1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,700
 You're  only  one 
 misconfiguration  away  from  a

2
00:00:02,700 --> 00:00:04,360
 breach.  What 
 are  your  thoughts  when  you 

3
00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,640
 hear  a  quote  like  that?  I 
 think  when  I  hear  a  quote 

4
00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:09,620
 like  that,  it  is  absolutely
 true.  It 

5
00:00:09,620 --> 00:00:11,820
 is  an  asymmetric  problem. 
 Attackers 

6
00:00:11,820 --> 00:00:13,660
 have  to  find  just  one 
 weakness  to  get  in. 

7
00:00:14,079 --> 00:00:16,460
 Defenders, 
 as  a  customer,  have  to 

8
00:00:16,460 --> 00:00:18,880
 have  their  100 %  coverage. 
 But 

9
00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:20,380
 it's  not  that  you  got  to 
 do  everything  perfect. 

10
00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:22,660
 That's 
 going  to  be,  you're  never 

11
00:00:22,660 --> 00:00:24,080
 going  to  stop  attacks. 
 You're 

12
00:00:24,080 --> 00:00:26,100
 never  going  to,  you  know, 
 if  there's  going  to  be 

13
00:00:26,100 --> 00:00:28,300
 some  challenges  coming  in, 
 it's  what  is  the  risk  of 

14
00:00:28,300 --> 00:00:31,260
 inaction?  What 
 is  the  risk  of  this 

15
00:00:31,260 --> 00:00:33,000
 access?  So 
 people  are  built  identity 

16
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,540
 systems  for  the  last  two 
 decades.  But 

17
00:00:35,540 --> 00:00:37,720
 the  concept  of  risk  of  an 
 identity,  the  fact  if  I'm 

18
00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:41,040
 giving  access  to  Jim  means 
 I'm  taking  on  a  risk.  I'm 

19
00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:43,120
 hoping  Jim  is  a  legitimate 
 employee.  He 

20
00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:45,060
 does  legitimate  actions,  but
 sometimes  that's  not  the 

21
00:00:45,060 --> 00:00:46,840
 case.  Sometimes 
 your  account  could  be 

22
00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:48,560
 compromised.  So 
 the  solution  threat  vector 

23
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,360
 we  are  looking  at  right 
 now  means  every  account  has

24
00:00:51,360 --> 00:01:00,280
 a  risk.  This 
 is  identity  at  the  center. 

25
00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:02,940
 If 
 it  has  anything  to  do  with

26
00:01:02,940 --> 00:01:07,540
 IAM,  this  is  the  go  to 
 podcast.  Now 

27
00:01:07,540 --> 00:01:18,100
 your  hosts,  Jim  McDonald 
 and  Jeff  Steadman.  Welcome 

28
00:01:18,100 --> 00:01:19,840
 to  the  identity  at  the 
 center  podcast.  I'm 

29
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,200
 Jeff  and  that's  Jim.  Hey, 
 Jim.  Hey, 

30
00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,460
 Jeff,  how  are  you?  Oh, 
 and  that's  a  bad  yourself. 

31
00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:26,740
 I'm 
 doing  great.  I'm, 

32
00:01:26,900 --> 00:01:30,820
 as  always,  very  excited  for
 this  episode.  I 

33
00:01:30,820 --> 00:01:35,900
 discovered  Venkat  a  while 
 back  at  an  event  and  Ian 

34
00:01:35,900 --> 00:01:38,560
 Singh,  who  probably  most 
 people  who  are  listening  to

35
00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,300
 this  podcast  know  Ian.  He's
 very  much  a  contributor  to 

36
00:01:42,300 --> 00:01:47,540
 our  community  on  LinkedIn 
 and  various  other  formats 

37
00:01:47,540 --> 00:01:50,580
 as  well.  He 
 introduced  me  to  Venkat.  I 

38
00:01:50,580 --> 00:01:53,140
 got  to  learn  a  little  bit 
 about  the  Stack  Identity 

39
00:01:53,140 --> 00:01:55,940
 product.  And 
 so  I'm  glad  we're  able  to 

40
00:01:55,940 --> 00:01:59,600
 bring  their  message  to  our 
 community.  Yeah, 

41
00:01:59,660 --> 00:02:01,040
 we're  looking  forward  to 
 this  one.  And 

42
00:02:01,040 --> 00:02:02,320
 definitely  want  to  give  a 
 shout  out  to  Ian  for  the 

43
00:02:02,320 --> 00:02:03,440
 connection.  He's 
 also  been  a  great  supporter

44
00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:06,800
 for  the  show.  So 
 shout  out  to  Ian.  Today's 

45
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:09,080
 episode  is  a  sponsored 
 episode,  something  that  we 

46
00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:10,820
 developed  these  in 
 collaboration  with  our 

47
00:02:10,820 --> 00:02:13,480
 friends  over  today  at  Stack
 Identity.  If 

48
00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:15,540
 you  don't  know  a  Stack 
 Identity,  they  are  your  co 

49
00:02:15,540 --> 00:02:17,400
-pilot  to  solve  identity 
 security  problems.  We're 

50
00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:18,860
 going  to  find  out  what 
 that  means.  You 

51
00:02:18,860 --> 00:02:23,040
 can  learn  more  about  them 
 at  stackidentity .com.  And 

52
00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:26,180
 so  we've  got  Venkat 
 Raghavan,  founder  and  CEO 

53
00:02:26,180 --> 00:02:28,700
 at  Stack  Identity.  Welcome 
 to  Identity  at  the  Center. 

54
00:02:29,060 --> 00:02:31,600
 Venkat. 
 Thank  you,  Jeff.  Thank 

55
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:33,500
 you,  Jim.  Good 
 morning.  So 

56
00:02:33,500 --> 00:02:35,080
 thanks  for  taking  the  time.
 One 

57
00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:36,680
 of  the  things  we  like  to 
 do  is  really  find  out 

58
00:02:36,680 --> 00:02:38,740
 about  the  background  and 
 the  origin  stories  of 

59
00:02:38,740 --> 00:02:40,660
 people  who  appear  on  our 
 show.  So 

60
00:02:40,660 --> 00:02:43,420
 let's  start  with  that.  How 
 did  you  get  into  the  IAM 

61
00:02:43,420 --> 00:02:46,660
 industry?  What 
 set  up  your  or  ignited 

62
00:02:46,660 --> 00:02:49,320
 maybe  your  passion  for  this
 sector  of  cybersecurity? 

63
00:02:50,140 --> 00:02:51,900
 Gosh, 
 I  got  to  go  back  25  years

64
00:02:51,900 --> 00:02:56,000
 back  here.  So 
 my  first  start  was  I'm  an 

65
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:59,600
 engineer  by  trade.  So 
 built  early  distributed 

66
00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:04,800
 systems  for  companies.  And 
 I  was  working  on  a 

67
00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:08,980
 specification  called  security
 assertions  markup  language, 

68
00:03:08,980 --> 00:03:13,120
 or  SAML,  as  it's  very 
 popular  these  days,  which 

69
00:03:13,120 --> 00:03:16,440
 is  the  kind  of  the  rule 
 break  of  identity  today.  I 

70
00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:18,920
 got  really  excited  about 
 the  opportunity  to  kind  of 

71
00:03:18,920 --> 00:03:21,100
 have  a  common  language  by 
 which  we  can  speak  identity

72
00:03:21,100 --> 00:03:23,760
 to  each  other 
 electronically.  And 

73
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:25,720
 so  that  got  me  excited. 
 Somebody's 

74
00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:30,120
 in  a  dug  in  this  a  bit 
 more  and  joined  a  startup 

75
00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:33,740
 called  Ascom,  based  for 
 pioneers  and  using  SAML  to 

76
00:03:33,740 --> 00:03:38,300
 build  the  first  generation 
 of  identity  management  and 

77
00:03:38,300 --> 00:03:41,800
 single  sign  on  systems, 
 which  powered  the  lot  of 

78
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:44,000
 Java  applications  back  in 
 the  first  days  of  Internet 

79
00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:47,600
 era.  So 
 had  a  great  experience  in 

80
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:51,760
 this  identity  space.  And 
 never  left,  frankly,  got  to

81
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:55,360
 know  SAML,  build  products, 
 was  part  of  a  start  up  on

82
00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:57,960
 BASCA,  we  got  acquired  by 
 IBM.  And 

83
00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:03,140
 I  am  still  head  25,  we 
 said,  still  doing  this.  So 

84
00:04:03,140 --> 00:04:04,720
 you've  got  a  long  history 
 in  this  space.  So 

85
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,060
 let's  talk  about  stack 
 identity.  What's 

86
00:04:07,060 --> 00:04:09,640
 the  core  problem  that  stack
 identity  looks  to  solve 

87
00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:12,100
 for?  And 
 this  is  a  very  competitive 

88
00:04:12,100 --> 00:04:14,440
 space.  How 
 do  you  set  yourself  apart 

89
00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:16,820
 from  others  in  such  a 
 crowded  market?  I 

90
00:04:16,820 --> 00:04:18,440
 think  it's  useful  to  kind 
 of  go  back  and  look  at 

91
00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:20,620
 how  industries  evolved  in 
 the  last  two  decades, 

92
00:04:20,940 --> 00:04:22,440
 right?  I 
 mean,  then  we  first  started

93
00:04:22,440 --> 00:04:25,180
 BASCOM  and  worked  on  the 
 early  generation  of 

94
00:04:25,180 --> 00:04:27,140
 activities  technologies.  The 
 problem  we  were  trying  to 

95
00:04:27,140 --> 00:04:31,680
 solve  was  simplifying 
 granting  of  access.  And 

96
00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:33,260
 so  that  was  very 
 complicated.  IT 

97
00:04:33,260 --> 00:04:35,940
 was  growing,  leaps  and 
 bounds.  And 

98
00:04:35,940 --> 00:04:37,820
 people  had  a  lot  of 
 applications  and  so  on  and 

99
00:04:37,820 --> 00:04:40,540
 so  single  sign  on,  nothing 
 a  single  password  is  a 

100
00:04:40,540 --> 00:04:42,620
 big,  big  issue,  big  pain 
 point.  That 

101
00:04:42,620 --> 00:04:44,780
 we  saw  that  we  saw 
 successfully  the  last  25 

102
00:04:44,780 --> 00:04:48,980
 years  or  so.  But 
 now  the  issue  is  granting 

103
00:04:48,980 --> 00:04:52,480
 of  access  is  the  easy 
 part.  Removing 

104
00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:55,700
 access  is  quite  difficult, 
 quite  challenging.  Why? 

105
00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:58,480
 When  you're  able  to  access 
 people's  free  mature,  you 

106
00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,720
 don't  like  it.  And 
 they  feel  like  they've 

107
00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:02,760
 taken  something  away.  They 
 were  taken  something  away 

108
00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:06,380
 from  their  daily  work.  What
 a  reason  becomes  immortal, 

109
00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:10,260
 cultural,  sometimes 
 political.  And 

110
00:05:10,260 --> 00:05:13,240
 so  what  happens  is  that  if
 you  don't  remove  the  access

111
00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:15,160
 under  whatever  pressure 
 you're  in,  in  companies, 

112
00:05:15,840 --> 00:05:19,440
 then  what  happens?  There's 
 some  access  for  all.  A 

113
00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:23,320
 hordes  of  access  lying 
 around  years  and  years.  And

114
00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:25,920
 it's  easy  picking  for 
 attackers.  The 

115
00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:30,000
 last  100  breaches,  attackers
 always  compromised  the  same 

116
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:32,660
 pattern,  a  compromised 
 identity,  but  with  a 

117
00:05:32,660 --> 00:05:35,940
 compromised  or  re -credential
 that  should  have  been 

118
00:05:35,940 --> 00:05:38,580
 removed,  that  wasn't 
 removed.  And 

119
00:05:38,580 --> 00:05:40,120
 we  only  find  out  after  the
 fact.  So 

120
00:05:40,128 --> 00:05:41,980
 the  problem  that  Stake  is 
 solving  is  to  kind  of 

121
00:05:41,980 --> 00:05:44,740
 figure  out,  how  do  I 
 simplify  and  make  it  easy, 

122
00:05:45,220 --> 00:05:48,640
 an  easy  button,  but 
 removing  access?  And 

123
00:05:48,640 --> 00:05:50,320
 so  that's,  I  think,  the 
 innovation  we're  applying. 

124
00:05:50,640 --> 00:05:51,940
 And 
 it's  very  difficult  to 

125
00:05:51,940 --> 00:05:54,960
 convince  people  to  remove 
 the  access,  but  we  got  to 

126
00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:56,320
 do  that.  And 
 that's  what  we're  empowering

127
00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:59,880
 teams  to  go  do  that.  So 
 I'd  love  to  find  out  also 

128
00:05:59,880 --> 00:06:01,100
 about  the  names  of 
 companies.  How 

129
00:06:01,100 --> 00:06:04,920
 did  you  come  up  with  the 
 name  Stack  Identity?  Well, 

130
00:06:04,920 --> 00:06:06,900
 I  think  if  you  look  at  at
 least  even  a  decade  ago, 

131
00:06:06,900 --> 00:06:09,860
 we  were  operating  just 
 Active  Directory  WSU  L 

132
00:06:09,860 --> 00:06:11,400
-BAPs.  That's 
 it.  In 

133
00:06:11,407 --> 00:06:13,540
 a  today's  world,  companies, 
 you  know,  there's  25,  30 

134
00:06:13,540 --> 00:06:15,900
 different  identity  systems. 
 You 

135
00:06:15,900 --> 00:06:20,020
 have  your  AD,  your  L -BAPs,
 you  have  EntraID,  you  have 

136
00:06:20,020 --> 00:06:23,060
 Aqta,  your  applications  that
 have  their  own  identities, 

137
00:06:23,340 --> 00:06:26,960
 and  it  goes  on  and  on.  So
 the  sprawl  of  identities 

138
00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:29,960
 was  massive.  So 
 now  we're  seeing  identities 

139
00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:32,360
 built  into  your  operating 
 systems  and  clouds  and 

140
00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:34,940
 applications  and  databases. 
 So 

141
00:06:34,940 --> 00:06:36,940
 we  see  stacks  of 
 identities.  You 

142
00:06:36,940 --> 00:06:38,360
 know,  all  over  the  place. 
 And 

143
00:06:38,360 --> 00:06:41,740
 so  for  customers,  it's  very
 difficult  to  manage  all  the

144
00:06:41,740 --> 00:06:43,360
 identity  populations  they 
 have.  And 

145
00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:46,520
 so  the  stack  is  named  to 
 kind  of  reflect  the  fact 

146
00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:48,680
 there's  now  a  distributed 
 identity  system.  And 

147
00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:50,520
 it's  going  to  be  that  way 
 for  the  next  several 

148
00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:53,040
 decades.  How 
 do  we  still  bring  the 

149
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,500
 unified  perspective  of 
 identities  and  what  they're 

150
00:06:55,500 --> 00:06:56,620
 doing  in  the  environment? 
 So 

151
00:06:56,620 --> 00:06:58,280
 that's  what  we're  trying  to
 accomplish  here  with  Stack. 

152
00:06:59,540 --> 00:07:00,880
 You 
 know,  Venkata  was  thinking, 

153
00:07:01,260 --> 00:07:05,100
 oh,  stack  could  also  mean 
 the  stacks  and  stacks  of 

154
00:07:05,100 --> 00:07:08,000
 entitlements  that  people 
 accumulate  over  time. 

155
00:07:08,300 --> 00:07:09,740
 Because 
 that's  really  what  it 

156
00:07:09,740 --> 00:07:11,760
 sounds  to  me  like,  the 
 problem  that  you're  solving,

157
00:07:11,900 --> 00:07:15,660
 right,  is  that  this 
 entitlement  creep  scenario 

158
00:07:15,660 --> 00:07:19,120
 where  you  keep  getting  more
 and  more  access,  whether 

159
00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:22,000
 it's,  you  know,  I  don't 
 think  it's  intentional, 

160
00:07:22,180 --> 00:07:24,320
 right?  Nobody's 
 out  there  trying  to  do  the

161
00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:26,840
 wrong  thing.  But 
 we,  you  know,  as 

162
00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:30,580
 consultants  in  our  day -to 
-day  lives,  Jeff  and  I  see 

163
00:07:30,580 --> 00:07:33,940
 scenarios  where  companies 
 are  still  doing  what  we 

164
00:07:33,940 --> 00:07:37,220
 call  model  after.  So 
 Venkata  joins  the  company 

165
00:07:37,220 --> 00:07:40,700
 and  he's,  you  know, 
 backfilling  for  Jeff.  Make 

166
00:07:40,700 --> 00:07:42,980
 him  like  Jeff.  Well, 
 what  they  don't  realize  is 

167
00:07:42,980 --> 00:07:46,180
 that  Jeff  has  been  working 
 here  for  15  years,  and  now

168
00:07:46,180 --> 00:07:48,820
 he  has  all  this  different 
 access.  So 

169
00:07:48,820 --> 00:07:53,420
 that's  one  scenario.  But 
 kind  of  what  I'm  very 

170
00:07:53,420 --> 00:07:58,780
 interested  in  is,  where  do 
 you  fit  into  that  life 

171
00:07:58,780 --> 00:08:03,340
 cycle  or  that  workload  of 
 getting  from  the  point 

172
00:08:03,340 --> 00:08:06,040
 where  it's  like,  you're 
 provisioning  these 

173
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:08,840
 entitlements  to  now  you 
 have  them  and  you  may  or 

174
00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:11,380
 may  not  be  using  them? 
 Where 

175
00:08:11,388 --> 00:08:15,600
 does  stack  solve  the 
 problem?  Which 

176
00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:19,040
 part  of  that  workflow  is 
 it?  Yeah, 

177
00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:21,860
 great  question.  So 
 you're  right,  it's  all 

178
00:08:21,860 --> 00:08:24,640
 about  stacks  of  identities. 
 And 

179
00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:26,420
 we  should  be  clear,  it's 
 both  human  as  well  as  non 

180
00:08:26,420 --> 00:08:28,440
-human.  Because 
 most  of  the  time  we  are 

181
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:30,580
 seeing  a  new  era  of 
 machine  identities  coming  in

182
00:08:30,580 --> 00:08:34,580
 workloads  and  whatnot,  APIs,
 AI  applications  and  so  on 

183
00:08:34,580 --> 00:08:35,700
 and  so  forth.  So 
 we  have  stacks  of 

184
00:08:35,700 --> 00:08:38,700
 identities,  so  stacks  of 
 permissions,  stacks  of 

185
00:08:38,700 --> 00:08:41,679
 privileges,  stacks  of 
 policies,  right?  So 

186
00:08:41,679 --> 00:08:45,880
 that's  a  complete  mess  we 
 have.  So 

187
00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,040
 granting  access  is  easy, 
 right?  Many 

188
00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:49,940
 tools  do  it  effectively.  So
 we're  not  solving  that 

189
00:08:49,940 --> 00:08:54,160
 problem.  Once 
 access  is  granted,  what 

190
00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:57,480
 happens  on  day  two,  day 
 three,  day  five,  day  10, 

191
00:08:57,640 --> 00:09:02,060
 day  100?  Are 
 you  using  the  access?  Or 

192
00:09:02,060 --> 00:09:05,180
 is  some  of,  do  you  have 
 more  access  than  necessary? 

193
00:09:06,960 --> 00:09:07,960
 And 
 are  you  approving  access 

194
00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:12,240
 that's  not  required?  And 
 so  we  look  into,  how  do 

195
00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:15,100
 we  understand  and  help 
 customers  understand  where 

196
00:09:15,100 --> 00:09:18,880
 are  they  over -permissioned 
 in  their  environments?  Where

197
00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:22,080
 are  unusual  access  patterns,
 unusual  behaviors  of  access?

