stocks and NATO have been cleared out, and most of the
NATO military are without major equipment because it's been
given to Ukraine. So an utter shambles.
Is this an accident? I don't think so.
I think what we're looking at is the deliberate destruction of
Britain's military. But we do don't need to worry
because the British government is spending parts and parts of
money on defence and they've just published the latest
statistics. So they've got a little bit of
video that they published on Twitter this morning.
It's £25 billion, two billion coming from Scotland,
186,000,000 coming from Northern Ireland and so on.
So this is all fantastic. Apparently all of the nations of
the UK have increased their spending and this means that
there's an average of £370 per human being in the UK being
spent with UK defence companies and that is supporting 209,000
jobs at the moment. So the British government
extremely excited about that. But of course, what they're not
excited about was the recent comments from Donald Trump.
And he was talking. NATO was busted until I came
along. I said everybody's going to pay.
They said, well, if we don't pay, are you still going to
protect us? I said absolutely not.
They couldn't believe the answer.
They asked me that question. One of the presidents of a big
country stood up, said, Well, Sir, if we don't pay and we're
attacked by Russia, will you protect us?
I said you didn't pay your delinquent.
He said Yes, let's say that happened.
No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them
to do whatever the hell they want.
You got to pay. You got to pay your bills.
So the British politicians and British ministering press going
absolutely nuts up over that statement.
They're apparently panicking over whether Trump will become
president once again. But of course, if they were
paying attention, I realized it'd been, what, three prime
ministers since? But Trump originally made these
comments. But if we go back to 2017, Trump
opened the NATO's headquarters in Brussels.
We've got a picture of it here. And this was him standing beside
Jan Stoltenberg with the 9/11 Article 5 memorial, which is
outside the NATO headquarters in Brussels at the moment.
But Trump was absolutely clear at that meeting that defence
spending by European countries would have to be increased, that
the US was no longer going to pay for European defence and,
well, this is what he said. I have been very, very direct
with Secretary Stoltenberg and members of the alliance in
saying that NATO members must finally contribute their fair
share and meet their financial obligations.
But 23 of the 28 member nations are still not paying what they
should be paying and what they're supposed to be paying
for their defense. This is not fair to the people
and taxpayers of the United States, and many of these
nations owe massive amounts of money from past years and not
paying in those past years. Over the last eight years, the
United States spent more on defense than all other NATO
countries combined. If all NATO members had spent
just 2% of their GDP on defense last year, we would have had
another $119 billion for our collective defense and for the
financing of additional NATO reserves.
So it shouldn't really. Sorry, Brian, I'm just going to
say it shouldn't really be a surprise to anybody that Trump
would make a statement like the one he made a couple of days
ago, despite the hysteria in the UK press, which would imply that
they were surprised by it in some way.
But nonetheless, our budget, USUKEU budget on the fence is an
order of magnitude higher than Russia or China.
And yet we don't have hypersonic missiles.
We have a collapsing military. Why is that?
Well, I for us, for the Uki believe it's because we no
longer have any reliance on building equipment in house.
We've been told for many years we don't have the knowledge, the
experience, the professionals, the quality of people,
everything was outsourced to a mismatch across the European
Union and what did we get? Poor low quality products in
inflated prices. But I just wanted to comment on,
on that that speech by Trump, because look at the faces of the
Europeans in the background, glowering and looking extremely
unhappy for people who say that all these people, the Americans
and NATO, work together as one cohesive bloc.
They're all in it together. I don't think this is quite
true. You can see the fractiousness
between them. OK, so let's come back to the
UK. And of course, on Friday we were
talking about the interview with Vladimir Putin.
And of course, one of the allegations that Putin made, we
showed the little video clip, was that Boris had scoured the
peace deal on Ukraine right at the very beginning, Boris
responded to this. So let's start off with a little
bit of video. Around the world, people are
watching that ludicrous interview with Vladimir Putin
conducted. By Tucker Carlson.
And we must not fall for this tissue of lies above, for the
notion that Putin somehow fated. To succeed in Ukraine.
On the contrary, he is doomed to fail.
Read about it in The Daily Man. So this morning is a comedy
show, Brian. It's it's very difficult to do
this because of course we're putting out a serious report
about what's happening in the world.
But we're dealing with complete we're reporting on complete
incompetent idiots and and Boris Johnson has got to be the lead.
