1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:04,280
I'm fresh off the Mongo DB dot 
local event. 

2
00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,160
They had a ton of developers, 
partners, startup founders 

3
00:00:07,160 --> 00:00:10,400
hanging around and showing how 
Mongo is trying to respond to 

4
00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:13,080
everything that's happening in 
artificial intelligence. 

5
00:00:13,120 --> 00:00:16,200
They are the sponsor of this 
podcast and they had me on site 

6
00:00:16,200 --> 00:00:19,560
at Mongo DB dot local to do a 
bunch of these interviews, which

7
00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:22,440
I really enjoyed, so we decided 
to put them in our feed. 

8
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:27,280
I had a great conversation with 
CJ Desai, the CEO of Mongo, who 

9
00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:29,960
dropped by my little studio at 
the conference. 

10
00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:32,840
We have another interview with 
the head of AI from Ripling 

11
00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:35,520
coming after that. 
This is the Newcomer podcast. 

12
00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:46,080
Hi, I'm Eric Newcomer, author of
Newcomer. 

13
00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:52,000
We're here at Mongo DB's local 
event, the amazing drop in when 

14
00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:56,960
you get the CEO, what, 65 days 
into the job to show up on 

15
00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:59,720
stage. 
What I mean, this is, this is 

16
00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:02,080
your big event. 
What was What's the message that

17
00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:04,959
you really wanted to carry to 
the attendees here? 

18
00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:09,320
You know, I would say, Eric, 
first, thank you for having me 

19
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:13,400
and thank you to you for letting
me crash the party of. 

20
00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:15,800
Course I love it. 
So we. 

21
00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,280
Just we just literally we just 
talked to a three person 

22
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:21,920
company. 
So now we're going much larger. 

23
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:23,280
Yeah. 
Sounds good, Eric. 

24
00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:29,960
So 65 days in and one of the 
things that our previous CEO, 

25
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:35,040
Dev and the entire team, we 
realized, so first of all, from 

26
00:01:35,960 --> 00:01:40,280
just being in Silicon Valley for
the long time, San Francisco 

27
00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:42,880
feels like it's back. 
San Francisco is back. 

28
00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:46,640
During the pandemic, people went
a little dark on San Francisco. 

29
00:01:46,960 --> 00:01:52,720
But with this AI platform shift,
San Francisco is back and as you

30
00:01:52,720 --> 00:01:55,360
know, we had a New York 
headquarter, New York founded 

31
00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,640
company. 
Listen, I'm I'm a New York based

32
00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:59,640
person who also believes in San 
Francisco. 

33
00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:03,120
So we have a sort of shared 
spirit on that realizing that AI

34
00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:05,880
boom is here, we are also in New
York. 

35
00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:10,240
So yeah, I feel it. 
So lot of you know, so San 

36
00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:14,120
Francisco is back. 
Mongo DB about 10 years ago did 

37
00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:15,840
a really nice job at San 
Francisco. 

38
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:20,560
They were in front of software 
developers, builders saying 

39
00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:22,240
build on Mongo DB. 
Here is why. 

40
00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:26,160
Speed, agility, scale out many, 
many advantages. 

41
00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:32,160
And then the team realized, Dave
and the team that we kind of as 

42
00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:35,200
the company succeeded, we took 
our eye off the ball for a lack 

43
00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:40,400
of better term. 
And so after four years, we 

44
00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:44,800
decided to reintroduce Mongo DB 
today in San Francisco. 

45
00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:49,720
So today's an auspicious day. 
Thank you for coming and we 

46
00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:53,280
wanted to launch and tell people
that we are here, we are Mongo 

47
00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:54,840
DB. 
It's a great data platform you 

48
00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:57,880
can build on no matter what kind
of applications you're building 

49
00:02:57,880 --> 00:03:01,680
on, digital native, AI native or
you have AI plus plus, whatever 

50
00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,040
the case might be, it is a great
database. 

51
00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:09,160
And you know, one of my biggest 
profound realization was that 

52
00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:13,040
when I, when I was doing my own 
diligence to join Mongo DB, even

53
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:16,840
though the founders didn't 
create with AI in mind, 

54
00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:20,960
unstructured data, flexible 
schema, you know, Symantec 

55
00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,360
Retrieval and all these things 
that are part of now the 

56
00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:29,960
platform, it is like the 
platform for AI applications. 

57
00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:32,000
And so we wanted to tell that to
everyone. 

58
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:36,040
And we got a great customer 
today to validate a great 

59
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:38,920
founder who said he has built 
three companies on Mocodb. 

60
00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:41,120
You're talking about Mike 
Krieger. 

61
00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:46,440
Yeah, you had the nice self 
video Instagram founder. 

62
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,800
I created artifacts, which you 
talked about briefly, which is 

63
00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:51,960
an interesting for me in the 
news world. 

64
00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:54,400
And then obviously he's at 
Anthropic. 

65
00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:56,960
Yeah, that was an exciting 
endorsement. 

