1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,400
At the top of Labour, they feel 
that they can't win an election 

2
00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:08,280
if it is a immigration general 
election, if they've taken small

3
00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:13,880
boats and these hotels off your 
television screens, then they're

4
00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:16,800
in play and somehow they can 
crawl back from the abysmal 

5
00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:18,560
ratings that they have at the 
moment. 

6
00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:21,840
But if those issues and that 
anger is at the top of people's 

7
00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:24,800
minds, if it is the most salient
issue come the next general 

8
00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:27,080
election, I think there are 
people at the top of the Labour 

9
00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:30,160
Party that think they might as 
well pack their bags and not 

10
00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:33,440
even turn up. 
Hello and welcome to the 

11
00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:35,880
forecast. 
Is the government's immigration 

12
00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:39,440
strategy doomed to fail? 
Despite the tough language, the 

13
00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:43,200
one in, one out deal with France
and the rapid closure of asylum 

14
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:46,280
hotels, Labour continues to 
plunge in the polls. 

15
00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:50,600
So why is it going so badly? 
Has Keir Starmer, as many of his

16
00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:55,040
critics charge, played directly 
into Nigel Farage's hands by 

17
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:58,680
elevating immigration? 
Or is there a long term plan 

18
00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:01,400
that could yet pay off? 
To discuss, I'm joined by our 

19
00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:04,680
community's editor Darshna Soni,
who has just been in France 

20
00:01:04,680 --> 00:01:08,720
meeting asylum seekers sent back
under the new scheme, and by our

21
00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:11,440
political editor Gary Gibbon in 
Westminster. 

22
00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:14,880
Gary, let me start with you. 
The latest polling has Labour in

23
00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:19,280
a dire situation. 
To what extent is immigration to

24
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:22,240
blame for that? 
It's in play. 

25
00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:26,240
It's not everything. 
When you ask voters to identify 

26
00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:30,120
the issues that have driven them
away from Labour, people who 

27
00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:34,400
voted Labour in 2024, 
immigration is is up there. 

28
00:01:34,680 --> 00:01:36,960
Winter fuel allowance used to be
the number one thing they 

29
00:01:36,960 --> 00:01:39,080
mentioned quite often. 
Now it's cost of living. 

30
00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:42,000
It's in play. 
It's a very top player in this 

31
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:44,800
dynamic and it's a dynamic 
which, as you say, is looking 

32
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:48,560
dire for Labour at the moment. 
And and and why is that? 

33
00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:52,240
Is it because it doesn't appear 
to have a clear vision on this? 

34
00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:56,920
Labour built an enormously broad
coalition of voters at the last 

35
00:01:56,920 --> 00:02:00,040
election. 
Shallow, but broad. 

36
00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:03,960
And that included a lot of 
people whose natural inclination

37
00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:06,200
hadn't been Labour over the 
years. 

38
00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:08,759
A lot of them were previous 
Conservative voters, people 

39
00:02:08,759 --> 00:02:12,240
who've now hopped to reform 
their their attitudes, their 

40
00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:16,000
outlook, their priorities were 
not necessarily a perfect match 

41
00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:22,280
for the traditional Labour sell.
And they have broken away from 

42
00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:24,040
the iceberg. 
The problem for Labour is 

43
00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:26,280
they've broken away in 
significant numbers and they're 

44
00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:28,840
also having a lot of fracturing 
on the other side. 

45
00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:32,480
The voters seem to deeply 
dislike Labour at the moment and

46
00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:35,120
immigration is one of the 
components of that. 

47
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,320
And Darshney, you've been 
looking at their current way of 

48
00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:40,960
trying to to tackle the 
immigration issue. 

49
00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:42,560
You know, the last government 
had Rwanda. 

50
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:44,720
This government has one in, one 
out. 

51
00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:47,640
You've been looking at these 
early days of that policy. 

52
00:02:47,640 --> 00:02:49,520
How is it working from what 
you've been finding? 

53
00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:53,440
Well, it's interesting that this
was announced to much fanfare 

54
00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:55,560
back in July. 
The government made a big deal 

55
00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:59,560
out of this and said that this 
was going to help deter people 

56
00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:01,520
crossing the Channel in small 
boats. 

57
00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:03,720
Now, so far there's only been a 
small number. 

58
00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:06,520
It is only a pilot, but it's 
really interesting. 