That man should be removed from politics.
He is dangerous. He is destroying the country.
And who would you believe, Putin or Boris?
Well, for me, there will be only one choice and that at the
moment would be Putin. Boris Johnson has got to be
removed. He's he's from his position.
OK, well, let's have a look at the Daily Mail article itself.
This was a headline Boris Johnson.
Colon Putin's interview with his fawning sturge, Tucker Carlson,
was straight out of Hitler's playbook.
It's pathetic. But unfortunately for Boris,
despite the denials, some people have memories.
And so here's a little piece of video which one of Zelensky's
key men talking about Boris's role with respect to the peace
deal. One is a groto.
Ebola is a Quinci TV. No, you've shown me this.
More yet, Finland. So that's pretty clear now.
That was David. I apologise, I'm going to mess
up the name here. But David Arakamiya, he's a
member of Zelensky's Servant of the People Party since 20.
Well, in 2014 he became advisor to the Ministry of Defence in
Ukraine and chairman of the Council of Volunteers at the
Ministry of Defence in Ukraine. And he's served as the Secretary
of the National Investment Council of Ukraine since August
2019. So you know, this was.
So it's a war because of Boris. That's exactly it, yes.
Oh, yes. Just to finish this segment off,
then of course the bit of hysteria, and not only in the
media about Trump, but also about the global South as a
whole. So let's bring up three articles
from Chatham House very quickly, Stop taking the global S for
granted from Baroness Ashton. Then we have one here from Arif
Leilani. New global alliances leave the
West behind and another one measuring the power of the
global S the think tanks, the major think tanks in the UK
starting to recognise what a position we are in.
What a disastrous position we're in.
Now let's just move on to this report.
House of Commons Defence Committee ready for war, First
report of session. This was put out on the 30th of
January this this year. Today we've only got time just
to give you a glimpse, so I went to the summary.
What's he talking about? Readiness.
The ability to deploy personnel and equipment within a set time
frame for the personnel to be trained.
To use that equipment effectively.
My goodness, this is top right stuff.
But have a look at this. What's being said here?
Operational readiness, the ability to deploy a force for a
standing commitment or respond to a crisis.
We find this proven. They're saying we think that the
armed forces of UK can do it, but with issues of overstretch I
think this is a a ridiculous statement.
But the second one, war fighting readiness, the ability to deploy
and sustain a force that can fight at high intensity in
multiple domains for a long period of time, we find this to
be in doubt. And finally, strategic
readiness, the ability of the state to identify and utilise
all the tools available to its support.
A war fighting effort. This appears still to be more of
a concept under debate. So the strategic readiness of
our armed forces is described as a concept under debate.
This is outrageous. But if we go on through, this is
the summary and the paragraphs. But I'm just going to take the
headlines for you today. The inquiry itself was Hanford
by a lack of government transparency.
So the government lying and being deceitful, that's what
they always do to cover up an an enquiry into the state of the
armed forces. It went on to say that the UK
armed forces have capability and stockpile shortages.
That means they can't fight a war, and if we go on to the next
one here, it says there's no easy answer to these problems.
We recognize that the government is considering options for
improving recruitment and retention of personnel by aiming
to reform its procurement system with a view to building
industrial capacity. So this is, of course, glossing
over the real problem. We don't have an industrial
capacity that was destroyed as part of our joining the European
Union. But we can't recruit and hold
people into the armed forces. It goes on to say that I've
paraphrased this. I've changed the way they've
made the statement, but we're spending 50 billion a year plus
the money for Ukraine. The UK's armed forces cannot
fight a sustained, high intensity war.
And my question to this is, are we looking at calculated treason
to destroy the ability of this country to defend itself?
In my mind it's clear this is treason, but others may
disagree. And if we just come on to the
conclusion, it says there's no easy answer to all the problems
outlined in the main report, which we will cover in future
addition to the news. They claim that the threat from
Russia has changed. No it hasn't.
It's always been there, They're just now understanding how
powerful Russia is. It says the armed forces have
been over tasked. Some truth in this, but of
course you're only over tasked if you don't have the assets to
do the task in the first place. And the fleet and the army and
the Air Force have consistently been cut in size, more leaving
than joining the armed forces. Well, that's due to the
outsourcing of recruitment. And finally, it says the
government must break the cycle. No, the government has broken
the armed forces. So I'm going to say without any
doubt this is the orchestrated breakdown of the armed forces.