66
00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:01,560
What what is your read on? 
You know, I don't know, AI hype 

67
00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:03,800
in 2026. 
On some level, you must think 

68
00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:07,280
this is obviously a phenomenon 
to say you're doing this big San

69
00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:10,320
Francisco push. 
Dave, you know, I think I talked

70
00:04:10,320 --> 00:04:12,480
to him last year. 
You know, he has a dose of 

71
00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:15,000
realism to it all. 
What's your what's your personal

72
00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:17,279
perspective on where we are in 
this hype cycle? 

73
00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:21,560
He's smart and realist and I'm 
an optimist, so that's how I. 

74
00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:24,360
Brought in the guy like, Oh no, 
this thing is going strong and 

75
00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:25,800
we're we're going to get in 
front of it. 

76
00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:28,960
Yeah. 
I mean, I, I would say since 

77
00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:32,840
2022, Christmas ish or October 
ish, when you look at the 

78
00:04:32,840 --> 00:04:37,000
evolution of AI and you look at 
some of the killer AI companies 

79
00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:42,640
where they have scale business 
in a significant way has been of

80
00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:44,880
course open AI. 
Everybody understands that that 

81
00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:47,520
is a killer app from my 
perspective. 

82
00:04:48,280 --> 00:04:52,440
But you also look at Grog and 
how fast they have grown X AI 

83
00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:58,760
and then Entropic, the entire 
team at Entropic Lab, that is a 

84
00:04:58,760 --> 00:05:04,200
truly killer AI app for coders. 
I mean, people load that 

85
00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:07,560
platform and they sometimes use 
it with cursor this that. 

86
00:05:07,840 --> 00:05:11,240
So you're seeing that these 
companies, if you look at like 

87
00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:16,520
Internet age in 90s, you look at
mobile age, they did not scale 

88
00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:19,600
this fast. 
How how fast this companies have

89
00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:22,840
scaled. 
That's like pretty amazing from 

90
00:05:22,840 --> 00:05:26,120
my standpoint. 
And in 2025, I think the killer 

91
00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:29,960
apps were the coding tools. 
There was a killer app besides 

92
00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:33,560
chat GPP of course. 
And now as we go into 2026, 

93
00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:35,680
which ones are going to take 
off? 

94
00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:39,880
I'm optimistic that some very 
specialized vertical apps 

95
00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:44,760
related to maybe a healthcare or
insurance insurance assist or 

96
00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:48,160
something may take off, but you 
will see some take. 

97
00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:50,600
Off close to, you know, a bridge
and open evidence. 

98
00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:52,920
Those are super interesting 
applications. 

99
00:05:52,920 --> 00:05:55,400
And health, Yeah. 
You interviewed Constantine and 

100
00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:56,480
Sequoia. 
Obviously, they're big. 

101
00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:58,440
They're bullish on Harvey, you 
know. 

102
00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:00,480
Yeah. 
So a lot of these vertical 

103
00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:04,840
applications are exciting. 
And Harvey, you know, I met them

104
00:06:04,840 --> 00:06:10,160
a couple of years ago and they 
were still, you know, truly with

105
00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:12,840
the legal firms they were using 
them. 

106
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:16,840
And then now you have the in 
house counsels use them as well.

107
00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,560
And so they have gotten a 
perfect product market fit and 

108
00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:22,280
they're expanding now their use 
cases. 

109
00:06:22,280 --> 00:06:24,320
So that's just it. 
But that's very specialized, 

110
00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:25,920
right? 
It's not just generic. 

111
00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:30,320
I come in and help me review 
this contract from a legality 

112
00:06:30,320 --> 00:06:33,280
perspective and so on. 
This is a drop by, so I don't 

113
00:06:33,280 --> 00:06:34,400
want to take too much of your 
time. 

114
00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:37,800
This will be the last question. 
How do you think about, you 

115
00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:40,280
know, there's so many models 
available. 

116
00:06:40,280 --> 00:06:45,160
How do you think about like, oh,
where to provide your own versus

117
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:48,040
to just sort of say you're 
obviously going to bring models 

118
00:06:48,040 --> 00:06:50,720
from other places? 
We provide sort of the database 

119
00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,280
layer. 
For databases, we want to be 

120
00:06:54,280 --> 00:06:57,200
model agnostic, Yeah, we want to
provide best embeddings. 

121
00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:00,560
So your retrieval quality is 
high, accuracy is high, but we 

122
00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:04,440
want to be model agnostic. 
And when I speak to customers, 

123
00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,720
including AI companies, like 
everybody who originally was 

124
00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:12,280
telling me open AI, then they 
shifted to cloud, I think the 

125
00:07:12,280 --> 00:07:15,720
innovation cycles are very fast.
And then you look at some of the

126
00:07:15,720 --> 00:07:18,960
firms in China and you look at 
DeepSeek and others that 

127
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:20,480
innovation. 
Cycles come from anywhere. 

128
00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:24,400
Yeah, that could come from and 
the product cycles are shorter, 

129
00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:26,320
right. 
Product cycles are shorter. 

130
00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:32,400
So multi model, not multi modal,
but multi model is will be a way

131
00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:37,440
to go and it gives freedom to 
people to use whichever model is

132
00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:39,120
best. 
Gemini, maybe today, better 

133
00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:42,000
tomorrow, maybe an topic again. 
And I think that's how it's 

134
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:44,120
going to work. 
So we will be agnostic 

135
00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:48,400
regardless of who you use. 
Our goal would be always to give

136
00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:54,080
best semantic retrieval 
capabilities and completely 

137
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:57,960
provide a scalable data plan. 
Well, I love, you know, 

138
00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:01,320
newcomer, we use green so it was
easy to share the stage, but 

139
00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:03,880
honoured that we get to share 
branding with Mongo. 

