We are going to kick off with our question and answer session.
So to those of you who've already put your notepad into
use, thank you very much indeed. We've had some excellent
questions. I have to apologise in advance
that I'm afraid I have no expectation that we'll be able
to get through all of them, such as being the response.
So I'm sorry about that. But to those of you that have
made the effort, thank you very much indeed and we will do our
best. Also, having said we'd have a
roving microphone, there's just not going to be time.
I will pose the questions, but they are still hugely
appreciated. So we're going to start with, I
think an absolutely excellent one when we consider that a lot
of today is not just about what has been going on and what is
going on, it's about what's going to happen and the future.
So if I could just ask for you to just quiet and down as I ask
the first question please, particularly this bit here.
Could you guys just just quiet and down please?
Thank you very much. OK.
So the first question is demographics.
Where are the young people? What can we do to engage the
younger generations? I think it's an excellent
question and I can give that to Alex.
The younger generation is more red pill than everyone in this
room put together. It's just, I think that they
don't have the habit of attending events like this.
It's not just, you know, the, the, the thought of being with
old fogies, it is that they are getting on with their lives in a
much quicker cycle than the rest of us.
Their thinking is mediated by not so much by outside Internet
influences, but by the group of friends and the platforms
they're on. There are many people, bear in
mind, up to 2025 now, gone through everything up to college
or starting work, who haven't really done many things in real
life. You know, there are people who
haven't owned many paper books, who are well read, intelligent
people. There are people who, you know,
have not been, I'll, I'll quote something from my, you know,
previous interests. You know, I used to go to folk
music in pubs. They won't have had the
opportunity even if they wanted to.
You know, how many folk sessions are there?
How many pubs are there left? All the usual channels.
And many of you know that a big one for me is church.
You know, it's unthinkable for people even, you know,
regardless of their belief systems and you know who, who
they, they wouldn't have been to church because the networks and
the precedents are not there. So they are there at all levels
of morality, all levels of intelligence versus
practicality. They do feel the same concerns
as us. And really you have to get to
where they are. Like any movement or
organisation that is seeking to win hearts and minds, to be
evangelistic, you have to get in amongst them.
And how do we lower the average age of this group?
I don't know. I think probably we would end up
with something in tandem. A group like this is probably
for the over 40s these days in essence.
And you know, some something, not necessarily online, but
starting it in that environment is where to go.
And I shall, I think, I think I'll be able to hang on for
another question. It would be rude of me to bow
out this very moment, but I do have to fly back to the
Netherlands and I have to take a train at 5:00 from Temple Meads.
So I'll try and hang on for an extra question if I do not get
the opportunity. There was something very
important which happened this morning.
A lady called Catherine, I can't see her now, was very keen to
talk to me about something that was distressing her a lot
because I can't see her and I'm not going to be able to talk.
There you are, 2 ladies who I won't mention the name of
because they didn't want that, but these ladies who are easily
recognised by their hair are ladies I absolutely implicitly
trust with everything that you mentioned to me.
And that's one of the event benefits of meeting in the
flesh. So I entrust you to them
wholeheartedly. Now that perhaps ties up the
answer to the question, can you do that online?
I don't think you can, right? So we're going to have to put
our thinking caps on on how we get the younger generation
actually to meet physically. But I think it has to start in
their space online. Alex, thanks very much.
We'll try and get another question to Alex a SEC.
I think we'll have to canter on. So this question from Sandy
Adams, what are the panel's thoughts on local and city
council's devolution and the Covenant of Mayors for Climate
Change? Ben or someone else?
They're just tinpot dictators, basically.
Like they're distributed authority further out into the
system and they've created these little networks that are there
to replace everything that was already there, right?
That's that's what they're. Doing, if you look at Tracy
Brabin in Leeds, who's someone who I pay quite close attention
to, I don't think they've got anyone from Yorkshire here.
I think I spoke to a couple of people who earlier, earlier
actually, yeah. So she kind of Swans around the
place doing a lot of social media activity, talking about
all these grand plans, and it's all about electrification and
new green jobs. And when they say new and green
jobs, that's like the gulag. I think that's the work camps
because it's all state stuff. Yeah.
And it's all building these new systems of control that we don't
need because we've already got all these things already.
So you're going to take valuable work and get rid of that and
replace it with state funded, IE taxpayer funded stuff that we
don't need to destroy and replace the things that already
exist. And that's not just the energy
system, right. They're going to go right down
into the infrastructure of, of this, of, of our society, all of
it. I was in Nottingham recently and
they've built a new library. We've already got a library.
