1
00:00:14,360 --> 00:00:18,280
Hello, this is Eva and you're 
listening to the In Between Tech

2
00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:20,960
and Trust podcast. 
In this week's episode, I talked

3
00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:25,440
to Michael Cohen and Michael is 
political scientist, founder of 

4
00:00:25,440 --> 00:00:28,880
Congress in Your Pocket, which 
is an app that has been making 

5
00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:32,439
US legislative information 
accessible to everyday for 

6
00:00:32,439 --> 00:00:37,440
voters for almost 18 years now. 
He's also authored the book 

7
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:42,240
Modern Political Campaigns and 
he's Executive Director of Fight

8
00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:46,120
Hate, which is an organization 
that's working to combat 

9
00:00:46,160 --> 00:00:49,320
anti-Semitism on college 
campuses globally. 

10
00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:53,640
Michael also teaches digital 
political strategy at John 

11
00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:58,080
Hopkins and NYU, which is why 
he's one of the best persons to 

12
00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,480
talk to. 
When we get into the 

13
00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:05,000
intersection of how AI is 
supercharging political content 

14
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:08,960
creation and what it does to a 
voter's ability to know what's 

15
00:01:08,960 --> 00:01:13,200
real, we also talk about micro 
targeting and how it has 

16
00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:17,120
fundamentally changed who 
campaigns actually talk to and 

17
00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:19,320
why. 
Michael also believes that the 

18
00:01:19,320 --> 00:01:23,320
most powerful way to fight 
online hate is to take the 

19
00:01:23,320 --> 00:01:28,040
conversation actually offline. 
One question that kept lingering

20
00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:31,800
with me after our conversations?
The following In a political 

21
00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:36,960
landscape that is flooded with 
AI generated content, how do we 

22
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:41,280
keep authenticity? 
Or we already passed a point of 

23
00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:44,040
where it matters? 
I invite you to find an answer 

24
00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:48,600
for yourself to that question 
and I hope some further arise 

25
00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:51,000
and some are answered are also 
shared with you. 

26
00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:56,720
Hello, Michael, and welcome to 
the In Between Tech and Trust 

27
00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:58,440
podcast. 
Thank you so much for having me 

28
00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:00,760
on. 
I want to start the conversation

29
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:03,440
as I do with every guest, 
because you also come from a 

30
00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:07,040
background in technology and 
politics, and I want to know 

31
00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:11,080
your take on trust in that 
intersection and also what the 

32
00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:12,800
first thing is that comes to 
your mind so. 

33
00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:15,480
The first thing that comes to my
mind when I think of tech and 

34
00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:18,040
trust is really your iPhone. 
It's the most personal device 

35
00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:20,440
you have and it's on us all the 
time. 

36
00:02:20,440 --> 00:02:23,000
We probably touch it more than 
we touch touch our spouses or 

37
00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:24,880
any other human being during the
day. 

38
00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:27,080
And it's a two way political 
gateway. 

39
00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:30,080
You know, candidates can now 
reach you directly wherever you 

40
00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:33,640
are and you can in turn seek out
information or stumble upon it 

41
00:02:33,640 --> 00:02:36,120
in your feed again everywhere. 
But now that ADI has sort of 

42
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:40,120
supercharged that content 
creation, how how much we know 

43
00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:43,320
is real and authentic and worthy
of your trust are all things 

44
00:02:43,320 --> 00:02:45,080
that are sort of up in play 
right now. 

45
00:02:45,160 --> 00:02:47,240
But again, it all goes back to 
that connected device that we 

46
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:50,040
carry in our pockets. 
And now talking about carrying 

47
00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:53,480
something in your pockets, you 
found it Congress in your 

48
00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:56,960
pocket, which is perfect, like 
an introduction to something 

49
00:02:56,960 --> 00:02:58,440
that you've been working on 
heavily. 

50
00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:01,600
And you also founded it because 
you wanted to make the 

51
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:05,360
legislative information 
accessible and you wanted to 

52
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:08,880
make it accessible in real time.
What problem were you trying to 

53
00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:12,800
solve and how did it turn out? 
Well, I, I think this came out 

54
00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:15,400
of my own just nerd him. 
I have a PhD in political 

55
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:18,480
science and mass communication. 
My dissertation was on Congress.

56
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:21,000
And so there was a lot of 
information that I wish I had 

57
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,320
for that dissertation that 
wasn't readily accessible. 

58
00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:25,040
I would have loved to have 
talked to staffers. 

59
00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:27,240
I would have loved to have 
talked to people around the 

60
00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:29,920
process that I was studying. 
And it was, it's very hard to 

61
00:03:29,920 --> 00:03:32,040
find that information. 
I mean, you would have to go to 

62
00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:35,640
spiral down notebooks that were 
basically out of date when after

63
00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:38,720
right after you printed them, 
you'd have to go and pay premium

64
00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:41,440
services, thousands of dollars a
year that you could get on the 

65
00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:43,280
Internet. 
But it was super clunky and it 

66
00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:44,840
was even at that price, it was 
out of date. 

67
00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,600
And so I felt that voters should
really have that access to 

68
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:50,920
information directly. 
And over time, we built out the 

69
00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:53,880
legislative section, which 
started with members sponsored 

70
00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:56,240
and Co sponsored bills. 
And a few years ago we had 

71
00:03:56,240 --> 00:03:58,280
committees and subcommittee 
membership and staff. 

72
00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:01,320
But last January, where we added
something that we thought was 

73
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:05,520
really amazing, we added AI bill
summaries, which provides real 

74
00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:08,960
context for people on what 
Capitol Hill is working on and 

75
00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:11,160
also distills down for people 
because they're not going to 

76
00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:15,160
read 400 to 500 pay bills, which
are available online. 

77
00:04:15,160 --> 00:04:18,920
And we also offer links to that.
But giving them a quick context 

78
00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:23,080
check within a summary really 
does allow people to understand 

79
00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,760
what is going on in the process,
and it does build trust. 

80
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:29,520
Talking about trust, and 
particularly in the political 

81
00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:33,800
context, information somehow has
become an infrastructure because

82
00:04:33,800 --> 00:04:37,440
it's also about the provision of
transparency, about tangible 

83
00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:39,680
impact that politicians do want 
to have. 

84
00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:43,880
And we often assume that access 
to information strengthens and 

85
00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:48,360
democracy. 
But from your experience, it is 

86
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:51,880
that automatically so? 
And does that then also create 

87
00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:53,720
trust? 
I think nothing is automatic in 

88
00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:55,440
the current world, right, that 
we're in right now. 

89
00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:57,880
I think trust is earned and not 
given. 

90
00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:00,880
I, I think that again, with our 
AI summaries, we sort of build 

91
00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:04,240
trust by building, by breaking 
down the walls of legalese, you 

92
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:06,560
know, that end up in 
legislation, which I think is 

93
00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:08,520
super helpful. 
You get to know what's being 

94
00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:12,040
proposed and with our widgets, 
how far along you are in the 

95
00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:13,560
process. 
So if your member says that 

96
00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,040
they're working on something and
you find out that's true, then 

97
00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:17,920
that's great, right? 
And if you find out it's 

98
00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,800
something that's not true, well,
then you have the information to

99
00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:23,640
know that your elected 
representatives are lying to you

100
00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:26,040
and that destroys trust. 
But I'm saying that overall it's

101
00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:29,080
good because you can become a 
more informed voter and act 

102
00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:30,800
accordingly. 
And that helps strengthen 

103
00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:32,240
democracy. 
But I think ultimately what 

104
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:34,840
we're trying to do is to help 
strengthen trust in democracy 

105
00:05:34,840 --> 00:05:36,440
through the information we 
provide. 