140
00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,320
Thanks so much for having me 
here and thanks for dropping by.

141
00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:08,440
Thank you, Our stage. 
We appreciate it and we'll see 

142
00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:09,800
you in Brooklyn soon. 
Sounds good. 

143
00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:12,920
Alright, thank you. 
Thanks again to Mongo DB for 

144
00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:15,600
sponsoring this episode. 
I feel like I've talked to both 

145
00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:17,840
CEOs, the old and the new in the
last six months. 

146
00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:20,880
So that's been a lot of fun. 
And now excited to get into it 

147
00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:23,000
with Anchor Bot, the head of AI 
at Ripling. 

148
00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,520
I know he's big boss Parker 
Conrad pretty well. 

149
00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:27,240
He's been on this podcast 
before. 

150
00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:29,880
Parker has been somewhat slow to
embrace AI. 

151
00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:32,720
So it's fun to talk to his head 
of AI about, you know, the 

152
00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:37,200
company finding AI Jesus, 
believing in AIA little bit and 

153
00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:40,360
how they're making that cultural
and technological 

154
00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:42,559
transformation. 
Give it a listen. 

155
00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:46,440
Thrilled to have anchor bot, the
head of AI at Rippling here. 

156
00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:49,520
I'm just saying, before we got 
on, I go way back with Parker 

157
00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:52,800
Conrad, your Ceoi wrote about 
Zenefits back in the day. 

158
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:55,480
I I feel like I was, you know, 
as far as reporters can be 

159
00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:57,160
bullish. 
I was pretty bullish on his 

160
00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:00,000
comeback in Rippling and have 
been following your work. 

161
00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:04,200
What's it like to be the head of
AI for? 

162
00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:08,520
I feel like for a Parker is a 
technologist for the guy, but he

163
00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:10,720
has not been wrapping himself in
AI. 

164
00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:14,840
Like how's that How how is it to
be the head of AI and CEO sort 

165
00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:19,240
of coming to the the AI hype? 
I think it's been exciting 

166
00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:22,600
specifically from the lens of 
there is so much happening in AI

167
00:09:22,680 --> 00:09:26,760
everyday. 
So automatically everybody's 

168
00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:30,240
curiosity on what's the new 
model release, what's the new 

169
00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,920
capability release? 
And like like these days, 

170
00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:36,320
everybody's hyped up on cloud 
code as an example, what 

171
00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:39,840
Entropic is doing. 
So that automatically starts to 

172
00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:42,680
create this pull internally 
around. 

173
00:09:42,680 --> 00:09:46,040
What does this mean for Rippling
from a product point of view? 

174
00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:49,640
What does it mean for Rippling 
in terms of day-to-day business 

175
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:51,960
perspective? 
And what does it mean in terms 

176
00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:55,000
of customers expectation on 
Rippling it, right? 

177
00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:57,600
You get to you get to be the guy
who knows what's happening 

178
00:09:57,600 --> 00:09:59,520
today. 
I say, oh, how do we respond to 

179
00:09:59,520 --> 00:10:02,160
this, this, that and the other 
we're obviously, you know, at 

180
00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:07,600
Mongo DB dot local, you know, 
obviously sprawling ambition 

181
00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,000
with Rippling, it's like, oh, we
want to stack startup on 

182
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:13,760
startup. 
So I can imagine strong data 

183
00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:17,280
organization capability is part 
of the business success. 

184
00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:19,920
But explain Ripling's 
relationship with Mongo. 

185
00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:21,480
Yeah. 
So we are being a long time 

186
00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:24,080
customer of Mongo from the 
beginning. 

187
00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:27,800
I think as you rightly pointed 
out, Parker's thesis was 

188
00:10:28,680 --> 00:10:32,120
compound startup like product 
over product. 

189
00:10:32,560 --> 00:10:36,320
And the core, heart of it is the
employee graph. 

190
00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:41,160
And being even though yes people
know us that we can run payroll 

191
00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:44,120
for you. 
Core of it is the employee graph

192
00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:48,560
which captures not just your pay
related information or benefits 

193
00:10:48,560 --> 00:10:51,920
related information. 
We also capture your ID and 

194
00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:54,760
identity related information, 
your device related information,

195
00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:58,480
because at the end we also have 
a product portfolio of ID. 

196
00:10:59,160 --> 00:11:02,160
Similarly, we also have a 
product portfolio around 

197
00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:06,240
finance, your corporate card, 
your spend, your travel expense.

198
00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:08,120
We just launched a travel 
expense product. 

199
00:11:08,560 --> 00:11:12,360
So that's certainly the amount 
of data you have about employees

200
00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:15,720
gets connected in so many 
different ways. 