198
00:09:22,860 --> 00:09:24,340
 Because 
 anytime  there's  an  access, 

199
00:09:24,580 --> 00:09:27,220
 there's  a  risk  of  somebody 
 doing  an  exfiltration  or  an

200
00:09:27,220 --> 00:09:29,720
 attack  on  your  critical 
 systems.  So 

201
00:09:29,720 --> 00:09:31,800
 we  are  always  focused  on 
 continuing  to  understand  the

202
00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:35,260
 access,  attack  surface,  and 
 always  helping  you  to 

203
00:09:35,260 --> 00:09:36,860
 automate  the  reduction  of 
 this.  So 

204
00:09:36,860 --> 00:09:40,080
 the  primary  goal  that  we're
 trying  to  solve  is  post 

205
00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:43,300
-grant  of  access  for  any 
 identity,  machine  or  human. 

206
00:09:44,340 --> 00:09:45,300
 How 
 do  we  make  sure  they  only 

207
00:09:45,300 --> 00:09:47,300
 get  the  right  access  for 
 the  right  reasons,  for  the 

208
00:09:47,300 --> 00:09:49,600
 right  duration,  for  the 
 right  purpose,  and  that's 

209
00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:52,520
 it.  And 
 help  customers  to  continue 

210
00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:54,740
 to  operate  in  least -for 
-permission  mode.  That's 

211
00:09:54,740 --> 00:09:57,140
 our  goal,  and  that's  our 
 IP,  but  to  the  company. 

212
00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:00,280
 Yeah, 
 that's  fantastic.  You 

213
00:10:00,288 --> 00:10:03,200
 know,  one  of  the  things 
 that  Jeff  mentioned  is,  you

214
00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:04,820
 know,  he  asked  a  question 
 of  how  did  you  come  up 

215
00:10:04,820 --> 00:10:08,040
 with  the  name  of  Stack? 
 I'm 

216
00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:10,400
 also  interested  to 
 understand,  so  you've  got 

217
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:15,420
 this  tagline  around  co 
-pilot  for  identity  security.

218
00:10:15,979 --> 00:10:17,380
 So 
 what  is  that  all  about? 

219
00:10:17,500 --> 00:10:18,840
 What 
 was  the  mentality  there? 

220
00:10:20,100 --> 00:10:22,200
 Yeah, 
 if  you  look  at  every  CISO 

221
00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:25,000
 you've  talked  to  or  an 
 identity  leader,  they  will 

222
00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,300
 internally  talk  to 
 themselves,  and  they  know 

223
00:10:27,300 --> 00:10:28,700
 they  have  to  solve  this 
 problem.  They 

224
00:10:28,700 --> 00:10:30,680
 know  they  have  a  challenge 
 with  access  of  access, 

225
00:10:30,960 --> 00:10:34,440
 access  running  a  muck, 
 whether  it's  employees, 

226
00:10:34,740 --> 00:10:37,060
 contractors,  third  parties, 
 whatever  it  is,  they  know 

227
00:10:37,060 --> 00:10:40,440
 this.  But 
 they  can  put  their  arms 

228
00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:45,200
 around  this  problem.  And 
 so,  so  why  is  that?  They 

229
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:47,100
 know  they  have  to  do  this,
 but  they  cannot  do  this, 

230
00:10:47,699 --> 00:10:49,820
 because  things  are  too 
 complex  right  now,  right? 

231
00:10:49,900 --> 00:10:50,820
 They 
 have  to  do  many  different 

232
00:10:50,820 --> 00:10:53,620
 systems.  They're 
 dealing  with,  you  know, 

233
00:10:53,820 --> 00:10:55,880
 identity  systems,  access 
 control  systems, 

234
00:10:56,260 --> 00:10:59,480
 applications,  databases  and 
 whatnot.  So 

235
00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:01,940
 they're  struggling  to  figure
 out,  how  do  I  get  my  arms

236
00:11:01,940 --> 00:11:06,160
 around  this?  And 
 so  the  answer  for  customers

237
00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:09,960
 is  to  help  them  leverage 
 automation.  So 

238
00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:12,660
 co -pilot  is  the  ability 
 for  us  to  work  and  concert

239
00:11:12,660 --> 00:11:16,060
 with  the  customers,  and  be 
 almost  like  a  co -pilot  to 

240
00:11:16,060 --> 00:11:18,060
 the  customers  and 
 environments.  Watch 

241
00:11:18,060 --> 00:11:20,840
 over  their  environments 
 continuously,  understand 

242
00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:24,280
 where  the  problems  are,  and
 clearly,  half  of  them  are 

243
00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:26,540
 children,  seeing  there's  a 
 problem  here.  So 

244
00:11:26,540 --> 00:11:28,820
 co -pilot  is  all  about  the 
 sort  of  AI  world  of 

245
00:11:28,820 --> 00:11:31,860
 automated  visibility, 
 automated  access  control, 

246
00:11:31,980 --> 00:11:36,080
 automated  resolutions.  So 
 customers  don't  have  to  put

247
00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:37,760
 human  labor  and  all  those 
 things.  And 

248
00:11:37,760 --> 00:11:39,340
 today,  we've  seen  many, 
 many  companies  that  use 

249
00:11:39,340 --> 00:11:42,420
 spreadsheets  and  screen 
 charts  and  emails  back  and 

250
00:11:42,420 --> 00:11:44,700
 forth  just  to  just  figure 
 out,  hey,  this  is  actually 

251
00:11:44,700 --> 00:11:47,180
 required  for  Jim.  That's 
 a  back  and  forth  that 

252
00:11:47,180 --> 00:11:49,720
 happens  for  like  a  couple 
 of  weeks.  So 

253
00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:52,380
 co -pilot  takes  a  different 
 approach.  It's 

254
00:11:52,380 --> 00:11:55,700
 entirely  automated.  It's 
 data  driven.  And 

255
00:11:55,700 --> 00:11:57,900
 through  that  approach, 
 customers  are  informed  of 

256
00:11:57,900 --> 00:12:01,220
 problems  automatically  in 
 our  console.  So 

257
00:12:01,220 --> 00:12:02,580
 they  kind  of  get  to  see, 
 okay,  these  are  the  areas 

258
00:12:02,580 --> 00:12:05,960
 I'm  focused  on.  These 
 are  my  exposures.  These 

259
00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:08,720
 are  my  exploit,  things  I 
 need  to  go  look  after, 

260
00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:09,900
 right?  And 
 these  are  the  ways  I  need 

261
00:12:09,900 --> 00:12:12,640
 to  resize  the  right  side 
 of  my  policies.  That's 

262
00:12:12,640 --> 00:12:14,240
 the  whole  idea  of  co -pilot
 is  to  give  you  the 

263
00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:17,840
 automation  layer  so  you  can
 automatically  detect  these 

264
00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:22,740
 unwanted  access,  unauthorized
 access,  shadow  access,  and 

265
00:12:22,740 --> 00:12:24,360
 help  customers  to  kind  of 
 go  through  a  process  of 

266
00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:28,000
 fixing  these  things  as  well
 automatically.  Yeah, 

267
00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:30,340
 I  thought  that  was  one  of 
 the  points  that  you  made 

268
00:12:30,340 --> 00:12:33,220
 there  was  real  interesting 
 around  not  only  the  human 

269
00:12:33,220 --> 00:12:35,880
 identities.  It's 
 so  easy  to  fall  into  the 

270
00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:39,080
 trap  to  think  about 
 identity  as  human  beings, 

271
00:12:39,160 --> 00:12:42,020
 but  there's  also  all  these 
 non -human  identities, 

272
00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:45,040
 especially  in  your  cloud 
 environments.  So 

273
00:12:45,048 --> 00:12:49,600
 let's  kind  of  like  shift 
 into  stuck  meat  and 

274
00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:53,120
 potatoes.  So 
 what  are  the  environments, 

275
00:12:53,400 --> 00:12:57,900
 the  cloud  platforms  that 
 you  guys  support?  And 

276
00:12:57,900 --> 00:13:02,120
 then  if  I'm  wanting  to  use
 stack  in  that  environment, 

277
00:13:03,540 --> 00:13:07,420
 what  is  the  implementation 
 of  that  like?  In 

278
00:13:07,420 --> 00:13:11,520
 other  words,  how  do  I  go 
 about  it  at  like  a  10 ,000

279
00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:14,720
 foot  level?  Yeah, 
 it's  quite  simple.  We 

280
00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:17,680
 support  all  the  major  cloud
 platforms  today.  We 

281
00:13:17,680 --> 00:13:20,900
 are  a  multi -cloud  and  a 
 multi -IDP,  multi -cloud 

282
00:13:20,900 --> 00:13:27,400
 mainly  support  AWS,  Azure, 
 GCP,  and  things  like  that. 

283
00:13:27,540 --> 00:13:28,400
 We 
 also  support  multiple 

284
00:13:28,400 --> 00:13:33,020
 identity  providers  like 
 Octa,  Active  Directory, 

285
00:13:33,380 --> 00:13:36,040
 EntryID.  We 
 also  support  identities  that

286
00:13:36,040 --> 00:13:38,680
 are  built  into  databases, 
 database  identities,  database

287
00:13:38,680 --> 00:13:41,340
 admins,  and  things  like 
 that.  So 

288
00:13:41,348 --> 00:13:44,060
 the  platform  is  a  SaaS 
 platform.  It's 

289
00:13:44,060 --> 00:13:47,040
 easy  to  deploy  and  onboard.
 And 

290
00:13:47,040 --> 00:13:49,300
 we  take  read -only  access 
 for  a  particular  cloud 

291
00:13:49,300 --> 00:13:51,640
 account.  Customers 
 create  a  couple  of  policies

292
00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:54,800
 for  us  and  give  a  limited 
 access  scope.  Through 

293
00:13:54,800 --> 00:13:57,480
 APIs,  we  ingest  this  data. 
 It 

294
00:13:57,480 --> 00:13:59,400
 takes  about  five  minutes  to
 onboard  a  specific  cloud 

295
00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:02,880
 account  or  an  identity 
 account  for  us,  like  Octa, 

296
00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:05,420
 for  example.  And 
 then  we  do  the  analysis, 

297
00:14:05,580 --> 00:14:08,840
 we  do  the  detections,  and 
 the  time  to  initial  value 

298
00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:10,280
 is  about  60  minutes  or 
 less.  So 

299
00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:11,540
 very  simple  to  use  to 
 product.  We 

300
00:14:11,540 --> 00:14:14,320
 have  a  nice  dashboard  that 
 builds  trust  with  our 

301
00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:17,640
 customers  to  tell,  we  tell 
 some  where  things  are  in 

302
00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:19,780
 the  global  population  space.
 What 

303
00:14:19,780 --> 00:14:21,680
 are  the  various  activities, 
 behaviors,  what  are  the 

304
00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:23,560
 risks  of  identities,  what 
 are  the  over -informationed 

305
00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:25,800
 access?  And 
 we  go  through  a  guide  and 

306
00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:27,880
 process  to  help  customers 
 to  understand,  agree, 

307
00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:30,180
 acknowledge,  and  then  take 
 action  from  the  platform. 

308
00:14:31,180 --> 00:14:32,580
 So 
 forgive  me  for  sounding  a 

309
00:14:32,580 --> 00:14:35,280
 little  bit  incredulous,  but 
 I'm  going  to  paraphrase 

310
00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,740
 what  you  just  said.  If 
 in  about  an  hour  you're 

311
00:14:38,740 --> 00:14:40,500
 able  to  pull  all  this 
 information  together  and 

312
00:14:40,500 --> 00:14:44,940
 really  start  having 
 actionable  data  across  GCP, 

313
00:14:45,340 --> 00:14:49,120
 Azure,  AWS,  various  IDPs, 
 etc.,  you're  pulling  that 

314
00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:51,580
 data,  that  quickly,  and 
 really  starting  to  be  able 

315
00:14:51,580 --> 00:14:54,000
 to  get  your  hands  around 
 the  cloud,  right?  Which 

316
00:14:54,000 --> 00:14:55,960
 is  kind  of  like  this 
 amorphous  thing,  right?  How 

317
00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:57,040
 do  you  grab  a  cloud, 
 right?  You're 

318
00:14:57,040 --> 00:14:59,940
 kind  of  trying  to  get  to 
 it,  but  did  I  hear  that 

319
00:14:59,940 --> 00:15:02,360
 correctly?  Absolutely. 
 I  mean,  I  wish  I  could 

320
00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:04,560
 show  you  a  demo  right  now,
 but  maybe  the  next  time, 

321
00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:06,700
 or  the  next  episode  here. 
 But 

322
00:15:06,700 --> 00:15:09,780
 the  point  is,  that's  about 
 all  the  cloud,  right?  API 

323
00:15:09,780 --> 00:15:12,080
-based  applications.  So, 
 you  know,  we're  going  to 

324
00:15:12,088 --> 00:15:14,760
 be  assassins  and  API,  we 
 ingest  this  data,  so  it's 

325
00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:17,900
 easy  for  us  to  grab  data, 
 put  it  together.  The 

326
00:15:17,900 --> 00:15:20,480
 power  of  our  platform  is 
 not  the  ingestion,  but  the 

327
00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:23,540
 correlation,  the  detection, 
 the  analysis  that  we  do 

328
00:15:23,540 --> 00:15:25,540
 automatically.  And 
 we're  going  to  be  throwing 

329
00:15:25,540 --> 00:15:26,880
 very  large  accounts  too. 
 So, 

330
00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:28,800
 we  have  customers  who  are 
 kind  of  small,  medium,  or 

331
00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:31,520
 large,  extra -large  kind  of 
 accounts.  So, 

332
00:15:31,700 --> 00:15:34,020
 you  know,  we  are  able  to 
 then,  the  IPU,  the 

333
00:15:34,020 --> 00:15:36,900
 Birtistic,  and  understand 
 and  the  entire  populations. 

334
00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:38,860
 The 
 challenge  in  this  problem 

335
00:15:38,860 --> 00:15:41,280
 is  always  going  to  be,  am 
 I  going  to  miss  an  island 

336
00:15:41,280 --> 00:15:43,160
 of  identities  lying  around, 
 which  I'm  not  even  touched,

337
00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:44,840
 right?  That's 
 a  problem.  And 

338
00:15:44,840 --> 00:15:46,540
 that  is  an  exposure, 
 customers  don't  have  the 

339
00:15:46,540 --> 00:15:48,480
 visibility.  The 
 idea  is  getting  a  100 % 

340
00:15:48,480 --> 00:15:51,740
 visibility  of  all  the 
 identities  across  your 

341
00:15:51,740 --> 00:15:53,940
 environments.  And 
 that's  what  we  do.  So, 

342
00:15:53,960 --> 00:15:55,560
 that's  an  important 
 statement.  You 

343
00:15:55,560 --> 00:15:58,080
 start  doing  for  one  cloud 
 or  one  platform  and  calling

344
00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:00,220
 it  a  day,  it's  about 
 looking  at  the  entire 

345
00:16:00,220 --> 00:16:03,000
 identity  populations  that  we
 live  in,  your  cloud 

346
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:05,680
 accounts,  your  identity 
 providers,  your  databases, 

347
00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:10,700
 on -prem,  hybrid,  cloud 
-native,  and  whatnot.  So, 

348
00:16:10,740 --> 00:16:13,340
 it's  the  comprehensiveness 
 of  our  ingestion  and  the 

349
00:16:13,340 --> 00:16:15,300
 correlation  with  the 
 customers'  complete  trust 

350
00:16:15,300 --> 00:16:18,700
 and  visibility.  It's 
 their  data.  It's 

351
00:16:18,700 --> 00:16:21,080
 their  story.  And 
 we  just  help  them  to  kind 

352
00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:23,580
 of  get  to  the  quick 
 conclusion  and  remember  all 

353
00:16:23,580 --> 00:16:26,100
 the  toil  of  managing,  you 
 know,  spreadsheets  and 

354
00:16:26,100 --> 00:16:27,980
 emails  and  back  and  forth 
 and  have  them  manage  their 

355
00:16:27,980 --> 00:16:30,180
 policies.  And 
 automatically,  we  have  the 

356
00:16:30,180 --> 00:16:32,220
 co -pilot,  things  that  can 
 take  action  quickly,  right? 

357
00:16:32,360 --> 00:16:33,180
 And 
 so,  the  goal  is  to 

358
00:16:33,180 --> 00:16:35,740
 continue  to  shrink  this 
 attack  surface  to  lose 

359
00:16:35,740 --> 00:16:37,820
 automation.  And 
 I  believe  this  is  the  way 

360
00:16:37,820 --> 00:16:39,620
 to  go.  At 
 the  end  of  the  day,  the 

361
00:16:39,620 --> 00:16:41,600
 customers  don't  have  time, 
 the  resources  are 

362
00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:44,120
 constrained.  They're 
 going  to  use  technologists 

363
00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:46,000
 like  General  Bay  App,  which
 we  were  brought  on  our 

364
00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:48,420
 technology,  to  kind  of 
 bring  this  power  of 

365
00:16:48,420 --> 00:16:51,260
 automation  to  market  and 
 get  them  to  take  action  to

366
00:16:51,260 --> 00:16:53,080
 kind  of  remove  the  access. 
 That's 

367
00:16:53,080 --> 00:16:55,420
 a  really  important  goal. 
 Not 

368
00:16:55,420 --> 00:16:57,020
 to  kind  of  show  nice, 
 pretty  pictures,  but  to 

369
00:16:57,020 --> 00:17:00,680
 have  them  take  action.  Hey,
 Venkat,  I  want  to  get  your

370
00:17:00,680 --> 00:17:05,359
 thoughts  on  a  statement  or 
 a  quote  that  I've  heard  a 

371
00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:07,900
 few  times,  which  is  that 
 you're  only  one 

372
00:17:07,900 --> 00:17:12,339
 misconfiguration  or  maybe  is
 one  over  entitled  account. 

373
00:17:13,140 --> 00:17:15,359
 You're 
 only  one  misconfiguration 

374
00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:18,260
 away  from  a  breach.  To 
 me,  that  puts  a  lot  of 

375
00:17:18,260 --> 00:17:22,960
 onus  on  the  identity 
 management  practitioner.  But 

376
00:17:22,960 --> 00:17:25,180
 I  kind  of  feel  like  that 
 just  means  you  have  to 

377
00:17:25,180 --> 00:17:27,800
 have  the  right  tools.  But 
 what  are  your  thoughts  when

378
00:17:27,800 --> 00:17:30,440
 you  hear  a  quote  like 
 that?  I 

379
00:17:30,440 --> 00:17:32,460
 think  when  I  hear  a  quote 
 like  that,  it  is  absolutely

380
00:17:32,460 --> 00:17:34,300
 true.  It 
 is  an  asymmetric  problem. 

381
00:17:34,980 --> 00:17:36,320
 Attackers 
 have  to  find  just  one 

382
00:17:36,320 --> 00:17:37,980
 weakness  to  get  in. 
 Defenders, 

383
00:17:38,500 --> 00:17:41,480
 as  a  customer,  have  to 
 have  the  100 %  coverage. 

384
00:17:42,060 --> 00:17:43,140
 But 
 it's  not  that  you  got  to 

385
00:17:43,140 --> 00:17:46,600
 do  everything  perfect.  You 
 are  never  going  to  stop 

386
00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:49,440
 attacks.  You're 
 never  going  to,  if  there's 

387
00:17:49,440 --> 00:17:51,140
 going  to  be  some  challenges
 coming  in,  it's  what  is 

388
00:17:51,140 --> 00:17:54,800
 the  risk  of  inaction?  What 
 is  the  risk  of  this 

389
00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:56,520
 access?  So 
 people  are  built  identity 

390
00:17:56,520 --> 00:17:59,060
 systems  for  the  last  two 
 decades.  But 

391
00:17:59,060 --> 00:18:01,220
 the  concept  of  risk  of  an 
 identity,  the  fact  if  I'm 

392
00:18:01,220 --> 00:18:04,580
 giving  access  to  Jim  means 
 I'm  taking  on  a  risk.  I'm 

393
00:18:04,580 --> 00:18:06,640
 hoping  Jim  is  a  legitimate 
 employee.  He 

394
00:18:06,640 --> 00:18:08,600
 does  legitimate  actions,  but
 sometimes  that's  not  the 

395
00:18:08,600 --> 00:18:10,380
 case.  Sometimes 
 your  account  could  be 

396
00:18:10,380 --> 00:18:12,100
 compromised.  So 
 the  solution  threat  vector 

397
00:18:12,100 --> 00:18:14,880
 we  are  looking  at  right 
 now  means  every  account  has

398
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:18,500
 a  risk  at  that  evening 
 understand  and  take  action. 

