My name is June. This is June.
Warfare, the battle of ideas. I I feel obliged to give long
form answers, Jeremy, because the subjects that you and I
discuss are very much bigger than people think that they are.
I heard some Americans talking about South Africa the other day
and the understanding of what's going on here is so simplistic.
If I simplified things, I'd leave myself open to a lot of
criticism. So I try to bring the receipts
and build the whole case for the audience so they know that I'm
not bull dusting. You know, if I talk about farm
murders, I talk about farm murders with facts, figures,
data and statistics so that nobody can say to me it's not
true. You know, they would have to
come with a tonne of non existent statistics to even make
a case. So yeah, we discussed subjects
that sort of invite a comprehensive address.
You know, I've been chatting for many years now, but I don't
think, Simon, you've ever actually explained to my UK
column audience particularly what Saitlanders is.
Many years ago our leader and founder believed that many of
the central premises of the New South Africa proposition were
false, that it was too much of A dollied up story to be real.
And he was trained in in the army, in intelligence, so he is
able to interrogate a subject intellectually.
Does this sound true? Does that you know, is this
likely? Is it probable?
And he arrived at the conclusion that sooner or later South
Africa was going to meet with a far more harsh reality then the
the the sweetheart Mary Poppins reality of the transition from
apartheid through the elections on the 27th of April 1994.
First multiracial elections in South Africa, general elections
that were won by the ANC. And he then became familiar with
the prophecies of an obscure character to most people,
obscure from about 100 and odd years ago.
He was born in 1862, died in 1926, so he lived to be 64.
And those prophecies are very, very, very reliable.
Whether you're an atheist watching this or a Buddhist,
what have you, doesn't matter. Maybe it was sheer luck, but the
fact remains that he was extraordinarily accurate and he
was involved in the Boer War as a non combatant for religious
reasons. He didn't carry a rifle, but he
was at the front lines. He felt it was his duty, and
many generals attested to the supernatural nature of his
prophecies. You know, there weren't
predictions. They were supernatural.
It's things that he could never possibly have known and which
were enormously improbable. And there's a long list, laundry
list 800 and something I believe all told.
One of the series of prophecies pertained to the New South
Africa. He said, bearing in mind 100
years ago nobody ever believed that any African country should
be allowed to rule itself. That was the prevailing wisdom
of all of the developed world. So he said that South Africa of
all countries, in other words, the African country with with
the highest percentage of European people, would one day
be ruled by a black man. One day a black man will sit on
the throne of South Africa and he will be deemed a St by the
world. And when he died, people will
come from all over the world to pay homage to him and he'll be
in a glass coffin in Pretoria, etcetera, etcetera.
With that in mind, our leader and founder, his name is Mr
Gustav Miller, sought to found an organisation based upon
Christian, conservative, Caucasian principles.
We're, we're an overtly Christian organisation that if
we don't do church services and things like that, that we are
overtly Christian. We're a, we're a an emergency
plan initiative. We're defined under law as a
civil defence organisation. Our raise on debt, our purpose
for existence is to execute a national emergency plan to
safeguard the welfare of our members in the event of
cataclysmic events in South Africa.
So he sought to set up something like that.
Not it's not Marshall. It's not about, I don't know,
whatever silly things inviting trouble.
It's about ordinary families in South Africa that share those
three values. They are Caucasian people,
Caucasian values, Caucasian norms, European, if you like,
conservative and Christian. And yeah, I think that's the
gist of the story. To answer your question and not
to be too long winded, that's that's who and what we are and
that's how we came to be. Now obviously on hearing that a
knee jerk response could be here, but that sounds a bit
racist. Yeah, I'm sure it does sound
racist, but it's never racist when no white person can now or
ever could buy a property in the Kingdom of Kwazulu or in any of
the 9 Corsa sub kingdoms or in Baputatswana or it's not racist
when you have the black accountants society.
You know, it's just that it's a silly argument.
It's a we're over it argument or that's how that's how we see it.
You know, it was, it kind of worked for a time, but then it
became patently hypocritical when South Africans were being
persuaded by the media and by the rest of the world that they
should accept and not resist the New South Africa rainbow nation.
Nobody ever said, oh, and by the way, there is going to be
reverse racism because there's a lot of catching up to do.
They said it's going to be equal.
Everybody will have equal opportunity.
Equal, equal, equal, equal. And then you have things like
our astonishing black economic empowerment laws which make it,
I mean, it's a whole subject on its own.
And you have things like a white people aren't allowed an
organisation, but black people are.
Black people can have, you know, Zulu organisations, you, you
name it, this devoted to their tribe, to their village,
exclusive of any race, any other tribe.
And we remember we were told what was the slogan in the
1980's, the late 80's, the chief slogan used by the anti
apartheid movement was non racialism, non tribalism, non
sexism. And now they they are overt
organisations that represent certain tribes only.
