Music. The.
The.
Ladies and gentlemen, dance Monsieurs mirror and chads
mirror and chads mirror, chads mirror and chuckles.
Welcome to Mirror and Chuck live.
See, we could do that again after ratings start.
We hear folks with banger of a show, absolute banger about to
drop. I was going to do this
yesterday, but I thought I had AI spent some time thinking
about the political Politico piece and information about the
Young Republicans GC being outed by Politico and revealing that
there are some leaks inside the Young Republican leadership.
Allegedly. Anyways, we'll get into all
those stories in a second, but my initial, well, I was going to
initially say, I realize it's like this one's a tender one,
this one's, this one's a tricky one because a lot of people's
emotions are running high on this and I understand why.
And so we're going to try, we're going to try to thread the
needle a little bit on this one because I, I don't think there's
any winning on, on either side here.
And mostly because people don't have well defined win
conditions. The left does kind of the left's
wind condition, at least for the last little while has been, or
the progressives, if you want to call it that, has been to get,
you know, win power, gain power in any way, in any way, shape or
form and hold it, hold it indefinitely, forever and ever
and ever and ever. For what reasons, we don't know.
It doesn't really matter. It's just power is power.
And once you have it, you can use it.
And then if you use it, but you know, if the evil soulless
people start using that power, well then you get evil soulless
results. And that's where we've been kind
of circling that drain for quite a while.
But the wind conditions on the right are have never really been
well defined. Even the neo reactionary sphere
of things, it was reactionary to this sort of chaos, demonic
influences of the left and degeneracies and all the rest of
it. And the general prognosis was,
well, we're going to reverse all that.
We're going to get rid of that and we're going to
resubstantiate order and that'll be good.
And then we can go on with our life.
The major problem of course is if you spend any time in any
kind of dissident right or right wing circles of in general,
there's, there's no unity, there's no cohesion.
This has LED someone like Charles Haywood to do his own
spin. It's a, it's a take off the old
French term from the revolution, Spadzemi al Ghosh.
We need no enemies to the left. Charles said, well, there should
be no enemies to the right, that the right wing needs to coalesce
around certain narratives, around certain structures and
keep, you know, keep a narrative, let's say unity of
some sort. But that would require some sort
of ethic or ethos. Ethos.
And that's been lacking because we all live and exist in this
liberal frame. What the right wing seems to
refuse to understand is that they are just as liberal as
left. It's just that they happen to
have differences. Opinion on how that power should
be used and who should wield it. And you know what should be
promoted to children and all the rest of it.
There's still some accord core decency, well, let's say the
leftovers of Christendom still alive and beating in the right
wing. In general, and I would say all
throughout the West, almost no one wants to abandon all these
principles entirely. There's a few out there, the
destinies and all the rest of it, sure, but for the majority
and for the most part, most people will still go don't
attack the children, don't abuse animals.
As we're seeing with the Hassan Piker doggate the dog collar
gate. I'm not going to spend any more
time on that. It's, it's too much slop.
I really don't care what happens to Hassan Piker.
However, just to keep this in mind and something else I've
said before on the show, when we get to, we get to academic agent
Nema Parvini, although I prefer to use his Christian name,
Norman. So when we get to Norman
Parvini, we'll, we'll talk about more about that.
But I said this in a previous episode talking about Norman,
that Asman Gold is far more based and far more influential
and in, in terms of narrative power, has way more narrative
power than Norman could ever hope to have ever in his career.
At best academic agent. A, a Norman could maybe be the
what is it? Who's the British guy?
The, the the next Piers Morgan. And I think that's what he's
angling for. But that's about all he's ever
going to be able to do, just be sort of mushy, a mush center,
maybe vaguely right personality on air.
And God bless him. And if that's his career, good,
good for him. He's got to do.
He's got to feed his family. So, you know, we're going to do
a review and critique of Norman's new veer into attacking
right wing ideas. We'll do we'll review his
videos. You know, always in this thing
people want to see the savagery and I'm not going to hold back
on in the critique. However, I'm just going to be
very clear here, just so because you know, I'm trying to be a
good Christian here. I'm trying.
I'm really trying. I'm failing all the time, but
Lord knows I try the the thing I want to.
I don't know Norman. I don't know what his situation
is at home. I don't know his financials and
all the rest of it. It doesn't matter to me.
We're not friends, we're not allies, we're not anything.
So I feel it's he's, he puts work out, it's free to
criticize. As for him as a human being, I
don't know the dude, so I don't care.
I don't wish him any. I don't wish him.
I'll, let's put it that way. And that's about as as generous
as I'm going to be today because I'm feeling like I'm going to
get on one and it's been a while.
I need to need to stop being so damn nice.
So we're going to we're going to get into that in the second-half
of the show. We already got some people
sending in money. Harry, my good Harry Ludwig,
who's existing on a tight budget, folks.
So if Harry can send some cash, you can Sure you sure can.
Harry, this is for you. The.
Best there is, the best there was, and the best ever will be.
Damn straight. And you also get yourself a get
yourself a Dick. He's you know what?
Harry also gifted a membership. So you know what?
Harry A. Thank.
You and you also get yourself a we also got who else sends in
some money here. We also got and it's funny
enough it's not showing up on the on the the mortgage fund
down here. I'm assuming because that was
sent before we started playing, but we got can I show this on
screen? I don't think so, right, Still
lacking that we got Kenneth Wells as well.
Super fan of the show, appreciate you can't Kenneth and
you get yourself. A thank you, baby.
Damn well. Oh and Harry you sent 2 super
chats so you always get this as well.
Thank you. Sending your money honeys so I
can keep on paying the bills and especially the mortgage.
I don't want to be living on the street that would be awkward.
Be interesting content though. I think maybe I don't know see
if it's live streaming from the beach horrible all right, So
what are we going to be talking about today?
We're going to let's talk about this political situation.
So it got released this week that and I got to be careful
about how I I don't even know if I can share this screen on
YouTube because of the language being used Politico tut tut
tuts. Apparently, you see, this is
also an indication, folks, Politico can say these things,
publish these things, blot out only certain words, which I
found really interesting. If you look at the thumbnail.
And it's interesting to see the words that they blotted out in
their in their thumbnail and the other words that they left in
there. So that it's what's often times
words or context that if I were to say it, my channel would get
naked. However you can.
They can say whatever the heck they want, which is a show of
power by the way. See, if you're going to win,
you're going to win everything. You're going to take it all
because we are in war. We are at war with no matter
what political side you're on or you find yourself on, or if
you're trying to be a comfortable centrist and ride
this one out. I hate to break this to you, but
we've been at war for a very long time.
We have inherited this war and it will possibly outlive us if
unless we actually do something. Want to know why birth rates
have been collapsing? Well, birth rates tend to go
down in a war zone. We've been in a war zone for
going on at least about 80 years as far as I can figure, probably
even longer if you really want to start it.
Back before World War One, even the baby boom, as it were, was
just kind of replacing the massive population decline of
World War One, Great Depression, World War 2.
It just kind of brought the numbers back to something that
was somewhere on par where it was before World War One.
Oops. Entire towns got completely like
vape. You know, their entire male
population got vaporized. Some of the we're seeing here in
Ukraine right now where they're lowering the consent age for
well, they're lowering the age of conscription to put on
military age for active combatants.
They moved it from 25 to 24 next year or by the end of this year,
beginning of next year will be moved down to 23.
Expectations is by by 2027, they'll be down to 20, which
means that they'll be, they're basically recruiting 15 and 16
year olds to do advanced training.
So right now in Ukraine, if you're below the age, you know,
1515 and above, you're probably being either taken off the
streets and put in the military or soon will be They're
vaporizing the entire the entire generations.
Go watch me and Jim jot just talk about this stuff.
If if you actually want to get an analysis and not sit around
for slop, Well, you know, we do, we do try.
So we've been in this war in one way shape or form for quite some
time. And it's taking the toll, it's
taking the toll on birth numbers.
It's taking the toll on people's mental health.
It's taking the a toll on on finances and just people's
general sense of hopeless of hopefulness, which is at all
time lows. The the bitter white pill here
for secularists is that you can fix that anytime you want by
going to liturgy and talking to your priest and tipping your
streamer, by the way. But all these three things
combined, this does this magical stuff, the, the cumulative
effects of the last, let's say, 120 years have been just sort of
like the, the crash course of liberalism in general.
This is where liberalism, all the ideologies have kind of come
together in this new state of things.
And we're watching that that inertia start to take over.
And so the the bottomless pit, nihilism is yawning open and
many people are very concerned, but they don't know what to be
concerned about. People are angry, but they don't
really know where to direct the anger.
People maybe people want answers.
And quite often all they get are, you know, start a standard
wrote. What are we going to call it?
Like it's pablum, it's just we just read off the teleprompter,
it's going to repeat the same things.
It's fine, it's fine. This is what the markets usually
do. It's fine, It's fine.
It's just the pendulum swinging. It's.
Fine, don't worry about it. Or be very afraid or be very
scared. Or, you know, black pill.
It's just all to SAP all your energy and keep all your
attention away from things that actually matter, like your
family or building 1. Like getting good with God,
embrace it. So do I share this on the
screen? I don't think I can
unfortunately. I'll read a little bit of it.
This is political. I love HH leaked messages expose
young Republicans racist chat. I'll go basically if you read
the political ad, it's, I mean, you know, it's pretty standard
stuff. It's picking and choosing out of
all these conversations that were going on for about 7
months. Again, I, I would love to read
more of this. However, I think if every single
paragraph I would read, unless I do the whole, you know, live
censoring of my speech and changing to grape and all the
rest of it, it's it's silly. I wouldn't be able to get
through it. So essentially it's this is that
the Young Republicans, this group that essentially are, are,
are training and financing and getting young people into
politics in the political wings, getting them contacts,
resources, all the rest of it. Catherine Whiteford famously is
also part of the Young Republicans.
I think she's one of the good ones, But they had this GC on
Telegram. It gets exposed, gets leaked.
We'll get to who likely leaked it to political and political
releases this and the response was pretty standard.
So this comes out and the young Republican leadership has to
come out and say this. This I can share.
I'm pretty sure we are appalled by the vile and inexcusable
language revealed in the political article published
today. Such behavior is disgraceful,
unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition
to the values of our movement. Our movement represents.
Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within
their state and local Young Republican organizations.
We must hold ourselves the highest standards of integrity,
respect and professionalism. And this is from the board of
directors of the Young Republicans.
Now people read this, many people, Warren McIntyre, many
others and took aim against it, saying this, of course, is what
the right does, right? Conservatives, instead of
standing with each other and and defending each other, turn
around and throw themselves and throw the offending parties
under the bus. So, you know, people get
offended by something and the first thing the Republicans do
is agree with them and get rid of of the offending parties.
JD Vance has come out with his own statement about this, and
this is apparently a leaked messaging from the possible
future attorney general of Virginia who is basically
calling for political violence and the murder of children of
one of his opposition of someone in the Republican Party in the
in in in Virginia. JD Van says this is far worse
than anything said in the college group check and the guy
who said it could become the AG of Virginia.
I refuse to join the Pearl clutching when powerful people
call for political violence. The leaked screen chat says you
simply. You weren't simply asking
questions and you know it. I generally was.
I wasn't attacking, I was trying to understand your logic.
You weren't trying to understand.
You were talking about hoping Jennifer Gilbert's children
would D and he's and then the AG possible future AG says yes.
I've told you this before. Only when people feel pain
personally do they move on policy.
So concerning stuff, eventual son demonic activities basically
saying he's totally OK with his opponent's children being
attacked because he thinks she's a brown shirt and all brown
shirts are going to influence their children become brown
shirts. So they must be eradicated.
The, you know, route to stem. Now wind conditions.
This is where it gets tricky because on one hand we can steal
man the young Republican situation and somebody say that.
Well, let's put it this way. Let's let's go back and forth
here. Yes, the left and many of the
Democrats or people in the Democratic parties or people who
vote Democrat are supported by the Democrats have crossed too
many lines. Now they cross too many lines
and they are entering into full on demon possession, right.
We don't need to give them a whole bunch of considerations.
I don't think we need to carry water for anybody.
I don't think we need to excuse them at all.
And we also have to realize that they are now becoming enemy.
They become enemy because they view anybody who doesn't agree
with him completely as enemy. And as we've seen what they do
to their own ranks. And this is kind of cuts against
that whole idea that Padzania Ghosh, it's like, oh, no, no,
no, the left will, will, will will have enemies to the left.
It's just that once you become an enemy left, you're no longer
left. They just poochie out the party.
You're no longer concerned. We've seen this happen to many
progressive voices, people who were part of the left and said
had a problem with something and then they got kicked out of the
party. My goodness, 10 Mirren Shuck now
gifts memberships by Harry. Thank you, Harry.
Appreciate you. Thank you to all the new
members. The so you were at war and that
means people have to start acting like it.
And I don't think that's really hit people completely yet, both
on the distance sphere, although many people have, you know, kind
of vocalized this after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
I think that was a wake up call to many people to understand how
things have gotten really hot now and they're going to have to
start responding. But people are responding very
quick, very slowly, and very predictably because most people
being used to being a commentary reactionary, they comment, they
they moan, they point things out, they call things out, they
call things out on the left. And the rights, aren't they so
great? Look, I do this.
