This Adora Laker, thank you for joining me in the trenches.
Thank you for inviting me. I I've spent quite a long time
trying to find somebody who knows a lot about German new
medicine and it's quite difficult and it seems to me
that it's not a terribly well known concept.
Any any idea why that might be? Well, a lot of the information
has been suppressed. Doctor Homer had a very
difficult time right from the beginning.
He was censored to a great extent.
Yeah. He would want to speak at a
venue and they would close the venue down, police on on the at
the entrance. So, yeah, it was very difficult
for him in the beginning. He was much blind in the
process, you know. So there was an attempt to
destroy his reputation and his character.
But knowing that immediately makes one want to know more
about it. Yeah.
Well, I did as soon as I heard about it, it was, it was like a
revelation. It was quite extraordinary after
being in in natural medicine for 14 years and we were involved
in, you know, a diet and cleansing and detoxes, etcetera,
etcetera, herbs and vitamins and but then all of a sudden Hammer
appeared and he answered all of the questions we had in the
process of working with patients.
So it's quite extraordinary. What is your background?
Well, it depends which background you're looking at.
I started off as an opera singer and I, I performed until around
1998. So, but the family business was
in natural medicine since 1981 and I was quite heavily
involved. And my husband is a clinical
herbalist. So we studied together and in
the beginning I, I saw patients and worked with them with, you
know, the usual detoxes and herbs, etcetera, diet.
And then I I kept pursuing my career until 92 when I was
introduced to Doctor Homer's work and it was a set of tapes.
It was a three hour lecture that Doctor Homer gave in Innsbruck
in 89. And I had it on a pile of tapes
in my car for the longest time before I actually listened to
it. And that was a moment that
changed everything. What do you mean by changed
everything? Well, the way we saw medicine,
it was, it was in German. So as Doctor Hammer was
speaking, I was interpreting for my husband and we just looked at
each other and said, wow, it's the missing link, you know.
Doctor Hammer explained the cause of disease and how a
disease naturally progresses if it's allowed to go through what
he calls the healing phase. So it certainly answered a lot
of questions for us with some of the diseases that we were
dealing with. My father was a great example of
that. We thought that a heart attack
which took my father's life, a heart attack was because your
arteries were clogged. It had nothing to do with that.
It had to do with what we call an epileptic or epileptoid
crisis, which is a healing crisis of sorts.
It's a turning point, but some diseases, of course, when we're
looking at the heart, when the heart goes through that massive
kind of a stress, it can take your life.
So these epileptic or epileptoid crises are a moment in time
where your survival is determined in some cases.
So when we understood the the nature of the conflict in my
father had a coronary infarct which meant that there were some
arteries involved and Doctor Homer explained that a
territorial loss conflict had something to do with that.
So we looked at my father's life.
He died about six years earlier very suddenly and he was doing
everything right, according to us.
He was on a raw food diet, a cleansing diet, he took herbs,
meditated, and yet he died of a massive heart attack.
But that was the healing crisis that took his life, and we
didn't understand that until Homer explained it to us.
OK, so let's go back to basics. What is German new medicine?
Well, it's the discovery that your experience in life, if it
is unanticipated, will simultaneously affect the brain,
the psyche and the organ in a split second.
And this is a process that we call the DHS.
This is after Doctor Homer's son, who died tragically at the
hands of the Italian Crown Prince, Victory Emanuel, Dirk
Homer syndrome, DHS. And it was because of that that
Doctor Homer developed a testicular cancer, which he
almost didn't survive because of the repercussions of the
surgery. But yes, so an unanticipated
event registers in the brain and simultaneously affects the
organ. And it's the psyche that
actually first perceives this event.
So depending on how you perceive it, that will determine
precisely what part of the brain and what organ will be affected.
OK, so take me through the through the basics.
I understand that there are 5 biological laws.
Well, the first biological law involves this moment in time
when we have the shock, the DHS. It's actually called the iron
rule of cancer. The second biological law
explains the actual disease process from the moment in time.
That you have the biological shock right through to the end
of what we call the healing phase.
The third biological law is the ontogenetic system of tumours,
where Doctor Homer actually discovered that different areas
of the brain controlled different cellular structures or
germ layers in our body. And this is what will determine
whether or not we will have the cancer process or a what he
calls a cancer equivalent disease, which is really just a
functional disturbance such as a diabetes, for example.
Then the 4th biological law explains how all of these
microbes play a role in our bodies, in particular in the
healing phase. And the 5th biological law is
the quintessence, in other words, the biological meaning
behind every. Disease manifestation.
Yeah. So the terminology matters.
So for example, when you say disease manifestation, what does
that mean for example? Well, for example, a skin
condition, we call that a disease, right, Eczema, which is
actually a healing phase. So during the conflict active
phase of some cellular structures, we don't have any
symptoms whatsoever. But as soon as we go into the
healing phase, in other words, resolve the conflict, this is
when we'll have the the physical problem.