399
00:18:18,940 --> 00:18:20,560
 So 
 the  focus  is  really  not 

400
00:18:20,560 --> 00:18:23,880
 about  do  the  basis  correct.
 For 

401
00:18:23,880 --> 00:18:26,740
 example,  if  there's  over 
 permissioned  access,  clean 

402
00:18:26,740 --> 00:18:28,640
 it  out.  If 
 there  are  unused  access, 

403
00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:29,940
 clean  it  out.  If 
 there  are  excessive  access, 

404
00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:31,680
 clean  it  out.  If 
 you  have  poor  posture, 

405
00:18:31,860 --> 00:18:35,120
 clean  it  out.  Doing 
 the  basics  correct  and 

406
00:18:35,120 --> 00:18:37,720
 having  complete  visibility 
 around  these  basic  hygiene, 

407
00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:41,700
 if  you  will,  solves  80 % 
 of  the  problem  in  this 

408
00:18:41,700 --> 00:18:44,400
 market.  Now 
 you've  got  20 %  to  go.  The

409
00:18:44,400 --> 00:18:46,920
 remaining  10 %  now  we've 
 got  the  hygiene  done.  It's 

410
00:18:46,920 --> 00:18:51,040
 comfortable  with  that.  Now 
 look  at  the  next  10%.  How 

411
00:18:51,040 --> 00:18:53,860
 do  I  look  at  the  critical 
 clown  jewels?  In 

412
00:18:53,860 --> 00:18:56,960
 a  data,  in  a  databases,  in
 a  customer  data,  supply 

413
00:18:56,960 --> 00:18:59,000
 chain,  look  at  external 
 actors  who  want  to  come 

414
00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:01,480
 in,  tighten  those  things 
 up.  That's 

415
00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:05,540
 another  10%.  Another 
 5 %  is  where  are  my  policy

416
00:19:05,540 --> 00:19:08,720
 gaps?  Where 
 are  my  blind  spots?  Fix 

417
00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:11,300
 that.  Now 
 you  get  a  95 %  pretty 

418
00:19:11,300 --> 00:19:12,720
 much.  And 
 the  remaining  5 %  is  just 

419
00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:14,500
 to  excuse  you  to  accept. 
 So 

420
00:19:14,500 --> 00:19:18,060
 by  methodically  looking  at 
 brass  tacks,  hygiene, 

421
00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:22,640
 configuration  practices, 
 least -fruits  practices, 

422
00:19:23,920 --> 00:19:27,500
 better  posture,  improved 
 posture,  and  tightening  your

423
00:19:27,500 --> 00:19:30,940
 policies,  tightening  your 
 guardrails,  education,  you 

424
00:19:30,940 --> 00:19:33,420
 get  to  the  95 %  mark  and 
 then  the  remaining  5 %  is 

425
00:19:33,420 --> 00:19:34,900
 the  risk  of  doing  business.
 That's 

426
00:19:34,900 --> 00:19:37,760
 why  I  think  about  it.  That
 way  you  can  make  progress. 

427
00:19:38,640 --> 00:19:39,440
 It's 
 never  going  to  be  about 

428
00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:41,660
 100%.  But 
 it's  always  about  having  a 

429
00:19:41,660 --> 00:19:44,840
 method  in  place.  And 
 tools  currently  don't  have 

430
00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:47,140
 this  methodology.  They 
 built  for  20  years  ago  for

431
00:19:47,140 --> 00:19:49,400
 compliance  and  audit  and 
 automation  for  productivity 

432
00:19:49,400 --> 00:19:51,640
 purposes.  Now 
 I  didn't  even  speak  about 

433
00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:54,220
 thread  dimension.  Access 
 is  a  thread  dimension.  This

434
00:19:54,220 --> 00:19:56,280
 is  the  change  the  market 
 is  using  in  the  last 

435
00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:58,900
 decade.  It's 
 going  to  get  worse  with 

436
00:19:58,900 --> 00:20:01,900
 the  arrival  of  AI  and 
 machine  identities  and 

437
00:20:01,900 --> 00:20:05,700
 things  like  that.  So 
 that's  a  new  part  here.  So

438
00:20:05,708 --> 00:20:10,960
 I  asked  you  earlier  about 
 lifecycle.  We 

439
00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:13,000
 have  to  now  leverage  thread
 as  part  of  the  identity 

440
00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:15,980
 lifecycle,  which  we've  never
 done  before.  So 

441
00:20:15,980 --> 00:20:18,720
 the  notion  of  thread  as 
 part  of  a  lifecycle  of 

442
00:20:18,720 --> 00:20:21,040
 identity  management  has  to 
 be  a  front  and  center 

443
00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:23,520
 thought.  And 
 that's  the  area  where  it 

444
00:20:23,520 --> 00:20:26,980
 will  be  a  part  of  the 
 great  innovation  around.  You

445
00:20:26,980 --> 00:20:29,300
 know,  another  thought  that 
 what  you  just  said,  they're

446
00:20:29,300 --> 00:20:33,040
 triggering  another  thought 
 to  me,  which  is  a  lot  of 

447
00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:39,000
 the  cloud  environments  were 
 spun  up  not  with  the 

448
00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:42,620
 inclusion  of  informational 
 security  and  the  IAM 

449
00:20:42,620 --> 00:20:46,520
 strategists  and  practitioners
 within  an  organization. 

450
00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:50,480
 Application 
 development  teams  were  given

451
00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:52,020
 like,  hey,  make  this 
 happen.  We 

452
00:20:52,020 --> 00:20:55,880
 need  to  have  this  data 
 lake  and  this  great  WISBANG

453
00:20:55,880 --> 00:20:58,200
 project.  And 
 they  went  out  and  they 

454
00:20:58,200 --> 00:21:01,900
 built  it.  And 
 a  lot  of  times  they're  not

455
00:21:01,900 --> 00:21:04,920
 security  minded.  So 
 they  weren't  trying  to  get 

456
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:08,480
 each  account  down  to  least 
 privilege.  Now 

457
00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:12,860
 this  is  someone  says  to 
 see  so,  hey,  buddy,  the 

458
00:21:12,860 --> 00:21:14,580
 buck  stops  at  your  desk. 
 You're 

459
00:21:14,580 --> 00:21:20,180
 responsible  for  protecting 
 our  data.  And 

460
00:21:20,188 --> 00:21:23,500
 now  the  see  so  he  or  she 
 has  to  figure  out,  oh, 

461
00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:26,580
 we've  got  this.  We've 
 got  those  crown  jewels  out 

462
00:21:26,580 --> 00:21:30,680
 there  in  this  cloud.  Now 
 I  need  to  figure  out  how 

463
00:21:30,680 --> 00:21:32,980
 to  make  it  more  secure. 
 And 

464
00:21:32,980 --> 00:21:35,960
 I  think  one  of  the  great 
 places,  sorry,  it's  not 

465
00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:37,860
 going  to  give  you 
 everything,  but  a  great 

466
00:21:37,860 --> 00:21:40,380
 place  to  start  would  be  to
 start  looking  at,  especially

467
00:21:40,380 --> 00:21:43,180
 this  machine  accounts,  but 
 all  accounts,  which  ones 

468
00:21:43,180 --> 00:21:47,380
 are  over  provisioned?  A 
 great  point.  Yeah, 

469
00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:49,600
 the  power  of  the  cloud, 
 right,  this  automation,  I 

470
00:21:49,600 --> 00:21:51,580
 saw  the  cloud,  we  love  the
 cloud  so  much,  it's 

471
00:21:51,580 --> 00:21:53,720
 tremendous  amount  of  power, 
 right.  Things 

472
00:21:53,720 --> 00:21:56,780
 like  using,  for  example, 
 you  know,  infrastructure  is 

473
00:21:56,780 --> 00:21:58,960
 code,  like  Tataform,  for 
 example,  you  can  spin  a 

474
00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:02,020
 cloud  in  like  five  minutes,
 right.  You 

475
00:22:02,020 --> 00:22:04,240
 can  imagine  you  can  set  up
 a  database  in  30  seconds, 

476
00:22:04,360 --> 00:22:07,060
 you  can  put  up  a  database,
 right,  and  have  an  upward 

477
00:22:07,060 --> 00:22:10,020
 customer  data  and  do  it, 
 right,  and  go  away.  So 

478
00:22:10,020 --> 00:22:12,000
 the  environment  is  quite 
 difficult.  So 

479
00:22:12,000 --> 00:22:16,660
 by  all  accounts,  most  cloud
 environments  are 

480
00:22:16,660 --> 00:22:18,020
 automatically  over 
 provisioned  because  of 

481
00:22:18,020 --> 00:22:21,460
 automation,  you  know,  and 
 developers  are  driven  by, 

482
00:22:21,540 --> 00:22:24,180
 that  are  their  KPIs  or 
 productivity  and  velocity  of

483
00:22:24,180 --> 00:22:28,060
 code,  not  examination 
 privileges.  That's 

484
00:22:28,060 --> 00:22:30,740
 not  their  job.  So 
 they  want  to  go  where  they

485
00:22:30,740 --> 00:22:32,800
 want  to  build  cool 
 applications  and  monetize 

486
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:35,660
 data,  bring  the  latest  AI, 
 ML  model,  general  AI,  show 

487
00:22:35,660 --> 00:22:38,160
 value,  right,  and  run  and 
 create  value  for  the 

488
00:22:38,160 --> 00:22:40,960
 business.  Security 
 teams  are  pretty  much  on 

489
00:22:40,960 --> 00:22:42,540
 the  outside  and  looking  at 
 this  cloud.  It's 

490
00:22:42,540 --> 00:22:45,440
 so  fast  and  growing  so 
 fast.  So 

491
00:22:45,448 --> 00:22:48,560
 when  the  buck  stops  for 
 the  security  teams,  they 

492
00:22:48,560 --> 00:22:50,200
 struggle,  right.  At 
 the  end  of  the  day,  they 

493
00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:52,060
 didn't  have  any  policy 
 control  over  this 

494
00:22:52,060 --> 00:22:55,300
 environment.  And 
 so  what  we're  trying  to  do

495
00:22:55,300 --> 00:22:57,160
 is  to  kind  of  bridge  the 
 gap,  is  to  kind  of  bridge,

496
00:22:57,320 --> 00:22:59,440
 help  the  security  teams 
 understand  the  risk  of 

497
00:23:00,199 --> 00:23:04,460
 already  over  permissioned 
 access,  all  the  over,  you 

498
00:23:04,460 --> 00:23:07,080
 know,  exporters  created. 
 Coming 

499
00:23:07,080 --> 00:23:09,260
 to  data  assets,  because 
 it's  so  easy  to  spin  up  a

500
00:23:09,260 --> 00:23:12,040
 data  asset  of  the  cloud 
 and  build  an  application  to

501
00:23:12,040 --> 00:23:14,700
 share  data.  So 
 data  sharing  is  ubiquitous. 

502
00:23:15,040 --> 00:23:16,920
 Like 
 imagine  how  easy  it  is  for

503
00:23:16,920 --> 00:23:19,040
 us  to,  you  know,  not  to 
 share,  you  know,  a  Google 

504
00:23:19,040 --> 00:23:21,540
 sheet,  right?  Or, 
 you  know,  it  takes  two 

505
00:23:21,540 --> 00:23:23,420
 minutes  for  us  to  create  a
 spreadsheet  or  doc  and 

506
00:23:23,420 --> 00:23:25,940
 share  it  with  you.  Done. 
 Imagine  now  you're  dead, 

507
00:23:26,080 --> 00:23:28,700
 you're  sharing  the  same 
 terabytes  of  data.  With 

508
00:23:28,700 --> 00:23:31,100
 that,  with  that  lot  of 
 simplicity,  I  can  share  my 

509
00:23:31,100 --> 00:23:34,660
 Google  Drive  or  my  Stoflake
 instances  to  my  third 

510
00:23:34,660 --> 00:23:37,160
 parties  and  do  interesting 
 applications.  So, 

511
00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:40,800
 and  I  just  in  two  minutes,
 you  have  changed  the  world 

512
00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:43,760
 from,  you  know,  kind  of 
 highly  change  control 

513
00:23:43,760 --> 00:23:47,260
 environment  to  a  completely,
 you  know,  sort  of,  you 

514
00:23:47,260 --> 00:23:50,840
 know,  ad  hoc  way  to  share 
 data  of  our  customers  and 

515
00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:54,700
 whatnot  to  various  third 
 parties  using  APIs.  So 

516
00:23:54,700 --> 00:23:56,800
 there's  no  visibility  to 
 these  entire  things.  So 

517
00:23:56,808 --> 00:23:58,520
 that's  why  I  go  back  to 
 the  Copilot.  Thought 

518
00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:02,340
 is  we  need  to  bring  the 
 part  of  automation  to  work 

519
00:24:02,340 --> 00:24:04,800
 to  solve  this  problem.  The 
 very,  this  problem  is  going

520
00:24:04,800 --> 00:24:06,440
 to  be  automation  in  the 
 first  place  in  the  cloud. 

521
00:24:06,820 --> 00:24:07,740
 So 
 let's  leverage  automation 

522
00:24:07,740 --> 00:24:11,020
 and  AI  together  to  bring 
 the  early  visibility,  to 

523
00:24:11,020 --> 00:24:12,720
 bring  that,  you  know, 
 continuous  visibility  to 

524
00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:15,180
 practitioners  of  identity 
 and  security.  So 

525
00:24:15,180 --> 00:24:17,320
 they  can  kind  of  keep  up 
 with  this  thing  and  start 

526
00:24:17,320 --> 00:24:20,000
 to  figure  out  how  they  can
 speak  about  risk,  right? 

527
00:24:21,160 --> 00:24:22,480
 The 
 job  of  the  C -SOS  is  not 

528
00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:24,440
 to  talk  about,  you  know, 
 not  to  take  on  risk,  but 

529
00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:26,940
 to  speak  about  risk.  If 
 this  is  where  I'm  exposed, 

530
00:24:28,180 --> 00:24:30,160
 this  is  where  the  risk  is,
 and  this  is  where  the 

531
00:24:30,160 --> 00:24:32,380
 impact  is  going  to  be.  You
 guys  take  a  call  on  this. 

532
00:24:32,700 --> 00:24:33,680
 So 
 we're  going  to  help  C -SOS 

533
00:24:33,680 --> 00:24:36,200
 and  the  board  ultimately 
 take  a  call,  and  these  are

534
00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:38,400
 the  exposures,  but  now 
 we're  going  to  make  it 

535
00:24:38,400 --> 00:24:41,000
 super  simple,  super  easy. 
 And 

536
00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:43,320
 that's  the  reason  why  we 
 so  thrilled  about,  so 

537
00:24:43,320 --> 00:24:47,400
 worked  about  AI  and  machine
 learning  and  data  lakes  and

538
00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:48,880
 whatnot.  So 
 this  ability  for  us  to 

539
00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:52,300
 bring  that  continuous 
 visibility  as  things  happen,

540
00:24:52,300 --> 00:24:55,260
 you're  able  to  respond  to 
 events  and  other  shut  it 

541
00:24:55,260 --> 00:24:59,340
 down  or  take  action.  That's
 super  compelling.  And 

542
00:24:59,340 --> 00:25:01,000
 go  back  in  the  day  of, 
 you  know,  change  management,

543
00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:02,820
 and  you  have  three  months 
 to  do  reactions  reviews 

544
00:25:02,820 --> 00:25:05,120
 today.  And 
 people  don't  even  do 

545
00:25:05,120 --> 00:25:07,140
 reactions  reviews  today,  you
 know,  three  months,  every 

546
00:25:07,140 --> 00:25:09,560
 manager  hates  it.  And 
 when  you  want  to  review 

547
00:25:09,560 --> 00:25:11,740
 actions  for  your  employees 
 or  your  reports,  you  go 

548
00:25:12,300 --> 00:25:14,860
 find  your  favorite  tool.  I 
 won't  name  these  tools 

549
00:25:14,860 --> 00:25:19,020
 today,  but  you  can  find 
 select  all  button  and  bulk 

550
00:25:19,020 --> 00:25:20,780
 approve.  Done. 
 It's  a  headache.  I'm 

551
00:25:20,780 --> 00:25:23,400
 done.  So 
 nobody's  examining  access 

552
00:25:23,400 --> 00:25:25,860
 trivillators.  It 
 should  be  there.  So 

553
00:25:25,860 --> 00:25:28,540
 when  it  doesn't  happen 
 through  either  a  fraud 

554
00:25:28,540 --> 00:25:33,840
 process  or  a  complex 
 process,  access  accrues.  So 

555
00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:36,820
 we  want  to  bring  automation
 and  simplicity,  because 

556
00:25:36,820 --> 00:25:39,840
 without  simplicity  and  data,
 our  customers  will  not  take

557
00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:41,720
 action.  That's 
 the  differentiating  aspect 

558
00:25:41,720 --> 00:25:45,300
 of  what  stack  does.  So 
 how  do  you,  how  do  you 

559
00:25:45,300 --> 00:25:48,980
 use  something  like  stack  to
 measure  the  success  of  the 

560
00:25:48,980 --> 00:25:50,960
 implementation  or  the  data 
 you're  getting  out  of  it? 

561
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:52,300
 Because 
 you  talked  about  risk, 

562
00:25:52,560 --> 00:25:53,580
 right?  And 
 access  permissions  and 

563
00:25:53,580 --> 00:25:56,460
 cleanup,  etc.  I 
 have  to  imagine  that  you've

564
00:25:56,460 --> 00:25:59,460
 got,  you  know,  customers 
 right  now  that  are  using 

565
00:25:59,460 --> 00:26:02,040
 the  product.  How 
 do  they  measure  success  to 

566
00:26:02,040 --> 00:26:03,560
 know  that  they've  gotten  a 
 return  on  the  investment 

567
00:26:03,560 --> 00:26:06,380
 they've  made?  Yeah, 
 let  me  give  an  example  of 

568
00:26:06,380 --> 00:26:09,080
 this,  you  know,  you  know, 
 our  customers  and  talk  to 

569
00:26:09,080 --> 00:26:12,100
 the  security  teams,  even 
 the  CISO,  right?  Their 

570
00:26:12,100 --> 00:26:14,420
 job  is  raise  risks  and 
 awareness.  And 

571
00:26:14,420 --> 00:26:16,560
 so  now  let's  say  they  have
 an  environment  in  which 

572
00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:19,480
 they  found  all  the  risks 
 of  AWS.  They're 

573
00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:21,640
 going  to  knock  on  their 
 colleagues,  VP  of 

574
00:26:21,640 --> 00:26:23,420
 engineering,  who  owns  the 
 cloud,  hey,  you  got  to  go 

575
00:26:23,420 --> 00:26:26,640
 fix  this  buddy.  The 
 VP  of  engineering  says,  you

576
00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:29,640
 know  what,  I  don't  have 
 time  for  this.  I'll 

577
00:26:29,640 --> 00:26:31,560
 look  at  it  when  I  can, 
 right?  So 

578
00:26:31,560 --> 00:26:34,920
 now  we  have  surface 
 intelligence  and  the  risk. 