And to me, this is deliberate and has been for a great many
years. But we'll we'll do more in
future news editions. Now, you'll remember a couple of
weeks ago, Grant Schapp said this to say, he said, we're in a
new area era and we must be prepared to deter our enemies,
prepared to lead our allies, prepared to defend our nation
whenever the call comes. And of course, he was talking
about creating some kind of militarization of our young and
perhaps conscription. Who knows?
But part of the message was this, that Russia has what the
two countries describe as a no limits partnership with China.
So we've got to worry about Russia and China, but we also
have to worry about terrorism and threats from non state
actors. And it was interesting that
somebody sent me a little piece of video from the United States
of Sheriff speaking. Let's have a listen to this
brief clip. We'll start out with My name is
Rick Jones. I'm the Butler County Sheriff,
Butler County, Ohio. I just came back from a national
sheriff's training in DC three days ago.
Two days ago, we were briefed by the FBI Director Ray, the
Director of the FBI, and several federal agencies.
There's 3300 sheriffs in the United States.
The President of the United States refuses to meet with the
sheriff's of the 3300. We have a hierarchy.
We have a president. We have a vice president.
President of the United States refuses to meet with the
sheriff's. He also refuses to meet with the
police chiefs of the United States.
They have a hierarchy. Also.
He refuses to meet with them to talk about border issues or talk
about crime. That's going on because of the
border issue. We were also told by Mr. Ray,
the FBI director, that there are more red flags going off now
than before. 911, OK, When I say red flags, meaning people that
are here in this country, that are wanting to do harm to us,
There's thousands of people here from other countries, 160
different countries. They're here not to be our
friends. Some of them are coming because
they're wanting to come here to the best country in the world.
The way we. See it?
Some are coming here to do harm to us and we were told by the
FBI director. It's not a matter.
Of. If it's a matter of when, So
isn't it a coincidence that both the United Kingdom and the
United States have the same kind of problem?
It isn't it a coincidence that in the UK it's widely
acknowledged that we have seen a lot of young fighting age men
being brought into this country in the last couple of years and
the same thing seems to be being warned about in the United
States as well. Now if you remember if you were
watching the genocide and Empire, supposing that we held a
few weeks ago, Kevin Ryan was talking about this idea of a
structural deep event. And one of the things that he
said was a common feature that you might recognise A structural
deep event is if you start seeing common narratives in
different places around the world at the same time.
And I just wanted to to sort of draw that to everybody's
attention and maybe we can talk a little bit more with Mark on
that in extra. So Mark, let's bring you onto
the programme and change topics now onto Agenda 2030.
Interesting timing with what you're saying, gentlemen.
We have two reports here from the UN1 very recent to the left
migration of the 2030 agenda, a guide for practitioners from the
Office of Migration of the UN and the Swiss government has its
stamp of approval on that because it was put together in
Geneva. The other is all the way from
the year 2000 and older report to the right replacement
migration, is it a solution to declining and aging populations?
This is the double barrels, gentlemen, of what's going on
and why it's happening. You talk about commonalities in
the UK and the US military, aged men coming across the border in
large numbers, while the the common framework under which
that happens, by all accounts is coming from the United Nations
and is more or less on autopilot.
So whatever whatever national governments do, whatever they
argue in Congress or Parliament seems to be spit wise, hitting
the side of a battleship if you will.
And EU NS philosophy and policies go largely unnoticed
and if they're noticed, largely unchallenged.
But we have a little bit that explains this.
This is from the Migration in 20-30 agenda.
Just to get the core quotes out of this, the 2030 agenda
recognizes migration as a core development consideration.
Core development consideration, which marks the first time
migration is integrated explicitly into the Global
development agenda. Listen to that.
The agenda is relevant to all mobile populations, all,
regardless of whether internal or cross-border, displaced or
not, goals and targets will be met for all nations and peoples
and all segments of society. It recognizes migrant men, women
and children as a vulnerable group to be protected and as
agents of development. All types of migration should
also be considered, including displacement.
It gets better. Let's move on from there.
This is additionally from the one to the left, Migration on
the 2030 Agenda, page 13. The last one was page 13 as
well. The central reference to
migration is made in target 10.7 under the goal that's one of the
17 strategic development goals of of Agenda 203010.7.
