Going back to a passage that we noticed last week also in the
book of Titus Chapter 1 and verse 5, the Apostle Paul said,
for this reason, I left you in Crete that you should set in
order, the things that are lacking and appoint ordain
Elders in every city as I commanded You In this passage
the Apostle Paul instructs Titus, or tells Titus.
The reason for leaving him in Reet.
Now, something about create. You might remember I think this
is very important creep was no small place.
In fact, it was the fifth largest island in the
Mediterranean Sea Scholars. Tell us that ancient Crete was
about 186 miles long and the width of it very in the
narrowest part of Crete, it was seven miles and in the widest
part of creating was 35 miles. There were over 100 cities in
that. Place and over a million people
and Paul tells Titus that he left them and creepy left him in
Crete for the purpose of doing two things.
Number one to set in order, the things that are lacking.
And number two to ordain Elders in every city.
Now, first of all, we need to understand.
And remember that ordaining, Elders that every city means
ordaining Elders in every church.
Now, if, in fact there Is a hundred cities that we might say
that there was 100 congregations in that particular place.
Perhaps every city where there was a church, they were toward a
Elders now. Elders were ordained in those
places without miraculous help from God.
I've heard people say, you know, we don't have a whole lot of
Elders. Today we have a lot of
congregations that don't have Elders today and the only way
that they could have done it back in the old days or back in
the days of the early, you Testament Church was with
miraculous Hill. I don't believe that at all.
I don't think there's anything that is described there about
Elders, that was with miraculous help.
I think that these men were spiritually minded, man.
Number two, they desire the office of a an elder.
And number three, they were fully qualified Now.
Understand today, we may not have Elders in a lot of
congregations, but really, what does it mean?
What we need to have Alders, we A spiritually minded men, that
desire the office and are fully qualified now.
It is scriptural government for there to be elders and deacons
in the Lord's church. That is scriptural.
But it would be equally on the opposite side, unscriptural and
wrong to ordain men that were not qualified according to the
word of God. Now names for the office.
We talked about this last time, I'll be very brief about this
names for the office. There's three different names
that describe the office of an elder one is the English word,
Elder, and Elder. Simply means older, and with
experience, and what I have here on the screen, I have the word
young, the line through it. Because by definition alone, an
Elgar is an older person. And by definition, it would
automatically eliminate a young man.
A young man cannot be an elder. After an elder is one that is
older. And with experience secondly,
there's another word that describes, the office of an
elders and that is the word. Bishop and Bishop is an overseer
and Bishop is used to describe the duty that the Elder has to
the congregation. And that is an overseer of the
flock. Number three is the word Pastor
sometimes taken out of context in the religious world where
somebody gives the name pass. Faster to an evangelist or a
preacher that is unscriptural. A pastor is an elder and there
were always a plurality of Elders in congregations of the
body of So, a one-man Pastor system that is found in the
denominational. World is unscriptural and Elder
though is called a pastor. And a pastor is a shepherd and
talks about the task to feed the flock.
Now, here's the point and Elder is described as an elder because
he's older it with experience. He's called a bishop to describe
his duty to the congregation and that is an overseer he is called
a pastor to Tribe. His task to feed the flock as a
Shepherd. All right, now, qualifications,
what do we noticed last week? Number one, a man must desire,
the office. That's first and foremost.
Now, you remember what we said, a man that's going to desire the
office. There's two different words and
that passes for desire. It says, if a bishop desires, if
a man desire, the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
Those two English word desires are different.
The first one is to desire the office.
The second one is to earnestly or eagerly desire to work.
So if a man is going to be an elder, he's got him desire, the
office but even more so he has Desire, the work.
You know what? This man described to me is this
man right here is described as a man.
That understands that influence is more important than
Authority. I'm going to say that again.
Influence is more important than Authority.
Leadership is more important and a man that wants the office.
He needs to also desire, even greater the work.
That's the first requirement, the second requirement, he must
be blameless. Now, remember, that does not
mean sinless. Blameless does not mean sinless,
blame. This means that there are no
sustainable charges against that, man.
That's a man, that's blameless, okay.
What about the family requirements?
The first one is he must be the husband of one wife. in 1st,
Timothy Chapter 3 and verse 2, Paul says a bishop must be
blameless. He must be the husband of one
wife. And by the way, these are not
suggestions. If a man is going to be an elder
which is the highest position in the Lord's church, and let me
dis daresay, the highest position in the world because
nothing is greater than the church.