Yeah. And for example, you say you say
conflict. So OK, so let's let's unpack
that a little bit. What do you mean by conflict?
Well, biological conflicts are different from psychological
conflicts in the sense that we need to have that unanticipated
event in order for the brain and the body to become involved,
right? So for example, let's take a
starvation conflict which would give us a liver tumour or
multiple liver tumours. As soon as we have a situation
in our lives that we didn't expect, for example, you lose
your job and you were the sole breadwinner, you had a couple of
mortgages on your house and payments on the car, utilities,
etcetera, etcetera, you're living.
Month to month, if you lose that income, what would happen?
It would. It's financial ruin, isn't it?
So we are looking at a possibility of starvation either
for yourself or for your family, in which case the liver would
become involved. Another example would be if a
patient is on traditional chemotherapy and they're unable
to eat and they are literally starving, they're emaciating,
they're starving. The liver can become involved in
that sense as well. So it's a, it's a very real
conflict, very important, that threatens your survival.
And this is when we will develop a liver cancer.
It's the precise nature of the conflict that is going to
determine what part of the brain is affected and simultaneously
what organ that is connected with that specific brain relay.
Now what's interesting is that that as soon as the conflict.
Is resolved in the case of a liver cancer, whatever tumours
had developed or growths had developed during that conflict
active phase, they actually stop growing.
Breast cancer, which is quite common now.
There's something there to do with nourishment feeding.
Absolutely. I think what you were describing
really is a lobular kind of breast cancer, which has to do
with with nurturing. Then we have the intraductal
breast cancer, which involves some milk ducts, and in that
case this is a completely different conflict.
It has to do with separation. So if we compare the tissues
that are affected when you have a lobular cancer, this involves
the breast gland and anything glandular, you will have a cell
mitosis during the conflict act of phase, in other words,
enlargement of the gland. But as again, as soon as the
conflict is resolved, the the growth stops.
And depending on whether or not you have the microbes in your
system to degrade what had grown, that will determine
whether or not it's going to become smaller and in a lot of
cases disappear, or if it will become what is commonly known as
an adenoma, which is benign. Then in contrast to that, we
have the breast, the milk duct, which actually during the
conflict act to face. We have no symptoms with the,
with the exception of the stress, we have ulcerations
occurring inside the milk duct. And as soon as you resolve the
conflict, this is when the restoration of those ulcerations
will take place. And this is what you call an
intraductal breast cancer, when in fact it's really just a
swelling of the the tubes that transport milk.
It's not actually a tumour that's developing in the milk
ducts. I was chatting to somebody close
to me, you know, leading up to this conversation with you and
she was saying to me that her, her mom died of leukaemia.
And she, she said that she actually believes that her mom
brought it on to herself because what happened was she had
retired from a, a job that she really enjoyed and ended up not
knowing what to do with her life.
And of course, it brought on depression and, and anxiety and
all sorts of other things. Do you think that there is some
sort of connection there? Well, it's, it's possible, but
we have to also understand that leukaemia is a healing phase.
It's a recovery phase of of the bone marry which bone marrow
which was destroyed during the conflict activity.
So unless she had some symptoms before, you know, perhaps a low
white blood cells or anaemia or low red cells, she would have
had to have ADHS to determine the leukaemia and when it would
develop. It's a healing phase, so she
must have come to terms with something.
Now, what's interesting about these healing phases that
present us with serious illnesses like a breast cancer
or in some cases a bile duct cancer or a bronchial carcinoma
or a bladder cancer, you name it, a leukaemia.
But what happens is, is that you can be in conflict for years and
not have any symptoms, but as soon as you come to terms with
it, this is when the disease manifestation will take place.
So it doesn't seem fair, does it?
No. But I think this is where where
we we get very. Confused in GNM because we have
been programmed to believe or conditioned to believe by
traditional medicine that. Everything has to be fatal if
it's diagnosed as a cancer, when in fact it's completely wrong.
You know, I think if if people really understood the five
biological laws and what Doctor Homer discovered before they
were diagnosed with anything, they would look at it with the
different eyes all together. They would perceive that
diagnosis differently. So we've been chatting about the
triggers and, and, and the severity of the conflict and how
it how it connects to the brain and all that area of the brain.
But now in terms of the second law, there are two aspects to
it. Am I correct?
Yes, the law of two phases. So we have a conflict active
phase and this is where the terminology comes in again.
Doctor Hammer called that Sympathico Tonia.
That means that the sympathetic nervous system is affected at
that very moment. You're in high alert, you're in
a stress phase. And then excuse me, when you
resolve that conflict, you go into the healing phase or the
vagatonia, and that vagatonia is divided into two.