Anyone who does any content creation does this is what you
do, right? But it doesn't lead to anything,
doesn't change anything. It's not acquiring power at all.
The young Republicans and people who have been voted onto those
boards, the young Republicans are learning how to be get into
position of taking power. That's their, that would be what
their wind condition would be. You're in this group.
That's that group's going to graduate into, into positions of
political power and they're going to go and chase that power
to use it, to wield it. If you're doing this when you're
in war, then loose lips in GCS can't happen.
You can't have traders who will sell out that GC to Politico,
and you certainly can't have people inside those GCS acting
as if this is a party. It's a good game.
It's not a game, or let's just put it this way, it's the game
you are playing the capital. THE game.
Capital G, you got to play it to win it when you're reading.
I've been reading EM Burlingame's Eternal War, Hope
to get EM on the show fairly soon.
He makes a distinction between the game and the war, and both
things kind of work within each other.
But at the same time, you don't get confused of what you're at,
where you're at. So saying spicy things to each
other and joking about these things and using that language.
And that's all just kind of like, that's just dissonant
language. That's just, you know, GC talk
from, from, from X groups. I've been, I've been a bunch of
them. Yeah, we say some, some words
are used in certain GCS I've just seen.
I don't know, I've never been part of it, but I've heard tell,
let's say of language being used in certain GCS.
That would be It was shocking, But hardly anyone in those GCS
is vying or trying to run for political office or presenting
themselves as a political wing, as a organization within a
political wing that has to, on some level, appeal to the masses
to appeal to the center. People who maybe want to like
the Republicans, maybe want to like Donald Trump, but will take
any excuse to say, Oh no. Oh, gross.
This was the same basic advice I gave to libertarian parties when
they were sharing the meme of, of, of the daughter crying at
her at her father's funeral, Liz Cheney crying at her dad's
funeral. And they're like ha ha ha,
because he's, they're evil. I'm like, ha ha, ha, this is
gross. This reads bad.
So when you're saying spicy, spicy things in GCS, not that,
not that they should have been revealed, not that they should
have been betrayed by their own, by their own organization, No,
we'll get to that in a second. Because there's, there is a, a
bitter white pill here. But if you're at war, you got to
start acting like it. Loose lips sink ships.
And that's going to be realized from the entire hierarchy, from
the top to the bottom. JD seems to get him because what
he's basically saying here is like, yeah, look, there's way
worse things being said with way by way more serious people who
will wield way more serious political power than the younger
Republicans would do at the at this at this time there.
That's way more concerning for us at a minute right now.
And he's right because JDI think understands they're at war.
And every single misstep and every single kind of misfire of
narrative cost you something. You're giving the enemy
something that it wants. Now, if I were on the board of
directors for the Young Republicans, I wouldn't have
fired these guys, right? I would suspend them during
pending an investigation, stopping some risks, you know,
give me some penalties. Sims, take him aside and go shut
the fuck up, OK? We're not children here.
I know it's young Republicans. I know you're all kids and some
of that, you know, relative age. But you can't got to stop acting
like that. Never give the enemy something
easy. At the same time you investigate
and you try to find out who leaked this to Politico.
Because automatically when I read this, I'm like, OK, so did
Politico have a guy inside? Did did someone leak something?
What's going on here? How did they get this
information? And then we have it from Milo
himself. Milo here says I've acquired the
sworn affidavit. Affidavit.
Sorry. Affidavit, affidavit, affidavit,
Affidavit. Written and signed by Michael
Bartels, the victim of Gavin Wax's blackmail op.
So the guy who's being named here is Gavin Wax.
He's one of the presidents of the let me get this sized up a
bit of the young Republicans essentially in here in the in
the affidavit. See if we can read this better.
Michael Bartels was was asked to hand over all the all the
telegram messages so they can be used.
I'll read this briefly. In the affidavit, Michael R
Bartels of Washington, District Columbia being duly sworn,
disposes a firm upon oath. I was in a group chat using the
application Telegram affiliated with Restore YR the Restore YR
chat. To my knowledge the Restore YR
chat the same group text Politico has attempted to
obtain. I was on August 8th 16th, 2025
the Executive Secretary of the New York Young Republicans Club.
I was demanded to provide a full log of Restore Why our chat by
Gavin Wax over dispute about related matters on August 16th,
2025. This demand was made via
telephone and to my knowledge was not recorded.
When I was attempted to resist the demand after providing some
of the required information, Wax threatened my professional
standing and raised the possibility of potential legal
action related to a latest breach of non disclosure
agreement. My position with the New York or
the New York Young Republican Club was directly threatened.
Actually this this conversation when I did not provide the logs,
I was removed from access to most communication channels,
leadership chats and my e-mail. Mutual contacts also began to
receive alleged call, sorry, alleged details on my personal
life from wax etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
So who is this wax character is the question.
And I'm going to actually do something that's a little bit
out of character here. I'm actually going to probably
agree with Nick Fuentes for a second.
I know, strange times, my friends, strange times.
Because Gavin Wax is a New York based conservative activist,
commentator, columnist and operative.
He serves as a 76th president of the New York Young Republican
Club, the oldest and largest youth group within the blah,
blah, blah, blah blah, right? So he's the president.
You might have asked why Gavin Wax is doing all this stuff.
You know, we can get to some speculations, but here's what
Nick Fuentes has going to say about it.
Because they're going to put this out to Politico and the
headline is going to be Generation Z.
The young white men are all Nazis.
We have a Nazi problem. And what do you think this does
for every under 30 white Republican, white man,
conservative in politics, huge target on their backs.
This puts pressure on TikTok and X to censor.
It puts pressure on Republicans to denounce and close ranks and,
and, you know, tighten up and it gives the left ammunition
because it justifies, especially after what happened, not just
that Charlie Kirk was shot, but that so many of the left wing
people were punished for celebrating Charlie Kirk's
death. I mean.
See, unforced errors always do the most damage.
Always. Because if I'm baiting you in,
we're, we're going back and forth and you slip up something
or you open, you know, you fall into one of my traps or
something like that. You could, you could maybe get
yourself out of it right there. You have tricks and you're,
you're being aware. You're aware of the conflict.
You're aware of your situation when it's unforced.
Now everyone has to scramble. They weren't prepared for this
one. They didn't know maybe that they
were being investigated or about to be, you know, having all
their stuff revealed by Politico.
So you're just giving the enemy tons of ammunition.
Don't do that, ever. Just shut up.
You don't have to post all this stuff online in AGC, especially
when you get elected to a position you're part of, a group
has a Republican on it, that means they're going to use you.
They'll use you if you just voted MAGA.
If you've worn a hat, they'll use you as a stat.
They'll make up stuff. You want to force them to make
up stuff. The more they have to lie to
attack you, the more you can expose the lie, the more they
can just point to something like AGC law can go see, look at them
saying this stuff. They want to, they want to, you
know, gas, gas room that yeah, they want to talk about all this
other stuff. Now I get it.
The people in the in the GC probably weren't being serious.
They're saying spicy things because it's fun.
It's, you know, it's pressed language, so it's fun to say it.
Right, I get it. I've done it, you've done it.
We've all done it in our own way.
But you got to be very careful about what you say right now,
where you put it out there, especially if you, you know,
you're you're what you're looking to achieve is mainstream
acceptance. Just because Trump got elected
and it's been not even a full calendar year doesn't mean you
just get to say and do whatever you want.
If anything, Trump getting elected and these things
starting to move now and across the across the globe, we're
seeing populist movements at least gain a lot more traction.
That just means it's going to get a lot more dangerous.
You are far safer to say what you wanted to say and whatever
spicy terms you wanted to say it maybe not publicly because you
said publicly you got you got cancelled, but you could say it
privately, you could say it in GCS, you could say it on certain
sites. And so that's sure, here's your
problem. Now they're going to come after
all of it because you are actually now a threat.
Before you weren't before you're a punching bag.
Now you're going to be a threat. It's also what I'm getting at.
Where's my prediction I made? I actually made it privately
last December, and I'd said it publicly in April.
That a lot of people you thought were based are going to prove to
you that they aren't going to suddenly show themselves to not
be all that based. Partly is going to be their own
defense, their own OP sack, Right?
This. That's reasonable.
The other part of it is they never really were based to begin
with. They were doing the fun thing or
the interesting thing or they found a vacuum and content and
they were using it. And as soon as as, as soon as
they understand that now it's gotten serious, they're going to
flip a switch and say and do whatever they need to do to
either get protected or get accepted.
Validation. At the end of the day, it's all
about acknowledgement. Acknowledgement and validation.
Acknowledge me. Read the room so if this.
Oops, my audio has gone out for some reason.
Hang on. There we go.
Story is true, then that means Gavin Wax is a traitor.
Traitor to his generation, to young white men, to right
wingers, to free speech, all of it.
And of course, it should not be lost on anybody who Gavin Wax
is. And you know, listen, I've
talked to Gavin Wax before. I think I have.
I'm not a fan of the guy. And, you know, people have said,
oh, you know, he likes you, he wants to meet you, this sort of
thing. But at the end of the day, guy's
Jewish. And not only that, it's not just
that, OK, which is, you know, people might say, well, he's
part of the Zionist Organization of America.
Isn't he sent up to be in the World Zionist Congress in some
kind of position? The guy's deeply embedded in pro
Israel politics, and that's no coincidence.
Think about the time and place. He's from New York City.
Just put this in context too, especially about Zionism on top
of this liberal frame. Zionism is inside that liberal
frame. It's just a it's a formalized
ideology of liberalism. It still rests on the same
tenants of liberalism, nominalism, individualism,
nationalism, even materialism, all these things that are that
predicate the frame, that basically are the foundations of
the frame. Zionism falls into that as well,
right? Just different percentages,
different levels of spice. That's it.
So, and I've said this too, is that Zionism is now becoming the
last holdout ideology of the 20th century.
We're evolving. It's evolving into this new
thing. I don't think it breaks the
frame, but the thing that's going to replace all these
ideologies I think is going to be a shibboleth.
It's a sort of a combination of all the, of all the ideologies
into one, into one pure frame. The true, the, let's say the
we're not post liberal and we're certainly not liberalism isn't
dying. It's it's evolving into its
final form, which will be a totalitarian, authoritarian form
of the frame substantial. You, you before it was sort of
like just suggested you could be liberal.
Please be liberal. It's nice to be liberal.
Everything is liberal, but just ignore all that Now it'll be
very, very, very clear to people that no, no, this is liberalism
and you either are on board or you're off to gulag.
Bye bye now permanent Siberia. This is a threat of digital IDs
and panopticons and all the rest of it, because what's going to
be a substantiated in this is pure ideology, totalizing of it,
and Zionism is just part of that.
It's not distinct, it's not different, It's not set apart.
It's simply 11 node inside of the frame.
Don Brownie, nice to see you. Help me hit that goal.
Folks, over on YouTube, we hit that goal tomorrow.
I will do a power washing stream while listening a little bit.
Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones, my goodness, talking about
global death cults and all the fun stuff.
I'll I'll play that and play some power washing and do some
commentary. So let me hit that goal and I
will make sure that happens tomorrow, Friday.
Jewish President of the New York Young Republicans.
He's sent up for a position, I think it's either the ZOA or the
WJC. He's a, I'm not making that up.
He's either a delegate for the ZOA or the WJC or the the WZO,
World Zionist Organization or Zionist Organization of America.
I didn't do my research before the show and this was something
else that I saw earlier I either this year or last year.
Yeah, the bagel influence is always there, Harry.
The thing is, and This is why I keep trying to get through to
people, it's not, it's not just the bagels.
Even Zionism as a as an ideology is not purely bagel.
It certainly benefits them. It might have been even invented
by them to benefit them, sure, no problem.
But it's not just them, right? Zionism can apply to anyone at
any time. There's Zionist Christians,
there are neocons who are Zionist, there's many people who
are not bagel and very much a Zionist and doing the work of a
Zionist because it's an ideology, This particular one,
it's a very odd one. It's a mutated form of, of,
let's say classic liberalism, but it's all, it all goes back
to the same roots, all of it. And if you want to defeat it,
you don't just defeat the the, the bagels.
You don't just toss them out 110 times because they've gotten a
little stale. No, no, no.
You got to destroy the the fundamentals of the ideologies
themselves, the thing that holds the frame together, which are
these mental categories, nominalism, materialism,
individualism, even nationalism. We're going to get to that when
we talk with Norman or listen to Norman talk about nationalism
because he's, because he's spoiler alert, I'm actually
probably going to agree with Norman quite a bit on certain
things because theoretically, yes, 100% we can all be in
agreement. Practically, however, there's a
big fall off. And This is why listening to
academics is a disease. It only gets you so far.
And usually what it gets you to is just chasing your own tail.
It's just they're an offshoot of the Merchants of Despair.
The Merchants of Slop are or the Slop Merchants are just a
subsidiary of the Merchants of Despair.
They do this, they work for the same people.
It's the same kind of company, same mall, just slightly
different goods. He's with Chuck Schumer, the
senator from New York, a Democrat, honoring his grandma,
who he says was a Holocaust survivor now.
For context, the grandma was in Italy in the 1940s.
That's a Holocaust survivor now, so.
Wow, it was during the time of the Holocaust and she survived?