If a man is going to be that he must be blameless and he must be
the husband of one wife. Let's go further.
Paul is writing to Titus in Titus Chapter 1 and verse 6.
If a man is blameless and if he's the husband of one wife, so
what do we have? We have the tightest, he's
giving a condition and he's saying the tightest.
If you find somebody that is blameless and if you find
somebody, that's the husband of one wife, they would fit into
the category with all the other requirements of someone that was
a candidate to be an elder. Over here.
Paul says, Point Blank, he must be blameless.
He must be the husband of one wife.
The question is, what does that mean?
Well, first of all, he's got to be married.
He has to be a married, man. He can't be single.
He has to be a one woman, man. In fact, Scholars.
Tell us, that's exactly what that means.
It means a one-woman man. A one-woman man, one scholar
said, he is to be as committed to his bride as Jesus Christ, is
to his bride. In other words, faithful and
true. Okay?
Who would be eliminated automatically, what is the
obvious people eliminated for having the husband of one wife,
obviously a polygamist and there's no problem with polygamy
in our country, really except in some various cult somewhere but
really, we don't have as A custom the deal of polygamy
because it's illegal. So I would it would eliminate a
polygamist but it would also eliminate a man that was I
scripturally divorced not following the pattern of
Matthew, 19, I'm scripturally divorced and unscriptural 8
remarried. Now the Bible in Matthew
chapter, 19 gives an exception. There's one exception and only
one regarding marriage and divorce and remarriage and that
is adultery 3. And if somebody commits
adultery, they are the guilty party, the innocent party could
put that guilty party away and that person is free to remarry.
That's the exception. There's only one exception.
Now somebody that was on scripturally divorced and on
scripturally remarried is somebody that's not the husband
of one wife. It would eliminate that guy,
too. All right, what about this?
What if a man's is married to a woman?
And she dies. And he marries another in the
Lord. 1st Corinthians said, and, Couple years later the
congregation where he is wants to install him as an elder.
Is he the husband of one wife? Yes.
Romans chapter 7, says that a man or a woman is bound to the
marriage relationship as long as the spouse is alive.
But when that spouse is now dead, that marriage Union is
separated, and that person is no longer married.
If he marries in the Lord, he is the husband of one wife all over
again. See the point.
He's the husband of one wife. Now.
I think we get that, we get that, but the real question is
this? And I want you to know that I
have really wrestled with this. I have studied with this by the
hour. I have wrestled with this.
What if a man is already an elder and his wife dies?
He's already an elder. He fit all the qualifications to
be an elder. And then his wife dies, should
he resign his position as an elder?
Now, my first reaction was we'll know he didn't do anything
wrong. But then, I study it further and
I have some problems with that. And by the way, I have known of
cases. Where a man was married.
He was an elder, she died, and he immediately stepped down and
resigned. I've also known in cases where a
man was married. He was an elder and his wife
dies and he just ignored about husband of one wife had just
kept right on going through. I know that those cases to the
question, is this? Does a man have to step down if
he is an elder and his wife dies?
Now, here's my problem with my first thing was.
No, he doesn't. But watch this, Paul talks about
what an elder must be and not what an elder has been.
That's the problem I got. It doesn't say what an elder has
been. At one time, it says, an elder
must be now. if a man cannot have more than one, then he
can't have less than 1. JW McGarvey says this.
Look at this, that he should be the husband of one wife,
forbids, having less than one as clearly as it forbids.
Having more than one more over the context, confirms the
conclusion for the Apostle proceeds in both Epistles to
state that the overseer must govern his household and
especially as children, which statements imply that he is to
be a family man, or a man of faith.
Only. Now, I realize that sometimes
these questions might be on might be hard to answer with
certainty. I get that.
But remember this, we must be very consistent in when
interpreting these qualifications.
We can't say that some qualifications are literal and
others are well up to interpretation.
Or we can look at those things with looseness.
We need to be very careful because if we look at the, at
the requirement of a man, being a husband of one wife, not
literally, then we would not have to attach a literal
interpretation to the next. Thing or the one after that, or
the one after that. What's the next one?
He's got to have faith for children.
He's got to have faithful children.
I'm going to tell you, if we take a loose interpretation of
husband of one wife, then we can also take a loose interpretation
of faithful children. As the man said, one time, if
not, why not? Faithful children.
Now in Titus, Chapter 1 and verse 6.