Yeah, it's been there for over 100 years.
Why do we need a new library? So that the council can put its
name on it and say, oh, look what we did, Aren't we
fantastic? And that's all they're doing.
And it's all, it's all, it's all the construct.
It's all Blair government, wasn't it?
Right. And there was a referendum, was
there not? And we rejected it by about 3:00
to 1:00 AD referendum, right? Yes, 2. 1011.
That was Cameron. Was it Cameron?
OK, right. Either way, they're all the
same. We said we said we we said we
didn't want it. And yet it's been forced on us.
And now we have. These people lauding it over us
that we never asked for spending our money on things that we
don't need. And that's what the mayors did.
That's what those mayors are doing.
You know, and actually I talked to to Wendy Gusset last night
and actually the the council people that you know, in the
traditional bits of the council, they have being overridden, they
got no idea. That's the 1% of the electorate.
They actually voted for an extended council emerging of the
councils of the former nation. Georgia all around. 800 people
reply to what was supposedly a consultation exercise and they
had called it a referendum. They would never have got it in
and when it was first brought in front of the council it was done
by a cabinet. It never went to full council,
so the full council never even got to debate it.
And now we're stuck with a mayoral system.
And they just announced spending to increase the size of the
Humber floodgate on the River Hull at some extortionate price,
which the 13 1/2 millionaire promises for having the next
step. That's that's where that money
is going. And that's quite right.
In green projects, that's what they're.
Doing and Windy will be in the bar later.
Thank you very much. The problem with these questions
is that all of them could easily last an entire day to answer.
But we will have to push on to quick one for Debbie to be
condensed into the smallest possible space from Graham.
Thank you Graham. Should we abolish the NHS?
Oh. I think the NHS is already gone.
I think it's dead. The NHS is not the NHSI trained
in Where's Jane? Where are all?
Who are all? Where are all the nurses?
We've got lots of nurses, 1-2. Look, nurses, nurses.
Jane. There you are, Jane.
Jane wrote an amazing book. I'll be talking about it on the
column and I'm going to be interviewing her soon because
she wrote an amazing book. Because the NHS is not the NHS
that I was trained in. It isn't the NHS that you
remember and my biggest bit of advice to everybody, you know,
whether or not I mean the NHS has gone and what is going to
come is not going to be good. We're going to have a three tier
health system for sure. So what I say to people is if
any of you have got relatives or are having to go into hospital
yourselves, know someone that's going into hospital, please make
sure you find out who is their named nurse, who is in charge of
the ward, who's doing the operation on you or your loved
ones, who's anaesthetising you. Find out who is looking after
you. Because in my day and your day,
all you nurses out there, we had uniforms and I was super proud
of my uniform. I loved it.
I used to go on the wards and we'd have to make 28 beds
before, before Harper State, we'd have to do it.
And if we didn't do it properly and if, if the envelope corners
weren't correct, we'd get matron or nursing officer on our back.
And I knew every single one of my patients on the wards.
And I now look around the nurses on the wards and the doctors.
Do you know your patients? Do you know who they are?
Because we were always told in the NHS.
And this is what I want to tell the young nurses coming up and
the and a lot of foreign nurses coming up in that every single
one of the patients that are in the NHS at the moment, whether
it's in care, in social care or whether it's in a hospital,
they're somebody's mum, somebody's dad, somebody's
brother, somebody's uncle, somebody's son, someone's
daughter. We're all humans.
And the one thing that we've lost is tender loving care.
And I know that all of you nurses here, we were trained
tender loving care and it hasn't gone.
It hasn't gone. We're going to bring it back.
And As for the MHRA, an ungram of the MHRA is harm, right?
So if I had a hospital, I'd employ all of you nurses here
and you amazing doctors. Where's Doctor Robert Everett?
Where is denier? There he is.
Please, will you give a round of applause?
But Doctor Robert Everett? Yeah, You could do that in a
SEC. Could Doctor Robert Everett
please go on the forum because he's become our very own doctor
in the house. And if you've got questions,
Doctor Robert Everett is your own personal doctor.
Thank you so much, Robert, for everything that you do on the
forum. Windy, everybody.
Mr Taff, where are you? Yes, Mr Taff.
And you know, it's just so lovely to put faces to names.