579
00:26:35,820 --> 00:26:37,460
 The 
 CISO  has  told  his  peers 

580
00:26:37,460 --> 00:26:40,400
 you  got  to  go  fix  it,  but
 nothing  happens.  So 

581
00:26:40,400 --> 00:26:42,120
 what  happens  now?  A 
 month  goes  by,  still 

582
00:26:42,120 --> 00:26:44,640
 nothing  happens.  It's 
 like,  so  now  there's  a 

583
00:26:44,640 --> 00:26:47,180
 back  and  forth,  right?  So 
 what  we  do  is  it  can  be 

584
00:26:47,180 --> 00:26:48,800
 a  bit  SLAs  out  of  the 
 product.  Now, 

585
00:26:49,020 --> 00:26:50,980
 you  know,  if  that  risk 
 you're  generating,  but  it's 

586
00:26:50,980 --> 00:26:54,160
 a  high  severity  risk,  it's 
 got  to  be  fixed  within  one

587
00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:57,200
 week,  right?  And 
 now  we  become  the  broker. 

588
00:26:58,160 --> 00:26:59,160
 So 
 our  ticketing  mechanism 

589
00:26:59,160 --> 00:27:03,580
 includes  this  SLA.  So 
 now  the  cloud  engineering 

590
00:27:03,580 --> 00:27:06,940
 VP  has  to  respond  to  this.
 They 

591
00:27:06,940 --> 00:27:08,760
 can  say,  look,  I  accept 
 the  risk,  I'll  fix  it 

592
00:27:08,760 --> 00:27:12,380
 within  a  week.  I 
 will  accept  the  risk.  I 

593
00:27:12,380 --> 00:27:15,040
 will  fix  it  in  two  weeks. 
 I 

594
00:27:15,040 --> 00:27:17,300
 will  not  accept  the  risk 
 escalate.  This 

595
00:27:17,300 --> 00:27:19,840
 is  the  business.  So 
 our  job  is  to  kind  of 

596
00:27:19,840 --> 00:27:21,340
 make  sure  they  come 
 together,  collaborate, 

597
00:27:21,420 --> 00:27:24,140
 collaborate  on  the  single 
 platform,  cost  tag,  identity

598
00:27:24,140 --> 00:27:28,440
 risks  of  high  fidelity, 
 high  urgency  has  to  be 

599
00:27:28,440 --> 00:27:30,740
 taken  care  of.  And 
 at  least  everybody's  on  the

600
00:27:30,740 --> 00:27:32,800
 same  page.  That's 
 the  same  data  they're 

601
00:27:32,800 --> 00:27:36,160
 looking  at  the  CISO  and 
 the  identity  of  looking  at 

602
00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:39,060
 the  same  data  as  the 
 DevOps  and  security  teams 

603
00:27:39,060 --> 00:27:40,860
 are  looking  at.  So 
 we're  able  to  bring  this, 

604
00:27:41,180 --> 00:27:44,380
 this  collaborative  platform 
 through  SLA.  So 

605
00:27:44,380 --> 00:27:46,780
 the  end  of  the  day,  it's 
 not,  you  know,  I'll  do  it 

606
00:27:46,780 --> 00:27:48,840
 when  I  can.  Let's 
 look  at  the  risk.  And 

607
00:27:48,840 --> 00:27:51,640
 if  you  can  resolve  this  at
 this  level,  we  elevate  this

608
00:27:51,640 --> 00:27:54,300
 to  the,  the  head  of 
 operations  or  the  business 

609
00:27:54,300 --> 00:27:56,160
 unit  data,  whatever  it  is. 
 Our 

610
00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:58,680
 goal  ultimately  is  to  kind 
 of  keep  on  nudging,  nudging

611
00:27:58,680 --> 00:28:00,860
 through  SLA.  So 
 somebody  can  actually  remove

612
00:28:00,860 --> 00:28:03,180
 the  access.  Until 
 such  point  in  time  access 

613
00:28:03,180 --> 00:28:05,860
 is  not  removed,  you're  not 
 done  a  job.  And 

614
00:28:05,860 --> 00:28:07,440
 that's  where  it  goes  to 
 kind  of  take  that  last 

615
00:28:07,440 --> 00:28:11,540
 mile,  help  leaders  and 
 owners  and  stakeholders  and 

616
00:28:11,540 --> 00:28:14,400
 risk  managers  and  teams 
 understand  the  risk,  agree 

617
00:28:14,400 --> 00:28:17,120
 on  the  risk,  and  then  I've
 delivered  plans  to  fix 

618
00:28:17,120 --> 00:28:19,860
 these  problems.  So 
 measurement  of  what  our 

619
00:28:19,860 --> 00:28:22,700
 product  is,  how  many  of 
 these  tickets  have  we,  have

620
00:28:22,700 --> 00:28:25,840
 we  sold  have  actually 
 removed  the  access?  Is 

621
00:28:25,840 --> 00:28:28,100
 it  growing?  Is 
 it  shrinking?  How's 

622
00:28:28,100 --> 00:28:29,480
 it  happened  on  the  last, 
 you  know,  however,  what  is 

623
00:28:29,480 --> 00:28:30,780
 the  trending?  So 
 when  they  see  the  trend 

624
00:28:30,780 --> 00:28:33,620
 lines  coming  down,  they  see
 value  in  the  product  that 

625
00:28:33,620 --> 00:28:35,780
 we're  able  to  now,  you 
 know,  take  a  fairly  chaotic

626
00:28:35,780 --> 00:28:39,700
 environment  of  unbroadened 
 access  and  brought  it  down 

627
00:28:39,700 --> 00:28:43,100
 to  manageable  sort  of 
 issues  and  risks  and  be 

628
00:28:43,100 --> 00:28:45,140
 able  to  provide  continuous 
 visibility  and  operational 

629
00:28:45,140 --> 00:28:47,780
 fidelity  around  this.  So 
 that's  what  customers 

630
00:28:47,780 --> 00:28:49,400
 measure,  right?  And 
 do  it  in  a  very  automated 

631
00:28:49,400 --> 00:28:52,020
 fashion,  which  means  they're
 not  repurposing  their  teams 

632
00:28:52,020 --> 00:28:53,760
 to  go  to  this,  you  know, 
 co -pilot  takes  it  further 

633
00:28:53,760 --> 00:28:56,600
 automatically.  You 
 talked  about  those  nudges 

634
00:28:56,600 --> 00:28:58,520
 and  I,  and  I  see  this  as 
 well  as  sort  of  in  the 

635
00:28:58,520 --> 00:29:00,940
 real  world  is  people  are 
 always  hesitant  to  take 

636
00:29:00,940 --> 00:29:03,040
 away  access  because  they're 
 not  sure  what  it  does. 

637
00:29:03,040 --> 00:29:04,580
 It's 
 going  to  break  something. 

638
00:29:04,840 --> 00:29:05,800
 And 
 so  they  just  kind  of  leave

639
00:29:05,800 --> 00:29:10,460
 it,  I  guess,  you  know,  is 
 that  fair  where  we're  at 

640
00:29:10,460 --> 00:29:12,120
 today  where  people  just 
 don't  know  what  they're, 

641
00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:14,640
 what  they're,  what  they're 
 human  and  sometimes  non 

642
00:29:14,640 --> 00:29:16,080
-human  accounts  are  doing. 
 And 

643
00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:18,760
 so  that,  that  hesitancy  is 
 real.  How 

644
00:29:18,760 --> 00:29:20,720
 do  you  take  something  like 
 that  and  say,  okay,  well, 

645
00:29:20,720 --> 00:29:22,620
 here's  a  better  way  to  do 
 it.  Maybe 

646
00:29:22,620 --> 00:29:25,040
 there's  more  context  around 
 what  this  account  does  or 

647
00:29:25,040 --> 00:29:27,500
 the  continuous  evaluation, 
 right,  of  what  the  access 

648
00:29:27,500 --> 00:29:30,120
 is  doing  and  shrinking 
 attack  surfaces  and  things 

649
00:29:30,120 --> 00:29:31,680
 like  that.  Can 
 you  talk  a  little  bit 

650
00:29:31,680 --> 00:29:35,680
 about  why  you  see  those 
 nudges  being  needed  still 

651
00:29:35,680 --> 00:29:38,180
 and  then  how  does  that 
 reduce  the  attack  surface 

652
00:29:38,180 --> 00:29:41,180
 once  you  get  through  the 
 nudge  factor?  Yeah, 

653
00:29:41,480 --> 00:29:44,540
 most  of  them,  for  example, 
 you  know,  when  you're 

654
00:29:44,540 --> 00:29:46,020
 trying  to  remove  access, 
 you  don't  have  the  full 

655
00:29:46,020 --> 00:29:48,180
 context,  right?  Because 
 the  removal  that  access 

656
00:29:48,180 --> 00:29:49,920
 could  impact  other 
 downstream  applications, 

657
00:29:50,240 --> 00:29:52,480
 legitimate  reasons,  right? 
 Why 

658
00:29:52,480 --> 00:29:54,400
 users  could  be  disabled  and
 not  get  access  to  the 

659
00:29:54,400 --> 00:29:55,940
 system.  So 
 the  worry  is,  am  I  going 

660
00:29:55,940 --> 00:29:57,940
 to  break  something  down  the
 line?  So 

661
00:29:57,940 --> 00:29:59,380
 the  first  thing  you  do  is 
 give  you  the  complete 

662
00:29:59,380 --> 00:30:00,760
 picture.  If 
 you  remove  this  access, 

663
00:30:00,880 --> 00:30:02,140
 this  is  going  to  be  the 
 impact,  right?  Of 

664
00:30:02,140 --> 00:30:05,140
 all  these  systems,  we  build
 that  map  and  we  show  that 

665
00:30:05,140 --> 00:30:06,980
 graph.  So 
 we  build  trust  in  our  data

666
00:30:06,980 --> 00:30:09,720
 itself,  number  one.  So 
 the  first  thing  is  to 

667
00:30:09,720 --> 00:30:12,380
 avoid  confident,  hey, 
 nobody's  access  is  the  last

668
00:30:12,380 --> 00:30:15,680
 90  days.  Okay. 
 And  you  know,  this  access 

669
00:30:15,680 --> 00:30:17,280
 is  very  risky.  It's 
 got  a  high  degree  of 

670
00:30:17,280 --> 00:30:19,900
 impact.  You 
 know,  I  think  of  some  of 

671
00:30:19,900 --> 00:30:21,720
 the  breaches  that's  happened
 over  the  last,  you  know, 

672
00:30:21,860 --> 00:30:24,540
 massive  breaches,  right,  you
 know,  you've  seen  in  a 

673
00:30:24,540 --> 00:30:28,120
 time  and  again,  and  you 
 got  to  take  action  on  and 

674
00:30:28,120 --> 00:30:31,400
 so  that's  one  example  is 
 to  kind  of  give  visibility.

675
00:30:32,240 --> 00:30:33,620
 The 
 second  area  we  have  helped 

676
00:30:33,620 --> 00:30:35,440
 customers  is  look,  even  if 
 I  have  to  remove  the 

677
00:30:35,440 --> 00:30:38,180
 access,  you  know,  some 
 people  call  it  the  screen 

678
00:30:38,180 --> 00:30:40,040
 test,  right?  You 
 don't  access  on  a  screen. 

679
00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:42,040
 Oh 
 my  God,  I  need  access. 

680
00:30:42,220 --> 00:30:43,300
 Okay. 
 If  you  need  screen,  you 

681
00:30:43,300 --> 00:30:45,600
 need  to  do  screen  test. 
 You 

682
00:30:45,600 --> 00:30:48,280
 go  out  to  a  URL  and 
 you'll  request  access  again.

683
00:30:48,980 --> 00:30:49,820
 You'll 
 access  the  store 

684
00:30:49,820 --> 00:30:53,320
 immediately.  So 
 we  remove  the  issue  of, 

685
00:30:53,440 --> 00:30:56,900
 you  know,  we  remove  the 
 issue  of,  you  know,  if  we,

686
00:30:57,060 --> 00:31:00,660
 if  customers  do  need 
 access,  you  know,  and  take 

687
00:31:00,660 --> 00:31:03,280
 enough  for  some  reason,  you
 can  now  give  them  access 

688
00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:06,380
 back,  but  now  it's  more 
 just  in  time  because  you're

689
00:31:06,380 --> 00:31:08,320
 only  using  it  once  in  90 
 days.  So 

690
00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:09,900
 we're  able  to  kind  of 
 bring  in,  bring  this 

691
00:31:09,900 --> 00:31:12,040
 process  together  to  kind  of
 institutionalize  a  behavioral

692
00:31:12,040 --> 00:31:14,520
 change.  It's 
 a  behavioral  change.  And 

693
00:31:14,520 --> 00:31:16,200
 behaviors  won't  change 
 overnight.  It 

694
00:31:16,200 --> 00:31:18,540
 needs  data.  It 
 needs  impact  to  downstream 

695
00:31:18,540 --> 00:31:21,160
 applications.  And 
 what  happens  if  I  do  make 

696
00:31:21,160 --> 00:31:23,160
 a  mistake  and  I  resort 
 that  this  day  quickly, 

697
00:31:23,160 --> 00:31:25,340
 that's  the  third  point,  all
 three  things  are  part  of 

698
00:31:25,340 --> 00:31:27,980
 the  art  platform.  So 
 customers  are  comfortable. 

699
00:31:28,180 --> 00:31:29,020
 Hey, 
 even  if  I  remove  the 

700
00:31:29,020 --> 00:31:31,560
 access,  you're  going  to 
 scream  at  me,  go  to  the 

701
00:31:31,560 --> 00:31:33,580
 swing  or  request  access 
 within  30  seconds,  we'll 

702
00:31:33,580 --> 00:31:36,620
 reprovision  the  access.  But 
 now  we  can  give  you  a 

703
00:31:36,620 --> 00:31:37,960
 limited  based  access,  right?
 Now 

704
00:31:37,960 --> 00:31:41,900
 I've  culturally  removed  the 
 access  and  also  kind  of 

705
00:31:41,900 --> 00:31:44,340
 give  you  more  of  a  time 
-based  approach.  So 

706
00:31:44,340 --> 00:31:48,340
 I've  made,  you  know,  great 
 progress  in  the  behavior 

707
00:31:48,340 --> 00:31:50,260
 and  sentiments  of  these 
 problems.  So 

708
00:31:50,260 --> 00:31:52,140
 those  are  the  couple  of 
 areas  we  really  customers 

709
00:31:52,140 --> 00:31:53,580
 like  this.  And 
 again,  all  of  this  is 

710
00:31:53,580 --> 00:31:56,200
 automated.  So 
 there's  no  kind  of  back 

711
00:31:56,200 --> 00:32:00,000
 and  forth  around  this  to 
 remove  the  human  toil.  And 

712
00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:02,380
 that's  a  big  issue.  Now 
 these  things  are  more 

713
00:32:02,380 --> 00:32:04,840
 complex  in  the  machine 
 editor  days,  right?  And 

714
00:32:04,840 --> 00:32:07,580
 there's  nobody  to  tap  in 
 the  verify  access.  You 

715
00:32:07,588 --> 00:32:10,860
 know,  so  we  see  a  lot  of 
 cases,  for  example,  when 

716
00:32:10,860 --> 00:32:12,800
 people  are  using  machine 
 editor  days  and  abusing  it,

717
00:32:12,980 --> 00:32:16,220
 human  users,  vice  versa.  So
 we  kind  of  have  all  these 

718
00:32:16,220 --> 00:32:18,800
 environments  where,  look, 
 where  there's  a  risk  of 

719
00:32:18,800 --> 00:32:22,580
 access  or  an  abuse  of 
 access,  but  things  are  sort

720
00:32:22,580 --> 00:32:24,940
 of  awry,  we  kind  of  bring 
 it  back.  But 

721
00:32:24,940 --> 00:32:26,680
 at  the  end  of  the  day,  we
 take  a  lot  of  pride  in 

722
00:32:26,680 --> 00:32:28,980
 operationally  making  sure 
 customers  are  able  to 

723
00:32:28,980 --> 00:32:32,440
 manage  this  entire  problem 
 within  their  culture,  within

724
00:32:32,440 --> 00:32:35,020
 their  workflows,  within 
 their  environments.  Only 

725
00:32:35,020 --> 00:32:37,000
 then  we  see,  you  know,  a 
 big  adapt  happening  in  our 

726
00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:42,080
 customers.  So 
 you  mentioned,  we've  been 

727
00:32:42,080 --> 00:32:43,740
 talking  awful  a  lot  of  the
 cloud,  I  think,  early  on 

728
00:32:43,740 --> 00:32:45,800
 you  mentioned  that  there 
 were  also  some  capabilities 

729
00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:49,440
 around  on -prem  systems  like
 Active  Directory  and 

730
00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:52,320
 Database.  Are 
 there  differences  in  how 

731
00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:55,140
 that  integration  works?  Is 
 it  relatively  the  same? 

732
00:32:55,620 --> 00:32:56,600
 Talk 
 a  little  bit  about  sort  of

733
00:32:56,600 --> 00:32:58,720
 like  the  divide  between 
 cloud  and  then  maybe  on 

734
00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:02,560
-prem  resources.  Yeah, 
 I  think  mostly  for  cloud 

735
00:33:02,560 --> 00:33:05,000
 being  such  a  modern 
 platform,  it's  all  API 

736
00:33:05,000 --> 00:33:06,840
 based.  So 
 most  of  the  times  we  have 

737
00:33:06,840 --> 00:33:08,900
 very  good  APIs  to 
 integrate.  So 

738
00:33:08,900 --> 00:33:11,680
 you  don't  have  to  have 
 agents  deployed  on  any 

739
00:33:11,680 --> 00:33:14,360
 systems.  We 
 can  just  use  APIs.  I 

740
00:33:14,360 --> 00:33:17,100
 use  the  cloud  control  plane
 to  look  at  our  data  when 

741
00:33:17,100 --> 00:33:20,260
 it's  really  on -prem.  Then 
 there's  no,  you  know, 

742
00:33:20,500 --> 00:33:22,540
 native  cloud,  there's  no 
 cloud  native  way  to  kind 

743
00:33:22,540 --> 00:33:23,820
 of  talk  to  the  resources, 
 right?  We 

744
00:33:23,820 --> 00:33:25,340
 need  some  sort  of  a 
 connector  or  an  agent  where

745
00:33:25,340 --> 00:33:28,760
 you  deploy  on  the  premise 
 itself,  which  acts  like  a 

746
00:33:28,760 --> 00:33:33,300
 broker,  right,  to  kind  of 
 to  look  at  this.  So, 

747
00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:37,920
 so,  you  know,  so  those  are
 the  ways  that  I  think,  you

748
00:33:37,920 --> 00:33:40,780
 know,  for  on -prem 
 environments,  we  do  need 

749
00:33:40,780 --> 00:33:42,940
 some  agents  deployed,  but 
 that's  really  a  consequence 

750
00:33:42,940 --> 00:33:46,180
 of  where  the  technology  is 
 for  the  end  of  the  day. 