59
00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:09,640
We've been to France and met 
some of those, mainly young men 

60
00:03:09,640 --> 00:03:14,160
who have been deported and the 
picture that they painted was of

61
00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:16,920
a system that's still quite 
chaotic, it's still not working 

62
00:03:16,920 --> 00:03:19,920
as it should be. 
So for example, we met people 

63
00:03:19,920 --> 00:03:24,000
who had come to England and they
were detained straight away. 

64
00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:27,720
They were held in detention for 
around 58 days. 

65
00:03:27,720 --> 00:03:31,680
Some of those that I spoke to 
and they weren't told why they 

66
00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:35,280
had been singled out, but they 
told us they had been given the 

67
00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:39,440
impression that they'd be able 
to apply for asylum in France. 

68
00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:42,120
Once they get to France, it's a 
very different story. 

69
00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:44,520
So for example, we got footage 
of the hostel where they're 

70
00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,680
staying. 
It's a very cramped place. 

71
00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:49,960
There were around 40 people 
sleeping in one room. 

72
00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:53,640
They were told that actually 
under the Dublin Convention they

73
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,640
won't be able to play, they 
won't be able to apply for 

74
00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:59,520
asylum in France. 
So actually a lot of them that 

75
00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:01,560
we spoke to are now trying to 
get back to England. 

76
00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:05,280
So it just all adds to this 
perception of the Home Office 

77
00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:08,040
being out of control. 
And you mentioned the Dublin 

78
00:04:08,040 --> 00:04:10,560
Convention, which makes us all 
think back to those days of 

79
00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,000
Brexit, which in many ways 
triggered or seemed to to 

80
00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:17,600
inflamed the current immigration
debate. 

81
00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:23,040
Explain how it's working and and
why it's relevant to these men. 

82
00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:27,400
It's a really important point 
and it's something that's cited 

83
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:29,920
by a lot of people who are 
seeking asylum. 

84
00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:33,640
We went to Calais as well and 
almost everybody that we met 

85
00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,600
there said that because of 
Dublin they were trying to get 

86
00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:38,640
to England because Dublin 
doesn't apply. 

87
00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:43,640
So under the Dublin Agreement, 
EU EU countries had agreed that 

88
00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:47,040
migrants could be sent back to 
the first country they entered 

89
00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:50,120
in Europe and their asylum claim
will be processed there. 

90
00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:53,800
So as many migrants do, for 
example, if you're coming and 

91
00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:56,280
you're travelling the route from
Libya across the Mediterranean, 

92
00:04:56,280 --> 00:04:58,800
you might land in Italy, then 
you might make your way to 

93
00:04:58,800 --> 00:05:02,000
France and then to England. 
Under this arrangement you can 

94
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:04,080
get sent back, for example to 
Italy. 

95
00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:07,000
A lot of people say they only 
cross through these countries, 

96
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,680
obviously because they had to on
their way to a place of safety, 

97
00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,200
and they're worried that if they
get sent back to some of these 

98
00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,880
countries, they may eventually 
be deported to their countries 

99
00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:18,320
of origin. 
They feel, rightly or wrongly, 

100
00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:22,320
that Britain has a much more 
sympathetic immigration system 

101
00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:26,400
to people from certain countries
like Eritrea or Sudan where 

102
00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:28,720
there has been a civil war since
Brexit. 

103
00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:31,320
That doesn't apply here, which 
is why, for example, the Prime 

104
00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:34,480
Minister tried to dub these boat
crossings the Farage boats. 

105
00:05:34,960 --> 00:05:36,960
They're saying that it all 
started because of Brexit. 

106
00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,360
Now the only country that we 
have a returns deal with is 

107
00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:42,720
France under this one in one out
scheme and. 

108
00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:46,120
It's one of the reasons why the 
men are saying to you they want 

109
00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,280
to get back here. 
Yeah, it is a big factor. 

110
00:05:49,280 --> 00:05:52,280
And we met people who had 
settled, for example, in Germany

111
00:05:52,280 --> 00:05:54,920
for many years. 
Now suddenly in Germany, the 

112
00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:57,440
political tide has turned there.
They're getting much more 

113
00:05:57,440 --> 00:05:59,640
strict. 
And they're saying that even 

114
00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:01,760
though people have settled there
for a number of years, waiting 

115
00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:04,840
for their asylum claims to be 
sorted, they're now being told, 

116
00:06:04,840 --> 00:06:07,720
no, you can't stay here. 
And that's happened to people 

117
00:06:07,720 --> 00:06:09,160
from a number of different 
countries. 

118
00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:13,000
And a lot of people said to me 
that England is their last 

119
00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:16,000
chance and that's why so many 
are desperate to get here. 