If a man is blameless, the husband of one wife, having
faithful children, not accused of dissipation or
insubordination. That's the new King James.
The King James version, says, Riot or unruly.
Now what does it mean to have faithful children?
I'm going to simply just say it like this.
And there's all manner of thoughts and theories of what
faithful children is. I'll tell you what, I believe
faithful children is, and I'm going to do my very best to
prove that That faithful children means, faithful
Christians. Faithful children is faithful
Christians. Now, I don't understand why it
is that people sometimes misinterpret faithful children
and they say that faithful. Here does not mean what faithful
means all throughout the word of God.
For example, when Paul is writing to Timothy and second
Timothy 2 and verse to listen to this and the things that you
have heard from me among many witnesses, Has commit these to
Faithful Men Who will be able to teach others.
Also, Nobody has a problem with that.
Nobody thinks that means faithful to their father.
Everybody understands the things that I am Telling You Timothy
commit vow to what Faithful Men Who are faithful, man.
They are faithful Christians. Nobody has a problem with that,
give me another passage Colossians 1 and verse 22.
The Saints, talking to Christians and faithful brethren
in Christ who are in colossi. Another passage Ephesians 1
verse 12, the same Who are in Ephesus and faithful in Christ
Jesus. Now, in these passages, no one
would say that Paul means anything other than faithful
Christians. But you know, you can read
commentators, you can talk to people that have all manner of
interpretations about this and some people would say, no, they
don't have to be Christians as long as their faithful to their
parent, faithful to their father.
It's the same word. It's the same word.
Let's look at some other translations of the exact same
passage and find out what they say about the American Standard
Version. The American Standard Version in
the place of faithful children says this having children that
belief, that's not a commentator.
That's not a commentary that's not a Bible scholar.
That isn't it? That is a translation of the
word of God and by the way, whenever the Bible talks about
believing or Believers, it is always talking about someone in
connection with some what the idea of obeying, the gospel,
somebody being Christian. Believers are those that are
Christians. Let's go further.
The NIV says whose children belief The Amplified New
Testament says whose children are well trained and Believers
Weist expanded translation says this having children who are
believers. These are translations of the
body of the Bible, The tell us that faithful children
obviously, is talking about faithful Christians, what about
some Greek authorities on the subject?
Mr. Thayer says this. This passenger faithful children
is talking about one who has become convinced that Jesus is
the Messiah and the author of Salvation, a Believer.
Next, here's another one art, Gingrich says a believer in
Christ. A Christian believer.
Henry says, brought up in the true Christian.
Faith Robinson says a Believer. A Christian one more.
This is the Cross Keys. Pulpit commentary, says
Believers adorning. The doctrine of the Gospel, my
Purity and obedience. There must be evidence that they
have been brought up in the nurture and admonition of the
Lord. So, why do I believe that
faithful children means faithful Christians.
Well, simply by the definition of faithful for one number two,
by the translations. We just noticed of the Bible.
Number three by noted. O Scholars, number four by
commentators and obviously the context fits that it's talking
about faithful Christians. Now.
When a man's children are faithful Christians.
There's a good reason for having this.
As a requirement, there is a good reason to believe that he
has experience in training and admonition of the Lord,
Ephesians, 6 and verse 4 that he has experience in ruling or
leading in such a way that inspires other people to obey
and emulate on the other hand, when a man's children are not
faithful, there's lingering questions.
There's lingering questions. Is he had fault?
I'm going to tell you something, folks.
I believe that the Bible is clear. that if my children go
make decisions and sin in their life, That I am not going to
Bear the penalty of their sin. We are all we are all given the
freedom of choice. They're not going to be held
accountable for my sin and I'm not going to be held accountable
for their sin. Bible says the soul that
sinneth, it shall die. Is he ill 18?
The son shall not bear. The iniquity of the father.
Neither shall the father bear, the iniquity of the son, we get
that. I'm going to stand before my
maker alone and I will give an account for the things that I
have done. My life.
So will you so will our children so well everyone that's of
accountable age. And an accountable mind
everybody will do that. But if I raise a family and my
children are not faithful children, does it not bring up
by way of my influence? Does it not bring up at least
some questions? A my fault.
Then I show my children. What was important?
Did I take my children and put the church above everything
else? Did I do that?
Do I have experience in raising others in the faith?
Do I have experience in, inspiring others?
To follow my example. Have I done those things?
Lingering questions. Faithful children, folks, simply
means what it is. It is faithful Christians.