106
00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:40,280
Now, how people use use that 
information is another thing, 

107
00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:43,400
and how people are willing to 
interact with that kind of 

108
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:46,000
information is also another 
level because just because it 

109
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:48,360
exists doesn't mean that people 
will use it. 

110
00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:50,560
And just because it exists 
doesn't mean that people will 

111
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:54,240
automatically trust it. 
I mean, we founded our, you 

112
00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:56,200
know, our apps with the first 
iPhone. 

113
00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:58,560
And so we've been around 18 
years and we are used by 

114
00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:01,200
Democrats, Republicans and 
independents, people who work on

115
00:06:01,200 --> 00:06:03,760
Capitol Hill and people who work
off of it, people who work in 

116
00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:05,840
the process and out of it. 
So I think to a real extent, 

117
00:06:05,840 --> 00:06:08,600
we've done a really good job of 
maintaining sort of neutrality. 

118
00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:10,280
We're just providing 
information. 

119
00:06:10,280 --> 00:06:13,480
We're not, you know, summarizing
it in a way that frankly gives 

120
00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:15,760
it partisan context to one way 
or the other. 

121
00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,040
And so I think that that helps 
build trust as well, so. 

122
00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:22,120
With your apps, use it at the 
intersection of the provider of 

123
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:25,080
information and of the consumer 
of them as well. 

124
00:06:25,200 --> 00:06:30,920
And sometimes the provision does
also aim at providing a 

125
00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:34,000
particular glimpse into the way 
of how this information is 

126
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:36,560
consumed. 
And then also the consumer 

127
00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:39,920
coming from a background of 
context of how they want to 

128
00:06:39,920 --> 00:06:41,920
interact with the politician in 
itself. 

129
00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:46,800
Do you think that it has become 
more crucial to understand of 

130
00:06:46,800 --> 00:06:50,000
how to interact with this 
intersection and what is your 

131
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:52,600
role in balancing navigating 
that? 

132
00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:55,680
That's a really fair question. 
I think some of the things that 

133
00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:58,680
we do is just straight up to 
provide information, but we also

134
00:06:58,840 --> 00:07:01,160
allow people to sort of interact
with us. 

135
00:07:01,280 --> 00:07:04,720
And by us, I mean me, I actually
answer every single e-mail that 

136
00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:06,440
comes to Congress in your pocket
personally. 

137
00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:09,840
And I've done this now for 18 
years and I find that I'm in, 

138
00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:12,440
I'm in very interesting 
conversations with people about 

139
00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:16,520
what the information is, how we 
get it, how much is it updated. 

140
00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:18,480
That's actually much more 
something that they care about 

141
00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:22,000
more than really the sourcing or
even the the potential bias is 

142
00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:24,840
that they just want to be right.
And I think that that's a really

143
00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:28,080
interesting opportunity for us. 
I think one situation that we 

144
00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:32,040
ended up in is after January 
6th, the riots on Capitol Hill 

145
00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:35,400
and the insurrection, we 
actually published in the app a 

146
00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:39,920
marker of people who voted for 
decertify the election. 

147
00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:43,320
And my rationale was that if you
were on the right, you wanted to

148
00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:45,080
know this because you wanted to 
support these people. 

149
00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:47,600
And if you were on the left, you
wanted to know who they were so 

150
00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:49,840
that you could vote them out. 
And as it turns out, the only 

151
00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:52,560
people who were very angry about
it were the people on the far 

152
00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:54,960
right. 
I actually got emails from 

153
00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:56,960
members of Congress who I won't 
name. 

154
00:07:57,000 --> 00:07:59,360
But you know, guy, it's very 
heated arguments with people 

155
00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:02,280
about I bet you didn't do this 
when Democrats did this, you 

156
00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:04,000
know, years ago for Nancy 
Pelosi. 

157
00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:05,520
And it's just, it went on and 
on. 

158
00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:08,000
And you go down this rabbit hole
and I realized, wow, it's really

159
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:10,920
interesting, like how both sides
really do react. 

160
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:13,280
And I'm sure if the situation 
was flipped, the left would be 

161
00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:16,040
coming after me on that as well.
But I felt like it was a very 

162
00:08:16,040 --> 00:08:19,320
crucial piece of information 
because if you were evaluating 

163
00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,000
who you were supporting, again, 
if you were a primary voter on 

164
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:26,440
the right, you wanted to know 
that this this person stood with

165
00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:29,320
Donald Trump, right. 
But on the left, you definitely 

166
00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:32,039
wanted to know that too, so that
you can target them in elections

167
00:08:32,039 --> 00:08:33,919
and at least, you know, have 
more information. 

168
00:08:34,159 --> 00:08:37,039
And so I thought that it was 
defensible, but it was also just

169
00:08:37,039 --> 00:08:40,760
sort of an interesting microcosm
of how, you know, the side that 

170
00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:44,440
felt aggrieved will come after 
you and then the other side will

171
00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:46,520
be completely silent but happy 
about it. 

172
00:08:46,640 --> 00:08:50,320
And so to a real extent, like I 
was willing to take the hit up 

173
00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:53,760
until the election was done. 
And so like, once we ended up 

174
00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:56,200
after the midterm election where
these people were re elected, I 

175
00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:57,360
took the information out. 
Why? 

176
00:08:57,360 --> 00:08:59,160
Because it wasn't relevant 
anymore, right? 

177
00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:01,520
People had made their decisions 
based upon the information that 

178
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:03,160
they had. 
We moved on. 

179
00:09:03,640 --> 00:09:06,520
And so I think it's it's an 
interesting place that we are 

180
00:09:06,520 --> 00:09:10,200
where we are providing factual 
information and people will get 

181
00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:13,440
angry just at the fact that the 
information is there, even 

182
00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:15,520
though it is absolutely true and
trustworthy. 

183
00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:18,720
And you can check the votes, but
you end up in a situation where 

184
00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:22,040
you're like, OK, you know, this 
is the value our brand, this is 

185
00:09:22,040 --> 00:09:24,560
the value, you know, our non 
partisanship. 

186
00:09:24,560 --> 00:09:27,960
And I still feel to this day 
that it was a very defensible 

187
00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:29,720
thing that we did. 
And I don't know that it 

188
00:09:29,720 --> 00:09:30,480
would've done a different. 
Way. 

189
00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:33,680
And now that you said that you 
answer all the emails 

190
00:09:33,680 --> 00:09:36,640
personally, that is super 
interesting. 