So you know people can say whatever they like really.
It's just now patently asinine to make that argument.
Yeah, you said reverse racism and a lot of academics and media
types, Pooh, Pooh that. But yeah, anybody can go to
racelaw.co dot Zedai. I have it open in front of me.
And yes, here's what it says on the front page.
South Africa's legal system is one of only a handful around the
world that treats legal subjects differently based on their
perceived race or skin colour. This has been the case for
centuries, but most of the world assumes it comes sorry it came
to an end in the 1990s and this is not the case.
Race Law dot Sierra Zeta is a public interest initiative to
index all the statuses, regulations, policies and
Superior Court judgments that perpetuate racialism as a matter
of law. Listen to this 324 Racial Acts
of Parliament have been adopted since 1910, 122 of those Racial
Acts of Parliament have been adopted since 1994, and 145
Racial Acts of Parliament are operational today in the year
2026. You see, yeah, it's silly,
Jeremy. You know, in Group stuff is
vital to everybody, but white people have been bullied out of
thinking like that. in Group is fine for me, but not for thee.
And we're just an organisation that says under international
law chiefly, but not only the Protocols additional to the
Geneva Conventions, provision is made for identifiable ethnic
groups to act in a lawful manner in their best interests in
anticipation of war. That's that's explicit.
Anybody can look that up. Anybody can find the Protocols
additional to the Geneva Conventions and read through
them. I think Protocol 3 is almost
totally irrelevant to such an exercise.
But the early portions of Protocols one and two express
this explicitly. So all that our boss, our leader
and founder, Mr Gustav Miller did was he said we're going to
do a legal, decent, respectable thing.
We're not going to injure, we're not going to maim, we're not
going to rob, we're not going to rape, of which there is so much
in this country. Highest rape statistics in the
world. Six of the top most dangerous
cities in the world are South African, four of the top ten,
six of the top 20 and four of the top ten.
It's we have nothing to be ashamed of.
No Saitlander has ever been convicted of a murder or a rape
or a whatever with decent, ordinary, plain, respectable
people who are under international law simply working
to the prejudice of nobody to safeguard the welfare of our
people in the event of a cataclysm in this country.
And what's more, it should, it should be noted, I know you
know, you're more politically correct.
Viewers will struggle with this one.
But if you live in a certain society, you understand it far
better than this. The experts in the Northern
Hemisphere, and as somebody who lives in this society, I know
that if there's a cataclysm in this country of 1 description or
another, there will be a fracturing on racial along
racial lines. And it won't be a purely white
thing. It won't be the whites saying,
you know, let's gather together as a tiny minority and beat up
all the blacks. We don't have control of the
army. We don't have control of the
police. We're we're about four and a
half million people of an official population of 60
million. That is generally regarded to be
around about the 80 million marked by statisticians.
You know the story. Every time we have a census in
South Africa, some very learned man writes into the newspaper
exposing the stats as silly. Four and a half million of 80
million or 70 million or 60 million.
It's the fracturing along racial lines will be driven mostly by
black people. And I'm not saying that's a bad
thing, because it is what has happened since forever.
We live in an age where doctrine is regarded as having greater
value than practical reality. I can distort reality with
doctrine. So although I've never
menstruated and the glands in my breasts are not sufficiently
developed for me to lactate, and though I have no cervix and no
womb and no birth canal, those things that I've just been
mentioned are the defining characteristics of a woman.
And they are determined by a 2X chromosomes.
And although I don't have 2X chromosomes at the root, at the
root, at the root of every cell in my body, I am not a woman yet
I can say that I am. And so we live in a time when
people can say that everybody can get along and it'll be
delightful, but very seldom in history as that worked well for
any sustained period. There are exceptions, but the
exceptions prove the rule. When you when you point to Rome
or Persia as two notable exceptions of places that
incorporated the peoples around them in a in an accommodating
manner, you stop there. You don't then go on to point
out, Oh no, I've heard that the the Aborigines were very, very
accepting because nobody has a third example.
It's always Roman Persia. The reality is that I have
guessed here, I've had a lot, many, many, many people come to
visit me over the past few months to ask advice on the the
Satanic timeline for the the ending of the world, which as I
described to you sometime back, there's about a seven month
window that began last Tuesday, the 17th of of February anyway.
And the, the in the occult, I believe that humanity must be
destroyed now. And a key date is the 2nd and
3rd of March. Very, very key.
My point being that throughout is history, when cataclysms have
occurred, you run first to your mommy and your daddy and your
brothers and your sister and your cousins.
You run to people of the same church and faith and traditions
and culture. It's the way that human beings
are built. You can, you can argue all you
like against it, but you know, Jeremy, this is, this becomes an
uncomfortable subject, but I'm going to say it.
