Thanks to our amazing community members like you, we've reached
the top 15 of Spotify's video podcast, the Top 10 audio
podcasts on both Apple and Spotify for the tech category,
so you all make this possible. If you want to support us more,
check out our Patreon that's patreon.com/stage 0 News so we
can keep this free and open for you to enjoy.
Elon Musk told a private audience that American politics
is entering a 12 year run under Republicans, starting with a
second Trump term and continuing with two terms for JD Vance.
Now, what does that prediction reveal about Musk's current
political posture? We'll unpack where he said it,
who is in the room, and why the setting matters for how he sees
power, tech, and risk. We'll look at his comments about
personal security, his sci-fi references, and his ongoing ties
to a federal cost cutting cohort known as DOGE, and we'll get
into that right after this quick break.
The reset is simple and the facts are concrete.
Musk delivered the forecast at a reunion for DOGE, his former
federal cost cutting group. From that scene, we move into
what he actually said, how the audience reacted, and what the
venue signals about his continuing political engagement.
Now, let's start with a setting. The event took place on November
22nd, 2025 at a facility he owns near SpaceX and The Boring
Company in Bastrop, TX with roughly 150 current and former
DOGE members and family in attendance.
Now Musk did not appear in person.
He joined by video from a dark undisclosed location and he
cited personal safety concerns. He said he sees himself as a top
assassination target after Trump advance a claim that framed the
rest of his remarks with a tone of threat awareness.
Now to the court of the prediction.
Musk said the country is at the beginning of what he
characterized as a 12 year span of Republican dominance.
In his view, the sequence runs through a second Donald Trump
term, then two consecutive terms for Vice President JD Vance.
And the statement was not a polar a model.
It was a forward projection by Musk delivered to a sympathetic
audience of former federal collaborators.
There are people on his side. Consider the audience and the
history. DOGE is described as a federal
cost cutting group that worked under the Trump administration
still doing work there. And he thanked members that have
worked and continue to work for sacrifices they made while
executing those mandates in Washington DC.
He addressed them as former teammates, not as a general
public crowd, which made the forecast feel like internal
guidance rather than a public sub speech.
And the choice Affirm anchors the message in his continuing
relationship with the Doge Network.
Now, the presentation itself carried some mixed signals.
Some attendees expected an in person appearance and were
disappointed when he did not show up.
The video backdrop, described as dark and undisclosed and gloomy,
underlined the security theme he raised at the top.
The visual choice reinforced his claim that proximity could be
risky, while still letting him speak directly to the people who
once worked under his direction. Now the talk ranged across
topics beyond elections, though, he worried about potential civil
unrest, then pivoted to space colonization and science
fiction. He referenced classic works and
including The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress and Asimov's
Foundation, which placed his political reading inside a
larger story about tech scarcity and the governance of frontier
societies in the mix of threat assessment and speculative
horizon matches the way he often frames long term projects.
And why put a 12 year marker on the calendar for a private
reunion now? My analysis is that predictions
like this do several jobs at once, especially inside a closed
door network. They give alumni a shared
objective, they elevate the stakes of their future work, and
they signal continuity of leadership influence even after
formal roles change. The number is memorable, the
sequence is very straightforward, and both
function as a banner for people who already identify with his
project style. They're his people.
He wants him to stay with him. He doesn't want to go outside
the lines. He knows what they'll vote for,
and he knows whose side they're on.
His safety rhetoric serves a strategic purpose.
Inside the same frame, declaring oneself a top target can justify
distance, explain absences and prepare allies for a leadership
model that operates through remote directives.
It also sets an expectation that any public reversal or delay
will be attributed to security calculus, not a retreat.
The claim may also encourage supporters to see routine
political conflicts through a lens of personal risk and
loyalty to their leaders. Now this is an important venue
because it reveals the network. He still prioritizes a reunion
of a cost cutting cohort. It's not just a regular
campaign, really, it's people that he used to work with as a
professional alumni gathering, bound by shared missions and
scars from high pressure government work.
Speaking to that audience lets him connect future political
timelines with technical statecraft, which is where those
alumni made their names and reputations.
The message lands as a continuation of that work rather
than a pivot away from it. Now the reaction in the room was
something it wasn't. Uniform enthusiasm,
disappointment about the lack of in person apparent shows the
paradox of charisma at a distance.
The disappointment does not negate the influence of the
message though. But it does point to the cost of
relying on video as the primary delivery method for a prediction
meant to galvanized this community.
It also shows the importance of setting and staging when
signaling momentum with your crew.
And his cultural references deserve a closer read because
they map to his governing instincts.
Heinlein's and Asimov's worlds present lean institutions,
unusual leaders, and long arc plans that outlast short
election cycles. By citing those works alongside
talk of civil unrest and space colonization, he thread the
story where political control, technological capabilities, and
survival planning sit on one timeline for an audience of
former government fixers, though as both familiar and attractive,
since it pulls budget discipline, engineering, and
national destiny into one narrative.
And there's also the matter of his stated regret about
political involvement, which the source notes from all of this.
He has expressed that sentiment before, yet he continues to
appear in political context, speak to political actors, and
offer forecasts about the next two election cycles.
And my analysis of this is that the continued engagement signals
he still sees politics as a lever on the technical projects
he values. And he needs politics for SpaceX
and Tesla. And he sees his alumni network
as a tool that can move that lever.
And the Bastrop location is important.
We place the reunion near SpaceX and Boring Company operations
because it aligns his political world with his industrial
footprint. Why bring the Bastrop?
Why not send them to Idaho or something?
All these people don't live near this town.
I know where this is. It's kind of in the middle of
nowhere. But it allows him to blend
operational updates and formal tours and off the record chatter
with a clear political message. Elon can take these people to
SpaceX and show them how cool it is or the Boring Company and and
also let's attendees absorb the scale of his projects first
hand. If you've ever been to any
SpaceX facility, it's massive. This can make his long arc
forecast feel practical rather than just theatre, and treat the
12 year forecast as a motivational device as much as a
calendar claim. Inside a team culture.
A crisp timeline focuses effort and reduces debate about
priorities. It encourages people to plan for
phases, not isolated events, which is how engineering Rd.
maps already function. For a group that once executed
fast turnarounds inside federal agencies, that format feels very
familiar to them. Now let's talk about the civil
unrest. Here it introduces a risk
register that pairs with the political timeline.
If you believe unrest is plausible, you plan for
redundancy, protected operations, and alternative
communications. You also seek policy shelter for
critical projects that you think must survive St. level
disruptions. The pairing of unrest talk with
space colonization suggests a survivalist here in his planning
more technological self-reliance functions as a hedge against
domestic volatility. Now, stepping back, the most
important take away is that MUST continues to knit together
political forecasts, Security and long range technology goals
with the same set of people who once executed cost cutting
mandates in Washington. He must like these people if he
invited them to a private event. He appears comfortable as a
remote figure who still sets direction.
He's still betting that a tight circle of trusted operators can
carry lessons forward into the next election cycle.
Hey, thank you so much for listening today.
I really do appreciate your support.
If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow
button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening
on right now, I greatly appreciate it.
It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never
miss an episode. And each episode is about 10
minutes or less to get you caught up quickly.
And please, if you want to support the show even more, go
to patreon.com/stagezero and please take care of yourselves
and each other and I'll see you tomorrow.