Now back to Titus Chapter 1 and verse 6 because connected to
faithful children, there's something else that's connected
on the opposite side. Watch this not accused of Riot
or unruly in the King James. Not accused of Riot or unruly
the new King James says, dissipation or insubordination.
Now, the question is, what does that mean?
You know, I read some Scholars Vincent said, this, watch this,
you know, what B and said that this means to be not accused of
Riot or unruly, what's it mean to be accused of Riot or unruly?
It means you are manifesting unsaved being this.
I'm saving this to coin a word. That's what he said.
It's about being unsafe being qualities.
That's the opposite of a faithful Christian.
In other words, the child of an elder must bear in himself.
The quality is demanded in the father, he cannot be accused of
Riot or to be unruly. The ni beak says that this way,
he cannot be wild or disobedient.
It's a word that is used to signify a wild and disorderly
lifestyle. And incidentally in Luke chapter
15 and verse 13. Remember what Jesus said about
the prodigal? He goes out into the world.
He takes his inheritance. It's and he wasted his substance
on. What?
Riotous living. It's the same thing.
An elder can't have kids folks. That are guilty of unsaved,
ananas or a wild riotous lifestyle.
You know, this word is also used the word Riot.
It's the Greek word s of T, by the way, but it's found also in
Ephesians chapter 5 and verse 18 in the new King James says, this
and do not be drunk with wine, which is in, which is
dissipation, but be filled with the spirit, that's the new King
James. The American Standard Version is
the same. Greek word is right there, the
American Standard Version, renders it like this and do not
be drunk with wine, which is Riot.
So in other words, Paul in that passage is putting this word or
attributing or putting this next to the idea of drunkenness.
Are we getting the picture of the lifestyle?
We are. Describing an Elders.
Children must not be accused of Riot or unruly, which means
guilty of unsaved equalities. And that's the opposite of being
a faithful Christian. Now now such a lifestyle brings
criticism to the child's father. An elder cannot serve
effectively because children are out of control, he is to rule
his own house. Well, in first, Timothy chapter
3 and verse 5, watch this for a man does not know how to rule
his own house. If he doesn't know, how will he
take care of the Church of God? Now, watch this.
Here's some conditions. If there's a man out there, that
is blameless. If he is a one woman, man, the
husband of one wife, if he has faithful children which are
faithful Christians, those that are not what they're not accused
of Riot, or unruly or unsafe weakness.
And if you got one a guy like that, he's also going to be
someone that rules or leads his own house.
Well, and when he does that he proves and he can also lead the
Church of God. All right.
Here's a big question. Oh, it's a big question.
If a child leaves leaves the house.
And the child no longer lives under the roof of that parent.
Do the rules still apply? What if he becomes Unfaithful
away from home? I've heard people say, it's just
not fair. Yeah, it might not be fair this
way. It is.
I've heard people say it's just not fair.
I mean after all their child is 35 years old and they live and
they're married and they live on their own and all of that.
And he decides to quit the church, it's not fair.
Should the Elder actually be responsible for that or have the
effects of that? It's not a matter of being
unfair but let me just say this way, I have two children, my
daughter is going to be 21 and my son just turned 18.
Everybody understands, they are my children.
Do we still have the same child parent relationship?
Yes, they are still my children. What about when they're 30 and
40 and 50 years old. If I'm still living.
Are they my children? Yes.
They are. They never stopped being my
children. Paul says that you have to have
faithful children. What if one of my kids, though,
what if I had four kids, And what if three of them are
faithful and one is unfaithful. What if that's the case if
somebody asks me? Well are your kids faithful?
What's my answer? Paul said, you got to have faith
for children. I'm not going to say, yes.
I'm going to say, well, three of them are but very sadly, one of
them is it? That's what I would say, because
that's the truth. We see in the point.
Now. What about the influence?
Or what about things that reflect back on a father?
How long should there be that, how long does a child still have
ramifications of their choices? Reflecting back on the influence
of the father, how long, okay, to two examples in the Old
Testament, come to mind. One is Eli and the other Samuel.
They had children that obviously the context shows they had sons
that were not, I believe under their roof and yet their
behavior. Their behavior was a reflection
back on their father's influence. me ask you something,
folks, we're not guilty of the sin that our children commit,
But we will always have that as a reflection back on us and our
good name when they make bad choices.
Just like we have people that Pat us on the back when they
make good choices and I'm going to tell you, yeah.