You don't have to be especially bright upon discovering that 88%
of our DNA is devoted to our brains to realise that
mathematically that means that brains are very very very very
much more different than skin and hair and teeth and whatever.
When we are threatened, we always will and it will never
change. Seek out those who are closest
to us brain wise. Yeah.
And everything that flows out of the brain.
I'm not talking about whether you can do mental, you know,
calculus in your head or something like that,
trigonometry without a, a pencil and a piece of paper.
I'm talking about everything, everything that flows out of our
brains. We have in South Africa Weaver
birds. And they, there's a huge variety
of them and they all build their nests differently, but according
to species, they all build them identically.
It comes from within. It's not an artefact.
My culture, my religion, my everything came from within the
body corporate of those most like me.
And there is some variety between, let's say, Eastern
Orthodoxy and, and Roman Catholicism and Protestantism,
but for the most part, they're practically identical when
viewed from the perspective of a Hindu or an animist.
You know, somebody who believes that there's a spirit in a tree
or whatever, or an activist, somebody who believes in in
ancestor worship. The divisions between us are
enormous, and they come from within.
That's how it works in science. They don't talk like modern
human beings do in science, they know.
In zoology and botany, for example, they know that it comes
from within. It's not imposed.
My behaviour, my culture, my traditions, my ways.
My in ancient Rome, they had an expression that was meant to
cover everything. Norms, mores and values.
So what are my norms in you're in Rome.
You want to know how to behave? Well, as a norm, we don't walk
around naked. Oh, OK, make a note of that.
As a norm, we don't pinch other men's wives bottoms.
Oh, jolly good. Better watch out for that.
As a norm, we have three meals a day and so on.
What are our mores? What do we what do we believe is
right and what is wrong? I should have used the the
illustration of the other man's wife in the in the mores
category. And what is right and wrong?
OK, Everybody understands that and values.
What do we cherish in the West? We cherish.
We have. I'm going to use some examples.
People may have have better ones that come to their minds.
Perhaps ballet, perhaps art, perhaps the building of
cathedrals and churches. So much so that the flying
buttresses of Rouen Cathedral and similar similar places have
never been replicated. They are the high point in the
pinnacle of architecture. Clearly somebody thought that it
was a very good idea to invest the, the then equivalent of
trillions of dollars into flying buttresses because it's damn
difficult. Those are we cherish that we we
cherish the idea of formal education so that everybody has
a, an identical basic knowledge of how the world functions and
not just throwing the, the baby in the deep end of the swimming
pool and watching some sink and some swim.
That's how it works. Really how it works.
And those people who doubt me should just be a little bit
patient because given what's going on in bond markets and
stock markets. And I'll illustrate with one
point. Sorry to be so long winded, but
if you're not sure, if you watch MSNBC and then you hear me talk
and you think, got it. Gee, I wonder who's right?
I'll settle the argument once and for all.
In 1929 when the stock market crashed, the crash was prompted
by the recognition of a bubble and people there therefore
withdrawing the market, their money from the market.
The bubble we don't have all the information that we would like
to have was an average price to earnings ratio of an American
stock of between 12 and 15. As I say, we can't be certain.
So across all of the stocks traded on the stock markets in
the United States of America, price to earnings ratio means
that it takes a certain amount of time when you get dividends.
I invest in Jeremy's company. He says to me, Simon, I promise
you I'm going to give you half the profits every year and
you'll never regret it. And I discover that those
profits are 5000 Rand a year, but I put in a million Rand or
£1,000,000 or $1,000,000. It's going to take me how many
years to get my money back? And I start to think cheapest,
I'm not going to fall for that again.
So people were buying stocks for a certain amount of money.
And on average, it took them 12 to 15 years to get the original
capital back in the form of the the yearly dividend payment.
And they perceived that that was absurd.
And so the clever guys got out of the market.
Right now the price to earnings ratio across all U.S. stock
markets is 26. Let that sink in.
But if you use a more nuanced way of measuring price to
earnings, if you, if you extend it a little bit, if you don't
just say, well, Jeremy gave me a great payout last year.
Golly Gee, this is going to go on forever and ever and ever.
If you measure it using the Cape Shiller Index or the Cape
Shiller, I'm forgetting the word, then you measure over a 10
year trailing period. So Jeremy says, oh Sam, I
promise you this thing is going to work.
I've been doing it for 10 years and it's worked.
But I need a cash injection. You're the man for me, man.
And I look at the books. If I use the Cape Shiller and I
see what profits he's made over 10 years to assess whether he's
as good as his word and this endeavour of his is profitable
and it's worth me investing in. You will discover using the Cape
Shiller that right now the US stock markets are at a price to
earnings ratio of 41. And the Tesla, I haven't looked
for a few weeks, but I believe it was 44 Fridays ago I looked,
excuse me, and it was 400.01. That means that the level of
mental retardation has risen right to the top that I've
sincerely believe that it's worth waiting 400 years to get
my money back. That's how insane global
financial markets are at the moment.