120
00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:20,280
I mean Gary, stop the boats 
Rwanda, one in one out. 

121
00:06:20,280 --> 00:06:23,880
All those short snappy 1 liners 
don't really get to the 

122
00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:27,040
complexity of this issue for 
successive governments. 

123
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:32,120
If this policy ends up being one
out, the same one back again as 

124
00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:35,200
Darshner suggests it might how? 
How problematic would that be 

125
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:38,200
for the Labour government? 
Oh, enormously problematic. 

126
00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:42,200
Labour MPs are in anguish about 
these headlines. 

127
00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:45,160
The idea that you can be sent 
out of the country and then come

128
00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:50,440
straight back on a on a boat 
again, yeah. 

129
00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:53,600
I don't think they have enormous
confidence in the a lot of 

130
00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:56,120
Labour MPs in the returns. 
Those of them who are 

131
00:06:56,120 --> 00:06:58,520
particularly concerned about 
immigration issues and sit in, 

132
00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:02,040
for instance, red wall seats 
where these issues can often be 

133
00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:06,360
more prominent, more salient for
voters higher up their list of 

134
00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:08,800
priorities. 
They're looking to Shabana 

135
00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:12,520
Mahmoud to do a lot of other 
things, what you might say, 

136
00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:18,920
reform leaning, conservative 
leaning policies to try and get 

137
00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:21,440
a grip of what they see as an 
enormous problem. 

138
00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:23,680
And they're, they're interested 
and you get the impression that 

139
00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:28,640
elements of the government are 
interested in removals to 

140
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:31,840
adjacent third countries to 
country of origin. 

141
00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:35,200
So maybe some exploratory talks 
going on in the background soon 

142
00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:39,720
with countries in Africa that 
maybe have some sort of more of 

143
00:07:39,720 --> 00:07:43,960
a population issue that they 
welcome additional people coming

144
00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:47,800
to their country, maybe trying 
to come to deals with some of 

145
00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:52,000
those countries and encourage 
people to go back there. 

146
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:57,800
Also looking, I strongly suspect
at the source of policy which 

147
00:07:57,800 --> 00:08:03,160
Italy has combined with Albania 
to do, where you set up a camp 

148
00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:09,200
in a third country and you send 
failed asylum seekers there. 

149
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:13,960
And that is something which Keir
Starmer thought he might be onto

150
00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:15,520
a winning ticket with Albania 
on. 

151
00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:17,600
But Albania said, no, we're not 
having yours. 

152
00:08:17,600 --> 00:08:21,360
We're just doing a deal with 
Italy, no other country. 

153
00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:24,040
They don't want to appear as a 
dumping ground. 

154
00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:25,880
They have their own country's 
image to think about. 

155
00:08:25,880 --> 00:08:28,320
They that was one of the 
arguments that came out from 

156
00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:30,080
Albania. 
But there are other countries 

157
00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:32,320
and you get a strong sense that 
the exploratory talks are going 

158
00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:34,679
on a lot in the background, 
exploring that. 

159
00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:37,280
And these these camps, if you 
have a look at some of the 

160
00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:40,799
footage there, they've got air 
conditioning units on the side 

161
00:08:40,799 --> 00:08:45,080
of a very small room. 
So it it, it would feel a lot 

162
00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:47,960
like some sort of prison in a 
hot climate. 

163
00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:50,800
And it's not quite clear what 
happens to people once they've 

164
00:08:50,800 --> 00:08:52,080
arrived there. 
Well, you know, what is their 

165
00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:54,360
next destination? 
What's the path of their life 

166
00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:57,160
beyond this? 
But nonetheless, this is stuff 

167
00:08:57,160 --> 00:08:59,880
which at the top of government 
is being considered and 

168
00:08:59,880 --> 00:09:03,640
pondered. 
So yeah, one in, one out, not 

169
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:07,240
looking like it's going to 
change the dial for Labour on 

170
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:11,840
the politics of of illegal 
migration, but other areas are 

171
00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:14,040
being looked at and they're 
quite hard line some of them. 

172
00:09:15,400 --> 00:09:18,080
I mean, Darshner, part of the 
difficulty for all the 

173
00:09:18,080 --> 00:09:23,880
politicians presumably is that 
immigration, asylum, they've all

174
00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:28,640
become inextricably linked with 
this idea that, you know, it's a

175
00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:32,040
0 sum game with people who are 
struggling very specifically, 

176
00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:35,320
not just a broad working class, 
but the white working class. 