751
00:33:46,260 --> 00:33:47,220
 It's 
 all  about  the  universal 

752
00:33:47,220 --> 00:33:50,660
 visibility,  right?  The 
 single  layer  that  aggregates

753
00:33:50,660 --> 00:33:52,780
 all  the  information  together
 at  a  single  place.  And 

754
00:33:52,780 --> 00:33:54,640
 so  we  kind  of  build  this 
 abstraction  where  whether 

755
00:33:54,640 --> 00:33:56,720
 it's  cloud,  whether  it's  on
-prem,  whether  it's  hybrid, 

756
00:33:57,380 --> 00:33:59,560
 whether  it's  cloud  native 
 or,  you  know,  customer 

757
00:33:59,560 --> 00:34:01,780
 managed,  doesn't  really 
 matter.  Good 

758
00:34:01,780 --> 00:34:04,160
 identities  or  where  they 
 are.  And 

759
00:34:04,168 --> 00:34:06,060
 so  we  are  job  is  to  go 
 pick  up  these  identities 

760
00:34:06,060 --> 00:34:10,860
 and  give,  you  know,  give 
 this  focus.  I'm 

761
00:34:10,860 --> 00:34:12,620
 also  going  to  address  one 
 other  issue,  right,  in 

762
00:34:12,620 --> 00:34:14,679
 terms  of,  I  think,  I  think
 Jimmy  brought  this  up  early

763
00:34:14,679 --> 00:34:19,040
 on  around  this  access  issue
 and  we  talk  about  stacks 

764
00:34:19,040 --> 00:34:22,159
 of  identities  and  stacks  of
 access,  right?  Now, 

765
00:34:23,560 --> 00:34:26,800
 stacks  of  access  was  always
 a  problem  given  the 

766
00:34:26,800 --> 00:34:29,219
 complexity.  Now 
 with  the  stacks  of 

767
00:34:29,219 --> 00:34:31,920
 identities  coming  in,  you 
 know,  all  these  platforms 

768
00:34:31,920 --> 00:34:34,900
 in  the  cloud,  enterprise, 
 in  database  or  whatnot, 

769
00:34:35,880 --> 00:34:38,860
 many  cases,  for  example, 
 right,  a  user  is  called 

770
00:34:38,860 --> 00:34:41,760
 multiple  accounts.  You 
 might  have  five,  six,  seven

771
00:34:41,760 --> 00:34:46,580
 accounts  in  your  system  and
 they  cross  cloud  platforms 

772
00:34:46,580 --> 00:34:49,300
 and  on -prem.  And 
 the  idea  that  everything  is

773
00:34:49,300 --> 00:34:52,280
 going  to  be  on  a  single 
 identity  or  a  single  IM  is

774
00:34:52,280 --> 00:34:55,400
 almost  impossible.  That's 
 the  end  of  the  station. 

775
00:34:55,960 --> 00:34:56,980
 For 
 the  last  20  years,  we 

776
00:34:56,980 --> 00:34:59,880
 built  a  system  with  the 
 premise  that  I  can  manage 

777
00:34:59,880 --> 00:35:02,860
 gyms  out  of  any  one  single
 place.  And 

778
00:35:02,860 --> 00:35:05,360
 that  promise  is  gone.  So 
 now  we're  living  in  a 

779
00:35:05,360 --> 00:35:07,080
 world  where  you're  going  to
 have  multiple  identities, 

780
00:35:07,260 --> 00:35:11,060
 multiple  personas,  and 
 multiple  access.  So 

781
00:35:11,060 --> 00:35:15,060
 for  example,  if  you  were 
 to  log  in  to  a  system  and

782
00:35:15,060 --> 00:35:16,940
 you've,  you've,  you've 
 failed  your  passwords  three 

783
00:35:16,940 --> 00:35:19,660
 times,  today,  what  is  the 
 typical  response  for  a 

784
00:35:19,660 --> 00:35:21,620
 company?  They 
 would  automatically  research 

785
00:35:21,620 --> 00:35:24,780
 a  password,  good  practice, 
 and  they  would  do  an 

786
00:35:24,780 --> 00:35:28,480
 Auduband  MFA  challenge, 
 again,  good  practice.  But 

787
00:35:28,480 --> 00:35:30,020
 nobody  was  going  to  look 
 at  whether  or  not  these 

788
00:35:30,020 --> 00:35:33,080
 three  password  failures  was 
 really  Jim  forgetting  the 

789
00:35:33,080 --> 00:35:36,040
 password  or  illegitimate 
 attempt  by  an  attacker 

790
00:35:36,040 --> 00:35:38,880
 trying  to  pawn  Jim's 
 account  or  do  an  account 

791
00:35:38,880 --> 00:35:41,140
 takeover.  Because 
 the  fourth  signal  doesn't 

792
00:35:41,140 --> 00:35:45,420
 happen  right  away.  So 
 you  have  a  process  that's 

793
00:35:45,420 --> 00:35:47,820
 dear  to  password  users  when
 you  move  on.  As 

794
00:35:47,820 --> 00:35:49,520
 a  co -pilot,  we  watch  you 
 go  at  these  things,  say, 

795
00:35:49,540 --> 00:35:50,820
 what  happened?  Wait 
 a  minute,  there's  now  a 

796
00:35:50,820 --> 00:35:53,420
 fifth  attempt  happened  two 
 days  later.  They 

797
00:35:53,420 --> 00:35:54,740
 put  the  three  together,  two
 together.  Wait 

798
00:35:54,740 --> 00:35:57,560
 a  minute,  this  is  now 
 early  patterns  of  ransomware

799
00:35:57,560 --> 00:35:59,060
 attack  on  a  particular 
 account.  So 

800
00:35:59,060 --> 00:36:01,280
 these  are  the  things  we're 
 doing  is  really,  you  know, 

801
00:36:01,300 --> 00:36:03,140
 this  is  difficult  for 
 humans  to  figure  out.  They,

802
00:36:03,160 --> 00:36:05,200
 they're  going  to  watch 
 every  event  every  time.  So 

803
00:36:05,200 --> 00:36:08,060
 this  automation  that  we've 
 built  helps  us  understand 

804
00:36:08,060 --> 00:36:11,380
 what  are  really  legitimate 
 access  patterns,  what  are 

805
00:36:11,380 --> 00:36:13,400
 illegitimate  and 
 unauthorized,  but  I'm  going 

806
00:36:13,408 --> 00:36:14,960
 to  indicate  attacks  and 
 whatnot.  So 

807
00:36:14,960 --> 00:36:16,400
 I  just  want  to  kind  of 
 add  the  bit  of  a  color  as

808
00:36:16,400 --> 00:36:19,440
 well  as  to  what  we  do 
 really  at  a  product 

809
00:36:19,440 --> 00:36:22,040
 platform  level.  You 
 know,  it's  just  what  I 

810
00:36:22,040 --> 00:36:24,980
 wanted  to  say  there, 
 Venkat,  was  early  on  with 

811
00:36:24,980 --> 00:36:29,800
 what  you  just  said,  you 
 talked  about,  well,  you 

812
00:36:29,800 --> 00:36:33,860
 know,  primarily  the,  the  on
-prem  infrastructure  doesn't 

813
00:36:33,860 --> 00:36:36,500
 have  all  the  connectors.  I 
 know  if  I  was  building  a 

814
00:36:36,500 --> 00:36:39,260
 product  right  now,  I'd 
 focus  on  the  cloud  because 

815
00:36:39,260 --> 00:36:43,220
 my  perspective  is  you've 
 already  seen  cloud  take  a 

816
00:36:43,220 --> 00:36:47,440
 big  bite  out  of  on -prem 
 infrastructure.  And 

817
00:36:47,440 --> 00:36:50,020
 I  think  that  five  years 
 down  the  road,  10  years 

818
00:36:50,020 --> 00:36:52,400
 down  the  road,  I  mean, 
 it's  going  to  be  smaller 

819
00:36:52,400 --> 00:36:53,800
 and  smaller.  It's 
 just  like  the  same 

820
00:36:53,800 --> 00:36:55,820
 progression  we  saw  with 
 mainframes.  I'm 

821
00:36:55,820 --> 00:36:57,480
 not  saying  that  I  think 
 it'll  ever  go  away. 

822
00:36:57,920 --> 00:36:59,680
 Mainframes 
 are  still  around.  They'll 

823
00:36:59,680 --> 00:37:03,780
 probably  still  be  around 
 when  I  retire,  but  you 

824
00:37:03,780 --> 00:37:06,780
 know,  it's  becoming  a  less 
 significant  piece  over  time.

825
00:37:07,020 --> 00:37:08,220
 So 
 that  was  where  I  would 

826
00:37:08,220 --> 00:37:10,200
 focus.  But 
 I  think  there's  another 

827
00:37:10,200 --> 00:37:13,060
 thing  at  play  here,  which 
 is  that  the  cloud 

828
00:37:13,060 --> 00:37:19,060
 environments  were  built  in 
 a  way  that  tools  like 

829
00:37:19,060 --> 00:37:24,860
 Stack  Identity  have  what 
 they  need  in  order  to  do 

830
00:37:24,860 --> 00:37:26,220
 the  type  of  analysis, 
 right?  You 

831
00:37:26,220 --> 00:37:28,800
 need  to  know  what  the 
 accounts  are,  what  access 

832
00:37:28,800 --> 00:37:31,960
 they  have,  but  then  you 
 also  need  to  know  what 

833
00:37:31,960 --> 00:37:34,440
 access  they're  actually 
 using,  right?  Because 

834
00:37:34,440 --> 00:37:37,320
 it's  the  bumping  up  of 
 those  two  things  to  say, 

835
00:37:37,520 --> 00:37:40,700
 hey,  here's  all  this  access
 this  account  has,  that's 

836
00:37:40,700 --> 00:37:42,840
 not  at  use.  Why 
 is  that  important?  So 

837
00:37:42,840 --> 00:37:46,500
 to  me,  and  I'm  hoping  you 
 can  either  validate  or 

838
00:37:46,500 --> 00:37:49,300
 correct  me,  but  why  is 
 that  important?  Okay, 

839
00:37:49,360 --> 00:37:53,400
 so  this  account  has  these 
 seven  roles  that  it's  not 

840
00:37:53,400 --> 00:37:55,600
 using.  Who 
 cares?  Well, 

841
00:37:55,740 --> 00:37:58,580
 it's  about  a  tax  surface, 
 right?  It's 

842
00:37:58,580 --> 00:38:02,320
 about,  hey,  if  I  have  an 
 account  out  there  that  has 

843
00:38:02,320 --> 00:38:06,240
 its  over  provisioned  with 
 entitlements  and  somebody 

844
00:38:06,240 --> 00:38:09,300
 gets  control  of  that 
 account,  now  they  have  all 

845
00:38:09,300 --> 00:38:11,980
 those  entitlements.  Even 
 though  those  entitlements 

846
00:38:11,980 --> 00:38:14,900
 haven't  been  getting  used, 
 well,  now  they  just  open 

847
00:38:14,900 --> 00:38:19,880
 up  a  whole  new  door.  Now 
 that  account  could  be  taken

848
00:38:19,880 --> 00:38:21,540
 over  regardless,  right? 
 That's 

849
00:38:21,540 --> 00:38:24,100
 a  totally  separate  control. 
 But 

850
00:38:24,100 --> 00:38:27,360
 do  you  want  that  account 
 to  be  least  privileged?  Or 

851
00:38:27,360 --> 00:38:31,100
 do  you  want  it  to  have 
 least  privilege  plus  who 

852
00:38:31,100 --> 00:38:33,800
 knows  how  many  additional 
 privileges?  So 

853
00:38:33,808 --> 00:38:37,300
 am  I,  and  like  I  said, 
 the  cloud  environment,  the 

854
00:38:37,300 --> 00:38:41,760
 cloud  platforms  have  the 
 pieces  and  parts  to  make 

855
00:38:41,760 --> 00:38:45,360
 that  determination.  If 
 it  was,  if  the  on -prem 

856
00:38:45,360 --> 00:38:48,180
 environment  had  all  those 
 things,  this  would  have 

857
00:38:48,180 --> 00:38:50,800
 been  getting  done  10,  15 
 years  ago  because  the 

858
00:38:50,800 --> 00:38:54,200
 problem  existed  then,  and 
 people  wanted  to  solve  it 

859
00:38:54,200 --> 00:38:58,160
 then,  but  they  just,  they 
 didn't  have  visibility  to 

860
00:38:59,140 --> 00:39:01,060
 where  all  the  accounts  were
 being  used.  And 

861
00:39:01,060 --> 00:39:03,560
 we  had  SIM  and  we  tried 
 to  pull  all  this 

862
00:39:03,560 --> 00:39:05,600
 information  together,  but 
 everyone  knew  it  wasn't 

863
00:39:05,600 --> 00:39:07,860
 complete.  So 
 if  you  just  started  taking 

864
00:39:07,860 --> 00:39:11,920
 access  away,  that's  that 
 part  that  you  started  off 

865
00:39:11,920 --> 00:39:14,500
 the  conversation  with  is 
 like,  that's  scary.  You 

866
00:39:14,500 --> 00:39:16,460
 start  taking  away  roles 
 just  because  you  think 

867
00:39:16,460 --> 00:39:18,280
 they're  not  being  used,  but
 they  actually  are  being 

868
00:39:18,280 --> 00:39:22,380
 used  problem,  right?  But 
 in  the  cloud  environment, 

869
00:39:22,380 --> 00:39:25,420
 you  have  a  higher  level  of
 confidence,  maybe  100 % 

870
00:39:25,420 --> 00:39:28,900
 confidence  that  that  role 
 is  actually  not  being  used.

871
00:39:29,780 --> 00:39:30,980
 Yeah, 
 absolutely.  And 

872
00:39:30,980 --> 00:39:32,100
 that's  it.  Do 
 you  put  the  nail  on  the 

873
00:39:32,100 --> 00:39:36,140
 head?  You 
 know,  if  you  look  at  the 

874
00:39:36,140 --> 00:39:38,300
 pattern  of  ransomware 
 attacks,  you  know,  the  big 

875
00:39:38,300 --> 00:39:40,040
 one  or  another  health  group
 and  all  those,  it's  all 

876
00:39:40,040 --> 00:39:43,280
 the  same  pattern,  a 
 compromise  identity.  And 

877
00:39:43,280 --> 00:39:46,380
 then  that's  not  enough.  You
 need  privileges  and 

878
00:39:46,380 --> 00:39:49,040
 permissions  to  elevate 
 yourself  and  laterally  move 

879
00:39:49,040 --> 00:39:50,020
 across  the  organization. 
 It's 

880
00:39:50,028 --> 00:39:53,000
 all  about  lateral  movement, 
 right?  What 

881
00:39:53,000 --> 00:39:54,960
 any  worse  lateral  movement? 
 It's 

882
00:39:54,960 --> 00:39:57,820
 access  and  privileges.  So 
 if  you  can  cut  off  these 

883
00:39:57,820 --> 00:40:02,080
 links  by  removing  access, 
 right?  And, 

884
00:40:02,160 --> 00:40:04,080
 and,  you  know,  then  you 
 can,  you  can  limit  the 

885
00:40:04,080 --> 00:40:06,380
 damage  you  can  contain  the,
 the  attack,  you  know,  and 

886
00:40:06,380 --> 00:40:11,220
 so,  so  understanding  how 
 our  leaders  can  move  within

887
00:40:11,220 --> 00:40:14,200
 the  enterprise,  how  can 
 they  flow  and  what  actions 

888
00:40:14,200 --> 00:40:16,620
 they  can  use  to  get  from 
 a  to  V  to  C  to  D  to  go 

889
00:40:16,620 --> 00:40:20,480
 to  the  target,  that's 
 crucial,  which  means  that 

890
00:40:20,480 --> 00:40:22,580
 in  cloud,  even  in  regular 
 environments,  we  need  to 

891
00:40:22,580 --> 00:40:26,480
 look  at  not  just  the 
 provisioned  access,  but  how 

892
00:40:26,480 --> 00:40:28,760
 is  Jim  using  this  access 
 or  a  service  to  condensing 

893
00:40:28,760 --> 00:40:31,440
 this  access?  That 
 means  you  got  to  look  at, 

894
00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:33,980
 for  example,  what's 
 happening  over  a  period  of 

895
00:40:33,980 --> 00:40:36,880
 time?  And 
 on  the  time  could  be  in  a

896
00:40:36,880 --> 00:40:40,080
 90  days,  for  example,  or 
 120  days.  Okay. 

897
00:40:40,340 --> 00:40:43,220
 What's  happening  with  this 
 time  boundary?  Now, 

898
00:40:43,280 --> 00:40:45,900
 the  user,  if  it  regularly, 
 if  there's  a  regular  role, 

899
00:40:46,260 --> 00:40:49,320
 you'll  be  using  this 
 account  to,  you  know,  to 

900
00:40:49,320 --> 00:40:51,960
 do  things,  right?  There'll 
 be  some  activity  on  this 

901
00:40:51,960 --> 00:40:53,940
 account.  There'll 
 be  some  actions  on  the 

902
00:40:53,940 --> 00:40:56,520
 target  resource.  There 
 could  be  some,  you  know, 

903
00:40:56,600 --> 00:40:59,900
 some  behaviors.  But 
 if  none  of  them  are 

904
00:40:59,900 --> 00:41:03,240
 present,  then  the  problem 
 is  you  just  under  our 

905
00:41:03,240 --> 00:41:06,280
 necessary  access.  So 
 the  access  or  type  surface 

906
00:41:06,280 --> 00:41:08,540
 is  really  by  product  of 
 you,  if  you're  not  using 

907
00:41:08,540 --> 00:41:11,080
 the  access,  you  got  to 
 give  up  the  access.  That 

908
00:41:11,080 --> 00:41:12,820
 should  be  the  very  simple 
 process.  If 

909
00:41:12,820 --> 00:41:14,340
 you're  not  using  the 
 access,  you  should  just 

910
00:41:14,340 --> 00:41:16,720
 give  up  the  access 
 automatically.  Now, 

911
00:41:16,740 --> 00:41:19,040
 today,  we  don't  have  these 
 tools  for  doing  some  cloud 

912
00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:22,040
 is  very  easy,  right?  But 
 you  also  need  two  data 

913
00:41:22,040 --> 00:41:24,640
 points.  One 
 is,  what's  your  access  and 

914
00:41:24,640 --> 00:41:28,780
 are  you  using  it?  So 
 we  automate  that,  that  the 

915
00:41:28,780 --> 00:41:33,280
 time  based  analysis  that  we
 can  easily  give  you  without

916
00:41:33,280 --> 00:41:34,880
 a  without  any  false 
 positive,  right?  We 

917
00:41:34,880 --> 00:41:37,640
 clearly  really  you're  not 
 using  this  access.  There's 

918
00:41:37,640 --> 00:41:39,480
 proof.  And 
 so  you  don't  need  access. 

