Hey everybody, welcome back to the Elon Musk.
Podcast This is a show where we discuss.
The Critical. Crossroads the shape SpaceX
Tesla X. The Boring Company.
And Neurolink, I'm your host will.
Walden Can the newly created Department of Government
Efficiency, or DOGE identify $2 trillion in federal budget
savings? How realistic is Elon Musk's
revised goal of cutting a trillion dollars?
And what obstacles does Doge face in addressing
inefficiencies and waste? These questions are at the heart
of Elon Musk's project overhaul government spending back in
October during a rally for President-elect Donald Trump at
Madison Square Garden. Elon Musk.
Made a bold claim his new advisory committee, Doge, could
recommend federal budget cuts of at least $2 trillion.
This figure, representing nearly 1/3 of the federal budget,
raised eyebrows across the political and economic spectrum.
Budget analysts quickly dismissed the target as very
unrealistic, given that the entire discretionary budget is
only $1.7 trillion now. Musk doubled down, suggesting
DOGE would focus on cutting waste and inefficiencies across
government agencies. However, during a live interview
on X with political strategist Mark Penn on Wednesday, Musk
walk back the $2 trillion projection, admitting that the
figure was more of a best case outcome.
Speaking candidly with Penn, Musk said DOGE has a good shot
at identifying a trillion dollars in cuts, while
acknowledging the challenges Musk framed.
This reduced target is a significant accomplishment, he
said. If we try for two trillion,
we've got a good shot at getting one.
Musk argue that such reductions, combined with freeing up the
economy to grow, could stabilize inflation.
He said if we can drop the budget deficit from 2 trillion
to one trillion and free up the economy to have additional
growth such that the output of goods and services keeps pace
with the increase in the money supply, then there will be no
inflation. So that, I think, would be an
epic outcome. Now, Doge is Co led by Musk and
Vivek Ramaswamy, and it lacks the formal authority to actually
enact budget cuts or regulatory changes.
Instead, it's tasked with making recommendations to the White
House after Trump assumes office for the second term.
Despite its limited powers, Doge has garnered attention largely
due to Musk's reputation as a billionaire innovator with a
track record of disrupting industries.
Now the. Committee's mission aligns with
Trump's broader pledge to streamline federal operations,
reduce waste and rein in spending.
However, the feasibility of achieving even Musk's revised
goal remains uncertain. Critics argue that meaningful
savings would require cuts to mandatory programs like
Medicaid, a politically sensitive move that could
provoke widespread backlash. Now, budget experts have been
critical of Musk's initial $2 trillion claim, calling it
disconnected from fiscal reliabilities.
In the federal budget, which totals approximately $6.8
trillion, includes a substantial portion allocated to mandatory
spending programs such as Social Security, Medicare and interest
on the national debt. These programs are largely
untouchable without significant legislative changes.
Now, to achieve savings of a trillion dollars, DOGE would
likely need to target discretionary spending and
implement systemic reforms. However, Musk offered few
specifics during his interview, instead describing the
government as a target rich environment for cost cutting.
It's like being in a room full of targets, like you could close
your eyes and you can't miss, he said.
Now, Musk also expressed frustration with the entrenched
inefficiencies within the government.
He said it's very, very hard for people to care about spending
someone else's money. Musk noted that even
well-intentioned government officials face systemic
obstacles that hinder their ability to manage funds
effectively. He said the system prevents them
from doing so. Now, addressing these challenges
will require more than identifying areas of waste.
It'll demand structural reforms to ensure greater accountability
and efficiency in federal operations.
Musk has pointed to excessive regulations as a key area for
improvement, arguing that outdated and overly complex
rules impede progress and inflate costs.
Now, if you're on a podcast platform that allows you to
comment, please let me know what you think about this.
Some people think that Elon Musk is using DOGE is kind of a cover
up to get deals for his companies or pave the road so to
speak for new Tesla models or for SpaceX to launch the Rockets
with less regulation. I don't know, what do you, what
do you think? Let me know in the comments down
below. But also Musk criticize the
regulatory environment which he claims has made large scale
projects essentially illegal. He highlighted the
inefficiencies caused by extensive paperwork and delays.
I know this for a fact. They they were delaying Spacex's
Starship in Boca Chica, Texas from launching for a long time
due to the environment and environmental causes.
The EPA and he asserted that DOGE would prioritize
eliminating regulations where the harm is worse than the good.
Now, while this approach may resonate with proponents of
smaller government, it risks sparking opposition from those
who view regulations as essential safeguards.
The prospect of massive budget cuts has drawn mixed reactions
from lawmakers. While many congressional
Republicans have voiced support for Doge's goals, some Democrats
have expressed concerns about the potential impact on public
services and social programs. Zach Nunn, who's a Republican
from Iowa, advocated for reducing federal overreach but
stopped short of endorsing specific cuts.
Now, Trump transition team has yet to comment on Musk's revised
estimate, and it remains unclear how closely the administration
will align with Doja's recommendations.
For now, the committee operates independently, with its findings
expected to inform broader policy decisions.
Now, Musk remains very optimistic about Doja's
potential despite the scaled back expectations.
He described the committee's work as a critical step toward
restoring fiscal discipline and fostering economic growth.
However, the success of this initiative will depend on this
ability to navigate political opposition, bureaucratic
inertia, and the complexities of federal budgeting.
Now, let me know in the comments what you think would happen if
Elon Musk cut $2 trillion. Also, keep the conversation
alive on our Discord. There's going to be a link in
the show notes or description for you.
Hey, thank you so much. For listening.
Today, I really do appreciate your support.
If you could take a second and hit this subscribe or the follow
button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening
on right now, I greatly appreciate it.
It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never
miss an episode. And each episode is about 10
minutes or less. To get you caught up.
Quickly and please if you want to support the show even more.
Go to Patreon dot. Com slash.
Stage 0. And please take care of
yourselves and each other, and I'll see you tomorrow.