Yeah. We feel good when somebody
passes on the back and, you know, our kids are doing well
and they're doing right and boy, you done a great job.
Yeah, thanks doll. That take the flip side of, that
is the flipside of that is, they bring shame and reproach on
their father and their mother. When they go make terrible
choices. Has absolutely.
When a child goes away from home, he's still a child.
And by the way, this relationship between child and
father it continues through life.
In fact, children are to honor their parents.
Did you know that a child is to honor his parents for his
lifetime? Not just while they live under
the roof, they are to honor their father and mother for the
duration of their life. And by the way, the greatest way
to honor your parents is stay faithful.
That's the greatest way. You can honor your father and
mother is to stay faithful. Have you ever stopped to
consider all the people in here that are old enough old enough
to be a Christian? And you have parents that are
still living? Have you ever stopped to
consider that the destroy Isis? That you make in your life are
affecting whether or not your father can be an elder in the
body of Christ, in the Lord's Church?
You know what I say that to the young man or young woman.
That has a Godly father, a spiritually minded father.
That is Desiring the office of an elder that wants to be an
elder in the body of Christ, in the Lord's church that fits the
qualifications in every other way, but you have decided the
young person has decided, I'm going to go about my business.
I'm gonna quit the church. You don't have to say about
that. The only comes to make my mind
shame on you. Shame on you.
We have confidence in children that are faithful.
We have confidence in children that are faithful in Proverbs 25
and 19 listen to this competence.
In an Unfaithful man though in time of trouble is like a bad
tooth and a foot out of joint. Boy, some good stuff.
We don't have confidence in people that are not faithful,
children bear, responsibilities toward their parents.
First Timothy 5 and verse 4, Listen to this.
But if a widow has children or grandchildren, let them first
show. Learn to show piety at home and
to repay their parents for, this is good and acceptable before
God, so does an Unfaithful child disqualify an elder.
Yes. Yes.
May not be fair folks, but it's right.
Can that man? Be a Christian?
Yes. Can that man, go to heaven?
Yes. Can that man be a teacher in the
local congregation? Yes.
Can that man? Be an evangelist and preach the
gospel all over the world? Yes.
But if he does not have faithful children, he can't be an elder
in the Lord's Church, simple as that.
Simple, as that. The only way that an elder can
serve free from distracting questions pertaining to a man's
qualifications to be an elder is if he continues to have faithful
children. Okay, here's a big question.
Here's a big question. I did not come to the conclusion
that I have today without much study reflection and prayer.
But here's a big question. If a man only has one child does
having one child disqualify him from being qualified to be an
elder. Doesn't disqualify him.
Well, let me just say this, I will say that a man that has a
plurality or multiple children in their home and he raises a
plurality of children and he has a plurality of children that are
Christians and are faithful. That man, really has,
demonstrated greater that he can deal with multiple personalities
in the church, because he has dealt with multiple
personalities in his own home. So, do I think think it is
better for a man to have a plurality of children.
Yes. The question, isn't that?
The question is, if a man only has one child?
Is he disqualified? All right, let's answer it like
this. Let's find out in Titus.
Chapter 1 in verse 6. Again, it says, having faithful
children. Now, the word children is the
word Tecna. Now, take Nia is the plural form
of the noun, for child, which is taking on now.
Now in this passage, it says, take NE.
It is the plural form of the noun for child, which is
translated in the English language as children.
And it is, obviously plural. The question is, what does it
mean? What does children mean in a
plural sense in this passage does it mean the number of
children that they have? Well, let's look the word teak.
NE is actually translated is actually defined as the word
spring. So Titus Chapter 1 and verse 6
by definition would be having faithful offspring.
Okay, let's go further. What is plural mean here?
Plural means plurality, here means plurality of class.
What does that mean? It means the plural containing
the singular. That's what that means the
plural containing the singular. And not necessarily, they
plurality of children or more than one.
Okay. I didn't go off the reservation.
Stay with me. Let's look at Some Bible
examples that prove exactly what I'm talking about.
Same exact word and moved 29:28. Watch this saying teacher, Moses
wrote to us that if a man's brother dies, having a wife
singular and he dies without children teak.
NE chloro, containing the singular, his brother should
take his wife and raise up Offspring for his brother.