191
00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:39,800
I think it builds trust. 
I think it does, you know, to 

192
00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:42,720
your point, I think, I think 
knowing that most of the time 

193
00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:45,880
when people go and they interact
with a platform or a product or 

194
00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:48,960
a service, it goes into this 
ether of customer service and, 

195
00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:51,560
and it's gone and knowing you 
never hear back from somebody if

196
00:09:51,560 --> 00:09:54,160
you do you think you're getting 
a bot or you're just getting a 

197
00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:57,120
disinterested person. 
And for me, I wanted them to 

198
00:09:57,120 --> 00:09:58,880
know that, look, I'm the 
founder. 

199
00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:02,360
This is a project that I care 
very deeply about and that 

200
00:10:02,360 --> 00:10:04,720
actually builds trust. 
I think that that has actually 

201
00:10:04,720 --> 00:10:09,240
helped me in situations where 
I've had to navigate with, you 

202
00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:11,160
know, people who frankly don't 
pay us a lot of money. 

203
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:12,800
I mean, it's not a very 
expensive app. 

204
00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:15,000
I mean, it's 10 bucks and it's 
$10 US. 

205
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,640
And so, you know, it's, it's not
something that it's a huge 

206
00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:20,120
commitment for somebody, but 
when they do it, they are 

207
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:22,000
committed to it. 
And whether you're spending 

208
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:25,480
$1.10 dollars or $1000, you want
to know that the people who are 

209
00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:28,920
behind it are really into it. 
And and so I think that helps. 

210
00:10:28,920 --> 00:10:33,640
And you also teach digital 
political strategy and also you 

211
00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:36,040
offered modern political 
campaigns. 

212
00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:40,440
And if we now go and dive into 
through the digital campaign, 

213
00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:43,720
highlighting now about how you 
interact with the political 

214
00:10:43,720 --> 00:10:47,720
landscape through your apps and 
so on, what is your experience, 

215
00:10:47,720 --> 00:10:52,120
how the political campaigning 
has changed and also how it has 

216
00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:54,960
changed the way trust is built 
in the political context? 

217
00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:57,800
Yeah, I think basically we've 
moved to digital campaigning. 

218
00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:01,320
So the campaigning when I first 
started in my career was very 

219
00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:03,200
analog. 
You know, we actually hit paper 

220
00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:06,480
lists, we would knock on doors. 
There was only so much you could

221
00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:09,760
really do because advertising 
was so expensive, particularly 

222
00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:12,160
in the state and local levels. 
But if you were running, you 

223
00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:14,640
know, statewide campaigns or 
national campaigns, you have 

224
00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:17,800
plenty of money, but you'd be 
spending money indiscriminately,

225
00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:21,400
essentially buying big, you 
know, geographic areas that 

226
00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:23,320
weren't hyper targeted to what 
was going on. 

227
00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:25,480
And, you know, a lot of 
advertising was very irrelevant 

228
00:11:25,480 --> 00:11:27,560
to people. 
And so it's very easy for people

229
00:11:27,560 --> 00:11:30,120
to sort of tune out not being, 
you know, interested in what was

230
00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,560
going on because politicians 
weren't essentially talking to 

231
00:11:32,560 --> 00:11:33,760
them. 
They were talking to this mass 

232
00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:35,600
group of people. 
And so right now what where we 

233
00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:38,400
are is that digital campaign is 
essentially hyper charged our 

234
00:11:38,400 --> 00:11:41,240
awareness of candidates because 
now they can reach us at scale. 

235
00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:43,880
And again, as we were talking 
about earlier on your personal 

236
00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:45,920
devices. 
So trust is built digitally 

237
00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:49,120
through like two things that I 
say is essentially authenticity 

238
00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:51,960
and consistency. 
And this means that, you know, 

239
00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:54,480
is the candidate believable? 
And then when challenged, do 

240
00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:57,120
they remain trustworthy? 
And we don't expect our 

241
00:11:57,120 --> 00:11:59,920
candidates to be perfect, but we
do expect them to be real. 

242
00:11:59,920 --> 00:12:03,040
And then on the campaign side, 
the micro targeting of all of 

243
00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:06,920
this, you know, it really says 
that I don't know, I no longer 

244
00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:09,440
have to go ahead and spend 
thousands of dollars on people 

245
00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:12,280
who are a knock interested in 
politics and be not interested 

246
00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:15,720
in my candidate at any level. 
And so you can now discern, 

247
00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:17,800
particularly in the United 
States, with the data that we 

248
00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,960
have, which voters might be 
interested in my my messaging 

249
00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:24,520
and then target those voters 
that are most most reachable to 

250
00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:27,960
activate and also to persuade so
that you don't waste money. 

251
00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:30,600
But then you actually end up 
reaching more people in a more 

252
00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:33,480
interesting way. 
And now with AI, you have a lot 

253
00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:36,640
more ability to sort of create 
content around that. 

254
00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:39,320
And then we'll talk more about 
this and why there can be 

255
00:12:39,320 --> 00:12:42,760
pitfalls about it, but to reach 
smaller and smaller and smaller 

256
00:12:42,760 --> 00:12:46,160
groups of people in a much more 
personal and powerful way. 

257
00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:47,960
And to me, I think that's 
actually a good thing because 

258
00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:50,000
what happened in the United 
States and maybe has happened in

259
00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:51,800
your country as well, as well as
around the world. 

260
00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:54,600
The way I've seen it from the 
outside looking in is that 

261
00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:58,160
politicians have have sort of 
doubled down on their bases of 

262
00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:01,360
support and they have stopped 
talking to the other side or 

263
00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:03,320
they have stopped talking to 
those people who are actually 

264
00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:05,520
reachable. 
But now because you can hyper 

265
00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:08,600
target and now you can reach 
people with scale and with 

266
00:13:08,600 --> 00:13:12,360
content that can be created 
rather quickly online, that can 

267
00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:15,920
be interesting and powerful, you
now have more incentive to reach

268
00:13:15,920 --> 00:13:19,840
out beyond the people that you 
can just get just by showing up 

269
00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:21,720
or just by getting them to show 
up. 

270
00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:25,880
You could now get people who you
would normally have said in it 

271
00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:29,280
nineties, 2000s and even the 
twenty 10s that it was just too 

272
00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:31,000
expensive. 
We couldn't afford it talking. 

273
00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:35,280
About content does. 
And if it does, how does 

274
00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:40,600
generative AI change the way 
ethics is infiltrated and 

275
00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:42,600
campaigning it actually? 
Puts much more of a 

276
00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:45,120
responsibility on the people 
that I'm teaching and the people

277
00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:48,560
that I'm trying to work through 
my own small system. 

278
00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:51,880
I teach a course in digital go 
campaigns over at Hopkins and I 

279
00:13:51,880 --> 00:13:54,320
teach a campaigns and 
international campaigns course 

280
00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:56,360
over at NYU this semester 
actually. 

281
00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:59,880
And so my my point of view on 
this is that as I teach them the

282
00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:03,040
tools, you also need to teach 
them the responsibility and the 

283
00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:06,240
ethics that go along with it. 
And so to a real extent, the 

284
00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:11,200
pressure on campaigns is always 
to that is the one and singular 

285
00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:14,600
goal that every campaign has. 
It's essentially a a tech 

286
00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:18,560
startup that has an end date. 
And so you have to work within 

287
00:14:18,560 --> 00:14:21,880
that structure and within those 
those needs and with the with 

288
00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:25,920
those priorities, right. 
But also we need to do the thing

289
00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:27,840
that that I keep telling my 
students is that you have to 

290
00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:30,240
give it adult supervision. 
Yeah, no matter what you end up 

291
00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:34,200
getting from AI slop is not just
the piece of this. 