201
00:11:16,080 --> 00:11:20,320
And having a partnership with 
Mongo allows us to continue 

202
00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:24,920
keeping that graph sanity intact
in terms of the relationships 

203
00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:30,160
you have in this business data. 
Rigorous are you guys about 

204
00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:33,200
making sure that everything 
built at Ripling uses the same 

205
00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:35,280
tech stack? 
I mean, if you're acquiring 

206
00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:37,720
startups and you're letting 
people sort of do their thing, 

207
00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:42,440
how do you balance the trade off
of sort of a consistent stack 

208
00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:44,680
versus letting different people 
build what they want? 

209
00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:48,600
Oh, that's a great question. 
And speed versus consistency is 

210
00:11:48,600 --> 00:11:50,560
a constant dialogue we have 
internally. 

211
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:56,040
I think there is a value in 
terms of letting people innovate

212
00:11:56,040 --> 00:12:00,680
on the side, but it's a little 
bit of a trade off because as 

213
00:12:00,680 --> 00:12:04,640
soon as they are reusing the 
common capabilities we already 

214
00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:09,240
have in our platform, there is a
dimensional speed which comes 

215
00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:12,680
with it. 
And certainly for example, the 

216
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:15,360
employee graph comes with the 
workflow, it comes with the 

217
00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:19,240
notification, it comes with an 
ability to you know, track the 

218
00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:22,640
changes that's happening now. 
If I am building now our travel 

219
00:12:22,640 --> 00:12:25,480
expense product that are 
workflows for me. 

220
00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:30,080
Of course there is a dimension 
where I need to go into 

221
00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:33,800
integrating into flight booking,
hotel booking, which is very 

222
00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:39,160
unique to my products niche. 
And there I'm free to choose 

223
00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:41,440
what I choose to do that and run
faster. 

224
00:12:42,040 --> 00:12:45,600
But I think we've been able to 
guide the different product 

225
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:49,160
teams even though running 
independently on the core value 

226
00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:53,160
of building on that common 
employee graph and common 

227
00:12:53,160 --> 00:12:55,960
capabilities. 
What has been the value of Mongo

228
00:12:55,960 --> 00:12:57,320
like? 
Would would Rippling be a 

229
00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:00,200
different company who is built 
on Postgres? 

230
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:04,720
I think, I think it would, no, 
Rippling would not be a 

231
00:13:04,720 --> 00:13:08,400
different company because of 
Parker's overall hypothesis of a

232
00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:12,080
compound startup and really 
building it as a connected 

233
00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:15,200
ecosystem of products running on
a common foundation. 

234
00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:19,200
I think it would have been just 
a little bit harder, I think and

235
00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:23,080
having that partnership with 
Mongo from day one allowed us to

236
00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:28,640
build this employee graph, build
a capability set so that the 

237
00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:31,960
next product or the next product
we were creating was a lot more 

238
00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:33,840
easy. 
And this is not just about 

239
00:13:33,960 --> 00:13:37,960
transactional data which we are 
maintaining and managing. 

240
00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:39,840
It's also about analytics and 
reporting. 

241
00:13:40,080 --> 00:13:43,400
Being able to take that 
information and have the ability

242
00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:47,080
to report across a cross section
of your product portfolio or 

243
00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:52,440
your business data, not just 
from HR or IT or finance allowed

244
00:13:52,720 --> 00:13:56,600
has opened up those 
possibilities which having a 

245
00:13:56,600 --> 00:14:02,560
common data store, having this 
doc Mongo capabilities opened up

246
00:14:02,560 --> 00:14:05,640
those possibilities for us, 
which we would have solved 

247
00:14:05,640 --> 00:14:08,040
eventually. 
It would just have taken a lot 

248
00:14:08,040 --> 00:14:10,600
more effort. 
So you're the head of AI. 

249
00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:14,040
We touched on some of that role 
means translating what's 

250
00:14:14,040 --> 00:14:17,520
happening in the broader San 
Francisco ecosystem to to 

251
00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:19,200
Rippling. 
But in terms of, you know, 

252
00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:23,160
products within Rippling, what 
what are the AI products? 

253
00:14:23,160 --> 00:14:25,480
Do you have an agent yet? 
What like what's that look like 

254
00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:27,160
inside of Rippling? 
Great question. 

255
00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:30,120
I think originally Rippling also
started. 

256
00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:34,840
We have almost 70 plus products 
in the portfolio and originally 

257
00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:39,560
each product started innovating 
around how they can embed AI as 

258
00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:41,040
they're building that product, 
right. 

259
00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:43,680
It could be within our 
recruiting product portfolio. 

260
00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,040
When you're doing interviews, 
you are meeting candidates 

261
00:14:46,040 --> 00:14:50,560
summarizing those information. 
It could be within our IIT 

262
00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:53,920
product portfolio where you are 
issuing devices, you are 

263
00:14:54,040 --> 00:14:58,120
tracking compliance and security
around those things and having a

264
00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:01,560
summary of your policies. 
So people started embedding AI 

265
00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:03,920
as product capabilities very 
early. 

266
00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:07,320
Inadvertently, I think the 
change happened. 

267
00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:11,480
The point in time we actively 
started investing on for 

268
00:15:11,480 --> 00:15:14,360
building AI products, you have 
to use AI everyday. 

269
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:18,720
Without that, I genuinely 
believe it's very hard for 

270
00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:20,880
people to reimagine what it 
means for their product. 