And that is reduce inequality in and among countries calling to
facilitate orderly, safe and regular and responsible
migration and mobility of people, including through the
implementation of planned and well managed migration policies.
And we'll keep explaining it there.
So migration fits into the strategic development goals.
It's an integral thing. And this is kind of the capstone
of this. This is right out of the report.
The applicability of all Sustainable Development Goal
targets to all countries underlines how each has a role
to play in migration and provides A framework for
progress for more effective international governance of
migration that is based on global partnerships.
There's nothing about national sovereignty ever even recognized
here. This moves beyond the notion of
classifying countries as origin, transit or destination and
assigning migration roles and responsibilities to them
accordingly, and instead proposes that all countries
must, I had the emphasis, must engage in migration governance
together. Page 14.
So they're basically saying it doesn't matter where a migrant
comes from, doesn't matter where they might be going.
People simply have to be untethered and allowed to roam
wherever they want, why ever they want.
And there's really no real direct or cogent role for
national governments to play. They simply need to be part of
the global partnership and cooperate under the UN
philosophy. So you can see what this does.
It basically paralyzes nations from intervening.
And they're therefore they kind of lay back and the UN policies
just kind of keep the wheel turning.
So you have what's going on in Britain and what's going on in
the United States. Now we have another item of
interest. This is sort of icing on the
cake. This is the website of the
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and this is brought up as an aside.
This is their 2020 report and we'll move on to the next slide
from there. That fully explains the
relevance here. As recent as 2020, the current
director of the Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Ali
Mayorkas, was a member of the board of directors.
And of course right around that time, as the as the year 2021
came around and the Biden administration was seated, he
became U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Secretary, and this has been cited in some quarters as a
massive conflict of interest. Now he did evidently pull back
from being on the board once he became Homeland Security
Secretary, but under Obama he was Deputy Homeland Security
secretary. Plus he had one other immigrant
related position. And when you read the Hebrew
immigrant aid societies philosophy and paper that I
showed, and when you hear Mayorkas talk, there's nothing
in his vernacular about defending the border, about
defending the United States and ensuring its safety, even though
he was a former U.S. District attorney, which is a
federal prosecutor. Everything he talks about
because of his Jewish background, his father was Cuban
Jew, and I believe it was the mother, Romanian Jew.
And he came through Cuba. And he's an immigrant.
He makes a big deal of that. But everything he talks about,
guys, is the plight of the immigrant, the plight of the
migrant, and virtually nothing about his job, 200,000 employees
under him at the DHS. And that is to defend and secure
the United States border. And so along with the UN
policies, you have someone like that in charge in the US who
sees immigration through the lens of his own background and
his own upbringing. And that kind of negates the
whole idea of defending the border and being serious about
it. So this is what we're looking
at. You guys have any questions or
remarks? Mark my my comment is if we look
at the migration that's resulted as that's come about as a result
of the war in Ukraine where nobody's too sure, but a figure
of 8,000,000 has certainly been talked about 8 million people
leave Ukraine as a result of the fighting and migrate into Europe
into UK. We start to ask a question was
the war in Ukraine orchestrated by Victoria Newland and her
friends And Boris Johnson has clearly got a big finger in the
pie that basically that war was created to assist this mass
migration issue because what what was the statement you use?
These people are agents of development.
The migrants are being callously used as agents of development
for the Agenda 2030 goals. Well, that, that's it.
And you know, so again, we've got to make the point that
government policy and governments are the target,
should be the target of our criticism here mainly.
Yes. Yeah, OK, OK, let's leave that
there and move on. If you like what the UK column
does, you would like to support us, You can do so at
community.ukcolumn.org. Your support is very much needed
and that would be appreciative. You could pick something up at
the UK column shop. We've got a number of different
things here to look at, but please do share anything at on
the various platforms, especially ukcolumn.org and UK
column extracts.co.uk. Now a reminder that on Sunday
this week we are hosting on behalf of organization for
Propaganda Studies and Propaganda and Focus symposium
called Silencing the Academics. And there's a number of
academics that have been coming under attack over the last
number of years through the mainstream media and through
their own academic institutions for the the way they have
presented information on a wide range of topics.
So that is on Sunday the 18th of February beginning at 6:00 PM UK
time. Join us for that if you possibly
can and then let's put an advert up for the sign Stand in the
Light, which the Light and Stand in the Park are hosting on May
the 24th 27th. This is taking place at Pika
near Workington in Lake District.