We have the epileptic or epileptoid crisis right in the
middle of that, which is the turning point.
Where we are supposed to go back to Normantonia.
But again, you know, it really depends on on the length of time
that you were in conflict and the degree of the.
Healing phase that you were in. If the heart is involved, it
could be It could mean a fatal heart attack if you had a
conflict that was of long duration.
It depends really on the amount of stress that the organ
experiences during the conflict active phase.
Now cancers, what we call glandular cancers or let's say a
lung cancer, a liver cancer, a bowel cancer, they're all
directed by the oldest part of the brain and they will all
develop tumours during the conflict active phase.
But as soon as the conflict is resolved, those tumours will
actually stop growing. And like I said before, if you
have the microbes, the TB mycobacteria in particular, in
your body, then they will multiply during conflict
activity and the body will set them loose as soon as you go
into the healing phase and this is when the degradation of those
tumours will begin. For example, a a bowel tumour is
usually discovered when you have bleeding from the bowels, right?
But that's already the healing phase.
That means that the tumour is being broken down.
It has actually stopped growing at that point.
But then that's where when we're diagnosed.
So what happens? The person has a shock about the
diagnosis, right? And this is how cancer will
spread. What is required, yeah, actually
is quite a large paradigm shift. Yes, very much.
For me, it wasn't much of A paradigm shift because we were
looking for answers. We saw that our methodology of
healing was successful in some cases, but not in all cases.
And it wasn't until we realised that the successes were in what
we call healing phases. So what we really did was
support the body in the healing phase to help them to get over a
process. But now let's just think back
now to the last few years. Now, I don't believe that there
was a pandemic and I'm sure you don't either.
But there were there were people who ended up getting sick and I
suspect that is related to their mental condition because of
perhaps all the propaganda and the fear campaigns etcetera.
Yes, absolutely right. A lot of people breathed a sigh
of relief when they came up with a vaccine, believe it or not,
whereas others were terrified of it, right?
And people that were terrified of it, that were forced to take
it or they would lose their job, they're the ones that got sick.
I'd like to go onto the third law now.
What did you call it? I have my notes here.
The. The auto genetic system of
tumours. OK, so so take me through that.
OK, Well, we have essentially 3 embryonic germ layers that
comprise our organs. OK, we're going into Embryology
a little bit here. Now these three germ layers are
controlled by 4 specific areas of the brain.
So we have the oldest part of the brain, which is the ponds of
the brain stem. Which controls the oldest germ
layer, which is the endodermal germ layer.
Then the second oldest is the cerebellum which controls the
mesodermal or the old mesodermal germ layer.
Now the difference being that all glandular manifestations or
organs that were derived from the old intestinal mucosa or
organs which dictate our vital function, they're all controlled
pretty much by the ponds of the brain stem and in this case the
endodermal. Cells.
And in the case of the cerebellum, the old mesodermal
cells, what we actually have is a cellular growth during the
conflict active phase. So as soon as you have this
biological shock, this is when you will have some cell mitosis,
OK. And this is what we call a, a
liver tumour or a lung tumour or a bowel tumour, OK, It can.
The cerebellum controls the skins around our body, the
dermis also the skins inside our body, which is the pleura or the
peritoneum or the envelope around the heart, which is the
pericardium. And it behaves very much like
the Ponds where we will have cell mitosis during the conflict
active phase. But in both cases as soon as the
conflict resolves, these cells actually stop growing and one or
two things with can happen. Either the tumour or the growth
will remain dormant or it will degrade with the help of the TB
or TB related mycobacterias. So when we go into the later
development of the brain, and this really has more to do with
how our bodies evolved and these parts of the brain had to
develop to accommodate that. So when we developed a skeletal
system, this is when the cerebral medulla came into play.
And in this case, everything behaves the opposite to the the
old brain, which is the pons and the cerebellum.
In this case, all of those organs that are connected with
the cerebral medulla, or the white matter as it's called,
those tissues will necrotize the moment that you have a
biological shock. So let's take the bones for
example. If the conflict is very, very
deep, then it will go to the bone marrow.
And here we're looking at self devaluation conflicts.
So when we're looking at that kind of a manifestation, there
is this, an actual suppression of the bone marrow function.
And you have low white cells. In many cases, you also have low
red, well, low red cells and but we can go about our daily lives
like that without a problem. However, as soon as you resolve
the conflict to do with the bone marrow, this is when you'll
develop what we call a blood disorder known as leukaemia.
OK, now leukaemia will also run its course according to the law
of two phases. It's a matter of understanding
it correctly and aiding the patient in.
Perhaps if they the red cells are late and starting up, they
may need a blood transfusion towards the end of the healing
phase. So on and so forth.
But it begins with a a necrosis. In other words, no symptoms with
the exception of the stress phase.
No, we also have the cerebrum which behaves very, very
similarly to the the cerebral medulla.