But is the NHS dead? The NHS as we knew it is dead
and gone and we have to look after ourselves.
And that's why we're all here today, to look after each other.
Thank you for being here. It's amazing to see you all.
Perfect, Debbie, that's lovely. Thank you very much.
Now a question from James, which I think will suit Diane.
Is there any ideological difference globally?
It's a big one. We're pushed for time.
Oh, this is like extra time with no chat box, Charles.
No, I think, well, that's an interesting question because I
don't know if you've seen some of my reporting in recent weeks
on the Summit of the Future and the Pact of the Future, the
Global Digital Compact and all of these documents that reside
within it. That ideology is actually built
into it, but it's built into it with very nice sounding
language. Oh, we're going to include
women. Oh, all people are important
from all countries. And so it's kind of this
blending of what used to be, you know, individual countries,
individual Western civilization, Eastern civilization, whatever
tradition our countries come from.
And what they're doing is erasing it in favour of what I
would actually consider a global ideology, if you really think
about it, that we're all supposed to be the same gender
eventually, which I think unfortunately goes towards the
depopulation agenda as well as other things, minor attracted
persons, other terrible things that we're heading towards
things around. Well, we're going to do away
with the fact that different people come from different
backgrounds, different traditions, different languages,
different religions, different cultures, all to kind of have
all of the same ideology. But I think what they have to do
first is erase it. Look at our cities here in the
UK. They've taken away all of the
local things. Everything looks the same.
It's all the Sainsbury's everywhere you look, right.
So all of that is taken away from us.
And I think it's a very intentional approach to destroy
what we know as as Western civilization or whatever might
be the same in the other countries.
You can probably go to China and eat KFC if you want to.
I wouldn't do it. I don't eat it here.
I never ate in America. But, you know, that's what
they're trying to do is that we have no individual identities
anymore. So that we have one single
identity, which will suit the the globalists quite well, I
think. Yeah.
Yeah, of course. Thank you, Diane.
Just just to add to that, the the agenda is to turn us all
into the same thing. As you say, this is another
example of the inversion of language because as they call
this process diversity, right? What they're doing is removing
diversity from the human race. We should celebrate other
cultures, other faiths, right? This brings different thinking
and if we all think the same, we're all going to come up with
the same rubbish answers to the problems that we face.
We need other opinions that our own.
We need to be challenged in what we believe and this idea of
moving us all into some uni party of whatever mush is, is
simply it it. It is weakening the human race
and we should be fighting it. Right, right.
Great question. One in actually, I think we'll
just stick with Mike for a second because this question is
from Arthur who asks. And I think it would be nice to
have the context over the years on this because I dare say
everybody's got their assumptions about what
connections we might have with whom within the sphere of
independent news. And the question therefore is
what informal contact does UK column have with mainstream
media, which I think is a good question and I think Mike can
answer. Informal contact.
Well, or let's say any. We report on them when we can.
As Ben says, yes, thank you. No, we, we don't really have any
contact with mainstream media. We, we try to contact the media
spokespeople for various agencies and institutions and
whatnot. And usually we get, sometimes we
get answers, sometimes we get ignored, sometimes we get other
comments from them. But the mainstream media, not
really. And we have tried to engage with
the lovely Mariana, but for some reason she doesn't want to speak
to us. And well, I mean, what can we
say? The most contact that we get
from the disinformation or censorship industrial complex,
whatever way you want to call it, is from the fact checking
organisations. And we have, we've just recently
had our annual inspection by News Guard.
Last year we got 27 out of 100 from News Guard.
And hopefully, hopefully we'll be significantly it's towards 0
by the by the time they published this year's report as
well. Yeah.
Oh, oh, oh, thank you. Right.
OK. There is has been one contact
with mainstream media in history and that was 2013 and the
Leveson Inquiry was going on and we saw that as being the 1st
modern attempt by the British government to take control of
the press. And we decided that, well, we
had done quite a bit of work on the people involved in the
Leveson Inquiry and the connections to common purpose in
particular. And we published an article or
two in the newspaper that we were publishing at the time.
And we decided that we would send the research that we did to
Paul Dacre, the Daily Mail. And he in fact wrote back to us
with a wedding signature, which we subsequently discovered is
like hen's teeth. It's it's extremely rare
thanking us for that. He took that, he gave it to a
team of four or five journalists and they worked on that for a
year and then published 13 pages in the mail on and blew the
Levinson inquiry out of the water.