292
00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:35,880
I mean, you had a great 
discussion about this with a 

293
00:14:35,880 --> 00:14:39,120
previous interviewee that was, I
was listening to this morning 

294
00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:41,360
while I was working out and it 
was great to hear you guys talk 

295
00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:44,120
about slop. 
But it's not just slop, not just

296
00:14:44,120 --> 00:14:47,360
like low quality content, it's 
also disinformation, 

297
00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:49,840
manipulative content, content 
that takes things out of 

298
00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:51,680
context. 
I, I think that there's a lot of

299
00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:54,520
ways that we need to make sure 
that we teach our students who 

300
00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:57,560
are going into this and our 
young professionals that there 

301
00:14:57,560 --> 00:15:00,760
is a line that you will be 
continuously put up against. 

302
00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:03,400
And you need to be able to 
understand what that line is and

303
00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:06,480
what the consequences of going 
over that line are, not just for

304
00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:08,880
you, not just for this campaign,
but also for the broader 

305
00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:12,440
democracy that you, you work in.
So what I'm trying to get people

306
00:15:12,440 --> 00:15:16,040
to think about is not just their
career or their client, but also

307
00:15:16,040 --> 00:15:18,240
the industry of politics around 
you. 

308
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:21,800
And that if we devalue what the 
industry of politics is and, and

309
00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:25,040
we all have a stake in this 
industry, then that actually 

310
00:15:25,320 --> 00:15:29,360
backwards flows towards you, you
know, individually and your 

311
00:15:29,360 --> 00:15:32,160
can't your opportunities to go 
and work in this, in this 

312
00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:33,720
endeavor. 
And I think to a real extent, 

313
00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:35,400
you know, all this has to be 
taught. 

314
00:15:35,400 --> 00:15:38,880
It has to be reinforced 
throughout the parties and it 

315
00:15:38,880 --> 00:15:42,480
has to be reinforced with people
who are owned companies like I 

316
00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:45,760
do and then teach those people 
who are coming up if they didn't

317
00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:48,520
learn it in college and 
certainly on the job, there is a

318
00:15:48,520 --> 00:15:50,760
real impact to going to the dark
side here. 

319
00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:53,480
What is the? 
One thing that you would want to

320
00:15:53,480 --> 00:15:57,280
teach me and my listeners now 
that we should take away at 

321
00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:00,920
exactly what you described of 
like the industry and also 

322
00:16:00,920 --> 00:16:06,560
regarding it as more of a well 
ecosystem and also our role in 

323
00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:08,960
that regard hard so the bottom. 
Line that I would love people to

324
00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:12,680
take away from would be if it's 
not real, if it's not authentic 

325
00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:15,240
and it's not factual, then don't
do it. 

326
00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:20,040
Beyond that, everything else is 
is ancillary and also supportive

327
00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:24,040
because at some level it will 
either come back to you 

328
00:16:24,400 --> 00:16:27,320
physically on your candidate 
candidate or metaphysically 

329
00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:30,600
through devaluing democracy. 
And that doesn't really help 

330
00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:32,920
anybody. 
And so to me, staying on the 

331
00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:36,320
right side of that actually does
not only, you know, reinforce 

332
00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:38,560
trust and, and trust in 
democracy, but it also 

333
00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:40,200
reinforces trust in your 
candidate. 

334
00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:44,120
It's actually good for you if 
you do the right thing within 

335
00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:46,640
this space. 
And that's not the same to say 

336
00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:48,920
that everybody who does the 
right thing is always going to 

337
00:16:48,920 --> 00:16:50,760
win. 
But it does mean that when you 

338
00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:53,240
do the right things, it 
eventually will lead to the 

339
00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:55,880
right results. 
And so to a real extent, I think

340
00:16:55,880 --> 00:16:58,880
that that's what I try to teach 
my students and what I would 

341
00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:01,160
hope to the people we're 
listening here when confronted 

342
00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:03,200
with these kind of ethical 
decisions every day, 

343
00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:04,800
particularly on the campaign 
trail. 

344
00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:08,119
Take a step back, take a breath,
take a comment and say you know,

345
00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:10,359
is this real, is this authentic 
and is it factual? 

346
00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:13,280
And if I can answer all three 
correctly, then go. 

347
00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:17,240
If you can't, or if one of those
3 or some somewhere on the wrong

348
00:17:17,240 --> 00:17:19,839
side of it, you need to take a 
step back and you need to think 

349
00:17:19,839 --> 00:17:23,760
about what the potential impacts
of this are and be truthful with

350
00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:27,520
yourself and with your team now.
Bringing tech into that equation

351
00:17:27,520 --> 00:17:33,800
and looking into the way of also
how we witness that tech became 

352
00:17:33,840 --> 00:17:36,680
more political. 
And there's also the discussion 

353
00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:39,760
around and whether it's 
politically sitting upstream or 

354
00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:42,480
downstream of like the usage of 
itself. 

355
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:47,480
Would you say that tech is 
rather a tool in that equation 

356
00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:52,760
or is it also influencing the 
way of authenticity is being 

357
00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:56,200
perceived by those who look at 
the output of someone who's 

358
00:17:56,200 --> 00:18:00,400
campaigning for their next also 
position in the political 

359
00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:02,120
environment? 
We have to. 

360
00:18:02,120 --> 00:18:04,280
Understand that these are just 
tools, right? 

361
00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:07,680
Politics is sort of it's a very 
human enterprise. 

362
00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:11,480
And so even though we have AI 
and when you ask it certain 

363
00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:13,560
questions, it will give you very
human answers. 

364
00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:16,560
You know, we have, we have a 
friend who's in a tough spot. 

365
00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:19,440
He's in the hospital right now. 
And, you know, I, my wife and I 

366
00:18:19,440 --> 00:18:23,360
were talking and I actually went
and used Chachi BT to go and, 

367
00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:25,920
you know, try and get a sense of
like how I should communicate 

368
00:18:26,240 --> 00:18:29,920
this, you know, to people and 
how you, how I should to think 

369
00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:31,040
about it. 
And it comes back with very 

370
00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:33,480
human responses. 
It's, it's a remarkable tool, 

371
00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:37,360
but it doesn't negate like the 
conversation I had with my wife 

372
00:18:37,440 --> 00:18:41,360
or visiting him yesterday in the
hospital and his and his wife 

373
00:18:41,360 --> 00:18:43,560
and being there as a human 
being. 

374
00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:46,240
I, I think that we need to 
really understand that these are

375
00:18:46,240 --> 00:18:48,400
just tools, OK? 
These are not replacements for 

376
00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:50,320
human beings. 
You know, whenever we make a 

377
00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:54,880
huge leap in in technology, 
humans automatically think that 

378
00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:57,800
we're going to somehow be 
devalued and that we're going to

379
00:18:57,800 --> 00:19:00,360
go away and that, you know, the 
technology is going to take away

380
00:19:00,360 --> 00:19:04,240
jobs or take away our value. 
When I and I think that there is

381
00:19:04,240 --> 00:19:08,160
value in the tools, but there's 
much, much greater value in the 

382
00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:09,840
humans that are using these 
tools. 