And in this case what we have is an ulceration that would develop
on the organ. So here the the cellular
structure we're looking at is new mesodermal for the cerebral
medulla and ectodermal for the cerebrum, but they behave very,
very similarly. However, again the devil sits in
the details when we have the healing phase kick in and this
is when you might have a a diagnosis of an eczema or
intraductal breast cancer or a bile duct cancer etcetera,
etcetera. So.
But how? How is it that certain therapies
successfully treat those symptoms?
Well, therapies will only be successful if you are in the
healing phase. This is why sometimes a patient
might might reverse a cancer if they have chemotherapy right and
other patients it may not reverse, instead it might grow
further. In actual fact, most cases do
that. Well, we, we need to understand
what the patient is going through and is this a metastasis
that is as a result of the prognosis etcetera, etcetera,
where there is no hope or they've been given a certain
amount of time to live, get your affairs in order, etcetera,
etcetera. It's very demoralising for a
patient and I don't know anyone that can overcome it unless
they're made of steel. Or or something simple like an
aspirin which treats the symptoms of a headache.
Right. Well, you know, we have to
understand the way these substances work, they they
actually fall into the two categories of sympathicotonia or
vagotonia, which is the active phase or the healing phase.
So any pain reliever which is anti inflammatory would be
sympathico tonic. And what it does is it
suppresses the healing phase symptoms.
You know we look at coffee as a remedy for a headache
occasionally, right? Why does it work?
Well, it works because it's sympathico tonic.
In other words, it's a stimulant, and if you take a
stimulant when you are in a deep healing phase, it's going to
offset those symptoms. But is that a good or bad thing?
Well, if you take a simple remedy, it's a good thing,
right? But if you take the drug, it
could be a bad thing. There could be repercussions and
serious repercussions in some cases.
But you know, we are conditioned to take stuff for what ails us,
right? I don't think people are going
to change anytime soon in that regard.
But then someone like me, if I get a headache, I question
straight away, OK, what just happened?
Am I in an healing phase or am I maybe in an active phase?
Because you can have a headache from an active phase as well.
So and then I start to work out the problem.
So I don't take stuff. But you make a good point.
I mean when my wife was pregnant she wasn't allowed to take
anything just about as which which goes to show.
Exactly. Does does German new medicine
apply only to humans or does it also dovetail with animals?
Oh, no, very much so. Absolutely.
We have to decipher the language that animals are speaking in
order to be able to help them. You know, every animal, every,
every species has its own code of behaviour.
They all have DH, SS. As a matter of fact, the DHS is
really meant for us to adapt in some way.
If we cannot solve the problem, our bodies will express a good
way to adapt to the problem. For example, the the liver
cancer. Again, you know this is to help
the liver or the body to resorb nutrients more efficiently by
developing another part of the liver.
In other words, the organ is expanding, it's growing to
accommodate the problem right to stomach cancer.
It it secrets digestive enzymes in order to digest that morsel
that you have difficulty coming to terms with.
You know, we're talking about an indigestible anger for a stomach
cancer always over the morsel, and the morsel is something that
we need to survive. What you're saying is that if a
dog has parvo or gets cancer late in life, it's also to do
with a conflict of sorts. Absolutely.
They react exactly the way humans react to ADHS.
The circumstances may not be exact, but they do react.
I think Doctor Armour also observed animal behaviour for
quite some time to, to be able to come to some of his
conclusions. You know, and some of those
traits crossover to humans, for example, a, a boundary
demarcation conflict, which would give us a bladder
infection. You know, animals are, are very
territorial in that sense. You know, you take your dog out
for a walk, he's going to find a shrub or a tree and he's going
to mark his territory. He's making sure.
What German new medicine is proposing is that all of these
things that are in our gut, for example, the gut flora,
etcetera, these are helpful microbes.
They're not there to harm us. Absolutely right.
They live in a symbiotic relationship with our bodies,
and it's only when we go into any kind of a healing phase, in
other words, we've resolved the conflict, that's they're
literally set into motion. So when Louis Pasteur proposed
that we take germs out of milk, it was a very bad idea.
Oh, absolutely. But I think didn't he recant his
own theory? His his work is in Princeton
University and he did recant everything that he had
discovered. So he was a fraud.
Yes, absolutely he was a fraud. So really, the germ theory is
based on fraudulent facts. But let's just stay on that for
a second because that's pretty important.
I mean, just about all milk that you buy today is pasteurised and
everything that's happened over the last few years has been
about microbes attacking us, right?
It's all nonsense. Well, it's big business.
I think you've interviewed others that agree with you,
right? That it is all nonsense, that it
has been misinterpreted and it's being taught as such.
So, you know, scientists these days have little choice but to
go with their teaching. They don't ask questions
anymore, you know, which is unfortunate.