But of course, they didn't mention us.
And then subsequently, Brian had contact with one of the
journalists that Dacre put on the team.
And Brian did say, maybe you want to comment on this, but
Brian did say, ask him why no credit?
What was his answer? His answer was well, you know
how it is. So there you go.
And on that note, bearing in mind Alex has got very little
time, but an enormous brain and full of useful things on the
law. We'll go to Liz, who asks, is
there any point in me as an ordinary person?
Not obviously me, the person who wrote the question, trying to
become a magistrate in the hope of rebalancing the system.
Is there any point? Yes, if you could live with
yourself, be aware that you will be breaking the Constitution by
doing so, because being appointed a justice of the
peace, OK. It goes back many centuries and
to be fair, the undifferentiated style of justice we had in
mediaeval England didn't have the separation of powers, and
you see vestiges of that in the Privy Council.
But about back then there were corrupt judges, and then if
there was a need to expedite justice, the king would appoint
King's Bench for the pledge to get straight to the king, at
least somebody acting in the King's names, a King's name.
And it was in that spirit that JPS, not magistrates, that's a
more recent term, but JPS were appointed back in the Middle
Ages to provide some kind of speedy access.
However, since we've had our constitutional settlements and
we are definitely reviving a dissident's guide to the
Constitution, many of you have urged us to and we'll be getting
into the history part of the series very soon since we've had
those essentially 17th century settlements.
The justice arm of government is not supposed to have anything to
do with the executive on the continent.
They're even stricter about this.
They will be quite flummoxed by what they see happening in
Britain. So for you to be AJP, you're an
officer of the executive, you know, you're, you're in the
wrong branch of government to be trying somebody.
The Dutch and some other continental countries have an
honest name for this system. They call it the police courts.
England had that term until 50 years ago.
So you're actually being told, you know, we'll deal with you
whippersnapper here so that you don't have to clog up the
justice system. However, everything what what's
the old saying about try everything in life except incest
and Morris dancing? Well, that there are certain
there are certain avenues of dissidents that's really are
worth trying. A couple of them are beyond the
pale of decency, British common sense, morality, etcetera.
I will leave it to your own conscience to decide whether
becoming a magistrate is one of these things that are just
beyond the pale or whether you can take it for the team.
Thank you. Yeah.
Cool. Yeah, Fen Fen's just got a
little bit more to chip in. Was that a mic drop?
He literally just ran. So I've, I've thought about this
quite a bit and there's a lot of discussion about setting up
parallel systems. And actually that would involve
or could involve setting up a parallel judiciary and police
force and everything else. And actually when you report a
crime, that's when it becomes a crime, right?
So if you don't report a crime to the police, then you go to a
separate police force and a separate judicial system.
And actually there is precedent for this already.
If you look at some of the, there are some Sharia courts,
for example, in this country. And actually I saw recently that
there are Jewish police officers from a separate police force
going on patrol in North London with the police, right.
So, you know, I'm not saying that we need to emulate that
precisely, but the idea that we need to take over the existing
institutions in our society in order to rectify them and, and,
and, and to rescue them. That might not be necessary.
Actually, there's a different way of thinking about it.
The the reason that there are Sharia courts in this country is
because they are set up under a system of arbitration.
So it's like Judge Judy or Judge Rinder, there's no reason why we
couldn't do exactly this type of thing, no reason whatsoever.
And we don't need to engage with the justice system.
You, you just have an agreement that whatever the decision of
the, whatever way you formulate the, the arbitration panel,
whether you have a jury or whatever it is, where, how, how
you investigate the crime in the 1st place, whether you have a
grand jury to do that, which we used to do.
And we have talked about, we have talked about this in the
past, past events. And just on the subject of grand
juries, if I may, Charles for 2-2 minutes, we have Ben in
particular and, and we have been talking about this whole issue
of sortition becoming a, a way of, of creating policy in this
country and of we've been very critical of it.
And, and just wanted to make a comment about the difference
between sortition and a grand jury, because the grand jury has
investigatory powers used to have they, they, they have
abolished them in the UK now. And so it is the responsibility
of the grand jury to decide who the experts are that they go to
if they want to discover whether a crime has been committed.
They are speaking to the people who are the witnesses they're,
they're speaking to the victim or whoever it happens to be.
Or if they're if, if we were to use grand juries to, to decide
on policy, for example, it's the grand jury's responsibility to
decide who they speak to, to get the advice that they need to
come to the conclusion that they need to come to.