Details at standardalight.uk. If you want to get along to
that, that is music festival and then we have Sounds Beautiful
festival happening in Dorset in Wimborne on June 27th to the
30th. There is a promo code which is
UK column and if you're picking up tickets for that, you use
that promotional code. You may end up with free tickets
or either the tickets money being refunded to you or some
free tickets that you can give to somebody else.
Now at 1:00 PM tomorrow we have a longer interview with Matt
Campbell and he's joined by Ted Walter from ic911.org.
That'll be going out at 1:00 PM tomorrow.
Join us for that. But I just wanted to say, I was
particularly shocked to see certain criticism that one of
your guests, Mike, had an unusual hairstyle.
We have Boris Johnson, of course, who who may appear as a
mop on occasions, but I, I, I, I thought we're not yet at the
stage where we're dismissing somebody from what they say
because of their hairstyle. Absolutely not.
Well, what's this 10? This is moving on to Mark again.
We've proved the point today, Mark, because we're not too sure
what is news and what is Clown world as that that description
is. So here was a serious slide
we're looking at on screen and we're thinking it's still
something to do with with an advert.
But in fact, it's the CDC mark. Yeah, well, it is a little bit
of clown world where clown world meets news, right?
Reality is a strange thing these days, according to Barnes and
Noble, a clerk I talked to yesterday at one of the local
outlets of that large nationwide book chain.
December 2023 was the release date as shown for the junior
disease detectives, Operation Outbreak.
And this is a booklet. They call it a graphic novel.
I call it a comic book put out by USDHHS, the CDC, the USDA and
who Knew 4H, which usually sponsors, you know, equestrian
events at county fairs. And what this is by all
indications, and I studied it quite a bit, is a way to reach
the preteen and teen demographic and convince them that health
authorities know what needs to be known.
They need not be questioned, and that healthcare consists of what
those authorities prioritize and promote, including vaccines.
Just trust the science, trust the vaccines.
If you want to be good detectives, learn from the CDC
and help the CDC root out infectious diseases.
Don't be the kind of detective that questions the DDCDC like UK
column might. You don't want to question them.
Be the kind of detective that doesn't ask too many questions
to authorities, which isn't really a detective at all.
But anyway, the foreword just says the following story is a
work of fiction, but real public health threats and diseases are
presented. The CDC hopes that this story
raises youth awareness of infectious diseases and so on
and and the threats to public health health that they pose.
And it talks about the sponsors and whatnot.
But moving on from there, this is some samples of what you look
at when you open this thing now. One of the things that became
evident during the. COVID scare and COVID, ocracy
and all that. The bureaucracy that grew up
around COVID was that they wanted to view infectious
diseases as a overarching enemy, and to fight that enemy is all
for one and one for all. So you take the vaccine, just as
you would be a good soldier, and if you don't take that vaccine,
you're being the kind of soldier that might go AWOL, that might
desert the troops, right? So you really don't belong in in
polite society. So accordingly, we have in this
graphic here that we're showing now a scene where the teens who
are the characters within this graphic novel slash comic book,
are seeing marauding, slobbering germs in the form of an enemy.
Sort of like the Lord of the Rings coming over the hill and
they're shooting arrows at them and they're trying to prevent
them from breaching the drawbridge and entering the
castle. And here we have one of the
characters in this next slide and Influenza is shown as this
red haired, unibrow, demonic, greenish character, kind of
green like the Incredible Hulk. So individual germs in for
individual diseases are shown as individual kinds of ghouls.
And this is one example. And here in this next one, just
to outline more of the conceptual of what's going on
here, the conceptual framework, we have another one of our teen
heroes, a character in the graphic novel.
He's running away from germs who are in this case characterized
as red insect like almost mantis style beings that are chasing
him and they're going to kill him and they're roaring behind
him. And then when you go to the next
slide, you see that he finally makes it into a government lab.
He breaks his breaks his way in just in time and takes a flask
of some kind of potion. He has no idea what it is.
It's not labeled and it's glowing.
It actually has a phosphorescence and he just
gulps it down. So the message is, you know, you
can trust the government's potions and concoctions so much.
You need only just gulp them down without questioning.
And then that disease in the form of a monster will stay
away. So this is what it's about.