What two things? Go figure, Gavin Watch, the
provocative, plucky chair of the New York Young Republicans,
which is a pretty edgy club. I mean, they host the gala every
year and that's all these people fucking talk about.
No offense to them, but all the NYRC, all I'd ever talk about is
how, you know, Jeremy Fragrance went to the fucking club one
year and it's like no one's ever heard of the end of it.
But anyway. Look, the lovers of power are
still controlled by connections. It's who you know.
You know the right people and you're in the right clubs and
you go to the right gals and you shake the right hands and you're
introduced the right people and the right people like you.
Guess what? You get invited to go to other
places and maybe along the way you get to hold position because
if you want to run for office and all that stuff, what do you
need? You need connections.
You need the right people to go yes, we like you.
Let's give them money. Let's give them the the push.
You got to get a push from the office always.
You know this, this is wrestling stuff, man.
It's not just kayfabe. It's you do have to get a push
from the office. So if you're going to go out
there and basically say to yourself, I'm not going to do
all that stuff, I'm going to I'm going to work from outside the
system. Well, the system is now I'm
going to see you as enemy. So if you I'll put it this way,
I'm totally on board and fine. Anyone who follows this channel
knows I keep saying this all the time.
It's like, look, politics in the whole political system as we
have it right now is Meshugana. It's diseased, it's rotted, it's
cancerous. It's it's not going to work.
It's not going to give you what things you want you you want to
it for it to produce misfired up says family of seven heading
towards baptism in December. New the channel.
Best of luck to you. Thank you misfired up.
God bless, family of seven, head towards baptism.
My goodness, glory to God. But I can say all that we can
say that being in the system is no good.
The system itself is no good. However, it still exists.
It's the system that you got. So sitting outside, they're
going, oh, we're going to go do this other thing.
It's like, OK, well, good, good for you, but it's not going to
work. You're going to get nothing done
zero to be a commentator on on YouTube.
Congratulations. And maybe if you're useful
enough because you're really working for the system, you just
have this appearance, you're outside of it that maybe they'll
they'll, they'll bring you back in.
What did Tulsi do right? Tulsa was in the system.
She got balanced out. She went and did her YouTube
thing and waited around and then they then they called her back
in. So it can be done.
But whether you're, if you're outside the system, you're just
trying to get back in, if you're in the Indies, man, you really
want to work for the WWE or AW or one of the bigger companies,
you want that. Why?
Because that's, that's exposure, that's validation, that's.
Acknowledge me. Every single time.
That's the name of the game. And it's not a criticism.
That's human. This is human.
You need a certain amount of acknowledgement, a certain
amount of of prestige, a certain amount of authority or be in a
in a system that has authority to borrow from it to get things
done. Otherwise you're just some
schmuck and a hoodie. Your your, your follower counts
and all that stuff. Doesn't matter if you can't get
things done. OK, OK.
He just detailed here, Nick just detail the fact that through 11
expose by Politico, all these other dominoes are happening.
Young Republicans have to come out and and and get get distance
from this X and all these other social platforms are going to
now start to censor because it's going to you know, we're going
to lose sponsorship and all the rest of it.
Why? Because the mushy middle is
still going to be reactive to this thing.
Good for you. Anyone in the chat who's been
the last five or so years, like many of us trying to figure
things out, right? The events of 2020 woke a lot of
people up. Even before that, people were
going, hey, something's wrong here.
And this is fundamentally not OK.
And now we're, we're, we're searching for things And you
find little groups and you find that and you say little things
and you're, and you're trying to work things out.
And maybe, you know, Old Glory Club and many of these other
groups have sprung up trying to get things done and good for
them. God bless.
That's the proper way of using this, of going forward with
things. That being said, you still need
people in the inside somewhere, local politics, something,
because the rest of the world responds to that.
The title mayor still means something.
Even if you're the mayor of some podunk little town, you have
more power than Bob because you're the mayor.
You're mayor, Bob. Not just, you know, schmucky
muck Bob. See, the title holds authority.
Authority is is necessary for sovereignty of any kind.
Any decision making needs to come down to the the metaphysics
of sovereignty. We'll get into that later in the
second-half of the show because it's really what comes.
What's the big question is who is sovereign?
Is anybody sovereign? Whatever term you use, is
sovereignty still allowed within the liberal frame?
I would argue no, that any time you say the word sovereignty,
it's an empty term. It's the word concept fallacy.
Sovereign is he who chooses the exception.
But who are the exceptions really, if the end result is
always the same? And that is what they're all
shooting for in one way, shape or form.
It just matters how it takes shape.
If you get 15 minute cities in 20 years, whether it's from a
Republican plan or a liberal plan or a Russian plan or
American or Israeli or whatever, whatever plan produces it, you
still get it. That's what you still get.
Maybe, maybe it's a it's done in the form that you can find
acceptable congratulations, but that's what it is.
See. Or digital ID or any of these
other things that are big spooky things.
They are concerning because they're being invented,
propagated and instigated, instigated and
institutionalized, let's say by very bad people, generally
speaking. Not your favorite guy.
I'm talking about the other guys, sure, but you get what I'm
saying, right? Let's do a little bit more Nick,
and then we'll get to to Norman. That's like kind of like an
inside joke. But so he's at this club.
It's a pretty edgy club. Like Steve Bannon goes to their
thing that some of the rhetoric's a little edgy and
he's with the Senate Minority Leader, former Senate Majority
Leader of the Democrats, another Jew from New York, Chuck
Schumer, honoring his grandma who he claims was in the
Holocaust. She's.
OK, Anyways, yeah, yeah, we get it.
Jew. Jew.
Jew, Jew. Jew.
Jew, Jew, Right.
The the, the the, the issue is this really.
Why did this wax guy, Gavin Wax? Why did he leak this to
Politico? Why was the language really all
that concerning? Was the positions all that
really outside the box? What what's going on?
What Gavin is concerned about is appearances, and he wants a
certain kind of appearance. He might be a double agent.
He might be sent there to basically undermine the entire
organization. It could happen, but most likely
it's just that, hey, he wants to be validated and he wants to be
invited to galas and he wants a hobnob with very respectable
people and very respectable people don't say certain things.
You can't be a flat earther and be and be part of the club.
Not defending flat earthers. I'm saying that somebody's
saying if they find out you're pro flat earther, guess what,
Boo bye Boo. Who's that?
Can't be, AHH, cost denier or questioner.
Let's say question the certain narratives at all.
And guess what? You're no longer invited to the
galas. You're not interested.
They're not interested in you. Power plays, all the stuff.
Yeah, these are all rationalizations after the fact.
It all comes down to acknowledge.
Me. Every single time.
It's how I can make that prediction.
Very soon, people that you thought were based are going to
turn out not to be. How can I make that prediction
so accurately? Because it comes down to
memetics. Figure out a man's desire and
suddenly he becomes fairly predictable.
Not entirely. Hey, sometimes people can
surprise you. Sometimes, you know, someone has
a a real core virtue that we just didn't see, and God bless
them for that. But.
In most cases, that is not the case.
In most cases, especially in the media sphere, what people really
want is acknowledgement. They want power.
They want to be invited to the nice places and talk to the nice
people and got on the big shows and you know, don't get a big
don't get brought into Piers Morgan as the as a punching
dummy, you know, as the as the effigy of of all that is wrong.
And Piers will do that. But no, you want they want to
get on the bigger shows and be treated like an equal, respected
equal because you know, you're very respectable, right?
You have you have a degree. Taught at Oxford.
Or wherever the heck he did. Then you get booted out for some
reason and he went back in, but you went back in on your terms.
You want to be right, I'm right, you're wrong.
It's a very powerful motivation. So brings it to a now this got
brought to me in AGC that Norman here, it's his Christian name
has started producing a whole series of what is he calling
this now? Norman Parvini versus right wing
ideas is #3 nationalism. It's on a few of these.
If you guys like this, when we're done, let me know and I'll
do more because this is, I think is a classic example of yet
again, you can be right in theory, but wrong in practice.
And especially when we get into certain word concept fallacies,
you're going to see that it, it doesn't reach people.
It doesn't matter if what you're saying is phonetically correct
and you pick up the dictionary and you see point to the word
CC. No one uses it that way.
No one thinks of it that way and no one's working in that
reality. If you want people to work in
that reality, then then the job is to get them to work in that
reality. That's a whole different kind of
set of objectives. So let's get into this, and
especially about his concept around nationalism.
Welcome to another edition of Neema Parvini versus Right Wing
ideas. I am Neema Parvini and today I'm
going to be talking about let's. See if this.
Nationalism and why I've never, in all these years, ever once
referred to myself as a nationalist.
I have here a book by John Mearsheimer called The Tragedy
of Great Power Politics. Now again, I'm I'm going to be
trying to be as fair as possible.
I I also I've never considered myself a nationalist.
However, I don't confuse my personal ideas, beliefs, frame
front of my all the rest of it with that which should be
adopted by others. I I don't confuse these two
things because I understand that I can set myself apart.
That's a personal decision and one because of my living
situation and who I am and how I am and all the rest of it makes
an easy one for me. I've always been sort of a
mental expat. So living as an expat here in
Australia, it makes it even easier.
I, I care, I have to care even less, which is wonderful.
But but I make also no mistake that just 'cause that's my
frame, my way of looking at the world and living, that it should
be everyone else's. That'd be silly.
You don't be like me, bad back, constantly irritated.
It's, it's not. It's not fun.
Note that he doesn't call it tragedy of power politics
between nations. That is because all of.
Yeah, He also, he doesn't call it a whole bunch of other things
too. He didn't know if the volume's
OK on this because it's coming through a little low on my end
and I can probably boost it. Hang on a second here, let's
boost the volume of it. The powers he considers in this
book were or are empires. All of these books I have behind
me are the histories of empires. This is this is such a sneaky
tactic. It's sneaky, right?
It's it's the you're it's a wiggle out, right.
I don't call myself a nationalist.
I call myself an empiricist. Oh, good for you.
Does it? Do you live in an empire
currently? They're they're Norman.
Do you really? Is the British Empire still a
thing? I say it is, but you know,
you're free to disagree. But so he's basically, he's
going to say the the American empire exists and the Russian
Empire exists and the Chinese empire exists today.
It's a heck of a statement. None of these countries would
ever admit to or have ever claimed that they are an empire.
They do claim that there are nations or republics or
something like that. If you're going to claim that a
that an empire is simply a a large, let's say a large region
with with many different sub regions included in it that are
all subservient to the main region.
So let's say in Russia, Well you have Chechnyans and many other
groups who are formed part of the Russian Republic.
Fair enough, but then that could apply to many places.
Canada would be then an empire if that's your definition of
empire. Large landmass made different
groups and language and ethnic groups, the French and Acadians
and many others natives etcetera, all held together
under 1 dominion, right? It's called the Dominion of
Canada. So is that the Empire of Canada?
Not so much right. Australia up to the 1960s had
dominion over over many of the islands here in this in the in
the Pacific that there was a was do we talk about Australia being
an empire? No.
Interesting. So right away we're into a word
concept fallacy. Now I understand when he says
empire, I understand exactly what he means.
Yeah. Empiricis the Imperium.
Yeah, I understand. I understand that Russia used to
be. And I believe is on would like
to be again an empire. I think that China more or less
thinks as an empire, if we want to use it, that that term, The
other term we could just use, which is a lot, lot easier is
civilization. Do you have a civilization or
don't you? Now, I've said publicly that you
no longer live in a civilization that none of us in the West do
They're, you know, the, the, the global American empire or
whatever you want to call it is no longer a civilization.
It's a group, it's a function. It's a system.
It's a this it's a that's a whatever.
Sure, but it's not a civilization.
It doesn't do what civilizations need to do Don Browning $10.
Thank you so much. World War 2 advertisement.
Keep mum. Either keep your mouth shut.
Yeah. And look if at the end of the
day, if Norman's doing all this because he lives in Britain and
Britain is getting crazy out there, right?
It's getting kind of crazy in the UK and he's just getting
ahead of it saying, hey, whoa. Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Before you start describing all these ideas to me, let me just
make very clear how I feel about this, that and the other thing.
I don't blame him for it OK? I do not blame him if this is
his defense off SEC OK. I do not blame him for it.
I don't blame him if he wants to be the nearest new Piers Morgan.
I don't blame him or have any ill words for him if this is
his. He thinks that this new track
will get him into the right conversations and and be able to
feed his family so that don't blame him.
Have nothing against him for that.
However, just keep in mind that many of these same people are
not going to give up their right wing credit cards, their social
credit cards in the right wing. They're not going to sacrifice
that. They might get revoked by
certain people, but they're going to be held up by by the by
the establishment as the new right, right.
Do these people reflect your values?
Do these people reflect your your ways of thinking?
Probably not. And even if you live in Britain,
maybe maybe you live in Britain, but certainly not if you live in
America. And fundamentally it's because
these these folks. And remember, I'm not saying
anything disparaging about about Norman, the human being, just
Norman the character here. The one thing I will say
disparaging about it is there are no ethics, there is no ethos
here. It's self-serving.
It is here to do 1 purpose and one purpose only, which is to
get Norman. Acknowledge me.
Acknowledgement, validation position, That's what it's for.
So watch if you want, but keep keep this in mind.