271
00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:27,240
So 10 months ago, we Albert, our
CTO really put a charter out and

272
00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:31,320
that's where I came in is 
driving the AI transformation of

273
00:15:31,320 --> 00:15:37,040
Rippling internally that we use 
AI everyday, we embrace latest 

274
00:15:37,040 --> 00:15:40,120
and greatest of AI tools every 
day in our workflow whether it 

275
00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:44,600
is product design, engineering, 
legal, finance, sales, marketing

276
00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:47,480
and that. 
What is that cursor? 

277
00:15:47,480 --> 00:15:49,800
Harvey Sierra? 
What do? 

278
00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:53,160
You use the tech stack is full 
of all the tools you can think 

279
00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:56,360
of, right? 
So of course Gemini chat GBD 

280
00:15:56,360 --> 00:16:01,840
cursor cloud codecs, so does. 
That engineer sort of pick their

281
00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:04,600
preferred. 
I think so because Rippling 

282
00:16:04,600 --> 00:16:07,760
deals with a lot of enterprise 
customer data. 

283
00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:14,280
We do have AI pilot process and 
I have built up a checklist with

284
00:16:14,280 --> 00:16:18,960
our security and legal so that 
we can quickly assess a new AI 

285
00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:20,320
solution or somebody will 
request. 

286
00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:23,720
So I get request every week. 
OK, I want to try granola. 

287
00:16:23,720 --> 00:16:27,320
I want to try Bisper flow. 
Typically what we do is we run 

288
00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:29,120
through it through an AI pilot 
process. 

289
00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:31,080
Do you know do you use factory? 
I'm going to be talking to the 

290
00:16:31,080 --> 00:16:34,400
factory. 
It's on my list of an ask from 

291
00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:35,840
somebody. 
Maybe it'll get accelerated 

292
00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:37,560
after yes. 
That could be. 

293
00:16:37,560 --> 00:16:41,360
I'm very keen to learn more, 
which keeps my job a little 

294
00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:44,640
curious because a lot of times I
can't stay on top of things. 

295
00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:48,280
So then the rest of the company 
is constantly keeping top of 

296
00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:50,760
things and asking me can we try 
this or can we try that and. 

297
00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:53,360
Do you, do you have an overall 
agent at ripling or? 

298
00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:56,000
That's one of the new 
investments we are making. 

299
00:16:56,800 --> 00:17:00,320
I think Mongo's partnership has 
helped us because if you think 

300
00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:03,960
about Rippling, we are not just 
a payroll system, We are not 

301
00:17:03,960 --> 00:17:06,599
just a finance or a travel 
expense system. 

302
00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:12,560
We are a full suite of products.
So for us, we can build an agent

303
00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:17,200
which is not a payroll agent or 
a finance agent or an IT agent. 

304
00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:20,839
We can actually build a rippling
intelligence agent which can 

305
00:17:20,839 --> 00:17:24,400
actually answer questions across
your entire day-to-day business.

306
00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:26,839
And that's essentially what we 
have embarked upon, right? 

307
00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:29,560
Parker is extremely excited 
about business. 

308
00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:32,800
Intelligence you think is a key 
output. 

309
00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:35,400
Or I think it is really 
productivity. 

310
00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:39,600
So if you think about AI 
productivity is the, is the 

311
00:17:39,600 --> 00:17:42,560
impact which we we see in 
engineering or product and 

312
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:46,160
design or marketing, right. 
The same productivity impact is 

313
00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,160
what we are hoping to provide to
our customers because as our 

314
00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:53,360
footprint has increased, our 
customers growth has also 

315
00:17:53,360 --> 00:17:55,840
happened. 
So they are growing from like 

316
00:17:55,840 --> 00:17:58,520
look at Andrew, one of our 
flagship customers. 

317
00:17:58,960 --> 00:18:02,680
As Andrew is growing, they are 
using more products from we're 

318
00:18:02,680 --> 00:18:05,080
playing, they have larger set of
ibase. 

319
00:18:05,600 --> 00:18:10,360
So essentially their day-to-day 
operations has gotten complex. 

320
00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:12,760
Yeah. 
So now if you are able to offer 

321
00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:18,120
them an agent to operate Android
payroll to their IT to their 

322
00:18:18,360 --> 00:18:22,720
travel and the agent takes care 
of, you know, proactively 

323
00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:26,360
working with their 
administrators and making sure 

324
00:18:26,360 --> 00:18:30,360
Android stays on top of things 
which they need to say on is the

325
00:18:30,360 --> 00:18:34,760
value we are aiming for. 
I hate to bring up a competitor,

326
00:18:34,760 --> 00:18:37,880
but ramp and rippling start in 
different places. 

327
00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:41,400
They overlap on some. 
You now have, I think credit 

328
00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:43,960
cards, yes. 
And you both want to be sort of 

329
00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:47,760
the what, what's the term of 
art, like the record of all 

330
00:18:47,800 --> 00:18:51,800
things business for somebody. 
They've clearly leaned into the 

331
00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:54,960
AI brand more than you have. 
I don't know, what do you, what 

332
00:18:54,960 --> 00:18:58,000
do you you're the AI guy? 
Like do you want, do you want 

333
00:18:58,000 --> 00:18:59,560
that AI brand? 
Or it's like we have different 

334
00:18:59,560 --> 00:19:01,200
sensibilities. 
Or how do you think about it? 

