1
00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:03,280
Hi, welcome to the Australian 
Law Students Law in Four 

2
00:00:03,280 --> 00:00:05,320
podcast. 
Your go to source for legal 

3
00:00:05,320 --> 00:00:09,080
insights in 4 minutes or less. 
I'm Nick Hodgkinson and today 

4
00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:11,600
we're talking about private 
nuisance. 

5
00:00:12,160 --> 00:00:13,920
But first our obligatory 
disclaimer. 

6
00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:17,680
The Law in Four is produced by 
law students for law students it

7
00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:20,880
is not, nor is it intended to 
constitute legal advice. 

8
00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:23,920
If you require legal assistance,
you should contact your local 

9
00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:26,040
Law Society, who can direct you 
appropriately. 

10
00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:29,080
For more information on the 
Australian law student, visit 

11
00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:33,640
ourwebsite@theoslawstudent.com 
Right Private nuisance? 

12
00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:36,840
It's the tort that safeguards 
the right to use and enjoy one's

13
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,240
land. 
In this episode, we'll explore 

14
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,400
the three key elements of 
private nuisance and the nuances

15
00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:45,240
that come with them. 
To kick things off, let's talk 

16
00:00:45,240 --> 00:00:48,160
about the first element, the 
plaintiff must have title to 

17
00:00:48,160 --> 00:00:51,200
sue. 
Title here refers to the legal 

18
00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:54,200
right to sue. 
Those eligible to sue include 

19
00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:57,080
property owners in possession, 
landlords facing permanent 

20
00:00:57,080 --> 00:01:00,320
devaluation, tenants with a 
legal right to possession, and 

21
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:02,200
licensees with occupancy 
agreements. 

22
00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:06,360
Family members, despite being 
licensees, lack the title to sue

23
00:01:07,240 --> 00:01:09,360
for title. 
You can refer to Hunter and 

24
00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:12,200
Canary Wharf. 
Moving on now to the second 

25
00:01:12,200 --> 00:01:15,160
requirement, interference with 
the use or enjoyment of land. 

26
00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:19,280
The interference can be 
intangible or tangible and each 

27
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:21,200
have their own unique 
considerations. 

28
00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:25,440
Intangible interferences like 
smells or noise must be 

29
00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:29,520
substantial and unreasonable. 
Substantiality and 

30
00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:32,360
unreasonableness are found 
applying the give or take test 

31
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:34,080
from Monroe and Southern 
Dairies. 

32
00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:37,360
The court in this test will 
consider factors like locality, 

33
00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:41,200
duration, time, frequency, 
extent, the plaintiff's 

34
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:44,720
sensitivities, and the purpose 
and utility of the defendant's 

35
00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:46,720
activity which causes the 
interference. 

36
00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:50,600
Alternatively, tangible 
interferences which involve 

37
00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,880
physical damage like smashed 
windows or fires, require that 

38
00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:57,320
the damage be beyond triviality 
to satisfy the substantial and 

39
00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:00,240
unreasonable test. 
That test comes from the case 

40
00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:02,320
Saint Helen's Smelting and 
Tipping. 

41
00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:06,040
Third, we need to establish the 
defendant's fault. 

42
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:08,800
This involves proving the 
defendant's knowledge of their 

43
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:10,360
nuisance and their connection to
it. 

44
00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:14,520
Fault can be established if the 
defendant created, authorized, 

45
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:16,480
continued, or adopted the 
nuisance. 

46
00:02:17,360 --> 00:02:20,320
Before continuing and adopting A
nuisance, the court will 

47
00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:23,160
consider whether the defendant 
knew or ought to have known of 

48
00:02:23,160 --> 00:02:26,440
the nuisance if damage was 
foreseeable and if they failed 

49
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:28,320
to comply with a measured duty 
of care. 

50
00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:30,920
The measured duty of care 
involves assessing the 

51
00:02:30,920 --> 00:02:33,280
reasonableness of actions to 
prevent or minimize the 

52
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:35,600
nuisance. 
Considering factors like cost, 

53
00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:40,520
difficulty, and time available 
at this stage, a defendant can 

54
00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:42,960
employ certain defenses to 
escape liability. 

55
00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:45,840
These defenses include the 
plaintiff contending to the 

56
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:48,400
nuisance or legislative 
authorization. 

57
00:02:48,920 --> 00:02:52,000
Legislative authorization does 
not apply if the defendant could

58
00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:55,000
reasonably have carried out the 
authorized conduct without that 

59
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:59,400
conduct causing the nuisance. 
As we wrap up today, it's clear 

60
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:01,600
that private nuisance in 
Australia involves a careful 

61
00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:03,440
balance of rights and 
responsibilities. 

62
00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:06,440
The law seeks to protect the 
enjoyment of one's land while 

63
00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:08,920
considering the circumstances 
and reasonableness of the 

64
00:03:08,920 --> 00:03:11,920
defendant's actions. 
We hope that this episode has 

65
00:03:11,920 --> 00:03:14,880
shed light on the complexities 
of private nuisance law in 

66
00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,440
Australia. 
Join us next time on the 

67
00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:19,920
Australian Law Student Law in 
Four podcast. 

68
00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:24,960
As always, if you have any 
suggestions, please e-mail us at

69
00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:29,360
team@theozlawstudent.com or 
leave a comment in your review 

70
00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:31,360
on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.