Because the history of the world is the history of empires.
Before I get going here, pick up a course at the academic agency.
Promo code Shredder gets you 25% off.
You know what you could easily say they're the history of the
world is the history of religions.
You know, Yes, empires are one thing.
Civilizations can exist with or without an empire.
Some of the greatest, some of the greatest civilizations on
the earth that that moved entire continents and moved entire
swaths of history were not empires.
Venice was not an empire. City of London.
The look, when we start getting into into shipping lanes, we
start talking about the Dutch East East India Company or the
British East India Company. Were they an empire?
No. Now you might attach them to an
empire, but the the Netherlands were never an empire.
Never vaguely. If you go back and vaguely
attach them to the Holy Roman Empires, and we're not sure
which were neither, which was neither holy nor Roman.
Discuss. Oh, a feeling of a clump.
You can, you can attach it to whatever you want, man.
The history of mankind is based on, you know, technology works.
Goodbye's course, though, of course.
I'm sure it's great. I'm sure it's fantastic.
For all courses I'll play the AD and when I come back I'm going
to talk about nationhood and Empire promo code.
Right away, we're seeing shorts. We all know what that means.
Oh shredder world class education good night to you by
school. Good night to you by woke
university. Well, no more pick up your
course today. I.
Don't even know what he's using. It's like the world's tiniest,
crappiest wood chipper, which he's, which he's definitely
afraid of. It's got every single guard in
the world, right. Look at the safety guards.
He's wearing his what? And what is this too?
He's wearing shorts. So it's warm enough to wear
shorts, apparently, but cold enough to wear a puffy jacket
and gloves and just be kind of like twigs.
Oh, the marsh might get up in my face.
Are you wearing a screen guard too?
Come on now. 25% off all courses with promo code shredder.
That history of the world is the history of empires.
Again, we can say the history of the world is the history of
affinity anymore. And as such.
History of the world is a history of books.
Literacy. History of the world is a
history of hats. I'm in the abstract, I believe
is utopian and unrealistic and I've developed this view over
many years. I've listened to a great many
self avowed nationalists, white nationalists and so on, and it
strikes me that their view is unrealistic.
For example, what does it mean to be a bell?
I would go on the limb here, tree surgeon and say that all
courses, online courses are essentially useless now with AI,
with AI and Grok and all the rest of it, you can literally go
into chat with GBT for free and say give me a course, design a
course for me and it will just spit one out for you.
If it doesn't do it like verbatim like in a in a 12 port
12 part course, which I'm sure you could get it to do as well.
You could have it just have video links and you sit there
and watch the videos. All of this stuff is the whole
academic revolution, let's say is done, it's finished bye.
Not saying the the information isn't, but the fact is we're we
have the problem of having too much data.
We have way too much data, especially when he gets into
gets into commentary. It's basically the bond market,
right? You have the derivatives market,
so you have bonds that are bought and sold and that's easy
to understand, right? OK, fine, commodities, assets,
etcetera. Sure, fine.
Then you get into derivatives and what they can basically do
with the bonds themselves and how many times they can sell it
and all the rest of it. And all of a sudden you're like,
Oh my goodness, This is why it's so screwed.
When you add commentary on to information, any data, every
single piece of data now has new commentary.
So the political piece, right political rights writes an
article and it spawns how many responses to that to to that
article? Thousands now with AI could
reach into the millions easily in different languages.
Everyone respond to you. Everyone can give their hot
take. I just did it.
New branch of information, and from that information, anyone
can branch off that and branch off that and branch off that.
So from one node, from one little piece of data, you can
have almost infinite amount of responses to that to that data
to the point where once you add in differentiation and all these
other little human things, all of a sudden, by the end of it,
you're no longer talking about political, you're talking about
something else entirely. But it's still the root is still
there. So when you get into these
courses and sort of academic analysis, one too much ink has
been spilled almost every single basic topic.
All you can do is revitalize a topic, bring it back into
conversation. You know, a a was big was big
into Carlisle and Yar of it and all the rest of it and use that
to gain ground when a lot of people are looking for answers
and looking for answers outside of the mainstream, me being one
of them. Certainly I still am.
The thing is that my all my all my searches led me to orthodoxy
and once I get it gets to once I got to Orthodoxy, I'm like, I
don't have to keep looking. I can keep examining and
utilizing and and using my developing front of A to examine
the world and produce content and discussions for you fine
folks, but I don't have to keep looking for where are the
answers? It's right there, all of it.
In fact, every single time I pick up a new thing and reading
it and go, Oh, this is interesting.
And then I kind of cross reference it back to the church
fathers. I find out that there's almost
almost for certain there is a church father from 1000 years
ago or whatever who said this exact thing, who discussed this
concept or who, you know, utilize Christian, the Christian
frame to predict these kind of these kind of outcomes.
To AT kind. Of makes everything else
redundant, doesn't it? So.
Norman here is going to try to make a distinction between
empire and nationalism. Then the idea of nationalism.
Now I happen to agree here that nationalism is born out of that
post enlightenment exists in that liberal frame.
Don't talk about empires anymore.
Empires require monarchs also require religions also create
also require distinct and permanent regions and peoples.
They're defined. The in Group is always the in
Group. Rome had a very clear idea of
who Romans were. When they stopped having a clear
idea of who Romans were, Rome fell apart.
It wasn't discussion about who, you know, the high times of
Rome. Romans were Romans and they
weren't, you know, the they weren't Gauls, for example, or
Persians. Keep it in mind.
You also need a religion. You need it.
Religion, in whatever form it is, is a repository of
tradition. It is how we keep and record
tradition and make tradition live in the present and carried
out the future. Tradition is inherent.
Is is important because it binds people together.
It gives them a sense of being, of meaning.
Without it, people have no sense of meaning.
They have no connection to the past.
The present is just what you're doing.
And the future becomes very attractive and novel.
But it's just a wizzle wazzle, you know, out there in the
wilderness. It's a seat of anxiety,
depression, nihilism. You get rid of religion,
guaranteed you no longer have a civilization, period.
I've said there's three things, three things.
A Reggio, right? The Reggio that binds
civilization together, that gives it purpose, is a ruler or
governing system. Let's say a religion and a
region, which includes both a border, land and a people,
culture, language, that which you know, so we can say it is
this and not that. The French civilization is
different from the Belgian civilization.
They can share certain things, they can share language, they
can share religion, they can even share a general region if
you want to talk about Europe, but they have to become
distinct. Why?
Because without that distinctness, without that
differentiation inherent in the system, in the civilization
itself, you lose all-purpose, you lose all meaning.
Someone's saying here a a maybe just go on this route to protect
his family. Yeah, I've covered that before.
Yeah. And you know, honestly, if
that's the reason, then I, I, I'll, I'll, I've said it before,
I'll say it again really briefly.
I, I don't, this is not a criticism of Norman, the human
being. I'm only criticizing what he's
putting out there as content. I don't know the man.
I don't know why his ex, you know, I don't, I have no insight
on on his life or his thinking or anything else.
Anything else like that behind the scenes I only get can
address what he's putting out there.
So this is what I'm doing. You got a inside track on him,
Share or not, I don't know whatever.
Elgin Nationalist. And the reason why I'm
interested in this, sorry, really briefly, the reason why
I'm interested in his public position positioning is that
it's 1 proof of my my prediction be true.
So me I'm right, I'm right, you're wrong.
The the other thing is that it does change things, right?
He's got over 100,000 subscribers.
He's very well respected in certain circles in the dissident
right and all these other circles or was he's considered a
gatekeeper, he's considered somebody.
So what he's changing messaging, he's going to change the
messaging of a percentage of people and all the percentage of
people are in your GCS are you know, are vying for political
position and all the rest of it. So.
What does it mean to be a nationalist for any small
nation? I would argue that today you can
only really be a nationalist for the American empire, which
basically means being a neo con. You can be a nationalist for the
Russian Empire, which means, you know, supporting Putin.
You can be a nationalist for the Chinese empire, which means
getting behind the Communist Party of China.
But all the other states really do not have a realistic right to
nationalism. Any quote UN quote nationalism
is afforded by another great power such as, I would argue,
Ukrainian nationalism. This is.
And that's nonsense. The Ukrainian nationalism, well,
Ukrainians got decreed, decried their their independence of the
Soviet Union. When the Soviet Union fell, they
did in 1991. Now speculation, big time
speculation is that the British got in there and supported
Ukraine nationalists. But to be clear, Ukraine
nationalists and the Ukraine nationalisms for the Bandera
kind of that kind of ideas that was still always a small subset
within the greater Ukrainian political body.
I, I was a Ukrainian nationalist for a long time.
You know, I, I rubbed noses or rubbed shoulders with serious
people who, you know, wanted Ukraine independence and
sovereignty above all else. I was in those discussions.
So, yeah. And I, you know, I had
discussions with people that I, that just kind of put me off
early on in my life about anarchy or anarchists because
you start talking to people and you're like, wow, OK, you guys
are a bit crazy. And that's really what was the
foundation the, the raison d'ete, the ideology of Ukrainian
nationalists going back into the mid into the mid and mid and
late 90s, probably early 2000s, probably even today it's
morphed. But it originally it was about,
about ultra anarchism. They're anarchists, you know,
Black Flag wearing anarchists, basically that group that's now
split into as of and, and Antifa.
You follow those tracks back, you get right back to anarchists
of the 1990s. All of them.
They all share that same ideologies.
See. So the problem with the with
nationalism is in its current frame and how he's using it, is
that nationalism is an ideology onto itself.
It's basically a storefront for a operating ideology behind it.
Now, the operating ideology might differ.
Each nation might have a differing set of idealistic
ideals, Classic liberalism, anarchists, communist, fascist,
da da da da da da, right? Socialist, sure, but that's what
it is, right? The Belgian, the Belgian nation.
So if you're a Belgian nationalist, what you're really
doing is you're projecting your own preferred form of ideology
onto the state. And you're saying the, in many
cases, what you're saying is the current state ideology is not
serving the people. And you make that, you make the
distinction because it's because it's a nice little selling
technique. The current system is diseased.
We're going to replace it with a new system, which is just my
system. You know, my group, we don't
like the socialists. We're going to place them with
them, with the fascists. We don't like the fascists.
We're going to place them with the socialists we don't like.
We're just going to brand them. And in many cases, yeah,
fundamentally the current system might have a set of ideologies
or might be able to be reduced to an ideology.
But quite often when we're seeing this in in Europe and why
it's being attacked by the extremes by people who have an
an actual definable ideology, is that Europe got into too much
mush where you couldn't define what, what is the European
ideology, vague socialism, something.
And why? Because of this sort of
mushness. And now that it's being attacked
by discernible ideologies and now gives the the Europeans the
excuse to move into authoritarianism, which is the
final form. And authoritarianism is not
coded into one set of ideologies, right?
It's not just the liberal, it's not just the right or the left.
Anyone can be authoritarianism. Anyone at any time, you just
decide to go. You know what, we're going to
squash everybody, and that's what's happening.
Clearly funded and fostered by. By my course, I should have a
course. No, just by my course.
That's it. Whatever.
NATO against Russia or Israeli nationalism, which is almost
entirely propped up by American power or.
Well, and British power who, who invented the state of Israel in
the 1st place there Norman, you'll notice.
And this is this is constant, right?
If we take two polarizing people personalities, you take someone
like Tom Luongo and then you take Norman over here and you
compare and contrast, Tom will go goes full in on it's all City
of London. It's all the British, right?
You can trace back all these problems, both past, present and
future to the British. And you know what?
Honestly, I have a hard time disagreeing.
I don't agree with every single thing Tom ever says.
I think sometimes he goes to a bit too hard to paint on certain
things. You know, I don't have examples,
but whatever. But they're minor, they're mild,
they're novel. You know, it's I like Tom.
I think Tom's, I think Tom's on the mark on 99% of things.
And anywhere we disagree, it's like sort of novel shit.
So someone asked, is is Myron Shuck the guy with the Montreal
cap? Yeah, it's STEM.
What? Who is this Myron Shuck guy?
It's me. Mirror if someone's pronounced,
if someone's spelling it that way, Bob, it's someone spelling
my name phonetically. Miron this is spelled MIRON is
pronounced mirror like the like one of the things that gave
Jesus mirror frankence gold frankenceis and mirror right.
So mirror Miron shook Miron shook.
Say it along with me. And if you bought, you'll buy a
membership. You can become a mirror and
shook mirror and shook mirror. How are you going to say this?
A mirror and Chad A mirror and shook mirror and wait.
Mirren shook Mirren. Chad or a Mirren chuckle, right?
Or Polish nationalism, which again is propped up by American
power, is kind of allowed as a frontier.
Mr. Fired Up says was the Byzantium Empire
authoritarianism? Not at first, but certain by the
end. It's almost it's always
authoritarian before it's end. Let's put it this way, legalism.
You need laws. Laws are fine, right?
Laws are are a way to, to discern when punishments and
judgement have to be metered out.
But when it's, when a society becomes a Society of laws, it's
lost its meaning. Because generally speaking, that
means that the, the people on the ground, the average citizen
of a, of a, of, of an empire, civilization or whatever, that
has to be held in by the law and not by their own, by their own
sense of moral right and wrong, which should line up to pretty
much everyone else's chuckle bucks.