177
00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:37,280
I mean, what are you finding on 
the ground? 

178
00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:43,200
So here in the UK, what's 
interesting is that it has 

179
00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:47,760
become one of the most defining 
and divisive issues of our 

180
00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:50,760
times, and small boats in 
particular. 

181
00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:54,000
They're just such a visual 
representation of this problem 

182
00:09:54,600 --> 00:09:56,720
and it does make people very 
angry. 

183
00:09:56,720 --> 00:10:00,320
So yesterday, for example, we 
looked at this report that the 

184
00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:02,960
Home Affairs Select Committee 
did about the amount of money 

185
00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:06,720
being spent on asylum. 
And if you are in a town and you

186
00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:09,480
are struggling with the cost of 
living and you feel like you 

187
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:11,320
can't get a point, an 
appointment at the doctor's 

188
00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:14,320
surgery and you feel that, you 
know, your kids school is 

189
00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:16,080
overcrowded. 
These things might not 

190
00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:19,440
necessarily be linked to asylum,
but that link has been made in 

191
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,080
certain narratives. 
And people are watching the 

192
00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:23,600
headlines. 
They're seeing the images of 

193
00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:26,320
these boats coming in. 
And then they're hearing that 

194
00:10:26,440 --> 00:10:29,840
the amount of money that we're 
spending on asylum has gone up 

195
00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:35,080
from something like 4.5 billion,
it has tripled now to £15 

196
00:10:35,080 --> 00:10:37,840
billion. 
And this is at a time when we're

197
00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:40,560
hearing that Rachel Reeves is 
struggling to balance the books,

198
00:10:40,560 --> 00:10:43,600
that taxes might have to go up, 
that businesses might be hit. 

199
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:47,840
So this is this is fuelling 
resentment when these things 

200
00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:50,600
keep being linked and there are 
people out there who are angry 

201
00:10:50,600 --> 00:10:53,800
and they just see successive 
government, successive home 

202
00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:57,280
secretaries unable to get a grip
on the situation. 

203
00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:00,560
But it's interesting, isn't it, 
that often that anger is 

204
00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:04,120
directed at asylum seekers and 
migrants rather? 

205
00:11:04,120 --> 00:11:07,280
I mean, you could reasonably be 
really furious at the government

206
00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,280
for the terrible contracts that 
they've had on these asylum 

207
00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:13,000
seekers. 
You could be reasonably enraged 

208
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,120
by the private companies making 
money. 

209
00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:20,320
But it's often this idea as, as 
I found myself, you know, in 

210
00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:22,760
parts of Middlesbrough where 
people will say they get 

211
00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:26,600
everything and we get nothing. 
So that is a huge issue and 

212
00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:28,880
that's what was so interesting 
about this Select Committee 

213
00:11:28,880 --> 00:11:31,800
report. 
The amount of profit that these 

214
00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:34,760
private companies are making 
doesn't get talked about. 

215
00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:38,120
And some of the terms of those 
contracts, I mean, there was a 

216
00:11:38,120 --> 00:11:40,320
lot of criticism yesterday 
because people were saying that 

217
00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:42,720
when these contracts were set 
up, the civil servants 

218
00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:45,960
responsible for overseeing it 
didn't understand how private 

219
00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:48,560
contracts work. 
Within those contracts there are

220
00:11:48,560 --> 00:11:52,160
no clauses, for example, no 
penalties for the companies if 

221
00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:54,280
they provide substandard 
accommodation. 

222
00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:58,040
And although we constantly hear 
this narrative that asylum 

223
00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:00,960
seekers are in plush hotels, 
that they are given free 

224
00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:04,760
housing, I've visited a lot of 
this housing all over the 

225
00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:06,240
country. 
I've been to a lot of these 

226
00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:09,560
hotels and some of the 
conditions are grim inside, 

227
00:12:09,880 --> 00:12:13,520
especially in some of the Hmos 
when they're dispersed from 

228
00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:15,880
hotels out in the into the 
communities. 

229
00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:18,960
Yes, they have got a roof over 
the head and they are given a 

230
00:12:18,960 --> 00:12:21,360
weekly allowance whilst their 
claim is heard. 

231
00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:24,960
But by no means are they living 
in luxury. 

232
00:12:24,960 --> 00:12:27,800
And I know that many people in 
government get frustrated at the

233
00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:29,880
fact that they haven't been able
to communicate this. 