And, and people like Doctor Homer, who did ask questions are
literally crucified for it. The environment is a reminder of
when they had ADHS. You see, when we have a
biological shock, there are billions of bits of information
that are being processed by our our psyche.
Of course, the most important bits are the ones that will
remain and will affect us in the future.
These are what we call tracks. So really what happens is, is
that the moment we have this biological shock, a compartment
is created in our psyche or our subconscious mind and that
compartment stores all the information.
Now when we have a a second event that is the same or
similar, more information will go into that very same
compartment. These are what we call tracks
and whenever we are exposed to these tracks or reminders, this
is when there is a great potential for us to develop some
kind of a physical problem, some kind of an ailment.
This is really the basis of chronic illnesses.
But Isadora, what happens in situations where it appears to
be collective, like for example chicken pox with kids that going
to school or seasonal flu where loads of people.
Did in fact have a collective conflict.
Chicken pox and measles is all about separation, right?
So the IT is a healing phase and what gives it away as a
separation is the fact that they would develop a fever.
And you only develop a fever if there is a a conflict that was
resolved in the sensory cortex of the brain.
And the sensory cortex of the brain responds almost
exclusively to separation conflicts.
So it's in fact the epithelium, the outer skin that's affected.
And during the conflict active phase, you have these
microscopic ulcerations during the stress phase.
So let's take for example, kids that all of a sudden the teacher
leaves and for unknown reasons and a replacement teacher comes
for a for a couple of months or so.
Their original teacher returns and next thing you know, there's
a measles or chicken pox epidemic.
That's because they experienced A separation and now the
teacher's back and they've resolved the conflict.
OK, but meanwhile we see this or we are convinced that this is
something of an of an epidemic, when in fact they all had the
same kind of conflict. Which is why it happens when
they go to school. Exactly.
And I see a lot of people getting sick around Christmas.
What do we do at Christmas? Well, we, we see our families
and we take a break, you know, we relax, we put everything
behind us and next thing you know, you're, you're down with
the flu. Now any kind of respiratory
ailment, lower respiratory that will develop a cough that will
materialise literally within 36 to 48 hours after you find a
solution to the conflict. So this is a good way to pay
attention as to what you resolve because it's in such close
proximity to when you get sick. So that's the question that you
need to ask yourselves. What just happened?
What did I resolve? And there is always a common
thread and that has to do with fear.
It's a situation that they feared.
So, for example, you know that winter's coming and so you know
that you're going to be indoors, it's going to get colder, it's
going to be perhaps wet and rainy, snowy, whatever.
And so you're you, you start preparing mentally for that, but
it's not exactly a positive experience.
Well, it's that is not a DHS. You see we have to include that
element. Without that we don't get sick.
We're preparing ADHS is means that we're not prepared.
In other words, you need to be in a stress phase before you
will get sick. Which also explains why not
everybody gets sick. Exactly.
Because we always talk about who gets sick, but we don't talk
about who doesn't get sick. Yes.
Well, in a family of sick, maybe one or two get sick.
Maybe they shared an experience. Nobody else got sick.
How do we explain that if it's contagious?
Yes, well obviously contagion then is nonsense.
Yes, absolutely, absolutely. I mean, we, if we have an open
wound, if we have an open wound and, and we become, we get dirt
or something into it, it can become infected or surgical
wound. You know, we can introduce
microbes into open wounds and it can become infected.
But you know, over time the body deals with it, right?
The same way you have a cold and a flu.
The body deals with it. It's only when we look at
history and pandemics and why people died, we have to
appreciate that 4 or 500 years ago, let's say when we had the
the plague, these people were, were malnourished.
Their bodies had absolutely no resistance, you know, So if they
got sick and they got a fever, there is always a high chance
that they might die. But that's not the case anymore,
right? We're not malnourished.
Do you think we have a very impoverished understanding of
health and well being? Oh, it's, it's absolutely wrong,
absolutely wrong. Everything that we believe or
believed up until Hammer was wrong, he stood all of medicine
on its head. It's quite extraordinary.
And what he discovered in that 35 years since he, he understood
the the first biological law, it's vast, absolutely vast.
It changes everything. And This is why there was so
much resistance, because current medicine is, is built on
misconceptions. How can they possibly have any
success when something is built on something that is incorrect?
If you ignore medical intervention, how then do you
treat something? Let's just let's just use an
everyday example like a headache or.
Well, you know, skin. Rash or something?
In some cases, intervention is necessary.
In serious cases, absolutely. And Doctor Hammer agreed with
that. He was, after all, a medical
doctor. You know, he, he wasn't some woo
woo. You know, he, he was a serious
medical doctor. He was the youngest medical
doctor to ever graduate medical school in Germany.
He was an internist. He worked in psychiatry.
So he understood the psyche like and the body like no one else.