919
00:41:39,840 --> 00:41:41,480
 Okay. 
 So  I'm  going  to  remove  the

920
00:41:41,480 --> 00:41:43,660
 access.  Let's 
 say  Jim  says,  you  know, 

921
00:41:43,720 --> 00:41:45,900
 I'm  going  to  use  it  once 
 in  90  days,  because  it's  a

922
00:41:45,900 --> 00:41:47,860
 quarterly  report,  great. 
 Then 

923
00:41:47,860 --> 00:41:49,720
 I'm  going  to  give  you  a 
 just  in  time  access  or  one

924
00:41:49,720 --> 00:41:52,400
 time  access,  you  can  just 
 use  it.  So 

925
00:41:52,400 --> 00:41:55,440
 the  number  of  ways  we  can 
 look  at  data,  and  we  can 

926
00:41:55,440 --> 00:41:58,940
 analyze  activities  and 
 behaviors  and  actions  to 

927
00:41:58,940 --> 00:42:01,600
 then  compare  with  your 
 intended  goal  of  giving 

928
00:42:01,600 --> 00:42:04,620
 access  and  to  solve  this 
 problem.  In 

929
00:42:04,620 --> 00:42:07,200
 cloud,  by  the  way,  many 
 cases  because  of  automation,

930
00:42:08,100 --> 00:42:10,820
 nobody  even  knows  why  an 
 access  was  granted.  Let 

931
00:42:10,820 --> 00:42:13,520
 me  show  our  dashboard  on 
 our  product.  The 

932
00:42:13,520 --> 00:42:15,420
 first  thing  customers  ask 
 us  is,  I  don't  know  why 

933
00:42:15,420 --> 00:42:18,220
 this  happened.  It's 
 a  very  common  refrain.  I 

934
00:42:18,220 --> 00:42:20,180
 don't  know  why  this  access 
 was  given,  which  means 

935
00:42:20,180 --> 00:42:24,300
 there  was  no  way  for  them 
 to  contemplate  why  somebody 

936
00:42:24,300 --> 00:42:27,480
 would  give  an  access.  Maybe
 it's  an  emergency  access 

937
00:42:27,480 --> 00:42:29,120
 and  just  state  permanent. 
 So 

938
00:42:29,120 --> 00:42:31,580
 there  are  a  lot  of 
 scenarios  where  at  the  end 

939
00:42:31,580 --> 00:42:33,320
 of  the  day,  it's  about  are
 you  using  the  access 

940
00:42:33,320 --> 00:42:35,400
 yourself  for  what  purpose? 
 You 

941
00:42:35,400 --> 00:42:38,180
 search  behavior  is  going  to
 be  important  for  us.  And 

942
00:42:38,180 --> 00:42:41,140
 I  figure  them  along  in  a 
 window,  then  we  remove  all 

943
00:42:41,140 --> 00:42:42,780
 the  false  positives,  we 
 remove  all  the  problems, 

944
00:42:42,940 --> 00:42:44,740
 you  remove  access  with  30 
 days,  that's  not  a  good 

945
00:42:44,740 --> 00:42:46,080
 practice.  You 
 might  still  need  the 

946
00:42:46,080 --> 00:42:49,640
 access,  but  they  will  be 
 for  us  to  use  automation 

947
00:42:49,640 --> 00:42:52,340
 and  to  provide  the 
 visibility  and  show  evidence

948
00:42:52,920 --> 00:42:55,920
 and  compare  with  their 
 policies  to  remove  the 

949
00:42:55,920 --> 00:42:57,760
 attack  surface.  And 
 those  are  the  things  I 

950
00:42:57,760 --> 00:42:59,380
 think  we  can  get  tremendous
 ROI.  You 

951
00:42:59,380 --> 00:43:02,280
 can  do  this  because  these 
 are  all  early  signals  that 

952
00:43:02,280 --> 00:43:06,080
 we're  going  to  stop.  By 
 the  way,  every  leader  in 

953
00:43:06,080 --> 00:43:08,660
 the  identity  practice  agrees
 with  this.  There's 

954
00:43:08,660 --> 00:43:10,760
 a  survey  done  by  one  of 
 the  security  group,  one  of 

955
00:43:10,760 --> 00:43:13,760
 the  top  identity  groups  and
 96 %  of  the  identity  leader

956
00:43:13,760 --> 00:43:16,660
 survey  said  they  could  have
 stopped  an  attack,  they 

957
00:43:16,660 --> 00:43:18,680
 could  have  stopped  an 
 attack  and  they  had  signals

958
00:43:18,680 --> 00:43:21,420
 available  to  them.  They 
 didn't  say,  wait  a  minute, 

959
00:43:21,480 --> 00:43:25,580
 this  was  a  complex  zero 
 day,  nothing  about  it.  So 

960
00:43:25,580 --> 00:43:29,020
 96 %  of  saying,  look,  in 
 retrospect,  and  I  had  they 

961
00:43:29,020 --> 00:43:31,220
 had  a  data  evidence,  I 
 could  have  prevented  this. 

962
00:43:31,880 --> 00:43:33,880
 So 
 that's  great,  great 

963
00:43:33,880 --> 00:43:36,180
 opportunity  for  us  startups 
 to  go  look  at,  let's  solve

964
00:43:36,180 --> 00:43:39,260
 the  problem  and  get  the 
 last  mile  out,  remove  the 

965
00:43:39,260 --> 00:43:41,320
 access  somehow,  and  then 
 all  of  a  sudden,  right? 

966
00:43:41,320 --> 00:43:42,580
 That's 
 why  you're  seeing  this 

967
00:43:42,580 --> 00:43:44,860
 broad  moment  to  more  just 
 in  time.  And 

968
00:43:44,860 --> 00:43:46,320
 don't  even  get  into  the 
 problem  of  managing  access. 

969
00:43:46,760 --> 00:43:47,740
 If 
 you  need  access  anytime  you

970
00:43:47,740 --> 00:43:51,620
 have  access,  you  know,  just
 come  in,  make  a  request, 

971
00:43:51,740 --> 00:43:53,560
 you  get  access  anymore  one.
 Anyways. 

972
00:43:54,640 --> 00:43:56,500
 No,  no,  it's  a  great 
 point.  And 

973
00:43:56,500 --> 00:44:02,860
 I  think  so  we've  talked  a 
 lot  about  risk.  And 

974
00:44:02,860 --> 00:44:06,240
 I'm  wondering,  I  want  to 
 get  your  perspective  on 

975
00:44:06,240 --> 00:44:09,540
 what  is  the  biggest  risk 
 that  CSOs  face?  Because 

976
00:44:09,548 --> 00:44:12,000
 to  me,  here's  what  it  is. 
 It's 

977
00:44:12,000 --> 00:44:15,720
 not  the,  it's  not  the 
 mechanics  of  all  this.  It's

978
00:44:15,720 --> 00:44:19,940
 the  ability  to  identify  the
 risks,  communicate  the 

979
00:44:19,940 --> 00:44:23,260
 risks,  and  assign  the  risks
 to  somebody  other  than  me. 

980
00:44:23,540 --> 00:44:24,920
 And 
 that  look,  I'm  not  just 

981
00:44:24,920 --> 00:44:27,300
 trying  to  be  Teflon  Don 
 here.  But 

982
00:44:27,300 --> 00:44:30,860
 reality  is,  is  either  it's 
 something  I  need  to  fix. 

983
00:44:30,940 --> 00:44:33,180
 And 
 I  probably  need  some  money 

984
00:44:33,180 --> 00:44:35,480
 to  fix  it.  Now, 
 if  I  have  everything  I 

985
00:44:35,480 --> 00:44:39,240
 need,  that  I  can  go  fix 
 it,  then  I  have  nothing  to

986
00:44:39,240 --> 00:44:41,360
 worry  about.  It's 
 completely  within  my  control

987
00:44:41,360 --> 00:44:43,180
 to  go  ahead  and  fix  it. 
 But 

988
00:44:43,180 --> 00:44:45,920
 a  lot  of  times,  these 
 risks  that  pop  up  are 

989
00:44:45,920 --> 00:44:49,360
 things  that  other  people 
 need  to  do.  Or 

990
00:44:49,360 --> 00:44:51,740
 I  need  additional 
 investment.  And 

991
00:44:51,740 --> 00:44:54,180
 so  I  need  to  be  able  to 
 identify  those  risks, 

992
00:44:54,440 --> 00:44:57,720
 communicate  those  risks.  And
 then  if  I  am  fulfilled 

993
00:44:57,720 --> 00:45:00,640
 with  what  I  need,  then  I 
 need  to  be  able  to  go  and

994
00:45:00,640 --> 00:45:03,500
 remediate  those  risks.  But 
 I'm  wondering,  maybe  you 

995
00:45:03,500 --> 00:45:07,920
 give  a  more  insightful 
 response  on  what  is  the 

996
00:45:07,920 --> 00:45:10,840
 biggest  risk  that  CSOs 
 face?  I 

997
00:45:10,840 --> 00:45:14,180
 think  if  you  look  at  all 
 the  ransomware  attacks,  you 

998
00:45:14,187 --> 00:45:17,060
 know,  all  these  customers 
 have  tremendous  amount  of 

999
00:45:17,060 --> 00:45:18,980
 products,  great  technologies,
 right?  And 

1000
00:45:18,980 --> 00:45:22,120
 they  got  30,  40  plus 
 tools.  Yet 

1001
00:45:22,120 --> 00:45:23,840
 these  things  happen,  right? 
 Time 

1002
00:45:23,840 --> 00:45:25,900
 and  again,  it  happens.  You 
 know,  happens  to  great 

1003
00:45:25,900 --> 00:45:28,260
 companies.  But 
 there's  something 

1004
00:45:28,260 --> 00:45:29,700
 fundamentally  flawed  here. 
 That 

1005
00:45:29,700 --> 00:45:32,200
 is,  how  do  we  understand 
 what  is  the  biggest  risk 

1006
00:45:32,200 --> 00:45:33,440
 is?  And 
 in  our  view,  the  biggest 

1007
00:45:33,440 --> 00:45:36,120
 risk  is  access.  Access 
 that  could  have  been 

1008
00:45:36,120 --> 00:45:40,080
 prevented  or  revoked.  And 
 if  you  can  have  a  truly, 

1009
00:45:40,440 --> 00:45:42,300
 you  know,  you  know,  we're 
 not  saying  that's  going  to 

1010
00:45:42,300 --> 00:45:43,820
 be  stopping  all  the 
 attacks.  But 

1011
00:45:43,820 --> 00:45:45,640
 I  think  what  we  are  saying
 is  that  that's  going  to  be

1012
00:45:45,640 --> 00:45:48,060
 a  number  one  priority  in 
 terms  of  investments  going 

1013
00:45:48,060 --> 00:45:50,960
 forward.  Because 
 at  the  end  of  the  day,  an

1014
00:45:50,960 --> 00:45:53,400
 attacker  on  adversary  needs 
 access  to  let  me  move  and 

1015
00:45:53,400 --> 00:45:55,200
 get  to  where  they  want  to 
 go.  So 

1016
00:45:55,200 --> 00:45:57,800
 by  the  way,  every  CSO  will
 agree  with  this.  There's 

1017
00:45:57,800 --> 00:46:00,060
 no  dispute  about  this. 
 Challenges, 

1018
00:46:00,420 --> 00:46:03,740
 you  know,  I  have  my  on 
-prem  projects.  I 

1019
00:46:03,740 --> 00:46:06,080
 got  my  IGAs  going.  I 
 got  this  and  that  going, 

1020
00:46:06,200 --> 00:46:08,280
 got  Pam  going.  I'm 
 looking  at  Pam  for  this. 

1021
00:46:08,440 --> 00:46:09,640
 I'm 
 looking  at  X,  Y  for  this. 

1022
00:46:10,240 --> 00:46:11,420
 So 
 we  are  saying  at  the  end 

1023
00:46:11,420 --> 00:46:14,240
 of  the  day,  the  environment
 is  changing  dramatically, 

1024
00:46:14,620 --> 00:46:17,560
 you  know,  and  so  it's  time
 to  relook  at  these 

1025
00:46:17,560 --> 00:46:18,840
 priorities.  I 
 mean,  people  are  spending  a

1026
00:46:18,840 --> 00:46:20,940
 lot  of  money  on  identity 
 projects  today,  even  today. 

1027
00:46:21,220 --> 00:46:21,860
 It's 
 one  of  the  largest 

1028
00:46:21,860 --> 00:46:24,720
 investment  categories  in  the
 budget.  However, 

1029
00:46:25,520 --> 00:46:29,380
 this  notion  of  risk  is 
 what  is  a  new  phenomena.  I

1030
00:46:29,388 --> 00:46:31,380
 mean,  even  analysts  and 
 gutters  talk  about  this  all

1031
00:46:31,380 --> 00:46:33,640
 the  time,  like  more  and 
 more  continuous  controls, 

1032
00:46:33,760 --> 00:46:35,500
 risk -based  controls.  So 
 we  are  seeing  this  big 

1033
00:46:35,500 --> 00:46:37,860
 change  happening.  At 
 the  end  of  the  day,  you've

1034
00:46:37,860 --> 00:46:39,840
 got  to  look  at  what  the 
 risk  is,  speak  about  the 

1035
00:46:39,840 --> 00:46:42,280
 risk.  But 
 you  cannot  speak  about  the 

1036
00:46:42,280 --> 00:46:43,880
 risk  if  you  don't  have 
 visibility  into  what's 

1037
00:46:43,880 --> 00:46:47,380
 happening.  You 
 don't  know  how  to  explain 

1038
00:46:47,380 --> 00:46:49,240
 why  something  is  happening. 
 So 

1039
00:46:49,240 --> 00:46:52,200
 with  our,  you  know,  with 
 our,  you  know,  with  our 

1040
00:46:52,200 --> 00:46:56,020
 automation  and  our  approach 
 to  providing  an  easy  way 

1041
00:46:56,020 --> 00:46:58,700
 to  go  look  at  this, 
 everything  in  concert,  we 

1042
00:46:58,700 --> 00:47:02,300
 are  job  is  to  provide 
 evidence  of  the  risk  and 

1043
00:47:02,300 --> 00:47:04,140
 help  to  see  so  communicate 
 the  risk  to  the 

1044
00:47:04,140 --> 00:47:07,380
 stakeholders  and  to  take 
 action.  So 

1045
00:47:07,380 --> 00:47:10,300
 that  is  the  approach  where 
 we  feel  like,  you  know, 

1046
00:47:10,660 --> 00:47:12,940
 you  know,  that,  you  know, 
 people  cannot  wait  for 

1047
00:47:12,940 --> 00:47:15,440
 this,  you  know,  process 
 that  they  put  up  place  20 

1048
00:47:15,440 --> 00:47:17,320
 years  ago,  right?  We 
 have  this  quarterly  order 

1049
00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:19,700
 process.  But 
 it  will  be  actually  done 

1050
00:47:19,700 --> 00:47:21,980
 for  age  of  Sarbanes,  Oxley 
 and  compliance,  still 

1051
00:47:21,980 --> 00:47:24,420
 required.  But 
 now  the  landscape  has 

1052
00:47:24,420 --> 00:47:27,020
 changed  automatically.  It's 
 cloud  first,  data  first, 

1053
00:47:27,200 --> 00:47:29,700
 API  first,  we  live  in. 
 Speed 

1054
00:47:29,700 --> 00:47:32,660
 is  not  security's  best 
 friend.  And 

1055
00:47:32,667 --> 00:47:35,420
 so  at  the  end  of  the  day,
 attackers  know  this,  they 

1056
00:47:35,420 --> 00:47:37,740
 have  these  weaknesses.  So 
 our  job  is  what  if  I  can 

1057
00:47:37,740 --> 00:47:40,620
 come  back  and  tell  you 
 within  one  hour,  your 

1058
00:47:40,620 --> 00:47:43,640
 exposures,  your  exploiting, 
 your  bare  pathways,  which 

1059
00:47:43,640 --> 00:47:47,160
 are  going  to  be  exposed, 
 your  policy  gaps,  your 

1060
00:47:47,160 --> 00:47:50,720
 blind  spots,  your  risky 
 accounts  and  help  you  fix 

1061
00:47:50,720 --> 00:47:53,500
 it  through  automation,  I 
 can  generate  code  and  do 

1062
00:47:53,500 --> 00:47:55,480
 this.  And 
 now  you  can  start  to  not 

1063
00:47:55,480 --> 00:47:57,080
 put  this  and  say,  wait  a 
 minute,  I'm  going  to  use 

1064
00:47:57,080 --> 00:47:58,800
 this  product  to  figure  out 
 where  do  I  need  to  product

1065
00:47:58,800 --> 00:48:00,740
 as  my  investments  in  even 
 ordinary  in  access 

1066
00:48:00,740 --> 00:48:02,860
 management,  where  do  I 
 invest  in  it?  Rather 

1067
00:48:02,860 --> 00:48:05,760
 than  going  off  and  building
 a  product,  look  at  the 

1068
00:48:05,760 --> 00:48:08,560
 process.  The 
 world  has  changed  now.  So 

1069
00:48:08,560 --> 00:48:10,580
 do  I  have  the  right 
 visibility  into  looking  at 

1070
00:48:10,580 --> 00:48:13,480
 overall  risks?  Can 
 I  communicate  these  risks 

1071
00:48:13,480 --> 00:48:15,900
 to  my  peers  and  to  the 
 board?  Now 

1072
00:48:15,900 --> 00:48:18,900
 based  on  the  risks,  can  I 
 not  focus  on  actions  in 

1073
00:48:18,900 --> 00:48:21,560
 these  areas,  particular  on 
 access  and  what  not  that  I

1074
00:48:21,560 --> 00:48:23,820
 can  help  you  with?  So 
 this  starts  a  different 

1075
00:48:23,820 --> 00:48:25,760
 paradigm.  I 
 think  Jim,  we're  focused  on

1076
00:48:25,760 --> 00:48:28,780
 is  that  we're  seeing  the 
 market  go  towards  that.  Is 

1077
00:48:28,780 --> 00:48:30,600
 that,  you  know,  just  look, 
 you  know,  attackers  are  now

1078
00:48:30,600 --> 00:48:32,920
 waiting  for  your  quarterly 
 audit  reports.  They're 

1079
00:48:32,920 --> 00:48:35,400
 finding  a  gap  and  zoom 
 they're  going  in.  And 

1080
00:48:35,400 --> 00:48:36,900
 so  we're  seeing  that 
 they're  ready  for  us  to 

1081
00:48:36,900 --> 00:48:40,680
 close  the  gap,  give 
 billboard  assurance  and  more

1082
00:48:40,680 --> 00:48:45,440
 confidence  and  data  and 
 help  CISOs  broker  this 

1083
00:48:45,440 --> 00:48:46,980
 conversation.  They're 
 not,  they  cannot  do  it 

1084
00:48:46,980 --> 00:48:48,860
 alone.  They're 
 going  to  talk  to  their 

1085
00:48:48,860 --> 00:48:52,620
 colleagues,  agree  on  what 
 the  risk  is,  agree  on  risk

1086
00:48:52,620 --> 00:48:56,340
 types,  agree  on  how  they 
 can  remediate,  time  to 

1087
00:48:56,340 --> 00:48:58,340
 remediate.  And 
 these  are  all  operational 

1088
00:48:58,340 --> 00:49:01,580
 things  that  we  can  go  from
 findings  to  the  operations. 

1089
00:49:01,820 --> 00:49:02,980
 That's 
 the  area  where  we  feel 

1090
00:49:02,980 --> 00:49:06,900
 like  we  can  really  help 
 optimize  investments  and  get

1091
00:49:06,900 --> 00:49:08,840
 on  this  treadmill  of 
 getting  this  more 

1092
00:49:08,840 --> 00:49:11,700
 continuous,  continuous  access
 management,  continuous 

1093
00:49:11,700 --> 00:49:16,200
 verification,  continuous 
 detection,  continuous  tuning 

1094
00:49:16,200 --> 00:49:18,860
 of  policies.  These 
 are  the  areas  we  believe 

1095
00:49:18,860 --> 00:49:21,720
 we  can,  we  can,  we  can 
 help  customers  get  to  the 

1096
00:49:21,720 --> 00:49:26,540
 95 %  quickly  and  manage 
 those  risks.  So 

1097
00:49:26,540 --> 00:49:30,180
 I  think  you  made  a  lot  of
 good  points  there.  It's 

1098
00:49:30,180 --> 00:49:36,160
 kind  of  like  I  want  to 
 rewind  one  of  the  security 

1099
00:49:36,160 --> 00:49:41,060
 architectural  principles  is 
 like  this  layers  of 

1100
00:49:41,060 --> 00:49:45,320
 security,  defense  in  depth, 
 but  it's  the  idea  that  you

1101
00:49:45,320 --> 00:49:48,060
 try  to  stop  the  hacker 
 here,  you  try  to  stop  the 

1102
00:49:48,060 --> 00:49:51,320
 hacker  here,  you  just  keep 
 going  and  adding  layers  of 

1103
00:49:51,320 --> 00:49:54,800
 security.  It's 
 almost  like  you  hear  this 

1104
00:49:54,800 --> 00:49:58,440
 paradigm  all  the  time, 
 which  is  if  you  haven't 

1105
00:49:58,440 --> 00:50:00,920
 been  breached,  that  just 
 means  you  don't  know  you've

1106
00:50:00,920 --> 00:50:03,940
 been  reached  or  it's  not  a
 matter  of  if,  but  when. 