So I'm saying to the person who listens to this podcast, you can
bet your very bottom dollar that within this year we're going to
see a financial cataclysm the likes of which the world has
never seen. Therefore, within this year, you
will go are going to be able to assess for yourself whether I am
100% right all of the time. Exceptions aside, they're always
exceptions, but the exceptions are so few that they prove the
rule. Therefore, for practical intents
and purposes, I am 100% right all of the time when I make the
proposition that everybody always reverts to type when
reality bites. It's only during periods of
excessive wealth and the breaking of the morals of a
society, and when the intelligentsia has so much
influence over society that they can propose to that society
things which are patently nonsensical.
So for now, you've got the upper hand.
You're living wherever in the world, in San Francisco, and
it's too good for words. Let's talk again in seven months
time and then you tell me but didn't of direct observation.
What did you see occur when that thing burst, when it all came
crumbling down as it's about to do?
Because many people don't even live to be 400 years, much less
have an adult lifespan of 400 years to collect the the
original investment in Tesla back.
You are going to see it happen before your very eyes.
It's as simple as that. Everybody will be in Group,
everybody with no exceptions, in a very short span of time.
I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with in Group
preference. Jews have made a great success
of in Group preference. I have an in Group preference
for my family. I will put my family before
other families. Does it mean that I hate other
families Simon? No, of course not.
Exactly. Yeah, as I say to people, where
have you ever heard of a guy paying his next door neighbour
children's school fees? There may be some exceptions
here and there. We've all helped unfortunate
children, but by and large, these wonderful idealistic
concepts exist only as long as it doesn't cost you, as long as
it makes you look virtuous, and so on.
And it only takes such a marginal amount of your wealth
that it scarcely counts. But when it really counts, all
of the most politically correct people in all of the world
suddenly abandoned these values that's all about them and their
family. And they put up a wall between
them and their neighbour. And they try not to look over
it. And they hope that their
neighbour never looks over either.
It's it's nonsense, Jeremy. It astonishes me that anybody
can fall for this way of thinking.
You know, it's like when you see the immigrants into Britain.
How anybody ever thought that was a good idea is beyond me.
I will never understand how anybody was that stupid.
Yeah. It was only one possible ending.
Yeah. Something that that that that
you and I can relate to is of course 1994 in South Africa and
what happened in the 80s and how South Africa changed people
around the world, unless they lived here, will never really
understand. South Africa was established as
a trading colony or as a trading post in 1652 for the Dutch East
India Company. Move forward a couple of 100
years and those first European settlers have gone into the
interior and they've developed various things.
They discovered diamonds and gold and all of a sudden the
British Empire takes a very strong interest in South Africa,
the largest greatest load of gold ever known to mankind.
British Empire comes along, conquers the the indigenous
white S Africans. Yeah, the boys and takes over
South Africa from the year 19102 if you like ish through 1910,
which is a key year on the establishment of the union of
South Africa by Great Britain all the way through to 1961.
So in all of that period, South Africa either didn't have a
central government or it was ruled by Britain.
Britain, let's go of the colony. And we have hang on, hang on,
hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on.
There were I think 2 worst states.
Yes, there were, but there wasn't a central South African
state. So so the the people that
imposed apartheid, the laws, the central laws is unquestionably
it's simply nobody but Great Britain come 1961, that's the
inherited system. Great Britain leaves, we become
a independent Republic and for 33 years there was a thing
called apartheid and that apartheid was based on the laws
imposed by Great Britain largely to do with labour and poll taxes
and what have you. Prior to that there wasn't
formal separation of races. There was effective separation
of races. The white people came along and
they said, oh, I've got to teach our kids to read our kids.
That's what we do. We, I can my kids read.
Whatever you're doing in your tribe has got nothing whatsoever
to do with me. So there was in a practical
sense separation, but it was never at all legal until the
British said we've got to make this thing formal and we've got
to find a way to drive African labour from Kwazulu Natal, one
of the provinces, and the Eastern Cape particularly, but
not only onto the gold mines, because the British, when they
won the Boer War, took those gold mines for themselves. 7
Jewish families, roughly speaking, which was obviously
the key driver of the war. That entire war was about one
thing and one thing only, and that was giving possession
because it wasn't advantageous to the British, wasn't
advantageous to the black people of South Africa, and wasn't
advantageous to the Boers who had set up a Republic, which
happened, They didn't know in advance, obviously, to be
sitting on the greatest load of gold of history.