335
00:19:01,400 --> 00:19:05,320
I think there is a, there is 
obviously an equity in terms of 

336
00:19:05,760 --> 00:19:11,840
having a clear AI story around 
your company and your product 

337
00:19:12,240 --> 00:19:15,560
because customers are keen to 
understand that because 

338
00:19:15,560 --> 00:19:19,000
specifically because if I'm a 
ripping customer today or I'm a 

339
00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:21,840
prospect evaluating Rippling 
today, I come with that 

340
00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:25,840
expectation that there is a 
certain amount of AI automation 

341
00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:32,080
productivity I will get. 
So it's, I, I commend Ramp for 

342
00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:34,520
what they have been able to 
embark on, not just on the 

343
00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:38,240
product side, but as well as in 
terms of positioning themselves 

344
00:19:38,240 --> 00:19:41,520
as an AI forward company. 
I think Rippling is not very far

345
00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:44,800
in terms of our AI 
transformation internally. 

346
00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:49,360
We are very further along than 
what people may be aware of in 

347
00:19:49,360 --> 00:19:50,960
terms of our design 
partnerships. 

348
00:19:50,960 --> 00:19:53,760
We have design partnerships with
Cursor, with Open AI, with 

349
00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:59,200
Entropic, with AWS where we get 
early access to the latest and 

350
00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:03,360
greatest land chain data breaks 
early and even Mongo, so early 

351
00:20:03,360 --> 00:20:05,440
access to their product 
capabilities. 

352
00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:08,680
We are piloting that at tripling
using that to create 

353
00:20:08,680 --> 00:20:10,200
productivity and give feedback 
back. 

354
00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:13,720
And when I see those 
interactions and when I see our.

355
00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:17,600
The ability to influence product
road map of so many ecosystem of

356
00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:22,520
AI companies it reflects back on
Rippling's AI impact is much 

357
00:20:22,520 --> 00:20:24,840
larger than what people may be 
aware of. 

358
00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:27,720
I should know that where is is 
enterprise search part of 

359
00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:31,320
Rippling's vision because that's
been an obviously clean is very 

360
00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:36,760
promising AI company. 
I would say part of Rippling's 

361
00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:40,520
AI assistant will take care of 
answering questions you'll need 

362
00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:42,960
answers for right across your 
enterprise, right? 

363
00:20:43,040 --> 00:20:47,600
Being able to obviously be being
the system of record of a lot of

364
00:20:47,600 --> 00:20:50,240
information, right? 
You don't need glean in those 

365
00:20:50,240 --> 00:20:52,520
cases because we can just answer
those questions for you 

366
00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:55,640
directly, right? 
What do you think? 

367
00:20:55,880 --> 00:20:58,520
There's been a lot of AI is 
going to replace software 

368
00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:01,760
companies. 
I mean, so you get it from both 

369
00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,880
ends, embrace AI, but also like,
oh, you know, you know, 

370
00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:07,320
individual companies are just 
going to spin up their own 

371
00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:11,000
payroll because, you know, they 
can build it with cursor on 

372
00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:12,920
their own. 
Like, I don't know, payroll 

373
00:21:12,920 --> 00:21:15,240
obviously to me seems sort of 
absurd because there's all the 

374
00:21:15,240 --> 00:21:19,400
regulatory and it just like 
sensitive, but clearly there are

375
00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:21,960
there must be pieces of your 
business where people are sort 

376
00:21:21,960 --> 00:21:24,000
of hacking together their own 
apps. 

377
00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:26,880
Like, what do you make of this 
narrative that the rise of 

378
00:21:26,880 --> 00:21:29,000
artificial intelligence is going
to have all these sort of 

379
00:21:29,280 --> 00:21:33,320
homespun software applications? 
We actually embrace that 

380
00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:38,120
wholeheartedly because what we 
find at at Rippling is what we 

381
00:21:38,120 --> 00:21:41,680
find at Rippling is as customers
are using our platform, there 

382
00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:47,760
are always niche unique use 
cases for which they like parts 

383
00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:51,080
of what we offer to them, but 
they want to extend, enhance and

384
00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:57,320
add new capabilities on top of. 
Which is why beginning of last 

385
00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:00,800
year, middle of last year, we 
launched our custom app 

386
00:22:01,320 --> 00:22:04,280
capabilities where you can 
essentially vibe code an 

387
00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:07,560
extension app to Rippling ad 
Rippling's platform itself. 

388
00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:10,360
Interesting. 
And again, going back to since 

389
00:22:10,360 --> 00:22:14,640
we are at Mongo's conference, 
right, being on Mongo in terms 

390
00:22:14,640 --> 00:22:19,800
of ability to store generic 
artifacts and documents actually

391
00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:23,200
opened up that possibility for 
us essentially then to create 

392
00:22:23,920 --> 00:22:28,040
custom objects which then can be
used as a container for any 

393
00:22:28,040 --> 00:22:30,040
customer to bring in whatever 
data they want to bring. 