Now in the next slide we're going to look at the back cover
of this. And this is my opinion guys, you
can tell me if I overreached on this.
To the left is the back cover of the CDCHHS comic book that we
just looked at. And to the right is from the US
sci-fi TV drama from the 1960s, The Twilight Zone with Rod
Serling. It's probably more than a
passing resemblance there. And usually a vortex or vector
is associated at least commonly with with a hypnosis.
And a pastor friend of mine, he he called this whole comic book
idea, looking at it from a spiritual point of view, he
called it subliminal indoctrination.
And so that's what the CDC has come out with.
The book is about a character named Eddie who gets sick at the
fair, and then all the other friends of his who went to the
fair with him and also attended ACDC class with him as one of
their own get sick. One of their own soldiers if you
will get sick. Then they all go out and
research how to make any better. And in so doing they have these
fantasies about medieval battles and fantasies about being chased
by monsters. And so it's comical in a way,
but yet it seems like they're trying to reach a demographic
that maybe they think they haven't lost.
I believe they think they've lost the narrative to a point.
This is my opinion, and they're trying to reach a demographic
that they can hang on to so they don't lose the narrative
altogether. And that's my take on it, and
that's what it looks like. Any comments gentlemen?
Well, Mark, I'll come back straight away and say for me
it's obvious that they're using applied behavioral psychology
wherever they can and the use of cartoons is to target
principally younger people. But as as the UK column News has
shown over a great many years, we're seeing more and more
childish material being presented at adults in UK and
the USA in order to convince them to follow government
policy. With regard to your your
comment, they're losing the narrative.
I think this is absolutely true. We are seeing a desperation in
these people. Boris Johnson, I think is so
angry, for example, with the Tucker Carlson interview with
Putin, because Boris knows millions and millions of people
have paid attention to that interview and what Putin has
said and nobody's paying attention to Boris Johnson.
So these people are are really getting very nervous.
But applied psychology is the meat of it.
We've also reported, I can't remember the lady's name, but a
senior UN official who was also boasting that the UN was going
to use applied behavioural psychology in order to advance
the vaccine programme worldwide. So this stuff is ingrained.
We know that UK had a major part to play in the origins of
applied political psychology and the behavioural insights team.
And clearly this has now gone worldwide.
So it has to be called out for what it is.
And I'd say thank you. Thank you for that report, Mark.
You've got another comment. Yeah, if I.
One more thing I I found it at a local library in large stacks,
and I also found out that it was originally produced came into
existence in 2018, but it's being evidently reissued as a
new thing December of 2023. So it's interesting that this
was created before the pandemic and it talks in there about
hospitals being overwhelmed, about an infectious flu
spreading around the world, and about the streets of of major
cities and other towns being almost empty before the COVID
thing came along. OK, thanks for that Mark Wright.
Let's move to net zero and well last week.
Last few weeks this graphic has been doing the rounds. 10th,
11th of February, big protest weekend stopped the war on the
motorists and farmers. This was a big meeting at
Orpington War Memorial and this was being described as a Sutton
Cam blocking and well the media going a bit nuts about this
today because indeed they succeeded in doing exactly that.
So here is a tweet a a post on X for action against Ulas.
This of course is with respect to the the Ultra Low Emission
Zone. And the reason for this
particular protest was because this part of London was not
subject to Ulas until the expansion.
And then basically overnight they found themselves covered by
it. So what they decided to do if we
just pop that back on screen again, Stephanie, please.
What they decided to do was to go and to cover up the cameras
with their signs. That's what they did.
They took out effectively all the cameras.
Some of the cameras had already been physically taken out by
other people, not part of this protest prior to it.
So some of the cameras weren't functioning, but they managed to
cover up all the functioning cameras for the day and as a
result people were able to drive around the area for the day
without having to pay the the Euler's fine.
And some of the farmers were there with their tractors as
well because taking advantage of the fact that they didn't have
to pay the money to Sadiq Khan. So this this protest continues
and just to let everybody know that there's the next one is on
the 17th of February, that's a Saturday 12:00 to 3:00 PM Beggin
Hill anti ULA's protest. Have a look at the action
against ULA's Twitter feed to stay up to date with these.
So hopefully these protests continue to build Now.
In the meantime, the UK has decided that Egypt is a good
country to partner with and they have set up the UK Egypt
strategic partnership on this. It's a fully fledged
partnership, so we've got to be very excited about it.