Yes, Oops. It's nice to see you back.
If you find yourself constantly in moral contradiction or
conflict with with the civilization you're in, there's
a problem, and it's either the civilization's problem or yours.
How do you make that discernment?
You go to liturgy, talk to a priest.
You have to draw on something bigger than you, something
that's been around much, much longer than you.
And this is where tradition comes in.
And this is also why tradition tends to be the first thing they
attack. If I want to destroy your
ability to tell right and wrong, to be able to have just a
discernment between what is what we're, what's happening here is,
is moral or immoral. The first thing I'm going to do
is destroy your, your, your continuity and call back and
only call it back a la carte. This is what the academic does.
The academic will reach into history and go, I like this,
like that. Oh, look at Carlyle.
Let's let's highlight this. What they failed to understand
is that Carlyle, especially look at his work in heroism.
Carlyle is calling back to tradition.
He's trying to be a node within the stream of tradition.
He's not trying to be a part of it, be separate from it.
He's trying to connect people to it, and that's vital.
It's important, Mr. Fire Up says.
That makes no sense. What makes no sense?
Let me know. Country against the encroachment
of Russia or Taiwanese nationalism as a kind of bulwark
against China. All of these are afforded by the
US. During the Cold War, the USA and
indeed the USSR funded many different nationalist uprisings
against the old European imperialist powers.
The old European empires were on the back foot, they were on the
decline, and the newly emerging empires, Russia and America,
were funding nationalist movements against the old
empires. That's not entirely accurate
either. In fact, America especially went
to war on behalf of the old European empires.
Korea and Vietnam stand out distinctly.
Why did America go to go to war in Vietnam?
Well, because the Vietnamese had kicked out the French.
So the Americans went in there to basically reclaim territory
that the French had. Now, you might say that they
came in there to fill a vacuum. OK, fair, whatever.
Sure, they were going to take it for themselves and exclude the
French. Yeah, maybe.
But either way, they went in there because the French had
failed. They went in there to replace
the French one way or the other. Same thing in Israel would have
said that. The seven country war, all that
stuff. Yeah, America got involved
because suddenly the the European outpost in the Middle
East was in trouble. Same thing in Korea.
Britain wants to go into Korea. Why?
Well, they want to make an inroad.
It was Britain and America went to war in Korea, along with
Australia and many, many of the British Commonwealth.
People forget that wasn't an American war.
In fact, people never talk about Korea.
I'm going to, I'm going to do a deep dive, I think starting next
year into Korea. It's been standing out as this
weird little place, this weird little dark place in the world
where it's like what happened during the Korean War.
Why don't people talk about it more?
There's no propaganda films about it.
Very few Manchurian Candidate and a few other little things
came out of came out of Korea. But that was this sort of like
leftover after the World War Two.
It was a major war that claimed a lot of lives and no one really
talks about it. Interesting.
So yeah, no, he's all the books. I'm no academic.
I have no big, you know, whatever.
But he's just using rhetoric here.
I think the US backed over 20 such movements according.
And his rhetoric exposes bland spots.
It's never, it's never Europe. Europe's on the back.
On the back end. Europe failed in World War 2.
America became ascendant. So all the problems in the world
post World War 2 I guess are America's problems or it's it's
America's fault. No one else.
No one else had sovereignty. Only America.
Russia and China apparently have
sovereignty because that's essentially what empire means.
Empire or or nationalism or nation or civilization, pick
your word, it essentially they all mean the same thing in this
context, all rely on one thing, sovereignty.
Who is sovereign? Because who is sovereign gets to
make decisions, gets to act independently of anybody else,
essentially. They may have considerations,
but ultimately if, if, if I am sovereign, I get to choose the
exceptions, I get to do what I want to do.
Now a global system gets rid of all sovereignty completely.
No one can do really do what they want to do because it all
has to be run by committee. But that just makes the global
system, this one world government or whatever you want
to call it, into the sovereign unit.
So they're acting independently of other people's interests.
They're only acting within their own interests.
They can code that as everybody's interests as much as
they want, but essentially it becomes their interest.
It's a separate group. So whatever term you use,
empire, nation, civilization is a term for sovereignty because
it relies on it. You can't have any of these
things without some sort of sovereignty, personal or
otherwise, external or internal. Now the the only thing that that
I would say is different between let's say an empire and a nation
is its direction. Nations are in are directed
internally and empires are directed externally.
Empires externalize their power as as far as they can, as as far
as they can make it. They expand their sphere of
influence to as many areas as possible.
A nation withholds that, that, that sovereignty onto itself.
So it's not looking to expand its sovereignty into other, into
other territories. It controls it for itself.
And when a nation begins to expand that sovereignty over
other areas or attempts to, that's its attempt to become an
empire. That's the distinction, right?
It's directional, not not systematic, because ultimately
the difference between an empire and a nation is really just
scale. And we can just we can, we can
disperse both those terms and just call it a civilization.
Western civilization is a civilization that spans an
immense amount of the world, all of Europe, Americas, most
Pacifica, right? In fact, in any place that
adopts it doesn't even have to be Western.
Russia is much more of a Western civilization than it is an
Eastern civilization. To this chap Ryan Griffiths over
20 nationalist movements during the Cold War, funded by America
against the against the imperial powers in America.
Obviously in in the Soviet case, obviously it came with, you
know, a kind of communist flavour.
Although the communists also use nationalism for their cause, as
Stalin did, as Maude, as sorry Ho Chi Minh did in the Vietnam
War against the Americans, which which again really was a battle
against the old European powers, in that case the French Empire.
So, yeah, so you can see that nationalism has a bottom up the.
French hadn't didn't have an empire.
Excuse me? The French didn't really have an
empire under classic. I mean they had under
colonialization. Again, if you're simply saying
that an empire is expansive. So an empire has territories
that are outside of its out of the home district, right?
The the seat of Rome is in Rome, but Rome is obviously in many
other places, right? It's under the authority of
Rome. So you'd say that if, if you
have a, a nation state, let's say, or a state that has
territories all over the place that are subservient to that
state, therefore it's an empire. If that's, if that's what he's
going with, then we can say, yes, the French had an empire,
the Belgians had an empire, the British and all these other
people's people had empires technically.
But that's really not what we would say when we talk about
Byzantium or Rome, or we talk about even the British or
American empires. If there are such things or were
such things. It's not just how much territory
controls, it's how much power it exerts on the world itself.
The British had an empire because the majority of the
world right now thinks and speaks in English.
English is the most common language still to this day.
I you, you maybe you can run the numbers and say actually because
of Africa and South America and stuff like that, it's actually
Spanish by X percentage. Or it's, you know, actually it's
Mandarin because. Because the population.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. OK, cool.
No one speaks Mandarin outside of China, really.
That's the thing. There's more English, there's
more Chinese people who learn English than there are English
people who learn Mandarin. That's the difference.
If you see people complaining about the American empire, some
of that on X from other places, from other nationalities, and
they're doing it in English and it's not just a translation
thing and they're actually writing it and speaking in
English, that means they have English in their head.
That means they've been colonized completely.
That's power. That's empire.
When Latin was the default language of the world or Greek
was default language of the world, That's empire.
See sound different? Also, if French was spoken
wildly by the majority of people in the world, you could say,
well, the French had an empire. How many people speak French?
Really? More than not, right?
More than more than no one. Vietnamese people speak French.
A lot of Africans speak French, Sure.
Spanish, same thing. So these were empires at some
point. I don't think the Vietnamese
were shirking off the French Empire though.
They were shirking off colonialism, which is
essentially the the end of empire, the liberalisation of
the concept of empire. Sentiment, it's not it's, I
wouldn't say it's a delusion. I would say people do feel
nationalistic. They do feel pride in their
country, but often that is indulged or that is played on by
elites for a specific purpose and a wider geostrategic
purpose. Divisions are always useful.
The British been the British model for a very long time.
Divide and control within the division.
It's why I think that Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
The the people who did the the Ppus was City of London and used
as off. I've detailed this in past
shows. Go check those out.
Buy membership. They're they're in the
membership portal. 2 bucks. It's easy.
The I won't even get. I won't really waste too much
time to talk about that. But the, the, the reason is that
when you see division and and control through division, that's
a British tactic. Not saying other people couldn't
do it, but that's that's a classic hallmark of the British.
So when you see those things that erupt Middle East and many
other places, even there in America, right, left versus
right, all this kind of discord, that's a British tactic.
That's an Anglo tactic. Just is OK.
The cauldron is a Russian tactic.
That's our tactic. Tactic. 2 beers and getting,
getting saucy. We could ascribe certain things
to certain nations. And so, yeah, sure, but that's
also a British thing, Malacca says.
I, I would say the British learned it from the Spanish.
Sure, OK, but but for the last 400 years that's been a British
tactic and they've excelled at it.
They've learned it from the Spanish.
They took it to new to new aims, to new heights.
And essentially here a, a is not saying anything here, like
there's nothing here that's actionable.
What are you going to do about an empire?
Because if the question is really sovereignty, personal or
national or group preference, when you say white nationalist,
really what they're saying is they want sovereignty for this
group, Black nationalist, Islam, nationalist, whatever, right?
They want sovereignty. They want the right to determine
and make choices for this group. That's what that comes down to.
When every time you hear nationalism, just think
sovereignty, either you have it or you don't.
If you don't, you want it. It's like leverage.
So you gain leverage in order to obtain sovereignty.
That's the wind condition or has to be the wind condition to tie
it back to what we started off with the show about.
I don't know, if I was part of the Young Republican Leadership
Committee, I would basically be saying, look, we're, we're, we
want sovereignty. We don't have it.
We don't have the ability to do what the left is going to do
with this political piece. Back to the left.
Hassan Piker is going to be brought down by shocking his
dog, not by his political positions.
OK? He's already losing real support
because of a dog mistreatment of an animal, not his political
positions, which is a bitter white pill.
Again, that shows there's some decency still beating the heart
of the West sometimes. We're just going to make a hard
stand and go Nope, no children, no animals, man, thank God.
But. For a dog, how delicious.
Will that be and also tell all these people it's like, look
man, you ain't got nothing. All your courses and all your
fine thinking and your theology and your your sorry, your your
theory sorry and and all your high minded positioning don't
mean nothing. Because what really brings a guy
down is mistreatment of an animal.
And who's been front and center on this is asthma and gold,
Patriot gold as as as Matthew Erickson's has talked about
who's way more powerful than Norman will ever be ever.
And here's the reason why. Asthma Gold.
Has has built and. Developed.
A. Multi million.
Subscriber and viewer viewership by being authentic.
I've watched asthma and Gold's. Let's say worldview change.
As the world's changed, as it changed for me and many others,
but it was authentic. He went through different
periods. It wasn't just to get views.
In fact, he he risked a whole bunch of things.
He put it on the line. That's why he's more effective.
People. Respond to authenticity and I
know I've seen this in the chat. And I'm sure, I guarantee you
we're we're going to. Hear about the defense of a A is
that he's playing a character. He's playing the heel.
He's doing a heel run. He's going to come back as a
babyface, right? This this is all part.
Of his plan, this is all part of his game.
If that's true, it's still damning because it means he's
playing a game. We're no longer.
In a game this. Is a war it's.
Not time for bobbleheads in the. Back and all that stuff.
It's that time's done. It's over, it's finished.
Charlie Kirk's The Charlie Kirk Incident should really ratify
that in your brain, it is later than you think.
Hasten therefore. To do the work.
Of God, get it right now at a minute.
OK, your nationalism is probably the pawn of some other power.
Trying to do something most of the time, even in the case of,
you know, like Iran, for example, Iran has tried to kind
of go it alone against the Great Satan and against the little
Satan. Israel OK, but in the process it
has found itself folded into Russian power and Chinese power,
so it still ends up being an imperial pawn in a greater chess
game. This sovereignty again, this as
I as Iran sovereign. Was it ever?
Sovereign. Could it ever be sovereign?
It is if you're going to say that Israel only exists on
behalf. Of the.
Global American. Empire then I ran in his current
configuration post King of the Shah, which was a British plant
by the way Again, nice little dodge from British Empire but
sure, whatever. Well, you kick out the British,
the British influence, you're going to get more influence
because you have a slight little window in time to create and
maintain sovereignty. And if you can't maintain that
because. Of your connections and
affiliations. Then the other sovereign nations
will take over for you. I don't have a grudge.
Against a A a Julio. If you watch the entire the.
Entirety of my show. Then you'll see that I don't
have a grudge. People put this in front of me
and asked me to comment, so I'm commenting.
I have no grudges. I don't care.
The way you. I don't care the way people
think people should care. I I don't what I care.
About is you going to church and talking to a priest.
And getting good with God, that's what I care about.
What I'm trying to do is break your frame constantly.
You want to maintain it. And hold on to it, that's fine.
Find comfort in it if you can. It's nihilistic, it's the end of
things. It's too it's too late in the
game or in the war. And then the in the world
itself. To hold on to false beliefs,
it's way too late for that. Really.
The history of nationalism. Proper.
When properly considered. Soviet, Soviet and US covert
regime changes. Do you ring the period of glory
to God in all things? Decolonization.
Post post colonial. Period of the Cold War, they
funded 64 covert regime changes, Charlemagne says.