394
00:22:30,040 --> 00:22:34,080
In any interesting examples? 
That you get, oh, tons of very 

395
00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:39,200
unique, very interesting 
examples in in companies, 

396
00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:42,360
because we deal with a lot of 
workers who are dealing with 

397
00:22:42,360 --> 00:22:45,840
shifts, for example, and 
compliance comes up quite often 

398
00:22:45,840 --> 00:22:49,520
in terms of having them having 
gone through certain amount of 

399
00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:53,120
rigors in certain industries. 
Very unique cases in terms of 

400
00:22:53,120 --> 00:22:59,400
tracking, you know, ticketing, 
tracking, sliding sign outs, 

401
00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:02,800
tracking. 
So there are like niche sort of 

402
00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:05,800
use cases people are building, 
which has actually motivated 

403
00:23:05,800 --> 00:23:11,240
Rippling to even launch RFD 
team, which is actually now 

404
00:23:11,240 --> 00:23:14,960
going in to our customers and 
building these niche customer 

405
00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:18,000
apps for them. 
And then seeing how we bring 

406
00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:20,920
that into our platform as 
capabilities in terms of 

407
00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:23,240
enhancing a platform to make 
that easier going forward. 

408
00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:29,120
Do you think your code base gets
a little worse the more people 

409
00:23:29,120 --> 00:23:34,520
use AI tools or what's the risk 
in terms of over reliance on 

410
00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:36,360
cursor? 
That's a great. 

411
00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:40,640
That's a great question. 
I think we've started to observe

412
00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:48,080
that, yes, there is a dimension 
of an AI slop seeping in to the 

413
00:23:48,080 --> 00:23:51,160
engineering discipline of coding
every day, right? 

414
00:23:51,560 --> 00:23:56,040
But I think we've been very 
strict about our AI stance on 

415
00:23:56,160 --> 00:23:58,880
couple of things. 
First, testing is non 

416
00:23:58,880 --> 00:24:00,800
negotiable. 
So any code which is being 

417
00:24:00,840 --> 00:24:04,160
checked into the main line and 
pushed to production has to be 

418
00:24:04,160 --> 00:24:08,480
fully tested and vetted. 
Second, accountability doesn't 

419
00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,680
just the fact that I used cursor
in AI doesn't take away my 

420
00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:13,760
accountability of what that code
does. 

421
00:24:14,600 --> 00:24:17,920
And I think we've been very 
clear to engineers from day one 

422
00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:19,680
that accountability is still 
there. 

423
00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:24,680
So that essentially creates sort
of a responsibility 

424
00:24:25,480 --> 00:24:27,800
accountability in engineers to 
be cautious of it. 

425
00:24:28,120 --> 00:24:30,000
But that's just on the human 
side. 

426
00:24:30,560 --> 00:24:34,360
From a system side, we're also 
bringing in additional AI tools,

427
00:24:34,360 --> 00:24:38,760
so AI coding, code review tools,
AI tools around looking through 

428
00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:41,520
in terms of production outages 
and bringing that information 

429
00:24:41,520 --> 00:24:46,000
back to to engineers to be able 
to troubleshoot and then 

430
00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:48,160
improve. 
Because at the end of the day, 

431
00:24:49,280 --> 00:24:54,080
the AI enablement or AI use is 
not just about development. 

432
00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:57,320
AI can also be used in analysis 
of what's happening in 

433
00:24:57,320 --> 00:24:59,360
production. 
AI can also be used in reviewing

434
00:24:59,360 --> 00:25:02,240
and verifying. 
And essentially by bringing 

435
00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:07,800
those systems in those places, 
overall keeps the health of the 

436
00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:13,600
code base at a peak and avoids 
the slops sort of just bleeding 

437
00:25:13,600 --> 00:25:17,480
into production. 
In terms of the rippling 

438
00:25:17,480 --> 00:25:22,520
product, maybe have you started 
to build it at all with the idea

439
00:25:22,520 --> 00:25:25,640
that it's like someday soon 
people are going to have AI 

440
00:25:25,640 --> 00:25:28,720
agents that they treat as a 
worker? 

441
00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:31,680
It's like, yeah, I want to in 
some ways compare apples to 

442
00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:34,520
apple, this human and this AI 
agent. 

443
00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:37,760
And I'm going to like think 
about it in terms of identity in

444
00:25:37,760 --> 00:25:40,320
the same way I would use 
rippling is that started to 

445
00:25:40,320 --> 00:25:41,920
creep into. 
Your great. 

446
00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:45,280
I don't know, it's like you're 
just just sort of picking up 

447
00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:47,840
things we are discussing 
internally because one of the 

448
00:25:47,840 --> 00:25:51,960
things we've been thinking about
is agent identity, right? 

449
00:25:51,960 --> 00:25:56,080
Because now if we think about 
agents we are building for our 

450
00:25:56,080 --> 00:25:58,840
customers, at the end of the 
day, they'll start accessing 

451
00:25:58,840 --> 00:26:01,040
payroll information. 
They'll start accessing, you 

452
00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:04,320
know, information which has its 
own access management of who can

453
00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:06,560
see what and how and what type 
of actions they can take. 

454
00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:11,120
Yeah, So it does need three 
things. 