So the only people who benefited from the Boer War were those
families. No other party participant to it
benefited. Come 1994, the first multiracial
elections after 33 years of apartheid and the African
National Congress wins and all the laws are changed.
No separate schools, no separation of schooling by race,
but the many black economic empowerment laws were brought
in. In other words, you must have a
super preponderance of black people working in your company,
and there must be a super preponderance of black suppliers
who supply to you. What happened post 94 was very,
very strange because it was marketed as the Rainbow Nation.
Now that has been a complete failure of multiculturalism.
Yeah, you know, it doesn't, It doesn't work.
It's like it's like hip hop and rap music in the in the USA.
I'm not saying it's it's bad, but clearly black people in the
USA, for reasons known best to them, headed off in different
musical directions, including jazz and Blues and so on.
And some of it's fantastic. I'm crazy about Blues.
It's just that it's resonant to me.
But generally speaking, it doesn't come out of my culture.
And to them it's the ideal. It has huge following where's
you don't get overwhelming numbers of white people sing in
the Blues in the cotton fields. You know it's it's not so the
the rainbow nation idea was was cute, but I want to Bry with
that is to say BBQ with people who speak my language.
I'm not against Brying with black people.
Let me give you an example, classic example.
Over recent years, they have been tremendous if it's to give
land to black people to be farmed, and those efforts have
been a terrific failure. But here in the Eastern Cape,
there are some exceptions. We recently held an open day
that involved horse riding. There were 167 competitors.
Not one black person attended. Were we offended?
Were we hurt? Or was there a big drama?
Did we write secret messages to one another saying look how
racist the blacks are? No, it was, you know, Western
mounted games. We kind of knew who wanted to
participate in advance. We could have predicted it.
If black farmers get together to celebrate a key holiday in their
religion, so in in ancestor worship, as they do at key times
of the year, the chances of a white farmer arriving are
exactly 0. I've never even heard of it.
So the idea that we were all just going to blend in and
adopt, you know, you can take 6 eighths of my culture and I'll
take 7 thirteenths of yours and it's going to be delightful was
always daft. It was never predicated on the
instinctive tendencies or inclinations or preferences that
come from within us that make Weaver birds almost identical to
one another. But the marginal differences
between them cause them to build their nests in absolutely
different ways. The most curious way some are
entered from underneath. Others are huge big colonies
where thousands of birds share one nest, and each bird or each
mating pair has its own sort of secret entrance.
Tiny, tiny, tiny, minuscule differences in the species
change behaviour completely. And anybody who knows anything
about animals, All the farmers watching this, we'll just be
sort of sitting there unremarking because it's known
to science, it's only not known to the Super intellectualised of
modern Western society. Civil war that might or might
not arrive in the future. People will align with those who
are most like them and that is why St Landers exists.
It exists as an organisation to bring together a particular
group of people who might want to find themselves aligning with
one another in that unlikely event.
It's never worked any other way in all of human history.
When things get tough, you revert to type.
You abandon all of the ornaments that have no utilitarian value
of your, yourself, whether it be clothes or whatever the case may
be scrolling on TikTok. And you, you resort to the
things that really count and you do it in the most effective way.
If I have to negotiate with you, Jeremy, let's say you and I were
in a, in a, in a life and death situation and we had to we had
to find common ground over what prayers we were going to say and
to whom we were going to say them, you know, in desperation.
So panic stations. Hey, maybe we should call upon
the Lord or what book we're going to read for him to, to, to
granted, to gain wisdom. It doesn't work that way.
I run to Jeremy because I know that 99 Percent, 99.999% of what
we are is absolutely identical language, origin, body strength,
muscle explosiveness, IQ, tolerance for heat or cold or
whatever the case may be. The the the, the differences
between Jeremy and me are so little that it enables me to at
once gain an ally and share the burden of risk.
OK. So then that also means by
extension that it's not just a website or a group.
I mean, there is, there's actually a strategy.
Yeah, as I said to you earlier, I've got some guests visiting
and we were chatting about something.
There's a concept that I've described many times.
When I was a youngster, my chief sport was life saving,
lifeguarding, same thing, but you can do it as a sport all
around the world. And I grew up at a beach that
was world famous for at the 1974 World Life saving Championships,
the Australians and the Americans refused to participate
at that beach. They said it had to be moved.
They said whoever thought that this was a safe beach for
bathing needs their head read. People are going to die.
This is one of the most dangerous beaches on the world
in the world and simultaneously it had the high the record for
the greatest number of shark attacks of any beach in the
world at that time. So I grew up on a beach as a
lifesaver, as a champion lifesaver in very, very
dangerous conditions. And sometimes we swim out very
far to the shark Nets, which are staggered like this.
There's no other way to make them work.
So the idea is that the sharks come in and they're they're with
the bathers, but they sense that they're trapped it because to
them is it looks like they're trapped.