383
00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:12,880
And so when you use it, you need
to look at it from the 

384
00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:16,200
perspective of, you know, this 
is, this is additional 

385
00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:19,800
information, an additional tool 
that I can use to create or to 

386
00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:23,000
understand or to research or to 
communicate. 

387
00:19:23,080 --> 00:19:26,080
But that you're the one who's 
doing that, that ultimately 

388
00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:28,120
you're the one who makes the 
decision to hit send. 

389
00:19:28,320 --> 00:19:30,760
You're the one who ultimately 
decides to take whatever you 

390
00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:32,320
learned and go talk to somebody 
about it. 

391
00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:35,240
You're the one who who looks at 
all this information and has to 

392
00:19:35,240 --> 00:19:38,080
make sense of it and also is 
responsible for any 

393
00:19:38,080 --> 00:19:40,440
hallucinations that comes 
through the AI. 

394
00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:42,360
So you have to make sure you 
double check everything. 

395
00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:44,640
And so I think to a real extent,
when you look at all of this, 

396
00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:47,800
you have to then put all of it 
into perspective of that we are 

397
00:19:47,800 --> 00:19:50,040
still human beings using tools 
now. 

398
00:19:50,200 --> 00:19:53,920
You're at the epicenter of also 
combining tech with your work 

399
00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:57,520
because you haven't only founded
like Congress in your pocket, 

400
00:19:57,520 --> 00:20:01,400
but you also work as executive 
director for Fight Hate. 

401
00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:04,760
And you also look into the way 
of how it's directly 

402
00:20:04,880 --> 00:20:09,080
intersecting with combating hate
or extremism. 

403
00:20:09,080 --> 00:20:11,920
Also the conversations that we 
have. 

404
00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:15,840
Like the political landscape and
what role does digital 

405
00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:17,960
architecture play in that 
regard? 

406
00:20:17,960 --> 00:20:21,080
And also is there a way of 
identifying whether it's 

407
00:20:21,080 --> 00:20:23,880
amplifying or also decreasing 
division? 

408
00:20:23,960 --> 00:20:25,360
Well, thanks for. 
Mentioning fight hate. 

409
00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:29,240
This has been a thing that I've 
been associated with now for 

410
00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:31,000
about 8 months. 
First of all, it's an honor and 

411
00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:32,400
a privilege to work on these 
issues. 

412
00:20:32,400 --> 00:20:35,760
I'm Jewish and Fight Hate is an 
organization that works to to 

413
00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:38,280
eliminate anti-Semitism on 
college campuses worldwide. 

414
00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:40,560
And we have a number of 
different campuses all over the 

415
00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:41,680
place. 
And these students are 

416
00:20:41,680 --> 00:20:44,880
incredible rock stars. 
And they are meeting not just 

417
00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:47,400
among Jews, but they're also 
meeting with Muslim students and

418
00:20:47,400 --> 00:20:50,280
with other people of different 
variations of religion and 

419
00:20:50,280 --> 00:20:53,920
ethnicity and color. 
And the idea here is that we 

420
00:20:53,920 --> 00:20:57,720
can't solve this alone. 
And so from a extremism online 

421
00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:02,080
perspective, it's very well 
documented that extremism online

422
00:21:02,080 --> 00:21:04,200
and hate is self perpetuate, 
right? 

423
00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:07,280
And it's often generated by 
forces that actually want to 

424
00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,120
divide us, that have the 
interest in dividing people. 

425
00:21:10,120 --> 00:21:12,800
And because it's easier to 
conquer, you know, if you 

426
00:21:12,800 --> 00:21:15,200
divide, you can conquer, right? 
And it's an extremely 

427
00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:17,520
challenging fight online. 
And there were some outstanding,

428
00:21:17,520 --> 00:21:20,160
really well funded organizations
that are working on this, 

429
00:21:20,160 --> 00:21:22,920
including the Blue Square 
project by Robert Kraft, who is 

430
00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:26,560
doing magical work on this. 
It's very, very hard because it 

431
00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:29,520
will never end because AI is 
made it even easier to spread 

432
00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:32,120
this kind of hate. 
And from my perspective, when I 

433
00:21:32,120 --> 00:21:35,000
looked at this project, you 
know, fight, hey, what was 

434
00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:37,640
interesting to me was that they 
weren't limiting what they were 

435
00:21:37,640 --> 00:21:40,200
going to do just online. 
We have these tools. 

436
00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:42,560
How do you use them? 
And so my point of view is we 

437
00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,960
only use these digital tools to 
identify and organize students, 

438
00:21:46,120 --> 00:21:47,320
you know, who don't want to live
with us. 

439
00:21:47,520 --> 00:21:49,480
And this is Jewish and non 
Jewish students on their 

440
00:21:49,480 --> 00:21:50,920
campuses. 
And eventually, you know, 

441
00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,200
because if you don't stop it on 
college campuses, it goes to 

442
00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:55,840
their families, it goes to their
careers and it goes to their 

443
00:21:55,840 --> 00:21:57,760
communities. 
So like now is really the time 

444
00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,880
to do it and it really exists so
that real people can work 

445
00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:02,920
through these issues in offline 
spaces. 

446
00:22:02,920 --> 00:22:05,720
And so I think that when I look 
at the tools that we have, 

447
00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:08,920
sometimes the best way to change
that trajectory is to have 

448
00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:12,520
conversations offline, whether 
it's anti-Semitism or 

449
00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:15,720
Islamophobia or whatever. 
The best relationships that we 

450
00:22:15,720 --> 00:22:19,400
have are not online. 
You know, you and I met at a 

451
00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:22,200
conference and even though we 
could have met on LinkedIn or 

452
00:22:22,200 --> 00:22:24,080
somewhere else, we met in 
person. 

453
00:22:24,080 --> 00:22:26,920
And I think that that is a 
different kind of relationship 

454
00:22:26,960 --> 00:22:28,600
than when you meet somebody 
online. 

455
00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:31,880
I met a lot of them at this 
conference that we went to shout

456
00:22:31,880 --> 00:22:35,280
out to the EU, you know, 
political tech summit, which was

457
00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:37,760
fantastic. 
Yosef and then the team just 

458
00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:41,480
been magical, amazing leaders 
and and really forward thinkers.

459
00:22:41,600 --> 00:22:44,800
But the magic of it really is, 
is that you bring people 

460
00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:47,480
together. 
So it's much easier to be mean 

461
00:22:47,480 --> 00:22:49,200
to somebody from behind the 
screen. 

462
00:22:49,440 --> 00:22:52,440
It's much more difficult to 
reconcile that with somebody 

463
00:22:52,440 --> 00:22:55,760
you're right in your face, right
and who wants to talk to you, 

464
00:22:55,760 --> 00:22:58,800
who wants to work through these 
issues and who wants allies. 