It establishes a fully fledged partnership which brings
technical knowledge, It brings together government bodies and
industry representatives to build infrastructure projects,
it for furthers, commercial opportunities.
It's all fantastic stuff and what they was signed in Cairo
last week. The key point here is that it
builds upon as they I'm going to use their words here, It builds
upon the UK and Egypt's commitment to the UN Sustainable
Development Goals and action on climate change in November 2022.
They say Egypt is, as COP 27 President developed a
Sustainable Urban Resilience for the Next Generation initiative
in collaboration with the UN. And therefore this initiative is
committed to achieving sustainable and resilient urban
cities, which the UK and Egypt are dedicated delivering via
this Memorandum of Understanding.
Now I'm not quite sure why they needed to define this as urban
cities. I'm not aware of any other kind
of cities. But anyway, OK, that's what they
had to say. But this next announcement from
the UK government was particularly interesting.
This is Earth Care. This is a joint UKEU Japan
initiative. It's a satellite, as you can
see, and the Earth care stands for Earth.
Sorry for the typo. Earth Colour, Aerosol and
Radiation Explorer. Sorry, Earth, Cloud, Aerosol and
Radiation Explorer, apologies for the typo.
And so basically, what are they saying about this?
This mission should lead to more reliable climate predictions.
Apparently it's going to address the need for better
understanding of the interaction between cloud, radiative and
aerosol processes that play a role in climate regulation.
And it's focused on research missions dedicated to specific
aspects of our planet's environment, carrying on board
leading edge technologies with the overall emphasis on learning
more about the interactions between components and the
impact of human activity is having on natural processes.
So I mean, we must applaud that. Well, I'd rather.
Didn't. Think so?
Yeah, I'd rather not, but it. Gets better because the UK is
the first major economy they claim to have report to report
having emissions since 1990. So there's the graph that they
pushed out. This is more exciting news.
I don't know why you're not excited about this.
Well, I was just going to say, is it a coincidence that we have
no industrial base to support the arms, the armed forces?
Why? Why is this base been cut?
We're now starting to see possible policies that explain
what's actually taking. Place.
This is absolutely right and actually on the EU side of the
channel, they have just recognised or in fact they're
celebrating the fact that they have cut their industrial base
by a significant margin. I can't remember the the
percentage off the top of my head and that therefore they're
well on their way to meeting their Net 0 policies.
But if we pop that one back for a second, you can see the UK
compared to the other major economies there.
They're particularly worried that the UK is one of only a few
countries where emissions are falling.
But let's bring the the graph on screen here, Reductions in CO2
emissions among G20 countries since 2010.
And this is the source for this is apparently Global Carbon
Atlas. So they produced a nice little
graph here which shows how well the UK is doing.
And well you can see that. Well, according to that, well,
this of course is from 2020. There's sorry from 2010 and they
were talking about a longer period of time.
But since 2010, it looks like we've reduced our carbon
emissions according to the government at least or according
to Global Carbon Atlas by what's at about 38%.
So that's pretty exciting and we should all be celebrating this.
I mean we are witnessing the shutdown of our industries.
We no longer have a steel industry in the UK as a result
of this policy, you less of course fantastic policy.
I hope everybody's appreciating the sarcasm in what I'm saying
here. But you know this is the this is
the outcome and this is what is driving so much of the effects
of on our lives of what government is doing.
It's all net zero. That's at the back of it.
Yeah, Agenda 2013, net zero, all part of the the same library.
And of course Sandy Adams, who will be with us on Wednesday,
has been talking about this subject for a great many years,
exposing it. Well, we're not worried about
CO2 in Ukraine because the bloodshed goes on.
But of course the reality is that things are very, very bad
now for Ukraine as they have have run out of men and they are
running out of munitions, particularly artillery
ammunition, because the West is simply unable to supply their
needs. Because of course, excuse me,
and the industrial base has been cut in the West and we're now
starting to see government surprised that they can't
actually produce shells. Now we're not saying we should
be able to produce all these munitions to support wars.
We we are taking this from a position of peace, but reporting
what is taking place in a structured way, we have to point
out what's going on here. So Ukraine now being deserted by
both the US and the EU and effectively the UK, because if
some money is coming through, the ammunition that they need is
not coming through and this is now telling on the front line.