So they swim as fast as they can outward and they get caught.
By the gills in the Nets and every Monday the anti shark
measures board comes along and pulls up the Nets, pulls out the
dead sharks and takes them away. If you swim out to the Nets it's
very, very, very, very, very dangerous.
I did it on a number of occasions with my friends and on
every occasion some clever Dick, smart Alec would say as he's
getting nervous. 15 year old boy, knowing that he's being
very reckless, would say I don't have to be the best swimmer here
today. I only have to be the second
slowest if we see a fin. My point being that to go from
this is what I was discussing with my guests.
To go from indefensible to defensible is not a matter of
getting a Cobra helicopter gunship.
You don't have to have a machine gun to go from being very, very,
very vulnerable to exceedingly less vulnerable.
You only have to make minimal efforts.
And our mentality is that if we provide basics, we don't have a
trillion dollars to buy everybody.
Let's say we get 100,000 refugees.
So that's 100 million Rand in our money just on sleeping bags,
about 1000 Rand, a sleeping bag, whatever that translates to in
pounds, we've called it 50 lbs, however many dollars, roughly
speaking, just as a rule of thumb, we are never going to be
able to conduct our national emergency plan in that manner.
So we say we're going to build a house, everybody bring 1 brick
and we'll be OK because we won't be perfectly defensible.
But the shark goes for the slowest swimmer, it goes for
what's closest to him. The first people in any conflict
to suffer are people who don't have groups around them.
The the, the, the head, the founder of Shit hits the fan
school is Jaeko, famous guru in the world of preppers.
He lived through a year long siege in Bosnia Herzegovina as
part of a small group of Croats that was trapped during the
breakup of Yugoslavia. So for one year no electricity,
no running water, no food and he took what he learned then to the
USA and made a lot of money and famously said when I go dark you
know that the USA is about to go terminal.
He said I will know when it is and he went dark sometime last
year. I was told just went dark, shut
down the the website so I was told and can't be found.
Anyway, point being that he says he has a fantastic course or
used to have, in which he maps what what are the first the
first the first the first of the first of the first of the first
things. Don't be alone.
The the vulnerability of a of an old lady versus the
vulnerability of three heavy smokers is as far as the Easters
from the West. It's not that you have to be
Jackie Chan and that you have to have a machine gun.
As long as you've got 10 people around you who are moderately
defensible, the jackals and the hyenas of this world will go for
the little old lady every single time.
So the idea of Saitlanders is we don't have to have the world's
perfect plan. We just have to gather together
as far as possible in one place and endeavour to remove
ourselves from the conflict. If other people want civil war,
they have welcome to it. We don't, and together we will
get by. We just have to to fill in the
blanks of the basic tenets of survivability according to real
life, in the real world. So we have a national emergency
plan to come together to support one another, to to grow crops,
to purify water, generate electricity.
Young men provide a, a, a, a border would stabilise a border
or protect a border, defend the border.
Yeah, that's, that's the long and the shorts of of it, Jeremy.
That's what I love about what you just said though, and even
if that kind of thing doesn't play out, the process of
learning is still very valuable. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Very. I, I don't know that I'm going
to make it. I believe in the prophecies of
Cena for Rainsburg. And he said that in the January,
February, March period, he used very specific words, the yellow
Peach rains. The yellow Peach rains in South
Africa fall between the first week of January, 1st week of
March, last week of January, 1st week of March, he said.
A cataclysm breaks out in the world.
He said after that, this prophet God to which I alluded to whom I
alluded earlier, he said after that in about September or
October, again he did it by signs and seasons and the how
green the grasses and how cold the winter is.
So we know that he was referring to sometime between September
and October ish. He said that fire that rages
across the world will come to South Africa.
I might be one of the people who dies.
That's real life in the real world.
People died in the English Civil War.
Nobody asked them, you know, How do you feel about this?
Sorry, man? In World War One, World War Two,
people were incinerated by the Americans wholesale in Vietnam,
in in in the Vietnam War in Iraq, the generally accepted
figure on both sides of the aisle of the number of innocent
civilians that died during the American occupation is 1 million
or more, not less. That's real life in the real
world. The real life and the real world
that we modern people have been insulated from since forever,
providing us the luxury of being able to over indulge in in
drinking. And here I point the finger at
me, not at you all do overindulge in food, overindulge
in smoking and not being healthy.
And you know, this and that bad behaviour with women that that
we all know what life in the modern world is, has allowed us
to do and to pretend that I'm a woman, though I've never once
menstruated, not even once. I could squeeze my chest for a
month of Sundays. I wouldn't be able to sustain an
infant on it and the rest. But it's completely delusional
is my point. But in what the time that we
believe is emerging before our very eyes?