465
00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:01,640
And I think that whether you're 
on the Muslim side of this or 

466
00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:03,880
the Jewish side of this or the 
Palestinian side or the Israeli 

467
00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:07,160
side of this, we really do want 
to sort of build those bridges 

468
00:23:07,160 --> 00:23:10,960
offline and using the digital 
tools that we have to bring 

469
00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:13,480
people together. 
You know, get the word out on, 

470
00:23:13,480 --> 00:23:17,640
on events that we're doing, you 
know, put together messaging 

471
00:23:17,640 --> 00:23:20,640
that brings people together that
doesn't just fight back, but we 

472
00:23:20,640 --> 00:23:22,640
want to fight with allies. 
We don't. 

473
00:23:22,720 --> 00:23:26,080
And to do that, we do use 
digital tools, but we're not 

474
00:23:26,080 --> 00:23:28,440
using, you know, digital tools 
to try and change people's 

475
00:23:28,440 --> 00:23:30,440
minds. 
We feel that other people are 

476
00:23:30,440 --> 00:23:33,440
doing a really good job of that 
and at scale. 

477
00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:36,320
And we feel that the best, you 
know, work that we can do is on 

478
00:23:36,320 --> 00:23:39,000
the ground using the tools that 
we have and talking. 

479
00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:43,480
About tools and also the way of 
how are they foster 

480
00:23:43,520 --> 00:23:48,920
collaboration interactions or 
not and combining or comparing 

481
00:23:48,920 --> 00:23:52,040
that with the interactions that 
we have in real life. 

482
00:23:52,040 --> 00:23:56,160
What role do you see, you see 
currently taking trust in both 

483
00:23:56,160 --> 00:24:00,760
of those spheres, be it online, 
be it offline, like in light of 

484
00:24:00,760 --> 00:24:05,840
fight hate or also in general? 
And is it being driven by 

485
00:24:05,840 --> 00:24:10,560
technology or is it amplified by
technology to increase or 

486
00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:12,640
decrease the trust that we have 
mutually? 

487
00:24:12,840 --> 00:24:15,520
Yeah, I think. 
Technology has not been a force 

488
00:24:15,520 --> 00:24:19,120
multiplier for trust. 
I think technology is, I think 

489
00:24:19,120 --> 00:24:22,720
it's fair to say after, you 
know, the past few years since 

490
00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:25,520
10/7 and, you know, particularly
in the space that I'm working 

491
00:24:25,520 --> 00:24:30,760
with, with fight, hey, it has 
broken levels of trust between 

492
00:24:30,760 --> 00:24:34,440
people where we have, I've heard
too many stories from my 

493
00:24:34,440 --> 00:24:38,080
students where the trust has 
been broken among friendships 

494
00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:41,920
and a lot of it has been 
generated through online 

495
00:24:42,120 --> 00:24:44,520
content. 
And it's very difficult to fight

496
00:24:44,520 --> 00:24:47,960
back against that. 
I mean, people, you know, are on

497
00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:51,800
their phones a lot and you know,
the algorithm is optimized for 

498
00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:55,240
outrageous or hateful content. 
The stuff that's on top of us, 

499
00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:58,840
that's coming through the cloud 
is really devaluing the trust 

500
00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:01,800
that we have among each other. 
And so we have to fight much 

501
00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:03,480
harder. 
We have to fight the hate 

502
00:25:03,640 --> 00:25:07,560
offline together. 
And that to me is the crux of 

503
00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:09,400
the work that I do with fight 
hate. 

504
00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:11,440
And these students who are just 
fantastic. 

505
00:25:11,520 --> 00:25:13,920
They are willing to put 
themselves out there and to be 

506
00:25:13,920 --> 00:25:16,240
yelled at or to be discriminated
against. 

507
00:25:16,320 --> 00:25:20,440
Any opportunity to somehow 
reduce the the hate on campus. 

508
00:25:20,440 --> 00:25:24,000
It's a really remarkable group 
of people and whatever they end 

509
00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:27,480
up doing and after college, I 
mean, these are people who are 

510
00:25:27,480 --> 00:25:31,200
going to be successful based 
upon just my own little slice of

511
00:25:31,200 --> 00:25:34,000
their life. 
And I think that they understand

512
00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:37,600
very clearly that and these are 
digital natives, that they can't

513
00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:41,480
just fight back online, that 
that doesn't work right? 

514
00:25:41,720 --> 00:25:45,880
That it's much more impactful 
and powerful to do that offline.

515
00:25:46,240 --> 00:25:49,360
And so to me, that's why I wake 
up every day feeling very lucky 

516
00:25:49,360 --> 00:25:52,040
that I get to do this work and 
who I get to work do it with. 

517
00:25:52,400 --> 00:25:54,600
Whether it's the students or 
whether it's our lay leaders or 

518
00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:57,320
whether it's the support I have 
for people like Jay Schiffman, 

519
00:25:57,320 --> 00:26:00,920
who should be mentioned on this 
podcast, who founded this after 

520
00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:04,840
10-7 and put a lot of his own 
time and money into it, and one 

521
00:26:04,840 --> 00:26:06,560
of the most impressive people 
I've met also. 

522
00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:10,760
Looking into the way of how you 
now mentioned your work with 

523
00:26:10,760 --> 00:26:15,080
your students in general, but 
then again, you also work with 

524
00:26:15,440 --> 00:26:18,680
students to teach them about 
future campaigning. 

525
00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:21,680
And you mentioned, like, NYU and
John Hopkins. 

526
00:26:21,680 --> 00:26:25,400
But is there something that your
students understand about 

527
00:26:25,400 --> 00:26:28,640
digital trust that earlier 
generations didn't? 

528
00:26:28,720 --> 00:26:31,880
Yeah. 
Yeah, they, they really have an 

529
00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:35,360
I'm, I'm not going to curse on, 
on, on your, on your fair 

530
00:26:35,360 --> 00:26:37,400
podcast, but they have high BS 
meters. 

531
00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:42,000
They do, but they know what's 
it's much their authenticity 

532
00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:44,960
meters operated exponentially 
higher than ours do. 

533
00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:48,240
They could spot this stuff a 
mile away and much quicker. 

534
00:26:48,360 --> 00:26:51,640
They also get the joke on what 
is AI and what is it when it's 

535
00:26:51,640 --> 00:26:55,000
appropriate and funny and 
interesting and when it's trying

536
00:26:55,000 --> 00:26:57,720
to be manipulative. 
And so they really, since they 

537
00:26:57,720 --> 00:26:59,920
grew up with this, really 
understand some of the 

538
00:26:59,920 --> 00:27:03,920
subcultures that exist within 
online and wine digital and 

539
00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:06,640
especially digital campaigning. 
And so to me, like, that's 

540
00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:09,120
really great, you know, and they
also, but the thing that I'm 

541
00:27:09,120 --> 00:27:11,000
concerned about, and I think 
that they're concerned about as 

542
00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:13,520
well, is that things are getting
to the point where the 

543
00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:16,200
development of AI has become so 
rapid. 

544
00:27:16,440 --> 00:27:19,520
I mean, just in the past year, 
the quality of the video, the 

545
00:27:19,520 --> 00:27:22,360
past 12 months, the quality of 
the video that we can get 

546
00:27:22,360 --> 00:27:26,560
through simple prompts to now is
very, very dramatic. 