Same exact word. Let's go further, though, let's
look at another one. How about this then, This is one
that we know about this is the perfect example of the singular
contained. In the plural word, it's talking
about words that Sarah said in Genesis chapter 21 and verse 7,
watch this who would have said to Abraham that Sarah would
nurse children, Tecna plural, containing the singular.
Then what did she do for? I have borne him a son singular.
In his old age. Let's talk about another one.
How about this first, Timothy Chapter 5 and verse 4. but if a
woman has children, Tina The plural containing the singular
or grandchildren, let them first learn to show piety at home and
to repay their parents for, this is good and acceptable before
God, now in this passage the word children is used without
regard to a specific number. If a widow had only one child,
the use of the word children would in no way have relieved
that person of their responsibilities.
Here's another one. And this really hits home to us.
Father's, watch this. This Ephesians 6 and 4.
And you fathers, do not provoke your children, plural,
containing the singular, taking us a word to wrath, but bring
them up in the training and admonition of the Lord, bring
them up in the training and admonition of the Lord. now
folks, that is a requirement of Father's when you have one child
or 10 children, whether you have one child or whether you have 10
children, Now, here's another one.
First, Corinthians 7:14 for the unbelieving, husband is
Sanctified by the wife and the unbelieving wife is Sanctified
by the husband. Otherwise, your children teak.
NE plural containing the singular would be unclean but
now they are holding. So what's my point?
Folks, listen, I do think I do believe that it is better for a
man to have and demonstrate the he can raise multiple children
in the house. Then he can raise them in the
training and admonition of the Lord that they could all be
faithful members of the body of Christ, that he can have, the
kind of reputation that shows that his influence, is more
important than his authority. And he has demonstrated in his
life that he could deal with multiple personalities.
And they could be children of God as I think that, that is
better than a man that has one child.
For example, in demonstrating that a man that has one child
does not disqualify him for being an elder.
Does in that. Passage the word, Tecna their
teeth. NE is the word children, which
is plural containing the singular, and Paul.
The entire point is this, he wasn't saying how large your
family is, he was talking about what the status of your family
is. He was talking about the status
of your offspring. Are they faithful?
Or are they not? Plural containing the singular.
That's exactly what he meant in. Titus 1 in 6.
That's exactly what Tina means. Now, it's the kind of family
that a man has and so what is a man to be in closing?
He's to be a one woman, man. He is to be the husband of one
wife. He is to have faithful children.
He would be a man that rules. Well, his own house.
He will be a man that has his children in subjection.
He will be a man that has the desire for the office and more.
So even the desire for the work, he will be blameless.
And there will be no sustainable charges against him.
He will be the husband of one wife, and as McGarvey said, if
he can't have more than one, then he can't have less than one
a married, man, he must be one that has faithful children, and
that means that they are all Christians.
I'm going to tell you. There's some hard
qualifications, folks? Not tell you Faithful children.
Probably disqualifies the majority of the men in the
Lord's church today. But folks, if we don't take a
literal interpretation of the requirements, then we can just
add any kind of Lux position. We want.
We can explain it all away and we could say that the
requirements don't even matter. The qualifications don't even
matter, we can throw them right out the door and we can add in
whatever we want to add in. We don't interpret anything else
in the word of God doctrinally that way.
And we can't do it regarding an elder.
Listen folks, we are teaching on the subject so that we have at
some point in time at some point spiritually minded man, that
desire, the office of an elder and are fully qualified to be so
These for we've already talked about next time.
Two weeks from today before Sunday morning, my next turn to
preach. We're going to talk about the
elders demeanor and the elders Behavior.
Now, let me just add one final thing in closing here.
One final thing. except for being the husband of one wife,
Are all of these requirements and qualifications, great things
for a Christian to Aspire to have in their life.
Absolutely. A Christian needs to be mindful
of these things. He needs to be blameless.
These are great qualities for the child of God.
So a sister that might be watching and studying with us on
these subject on the subject matters can also apply the
things that would apply her life will be better in her life too.
And one final thing. If many strove to do that and
aspire to be an elder one day and never made it.
Let's say they never made it. Don't you think they'd be better
for the cause of Christ in ever could have been They would.
We thank you for listening to our podcast, put on by the
Church of Christ at 22:15 plans. Road in Bakersfield, if you
would like any additional information or you would like to
receive a free Bible correspondence, course by mail.
Please email us at info at True Church of Christ
Bakersfield.com. Our service times are on Sundays
at 10:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. and Wednesdays at 7:30 p.m.
Please make plans to join us. We would love for you to be our
honored guest.