A simple scroll through your X feed can make you wonder, is
that really Elon Musk or is it a faker or a parody account?
Try to be funny or trying to trick you?
Well, on April 10th, 2025, X is introducing a new rule book
aimed at stopping this exact confusion.
Starting then, parody fan and commentary accounts will have to
make their intentions painfully clear.
Rules are not just a suggestion. The reformal directive from Elon
himself. That leaves users with one big
question. Will it actually work?
Because so far, the line between satire and scammers has never
been thinner on X. And it's a problem not just Elon
Musk's public image, but for millions of users who rely on X
to tell fact from fiction. Now the rule change is simple on
its face. Any account impersonating
someone else must now begin its display name with a term like
fake, parody, fan, or commentary.
That prefix needs to be visible immediately, not buried at the
end of username where it might be cut off and replies or
truncated and feeds. And furthermore, parody accounts
can no longer use the same profile image as the person or
organization that they mimic. Now.
It's a design meant to ensure that users aren't easily fooled
by names or avatars that, at a glance, look very legitimate.
Now, the need for the update stems from mounting frustration.
Parody accounts pretending to be Elon Musk have ballooned in
numbers, of course. That's why Elon's changing it,
because that affects him. And ranging from harmless mean
posters of Elon to more malicious actors promoting fake
cryptocurrency giveaways or phony contests.
In one case, a Elon Musk parody account with over 1,000,000
followers posted a fake Tesla giveaway, asking users to like
and comment for a chance to win. The post received more than
428,000 likes and 200,000 replies.
There was, of course, no car to be won.
Now the deception isn't always obvious though.
Many of these accounts already add parity at the end of their
usernames, but in the way X displays names, especially on
replies or when screen space is limited, the brackets don't even
show up. Combine that with identical
profile pictures and it becomes easy to fool even sharp eyed
users. Now these new rules aim to short
circuit that formula. Now this includes all the
thousands of fake variations of Elon Musk accounts.
And it's about time that Elon Musk's fake accounts get
banished. Now.
The impersonation issue has gone from occasional prank to
constant annoyance and in some cases, a genuine security risk.
Imagine a fake Elon Musk account reaches out to you, pretends to
be the real Elon Musk, and says something to the order of hey,
I'm going to be in town today. I want this to be a secret
meeting. Meet me at XYZ St.
We're going to do some business and I need your help with
something. You show up at the time in the
place and there's no Elon to be found, but instead something
more nefarious. That's horrible.
Now, according to X, the upcoming changes are being
implemented to help users better understand the unaffiliated
nature of PCF accounts and reduce the risk of confusion and
impersonation. Now, PCF stands for parody,
commentary and fan, but this means that even supportive or
humorous accounts what's not trying to be malicious or cause
harm are still expected to conform to the updated rules.
Fandom won't be an excuse for for being one of these parody
accounts and for not limiting it.
So the move is more than a policy tweak, though.
It's also a course correction. When Elon Musk acquired Twitter
in 2022, one of his most controversial decisions was
reworking the verification system.
The blue check mark, once a marker of verified identity, it
just became available to anyone willing to pay X for the
privilege to have this account. This little check mark, it's
opened the floodgates for impersonators to buy legitimacy
just for about $10 a month. Musk's original stance was firm.
He said any account engaging impersonation without a clear
label would be banned. That promise, however, ran up
against the realities of a user base quick to exploit the
loopholes. How can they catch all these
people? It'd be almost incredible
amounts of hardware and data to catch every single one of these
parity accounts, and those loopholes have proven costly.
In July 2024, the European Union publicly criticized XS Blue
check system, calling it potentially misleading.
The EU officials argued that the check mark could deceive users
into believing an account is authentic when it's not.
And their conclusion? The verification badge under the
new system violated online content transparency rules.
Musk dismissed the EU's warning is misinformation, but the
message was clear. What used to be a symbol of
trust has become just another paid feature for a huge tech
company and a multi billionaire. Boss X has been trying to
reverse some of this damage. In January, the platform
introduced parody labels applied to both posts and profiles.
The labels are automatic and intended to help users
distinguish real content from imitation, but the effectiveness
of the labeling system has been debated.
Unlike the display name prefix required by the new rules,
labels are often missed or ignored by users in fast growing
environments. Now the new naming mandate goes
further than labels. It directly changes how parity
accounts appear in every interaction.
Even when names are shortened or cropped, A prefix like fake or
parity will still show at the beginning, providing immediate
context. Now that's an intentional design
change and a recognition that XS user interface plays a role in
the confusion. It's not just celebrities or
public figures being impersonated.
Misinformation disguised disparity has real world
consequences. Fake corporate announcements can
send stock prices swinging, plunging, losing millions of
dollars in value. Bogus political statements can
go viral within minutes, and people can take action on those
statements. A blue check mark doesn't mean
anything. It's just a blue check mark that
anybody can buy. And in a space where text and
timing matter more than ever, false content can gain traction
before anyone has the chance to verify it.
X says it'll start enforcing the rules starting April 10th.
Now, accounts that failed to update the display names and
images may face restrictions of removal.
The directive applies even to accounts that already displayed
the parody label and their profile BIOS.
The platform is making it clear a casual nod to parity isn't
enough. And for those running parody
accounts, the changes mean rebranding, and for fans and
commentators, it means redrawing the line between entertainment
and impersonation. Those using profile pics or
names too close to the original may not find their accounts at
risk and even if they intend was to not deceive.
But they could lose their accounts.
Now X is trying to reassert control over its public facing
structure. They need the money.
This got absorbed into XAI and the company has seen stagnation
in its premium subscriber base, with only about 1.3 million
paying users. That's about .22% of its claim.
600 million active users. If you can only get .22% of your
users to pay for a check mark, you're doing something wrong.
For a platform attempting to boost revenue and sustain
credibility, distinguishing real from fake is no longer optional.
Now, why does it matter to you? It's because X is still a major
digital town square and Elon wants to make it even bigger.
It hosts political debates, breaking news, viral trends,
live event commentary, and when impersonation runs unchecked, it
weakens the core function of the platform to inform and to
connect. Single misleading tweet from a
fake account can ripple out, influencing public opinion or
damaging reputations. It also matters on a personal
level. Users often rely on X for
everything from customer service to crisis updates.
If parity accounts mimic brands, individuals or officials too
closely, people could act on false information.
Now, these new rules aim to put a speed bump in front of them.
Now, Musk's stance has remained mostly unchanged since 20/22.
He said back then that unlabeled impersonation would lead to
bans. These new rules are a
continuation of this position. Still, some wonder if a stricter
label requirement could coexist with the culture of online
parody. And haha yuck yuck jokes that's
helped make X entertaining, or if it will simply chase those
creators elsewhere. Thanks so much for listening to
the show today. I really do appreciate your
time. Now, if you could do me a favor,
hit the subscribe button on whatever podcast platform you're
on right now. I would greatly appreciate it
because I do this show every single day and I've been doing
it for about 5 years. So I'm not going to stop anytime
soon. And what I can guarantee you is
that I'll be doing this for another 10 years because I'm not
going to stop. That's my promise to you.
And all I ask from you, simple subscribe or a follow on
whatever podcast platform you're on right now.
Thanks so much, I'll take care of yourselves and each other and
I will see you in the next one.