1107
00:50:04,520 --> 00:50:06,160
 And 
 the  idea  is  that,  I  mean, 

1108
00:50:06,300 --> 00:50:08,120
 you  still  look  at  like 
 what's  the  most  common 

1109
00:50:08,120 --> 00:50:11,100
 pattern  that  attackers  use. 
 It's 

1110
00:50:11,100 --> 00:50:14,320
 phishing,  social  engineering,
 right?  These 

1111
00:50:14,320 --> 00:50:17,060
 things  have  literally  been 
 around  for  more  than  20 

1112
00:50:17,060 --> 00:50:19,920
 years.  And 
 they're  still  the  top  two 

1113
00:50:19,920 --> 00:50:21,980
 ways  that  people  get 
 access.  So 

1114
00:50:21,980 --> 00:50:24,480
 you  almost  can  look  at 
 your  accounts,  say  they're 

1115
00:50:24,480 --> 00:50:26,640
 going  to  be  breached, 
 someone's  going  to  be  able 

1116
00:50:26,640 --> 00:50:29,140
 to  get  access  to  them.  The
 question  is  what  can  they 

1117
00:50:29,140 --> 00:50:31,340
 do  when  they  get  to 
 access?  So 

1118
00:50:31,340 --> 00:50:35,580
 that's  that  paradigm  of 
 least  privilege  access  and 

1119
00:50:35,580 --> 00:50:38,320
 why  it's  so  important.  So 
 I  think  you've  made  an 

1120
00:50:38,320 --> 00:50:40,960
 excellent  case  here  today 
 for  what  you're  doing  with 

1121
00:50:40,960 --> 00:50:43,800
 Stack  Identity.  And 
 what  I'd  like  to  know  is 

1122
00:50:43,800 --> 00:50:48,380
 if  our  listeners  are 
 interested  in  playing  or, 

1123
00:50:48,500 --> 00:50:51,620
 you  know,  getting  more 
 hands  on  with  Stack 

1124
00:50:51,620 --> 00:50:55,240
 Identity,  what's  available 
 to  them?  Yeah, 

1125
00:50:55,280 --> 00:50:58,380
 we  have  a  very  easy  way 
 to  assess  the  current  risks

1126
00:50:58,380 --> 00:51:00,660
 using  our  Shadow  Access 
 Risk  Assessment  Tool,  they 

1127
00:51:00,660 --> 00:51:03,120
 call  it  CERA.  So 
 you  plug  it  in,  you 

1128
00:51:03,120 --> 00:51:05,640
 connect  your  accounts,  you 
 connect  your  IDPs.  And 

1129
00:51:05,647 --> 00:51:07,940
 again,  within  an  hour,  you 
 get  a  report  that  shows 

1130
00:51:07,940 --> 00:51:11,640
 you  all  the  code  of  code 
 access  for  all  issues  you 

1131
00:51:11,640 --> 00:51:14,540
 have,  right?  And 
 then  you  start  the  cleanup 

1132
00:51:14,540 --> 00:51:17,380
 process,  you  know,  cleaning 
 up  our  units  and  access  is

1133
00:51:17,380 --> 00:51:19,780
 an  important  thing.  Because 
 the  environments  are  grown 

1134
00:51:19,780 --> 00:51:23,120
 so  widely  now,  you  know, 
 on -prem  and  cloud  and 

1135
00:51:23,120 --> 00:51:26,580
 whatnot,  that  singular 
 dashboard  and  singular  view 

1136
00:51:26,580 --> 00:51:29,220
 of  single  pane  of  glass, 
 the  command  and  control  of 

1137
00:51:29,220 --> 00:51:30,900
 all  the  risks  that  you 
 have  currently  in  your 

1138
00:51:30,900 --> 00:51:33,840
 environment,  having  a  quick 
 view  of  that  is  a  starting

1139
00:51:33,840 --> 00:51:36,160
 point.  Now 
 you  look  at  these  risks 

1140
00:51:36,160 --> 00:51:38,080
 and  you  look  at  what  do 
 we  do  about  tax,  like  I 

1141
00:51:38,080 --> 00:51:39,780
 started  to  dig  into  this 
 and  figure  out  where  you 

1142
00:51:39,780 --> 00:51:42,200
 need  to,  where  are  you 
 exposed,  what  are  the 

1143
00:51:42,200 --> 00:51:44,660
 critical  systems,  your  crown
 jewels,  whether  it's  third 

1144
00:51:44,660 --> 00:51:46,000
 party,  all  those  things. 
 But 

1145
00:51:46,000 --> 00:51:50,560
 it  starts  with  where  am  I 
 today?  What 

1146
00:51:50,560 --> 00:51:52,940
 is  the  where  am  I  exposed?
 Tell 

1147
00:51:52,940 --> 00:51:56,580
 me  that,  that  view.  Let 
 me  start  with  that,  that 

1148
00:51:56,580 --> 00:51:59,700
 assessment  view.  We 
 call  it  shadow  access  risk 

1149
00:51:59,700 --> 00:52:02,500
 assessment.  Generally 
 speaking,  all  these  problems

1150
00:52:02,500 --> 00:52:05,800
 are  really,  you  know,  a 
 gap  in  access,  that  should 

1151
00:52:05,800 --> 00:52:07,280
 be  that  of  the  first 
 place,  we  call  it  shadow 

1152
00:52:07,280 --> 00:52:10,660
 access,  kind  of  the  shadow 
 IT  as  a  term.  So 

1153
00:52:10,660 --> 00:52:13,280
 you  start  with  the  shadow 
 access,  you  know,  discovery 

1154
00:52:13,280 --> 00:52:15,940
 and  assessment  tool.  Then 
 that  gives  you  the 

1155
00:52:15,940 --> 00:52:18,580
 foundation  to  clean  up  all 
 the  identities,  tighten  up 

1156
00:52:18,580 --> 00:52:22,060
 all  the  weak  identities, 
 make  them  strong,  look  at 

1157
00:52:22,060 --> 00:52:23,920
 all  the  over  permission 
 access,  start  to  reduce 

1158
00:52:23,920 --> 00:52:26,100
 your  tax  service,  you  can 
 start  to  put  an  action  in 

1159
00:52:26,100 --> 00:52:28,440
 place  based  on  the  data. 
 So 

1160
00:52:28,440 --> 00:52:30,940
 initial  thing  is  data 
 gathering,  data  visibility, 

1161
00:52:31,060 --> 00:52:33,500
 and  you  know,  a  report 
 that  gives  you  a  way  to 

1162
00:52:33,500 --> 00:52:35,300
 kind  of  action  that 
 starting  your  program.  And 

1163
00:52:35,308 --> 00:52:37,460
 again,  it  takes  about  an 
 hour.  So 

1164
00:52:37,460 --> 00:52:39,600
 it's  not  that  we  can 
 effort  together,  but  it 

1165
00:52:39,600 --> 00:52:42,600
 gives  you  enormous  value 
 add.  I 

1166
00:52:42,600 --> 00:52:44,680
 go  back  to  look  at  the 
 example  the  day  before  any 

1167
00:52:44,680 --> 00:52:47,740
 breach,  imagine  if  you  had 
 a  report  of  all  these 

1168
00:52:47,740 --> 00:52:50,800
 exposures,  and  imagine 
 tomorrow  you're  going  to  be

1169
00:52:50,800 --> 00:52:54,640
 breached,  you  will  run  fast
 to  fix  those  things.  So 

1170
00:52:54,647 --> 00:52:56,440
 you'll  drop  everything  and 
 then  go  fix  it,  right? 

1171
00:52:57,160 --> 00:52:58,840
 Imagine 
 it's  always  a  small  thing, 

1172
00:52:59,000 --> 00:53:01,340
 you  know,  an  S3  bucket  or 
 a  startup  chart  permission, 

1173
00:53:02,120 --> 00:53:04,260
 or  some  lateral  moment 
 permission.  Hey, 

1174
00:53:04,320 --> 00:53:06,300
 I  never  thought  nobody's 
 going  to  use  it.  Oops, 

1175
00:53:06,500 --> 00:53:09,700
 yeah,  somebody  used  it.  So 
 it's  all  these  small,  small

1176
00:53:09,700 --> 00:53:12,620
 things  that  is  very 
 difficult  to  spot.  And 

1177
00:53:12,620 --> 00:53:14,420
 it's  lying  around,  you 
 know,  creating  these 

1178
00:53:14,420 --> 00:53:16,540
 pathways.  Let's 
 just  blow  them  off,  you 

1179
00:53:16,540 --> 00:53:18,600
 know,  in  a  systematic 
 fashion.  So 

1180
00:53:18,600 --> 00:53:20,440
 yeah,  the  shadow  actually 
 has  some  sort  of  a 

1181
00:53:20,440 --> 00:53:23,980
 starting  point.  And 
 customers  can  use  it,  it's 

1182
00:53:23,980 --> 00:53:26,320
 free  of  charge,  and  they 
 get  immediate  visibility, 

1183
00:53:27,040 --> 00:53:28,640
 and  get  to  see  what  we 
 can  do.  And 

1184
00:53:28,640 --> 00:53:31,200
 that  gives  confidence  then. 
 And 

1185
00:53:31,200 --> 00:53:33,380
 then,  and  then  from  there, 
 we  can  start  to  starburst, 

1186
00:53:33,480 --> 00:53:35,100
 and  then  many  different 
 ways  to  for  them  to  cannot

1187
00:53:35,100 --> 00:53:37,600
 take  workflows  and  take 
 action.  Yeah, 

1188
00:53:37,640 --> 00:53:39,780
 I  think  that  it's  really 
 great  that  you've  made  that

1189
00:53:39,780 --> 00:53:42,100
 available  as  a  free 
 resource  to  our  listeners. 

1190
00:53:42,600 --> 00:53:44,920
 Just 
 so  folks  know,  the  URL 

1191
00:53:44,920 --> 00:53:50,760
 stack  identity .com  slash 
 IDAC  is  where  you  can  go 

1192
00:53:50,760 --> 00:53:53,560
 to  get  right  there  and  get
 that  thing  downloaded. 

1193
00:53:54,260 --> 00:53:55,880
 Wanted 
 to  ask  you  one  more 

1194
00:53:55,880 --> 00:53:58,020
 question,  Venkat,  I  know 
 you  guys  are  going  to  be 

1195
00:53:58,020 --> 00:54:00,860
 at  RSA.  Sounds 
 like  you  have  a  booth. 

1196
00:54:01,340 --> 00:54:03,080
 What's 
 going  on  at  RSA?  What's 

1197
00:54:03,080 --> 00:54:05,360
 your  presence  there?  A 
 great,  great  plan  at  RSA. 

1198
00:54:05,860 --> 00:54:07,900
 Being 
 super  busy  with  this.  First

1199
00:54:07,900 --> 00:54:10,200
 time  here  at  RSA,  so  super
 excited  to  be  there  as 

1200
00:54:10,200 --> 00:54:13,220
 well.  So 
 we  have  a  number  of  devos 

1201
00:54:13,220 --> 00:54:15,900
 planned,  customer  sessions 
 and  meetings.  So 

1202
00:54:15,908 --> 00:54:18,300
 please  stop  by  our  booth. 
 And 

1203
00:54:18,308 --> 00:54:21,460
 we'll  be  running,  devos, 
 Ian  is  going  to  be  there. 

1204
00:54:21,960 --> 00:54:22,940
 So 
 we  have  a  lot  of  great 

1205
00:54:22,940 --> 00:54:26,720
 team  at  RSA.  So 
 super  excited  about  this. 

1206
00:54:26,820 --> 00:54:28,920
 Again, 
 at  the  end  of  the  day, 

1207
00:54:29,260 --> 00:54:31,300
 what  we  are  trying  to  look
 at  is  how  do  they  give 

1208
00:54:31,300 --> 00:54:34,820
 customers  time  back?  How 
 do  the  customers  capacity 

1209
00:54:34,820 --> 00:54:37,180
 back?  Those 
 are  the  two  things 

1210
00:54:37,180 --> 00:54:38,140
 customers  don't  have. 
 Already 

1211
00:54:38,140 --> 00:54:40,240
 having  a  lot  of  projects. 
 And 

1212
00:54:40,240 --> 00:54:44,040
 again,  this  is  again, 
 complex  problem.  Let's 

1213
00:54:44,040 --> 00:54:47,460
 make  their  jobs  a  bit 
 easier  and  get  them  the 

1214
00:54:47,460 --> 00:54:51,300
 help  they  need.  And 
 every  CSA  I  talk  to  knows 

1215
00:54:51,300 --> 00:54:53,020
 this  problem.  They 
 feel  in  their  hearts,  they 

1216
00:54:53,020 --> 00:54:54,960
 got  to  do  something  about 
 it.  But 

1217
00:54:54,960 --> 00:54:57,200
 they're  constrained  by 
 ongoing  projects,  this  and 

1218
00:54:57,200 --> 00:55:00,460
 that.  But 
 so  we  are  coming  in  and 

1219
00:55:00,460 --> 00:55:02,700
 saying,  wait  a  minute, 
 let's  give  you  the  unified 

1220
00:55:02,700 --> 00:55:04,120
 layer,  the  visibility  layer.
 Just 

1221
00:55:04,120 --> 00:55:08,100
 talk  to  look  at  taking 
 some  control  back.  And 

1222
00:55:08,100 --> 00:55:10,580
 for  CSA,  the  particular 
 cloud  has  gone  to  the 

1223
00:55:10,580 --> 00:55:11,880
 sprawl.  I 
 mean,  they're  going  to  pull

1224
00:55:11,880 --> 00:55:13,660
 rain  this  rain  this  back 
 and  put  some  policies 

1225
00:55:13,660 --> 00:55:16,220
 around  it.  So 
 we  think  with  our 

1226
00:55:16,220 --> 00:55:21,200
 automation  and  our  data 
 platform,  and  we  can  cannot

1227
00:55:21,200 --> 00:55:24,240
 really  have  customers  get 
 quick  time  to  value.  That's

1228
00:55:24,240 --> 00:55:25,300
 our  main  focus  with  demo. 
 This 

1229
00:55:25,308 --> 00:55:27,220
 is  RSA.  We 
 also  want  our  one  session 

1230
00:55:27,220 --> 00:55:29,480
 for  the  customers  at  RSA. 
 So 

1231
00:55:29,480 --> 00:55:33,320
 please  TSM,  if  you  want  to
 show  a  demo  or  discuss 

1232
00:55:33,320 --> 00:55:36,220
 more,  we  have  a  great  team
 at  hand  to  support  your 

1233
00:55:36,220 --> 00:55:39,080
 doors  customers  at  RSA. 
 Yeah. 

1234
00:55:39,380 --> 00:55:41,820
 So  Ian  Singh  on  the  spot 
 again,  he's  given  us 

1235
00:55:41,820 --> 00:55:44,780
 specific  location  where  to 
 find  you.  It's 

1236
00:55:44,780 --> 00:55:49,320
 booth  N6564.  It's 
 in  the  North  Expo  hall.  So

1237
00:55:49,328 --> 00:55:52,000
 RSA  is  huge,  right?  There's
 a  North  and  I  think  it's 

1238
00:55:52,000 --> 00:55:54,800
 South  Expo  hall  and  there's
 the  tunnel  in  between  where

1239
00:55:54,800 --> 00:55:56,560
 everybody  has  collected  all 
 their  swag  and  they  had 

1240
00:55:56,560 --> 00:56:00,080
 their  bags  sort  of  wind  up
 there.  So 

1241
00:56:00,080 --> 00:56:01,680
 definitely  go  check  it  out.
 You 

1242
00:56:01,680 --> 00:56:03,340
 know,  I  think  this  is  an 
 area  where  you  kind  of 

1243
00:56:03,340 --> 00:56:05,400
 mentioned  this,  Venkat.  It's
 like,  you  know,  it's  a 

1244
00:56:05,400 --> 00:56:07,240
 problem.  What 
 are  you  going  to  do  about 

1245
00:56:07,240 --> 00:56:09,080
 it?  There 
 are  solutions  out  there. 

1246
00:56:09,400 --> 00:56:10,300
 Stack 
 Identity  is  one  of  them. 

1247
00:56:10,800 --> 00:56:12,380
 You 
 know,  you  can't  claim  that 

1248
00:56:12,380 --> 00:56:14,360
 they're,  you  know,  you 
 don't  have  the  right  tools 

1249
00:56:14,360 --> 00:56:16,100
 or  the  arrows  in  your 
 quiver  right  to  solve  this 

1250
00:56:16,100 --> 00:56:17,780
 issue.  So 
 I  would  definitely  encourage

1251
00:56:17,780 --> 00:56:21,280
 folks  go  to  stack  identity 
.com  slash  IDAC.  There's 

1252
00:56:21,280 --> 00:56:23,720
 a  link  on  there  for  Sarah,
 which  is  that  shadow  access

1253
00:56:23,720 --> 00:56:26,000
 risk  assessment.  I 
 think  you  also  do  office 

1254
00:56:26,000 --> 00:56:28,140
 hours,  Venkat.  If 
 I  remember,  there's  like  a 

1255
00:56:28,140 --> 00:56:29,940
 link  where  you  actually 
 people  can  book  time  and 

1256
00:56:29,940 --> 00:56:32,360
 yeah,  absolutely.  I 
 mean,  for  example,  we  are 

1257
00:56:32,360 --> 00:56:34,940
 getting  out  of  inquiries  on
 the  new  SEC,  it's  coming 

1258
00:56:34,940 --> 00:56:36,600
 with  new  rules  for 
 disclosures.  Now 

1259
00:56:36,600 --> 00:56:38,880
 you  cannot  just  be  silent 
 about  disclosure  incident. 

1260
00:56:39,080 --> 00:56:40,620
 You 
 got  to  report  it  within 

1261
00:56:40,620 --> 00:56:43,740
 five  days  and  then  you  got
 to  report  your  8K  filing. 

1262
00:56:43,900 --> 00:56:45,880
 So 
 a  lot  of  pressure  is  he's 

1263
00:56:45,880 --> 00:56:49,260
 putting  on  leaders  to  kind 
 of  report  incidents  and  to 

1264
00:56:49,260 --> 00:56:50,460
 kind  of  drive  these 
 practices.  So 

1265
00:56:50,460 --> 00:56:53,760
 let's  help  you  stay  ahead 
 of  these  disclosures  and 

1266
00:56:53,760 --> 00:56:55,220
 reports.  Nobody 
 wants  to  put  their  hand  up

1267
00:56:55,220 --> 00:56:57,580
 and  say,  I  got  a  problem 
 with  the  inverse  more 

1268
00:56:57,580 --> 00:56:59,340
 scrutiny.  So 
 yeah,  definitely  office 

1269
00:56:59,340 --> 00:57:01,120
 hours  is  the  way  to  kind 
 of,  you  know,  you  know, 

1270
00:57:01,120 --> 00:57:03,700
 bring  in  our  knowledge,  you
 know,  any  topic  you  can 

1271
00:57:03,700 --> 00:57:06,820
 bring  in  and  sort  of  time 
 with  us.  And 

1272
00:57:06,820 --> 00:57:09,120
 again,  one  of  the  good 
 things  about  being  a 

1273
00:57:09,120 --> 00:57:10,660
 startup  is,  you  know,  we 
 have  extremely  knowledgeable 

1274
00:57:10,660 --> 00:57:13,620
 people  that  are  on  the 
 block  a  number  of  years, 

1275
00:57:13,900 --> 00:57:16,240
 you  know,  but  first 
 generation  products,  second 

1276
00:57:16,240 --> 00:57:17,980
 generation,  not  third 
 generation.  So 

1277
00:57:17,980 --> 00:57:20,260
 they  can  help  customers  to 
 kind  of  get  to  the  where 

1278
00:57:20,260 --> 00:57:21,820
 they  want  to  go.  And 
 that's  a  unique  value 

1279
00:57:21,820 --> 00:57:23,800
 beyond  just  the  technology 
 and  platform  that  sort  of 

1280
00:57:23,800 --> 00:57:25,680
 ring  in  as  a  huge  amount 
 of  knowledge  and  approach 

1281
00:57:25,680 --> 00:57:28,880
 and  practicality  to  solve 
 very,  very  thorny  issues 

1282
00:57:28,880 --> 00:57:32,160
 and  then  some  deep 
 technologies.  So 

1283
00:57:32,160 --> 00:57:34,260
 we're  going  to  wrap  it  up 
 there,  but  we  were  talking 

1284
00:57:34,260 --> 00:57:38,260
 before  we  hit  record  that 
 you  play  competitive  tennis.