547
00:27:26,560 --> 00:27:31,320
I mean, seeing Brad Pitt and Tom
Cruise fight on through AI and 

548
00:27:31,320 --> 00:27:34,480
it looks real like it is. 
It was really hard. 

549
00:27:34,480 --> 00:27:36,000
I was looking at this. 
I'm like, is this a movie that 

550
00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:37,520
I'm missing? 
What's going on here? 

551
00:27:37,600 --> 00:27:39,560
And of course, it was, it was 
AI. 

552
00:27:39,560 --> 00:27:42,240
And like, it's getting me. 
And students are saying, yeah, 

553
00:27:42,240 --> 00:27:44,400
you know, it's getting to the 
point where even they are 

554
00:27:44,400 --> 00:27:46,240
starting to be concerned about 
this. 

555
00:27:46,240 --> 00:27:49,560
And so I think to a certain 
extent, if those people can't 

556
00:27:49,560 --> 00:27:52,080
spot it really quickly, then we 
know we're sort of in trouble. 

557
00:27:52,120 --> 00:27:55,360
And so we have to pay much, much
more attention to what this is 

558
00:27:55,360 --> 00:27:58,840
and how it's being distributed. 
But they also understand what 

559
00:27:58,840 --> 00:28:00,680
works online. 
I mean, they know what's funny 

560
00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:02,800
and interesting and cool, and 
they also understand what's 

561
00:28:02,800 --> 00:28:06,000
cringe. 
And so you have to pair this 

562
00:28:06,000 --> 00:28:08,560
with how I teach. 
You know, in both classes, they 

563
00:28:08,560 --> 00:28:10,400
get clients in the beginning of 
the semester. 

564
00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:14,160
And so like, we don't have 
standard essays or quizzes or 

565
00:28:14,160 --> 00:28:16,280
tests. 
We have them choose their own 

566
00:28:16,280 --> 00:28:18,520
political candidates at the 
beginning of semester and then 

567
00:28:18,520 --> 00:28:21,000
we have them follow through what
they, what they want to 

568
00:28:21,000 --> 00:28:23,120
construct for their, their 
candidates. 

569
00:28:23,120 --> 00:28:24,680
Now, some of this does include 
AI. 

570
00:28:24,960 --> 00:28:28,600
And so when you, when they start
using the tools, they realize 

571
00:28:28,760 --> 00:28:32,320
not just conceptually, but also 
hands on that, Oh wow, I could 

572
00:28:32,320 --> 00:28:34,920
do this. 
It is right, I could and then I 

573
00:28:34,920 --> 00:28:37,440
could do that, but it's really 
cringe, right? 

574
00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:40,760
And so to a real extent, they 
can recognize the content that's

575
00:28:40,760 --> 00:28:43,440
really great online. 
But once they start using the 

576
00:28:43,440 --> 00:28:47,560
tools, they actually understand 
the limits and also the benefits

577
00:28:47,560 --> 00:28:49,120
of what the tools can do for 
them. 

578
00:28:49,320 --> 00:28:50,960
And then also the ethics around 
them. 

579
00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:53,880
And I think that with all of 
that, getting them hands on into

580
00:28:53,880 --> 00:28:57,040
a campaign right away that they 
care about, not me, like they 

581
00:28:57,040 --> 00:28:59,080
choose the their own candidates,
not me. 

582
00:28:59,120 --> 00:29:03,200
It really brings them into the 
process and really makes it real

583
00:29:03,200 --> 00:29:05,320
for them. 
And then when they leave my 

584
00:29:05,320 --> 00:29:07,800
class, they can take this and 
show this to a potential 

585
00:29:07,800 --> 00:29:10,720
employer and say, hey, look, 
this is a campaign plan. 

586
00:29:10,720 --> 00:29:12,720
We did. 
This is content that we produce.

587
00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:14,400
This is all the kinds of 
different things that you would 

588
00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:17,680
do in a campaign. 
They can now show examples of 

589
00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:20,720
actual real world work that they
would have done for a client had

590
00:29:20,720 --> 00:29:23,000
they had that client. 
And I think that that changes 

591
00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:26,520
how the students look at the 
tools that we have and also 

592
00:29:26,520 --> 00:29:29,320
changes the platforms and the 
other things that they want to 

593
00:29:29,320 --> 00:29:31,840
go ahead and build, right? 
Because they understand, oh, 

594
00:29:31,840 --> 00:29:34,520
wait a minute, you know, I had a
chance to work on this in my 

595
00:29:34,520 --> 00:29:36,040
class. 
There's a gap here. 

596
00:29:36,080 --> 00:29:39,800
We can go and do this better or 
wow, there's a really big 

597
00:29:39,800 --> 00:29:41,800
problem here. 
We need to work on a tool that 

598
00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:43,600
would mitigate this kind of 
misinformation or 

599
00:29:43,600 --> 00:29:45,640
disinformation. 
And so I think to a real extent,

600
00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:49,720
putting them in those kinds of 
roles really does make it much 

601
00:29:49,720 --> 00:29:51,960
more interesting for them, and 
it also makes them better 

602
00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:53,840
professionals on the way out. 
What do younger? 

603
00:29:53,840 --> 00:29:57,400
Generations understand 
differently about ethics and AI 

604
00:29:57,400 --> 00:30:00,480
than potentially older ones do, 
so I think. 

605
00:30:00,480 --> 00:30:03,640
Older people right now are much 
more concerned about AI just 

606
00:30:03,640 --> 00:30:06,080
globally, like we all think 
that, you know, if you were to 

607
00:30:06,080 --> 00:30:09,600
ask the olds, the olds would 
say, oh God, this is going to 

608
00:30:09,600 --> 00:30:11,720
kill us all. 
And this is Terminator kind of 

609
00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:14,760
level stuff, you know, just 
looking for the next shoe to 

610
00:30:14,760 --> 00:30:16,440
drop. 
Students are looking at this as 

611
00:30:16,440 --> 00:30:17,960
like, wow, this is kind of 
interesting. 

612
00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:21,120
This is, this is very, you know,
how do I get, how do I use this,

613
00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:23,800
you know, to my advantage? 
How do I use this in my, my 

614
00:30:23,800 --> 00:30:25,400
school work? 
How do I use this in my, my 

615
00:30:25,400 --> 00:30:28,120
regular life? 
They, they look at it as if we 

616
00:30:28,120 --> 00:30:30,760
look at it like spell check. 
Like, do you remember when spell

617
00:30:30,760 --> 00:30:32,960
check happens? 
You know, when I remember when I

618
00:30:32,960 --> 00:30:35,280
first used spell check on 
Microsoft Word and I was like, 

619
00:30:35,520 --> 00:30:37,760
wow, this is great. 
I don't need to look up this 

620
00:30:37,760 --> 00:30:40,280
word because the squiggly line 
is telling me that I spelled, 

621
00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:43,880
they're wrong, you know, and 
like, that's amazing, right? 