Well said. We must speak plainly and mean
what we say. Now is not the time for games.
Games. Over game is over if.
Game was over and. Game was over a long.
Time before a long time. Ago game was over in 2016.
Game was certainly over when Charlie Kirk got shot.
Get serious guys, if you want to play this, if you want to be in
this, if you want to be in these spheres and think these
thoughts. It's the choice.
Is yours. You can go watch Marvel movies.
Man or whatever is on Netflix. Or something.
You can just go do that, Play some games.
Hey, we're going to play some power washing tomorrow.
Whatever, fine, do your thing. This doesn't have to be for you.
Buckle in. Do your thing man.
Goom, I don't care. So again, this whole like I got
a grudge I. Don't have a grudge.
I literally people put this in front of me.
And saying, look, a, A is doing the thing you said you said
people are going to start doing. So I'm going to talk about it
because people then hold on to things and project.
These people. And these ideas and it's like.
Look man, you got to know what time.
It is. This this is not the.
Time to talk about Empire. Or.
Wonderful things we're going to do in 100.
Years. Now you got to get your shit
figured out. Right now, because they're going
to come for you. They're coming for all of us.
If you hold any idea? Outside of a very narrow band of
allowable. Opinions.
They're going to get rid of you. One way you should perform the
digital gulag will exist. Now is your time to do something
about it and either that thing is going.
To church, going to liturgy? Talk to a priest.
Learning discernment, getting that tradition, getting your
getting your head out of your spiritual ass and starting to
see things straight, then that is the mission that becomes a
calling of your life and hopefully you pass it on to your
kids. Go have.
Kids get married. Have kids, sacrifice, suffer.
And do with a smile on your face.
That's the calling. That's your life.
That's. What this is right now?
Get it? Straight Octavian 9 and a nine.
Thank you so much. We are living the symptoms of
the game. Being over, yeah, well, again,
there is a game and the game, I'll get an EM on.
We'll talk about it between them.
In a in a very short. Space of time.
Many of them were overtly nationalist movements and you
know. The the Ukraine example.
Is, you know, they've given billions upon billions, $175
billion since 2022 given to Ukraine.
Russians have given lots of money to some of their proxy
forces around the world as well. So, yeah, I mean, in in such a
case, in such a situation, that's the actual reality of
things. What is your nationalism?
Your nationalism is a plot. You're, you're, you're basically
being played by somebody else. This is, This is why I during
the whole Russia Ukraine thing, which is still ongoing, I was
always reluctant to kind of come down on the Ukrainian cause
because it's obvious it's being propped up.
It's obvious that it's, you know, a stratagem by empire.
OK, now you could say, well, well, I wish Empire again.
We'll just ignore the whole. British thing completely because
it's it's easier. It's down to sovereignty.
Do do Ukrainians have the right to be sovereign?
Do the do the? Do the Does Israel have the
right to exist? Is code for.
Does Israel have the right to be sovereign?
Julio 499 Just a little support for our guy.
Thank you so much. I want to break your frame.
I can present you with the ammunition I.
Can present you, I can light the fire, but you got to break it
yourself. You got to challenge it and
everywhere it leads. And sometimes that means.
That your sacred cows. And guys you like.
You got to go. Hey, I liked you for for a
while. Thank you for.
Your ideas. Thank you for for getting me to.
To this place, appreciate it. Bye now 'cause you're all
they're doing substantiating a frame.
They're in the frame. They can't think outside of it.
The only thing that allows you to break a.
Frame. Really.
Break the frame completely is God, is religion is a tradition
and a people. It's peak known as it once said.
Collectivize or die you'll. Hear that and go, oh, communism.
No, no, no. You got to get.
Yourself a community you got to
surround yourself with. People, you will.
Fast with, never feast with those you will not fast with, or
will not. Fast with you.
Surround yourself with people who will be with you in.
The hard, bad. Times and then ask yourself
often will some. People like Norman over here.
Is Norman going to fast with you?
Is he, you really think, Norman? 'S going to fast with you.
If you're. An American, especially.
Do you think Norman's going to fast with you?
No, Norman's going to do what's good for Norman.
And I'm not. I'm not.
Judging him on that, I'm really not.
You know, people hear that and go, oh, you're obsessed or
something else. I'm just calling it out.
You got to be clear about these things.
Because if you're surrounding yourself with people who will
not. Fast with you.
Then their support means nothing.
Their likes mean nothing. Their viewership and all the
rest of their ideas mean nothing.
It's all self-serving at the end of the day.
It all substantiates the frame Charmaine says.
I'm being. I'm get being afraid of the UK
government. Knocking, but if that is just.
The case then why play at all, exactly?
Just go to just go to the table. Be either hot, be neither hot
nor cold, nor in the middle. I spit you from my mouth not
because you're hot nor cold, because you're a tepid, sensible
centrist, right? Here's the thing.
You don't want to. Sacrifice your channel.
You built this thing. You've made many sacrifices to
build this. Thing all the hours of work all.
The yes, all the things you've built, this great thing, this
vehicle, you don't give up the vehicle, you just turn the
vehicle onto a new road, right? No ethics, no ethos.
You need to. Have religion to have.
Ethics. You need it.
The the inverse reality. Is and This is why liberty.
Being a adjunctive liberal frame is Luciferian to its core.
Liberty Here's a here's a word concept fallacy of the day
liberty often times gets. Coded as freedom.
These two things are not the same thing.
Freedom is often found in servitude.
When you serve God truly, justly, you become free.
You become free of all the evils of the world or you become
detached. You became, you become, you're
given the ability to become free of them are the things that will
pull you down, which will lead to derivations, to derelictions,
to we know what ask. A A hear about his transgender
friends. Or his gay friends, right?
And he was supporting those people long before he got the
call. We all got the call, by the way.
That's what Charlie Kirk was. That was the call.
Now you make your decision. If you're a small channel like
myself. The worst they can do, really.
Is just delete the channel. Get to someone like him now.
They could do something more with him.
So as I said, I'm not dismerging Norman.
This might be a good tactical move.
But like like Charlene says here.
Just delete the channel. You read that concern, go make
some other. Go make some other thing.
Talk about movies if you're going to.
View the channel into something completely away from what?
You're what you were. Doing before go talk about
movies. I think he tried doing that.
I think he tried making a video game channel who made that
didn't work out. But make Dark Soul videos.
I I see them all the time. There's like, you know, Major.
Major channels you could just go talk about like, you know.
Go talk with nerd Roddick and Mauler and and the and the was
it casual drinker? You could just do that wrestling
content. Yeah, you could just go do
wrestling, man. Oops.
And I get it. I went from last year talking
almost exclusively about political theory.
And now because of my own personal situation, moving into
Orthodoxy, now the show's moving to Orthodoxy and it's got, and
I've lost many people. And that's fine.
It's just that's what you're going to do.
You sacrifice, you build something.
And you put it out there. Hey, I'd like Mahler too.
I was. I was watching.
Every. EFAP for many, many years.
In fact, EFAP was a big influence into how I want to
construct Friend or Fed. That's serious.
We have a new series coming up, hopefully soon, but.
Again, this is not. Criticism just for criticism's
sake. There's many options you have.
If you're concerned about your safety, you can just drop the
politics all together and you will.
And it will. It will suck, you will lose a
lot of people, but you'll gain in 3-4 years and you'll be fine.
But if you're I, I'm going to guess that.
What a a would like to be is an. Is an ex Piers Morgan?
Piers Morgan's going to retire sometime and I'm sure that he
would like to take that spot. So this is a triangulation.
Some people do, as Richard Spencer has what he is.
Just supports the. NATO empire he supports that he
thinks that's good. You know, I'm more ambivalent
about the current the current empire than him.
But I'm realistic to know that the kind of romantic nationalism
that is trying to be GED up in the Ukrainian cause is it's a
play. It's it's a, you know, the you,
you basically it's it's another pro wrestling scenario.
Are you? Yeah.
But it's not a play to the to the 2 million Ukrainians who
died. It's certainly not a.
It's not a play. It wasn't a play for many of
the. Ukrainians who got involved in
the war, period. It wasn't a play for many
Ukrainians. Who, who had been annexed?
By Russia, for 250 years at least, that was a history they
were given. It wasn't a play for them to
suddenly be given in 1991 a chance at being a sovereign
nation and making its own choices for itself and the
people. Responded to that.
And people dysphoria all over the West from Winnipeg and
Toronto and Chicago and many other places going back to
Ukraine to teach Ukraine's Ukrainian to bring back the
church, to re establish it as an actual real country, a sovereign
nation, nation, country, civilization, whatever you want
to. Obviously it didn't work out.
It's now become the victim of the human sacrifice ritual.
Go check out me and Jim talking about this.
Last stream. No, who I'm not.
I'm calling him out for having a tranny friend.
And as far as I can tell, if you are saying you're right wing and
you're promoting transgenderism, you're you're not right wing,
you're being played. If you have a look between 1946
and 2000. The America has intervened 81
times in foreign elections. That is, other countries are
trying to have the democratic elections and America doesn't
like the outcome that the people are going to vote for.
So they intervene to ensure that the force that they want wins 81
times between 1946 and 2000. Now, if your government
literally has come about due to foreign intervention by the
American empire, can you really be a nationalist for that nation
are? You just a vassal.
State and this is one of the reasons.
Why, I've been at pains to. Try to demonstrate to people
that a Britain is a vassal. Well, hang on a second.
America came to creation because of.
Being a vessel state. Of the of the British.
Empire what? Oops, what's it?
What are you talking about also? Post Soviet.
Union there was a whole bunch. Of new nations.
Created. Out.
Out of nowhere, like Poland hadn't been his.
Own. Nation state.
For. Quite some time even predating
predating the Soviet Union, and now is the most dominant
economic zone in all of Europe. Huh.
What? What?
I'm not an academic, I have no letters behind my name, but even
I can. I can.
Read and. Tie my shoes.
It's amazing. All of the American empire.
So in some ways it's a nonsense. To think about.
British interests separate from the role it plays within the
greater American empire, just in the interests of realism.
This is something clearly that Tony Blair understands,
something a lot of you understand.
But the practical reality is you're not going to be able to.
Bust out of it. Through nationalism.
Unless your nationalism gets an even more powerful backer.
But then Britain is reduced to the status of one of these poor.
Nations and I actually. Think it's going on right now.
I think that the Civil War narrative is being pushed by
foreign powers. I've told I've said this before,
right? It's.
It's always foreign powers. It's.
Never Britain. You know people blame the Jays
for always being the perpetual victim, right?
It's never them, it's everyone else.
It's always someone else. Even when it's them, it's
someone else. They draw us to it.
How could we stop? How could we stop it?
You know who the biggest bitches in the world are?
Really are? The British.
The biggest didn't do nothings. Didn't do nothings is the
British. My goodness, every time.
Every single. Time as.
Anyone ever brings? Anything.
A legitimate or illegitimate or any kind of complaint, any
historical current whatever to the British, you're always going
to find some Brit who goes, wow, it's not us, it was the climate.
It was those damn Americans. It's the global American.
Empire you know and not. The British Empire that spanned
the globe. No, no, we just gave it up in
1945. Mysteriously for for reasons.
Because we couldn't financially deal with it at what?
I don't know why. Huh.
What it it, it, it doesn't make sense.
It never made sense. It only makes.
Sense because you. Hear it and you just and you
never question it, you go along with it.
I mean, as long as you go along with it, it's fine.
But why, for example, does the entire world in general all look
like the British Parliament? They all use some varying forms
of the British parliamentary system.
Weird. That's power, isn't it?
That you can go anywhere in the world, even.
In China, even Communist China still uses essentially elements
of a Westphalian system. Ah, dear modern democracy, the
way that we conceive from. Democracy in in the West.
Is a British invention, not democracy, The idea that's.
Greek sure, but how it works in sort of like?
Districts and zones and voting in Congress people which are
just MPs and all the rest, that's all British.
British common law. All of it.
British, English, everyone. Speaks English.
Sorry, Norman, I I think you're missing your your your purposely
just skipping over who? Might.
Be culpable, maybe, possibly just a little bit, and they'll
use your. Genuine nationalist sentiment
for. Their ends actually happening
right now, actually happening. I've been watching it happen.
I've commented on it. You can go back and watch those
videos. That's really what is happening.
Foreign actors are trying to ferment.
Civil. Conflict in the UK.
They realise there are fissures, they realise there are real
issues and they think they can profit off the genuine anger of
British patriots at this moment. Probably work too.
Nationalism. Is a very strong.
Motivating force. When the state runs out of
options, it always turns to nationalism, always as a final
resort. All communists in their right
things admit that nationalism is a stronger driver to drive
people to pick up a gun and die or fight than communism.
In the abstract, yes. Someone's saying he's around
this though. Yeah, again, I'm not disagreeing
with his, with his, with him entirely in.
Theory, if you have a desire for sovereignty and there's people
out there who have leverage on your sovereignty, they will use
your sovereignty or they will use your desire against you.
They will promise you just they will promise you the sovereignty
and give you something else. The the the hardest pill to for
me to swallow the Ukrainian Russia situation.
Was Ukrainian. Sovereignty is no longer on the
table. Maybe never was they had.
They had a window. In time they squandered it.
They didn't get it. They could have become Poland.