234
00:12:29,880 --> 00:12:33,560
And the narrative is that people
are, you know, living a life of 

235
00:12:33,560 --> 00:12:37,080
Riley, that they are living in 
luxury and that they aren't 

236
00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:39,120
working when actually they're 
not allowed to work. 

237
00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,800
That is a huge issue for many of
these asylum seekers. 

238
00:12:43,480 --> 00:12:46,000
And that is a very real problem 
for the government isn't it, 

239
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:48,640
That narrative, if you can't, 
you can Fact Check it all you 

240
00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:51,760
like and you can say to people 
they don't get iPhones, you 

241
00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:55,120
know, they're not living with 
big wide screen televisions, 

242
00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:57,960
perhaps they're living, as 
Darshana suggests, sometimes 

243
00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:01,480
quite grim existences. 
But at the same time, you know, 

244
00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:02,960
that narrative has taken hold, 
Gary. 

245
00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:05,240
And what does a Labour 
government do about it? 

246
00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,040
Yeah, they they try to reduce 
the salience of the issue 

247
00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:12,160
because I think at the top of 
Labour they feel that they can't

248
00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:16,720
win an election if it is a 
immigration general election. 

249
00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:19,360
They can win an election if they
have neutralized the issue, if 

250
00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:22,360
they've made people think there 
is real progress happening, if 

251
00:13:22,360 --> 00:13:27,000
they've taken small boats and 
these hotels off your television

252
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:31,560
screens, then they're in play 
and somehow they can crawl back 

253
00:13:31,560 --> 00:13:34,560
from the abysmal ratings that 
they have at the moment. 

254
00:13:34,560 --> 00:13:37,840
But if those issues and that 
anger is at the top of people's 

255
00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:40,840
minds, if it is the most salient
issue come the next general 

256
00:13:40,840 --> 00:13:43,080
election, I think there are 
people at the top of the Labour 

257
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:46,400
Party that think they might as 
well pack their bags and, and 

258
00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:51,000
not even turn up because it it 
could be very, very grim indeed.

259
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,280
It's interesting how they're 
trying to trying so many 

260
00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:58,440
different levers Labour to 
neutralize this issue. 

261
00:13:58,640 --> 00:14:02,000
And sometimes they do it with a 
little whiff of what you might 

262
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:08,200
call opposition politics, not 
necessarily the most worked out 

263
00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:12,480
policy document in front of you,
considering the many, many 

264
00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:16,960
officials that lurk in Whitehall
and could Polish these things 

265
00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:19,160
up. 
Today we've been hearing about 

266
00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:21,800
barracks being used. 
When you probe a little about 

267
00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:26,360
how ready those plans are used 
for people who are currently in 

268
00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:29,600
hotels, fairly small number of 
them being talked about, two 

269
00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:32,040
areas being talked about. 
But when you probe, it doesn't 

270
00:14:32,040 --> 00:14:34,120
sound as though it's incredibly 
worked out. 

271
00:14:34,280 --> 00:14:36,320
And then of course we had 
another, we had a speech from 

272
00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:39,600
Keir Starmer just before the 
Labour Party conference when he 

273
00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:44,560
was talking about digital ID. 
And again, it didn't sound like 

274
00:14:44,560 --> 00:14:46,320
the thing was remotely worked 
out. 

275
00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:50,720
It has applications potentially 
across the whole realm of of 

276
00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:53,640
people's lives. 
But he, he was selling it in 

277
00:14:53,640 --> 00:14:58,680
some big way as part of the 
solution to illegal migration 

278
00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:01,480
and yet the thing hadn't been 
fully worked out. 

279
00:15:01,480 --> 00:15:05,480
So they are busy, they are 
shoving stuff out the door. 

280
00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:11,400
It isn't always, to mix my 
metaphors, fully cooked, But 

281
00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:13,760
yeah, they don't, they don't 
have a solution. 

282
00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:14,880
They're trying to put a lot of 
levers. 

283
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:17,640
Remember the conventions, we 
haven't talked about those, the 

284
00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:22,240
ECHR, the Refugee Convention, 
They're interested in trying to 

285
00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:25,720
get changes to the way courts 
interpret those. 

286
00:15:25,720 --> 00:15:28,360
And they think they have allies 
in Europe to help on those 

287
00:15:28,360 --> 00:15:29,720
fronts as well. 
The sort of thing, though, that 

288
00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:32,400
Labour governments would never 
have counted in the past. 