So at the moment, Russia is pressing forward right the way
across the the the front lines. And the thing which is now
obvious to see is that claims of a frozen front are simply
nonsense. The Russians are being very slow
and methodical in what they're doing.
But the key battle taking place at the moment is the telling one
in this war, and this is Adika, which we'll just bring on
screen. And as always, I give great
credit to the online reporters I've chosen.
Weeb Union here. The title for this particular
map, which I'll explain a little bit more.
And the moment is Adika end game and the Russian armed forces are
launching A flanking attack to encircle Ukrainian forward
positions. Now, Avdivka is a highly
fortified city. For years and years the
Ukrainians have been building fortifications in this city.
But what's now taking place is the Ukrainians from the top
right of your sorry, the Russians from the top right of
your screen have penetrated the outer defences, and they have
now effectively cut the city into creating one major
cauldron, as the Russians call it, where if the Ukrainian
troops do not retreat, they will be caught up in this cauldron
and either killed or captured. What is Zelensky doing?
Well, having got rid of Zaluzny, his trusted head of the armed
forces, and brought in Searski his yes man.
The aim of the Ukrainians is to bring even more troops in to try
and prop up this failing situation.
But of course the real sad point is the troops are extremely low
grade with very little training, and the mobilisation teams in
Ukraine are having huge problems in getting men of proper
fighting age. So we've got elderly men, we've
got young men. It's also been reported that
people with injuries, even mental health problems, are
being dragged into the fighting. And of course they're not going
to last long. And alongside we've got the
pitiful pictures of young women kitted out to go and fight the
Russians in this cauldron where they are going to die, adding to
the horrific numbers that we've already seen.
So the last figure that UK column news reported was 410,000
dead for the Ukrainians. We can't confirm that figure,
but we can say it makes sense with all the other reports.
Now, just to emphasize this battle a little bit more, this
is defence, politics, Asia. Slightly different style of
commentary, but all these commentators are using accurate
reports from the battlefield and he's focused in here, showing
the Russian pincer into Abdivka City and how the movement
towards the northwest to the left of your screen is towards
the heavily defended industrial areas which form really the
Ukrainian main bastion to the north.
But the cauldron area being encircled is to the South of the
lake. You can see to the right of your
picture, and I do encourage people to go and have a look at
these reports not only by Defence, Politics Asia and Weeb
Union, but also free Russia from military summary channel and
rebar. Because you will be getting the
facts of the battle contrary to the sheer nonsense put out by
the British Ministry of Defence and the BBC.
Now I'm just going to take us to the Ministry of Defence because
all they reporting the facts that thousands and thousands of
Ukrainians are being slaughtered and even more are going to be
slaughtered. No on the MOT Twitter or X page.
What have we got? We've got a report about the
excellent trauma expertise that the UK is providing Ukrainians.
That's on the left of the screen, and the text image on
the right of the screen is the bizarre claim that Russia has
now run out of doctors inside Russia because of the extent of
its own casualties on the front. This is completely 180° out from
the truth and I think it's really just appalling to to see
what's being done here, the propaganda from the United
Kingdom and the Ministry of Defence.
But I'm just going to end on this, which somebody kindly
emailed through. We're back on a report from the
Telegraph and it says that soldiers have been told to
avoid, quote, Christian elements in Acts of Remembrance.
And I was very interested in this because of course we see
we're consistently heading in what I regard as a demonic
direction with policy from the UK government.
But we shouldn't forget that it was only a few years ago that
Britain was proud to boast that we'd allowed satanic ceremonies
to take place on board His Majesty's warships.
So I'll just throw that one back to you, Mark, because I know
that you're seeing this bizarre stuff unfolding.
Celebrating Satanic Things and monuments in in the United
States. Yes.
And not to take much time with it now, but we'll cover that in
extra. I want to reflect on that
briefly. I appreciate that.
OK, Mark. Thank you very much.
Well, we'll end to the news there.
Thank you, Mark, for joining us. There will be an extra in a few
minutes after the news. And I just want to end by saying
a huge thank you to the people who support the UK column
financially because out of the multitude of our viewers, we
know this is still relatively few people, but we thoroughly,
well, we're so thank you for your support and it's your
financial support that keeps this channel going.
So thank you very much indeed. We'll end there.
Thanks for joining us. Bye, bye.