It's not going to be a case of can I guarantee my survival in
such circumstances. Who could get aeroplane comes
over and drops, drops a napalm and Vietnamese village.
But if all the villages of Vietnam, or many of them,
certain certain villages in Vietnam had spent 20 or 25 years
learning and practising and rehearsing and meditating on
improving their chances of survival, then there's going to
be a, there would have been a disproportionately high survival
rate among, let's say, let's say among people, among people of
Cambodia. It would have been a
disproportionately high survival rate if all of the among people
had been doing that. So we're not guaranteeing
anybody anything. It's war for goodness sake, man.
What do you think? But we are saying if you make a
little bit of effort, you will improve your chances of not
suffering grievously should such terrible events transpire.
Then if you didn't. And sorry, Jeremy, to hug the
microphone. I want to make a brief last
comment. I'm very close.
I have three sons. And people remark on it all the
time. You know, it's cheapest.
I've never seen a father that's so close to his sons.
One's 25, one's 23 and one is 16.
And we maintain a very, very, very, very close relationship.
I, more than anybody else, am terrified that Donald Trump is
going to start World War Three on the second of of March, as
per this this occultic date, and that my son's lives are going to
be ruined forever. So please, if there's anybody
watching this who has the idea that Simon just can't wait to
shoot black people, he's just dying for it all to go down in
South Africa and for families and children and everybody to
die. You've got rocks in your head.
I think I felt as if I had to say that because some people
really are dumb. I get it, but that's because I'm
South African. But you know, something I was
thinking about, Simon, is you look at China, right?
It's, it's got a super majority of, of Han people, about over
90%, I think, right? It's it's in many ways
monocultural. Yes.
And nobody accuses them of being racist for wanting to keep it
that way. Yeah, yeah, I watched Lei's real
talk. I find it fascinating to to get
an insight into into China. And she's she's talking at the
moment about the XI Jinping's assassination of these two top
generals who were opposing him going to war with Taiwan.
So they were this kind of last obstacle in the, all these
dramas going, going on at the moment at the highest levels in,
in China. And I've watched so many hours
of lay talk about these things that I, I understand exactly
what you're saying. You know, I've, I've come to,
I've never been to China. I, I had my best, my bestest,
longest friend. I always say to people lives in
China and he's married to a Chinese and we, I, we haven't
seen each other for about 20 years, but he, he's for sure.
I mean, we just keep in touch and I adore him.
So I know a little bit about China, but not much.
And I've learned a lot from Lay. And one thing is clear, boy,
it's my way or the highway. The, the, the, the, let's say
the Uyghur people. I don't want to jump on that
Uyghur train. You know, that's not what I'm,
I'm trying to do. I'm not trying to, to, to stir
trouble. It's just the first ethnic name
from China that comes to mind. We are predominant.
You play by our rules and that's the end of it.
The Uyghurs maintain their religion and I suppose cultural
things, and they do things their way.
They toe the party line of the established culture that is
imposed by the Han people. But nobody accuses one another
of being racist or it's you have your way.
I have my way where I call the shots.
I will call the shots where you have a preponderance of people,
you're doubtless going to build mosques and you're doubtless
going to talk a, a dialect that offends me, but which is your
dialect and which is precious to you.
And you're doubtless going to make your, your women do that
thing. And yeah, that's the way it is.
I I don't think you're being a racist and I don't feel like I'm
being a racist either. I mean, I'm at the point now
where I'm not even endeavouring to proselytise anymore.
If the Americans wish to commit cultural suicide and Europe
clearly wishes to do so, well, so be it.
I'm now at that point where it's just about me and my small
group. It's, you know, that I was
telling somebody earlier the three best things you can do as
a prepper or survivalist by father Three.
I'll watch the documentary on YouTube.
The two the 1 is much inferior that one is the other is much
superior. The long form.
I think it's two hours 43 minutes and documentary on
YouTube about the worst year in human history, the year 536 AD
and the 19 years after it when all of almost all of mankind
nearly died or did die. Read the book Patriots by James
Wesley Rawls and do the now no longer existing shitheads the
Fans school.com Jaco course in which he makes it clear you
don't have to go into a civil war with mortars and bazookas
and what have you. All you have to to begin with,
to begin with first steps is have a team around you that's
loyal to you. Don't be an individual,
particularly if you're old. Don't be isolated and go to a
place that gives you favour because when you and your team
are holed up in that, in that space, people will like an
animal. He uses the example he says.
We've all watched those National Geographic videos in his thick,
thick, thick, thick, thick Balkan accent in which we can't
understand why the Mountain Lion didn't.
It would have killed the dog. Why didn't it go for the dog?
Because the Mountain Lion has to get through winter and it knows
that it probably won't if it if it's got a broken leg, the dog
has no chance against the Mountain Lion, but it will enter
the Mountain Lion. And that's why predators usually
go for very much weaker prey. They don't go for prey that is
just one echelon beneath them. They go 3 echelons down and and
I've lost my train of thought now.