289
00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:36,720
Now in play and and and you. 
Talk about them, them trying to,

290
00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:40,840
to, to workout where they should
be on this, You know, it is 

291
00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:42,600
their strategy. 
In the end, you say, to remove 

292
00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:44,800
the salience. 
Is it in a way to desperately 

293
00:15:44,800 --> 00:15:47,880
try to not talk about it? 
Because a big part of the 

294
00:15:47,880 --> 00:15:50,400
problem, you know, we saw Keir 
Starmer with his Islands of 

295
00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:54,120
Strangers speech, which many of 
his own MP said had echoes of 

296
00:15:54,360 --> 00:15:56,520
Enoch Powell. 
And he was forced to say that he

297
00:15:56,520 --> 00:15:59,760
he was sorry about the use of 
that language. 

298
00:15:59,880 --> 00:16:03,200
You then had a sort of about 
turn with him calling reform 

299
00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:06,800
plans to end indefinite leave to
remain racist. 

300
00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:11,720
And politicians don't generally 
like to to be as definitive as 

301
00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:14,120
that. 
It's it's hard to see where 

302
00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:18,600
Labour sit compared to the much 
more definitive position, say of

303
00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:21,240
reform and now a resurgent Green
Party. 

304
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:23,160
It's very. 
Interesting those moments you 

305
00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:26,960
talked about there on Keir 
Starmer's journey on this issue,

306
00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:31,520
the Island of Strangers speech. 
I remember sitting under under 

307
00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:34,440
his nose as he delivered it and 
asking him afterwards. 

308
00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:37,880
You know that that that didn't 
sound like you, but he delivered

309
00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:39,760
nonetheless, recanted of it 
later. 

310
00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:42,240
And then when he came off the 
stage after that speech you've 

311
00:16:42,240 --> 00:16:45,920
just referred to at the Labour 
Party conference when he attacks

312
00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:51,520
reform, he said to someone in 
the wings as he came off the 

313
00:16:51,520 --> 00:16:54,800
stage, that was me. 
I felt what he was saying was I,

314
00:16:54,800 --> 00:16:57,360
I felt good about that. 
Most people are too young to 

315
00:16:57,360 --> 00:16:59,640
remember Mike Yard, an 
impressionist who would say, and

316
00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:02,040
this is me at the end of all his
impressions and pull off an 

317
00:17:02,040 --> 00:17:04,640
imaginary mask. 
He, he clearly felt that he was 

318
00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:06,960
saying something that was true 
to himself that he felt 

319
00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:09,319
comfortable with. 
Certainly the case watching his 

320
00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:13,560
party in the hall at Liverpool, 
that they felt comfortable with 

321
00:17:13,560 --> 00:17:14,880
it. 
They were basking in it and 

322
00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:17,000
applauding it. 
They loved the fact that he was 

323
00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:22,599
actually going for reform rather
than, as he sometimes can sound,

324
00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:26,599
some people aping them. 
Whether this all means there's 

325
00:17:26,599 --> 00:17:30,440
an absolute shift in Labour 
policy, well, you know, he just 

326
00:17:30,520 --> 00:17:35,160
constructed an entire reshuffle 
around trying to get Shabana 

327
00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:39,160
Mahmoud in as home secretary and
moved a lot of other pieces on 

328
00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:40,880
his chess board to make that 
happen. 

329
00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:45,680
And he was doing that because 
she represents a harder line 

330
00:17:45,680 --> 00:17:48,720
approach and might just 
implement some of those policies

331
00:17:48,720 --> 00:17:52,240
I was talking about a moment 
ago, which go way, way outside 

332
00:17:52,240 --> 00:17:54,280
Labour's conventional comfort 
zone. 

333
00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:56,800
So which is the real key? 
We still, I mean, he's, he's 

334
00:17:56,800 --> 00:18:00,280
still sort of mid Mike Yarwood. 
He's, we're not really quite 

335
00:18:00,280 --> 00:18:03,920
sure where he's going with this,
but he was definitely more 

336
00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:06,880
comfortable singing that song at
party conference. 

337
00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:10,480
I'm definitely old enough to 
remember who Mike Yarwood is, 

338
00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:14,560
even if nobody else is Darshna. 
I mean, on the ground, I know 

339
00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:18,400
it's very difficult, but on the 
ground, you know, the government

340
00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:22,720
may hope to to take the air out 
of the balloon if you like. 

341
00:18:23,320 --> 00:18:26,640
Reformer, not going to want to 
do that on the ground. 

342
00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:30,640
The communities that you talk 
to, do you think immigration 

343
00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:35,120
will remain a really, really 
difficult, important issue for 

344
00:18:35,120 --> 00:18:38,200
them? 
I think it will at the minute, 

345
00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:41,160
as long as we keep seeing the 
images of those boats coming 

346
00:18:41,160 --> 00:18:45,000
over, as long as we keep hearing
about Home Office chaos. 