622
00:30:43,920 --> 00:30:47,480
And so now people are saying to 
themselves, OK, well, how much 

623
00:30:47,480 --> 00:30:51,760
do I need to do, you know, with 
the tools that I have and still 

624
00:30:51,760 --> 00:30:54,800
make sure it's still me, right? 
And so I think that the place 

625
00:30:54,800 --> 00:30:58,680
that they're navigating is that 
because it can create content 

626
00:30:58,680 --> 00:31:01,040
from scratch. 
And it is also a big challenge 

627
00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:03,600
from the education standpoint. 
How much am I getting? 

628
00:31:03,600 --> 00:31:06,640
Is AI driven? 
How much am I are they producing

629
00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:08,840
is AI driven? 
You know, if you are not a 

630
00:31:08,840 --> 00:31:13,560
natural writer, AI is a really 
interesting lure for you, right?

631
00:31:13,760 --> 00:31:16,520
If you are not a great 
researcher, you can get your 

632
00:31:16,520 --> 00:31:19,000
answers very quickly, and most 
of them will be right. 

633
00:31:19,240 --> 00:31:21,240
Some of them will be wrong. 
So like we have to teach them 

634
00:31:21,240 --> 00:31:24,200
how to use these tools because 
they're going to use these tools

635
00:31:24,320 --> 00:31:28,040
and they're going to use them at
a much more fluent rate then 

636
00:31:28,080 --> 00:31:30,800
then we're using them right now.
And so like, for example, in my 

637
00:31:30,800 --> 00:31:33,120
classes, and I'll tell my 
students this right now, the 

638
00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:36,720
secret sauce to my classes is 
that now basically a quarter of 

639
00:31:36,720 --> 00:31:38,720
your grade is your class 
participation. 

640
00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:41,800
So if I get really great writing
from you and I get really 

641
00:31:41,800 --> 00:31:44,440
interesting and thought 
provoking pieces from you or 

642
00:31:44,440 --> 00:31:47,320
great content, but you are 
basically a zombie in class. 

643
00:31:47,440 --> 00:31:50,640
Well, it's pretty obvious to me 
who's doing the work right now. 

644
00:31:50,680 --> 00:31:52,840
On the other side. 
I tell them, hey, there are 

645
00:31:52,840 --> 00:31:56,440
certain uses of AI that I 
encourage you to use, right? 

646
00:31:56,440 --> 00:31:59,080
We actually do exercises where 
you ask them to use AI to 

647
00:31:59,080 --> 00:32:02,080
produce content so they can see 
what it can do or use it for 

648
00:32:02,080 --> 00:32:05,680
research on certain topics that 
are esoterica that they would 

649
00:32:05,680 --> 00:32:08,360
never be able to find, right. 
And then go ahead and double 

650
00:32:08,360 --> 00:32:10,160
check that kind of information 
to make sure it's right. 

651
00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:13,200
So I think there's a lot of ways
to sort of build trust within 

652
00:32:13,200 --> 00:32:15,520
the classroom, build trust 
within our communities and, and 

653
00:32:15,520 --> 00:32:18,040
in our careers and especially in
our politics. 

654
00:32:18,040 --> 00:32:22,560
And to me, that is, that is what
we have to lean into now because

655
00:32:22,560 --> 00:32:26,120
the tools and the digitals are 
all pushing it back on trust, 

656
00:32:26,240 --> 00:32:28,880
right? 
So we have to lean into trust as

657
00:32:28,880 --> 00:32:32,880
human beings in all phases of 
what we do so that we can remain

658
00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:35,360
human and remain the kind of 
people we want we strive to be. 

659
00:32:35,440 --> 00:32:37,920
Yeah. 
And leaning into trust is 

660
00:32:37,920 --> 00:32:41,520
exactly like the transition that
I want to make now with you, 

661
00:32:41,520 --> 00:32:45,440
because I want to lean into some
in between moments when I ask 

662
00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:49,960
you the first moment to share. 
And that is, is like trust in 

663
00:32:49,960 --> 00:32:52,200
democracy feels like to you. 
It feels like it's. 

664
00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:55,560
Being challenged and. 
What should in a campaign 

665
00:32:55,560 --> 00:32:58,320
technology never do It's. 
Never replaced into human 

666
00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:00,840
judgment and what? 
Is the real danger of AI? 

667
00:33:01,160 --> 00:33:02,360
That's a very interesting 
question. 

668
00:33:02,360 --> 00:33:06,160
I think the real danger of AI is
alienation, that we lose trust 

669
00:33:06,160 --> 00:33:09,640
in democracy and we lose trust 
in each other along the way. 

670
00:33:09,680 --> 00:33:12,520
What? 
Do voters need more of they 

671
00:33:12,520 --> 00:33:14,160
need? 
More in person interactions with

672
00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:17,280
the candidates and their tiers. 
And I think that that that's a, 

673
00:33:17,360 --> 00:33:18,880
that's a huge piece of 
campaigning. 

674
00:33:18,880 --> 00:33:22,800
And we still find today that the
research does land that point 

675
00:33:22,800 --> 00:33:26,160
that if you interact with people
is a much more powerful 

676
00:33:26,160 --> 00:33:28,200
experience and also a much more 
persuasive one. 

677
00:33:28,280 --> 00:33:31,280
And. 
Is there a word that you can use

678
00:33:31,280 --> 00:33:34,200
to share if you're currently in 
between something? 

679
00:33:34,360 --> 00:33:35,640
I think. 
I don't know. 

680
00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:38,400
Yeah, this was hard for me. 
I think the word authenticity is

681
00:33:38,400 --> 00:33:41,000
a word that I find that I 
grapple with everyday. 

682
00:33:41,040 --> 00:33:42,800
How much of what I'm seeing is 
real? 

683
00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:45,640
How much of what I'm seeing is 
generated, I'm seeing, you know,

684
00:33:45,640 --> 00:33:48,480
in all phases of my life. 
And I, I think that the what 

685
00:33:48,480 --> 00:33:51,560
voters absolutely want, and this
is cross cultural and cross 

686
00:33:51,560 --> 00:33:55,120
national is they want real and 
they want authentic, but they 

687
00:33:55,120 --> 00:33:57,800
also understand that there's a 
lot of digital tools now that 

688
00:33:57,800 --> 00:34:00,240
are fighting against that 
because they're easy to use. 

689
00:34:00,480 --> 00:34:04,240
And so it actually places a 
higher premium on authenticity. 

690
00:34:04,280 --> 00:34:06,720
But I think that we are 
struggling with that word right 

691
00:34:06,720 --> 00:34:08,760
now and what it means. 
I think that that's that's 

692
00:34:08,760 --> 00:34:10,639
something that we have to 
reconcile over the next several 

693
00:34:10,639 --> 00:34:12,159
years. 
What a great end to a great. 

694
00:34:12,159 --> 00:34:14,719
Conversation. 
I enjoyed having you as a guest 

695
00:34:14,880 --> 00:34:17,639
and thank you so much, Michael 
for joining the In Between Tech 

696
00:34:17,639 --> 00:34:19,600
and Trust podcast. 
Thank you so much for everything

697
00:34:19,600 --> 00:34:20,639
I. 
Appreciate it and thanks for 

698
00:34:20,639 --> 00:34:21,360
listening everybody.