They didn't. They became.
Ukraine and you can say, well, that's because of Russian
intervention or because of British intervention.
Or mismanagement. All the rest of it, sure, yeah,
absolutely. But the problem is, is that you
keep looking for a scapegoat here.
It's the this, It's the that's the elites.
It's the this. It's the bankers.
They're people. They're human beings.
Human beings can be held in and constrained essentially by a
worldview. If you want to change the
people, you change the worldview.
That's the that's what's, that's what's ahead of us.
That's why you act locally. You create the groundswell.
Beneath you. That will never work 'cause
they're in control of everything.
Well, if that's what you believe, then why are you
talking about anything ever to Charlemagne's point, if you
believe that the entire system is rigged?
And controlled by the. Nebulous woo evil, and there's
no chance or no hope of anything ever happening, although we've
been given an example by Jesus Christ and the Christians who
overturned Rome in 300 years. The thing is, it's not possible
in your lifetime. And that's the whole big
freaking point, isn't it? It's got to be about you when
you make it, all about you and you make it.
About. My lifetime and it has.
To happen in my time and. With my name on it and it
somehow be connected by me and my ideas have led to these
things. When it all becomes a point of
pride because you have no ethics, guess what?
You lead into despair. The merchants of despair act on
you because they play on your pride.
What is sovereignty in the end of the day?
What are the? Passions that keep a hold of it.
What fuels it? Pride.
Than glory. Lust, avarice, all the good
prides, degeneracy. Is held together by these
things. When you begin to bring death to
the world, when you begin to bring death to the passions you
get, guess what? Freedom.
You must liberate yourself. The true final revolution.
Is a revolution against itself. That which holds you to it.
Blaming others and. Creating the spooky wookies only
leads only plays into their game, so the slop merchants,
like I said, become. Subsidiaries of the Merchants of
Despair. They don't want your solutions.
They're not interested in solutions.
No solutions ever offered. What?
What are you going to do? A Tony Blair's in control and
all these. Foreign.
Nationalists. OK.
The the. The The global American empire
is screwing you. What are you going to do?
Not buy hamburgers? Don't go to McDonald's?
What are? You going to do what?
What? What's your What's your game
plan exactly? Huh.
Because you're because you're worried.
About running out of scones, aren't you?
Because. You want your viewership, you
don't want to sacrifice. Strangely enough, in the his
world view, because he's an atheist, he believes that.
Nothing means nothing. We're all one.
Cosmic accident, but you're very scared of of dying or suffering
or having your child suffer, aren't you?
That would would call into the question this idea of.
What is good? If if all we are are just
accidental organisms, then nothing bad that happens to you
is bad. Scones are good with clotted
Kleenex. Exactly.
I agree, good school. I like sleeping in a nice.
Bed I'm a. I'm a slave.
To the flesh. As well, do you think an
academic agent has a Funko pop collection?
I don't know if he. Does, but he should.
Replace all that with Funko Pops.
Go John. Neurotic.
No shame in it. Talk to Louise.
Marvel movie, it's fine. You don't have to do.
This you don't have to live this way.
Constant messages show. Break the frame.
Don't live like this. Do something.
James Burnham in The Managerial Revolution talks about how.
During the early phases of World War 2, the Germans had no
problem getting people enlisted. They had no problem with
volunteers because people wanted to fight for the fatherland
British. Oh, here we go.
I got 4. More super chats to.
Go and we'll give. You a we'll.
Do a stream tomorrow doing some power washing and listening to
Alex Jones talking with Tucker Carlson about the globalist
death cult. Trans transdimensional
globalists. Little hats like like.
Fish. We'll be talking about them
tomorrow, but it's only. We hit that goal.
I'll do this trip.
Establishment French. Establishment An American.
Establishment had trouble. Recruiting in a time of mass
unemployment. Why?
Because people were not motivated to fight for abstract
notions like liberty or justice or capitalism or, you know,
whatever else. Whatever other slogans they
threw at them, they weren't strong.
Whereas nationalism was strong. That's why Stalin hacked.
But all these things are metaphysical claims at the end
of the day. And this is your problem, being
an atheist. You can't deal an anomalist, you
can't deal with a metaphysical claim, whether it be glory or
heroism or nationalism. Or Unity.
Or whatever the claim is. It's a metaphysical claim.
Whiteness doesn't really exist in the sense that every single
group is going to. Fall into that group.
Eventually I saw this happen in Canada, live in Quebec.
If you're not pure, then it doesn't matter if you're white
or European. If you're not.
French enough or specifically Quebec QC?
Why enough? You're not pure then.
You're not part of the in Group. You're on the out group.
These will always happen. Differentiation happens.
It's a human thing. It's part of the fallen nature.
Sure, whatever you want to define it as, but it's a
metaphysical claim, all of it. LG Brandon Walsh.
Good to see you back my. Friend LG says you earned it in
your bag tonight, the fast feast.
Line was a bar and I'll teach it to.
My kids $10 appreciate you. When you're dealing with
metaphysical claims, yes, people will always fight.
People. Always.
Ascend to a metaphysical claim transcendence is a desire to be
more than. Oneself.
But if you've been telling people that you're not anything
but mush and there is no hope and there is no greater thing,
and we're being. Controlled by the.
The JS or the? Diss or the that or the.
Whatever group, sure. If that's your messaging, guess
what? No one's going to fight for you.
No one 's going to care about you.
The long the. Night of the Long Pillow comes
for us all. Then how do you how do?
We switch it, go to liturgy, talk to a priest, become.
Part of a community sacrifice, Give something.
Do. Something I'll keep.
Saying the same damn things over and.
Over again because now I'm I'm past the point of being nice or
trying to appeal to people. Someone asked me recently.
Someone I I I love and respect. To convince them I'm like, I
don't, I'm not here. To convince you, man, it's here.
Vengeful Sun is here. People's.
Desire for violence. Is spilling over and if you
don't see it and you want to deny it and you want to Pooh
Pooh it and because it came. From me and you want to you.
Want to reframe it? Go ahead, reframe it.
Call, give it another name. I don't give a shit.
Whatever, whatever, whatever is good for you, go ahead, go
ahead, do it. Ultimately, end of day, brass
tacks, this is the war. You're in it.
You're either an active combatant or you're a casualty,
which you which you want to be to move to nationalism.
To get Russians motivated to fight.
That war. Every leader ultimately knows
this, so it's part from. From the elite point of view,
it's. Powerful to get plebs to do what
you want them to do. OK, But the zoom out a little
bit and you'll see that unless you're a powerful empire in and
of yourself, it's almost pointless to be a nationalist.
It's almost pointless because you're just never going to.
You're never going to escape the raw reality of this.
Yes, it's basically pointless. Almost pointless.
Holding a little bit of hope.
So if you're not an empire, if you if you haven't.
Rolled the geographical dice and lucked.
Out on being part of an empire? You're screwed.
That's the message. Eat your scones.
They exist. I don't know.
What's the operation here? Anything.
Nothing. Just wait for it all.
To collapse and. Maybe rebuild from the ruins I
guess. Do you know how to do anything?
Not really $5 from cool do appreciate you I've been drawn
to. Orthodoxy.
God bless after. Not attending any church for
years due to many people's efforts, including myself.
Thank you on my T God bless. Yeah, thank you.
Amen. I I will if you've been.
Watching the show over the last four, whatever.
Years I've gone from observing to participating to desiring
nothing but Christ. Like there's a line from.
One of Father Sir from Rose's books.
Where he said, you know, he broke down almost in his heart
was broken and he just called out and he just, he just.
Wants he wants God, He want he just.
Give me God and I know that feeling where it's the.
Only thing that makes sense. Anymore the only thing.
That's like if this is. I look at my life and it's like
I've had all the things, or I have all the things.
I have all the things you're supposed to have and I'm doing
all the. Things you're supposed to do and
all that. And it's still not enough.
It's still empty. You're still craving because
you've been in this spiritual fast and now we.
Get to feast, go to liturgy. Talk to a priest, get good with
God and it is a feast. It's glory.
You suddenly feel at home and all the things that are worrying
you and all the things that are keep coming.
Down on you, pressuring you. Trying to trying to make you
trying to draw you into. Despair trying to just draw you
into this point of. Nihilism where hey, if you're
not part of an empire I guess you're screwed.
Get good with with the mud people.
Learn to adapt. I guess or something like that.
Just change your change your language, fit in.
Don't rock any boats. Fuck that.
Fuck your boats. Tired of your boats, tired of
your frame, tired of the lies. I'm tired of the seat.
I'm tired by the rules. I'm tired of sitting here and
watching it. And having no recourse and
having that anxiety and knowing that your ass is out.
In the wind, what do you do? Who do you have?
Who do you really have? So if you don't have people who
are conjoined, who are joined in, who are in communion.
With something higher than themselves, with a purpose that
is not just them. And here and now and what we're
doing, going to church and having.
The Fellowship. Afterwards, the coffee hour.
No, no, we're joined is something that's eternal, that
is much bigger than us, ours. That is the the.
Bricks that we use to build. Both symbolically and.
Physically, if you don't have that, you have nothing.
That's what was taken from us. That's what we take.
Back cyber-shot fine. 499 I think.
You're the only channel untangling these Christmas
lights, Jason. A released this series to
resounding, huh? And I know I get it right and.
His defenders are going to say he's he's kayfabe.
Yeah, maybe it is. Maybe it is, but I don't think
so. I clocked this in a long.
Time ago I, you know I, I. Like me, some Don the pleb and.
I watched a. Throw Don the pleb under the
bus. I watched him throw a lot of the
other people in the bus. A lot of names in the chat
tonight. A lot of people watching this.
I'm sure a lot of people watching in the future will.
Either. Say something or not say
something and this guy's no good man.
And when you start realizing. It and realize that it's not.
And it's again, it's not just him.
There are many others who filled a vacuum.
Because they could. And promote a certain ideas and
the. Ideas can be used.
God bless. Right, Curtis Jarvan brings up
some ideas I think are very useful, if useful.
In in nothing. Else, not from something I'm
going to use, but to understand what other people are thinking.
It's a weather. It's a weather pattern.
I'm a weatherman. I'm telling you which way the
wind blows. Do with that which will.
That being said. When you get into these.
To these ideas that these. Guys are going to tell you
everything. And be able to.
Discern anything they can't. They have no ethics.
None. So they'll turn on a dime man,
and that leaves your ass out. In the wind.
Too bad they've. Got you thinking and saying a
whole bunch of stuff. And as soon as it becomes
unpopular, because as soon as it becomes risky for them, they'll
leave you in the frying pan. Never feast with those you would
not fast with or those who would not fast with you.
And again, I have nothing against them.
It's not personal. It's not a judgement in terms of
damn him or. I forgive him.
Go ahead, it's easier for me. It's not.
Personal. But I have I feel.
I have a responsibility. To anyone who watches his
channel to try to break. That frame, because I'm trying
to break that frame, I know how hard it is.
I know how much of it will feel like a humiliation, but it's
actually just a it's a true humbling and to get to
acceptance you have to pass. Through humility, and humility
comes in many. Levels and it's very difficult
for the modern. For the modern man, because you
feel. Like you're already brought low
and you have been in many ways. You are eating the food of the
pigs, and that's why you have to have that realization.
Like the prodigal son, get up and return to the father to
repent and rebuild. Return, repent, rebuild.
If I say nothing else, if I've given you nothing else in my
entire life, use those three things.
Return to the father, repent of your sins, and rebuild.
Has to. Happen will happen.
It's going to happen. We just got started.
What's the best that you can hope for?
Really the best you can hope. For as I've talked about.
Is a devolved self governed unit something like that which may be
organised along ethnic lines? Maybe this might, I mean this in
the current set up, if the elites decided right, well,
rather than have, rather than try to have this force
integration model, which is never going to work, we're
actually going to do multiculturalism in the manner
of the old Millet system, right? There's a, there's a black area
with a black tribal leader. There's a white area with a
white tribal leader. There's a, you know, there's an
Indian area with an Indian tribal leader.
They all report in to the sovereign, right?
That's the history of Britain. A.
The Welsh.
The Celts. The the the Britons.
Were all separate areas kingdoms that you that landlords, Lords
of the land who who gave up a part of their sovereignty to a
king who led the entire Kingdom The Who united the.
Kingdoms and they just gave part of their.
Sovereignty to this King who would rule the kingdoms on their
behalf to stop conflict. The Medic.
Conflict. The more the more alike people
are. The more rivalists become, so
you have a bunch of landlords who have a bunch of armies and
peoples who are always in conflict.
So, so say to end these conflicts, we're going to take a
10% of our or whatever of our sovereignty and put it into this
office of the king. And the king will become the
arbiter of sovereignty itself. He'd become the seat of
sovereignty. This.
Is the. Importance of kings.
This is why monarchy and hierarchy is is important.
You don't get there without any other system.
Doesn't exist. Can't work.
That's why it's reducing to this.
To tribalism. But even it splits apart to
tribalism. The tribes will then need a
Chieftain. They will elect one over time,
because that's how hierarchies work.
That's how human beings do. So the only question is, are you
going to submit to the authority?
Are you going to try to make sure that?
Whatever the future authority is for yourself or your children.
Or your lineage will be a proper authority, authority maintained
and informed by a proper morality.