347
00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:50,200
I mean, whilst we were filming 
in Paris on Friday, you couldn't

348
00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:53,120
make it up. 
That's when we got news about 

349
00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:55,920
the immigrant sex offender from 
the Bell Hotel being 

350
00:18:55,920 --> 00:18:58,280
accidentally released. 
I mean, it was like some sort of

351
00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:00,840
farce. 
As soon as we, you know, these 

352
00:19:00,840 --> 00:19:04,760
kind of stories just keep it up 
there and they just add to this 

353
00:19:05,120 --> 00:19:08,600
impression of incompetence. 
And I've spoken to a lot of 

354
00:19:08,600 --> 00:19:11,640
people who have said the Tories 
couldn't get a grip of it. 

355
00:19:11,640 --> 00:19:13,080
Now Labour can't get a grip of 
it. 

356
00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:16,800
We might as well try reform. 
People who wouldn't necessarily 

357
00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:20,560
vote for reform or say that they
don't agree with for reform on 

358
00:19:20,560 --> 00:19:24,560
all of their policies now feel 
that they might be the only ones

359
00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:27,000
or they they should be given a 
chance because everybody else 

360
00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:30,400
has tried but failed. 
And, you know, there are all 

361
00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:33,400
sorts of people who feel that 
sometimes we as journalists give

362
00:19:33,400 --> 00:19:35,960
it too much prominence and we're
feeding that narrative. 

363
00:19:36,440 --> 00:19:39,240
And there's, you know, but in 
that climate, it is in the 

364
00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:42,400
headlines every single day. 
It is a talking point. 

365
00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:46,480
And as long as people are making
that link, that is a worry for 

366
00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:48,440
the government. 
As Gary said, I mean in. 

367
00:19:48,720 --> 00:19:52,560
In a sense, what, what this 
debate has become in, in in many

368
00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:56,560
parts of the country has been 
very focused around, you know, 

369
00:19:56,600 --> 00:20:00,320
what maybe 10 years ago would 
have been defined as a broad 

370
00:20:00,320 --> 00:20:02,640
working classes. 
Now very specifically, many 

371
00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,320
people would say for specific 
reasons being defined as white 

372
00:20:05,320 --> 00:20:08,120
working class and what they are 
not getting and what they are 

373
00:20:08,120 --> 00:20:11,480
losing out on. 
And that is a, an area of 

374
00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:13,120
problem for the government, 
isn't it? 

375
00:20:13,160 --> 00:20:13,720
It's a. 
It's a. 

376
00:20:13,760 --> 00:20:16,720
It's a huge problem and, and 
they're very focused on it 

377
00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:22,440
inside #10 I think they think 
there's a section of the what we

378
00:20:22,440 --> 00:20:28,480
might call white working class 
vote that they picked up in, in 

379
00:20:28,480 --> 00:20:31,040
the last general election which 
is lost to them forever. 

380
00:20:31,120 --> 00:20:34,440
Which is much, which is, which 
has moved from the Conservatives

381
00:20:34,440 --> 00:20:37,320
temporarily used Labour as a 
tool with which to get the 

382
00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:42,200
Tories out and has now hopped 
away from a very long hop over 

383
00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:45,600
to Reform, not coming back. 
There are others who are more 

384
00:20:45,600 --> 00:20:49,880
biddable, who are similar but 
not as strident in their views 

385
00:20:51,040 --> 00:20:54,080
and maybe not as despairing, 
maybe not as utterly 

386
00:20:54,080 --> 00:20:56,000
pessimistic. 
And Labour thinks if they can 

387
00:20:56,800 --> 00:20:59,600
neutralize this issue, bring 
bring the election back to 

388
00:20:59,640 --> 00:21:03,280
issues like public services 
where they Labour don't think 

389
00:21:03,280 --> 00:21:06,600
Nigel Farage is as strong, that 
there's a chance of pulling back

390
00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:08,880
that segment of votes and Arshan
1. 

391
00:21:08,880 --> 00:21:12,080
Of the other things that perhaps
is a consequence of, of where 

392
00:21:12,080 --> 00:21:15,040
this debate has gone, you know, 
people talk about it as a toxic 

393
00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,360
debate in, in, in many parts of 
the country. 

394
00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:21,280
People say that, you know, 
talking about valid concerns. 