But my point being that that if you just do the basics, if you
just observe and recognise the basics of human survival, how
people got through the worst year in history, how who
survived in Bosnia and Yugoslavia when it broke up and
who died. If you just follow the basics of
you bit of common sense, yeah, people won't attack your house.
Not because you're super duper, duper super, super defensible.
It's because you're not the weakest.
A gang of armed marauders who could easily beat you doesn't
want to suffer a meat cleaver to the forest, to the forehead.
You know, they know they'll win like the Mountain Lion and the
dog, but they know that they'll take wounds that they'll regret.
So they always go for the for the weakest.
And I, I forgot where we started there and I apologise to you,
Jeremy, but somehow I thought that was relevant.
I think I've messed it up a bit. I just realised that we went
through this entire discussion saying Saitlanders but without
explaining what it means. It's an Afrikaans word.
I know we've we've had to explain this many times, but you
can always explain it again. Yeah, people might translate it
as Southerners in, in colloquial English, that's the word that we
would use. But it's a, it's a, it's a, it's
a translation that doesn't do justice to the Afrikaans
language, particularly certain terms used in the Bible.
And therefore the better translation is Southlanders, the
people of the Southland. And yeah, we are the the
Europeans who occupy the southern tip of Africa.
Yeah, I mean the word said Landers, I think just sounds
better than saying S the Landers.
It's just a nicer. It just flows off the tongue
better. Yes.
OK, well, I mean, as we come in for a landing, Simon, I was
actually looking for a better, a better metaphor, the landing as
we come in for a better. Help me out here with one that's
relatable to our conversation as we come in for the.
The moral of the story is what? The moral of the story is that
people can say and think and believe whatever they like.
Cow legs, walks on 4 legs. Men have certain
characteristics, women have other characteristics, and in
times of critical danger, people always seek out those with whom
they have the most in common. And as we in the Western world
begin to explore a general cataclysm, you know, the
invasion of Europe, the the, the stock market madness, all of
these things as this boil or pimple comes to a an inevitable
head which everybody can see happening.
Are you daft if you can't see that what I've just said is
going to be proven right over and over and over again and the
best thing that people can do is not attempt the impossible.
That is to say, don't think, oh gosh, I think there might be a
civil war in Britain one day. I need an atomic bomb.
If you want to survive, you just need a bunch of mates, a bit of
a plan, a destination to head for you.
You need to be just a little bit defensible than the next guy.
You can buy lasers that are extremely powerful. 11 got
burned. I've got heavy, heavy heavy
boots and he switched it on and he immediately burned a hole
through the boots. He was trying to prove a point.
You can buy torches nowadays that can blind people.
Pepper spray. I've been pepper sprayed twice
in my life and let me tell you, it's very much worse than you
might think. It's completely debilitating.
Buy yourself a bow and arrow, buy a a a sling, buy a catapult.
Go to a safe place, have a a plan, get some extra fuel.
The moral of the story is that trouble is coming, and whether
you like it or not, you're going to find yourself depending upon
those who are closest to you, kith and kin.
You might as well start now. And don't panic about not having
some foolproof plan. You don't need to be the fastest
swimmer in the world, and you only need to be not the slowest.
And the moment you make that much effort, the moment you do
that much, you already move. Let's say the there are 100
echelons of preparedness. You're in it.
You're a male in your 40s and you're fairly healthy.
So you would like to believe that you're not in the lowest
echelon, you're in echelon #30. To go from 30 to 70 or 80 is the
easiest thing in the world. To get to 100, yes, you need a
Cobra helicopter gunship and you need nukes and all of that kind
of stuff. But to to get yourself out of
danger very far removed from the shark is easy peasy.
It's 100 litres of fuel. It's a some pepper spray.
It's a location that is a little bit more remote.
It's a clean water source, it's some food, and it's 10 buddies,
each armed with a catapult. Yes, that's ridiculous against
the nuclear bomb, but most people never ever.
It's not how wars are fought. In no war in history, as 100% of
the people died. It's usually between 10 and 20%
of the combatants. So it's a small fraction in
order for you, you to elevate yourself out of the most
vulnerable that small fraction. Exceptions aside, some, some of
the best prepared people will also die.
But generally it's the most vulnerable for you to get from
here to here. Easy, easiest thing in the
world. Do it.
Do it like we're doing it here in South Africa, Saitlanders.
And the website is. Saitlanders.org.
No. Do you just type
saitlanders.org? There you see the spelling
SUIDLANDER s.org. That's our English language
website. All right, Simon Rush, thank you
for joining me in the trenches. No, Thank you very much for
having Saitlan as Jeremy. We always appreciate it.