1285
00:57:38,420 --> 00:57:40,100
 So 
 I'm  always  curious  about 

1286
00:57:40,100 --> 00:57:44,040
 sort  of  rituals  or 
 superstitions  or  things  that

1287
00:57:44,040 --> 00:57:47,160
 people  do  before  they  get 
 into  any  sort  of  sporting 

1288
00:57:47,160 --> 00:57:49,860
 event,  you  know,  where 
 they're  competing.  Do 

1289
00:57:49,860 --> 00:57:51,460
 you  have  something  like 
 that  that  helps  you  kind 

1290
00:57:51,460 --> 00:57:53,560
 of  get  into  the  zone  and 
 mentally  prepare  or  be 

1291
00:57:53,560 --> 00:57:56,100
 physically  prepared  for 
 what's  about  to  happen? 

1292
00:57:56,860 --> 00:57:57,860
 Yeah, 
 absolutely.  I 

1293
00:57:57,860 --> 00:58:00,280
 think,  I  think  most  tennis 
 people,  I  would  say  they 

1294
00:58:00,280 --> 00:58:04,660
 are,  you  know,  and  for  me,
 for  example,  certainly,  you 

1295
00:58:04,660 --> 00:58:06,820
 know,  warm  up  is  an 
 important  aspect  of  ritual, 

1296
00:58:07,120 --> 00:58:10,980
 at  least  30  minutes,  a 
 mental  cadence  of  how 

1297
00:58:10,980 --> 00:58:14,500
 you're  going  to  play  out 
 doing  some,  you  know,  some,

1298
00:58:14,660 --> 00:58:18,140
 you  know,  very  specific 
 targeted  drills  for  the 

1299
00:58:18,140 --> 00:58:21,540
 particular  opponent  in  case.
 And 

1300
00:58:21,540 --> 00:58:24,160
 most  importantly,  kind  of 
 managed  by  my  emotions, 

1301
00:58:24,400 --> 00:58:27,060
 because  tennis  is  a  very 
 one  on  one  sport.  So 

1302
00:58:27,060 --> 00:58:28,860
 me,  one  of  the  things  I 
 do  really  well  is  the 

1303
00:58:28,860 --> 00:58:31,860
 alternate  national  breathing,
 which  helps  me  calm  down  a

1304
00:58:31,860 --> 00:58:34,820
 bit,  about  five  minutes, 
 just  kind  of  research  my 

1305
00:58:34,820 --> 00:58:37,040
 mind  a  bit.  And 
 it's  just  in  the  next  60 

1306
00:58:37,040 --> 00:58:39,400
 minutes  is  what  a  match. 
 Because 

1307
00:58:39,400 --> 00:58:41,580
 as  you  know,  we're  getting 
 a  lot  of  messages  and  some

1308
00:58:41,580 --> 00:58:42,900
 bad  emails,  all  those 
 things.  So 

1309
00:58:42,908 --> 00:58:45,660
 at  least  being  a  place 
 where  you  can  kind  of  free

1310
00:58:45,660 --> 00:58:50,180
 your  mind,  be  calm,  you 
 know,  you  know,  stable,  you

1311
00:58:50,180 --> 00:58:53,120
 know,  focus  on  the 
 likelihood  and  enjoy.  So 

1312
00:58:53,120 --> 00:58:55,940
 there  are  a  few  things 
 that  I  definitely  go 

1313
00:58:55,940 --> 00:58:58,940
 through.  And, 
 and  that's  one  of  the 

1314
00:58:58,940 --> 00:59:00,760
 things  I  look  forward  to 
 is  the  rituals  as  well. 

1315
00:59:00,900 --> 00:59:01,920
 Sometimes 
 we  can't  control  the 

1316
00:59:01,920 --> 00:59:07,480
 outcomes,  or  we  certainly 
 can  control  the  rituals.  I 

1317
00:59:07,480 --> 00:59:09,780
 love  that  reminder  to 
 enjoy,  right?  It's 

1318
00:59:09,780 --> 00:59:10,640
 supposed  to  be  fun,  right? 
 I 

1319
00:59:10,647 --> 00:59:12,200
 mean,  competition  is 
 competition.  But 

1320
00:59:12,200 --> 00:59:14,500
 if  you're,  you  know, 
 playing  a,  you  know,  tennis

1321
00:59:14,500 --> 00:59:18,240
 or  basketball,  or  baseball, 
 or  football,  whatever 

1322
00:59:18,240 --> 00:59:20,540
 version  of  football  that 
 you  that  you  like,  right, 

1323
00:59:20,580 --> 00:59:22,140
 you  had  this  idea  of  like,
 this  is  still  supposed  to 

1324
00:59:22,140 --> 00:59:23,820
 be  a  game.  It's 
 supposed  to  have  fun  with 

1325
00:59:23,820 --> 00:59:26,640
 it.  Jim, 
 when  it  comes  to  yourself, 

1326
00:59:26,660 --> 00:59:29,200
 do  you  have  any,  you  know,
 rituals  or  things  that  you 

1327
00:59:29,200 --> 00:59:31,400
 go  through  for  if  you're 
 about  to  engage  in 

1328
00:59:31,400 --> 00:59:32,360
 something?  And 
 maybe  it's  not  even  a 

1329
00:59:32,360 --> 00:59:34,200
 sport,  maybe  it's  just 
 getting  in  front  of  a 

1330
00:59:34,200 --> 00:59:36,360
 crowd  and  talking.  We're 
 doing  a  podcast.  No, 

1331
00:59:36,880 --> 00:59:42,080
 it's  definitely  that.  And 
 it's  also  whatever  sport, 

1332
00:59:42,300 --> 00:59:44,880
 you  know,  it's  kind  of 
 become  an  unconscious  thing.

1333
00:59:44,940 --> 00:59:46,240
 And 
 I  think  if  you  start  to 

1334
00:59:46,240 --> 00:59:50,300
 incorporate  those  throughout 
 your  life,  it'll  happen 

1335
00:59:50,300 --> 00:59:54,280
 unconsciously,  which  is  to 
 visualize  yourself  doing  the

1336
00:59:54,280 --> 00:59:57,560
 activity  in  a  successful 
 way.  And 

1337
00:59:57,560 --> 00:59:59,760
 you  hear  about  it  in 
 almost  every  sport  where 

1338
00:59:59,760 --> 01:00:03,160
 some  people  will  play  the 
 entire  match  or  the  entire 

1339
01:00:03,160 --> 01:00:05,500
 game  before  they  go  out 
 and  play  it.  And 

1340
01:00:05,500 --> 01:00:07,660
 they  do  it  very 
 successfully.  So 

1341
01:00:07,660 --> 01:00:11,040
 I  mean,  my  fitness  has 
 really  become  going  to  the 

1342
01:00:11,040 --> 01:00:14,760
 gym  and  everything.  And 
 it's  much  more  like  a  very

1343
01:00:14,760 --> 01:00:18,440
 solitary  sport.  You're 
 completely  in  control  of 

1344
01:00:18,440 --> 01:00:20,660
 your  results.  Nobody 
 else,  you're  not  against 

1345
01:00:20,660 --> 01:00:23,780
 somebody  else.  So 
 a  lot  of  times,  like 

1346
01:00:23,780 --> 01:00:27,280
 before  I  go  and  do  a  set 
 of  weightlifting,  I'll 

1347
01:00:27,280 --> 01:00:31,460
 visualize  that  set.  And 
 I  don't,  like  I  said,  I 

1348
01:00:31,460 --> 01:00:33,220
 don't  even  do  it 
 consciously  anymore.  I 

1349
01:00:33,227 --> 01:00:36,820
 just  kind  of  wind  up  doing
 it.  And 

1350
01:00:36,820 --> 01:00:39,600
 I  think  what  you  said  for 
 public  speaking,  that's  one 

1351
01:00:39,600 --> 01:00:41,460
 of  the  things  I  do.  I'd 
 like  sit  there  and 

1352
01:00:41,460 --> 01:00:44,920
 visualize  myself  presenting. 
 And 

1353
01:00:44,920 --> 01:00:47,800
 the  more  I  do  that,  I 
 find  the  better  results  I 

1354
01:00:47,800 --> 01:00:51,120
 get.  What 
 about  you,  Jeff?  I 

1355
01:00:51,127 --> 01:00:54,960
 know  I'm  probably  a  blend 
 here  of  what  Venkat  said 

1356
01:00:54,960 --> 01:00:56,880
 in  yourself.  I 
 subscribe  to  the 

1357
01:00:56,880 --> 01:00:59,300
 Littlefinger  School  of 
 Thought,  which  is  fight 

1358
01:00:59,300 --> 01:01:01,100
 every  battle  everywhere  all 
 at  once.  You'll 

1359
01:01:01,100 --> 01:01:03,640
 never  be  surprised.  So 
 to  me,  that's  about 

1360
01:01:03,640 --> 01:01:06,660
 preparation.  So, 
 you  know,  for  example,  the 

1361
01:01:06,660 --> 01:01:10,120
 podcast,  you  know,  I  have 
 meticulous  detail  that  I 

1362
01:01:10,120 --> 01:01:13,920
 put  into  this  to  try  to 
 solve  or  anticipate  every 

1363
01:01:13,920 --> 01:01:15,940
 single  issue  that  can  pop 
 up.  Now, 

1364
01:01:16,000 --> 01:01:19,020
 there's  always  something  in 
 the  pops  up,  right?  But 

1365
01:01:19,020 --> 01:01:21,680
 it's  kind  of  like,  okay, 
 let  me  visualize  how  this 

1366
01:01:21,680 --> 01:01:23,460
 is  going  to  work  or,  you 
 know,  in  this  case,  listen 

1367
01:01:23,460 --> 01:01:25,340
 to  how  this  might  work  or 
 whatever  it  looks  like. 

1368
01:01:28,460 --> 01:01:29,740
 And, 
 you  know,  if  I'm  playing, 

1369
01:01:29,920 --> 01:01:32,580
 you  know,  basketball  or 
 something  like  that,  sure, 

1370
01:01:32,700 --> 01:01:34,860
 research  might  point  it, 
 you  know,  do  they  tend  to 

1371
01:01:34,860 --> 01:01:38,000
 break  left,  break  right?  Do
 they  prefer  a  fadeaway 

1372
01:01:38,000 --> 01:01:40,840
 jumper  versus  a  hookshot 
 versus  do  they  do  a  euro 

1373
01:01:40,840 --> 01:01:43,060
 step  and  want  to  cross  you
 up,  right?  Things 

1374
01:01:43,060 --> 01:01:44,860
 like  that.  I 
 think  there's,  there's 

1375
01:01:44,860 --> 01:01:47,500
 intelligence  that  you  can 
 gather  and  is  part  of  the 

1376
01:01:47,500 --> 01:01:49,140
 reconnaissance.  I 
 say,  okay,  what  am  I,  what

1377
01:01:49,140 --> 01:01:52,600
 opponent  am  I  facing?  Now 
 I  sort  of  know  what  to 

1378
01:01:52,600 --> 01:01:54,600
 expect.  Now, 
 how  am  I  going  to  counter 

1379
01:01:54,600 --> 01:01:57,840
 that?  Okay. 
 Whether  it's  basketball,  you

1380
01:01:57,840 --> 01:01:59,400
 know,  speaking  in  front  of 
 a  crowd  or  doing  a 

1381
01:01:59,400 --> 01:02:02,160
 podcast,  okay,  well,  I  know
 that,  you  know,  I  want  to 

1382
01:02:02,160 --> 01:02:04,060
 have  good  lighting  because 
 the  camera  is  going  to  be 

1383
01:02:04,060 --> 01:02:06,620
 on  or  I  want  to  have  a 
 good  microphone  because,  you

1384
01:02:06,620 --> 01:02:08,360
 know,  this  is  going  to 
 happen  or  I  want  to  have 

1385
01:02:08,360 --> 01:02:09,780
 my  notes  prepared  because 
 we're  going  to  have 

1386
01:02:09,780 --> 01:02:12,140
 somebody  really,  really 
 smart  like  Venkat  on  it.  I

1387
01:02:12,147 --> 01:02:13,820
 don't  want  to  like  an 
 idiot,  right?  Things 

1388
01:02:13,820 --> 01:02:16,320
 like  that.  So 
 I,  again,  it  goes  back 

1389
01:02:16,320 --> 01:02:17,920
 that  little  finger  thought 
 from  Game  of  Thrones 

1390
01:02:17,920 --> 01:02:22,260
 preparation,  you  know, 
 visualize,  prepare  for  every

1391
01:02:22,260 --> 01:02:24,080
 potential  outcome  and  you 
 can't,  it's  more  difficult 

1392
01:02:24,080 --> 01:02:26,960
 to  be  surprised.  So 
 if  you're  playing  basketball

1393
01:02:26,960 --> 01:02:29,600
 against  Karim  Abdul -Jabbar, 
 you  know,  he  has  killer 

1394
01:02:29,600 --> 01:02:31,260
 skyhook.  Yep. 
 What  are  you  going  to  do? 

1395
01:02:31,400 --> 01:02:33,520
 Punch 
 him  in  his  knee?  No, 

1396
01:02:33,700 --> 01:02:35,300
 I  mean,  well,  there's 
 obviously  quite  a  high 

1397
01:02:35,300 --> 01:02:38,020
 advantage  there  that  he 
 would  have  over  me,  but 

1398
01:02:38,020 --> 01:02:42,020
 you  know,  he  would,  he  had
 the  skyhook  and  you  know, 

1399
01:02:42,020 --> 01:02:44,840
 it  was  almost  unblockable 
 for  people  in  the  NBA.  I 

1400
01:02:44,840 --> 01:02:47,740
 mean,  it  was,  it  was 
 really  down  to  his 

1401
01:02:47,740 --> 01:02:51,160
 execution  and  anything  you 
 can,  you  can  put  in  front 

1402
01:02:51,160 --> 01:02:53,440
 of  him  to  disrupt  either 
 the  timing  or  the  execution

1403
01:02:53,440 --> 01:02:56,000
 was  the  important  part.  He 
 was  going  to  be  able  to 

1404
01:02:56,000 --> 01:02:58,300
 get  over  you.  That's 
 a  good  point,  Jim.  This 

1405
01:02:58,300 --> 01:02:59,560
 is  a  border  risk 
 management,  right?  You 

1406
01:02:59,560 --> 01:03:01,380
 give  Karim  his  points,  but 
 he  stopped  the  others, 

1407
01:03:01,520 --> 01:03:04,580
 right?  You 
 still  win  the  game.  That's 

1408
01:03:04,580 --> 01:03:06,740
 a  good  point.  You 
 hear  that  in  sports  a  lot.

1409
01:03:07,060 --> 01:03:09,200
 Don't 
 let  the  superstar  be  the 

1410
01:03:09,200 --> 01:03:11,320
 one  that  beats  you.  Take 
 the  superstar  out  of  the 

1411
01:03:11,320 --> 01:03:13,660
 game  and  let,  let  the  rest
 of  the  team  beat  you.  And 

1412
01:03:13,660 --> 01:03:15,360
 if  that  happens,  that 
 happens,  but  it's  a 

1413
01:03:15,360 --> 01:03:19,240
 strategy.  Exactly. 
 That's  a  good  spot.  We'll 

1414
01:03:19,240 --> 01:03:21,580
 leave  it  for  this  week.  If
 you  want  to  learn  more 

1415
01:03:21,580 --> 01:03:23,700
 about  stack  identity,  you 
 can  find  them  on  the  web, 

1416
01:03:24,060 --> 01:03:26,840
 stack  identity .com  slash 
 IDAC.  It's 

1417
01:03:26,840 --> 01:03:28,380
 a  nice  little  landing  page 
 where  you've  got  a  bunch 

1418
01:03:28,380 --> 01:03:30,740
 of  different  links  to  talk 
 about  everything  or  go  to 

1419
01:03:30,740 --> 01:03:32,560
 everything  that  we  talked 
 about,  including  Sarah,  the 

1420
01:03:32,560 --> 01:03:35,280
 shadow  assist,  a  shadow 
 access  risk  assessment, 

1421
01:03:37,180 --> 01:03:39,180
 Venkat's  office  hours  and 
 just  getting  more 

1422
01:03:39,180 --> 01:03:40,580
 information.  And 
 of  course  you  guys  will  be

1423
01:03:40,580 --> 01:03:46,120
 at  RSA  again,  the  North 
 Expo  Hall  booth  N6564.  And 

1424
01:03:46,120 --> 01:03:48,340
 you  can  always  connect  with
 Venkat  on  LinkedIn.  We'll 

1425
01:03:48,340 --> 01:03:50,280
 have  a  bunch  of  links  in 
 our  show  notes  as  well.  So

1426
01:03:50,280 --> 01:03:52,520
 make  it  easy  for  people  to
 find  and  they'll  also  be 

1427
01:03:52,520 --> 01:03:54,240
 on  our  website.  And 
 then  of  course  you  could 

1428
01:03:54,240 --> 01:03:55,600
 always  reach  out  to  Jim 
 and  I.  We're 

1429
01:03:55,600 --> 01:03:57,060
 all,  we're  both  on 
 LinkedIn.  We're 

1430
01:03:57,060 --> 01:03:59,040
 always  curious  to  see  what 
 people  think  if  they  have 

1431
01:03:59,919 --> 01:04:03,400
 ideas  or,  you  know, 
 direction  on  how  they'd 

1432
01:04:03,400 --> 01:04:05,300
 like  to  see  things  go  in 
 the  future.  That's 

1433
01:04:05,300 --> 01:04:06,440
 something  we're  always  open 
 to.  So 

1434
01:04:06,440 --> 01:04:09,560
 don't  forget  to  visit  us 
 on  the  web,  IDACpodcast 

1435
01:04:09,560 --> 01:04:12,220
.com.  Check 
 out  our  still  growing 

1436
01:04:12,220 --> 01:04:14,820
 YouTube  channel.  And 
 the  link  to  that  will  be 

1437
01:04:14,820 --> 01:04:16,840
 on  our  website  as  well.  So
 with  that,  we'll  leave  it. 

1438
01:04:17,240 --> 01:04:18,180
 Thanks 
 everyone  for  listening. 

1439
01:04:18,420 --> 01:04:19,560
 Venkat, 
 thank  you  so  much  for 

1440
01:04:19,560 --> 01:04:21,780
 taking  the  time  with  us 
 today.  And 

1441
01:04:21,780 --> 01:04:24,520
 we'll  talk  with  everyone  in
 the  next  one.  Thank 

1442
01:04:24,520 --> 01:04:29,180
 you,  Jeff.  Thank 
 you,  Jim.  You've 

1443
01:04:29,180 --> 01:04:32,420
 been  listening  to  Identity 
 at  the  Center.  We 

1444
01:04:32,420 --> 01:04:34,340
 hope  you've  enjoyed  the 
 show.  Make 

1445
01:04:34,340 --> 01:04:37,260
 sure  to  like,  rate  and 
 review.  And 

1446
01:04:37,260 --> 01:04:39,940
 we'll  be  back  soon.  But 
 in  the  meantime,  hit  the 

1447
01:04:39,940 --> 01:04:44,240
 website  at 
 identityatthesenter .com.  See 

1448
01:04:44,240 --> 01:04:47,760
 you  next  time  on  Identity 
 at  the  Center.