It was quite extraordinary. And if he didn't know something,
he would research and research and research until he figured it
out. So it's the training is all
wrong for one, OK, in in order for this to change, they have to
begin training doctors differently.
And according to what Homer discovered, now the only way I
see that happening is if there are some brave doctors, and
there are some. There are some doctors that are
in my courses now, some brave doctors that are challenging the
system and are doing their own thing.
They're working with patients differently because they don't
see any results with what they're doing.
But why is German new medicine such a threat if it's helping
people? Oh.
Well, consider that if everybody that understood GNM at the time
that the pandemic hit, do you think they would have
successfully vaccinated that many people globally?
Yeah, right. So we have to be kept stupid.
And the only way to do that is to malign the discoverer of what
goes against what they're doing. I think there, there might have
been a suspicion. I mean, we already knew that
stress was was instrumental in making people sick.
We know that, but I think he, he wanted to know why specifically,
in particular, because his cancer was so precise.
It was a testicular cancer and he lost his son.
You cannot procreate without the testes, right?
So the fact that it, it affected that part of the body, I think
spurred him on to try to understand why he became I'll
after his son died. And the kind of testicular
cancer that he developed develops during the conflict act
of phase. It doesn't grow when the
conflict is resolved. So it was literally within three
months that he had the the surgery to remove the testicular
tumour after, after Dirk died. And you know, when I first met
Doctor Homer, this is going back to 1999, I asked him because I
knew his background was traditional.
I asked him, you didn't understand GNM when you got
sick, why didn't you take chemotherapy?
And he said to me, you know, El Sedora, I don't know of any
doctor that would subject himself or his family to
chemotherapy. And that's why he only had
surgery. But even surgery was dangerous
for him because he developed a a very serious peritoneal
infection. And he had only, I think of of
5% of surviving that so. What you're describing is
effectively the fifth law, which is that every conflict has a
biological meaning. There's a purpose.
Exactly. So that means that, for example,
some cancers will develop during the conflict active phase to
accommodate or to adapt, right? To help the individual to adapt
to accommodate the conflict. And then others will only fulfil
their biological meaning when the conflict has been resolved.
For example, a bone cancer or a testicular teratoma, sorry, a
testicular cancer. There are two kinds.
The one doctor Hammer had was a teratoma.
Now we have another kind of testicular cancer which involves
different cells, different tissues that will only occur
when the conflict has been resolved.
So this actually augments this the testicular tissue.
Whereas the teratoma, you have three different germ layers that
are growing simultaneously and this, these are the same germ
layers that develop the moment that the the egg is fertilised
and becomes an embryo. So we're looking at procreation
in both cases. So a territorial a, a lost
conflict, a a very profound lost conflict, a sudden lost conflict
is going to affect the testes in men and the ovaries in women.
So there is a incredible amount of brain body connection.
And as far as creepy if I'm wrong, but this can even be seen
in things like CT scans. Oh yes, absolutely.
That's that's something that Doctor Homer discovered the
connection. He he discovered early on, he
was still working in traditional medicine and he was on duty in
emergency when a heart attack patient came in.
And in this case it was a coronary and he had he came in
completely without consciousness.
So when someone comes in unconscious, the protocol is to
do ACT of the brain. And here we're looking at the
1980s Doctor Hammer couldn't have discovered this connection
until then because the CT wasn't actually invented until the
1970s sometimes. So it was a very, very new kind
of imaging that they were using. So they took ACT of this, this
gentleman, and when Doctor Hammer looked at it, he realised
that there was a pocket of fluid or edoema precisely in the part
of the brain that neurology already understood had to do
with the heart rhythm centre. And that's when he made that
connection that the brain actually mediates what goes on
between the psyche and the organ.
It was a healing phase, right? Because we're looking at edoema.
Edoema will only occur in the healing phase of a of a a
biological programme. What is the significance of
being right handed and being left handed?
Oh, it is very significant. But you know, we're looking at
how the brain is wired, OK? It is significant when we're
looking at let's say cancers or skin manifestations for example,
that are on one side of the body or the other with cancers we're
looking at breast cancers, testicular cancers, ovarian
cancers, etcetera, etcetera. Doctor Homer found that in right
handed people the right side of the body will respond to issues
to do with partners and the left side of the body has to do with
issues with mother and children. Now, in left handed people, that
is completely opposite. So if we're looking for the
cause of a breast cancer, let's say a separation conflict in a
female that has given them an intraductal cancer, we need to
establish their laterality, right handed or left handed to
be able to determine whether or not the breast cancer was as a
result of a separation from her mother, her child or her
partner. It's very precise.
It's, it's quite extraordinary how he managed to put these
pieces together. And I can guarantee you I've
been working with this since 1994 officially and it's
absolutely correct. It's mind boggling how he
managed to put this together. Does it does it actually make a
difference? Because it's always in
hindsight. Oh.