If that's not how it is, then you're they'll be ruled by some
J or whatever someone of question moral standings.
And the only way you can assure their moral standing is by tying
them to a tradition which is in hell, which is upheld by a
religion. And if you're the West, that's
Christianity. Get your head out your ass to
the M to the Sultan. But whatever goes on.
In those areas in. Those enclaves.
Is up to the local. Is up to the local, leader Will
Emmanuel says a very good thing. Speaking of elites, become a
member. Become a member, $2.00 gets you
in $25 is the preferred member status.
That's where you become the the true elite.
Excelsior Club is the elite club.
But for all the rest of you, 2 bucks that's it Give me some
bucks easy. Or send over on Streamlabs.
Send it over on PayPal. That's nice.
I like to have it in my pocket. You know either way, like
subscribe, share, do the things, do the.
Do the free stuff. That's the mirror and.
Shuckle Zone, the mirror and Shuckles do the free stuff.
The mirror, the mirror and chuds give Me 2 bucks and send some
money, some money any other way. And the mirror and Chads, my
friend, Mirror and chads do all the above.
They like, subscribe, they share, they tell people that
they'd let the people know whoever we're at and they send
me money and they support and they're in the chat and they
show up every time. Don Browning just sent 5 mirror
and chef gifts. Don Browning, by the way, is one
of the greatest Australians ever existing.
She is a mirror and Chad of all mirror and Chads.
God bless you Don. OK.
Let's get through this last. Little bit.
And we'll sign off of the evening.
They they haven't done that as. Of yet OK maybe at some point in
the future they. Will, because that's a model
like I've talked about that can endure for hundreds of years,
whereas what we're doing now doesn't really endure as as
we're seeing kind of falls apart.
Look, Charlemagne said. You know, maybe he's doing
something good for Britain and that's fine and whatever, he's
only. Charlie only cares about the UKI
care about Australia only because I live here and so that
I'm I'm in a different kind of zone all together.
That being said, it's like, look mate, Britain is being invaded
by, by the by the Muslims. You have areas in Britain where
they're putting Christians in jail for.
Praying. And yet allowing Muslim prayer
to exist without, without any kind of question, you got to
address that. That's a spiritual war.
It's literally a religious war. And right now a, A and maybe
maybe his, his Persian influence is speaking, I don't know, maybe
he doesn't have a problem with the Muslims because he could
maybe get coded that way. I don't know.
But either way, that's your problem right now in the UK.
And if nationalism of a of a kind Christian nationalism
white. Nationalism.
British. Nationalism, something
nationalism is going to be the calling card.
It's going to be the force against the invasion of Islam
into your country, which, by the way, you should be concerned
about. You got a daughter.
Should be concerned about that. No guarantee.
That the that the the the the Islam.
Being. Being substantiated in your
country is going to be the the secular kind or you're going to
secularize them over time, Sure, maybe in 40-50 years.
They'll just turn out to be. Nominal.
You know Muslims. You know Muslims in name,
cultural Muslims. Sure, maybe.
Or maybe they become Afghan, you become Afghanistan.
Oops. Because at the moment.
What they're doing is. They're they're kind of
favouring. Or they have been favouring
minority groups over the majority and that's kind of not
a not a recipe that lasts. Actually, it does.
It can last up to 80 years. All right.
I think that'll. Do on nationalism.
I, I I've kind of said. This quite a few times before
this is OK Basically is this. Word concept fallacy is not not.
Notwithstanding we took this off here, it's not updating.
Word concepts of fallacy is. Notwithstanding, right now in
2025. You're going to need if you're
going to need. A calling card A.
Frame a word, a thing, an ideology, a a vehicle.
If it's not religious because you're not calling people to
become religious, then it'll have to be something.
Secularist. Nationalism is the secular
version of a religious side, a discernment, a a setting apart,
a border. This people group versus this
people group. Now I'm I'm all for destroying
the. Dialectic.
The only way you destroy the dialectic is breaking the frame.
The dialectic upholds liberal frame, so if you want to get
free of the dialectic, you got to break the frame.
Want to do that? I'm your.
I'm your friend, man. I'm your bud.
You don't want to. Do that?
Well, guess what? You get what the frame gives
you. And right now, if you're in the
UK, it's giving you. Virulent Islam.
Enjoy. Oh and Hinduism as well.
You're becoming Singapore, but whereas Singapore.
Was set up to maintain three desperate groups.
In a region because they kind of existed there before and they're
just trying to figure out a way to best.
Civilize those groups. You come from a civilization
that's being transformed into a different civilization
altogether, and maybe that means something to you and it isn't.
But the core principles of Western.
Civilization have been. Christianity.
You need it. All the other things you like
and you rely upon go away without it.
Decency law. Community doesn't have to come
down to skin, by the way. I've said this on the show Many.
Times and draw. Heat for it, but.
I'm not a racialist at all in terms of skin color.
I'm not an ethno. Guy, I am a cultural guy.
Though, and I certainly am now a massively religious guy, you
want to call? Me, a religious bigot.
Here we go, Because without a clear idea of religion,
tradition, people, region, culture, identity, language,
history. Without.
These things functioning along with a ruler.
And a religion. That substantiates those things,
that all these things are operating in tandem and
substantiating each other constantly.
Without that, you do not have a civilization.
If you don't have a civilization, guess what?
Everything else doesn't matter. Does not matter, because we are.
Civilizationalists. We exist in a civilizational
frame. We.
Build. Why?
Because we do, that's what. We do.
We're builders. It's how we function, it's in
our DNA, it's what we're called to do and anything that blocks
us from doing that. Is enemy.
Cannot exist. We cannot coexist with the.
Primals, we can't coexist. With people who don't want to
build and maintain civilization doesn't work.
It's not their civilization versus ours.
It's civilization itself, period.
And you're either in the frame or you're out of it.
And that civilizational frame is doesn't need.
Liberalism. It's not required.
Break it for yourself. And for others, and for your
children, and for your generations.
That's where we're at now, folks.
All right. Said my peace.
If you enjoy this kind of content let me know, let put the
comments. In the section put the.
Comments in the comments section.
And all the rest of it like subscribe and share.
I'll be back tomorrow. We're we got four more.
Can we get 4? More super.
Chats before we sign up on YouTube just 'cause I, yeah, I
said it. So we're going to make the thing
and we'll be back tomorrow if we hit that super chat.
We'll be back. Tomorrow and we'll do a little
bit, do a little power washing, listen to a little bit of of
Alex Jones on the Tucker Carlson.
What else is the chat saying? Julio says.
I just wish mommy. And daddy would stop fighting
for no reason. Wow, yeah, Charlemagne says.
Nationalism is a frame the British people are using to
fight back. The best move is a guide the
people in that frame rather than attack it with no viable
alternative. Exactly.
I would prefer it to be a different.
I would prefer to be. You know, even Anglicanism.
Anglicanism at this point would be better.
There's just now a massive fracture within the Anglican
Church, a schism that's happening between more
traditional Anglicans in in Africa.
God bless. And you know, they're there's
basically saying, yeah, this whole woman, female Archbishop
of Canterbury, Yeah, no, this is how deep it runs.
You don't even be concerned about.
Just the politics of it. It's seeping into all other
forms and guys like A and many others are sitting there going.
What's happening? How's this?
Happening. Well, if you're not part of an
empire, I guess you just have to suck it up and deal with it.
No. Says who?
Why? Because you may not.
Because you might run out of scones this week.
No, not going to happen. Not without a.
Fight. Let's see here.
Julio. Says good stream but.
Did not convince me the need for this.
I'm not here to convince you, cool dude says.
Do you think A could have heritage?
Related reasons for not being concerned about the huge number
of Muslims. Yeah, for sure.
Although he's part Welsh, right? So whatever.
I don't. I don't really mean.
Possibly it's a fair attack or fair question.
I. Think it's I think I.
Would say would be more about that the academic doesn't have a
defense against this thing. If your.
If your whole entire world view distills down to nominalism,
rejection of the metaphysical and, and and pure forms of
normalism, materialism, then all of these things, these
occurrences, these people groups become equatable.
There is no differentiation really.
There is something that benefits you more than others, but as
long as you you can find a benefit, as long as you can find
a way to benefit, then everything remains the same.
It's just, you know, 1 empire or another.
One category. Or another There's no ethic.
Holding this thing. There's no nominal value, and
even if you, you can say something contrary to that, but
your your. Worldview as an atheist.
Is baked in it accidental life? Everything is an accident.
Everything is, you know, you. There is no mind, it's all.
Biochemical processing in the brain.
Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Well then none of it means
anything. Doesn't matter, just don't
suffer. Get to sleep in your warm bed.
As long as the flesh. Is is cared for?
Then everything else. Is going to be OK because you're
just here to satisfy the fleshy desires.
Make sure. You're well fed.
So whichever way you can do that, it's good.
And I'm not out. Here saying, advocating that
everyone. Needs.
Everyone needs to be a martyr or sacrifice.
Themselves for. 'Cause as, as Charlie said, just
you can just stop talking. You can just stop, right?
Go do something else. Go work at a.
Cafe or some of that. But you can't, right?
Because you only want to move parallel.
You want to move up or parallel, you never want to move down.
And that would be the sacrifice, right?
Stop doing what you're doing, OK?
What else do I do? Well, either change the.
Channel to something to talk about, something you maybe you
don't even want to talk about, or something that's coded low
class. Or give it up all entirely and
go work the. 711. I've applied, I don't care.
You know it's about. Putting food on the.
Table taking care of my. Taking care of.
My family and. Substantiating an ethic for
myself and my family, which will carry on through my through my
generations. That doesn't have to be with a
show, but it does have to. Happen and I.
Can't make that I couldn't do the show.
Presenting myself. As something that I'm not and
that doesn't make me better than anybody.
It's just somebody saying I can't do that.
And when people do, if people are doing that, it mystifies me.
It's like, well. Why would you even do that?
Do. Something else Julie says.
Anything. I'm still bitter.
When he called you up? No, no, no.
I was never bitter. I was never bitter in.
The in the first place. And he and also Julio, he never
called me up. It was Black Horse.
Blackface, horse, whatever he's saying, that was that's.
That's. Who who took a shot at me and I
had to punch him in the digital Dick.
So as a A and I, I was on his show.
He brought Black Horse on who who misrepresented me.
I called out Black Horse and that was that's the conflict.
I had no compliment professionally, otherwise I, I.
Know you want. To bring this into a dialectic.
To a fight, it's. Not like I said, I I don't.
Care about the man. I'm criticizing what he's
putting out there. If he's different behind the
scenes. God bless him, I hope he is, but
that'd be like saying like if I criticize.
The Catholics I got. AI got AI.
Oh I have a burning problem with the Pope.
Like what? No.
Cyber shows his Black Horse has a sore ass.
He's always mad about something or someone.
Yeah, yeah. Well, I won't get into that
whole thing, but yeah, all right.
Folks, Charlie says A, A is cool, he's doing what his thing.
Whatever. I just don't want Americans to
believe. Any of that crap in the video?
Yeah, exactly. I don't.
I don't want British people to believe that, you know, I, I do
I, you can speculate wildly. Onto his reasons and stuff like
that. And I'm I'm fine with whatever
reason he is. Hey, whatever reason he has is
his reason. You know it's what it is, but
same time not calling it out and not saying hey you this kind of.
Thinking leads to. Bad results.
I mean, what else we're doing here?
Why bother having a channel? If not doing that, ladies and.
Gentlemen, thank you so much. Appreciate each and everyone of
you. We'll be back.
We're at six to 10. I know I got some private chat,
so anyways. Check out tomorrow.
You might be back with some with some.
Power washing and I appreciate you can always send me
contributions after the stream, like subscribe, do all the
things. I appreciate each and everyone
of you, and we'll be back again soon.
And take a look for a new show. That might be on the horizon,
just trying to get some. Confirmations, but I.
Appreciate it. Thank you everyone in the chat
and I'll talk to you soon. I am Jason Maranchuk and it's
later than you think. This is the church, Richard and
his family. Belong to.
Here he goes to. Sunday school.
There are other churches in town for people who worship in ways
different from Richard's family. Millwood has a radio and
television station. The programs come from this
building. Many people, they are the men
and women who act on these programs.
Some men operate the big television cameras, Others.
Control the pictures as. They go out over the air.
They see to it that Richard gets the right program at the right
time. He often watches television at
home. The programs are fun and.
Sometimes he learns. A great deal from them.
Then there are the movies. The Andersons go off into the
neighborhood theater 1 evening every week.
Richard's father goes bowling. He belongs.
To a bowling league with. Some of his friends, that's his
favorite evening recreation at night when Richard.
Goes to bed. He may have thought very little
about his community. What he has done for it and what
it has done for him. But the community's work never
stops. There's bread to be baked, bread
which Richard will eat tomorrow. There's milk to be processed,
milk which Richard will drink tomorrow.
There's the newspaper to be printed for people to read in
the morning, and electricity to be made, and water to be pumped
and filtered, and telephone calls to be put through day and
night. So the work in Richard's
community goes on day after day, night after night, people
working for each other, depending on each other all.
Of them. Partners in making their
community a better place in which to live.
There is nothing wrong with your television set.
Do not attempt to adjust the picture.
The.