Whereas in the sortition process, it's the opposite, the
organiser selects or elects by lottery or whatever way they
want to do it, the people that are on this, this panel.
And then the organiser selects who the experts are that the
panel. And that's a, that's a
significantly important differentiation.
It's about who's in control of discovering the information that
you need to make the decision at the end of the day.
So I just wanted to put a word in for grand juries and, and,
and arbitration and. So on but excellent point, very,
very well made. And there's, you know, it's this
topic that UK column definitely will be covering a lot in the
future as the sortition continues to sort of push its
way to the to the front of the queue.
We've just got time for one more, which I'd like Brian to
answer for a short period of time.
It is a big question and it is on everybody's lips so, so much
of the time. But it's from Judith.
How can we motivate the frightened silence, sorry the
frightened silent awake to be more active in resistance?
Well, excuse me, I think you've got to cuddle them basically.
You know, if if you're talking people who are genuinely
frightened, then you've got to come in with some compassion and
some understanding to bring them out of that fear.
There's no question of this. And you know, we, we began today
by, or I, I began today by sort of talking that we are getting
feeling from you guys that there are some people who are
beginning to feel fearful. And it's no good me saying to
you, stand up and straighten your backbone and chin up and
get on with it. There's a bit more to it than
that, which is understanding why people are feeling nervous and
what we have to do in order to get them to act.
So I, I'm maybe surprising, sorry I'm laughing while I'm
talking this because I can see Charles out of the corner of my
eye who's standing up appropriately.
And, and of course, in in a military sense, the person who
started to show a bit of fear would probably be told just to
their face to buck up and get on with it.
So, you know, there's horses for courses.
But if we're dealing with the average person and they're
fearful, there needs to be a bit of understanding first.
But I gave you all the things in that initial slide, which is
that, you know, if you're fearful, how do you get round
fear? Well, being with somebody else
is the first step. When patrols are sent out, you
know it's going to be two or more men.
Why? Because two people are always
better than one. Two people are hugely braver
than one person, right? It's a dark night, you've got to
go and do your patrol in the cemetery.
You go with another person, you'll think about it on your
own. So being with somebody training,
right, we're in a battle and you should start training for it.
It doesn't mean to say you've got to fight every area, but you
decide which areas you're going to fight.
And if for say it's going to be in The Who was talking about the
magistrates, then start researching the law so that you
know the law. And then then the fear of what
you're going to go into drops away because you've educated
yourself. We also talked about laughter.
This is so important because you you see the old war films and
they're about to go off on some mission or jump out of an
aeroplane. Then somebody makes the joke and
that breaks the that breaks the hole that the fears got.
So it's being human to me at the end of the day.
But you just think the fire team going into a burning building,
you said they're going to be two or more in that crew, the
minimums 2 because two people is braver than one.
Hello. Well, absolutely.
So there was a lot covered in that.
So we we're going to give lots of praise for that because I
think your presentation was very uplifting straight off today.
So I'm happy to say thank you very much for that.
Lovely. Fantastic note to conclude the
question and answer session. Thank you very much indeed for
all the questions that you've put.
I'm sorry that so few have been answered, but it's lovely that
we've had the chance to hear from Alex in particular, who's
had to scoot off now whilst we stand here.
You're familiar with our faces because we appear on screen now.
Those that don't are here also and without them this wouldn't
be happening. So I'd just like to point out
Stephanie sitting just, well, now standing.
Stephanie is our producer and without her, obviously you
wouldn't know who we are. So thank you very much,
Stephanie. Kenny.
Also, please come on. He can stand up.
Come on, Kenny. Well done.
Kenny knows an awful lot about an awful lot, mainly tech, and
it's fantastic. And Claire runs the shop and is
a stalwart too. The the shop, which by the way,
still has plenty of merchandise available and blah, blah.
And also actually on that, I did forget to mention at lunch that
Bob still has a huge stack of books which he doesn't want to
take home. So don't forget that.
The other thing is that this, as I said, this being live
streamed, so Many thanks to Phil and Liam from Oracle Films.
It's an absolute pleasure to have them here.
And in the in this short break now before we hear Kim
Isherwood, we're just going to have a few UK column team face
Gross. So we have Kerry Murray here,
photographer, local photographer.
And it's fantastic to have Kerry here as well.
So, Kerry, thank you for joining us.