455
00:26:11,120 --> 00:26:14,920
One, obviously an identity of an
agent, which we know who's doing

456
00:26:14,920 --> 00:26:18,720
what. 
But then second, it should still

457
00:26:18,720 --> 00:26:23,680
inherit from a human, because in
some ways that's one of the 

458
00:26:23,680 --> 00:26:26,560
conclusions. 
At least we landed on that. 

459
00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:30,120
At the end of the day, humans. 
Culpable for this agent? 

460
00:26:30,120 --> 00:26:35,240
Exactly, exactly, exactly who is
who is on the hook for the agent

461
00:26:35,240 --> 00:26:39,080
at the end of the day and whose,
whose team This essentially 

462
00:26:39,080 --> 00:26:42,080
which translates into whose 
permissions, whose access 

463
00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:43,960
management this agent has to 
have. 

464
00:26:44,480 --> 00:26:48,280
And we found that it's a lot 
more easier to say that, OK, 

465
00:26:48,280 --> 00:26:50,920
there is always a human. 
There is always a human in the 

466
00:26:50,920 --> 00:26:53,000
system. 
Of course, what we are adding is

467
00:26:53,000 --> 00:26:56,080
a productivity element. 
So instead of in future thinking

468
00:26:56,080 --> 00:26:58,920
of adding more humans, you're 
essentially adding more agents. 

469
00:26:59,240 --> 00:27:02,760
But they still function as part 
of a payroll team and then they 

470
00:27:02,760 --> 00:27:05,680
get access according to being a 
payroll admin, right? 

471
00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:09,040
They are part of an IT team and 
they get access as part of an. 

472
00:27:09,040 --> 00:27:11,760
I feel like a lot of people are 
excited about what agents can 

473
00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:15,880
do, but not excited about being 
the one responsible for stopping

474
00:27:15,880 --> 00:27:17,560
the agent from doing what it's 
not supposed to do. 

475
00:27:17,560 --> 00:27:20,360
Is Rippling willing to take that
on at all? 

476
00:27:20,360 --> 00:27:23,600
Or like, do you, you see a world
where you say, yes, we're the 

477
00:27:23,600 --> 00:27:27,200
barrier for your agent not 
getting access to some system 

478
00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:28,960
it's not supposed to? 
Have that already. 

479
00:27:29,880 --> 00:27:32,200
That already is something part 
of Rippling's ethos. 

480
00:27:32,600 --> 00:27:36,880
So we because we're not just a 
payroll company, we also have a 

481
00:27:36,880 --> 00:27:40,120
full blown identity system, we 
have a full blown access 

482
00:27:40,120 --> 00:27:43,360
management system. 
We already control what data who

483
00:27:43,360 --> 00:27:46,280
has access to. 
We have a very well defined 

484
00:27:46,320 --> 00:27:48,840
access management platform 
essentially. 

485
00:27:49,200 --> 00:27:52,800
And if you which is what is 
allowing us to now bring in 

486
00:27:52,800 --> 00:27:55,640
agents and say, oh, this agent 
inherits from Encore and 

487
00:27:55,640 --> 00:27:58,120
whatever Encore can do in 
rippling this agent can do 

488
00:27:58,360 --> 00:28:01,640
right. 
And that philosophy essentially 

489
00:28:01,640 --> 00:28:05,520
allows us to guardrail not just 
when we are building agents 

490
00:28:05,520 --> 00:28:08,840
ourselves, but customers 
deploying agents in their 

491
00:28:08,840 --> 00:28:13,200
landscape, being able to then 
start performing tasks and 

492
00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:17,320
actions and leading to 
unintended consequences because 

493
00:28:17,320 --> 00:28:20,480
we will still keep that 
principle even for them 

494
00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:23,320
accessing ripping data. 
We guardrail that heavily. 

495
00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:27,760
The API access is only enabled 
through certain controls and 

496
00:28:27,760 --> 00:28:31,280
access management principles, so
randomly customers can't deploy 

497
00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:33,360
an agent and start accessing 
ripping information. 

498
00:28:33,520 --> 00:28:37,080
Well, you have what every AI 
company wants, which is great 

499
00:28:37,080 --> 00:28:38,720
data. 
And now it sounds like you've 

500
00:28:38,720 --> 00:28:42,920
got the AI conviction. 
So exciting times ahead at 

501
00:28:42,920 --> 00:28:44,600
Rippling and thanks for joining 
us. 

502
00:28:44,600 --> 00:28:48,160
No, thanks for the great 
conversation and really enjoyed 

503
00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:50,120
talking to you. 
And yeah, let's continue this 

504
00:28:50,120 --> 00:28:51,040
dialogue. 
Sounds good. 

505
00:28:51,040 --> 00:28:52,160
Thanks so much. 
Thank you. 

506
00:28:52,440 --> 00:28:54,720
Thank you for tuning in to this 
week's episode of the podcast. 

507
00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:56,640
If you're new here, please like 
and subscribe. 

508
00:28:56,640 --> 00:28:59,240
It really helps out the channel.
Listen in for new episodes every

509
00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:00,360
week wherever you get your 
podcast. 

510
00:29:00,440 --> 00:29:00,680
Yes.