Oh, OK. So I see that you're left
handed. Oh, OK, I see that you're right
handed. At which point isn't it already
too late? Not at all.
You know, I, I found through my own experience over the last 25
years that when we understand the conflict and its origin in
in particular the programming biological shock, that we can
alleviate symptoms immediately. It's quite extraordinary.
It's skin conditions, arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, you know
that the most common ailments, migraines, you name it, they can
be reversed immediately. Now intraductal breast cancer is
a little bit more difficult, but nonetheless, unless we establish
what is preventing it from completely run, it's running its
course. It will continue and it can
create problems down the line. Of course it depends on the
individual. What role does diet and toxins
and environment play? Well, you know, I eat almost
organic foods. I don't like preservatives.
My environment is clean. I think it's important because
they can compromise certain conditions.
You know, if you're dealing with a with a toxin and a chronic
illness, it's it's probably a lot better that you try to eat
naturally and stay away from preservatives and environmental
poisons. We know they do make you I'll
cumulatively so. And it's the same for for
radiation, right? Because radiation destroys
cells, radiation. If people are exposed to
radiation, it can induce leukaemia when the radiation
leaves your body. So these environmental toxins
can create illness. So like smoking a stool?
Not a good idea. Well, you know, if you want
black lungs and go for it, but it's not going to give you
cancer, You know, for that we need a biological shock.
In other words, for there to be a cellular change, we do need a
biological shock. Well that's a good point because
I know lots of people who live till age 94.
They smoked their whole life and they didn't get cancer.
Right, they weren't worried about it.
No, they died of a heart attack. Which is a healing crisis.
What a heart attack. Yes.
I'm struggling to get my head around that.
Can you explain what you mean? Cause a heart attack?
It it ends it ends somebody's life.
How is it now it? Again it depends on how much
damage was done to the heart muscle in the process and how
much damage and how long the patient was was in conflict.
It, it goes without saying that any disease that where you were
in conflict for such a long time, the healing phase
repercussions can be quite devastating.
You know when, when we, if you remember, I, I spoke about CTS
of the brain where Doctor Homer saw this patient had edoema
after a massive heart attack. Well, it's the edoema in the
brain that will appear in all very important healing phases.
So there we also need to be careful.
So in a coronary we are looking at edoema in the heart rhythm
centre. That will determine whether or
not the patient is going to survive.
Also, it depends on how much damage was done to the heart
muscle during the conflict act of phase, because there is a
degeneration of cells or tissues during that period.
So, and of course, so with the magnitude of these epileptic or
epileptoid crises, the tissues of the heart, because they
degenerate, the heart can actually rupture.
But now, is something like diabetes a result of too much
sugar? No, not at all.
The sugar will compromise people with diabetes, but it's not the
cause. There is a very specific part of
the brain that will control your blood sugar.
We have one for the glycogen and we have another one for the
insulin, so sorry, Glucagon and insulin.
And that means that when we have a biological shock that is
actively affecting either one of those relays, this is when we
will have a blood sugar disorder.
I don't know how to ask this question.
Slip me. Let me try my best.
Do you think that there there is basically an industry around
naming diseases? In other words, there aren't
nearly as many illnesses and diseases as what the
Pharmaceutical industry tells us.
It's basically all just renaming of conditions that we already
have. Well, I think you know, this is
what Doctor Homer was actually trying to tell us.
When he looked at at the different organs and the kinds
of diseases that could present in an organ, he narrowed it down
considerably to the the three germ layers, or let's say the
three, three most important areas of the brain that control
those germ layers. And he actually devised the
scientific chart. I don't know if you're familiar
with it. It's it's a book where he
outlines the actual name of the disease, the part of the brain
that will react to a biological shock, the name of the
biological shock or the kind of shock that you will react to.
How this materialises during the conflict active phase and how it
materialises during the healing phase.
Now when when we look at the scientific chart, it's all
colour coded. We have 3 embryonic germ layers
that are controlled by 4 areas of the brain.
Now when we look at the ponds of the brain stem, all of those
organs react to biological shocks to do with survival.
OK, we're looking at vital organs now the second part of
the old brain, the cerebellum, reacts to protection.
This is when our skin began to develop.
Our skin actually protects us from the rays of the sun, right
from the radiation. And then after that, when when
we began to live on land, we needed to find a way to move on
land. This is when our skeletal
structure and our muscles and connective tissue and tendons
and the lymphatic system, that's when all of that developed and
that has to do with the self devaluation, feeling bad about
yourself or being made to feel bad about yourself.
Then when we have the latest addition to the brain, what
we're looking at is relationships.
OK, so all of the organs really that that are covered by the
outer skin are connected to the cerebrum and the outer skin
itself, which is connected to the sensory cortex.
They all respond to relationships.
