1
00:00:00,600 --> 00:00:03,292
Hi, welcome back to The 
Australian Law Student, LawIn4 

2
00:00:03,292 --> 00:00:06,282
podcast: your go-to podcast for 
legal insights in four minutes 

3
00:00:06,282 --> 00:00:09,145
or less. 
Today we're talking about our 

4
00:00:09,145 --> 00:00:11,200
third intentional tort, false 
imprisonment. 

5
00:00:11,570 --> 00:00:14,527
But first, our obligatory 
disclaimer: The LawIn4 is 

6
00:00:14,527 --> 00:00:16,480
produced by law students for law
students. 

7
00:00:16,790 --> 00:00:19,900
It is not, nor is it intended to
constitute, legal advice. 

8
00:00:20,330 --> 00:00:23,806
If you require legal assistance,
you should contact your local 

9
00:00:23,806 --> 00:00:25,180
law society who can direct you 
appropriately. 

10
00:00:25,770 --> 00:00:30,072
For more information on The 
Australian Law Student, visit 

11
00:00:30,072 --> 00:00:32,250
our website at 
theaustlawstudent.com Okay, 

12
00:00:32,250 --> 00:00:35,370
trespass to the person. 
It shares similarities with 

13
00:00:35,370 --> 00:00:38,586
battery and assault. 
Like its counter parts, it 

14
00:00:38,586 --> 00:00:42,045
requires directness, a positive 
act, and fault, with damage not 

15
00:00:42,045 --> 00:00:45,227
being a prerequisite. 
Okay, false imprisonment 

16
00:00:45,227 --> 00:00:48,000
involves a direct act by the 
defendant which intentionally, 

17
00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,188
recklessly, or negligently 
deprives the plaintiff of their 

18
00:00:51,188 --> 00:00:52,620
liberty without lawful 
justification. 

19
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:56,704
The act that leads to the 
deprivation of liberty must be 

20
00:00:56,704 --> 00:00:59,504
the defendant's own act, 
however, encouraging others to 

21
00:00:59,504 --> 00:01:01,960
carry out the false imprisonment
is also sufficient. 

22
00:01:02,700 --> 00:01:06,252
A classic case which illustrates
this is Dixon and Water, where 

23
00:01:06,252 --> 00:01:09,388
shop manager falsely accused the
plaintiff of shoplifting and was

24
00:01:09,388 --> 00:01:12,760
found liable for parading a 
police officer to carry out the 

25
00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:15,467
imprisonment. 
Next, the imprisonment must be 

26
00:01:15,467 --> 00:01:18,140
total and must restrict the 
plaintiff's movement in all 

27
00:01:18,220 --> 00:01:21,080
directions. 
Mere obstruction of movement in 

28
00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:22,720
a particular direction won't 
suffice. 

29
00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:26,295
In Burton Jones, the plaintiffs 
claim failed because they could 

30
00:01:26,295 --> 00:01:29,515
have turned around and exited 
using a different path. 

31
00:01:29,515 --> 00:01:32,738
The determination of total 
imprisonment often hinges on 

32
00:01:32,738 --> 00:01:36,524
whether there is a reasonable 
means of escape, taking into 

33
00:01:36,524 --> 00:01:40,064
account safety, justification, 
and the plaintiff's will to do 

34
00:01:40,064 --> 00:01:42,090
so. 
Burton and Davies highlights 

35
00:01:42,090 --> 00:01:45,192
this, whether plaintiff had no 
reasonable means of escape from 

36
00:01:45,192 --> 00:01:48,388
a moving car because jumping out
was their only option. 

37
00:01:48,388 --> 00:01:52,093
Notably, a plaintiff can be 
falsely imprisoned without 

38
00:01:52,093 --> 00:01:54,008
imposing physical boundaries 
upon them. 

39
00:01:54,008 --> 00:01:57,542
In Simes's and Martin, the 
plaintiff, mistaken as an 

40
00:01:57,542 --> 00:02:00,774
individual with a warrant was 
taken to the police watch house.

41
00:02:00,774 --> 00:02:03,770
Even though he was allowed to 
leave halfway through, he was 

42
00:02:03,770 --> 00:02:06,344
considered falsely imprisoned 
from the time he was required to

43
00:02:06,344 --> 00:02:08,360
go with the police until his 
formal release. 

44
00:02:09,380 --> 00:02:12,092
Finally, false imprisonment 
underscores the importance of 

45
00:02:12,092 --> 00:02:15,272
the plaintiff's belief in their 
liberty being unlawfully 

46
00:02:15,272 --> 00:02:17,719
restricted. 
In Balmain, New Ferry and 

47
00:02:17,719 --> 00:02:20,595
Robertson, a false imprisonment 
claim failed because the 

48
00:02:20,595 --> 00:02:23,079
plaintiff, aware of the 
conditions displayed at the 

49
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:26,280
Warf's entrance could not be 
said to have been held against 

50
00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:29,570
his will. 
As we wrap up this episode on 

51
00:02:29,570 --> 00:02:31,820
false imprisonment, it's clear 
that this tort demands a careful

52
00:02:31,920 --> 00:02:34,948
examination of the defendant's 
actions, the extent of the 

53
00:02:34,948 --> 00:02:38,728
plaintiff's confinement, and the
presence of reasonable means of 

54
00:02:38,728 --> 00:02:41,465
escape. 
Join us next time on The 

55
00:02:41,465 --> 00:02:43,420
Australian Law Students' LawIn4 
podcast. 

56
00:02:43,990 --> 00:02:49,198
As always, if you have any 
suggestions, please email us at 

57
00:02:49,198 --> 00:02:51,715
team@theauslawstudent.com or 
leave a comment in your review 

58
00:02:51,715 --> 00:02:52,500
on Spotify or Apple podcasts.