395
00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:24,760
There's a, there's a very thin 
line sometimes between that and 

396
00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:27,320
out and out racism. 
And I just wonder, you know what

397
00:21:27,320 --> 00:21:29,880
again you're seeing from your 
reporting on the ground. 

398
00:21:29,960 --> 00:21:33,000
It's an interesting. 
Debate isn't it because often 

399
00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:36,680
when I travel to different 
areas, people will start 

400
00:21:36,680 --> 00:21:40,120
speaking to me and they will 
always say I'm not racist. 

401
00:21:40,920 --> 00:21:43,440
Before you've even started the 
conversation or before you've 

402
00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:45,200
even asked them about their 
views or anything. 

403
00:21:45,200 --> 00:21:49,200
People, there is a perception 
that talking about this will be 

404
00:21:50,360 --> 00:21:52,840
will somehow earn you the label 
of being a racist. 

405
00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:57,720
And you know, we hear it from 
politicians all of the time. 

406
00:21:57,720 --> 00:21:59,640
Nigel Farage has made a big 
thing about this. 

407
00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:01,760
There was the issue with Sarah 
poaching talking about 

408
00:22:01,760 --> 00:22:04,120
advertising. 
And it was interesting. 

409
00:22:04,120 --> 00:22:07,960
Gary was saying about Keir 
Starmer feeling comfortable now 

410
00:22:07,960 --> 00:22:10,120
taking on reforms. 
It's interesting how quickly W 

411
00:22:10,120 --> 00:22:12,200
Streeting came out at the 
weekend and used the R word. 

412
00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:14,520
He actually used racism when he 
was talking about this. 

413
00:22:14,920 --> 00:22:18,400
So it's one of those interesting
things that people feel very 

414
00:22:18,400 --> 00:22:20,320
uncomfortable. 
And I think still talking about 

415
00:22:20,320 --> 00:22:23,320
it and the politics around it 
has been very, very toxic. 

416
00:22:23,480 --> 00:22:26,280
It's tied up with things like 
the issue of the flags, how 

417
00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:28,960
black and Asian people are made 
to feel at the minute, that 

418
00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:31,760
whole debate about whether it is
patriotism or whether it's an 

419
00:22:31,760 --> 00:22:35,040
obvious symbol that brings back 
memories of the 70s and 80s and 

420
00:22:35,040 --> 00:22:38,480
the National Front and so on. 
So it is a very difficult, toxic

421
00:22:38,480 --> 00:22:42,280
debate at the moment, not helped
by social media, some of the 

422
00:22:42,280 --> 00:22:45,480
influence of people from America
that we're seeing playing out 

423
00:22:45,480 --> 00:22:47,680
here. 
It is just a very, very toxic 

424
00:22:47,680 --> 00:22:51,560
time. 
And people feel that some of the

425
00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:54,160
language and some of the way 
that we speak to each other 

426
00:22:54,160 --> 00:22:56,600
about it has just become very, 
very difficult. 

427
00:22:56,840 --> 00:22:58,800
And Gary, just. 
To finish, I mean if as you've 

428
00:22:58,800 --> 00:23:01,440
talked about, you know, they 
hope to take the salience out of

429
00:23:01,440 --> 00:23:06,920
this, this subject, how likely 
is that it's all very. 

430
00:23:06,920 --> 00:23:09,840
Well, for Labour to say they 
want to reduce the salience of 

431
00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:12,720
immigration and get people 
talking about cost of living and

432
00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:15,560
public services, but they they 
haven't got a great tune to 

433
00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:19,800
whistle yet on those two. 
And that is one of the reasons 

434
00:23:19,800 --> 00:23:23,400
why Labour is in such a 
miserable place in the polls and

435
00:23:23,400 --> 00:23:27,320
staring potentially at horrible 
results next May. 

436
00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:31,800
So yeah, they have to get that 
side of things working. 

437
00:23:31,800 --> 00:23:36,920
That's their avowed intent. 
But so far it's not producing 

438
00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:38,120
many goods. 
And of course, we have the 

439
00:23:38,120 --> 00:23:43,200
budget coming up at the end of 
November, which might just make 

440
00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:45,000
life even more difficult for 
quite a few people. 

441
00:23:45,040 --> 00:23:46,920
Gary Gibbon. 
Darsh Nasani, both of you, 

442
00:23:46,920 --> 00:23:48,840
thanks very much for talking to 
me today. 

443
00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:51,080
That is it for this episode of 
The Forecast. 

444
00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:52,760
Until next time, goodbye.