OK, so when we began to form groups, this is when that part
of the brain began to develop. So this is the outermost germ
layer. Then the cerebral medulla, which
affects the skeletal structure. That has to do with with the new
mesodermal germ layer. So we have 3 germ layers which
are controlled by 4 different areas of the brain and we react
according to our evolution. So what is the moral of the
story El Sidora? The moral of the story?
Well, if I'm going to give any advice to anyone, I would say
live a life of harmlessness because you never know how
people will react to how you behave.
I think that's that's going to be our future.
I think that will have to be our future.
If we are going to evolve as the human race, we will have to take
that into consideration and I think that is really one of the
biggest gifts that Doctor Homer has given us.
Because once we all embrace this and live our lives accordingly
and understand that the Word can harm and the Word can heal, that
we will begin to change our behaviour and begin to evolve
spiritually. And if I'm if I'm understanding
correctly, there is a place for medicine but currently
everything is over medicalized. I think so.
You know, the way Dr Homer has outlined it, he like to see the
body and what it's capable of. I've seen some extraordinary
recoveries and reversals and he's absolutely right in in
seeing things that way. The problem is that we have been
conditioned to take a remedy for everything, when in fact we're
we're stopping nature from taking its course.
We're suppressing something and driving it deeper into our
systems. We're not even allowing
ourselves to understand its origin, which ultimately when we
do understand its origin, we can make those corrections in our
lives. But that's a very important
point because currently everything is about treating the
symptoms and not looking at the cause.
That's right. But again, we, we've allowed
that, we facilitated that. But then, Yossidora, what is the
purpose of pain? It's a warning, you know, It
really is a warning. Now in my observations, at least
over the last 10 years, I've when working with with chronic
conditions, the original conflicts have always been
resolved. But as soon as the psyche
identifies a track which during which you experience that
conflict, your body is going to react to that track by giving
you some kind of a symptom. So it's a matter of deciphering
the symptom to understand exactly what just happened, what
that track was related to, and how your symptoms associate with
that first biological shock. So it's a problem, you know, we
have to remain more conscious. We're not living consciously at
at in any way. But I'm thinking, for example,
childbirth. Now that isn't a negative thing.
It's literally bringing life into the world.
Yet there is an association attached to that which is pain.
Well, the, the pain really has to do with the muscles that are
contracting in order to facilitate the birth.
And of course the at the, this is an epileptoid crisis or
actually an epileptic crisis because it involves the
musculature even the, the moment the ovum is fertilised and the
embryo begins to form, that entire nine month process
follows the law of two phases. And what we're looking at is the
epileptic crisis at birth, where the foetus actually becomes
rigid in order to start to move out into the birth canal.
OK, so the foetus and the mother are both undergoing the this
epileptic crisis at that moment, and all muscle spasms involve
pain, but it's temporary. It's not like you're going to be
in pain the rest of your life, right?
At the other end of the spectrum, you get bitten, let's
say by a mosquito, and you get a a, a a response.
That's itchy. Now that isn't a crisis, is it?
No, that's a toxin because they inject some kind of a poison
into your skin that makes you itchy, right?
OK, it's. Only when it's associated with
ADHSA mosquito bite. Well, let's say malaria.
Certain circumstances. Well, malaria is a parasite that
has nothing to do with it. So malaria is is not a toxin.
It's not a disease in itself, it's a parasite.
Which of course is in itself a problem.
Well, over time, people do build an immunity to IT.
People that live in these regions eventually do build an
immunity to it. It's newbies like us that would
be affected if we went into your environment and we were bitten
by a mosquito carrying this parasite.
How can I follow your work and find out more?
Well, I'm teaching the GNM now at at a very high level through
the GNM Institute. So anyone that is interested in
courses, we have courses from the beginners.
The GNM simplified, it's not taught my by myself, it's taught
my by my protege. And I've been interactive in, in
the development of the course. So everything is 100%.
Then I have the intermediate courses, which are the GNM for
healthcare professionals, for anyone that is in the healthcare
profession that wants to go in this direction or wants to know
more about it, they're welcome to enter into these courses.
And then I have the certification levels for people
that wish to practise this at a very high level.
So we have the Institute, but for general information, you
could just Google Ilsidora's blog and you'll see all of my
blogs and my rents on the GNM. And then I have the original
website which was actually put up on request of Doctor Homer in
2000. It's called New medicine.ca now.
It was originally called the New Medicine until about 2005 when
he had to make a change of the name.
He couldn't register new medicine, so he added German in
front of it or Germanic in front of it.
But I mean, at this stage of the game shouldn't be called German
somewhat new medicine. It's a few decades old now.
Well, yes, it's been more than 40 years since he discovered the
iron rule of cancer. On that note, Elsa Dora Laker,
thank you for joining me in the trenches.
My pleasure.